1: \documentclass[10pt]{article}
2: \usepackage{amsfonts}
3: \textwidth=16cm %
4: \textheight=23cm %
5: \topmargin -0.0cm %
6: \oddsidemargin-0.0cm %
7: \evensidemargin -0.0cm %
8: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}
9: \setlength{\parskip}{12pt}
10: \usepackage{epsfig,cite}
11: \begin{document}
12: \begin{center}
13: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
14: {\Large\bf Two-Photon Exchange Contribution to Proton Form Factors\\%
15: \vspace{0.3cm} %
16: in Time-Like region}\\
17: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
18: \vspace*{1cm}
19: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
20: D. Y. Chen $^1 \footnote{E-mail: chendy@mail.ihep.ac.cn}$, H. Q.
21: Zhou $^2$ and Y. B. Dong$^1$\\
22: \vspace{0.3cm} %
23: {\ $^1$Institute of High Energy Physics \\
24: The Chinese Academy of Science,\ Beijing,\ 100049,\ P. R. China}\\
25: {\ $^2$ Department of Physics, Southeast University,
26: Nanjing,\ 211189,\ P. R. China}
27: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
28: \vspace*{1cm}
29: \end{center}
30: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
31: \begin{abstract}
32: We estimate two-photon exchange contribution to the process $e^+ +
33: e^- \rightarrow p + \bar{p}$. The two-photon exchange corrections to
34: double spin polarization observables and form factors in the
35: time-like region are calculated. The corrections are found to be
36: small in magnitude, but with a strong angular dependence at fixed
37: momentum transfer. These two features are the same as those in the
38: space-like region. In the view of experiment, the double spin
39: polarization observable $P_z$ deserves to be considered.
40: \end{abstract}
41: \textbf{PACS numbers:} 13.40.Gp, 13.60.-r, 25.30.-c. \\%
42: \textbf{Key words:} Two-Photon Exchange, Time-Like Region, Double
43: Spin Polarization.
44: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
45:
46: \section{Introduction}
47:
48: The electromagnetic form factors in both space-like $(Q^2>0)$ and
49: time-like $(Q^2<0)$ regions are essential to understand the
50: intrinsic structure of hadrons. The experimental data of elastic
51: form factors over several decades, including recent high precision
52: measurement at Jefferson Lab \cite{PRL-1398,PRL-092301} and
53: elsewhere \cite{PRD-5491}, have provided considerable insight into
54: the detail structure of the nucleon. Generally, in Born amplitude
55: for one photon exchange, the proton current operator is
56: parameterized in terms of Dirac $(F_1)$ and Pauli $(F_2)$ form
57: factors,
58: \begin{eqnarray}
59: \Gamma_{\mu}=F_1(q^2)\gamma_{\mu}+i\frac{F_2(q^2)}{2 m_N} \sigma_{\mu
60: \nu} q^{\nu},
61: \label{ff0}%
62: \end{eqnarray}
63: where $q$ is the momentum transfer to the nucleon and $m_N$ is the
64: nucleon mass. The resulting differential cross section depends on
65: two kinematic variables, conventionally taken to be $Q^2\equiv -q^2$
66: (or $\tau$, in order to consistent with the case in the time-like
67: region, we take $\tau \equiv q^2/4m_N$ other than $\tau \equiv
68: Q^2/4m_N$ ) and the scattering angle $\theta_e$ (or virtual photon
69: polarization $\varepsilon \equiv [1+ 2(1-\tau) \tan^2
70: (\theta_e/2)]^{-1}$). The reduced Born cross section, in terms of
71: the Sachs electric and magnetic form factors, is
72: \begin{eqnarray}
73: \frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega}=C(Q^2,\varepsilon)
74: \left[G_M^2(Q^2)-\frac{\varepsilon}{\tau} G_E^2(Q^2)\right].
75: \label{cs0}%
76: \end{eqnarray}
77:
78: \par%
79:
80: The standard method that has been used to determine the electric and
81: magnetic form factors, particularly those of the proton has been the
82: Rosenbluth, or longitudinal-transverse(LT), separation method. The
83: results of the Rosenbluth measurements for the proton form factor
84: ratio $R=\mu_p G_E/G_M$ have generally been consistent with $R
85: \approx 1$ for $Q^2\leq 6 GeV^2$
86: \cite{PRD-5671,PRC-034325,PRC-015206}. The 'Super-Rosenbluth'
87: experiment at Jefferson Lab \cite{PRL-142301}, with very small
88: systematic errors were achieved by detecting the recoiling proton
89: rather than the electron, is also consistent with the earlier LT
90: results. It should be mentioned that polarized lepton beams give
91: another way to access the form factors \cite{SP-588}. In the Born
92: approximation, the polarization of the recoiling proton along its
93: motion $(p_l)$ is proportional to $G_M^2(Q^2)$ while the component
94: perpendicular to the motion $(p_t)$ is proportional to
95: $G_E(Q^2)G_M(Q^2)$. Then the form factor ratio $R$ can be determined
96: through a measurement of $p_t/p_l$, with
97: \begin{eqnarray}
98: \frac{p_t}{p_l}=-\sqrt{-\frac{2\varepsilon}{\tau(1+\varepsilon)}}
99: \frac{G_E(Q^2)}{G_M(Q^2)} \ .
100: \end{eqnarray}
101: This method has been applied only recently in Jefferson Lab
102: \cite{PRL-1398}, since it needs high-intensity polarized beams,
103: large solid-angle spectrometers, and advanced techniques of
104: polarimetry in $GeV$ range. The measurement about the
105: electron-to-proton polarized transfer in $\vec{e}^{\ -} + p
106: \rightarrow e^{-}+ \vec{p}$ shows that the ratio of Sachs form
107: factors \cite{PR-2256,NC-821} is monotonically decreasing with
108: increasing of $Q^2$, which strongly contradicts to the scaling ratio
109: determined by the traditional Rosenbluth separation method
110: \cite{PR-615}. In order to explain the discrepancy, radiative
111: corrections, especially the two-photon contribution, have been
112: involved \cite{PRC-054320, PRL-142303, PRL-142304,
113: PRL-172503,PRL-122301, PRC-065203, PRC-038202}. In Ref.
114: \cite{PRL-142304}, only the intermediate proton state considered, it
115: is found that the two-photon corrections have the proper sign and
116: magnitude to resolve a lager part of the discrepancy between the two
117: experimental techniques. Furthermore, Ref. \cite{PRL-172503}
118: considered the intermediate $\Delta^+$ state as well as the proton.
119: In Ref.\cite{PRL-122301} a partonic calculation of the two-photon
120: exchange contribution to the form factors is given. It is concluded
121: that for $Q^2$ in the range of $2 \sim 3 GeV^2$, the ratio extracted
122: using LT method including the two-photon corrections agrees well
123: with the polarization transfer results. Consequently, it shows that
124: the two-photon exchange corrections can, at least, partly explain
125: the discrepancy of the two methods of the separation.
126:
127: \par%
128:
129: For a stable hadron, in the space-like region the form factors are
130: real, while its time-like form factors have a phase structure
131: reflecting the final-state interactions of the outgoing hadrons,
132: therefore, form factors are complex. So far, there are not many
133: precise experimental data in this region as in the space-like one.
134: In the theoretical point of view, it seems unavoidable to check the
135: two-photon exchange contribution to the nucleon form factors in the
136: time-like region. Actually, some works have been done. Refs.
137: \cite{PRC-042202, NPA-120, PLB-197} employed the general arguments
138: based on crossing symmetry for the processes of $e^{-} + h
139: \rightarrow e^{-} +h$ and $e^{+} + e^{-} \rightarrow h + \bar{h}$,
140: and showed the general expressions for the polarization observables
141: of the reaction $\bar{p} + p \rightarrow e^{+} + e^{-}$ in terms of
142: three independent complex amplitudes and in presence of two-photon
143: exchange. Ref. \cite{PLB-197} also tried to search some experimental
144: evidences for the two-photon exchange from the experimental data of
145: $e^{+} + e^{-} \rightarrow p+\bar{p}+\gamma$. However, a negative
146: conclusion is obtained due to the level of the present precision. A
147: total contribution of the radiative corrections to the angular
148: asymmetry is under $2 \%$, while the asymmetry getting from the
149: experimental data is always compatible with zero and the typical
150: error is about $5 \%$. In this reference, the polarization
151: observables are not discussed.
152:
153: \par%
154:
155: Difference with the above work, we calculate the two-photon exchange
156: correction to the unpolarized differential cross section as well as
157: the double spin polarization observables. Some qualitative
158: properties based on the crossing symmetry and C- invariance are
159: discussed in section $2$. Moreover, the analytical forms of the
160: unpolarized differential cross section and polarization observables
161: are presented in section $3$. In section $4$, we will directly
162: calculate the two-photon exchange contribution to the differential
163: cross section and polarization observables. In section $5$, some
164: numerical results and discussions are given.
165:
166: \par%
167:
168: \section{Crossing Symmetry and C-invariance}
169:
170: In quantum field theory, crossing symmetry is a symmetry that relates to the
171: $S$-matrix elements. In general, the $S$-matrix for any
172: process involving a particle with momentum $p$ in the initial state
173: is equal to the $S$-matrix for an otherwise identical process but
174: with an anti-particle of momentum $k=-p$ in the final state, that is,
175: \begin{eqnarray}
176: \mathcal{M}(\phi(p)+\cdot\cdot\cdot\rightarrow\cdot\cdot\cdot)=
177: \mathcal{M}(\cdot\cdot\cdot\rightarrow\cdot\cdot\cdot+\bar{\phi}(k)),
178: \end{eqnarray}
179: where $\bar{\phi}$ stands for anti-particle and $k = -p$. We notice
180: that there is no any realistic value of $p$ for which $p$ and $k$
181: are both physically allowed. So technically we should say that
182: either amplitude can be obtained from the other by analytic
183: continuation. The crossing symmetry provides a relation between the
184: scattering channel $e^{-} + p \rightarrow e^{-} + p$ and the
185: annihilating channel $e^{+} + e^{-} \rightarrow p + \bar{p}$. In
186: the one-photon approximation as shown in Fig. (\ref{Fig-feyntree}),
187: the crossing symmetry can be expressed by the following relation
188: \begin{eqnarray}
189: \overline{|\mathcal{M}(e^{-}p \rightarrow
190: e^{-}p)|^2}=f(s,t)=\overline{|\mathcal{M}(e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow p
191: \bar{p})|^2}.
192: \label{csym}%
193: \end{eqnarray}
194: The line over $\mathcal{M}$ denotes the sum over the polarization of
195: all particles in the initial and final states. The Mandelstan
196: variables $s$ and $t$ are defined as follows:
197: \begin{eqnarray}
198: s&=&(k_1+p_1)^2=m_N^2+2 E_1 m_N \geq m_N^2,\nonumber\\
199: t&=&(k_1-k_2)^2=q^2<0,
200: \end{eqnarray}
201: for the scattering channel (with $E_1$ being the energy of the
202: incoming electron in the Lab frame), and
203: \begin{eqnarray}
204: s&=&(k_1-p_1)^2=m_N^2-2 \widetilde{\epsilon}^2+2 \widetilde{\epsilon}
205: \sqrt{\widetilde{\epsilon}^2-m_N^2} \cos \theta \leq 0,\nonumber\\
206: t&=&(k_1+k_2)^2=4 \widetilde{\epsilon}^2>4 m_N^2,
207: \end{eqnarray}
208: for the annihilating channel with $\widetilde{\epsilon}$ being the energy of
209: the initial electron (or final proton) and $\theta$ being the hadron
210: production angle.
211:
212: \par%
213: Considering Lorentz, parity, time-reversal, and helicity
214: conservation in the limit of $m_e\rightarrow 0$, the $T-$ matrix
215: for the elastic scattering of two Dirac particles can be expanded in
216: terms of three independent Lorentz structures. Then, the proton
217: current operator through the Lorentz structure \cite{SP-588} is
218: \begin{eqnarray}
219: \Gamma_{\mu}=\widetilde{F}_1(s,t)\gamma_{\mu}+i\frac{\widetilde{F}_2(s,t)}{2
220: m_N} \sigma_{\mu \nu} q^{\nu} +\widetilde{F}_3(s,t) \frac{\gamma \cdot
221: K P_{\mu}}{m_N^2},
222: \label{ff1}%
223: \end{eqnarray}
224: with
225: \begin{eqnarray}
226: P=\frac{1}{2} (p_2+p_1),\ \ \ \ \ K=\frac{1}{2} (k_1+k_2),
227: \end{eqnarray}
228: in the scattering channel, and
229: \begin{eqnarray}
230: P=\frac{1}{2} (p_2-p_1),\ \ \ \ \ K=\frac{1}{2} (k_1-k_2),
231: \end{eqnarray}
232: in the annihilating channel. Similar to the Sachs form factor, we can
233: recombine the form factors $\widetilde{F}_{1,2}$ as
234: \begin{eqnarray}
235: \widetilde{G}_E(q^2, \cos \theta) &=&\widetilde{F}_{1} (q^2, \cos
236: \theta) +\tau \widetilde{F}_2(q^2, \cos \theta),\nonumber\\
237: \widetilde{G}_M(q^2, \cos \theta) &=&\widetilde{F}_{1} (q^2, \cos
238: \theta) + \widetilde{F}_2(q^2, \cos \theta).
239: \label{sachs1}%
240: \end{eqnarray}
241:
242: \par%
243:
244: Taking the proton current operator defined in Eq. (\ref{ff1}) which
245: includes the multi-photon exchange, we can express $f(s,t)$ in Eq.
246: (\ref{csym}) in the form:
247: \begin{eqnarray}
248: f(s,t)=\frac{8 e^4}{(4 m_N^2 -t)t}\Big\{8 |\widetilde{G}_E|^2 m_N^2
249: \big[m_N^4-2 s m_N^2 + s(s+t)\big]- |\widetilde{G}_M|^2 t\big[2
250: m_N^4 - 4 m_N(s+t)+2 s^2+t^2 +2 s t\big] \nonumber\\
251: -m_N^{-2} \big[2 m_N^6-m_N^4(6s+t)+2 m_N^2s(3s+2t)-s(2s^2+3ts+t^2)
252: \big]Re\big[(4 m_N^2 \widetilde{G}_E-t
253: \widetilde{G}_M)^{*}\widetilde{F}_3\big]\Big\}.
254: \end{eqnarray}
255:
256: \par%
257:
258: In the one-photon mechanism for $e^{+} + e^{-} \rightarrow p +
259: \bar{p}$, the conservation of the total angular momentum
260: $\mathcal{J}$ allows only one value of $\mathcal{J}=1$. This is due to the
261: quantum numbers of the photon : $\mathcal{J}^p=1^-, C(1 \gamma)=-1$.
262: The selection rule combined with $C$ and $P$ invariances allows
263: two states for $e^{+} e^{-}$ (and $p \bar{p}$):
264: \begin{eqnarray}
265: S=1,\ \ \ \ell=0\ \ \ \mathrm{and}\ \ \ \ S=1,\ \ \ \ \ell=2 \ \ \
266: \ \mathrm{with}\ \ \ \mathcal{J}^p=1^{-},
267: \end{eqnarray}
268: where $S$ is the total spin and $\ell$ is the orbital angular
269: momentum of the $e^{+} e^{-}$ (or $p \bar{p}$) system. As a result
270: the $\theta$ dependence of the differential cross section for $e^{+}
271: + e^{-} \rightarrow p + \bar{p}$, in the one-photon exchange
272: mechanism, has the following general form
273: \begin{eqnarray}
274: \frac{d\sigma^{1 \gamma}}{d \Omega} = a(t) +b(t) \cos^2 \theta.
275: \label{sigma0}%
276: \end{eqnarray}
277: Similar analysis can be done for the $\cos \theta$ dependence of the
278: $1 \gamma \otimes 2 \gamma-$ interference contribution to the
279: differential cross section of this precess. In general, the spin and
280: parity of the $2 \gamma -$ states are not fixed, but only a positive
281: $C-$ parity, $C ( 2 \gamma ) = +$, is allowed, then the $\cos
282: \theta$ dependence of the $1\gamma \otimes 2 \gamma$ interference
283: contribution to the differential cross section can be predicted on
284: the basis of its $C-$ odd nature as:
285: \begin{eqnarray}
286: \frac{d\sigma^{int}}{d\Omega}= \cos\theta \big[c_0(t)+c_1(t) \cos^2
287: \theta + c_2(t) \cos^4 \theta + ...\big].
288: \label{sigmaint}%
289: \end{eqnarray}
290:
291: \par%
292:
293: In the one-photon exchange mechanism, the differential cross section
294: is angular symmetric. However, after considering the two-photon
295: exchange, this symmetry is broken. Define the asymmetry of the
296: total differential cross section as
297: \begin{eqnarray}
298: A_{2 \gamma}(q^2,\theta)= \frac{\displaystyle\frac{d \sigma}{d
299: \Omega}(q^2, \theta) - \frac{d \sigma}{d \Omega}(q^2,\pi-\theta) }
300: {\displaystyle\frac{d \sigma}{d \Omega}(q^2, \theta) + \frac{d
301: \sigma}{d \Omega}(q^2,\pi-\theta) }\ \ ,
302: \end{eqnarray}
303: after some algebraic simplification, we have
304: \begin{eqnarray}
305: A_{2\gamma}(q^2, \theta)=\frac{d\sigma^{int}}{d \Omega} (q^2,\theta)
306: ~\Big/~ \frac{d\sigma^{1 \gamma}}{d \Omega}(q^2,\theta).
307: \end{eqnarray}
308: Then based on the general forms of $d \sigma^{1\gamma}/d\Omega$ and
309: $d \sigma^{int}/d\Omega$ as shown in Eq. (\ref{sigma0}) and Eq.
310: (\ref{sigmaint}), One can easily conclude that the angular asymmetry
311: of the total differential cross section is also an odd function of
312: $\cos\theta$.
313:
314: \section{Differential Cross Section and Polarization Observables}
315: \label{dcspo}%
316:
317: In order to represent the polarization vector of outgoing anti-proton
318: in a straight way for the process of $e^{+} + e^{-} \rightarrow p +
319: \bar{p}$, we define a coordinate frame in center of mass system (CMS)
320: of the reaction in such a way that the $z$ axis directs along the
321: three-momentum of the anti-proton and the angle between the incoming
322: electron and outgoing anti-proton is defined as $\theta$. In such a
323: frame, according to the approaches used in Refs. \cite{EPJA-331,
324: NPA-271, NPA-322}, one has
325: \begin{eqnarray}
326: \mathcal{M}=\frac{e^2}{q^2} j_{\mu} J^{\mu}
327: \end{eqnarray}
328: with leptonic current
329: \begin{eqnarray}
330: j_{\mu}=\bar{u} (-k_2) \gamma_{\mu} u(k_1) \nonumber
331: \end{eqnarray}
332: and hadronic current
333: \begin{eqnarray}
334: J_{\mu}=\bar{u} (p_2)
335: \Big[\widetilde{F}_1(s,t)\gamma_{\mu}+i\frac{\widetilde{F}_2(s,t)}{2
336: m_N} \sigma_{\mu \nu} q^{\nu} +\widetilde{F}_3(s,t) \frac{\gamma
337: \cdot K P_{\mu}}{m_N^2}\Big] u(-p_1)
338: \label{current}%
339: \end{eqnarray}
340:
341: Then the differential cross section of the reaction in the CMS is
342: \begin{eqnarray}
343: \frac{d \sigma}{d \Omega} =\frac{\alpha^2\beta}{q^6}L_{\mu \nu}
344: H^{\mu \nu}, \ \ \ L_{\mu \nu} =j_{\mu} j^{*}_{\nu}, \ \ \ H_{\mu
345: \nu} = J_{\mu} J^{*}_{\nu},
346: \label{tensor}%
347: \end{eqnarray}
348: $\alpha=e^2/4 \pi$ is the fine structure constant and
349: $\beta=\sqrt{1-4M^2/q^2}$ is the nucleon velocity in the CMS. In
350: this work we consider the unpolarized incoming positron and
351: longitudinally polarized incoming electron with the polarization
352: four-vector $s$, and in the final state, the anti-proton is
353: polarized with polarization four-vector $s_1$, then the leptonic and
354: hadronic vectors can be divided into unpolarized and polarized parts
355: \begin{eqnarray}
356: L_{\mu\nu} = L_{\mu \nu}(0) +L_{\mu\nu} (s), \ \ \ H_{\mu \nu}
357: =H_{\mu \nu}(0) +H_{\mu \nu} (s_1).
358: \end{eqnarray}
359: \par%
360:
361: In the current operator shown in Eq. (\ref{ff1}), the Lorentz
362: structure functions are not only the function of $q^2$ but also
363: depend on hadron production angle $\theta$, and they can relate to
364: the Dirac and Pauli form factors
365: \begin{eqnarray}
366: \widetilde{F}_{1,2} (q^2, \cos\theta)=F_{1,2} (q^2) + \Delta F_{1,2}
367: (q^2, \cos\theta)
368: \end{eqnarray}
369: and $\widetilde{G}_{E,M}(q^2, \cos \theta)$ related to the Sachs
370: form factors
371: \begin{eqnarray}
372: \widetilde{G}_{E,M}(q^2, \cos \theta)= G_{E,M}(q^2) + \Delta
373: G_{E,M}(q^2, \cos \theta) \ .
374: \label{dsachs}%
375: \end{eqnarray}
376: \par%
377:
378: The unpolarized differential cross section of the process $e^{+} +
379: e^{-} \rightarrow p + \bar{p}$ is in the form
380: \begin{eqnarray}
381: \frac{d\sigma_{un}}{d\Omega}=\frac{\alpha^2 \beta}{4 q^6}L_{\mu
382: \nu}(0) H^{\mu \nu}(0)=\frac{\alpha^2 \beta}{4 q^2}\ D,
383: \end{eqnarray}
384: with the current operator in Eq. (\ref{ff1}) and the definition in
385: Eq. (\ref{sachs1}), $D$ can be expressed as:
386: \begin{eqnarray}
387: D=|\widetilde{G}_M|^2 (1+ \cos^2\theta) +\frac{1}{\tau}
388: |\widetilde{G}_E|^2 \sin^2\theta - 2 \sqrt{\tau (\tau-1)}
389: Re[(\widetilde{G}_M-\frac{1}{\tau} \widetilde{G}_E) \widetilde{F}_3
390: ^{*}] \sin^2\theta \cos \theta.
391: \end{eqnarray}
392: Notice that in Eq.(\ref{dsachs}), $\Delta G_{E,M}$ and
393: $\widetilde{F}_3$ caused by the two-photon exchange is in the order
394: of $\alpha \simeq 1/137$, so that the terms $\Delta G_{E,M} \Delta
395: G_{E,M}$ and $\Delta G_{E,M}\widetilde{F}_3$ are negligible, then,
396: \begin{eqnarray}
397: D&=&|G_M|^2 (1+\cos^2 \theta) + \frac{1}{\tau} |G_E|^2 \sin^2 \theta
398: + 2 Re[G_M \Delta G^*_M] (1+ \cos^2 \theta) + \nonumber\\
399: &&\frac{2}{\tau} Re[G_E \Delta G^*_E] \sin^2 \theta- 2 \sqrt{\tau
400: (\tau-1)} Re[(G_M-\frac{1}{\tau} G_E) \widetilde{F}_3^{*}]
401: \sin^2\theta \cos \theta.
402: \label{dd}%
403: \end{eqnarray}
404: \par%
405:
406: From $C-$ invariance and the above expression of $D$, we have the
407: general properties of the form factors,
408: \begin{eqnarray}
409: \Delta G_{E,M}(q^2, +\cos\theta)&=&-\Delta
410: G_{E,M}(q^2,-\cos\theta),\nonumber\\ \widetilde{F}_3(q^2, +\cos
411: \theta) &=& \widetilde{F}_3(q^2, -\cos \theta).
412: \label{gemf3}%
413: \end{eqnarray}
414: which is equivalent to the symmetry relations of the scattering channel
415: \cite{EPJA-331}.
416:
417: Generally, the polarization four-vector $S_{\mu}$ of a relativistic
418: particle with three-momentum $\vec{p}$ and mass $m$, is connected
419: with the polarization vector, $\vec{\xi}$, by a Lorentz boost:
420: \begin{eqnarray}
421: \vec{S} = \vec{\xi} + \frac{\vec{p}\cdot\vec{\xi}\ \vec{p}}{m(E+p)}\
422: ,\ \ \ \ \ S^0 =\frac{\vec{p}\cdot \vec{S}}{m}\ .
423: \end{eqnarray}
424: Where $E=\sqrt{m^2+\vec{p}^2}$ is the energy of the particle. In the
425: CMS defined above, we have the polarization vectors of the
426: anti-proton
427: \begin{eqnarray}
428: \vec{\xi}_x &=&(1,\ 0,\ 0),\ \ \ \ s_{1x}= (0,\ 1,\ 0,\ 0),
429: \nonumber\\
430: \vec{\xi}_y &=&(0,\ 1,\ 0),\ \ \ \ s_{1y}= (0,\ 0,\ 1,\ 0),
431: \nonumber\\
432: \vec{\xi}_z &=&(0,\ 0,\ 1),\ \ \ \ s_{1z}= (\sqrt{\tau -1},\ 0,\
433: 0,\ \sqrt{\tau}).
434: \end{eqnarray}
435:
436: \par%
437: $P_y$ is a single-spin polarization observable, which relates to one
438: polarized particle along the $y-$ axis. Since the time-like form
439: factors are complex, then it appears in the Born approximation in
440: the process $e^{+} + e^{-} \rightarrow p + \bar{p}$. In this work we
441: consider the outgoing anti-proton polarized. The general expression
442: for $P_y$ is
443: \begin{eqnarray}
444: P_y=\frac{1}{D q^4} L_{\mu\nu} H_{\mu \nu} (s_{1 y})=\frac{1}{D q^4}
445: \big[L_{\mu\nu}(0) H_{\mu \nu} (s_{1 y})+L_{\mu\nu}(s) H_{\mu \nu}
446: (s_{1 y})\big].
447: \label{py}%
448: \end{eqnarray}
449: After some algebraic calculation \cite{arXiv-0704.3375}, we can find
450: $P_y$ does not depend on the polarization of incoming electron, that
451: means the second term in Eq. (\ref{py}) has no contribution to
452: $P_y$. With the proton current operator in Eq. (\ref{ff1}) we have,
453: \begin{eqnarray}
454: P_y&=& \frac{2 \sin \theta}{D \sqrt{\tau}} \big[Im[\widetilde{G}_M
455: \widetilde{G}^{*}_E] \cos \theta - \sqrt{\tau (\tau -1)} (Im[
456: \widetilde{G}_E \widetilde{F}^{*}_3 ] \sin^2 \theta +Im[
457: \widetilde{G}_M \widetilde{F}^{*}_3 ] \cos^2 \theta )\big]\nonumber\\
458: &=& \frac{2 \sin \theta}{D \sqrt{\tau}} \big[Im[G_M G^{*}_E + G_M
459: \Delta G^{*}_E+\Delta G_M G^{*}_E] \cos \theta -\nonumber\\
460: &&\sqrt{\tau (\tau -1)} (Im[ G_E \widetilde{F}^{*}_3 ] \sin^2 \theta
461: +Im[G_M \widetilde{F}^{*}_3 ] \cos^2 \theta ) \big].
462: \label{polarpy}%
463: \end{eqnarray}
464: Similar definitions are employed for the double spin polarization
465: observables $P_x$ and $P_z$. For $P_x$ and $P_z$, the polarization
466: of the incoming electron is necessary, and the unpolarized incoming
467: electron has no contribution, that is $L_{\mu\nu}(0) H_{\mu \nu}
468: (s_{1x,z})=0$. Since $L_{\mu \nu}(0) H^{\mu \nu} (s_{1x,z}) \propto
469: a_{\mu}b_{\nu}c_{\rho}d_{\lambda}\epsilon^{\nu\nu\rho\lambda}\equiv
470: \epsilon^{a b c d}$ and $a,\ b,\ c,\ d$ are four out of $s_{1x,z},\
471: k_1,\ k_2,\ p_1,\ p_2$, and all of those four-vectors have zero
472: $y-$ component, then the contribution of the unpolarized electron
473: vanishes. The double spin polarization observables with proton
474: current operator in Eq. (\ref{ff1}) are
475: \begin{eqnarray}
476: P_x&=&-\frac{2 \sin \theta}{D \sqrt{\tau}} \Big\{Re[\widetilde{G}_M
477: \widetilde{G}^{*}_E] + Re[\widetilde{G}_M \widetilde{F}^{*}_3]
478: \sqrt{\tau (\tau-1)} \cos \theta \Big\}\nonumber\\
479: &=&-\frac{2 \sin \theta}{D \sqrt{\tau}} \Big\{Re[ G_M G^{*}_E + G_M
480: \Delta G^{*}_E+\Delta G_M G^{*}_E] + Re[G_M \widetilde{F}^{*}_3
481: ]\sqrt{\tau (\tau-1)} \cos \theta \Big\},\nonumber\\
482: P_z&=&\frac{2}{D}\Big\{|\widetilde{G}_M|^2 \cos \theta
483: -Re[\widetilde{G}_M \widetilde{F}_3^{*} ] \sqrt{\tau (\tau-1)}\sin^2
484: \theta \Big\}\nonumber\\
485: &=&\frac{2}{D}\Big\{|G_M|^2 \cos \theta + 2 Re[G_M \Delta G_M] \cos
486: \theta -Re[G_M \widetilde{F}_3^{*} ] \sqrt{\tau (\tau-1)}\sin^2
487: \theta \Big\}.
488: \label{polar}%
489: \end{eqnarray}
490: In Eqs. (\ref{polarpy},\ref{polar}), if we set $\Delta G_{E,M}=0$
491: and $\widetilde{F}_3=0$, the polarization observables reduces to the
492: results in the one-photon approximation. Considering the two-photon
493: exchange contribution to the double spin polarization observables,
494: we define $\delta(P_{x,z})$ as the ratio between the contributions
495: of $1 \gamma \otimes 2 \gamma$ interference terms and the results in
496: the one-photon mechanism, that is ,
497: \begin{eqnarray}
498: \delta(P_{x,z}) =P^{int}_{x,z}/P^{1 \gamma}_{x,z},\nonumber
499: \end{eqnarray}
500: with Eq. (\ref{polar}) we have,
501: \begin{eqnarray}
502: \delta(P_x) &=& \frac{Re[G_M \Delta G^{*}_E + G_E \Delta
503: G^{*}_M]}{Re[ G_M G^{*}_E]} + \sqrt{\tau (\tau -1)} \frac{Re[G_M
504: \widetilde{F}_3]}{Re[ G_M G^{*}_E]} \cos \theta~, \nonumber\\
505: \delta(P_z) &=& \frac{2 Re[G_M \Delta G_M]}{|G_M|^2}- \sqrt{\tau
506: (\tau-1)} \frac{Re[G_M \widetilde{F}^{*}_3]}{|G_M|^2} \sin \theta
507: \tan \theta~.
508: \label{deltap}%
509: \end{eqnarray}
510: One can see both $\delta(P_x)$ and
511: $\delta(P_z)$ are the odd functions of $\cos \theta$.
512:
513: \section{Two-Photon Exchange Contribution}
514: This section is devoted to a directly numerical calculation for the
515: two-photon exchange. We know that much work has been done in the
516: space-like region. Naturally, it is expected that the same
517: calculation should be performed in the time-like region. After
518: considering the two-photon exchange, the amplitude $\mathcal{M}$
519: will be essentially modified, that is,
520: \begin{eqnarray}
521: \mathcal{M}=\mathcal{M}_0 +\mathcal{M}_{2\gamma},
522: \end{eqnarray}
523: where $\mathcal{M}_0$ is the contribution of the one-photon exchange and
524: $\mathcal{M}_{2\gamma}$ denotes the two-photon exchange. Therefore, to
525: the first order of $\alpha\ (\alpha = e^2/4\pi)$, we have,
526: \begin{eqnarray}
527: \frac{d \sigma}{d \Omega}\ \propto\ \overline{|\mathcal{M}|^2}\ =\
528: \overline{|\mathcal{M}_0|^2}\ (1+ \delta_{2 \gamma}) \nonumber
529: \end{eqnarray}
530: with
531: \begin{eqnarray}
532: \delta_{2 \gamma}=2 \frac{Re\{\overline{\mathcal{M}_{2\gamma}
533: \mathcal{M}_0^\dagger}\}}{|\mathcal{M}_0|^2}.
534: \label{delta}%
535: \end{eqnarray}
536: From the analysis in section 2, one can see that
537: $A_{2\gamma}(q^2,\theta)$ and $\delta_{2\gamma}$ are identical.
538:
539: \par%
540:
541: To proceed a direct calculation, the amplitude of the two-photon
542: exchange from the direct box (Fig. \ref{Fig-feyntpe} $a$) and
543: crossed box diagram (Fig. \ref{Fig-feyntpe} $b$) has the form
544: \begin{eqnarray}
545: \mathcal{M}_{2 \gamma}= e^4 \int \frac{d^4 k}{(2 \pi)^4}\left[
546: \frac{N_{a}(k)}{D_a(k)}+\frac{N_{b}(k)}{D_{b}(k)}\right].
547: \label{mtpe}%
548: \end{eqnarray}
549: where the numerators are the matrix elements. For the direct box
550: diagram,
551: \begin{eqnarray}
552: N_{a}(k)= j_{(a)\mu\nu}J_{(a)}^{\mu\nu}~,\nonumber
553: \end{eqnarray}
554: with
555: \begin{eqnarray}
556: j_{a}^{\mu \nu}&=& \bar{u}(-k_2) \gamma^{\mu} (\hat{k}_1-\hat{k})
557: \gamma^{\nu} u(k_1),\nonumber\\
558: J_{a}^{\mu\nu}&=& \bar{u}(p_2) \Gamma^{\mu}(k_1+k_2-k)
559: (\hat{k}-\hat{p}_1-m_N) \Gamma^{\nu}(k) u(-p_1),
560: \end{eqnarray}
561: with $\hat{k} \equiv \gamma\cdot k$ and $\Gamma_{\mu}(k)$ defined
562: in Eq. (\ref{ff0}). The denominators in Eq. (\ref{mtpe}) are the
563: products of the scalar propagators,
564: \begin{eqnarray}
565: D_{a}(k)&=&[k^2-\lambda^2][(k_1+k_2-k)^2-\lambda^2][(k_1-k)^2-m_e^2]
566: [(k-p_1)^2-m_N^2],
567: \end{eqnarray}
568: where an infinitesimal photon mass, $\lambda$, has been introduced
569: in the photon propagator to regulate the IR divergence. Similarly we
570: can write down the expressions of $N_{b}(k)$ and $D_{b}(k)$ for Fig.
571: \ref{Fig-feyntpe} $b$.
572:
573: \par%
574:
575: For the $1\gamma \otimes 2\gamma$ interference term, we define the
576: leptonic and hadronic tensors as,
577: \begin{eqnarray}
578: L^{(a,b)}_{\mu\nu\rho}=j^{(a,b)}_{\mu\nu} j^{*}_{\rho}~,~~~~
579: H^{(a,b)}_{\mu\nu\rho}=J^{(a,b)}_{\mu\nu} J^{*}_{\rho}\ .
580: \end{eqnarray}
581: Here the current operator in the hadronic current $J_{\rho}$ is the
582: same as the one in $J_{\mu\nu}$, then,
583: \begin{eqnarray}
584: \frac{d\sigma^{int}}{d\Omega}\propto\mathcal{M}_{2\gamma}\mathcal{M}_0
585: =\frac{e^6}{q^2} \int \frac{d^4k}{(2 \pi)^4} \Big[
586: \frac{L^{(a)}_{\mu\nu\rho} H^{(a) \mu\nu\rho}}{D_{a}(k)}
587: +\frac{L^{(b)}_{\mu\nu\rho} H^{(b) \mu\nu\rho}}{D_{b}(k)} \Big]
588: \label{mtpem0}.%
589: \end{eqnarray}
590: For the unpolarized differential cross section only
591: $L^{(a,b)}_{\mu\nu\rho}(0) H^{(a,b) \mu\nu\rho}(0)$ survives. From
592: the crossing symmetry, we conclude that the expressions of
593: $\delta_{2 \gamma}$ are identical with Mandelstan variables for both
594: the scattering channel and the annihilating channel, that is,
595: \begin{eqnarray}
596: \delta_{2 \gamma}(s, t)_{e^{-} + p\rightarrow e^{-} +
597: p}=g(s,t)=\delta_{2 \gamma}(s, t)_{e^{-} + e^{+} \rightarrow p +
598: \bar{p}}.
599: \end{eqnarray}
600: In the soft approximation $g(s,t)$ can be expressed as
601: \begin{eqnarray}
602: g(s,t)_{soft}=-2 \frac{\alpha}{\pi} \ln \left|
603: \frac{s-m_e^2-m_N^2}{s+t-m_e^2-m_N^2} \right| \ln
604: \left|\frac{t}{\lambda^2}\right|.
605: \label{soft}%
606: \end{eqnarray}
607: \par%
608:
609: For the double spin polarization observables $P_x$ and $P_z$ the $1
610: \gamma \otimes 2\gamma$ interference contribution is
611: \begin{eqnarray}
612: P^{int}_{x,z}&=&\frac{e^2}{q^2 D} \int \frac{d^4k}{(2\pi)^4} \Big[
613: \frac{L^{(a)}_{\mu\nu\rho} H^{(a)\mu\nu\rho}(s_{1x,z})}{D_a(k)}
614: +\frac{L^{(b)}_{\mu\nu\rho} H^{(b)\mu\nu\rho} (s_{1x,z}) }{
615: D_b(k) }\Big]\nonumber\\
616: &=&\frac{e^2}{q^2 D} \int \frac{d^4k}{(2\pi)^4} \Big[
617: \frac{L^{(a)}_{\mu\nu\rho}(S) H^{(a)\mu\nu\rho}(s_{1x,z})}{D_a(k)}
618: +\frac{L^{(b)}_{\mu\nu\rho}(S) H^{(b)\mu\nu\rho} (s_{1x,z}) }{
619: D_b(k) }\Big].
620: \label{pint}%
621: \end{eqnarray}
622: As in the one-photon exchange approximation, the unpolarized
623: leptonic vector has no contribution to the double spin polarization
624: observables. For the term of $L_{\mu\nu\rho}(0) H^{\mu\nu\rho}
625: (s_{1x,z})$, after some algebraic calculations, we find that the
626: non-vanishing contributions are in the forms of $\varepsilon^{a b c
627: k},\ a'\cdot k \varepsilon^{a b c k},\ a'\cdot k \ b'\cdot k
628: \varepsilon^{a b c k},\ k^2 \ a'\cdot k \varepsilon^{a b c k},$ and
629: $\{a',\ b',\ a,\ b,\ c\}\in \{s_{1},\ k_1,\ k_2,\ p_1,\ p_2,\}$.
630: Since $a',\ a,\ b,\ b' $ and $c$ have zero-$y$ component, then the
631: non-vanishing terms are the odd functions of $k_y$. Namely
632: $L_{\mu\nu\rho}(0)H^{\mu\nu\rho}(s_1) = f(s,t,k_0,k_x,k_z,k_y^2) k_y
633: $. Since the denominators in Eq. (\ref{pint}) are the even functions
634: of $k_y$, the contribution of $L_{\mu\nu\rho}(0)
635: H^{\mu\nu\rho}(s_1)$, therefore, vanishes.
636:
637: \section{Numerical Results and Discussion}
638:
639: In this work, we calculate the contributions of direct box diagram
640: (Fig. \ref{Fig-feyntpe} $a$ ) and crossed box diagram (Fig.
641: \ref{Fig-feyntpe} $b$ ) to the unpolarized differential cross
642: section and the double spin polarization observables. In this
643: calculation a simple monopole form of the form factors is employed.
644: This phenomenological form factor is $G_E(q^2)=G_M(q^2)/\mu_p=G(q^2)
645: = -\Lambda^2 / (q^2-\Lambda^2)$, with $\Lambda=0.84\ GeV$, which is
646: consistent with the size of the nucleon. Practically, for the
647: interaction of the outgoing hadrons, the time-like form factors have
648: a phase structure. which means the form factors are complex in the
649: time-like region. In this work what we concern is the ratio
650: $\delta_{2\gamma}$ and double spin polarization observables $P_x$
651: and $P_z$. Moreover, the phenomenological form factors appear in
652: both denominator and numerator of these physical observables. In
653: such cases, the form of form factors varies the ratio and
654: polarization observables in a very limited extension. The same
655: conclusion can be drawn from the results of two-photon exchange
656: corrections to space-like form factors in Ref. \cite{PRC-065203}.
657:
658: \par%
659:
660:
661: In our calculation, the loop integrals of the two-photon exchange
662: contribution, firstly, were evaluated analytically in terms of the
663: four-point Passarino-Veltman functions \cite{NPB-151} using package
664: FeynCalc \cite{CPC-345}. Then, the Passarino-Veltman functions were
665: evaluated numerically with LoopTools \cite{CPC-153}. The IR
666: divergence in the $1 \gamma \otimes 2 \gamma$ is proportional to
667: $\ln \lambda$. This conclusion can be drawn by analyzing the
668: integral in Eq. (\ref{delta}) as well as by crossing symmetry and
669: previous results in the scattering channel. Furthermore, the
670: previous calculations in the scattering channel have shown that the
671: IR divergence in the two-photon exchange contribution is exactly
672: canceled by the corresponding terms in the bremsstrahlung cross
673: section involving the interference between the real photons emitted
674: from the electron and from the proton. With crossing symmetry, the
675: IR divergence in the annihilating channel caused by the two-photon
676: exchange can also be ignored.
677:
678: \par%
679:
680: From our previous analysis, the two-photon contribution to
681: unpolarized differential cross section $\delta_{2\gamma}$ is
682: identical to the angular asymmetry $A_{2 \gamma}$, which means
683: $\delta_{2 \gamma}$ is also the odd function of $\cos \theta$. The
684: numerical results of the two-photon contribution to unpolarized
685: differential cross section $\delta_{2 \gamma}$ are presented in Fig.
686: (\ref{Fig-unpolar}), where we show a comparison of $\delta_{2
687: \gamma}$ (defined as in Eq. (\ref{delta})) between the results of
688: the full calculation and the soft approximation. The full circles in
689: the figure are the full calculation, the dotted curves are the
690: results with soft approximation and the full curves are the
691: polynomial fits to the full calculation. We find a polynomial in the
692: form of $\cos \theta [a_0(t) + a_1(t) \cos^2 \theta + a_2(t) \cos^4
693: \theta + ...]$ can give a good fit with a power series of $\cos
694: \theta$ (no more than $\cos^5 \theta$). The left panel of Fig.
695: (\ref{Fig-unpolar}) shows the results with momentum transfer
696: $q^2=~4~GeV^2$, which is near the threshold of the reaction $e^{+}+
697: e^{-} \rightarrow p + \bar{p}$. We see that the two-photon exchange
698: contribution to the unpolarized differential cross section is rather
699: small, only about $\pm 0.6 \%$ at $\theta = \pi (0)$. In addition,
700: with the coefficients $a_0 = -9.6 \times 10^{-3}, a_1 = 4.9 \times
701: 10^{-3}, a_2 = -1.5 \times 10^{-3}$ we see that the polynomial gives
702: a good fit of the full calculation. The right panel of Fig.
703: (\ref{Fig-unpolar}) is the results at $q^2= 16~GeV^2$, the
704: contribution of the two-photon exchange is relatively large, nearly
705: $4 \%$, the parameters of the fit for the full calculation are $a_0
706: = 2.9 \times 10^{-3}, a_1 = 5.7 \times 10^{-2}, a_2 = -1.9 \times
707: 10^{-2}$. We conclude that at a fixed momentum transfer, the
708: contribution of the two-photon exchange is strongly dependent on
709: $\cos \theta$. In magnitude, the contribution is rather limited in
710: small momentum transfer region, with $q^2$ increasing, the
711: contribution becomes larger. This conclusion is consistent with the
712: results in the space-like region.
713:
714: \par%
715:
716: In Fig. \ref{Fig-ffs}, we show the $\cos \theta$ dependence of the
717: real part of corrections to the proton time-like form factors caused
718: by the two -photon exchange at $q^2~=~4 ~GeV^2$. For $\Delta G_E/G$
719: and $\Delta G_M/G$, significant $\cos \theta$ dependences are
720: observed, while $\widetilde{F}_3/G$ weakly depends on $\cos \theta$.
721: For the parity, $\Delta G_E/G$ and $\Delta G_M/G$ are odd, and
722: $\widetilde{F}_3/G$ is even. These features are consistent with our
723: general analysis. The electric form factor is relatively more
724: sensitive to the two-photon exchange corrections, is about $2.5 \%$
725: at $\theta =0 (\cos \theta=1)$ and $-2.5 \%$ at $\theta = \pi (\cos
726: \theta=-1)$. The correction to magnetic form factor, $\Delta G_M /G$
727: varies from $1 \%$ to $-1 \%$ with $\theta$ from zero to $\pi$,
728: while $\widetilde{F}_3/G_E$ is about $1\%$ in the whole $\theta$
729: region.
730: \par%
731:
732: From our previous analysis in Sec. \ref{dcspo}, one can see the
733: two-photon contributions to double spin polarization observables
734: $P_x$ and $P_z$ are even functions of $\cos \theta$. In our previous
735: numerical results in Fig. (4) we find $\widetilde{F}_3$ is not zero
736: at $\theta~=~\pi/2$, then $\delta(P_z)$ will be proportional to
737: $\tan \theta$ at the limit of $\theta \rightarrow \pi/2$ and will be
738: infinity at $\theta~=~\pi/2$. Our numerical results of the $\cos
739: \theta$ dependence of $\delta(P_{x,z})$ at $q^2~=~4~GeV^2$ are
740: displayed in Fig. (\ref{Fig-polar}). We can see that the two-photon
741: exchange contribution to the double spin polarization is strongly
742: $\theta-$ dependence, and is the odd function of $\cos \theta$,
743: which is consistent with our general analysis. For $P_x$, the
744: variation caused by the two-photon exchange reaches maximum at
745: $\theta =\pi(0)$ (about $4 \%$). It seems that one can more easily
746: find the signal of the two-photon exchange at the backward ($\theta
747: = \pi$) and forward ($\theta = 0$) angle. However, notice Eq.
748: (\ref{polar}), we know that $P^{1\gamma}_x$ is proportional to $\sin
749: \theta$. It means when $\theta$ is very small(close to $0$) or very
750: large(close to $\pi$), $P^{1 \gamma}_x$ will be compatible to $0$,
751: and therefore, the absolute variation caused by the two-photon
752: exchange will be very limited. Thus, it will still be difficult to
753: find any signal of the two-photon exchange in the observable $P_x$.
754: For $P_z$, the contribution of the two-photon exchange reaches
755: maximum when $\theta= \pi/2$. In the one photon mechanism
756: $P^{1\gamma}_z $ is proportional to $ \cos\theta$, which suggests
757: that no matter what kinds of form factors we employed, $P^{1
758: \gamma}_z$ vanishes at $\theta ~=~\pi/2$. While taking the
759: two-photon exchange contribution into consideration, as in Eq.
760: (\ref{deltap}), $P_z(\pi/2)$ is not equal to zero any more. From the
761: experimental point of view, the nonzero $P_z$ at $\theta~=~\pi/2$
762: might be a strong evidence of the two-photon exchange in the process
763: of $e^{+} + e^{-} \rightarrow p + \bar{p}$.
764:
765: \par%
766:
767: According to our numerical results, one can see the two-photon
768: exchange contribution to the unpolarized differential cross section
769: $\delta_{2\gamma}$, which is identical to angular asymmetry
770: $A_{2\gamma}$, is rather small at small momentum transfer. With
771: present experimental precision, it is rather difficult to find any
772: evidence of the two-photon exchange from the unpolarized observable
773: in the process $e^{+} + e^{-} \rightarrow p + \bar{p}$, especially
774: at low momentum transfer region. With $q^2$ increasing, the
775: contribution of the two-photon exchange becomes important. It can
776: be several percent at $q^2$ about $16 ~GeV^2$. Furthermore, for
777: the double spin polarization observables, $P_z$ deserves to be
778: considered in further experiment. In conclusion,the precise
779: measurements of the unpolarized differential cross section at high
780: momentum transfer and the double spin polarization observable $P_z$
781: especially at $\theta~=~\pi/2$ are expected to show some evidences
782: of the two-photon exchange in this process.
783:
784: \par%
785:
786: \section{Acknowledgment}
787: This work is supported by the National Sciences Foundations of China
788: under Grant No. 10475088, No. 10747118, and by CAS Knowledge
789: Innovation Project No. KC2-SW-N02.
790:
791:
792: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Reference %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
793: \begin{thebibliography}{00}
794: \bibitem{PRL-1398} Jefferson Lab Hall A Collaboration, M. K. Jones
795: et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 84}, 1398 (2000).
796: \bibitem{PRL-092301}Jefferson Lab Hall A Collaboration, O. Gayou et al.,
797: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 88}, 092301 (2002).
798: \bibitem{PRD-5491} L. Andivahis et al., Phys. Rev. D {\bf 50}, 5491
799: (1994).
800: \bibitem{PRD-5671} R. C. Walker et al., Phys. Rev. D {\bf 49}, 5671
801: (1994).
802: \bibitem{PRC-034325} J. Arrington, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 68}, 034325 (2003)
803: \bibitem{PRC-015206} M. E. Christy et al., Phys. Rev. C {\bf 70},
804: 015206 (2004).
805: \bibitem{PRL-142301} I. A. Qattan et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 94},
806: 142301 (2005); J. Arrington, arXiv: nucl-ex/0312017.
807: \bibitem{SP-588} A. I. Akhiezer, L. N. Rozentsveig and I. M.
808: Shmushkevich, Sov. Phys. JETP {\bf 6}, 588 (1958).
809: \bibitem{PR-2256} R. G. Sachs, Phys. Rev. {\bf 126}, 2256 (1962).
810: \bibitem{NC-821} J. D. Walecka, Nuovo Cimento {\bf 11}, 821 (1959).
811: \bibitem{PR-615} M. N. Rosenbluth, Phys. Rev. {\bf 79}, 615 (1950).
812: \bibitem{PRC-054320} L. C. Maximon and J. A. Tjon, Phys. Rev. C. {\bf
813: 62}, 054320 (2003).
814: \bibitem{PRL-142303} P. A. M. Guichon and M. Vanderhaeghen, Phys.
815: Rev. Lett. {\bf 91}, 142303 (2003).
816: \bibitem{PRL-142304} P. G. Blunden, W. Melnitchouk and J. A. Tjon,
817: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 91}, 142304 (2003).
818: \bibitem{PRL-172503} S. Kondratyuk, P. G. Blunden, W. Melnitchouk
819: and J. A. Tjon, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 95}, 172503 (2005).
820: \bibitem{PRL-122301} Y. -C. Chen, A. Afanasev, S. J. Brodsky, C. E.
821: Carlson and M. Wanderhaeghen, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 93}, 122301
822: (2004).
823: \bibitem{PRC-065203} D. Borisyuk and A. Kobushkin, Phys. Rev.
824: C {\bf 74}, 065203 (2006).
825: \bibitem{PRC-038202} D. Borisyuk and A. Kobushkin, Phys. Rev. C {\bf
826: 75}, 038202 (2007).
827: \bibitem{PRC-042202} M. P. Rekalo E. Tomasi-Gustafsson and D. Prout,
828: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 60}, 042202 (1999).
829: \bibitem{NPA-120} G. I. Gakh, E. Tomasi-Gustafsson, Nucl. Phys. A {\bf
830: 761}, 120 (2005).
831: \bibitem{PLB-197} E. Tomasi-Gustafsson, E. A. Kuraev, S. Bakmaev and S.
832: Pacetti, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 659}, 197 (2008).
833: \bibitem{EPJA-331} M. P. Rekalo and E. Tomasi-Gustafsson, Eur. Phys.
834: J. A {\bf 22}, 331 (2004).
835: \bibitem{NPA-271} M. P. Rekalo, E. Tomasi-Gustafsson, Nucl. Phys. A
836: {\bf 740}, 271 (2004).
837: \bibitem{NPA-322} M. P. Rekalo, E. Tomasi-Gustafsson, Nucl. Phys. A
838: {\bf 742}, 322 (2004).
839: \bibitem{arXiv-0704.3375} C. Adamuscin, G. I. Gakh and E.
840: Tomasi-Gustafsson, hep-ph/0704.3375, (2007).
841: \bibitem{PRC-054302} L. C. Maximon and J. A. Tjon, Phys. Rev. C {\bf
842: 62}, 054320 (2000)
843: \bibitem{NPB-151} G. Passarino and M. Veltman, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf
844: 160}, 151 (1979).
845: \bibitem{CPC-345} R. Mertig, M. Bohm and A. Denner, Comput. Phys.
846: Commun. {\bf 64}, 345 (1991).
847: \bibitem{CPC-153} T. Hahn, M. Perez-Victoria, Comput. Phys.Commun.
848: {\bf 118}, 153 (1999).
849: \bibitem{PRC-034612} P. G. Blunden, W. Melnitchouk and J. A. Tjon,
850: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 72}, 034612 (2005)
851: \end{thebibliography}
852:
853:
854: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Figures %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
855: \clearpage\newpage%
856: %%%%%%%%%% Fig. 1 %%%%%%%%%%%%
857: \begin{figure}[h]
858: \centering
859: \mbox{\epsfig{figure=feyn_tree.eps,width=120mm,clip=}} %
860: \renewcommand{\figurename}{Fig.}
861: \caption{One-photon approximation for the crossed channels. The left
862: one represents the annihilating channel of $e^{+} +
863: e^{-}\rightarrow h + \bar{h}$, and the right one shows the
864: scattering channel of $e^{-} + h\rightarrow e^{-} + h$.}
865: \label{Fig-feyntree}%
866: \end{figure}%
867: %%%%%%%%%% Fig. 2 %%%%%%%%%%%%
868: \begin{figure}
869: \centering
870: \mbox{\epsfig{figure=feyn_tpe.eps,width=120mm,clip=}} %
871: \renewcommand{\figurename}{Fig.}
872: \caption{Two-photon exchange box and crossed box diagrams in
873: annihilating channel.}
874: \label{Fig-feyntpe}%
875: \end{figure}%
876:
877: %%%%%%%%%% Fig. 3 %%%%%%%%%%%%
878: \begin{figure}[h]
879: \centering
880: \mbox{\epsfig{figure=unpolar_E1_1.eps,width=75mm,clip=}} %
881: \hspace{5mm}
882: \mbox{\epsfig{figure=unpolar_E1_2.eps,width=75mm,clip=}} %
883: \renewcommand{\figurename}{Fig.}
884: \caption{$\cos \theta$ dependences of the finite $2\gamma$
885: contribution to the unpolarized differential cross section. The full
886: circles are the results of full calculation, the dotted curves are
887: those with soft approximation, and the solid lines are the
888: polynomial fit for the full calculation. The left panel is the
889: result at $q^2=4~ GeV^2$ and right one is at $q^2=16~ GeV^2$.}
890: \label{Fig-unpolar}%
891: \end{figure}%
892: %%%%%%%%%% Fig. 4 %%%%%%%%%%%%
893: \begin{figure}[h]
894: \centering
895: \mbox{\epsfig{figure=ffs.eps,width=120mm,clip=}} %
896: \renewcommand{\figurename}{Fig.}
897: \caption{$\cos \theta$ dependence of the two-photon contribution to
898: the proton form factors in the time-like region at $q^2=4~GeV^2$.}
899: \label{Fig-ffs}%
900: \end{figure}
901: %%%%%%%%%%% Fig. 5 %%%%%%%%%%%%
902: \begin{figure}[h]
903: \centering
904: \mbox{\epsfig{figure=polar.eps,width=120mm,clip=}} %
905: \renewcommand{\figurename}{Fig.}
906: \caption{$\cos \theta$ dependences of the two-photon contribution to
907: the polarization observables at $q^2=4GeV$. The solid curve stands
908: for the results of $\delta(P_x)$, and the dotted curve represents
909: the results of $\delta(P_z)$.}
910: \label{Fig-polar}%
911: \end{figure}%
912:
913:
914:
915:
916: \end{document}
917: