1:
2: %Last modified: 16/06/09
3: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
4: %\documentstyle[12pt]{article}
5: %\documentstyle[12pt,cite]{article}
6: \documentstyle[12pt,cite,epsfig,psfrag]{article}
7: %\documentstyle[12pt,fleqn,cite,epsfig,psfrag]{article}
8: %\newcommand{\sect}[1]{\setcounter{equation}{0}\section{#1}}
9: %\newcommand{\subsect}[1]{\subsection{#1}}
10: %\newcommand{\subsubsect}[1]{\subsubsection{#1}}
11: %\renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}
12: \def\sxn#1{\sect{#1}}
13: \def\subsxn#1{\subsect{#1}}
14: \def\subsubsxn#1{\subsubsect{#1}}
15: \font\mybb=msbm10 at 12pt
16: \def\bb#1{\hbox{\mybb#1}}
17: \def\K {\bb{K}}
18: \def\S {\bb{S}}
19: \def\Z {\bb{Z}}
20: \def\T {\bb{T}}
21: \def\ab {(a)}
22: \def \cf {{\cal {F}}}
23: \def \ca {{\cal {A}}}
24:
25: \def\ten{(10)}
26: \textheight 8.5in
27: \textwidth 6.0in
28: \topmargin=-0.5cm
29: \hoffset -.14cm
30: %\baselineskip= 16pt
31:
32: \def\be{\begin{equation}}
33: \def\ee{\end{equation}}
34: \def\bea{\begin{eqnarray}}
35: \def\eea{\end{eqnarray}}
36: \def\pa{\partial}
37: \def\dmu{\partial_\mu}
38: \def\rt{\rightarrow}
39: \newcommand{\beqal}{\begin{eqnarray}\label}
40: \newcommand{\beqa}{\begin{eqnarray}}
41: \newcommand{\eeqa}{\end{eqnarray}}
42: \newcommand {\tr}{\mbox{tr}}
43: \newcommand {\Tr}{\mbox{Tr}}
44: \newcommand {\expt}[1]{\left\langle #1 \right\rangle}
45: \newcommand {\non}{\\\nonumber}
46: \newcommand {\f}{\frac}
47:
48: \begin{document}
49: \baselineskip=0.6cm
50: \begin{titlepage}
51: \begin{center}
52: %\hfill hep-th/yymmnnn\\
53: %\hfill IP/BBSR/2008-??\\
54: \vskip .2in
55:
56: {\Large \bf Bouncing Braneworld with Born-Infeld and Gauss-Bonnet}
57: \vskip .5in
58:
59: {\bf Sudipta Mukherji$^*$\footnote{e-mail: mukherji@iopb.res.in} and
60: Supratik Pal$^+$\footnote{e-mail: supratik\_v@isical.ac.in}\\
61: \vskip .1in
62: {\em $^*$Institute of Physics,\\
63: Bhubaneswar 751 005, India.}
64: \vskip .1in
65: {\em $^+$Physics and Applied Mathematics Unit,\\
66: Indian Statistical Institute,\\
67: 203 B.T. Road, Kolkata 700 108, India.}}
68:
69: \end{center}
70:
71: \begin{center} {\bf ABSTRACT}
72: \end{center}
73: \begin{quotation}
74:
75: \baselineskip 15pt
76:
77: \noindent We show the existence of some bouncing cosmological solutions in the
78: braneworld
79: scenario. More specifically, we consider a dynamical three-brane in the background
80: of Born-Infeld and electrically charged Gauss-Bonnet black hole.
81: We find that, in certain range of parameter space, the brane universe, at least
82: classically, never shrinks to a zero size, resulting in a singularity-free cosmology
83: within the classical domain.
84: \end{quotation}
85: \vskip 2in
86: 16 June 2009\\
87: \end{titlepage}
88: \vfill
89: \eject
90:
91: Singularity-free cosmological solutions are very rare within the
92: framework of the conventional Einstein
93: theory of gravity. It is however believed that at a short distance scale, Einstein
94: action would require modifications. These modifications can, in principle, have
95: cosmological consequences and may induce nonsingular cosmologies by evading the
96: singularity theorem \cite{Hawking:1969sw}. Indeed, in string theory, one expects
97: drastic modifications of Einstein action at high energies.
98: These modifications appear due to worldsheet corrections and
99: due to contributions from the quantum loops. These corrections may violate
100: strong energy
101: condition, making it possible to construct non-singular time dependent
102: solutions \cite{Antoniadis:1993jc, Gasperini:2002bn, Kachru:2002kx}.
103:
104: Physics at a small scale receives modifications in the braneworld
105: scenario as well.
106: In the cosmological sector, this is substantiated via a modified version
107: of the Friedmann equations resulting from the embedding geometry.
108: Indeed in many braneworld models, it has been found that the universe can have
109: a smooth transition from a contracting to an expanding phase without reaching
110: a singularity \cite{Mukherji:2002ft, Biswas:2003rb, Shtanov:2002mb,
111: DeRisi:2007dn}.
112: In particular, in \cite{Mukherji:2002ft}, a non-singular cosmological
113: solution was
114: presented by considering a dynamical three-brane in a five dimensional charged AdS
115: black hole background. This happens because the charge of the bulk black hole induces a
116: negative energy
117: density on the brane world volume. This, in turn, prevents the brane to fall in to
118: the black hole singularity. However, this bounce, unfortunately, occurs inside the
119: Cauchy horizon of the black hole. Consequently, regardless of the initial
120: energy of the brane, the bulk space-time collapses due to the back-reaction at the
121: Cauchy horizon \cite{Hovdebo:2003ug}.
122:
123: Within the framework of braneworld scenario, in this short note, we search for
124: other probable models, where, at least classically, one can construct non-singular
125: cosmological
126: universe. In the following, we show the existence of such solutions by
127: considering an
128: empty three-brane in the background of
129: Born-Infeld black hole \cite{Dey:2004yt} and in the
130: background
131: of charged Gauss-Bonnet (GB) black hole \cite{Lidsey:2002zw, Torii:2005nh, Dey:2007vt}. In both the cases, by
132: considering the
133: effective potentials, we show that, within a certain range of parameter space,
134: there do exist
135: bouncing solutions in these backgrounds as well.
136: An important conclusion of this analysis is that the charge of the bulk black hole plays the key role
137: in avoiding cosmological singularity on the brane.
138: It is however important to study the stability of such
139: solution. We have not done this in this note and expect to come back to it
140: in the future.
141:
142:
143: \bigskip
144:
145: \bigskip
146:
147: \noindent {\bf {Bounce with Born-Infeld}}
148:
149: \bigskip
150:
151: \bigskip
152:
153: The Einstein-Born-Infeld action in five dimensions in the presence of a
154: negative bulk cosmological constant $\Lambda$ is given by
155: \begin{equation}
156: S = \int d^5x\sqrt{-g}\Big[{1\over{\kappa}}(R - 2 \Lambda) + L(F)\Big],
157: \end{equation}
158: where $L(F)$ is the contribution from the Born-Infeld gravity
159: \begin{equation}
160: L(F) = 4 \beta^2 \Big(1 - {\sqrt{1 + {F_{\mu\nu}
161: F^{\mu\nu}\over{2\beta^2}}}}\Big).
162: \end{equation}
163: Here the constant $\beta$ is the Born-Infeld parameter, having the dimension of
164: mass. In the limit $\beta \rightarrow \infty$, $L(F)$ reduces to the
165: standard Maxwell form
166: \begin{equation}
167: L(F) = - F^{\mu\nu} F_{\mu\nu} + {\cal {O}} (F^4).
168: \end{equation}
169: A $(n+1)$ dimensional black hole solution of this theory has been obtained
170: in \cite{Dey:2004yt} by considering the
171: general form of the metric as
172: \begin{equation}
173: ds^2 = - V(r) dt^2 + {dr^2\over{V(r)}} + r^2 d\Omega^2_3,
174: \label{bbb}
175: \end{equation}
176: which gives, after some rigorous calculations, a solution for the metric function
177: $V(r)$ in $(n+1)$ dimensions \cite{Dey:2004yt}.
178: In $(4+1)$ dimensions, the metric function $V(r)$ can be written in a compact form in terms of Hypergeometric
179: and algebraic functions as
180: \begin{eqnarray}
181: V(r) = 1 - {m\over r^2} + \Big[{\beta^2\over 3} + {1\over l^2}\Big] r^2
182: -{ {\sqrt 2}\beta \over {6 r}} {\sqrt{2 \beta^2 r^{6} + 6
183: q^2}}
184: + {3 \over{2 r^4}} {q^2} ~ {}_2F_1\big[{1\over 3}, {1\over 2}, {4\over 3},
185: - { 3 q^2\over{\beta^2 r^{6}}}\Big].
186: \label{biv}
187: \end{eqnarray}
188: The solution of the corresponding gauge field equations of motion is
189: \begin{equation}
190: F^{rt} = { \sqrt{3} \beta q\over{\sqrt{\beta^2 r^6 + 3 q^2}}},
191: \label{bif}
192: \end{equation}
193: with all the other components of $F^{\mu\nu}$ being zero.
194: In (\ref{biv}), $m$ and $q$ are related to the ADM mass and charge of the black hole respectively. The
195: constant $l$, appearing in various equations, parametrises the cosmological
196: constant $\Lambda$
197: as $\Lambda = - 6/l^2$. The asymptotic behaviour (large $r$ limit) of the metric function
198: can be obtained by using the properties of the Hypergeometric function in (\ref{biv}), which
199: gives
200: \begin{equation}
201: V(r)|_{r \rightarrow \infty} = 1 - {m\over r^2} + {q^2\over{r^4}} + {r^2\over l^2} - { 3 q^4\over{ 16 \beta^2
202: r^{10}}}.
203: \label{asymp}
204: \end{equation}
205: Note that in the limit of large $\beta$, it has the form of Reissner-Nordstrom AdS black hole,
206: which is obvious from the fact that, in the large $\beta$ limit, the non-zero gauge field component
207: reduces to
208: \begin{equation}
209: F^{r t} |_{\beta \rightarrow \infty} \sim \frac{q}{r^3}.
210: \end{equation}
211:
212:
213: It is instructive to consider the nature of the horizon(s)
214: associated with this black hole. This is perhaps best described
215: by a plot of the mass of the hole as a function of the
216: horizon radius. The horizons correspond to the zeros of $V(r)$. Denoting the radius by $r_h$,
217: from (\ref{biv}), we get
218: \begin{equation}
219: m = r_h^2 + \Big[{\beta^2\over 3} + {1\over l^2}\Big] r_h^4
220: -{ {\sqrt 2}\beta r_h\over {6}} {\sqrt{2 \beta^2 r_h^{6} + 6
221: q^2}}
222: + {3 \over{2 r_h^2}} {q^2} ~ {}_2F_1\big[{1\over 3}, {1\over 2}, {4\over 3},
223: - { 3 q^2\over{\beta^2 r_h^{6}}}\Big].
224: \label{mrb}
225: \end{equation}
226:
227: \begin{figure}[t]
228: \begin{center}
229: \begin{psfrags}
230: \psfrag{a}[][]{$ r_h$}
231: \psfrag{b}[][]{$m$}
232: \epsfig{file=BIm-beta.eps, width= 12cm,angle=0}
233: \end{psfrags}
234: \vspace{ .1 in }
235: \caption{Plot for the mass of BI black hole as a function of horizon radius for fixed charge.
236: The dashed
237: line is for $\beta < \beta_c$ and the rest two are for $\beta > \beta_c$.
238: For a specific choice of parameters $q = 0.1$ and $l = 1$, the curves correspond to $\beta = 0.1$ (dashed),
239: 635 (dotted) and $10^{5}$ (continuous line) respectively.}
240: \label{bimb}
241: \end{center}
242: \end{figure}
243:
244: In figure (\ref{bimb}), we have plotted $m(r_h)$ for fixed $q$ and for different values
245: of $\beta$. For a given mass, we clearly see that the number of horizons depend on the
246: value of $\beta$. For fixed $q$, there is a single horizon unless $\beta$ is above a
247: critical value, which we call $\beta_c$. This critical value $\beta_c$
248: can be found out as follows. From the figure, we see that if we decrease the mass,
249: at some value of $m$, two horizons meet. We call this an extremal hole\footnote{Black
250: hole then has zero temperature.}. This minimum can be found by
251: extremising
252: (\ref{mrb}). At the extremal point, $r_h$ then satisfies
253: \begin{equation}
254: 2 r_h + 4 ({\beta^2 \over 3} + {1\over l^2})r_h^3 - {2 \sqrt 2\over 3} \beta
255: {\sqrt{2 \beta^2 r_h^{6} + 6 q^2}} = 0.
256: \end{equation}
257: It can be checked that, for a given $q$, there exists a real solution for $r_h$
258: only
259: when $\beta$ is larger than a critical value. We previously called
260: this $\beta_c$.
261: It can also be checked that $\beta_c$ decreases as we increase $q$,
262: which reveals the important role of the charge parameter in the bouncing
263: cosmology in the braneworld context.
264:
265: We would now like to study cosmology of an empty three-brane moving in this
266: background. In what follows, we will show the existence of a bouncing cosmology on the brane for
267: $\beta > \beta_c$.
268:
269: Let us start with a three-brane with tension $\Lambda_{\rm br}$ moving in the geometry
270: given by (\ref{bbb}) with $V(r)$ given in (\ref{biv}). The brane metric, consistent with
271: the orthonormality conditions and junction conditions for embedding,
272: is compatible to FRW geometry
273: \begin{equation}
274: ds_4^2 = - d\tau^2 + a(\tau)^2 d\Omega_3^2,
275: \label{frw}
276: \end{equation}
277: $\tau$ being the proper time on the brane. Using the junction conditions relating
278: the extrinsic curvature with the bulk quantities,
279: one can obtain an FRW metric on the brane of the above form if one identifies the scale factor $a(\tau)$
280: on the brane
281: with the radial trajectory $r(\tau)$ of the bulk black hole. From now on we shall use $a$ for $r$,
282: wherever it appears.
283: The embedding geometry thus gives \cite{Barcelo:2000re}
284: \begin{equation}
285: {\bar\Lambda_{\rm br}\over 3} = \bar H^2 + {V(\bar a)\over{\bar a^2}}.
286: \label{hubBI}
287: \end{equation}
288: %Here $\bar \Lambda_{\rm br}$ is the effective brane cosmological
289: %constant, which is the combined effect
290: %of the bulk cosmological constant $\Lambda$ and the brane tension.
291: In the above,
292: the quantities with bar are all dimensionless and are defined as
293: \begin{equation}
294: \bar \Lambda_{\rm br} = l^2 \Lambda_{\rm br}, ~ \bar a = {a\over l}, ~\bar H = {d\bar
295: a\over{\bar a d\bar \tau}}.
296: \end{equation}
297:
298: In the limit $\beta \rightarrow \infty$, (\ref{hubBI}) reduces to
299: \begin{equation}
300: {\bar \Lambda_{\rm br}\over 3} = 1 + \bar H^2 + {1\over {\bar a^2}} - {\bar m\over
301: \bar a^4} + {{\bar q^2}\over {\bar a^6}}.
302: \label{smal}
303: \end{equation}
304: Here $\bar m = m/l^2, \bar q = q/l^2$.
305: This equation has a simple solution when we tune the brane tension such that
306: $\bar \Lambda_{\rm br} = 3$. This corresponds to setting the brane tension same as
307: that of the curvature radius of the asymptotic AdS space. In conformal gauge, the
308: solution of (\ref{smal}) is
309: \begin{equation}
310: \bar a(\bar \eta) = {\sqrt{\bar m\over 2}}\Big[1 - {\sqrt{1 - {4 \bar q^2\over {\bar
311: m^2}}}} {\rm cos} (2 \bar \eta)\Big],
312: \label{betainfty}
313: \end{equation}
314: where $\eta$ is the conformal time defined as $d\tau = a(\eta) d\eta$ and $\bar \eta
315: = \eta/l$. For $\bar m > 2 \bar q$, this generates a non-singular cyclic cosmology with
316: brane universe reaching a minimum radius at $\eta = n \pi$ for $n$ being integer,
317: while the maximum radius is reached at $\eta = (n+1/2) \pi$.
318:
319: For finite $\beta$, it is difficult to find an exact closed form solution of (\ref{hubBI}), which now includes terms involving $\beta$ in the Friedmann equation and, in turn, make the results more complicated.
320: It is obvious from the inclusion of the Hypergeometric function which does not have a
321: simple algebraic expression for a general value of $\beta$ as such.
322: However, taking the asymptotic behaviour (\ref{asymp}) and rearranging terms, we can arrive at the following expression
323: for the modified Friedmann equations on the brane for large $\bar a$ limit :
324: \begin{equation}
325: {\bar \Lambda_{\rm br}\over 3} = 1 + \bar H^2 + {1\over {\bar a^2}} - {\bar m\over
326: \bar a^4} + {{\bar q^2}\over {\bar a^6}} - \frac{3\bar q^4}{16 \beta^2 {\bar a}^{12}},
327: \label{frwBI}
328: \end{equation}
329: where the term involving $\bar m$ is the usual dark radiation, the one with ${\bar q}^2$
330: gives a geometric stiff matter-like contribution (obtained in the case of infinite $\beta$ as well)
331: and the one with ${\bar q}^4$ and $\beta$ gives another geometric contribution (stiffer matter), which reflects the precise role
332: of a finite Born-Infeld parameter in this context.
333: We have been able to obtain an analytical solution for the scale factor
334: at least in this asymptotic limit but the expressions are too lengthy to produce here.
335: As apparent, complicated equations sometime defer us from obtaining a simple
336: analytical result but it is more important to overcome the hindrance and to extract the
337: underlying physics than to obtain a simple analytical solution.
338:
339: So, irrespective of whether or not there is a simple analytical solution for a general
340: Born-Infeld parameter,
341: it is rather more relevant to ask whether we can have a
342: bouncing cosmology in this Born-Infeld background with a finite $\beta$ as well.
343: In the following, we incorporate a mechanism by analysing the
344: effective potential to find that
345: the bouncing solution still survives if $\beta
346: > \beta_c$.
347: In order to see this, we rewrite (\ref{hubBI}) as
348: \begin{equation}
349: \Big({d\bar a\over{d\bar \tau}}\Big)^2 + U(\bar a) = 0,
350: \end{equation}
351: Here $U(\bar a)$ is the effective potential given by
352: \begin{equation}
353: U(\bar a) = V(\bar a) - {\bar a}^2.
354: \end{equation}
355: where we have set, as before, $\bar\Lambda_{\rm br} = 3$.
356:
357:
358: For $\beta < \beta_c$ and $\beta > \beta_c$, the plots are
359: shown in figure (\ref{ubi}). Physical domain of the solution corresponds to the
360: region $U(\bar a) \le 0$ with $U(\bar a) = 0$ representing the turning points.
361: From the plots we see that for very small $\beta$, the effective potential does not
362: show any signature for bounce. On the contrary, above a specific value for the
363: BI parameter $\beta = \beta_c$, there are, indeed, bouncing cosmological solutions
364: as indicated by the nature of the
365: effective potential. We have previously termed this $\beta_c$ as the critical value
366: for the BI parameter. It readily follows from the above analysis that,
367: so far as the BI parameter is above a critical
368: value, we have non-singular cosmology on the brane. This is true for infinite value
369: of $\beta$ as well, as supported by the analytical solution (\ref{betainfty}).
370:
371:
372:
373: \begin{figure}[t]
374: \begin{center}
375: \begin{psfrags}
376: \psfrag{a}[][]{$\bar a$}
377: \psfrag{b}[][]{$U(\bar a)$}
378: \epsfig{file=BIeffpota.eps, width= 14cm,angle=0}
379: \end{psfrags}
380: \vspace{ .1 in }
381: \caption{Plot of effective potential $U(\bar a)$ as a function of $\bar a$. The dashed line is for
382: $\beta < \beta_c$ and the rest two are for $\beta > \beta_c$. In this plot, for a specific set of
383: $\bar m = 10$, $\bar q = 0.1$ we have $\beta = 0.1$ (dashed), 635 (continuous line) and
384: $1000$ (dotted) respectively, with $\beta = 635$ being its critical value
385: for this choice of parameters.}
386: \label{ubi}
387: \end{center}
388: \end{figure}
389:
390:
391: In the rest of this note, we show that even in the Gauss-Bonnet theory, in the
392: presence of electric charge, it is possible to construct a bouncing cosmological
393: solution.
394:
395: \bigskip
396:
397: \bigskip
398:
399: \noindent{\bf{Bounce with Gauss-Bonnet}}
400:
401: \bigskip
402:
403: \bigskip
404:
405: The Gauss-Bonnet action with a Maxwell term is given by
406: \begin{equation}
407: S = \int d^5x\sqrt{-g}\Big[{R\over \kappa} - 2 \Lambda + \alpha (R^2 - 4 R_{ab}R^{ab}
408: + R_{abcd}R^{abcd} ) - {F^2\over \kappa}
409: \Big].
410: \label{act}
411: \end{equation}
412: Here, $\alpha$ is the GB coupling. This action possesses black hole solutions carrying
413: electric charge \cite{Torii:2005nh, Dey:2007vt}. These solutions have the form
414: \begin{equation}
415: ds^2 = -V(r) dt^2 + {dr^2\over{V(r)}} + r^2 d\Omega^2_3,
416: \label{bh}
417: \end{equation}
418: where $V(r)$ is given by
419: \begin{equation}
420: V(r) = 1 + {r^2\over{2 \hat\alpha}} - {r^2\over{2 \hat\alpha}}\Big[1 - {4 \hat
421: \alpha\over{l^2}}
422: + {4 \hat\alpha m\over {r^4}} - {4 \hat\alpha q^2\over{r^6}}\Big]^{1\over 2}.
423: \label{vblack}
424: \end{equation}
425: In the above expression, $\hat\alpha = 2 \alpha \kappa$, while $l$ is related to the
426: cosmological constant as $l^2 = - 6/(\kappa \Lambda)$. As before, the parameters $m$ and $q$ are
427: related to the ADM mass and the charge respectively. The gauge potential is
428: given by
429: \begin{equation}
430: A_t = - {\sqrt{3}\over 2} {q\over r^2} + \Phi,
431: \end{equation}
432: where $\Phi$ is a constant which we will fix below. Denoting $r_+$ as the largest real
433: positive root of $V(r)$, we find that the metric (\ref{bh}) describes a black hole with
434: a non-singular horizon if
435: \begin{equation}
436: 2 r_+^6 + l^2 r_+^4 \ge q^2 l^2.
437: \end{equation}
438: In the following we would choose the gauge potential $A_t$ to vanish at the horizon,
439: which, in turn, fixes $\Phi$ as
440: \begin{equation}
441: \Phi = - {\sqrt{3}\over 2} {q\over r_+^2}.
442: \end{equation}
443: Asymptotically, the metric (\ref{bh}) is an AdS space with
444: \begin{equation}
445: V(r)|_{r\rightarrow \infty} = 1 + \Big[ {1\over {2 \hat\alpha}} - {1\over {2 \hat\alpha}}
446: \Big(1 - { 4 \hat\alpha\over{l^2}}\Big)^{1\over 2}\Big] r^2.
447: \end{equation}
448: Therefore, the effective AdS length associated with the asymptotic metric
449: is given by
450: \begin{equation}
451: L^2 = \Big[ {1\over{2 \hat\alpha}}- {1\over {2\hat\alpha}}(1 - { 4
452: \hat\alpha\over{l^2}}\Big)^{1\over 2}\Big]^{-1}
453: \label{efads}
454: \end{equation}
455: We now note that the metric is real if,
456: \begin{equation}
457: \hat\alpha \le {l^2\over 4}.
458: \end{equation}
459: In the rest of our discussion in this section, we will always work with $\hat\alpha$
460: satisfying this bound.
461:
462: As in Born-Infeld, it would be convenient for us to define a few dimensionless quantities
463: \begin{equation}
464: \bar r = {r\over l}, ~\bar \alpha = {\hat \alpha\over {l^2}}, ~\bar q = {q\over l^2}, ~
465: {\rm and}~\bar m ={m\over l^2}.
466: \end{equation}
467: In terms of these quantities the temperature of the black hole $\bar T$ is given by
468: \begin{equation}
469: \bar T = {Tl} = {\bar r^2 + 2 \bar r^4 - {\bar q\over {\bar r^2}}\over
470: {2 \pi \bar r (\bar r^2 + 2 \bar \alpha)}}.
471: \label{temp}
472: \end{equation}
473:
474: Again, it would be instructive to study the structure of the horizon(s) associated with the
475: black hole. Firstly notice that, from (\ref{vblack}), we can write a relation between
476: mass and horizon radius as
477: \begin{equation}
478: \bar m = \bar r_h^4 + \bar r_h^2 + \bar \alpha + {\bar q^2\over {\bar r_h}^2},
479: \end{equation}
480: where $\bar r_h = r_h/l$ and $r_h$ represents the roots of the equation $V(r) = 0$.
481: The largest root was defined as $r_+$ earlier.
482: For generic values of $\bar q$ and $\bar \alpha$, at small $\bar r_h$, $\bar m$
483: decreases
484: with $\bar r_h$ while for large $\bar r_h$, it increases as $\bar r_h^4$. In
485: between, there is
486: a single minimum. At the minimum, $\bar r_h$ satisfies
487: \begin{equation}
488: 2\bar r_h^6 + \bar r_h^4 - \bar q^2 = 0.
489: \label{extr}
490: \end{equation}
491:
492: \begin{figure}[t]
493: \begin{center}
494: \begin{psfrags}
495: \psfrag{a}[][]{$\bar r_h$}
496: \psfrag{b}[][]{$\bar m$}
497: \epsfig{file=m-r.eps, width= 10cm,angle=0}
498: \end{psfrags}
499: \vspace{ .1 in }
500: \caption{This is a plot $\bar m$ with $\bar r$ for $\bar \alpha =.001$ for $\bar q =
501: .001, .005, .009$.
502: As $\bar q$ increases, the critical value of $\bar m$, where the two horizons meet,
503: increases.}
504: \label{m-r}
505: \end{center}
506: \end{figure}
507:
508:
509:
510:
511: The behaviour of $\bar m$ as a function of $\bar r_h$ is shown in Figure (\ref{m-r}).
512: It is clear from the
513: figure that in general for a given $\bar q$, as long as $\bar m$ is more than a critical
514: value, there are two horizons. They will be called inner and outer horizons subsequently.
515: At the critical value of $\bar m$, when (\ref{extr}) is satisfied, two horizons coincide.
516: From (\ref{temp}), we see that the temperature of the hole is then zero. We call this
517: hole as an extremal black hole. When we further decrease the mass, there are no
518: horizons.
519: One then has a naked singularity.
520:
521: Let us now consider a three-brane with tension $\Lambda_{\rm br}$ moving in this
522: background. Choosing the brane metric as in equation (\ref{frw}), we get the
523: Hubble equation of the form \cite{Maeda:2007cb}
524: \begin{equation}
525: {\bar \Lambda_{\rm br}\over 3} = \Big( {V(\bar a)\over{\bar a^2}} + \bar H^2
526: \Big)\Big[1 +
527: {2
528: \bar\alpha\over
529: 3}\Big( {3 - V(\bar a)\over {\bar a^2}} + 2 \bar H^2\Big)\Big]^2.
530: \label{hub}
531: \end{equation}
532: In the above, we have used $\bar a = {a/l}$. $\bar H$, the Hubble parameter, is given
533: by $\bar H = d \bar a/(\bar ad \bar \tau)$ where $\bar \tau = \tau/l$. Furthermore, we
534: have defined $\bar \Lambda_{\rm br} = l^2 \Lambda_{\rm br}$.
535:
536: In the limit $\bar \alpha \rightarrow 0$, (\ref{hub}) simplifies and goes over
537: to the form given in equation (\ref{smal}). The solution for the scale factor for
538: $\bar \alpha \rightarrow 0$ is then given by (\ref{betainfty}), resulting
539: a cyclic universe. Thus, for a vanishing
540: $\bar \alpha$, we have non-singular cosmological solutions on the brane.
541:
542: Though for finite $\bar\alpha$, it is hard to find an exact closed form solution
543: of (\ref{hub}), however, it is easy to see that the bouncing solutions still
544: continue to survive. Note that the effective AdS scale for non-zero $\bar \alpha$
545: and large $r$ is given by $L$ as in (\ref{efads}). As before, and for the sake
546: of comparison, we make effective brane tension to zero at large $r$ by setting
547: \begin{equation}
548: \Lambda_{\rm br} = 3 L^{-2}
549: \end{equation}
550: Hence the equation (\ref{hub}) reduces to
551: \begin{equation}
552: \Big[{1\over{2 \bar \alpha}} - {1\over{2 \bar\alpha}} \Big(1 - 4 \bar\alpha
553: \Big)^{1\over 2}\Big]
554: = \Big( {V(\bar a)\over{\bar a^2}} + \bar H^2
555: \Big)\Big[1 +
556: {2
557: \bar\alpha\over
558: 3}\Big( {3 - V(\bar a)\over {\bar a^2}} + 2 \bar H^2\Big)\Big]^2.
559: \label{hubtwo}
560: \end{equation}
561: This is a cubic equation of $\bar H^2$ and can be re-written as
562: \begin{eqnarray}
563: {16 \bar \alpha^2\over 9}\bar H^6 &+& {8 \bar \alpha \over 3}\Big(1 + {2 \bar \alpha\over {\bar
564: a^2}}\Big) \bar
565: H^4
566: + {1\over {3 \bar a^4}}\Big( 3 \bar a^2 + 6\bar \alpha - 2 \bar \alpha V\Big)\Big(\bar a^2 + 2 \bar\alpha
567: + 2 \bar \alpha V\Big) \bar H^2 \nonumber\\
568: &+& {1\over{18 \bar a^6 \bar\alpha}}\Big(9 \bar a^6 ({\sqrt{1 - 4\bar\alpha}} -1)
569: + 18 \bar a^4 \bar\alpha V \nonumber\\
570: &-& 24 \bar \alpha^2 \bar a^2 (V - 3)V + 8\bar\alpha^3 (V - 3)^2 V\Big) = 0.
571: \label{hsol}
572: \end{eqnarray}
573: This equation can, in principle, be explicitly solved to get $\bar H^2$. The physical domain, however, corresponds to
574: the region $\bar H^2 \ge 0$. The points where the equality holds represent the turning points.
575: Unlike the case of $\bar \alpha = 0$, we have not been able to integrate the above equation
576: to get the scale factor $\bar a$ as a function of time in a closed form. However,
577: as in the Born-Infeld case, it is possible to
578: re-write (\ref{hsol}) as
579: \begin{equation}
580: \Big({d \bar a\over{d \bar \tau}}\Big)^2 + U(\bar a) =0,
581: \label{effc}
582: \end{equation}
583: with $U(\bar a)$, the effective potential.
584: By studying $U(\bar a)$ for different values of parameters, we would be able to infer the nature
585: of the brane universe. This is what we do in the following.
586:
587:
588: \begin{figure}[t]
589: \begin{center}
590: \begin{psfrags}
591: \psfrag{x}[][]{$\bar a$}
592: \psfrag{y}[][]{$U(\bar a)$}
593: \epsfig{file=V-a.eps, width= 12cm,angle=0}
594: \end{psfrags}
595: \vspace{ .1 in }
596: \caption{A plot of the potential $U(\bar a)$ with $\bar a$. Three curves correspond to
597: $\bar \alpha = 10^{-7}$(dotted), $\bar \alpha = 10^{-6}$ (dashed) and the other is for $\bar \alpha =0$.
598: We have also set $\bar m = 10$ and $\bar q = .1$.
599: From (\ref{effc}),
600: allowed physical region
601: is $U(\bar a) \le 0$. Since $U(\bar a) = 0$ occurs only at non-zero finite values of $\bar a$, we
602: get non-singular cyclic brane universe. }
603: \label{V-a}
604: \end{center}
605: \end{figure}
606:
607: Figure (\ref{V-a}) shows a plot of the
608: effective potential $U(\bar a)$ for different values of $\bar \alpha$ including
609: the
610: Reissner-Nordstrom black
611: hole ($\bar \alpha = 0$). Notice that the potential does not allow the brane to
612: hit the
613: black hole singularity. It bounces before reaching the singularity and thus
614: generates a bouncing
615: universe. It can be checked that for large $\bar a$, $U(\bar a)$ changes sign at
616: some value of $\bar a$,
617: becomes positive and asymptotically reaches a constant. We can therefore
618: conclude
619: that the brane again bounces before reaching an infinite size. This is
620: typical of a bouncing cyclic
621: universe. However, we must mention here that, as in
622: the case of $\bar \alpha = 0$ \cite{Mukherji:2002ft},
623: it can however be checked that for a bounce at small
624: $\bar a$
625: to occur, the brane has to cross the inner horizon.
626: As in $\bar \alpha = 0$, this may
627: induce instabilities in the bulk causing an appearance of a
628: singularity on the inner horizon \cite{Hovdebo:2003ug}.
629: For that, one needs to study perturbations on the bulk due to the brane. We leave
630: this for a future study.
631:
632:
633:
634: To conclude, in this note, we have shown the existence of bouncing cosmological
635: solutions by studying the dynamics of three-brane in certain black hole
636: backgrounds. These black holes are the classical solutions of Born-Infeld
637: and Gauss-Bonnet theories in the presence of negative cosmological constant.
638: The analysis guides us to infer that the charge parameter of the bulk black holes
639: play crucial role, inducing bouncing cosmology on the brane.
640: More precisely, the charge induces a negative energy density on the brane thereby
641: preventing the brane to fall in the black hole singularity, and in turn, succeeding to give
642: singularity-free cosmology on the four-dimensional world.
643: Finally, it is important to study the stability of these solutions. We plan to
644: return to this issue in the future.
645:
646: \section*{Acknowledgments}
647:
648: SP thanks Institute of Physics, Bhubaneswar for warm hospitality
649: on a visit during which the project was substantiated.
650:
651: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
652:
653: %\cite{Hawking:1969sw}
654: \bibitem{Hawking:1969sw}
655: S.~W.~Hawking and R.~Penrose,
656: %``The Singularities of gravitational collapse and cosmology,''
657: Proc.\ Roy.\ Soc.\ Lond.\ A {\bf 314}, 529 (1970).
658: %%CITATION = PRSLA,A314,529;%%
659:
660: %\cite{Antoniadis:1993jc}
661: \bibitem{Antoniadis:1993jc}
662: I.~Antoniadis, J.~Rizos and K.~Tamvakis,
663: %``Singularity - free cosmological solutions of the superstring effective
664: %action,''
665: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 415}, 497 (1994)
666: [arXiv:hep-th/9305025].
667: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B415,497;%%
668:
669: %\cite{Gasperini:2002bn}
670: \bibitem{Gasperini:2002bn}
671: M.~Gasperini and G.~Veneziano,
672: %``The pre-big bang scenario in string cosmology,''
673: Phys.\ Rept.\ {\bf 373}, 1 (2003)
674: [arXiv:hep-th/0207130].
675: %%CITATION = PRPLC,373,1;%%
676:
677: %\cite{Kachru:2002kx}
678: \bibitem{Kachru:2002kx}
679: S.~Kachru and L.~McAllister,
680: %``Bouncing brane cosmologies from warped string compactifications,''
681: JHEP {\bf 0303}, 018 (2003)
682: [arXiv:hep-th/0205209].
683: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0303,018;%%
684:
685:
686: %\cite{Mukherji:2002ft}
687: \bibitem{Mukherji:2002ft}
688: S.~Mukherji and M.~Peloso,
689: %``Bouncing and cyclic universes from brane models,''
690: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 547}, 297 (2002)
691: [arXiv:hep-th/0205180].
692: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B547,297;%%
693:
694: %\cite{Biswas:2003rb}
695: \bibitem{Biswas:2003rb}
696: A.~Biswas, S.~Mukherji and S.~S.~Pal,
697: %``Nonsingular cosmologies from branes,''
698: Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 19}, 557 (2004)
699: [arXiv:hep-th/0301144].
700: %%CITATION = IMPAE,A19,557;%%
701:
702: %\cite{Shtanov:2002mb}
703: \bibitem{Shtanov:2002mb}
704: Y.~Shtanov and V.~Sahni,
705: %``Bouncing braneworlds,''
706: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 557}, 1 (2003)
707: [arXiv:gr-qc/0208047].
708: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B557,1;%%
709:
710: %\cite{DeRisi:2007dn}
711: \bibitem{DeRisi:2007dn}
712: G.~De Risi,
713: %``Bouncing cosmology from Kalb-Ramond Braneworld,''
714: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 77}, 044030 (2008)
715: [arXiv:0711.3781 [hep-th]].
716: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D77,044030;%%
717:
718: %\cite{Hovdebo:2003ug}
719: \bibitem{Hovdebo:2003ug}
720: J.~L.~Hovdebo and R.~C.~Myers,
721: %``Bouncing braneworlds go crunch!,''
722: JCAP {\bf 0311}, 012 (2003)
723: [arXiv:hep-th/0308088].
724: %%CITATION = JCAPA,0311,012;%%
725:
726: %\cite{Dey:2004yt}
727: \bibitem{Dey:2004yt}
728: T.~K.~Dey,
729: %``Born-Infeld black holes in the presence of a cosmological constant,''
730: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 595}, 484 (2004)
731: [arXiv:hep-th/0406169].
732: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B595,484;%%
733:
734:
735: %\cite{Lidsey:2002zw}
736: \bibitem{Lidsey:2002zw}
737: J.~E.~Lidsey, S.~Nojiri and S.~D.~Odintsov,
738: %``Braneworld cosmology in (anti)-de Sitter Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet-Maxwell
739: %gravity,''
740: JHEP {\bf 0206}, 026 (2002)
741: [arXiv:hep-th/0202198].
742: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0206,026;%%
743:
744: %\cite{Torii:2005nh}
745: \bibitem{Torii:2005nh}
746: T.~Torii and H.~Maeda,
747: %``Spacetime structure of static solutions in Gauss-Bonnet gravity: Charged
748: %case,''
749: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 72}, 064007 (2005)
750: [arXiv:hep-th/0504141].
751: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D72,064007;%%
752:
753: %\cite{Dey:2007vt}
754: \bibitem{Dey:2007vt}
755: T.~K.~Dey, S.~Mukherji, S.~Mukhopadhyay and S.~Sarkar,
756: %``Phase transitions in higher derivative gravity and gauge theory: R-charged
757: %black holes,''
758: JHEP {\bf 0709}, 026 (2007)
759: [arXiv:0706.3996 [hep-th]].
760: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0709,026;%%
761:
762: %\cite{Barcelo:2000re}
763: \bibitem{Barcelo:2000re}
764: C.~Barcelo and M.~Visser,
765: %``Living on the edge: Cosmology on the boundary of anti-de Sitter space,''
766: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 482}, 183 (2000)
767: [arXiv:hep-th/0004056].
768: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B482,183;%%
769:
770:
771: %\cite{Maeda:2007cb}
772: \bibitem{Maeda:2007cb}
773: H.~Maeda, V.~Sahni and Y.~Shtanov,
774: %``Braneworld dynamics in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity,''
775: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 76}, 104028 (2007)
776: [arXiv:0708.3237 [gr-qc]].
777: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D76,104028;%%
778:
779:
780: %############################################
781: \end{thebibliography}
782:
783: \end{document}
784: