1: \documentclass[preprint,12pt]{aastex}

2: 

3: \shorttitle{\emph{Spitzer} observations toward high-mass star

4: forming regions} \shortauthors{Qiu et al.}

5: \begin{document}

6: 

7: \title{\emph{Spitzer} IRAC and MIPS Imaging of Clusters and

8: Outflows in 9 High-mass Star Forming Regions}

9: 

10: \author{Keping Qiu\altaffilmark{1,2}, Qizhou Zhang\altaffilmark{2},

11: S. Thomas Megeath\altaffilmark{3}, Robert A.

12: Gutermuth\altaffilmark{2}, Henrik Beuther\altaffilmark{4}, Debra

13: S. Shepherd\altaffilmark{5}, T. K. Sridharan\altaffilmark{2}, L.

14: Testi\altaffilmark{6,7}, and C. G. De Pree\altaffilmark{8}}

15: %\affil{Department of Astronomy, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China

16: %\\ and Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA}

17: \email{kqiu@cfa.harvard.edu}

18: 

19: %\author{Qizhou Zhang}

20: %\affil{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA}

21: 

22: %\author{S. Thomas Megeath}

23: %\affil{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Toledo,

24: %Toledo, OH}

25: 

26: %\author{Robert A. Gutermuth}

27: %\affil{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA}

28: 

29: %\author{Henrik Beuther}

30: %\affil{Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy, Heidelberg, Germany}

31: 

32: %\author{Debra S. Shepherd}

33: %\affil{National Radio Astronomical Observatory, Socorro, NM}

34: 

35: %\author{T. K. Sridharan}

36: %\affil{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA}

37: 

38: %\author{L. Testi}

39: %\affil{Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, Firenze, Italy}

40: 

41: %\and

42: 

43: %\author{C. G. De Pree}

44: %\affil{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Agnes Scott College,

45: %Decatur, GA}

46: 

47: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Astronomy, Nanjing University,

48: Nanjing, China} \altaffiltext{2}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for

49: Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA} \altaffiltext{3}{Department of

50: Physics and Astronomy, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH}

51: \altaffiltext{4}{Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy, Heidelberg,

52: Germany} \altaffiltext{5}{National Radio Astronomical Observatory,

53: Socorro, NM} \altaffiltext{6}{Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri,

54: Firenze, Italy} \altaffiltext{7}{ESO, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 2,

55: D-85748 Garching bei M\"{u}nchen, Germany}

56: \altaffiltext{8}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Agnes Scott

57: College, Decatur, GA}

58: 

59: \begin{abstract}

60: We present {\it Spitzer} Space Telescope IRAC and MIPS

61: observations toward a sample of nine high-mass star forming

62: regions at a distance of around 2 kpc. Based on IRAC and MIPS 24

63: $\mu$m photometric results and 2MASS \emph{JHKs} data, we carry

64: out a census of young stellar objects (YSOs) in a $5'\times5'$

65: field toward each region. Toward seven out of the nine regions, we

66: detect parsec sized clusters with around 20 YSOs surrounded by a

67: more extended and sparse distribution of young stars and

68: protostars. For the other two regions, IRAS 20126+4104 and IRAS

69: 22172+5549, the former has the lowest number of YSOs in the sample

70: and shows no obvious cluster, and the latter appears to be part of

71: a larger, potentially more evolved cluster. The deep IRAC imaging

72: reveals at least twelve outflows in eight out of the nine regions,

73: with nine outflows prominent in the 4.5 $\mu$m band most probably

74: attributed to shocked H$_2$ emission, two outflows dominated by

75: scattered light in the 3.6 and 4.5 $\mu$m bands, and one outflow

76: standing out from its hydrocarbon emission in the 8.0 $\mu$m band.

77: In comparison with previous ground-based observations, our IRAC

78: observations reveal new outflow structures in five regions. The

79: dramatically different morphologies of detected outflows can be

80: tentatively interpreted in terms of possible evolution of massive

81: outflows. The driving sources of these outflows are deeply

82: embedded in dense dusty cores revealed by previous millimeter

83: interferometric observations. We detect infrared counterparts of

84: these dusty cores in the IRAC or MIPS 24 $\mu$m bands. Reflection

85: nebulae dominated by the emission from UV heated hydrocarbons in

86: the $8\,\mu$m band can be found in most regions and they may imply

87: the presence of young B stars.

88: \end{abstract}

89: 

90: \keywords{infrared: stars --- stars: formation --- stars:

91: pre-main-sequence --- ISM: jets and outflows --- ISM: reflection

92: nebulae}

93: 

94: \section{Introduction}

95: It is well know that high-mass stars form in dense clusters

96: \citep{Lada03}. The research on embedded young clusters around

97: young intermediate- to high-mass stars has advanced significantly

98: via near-infrared surveys \citep[e.g.,][]{Testi99, Gutermuth05,

99: Kumar06}. The {\it Spitzer} space telescope with its unprecedented

100: sensitivity at mid-infrared wavelengths provides a new means for

101: identifying young stellar objects (YSOs) in star forming regions

102: through detection of dusty disks and envelopes. High sensitivity

103: in the $3-24$ $\mu$m bands is invaluable for distinguishing young

104: stars from reddened background stars through infrared excess

105: arising from circumstellar materials \citep{Allen04, Megeath04,

106: Whitney04, Gutermuth04, Muzerolle04}. This capability is

107: particularly valuable for studies of high-mass star forming

108: regions for two reasons: 1) such regions are typically located

109: near the Galactic plane where the density of background stars is

110: high and 2) the member YSOs are often faint due to the large

111: distances to these regions ($>1$kpc). The faint magnitude of the

112: YSOs complicates not only the detection of members but also their

113: identification since the density of background stars rises rapidly

114: with increasing magnitudes. With the Infrared Array Camera (IRAC)

115: and Multiband Imaging Photometer for \emph{Spitzer} (MIPS), a

116: significant census of YSOs can be carried out, which provides a

117: fossil record of the distribution of star formation sites and

118: information on the environments in which stars and planets form.

119: This method is particularly effective for finding extended, lower

120: density distributions of stars surrounding the dense regions of

121: embedded clusters.

122: 

123: Extended structures, such as reflection nebulae and outflows, can

124: also be mapped with the IRAC. Outflows emanating from the central

125: young stars or protostars are usually detectable in rotational

126: transitions of CO and other molecules at (sub)millimeter

127: wavelengths. In IRAC observations, outflows can be revealed from

128: shocked H$_2$ emission. Hydrodynamic simulations of shock models

129: predict that H$_2$ emission is particularly strong in the 4.5

130: $\mu$m band \citep{Smith05}. Since the 4.5 $\mu$m band is

131: relatively free of the emission from hydrocarbons (probably in the

132: form of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, or PAHs) compared with

133: the other three bands, and the 5.8 and 8.0 $\mu$m bands are

134: significantly less sensitive than the shorter wavelength bands,

135: composite images with emission from different bands coded in

136: different colors can be a diagnostic tool for H$_2$ emission in

137: outflows. A remarkable example of such a detection can be found in

138: the IRAC observations of the HH 46/47 outflow, a collimated

139: bipolar outflow emanating from a low-mass protostar, where the

140: southwestern lobe was clearly seen in the 4.5 $\mu$m band as a

141: limb-brightened bow-shock cavity \citep{Raga04, Noriega04b}.

142: \citet{Smith06} reported the IRAC detection of a spectacular

143: outflow in the high-mass star forming region DR 21 by virtue of

144: its brightness in the 4.5 $\mu$m band. Further investigations of

145: the \emph{ISO} SWS spectra of the DR 21 outflow verified that the

146: H$_2$ lines contribute significantly to all four IRAC bands and

147: the emission in the 4.5 $\mu$m band is mostly attributed to the

148: H$_2$ v=0-0 $S(9)$ (4.695 $\mu$m) line. Outflow activities can

149: also be revealed from scattered light in the IRAC bands. By

150: comparison of the deep IRAC imaging of L1448 with the radiative

151: transfer modelling, \citet{Tobin07} demonstrated that the observed

152: infrared emission in the IRAC bands is consistent with the

153: scattered light from the central low-mass protostars escaping the

154: cavities carved by molecular outflows. \citet{Valusamy07}

155: reprocessed the IRAC observations of the HH 46/47 outflow using a

156: deconvolution algorithm and found a wide-angle biconical component

157: in scattered light in addition to the previously reported

158: bow-shock cavity. Finally, in some cases hydrocarbon emission is

159: visible from outflow cavities, presumably due to the illumination

160: of the cavity walls by UV radiation from the central source

161: \citep{vandenAncker00}.

162: 

163: We have observed a sample of nine high-mass star forming regions

164: with the IRAC and MIPS instruments (PID: 3528, PI: Qizhou Zhang).

165: These regions were chosen according to the following criteria: 1)

166: already imaged with millimeter interferometers; 2) known to have

167: molecular outflows; 3) outside of the GLIMPSE survey except IRAS

168: 19410+2336; 4) at a distance of $<2.5$kpc ($<5000$AU at the

169: resolution of IRAC). These regions exhibit far-infrared

170: luminosities ranging from $10^3$ to $10^5\,L_{\odot}$ (see Table

171: \ref{source} for source parameters). We carry out a census of YSOs

172: toward each region, and simultaneously, zoom in on the central

173: massive star formation sites with the aim of searching for

174: infrared counterparts of millimeter continuum sources and infrared

175: emission from outflows. In this paper we present initial results

176: of the observations. In {\S} 2, we describe the observations. We

177: present observational results in {\S} 3 and subsequent discussion

178: in {\S} 4. A brief summary is given in {\S} 5.

179: 

180: \section{Observations and Data Reduction} \label{obs}

181: The IRAC \citep{Fazio04} observations were obtained from February

182: to September 2005 except IRAS 19410+2336, which was observed in

183: October 2004. Each region was observed in the High Dynamic Range

184: mode with 0.4 second and 10.4 second integration times per dither,

185: and 16 dithers per map position. The area covered by all four

186: bands is roughly $5'\times5'$. The total effective integration

187: time per pixel is 166.4 seconds. The 0.4 second integration frames

188: were used to obtain photometry for bright sources. The frames were

189: processed by the Spitzer Science Center (SSC) using the standard

190: pipeline version S13.2 to produce the standard Basic Calibrated

191: Data (BCD) products. Additional bright source artifacts

192: (``jailbar'', ``pulldown'', ``muxbleed'', and ``banding'') were

193: removed or mitigated using customized IDL scripts developed by the

194: IRAC instrument team \citep{Hora04, Pipher04}. There are often

195: ``bandwidth'' artifacts in the 5.8 and 8.0 $\mu$m images, where a

196: decaying trail of the 4th, 8th, and in some cases even 12th pixels

197: to the right of a bright or saturated spot is found. Currently

198: there is no correction for this effect. Mosaics were created at

199: the native instrument resolution of $1.\!''2$ per pixel from the

200: BCD frames using Gutermuth's WCSmosaic IDL package

201: \citep{Gutermuth07}. Since the IRAC data is under-sampled and the

202: point-spread-function (PSF) varies in shape with position and

203: signal, aperture photometry is currently preferred over the

204: PSF-fitting photometry. Source finding and aperture photometry

205: were performed using Gutermuth's IDL photometry and visualization

206: tool PhotVis, version 1.10 \citep{Gutermuth04, Gutermuth07}. The

207: radii of the source aperture, the inner and outer boundaries of

208: the sky annulus were set to $2.\!''4$, $2.\!''4$ and $7.\!''2$,

209: respectively. IRAC photometry was calibrated using large-aperture

210: measurements of several standard stars from observations obtained

211: in flight \citep{Reach05}. There is a $\sim5\%$ calibration

212: uncertainty due to a position dependent gain for point sources

213: which is not corrected by the flat field. It is the dominant

214: source of uncertainty in the photometry of IRAC images. Fluxes at

215: zero mag are 280.9 Jy at 3.6 $\mu$m, 179.7 Jy at 4.5 $\mu$m, 115.0

216: Jy at 5.8 $\mu$m, and 64.1 Jy at 8.0 $\mu$m. Magnitudes for 1 DN/s

217: are set to 19.455 at 3.6 $\mu$m, 18.699 at 4.5 $\mu$m, 16.498 at

218: 5.8 $\mu$m, and 16.892 at 8.0 $\mu$m, using standard aperture

219: corrections for the radii adopted (see Table 5.7 in IRAC Data

220: Handbook v3.0). Since regions of active star formation often have

221: bright nebulosity in the $5.8$ and $8.0\,{\mu}$m bands, we

222: rejected detections with photometric uncertainties above 0.25 mag

223: in these two bands, while for the $3.6$ and $4.5\,{\mu}$m bands

224: detections with uncertainties above 0.2 mag were rejected. The

225: number of detected sources and the limiting magnitude for each

226: band toward each region are listed in Table \ref{observation}.

227: 

228: The MIPS \citep{Rieke04} observations were undertaken in the

229: photometry mode during campaigns separated by less than 1 month

230: from the IRAC observations with the exception of IRAS 22172+5549

231: (1.5 months separation) and HH 80-81 (5 months separation). The

232: target sources were mapped in the 24 and $70\,{\mu}$m bands. The

233: MIPS 70\,${\mu}$m images were severely saturated and not included

234: in this paper. The 24\,${\mu}$m observations consist of 400 frames

235: with an integration of 2.62 seconds per frame, resulting in a

236: total effective integration time of 1048 seconds. The frames were

237: processed by the SSC standard pipeline S16.0 for AFGL 5142, IRAS

238: 05358+3543, and G192.16-3.82, and by pipeline S16.1 for the other

239: regions. Mosaics were created based on the BCD frames using the

240: SSC MOPEX package, with a pixel size of $1.\!''225$ (half of the

241: native instrument resolution). The central brightest sources in

242: all the regions except IRAS 22172+5549 were significantly

243: saturated. Unsaturated point sources with peaks more than 10 times

244: the RMS noise level were identified using Photvis 1.10. Aperture

245: photometry with a 5 pixel aperture and a sky annulus from 12 to 15

246: pixels was performed on these sources. Multiplying by

247: $\frac{1}{4}$ to correct for the smaller mosaic pixels and by

248: 1.708 to correct from a 5 pixel aperture to infinite, and using a

249: zero mag flux of 7.3 Jy, the aperture photometry was converted to

250: magnitudes \citep{Winston07}. The detections with photometric

251: uncertainties above 0.25 mag were rejected. The number of detected

252: sources and the limiting magnitude toward each region are listed

253: in Table \ref{observation}.

254: 

255: The PSF-fitting photometry is preferred in crowded fields with

256: multiple point-sources. While in our MIPS 24 $\mu$m images, only

257: about 10 to 20 unsaturated objects were detected in each field

258: with a sparse distribution, and in some fields the PSF-fitting

259: photometry is limited by the lack of ideal PSF-generating stars

260: which are supposed to be bright, unsaturated, and uncontaminated

261: by nebulosity. To further evaluate the aperture photometry

262: quantitatively, we performed PSF-fitting photometry on all the 24

263: $\mu$m detections using the IDL DAOPHOT package. The reference PSF

264: was generated from one to two objects chosen from the available in

265: the field to be most suitable for PSF-generating. We then compared

266: the returns from the PSF-fitting with the aperture photometry and

267: found that the majority of unsaturated objects agree with each

268: other in 0.2 mag; a few objects show differences of 0.3 to 0.4 mag

269: but these objects are relatively faint and located in a spatially

270: varying background, thus the differences are probably due to

271: background subtraction, a limitation to both aperture and

272: PSF-fitting photometry. Therefore, in Table \ref{photometry} we

273: show the aperture photometry with the exception of four objects.

274: These four objects are blended with a neighboring brighter object;

275: the resulting magnitudes derived from the contaminated aperture

276: photometry is consequently 0.5 to 0.6 mag brighter than those

277: determined with the PSF-fitting photometry. We show the

278: PSF-fitting photometry for these objects and have annotated the

279: table to identify these objects.

280: 

281: In addition, there are three slightly saturated objects in our

282: sample (annotated in Table \ref{photometry}); we derived their

283: magnitudes by manually scaling the PSF, subtracting the PSF from

284: the image, and comparing the averaged residual of the PSF wing

285: with a sky value taken from an annulus of 12 to 15 pixels. The

286: tabulated magnitudes give an averaged residual closest to the sky

287: value. Since raising/lowering the magnitudes by 0.1 would give an

288: averaged residual distinctly higher/lower than the sky value, we

289: adopt an uncertainty of 0.1 mag for these objects.

290: 

291: \section{Results}

292: 

293: \subsection{Young Stellar Objects Census}

294: In this section, we carry out a census of YSOs and classify them

295: using their positions in near- to mid-infrared color-color

296: diagrams. The results of this analysis are shown in Figure

297: \ref{fig1}, where we display the colors of the detected YSOs in

298: all nine regions, and Figure \ref{fig2}, where we show

299: color-composite images of the regions with the identified YSOs

300: overlaid. We list the number of identified YSOs in Table

301: \ref{source}, and present the multi-band photometry of each YSO in

302: Table \ref{photometry}.

303: 

304: Although the criteria we have used to identify YSOs were developed

305: primarily for low-mass stars, we do not select sources in specific

306: mass ranges. The census will be dominated by low-mass YSOs, but

307: intermediate-mass YSOs, such as Herbig Ae/Be stars with disks and

308: intermediate-mass protostars, may be identified by the same

309: method. Since we are observing high-mass star forming regions,

310: high-mass young stars and protostars certainly exist in our

311: fields. Candidate massive protostellar objects in the IRAC bands

312: have been identified with the GLIMPSE survey \citep{Kumar07};

313: however, the colors of those objects are less well understood. It

314: is unclear whether this method is effective for identifying

315: high-mass stars with disks or envelopes. In our sample, there are

316: twelve objects exhibiting obvious infrared excess in one or more

317: color-color diagrams and also showing evidence of being an

318: intermediate- to high-mass star (labelled as ``High'' in the last

319: column of Table \ref{photometry} and marked with blue crosses in

320: Figure \ref{fig2}). These objects show no or weak dust emission in

321: the millimeter continuum (except the exciting star of the

322: H{\scriptsize II} region W75\,N (A), which is within a warm dust

323: shell) and appear very bright in near-infrared, suggesting the

324: lack of dense envelopes thus more evolved than typical protostars.

325: Part of these objects are identified as candidate exciting sources

326: of the surrounding UV-heated reflection nebulae (\S

327: \ref{nebulae}). In contrast, the youngest high-mass stars in our

328: sample are still deeply embedded in dense dusty cores which were

329: identified as millimeter continuum sources in previous

330: interferometric observations. Most of these millimeter sources are

331: not detected shortward of 3.6 $\mu$m, and in some cases even

332: undetectable at longer wavelengths. Given the extra level of

333: complication and uncertainty in identifying and classifying these

334: youngest high-mass objects, we exclude these objects from this

335: section and discuss them in more detail in \S \ref{msf}.

336: 

337: \subsubsection{IRAC diagram}

338: \citet{Allen04} and \citet{Megeath04} have established a YSOs

339: classification scheme in the IRAC color-color diagram [3.6]-[4.5]

340: vs. [5.8]-[8.0]. This scheme was confirmed by \citet{Hartmann05}

341: with an IRAC survey of a sample of known Taurus pre-main-sequence

342: stars, even though some ambiguities were found in a few cases.

343: Here we adopt this scheme to classify YSOs detected in all four

344: IRAC bands. The [5.8]-[8.0] color is insensitive to reddening and

345: is effective at distinguishing between highly reddened background

346: stars with photospheric emission only and young stars with

347: circumstellar material. Thus we require $[5.8]-[8.0]>0.2$ for all

348: the identified YSOs. Bright nebulosity dominated by hydrocarbon

349: emission features can be found in all the regions and have a very

350: red [5.8]-[8.0] color.

351: 

352: To assess the impact of nebulosity on creating false detections,

353: we added artificial stars to each of the mosaics. Each artificial

354: star was 10 pixel ($12''$) to the west of an actual source that

355: was detected in the 3.6 and 4.5 $\mu$m bands, and the magnitude of

356: the artificial star in all four IRAC bands was set to the 3.6

357: $\mu$m magnitude of the actual source. Thus, the artificial stars

358: had $[3.6]-[4.5]$ and $[5.8]-[8.0]$ colors equal to $0$. These

359: sources accurately sampled the range of magnitudes and background

360: nebulosities found in the image. We then recovered the photometry

361: to determine how many such stars would be mistaken as having

362: infrared excesses due to the nebulosity. Although there were about

363: 10 to 30 sources with $[5.8]-[8.0]>0.2$, only 1 to 3 of the

364: sources had a color of $[3.6]-[4.5]>0.2$.

365: 

366: Hence we require $[3.6]-[4.5]>0.2$ to eliminate pure photospheres

367: contaminated by hydrocarbon emission nebulosity. Figure

368: \ref{fig1}a shows the [3.6]-[4.5] vs. [5.8]-[8.0] diagram for

369: objects merged from all 9 regions and detectable in all four IRAC

370: bands. In this diagram, objects with $0.2<[3.6]-[4.5]<0.8$ and

371: $0.4<[5.8]-[8.0]<1.1$ are classified Class II; objects with

372: $[3.6]-[4.5]>0.8$ and $[5.8]-[8.0]>0.2$, or, $[3.6]-[4.5]\geq0.4$

373: and $[5.8]-[8.0]>1.1$ are classified protostars (including Class 0

374: and Class I objects); while objects with $[5.8]-[8.0]>1.1$, which

375: is consistent with that of protostars, but with

376: $0.2<[3.6]-[4.5]<0.4$, which is lower than that of protostars, are

377: classified class I/II. For those detected in the 24 $\mu$m band,

378: we re-examine them in the IRAC-MIPS diagram.

379: 

380: From both observations and model calculations, the [3.6]-[4.5] vs

381: [5.8]-[8.0] diagram has been proven quite effective in separating

382: YSOs with dusty disks or envelops from purely photospheric

383: emission stars \citep{Hartmann05, Robitaille06}. The principal

384: ambiguity for the [3.6]-[4.5] vs [5.8]-[8.0] classification scheme

385: lies in distinguishing protostars from class II objects. From the

386: direction of the reddening vector in Figure \ref{fig1}a, the

387: identified protostars immediately above the class II rectangle

388: ($0.8\lesssim[3.6]-[4.5]\lesssim1.2$) are likely reddened class II

389: objects. In addtion, some of the objects immediately right to the

390: class II rectangle ($1.1\lesssim[5.8]-[8.0]\lesssim1.5$), which

391: are identified as protostars or class I/II, are likely class II

392: objects contaminated by hydrocarbon emission. In addition, some

393: intrinsic characteristics of YSOs make the classification

394: ambiguous as well. For example, geometric effects including

395: bipolar outflow cavities, flattened pattern of envelops and

396: pole-on geometry will all make the IRAC colors of protostars much

397: bluer \citep{Hartmann05, Robitaille06}. In a few cases the

398: discrimination between class II objects and class III/field stars

399: is also ambiguous; some YSOs with circumstellar disks have an

400: evacuated or very optically thin inner hole and show little

401: infrared excess shortward of 8.0 $\mu$m and then can be

402: misidentified as class III/field stars.

403: 

404: \subsubsection{2MASS-IRAC diagrams}

405: The IRAC 5.8 and 8.0 $\mu$m bands are far less sensitive than the

406: 3.6 and 4.5 $\mu$m bands (see the limiting magnitudes in Table

407: \ref{observation}), and are often dominated by bright nebulosity

408: in observations of active star forming regions. For this reason,

409: we combine the IRAC photometric results with data from the 2MASS

410: \emph{JHKs} Point Source Catalog. We limit the \emph{JHKs}

411: photometric uncertainty to be less than 0.1 mag. Since the 4.5

412: $\mu$m band is the most sensitive band to YSOs among all four IRAC

413: bands \citep{Gutermuth04}, we use the $J-H$ vs. $H-[4.5]$ and

414: $H-Ks$ vs. $Ks-[4.5]$ diagrams (Figures \ref{fig1}b, \ref{fig1}c)

415: to identify objects with infrared excess emission but not detected

416: in the IRAC longer wavelength bands. In Figures \ref{fig1}b and

417: \ref{fig1}c, objects with the $H-[4.5]$ or $Ks-[4.5]$ colors more

418: than $1\sigma$ beyond the reddening vectors are identified as

419: objects with intrinsic infrared excess. The extinction law in the

420: mid-infrared wavelengths toward star-forming regions, in

421: particular toward distant high-mass star forming regions, has not

422: been well established. Most recently, \citet{Flaherty07} derived

423: the interstellar extinction laws in IRAC bands toward five nearby

424: star-forming regions. We adopt the average of the extinction laws

425: derived by Flaherty et al. for our sample. From the dispersion of

426: the objects left to the reddening vectors in these two diagrams,

427: it seems the adopted reddening law is applicable for our high-mass

428: star forming regions. The positions offsets of the reddening

429: vectors in these two diagrams, which were determined by

430: \citet{Winston07} for Serpens, also appear to be a good

431: approximation for our regions. However, the completeness of the

432: YSOs identification from these two diagrams are significantly

433: limited by the modest sensitivity of the 2MASS survey. Deeper

434: near-infrared observations will not only improve the completeness

435: but also help to derive a more accurate reddening law toward each

436: region, which would improve the reliability of the YSOs

437: identification.

438: 

439: \subsubsection{IRAC-MIPS diagram}

440: Including data at wavelengths longward of 20 $\mu$m is valuable

441: for more reliable classification of YSOs \citep{Robitaille06}. In

442: Figure \ref{fig1}d, we use the [3.6]-[4.5] vs. [4.5]-[24] diagram

443: to classify YSOs which are detectable both in the two most

444: sensitive IRAC bands and in the MIPS 24 $\mu$m band. Sources with

445: spectral indexes greater than -0.3 have IRAC-MIPS colors

446: $[3.6]-[4.5]>0.652$ and $[4.5]-[24]>4.761$. These sources would

447: include both the flat spectrum and class I objects in the

448: classification scheme of \citet{Greene94}. In addition, the high

449: sensitivity of {\it Spitzer} data allows for the detection of

450: previously identified class 0 sources in mid-infrared

451: \citep{Noriega04a, Rho06, Hatchell07, Winston07}; consequently,

452: class 0 sources can also be identified by these criteria. Since an

453: infalling envelope is required to explain the SEDs of flat

454: spectrum, class I and class 0 sources \citep{Calvet94, Whitney03},

455: we refer to the combined set of these sources as protostars. In

456: Figure \ref{fig1}d, there is clearly an isolated group close to

457: (0, 0). The objects in this group are class III/field stars whose

458: emission is dominantly from photospheres. In this diagram objects

459: outside of the protostar region and not in the class III/field

460: star group are classified as class II. There is an obvious gap

461: between protostars/class II objects and classIII/field stars,

462: suggesting this diagram is very effective in distinguishing YSOs

463: with circumstellar materials from purely photospheric objects.

464: From the objects that can be classified both in the [3.6]-[4.5]

465: vs. [5.8]-[8.0] and in the [3.6]-[4.5] vs. [4.5]-[24] diagrams, we

466: find that the two classification schemes are in general

467: consistent, otherwise we adopt the latter if there is an

468: ambiguity. With the IRAC-MIPS diagram we also identify 15 class II

469: objects and 2 protostars that cannot be identified in any of the

470: other three color-color diagrams.

471: 

472: \subsubsection{Removing extragalactic contaminants}

473: There are mainly two classes of extragalactic contaminants that

474: can be misidentified as YSOs \citep{Stern05}. One is star forming

475: galaxies and narrow-line active galactic nuclei (AGN) which have

476: growing excess at 5.8 and 8.0 $\mu$m due to hydrocarbon emission.

477: The other is broad-line AGN which have IRAC colors very similar to

478: that of bona fide YSOs. \citet{Gutermuth07} have developed a

479: method based on the Bootes Shallow Survey data to substantially

480: mitigate these contaminants. In this method, hydrocarbon emission

481: sources, including galaxies and narrow-line AGN, can be eliminated

482: by their positions in the [4.5]-[5.8] vs. [5.8]-[8.0] and

483: [3.6]-[5.8] vs. [4.5]-[8.0] diagrams, while broad-line AGN, which

484: are typically fainter than YSOs in the {\it Spitzer} bands, are

485: identified by their positions in the [4.5] vs. [4.5]-[8.0]

486: diagram. Here we adopt this method and lower the [4.5] limit in

487: the [4.5] vs. [4.5]-[8.0] diagram by 1 mag since our regions are

488: far more distant. To further remove AGN, we set $[3.6]<16$ for

489: YSOs not detected in the 8.0 $\mu$m band and require $[24]<8.5$

490: for those only identifiable in the [3.6]-[4.5] vs. [4.5]-[24]

491: diagram. We filter out a total of 11 extragalactic contaminants in

492: all nine regions.

493: 

494: \subsubsection{Completeness of the census}

495: Although we are undertaking deep observations toward relatively

496: nearby high-mass star forming regions, the completeness of the

497: YSOs census is limited by a few factors. Bright extended

498: nebulosity in the IRAC bands can be found in all the regions,

499: which significantly limit the point source detection in these

500: areas. The YSOs identification from the 2MASS-IRAC diagram is

501: limited by the modest sensitivity of the 2MASS survey, while that

502: from the IRAC-MIPS diagram suffers from the significant saturation

503: in the MIPS 24 $\mu$m image caused by the central luminous

504: sources. To further evaluate the completeness of the census

505: quantitatively, we plot histograms of the sources which are

506: counted within 0.5 mag bins of the 3.6 $\mu$m photometry in Figure

507: \ref{complete}. In this plot, all the 3.6 $\mu$m detections with

508: signal to noise ratios sufficient to be identified by our point

509: source filter are plotted with the gray solid lines, and sources

510: with corresponding multi-band photometry so that they can be

511: placed on one or more color-color diagrams for an assessment of

512: infrared excess are plotted with the dark dashed lines. The

513: identified YSO members are also plotted with the gray dotted

514: lines. There are two types of completeness in this diagram. The

515: first is the completeness in the 3.6 $\mu$m band, which declines

516: strongly where a peak is evident in the solid gray line histogram.

517: The second is the coupled multi-band completeness to infrared

518: excess sources, which is approximately given where the dark dashed

519: line diverges from the solid gray line. Since the 3.6 $\mu$m band

520: detects sources of fainter magnitudes than the other bands, we

521: define the completeness magnitude as the point where the

522: multi-band histogram declines more than 30\% with respect to the

523: 3.6 $\mu$m histogram. A vertical dash-dotted line in each plot

524: indicates the completeness magnitude. For sources with the 3.6

525: $\mu$m photometry brighter than the completeness magnitude, we

526: calculate the ratio of the number of sources that can be placed on

527: one or more color-color diagrams for the search of infrared excess

528: to the number of the total detections (Table \ref{fraction}). The

529: actual completeness to infrared excess sources is presumably

530: higher since they will have stronger emission in the IRAC bands

531: than field stars and young stars without disks.

532: 

533: \subsection{Central Massive Star formation Sites} \label{msf}

534: Previous interferometric studies have identified dusty cores at

535: the center of each region through the millimeter continuum

536: emission, and so far five regions show multiple or a cluster of

537: dusty cores. Of these millimeter sources, the deep IRAC imaging

538: detects six at 8.0 $\mu$m, five at 5.8 $\mu$m, three at 4.5

539: $\mu$m, and two at 3.6 $\mu$m. The low detection rate is

540: consistent with the deep IRAC observations of the other two nearby

541: (1.7 kpc) high-mass star forming regions, NGC 6334 I and NGC 6334

542: I(N), where only one out of eleven SMA 1.3 mm sources shows a

543: detectable infrared counterpart \citep{Hunter06}. \citet{Kumar07}

544: suggested that the IRAC band emission of candidate massive

545: protostellar objects arises from the luminous envelopes around the

546: protostars rather than their photospheres or disks. In our sample,

547: the number of detected infrared counterparts increases with the

548: increasing wavelength of the band, despite the fact that the 3.6

549: and 4.5 $\mu$m bands are much more sensitive than the 5.8 and 8.0

550: $\mu$m bands. This implies a steeply rising SED in the IRAC bands,

551: which is consistent with the interpretation that the emission is

552: mostly coming from the dense envelopes. All the six millimeter

553: sources detected in one or more IRAC bands appear significantly

554: saturated in the MIPS 24 $\mu$m band, while there are two

555: millimeter sources detected at 24 $\mu$m without saturation but

556: undetectable in any of the four IRAC bands. We list the IRAC or

557: MIPS 24 $\mu$m photometry of detected millimeter sources in Table

558: \ref{irmm}. In our sample, high-mass stars deeply embedded in

559: dusty cores are early-B types estimated from far-infrared

560: luminosities, ionizing UV radiation fluxes (if UC H{\scriptsize

561: II} regions detected), and core masses. Also considering they are

562: associated with molecular outflows indicative of active accretion,

563: we refer to these deeply embedded B stars as proto-B stars.

564: 

565: In all nine regions, massive molecular outflows have been

566: identified in millimeter lines of CO and/or SiO. In the IRAC

567: observations, the central high-mass sources are found to be

568: associated with extended nebulosity. Several mechanisms produce

569: extended nebulosity in the IRAC bands. Prominent features from

570: hydrocarbons appear in the 3.6, 5.8, and 8.0 $\mu$m bands, with

571: the strongest emission features in the 8.0 $\mu$m band

572: \citep{Werner04}. Vibrational and rotational H$_2$ lines appear in

573: all four bands, with the weakest and most spatially confined

574: emission in the 3.6 $\mu$m band \citep{Smith06, Smith05}; this

575: H$_2$ emission is most apparent in the 4.5 $\mu$m band due to the

576: high sensitivity of this band and presence of strong rotational

577: lines \citep{Smith05}. Finally scattered light may also produce

578: nebulosity which is expected to be the strongest in the 3.6 $\mu$m

579: band. To distinguish between these different mechanisms, we employ

580: 3.6/4.5 $\mu$m two-color and 3.6/4.5/8.0 $\mu$m three-color

581: composite images to highlight emission from shocked H$_2$ in

582: outflows, scattered light from outflow cavities, and emission from

583: UV heated hydrocarbons. We identify a total of twelve outflows in

584: eight out of the nine regions. Reflection nebulae and externally

585: heated rimmed clouds are detected as well.

586: 

587: In the following subsections, we discuss each region separately.

588: For Figures \ref{afgl5142} to \ref{w75n}, the 3.6, 4.5 and 8.0

589: $\mu$m emissions in color composites are coded in blue, green and

590: red, respectively; millimeter continuum cores from previous

591: observations are marked as plus signs; CO and SiO outflows from

592: previous observations are shown in contours; additional symbols

593: (arrows, dashed curves, etc.) are merely to highlight the IRAC

594: outflows from the ambient reflection nebulae or scattered light.

595: 

596: \subsubsection{AFGL 5142} \label{msf_afgl5142}

597: In Figure \ref{afgl5142}a, a short jet in the east and a long jet

598: in the west are detected. The short jet coincides with the axis of

599: one of the three jet-like molecular outflows detected in the CO

600: (2-1) and SO ($6_5-5_4$) with the SMA \citep[outflow B in][see

601: contours in Figure \ref{afgl5142}b]{Zhang07}. The long jet, on the

602: other hand, coincides with the axis of an extended remnant outflow

603: detected in CO (2-1) with the CSO telescope \citep{Hunter95}. The

604: emission from these two jets is most prominent in the 4.5 $\mu$m

605: band, in agreement with the previous ground-based 2.12 $\mu$m

606: H$_2$ v=1-0 $S(1)$ observations \citep{Hunter95, Chen05}.

607: Apparently the IRAC imaging of this region reveals internal

608: driving agents of two molecular outflows.

609: 

610: Toward the center of AFGL 5142, \citet{Zhang07} detected five

611: millimeter continuum sources (MM1 to MM5 in Figure

612: \ref{5142core}). In Figure \ref{5142core}, a bright source

613: residing $0.\!''8$ northwest to MM1 (marked with a star symbol) is

614: detected in the 2MASS \emph{Ks} band, all four IRAC bands and MIPS

615: 24 $\mu$m band (see the detection at

616: $\alpha($J$2000.0)=05^{\mathrm h}30^{\mathrm m}47.98^{\mathrm s}$,

617: $\delta($J$2000.0)=33^{\circ}47'54.9''$ in Table

618: \ref{photometry}). It is classified as a protostar in the

619: [3.6]-[4.5] vs. [5.8]-[8.0] and [3.6]-[4.5] vs. [4.5]-[24]

620: diagrams. The projected offset between this source and MM1 is

621: marginally within the IRAC astrometry allowance. Thus it is still

622: possible that this source is the infrared counterpart of MM1.

623: However, \citet{Zhang07} detected a forest of molecular lines

624: toward MM1 and suggested it to be the driving source of a jet-like

625: molecular outflow, which implies that the protostar deeply

626: embedded in MM1 is actively accreting. Such a protostellar core is

627: usually obscured in $K$ band \citep[e.g.][and observations of

628: other regions in our sample]{Walther90, Aspin91}. Considering the

629: source is detected in the 2MASS \emph{Ks} band, a survey with

630: limited sensitivity, we suggest that it is most likely a different

631: source rather than the infrared counterpart of MM1. But the 24

632: $\mu$m emission can still arise from MM1 and/or other millimeter

633: sources given its relatively low resolution ($\sim5''$), thus we

634: list the 24 $\mu$m photometry in Table \ref{irmm}. The 24 $\mu$m

635: detection is located at the bright PSF wing of a nearby saturated

636: source, resulting in a potential overestimate of the flux by about

637: $0.3$ to $0.4$ Jy. The driving sources of the multiple CO/SO

638: outflows have not been unambiguously identified. \citet{Zhang07}

639: suggested MM3 may be the powering source of the CO outflow

640: coincident with the short jet in Figure \ref{afgl5142}b. The long

641: jet is apparently powered by a relatively more evolved young B

642: star (denoted by a blue cross in Figure \ref{fig2}a).

643: 

644: \subsubsection{IRAS 05358+3543} \label{msf_i05358}

645: In Figure \ref{i05358}, three highly collimated jets emanating

646: from a group of millimeter continuum sources are detected in the

647: central part of IRAS 05358+3543 (hereafter referred as IRAS

648: 05358). Jet1 coincides a well collimated outflow in CO (1-0)

649: reported by \citet{Beuther02} (see contours in Figure

650: \ref{i05358}). Jet2 coincides with the axis of a high-velocity CO

651: outflow (outflow B in \citet{Beuther02}). Several knots from these

652: two jets are almost exactly coincident with the previously

653: identified 2.12 $\mu$m H$_2$ knots \citep{Porras00, Jiang01,

654: Beuther02, Kumar02}. \citet{Beuther02} did not report the

655: identification of Jet3, but weak emission features coincident with

656: this jet can be found in their 2.12 $\mu$m H$_2$ image.

657: \citet{Kumar02} suggested the existence of this jet, but the

658: emission appears to be weaker since their H$_2$ observations are

659: less deep than that of \citet{Beuther02}. In the IRAC imaging

660: (Figure \ref{i05358}), a chain of emission knots in this jet can

661: be identified and even its tip can be identified despite the

662: contamination by a nebulous knot. There is no reported detection

663: of an outflow toward this jet in millimeter CO or SiO

664: observations. However, in the northern lobe of the SiO (2-1)

665: outflow proposed by \citet{Beuther02} (their Fig. 8b), the highest

666: contours show elongation coincident with Jet3. Considering SiO is

667: a good shock tracer at (sub)millimeter wavelengths, the elongated

668: SiO emission could be at least partially powered by Jet3.

669: 

670: At the center of this region, \citet{Beuther02, Beuther07}

671: detected three millimter continuum sources at $\sim2-3''$

672: resolutions (marked as MM1 to MM3 in Figure \ref{05358core}). The

673: brightest emission feature in Figure \ref{05358core} coincides

674: with MM1; two northern ``red'' features (denoted by two white

675: dashed circles) are not real but ``bandwidth'' artifacts. An

676: investigation of the emission in individual bands shows that

677: emission features coincident with MM2 and MM3 are discernible in

678: the 3.6 and 4.5 $\mu$m bands but is not identified by our point

679: source filter. The emission feature coincident with MM1 is

680: marginally discernible in the 3.6\,$\mu$m band, and identified as

681: a point source longward of 4.5 $\mu$m. The MIPS 24 $\mu$m emission

682: from this area is significantly saturated. From its extremely red

683: IRAC colors ([4.5]-[5.8] = 1.33 and [5.8]-[8.0] = 1.15) and

684: position coincidence with MM1, we suggest this source to be the

685: infrared counterpart of MM1 and list its photometry in Table

686: \ref{irmm}. At higher resolutions ($\lesssim1''$), the MM1 core

687: splits into two sub-cores at 875 $\mu$m and 1.2 mm

688: \citep{Beuther07}. One of the two sub-cores coincides with a point

689: source at 7.9 $\mu$m detected with the Gemini North telescope

690: \citep{Longmore06}. The sub-structure of MM1 cannot be resolved in

691: the IRAC observations. The flux of 0.586 Jy at 8.0 $\mu$m

692: ($[8.0]=5.098$) is consistent with the flux of 0.68 Jy at 7.9

693: $\mu$m reported in \citet{Longmore06}, suggesting that the flux of

694: the IRAC source is dominated by the sub-core coincident with the

695: 7.9 $\mu$m detection. MM1 (or more precisely, one of the two

696: sub-cores in MM1) is suggested to be the driving source of Jet1

697: \citep{Beuther07}. A reliable one-to-one association between Jet2,

698: Jet3 and any two millimeter sources in this region cannot be

699: established with the current data.

700: 

701: \subsubsection{G192.16-3.82} \label{msf_g192}

702: \citet{Shepherd98} detected a west-east bipolar outflow in CO

703: (1-0) in G192.16-3.82 (hereafter referred as G192). The eastern

704: lobe of this outflow is detected in the 3.6 and 4.5 $\mu$m bands.

705: In Figure \ref{g192}, the most prominent features of this lobe are

706: ``green'' nebulosities within the area outlined by two dashed

707: lines. The emission to the west of these features is confused by

708: the bright reflection nebula, but a ``blue'' V-shaped structure,

709: with the millimeter source at the tip, is still discernable in the

710: three-color composite of the field (Figure \ref{fig2}c). The

711: overall structure of the eastern lobe in the IRAC imaging, i.e.,

712: the ``green'' features as well as the V-shaped inner part, roughly

713: coincides with but far exceeds the eastern lobe of the CO outflow.

714: The prominence in the 4.5 $\mu$m band and coincidence with

715: previous H$\alpha$ and [S{\scriptsize II}] detections

716: \citep{Devine99} strongly suggest that the ``green'' nebulosities

717: are shock excited H$_2$ knots. The base of the western lobe of the

718: CO outflow is also detected in the IRAC imaging, with the

719: prominent feature being a candle-flame-shaped structure

720: (delineated by a dashed curve in Figure \ref{g192}, but more

721: prominent in Figure \ref{fig2}c); this structure is previously

722: detected in the $K$-band imaging \citep{Shepherd98, Devine99}. One

723: interesting aspect of this outflow is that although the eastern

724: lobe is filled with shocked H$_2$ knots, a collimated component

725: cannot be found either in our IRAC imaging or previous

726: observations. The CO outflow appears to be driven by a wide-angle

727: wind revealed in the IRAC, H$\alpha$ and [S{\scriptsize II}]

728: observations.

729: 

730: A proto-B star surrounded by an UC H{\scriptsize II} region and

731: embedded in a dense dusty core was suggested to be the driving

732: source of the outflow \citep{Shepherd99, Shepherd04a}. A bright

733: source coincident with the millimeter continuum peak is detected

734: in the IRAC bands and show very red IRAC colors (Figure

735: \ref{192core}). We suggest it to be the infrared counterpart of

736: the millimeter source and list its photometry in Table \ref{irmm}.

737: A detailed comparison between the infrared and millimeter emission

738: in the region will be presented in a future work (Shepherd et al.,

739: in prep.).

740: 

741: \subsubsection{HH 80-81} \label{msf_hh8081}

742: An extraordinarily well-collimated and powerful radio jet was

743: previously detected in HH 80-81 \citep[][see contours in Figure

744: \ref{h8081}]{Marti93,Marti95,Marti98}. Having the radio jet right

745: at the axis, the {\it Spitzer} data for the first time reveals a

746: bipolar cone-shaped cavity with its emission most prominent in the

747: 8.0 $\mu$m band with an extent of about 4pc (Figure \ref{h8081}).

748: Low-mass protostellar outflows are often found to consist of two

749: components, with an axial narrow jet-like component surrounded by

750: a wide-angle biconical component \citep{Lee06, Palau06}. It is

751: unclear whether outflows emanating from high-mass young stars or

752: protostars may exhibit two components similar to low-mass

753: outflows. Our IRAC imaging as well as previous radio continuum

754: observations of the HH 80-81 outflow provides the best case of a

755: two-component outflow emanating from a $10^4L_{\odot}$ source. The

756: remarkable prominence in the 8.0 $\mu$m band suggests that the

757: emission of the IRAC biconical structure is from hydrocarbons

758: heated by UV photons from the central source. Single-dish

759: observations revealed a large bipolar outflow in CO (1-0)

760: \citep{Yamashita89, Benedettini04}, with the northern lobe being

761: blueshifted and the southern lobe redshifted. The orientation of

762: the CO outflow is roughly consistent with the IRAC outflow

763: structure. In the three-color composite image (Figure

764: \ref{fig2}d), a curved structure in the northern lobe stands out

765: in the 3.6 $\mu$m emission (blue). This curved structure is very

766: bright in previous near-infrared $K$-band observations and has

767: been suggested as the wall of a parabolic cavity \citep{Aspin91}.

768: The dominant 3.6 $\mu$m emission from this structure may be partly

769: explained by the scattered light in this structure being enhanced

770: by forward scattering and lower extinction. The 8.0 $\mu$m

771: emission within this structure is spatially limited to the inner

772: edge of the parabolic wall. This may suggest that part of the

773: northern lobe cavity is shielded from the UV photons by gas and

774: dust in the outflow and perhaps by the circumstellar environment

775: around the central source. Two additional reflection nebulae are

776: found on both sides of the bipolar cavity; these appear to be

777: heated by two young B stars (see Table \ref{photometry}) and not

778: directly connected to the outflow cavity.

779: 

780: The central driving source of the outflow has been detected in the

781: centimeter \citep{Marti93, Marti99} and millimeter \citep{Gomez03}

782: continuum. Mid-infrared emission from this source has been

783: detected at 4.7 to 13 $\mu$m in the ground-based observations

784: \citep{Aspin94, Stecklum97}. In Figure \ref{8081core}, the

785: centroid of the emission feature in the 3.6 $\mu$m band is about

786: $2''$ northeast offset from the millimeter peak. This feature

787: coincides with a $K$-band knot detected in previous ground-based

788: observations \citep[their IRS 2,][]{Aspin91, Aspin94, Stecklum97}.

789: From its high polarization and relatively large FWHM,

790: \citet{Aspin91} argued that it is a nebulous knot of gas/dust

791: rather than a point source. The emission feature in the 4.5 $\mu$m

792: band shows elongation toward the position of the millimeter peak.

793: The centroid of the emission feature in the 5.8 and 8.0 $\mu$m

794: bands, discarding the ``bandwidth'' artifact in the north,

795: coincides with the millimeter peak. We suggest that the emission

796: in the 3.6 and 4.5 $\mu$m bands is mostly attributed to the IRS 2

797: knot, while that in the long wavelength bands is mostly coming

798: from the millimeter core and their photometry is listed in Table

799: \ref{irmm}. The MIPS 24 $\mu$m emission in the central part of

800: this region is significantly saturated.

801: 

802: \subsubsection{IRAS 19410+2336} \label{msf_i19410}

803: As outlined with a dashed ellipse in Figure \ref{i19410}, an

804: elliptical nebula orientated in the northeast-southwest direction

805: can be identified from the extended emission in the central part

806: of IRAS 19410+2336 (hereafter IRAS 19410). In interferometric CO

807: observations, multiple outflows emanating from the center of this

808: region show very complex morphologies \citep{Beuther03}. The axis

809: of one outflow proposed by Beuther et al., which is shown in

810: contours in Figure \ref{i19410}, coincides with the major axis of

811: the IRAC elliptical nebula. Jet-like 2.12 $\mu$m H$_2$ emission

812: along the axis of this outflow was detected as well

813: \citep{Beuther03}. The elliptical nebula, with two local cavities

814: at the ends of the major axis, is only detectable in the 3.6 and

815: 4.5 $\mu$m bands and appears more prominent in the 3.6 $\mu$m

816: band, suggesting the emission is dominated by scattered light from

817: the central source. Apparently the IRAC imaging of the IRAS 19410

818: outflow reveals a less collimated component than the 2.12 $\mu$m

819: H$_2$ jet.

820: 

821: The driving source of this outflow is suggested to be deeply

822: embedded in a dusty core traced by millimeter continuum emission

823: at a resolution of $5.5''\times3.5''$ \citep{Beuther03}. The

824: infrared emission from this millimeter source is detected in all

825: four IRAC bands and the photometry is listed in Table \ref{irmm}.

826: There is a 2MASS $Ks$ band detection, with the photometry of

827: $10.802\pm0.044$, at $\sim0.7''$ away from the millimeter

828: continuum peak. As we discussed in \S \ref{msf_afgl5142}, it is

829: more likely another star rather than the infrared counterpart of

830: the millimeter source. The MIPS 24 $\mu$m emission from the source

831: is significantly saturated. At a higher resolution

832: ($1.5''\times1''$), the millimeter core splits into multiple

833: sources \citep{Beuther04a}; our IRAC observations cannot resolve

834: those sources. A detailed comparison between the IRAC observations

835: and high-spatial-resolution millimeter continuum observations of

836: this region will be presented in a future work (Rodon et al., in

837: prep.).

838: 

839: \subsubsection{IRAS 20126+4104} \label{msf_i20126}

840: In Figures \ref{i20126}a \& \ref{i20126}c, a bipolar outflow in

841: IRAS 20126+4104 (hereafter referred as IRAS 20126) is detected as

842: a limb-brightened biconical cavity. The cavity structure, in

843: particular the wall of the northwestern lobe, is clearly detected

844: in the 3.6, 4.5, and 5.8 $\mu$m bands and its prominence in the

845: 3.6 and 4.5 $\mu$m bands suggests that the emission is dominated

846: by the scattered light. The molecular outflow in IRAS 20126 has

847: been interpreted as driven by a precessing jet based on the

848: S-shaped locus of the 2.12 $\mu$m H$_2$ knots and the orientation

849: variation between the inner jet-like SiO outflow and the larger CO

850: outflow \citep{Cesaroni97, Cesaroni99, Shepherd00, Lebron06,

851: Su07}. The jet-precessing scenario is also consistent with the

852: presence of a double system detected at centimeter and

853: near-infrared wavelengths \citep{Sridharan05, Hofner99, Hofner07}.

854: Our IRAC observations put new insight into the outflow property of

855: this luminous source. The IRAC biconical structure far exceeds

856: inner SiO outflow and covers part of the larger CO outflow. From

857: the limb-brightening, the cavity wall has PAs from $\sim-33^\circ$

858: to $\sim-65^\circ$. The PA $\sim-33^\circ$ wall is significantly

859: offset from the axis of the larger CO outflow which is nearly in a

860: N-S orientation \citep{Shepherd00, Lebron06}, while the

861: PA$\sim-65^\circ$ wall has an approximately same orientation as

862: the jet-like SiO outflow. A natural interpretation of the cavity

863: (with the limb-brightening) is that it traces a less collimated

864: biconical component of the IRAS 20126 outflow, rather than being

865: swept up by a jet precessing from N-S to the current-position of

866: PA$\sim33^\circ$. However, in contrast to the HH 80-81 outflow (\S

867: \ref{msf_hh8081}), the jet component in this region coincides with

868: the wall, not the axis, of the biconical cavity. While multiple

869: outflows can be one possibility, another possibility can be

870: derived by adopting the precessing scenario and the theoretical

871: model unifying the jet-driven and wind-driven low-mass outflows

872: \citep{Shang07}: when the underlying axial jet and the co-existing

873: wind are precessing, the dense jet is more efficient in entraining

874: a collimated molecular outflow via strong shock activities, while

875: the cavity evacuating by the more tenuous wind component is less

876: efficient. Consequently, the jet-like SiO outflow can be detected

877: very close to the current-position of the precessing jet while the

878: cavity revealed by the scattered light more or less lags behind.

879: 

880: A dense dusty core, which harbors a proto-B star driving the

881: outflow, was previously detected in the millimeter continuum

882: \citep{Shepherd00, Cesaroni05}. In the 4.5 and 5.8 $\mu$m bands

883: the emission feature coincident with the millimeter source is

884: discernible. In the 8.0 $\mu$m band (Figure \ref{i20126}b), a

885: point source at this position is detected and the photometry is

886: listed in Table \ref{irmm}. At higher resolutions

887: ($\lesssim0.5''$), two emission regions oriented along the outflow

888: axis and separated by a dark lane were detected at near- and

889: mid-infrared wavelengths \citep{Sridharan05, DeBuizer07}. The

890: source in the 8.0 $\mu$m band may encompass the previously

891: detected double sources.

892: 

893: \subsubsection{IRAS 20293+3952} \label{msf_i20293}

894: In Figure \ref{i20293}, ahead of a previously detected

895: high-velocity CO outflow \citep{Beuther04b}, a short jet is

896: detected in the IRAC imaging with an extent of about $10''$. with

897: the most prominent emission in the 4.5 $\mu$m band. In orientation

898: the IRAC jet well coincides with the CO outflow. This outflow was

899: also detected in thermal emissions of SiO and CH$_3$OH

900: \citep{Beuther04b, Palau07}, which often trace shock activities in

901: outflows. In the previous 2.12 $\mu$m H$_2$ observations, the

902: overall structure was not detected but a faint knot can be found

903: at the southeastern end of the IRAC jet (knot ``C'' in Fig. 2 of

904: \citet{Kumar02}). We suggest that the IRAC imaging for the first

905: time reveals the interval driving agent of the CO/SiO/CH$_3$OH

906: outflow.

907: 

908: A millimeter continuum source, which may harbor an

909: intermediate-mass protostar, is suggested to be the driving source

910: of the CO/SiO/CH$_3$OH outflow \citep{Beuther04b, Beuther04c,

911: Palau07}. The infrared emission from the millimeter source is only

912: detected in the MIPS 24 $\mu$m band (Table \ref{irmm}). As the

913: case of AFGL 5142 (\S \ref{msf_afgl5142}), the 24 $\mu$m detection

914: is located at the bright PSF wing of a nearby saturated source,

915: resulting in a potential overestimate of the source flux by about

916: $0.8$ to $0.9$ Jy.

917: 

918: \subsubsection{W75\,N} \label{msf_w75n}

919: In Figure \ref{w75}, multiple bow-shaped structures in W75\,N can

920: be identified. The most remarkable one, marked by the double

921: arrows, form a large scale bipolar bow-shaped structure. The shell

922: of the southwestern lobe and the tip of the northeastern lobe of

923: this structure is clearly revealed in the 4.5 $\mu$m band. This

924: bow-shaped structure has previously been detected in the 2.12

925: $\mu$m H$_2$ imaging by several authors \citep{Davis98,

926: Shepherd03, Davis07}, but not reported in previous IRAC

927: observations toward the DR 21/W75\,N region carried out during the

928: science verification period of \emph{Spizer} \citep{Persi06,

929: Davis07}, probably because their observations are far less deep in

930: integration. The southwestern lobe coincides with the boundary of

931: the redshifted lobe of a large outflow detected in CO (1-0)

932: \citep{Shepherd03}, suggesting the bow-shock-driven nature of this

933: molecular outflow. In addition to this remarkable structure, at

934: least five bow-shaped structures pointing to the southeast of the

935: region can be found in Figure \ref{w75}. These structures may be

936: shocked H$_2$ ``fingers'' tracing multiple bow-shocks driven from

937: the center of the region, roughly in a fashion similar to the

938: famous H$_2$ ``fingers'' in the Orion KL region \citep{Schultz99,

939: Nissen07}. Zooming in on the inner part of this region, the IRAC

940: imaging reveals a new bow-shaped structure (outlined by a solid

941: curve in Figure \ref{w75n}). This structure is clearly detected in

942: the 3.6 and 4.5 $\mu$m bands and appears more prominent in the 4.5

943: $\mu$m band (Figures \ref{w75n}a, \ref{w75n}b). Its orientation

944: approximately coincides with the axis of a CO outflow proposed by

945: \citet{Shepherd03}.

946: 

947: At the center of the large northeast-southwest bow-shaped

948: structure, \citet{Shepherd01} detected a group of four millimeter

949: continuum sources (labelled as MM1 to MM4 in Figure \ref{w75n}a).

950: Embedded in MM1 is a cluster of four centimeter continuum sources,

951: with three within an area of $1.\!''5$ and another about $3''$ to

952: the south \citep[Figure \ref{w75n}c,][]{Hunter94, Torrelles97,

953: Shepherd03}. Of the four centimeter sources, the northernmost one

954: was interpreted as an ionized radio jet while the other three were

955: suggested to be UC H{\scriptsize II} regions excited by proto-B

956: stars. It is still unclear which is driving the large scale CO

957: outflow. \citet{Shepherd03} suggested the first UC H{\scriptsize

958: II} region from the north (namely VLA 2) is likely to be the

959: driving source. The resolution of our IRAC observation does not

960: allow us to shed any further light on this issue.

961: \citet{Shepherd03} suggested the second UC H{\scriptsize II}

962: region from the north (namely VLA 3) to be the driving source of

963: the CO outflow whose axis approximately coincides with the newly

964: discovered small bow-shaped structure in the IRAC image. However,

965: the CO outflow is very compact and confined to within $\sim5''$

966: from MM1 while the bow-shaped structure is about $50''$ (0.5 pc in

967: projection) away from the group of the millimeter sources. In

968: projection MM3 is closer to the axis of this bow-shaped structure

969: and thus more likely to be the driving source of this structure.

970: The infrared emission from MM1 is marginally discernible in the

971: 3.6 $\mu$m band (Figure \ref{w75n}a). From 4.5 (Figure

972: \ref{w75n}b) to 8.0 $\mu$m it is clearly identified as a point

973: source, and the photometry is listed in Table \ref{irmm}. The MIPS

974: 24 $\mu$m emission from the source is significantly saturated.

975: 

976: \subsubsection{IRAS 22172+5912} \label{msf_i22172}

977: IRAS 22172+5912 (hereafter IRAS 22172) is the only region in our

978: sample toward which no outflow signature is found in the IRAC

979: bands, though a bipolar outflow in CO and HCO$^+$ has been

980: detected with the OVRO array \citep{Molinari02, Fontani04}. The

981: peak of the dust emission, which was detected in the OVRO 2.6 mm

982: and 3.4 mm continuum observations at $\sim4-6''$ resolutions, is

983: about $5''$ offset from the geometric center of the bipolar

984: molecular outflow \citep{Molinari02, Fontani04}. The IRAC and MIPS

985: 24$\mu$m imaging do not detect infrared emission from the

986: millimeter source but reveals two protostars at the center of this

987: field (see Figure \ref{fig2}i). The southern protostar coincides

988: with the geometric center of the CO outflow and thus can be a

989: candidate of the driving source of the outflow. For the millimeter

990: source, the lack of infrared emission shortward of 24 $\mu$m and

991: the apparent non-association with the molecular outflow suggest

992: the source to be at a very young evolutionary stage. Further

993: (sub)millimeter continuum and line observations with high

994: sensitivity and higher resolutions are needed to verify whether it

995: is at a prestellar stage or harbors deeply embedded protostars.

996: 

997: \subsection{UV Heated Reflection Nebulae and Bright Rimmed Clouds}

998: \label{nebulae} The IRAC imaging of the sample reveals mainly

999: three classes of extended emission: H$_2$ emission dominated

1000: nebulae most prominent in the 4.5 $\mu$m band (green); scattered

1001: light dominated nebulae most prominent in the 3.6 $\mu$m band

1002: (blue); UV heated hydrocarbon emission dominated reflection

1003: nebulae most prominent in the 8.0 $\mu$m band (red). The first two

1004: classes have been discussed in detail in \S \ref{msf}.

1005: 

1006: The UV heated reflection nebulae can be found in most regions.

1007: While the first two classes of extended emission are found in

1008: outflows or outflow cavities and thus imply a very young

1009: evolutionary stage of the central source, most of the UV heated

1010: reflection nebulae are associated with young but relatively more

1011: evolved B stars (one exception being the biconical cavity of the

1012: HH 80-81 outflow). For the cometary nebula in AFGL 5142, the

1013: southwestern nebula in IRAS 05358, the southeastern and

1014: northerwestern nebulae in HH 80-81, the central nebula in IRAS

1015: 20293, and the northern and central nebulae in W75\,N, a bright

1016: source at the center is detected (denoted as a blue cross in

1017: Figure \ref{fig2}). These sources show infrared excess in our

1018: censes of YSOs based on color-color diagrams, and most of them

1019: were previously suggested to be intermediate- to high-mass young

1020: stars (see annotation of Tabel \ref{photometry}). They are most

1021: likely the exciting sources of the surrounding reflection nebulae.

1022: Of these sources, the one in IRAS 20293 shows an UC H{\scriptsize

1023: II} region and the central one in W75\,N is surrounded by a

1024: relatively extended H{\scriptsize II} region. The spectral types

1025: of the exciting stars of these two H{\scriptsize II} regions,

1026: derived from the Lyman continuum photos required to produce the

1027: observed ionized emission, are B1 and B0.5 for that in IRAS 20293

1028: and W75\,N, respectively \citep{Palau07, Shepherd04b}. Toward the

1029: two sources in HH 80-81, compact centimeter continuum was detected

1030: as well \citep{Marti93}, and the estimated rates of Lyman

1031: continuum photos suggest B3 to B2 stars being the exciting sources

1032: of these two reflection nebulae. There is no reported detection of

1033: a distinct H{\scriptsize II} region surrounding the other

1034: candidate exciting sources. We suggest they are young B stars

1035: capable of providing strong FUV radiation to excite hydrocarbon

1036: emission but too weak EUV to ionize its environment. Spectroscopic

1037: studies are needed to further investigate whether these stars have

1038: circumstellar disks and to confirm their spectral types. There are

1039: also UV heated reflection nebulae for which an exciting source

1040: cannot be identified with the existing data, but the need of FUV

1041: photons to heat hydrocarbons and the lack of significant free-free

1042: emission also suggest a B type star being the exciting source. To

1043: lower the optical depth in FUV and consequently allow the stars to

1044: heat the surrounding hydrocarbons, these B stars must have cleared

1045: most of the surrounding gas. On the other hand, as discussed in \S

1046: \ref{msf}, the central massive star formation site in each region

1047: shows millimeter continuum cores harboring deeply imbedded proto-B

1048: stars. Thus it appears that most regions in the sample are forming

1049: B stars at a range of evolutionary stages.

1050: 

1051: In two regions, IRAS 20126 and IRAS 22172, the central massive

1052: star formation sites are embedded in a bright large scale

1053: structure which is prominent in the 8.0 $\mu$m band. These two

1054: structures are externally heated rimmed clouds.

1055: 

1056: \section{Discussion}

1057: 

1058: \subsection{Clustering} \label{dis_cluster}

1059: One of the distinctive features of massive star formation is that

1060: it occurs in clusters. Consequently, understanding the role of

1061: clustering in the formation of high-mass stars is an essential

1062: step toward a theory of massive star formation. A controversial

1063: issue is whether clusters are necessary for the formation of

1064: high-mass stars, or whether clusters are merely the byproduct of

1065: the formation of high-mass stars in dense massive molecular cores.

1066: In a near-infrared survey of intermediate-mass Herbig Ae/Be stars,

1067: \citet{Testi99} found a smooth transition between the low density

1068: aggregates of young stars associated with stars of spectral type A

1069: or later, and the dense clusters associated with O and early-B

1070: type stars. They argued that the presence of dense clusters is

1071: required for the formation of high-mass stars. The smooth

1072: transition suggested that there may be a fundamental relationship

1073: between the mass of the most massive star and the number and/or

1074: density of stars in a cluster. However, \citet{deWit05} found

1075: evidence that 4\% of O stars form in isolation. This is evidence

1076: that clusters are not necessary for the formation of O stars,

1077: although \citet{Parker07} argued that the isolated O stars may

1078: actually form in small clusters.

1079: 

1080: To test whether massive stars can form without low-mass stars

1081: requires identification of young massive objects without

1082: associated clusters of low-mass stars; only in these cases, can we

1083: rule out the possibility that an attendant cluster dispersed due

1084: to dynamical evolution. In a $K$-band survey of eight high-mass

1085: star forming cores, \citet{Megeath04} found one core, NGC 6334

1086: I(North), showing evidence of high-mass star formation without

1087: evidence for a cluster of embedded low-mass stars \citep[also see

1088: ][]{Megeath99, Hunter06}, although a cluster may still exist

1089: deeply embedded in the cloud \citep{Persi05}. It is important to

1090: search for other potential examples of massive star formation

1091: without the presence of a dense cluster. With its ability to

1092: identify YSOs through infrared excesses and detect deeply embedded

1093: protostars, \emph{Spitzer} is well suited to this task. Although

1094: such regions may yet form clusters, the identification of

1095: high-mass young or protostars without a dense cluster would

1096: demonstrate that low-mass stars are not required for the formation

1097: of massive stars.

1098: 

1099: Our survey of young intermediate- to high-mass (proto)stars

1100: ($\sim10^3$ to $10^5L_{\odot}$) can directly address the role of

1101: clustering in the early stages of intermediate- and high-mass

1102: forming stars. The {\it Spitzer} data provides the ability to

1103: directly identify likely YSOs by the detection of mid-infrared

1104: excesses. The advantage of this approach over previous

1105: near-infrared source counting methods is that the sample does not

1106: significantly suffer from contamination by background stars which

1107: can be significant for high-mass star forming regions in the

1108: Galactic plane \citep{Pratap99}. Also, the mid-infrared colors are

1109: much more sensitive to protostellar objects, and candidate

1110: protostellar objects can be identified through their colors.

1111: However, the bright mid-infrared nebulosity in high-mass star

1112: forming regions, the $\sim2-3''$ angular resolution of the IRAC

1113: data, and the modest sensitivity of the 2MASS photometry limit the

1114: detection of sources, in particular in regions of bright

1115: nebulosity. We expect the census of YSOs to be incomplete in all

1116: of the regions. Furthermore, we expect that a certain fraction of

1117: the stars do not have disks and will not be identified in our

1118: analysis; the fraction of stars without disks is approximately

1119: 30\% for 1 Myr old low-mass stars \citep{Hernandez07}.

1120: 

1121: We group the objects by their total far-infrared luminosity, as

1122: measured from the IRAS point source catalog; this luminosity will

1123: be dominated by the most massive objects in the regions. In all

1124: the regions, associated low-mass YSOs are detected.  The

1125: $\sim10^3L_{\odot}$ regions, AFGL 5142, G192, IRAS 05358 and IRAS

1126: 20293, show parsec sized clusters with around 20 YSOs surrounded

1127: by a more extended and sparse distribution of young stars and

1128: protostars. The $\sim10^4L_{\odot}$ regions IRAS 19410 and HH

1129: 80-81 also show clusters and extended components. Except AFGL

1130: 5142, the clusters associated with these regions do not show

1131: concentrations of stars toward the central massive objects. This

1132: may be due to the decrease in completeness toward the bright

1133: nebulosities in the central regions. Finally, the

1134: $10^{5.1}L_{\odot}$ region W75\,N shows a cluster that is both

1135: richer and more spatially extended. This region also shows a

1136: paucity of sources in the bright nebulous center of the region,

1137: further indicating the observations are significantly limited by

1138: completeness.

1139: 

1140: In Figure \ref{fig17} we plot the number of sources as a function

1141: of the source luminosity. To mitigate the effects of

1142: incompleteness on our samples, we plot the number of sources with

1143: 3.6 $\mu$m magnitudes lower than 13 and 14. Given a typical

1144: $Ks-[3.6]$ color of 0.25, an extinction of $A_K\sim0.25$ at 1.8

1145: kpc, and an age of 1 Myr, these limits correspond to masses of 1.2

1146: and 0.5 $M_{\odot}$ \citep{Baraffe98}. The two plots show a trend

1147: of increasing number of associated YSOs with increasing total

1148: luminosity. In particular, the number of YSOs in the

1149: $10^{5.1}L_{\odot}$ region (W75\,N) is significant higher than

1150: those in $\sim10^4L_{\odot}$ regions, which again are somewhat

1151: higher in number than the $\sim10^3L_{\odot}$ regions. It is

1152: possible that a trend of increasing incompleteness with higher

1153: far-infrared luminosities is decreasing the slope of this trend.

1154: 

1155: There are two main exceptions to this trend: IRAS 22172 and IRAS

1156: 20126. IRAS 22172 appears to be part of a larger, potentially more

1157: evolved region which has undergone significant gas clearing. The

1158: clearing of the gas would also lower the fraction of light

1159: absorbed by dust and re-emitted in the infrared; hence this region

1160: shows a large number of stars for its measured IRAS far-infrared

1161: luminosity. The other exception is IRAS 20126, which has the

1162: lowest number of associated YSOs in the sample. Unlike the other

1163: regions, IRAS 20126 shows no obvious cluster in the field. This is

1164: unlikely to be solely the effects of incompleteness, with the

1165: average signal of about 2.5 MJy/sr at 4.5 $\mu$m and 52 MJy/sr at

1166: 8.0 $\mu$m in the central parsec area, compared to 6.5 MJy/sr at

1167: 4.5 $\mu$m and 67 MJy/sr at 8.0 $\mu$m for HH 80-81 and 3.8 MJy/sr

1168: at 4.5 $\mu$m and 72 MJy/sr at 8.0 $\mu$m for IRAS 19410.

1169: 

1170: More rigorous studies of this sample await deeper near-infrared

1171: data to complement the {\it Spitzer} 3.6 and 4.5 $\mu$m imaging.

1172: However, the analysis here already illustrates several features.

1173: First, there does seem to be a trend of the number of associated

1174: YSOs with luminosity. Second, these regions show both clusters in

1175: the central 1 pc as well as more extended halos of sources around

1176: the clusters. Finally, there does seem to be a significant

1177: dispersion in the number of associated YSOs for a given total

1178: far-infrared luminosity, with one luminous source, IRAS 20126,

1179: showing no obvious cluster. The lack of a cluster warrants future

1180: work; if confirmed this would demonstrate that the formation of

1181: $\sim10^4L_{\odot}$ sources is not dependent on the presence of

1182: deep clusters.

1183: 

1184: \subsection{Outflows and Outflow Cavities}

1185: For a sample of nine high-mass star forming regions associated

1186: with CO and/or SiO outflows, the deep IRAC imaging reveals

1187: outflows and outflow cavities toward eight regions, illustrating

1188: that the IRAC imaging can be an effective tool for outflow

1189: detection. For the jets in IRAS 05358, AFGL 5142, IRAS 20293, the

1190: bow-shock shells in W75\,N, and the nebulosities in the eastern

1191: lobe of the G192 outflow, the prominence in the 4.5 $\mu$m band

1192: and coincidence with the ground-based 2.12 $\mu$m H$_2$ detections

1193: (if detected in the 2.12 $\mu$m H$_2$ line) suggest the emission

1194: is mostly attributed to shocked H$_2$ emission, although the

1195: contribution from H{\scriptsize I} Br$\alpha$ (4.052 $\mu$m), CO

1196: v=1-0 (4.45-4.95 $\mu$m) lines cannot be ruled out without

1197: spectroscopic observations. A detailed investigation of the

1198: emission in the biconical cavity in IRAS 20126 shows strong

1199: evidence for the scattered light being dominant in the 3.6 and 4.5

1200: $\mu$m bands (Qiu et al., in prep.). The elliptical structure in

1201: IRAS 19410 appears relatively diffuse and most prominent in the

1202: 3.6 $\mu$m band. The emission in this outflow can be dominated by

1203: the scattered light as well. The clear prominence of the biconical

1204: structure in HH 80-81 suggested is dominated by UV heated

1205: hydrocarbon emission.

1206: 

1207: \subsubsection{An evolutionary picture of massive outflows?}

1208: Both theoretical models and high spatial resolution observations

1209: suggest an evolutionary scenario for low-mass outflows: as

1210: low-mass stars evolve from class 0 through class I to class II

1211: stages, the mass loading in the winds and density structure in the

1212: cores conspire the widening of outflows \citep{Fuller02, Arce06,

1213: Shang07}. While for massive outflows, whether an evolutionary

1214: picture exists is unknown \citep{Beuther05}.

1215: 

1216: The detected outflows in the sample show dramatically different

1217: morphologies. We detect highly collimated jets, bow-shock shells,

1218: and biconical cavities. Given the extreme complexity of the CO

1219: observations \citep{Beuther03} and relatively confused emission in

1220: the IRAC imaging compared with the other regions, we leave out the

1221: IRAS 19410 outflow in the following discussion. Considering Jet1

1222: in IRAS 05358, the short jet in AFGL 5142, and the jet in IRAS

1223: 20293, the IRAC observations reveal the internal driving agents of

1224: well collimated CO outflows in these regions. The powering sources

1225: of Jet1 in IRAS 05358 and the short jet in AFGL 5142 are suggested

1226: to be deeply embedded proto-B stars, toward which only very weak

1227: radio continuum was detected \citep{Beuther07,Zhang07}. The jet in

1228: IRAS 20293 is most likely driven by an intermediate-mass protostar

1229: showing no detectable centimeter emission \citep{Beuther04b}. In

1230: contrast, the large scale CO outflows in W75\,N and G192 appear to

1231: be poorly collimated within $\lesssim0.5$ pc from the central

1232: driving sources. In W75\,N, proper-motion observations of water

1233: masers by \citet{Torrelles03} delineated a non-collimated, shell

1234: outflow at a 160 AU scale expanding in multiple directions with

1235: respective to the UC H{\scriptsize II} region VLA 2, which may

1236: drive the large scale CO outflow as suggested by

1237: \citet{Shepherd03}. The bipolar bow-shaped structure beyond

1238: $\sim1$ pc detected in the 2.12 $\mu$m H$_2$ and the IRAC 4.5

1239: $\mu$m imaging could be the remanent of a collimated component.

1240: For the G192 outflow, no collimated component can be found within

1241: $\sim2.4$ pc from the driving source. The proposed central driving

1242: sources of these two poorly collimated outflows are found to be

1243: surrounded by UC H{\scriptsize II} regions. If we adopt the

1244: centimeter free-free emission as an indicator of the relative

1245: evolution between these sources, there seems to be a trend of

1246: evolution for the related outflows: both internal driving agents

1247: and entrained molecular outflows appear to be highly collimated

1248: for the youngest sources (e.g., IRAS 05358, AFGL 5142, IRAS

1249: 20293); as the central source evolves to form a significant UC

1250: H{\scriptsize II} region, only poorly collimated outflow

1251: structures can be found around the central driving source (e.g.,

1252: W75\,N, G192).

1253: 

1254: For the IRAS 20126 outflow, it remains ambiguous whether it is

1255: merely composed of a precessing jet and consequently larger

1256: structures are all entrained/swept-up by this jet or it has a

1257: jet-like component as well as a biconical component with a

1258: moderate opening angle. Toward the central driving source of this

1259: outflow, very weak centimeter continuum was detected, presumably

1260: suggesting the source being at a very young evolutionary stage.

1261: For the HH 80-81 outflow, our \emph{Spitzer} data and previous

1262: centimeter continuum reveal a remarkable two-component outflow

1263: with a biconical cavity surrounding an axial radio jet. Strong

1264: centimeter continuum was detected toward the central driving

1265: source of the HH 80-81 outflow, presumably suggesting the source

1266: being relatively more evolved compared with that of IRAS 20126.

1267: The outflow cavity of HH 80-81 also shows emission in the

1268: mid-infrared hydrocarbon features, suggesting that UV radiation

1269: from the central sources are heating the cavity walls. Therefore,

1270: if the IRAC biconical cavity in IRAS 20126 is a complementary less

1271: collimated component of the previously detected SiO jet, there

1272: will be a large evolutionary time scale for the existence of both

1273: a highly collimated jet-like component and a less collimated

1274: biconical component for outflows from proto-B stars. With the

1275: existing data it is very difficult to determine whether the

1276: central source of IRAS 20126 is more evolved than those of AFGL

1277: 5142 and IRAS 05358, and whether the central source of HH 80-81 is

1278: younger than those of W75\,N and G192. Presumably it is likely

1279: that the IRAS 20126 and HH 80-81 outflows, with the former being

1280: younger, represent evolutionary stages between that of the AFGL

1281: 5142 \& IRAS 05358 outflows, for which both internal driving

1282: agents and entrained gas appear well collimated, and that of the

1283: W75\,N \& G192 outflows, for which only poorly collimated

1284: structures can be found around the central driving sources.

1285: 

1286: However, such a trend is only a tentative interpretation based on

1287: current observations of a small sample. The question whether there

1288: is an evolutionary picture for massive outflows is far from

1289: conclusive, and remains an observational challenge. In high-mass

1290: star forming regions, multiple outflows with complicated

1291: structures are often detected. Due to relatively larger distances

1292: and crowded clustering mode, it is very difficult with the current

1293: facilities to reliably identify the driving source of a massive

1294: outflow. Also resolving the launching zone of a massive outflow,

1295: which is of great importance for investigate driving mechanisms,

1296: requires extremely high spatial resolution and high sensitivity.

1297: In addition, observations of outflows in more luminous objects

1298: ($L\,{\gtrsim}\,10^5L_{\odot}$), in particular high spatial

1299: resolution observations, are still rare (the combined bolometric

1300: luminosity of UC H{\scriptsize II} regions in MM-1 in W75\,N is

1301: $10^{4.6}L_{\odot}$). Extensive and comprehensive studies of

1302: outflows in this luminosity regime would be crucial for testing

1303: possible evolutionary scenarios of massive outflows and

1304: understanding formation processes of O type stars.

1305: 

1306: \section{Summary}

1307: We have described initial results of mid-infrared imaging

1308: observations toward nine high-mass star forming regions made with

1309: the IRAC and MIPS cameras onboard \emph{Spitzer}. The regions were

1310: selected for the presence of luminous ($> 10^3$~L${_\odot}$) young

1311: objects driving molecular outflows. The observed fields are

1312: approximately $5'\times5'$, corresponding to physical widths of

1313: $\sim2.5-3.5$ pc for the source distances ranging from

1314: $\sim1.7-2.4$ kpc.

1315: 

1316: Using the $3-24\,\mu$m \emph{Spitzer} photometry in combination

1317: with near-infrared 2MASS data, we identify a total of 417 YSOs

1318: with infrared excesses attributed to circumstellar disks or

1319: envelopes, including at least 12 candidates of intermediate- to

1320: high-mass young stars. In most regions, the spatial distribution

1321: of these YSOs shows both a cluster component centered on the sites

1322: of massive star formation as well as a more extended distribution

1323: of YSOs outside the cluster. The number of YSOs grows with the

1324: total far-infrared luminosity, with two significant exceptions:

1325: IRAS 22172 appears to be part of a larger, more evolved region;

1326: IRAS 20126 appears to be a $10^4$\,L$_{\odot}$ protostar with only

1327: 19 associated YSOs and no central cluster.

1328: 

1329: Zooming in on the central massive star formation sites, we search

1330: for infrared counterparts toward millimeter continuum sources

1331: identified in interferometer observations. We detected

1332: counterparts for eight millimeter continuum sources in the IRAC

1333: bands or MIPS 24 $\mu$m band. These eight sources appear to be

1334: natal cores of proto-B stars driving molecular outflows. All of

1335: the regions of massive star formation have bright associated

1336: nebulosity from scattered light, shocked H$_2$ and/or UV heated

1337: hydrocarbon emission features. This nebulosity limits the

1338: completeness of our YSO survey in the central areas.

1339: 

1340: The deep IRAC imaging detects features associated with 12 outflows

1341: in eight of the surveyed regions. Compared with previous

1342: ground-based observations, our IRAC observations confirm previous

1343: 2.12 $\mu$m H$_2$ jets or bow-shock shaped structures in AFGL

1344: 5142, IRAS 05358, and W75\,N (the large bow-shock shaped

1345: structure), and previous H${\scriptsize \alpha}$/[S{\scriptsize

1346: II}] features in G192; reveal new structures in HH 80-81, IRAS

1347: 20126, and IRAS 19410; detect a new H$_2$ jet in IRAS 20293 and a

1348: new bow-shock shaped structure in W75\,N (the small bow-shock

1349: shaped structure). In one case, HH 80-81, the inner surface of the

1350: outflow cavity shows strong 8 $\mu$m emission indicative of

1351: hydrocarbons heated by UV radiation. Based on the morphological

1352: variations of the detected outflows in conjunction with previous

1353: observations, we outline a possible evolutionary picture for

1354: massive outflows.

1355: 

1356: UV heated reflection nebulae dominated by hydrocarbon emission in

1357: the 8.0 $\mu$m band can be found in most regions. They may imply

1358: the presence of relatively more evolved young B stars. Externally

1359: heated bright rimmed clouds are found in IRAS 20126 and IRAS

1360: 22172.

1361: 

1362: 

1363: \acknowledgments We are grateful to Luis F. Rodr\'{i}guez for

1364: providing us the VLA cm data on HH 80-81. This work is based on

1365: observations made with the \emph{Spitzer} Space Telescope, which

1366: is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute

1367: of Technology under a contract with the National Aeronautics and

1368: Space Administration (NASA). This publication makes use of data

1369: products form the Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint

1370: project of the University of Massachusetts and the Infrared

1371: Processing and Analysis Center/California Institute of Technology,

1372: funded by NASA and the National Science Foundation. K. Q.

1373: acknowledges the support of the Grant 10128306 from NSFC. H. B.

1374: acknowledges financial support by the Emmy-Noether-Program of the

1375: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, grant BE2578).

1376: 

1377: 

1378: \begin{thebibliography}{}

1379: \bibitem[Allen et al.(2004)]{Allen04}Allen, L. E., Calvet, N.,

1380: D'Alessio, P., Merin, B., Hartmann, L., Megeath, S. T., Gutermuth,

1381: R. A., Muzerolle, J., Pipher, J. L., Myers, P. C., \& Fazio, G. G.

1382: 2004, \apjs, 154, 363

1383: \bibitem[Arce \& Sargent(2006)]{Arce06}Arce, H. G. \& Sargent, A. I.

1384: 2006, ApJ, 646, 1070

1385: \bibitem[Aspin \& Geballe(1992)]{Aspin92}Aspin, C. \& Geballe, T. R.

1386: 1992, \aap, 266, 219

1387: \bibitem[Aspin et al.(1991)]{Aspin91}Aspin, C., McCaughrean, M.

1388: J., Casali, M. M., \& Geballe, T. R. 1991, \aap, 252, 299

1389: \bibitem[Aspin et al.(1994)]{Aspin94}Aspin, C., Puxley, P. J.,

1390: Blano, P. R., Pi\~{n}a, P. K., Pickup, D. A., Paterson, M. J.,

1391: Sylvester, J., Laird, D. C., Bridger, A., Daly, P. N., \& Griffin,

1392: J. L. 1994, \aap, 292, L9

1393: \bibitem[Benedettini et al.(2004)]{Benedettini04}Benedettini, M.,

1394: Molinari, S., Testi, L., \& Noriega-Crespo, A. 2004, \mnras, 347,

1395: 295

1396: \bibitem[Beuther et al.(2007)]{Beuther07}Beuther, H., Leurini, S.,

1397: Schike, P., Wyrowski, F., Menten, K. M., \& Zhang, Q. 2007, \aap,

1398: 466, 1065

1399: \bibitem[Beuther \& Schilke(2004a)]{Beuther04a}Beuther, H. \& Schilke,

1400: P. 2004a, Science, 303, 1167

1401: \bibitem[Beuther et al.(2004b)]{Beuther04b}Beuther, H., Schike,

1402: P., \& Gueth, F. 2004b, \apj, 608, 330

1403: \bibitem[Beuther et al.(2004c)]{Beuther04c}Beuther, H., Schike,

1404: P., \& Wyrowski, F. 2004c, \apj, 615, 832

1405: \bibitem[Beuther et al.(2002)]{Beuther02}Beuther, H., Schike, P.,

1406: Gueth, F., McCaughrean, M., Andersen, M., Sridharan, T. K., \&

1407: Menten, K. M. 2002, \aap, 387, 931

1408: \bibitem[Beuther et al.(2003)]{Beuther03}Beuther, H., Schike, P.,

1409: \& Stanke, T. 2003, \aap, 408, 601

1410: \bibitem[Beuther \& Shepherd(2005)]{Beuther05}Beuther, H \& Shepherd, D.

1411: S. 2005, in Cores to Clusters: Star Formation With Next Generation

1412: Telescopes, eds. M. S. N. Kumar et al., 105-119

1413: \bibitem[Baraffe et al.(1998)]{Baraffe98}Baraffe, I., Chabrier,

1414: G., Allard, F., \& Hauschildt, P. H. 1998, \aap, 337, 403

1415: \bibitem[Calvet et al.(1994)]{Calvet94}Calvet, N., Hartmann, L.,

1416: Kenyon, S. J., \& Whitney, B. A. 1994, \apj, 434, 330

1417: \bibitem[Cesaroni et al.(1999)]{Cesaroni99}Cesaroni, R., Felli,

1418: M., Jenness, T., Neri, R., Olmi, L., Robberto, M., Testi, L, \&

1419: Walmsley, C. M. 1999, \aap, 345, 949

1420: \bibitem[Cesaroni et al.(1997)]{Cesaroni97}Cesaroni, R., Felli,

1421: M., Testi, L., Walmsley, C. M., \& Olmi, L. 1997, \aap, 325, 725

1422: \bibitem[Cesaroni et al.(2005)]{Cesaroni05}Cesaroni, R., Neri, R.,

1423: Olmi, L., Testi, L., Walmsley, C. M., \& Hofner, P. 2005, \aap,

1424: 434, 1039

1425: \bibitem[Chen et al.(2005)]{Chen05}Chen Y., Yao, Y., Yang, J., \&

1426: Zeng, Q. 2005, \apj, 629, 288

1427: \bibitem[Davis et al.(2007)]{Davis07}Davis, C. J., Kumar, M. S.

1428: N., Sandell, G., Froebrich, D., Smith, M. D., \& Currie, M. J.

1429: 2007, \mnras, 374, 29

1430: \bibitem[Davis et al.(1998)]{Davis98}Davis, C. J., Smith, M. D.,

1431: \& Moriarty-Schieven, G. H. 1998, \mnras, 299, 825

1432: \bibitem[De Buizer(2007)]{DeBuizer07}De Buizer, J. M. 2007,

1433: \apj, 654, L147

1434: \bibitem[Devine et al.(1999)]{Devine99}Devine, D., Bally, J.,

1435: Reipurth, B., Shepherd, D., \& Watson, A. 1999, \aj, 117, 2919

1436: \bibitem[de Wit et al.(2005)]{deWit05}de Wit, W. J., Testi, L.,

1437: Palla, F., \& Zinnecker, H. 2005, \aap, 437, 247

1438: \bibitem[Fazio et al.(2004)]{Fazio04}Fazio, G. G. et al. 2004,

1439: \apjs, 154, 10

1440: \bibitem[Flagey et al.(2006)]{Flagey06}Flagey, N., Boulanger, F.,

1441: Verstraete, L., Miville Desch\^{e}nes, M. A., Grespo, A. N., \&

1442: Reach, W. T. 2006, \aap, 453, 969

1443: \bibitem[Flaherty et al.(2007)]{Flaherty07}Flaherty, K. M.,

1444: Pipher, J. L., Megeath, S. T., Winston, E. M., Gutermuth, R. A.,

1445: Muzerolle, J., Allen, L. E., \& Fazio, G. G. 2007, \apj, 663, 1069

1446: \bibitem[Fontani et al.(2004)]{Fontani04}Fontani, F., Cesanori,

1447: R., Testi, L., Molinari, S., Zhang, Q., Brand, J., \& Walmsley, C.

1448: M. 2004, \aap, 424, 179

1449: \bibitem[Fuller \& Ladd(2002)]{Fuller02}Fuller, G. A. \& Ladd, E.

1450: F. 2002, ApJ, 573, 699

1451: \bibitem[G\'{o}mez et al.(2003)]{Gomez03}G\'{o}mez, Y.,

1452: Rodr\'{i}guez, L. F., Girart, J. M., Garay, G., \& Mart\'{i}, J.

1453: 2003, \apj, 597, 414

1454: \bibitem[Greene et al.(1994)]{Greene94}Greene, T. P., Wilking, B.

1455: A., Andr\'{e}, P., Young, E. T., \& Lada, C. J. 1994, \apj, 434,

1456: 614

1457: \bibitem[Gutermuth et al.(2004)]{Gutermuth04}Gutermuth, R. A.,

1458: Megeath, S. T., Muzerolle, J. M., Allen, L. E., Pipher, J. L.,

1459: Myers, P. C., \& Fazio, G. G. 2004, \apjs, 154, 374

1460: \bibitem[Gutermuth et al.(2005)]{Gutermuth05}Gutermuth, R. A.,

1461: Megeath, S. T., Pipher, J. L., Williams, J. P., Allen, L. E.,

1462: Myers, P. C., \& Raines, N. 2005, \apj, 632, 397

1463: \bibitem[Gutermuth et al.(2007)]{Gutermuth07}Gutermuth, R. A.,

1464: Myers, P. C., Megeath, S. T., Allen, L. E., Pipher, J. L,

1465: Muzerolle, J., Porras, A., Winston, E., \& Fazio, G. 2008, \apj,

1466: 674, 336

1467: \bibitem[Hartmann et al.(2005)]{Hartmann05}Hartmann, L., Megeath,

1468: S. T., Allen, L., Luhman, K., Calvet, N., D'Alessio, P.,

1469: Franco-Hernandez, R., \& Fazio, G. 2005, \apj, 629, 881

1470: \bibitem[Hatchell et al.(2007)]{Hatchell07}Hatchell, J., Fuller,

1471: G. A., Richer, J. S., Harries, T. J., \& Ladd, E. F. 2007, \aap,

1472: 468, 1009

1473: \bibitem[Haschick et al.(1981)]{Haschick81}Haschick, A. D., Reid,

1474: M. J., Burke, B. F., Moran, J. M., \& Miller, G. 1981, \apj, 244,

1475: 76

1476: \bibitem[Hern\'{a}ndez et al.(2007)]{Hernandez07}Hern\'{a}ndez,

1477: J., Hartmann, L., Megeath, S. T., Gutermuth, R., Muzerolle, J.,

1478: Calvet, N., Vivas, A. K., Briceno, C., Allen, L, Stuffer, J.,

1479: Young, E., \& Fazio, G. 2007, \apj, 662, 1067

1480: \bibitem[Hofner et al.(2007)]{Hofner07}Hofner, P., Cesaroni, R.,

1481: Olmi, L., Rodr\'{i}guez, L. F., Mart\'{i}, J., \& Araya, E. 2007,

1482: \aap, 465, 197

1483: \bibitem[Hofner et al.(1999)]{Hofner99}Hofner, P., Cesaroni, R.,

1484: Rodr\'{i}guez, L. F., \& Mart\'{i}, J. 1999, \aap, 345, L43

1485: \bibitem[Hora et al.(2004)]{Hora04}Hora J. L. et al. 2004, Proc.

1486: SPIE, 5487, 77

1487: \bibitem[Hunter et al.(2006)]{Hunter06}Hunter, T. R., Brogan, C.

1488: L., Megeath, S. T., Menten, K. M., Beuther, H., \& Thorwirth, S.

1489: 2006, \apj, 649, 888

1490: \bibitem[Hunter et al.(1994)]{Hunter94}Hunter, T. R., Taylor, G.

1491: B., Felli, M., \& Tofani, G. 1994, \aap, 284, 215

1492: \bibitem[Hunter et al.(1995)]{Hunter95}Hunter, T. R., Testi, L.,

1493: Taylor, G. B., Tofani, G., Felli, M., \& Phillips, T. G. 1995,

1494: \aap, 302, 249

1495: \bibitem[Jiang et al.(2001)]{Jiang01}Jiang, Z., Yao, Y., Yang, J.,

1496: Ishii, M., Nagata, T., Nakaya, H., \& Sato, S. 2001, \aj, 122, 313

1497: \bibitem[Kumar et al.(2002)]{Kumar02}Kumar, M. S. N., Bachiller,

1498: R., \& Davis, C. J. 2002, \apj, 576, 313

1499: \bibitem[Kumar \& Grave(2007)]{Kumar07}Kumar, M. S. N. \& Grave,

1500: J. M. C. 2007, \aap, 472, 155

1501: \bibitem[Kumar et al.(2006)]{Kumar06}Kumar, M. S. N., Keto, E., \&

1502: Clerkin, E. 2006, \aap, 449, 1033

1503: \bibitem[Lada \& Lada(2003)]{Lada03}Lada, C. J. \& Lada, E. A.

1504: 2003, \araa, 41, 57

1505: \bibitem[Lebr\'{o}n et al.(2006)]{Lebron06}Lebron, M., Beuther,

1506: H., Schike, P., \& Stanke, Th. 2006, \aap, 448, 1037

1507: \bibitem[Lee et al.(2006)]{Lee06}Lee, C.-F., Ho, P. T. P.,

1508: Beuther, H., Bourke, T. L., Zhang, Q., Hirano, N., \& Shang, H.

1509: 2006, \apj, 639, 292

1510: \bibitem[Longmore et al.(2006)]{Longmore06}Longmore, S. N.,

1511: Burton, M. G., Minier, V., \& Walsh, A. J. 2006, \mnras, 369, 1196

1512: \bibitem[Mart\'{i} et al.(1993)]{Marti93}Mart\'{i}, J.,

1513: Rodgr\'{i}guez, L. F., \& Reipurth, B., 1993, \apj, 416, 208

1514: \bibitem[Mart\'{i} et al.(1995)]{Marti95}Mart\'{i}, J.,

1515: Rodgr\'{i}guez, L. F., \& Reipurth, B., 1995, \apj, 449, 184

1516: \bibitem[Mart\'{i} et al.(1998)]{Marti98}Mart\'{i}, J.,

1517: Rodgr\'{i}guez, L. F., \& Reipurth, B., 1998, \apj, 502, 337

1518: \bibitem[Mart\'{i} et al.(1999)]{Marti99}Mart\'{i}, J.,

1519: Rodgr\'{i}guez, L. F., \& Torrelles, J. M. 1999, \aap, 345, L5

1520: \bibitem[Megeath et al.(2004)]{Megeath04}Megeath, S. T., Allen, L.

1521: E., Gutermuth, R. A., Pipher, J. L., Myers, P. C., Calvet, N.,

1522: Hartmann, L., Muzerolle, J. \& Fazio, G. G. 2004, \apjs, 154, 367

1523: \bibitem[Megeath \& Tieftrunk(1999)]{Megeath99}Megeath, S. T. \&

1524: Tieftrunk, A. R. 1999, \apj, 526, L113

1525: \bibitem[Molinari et al.(2002)]{Molinari02}Molinari, S., Testi,

1526: L., Rodr\'{i}guez, L. F., \& Zhang, Q. 2002, \apj, 570, 758

1527: \bibitem[Moore et al.(1991)]{Moore91}Moore, T. J. T., Mountain, C.

1528: M., \& Yamashita, T. 1991, \mnras, 248, 79

1529: \bibitem[Muzerolle et al.(2004)]{Muzerolle04}Muzerolle, J.,

1530: Megeath, S. T., Gutermuth, R. A., Allen, L. E., Pipher, J. L.,

1531: Hartmann, L., Gordon, K. D., Padgett, D. L., Noriega-Crespo, A.,

1532: Myers, P. C., Fazio, G. G., Rieke, G. H., Young, E. T., Morrison,

1533: J. E., Hines, D. C., Su, K. Y. L., Engelbracht, C. W., \& Misselt,

1534: K. A. 2004, \apjs, 154, 379

1535: \bibitem[Nissen et al.(2007)]{Nissen07}Nissen, H. D., Gustafsson,

1536: M., Lemaire, J. L., Cl\'{e}net, Y., Rouan, D., \& Field, D. 2007,

1537: \aap, 466, 949

1538: \bibitem[Noriega-Crespo et al.(2004a)]{Noriega04a}Noriega-Crespo,

1539: A., Moro-Martin, A. Garay, S., Morris, P. W., Padgett, D. L.,

1540: Latter, W. B., \& Muzerolle, J. 2004a, \apjs, 154, 402

1541: \bibitem[Noriega-Crespo et al.(2004b)]{Noriega04b}Noriega-Crespo,

1542: A., Morris, P., Marleau, F. R., Carey, S., Boogert, A., van

1543: Dishoeck, E., Evans II, N. J., Keene, J., Muzerolle, J.,

1544: Stapelfeldt, K., Pontoppidan, K., Lowrance, P., Allen, L., \&

1545: Bourke, T. L. 2004b, \apjs, 154, 352

1546: \bibitem[Palau et al.(2006)]{Palau06}Palau, A., Ho, P. T. P.,

1547: Zhang, Q., Estalella, R., Hirano, N., Shang, H., Lee, C.-F.,

1548: Bourke, T. L., Beuther, H., \& Kuan, Y.-J. 2006, \apj, 636, L137

1549: \bibitem[Palau et al.(2007)]{Palau07}Palau, A., Estalella, R.,

1550: Girart, J. M., Ho, P. T. P., Zhang, Q., \& Beuther, H. 2007, \aap,

1551: 465, 219

1552: \bibitem[Parker \& Goodwin(2007)]{Parker07}Parker, R. J.

1553: \& Goodwin, S. P. 2007, \mnras, 380, 1271

1554: \bibitem[Persi et al.(2006)]{Persi06}Persi, P., Tapia, M., \&

1555: Smith, H. A. 2006, \aap, 445, 971

1556: \bibitem[Persi et al.(2005)]{Persi05}Persi, P., Tapia, M., Roth,

1557: M., G\'{o}mez, M., \& Marenzi, A. R. 2005, in Proceedings of IAU

1558: Symposium No. 227, Massive Star Birth: A Crossroad of

1559: Astrophysics, eds. Cesaroni, R. et al., 291-296

1560: \bibitem[Pipher et al.(2004)]{Pipher04}Pipher, J. L. et al. 2004,

1561: Proc. SPIE, 5487, 234

1562: \bibitem[Porras et al.(2000)]{Porras00}Porras, A.,

1563: Cruz-Gonz\'{a}lez, I., \& Salas, L. 2000, \aap, 361, 660

1564: \bibitem[Pratap et al.(1999)]{Pratap99}Pratap, P., Megeath, S. T.,

1565: \& Bergin, E. A. 1999, \apj, 517, 799

1566: \bibitem[Raga et al.(2004)]{Raga04}Raga, A. C., Noriega-Crespo,

1567: A., Gonz\'{a}lez, R. F., \& Vel\'{a}zquez, P. F. 2004, \apjs, 154,

1568: 346

1569: \bibitem[Reach et al.(2005)]{Reach05}Reach, W. T. et al. 2005,

1570: \pasp, 117, 978

1571: \bibitem[Rieke et al.(2004)]{Rieke04}Rieke, G. H. et al. 2004,

1572: \apjs, 154, 25

1573: \bibitem[Robitaille et al.(2006)]{Robitaille06}Robitaille, T. P.,

1574: Whitney, B. A., Indebetouw, R., Wood, K., \& Denzmore, P. 2006,

1575: \apjs, 167, 256

1576: \bibitem[Rho et al.(2006)]{Rho06}Rho, J., Reach, W. T., Lefloch, B., \&

1577: Fazio, G. G. 2006, \apj, 643, 965

1578: \bibitem[Schultz et al.(1999)]{Schultz99}Schultz, A. S. B.,

1579: Colgan, S. W. J., Erickson, E. F., Kaufman, M. J., Hollenbach, D.

1580: J., O'dell C. R., Young, E. T., \& Chen, H. 1999, \apj, 511, 282

1581: \bibitem[Shang et al.(2007)]{Shang07}Shang, H., Li, Z.-Y., \&

1582: Hirano, N. 2007, in Protostars and Planets V., eds. B. Reipurth,

1583: D. Jewitt, \& K. Keil, 261-276

1584: \bibitem[Shepherd(2001)]{Shepherd01}Shepherd, D. S. 2001, \apj,

1585: 546, 345

1586: \bibitem[Shepherd et al.(2004a)]{Shepherd04a}Shepherd, D. S.,

1587: Borders, T., Claussen, M., Shirley, Y., \& Kurtz, S. 2004a, \apj,

1588: 614, 211

1589: \bibitem[Shepherd et al.(1999)]{Shepherd99}Shepherd, D. S. \&

1590: Kurtz, S. E. 1999, \apj, 523, 690

1591: \bibitem[Shepherd et al.(2004b)]{Shepherd04b}Shepherd, D. S., Kurtz,

1592: S. E., \& Testi, L. 2004b, \apj, 601, 952

1593: \bibitem[Shepherd et al.(2003)]{Shepherd03}Shepherd, D. S., Testi,

1594: L., \& Stark, D. P. 2003, \apj, 584, 882

1595: \bibitem[Shepherd et al.(1998)]{Shepherd98}Shepherd, D. S.,

1596: Watson, A. M., Sargent, A. I., \& Churchwell, E. 1998, \apj, 507,

1597: 861

1598: \bibitem[Shepherd et al.(2000)]{Shepherd00}Shepherd, D. S., Yu, K.

1599: C., Bally, J., \& Testi, L. 2000, \apj, 535, 833

1600: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2006)]{Smith06}Smith, H. A., Hora, J. L., \&

1601: Marengo, M. 2006, \apj, 645, 1264

1602: \bibitem[Smith \& Rosen(2005)]{Smith05}Smith, M. D. \& Rosen, A.

1603: 2005, \mnras, 357, 1370

1604: \bibitem[Sollins \& Megeath(2004)]{Sollins04}Sollins, P. K. \& Megeath,

1605: S. T. 2004, \aj, 128, 2374

1606: \bibitem[Sridharan et al.(2005)]{Sridharan05}Sridharan, T. K.,

1607: Williams, S. J., \& Fuller, G. A. 2005, \apj, 631, L73

1608: \bibitem[Stecklum et al.(1997)]{Stecklum97}Stecklum, B., Feldt,

1609: M., Richichi, A., Calamai, G., \& Lagage, P. O. 1997, \apj, 479,

1610: 339

1611: \bibitem[Stern et al.(2005)]{Stern05}Stern, D., Eisenhardt, P.,

1612: Gorjian, V. et al. 2005, \apj, 631, 163

1613: \bibitem[Su et al.(2007)]{Su07}Su, Y. N., Liu, S.-Y., Chen, H.-R.,

1614: Zhang, Q., Cesaroni, R. 2007, \apj, accepted

1615: \bibitem[Testi et al.(1999)]{Testi99}Testi, L., Palla, F., \&

1616: Natta, A. 1999, \aap, 342, 515

1617: \bibitem[Tobin et al.(2007)]{Tobin07}Tobin, J. L, Looney, L. W.,

1618: Mundy, L. G., Kwon, W., \& Hamidouche, M. 2007, \apj, 659, 1404

1619: \bibitem[Torrelles et al.(1997)]{Torrelles97}Torrelles, J. M.,

1620: G\'{o}mez, J. F., Rodr\'{i}guez, L. F., Ho, P. T. P., Curiel, S.,

1621: \& V\'{a}zquez, R. 1997, \apj, 489, 744

1622: \bibitem[Torrelles et al.(2003)]{Torrelles03}Torrelles, J. M.,

1623: Patel, N. A., Anglada, G., G\'{o}mez, J. F., Ho, P. T. P., Lada,

1624: L., Alberdi, A., Cant\'{o}, J., Curiel, S., Garay, G., \&

1625: Rodr\'{i}guez, L. F. 2003, \apj, 598, L115

1626: \bibitem[Valusamy et al.(2007)]{Valusamy07}Valusamy, T., William,

1627: D. L., \& Marsh, K. A. 2007, \apj, accepted

1628: \bibitem[van den Ancker et al.(2000)]{vandenAncker00}van den

1629: Ancker, M. E., Tielens, A. G. G. M., \& Wesselius, P. R. 2000,

1630: \aap, 358, 1035

1631: \bibitem[Walther et al.(1990)]{Walther90}Walther, D. M., Aspin,

1632: C., \& Mclean, I. S. 1990, \apj, 356, 544

1633: \bibitem[Winston et al.(2007)]{Winston07}Winston, E., Megeath, S.

1634: T., Wolk, S. J., Muzerolle, J., Gutermuth, R., Hora, J. L., Allen,

1635: L. E., Spitzbart, B., Myers, P., \& Fazio, G. G. 2007, \apj,

1636: accepted

1637: \bibitem[Werner et al.(2004)]{Werner04}Werner, M. W, Uchida, K.

1638: I., Marengo, M., Gordon, K. D., Morris, P. W., Houck, J. R., \&

1639: Stansberry, J. A. 2004, \apjs, 154, 309

1640: \bibitem[Whitney et al.(2004)]{Whitney04}Whitney, B. A.,

1641: Indebetouw, R., Babler, B. L., Meade, M. R., Watson, C., Wolff, M.

1642: G., Clemens, D. P., Bania, T. M., Benjamin, R. A., Cohen, M.,

1643: Devine, K. E.,, Dickey, J. M., Heitsch, F., Jackson, J. M.,

1644: Kobulnicky, H. A., Marston, A. P., Mathis, J. S., Mercer, E. P.,

1645: Stauffer, J. R., Stolovy, S. R., \& Churchwell, E. 2004, \apjs,

1646: 154, 315

1647: \bibitem[Whitney et al.(2003)]{Whitney03}Whitney, B. A., Wood, K.,

1648: Bjorkman, J. E., \& Cohen, M. 2003, \apj, 598, 1079

1649: \bibitem[Yamashita et al.(1991)]{Yamashita91}Yamshita, T., Murata,

1650: Y., Kawabe, R., Kaifu, N., \& Tamura, M. 1991, \apj, 373, 560

1651: \bibitem[Yamashita et al.(1989)]{Yamashita89}Yamashita, T.,

1652: Suzuki, H., Kaifu, N., \& Tamura, M. 1989, \apj, 347, 894

1653: \bibitem[Zhang et al.(2007)]{Zhang07}Zhang, Q., Hunter, T. R.,

1654: Beuther, H., Sridharan, T. K., Liu, S.-Y., Su, Y.-N., Chen, H.-R.,

1655: \& Chen, Y. 2007, 658, 1152

1656: 

1657: \end{thebibliography}

1658: 

1659: \clearpage

1660: 

1661: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccc}

1662: \tablewidth{0pc} \tabletypesize{\scriptsize} \tablecaption{Summary

1663: of the Sample \label{source}}

1664: 

1665: \tablehead{ \colhead{} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Reference Center} &

1666: \colhead{IRAS Luminosity} & \colhead{Distance} & \colhead{} \\

1667: \cline{2-3} \\[-2ex] \raisebox{2.3ex}[0pt]{Source Name} &

1668: \colhead{RA(J2000)} & \colhead{DEC(J2000)} &

1669: \colhead{($L_{\odot}$)} & \colhead{(kpc)} &

1670: \raisebox{2.3ex}[0pt]{Number of Identified YSOs}}

1671: 

1672: \startdata

1673: AFGL 5142         &  05 30 48.00  & +33 47 53.8  & $10^{3.4}$ &  1.8 & 44 \\

1674: IRAS 05358+3543   &  05 39 12.78  & +35 45 50.6  & $10^{3.8}$ &  1.8 & 30 \\

1675: G192.16-3.82      &  05 58 13.52  & +16 31 58.3  & $10^{3.4}$ &  2.0 & 31 \\

1676: HH 80-81          &  18 19 12.09  & -20 47 30.9  & $10^{4.2}$ &  1.7 & 48 \\

1677: IRAS 19410+2336   &  19 43 11.00  & +23 44 35.0  & $10^{4.0}$ &  2.1 & 46 \\

1678: IRAS 20126+4104   &  20 14 26.00  & +41 13 32.0  & $10^{4.0}$ &  1.7 & 19 \\

1679: IRAS 20293+3952   &  20 31 10.70  & +40 03 10.0  & $10^{3.8}$ &  2.0 & 31 \\

1680: W75\,N            &  20 38 36.45  & +42 37 34.0  & $10^{5.1}$ &  2.0 & 77 \\

1681: IRAS 22172+5549   &  22 19 08.60  & +56 05 02.0  & $10^{3.3}$ &  2.4 & 91 \\

1682: \enddata

1683: \end{deluxetable}

1684: 

1685: \clearpage

1686: 

1687: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccccccc}

1688: \tablewidth{0pc} \tabletypesize{\scriptsize} \rotate

1689: \tablecaption{Point Source Detections and Limiting Magnitudes

1690: \label{observation}}

1691: 

1692: \tablehead{ \colhead{} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{3.6 $\mu$m} &

1693: \multicolumn{2}{c}{4.5 $\mu$m} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{5.8 $\mu$m}

1694: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{8.0 $\mu$m} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{24 $\mu$m} \\

1695: \cline{2-3} \cline{4-5} \cline{6-7} \cline{8-9} \cline{10-11} \\[-2ex]

1696: \raisebox{2.3ex}[0pt]{Source Name} & \colhead{number} &

1697: \colhead{limiting mag} & \colhead{number} & \colhead{limiting mag}

1698: & \colhead{number} & \colhead{limiting mag} & \colhead{number} &

1699: \colhead{limiting mag} & \colhead{number} & \colhead{limiting mag}

1700: }

1701: 

1702: \startdata

1703: AFGL 5142         &  517  & 18.206$\pm$0.166 & 545 & 17.790$\pm$0.168 & 193 & 15.849$\pm$0.170 & 128& 15.073$\pm$0.215 & 16 & 9.774$\pm$0.131 \\

1704: IRAS 05358+3543   &  377  & 17.674$\pm$0.120 & 410 & 17.522$\pm$0.185 & 122 & 15.168$\pm$0.187 & 76 & 13.973$\pm$0.124 & 12 & 8.386$\pm$0.148 \\

1705: G192.16-3.82      &  432  & 18.365$\pm$0.158 & 449 & 17.788$\pm$0.156 & 130 & 15.640$\pm$0.199 & 75 & 15.271$\pm$0.200 & 14 & 9.850$\pm$0.084 \\

1706: HH 80-81          &  783  & 16.529$\pm$0.129 & 862 & 16.057$\pm$0.193 & 578 & 15.066$\pm$0.217 & 402& 13.930$\pm$0.239 & 17 & 7.821$\pm$0.184 \\

1707: IRAS 19410+2336   &  750  & 16.385$\pm$0.127 & 844 & 16.181$\pm$0.119 & 411 & 14.807$\pm$0.181 & 203& 13.849$\pm$0.216 & 21 & 7.396$\pm$0.067 \\

1708: IRAS 20126+4104   &  630  & 17.070$\pm$0.146 & 808 & 16.942$\pm$0.155 & 253 & 15.894$\pm$0.241 & 154& 14.807$\pm$0.196 &  7 & 7.834$\pm$0.174 \\

1709: IRAS 20293+3952   &  646  & 16.977$\pm$0.130 & 769 & 16.609$\pm$0.159 & 282 & 14.953$\pm$0.198 & 137& 13.417$\pm$0.159 & 11 & 7.932$\pm$0.133 \\

1710: W75\,N            &  627  & 17.077$\pm$0.140 & 798 & 16.869$\pm$0.194 & 227 & 14.371$\pm$0.235 & 115& 12.732$\pm$0.208 & 11 & 7.894$\pm$0.144 \\

1711: IRAS 22172+5549   &  713  & 17.408$\pm$0.085 & 869 & 17.053$\pm$0.107 & 355 & 15.975$\pm$0.238 & 250& 15.248$\pm$0.196 & 19 & 8.345$\pm$0.093 \\

1712: \enddata

1713: \end{deluxetable}

1714: 

1715: \clearpage

1716: 

1717: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccccccc}

1718: \tablewidth{0pc} \tabletypesize{\scriptsize} \rotate

1719: \tablecaption{YSOs: 2MASS, IRAC, MIPS 24 $\mu$m Photometry

1720: \label{photometry}}

1721: 

1722: \tablehead{ \colhead{RA\tablenotemark{\dag}} &

1723: \colhead{DEC\tablenotemark{\dag}} & \colhead{$J$} & \colhead{$H$}

1724: & \colhead{$Ks$} & \colhead{[3.6]} & \colhead{[4.5]} &

1725: \colhead{[5.8]} & \colhead{[8.0]} &

1726: \colhead{[24]\tablenotemark{\ddag}} &

1727: \colhead{Remark\tablenotemark{\ast}} }

1728: 

1729: \startdata

1730: %\cutinhead{AFGL 5142}

1731:             &             &      &      &      &   AFGL 5142      &                  &                  &                  &      &    \\

1732: \tableline

1733: 05 30 36.61 & +33 49 18.9 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.945$\pm$0.013 & 14.597$\pm$0.015 & 14.330$\pm$0.051 & 13.522$\pm$0.073 &  --- & II \\

1734: 05 30 36.79 & +33 47 18.7 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.672$\pm$0.014 & 14.345$\pm$0.011 & 13.975$\pm$0.053 & 13.331$\pm$0.046 &  --- & II \\

1735: 05 30 37.98 & +33 49 02.2 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 11.907$\pm$0.006 & 11.530$\pm$0.005 & 11.264$\pm$0.006 & 10.540$\pm$0.021 &  7.149$\pm$0.021 & II \\

1736: 05 30 40.18 & +33 46 18.2 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 15.257$\pm$0.016 & 14.343$\pm$0.011 & 13.485$\pm$0.029 & 12.623$\pm$0.029 &  9.156$\pm$0.073 & I \\

1737: 05 30 42.14 & +33 48 32.8 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 15.162$\pm$0.035 & 14.426$\pm$0.036 & 13.428$\pm$0.060 & 12.624$\pm$0.061 &  --- & II \\

1738: 05 30 42.36 & +33 48 15.1 & 12.523$\pm$0.023 & 11.502$\pm$0.022 & 10.905$\pm$0.019 &  9.896$\pm$0.002 &  9.407$\pm$0.002 &  8.877$\pm$0.002 &  8.064$\pm$0.002 &  4.982$\pm$0.035 & II \\

1739: 05 30 42.67 & +33 48 59.7 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.783$\pm$0.012 & 14.573$\pm$0.015 & 14.510$\pm$0.067 & 14.011$\pm$0.099 &  --- & II \\

1740: 05 30 43.39 & +33 46 00.8 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.813$\pm$0.014 & 13.143$\pm$0.014 & 12.439$\pm$0.019 & 11.216$\pm$0.012 &  7.356$\pm$0.021 & I \\

1741: 05 30 45.26 & +33 48 26.9 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.450$\pm$0.031 & 13.467$\pm$0.021 & 12.687$\pm$0.103 & 11.950$\pm$0.175 &  --- & I \\

1742: 05 30 46.06 & +33 47 54.2 & 12.467$\pm$0.026 & 11.303$\pm$0.026 & 10.350$\pm$0.022 &  8.462$\pm$0.014 &  7.806$\pm$0.010 &  5.900$\pm$0.024 &  4.010$\pm$0.032 & $\ll0.626$ & High\tablenotemark{1} \\

1743: 05 30 46.26 & +33 47 20.2 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.489$\pm$0.014 & 12.706$\pm$0.011 & 12.089$\pm$0.124 & 10.928$\pm$0.141 &  --- & I \\

1744: 05 30 47.05 & +33 47 31.5 & 14.889$\pm$0.039 & 13.744$\pm$0.037 & 13.163$\pm$0.032 & 11.996$\pm$0.011 & 11.568$\pm$0.010 & 11.113$\pm$0.067 & 10.261$\pm$0.102 &  --- & II \\

1745: 05 30 47.04 & +33 48 43.3 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.041$\pm$0.019 & 13.631$\pm$0.016 & 13.510$\pm$0.072 & 12.467$\pm$0.049 &  --- & II \\

1746: 05 30 47.10 & +33 45 23.1 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 15.551$\pm$0.032 & 15.094$\pm$0.027 & 14.676$\pm$0.103 & 14.152$\pm$0.118 &  --- & II \\

1747: 05 30 47.11 & +33 50 55.4 & 12.920$\pm$0.023 & 12.725$\pm$0.024 & 12.615$\pm$0.023 & 12.610$\pm$0.004 & 12.201$\pm$0.005 & 12.821$\pm$0.039 & 12.544$\pm$0.072 &  --- & IRe \\

1748: 05 30 47.53 & +33 47 43.3 &  --- & 14.903$\pm$0.084 & 13.580$\pm$0.055 & 11.908$\pm$0.020 & 10.881$\pm$0.025 & 10.359$\pm$0.080 &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

1749: 05 30 47.74 & +33 47 32.9 &  --- & 14.544$\pm$0.067 & 13.481$\pm$0.042 & 12.402$\pm$0.024 & 11.900$\pm$0.021 & 11.405$\pm$0.082 & 10.974$\pm$0.169 &  --- & II \\

1750: 05 30 47.78 & +33 48 13.0 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 11.712$\pm$0.010 & 10.483$\pm$0.008 &  9.731$\pm$0.018 &  8.841$\pm$0.031 &  --- & I \\

1751: 05 30 47.98 & +33 47 54.9 &  --- &  --- & 13.923$\pm$0.079 & 11.716$\pm$0.041 & 10.504$\pm$0.056 &  9.772$\pm$0.089 &  9.096$\pm$0.104 &  0.632$\pm$0.005\tablenotemark{\blacktriangle} & I \\

1752: 05 30 48.04 & +33 48 21.4 &  --- &  --- & 14.354$\pm$0.084 & 12.906$\pm$0.033 & 12.009$\pm$0.037 & 11.112$\pm$0.032 &  9.920$\pm$0.050 &  4.018$\pm$0.036 & I \\

1753: 05 30 47.98 & +33 47 10.0 & 15.174$\pm$0.045 & 14.210$\pm$0.044 & 13.702$\pm$0.039 & 13.059$\pm$0.005 & 12.827$\pm$0.005 & 12.496$\pm$0.029 & 11.731$\pm$0.033 &  --- & II \\

1754: 05 30 48.31 & +33 47 34.6 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.149$\pm$0.040 & 13.612$\pm$0.050 & 12.972$\pm$0.157 & 11.634$\pm$0.166 &  --- & I \\

1755: 05 30 48.33 & +33 48 04.6 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.683$\pm$0.111 & 12.278$\pm$0.071 & 11.535$\pm$0.105 & 10.707$\pm$0.134 &  --- & I \\

1756: 05 30 48.41 & +33 47 23.8 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.799$\pm$0.045 & 14.283$\pm$0.044 & 13.709$\pm$0.137 & 13.131$\pm$0.239 &  --- & II \\

1757: 05 30 48.85 & +33 50 21.7 &  --- &  --- & 14.769$\pm$0.100 & 13.923$\pm$0.009 & 13.229$\pm$0.006 & 12.869$\pm$0.015 & 12.137$\pm$0.034 &  9.139$\pm$0.101 & II \\

1758: 05 30 49.08 & +33 47 45.7 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 12.087$\pm$0.008 & 10.958$\pm$0.010 & 10.315$\pm$0.015 &  9.883$\pm$0.032 &  --- & I \\

1759: 05 30 49.19 & +33 48 18.8 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.976$\pm$0.026 & 13.054$\pm$0.027 & 12.327$\pm$0.060 & 11.419$\pm$0.075 &  --- & I \\

1760: 05 30 49.21 & +33 47 38.5 &  --- & 15.284$\pm$0.090 &  --- & 14.097$\pm$0.036 & 13.716$\pm$0.052 & 13.283$\pm$0.149 & 12.758$\pm$0.233 &  --- & II \\

1761: 05 30 49.69 & +33 46 24.7 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.108$\pm$0.014 & 13.335$\pm$0.010 & 12.595$\pm$0.014 & 11.631$\pm$0.013 &  7.681$\pm$0.049 & I \\

1762: 05 30 49.78 & +33 47 36.9 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.808$\pm$0.030 & 14.606$\pm$0.042 & 14.454$\pm$0.213 & 13.355$\pm$0.137 &  --- & II \\

1763: 05 30 49.82 & +33 48 17.2 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.376$\pm$0.032 & 12.950$\pm$0.017 & 12.059$\pm$0.027 & 10.956$\pm$0.033 &  --- & I \\

1764: 05 30 50.26 & +33 47 03.0 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.636$\pm$0.017 & 14.289$\pm$0.015 & 13.808$\pm$0.037 & 12.993$\pm$0.038 &  --- & II \\

1765: 05 30 50.51 & +33 48 05.3 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 15.281$\pm$0.032 & 13.538$\pm$0.016 & 12.463$\pm$0.034 & 11.220$\pm$0.032 &  4.631$\pm$0.052 & I \\

1766: 05 30 51.09 & +33 50 11.1 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.429$\pm$0.012 & 13.876$\pm$0.009 & 13.337$\pm$0.027 & 12.524$\pm$0.045 &  9.775$\pm$0.131 & II \\

1767: 05 30 51.31 & +33 48 04.7 &  --- & 15.279$\pm$0.087 & 14.735$\pm$0.090 & 14.023$\pm$0.010 & 13.643$\pm$0.010 & 13.313$\pm$0.042 & 12.468$\pm$0.044 &  --- & II \\

1768: 05 30 51.41 & +33 46 48.3 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.821$\pm$0.040 & 14.241$\pm$0.023 & 14.093$\pm$0.108 & 13.648$\pm$0.105 &  --- & II \\

1769: 05 30 51.64 & +33 48 42.7 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.825$\pm$0.017 & 14.403$\pm$0.014 & 14.020$\pm$0.042 & 13.212$\pm$0.070 &  --- & II \\

1770: 05 30 51.74 & +33 47 39.5 &  --- &  --- & 14.750$\pm$0.099 & 13.849$\pm$0.009 & 13.484$\pm$0.008 & 13.198$\pm$0.039 & 12.595$\pm$0.054 &  --- & II \\

1771: 05 30 52.68 & +33 47 59.5 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.904$\pm$0.009 & 13.477$\pm$0.007 & 13.341$\pm$0.050 & 12.776$\pm$0.051 &  --- & II \\

1772: 05 30 53.23 & +33 45 39.5 & 15.137$\pm$0.045 & 14.229$\pm$0.041 & 13.871$\pm$0.047 & 13.090$\pm$0.004 & 12.664$\pm$0.004 & 12.172$\pm$0.012 & 11.195$\pm$0.009 &  8.366$\pm$0.023 & II \\

1773: 05 30 54.65 & +33 47 30.8 & 15.639$\pm$0.060 & 14.561$\pm$0.050 & 13.749$\pm$0.040 & 11.958$\pm$0.002 & 11.329$\pm$0.003 & 10.797$\pm$0.004 & 10.139$\pm$0.003 &  7.343$\pm$0.037 & II \\

1774: 05 30 54.92 & +33 47 18.0 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.982$\pm$0.013 & 14.661$\pm$0.017 & 14.177$\pm$0.039 & 13.415$\pm$0.048 &  --- & II \\

1775: 05 30 55.27 & +33 46 53.4 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.625$\pm$0.009 & 14.244$\pm$0.010 & 13.835$\pm$0.050 & 13.053$\pm$0.043 &  --- & II \\

1776: 05 30 57.18 & +33 46 39.9 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.814$\pm$0.018 & 14.368$\pm$0.013 & 13.754$\pm$0.042 & 12.824$\pm$0.038 &  9.233$\pm$0.080 & II \\

1777: \cutinhead{IRAS 05358+3543}

1778: 05 39 05.66 & +35 47 03.0 &  --- &  --- & 13.869$\pm$0.048 & 11.536$\pm$0.004 & 10.554$\pm$0.003 &  9.983$\pm$0.003 &  9.357$\pm$0.012 &  6.341$\pm$0.033 & II \\

1779: 05 39 07.22 & +35 43 40.0 & 15.176$\pm$0.038 & 13.801$\pm$0.028 & 12.834$\pm$0.027 & 11.661$\pm$0.003 & 11.215$\pm$0.003 & 10.729$\pm$0.006 &  9.930$\pm$0.005 &  7.071$\pm$0.055 & II \\

1780: 05 39 07.80 & +35 43 59.1 & 14.911$\pm$0.044 & 13.835$\pm$0.041 & 13.255$\pm$0.039 & 12.760$\pm$0.007 & 12.548$\pm$0.008 & 12.345$\pm$0.037 & 11.978$\pm$0.041 &  7.003$\pm$0.104 & II \\

1781: 05 39 08.11 & +35 45 58.5 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 15.843$\pm$0.066 & 14.475$\pm$0.037 & 13.077$\pm$0.107 & 11.876$\pm$0.076 &  --- & I \\

1782: 05 39 08.50 & +35 46 37.7 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 15.321$\pm$0.041 & 12.477$\pm$0.010 & 10.898$\pm$0.012 &  9.760$\pm$0.020 &  3.409$\pm$0.008 & I \\

1783: 05 39 08.91 & +35 45 06.3 & 15.119$\pm$0.060 & 13.492$\pm$0.047 & 12.588$\pm$0.041 & 11.737$\pm$0.111 & 11.334$\pm$0.103 &  --- &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

1784: 05 39 09.17 & +35 45 03.2 & 15.477$\pm$0.063 & 14.259$\pm$0.064 & 13.566$\pm$0.061 & 12.057$\pm$0.167 & 11.545$\pm$0.154 &  --- &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

1785: 05 39 09.17 & +35 44 22.6 & 11.474$\pm$0.022 & 10.532$\pm$0.016 &  9.697$\pm$0.018 &  8.406$\pm$0.001 &  7.987$\pm$0.002 &  7.217$\pm$0.001 &  5.918$\pm$0.001 &  2.009$\pm$0.001 & II \\

1786: 05 39 09.40 & +35 46 08.2 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 15.603$\pm$0.145 & 13.431$\pm$0.059 & 13.382$\pm$0.165 & 12.814$\pm$0.165 &  --- & I \\

1787: 05 39 09.54 & +35 45 05.8 & 14.436$\pm$0.043 & 12.767$\pm$0.031 & 11.868$\pm$0.027 & 10.920$\pm$0.099 & 10.540$\pm$0.074 &  --- &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

1788: 05 39 09.92 & +35 45 17.2 & 12.371$\pm$0.026 & 10.631$\pm$0.021 &  9.251$\pm$0.019 &  6.973$\pm$0.007 &  6.236$\pm$0.004 &  5.386$\pm$0.019 &  4.325$\pm$0.051 & $\ll0.626$ & High\tablenotemark{2} \\

1789: 05 39 09.99 & +35 46 27.1 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 15.851$\pm$0.051 & 13.459$\pm$0.019 & 12.387$\pm$0.043 & 11.472$\pm$0.026 &  --- & I \\

1790: 05 39 10.15 & +35 44 28.2 & 15.982$\pm$0.065 & 14.839$\pm$0.050 & 14.237$\pm$0.060 & 13.512$\pm$0.021 & 13.029$\pm$0.030 &  --- & 11.841$\pm$0.213 &  --- & IRe \\

1791: 05 39 10.41 & +35 45 03.5 & 13.699$\pm$0.027 & 12.346$\pm$0.019 & 11.598$\pm$0.020 & 10.882$\pm$0.020 & 10.233$\pm$0.012 &  9.104$\pm$0.080 &  7.760$\pm$0.096 &  --- & I \\

1792: 05 39 11.27 & +35 45 22.6 & 15.572$\pm$0.057 & 13.851$\pm$0.034 & 13.028$\pm$0.029 & 12.063$\pm$0.018 & 11.684$\pm$0.038 & 10.747$\pm$0.048 &  9.660$\pm$0.043 &  --- & II \\

1793: 05 39 11.50 & +35 43 33.7 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.904$\pm$0.010 & 13.367$\pm$0.009 & 12.735$\pm$0.025 & 12.267$\pm$0.049 &  --- & II \\

1794: 05 39 11.58 & +35 45 09.2 & 15.896$\pm$0.066 & 14.724$\pm$0.046 & 14.417$\pm$0.069 & 13.795$\pm$0.033 & 13.187$\pm$0.033 & 12.043$\pm$0.231 &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

1795: 05 39 11.58 & +35 46 22.2 &  --- & 15.470$\pm$0.093 & 13.834$\pm$0.044 & 12.326$\pm$0.006 & 11.664$\pm$0.009 & 11.230$\pm$0.027 & 10.656$\pm$0.067 &  --- & II \\

1796: 05 39 11.75 & +35 43 43.5 & 15.938$\pm$0.076 & 14.780$\pm$0.066 & 14.241$\pm$0.065 & 13.678$\pm$0.006 & 13.387$\pm$0.013 & 12.917$\pm$0.033 & 12.250$\pm$0.055 &  --- & II \\

1797: 05 39 11.80 & +35 44 24.9 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 16.143$\pm$0.079 & 14.693$\pm$0.047 & 13.896$\pm$0.115 & 13.323$\pm$0.235 &  --- & I \\

1798: 05 39 12.13 & +35 43 39.7 &  --- & 15.537$\pm$0.099 &  --- & 14.554$\pm$0.018 & 14.262$\pm$0.021 & 13.890$\pm$0.053 & 13.223$\pm$0.063 &  --- & II \\

1799: 05 39 13.35 & +35 44 17.0 & 14.108$\pm$0.034 & 13.012$\pm$0.027 & 12.537$\pm$0.025 & 11.532$\pm$0.002 & 11.154$\pm$0.003 & 10.727$\pm$0.007 & 10.228$\pm$0.012 &  6.328$\pm$0.099 & II \\

1800: 05 39 13.81 & +35 45 35.5 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.524$\pm$0.058 & 12.413$\pm$0.064 & 11.913$\pm$0.124 & 11.229$\pm$0.091 &  --- & I \\

1801: 05 39 14.66 & +35 45 23.9 & 15.821$\pm$0.065 & 14.183$\pm$0.039 & 13.275$\pm$0.034 & 12.317$\pm$0.005 & 11.839$\pm$0.006 & 11.378$\pm$0.016 & 10.683$\pm$0.036 &  --- & II \\

1802: 05 39 14.75 & +35 45 39.6 &  --- &  --- & 13.814$\pm$0.040 & 12.025$\pm$0.024 & 11.161$\pm$0.024 & 10.602$\pm$0.034 &  9.924$\pm$0.035 &  --- & I \\

1803: 05 39 14.79 & +35 46 01.9 &  --- & 15.298$\pm$0.095 & 13.566$\pm$0.060 & 12.521$\pm$0.061 & 11.838$\pm$0.060 & 11.462$\pm$0.070 & 10.995$\pm$0.067 &  --- & II \\

1804: 05 39 18.15 & +35 46 08.6 & 12.327$\pm$0.022 & 11.586$\pm$0.018 & 11.223$\pm$0.019 & 11.014$\pm$0.004 & 10.923$\pm$0.004 & 10.813$\pm$0.029 & 10.432$\pm$0.101 &  5.735$\pm$0.110 & II \\

1805: 05 39 21.03 & +35 46 09.3 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.865$\pm$0.020 & 14.378$\pm$0.022 & 13.773$\pm$0.133 & 12.543$\pm$0.194 &  --- & I \\

1806: 05 39 22.95 & +35 44 49.6 & 15.792$\pm$0.059 & 14.551$\pm$0.042 & 14.025$\pm$0.049 & 13.303$\pm$0.006 & 12.945$\pm$0.005 & 12.558$\pm$0.033 & 11.792$\pm$0.056 &  8.386$\pm$0.148 & II \\

1807: 05 39 24.79 & +35 44 45.4 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.218$\pm$0.022 & 13.261$\pm$0.008 & 12.248$\pm$0.047 & 11.214$\pm$0.080 &  7.141$\pm$0.056 & I \\

1808: \cutinhead{G192.16-3.82}

1809: 05 58 05.44 & +16 34 17.8 & 15.827$\pm$0.061 & 15.049$\pm$0.054 &  --- & 14.080$\pm$0.009 & 13.863$\pm$0.015 & 13.758$\pm$0.079 & 13.245$\pm$0.117 &  --- & II \\

1810: 05 58 09.98 & +16 34 50.7 & 15.855$\pm$0.064 & 14.858$\pm$0.058 & 14.589$\pm$0.092 & 14.071$\pm$0.012 & 13.854$\pm$0.018 & 13.574$\pm$0.061 & 12.402$\pm$0.055 &  --- & I/II \\

1811: 05 58 10.21 & +16 34 34.5 & 16.193$\pm$0.088 & 15.333$\pm$0.084 & 14.758$\pm$0.087 & 14.353$\pm$0.012 & 14.053$\pm$0.013 & 13.906$\pm$0.094 & 12.693$\pm$0.154 &  7.897$\pm$0.067 & II \\

1812: 05 58 10.37 & +16 33 57.4 & 15.085$\pm$0.038 & 14.227$\pm$0.039 & 13.988$\pm$0.050 & 13.256$\pm$0.013 & 13.066$\pm$0.009 & 12.920$\pm$0.152 &  --- &  7.163$\pm$0.089 & II \\

1813: 05 58 11.15 & +16 31 20.0 & 14.373$\pm$0.029 & 13.392$\pm$0.027 & 12.821$\pm$0.028 & 12.331$\pm$0.013 & 12.129$\pm$0.013 & 10.477$\pm$0.050 &  8.737$\pm$0.074 &  --- & I/II \\

1814: 05 58 11.91 & +16 32 54.3 & 15.811$\pm$0.074 & 14.114$\pm$0.040 & 13.272$\pm$0.039 & 12.226$\pm$0.027 & 11.886$\pm$0.009 & 10.913$\pm$0.130 &  9.527$\pm$0.177 &  --- & I/II \\

1815: 05 58 12.16 & +16 31 25.1 & 14.834$\pm$0.034 & 13.653$\pm$0.021 & 13.293$\pm$0.030 & 12.647$\pm$0.007 & 12.329$\pm$0.006 & 11.848$\pm$0.042 & 10.987$\pm$0.099 &  --- & II \\

1816: 05 58 13.84 & +16 31 57.1 & 15.898$\pm$0.075 & 13.322$\pm$0.051 & 11.130$\pm$0.056 &  8.983$\pm$0.015 &  8.104$\pm$0.018 &  7.748$\pm$0.026 &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

1817: 05 58 13.93 & +16 30 00.0 & 13.328$\pm$0.022 & 12.765$\pm$0.019 & 12.377$\pm$0.019 & 12.050$\pm$0.004 & 11.827$\pm$0.004 & 10.773$\pm$0.006 &  9.324$\pm$0.004 &  7.346$\pm$0.021 & II \\

1818: 05 58 13.95 & +16 31 31.0 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.234$\pm$0.029 & 11.950$\pm$0.016 & 11.085$\pm$0.037 & 10.064$\pm$0.040 &  --- & I \\

1819: 05 58 13.99 & +16 30 18.8 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.349$\pm$0.015 & 12.752$\pm$0.010 & 12.207$\pm$0.032 & 11.691$\pm$0.036 &  --- & II \\

1820: 05 58 14.21 & +16 30 46.1 & 16.106$\pm$0.069 & 14.993$\pm$0.051 & 14.404$\pm$0.059 & 13.571$\pm$0.032 & 13.210$\pm$0.038 & 12.621$\pm$0.220 & 12.677$\pm$0.144 &  --- & IRe \\

1821: 05 58 14.64 & +16 31 54.7 &  --- & 15.291$\pm$0.077 & 13.063$\pm$0.034 & 10.578$\pm$0.013 &  9.645$\pm$0.009 &  8.854$\pm$0.005 &  8.010$\pm$0.027 &  --- & I \\

1822: 05 58 14.74 & +16 31 07.0 & 13.103$\pm$0.028 & 10.752$\pm$0.023 &  9.041$\pm$0.021 &  6.982$\pm$0.002 &  6.140$\pm$0.002 &  5.304$\pm$0.001 &  4.456$\pm$0.000 &  1.287$\pm$0.002 & I \\

1823: 05 58 14.96 & +16 30 22.9 & 11.460$\pm$0.021 & 10.546$\pm$0.018 & 10.261$\pm$0.019 &  9.851$\pm$0.003 &  9.663$\pm$0.003 &  9.211$\pm$0.006 &  8.766$\pm$0.008 &  5.967$\pm$0.033 & II \\

1824: 05 58 15.23 & +16 31 13.6 & 14.645$\pm$0.037 & 13.519$\pm$0.033 & 13.087$\pm$0.046 & 12.189$\pm$0.025 & 11.645$\pm$0.061 &  --- &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

1825: 05 58 15.26 & +16 31 39.2 & 15.412$\pm$0.055 & 14.248$\pm$0.038 & 13.615$\pm$0.039 & 12.305$\pm$0.084 & 12.094$\pm$0.084 &  --- &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

1826: 05 58 15.44 & +16 31 02.6 &  --- & 14.880$\pm$0.080 & 13.203$\pm$0.077 & 11.610$\pm$0.057 & 10.966$\pm$0.079 & 10.335$\pm$0.055 &  9.422$\pm$0.095 &  --- & II \\

1827: 05 58 15.47 & +16 33 57.7 &  --- & 15.405$\pm$0.066 & 14.722$\pm$0.085 & 13.706$\pm$0.036 & 13.274$\pm$0.033 & 12.378$\pm$0.188 & 10.854$\pm$0.235 &  --- & I \\

1828: 05 58 15.60 & +16 30 58.3 &  --- & 14.389$\pm$0.055 & 13.472$\pm$0.051 & 11.946$\pm$0.024 & 11.384$\pm$0.027 & 11.178$\pm$0.170 & 10.285$\pm$0.127 &  --- & II \\

1829: 05 58 15.68 & +16 32 30.0 & 15.508$\pm$0.047 & 13.803$\pm$0.030 & 12.686$\pm$0.023 & 11.464$\pm$0.009 & 10.930$\pm$0.005 & 10.521$\pm$0.090 &  9.571$\pm$0.224 &  --- & II \\

1830: 05 58 15.78 & +16 30 26.3 &  --- & 15.140$\pm$0.063 & 13.763$\pm$0.039 & 12.480$\pm$0.008 & 11.932$\pm$0.008 & 11.411$\pm$0.017 & 10.671$\pm$0.034 &  7.599$\pm$0.194 & II \\

1831: 05 58 16.02 & +16 31 01.2 & 16.328$\pm$0.085 & 14.459$\pm$0.040 & 13.353$\pm$0.032 & 11.942$\pm$0.011 & 11.406$\pm$0.017 & 10.986$\pm$0.081 & 10.508$\pm$0.108 &  --- & II \\

1832: 05 58 16.38 & +16 30 41.9 & 14.798$\pm$0.030 & 13.327$\pm$0.027 & 12.488$\pm$0.021 & 11.328$\pm$0.003 & 10.985$\pm$0.003 & 10.700$\pm$0.007 & 10.220$\pm$0.014 &  --- & II \\

1833: 05 58 16.49 & +16 31 32.4 &  --- & 15.608$\pm$0.081 & 14.990$\pm$0.100 & 13.752$\pm$0.093 & 13.821$\pm$0.074 &  --- &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

1834: 05 58 16.58 & +16 30 29.7 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.091$\pm$0.007 & 12.501$\pm$0.006 & 12.071$\pm$0.017 & 11.477$\pm$0.034 &  7.919$\pm$0.051\tablenotemark{\star} & II \\

1835: 05 58 17.46 & +16 30 15.4 & 14.983$\pm$0.039 & 13.827$\pm$0.033 & 13.347$\pm$0.034 & 12.814$\pm$0.005 & 12.544$\pm$0.005 & 12.147$\pm$0.014 & 11.372$\pm$0.022 &  8.214$\pm$0.026 & II \\

1836: 05 58 17.53 & +16 31 19.0 & 15.126$\pm$0.037 & 14.087$\pm$0.027 & 13.492$\pm$0.034 & 12.484$\pm$0.006 & 12.074$\pm$0.005 & 11.758$\pm$0.039 & 11.114$\pm$0.115 &  --- & II \\

1837: 05 58 18.16 & +16 34 39.9 & 16.572$\pm$0.097 & 15.699$\pm$0.087 &  --- & 14.671$\pm$0.018 & 14.238$\pm$0.013 & 13.856$\pm$0.106 & 12.750$\pm$0.210 &  --- & I \\

1838: 05 58 21.27 & +16 29 34.2 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.453$\pm$0.010 & 14.021$\pm$0.010 & 13.618$\pm$0.038 & 12.900$\pm$0.037 &  --- & II \\

1839: 05 58 22.19 & +16 33 12.1 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 16.903$\pm$0.065 & 16.627$\pm$0.075 &  --- &  --- &  7.927$\pm$0.041 & II \\

1840: \cutinhead{HH 80-81}

1841: 18 18 59.59 & -20 45 53.8 & 14.750$\pm$0.029 & 14.214$\pm$0.049 & 13.843$\pm$0.051 & 13.526$\pm$0.029 & 13.341$\pm$0.029 & 13.346$\pm$0.094 &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

1842: 18 19 01.08 & -20 45 47.7 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.154$\pm$0.048 & 13.571$\pm$0.046 & 13.226$\pm$0.051 & 12.630$\pm$0.090 &  --- & II \\

1843: 18 19 02.02 & -20 47 17.2 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.566$\pm$0.037 & 13.268$\pm$0.032 & 12.959$\pm$0.104 & 11.708$\pm$0.057 &  7.770$\pm$0.113 & II \\

1844: 18 19 03.13 & -20 47 00.9 & 15.435$\pm$0.089 &  --- &  --- & 12.508$\pm$0.018 & 12.156$\pm$0.013 & 11.710$\pm$0.031 & 10.861$\pm$0.078 &  --- & II \\

1845: 18 19 03.81 & -20 45 06.3 & 14.848$\pm$0.055 & 13.556$\pm$0.036 & 12.908$\pm$0.035 & 11.856$\pm$0.010 & 11.330$\pm$0.007 & 10.810$\pm$0.008 &  9.668$\pm$0.012 &  6.391$\pm$0.020 & II \\

1846: 18 19 04.51 & -20 45 26.8 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.027$\pm$0.056 & 13.717$\pm$0.044 & 13.556$\pm$0.084 & 12.538$\pm$0.133 &  --- & II \\

1847: 18 19 05.77 & -20 49 20.0 &  --- &  --- & 13.454$\pm$0.049 & 12.130$\pm$0.025 & 11.644$\pm$0.020 & 10.928$\pm$0.015 &  9.917$\pm$0.036 &  6.020$\pm$0.023 & II \\

1848: 18 19 06.24 & -20 49 19.3 & 14.851$\pm$0.038 & 13.755$\pm$0.047 & 13.107$\pm$0.037 & 12.160$\pm$0.012 & 11.791$\pm$0.011 & 11.382$\pm$0.018 & 10.570$\pm$0.031 &  --- & II \\

1849: 18 19 07.77 & -20 48 45.5 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.097$\pm$0.054 & 12.757$\pm$0.045 & 12.471$\pm$0.046 & 11.924$\pm$0.061 &  --- & II \\

1850: 18 19 08.97 & -20 47 36.0 & 15.070$\pm$0.030 & 14.285$\pm$0.021 & 13.954$\pm$0.050 & 13.324$\pm$0.061 & 13.108$\pm$0.066 &  --- &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

1851: 18 19 09.11 & -20 47 15.0 & 15.672$\pm$0.051 & 14.306$\pm$0.021 & 13.804$\pm$0.051 &  --- & 12.264$\pm$0.132 &  --- &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

1852: 18 19 09.84 & -20 47 15.6 & 15.719$\pm$0.070 & 13.538$\pm$0.021 & 12.077$\pm$0.020 & 10.275$\pm$0.039 &  9.748$\pm$0.026 &  --- &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

1853: 18 19 09.98 & -20 44 49.5 &  --- &  --- & 13.861$\pm$0.093 & 13.090$\pm$0.045 & 12.686$\pm$0.031 & 12.452$\pm$0.065 & 11.844$\pm$0.076 &  --- & II \\

1854: 18 19 10.51 & -20 46 57.8 & 11.209$\pm$0.030 & 10.496$\pm$0.029 & 10.022$\pm$0.029 &  9.737$\pm$0.053 &  9.479$\pm$0.066 &  --- &  --- & $\ll0.626$ & High\tablenotemark{3} \\

1855: 18 19 10.76 & -20 46 41.4 &  --- & 14.780$\pm$0.060 & 12.527$\pm$0.031 &  9.911$\pm$0.025 &  9.119$\pm$0.015 &  8.612$\pm$0.101 &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

1856: 18 19 11.00 & -20 46 38.5 &  --- & 14.098$\pm$0.025 & 12.988$\pm$0.023 & 11.499$\pm$0.088 & 10.845$\pm$0.054 &  --- &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

1857: 18 19 11.47 & -20 48 47.8 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.621$\pm$0.044 & 12.345$\pm$0.016 & 11.687$\pm$0.110 & 11.018$\pm$0.091 &  --- & I \\

1858: 18 19 12.08 & -20 47 50.9 & 13.062$\pm$0.044 & 10.244$\pm$0.038 &  8.186$\pm$0.026 &  6.077$\pm$0.004 &  5.432$\pm$0.004 &  4.700$\pm$0.012 &  3.650$\pm$0.034 & $\ll0.626$ & High\tablenotemark{4} \\

1859: 18 19 12.26 & -20 44 53.3 & 15.947$\pm$0.094 & 14.521$\pm$0.048 & 13.724$\pm$0.044 & 12.785$\pm$0.046 & 12.397$\pm$0.041 & 12.301$\pm$0.083 & 11.775$\pm$0.067 &  --- & II \\

1860: 18 19 12.95 & -20 48 45.6 &  --- &  --- & 14.200$\pm$0.063 & 12.377$\pm$0.011 & 11.587$\pm$0.005 & 11.156$\pm$0.047 & 10.438$\pm$0.014 &  --- & II \\

1861: 18 19 13.43 & -20 46 25.3 & 15.882$\pm$0.072 & 14.986$\pm$0.077 &  --- & 13.627$\pm$0.067 & 13.281$\pm$0.115 &  --- &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

1862: 18 19 13.64 & -20 47 50.5 & 14.782$\pm$0.037 & 13.090$\pm$0.022 & 12.055$\pm$0.019 & 10.849$\pm$0.019 & 10.371$\pm$0.027 &  9.693$\pm$0.081 &  8.324$\pm$0.117 &  --- & I \\

1863: 18 19 13.79 & -20 47 40.5 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 11.842$\pm$0.057 & 10.227$\pm$0.013 &  9.317$\pm$0.039 &  8.575$\pm$0.106 &  --- & I \\

1864: 18 19 14.02 & -20 45 09.7 &  --- & 15.161$\pm$0.071 & 14.282$\pm$0.069 & 13.311$\pm$0.027 & 13.064$\pm$0.024 & 12.790$\pm$0.096 & 11.826$\pm$0.134 &  --- & II \\

1865: 18 19 14.19 & -20 47 59.8 & 15.435$\pm$0.053 & 13.872$\pm$0.022 & 13.144$\pm$0.019 & 11.893$\pm$0.039 & 11.460$\pm$0.032 & 10.303$\pm$0.200 &  8.786$\pm$0.203 &  --- & I \\

1866: 18 19 14.53 & -20 48 28.4 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.298$\pm$0.020 & 13.001$\pm$0.024 & 12.464$\pm$0.175 & 11.527$\pm$0.238 &  --- & II \\

1867: 18 19 14.64 & -20 46 59.2 & 13.009$\pm$0.026 & 12.342$\pm$0.025 & 11.869$\pm$0.037 & 11.482$\pm$0.084 & 11.228$\pm$0.111 &  9.664$\pm$0.062 &  7.576$\pm$0.044 &  --- & I/II \\

1868: 18 19 14.68 & -20 49 29.1 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.441$\pm$0.080 & 14.079$\pm$0.060 & 13.675$\pm$0.105 & 12.680$\pm$0.067 &  --- & II \\

1869: 18 19 14.79 & -20 45 58.7 &  --- & 14.239$\pm$0.066 & 12.551$\pm$0.034 & 11.536$\pm$0.010 & 11.307$\pm$0.011 & 11.031$\pm$0.053 & 10.291$\pm$0.168 &  --- & II \\

1870: 18 19 14.83 & -20 47 14.5 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 12.529$\pm$0.057 & 11.803$\pm$0.047 & 11.413$\pm$0.088 & 10.725$\pm$0.146 &  --- & II \\

1871: 18 19 15.10 & -20 47 46.0 & 11.553$\pm$0.039 & 10.734$\pm$0.047 & 10.051$\pm$0.035 &  8.324$\pm$0.026 &  7.845$\pm$0.019 &  5.617$\pm$0.048 &  3.802$\pm$0.062 & $\ll0.626$ & High\tablenotemark{5} \\

1872: 18 19 15.88 & -20 46 05.7 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.244$\pm$0.026 & 12.690$\pm$0.029 & 12.062$\pm$0.089 & 10.893$\pm$0.054 &  --- & I \\

1873: 18 19 16.16 & -20 48 17.2 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.911$\pm$0.026 & 13.234$\pm$0.028 & 12.412$\pm$0.180 & 11.182$\pm$0.192 &  --- & I \\

1874: 18 19 17.95 & -20 45 10.4 & 13.699$\pm$0.028 & 13.325$\pm$0.038 & 13.146$\pm$0.044 & 12.624$\pm$0.014 & 12.541$\pm$0.019 &  --- &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

1875: 18 19 20.89 & -20 46 32.5 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.754$\pm$0.069 & 13.282$\pm$0.061 & 12.831$\pm$0.098 & 12.039$\pm$0.091 &  --- & II \\

1876: 18 19 20.95 & -20 46 09.6 & 13.080$\pm$0.029 & 11.920$\pm$0.031 & 11.079$\pm$0.026 &  9.930$\pm$0.005 &  9.330$\pm$0.005 &  8.827$\pm$0.004 &  8.014$\pm$0.006 &  4.206$\pm$0.005 & II \\

1877: 18 19 21.10 & -20 45 55.9 & 14.053$\pm$0.077 & 12.423$\pm$0.085 & 10.902$\pm$0.037 &  9.173$\pm$0.007 &  8.231$\pm$0.005 &  7.604$\pm$0.004 &  6.879$\pm$0.017 &  2.663$\pm$0.004 & I \\

1878: 18 19 21.16 & -20 47 41.8 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.718$\pm$0.022 & 12.925$\pm$0.015 & 12.476$\pm$0.030 & 12.014$\pm$0.076 &  --- & II \\

1879: 18 19 21.37 & -20 45 30.5 &  --- &  --- & 14.062$\pm$0.072 & 12.593$\pm$0.027 & 11.884$\pm$0.021 & 11.316$\pm$0.030 & 10.694$\pm$0.067 &  --- & II \\

1880: 18 19 21.52 & -20 45 56.6 & 14.107$\pm$0.057 & 12.352$\pm$0.052 & 11.007$\pm$0.039 &  9.283$\pm$0.006 &  8.511$\pm$0.006 &  7.884$\pm$0.003 &  6.961$\pm$0.002 &  --- & II \\

1881: 18 19 21.78 & -20 45 35.9 & 14.690$\pm$0.079 & 12.817$\pm$0.065 & 11.918$\pm$0.034 & 11.135$\pm$0.015 & 10.713$\pm$0.013 & 10.168$\pm$0.016 &  9.066$\pm$0.026 &  4.723$\pm$0.008 & II \\

1882: 18 19 22.00 & -20 48 51.5 & 14.530$\pm$0.044 & 12.569$\pm$0.029 & 11.152$\pm$0.023 &  9.587$\pm$0.003 &  8.959$\pm$0.003 &  8.410$\pm$0.002 &  7.636$\pm$0.002 &  4.640$\pm$0.006 & II \\

1883: 18 19 22.08 & -20 45 36.9 & 12.827$\pm$0.039 & 11.200$\pm$0.038 & 10.272$\pm$0.030 &  9.544$\pm$0.004 &  9.173$\pm$0.004 &  8.952$\pm$0.004 &  8.473$\pm$0.011 &  --- & II \\

1884: 18 19 22.77 & -20 46 45.2 & 14.968$\pm$0.046 & 14.039$\pm$0.053 & 13.502$\pm$0.034 & 12.579$\pm$0.006 & 12.185$\pm$0.004 & 11.780$\pm$0.016 & 11.016$\pm$0.043 &  --- & II \\

1885: 18 19 22.86 & -20 44 41.2 &  --- & 13.899$\pm$0.052 & 12.047$\pm$0.024 & 10.931$\pm$0.005 & 10.044$\pm$0.003 &  9.606$\pm$0.006 &  8.854$\pm$0.013 &  --- & I \\

1886: 18 19 23.35 & -20 47 54.1 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.643$\pm$0.037 & 14.274$\pm$0.030 & 13.988$\pm$0.082 & 13.492$\pm$0.211 &  --- & II \\

1887: 18 19 23.53 & -20 48 18.3 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.308$\pm$0.029 & 13.833$\pm$0.030 & 13.410$\pm$0.073 & 12.952$\pm$0.098 &  --- & II \\

1888: 18 19 23.59 & -20 45 43.0 &  --- &  --- & 14.161$\pm$0.059 & 12.401$\pm$0.011 & 11.709$\pm$0.010 & 11.180$\pm$0.014 & 10.213$\pm$0.012 &  --- & II \\

1889: \cutinhead{IRAS 19410+2336}

1890: 19 42 56.93 & +23 46 32.0 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.594$\pm$0.015 & 13.366$\pm$0.019 & 13.186$\pm$0.076 & 12.474$\pm$0.136 &  --- & II \\

1891: 19 42 57.66 & +23 44 49.3 & 15.520$\pm$0.074 & 14.756$\pm$0.078 & 14.076$\pm$0.062 & 13.660$\pm$0.030 & 13.563$\pm$0.044 &  --- &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

1892: 19 43 02.75 & +23 43 18.3 &  --- &  --- & 12.975$\pm$0.031 &  9.023$\pm$0.002 &  7.945$\pm$0.002 &  7.033$\pm$0.001 &  6.436$\pm$0.002 &  4.725$\pm$0.014 & II \\

1893: 19 43 03.34 & +23 45 09.4 &  --- & 13.997$\pm$0.061 &  --- & 12.760$\pm$0.010 & 12.651$\pm$0.016 & 12.614$\pm$0.061 & 11.935$\pm$0.122 &  6.491$\pm$0.012 & II \\

1894: 19 43 03.60 & +23 46 50.6 & 15.194$\pm$0.050 & 14.808$\pm$0.083 &  --- & 13.557$\pm$0.017 & 13.146$\pm$0.012 &  --- &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

1895: 19 43 04.53 & +23 42 32.8 & 14.914$\pm$0.037 & 14.250$\pm$0.058 & 13.849$\pm$0.048 & 13.317$\pm$0.024 & 13.187$\pm$0.023 &  --- &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

1896: 19 43 05.75 & +23 41 35.0 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.247$\pm$0.056 & 13.879$\pm$0.051 & 13.555$\pm$0.120 & 12.536$\pm$0.171 &  --- & II \\

1897: 19 43 06.25 & +23 42 44.2 &  --- & 14.837$\pm$0.082 & 13.891$\pm$0.059 & 12.872$\pm$0.007 & 12.422$\pm$0.008 & 12.110$\pm$0.032 & 11.851$\pm$0.068 &  --- & IRe \\

1898: 19 43 06.91 & +23 43 58.0 & 11.881$\pm$0.024 & 11.226$\pm$0.035 & 10.639$\pm$0.032 & 10.071$\pm$0.078 &  9.306$\pm$0.042 &  --- &  --- & -0.4$\pm$0.1\tablenotemark{{\star}{\star}} & High\tablenotemark{6} \\

1899: 19 43 08.18 & +23 43 41.4 &  --- &  --- & 13.717$\pm$0.046 & 10.600$\pm$0.009 &  9.516$\pm$0.005 &  8.593$\pm$0.018 &  7.855$\pm$0.045 &  --- & I \\

1900: 19 43 08.60 & +23 44 25.6 &  --- & 15.187$\pm$0.099 & 14.329$\pm$0.080 & 12.561$\pm$0.040 & 11.617$\pm$0.031 & 10.796$\pm$0.057 &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

1901: 19 43 09.04 & +23 44 08.9 &  --- &  --- & 12.164$\pm$0.043 & 10.247$\pm$0.010 &  9.069$\pm$0.004 &  7.811$\pm$0.011 &  5.720$\pm$0.016 &  1.981$\pm$0.027 & I \\

1902: 19 43 09.18 & +23 44 13.9 & 14.080$\pm$0.052 & 13.447$\pm$0.037 & 12.968$\pm$0.036 & 12.060$\pm$0.050 & 11.675$\pm$0.067 &  --- &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

1903: 19 43 09.41 & +23 47 05.9 & 14.507$\pm$0.040 & 13.557$\pm$0.045 & 12.901$\pm$0.039 & 12.034$\pm$0.008 & 11.750$\pm$0.007 & 11.502$\pm$0.018 & 10.545$\pm$0.025 &  7.133$\pm$0.018 & II \\

1904: 19 43 09.43 & +23 46 12.7 & 15.339$\pm$0.059 & 14.226$\pm$0.083 &  --- & 12.554$\pm$0.011 & 12.448$\pm$0.008 & 12.313$\pm$0.096 &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

1905: 19 43 09.45 & +23 44 34.0 & 13.407$\pm$0.031 & 12.409$\pm$0.039 & 11.690$\pm$0.033 & 10.243$\pm$0.051 &  9.956$\pm$0.041 &  7.387$\pm$0.096 &  5.765$\pm$0.112 &  1.420$\pm$0.008 & II \\

1906: 19 43 09.78 & +23 45 07.4 &  --- &  --- & 13.685$\pm$0.056 & 11.878$\pm$0.014 & 11.072$\pm$0.015 & 10.552$\pm$0.032 & 10.109$\pm$0.062 &  --- & I \\

1907: 19 43 10.61 & +23 44 57.6 &  --- & 14.202$\pm$0.056 & 12.527$\pm$0.033 & 11.000$\pm$0.009 & 10.024$\pm$0.011 &  9.207$\pm$0.021 &  8.487$\pm$0.041 &  1.724$\pm$0.003 & I \\

1908: 19 43 10.77 & +23 45 07.8 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.394$\pm$0.131 & 11.730$\pm$0.071 & 11.121$\pm$0.101 & 10.635$\pm$0.112 &  --- & I \\

1909: 19 43 11.45 & +23 44 50.6 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.025$\pm$0.065 & 12.963$\pm$0.058 & 12.033$\pm$0.106 & 10.991$\pm$0.130 &  --- & I \\

1910: 19 43 11.53 & +23 43 37.6 &  --- & 13.797$\pm$0.075 & 12.405$\pm$0.043 & 10.739$\pm$0.008 &  9.986$\pm$0.010 &  9.114$\pm$0.037 &  8.488$\pm$0.055 &  --- & II \\

1911: 19 43 11.59 & +23 47 28.6 & 13.822$\pm$0.027 & 13.267$\pm$0.030 & 13.111$\pm$0.033 & 13.013$\pm$0.009 & 12.806$\pm$0.008 & 13.010$\pm$0.041 & 12.438$\pm$0.086 &  --- & II \\

1912: 19 43 11.60 & +23 44 58.8 &  --- &  --- & 13.426$\pm$0.044 & 12.128$\pm$0.017 & 11.503$\pm$0.021 & 10.859$\pm$0.051 & 10.155$\pm$0.082 &  --- & II \\

1913: 19 43 11.85 & +23 43 53.5 & 15.002$\pm$0.056 & 12.998$\pm$0.041 & 11.514$\pm$0.028 &  9.812$\pm$0.010 &  9.090$\pm$0.029 &  8.727$\pm$0.074 &  8.066$\pm$0.040 &  --- & II \\

1914: 19 43 11.91 & +23 44 52.3 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.414$\pm$0.033 & 12.821$\pm$0.036 & 12.378$\pm$0.131 & 11.539$\pm$0.049 &  --- & II \\

1915: 19 43 12.41 & +23 45 25.5 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.823$\pm$0.043 & 12.941$\pm$0.023 & 12.517$\pm$0.133 & 11.276$\pm$0.122 &  --- & I \\

1916: 19 43 12.85 & +23 45 18.6 &  --- &  --- & 14.169$\pm$0.090 & 12.203$\pm$0.007 & 11.578$\pm$0.005 & 10.993$\pm$0.019 & 10.305$\pm$0.052 &  --- & II \\

1917: 19 43 12.95 & +23 45 01.7 &  --- & 14.738$\pm$0.068 & 13.915$\pm$0.056 & 12.906$\pm$0.008 & 12.550$\pm$0.008 & 12.587$\pm$0.081 &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

1918: 19 43 13.33 & +23 46 04.7 & 14.690$\pm$0.041 & 14.041$\pm$0.066 &  --- &  --- & 12.713$\pm$0.014 &  --- &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

1919: 19 43 14.22 & +23 45 26.9 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 11.550$\pm$0.004 & 10.402$\pm$0.003 &  9.436$\pm$0.008 &  8.733$\pm$0.023 &  --- & I \\

1920: 19 43 14.72 & +23 44 26.1 &  --- & 13.311$\pm$0.050 & 10.225$\pm$0.026 &  7.883$\pm$0.005 &  7.621$\pm$0.005 &  7.205$\pm$0.002 &  6.713$\pm$0.006 &  --- & II \\

1921: 19 43 14.95 & +23 45 33.9 & 15.816$\pm$0.078 & 14.002$\pm$0.052 & 13.023$\pm$0.036 & 11.542$\pm$0.006 & 10.875$\pm$0.005 & 10.310$\pm$0.010 &  9.541$\pm$0.027 &  5.851$\pm$0.024\tablenotemark{\star} & I \\

1922: 19 43 15.09 & +23 44 38.4 &  --- &  --- & 13.382$\pm$0.036 & 12.309$\pm$0.023 & 12.076$\pm$0.039 & 11.817$\pm$0.094 & 11.385$\pm$0.250 &  --- & II \\

1923: 19 43 15.29 & +23 45 26.7 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.580$\pm$0.018 & 12.373$\pm$0.015 & 11.539$\pm$0.043 & 10.849$\pm$0.093 &  5.196$\pm$0.029 & I \\

1924: 19 43 15.61 & +23 43 56.1 &  --- & 14.866$\pm$0.087 & 14.049$\pm$0.068 & 12.754$\pm$0.091 & 12.460$\pm$0.143 &  --- &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

1925: 19 43 16.01 & +23 42 58.2 & 15.191$\pm$0.067 & 14.154$\pm$0.063 & 13.586$\pm$0.057 & 13.095$\pm$0.017 & 12.785$\pm$0.015 &  --- &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

1926: 19 43 16.43 & +23 44 21.2 & 15.342$\pm$0.057 & 14.459$\pm$0.060 & 14.249$\pm$0.073 & 13.221$\pm$0.112 & 13.297$\pm$0.128 &  --- &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

1927: 19 43 16.73 & +23 45 18.2 & 15.294$\pm$0.070 & 13.604$\pm$0.053 & 12.441$\pm$0.036 & 11.010$\pm$0.006 & 10.451$\pm$0.004 &  9.962$\pm$0.013 &  9.345$\pm$0.048 &  7.100$\pm$0.117 & II \\

1928: 19 43 16.87 & +23 45 08.9 &  --- &  --- & 14.192$\pm$0.095 & 12.996$\pm$0.015 & 12.600$\pm$0.021 & 12.442$\pm$0.043 & 11.779$\pm$0.066 &  --- & II \\

1929: 19 43 16.90 & +23 45 13.1 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 12.373$\pm$0.022 & 11.586$\pm$0.011 & 10.812$\pm$0.023 & 10.125$\pm$0.060 &  --- & II \\

1930: 19 43 21.22 & +23 46 25.0 & 15.669$\pm$0.071 & 14.541$\pm$0.061 & 14.000$\pm$0.059 & 13.052$\pm$0.012 & 12.706$\pm$0.010 & 12.590$\pm$0.050 & 12.252$\pm$0.105 &  --- & IRe \\

1931: 19 43 21.59 & +23 44 33.2 &  --- &  --- & 14.343$\pm$0.078 & 13.072$\pm$0.040 & 12.692$\pm$0.025 & 12.223$\pm$0.162 &  --- &  7.026$\pm$0.096 & II \\

1932: 19 43 22.08 & +23 46 06.6 &  --- &  --- & 14.456$\pm$0.083 & 13.815$\pm$0.027 & 13.542$\pm$0.029 & 13.500$\pm$0.120 & 13.055$\pm$0.209 &  --- & II \\

1933: 19 43 22.12 & +23 45 09.1 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.369$\pm$0.034 & 12.687$\pm$0.014 & 12.072$\pm$0.073 & 11.041$\pm$0.166 &  --- & II \\

1934: 19 43 22.10 & +23 46 38.8 & 16.021$\pm$0.095 & 15.008$\pm$0.089 & 14.354$\pm$0.080 & 13.800$\pm$0.019 & 13.599$\pm$0.021 &  --- &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

1935: 19 43 25.12 & +23 43 02.0 &  --- & 14.327$\pm$0.062 & 13.377$\pm$0.049 & 12.413$\pm$0.014 & 11.791$\pm$0.007 & 11.259$\pm$0.029 & 10.668$\pm$0.033 &  --- & II \\

1936: \cutinhead{IRAS 20126+4104}

1937: 20 14 18.59 & +41 14 33.7 & 11.931$\pm$0.025 & 11.622$\pm$0.030 &  --- & 10.937$\pm$0.010 & 10.811$\pm$0.008 & 10.676$\pm$0.076 &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

1938: 20 14 19.05 & +41 13 36.3 &  9.419$\pm$0.020 &  9.323$\pm$0.017 &  9.251$\pm$0.020 &  9.328$\pm$0.002 &  9.303$\pm$0.002 &  9.257$\pm$0.006 &  9.140$\pm$0.039 &  4.594$\pm$0.046 & II \\

1939: 20 14 20.46 & +41 13 41.3 & 15.873$\pm$0.093 & 15.057$\pm$0.085 &  --- & 13.863$\pm$0.026 & 13.532$\pm$0.024 & 13.341$\pm$0.113 &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

1940: 20 14 23.21 & +41 13 25.1 &  --- &  --- & 13.675$\pm$0.062 & 11.893$\pm$0.007 & 11.286$\pm$0.014 & 10.733$\pm$0.037 & 10.022$\pm$0.080 &  --- & II \\

1941: 20 14 24.51 & +41 11 22.1 & 15.053$\pm$0.046 & 14.515$\pm$0.052 & 14.150$\pm$0.086 & 13.516$\pm$0.026 & 13.539$\pm$0.025 &  --- &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

1942: 20 14 24.99 & +41 13 32.0 & 12.064$\pm$0.021 & 11.683$\pm$0.019 & 11.485$\pm$0.031 & 10.685$\pm$0.038 & 10.348$\pm$0.083 &  8.125$\pm$0.037 &  6.367$\pm$0.060 &  --- & I/II \\

1943: 20 14 26.57 & +41 15 29.7 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.428$\pm$0.027 & 13.754$\pm$0.018 & 13.213$\pm$0.093 & 12.134$\pm$0.170 &  --- & II \\

1944: 20 14 27.12 & +41 14 44.0 & 15.200$\pm$0.053 & 14.167$\pm$0.042 & 14.018$\pm$0.079 & 13.044$\pm$0.054 & 12.902$\pm$0.044 &  --- &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

1945: 20 14 28.18 & +41 13 17.0 & 15.847$\pm$0.086 & 14.635$\pm$0.064 & 14.185$\pm$0.087 &  --- & 12.674$\pm$0.143 &  --- &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

1946: 20 14 28.38 & +41 13 51.7 & 12.669$\pm$0.021 & 11.557$\pm$0.019 & 10.815$\pm$0.023 &  9.905$\pm$0.005 &  9.593$\pm$0.004 &  9.250$\pm$0.032 &  8.660$\pm$0.094 &  --- & II \\

1947: 20 14 33.58 & +41 12 30.6 & 14.044$\pm$0.037 & 12.990$\pm$0.037 &  --- & 11.861$\pm$0.006 & 11.423$\pm$0.005 & 10.967$\pm$0.008 & 10.222$\pm$0.012 &  --- & II \\

1948: 20 14 34.67 & +41 10 59.6 &  --- & 14.981$\pm$0.085 & 14.245$\pm$0.083 & 13.766$\pm$0.013 & 12.829$\pm$0.011 & 12.411$\pm$0.025 & 11.767$\pm$0.037 &  --- & I \\

1949: 20 14 34.91 & +41 12 31.3 & 15.375$\pm$0.044 & 14.223$\pm$0.036 & 13.442$\pm$0.046 & 12.682$\pm$0.005 & 12.233$\pm$0.004 & 11.980$\pm$0.011 & 11.254$\pm$0.028 &  7.372$\pm$0.173 & II \\

1950: 20 14 37.57 & +41 12 34.8 & 15.698$\pm$0.067 & 14.661$\pm$0.055 & 14.090$\pm$0.075 & 12.956$\pm$0.005 & 12.326$\pm$0.004 & 11.791$\pm$0.009 & 10.771$\pm$0.026 &  7.834$\pm$0.174 & II \\

1951: 20 14 38.69 & +41 12 23.2 &  --- & 15.165$\pm$0.090 &  --- & 14.194$\pm$0.015 & 13.982$\pm$0.015 & 13.697$\pm$0.038 & 12.876$\pm$0.114 &  --- & II \\

1952: 20 14 39.92 & +41 14 35.4 & 15.361$\pm$0.080 & 14.216$\pm$0.067 & 13.634$\pm$0.058 & 13.056$\pm$0.012 & 12.674$\pm$0.008 & 12.247$\pm$0.021 & 11.049$\pm$0.028 &  --- & I/II \\

1953: 20 14 41.17 & +41 12 55.8 & 15.290$\pm$0.052 & 14.028$\pm$0.041 & 13.281$\pm$0.045 & 12.422$\pm$0.005 & 11.989$\pm$0.005 & 11.770$\pm$0.009 & 11.421$\pm$0.036 &  --- & IRe \\

1954: 20 14 43.33 & +41 13 40.7 & 13.937$\pm$0.028 & 12.997$\pm$0.023 & 12.575$\pm$0.027 & 12.164$\pm$0.004 & 11.934$\pm$0.004 & 11.715$\pm$0.014 & 10.711$\pm$0.037 &  --- & II \\

1955: 20 14 44.47 & +41 12 59.8 & 15.492$\pm$0.072 & 14.398$\pm$0.061 & 13.814$\pm$0.066 & 13.132$\pm$0.008 & 12.682$\pm$0.009 & 12.336$\pm$0.024 & 11.223$\pm$0.038 &  --- & I \\

1956: \cutinhead{IRAS 20293+3952}

1957: 20 30 57.60 & +40 02 22.7 & 16.327$\pm$0.096 & 11.954$\pm$0.019 &  9.509$\pm$0.016 &  7.538$\pm$0.002 &  7.392$\pm$0.002 &  7.236$\pm$0.002 &  6.732$\pm$0.002 &  --- & IRe \\

1958: 20 31 00.75 & +40 02 04.1 &  --- &  --- & 14.456$\pm$0.090 & 12.996$\pm$0.008 & 12.398$\pm$0.005 & 11.709$\pm$0.041 & 10.599$\pm$0.058 &  7.628$\pm$0.083 & II \\

1959: 20 31 04.55 & +40 01 46.0 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.132$\pm$0.019 & 13.636$\pm$0.014 & 13.274$\pm$0.082 & 12.257$\pm$0.149 &  --- & II \\

1960: 20 31 08.05 & +40 04 48.7 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.623$\pm$0.022 & 13.324$\pm$0.025 & 12.805$\pm$0.060 & 12.134$\pm$0.125 &  --- & II \\

1961: 20 31 08.59 & +40 02 37.5 & 16.156$\pm$0.084 & 15.038$\pm$0.074 & 14.087$\pm$0.067 & 13.467$\pm$0.037 & 13.109$\pm$0.070 & 12.550$\pm$0.238 &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

1962: 20 31 08.68 & +40 03 48.5 &  --- &  --- &  --- &  9.907$\pm$0.004 &  7.745$\pm$0.003 &  5.924$\pm$0.003 &  4.647$\pm$0.002 &  1.127$\pm$0.007 & I \\

1963: 20 31 08.75 & +40 02 47.4 &  --- &  --- & 12.249$\pm$0.027 &  9.227$\pm$0.003 &  8.203$\pm$0.003 &  7.375$\pm$0.005 &  6.675$\pm$0.011 &  2.616$\pm$0.009 & I \\

1964: 20 31 09.52 & +40 00 22.1 &  --- & 14.943$\pm$0.067 & 14.175$\pm$0.069 & 13.545$\pm$0.008 & 13.338$\pm$0.008 & 13.280$\pm$0.040 & 12.734$\pm$0.118 &  --- & II \\

1965: 20 31 09.59 & +40 03 04.8 &  --- & 14.659$\pm$0.085 & 12.952$\pm$0.044 & 11.032$\pm$0.049 & 10.305$\pm$0.044 &  9.542$\pm$0.218 &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

1966: 20 31 09.85 & +40 02 37.6 &  --- &  --- & 13.741$\pm$0.053 & 11.988$\pm$0.016 & 11.381$\pm$0.015 & 11.021$\pm$0.074 & 10.401$\pm$0.140 &  --- & II \\

1967: 20 31 10.32 & +40 03 16.5 & 13.528$\pm$0.042 & 10.739$\pm$0.024 &  8.316$\pm$0.017 &  5.543$\pm$0.005 &  4.590$\pm$0.003 &  3.303$\pm$0.003 &  2.325$\pm$0.005 & $\ll0.626$ & High\tablenotemark{7} \\

1968: 20 31 10.41 & +40 04 08.2 & 15.096$\pm$0.040 & 13.330$\pm$0.028 & 12.108$\pm$0.022 & 10.358$\pm$0.003 &  9.854$\pm$0.003 &  9.334$\pm$0.006 &  8.477$\pm$0.010 &  --- & II \\

1969: 20 31 11.26 & +40 03 07.6 & 11.403$\pm$0.032 &  9.439$\pm$0.024 &  8.049$\pm$0.016 &  6.775$\pm$0.016 &  6.269$\pm$0.013 &  5.774$\pm$0.116 &  --- & $\ll0.626$ & High\tablenotemark{8} \\

1970: 20 31 11.78 & +40 03 48.8 &  --- & 14.997$\pm$0.068 & 13.814$\pm$0.052 & 12.160$\pm$0.011 & 11.537$\pm$0.010 & 11.004$\pm$0.052 & 10.403$\pm$0.107 &  --- & II \\

1971: 20 31 12.38 & +40 03 10.2 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 11.130$\pm$0.056 &  9.371$\pm$0.023 &  7.397$\pm$0.049 &  6.325$\pm$0.084 &  --- & I \\

1972: 20 31 12.48 & +40 03 20.0 &  --- & 14.873$\pm$0.076 & 12.809$\pm$0.040 &  9.594$\pm$0.016 &  8.484$\pm$0.011 &  7.494$\pm$0.041 &  6.632$\pm$0.083 &  --- & I \\

1973: 20 31 13.87 & +40 06 52.4 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.564$\pm$0.031 & 12.800$\pm$0.027 & 11.999$\pm$0.042 & 11.360$\pm$0.078 &  --- & II \\

1974: 20 31 14.52 & +40 03 26.1 & 13.446$\pm$0.023 & 12.534$\pm$0.026 & 12.040$\pm$0.028 & 11.656$\pm$0.028 & 11.293$\pm$0.043 & 11.189$\pm$0.120 &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

1975: 20 31 14.64 & +40 03 18.6 &  --- & 14.717$\pm$0.074 & 12.312$\pm$0.028 & 10.110$\pm$0.007 &  9.364$\pm$0.006 &  8.751$\pm$0.016 &  8.147$\pm$0.027 &  3.721$\pm$0.079 & I \\

1976: 20 31 15.35 & +40 02 53.8 &  --- &  --- & 14.257$\pm$0.078 & 12.146$\pm$0.008 & 11.394$\pm$0.008 & 10.673$\pm$0.025 &  9.817$\pm$0.061 &  --- & II \\

1977: 20 31 15.69 & +40 03 11.2 &  --- & 14.459$\pm$0.042 & 13.150$\pm$0.031 & 11.492$\pm$0.007 & 10.824$\pm$0.006 & 10.236$\pm$0.016 &  9.428$\pm$0.026 &  --- & II \\

1978: 20 31 16.27 & +40 02 55.2 &  --- &  --- & 14.381$\pm$0.099 & 12.059$\pm$0.007 & 11.277$\pm$0.009 & 10.634$\pm$0.020 &  9.898$\pm$0.043 &  --- & II \\

1979: 20 31 17.05 & +40 03 40.1 &  --- & 14.327$\pm$0.059 & 13.118$\pm$0.047 & 11.721$\pm$0.004 & 11.292$\pm$0.004 & 10.981$\pm$0.017 & 10.381$\pm$0.051 &  --- & II \\

1980: 20 31 17.17 & +40 03 49.8 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.618$\pm$0.032 & 13.905$\pm$0.030 & 13.519$\pm$0.147 & 12.638$\pm$0.200 &  --- & II \\

1981: 20 31 17.46 & +40 03 28.5 & 16.012$\pm$0.080 & 13.758$\pm$0.028 & 12.576$\pm$0.026 & 11.765$\pm$0.004 & 11.473$\pm$0.004 & 11.186$\pm$0.010 & 10.945$\pm$0.031 &  6.313$\pm$0.156 & II \\

1982: 20 31 18.23 & +40 02 53.9 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.548$\pm$0.028 & 12.675$\pm$0.018 & 11.700$\pm$0.022 & 10.437$\pm$0.046 &  4.856$\pm$0.016 & I \\

1983: 20 31 22.88 & +40 03 09.7 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 11.896$\pm$0.006 & 10.910$\pm$0.003 & 10.262$\pm$0.014 &  9.663$\pm$0.043 &  6.457$\pm$0.064 & II \\

1984: 20 31 22.98 & +40 02 21.1 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.660$\pm$0.015 & 14.365$\pm$0.026 & 13.879$\pm$0.100 & 12.890$\pm$0.181 &  --- & II \\

1985: 20 31 25.54 & +40 01 59.2 &  --- & 14.430$\pm$0.044 & 12.860$\pm$0.030 & 11.236$\pm$0.002 & 10.570$\pm$0.003 & 10.026$\pm$0.005 &  9.412$\pm$0.011 &  5.406$\pm$0.017 & I \\

1986: 20 31 27.93 & +40 03 35.6 & 14.312$\pm$0.027 & 13.540$\pm$0.031 & 13.236$\pm$0.040 & 12.782$\pm$0.044 & 12.417$\pm$0.071 &  --- &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

1987: 20 31 28.05 & +40 03 40.5 & 13.808$\pm$0.039 & 12.615$\pm$0.036 & 11.929$\pm$0.030 & 11.146$\pm$0.016 & 10.760$\pm$0.019 & 10.156$\pm$0.072 &  8.492$\pm$0.066 &  --- & I/II \\

1988: \cutinhead{W75\,N}

1989: 20 38 19.40 & +42 36 57.1 &  --- &  --- & 12.029$\pm$0.047 &  9.531$\pm$0.003 &  8.465$\pm$0.003 &  7.431$\pm$0.002 &  6.154$\pm$0.002 &  --- & I \\

1990: 20 38 20.48 & +42 37 13.6 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.491$\pm$0.014 & 12.947$\pm$0.019 & 12.666$\pm$0.072 & 12.162$\pm$0.243 &  --- & II \\

1991: 20 38 22.84 & +42 37 41.9 & 15.671$\pm$0.071 & 14.019$\pm$0.041 & 12.928$\pm$0.027 & 11.770$\pm$0.003 & 11.366$\pm$0.003 & 11.011$\pm$0.016 & 10.659$\pm$0.055 &  --- & IRe \\

1992: 20 38 23.18 & +42 36 41.6 &  --- &  --- & 14.219$\pm$0.068 & 12.190$\pm$0.006 & 11.798$\pm$0.006 & 11.188$\pm$0.040 & 10.779$\pm$0.134 &  --- & II \\

1993: 20 38 23.49 & +42 37 37.4 &  --- & 15.191$\pm$0.097 & 13.968$\pm$0.041 & 12.702$\pm$0.011 & 12.156$\pm$0.006 & 11.856$\pm$0.028 & 11.700$\pm$0.111 &  --- & IRe \\

1994: 20 38 25.02 & +42 35 27.2 &  --- & 14.762$\pm$0.086 & 13.644$\pm$0.041 & 12.360$\pm$0.006 & 11.942$\pm$0.007 & 11.585$\pm$0.042 & 10.861$\pm$0.080 &  --- & II \\

1995: 20 38 25.25 & +42 36 26.9 &  --- &  --- & 14.648$\pm$0.095 & 13.424$\pm$0.018 & 12.937$\pm$0.023 & 12.495$\pm$0.063 & 11.309$\pm$0.144 &  --- & I \\

1996: 20 38 25.89 & +42 36 35.5 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.268$\pm$0.033 & 13.606$\pm$0.064 & 12.907$\pm$0.082 & 11.756$\pm$0.126 &  --- & I \\

1997: 20 38 26.86 & +42 39 29.1 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 12.491$\pm$0.015 & 11.801$\pm$0.008 & 11.148$\pm$0.061 & 10.273$\pm$0.093 &  --- & II \\

1998: 20 38 27.34 & +42 38 29.8 &  --- & 14.387$\pm$0.057 & 13.284$\pm$0.039 & 12.301$\pm$0.006 & 11.824$\pm$0.004 & 11.451$\pm$0.035 & 10.699$\pm$0.100 &  --- & II \\

1999: 20 38 28.58 & +42 37 01.1 &  --- &  --- & 14.710$\pm$0.099 & 13.504$\pm$0.008 & 12.989$\pm$0.007 & 12.445$\pm$0.064 & 11.632$\pm$0.176 &  --- & II \\

2000: 20 38 31.27 & +42 38 24.9 &  --- &  --- & 14.287$\pm$0.075 & 12.250$\pm$0.008 & 11.526$\pm$0.005 & 10.921$\pm$0.023 & 10.285$\pm$0.078 &  --- & II \\

2001: 20 38 31.63 & +42 38 34.7 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 11.900$\pm$0.004 & 11.124$\pm$0.004 & 10.452$\pm$0.023 &  9.801$\pm$0.046 &  4.452$\pm$0.010 & I \\

2002: 20 38 31.96 & +42 37 40.9 & 15.507$\pm$0.062 & 13.837$\pm$0.042 & 13.002$\pm$0.030 & 12.109$\pm$0.012 & 11.668$\pm$0.013 & 11.090$\pm$0.096 & 10.706$\pm$0.229 &  --- & IRe \\

2003: 20 38 32.20 & +42 36 37.3 &  --- & 14.864$\pm$0.095 & 13.549$\pm$0.057 & 11.862$\pm$0.009 & 11.306$\pm$0.007 & 10.975$\pm$0.062 & 10.584$\pm$0.160 &  --- & IRe \\

2004: 20 38 32.31 & +42 39 45.2 &  --- &  --- & 14.735$\pm$0.095 & 10.431$\pm$0.002 &  9.006$\pm$0.002 &  7.888$\pm$0.003 &  7.108$\pm$0.003 &  3.228$\pm$0.015 & I \\

2005: 20 38 32.29 & +42 36 31.4 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 11.340$\pm$0.007 & 10.475$\pm$0.005 &  9.810$\pm$0.016 &  9.255$\pm$0.053 &  --- & I \\

2006: 20 38 32.67 & +42 40 07.1 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.162$\pm$0.032 & 13.264$\pm$0.021 & 12.589$\pm$0.087 & 11.403$\pm$0.121 &  --- & I \\

2007: 20 38 32.82 & +42 39 35.3 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 12.225$\pm$0.027 & 10.368$\pm$0.020 &  9.231$\pm$0.014 &  8.621$\pm$0.036 &  --- & I \\

2008: 20 38 33.14 & +42 38 07.4 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.172$\pm$0.028 & 12.570$\pm$0.023 & 12.042$\pm$0.166 & 10.892$\pm$0.157 &  --- & I \\

2009: 20 38 33.29 & +42 39 32.3 &  --- &  --- & 14.559$\pm$0.091 & 12.833$\pm$0.019 & 11.736$\pm$0.010 & 11.023$\pm$0.026 & 10.575$\pm$0.127 &  --- & I \\

2010: 20 38 33.29 & +42 39 38.5 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 11.734$\pm$0.006 &  9.848$\pm$0.004 &  8.429$\pm$0.004 &  7.377$\pm$0.013 &  3.152$\pm$0.010 & I \\

2011: 20 38 33.42 & +42 37 06.4 & 15.723$\pm$0.065 & 13.955$\pm$0.060 & 13.120$\pm$0.069 & 12.087$\pm$0.068 & 11.665$\pm$0.065 &  --- &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

2012: 20 38 33.60 & +42 37 27.3 &  --- &  --- & 14.320$\pm$0.068 & 11.537$\pm$0.019 & 10.690$\pm$0.023 & 10.093$\pm$0.155 &  9.298$\pm$0.157 &  --- & I \\

2013: 20 38 33.64 & +42 36 53.2 &  --- & 14.363$\pm$0.054 & 12.969$\pm$0.027 & 11.415$\pm$0.008 & 10.893$\pm$0.010 & 10.419$\pm$0.082 &  9.750$\pm$0.095 &  --- & II \\

2014: 20 38 33.73 & +42 39 21.9 &  --- &  --- & 14.560$\pm$0.100 & 12.090$\pm$0.012 & 11.167$\pm$0.008 & 10.350$\pm$0.014 &  9.675$\pm$0.066 &  --- & I \\

2015: 20 38 33.83 & +42 36 15.5 &  --- &  --- & 13.551$\pm$0.041 & 11.983$\pm$0.006 & 11.284$\pm$0.005 & 10.688$\pm$0.021 & 10.056$\pm$0.057 &  --- & II \\

2016: 20 38 34.06 & +42 39 55.8 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.791$\pm$0.029 & 12.447$\pm$0.025 & 12.017$\pm$0.093 & 12.116$\pm$0.183 &  5.685$\pm$0.061\tablenotemark{\star} & I \\

2017: 20 38 34.14 & +42 37 58.2 &  --- & 14.147$\pm$0.054 & 12.890$\pm$0.039 & 11.404$\pm$0.019 & 10.708$\pm$0.011 & 10.000$\pm$0.087 &  9.208$\pm$0.197 &  --- & II \\

2018: 20 38 34.17 & +42 38 40.9 & 15.897$\pm$0.089 & 13.363$\pm$0.040 & 11.936$\pm$0.028 & 10.541$\pm$0.005 &  9.907$\pm$0.005 &  9.317$\pm$0.029 &  8.796$\pm$0.038 &  --- & II \\

2019: 20 38 34.39 & +42 39 18.1 & 15.990$\pm$0.092 & 14.084$\pm$0.053 & 13.152$\pm$0.037 & 11.793$\pm$0.006 & 11.288$\pm$0.007 & 10.795$\pm$0.040 & 10.380$\pm$0.098 &  --- & II \\

2020: 20 38 34.51 & +42 38 07.5 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 12.548$\pm$0.039 & 11.591$\pm$0.023 & 10.909$\pm$0.160 &  9.629$\pm$0.218 &  --- & I \\

2021: 20 38 34.66 & +42 36 20.5 &  --- & 14.795$\pm$0.087 & 13.826$\pm$0.051 & 12.847$\pm$0.012 & 12.511$\pm$0.008 & 11.939$\pm$0.089 & 10.731$\pm$0.160 &  --- & I/II \\

2022: 20 38 35.28 & +42 36 50.1 &  --- &  --- & 13.600$\pm$0.057 & 11.476$\pm$0.019 & 10.649$\pm$0.020 & 10.186$\pm$0.058 &  9.666$\pm$0.056 &  --- & I \\

2023: 20 38 35.37 & +42 37 13.7 &  --- & 12.771$\pm$0.045 &  9.482$\pm$0.028 &  5.817$\pm$0.004 &  4.757$\pm$0.003 &  3.556$\pm$0.009 &  2.451$\pm$0.010 & $\ll0.626$ & High\tablenotemark{9} \\

2024: 20 38 36.20 & +42 38 07.8 & 15.614$\pm$0.075 & 13.649$\pm$0.049 & 12.522$\pm$0.046 & 10.824$\pm$0.150 & 10.570$\pm$0.151 &  --- &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

2025: 20 38 36.26 & +42 38 26.0 &  --- & 14.969$\pm$0.083 & 13.146$\pm$0.019 & 11.802$\pm$0.021 & 11.253$\pm$0.024 & 10.482$\pm$0.085 &  9.619$\pm$0.144 &  --- & II \\

2026: 20 38 36.34 & +42 39 47.6 & 14.821$\pm$0.040 & 12.920$\pm$0.027 & 11.784$\pm$0.023 & 10.352$\pm$0.007 &  9.698$\pm$0.005 &  9.020$\pm$0.018 &  8.250$\pm$0.064 &  --- & II \\

2027: 20 38 36.43 & +42 40 41.8 & 15.943$\pm$0.089 & 14.208$\pm$0.047 & 13.404$\pm$0.034 & 12.713$\pm$0.015 & 12.256$\pm$0.012 & 11.718$\pm$0.053 & 10.829$\pm$0.100 &  7.894$\pm$0.144 & II \\

2028: 20 38 36.89 & +42 39 52.1 & 15.753$\pm$0.073 & 14.848$\pm$0.071 & 14.374$\pm$0.069 & 13.709$\pm$0.082 & 13.432$\pm$0.098 &  --- &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

2029: 20 38 37.01 & +42 39 34.8 & 14.604$\pm$0.064 &  --- & 12.264$\pm$0.071 & 10.198$\pm$0.083 &  9.874$\pm$0.063 &  7.222$\pm$0.116 &  5.485$\pm$0.112 &  --- & I/II \\

2030: 20 38 37.29 & +42 39 33.0 & 13.623$\pm$0.063 &  --- & 11.078$\pm$0.063 &  9.493$\pm$0.057 &  8.956$\pm$0.032 &  --- &  5.288$\pm$0.114 &  0.2$\pm$0.1\tablenotemark{{\star}{\star}} & II \\

2031: 20 38 37.50 & +42 39 10.4 & 15.681$\pm$0.073 & 13.739$\pm$0.045 & 12.655$\pm$0.036 & 11.377$\pm$0.009 & 10.815$\pm$0.010 & 10.204$\pm$0.023 &  9.532$\pm$0.062 &  --- & II \\

2032: 20 38 37.52 & +42 39 26.3 & 14.973$\pm$0.087 & 12.349$\pm$0.076 & 10.662$\pm$0.042 &  8.828$\pm$0.013 &  8.251$\pm$0.012 &  7.356$\pm$0.026 &  6.027$\pm$0.052 &  --- & I \\

2033: 20 38 37.73 & +42 37 59.4 & 13.950$\pm$0.039 & 11.457$\pm$0.037 & 10.066$\pm$0.045 &  8.922$\pm$0.105 &  8.074$\pm$0.094 &  --- &  --- & $\ll0.626$ & High\tablenotemark{10} \\

2034: 20 38 37.87 & +42 40 00.1 &  --- &  --- & 14.438$\pm$0.079 & 12.431$\pm$0.023 & 11.661$\pm$0.015 & 11.030$\pm$0.108 & 10.216$\pm$0.250 &  --- & II \\

2035: 20 38 37.91 & +42 39 21.4 & 14.707$\pm$0.040 & 12.805$\pm$0.034 & 11.714$\pm$0.024 & 10.091$\pm$0.012 &  9.495$\pm$0.009 &  8.857$\pm$0.022 &  7.834$\pm$0.037 &  --- & II \\

2036: 20 38 38.15 & +42 39 07.5 &  --- & 14.825$\pm$0.084 & 13.822$\pm$0.064 & 12.556$\pm$0.021 & 12.084$\pm$0.028 &  --- &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

2037: 20 38 38.46 & +42 39 50.0 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 11.608$\pm$0.019 & 10.560$\pm$0.014 &  9.386$\pm$0.031 &  8.097$\pm$0.051 &  --- & I \\

2038: 20 38 38.64 & +42 39 39.2 &  --- & 15.073$\pm$0.091 & 13.484$\pm$0.037 & 11.109$\pm$0.008 & 10.007$\pm$0.007 &  9.165$\pm$0.026 &  8.554$\pm$0.061 &  --- & I \\

2039: 20 38 38.74 & +42 39 52.3 & 15.103$\pm$0.048 & 13.418$\pm$0.041 & 12.415$\pm$0.027 & 11.192$\pm$0.021 & 10.785$\pm$0.041 &  --- &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

2040: 20 38 38.82 & +42 37 17.6 & 12.614$\pm$0.025 & 10.984$\pm$0.029 &  9.723$\pm$0.027 &  8.353$\pm$0.006 &  7.780$\pm$0.005 &  7.051$\pm$0.027 &  5.695$\pm$0.043 &  --- & High\tablenotemark{11} \\

2041: 20 38 38.83 & +42 39 26.6 & 14.209$\pm$0.032 & 12.337$\pm$0.032 & 11.126$\pm$0.027 &  9.889$\pm$0.005 &  9.497$\pm$0.006 &  9.191$\pm$0.023 &  9.199$\pm$0.074 &  --- & IRe \\

2042: 20 38 38.86 & +42 37 43.9 &  --- & 13.672$\pm$0.023 & 12.129$\pm$0.023 & 10.325$\pm$0.044 &  9.725$\pm$0.047 &  8.590$\pm$0.160 &  7.186$\pm$0.205 &  --- & I \\

2043: 20 38 39.01 & +42 39 22.0 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 11.576$\pm$0.012 & 10.721$\pm$0.013 &  9.838$\pm$0.036 &  8.992$\pm$0.076 &  --- & I \\

2044: 20 38 39.37 & +42 37 11.6 &  --- & 13.657$\pm$0.090 & 12.261$\pm$0.081 & 10.923$\pm$0.063 & 10.144$\pm$0.047 &  9.276$\pm$0.034 &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

2045: 20 38 39.47 & +42 38 56.9 &  --- &  --- & 14.606$\pm$0.093 & 12.737$\pm$0.032 & 12.120$\pm$0.035 & 11.554$\pm$0.071 & 10.881$\pm$0.140 &  --- & II \\

2046: 20 38 39.89 & +42 36 42.6 &  --- &  --- & 14.575$\pm$0.099 & 13.998$\pm$0.107 & 13.792$\pm$0.122 & 12.758$\pm$0.177 & 12.158$\pm$0.187 &  --- & II \\

2047: 20 38 40.07 & +42 38 09.2 & 16.130$\pm$0.098 & 14.234$\pm$0.061 & 13.218$\pm$0.042 & 11.319$\pm$0.111 & 10.917$\pm$0.112 &  --- &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

2048: 20 38 40.16 & +42 39 53.5 &  --- & 14.383$\pm$0.082 & 12.799$\pm$0.055 & 11.294$\pm$0.094 & 10.535$\pm$0.067 &  8.885$\pm$0.171 &  --- &  0.900$\pm$0.004 & High\tablenotemark{12} \\

2049: 20 38 40.42 & +42 35 45.9 & 15.159$\pm$0.045 & 14.505$\pm$0.065 & 14.286$\pm$0.071 & 13.551$\pm$0.126 & 13.399$\pm$0.111 &  --- &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

2050: 20 38 41.16 & +42 39 23.1 &  --- & 13.395$\pm$0.040 & 11.369$\pm$0.023 &  9.372$\pm$0.004 &  8.828$\pm$0.003 &  8.291$\pm$0.002 &  7.741$\pm$0.008 &  3.539$\pm$0.052 & II \\

2051: 20 38 42.63 & +42 35 43.7 &  --- &  --- & 11.737$\pm$0.033 & 10.489$\pm$0.003 &  9.997$\pm$0.003 &  9.686$\pm$0.012 &  9.224$\pm$0.022 &  5.681$\pm$0.169 & II \\

2052: 20 38 43.05 & +42 39 04.5 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.327$\pm$0.039 & 12.638$\pm$0.035 & 12.144$\pm$0.120 & 11.143$\pm$0.197 &  --- & II \\

2053: 20 38 43.06 & +42 36 59.7 &  --- &  --- & 13.593$\pm$0.056 & 10.989$\pm$0.009 & 10.306$\pm$0.007 &  9.797$\pm$0.025 &  9.316$\pm$0.042 &  --- & II \\

2054: 20 38 43.84 & +42 37 13.7 &  --- &  --- & 14.696$\pm$0.081 & 13.080$\pm$0.013 & 12.548$\pm$0.028 & 12.085$\pm$0.060 & 11.347$\pm$0.132 &  --- & II \\

2055: 20 38 43.86 & +42 36 52.9 &  --- &  --- & 14.213$\pm$0.060 & 12.138$\pm$0.013 & 11.345$\pm$0.007 & 10.842$\pm$0.017 & 10.219$\pm$0.085 &  --- & II \\

2056: 20 38 43.93 & +42 37 44.6 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 12.958$\pm$0.045 & 12.189$\pm$0.046 & 11.133$\pm$0.073 &  9.951$\pm$0.176 &  --- & I \\

2057: 20 38 44.42 & +42 38 58.4 &  --- &  --- & 14.520$\pm$0.081 & 13.101$\pm$0.020 & 12.514$\pm$0.013 & 11.638$\pm$0.094 & 10.666$\pm$0.242 &  --- & II \\

2058: 20 38 45.04 & +42 39 40.2 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.900$\pm$0.013 & 13.007$\pm$0.012 & 12.200$\pm$0.053 & 11.318$\pm$0.101 &  --- & I \\

2059: 20 38 45.56 & +42 38 01.9 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 12.996$\pm$0.025 & 12.278$\pm$0.014 & 11.392$\pm$0.081 & 10.126$\pm$0.066 &  --- & I \\

2060: 20 38 46.22 & +42 40 01.5 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.605$\pm$0.011 & 12.997$\pm$0.009 & 12.845$\pm$0.066 & 12.267$\pm$0.188 &  --- & II \\

2061: 20 38 46.69 & +42 37 44.0 &  --- &  --- & 13.625$\pm$0.044 & 12.178$\pm$0.008 & 11.885$\pm$0.010 & 11.480$\pm$0.064 & 10.949$\pm$0.174 &  --- & II \\

2062: 20 38 47.43 & +42 38 19.9 &  --- &  --- & 14.192$\pm$0.065 & 13.136$\pm$0.013 & 12.909$\pm$0.013 & 12.211$\pm$0.087 & 11.221$\pm$0.187 &  --- & II \\

2063: 20 38 48.52 & +42 37 30.0 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.911$\pm$0.020 & 13.383$\pm$0.015 & 12.589$\pm$0.099 & 11.545$\pm$0.159 &  --- & II \\

2064: 20 38 49.47 & +42 36 08.5 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 12.123$\pm$0.007 & 10.261$\pm$0.003 &  9.130$\pm$0.007 &  8.200$\pm$0.028 &  4.367$\pm$0.014 & I \\

2065: 20 38 51.13 & +42 35 51.7 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.737$\pm$0.016 & 13.167$\pm$0.020 & 12.645$\pm$0.062 & 11.538$\pm$0.185 &  --- & I \\

2066: \cutinhead{IRAS 22172+5549}

2067: 22 18 45.18 & +56 04 49.3 & 15.020$\pm$0.052 & 14.149$\pm$0.059 & 13.530$\pm$0.052 & 12.824$\pm$0.010 & 12.451$\pm$0.010 & 12.185$\pm$0.078 & 11.147$\pm$0.169 &  --- & II \\

2068: 22 18 45.73 & +56 03 52.6 &  --- & 14.950$\pm$0.089 & 14.180$\pm$0.075 & 12.817$\pm$0.023 & 12.524$\pm$0.014 & 11.655$\pm$0.170 &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

2069: 22 18 46.31 & +56 05 03.4 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.182$\pm$0.016 & 13.874$\pm$0.018 & 13.703$\pm$0.037 & 13.058$\pm$0.071 &  --- & II \\

2070: 22 18 47.26 & +56 05 58.4 & 15.913$\pm$0.097 & 14.767$\pm$0.090 & 14.133$\pm$0.071 & 12.870$\pm$0.037 & 12.540$\pm$0.021 & 12.156$\pm$0.174 &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

2071: 22 18 47.54 & +56 05 11.2 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 15.043$\pm$0.021 & 14.544$\pm$0.023 & 14.133$\pm$0.061 & 13.072$\pm$0.070 &  --- & II \\

2072: 22 18 48.01 & +56 05 02.9 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.347$\pm$0.015 & 13.848$\pm$0.020 & 13.453$\pm$0.042 & 12.997$\pm$0.096 &  --- & II \\

2073: 22 18 49.37 & +56 05 46.5 & 14.128$\pm$0.031 & 13.120$\pm$0.037 & 12.394$\pm$0.033 & 11.297$\pm$0.003 & 10.824$\pm$0.003 & 10.320$\pm$0.004 &  9.549$\pm$0.010 &  --- & II \\

2074: 22 18 49.40 & +56 04 31.0 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 15.127$\pm$0.051 & 14.550$\pm$0.042 & 14.153$\pm$0.151 & 13.245$\pm$0.230 &  --- & II \\

2075: 22 18 49.86 & +56 06 18.5 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.732$\pm$0.016 & 13.486$\pm$0.014 & 13.500$\pm$0.090 & 12.536$\pm$0.111 &  --- & II \\

2076: 22 18 50.13 & +56 03 40.8 & 15.555$\pm$0.072 & 14.556$\pm$0.075 & 13.805$\pm$0.057 & 12.616$\pm$0.048 & 12.106$\pm$0.025 & 11.944$\pm$0.245 &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

2077: 22 18 50.78 & +56 05 06.8 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.304$\pm$0.038 & 13.990$\pm$0.022 & 13.566$\pm$0.044 & 12.893$\pm$0.064 &  --- & II \\

2078: 22 18 52.22 & +56 06 13.7 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.835$\pm$0.025 & 13.393$\pm$0.027 & 13.071$\pm$0.048 & 12.275$\pm$0.068 &  --- & II \\

2079: 22 18 52.49 & +56 06 48.8 & 15.849$\pm$0.086 &  --- &  --- & 13.861$\pm$0.013 & 13.587$\pm$0.015 & 13.036$\pm$0.079 & 12.612$\pm$0.141 &  --- & II \\

2080: 22 18 52.69 & +56 06 05.1 & 14.392$\pm$0.032 & 13.444$\pm$0.038 & 12.604$\pm$0.033 & 11.494$\pm$0.004 & 10.997$\pm$0.003 & 10.366$\pm$0.006 &  9.244$\pm$0.008 &  6.996$\pm$0.100 & II \\

2081: 22 18 53.62 & +56 06 24.8 & 15.779$\pm$0.084 &  --- & 14.292$\pm$0.091 & 13.682$\pm$0.016 & 13.410$\pm$0.016 & 13.149$\pm$0.055 & 12.151$\pm$0.087 &  --- & II \\

2082: 22 18 54.35 & +56 04 59.6 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 15.135$\pm$0.064 & 14.341$\pm$0.037 & 13.548$\pm$0.051 & 12.361$\pm$0.103 &  --- & I \\

2083: 22 18 55.39 & +56 05 12.9 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.456$\pm$0.025 & 13.088$\pm$0.031 & 12.710$\pm$0.047 & 11.766$\pm$0.051 &  --- & II \\

2084: 22 18 55.67 & +56 05 16.3 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 12.832$\pm$0.025 & 12.415$\pm$0.022 & 11.921$\pm$0.027 & 10.884$\pm$0.020 &  --- & II \\

2085: 22 18 55.67 & +56 04 55.4 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.589$\pm$0.039 & 14.275$\pm$0.037 & 13.948$\pm$0.086 & 13.240$\pm$0.117 &  --- & II \\

2086: 22 18 56.14 & +56 05 48.6 & 11.113$\pm$0.024 & 10.983$\pm$0.032 & 10.856$\pm$0.026 & 10.865$\pm$0.004 & 10.874$\pm$0.004 & 10.755$\pm$0.009 & 10.745$\pm$0.043 &  5.022$\pm$0.040 & II \\

2087: 22 18 56.27 & +56 05 32.3 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.709$\pm$0.021 & 13.371$\pm$0.025 & 13.113$\pm$0.058 & 12.284$\pm$0.076 &  --- & II \\

2088: 22 18 57.18 & +56 05 02.0 & 12.895$\pm$0.027 & 12.669$\pm$0.036 & 12.535$\pm$0.030 & 12.523$\pm$0.008 & 12.519$\pm$0.011 & 12.440$\pm$0.024 & 12.341$\pm$0.072 &  5.719$\pm$0.061\tablenotemark{\star} & II \\

2089: 22 18 57.62 & +56 07 07.0 & 14.513$\pm$0.062 & 13.788$\pm$0.067 & 13.247$\pm$0.057 & 12.551$\pm$0.017 & 12.304$\pm$0.018 & 11.905$\pm$0.021 & 10.794$\pm$0.042 &  --- & I/II \\

2090: 22 18 57.71 & +56 04 27.5 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.889$\pm$0.053 & 14.477$\pm$0.040 & 14.013$\pm$0.136 & 13.007$\pm$0.147 &  --- & II \\

2091: 22 18 57.82 & +56 05 52.6 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.702$\pm$0.032 & 14.026$\pm$0.024 & 13.804$\pm$0.092 & 12.896$\pm$0.173 &  --- & II \\

2092: 22 18 58.38 & +56 04 23.3 & 15.038$\pm$0.054 & 14.818$\pm$0.095 & 14.452$\pm$0.091 & 14.145$\pm$0.054 & 13.946$\pm$0.041 &  --- &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

2093: 22 18 58.68 & +56 07 23.6 &  8.931$\pm$0.027 &  8.896$\pm$0.038 &  8.806$\pm$0.029 &  8.611$\pm$0.003 &  8.533$\pm$0.003 &  8.443$\pm$0.004 &  8.443$\pm$0.008 &  --- & IRe \\

2094: 22 18 58.71 & +56 04 54.5 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.739$\pm$0.018 & 14.022$\pm$0.012 & 13.410$\pm$0.058 & 12.698$\pm$0.087 &  --- & II \\

2095: 22 18 58.76 & +56 05 18.8 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.950$\pm$0.033 & 14.521$\pm$0.022 & 14.202$\pm$0.071 & 13.625$\pm$0.118 &  --- & II \\

2096: 22 18 59.21 & +56 05 00.6 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.446$\pm$0.009 & 13.065$\pm$0.008 & 12.663$\pm$0.033 & 12.208$\pm$0.069 &  --- & II \\

2097: 22 18 59.72 & +56 05 13.9 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.744$\pm$0.011 & 13.256$\pm$0.011 & 12.750$\pm$0.026 & 12.090$\pm$0.031 &  --- & II \\

2098: 22 19 00.08 & +56 03 14.8 & 14.409$\pm$0.041 & 14.326$\pm$0.084 & 14.223$\pm$0.075 & 13.747$\pm$0.077 & 13.742$\pm$0.066 &  --- &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

2099: 22 19 00.18 & +56 05 34.7 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.802$\pm$0.024 & 14.256$\pm$0.021 & 13.743$\pm$0.074 & 12.564$\pm$0.060 &  --- & I \\

2100: 22 19 00.26 & +56 06 41.4 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.707$\pm$0.016 & 13.249$\pm$0.011 & 12.780$\pm$0.045 & 12.298$\pm$0.112 &  --- & II \\

2101: 22 19 02.01 & +56 07 08.5 & 15.270$\pm$0.056 & 14.481$\pm$0.053 & 13.862$\pm$0.052 & 13.070$\pm$0.014 & 12.676$\pm$0.012 & 12.327$\pm$0.024 & 11.843$\pm$0.047 &  --- & II \\

2102: 22 19 02.01 & +56 08 00.7 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.705$\pm$0.034 & 14.267$\pm$0.041 & 14.050$\pm$0.119 & 12.965$\pm$0.173 &  --- & II \\

2103: 22 19 02.18 & +56 07 25.8 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.747$\pm$0.037 & 13.380$\pm$0.038 & 13.006$\pm$0.054 & 12.336$\pm$0.065 &  --- & II \\

2104: 22 19 02.26 & +56 06 36.5 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.591$\pm$0.012 & 13.288$\pm$0.012 & 12.899$\pm$0.040 & 12.067$\pm$0.075 &  --- & II \\

2105: 22 19 02.62 & +56 06 17.3 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.959$\pm$0.031 & 14.574$\pm$0.028 & 14.038$\pm$0.082 & 13.163$\pm$0.177 &  --- & II \\

2106: 22 19 02.77 & +56 05 40.6 & 15.718$\pm$0.098 &  --- & 14.373$\pm$0.096 & 13.702$\pm$0.018 & 13.421$\pm$0.016 & 12.686$\pm$0.056 & 11.228$\pm$0.099 &  --- & I/II \\

2107: 22 19 03.80 & +56 05 10.3 &  --- &  --- & 14.352$\pm$0.086 & 13.326$\pm$0.017 & 12.954$\pm$0.017 & 12.516$\pm$0.058 & 11.574$\pm$0.073 &  --- & II \\

2108: 22 19 04.36 & +56 05 50.8 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 15.065$\pm$0.042 & 14.314$\pm$0.042 & 13.823$\pm$0.188 & 12.684$\pm$0.196 &  --- & I \\

2109: 22 19 04.46 & +56 05 36.0 &  --- &  --- & 14.400$\pm$0.089 & 13.276$\pm$0.014 & 12.792$\pm$0.014 & 12.347$\pm$0.080 & 11.694$\pm$0.097 &  --- & II \\

2110: 22 19 04.50 & +56 05 07.8 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.300$\pm$0.033 & 13.682$\pm$0.021 & 13.067$\pm$0.139 & 11.783$\pm$0.206 &  --- & I \\

2111: 22 19 05.21 & +56 08 25.8 & 15.052$\pm$0.061 & 14.240$\pm$0.068 & 13.573$\pm$0.055 & 12.759$\pm$0.006 & 12.454$\pm$0.007 & 12.038$\pm$0.022 & 11.079$\pm$0.043 &  --- & II \\

2112: 22 19 05.72 & +56 04 52.7 &  --- & 14.742$\pm$0.092 & 13.724$\pm$0.067 & 12.543$\pm$0.127 & 11.716$\pm$0.049 &  --- &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

2113: 22 19 05.82 & +56 05 18.8 &  --- & 15.059$\pm$0.097 & 14.139$\pm$0.061 & 12.013$\pm$0.008 & 11.568$\pm$0.008 & 11.249$\pm$0.050 & 10.421$\pm$0.100 &  --- & II \\

2114: 22 19 05.79 & +56 07 05.9 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.806$\pm$0.007 & 13.569$\pm$0.013 & 13.200$\pm$0.029 & 12.794$\pm$0.054 &  --- & II \\

2115: 22 19 05.94 & +56 05 41.7 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.125$\pm$0.018 & 13.725$\pm$0.025 & 12.992$\pm$0.163 & 11.932$\pm$0.146 &  --- & II \\

2116: 22 19 06.02 & +56 05 55.3 & 15.355$\pm$0.061 & 14.251$\pm$0.054 & 13.557$\pm$0.047 & 12.410$\pm$0.006 & 11.978$\pm$0.004 & 11.629$\pm$0.024 & 10.753$\pm$0.043 &  --- & II \\

2117: 22 19 07.65 & +56 05 28.6 & 15.827$\pm$0.092 & 14.675$\pm$0.064 & 13.733$\pm$0.058 & 12.327$\pm$0.025 & 11.811$\pm$0.028 & 11.646$\pm$0.166 &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

2118: 22 19 08.03 & +56 04 11.1 &  --- & 14.842$\pm$0.086 & 13.321$\pm$0.047 & 10.996$\pm$0.007 & 10.090$\pm$0.003 &  9.156$\pm$0.016 &  8.190$\pm$0.039 &  4.487$\pm$0.069 & I \\

2119: 22 19 08.30 & +56 05 11.0 & 11.965$\pm$0.035 & 11.228$\pm$0.045 & 10.474$\pm$0.033 &  9.074$\pm$0.011 &  8.562$\pm$0.012 &  7.390$\pm$0.028 &  5.902$\pm$0.038 &  1.305$\pm$0.008 & II \\

2120: 22 19 08.45 & +56 05 28.7 & 15.626$\pm$0.092 & 14.406$\pm$0.068 & 13.727$\pm$0.064 & 12.688$\pm$0.039 & 12.071$\pm$0.047 & 11.519$\pm$0.160 &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

2121: 22 19 09.39 & +56 04 45.7 & 15.279$\pm$0.071 & 14.094$\pm$0.056 & 13.175$\pm$0.046 & 10.549$\pm$0.017 & 10.256$\pm$0.037 &  7.507$\pm$0.015 &  5.775$\pm$0.018 &  1.175$\pm$0.002 & II \\

2122: 22 19 09.38 & +56 05 00.4 &  --- & 13.306$\pm$0.092 & 11.331$\pm$0.052 &  7.882$\pm$0.007 &  6.685$\pm$0.005 &  5.552$\pm$0.007 &  4.449$\pm$0.012 &  0.3$\pm$0.1\tablenotemark{{\star}{\star}} & I \\

2123: 22 19 09.70 & +56 05 04.8 &  --- &  --- &  --- &  8.097$\pm$0.008 &  7.042$\pm$0.007 &  5.969$\pm$0.008 &  4.969$\pm$0.016 &  --- & I \\

2124: 22 19 09.84 & +56 07 37.4 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.546$\pm$0.067 & 14.064$\pm$0.032 & 13.684$\pm$0.059 & 13.006$\pm$0.133 &  --- & II \\

2125: 22 19 09.94 & +56 08 20.5 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.614$\pm$0.017 & 14.099$\pm$0.018 & 13.705$\pm$0.070 & 12.698$\pm$0.138 &  --- & II \\

2126: 22 19 10.42 & +56 02 11.5 & 13.786$\pm$0.027 & 12.895$\pm$0.039 & 12.215$\pm$0.025 & 11.363$\pm$0.005 & 10.926$\pm$0.003 & 10.527$\pm$0.022 &  9.633$\pm$0.052 &  --- & II \\

2127: 22 19 10.94 & +56 06 07.6 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.477$\pm$0.025 & 14.199$\pm$0.022 & 13.795$\pm$0.048 & 13.171$\pm$0.088 &  --- & II \\

2128: 22 19 11.45 & +56 02 53.2 & 15.832$\pm$0.087 & 14.918$\pm$0.094 & 14.261$\pm$0.076 & 13.261$\pm$0.015 & 12.845$\pm$0.014 & 12.947$\pm$0.109 &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

2129: 22 19 11.62 & +56 02 36.6 & 11.025$\pm$0.038 & 10.874$\pm$0.039 & 10.782$\pm$0.033 & 10.772$\pm$0.008 & 10.671$\pm$0.009 & 10.583$\pm$0.025 &  9.777$\pm$0.054 &  4.561$\pm$0.026 & II \\

2130: 22 19 12.07 & +56 07 09.1 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.114$\pm$0.021 & 13.791$\pm$0.017 & 12.987$\pm$0.067 & 11.655$\pm$0.077 &  --- & I/II \\

2131: 22 19 12.65 & +56 02 03.6 & 15.064$\pm$0.054 & 14.353$\pm$0.084 & 13.829$\pm$0.066 & 12.865$\pm$0.015 & 12.427$\pm$0.008 & 12.052$\pm$0.083 & 11.098$\pm$0.173 &  --- & II \\

2132: 22 19 13.80 & +56 07 48.4 & 14.745$\pm$0.053 & 14.444$\pm$0.074 & 14.067$\pm$0.071 & 13.764$\pm$0.010 & 13.675$\pm$0.010 & 13.636$\pm$0.064 &  --- &  --- & IRe \\

2133: 22 19 15.06 & +56 06 53.0 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.043$\pm$0.008 & 13.752$\pm$0.010 & 13.465$\pm$0.029 & 12.844$\pm$0.045 &  --- & II \\

2134: 22 19 15.18 & +56 07 02.8 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.478$\pm$0.026 & 14.241$\pm$0.043 & 13.909$\pm$0.069 & 13.280$\pm$0.084 &  --- & II \\

2135: 22 19 17.51 & +56 03 14.2 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.814$\pm$0.026 & 14.445$\pm$0.023 & 14.085$\pm$0.049 & 13.401$\pm$0.090 &  --- & II \\

2136: 22 19 17.89 & +56 04 01.7 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.444$\pm$0.015 & 14.057$\pm$0.017 & 13.886$\pm$0.104 & 13.136$\pm$0.213 &  --- & II \\

2137: 22 19 18.33 & +56 02 56.0 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 15.177$\pm$0.034 & 14.934$\pm$0.027 & 14.756$\pm$0.084 & 14.151$\pm$0.121 &  --- & II \\

2138: 22 19 19.80 & +56 03 01.5 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.251$\pm$0.025 & 13.386$\pm$0.015 & 12.660$\pm$0.016 & 11.928$\pm$0.031 &  7.246$\pm$0.038 & I \\

2139: 22 19 20.39 & +56 03 49.3 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 15.110$\pm$0.025 & 14.846$\pm$0.032 & 14.733$\pm$0.128 & 14.031$\pm$0.137 &  --- & II \\

2140: 22 19 20.78 & +56 06 12.3 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 15.509$\pm$0.039 & 15.072$\pm$0.040 & 14.546$\pm$0.096 & 13.892$\pm$0.105 &  --- & II \\

2141: 22 19 21.06 & +56 06 31.0 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.443$\pm$0.013 & 14.111$\pm$0.013 & 13.777$\pm$0.055 & 13.367$\pm$0.066 &  --- & II \\

2142: 22 19 21.24 & +56 06 40.1 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.756$\pm$0.020 & 14.584$\pm$0.016 & 14.480$\pm$0.114 & 13.548$\pm$0.116 &  8.345$\pm$0.093 & II \\

2143: 22 19 21.35 & +56 04 48.3 & 11.740$\pm$0.024 & 11.571$\pm$0.032 & 11.473$\pm$0.023 & 11.446$\pm$0.002 & 11.460$\pm$0.003 & 11.472$\pm$0.008 & 11.374$\pm$0.018 &  6.394$\pm$0.016 & II \\

2144: 22 19 21.58 & +56 04 20.8 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.740$\pm$0.014 & 13.315$\pm$0.012 & 12.919$\pm$0.024 & 12.136$\pm$0.047 &  --- & II \\

2145: 22 19 21.80 & +56 06 03.9 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 15.277$\pm$0.019 & 15.059$\pm$0.030 & 14.670$\pm$0.067 & 14.258$\pm$0.091 &  --- & II \\

2146: 22 19 21.81 & +56 03 06.1 & 11.624$\pm$0.024 & 11.480$\pm$0.031 & 11.341$\pm$0.022 & 11.371$\pm$0.005 & 11.415$\pm$0.005 & 11.359$\pm$0.009 & 11.084$\pm$0.031 &  5.497$\pm$0.011 & II \\

2147: 22 19 22.67 & +56 05 57.0 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 15.179$\pm$0.017 & 14.699$\pm$0.020 & 14.466$\pm$0.058 & 13.643$\pm$0.060 &  --- & II \\

2148: 22 19 22.85 & +56 06 02.3 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 13.969$\pm$0.012 & 13.736$\pm$0.013 & 13.611$\pm$0.045 & 13.074$\pm$0.049 &  --- & II \\

2149: 22 19 23.28 & +56 03 54.9 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.338$\pm$0.009 & 14.060$\pm$0.013 & 13.701$\pm$0.037 & 12.926$\pm$0.051 &  --- & II \\

2150: 22 19 23.81 & +56 06 00.4 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.304$\pm$0.012 & 14.034$\pm$0.015 & 13.774$\pm$0.044 & 13.223$\pm$0.071 &  --- & II \\

2151: 22 19 24.50 & +56 03 36.0 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.487$\pm$0.031 & 14.195$\pm$0.025 & 13.920$\pm$0.053 & 13.399$\pm$0.118 &  --- & II \\

2152: 22 19 24.54 & +56 03 21.3 & 12.454$\pm$0.026 & 12.308$\pm$0.036 & 12.279$\pm$0.034 & 12.350$\pm$0.023 & 12.264$\pm$0.016 & 12.414$\pm$0.061 & 12.226$\pm$0.082 &  7.554$\pm$0.070 & II \\

2153: 22 19 25.98 & +56 04 10.2 & 12.667$\pm$0.022 & 12.489$\pm$0.032 & 12.414$\pm$0.028 & 12.428$\pm$0.007 & 12.414$\pm$0.006 & 12.382$\pm$0.024 & 12.159$\pm$0.053 &  6.440$\pm$0.026 & II \\

2154: 22 19 27.48 & +56 04 47.8 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.483$\pm$0.026 & 13.967$\pm$0.029 & 13.786$\pm$0.046 & 13.071$\pm$0.048 &  --- & II \\

2155: 22 19 27.90 & +56 06 08.2 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.861$\pm$0.012 & 14.536$\pm$0.020 & 14.172$\pm$0.065 & 13.716$\pm$0.108 &  --- & II \\

2156: 22 19 28.81 & +56 04 53.9 &  --- &  --- &  --- & 14.948$\pm$0.014 & 14.686$\pm$0.021 & 14.458$\pm$0.049 & 13.808$\pm$0.066 &  --- & II \\

2157: 22 19 31.32 & +56 06 00.8 & 15.960$\pm$0.095 & 15.054$\pm$0.092 & 14.496$\pm$0.089 & 13.821$\pm$0.011 & 13.447$\pm$0.012 & 13.350$\pm$0.043 & 12.831$\pm$0.067 &  --- & II \\

2158: \enddata

2159: 

2160: \tablenotetext{\dag}{J2000.0 coordinates}

2161: \tablenotetext{\ddag}{source significantly saturated in the MIPS

2162: 24 $\mu$m band are marked with the photometry of $\ll0.626$,

2163: implying a flux level much higher than the saturation limit of 4.1

2164: Jy} \tablenotetext{\ast}{I

2165: --- protostars; II --- class II; I/II --- class I/II; IRe --- YSOs

2166: only identifiable in the 2MASS-IRAC diagrams; High --- candidates

2167: of intermediate- to high-mass YSOs, see the notes below for

2168: details} \tablenotetext{\blacktriangle}{most likely attributed to

2169: the millimeter source(s) in \citet{Zhang07}}

2170: \tablenotetext{\star}{blended with a neighboring brighter object

2171: in the MIPS 24 $\mu$m band --- magnitudes derived from the

2172: PSF-fitting photometry} \tablenotetext{{\star}{\star}}{slightly

2173: saturated in the MIPS 24 $\mu$m band --- magnitudes derived by

2174: manually scaling the PSF, subtracting the PSF from the image, and

2175: comparing the residual of the PSF wing with a sky value}

2176: \tablenotetext{1}{the exciting source of the surrounding

2177: reflection nebula, associated with the luminous IRAS source

2178: \citep{Hunter95}, a B2 star at 3 Myr from its position in the $J$

2179: vs. $J-H$ diagram \citep{Chen05}} \tablenotetext{2}{the exciting

2180: source of the surrounding reflection nebula, coincident with the

2181: IRAS 12 $\mu$m emission peak, a candidate Herbig Ae/Be star

2182: suggested by \citet{Porras00}} \tablenotetext{3}{the exciting

2183: source of the surrounding reflection nebula, spectral type of B2

2184: to B3 estimated from the centimeter free-free emission observed by

2185: \citet{Marti93}} \tablenotetext{4}{an intermediate- to high-mass

2186: pre-main-sequence star suggested by \citet{Aspin92}}

2187: \tablenotetext{5}{the exciting source of the surrounding

2188: reflection nebula, spectral type of B2 to B3 estimated from the

2189: centimeter free-free emission observed by \citet{Marti93}, an

2190: intermediate- to high-mass pre-main-sequence star suggested by

2191: \citet{Aspin92}} \tablenotetext{6}{the exciting source of the

2192: surrounding reflection nebula} \tablenotetext{7}{an

2193: intermediate-mass YSO suggested by \citet{Palau07}}

2194: \tablenotetext{8}{the exciting source of the surrounding

2195: reflection nebula, a young B1 star surrounded by a relatively

2196: extended UC H{\tiny II} region \citep{Palau07}}

2197: \tablenotetext{9}{a young B star with a $1-20\mu$m luminosity of

2198: $254L_{\odot}$ \citep{Persi06} to $540L_{\odot}$ \citep{Moore91}}

2199: \tablenotetext{10}{the exciting source of the surrounding

2200: reflection nebula, a B0.5 star at $1-5$ Myr surrounded by the

2201: expanding H{\tiny II} region W75\,N(A) and within a warm dust

2202: shell \citep{Haschick81, Shepherd03, Shepherd04b}}

2203: \tablenotetext{11}{a young intermediate-mass star with a

2204: $1-20\mu$m luminosity of $36L_{\odot}$ \citep{Persi06}}

2205: \tablenotetext{12}{the exciting source of the surrounding

2206: reflection nebula}

2207: \end{deluxetable}

2208: 

2209: \clearpage

2210: 

2211: \begin{deluxetable}{ccc}

2212: \tablewidth{0pc} \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

2213: \tablecaption{Completeness Estimates\label{fraction}}

2214: 

2215: \tablehead{\colhead{Source Name} &

2216: \colhead{[3.6]\tablenotemark{a}} &

2217: \colhead{Completeness\tablenotemark{b}}}

2218: 

2219: \startdata

2220: AFGL 5142         &  15  & 84\% \\

2221: IRAS 05358+3543   &  14.5  & 79\% \\

2222: G192.16-3.82      &  15  & 81\% \\

2223: HH 80-81          &  13.5  & 84\% \\

2224: IRAS 19410+2336   &  13.5  & 73\% \\

2225: IRAS 20126+4104   &  14.5  & 73\% \\

2226: IRAS 20293+3952   &  13  & 85\% \\

2227: W75\,N            &  12.5  & 75\% \\

2228: IRAS 22172+5549   &  14.5  & 76\% \\

2229: \enddata

2230: \tablenotetext{a}{Completeness magnitudes at 3.6 $\mu$m derived

2231: from Figure \ref{complete}.} \tablenotetext{b}{For sources with

2232: the 3.6 $\mu$m photometry brighter than the completeness

2233: magnitude, the fraction of the sources that can be placed on one

2234: or more color-color diagrams.}

2235: \end{deluxetable}

2236: 

2237: \clearpage

2238: 

2239: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccccc}

2240: \tablewidth{0pc} \tabletypesize{\scriptsize} \rotate

2241: \tablecaption{Infrared Counterparts of Millimeter Cores

2242: \label{irmm}}

2243: 

2244: \tablehead{\colhead{Source} & \colhead{R.A. (J2000)} &

2245: \colhead{Decl. (J2000)} & \colhead{[3.6]} & \colhead{[4.5]} &

2246: \colhead{[5.8]} & \colhead{[8.0]} & \colhead{[24]} &

2247: \colhead{Ref.\tablenotemark{\dag}} }

2248: 

2249: \startdata

2250: AFGL 5142         &  05 30 47.94  & +33 47 54.2  & --- &  --- & --- & --- & 0.632$\pm$0.005 & 1 \\

2251: IRAS 05358+3543   &  05 39 13.04  & +35 45 51.2  & --- & 7.582$\pm$0.020 & 6.250$\pm$0.015 & 5.098$\pm$0.011 & $\ll$0.626 & 2, 3 \\

2252: G192.16-3.82      &  05 58 13.55  & +16 31 58.2  & 9.063$\pm$0.009 & 7.726$\pm$0.007 & 6.915$\pm$0.007 & 5.954$\pm$0.014 & $\ll$0.626 & 4, 5 \\

2253: HH 80-81          &  18 19 12.11  & -20 47 31.0  & --- & --- & 4.104$\pm$0.050 & 3.040$\pm$0.081 & $\ll$0.626 & 6 \\

2254: IRAS 19410+2336   &  19 43 11.25  & +23 44 03.2  & 6.682$\pm$0.018 & 4.624$\pm$0.008 & 3.365$\pm$0.004 & 2.780$\pm$0.008 & $\ll$0.626 & 7, 8 \\

2255: IRAS 20126+4104   &  20 14 25.97  & +41 13 33.1  & --- & --- & --- & 5.422$\pm$0.060 & $\ll$0.626 & 9, 10 \\

2256: IRAS 20293+3952   &  20 31 12.92  & +40 03 23.0  & --- & --- & --- & --- & 1.123$\pm$0.021 & 11, 12, 13 \\

2257: W75\,N            &  20 38 36.49  & +42 37 33.5  & --- & 6.161$\pm$0.22 & 4.451$\pm$0.017 & 3.346$\pm$0.018 & $\ll$0.626 & 14 \\

2258: \enddata

2259: \tablenotetext{\dag}{References of interferometric millimeter

2260: continuum observations: 1. \citet{Zhang07}; 2. \citet{Beuther02};

2261: 3. \citet{Beuther07}; 4. \citet{Shepherd99}; 5.

2262: \citet{Shepherd04a}; 6. \citet{Gomez03}; 7. \citet{Beuther03}; 8.

2263: \citet{Beuther04a}; 9. \citet{Shepherd00}; 10. \citet{Cesaroni05};

2264: 11. \citet{Beuther04b}; 12. \citet{Beuther04c}; 13.

2265: \citet{Palau07}; 14. \citet{Shepherd01}}

2266: \end{deluxetable}

2267: 

2268: \clearpage

2269: 

2270: \begin{figure}

2271: \epsscale{.8} \plotone{f1.eps} \caption{Color-color diagrams used

2272: to identify and classify YSOs. Protostars, class I/II, and class

2273: II objects are encircled with circles, triangles, and diamonds,

2274: respectively. YSOs that can only be identified in the IRAC-2MASS

2275: diagrams are encircled with squares. Arrows in the first three

2276: diagrams are reddening vectors derived from an averaged reddening

2277: law in nearby star forming regions \citep{Flaherty07}. (a) The

2278: IRAC diagram. The rectangle marks the class II region determined

2279: by \citet{Allen04} and \citet{Megeath04}. The vertical and

2280: horizontal dotted lines represent the requirements of

2281: $[5.8]-[8.0]>0.2$ and $[3.6]-[4.5]>0.2$, respectively. The

2282: horizontal solid line to the right of the class II rectangle

2283: labels the criterion of $[3.6]-[4.5]=0.4$ and $[5.8]-[8.0]>1.1$,

2284: which is used to distinguish between protostars and class I/II

2285: objects \citep{Megeath04}. (b) and (c) IRAC-2MASS diagrams.

2286: Sources more than $1\sigma$ to the right of the reddening vectors

2287: are identified as having intrinsic infrared excesses. (d) The

2288: IRAC-MIPS diagram. The outlined region in the upper right corner

2289: represents the protostar region. An isolated group of sources in

2290: the lower left of the diagram are recognized as class III/field

2291: stars. Objects located outside of the protostar region and not in

2292: the class III/field stars group are classified as class II.

2293: \label{fig1}}

2294: \end{figure}

2295: 

2296: \clearpage

2297: 

2298: \begin{figure}

2299: \epsscale{1.} \plotone{f2a.eps} \caption{IRAC 3.6/4.5/8.0 $\mu$m

2300: (Blue/Green/Red) three-color composite images of all 9 regions.

2301: Red circles, red triangles, and brown diamonds represent

2302: protostars, class I/II, and class II objects, respectively. Yellow

2303: squares mark YSOs that can only be identified in the IRAC-2MASS

2304: diagrams. Blue crosses label candidates of intermediate- to

2305: high-mass young stars (see ``high'' sources in Table

2306: \ref{photometry} for details). \label{fig2}}

2307: \end{figure}

2308: 

2309: \begin{figure}

2310: \plotone{f2b.eps}\\

2311: Fig. \ref{fig2}. --- Continued

2312: \end{figure}

2313: 

2314: \begin{figure}

2315: \plotone{f2c.eps}\\

2316: Fig. \ref{fig2}. --- Continued

2317: \end{figure}

2318: 

2319: \begin{figure}

2320: \plotone{f2d.eps}\\

2321: Fig. \ref{fig2}. --- Continued

2322: \end{figure}

2323: 

2324: \begin{figure}

2325: \plotone{f2e.eps}\\

2326: Fig. \ref{fig2}. --- Continued

2327: \end{figure}

2328: 

2329: \begin{figure}

2330: \plotone{f2f.eps}\\

2331: Fig. \ref{fig2}. --- Continued

2332: \end{figure}

2333: 

2334: \begin{figure}

2335: \plotone{f2g.eps}\\

2336: Fig. \ref{fig2}. --- Continued

2337: \end{figure}

2338: 

2339: \begin{figure}

2340: \plotone{f2h.eps}\\

2341: Fig. \ref{fig2}. --- Continued

2342: \end{figure}

2343: 

2344: \begin{figure}

2345: \plotone{f2i.eps}\\

2346: Fig. \ref{fig2}. --- Continued

2347: \end{figure}

2348: 

2349: \clearpage

2350: 

2351: \begin{figure}

2352: \epsscale{.32} \plotone{f3a.eps}\plotone{f3b.eps}\plotone{f3c.eps}

2353: \plotone{f3d.eps}\plotone{f3e.eps}\plotone{f3f.eps}

2354: \plotone{f3g.eps}\plotone{f3h.eps}\plotone{f3i.eps}

2355: \caption{Histograms of sources in the 0.5 mag bins as a function

2356: of the 3.6 $\mu$m magnitudes. The gray solid lines plot all the

2357: 3.6 $\mu$m detections in each field. The dark dashed lines show

2358: sources with multi-band photometry, which can be placed on one or

2359: more color-color diagrams for search of infrared excess. The gray

2360: dotted lines represent sources that are identified as YSOs.

2361: \label{complete}}

2362: \end{figure}

2363: 

2364: \clearpage

2365: 

2366: \begin{figure}

2367: \epsscale{.6} \plotone{f4.eps} \caption{AFGL 5142: (a) The

2368: 3.6/4.5/8.0 $\mu$m (B/G/R) three-color composite of the central

2369: part. The short and long arrows mark the orientations of two

2370: detected jets. (b) The 3.6/4.5 $\mu$m (B/G) two-color composite of

2371: the area labelled by a rectangle in (a), to more clearly show the

2372: short jet prominent in the 4.5 $\mu$m band. Contours are

2373: high-velocity CO emission from outflow B in \citet{Zhang07}. Plus

2374: signs in both panels mark the millimeter continuum peaks (MM1 to

2375: MM5) from \citet{Zhang07}. \label{afgl5142}}

2376: \end{figure}

2377: 

2378: \clearpage

2379: 

2380: \begin{figure}

2381: \plotone{f5.eps} \caption{AFGL 5142: the 3.6/4.5/8.0 $\mu$m

2382: (B/G/R) three-color composite of the inner massive star formation

2383: site, to show a comparison between the point-source detections in

2384: the IRAC bands and previous millimeter continuum observation. The

2385: star symbol denotes a protostar identified from the color-color

2386: diagrams. Plus signs mark the millimeter continuum peaks (MM1 to

2387: MM5) from \citet{Zhang07}. \label{5142core}}

2388: \end{figure}

2389: 

2390: \clearpage

2391: 

2392: \begin{figure}

2393: \plotone{f6.eps} \caption{IRAS 05358: the 3.6/4.5 $\mu$m two-color

2394: composite of the central part. The arrows mark the orientations of

2395: three detected jets, which are labelled as ``Jet1'', ``Jet2'', and

2396: ``Jet3'' from east to west. Solid and dashed contours show blue-

2397: and redshifted lobes of CO outflows from \citet{Beuther02},

2398: repectively. Plus signs mark the 3.1 mm continuum peaks from

2399: \citet{Beuther07}. \label{i05358}}

2400: \end{figure}

2401: 

2402: \clearpage

2403: 

2404: \begin{figure}

2405: \epsscale{1.} \plotone{f7.eps} \caption{IRAS 05358: the

2406: 3.6/4.5/8.0 $\mu$m three-color composite of the inner massive star

2407: formation site, to show a comparison between the point-source

2408: detections in the IRAC bands and previous millimeter continuum

2409: observation. The dashed contours are for the 3.1 mm continuum

2410: emission with three peaks labelled as ``MM1'', ``MM2'', ``MM3''

2411: \citep{Beuther07}. The two white dashed circles denote

2412: ``bandwidth'' artifacts in the 8.0 $\mu$m band. \label{05358core}}

2413: \end{figure}

2414: 

2415: \clearpage

2416: 

2417: \begin{figure}

2418: \plotone{f8.eps} \caption{G192: the 3.6/4.5 $\mu$m two-color

2419: composite of the central part. Solid and dashed contours are the

2420: lowest contours of red- and blueshifted CO outflow, respectively

2421: \citep{Shepherd98}. Two red dashed lines in the east outline the

2422: area filled with ``green'' nebulosities, and the red dashed curve

2423: in the west the candle-flame-shaped structure (this structure is

2424: more prominent in the three-color composite Figure \ref{fig2}c).

2425: The plus sign marks the millimeter continuum peak from

2426: \citet{Shepherd98}. \label{g192}}

2427: \end{figure}

2428: 

2429: \clearpage

2430: 

2431: \begin{figure}

2432: \epsscale{1.} \plotone{f9.eps} \caption{G192: the 3.6/4.5/8.0

2433: $\mu$m three-color composite of the inner massive star formation

2434: site, to show a comparison between the point-source detections in

2435: the IRAC bands and previous millimeter continuum observation. The

2436: plus sign marks the millimeter continuum peak from

2437: \citet{Shepherd98}. \label{192core}}

2438: \end{figure}

2439: 

2440: \clearpage

2441: 

2442: \begin{figure}

2443: \epsscale{.8} \plotone{f10.eps} \caption{HH 80-81: the 8.0 $\mu$m

2444: band emission in grayscale and the 6 cm continuum emission from

2445: \citet{Marti93} in contours. The plus sign marks the 7 mm

2446: continuum peak from \citet{Gomez03}. \label{h8081}}

2447: \end{figure}

2448: 

2449: \clearpage

2450: 

2451: \begin{figure}

2452: \epsscale{1.} \plotone{f11.eps} \caption{HH 80-81: the IRAC band

2453: emission from the inner massive star formation site, to show a

2454: comparison between the point-source detections in the IRAC bands

2455: and previous millimeter continuum observation. The plus sign marks

2456: the 7 mm continuum peak from \citet{Gomez03}. \label{8081core}}

2457: \end{figure}

2458: 

2459: \clearpage

2460: 

2461: \begin{figure}

2462: \plotone{f12.eps} \caption{IRAS 19410: the 3.6/4.5/8.0 $\mu$m

2463: three-color composite of the central part. The dashed ellipse

2464: outlines the IRAC elliptical structure. Solid and dashed contours

2465: show blue- and redshifted lobes from a CO outflow by

2466: \citet{Beuther03}, repectively,  and the plus sign a millimeter

2467: continuum peak therein. \label{i19410}}

2468: \end{figure}

2469: 

2470: \clearpage

2471: 

2472: \begin{figure}

2473: \plotone{f13.eps} \caption{IRAS 20126: the IRAC bands emission

2474: from the central part. (a) The 3.6 $\mu$m emission. To highlight

2475: the bipolar nebula a high-pass-filtering in IDL has been applied

2476: to the image. (b) Same as (a), but for the 8.0 $\mu$m emission.

2477: Infrared emission from the central source is detected at this

2478: wavelength. The two dashed circles mark ``bandwidth'' artifacts

2479: induced by the central bright source. (c) The 3.6/4.5/8.0 $\mu$m

2480: three-color composite, with an SiO (2-1) jet from

2481: \citet{Cesaroni99} overlaid in red contours. In each panel the

2482: crossing lines outline the wall of the IRAC biconical structure.

2483: The plus sign marks the 1.2 mm continuum peak from

2484: \citet{Cesaroni05}. \label{i20126}}

2485: \end{figure}

2486: 

2487: \clearpage

2488: 

2489: \begin{figure}

2490: \epsscale{1.} \plotone{f14.eps} \caption{IRAS 20293: the

2491: 3.6/4.5/8.0 $\mu$m three-color composite of the central part. The

2492: arrow marks the orientation of a jet prominent in the 4.5 $\mu$m

2493: band. The contours show blueshifted high-velocity CO emission in a

2494: a jet-like outflow and the plus sign the millimeter continuum peak

2495: from \citet{Beuther04a}. \label{i20293}}

2496: \end{figure}

2497: 

2498: \clearpage

2499: 

2500: \begin{figure}

2501: \epsscale{1.} \plotone{f15.eps} \caption{W75\,N: the 3.6/4.5

2502: $\mu$m two-color composite of the central part. The double arrows

2503: mark the orientation of a large scale bow-shaped structure. Solid

2504: and dashed contours are the lowest contours of red- and

2505: blueshifted emission in a CO outflow, respectively

2506: \citep{Shepherd03}. Plus signs mark the millimeter continuum peaks

2507: from \citet{Shepherd01}.\label{w75}}

2508: \end{figure}

2509: 

2510: \clearpage

2511: 

2512: \begin{figure}

2513: \epsscale{.6} \plotone{f16.eps} \caption{W75\,N: the IRAC bands

2514: emission of the area labelled as a rectangle in Figure \ref{w75}.

2515: (a) The 3.6 $\mu$m emission, with emission levels between 8.2 and

2516: 80 MJy/sr shown in grayscale and that beyond 80 MJy/sr in colored

2517: contours. The contour levels in MJy/sr are labelled at the top of

2518: the image. (b) Same as (a), but for the 4.5 $\mu$m emission. The

2519: emission between 10.7 and 130 MJy/sr is shown in grayscale and

2520: that beyond 130 MJy/sr in colored contours. (c) The 3.6/4.5/8.0

2521: $\mu$m three-color composite. In each panel a solid curve outlines

2522: the edge of a small bow-shaped structure and the plus signs mark

2523: the millimeter continuum peaks (MM1 to MM4) from

2524: \citet{Shepherd01}. The crosses in (c) mark the centimeter

2525: continuum peaks revealed by \citet{Hunter95} and

2526: \citet{Torrelles97}. \label{w75n}}

2527: \end{figure}

2528: 

2529: \clearpage

2530: 

2531: \begin{figure}

2532: \epsscale{.8} \plotone{f17.eps} \caption{The number of detected

2533: YSOs vs. the IRAS luminosity. (a) The YSOs number counted from

2534: those with $[3.6]<14$. The data points for IRAS 22172 and IRAS

2535: 20126 are overlaid with a plus sign and a cross, respectively.

2536: (b)Same as (a), but for YSOs with $[3.6]<13$. \label{fig17}}

2537: \end{figure}

2538: 

2539: \end{document}

2540: