1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{emulateapj}
3: %\usepackage{apjfonts}
4: %\usepackage{rotating}
5: \def\msun{\rm M_{\sun}}
6: \def\rsun{\rm R_{\sun}}
7: \def\lsun{\rm L_{\sun}}
8: \def\gammV{${\gamma}$ Vel}
9: \def\av{${\rm A_V}$}
10:
11: \begin{document}
12: \shortauthors{Hernandez et al.}
13: \shorttitle{ {\em Spitzer} in $\gamma$ Velorum cluster}
14: \title{A Spitzer view of protoplanetary disks in the $\gamma$ Velorum cluster}
15:
16: \author{Jes\'{u}s Hern\'andez\altaffilmark{1,2}, Lee Hartmann\altaffilmark{1}, Nuria Calvet\altaffilmark{1},
17: R. D. Jeffries \altaffilmark{3}, R. Gutermuth \altaffilmark{4}, J. Muzerolle\altaffilmark{5}, J. Stauffer\altaffilmark{6}}
18:
19: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Astronomy, University of Michigan, 830 Dennison Building, 500 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, US}
20: \altaffiltext{2}{Centro de Investigaciones de Astronom\'{\i}a, Apdo. Postal 264, M\'{e}rida 5101-A, Venezuela.}
21: \altaffiltext{3}{Astrophysics Group, School of Physical and Geographical Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire ST5 5BG}
22: \altaffiltext{4}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Cambridge, MA 02138, US}
23: \altaffiltext{5}{Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721, US}
24: \altaffiltext{6}{{\em Spitzer} Science Center, Caltech M/S 220-6, 1200 East California Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91125}
25:
26:
27: \email{hernandj@umich.edu}
28:
29:
30: \begin{abstract}
31: We present new {\em Spitzer Space Telescope} observations of stars in
32: the young ($\sim$5 Myr) $\gamma$ Velorum stellar cluster. Combining optical and 2MASS photometry,
33: we have selected 579 stars as candidate members of the cluster. With the
34: addition of the Spitzer mid-infrared data,
35: we have identified 5 debris disks around A-type stars, and 5-6 debris disks
36: around solar-type stars, indicating that the strong radiation field in the
37: cluster does not completely suppress the production of planetesimals in the
38: disks of cluster members. However, we find some evidence that the frequency
39: of circumstellar primordial disks is lower, and the IR flux excesses are smaller than for
40: disks around stellar populations with similar ages. This could be
41: evidence for a relatively fast dissipation of circumstellar dust by the
42: strong radiation field from the highest mass star(s) in the cluster. Another
43: possibility is that $\gamma$ Velorum stellar cluster is slightly older than
44: reported ages and the the low frequency of primordial disks reflects the fast
45: disk dissipation observed at $\sim$5 Myr.
46:
47: \end{abstract}
48:
49: \keywords{infrared: stars: formation --- stars: pre-main sequence --- open cluster and associations: individual ( $\gamma$ Velorum) ---
50: protoplanetary systems: protoplanetary disk}
51:
52: \section{Introduction}
53: \label{sec:int}
54:
55: In recent years the sensitivity of the {\em Spitzer Space Telescope} has made it
56: possible to expand our knowledge of dusty disk emission dramatically, enabling
57: statistically significant studies of disk emission as a function of mass and age
58: over a much wider wavelength range than previously possible
59: \citep[e.g.,][]{lada06,aurora06,hernandez07a,hernandez07b}.
60: In addition to confirming the rapid decrease of optically-thick disk emission previously
61: inferred from near-infrared observations \citep{strom89, haisch01},
62: {\em Spitzer} observations have provided strong evidence that disk dissipation timescales
63: depend significantly on host star mass
64: \citep{lada06,carpenter06,hernandez07a}, with a timescale for inner disk dissipation of 5-7 Myr
65: \citep{haisch01,hartmann05b,hernandez07a} for low mass stars ($\lesssim$1M$\sun$), and $<$3 Myr
66: \citep{hernandez05} for intermediate mass stars (2-10{$\msun$}).
67: {\em Spitzer} observations have also provided new clues to disk structure through
68: Spectral Energy Distribution (SED) analysis, from slight indications of faster
69: dust settling in inner disks \citep{aurora06} to strong evacuation of the inner
70: disks in some stars that retain optically thick outer disks \citep{calvet02,calvet05,dalessio05a,espaillat07a}.
71: Spitzer data have also been used to show that debris disks
72: around intermediate mass stars are more frequent
73: and have larger 24 $\mu$m excesses around 10-13 Myr,
74: when models predict that dust is produced by collisional
75: cascades due to the formation of large solid bodies ($\sim$1000 km)
76: in the disk \citep{kenyon05,hernandez06,currie08}.
77:
78: The possible effects of environment on disk frequency and structure are
79: less clear. In clusters with high mass stars,
80: disk photoevaporation due to the strong ultraviolet radiation
81: field can be important, and is directly observed in the Orion Nebula Cluster
82: \citep{richling00,adams04,hollenbach04,throop05,clarke07,megeath07}.
83: \citet{balog07} found a reduction in disk frequency of about a factor of two
84: in the relatively young cluster NGC 2244, but only in the innermost regions
85: (d$\lesssim$0.5 pc). NGC 2244 is very rich and
86: contains seven O type stars, so that the ultraviolet radiation
87: field should be very strong.
88:
89: The discovery of a young cluster of low-mass stars around the $\gamma$ Vel
90: system \citep{pozzo00}, with the central binary consisting of an O7.5 star and
91: a Wolf Rayet star \citep{demarco99,demarco00},
92: provides an opportunity to study the possible effects of central star ultraviolet
93: radiation fields on disk evolution.
94: The Wolf Rayet star is classified as WC8 (carbon-rich),
95: implying a progenitor mass of $>$40$\msun$ \citep{demarco99,crowther07}.
96: In this paper we report {\em Spitzer}
97: observations of infrared emission in this cluster.
98: In \S\ref{sec:obs} we present the observational
99: data used in this contribution, and discuss membership in
100: \S\ref{s:mem}. We analyze the infrared data
101: \S\ref{sec:disks}, and compare with disk frequencies in other young stellar populations
102: in \S\ref{sec:comp}, with our main results summarized in \S\ref{sec:conc}.
103:
104:
105: \section{Observations}
106: \label{sec:obs}
107:
108: \subsection{Infrared photometry}
109: \label{sec2:ir}
110:
111: We have obtained near-infrared (NIR) and mid-infrared photometry
112: of the $\gamma$ Velorum cluster using the four channels
113: (3.6, 4.5, 5.8 \& 8.0 {\micron}) of the InfraRed Array Camera
114: \citep[IRAC, ][]{fazio04} and the 24 {\micron} band of the Multiband
115: Imaging Spectrometer for Spitzer \citep[MIPS;][]{rieke04}
116: on board the Spitzer Space Telescope. These data were collected during
117: 2005 February 23 (IRAC) and April 10 (MIPS) as part of a GTO program
118: conducted by the IRAC and MIPS instrument teams.
119:
120: The IRAC observations were done using a standard raster map with 280" offsets,
121: to provide maximum areal coverage while still allowing $\sim$20'' overlap
122: between frames in order to facilitate accurate mosaicking of the data.
123: The mapped region was covered by a 9x10 position mosaic,
124: with three dither exposures at each position. Images were obtained in high
125: dynamic range (HDR) mode, in which a short integration (1 s) is
126: immediately followed by a long integration (26.8 s).
127: Standard Basic Calibrated Data (BCD) products from version S14.0.0 of
128: the {\em Spitzer} Science Center's IRAC pipeline were used to make
129: the final mosaics. Post-BCD data treatment was performed using
130: custom IDL software \citep{gutermuth04}
131: that includes modules for detection and correction of bright source
132: artifacts, detection and removal of cosmic ray hits, construction
133: of the long and short exposure HDR mosaics, and the merger of those
134: mosaics to yield the final science images.
135: The final mosaics have a scale of 1".22 pixel$^{-1}$.
136: Point source detections
137: were carried out individually on each IRAC band using PhotVis (version 1.09),
138: an IDL GUI-based photometry visualization tool developed by R. Gutermuth using the DAOPHOT modules
139: ported to IDL as part of the IDL Astronomy User Library \citep{landsman93}.
140:
141: More than 40,000 sources were detected in at least one IRAC band.
142: We extracted the photometry of these objects using the {\it apphot} package in IRAF,
143: with an aperture radius of 3\arcsec.7 and a background annulus from 3\arcsec.7 to 8\arcsec.6.
144: We adopted zero-point magnitudes for the standard aperture radius (12\arcsec) and
145: background annulus (12-22\arcsec.4) of 19.665, 18.928, 16.847 and 17.391 in the
146: [3.6], [4.5], [5.8] and [8.0] bands, respectively. Aperture corrections were made using
147: the values described in IRAC Data Handbook \citep{reach06}. Final photometric errors
148: include the uncertainties in the zero-point magnitudes ($\sim$0.03 mag).
149:
150: MIPS observations were made using medium scan mode with full-array
151: cross-scan overlap, resulting in a total effective exposure time per pointing
152: of 40 seconds. The images were processed using the MIPS instrument team Data
153: Analysis Tool (DAT), which calibrates the data and applies a distortion correction
154: to each individual exposure before combining it into a final mosaic \citep{gordon05}.
155: A second flat correction was also done to each image using a median
156: of all the images in order to correct for dark latents and scattered light
157: background gradients.
158: The second flat correction is determined by creating a median image of all the data
159: in a given scan leg, and then dividing each individual image in that scan leg by that median.
160: Bright sources and extended regions are masked out of the data before creation of
161: the median, so the nebulosity seen in the map has a negligible effect on any noise
162: that might be added by the second flat. We obtained point source photometry
163: at 24 {\micron} with IRAF/{\it daophot} point spread function fitting,
164: using an aperture size of about 5\arcsec.7 and an aperture correction
165: factor of 1.73 derived from the STinyTim PSF model. The aperture size
166: corresponds to the location of the first airy dark ring, and was chosen
167: to minimize effects of source crowding and background inhomogeneities.
168: The sources were identified using an IDL photometry routine, based on
169: the IRAF/{\it daophot} package, with a 10$\sigma$ cutoff. Any obvious
170: point sources missed by the find routine were added in by hand.
171: The absolute flux calibration uncertainty is $\sim$4\% \citep{engelbracht07}.
172: The photometric uncertainties are dominated by the background/photon noise.
173: Our final flux measurements are complete down to about 0.8mJy.
174:
175:
176: \subsection{Optical photometry}
177: \label{sec2:opt}
178:
179: CCD photometry was obtained with the 0.9m Telescope
180: at the Cerro Tololo Interamerican Observatory (CTIO)
181: using a Tek 2048x2048 CCD (13.5x13.5 arcmin$^2$).
182: A region of 0.93x0.95 deg$^2$ centered on the $\gamma$ Velorum system was
183: surveyed in BVI$_c$ with short (20, 10, 6s) and long (300, 120, 60 s)
184: exposure times \citep[more details in][ R. D. Jeffries et al, in preparation]{pozzo00}.
185: Photometry was performed on the reduced data using the
186: optimal extraction algorithm detailed in
187: \citet{naylor98} and \citet{naylor02}.
188: Stars closer than 3{\arcmin} to the central object have poor
189: photometry because of the brightness of the $\gamma$ Velorum system.
190: The optical catalog includes
191: 24,730 sources in the IRAC field ranging from V=10 to V=21 and with
192: photometric errors less than 0.1 magnitudes. We augmented the V,B optical
193: data set toward the brightest objects using the \citet{kharchenko01} catalog.
194: A preliminary list of 15,712 objects (hereafter Sample 1) was created
195: by selecting the optical sources that have photometric measurements
196: in all IRAC bands within 3{\arcsec} of matching radius. We have cross-correlated
197: Sample 1 with stars in the 2MASS point source catalog.
198: About 30\% of these sources do not have 2MASS counterparts within a
199: 3{\arcsec} matching radius; however, many of these objects without a 2MASS counterpart
200: are likely to be background sources (see \S \ref{s:mem}).
201: In general, optical, 2MASS, and IRAC positions agree within 1{\arcsec}.
202:
203:
204: Sample 1 was cross-correlated with the Second XMM-Newton Serendipitous
205: Source Catalog (2XMM \footnote{http://xmmssc-www.star.le.ac.uk/Catalogue/2XMM/})
206: using a correlation radius of 3\arcsec, which is the maximum astrometric
207: error expected for most of the sources in 2XMM.
208: In an area of $\sim$0.25 square degrees around the $\gamma$
209: Velorum system about 174 objects in Sample 1 have X ray counterparts.
210:
211: Finally, 32 stars were confirmed as members of the $\gamma$ Velorum
212: cluster using the presence of the \ion{Li}{1} 6707 line in absorption,
213: the equivalent width of the H$\alpha$ line and/or radial velocity
214: in a narrow range around 17 km/s \citep[][; Jeffries R.D. et al in preparation]{jeffries00}.
215: The spectroscopic data were obtained at CTIO using the 4-m Blanco telescope in
216: conjunction with the Hydra fiber spectrograph (resolving power $\sim$ 25000).
217:
218: Figure \ref{fig:map} shows the field covered by the optical survey of the
219: $\gamma$ Velorum cluster. Solid lines indicate the region studied in
220: this paper (IRAC field), which is the area covered by the four IRAC
221: channels and where Sample 1 is located. The MIPS observation (dashed lines)
222: covers most ($\sim$90\%) of this area. The 2XMM catalog covers about 30\%
223: of the IRAC field; X ray sources are indicated on the image (crosses). Most
224: of the members confirmed spectroscopically (open squares) are X ray sources.
225: Only three spectroscopic members do not have X-ray counterparts, and they
226: are all located outside the 2XMM field of view.
227: The ring-like diffuse emission structure around the $\gamma$
228: Velorum cluster confirms that some of the gas from which
229: the cluster formed is still present.
230:
231:
232: \section{Membership selection}
233: \label{s:mem}
234:
235: Our membership selection is based on using the sequence defined by
236: the spectroscopic members \citep[][; Jeffries R.D. et al, in preparation]{jeffries00}
237: and the X-Ray sources from 2XMM.
238: As most of the stars in Sample 1 do not have spectroscopic data,
239: we use photometric criteria to make a selection of potential
240: members based on their colors and magnitudes. Figure \ref{fig:cmd1}
241: shows color magnitude diagrams (CMDs), V versus V-J (left panels)
242: and V versus V-I (right panels), illustrating the procedure
243: to select photometric candidates of the $\gamma$ Velorum cluster.
244: We assume a distance of 350 pc (see \S \ref{sec:comp}) to plot the Zero Age Main Sequence
245: (solid line) and the 5 Myr isochrone (dashed line) from \citet{sf00}.
246: Since, it is well known that theoretical, non-birthline isochrones
247: do not accurately match empirical isochrones for intermediate mass stars \citep{hartmann03} and
248: that the opacity tables at low temperatures are incomplete \citep{lyra06,baraffe98},
249: these theoretical isochrones are plotted as reference only and
250: are not used for the selection of the photometric candidates
251: (however, evidence in favor of this age is detailed in \S\ref{sec:comp}).
252: Open squares and crosses represent the
253: spectroscopic members and the X ray sources, respectively.
254: Bright stars with optical photometry from \citet{kharchenko01}
255: are plotted as open triangles.
256:
257:
258: The upper left panel shows that X-ray sources are highly concentrated along the nominal
259: empirical isochrone, with a scattering of stars below this region in the CMD
260: probably representing background low-mass stars or other non-members.
261: All the spectroscopic members within the 2XMM field are X ray sources
262: (see Figure \ref{fig:map}). Essentially none of the objects above the nominal
263: isochrone are X-ray sources, and thus are mostly likely heavily-reddened giants. In addition,
264: a number of the bright objects from \citet{kharchenko01} are also far above the nominal
265: isochrone so we reject them as members as well.
266:
267: As shown in the upper right panel of Figure \ref{fig:cmd1},
268: stars without 2MASS counterparts (open diamonds)
269: are located well below the nominal isochrone and even below the ZAMS (at 350 pc),
270: demonstrating that they are background objects.
271:
272: In the lower panels we plotted the regions of probable members (large error bars).
273: These regions were calculated using the median colors (V-I and V-J)
274: of the member sample (spectroscopic members plus X ray sources above the ZAMS)
275: for 1.0 mag bins in the visual band.
276: We used the differences between the observed colors and the expected colors
277: (the median; represented by thick solid lines) to calculate the standard deviation
278: ($\sigma$) of the member sample. The regions of probable members
279: are defined using 2.5$\sigma$ limit from the median colors
280: \citep[see ][]{hernandez07a, hernandez07b}.
281: The lower left panel shows the stars above the ZAMS on the V versus V-J
282: diagram (sample 2), roughly defined using a straight line;
283: while the lower right panel shows the V versus V-I diagram for
284: the stars selected using the region of probable members
285: in the V versus V-J diagram (sample 3).
286:
287: Our final list of photometric candidates includes 579 stars located
288: within the probable member region of the CMDs.
289: Using the 5 Myr isochrone \citep{sf00} at 350 pc and a reddening of \av=0.2,
290: we estimate that we can detect excess at [5.8] and [8.0]
291: with signal to noise larger than 5 for a star with spectral type M5
292: or earlier (at [3.5] and [4.5] the corresponding signal to noise
293: is larger than 40). For MIPS observations, the completeness limit
294: roughly corresponds to spectral type early K (see \S\ref{sec2:ir}).
295: Table \ref{tab:members} shows the optical, IRAC and MIPS photometry
296: of the photometric candidates of the $\gamma$ Velorum cluster. Column (1) shows the internal
297: running identification number in our sample; column (2) provides the 2MASS object name
298: \footnote{electronic table also includes 2MASS photometry};
299: columns (3), (4), and (5) give the optical magnitudes in the bands B, V and Ic, respectively;
300: column (6) indicates the reference for the optical data;
301: columns (7), (8), (9) and (10) give the IRAC magnitudes in the bands [3.6], [4.5], [5.8] and [8.0],
302: respectively; column (11) gives the Flux at the 24{\micron} MIPS band; column (12)
303: indicates whether the star is a 2XMM source;
304: column (13) shows the disk classification based on the IRAC and MIPS analysis (see \S \ref{sec:disks})
305:
306:
307: The giant branch of background stars clearly contaminates one portion
308: of the cluster member region defined in Figure \ref{fig:cmd1}.
309: We plotted in Figure \ref{fig:cmd2} the V versus V-J diagram for the
310: photometric members illustrating the contamination level expected
311: in several color ranges. Since the reddening of the $\gamma$ Velorum
312: cluster is quite low \citep[\av $<$0.2;][; Jeffries in preparation]{pozzo00},
313: we can estimate spectral types for the sources using their V-J color and
314: the standard colors \citep{kh95} indicated in the Figure. The upper panel shows
315: the V-J distributions for the photometric candidates (open histogram)
316: and for the spectroscopic or X-ray selected member sample (solid histogram).
317: Within the 2XMM field, more than $\sim$80\% of the photometric members with
318: V-J$>$3.5 are X ray sources; most stars without X-ray counterparts are
319: very faint (V$>$19.5) or located near the 2XMM field border.
320: This suggests that most photometric candidates with V-J$>$3.5
321: are real members of the $\gamma$ Velorum cluster.
322: Normalizing the member sample histogram to the photometric candidates
323: histogram in the color range V-J$>$3.5, we estimate the
324: number of members expected as function of V-J color (dotted histogram).
325: The deviation between the expected member distribution and the photometric
326: candidates distribution indicates the level of contamination for a given
327: range of color (or spectral types). The number
328: of photometric candidates increases between V-J$\sim$1.5 and V-J$\sim$3.5, where the giant
329: branch crosses the member sequence. In this range of color, the contamination level by
330: non-members of the $\gamma$ Velorum cluster is quite high ($\ga$68\%).
331: Since the number of members of stellar groups normally decreases toward higher stellar masses,
332: the relative contamination at V-J$<$1.5 can still be significant.
333:
334: Figure \ref{fig:ccd} shows the 2MASS color color diagram, J-H versus H-K, for the
335: photometric members of the $\gamma$ Velorum cluster. Since the locus of giants
336: separates from main sequence late type stars \citep{bessell88},
337: we can identify background M type giants in this diagram. We have selected 27 stars
338: in the locus of giants with J-H$\ge$0.8, these stars are labeled in Table
339: \ref{tab:members} as M type giant candidates. Taking into account this M giant sample,
340: the contamination level where the giants branch crosses the $\gamma$ Velorum sequence in Figure
341: \ref{fig:cmd2} is still high ($\ga$66\%).
342:
343:
344: \section{Disk diagnostics}
345: \label{sec:disks}
346:
347: Figure \ref{fig:disk} shows three diagrams used to identify and characterize
348: stars bearing disks in the $\gamma$ Velorum cluster. The top panel shows the
349: SED slope, determined from the [3.6]$-$[8.0] color
350: (SED slope=$dlog[{\lambda}F_\lambda]/dlog[\lambda]$),
351: versus the [8.0] magnitude. Dotted lines represent the
352: 3 $\sigma$ boundaries (photospheric level), which is calculated using
353: the photometric errors propagated from the [3.6]$-$[8.0] color
354: \citep{hernandez07a, hernandez07b}. Stars with excess emission at
355: 8 {\micron} can be identified in this diagram above the photospheric
356: limit. In general, disk bearing
357: stars in Taurus \citep{hartmann05a} are located
358: above the dotted line, with an IRAC SED slope $>$ -1.8 \citep[see ][]{lada06, hernandez07b};
359: this limit is used to identify objects with optically thick primordial disks (class II).
360: Half of the stars with IRAC excesses are located below the class II region suggesting that the
361: disks around these stars have evolved significantly, and are in an intermediate phase between
362: stars with optically thick disks and debris disk stars.
363: We call these evolved disks.
364:
365:
366: The bottom left panel shows the V-J versus K$-$[24] color-color diagram, in which we identify
367: stars with 24 {\micron} infrared emission above the photospheric level
368: \citep[e.g.; ][]{gorlova04,gorlova06, hernandez06,hernandez07a}. The K-[24] color distribution of
369: stars with K-[24]$<$1.0 describes a Gaussian centered at K-[24] = 0.05 with $\sigma$=0.14.
370: The 3 $\sigma$ boundaries (dotted lines) represent the photospheric region at 24 \micron;
371: stars with 24{\micron} excesses are located red-ward from this region.
372: Except for the three faintest stars with excesses at 8{\micron} (inverse triangles in the upper panel),
373: all stars with IRAC excess have excess at 24{\micron}. Our sample of disk-bearing candidates includes
374: 14 stars with excess at 8{\micron} and 24{\micron}, 3 stars with excess at 8{\micron}
375: and with no MIPS detection, and 12 stars with excess at 24{\micron}
376: and photospheric color in the IRAC bands.
377:
378: Using the standard V-J colors in Figure \ref{fig:cmd2} (or in the bottom left panel), we can estimate
379: the spectral types of stars with infrared excesses. We use three bins:
380: early type stars (V-J$\le$0.54; F0 or earlier); solar type stars
381: (0.54$<$V-J$<$2.0; from early-F to early-K); and late-type stars (V-J$>$2.0; K5 or later).
382: The bottom right panel of Figure \ref{fig:disk} displays the distribution of the disk-bearing stars
383: in a SED slope diagram, generated using the K-[5.8] and [8.0]-[24] colors.
384: The [8.0]-[24] SED slope indicates whether the star has
385: a flat or a rising SED (SED slope $\ge$ 0) at wavelengths greater than 8.0{\micron},
386: and hence whether it should be classified as a
387: flat-spectrum or a Class I source.
388:
389:
390: We can also compare the properties of disks in the $\gamma$ Velorum cluster
391: to those disks with strong evidence of dust evolution.
392: Primordial disks with a high degree of inner disk clearing
393: have been called transitional disks; observationally they are characterized by
394: relatively small excess below 5.8{\micron} and a large excess at longer wavelengths
395: implying a a SED slope [8.0]-[24] $>$ 0 \citep{hernandez07b}.
396: We show in Figure 4 the location of four well known
397: transitional disks in Taurus, Chameleon, and the TW Hya association:
398: TW Hyd (4) , GM Aur (5), Coku Tau (6) and
399: CS Cha (7) \citep{calvet02,calvet05,dalessio05b,espaillat07a}.
400: In addition, we show in Figure 4 the location of the newly
401: discovered class of pre-transitional disks, in which gaps
402: in primordial disks rather than holes have been identified
403: \citep{espaillat07b,brown08}. These are
404: LkCa 15 (1), UX Tau (2), and HK Tau (3) \citep{espaillat07b,furlan06}.
405: In contrast to the disk population in the $\sigma$ Orionis cluster, the Orion OB1b association,
406: and the 25 Orionis aggregate \citep[ with ages of $\sim$ 3, 5 and 8 Myr, respectively][]{hernandez07a,hernandez07b},
407: there are no transitional disk candidate detected in the $\gamma$ Velorum cluster.
408: However, there is a pre-transitional disk candidate (star 52; labeled as PTD in Table \ref{tab:members}) with infrared excesses similar
409: to the pre-transitional disk systems UX Tau and Lk Ca 15 \citep{espaillat07b}.
410:
411:
412:
413: The late-type stars exhibit less infrared excess than the
414: disk population in Taurus, suggesting that
415: the disks in the $\gamma$ Velorum cluster have evolved substantially.
416:
417: Except for one solar type star (see \ref{s:gtype}),
418: which exhibits IRAC and MIPS excesses, the early-type
419: and solar-type stars show excesses only at 24{\micron}. The relatively
420: small 24{\micron} excess (K-[24]$<$3) of these objects are consistent with their
421: being debris disks, in which second generation dust
422: is produced by collisions between planetesimals \citep[e.g.,][]{kenyon05,hernandez06,currie08}.
423: However, theoretical models of collisional cascade at 30-150 AU
424: \citet{kenyon05} do not predict enough excess emission
425: to explain the observed excesses at 5 Myr. A small dust contribution
426: from collisional cascade in the inner disk ($<$30 AU) or
427: remaining primordial dust in the disk could explain
428: these differences \citep[see][]{hernandez06}. Since, the timescale
429: for primordial disk dissipation decreases as
430: the stellar mass increases \citep[e.g.][]{hernandez07a,lada06},
431: it is more likely to observe remaining primordial dust
432: in the disk around solar-type stars than in early-type stars.
433:
434:
435: Visual inspection of the IRAC and MIPS images
436: reveals that stars with infrared excesses are not contaminated by
437: artifacts, nebulosity or
438: extragalactic sources. In general, the stars with infrared
439: excesses are isolated sources. Only stars 115 and 359
440: have near faint sources (within the background photometric annulus)
441: that could affect the photometry at [3.6] and [4.5]; however,
442: these objects look like isolated objects at longer wavelengths,
443: where infrared excesses are more obvious.
444: The star 8797 (with elongated PSF) can be a
445: close binary not resolved by IRAC. For this source,
446: IRAC and MIPS photometry includes contributions from both
447: components.
448:
449:
450: \subsection{Disks of early type stars}
451: \label{s:debris}
452:
453: We detected six early type stars with excess at 24{\micron}. Figure
454: \ref{fig:sed1} shows the SEDs of these objects. Except for the star 285
455: \citep[$\gamma$ Vel D, ][]{abt76}, a binary star near the $\gamma$ Velorum system,
456: all stars have spectral types from \citet{houk78}. \citet{abt76} classified
457: $\gamma$ Vel D as a metallic-lined binary star with spectral type
458: ranging from A2 to A8; we assumed a spectral type of A5 in Figure \ref{fig:sed1}.
459:
460: Color excesses (E$_{V - J}$) were obtained by interpolating spectral types
461: in the table of standard V-J color given by \citet{kh95}.
462: SEDs were corrected for reddening (\av) using E$_{V - J}$ and
463: the extinction relation from \citet{cardelli89}, with the
464: value of total-to-selective extinction for normal interstellar reddening ({\rm $R_V = 3.1$}).
465: The small values of {\av} obtained (average=0.2$\pm$0.1) support the low
466: reddening reported for the $\gamma$ Velorum cluster
467: \citep[][Jeffries R.D. et al in preparation]{abt76,pozzo00}.
468: We use the color K-[24] to determine the excess ratio at
469: 24{\micron} \citep[e.g.,][]{rieke05}, {\rm$E_{24}=10^{(K-[24]-0.05)/2.5}$},
470: where 0.05 is the mean value of K-[24] for the photometric candidates with MIPS detections.
471:
472: Star 105 exhibits a very small excess at 24{\micron}. As it is also
473: an emission-line star \citep{houk78,macconnell81} and its 2MASS colors
474: are similar than those observed in classical Be stars \citep{hernandez05}, this excess is likely
475: to be free-free emission in a hot envelope - that is, this is probably the excess
476: of a classical Be star.
477: The remaining stars with 24{\micron} excesses are likely to be debris disk systems
478: with {\rm$E_{24}$} similar to those observed
479: in debris disks candidates of the $\sigma$ Orionis cluster and the Orion OB1b
480: subassociation \citep{hernandez06,hernandez07a}.
481:
482:
483: Most of stars with V-J$\le$0.54 (F0 or earlier)
484: have spectral types from \citet{houk78} or \citet{kharchenko01}.
485: Except for the stars 277 and 572, the published spectral type and the
486: photometric spectral type calculated from the V-J color (see Figure \ref{fig:cmd2})
487: agrees within 5 spectral subclasses. However, additional studies (e.g radial velocity)
488: are necessary to confirm membership of our early type sample.
489: Assuming that stars 277 and 572 are not members of the $\gamma$ Velorum cluster,
490: we find 8 early type candidates without infrared excess (diskless),
491: 5 debris disk candidates and one classical Be star. Since some diskless
492: could not be members of the cluster, the debris disk frequency
493: estimated in this work (5 debris disks / 14 early type stars; $\sim$36$\pm$16\%)
494: is a lower limit.
495:
496:
497: \citet{adams04} report that mechanisms of gas dispersal, like photoevaporation,
498: can disrupts planet formation in two important ways: (1) if the gas is dispersed
499: before the disk dust has grown to centimeter size, the
500: formation of planetesimals will be curtailed as the dust is removed with the gas;
501: (2) if the gas is dispersed before large rocky planets
502: are formed, the formation of gas giant planets like Jupiter will be
503: suppressed. The debris disk frequency ($\ga$36\%) and the infrared
504: emission from the debris disks in the $\gamma$ Velorum cluster are comparable
505: to the debris disk population of stellar groups with similar ages.
506: For instance, using the same method to detect
507: stars with excess at 24{\micron}, \citet{hernandez06} reported
508: debris disk frequency of $\sim$38\%$\pm$3\% and $\sim$46\%$\pm$4\%
509: for the Orion OB1b subassociation ($\sim$5 Myr) and for the 25
510: Orionis stellar aggregate ($\sim$8 Myr), respectively.
511: Since the presence of debris disks implies the formation of km size objects \citep{kenyon05},
512: proposal (1) appears unlikely.
513:
514: \subsection{Disks around solar-type stars}
515: \label{s:gtype}
516:
517: We detected six solar-type stars with excesses at 24{\micron}.
518: Figure \ref{fig:sed2} shows the SEDs for this subsample.
519: Each panel shows the corresponding photospheric fluxes \citep{kh95}.
520: Spectral types were estimated by interpolating
521: dereddened V-J colors using the standard table given by \citet{kh95}.
522: We assumed a reddening value of \av=0.15 \citep[E$_{V-I}$=0.06;][]{pozzo00}.
523:
524:
525: The values of {\rm$E_{24}$} in this subsample
526: are slightly smaller than the debris disks around FGK stars observed
527: in the 15 Myr-old Scorpius-Centaurus-Lupus
528: sub-association \citep{chen05,siegler07} and comparable to the
529: excesses of debris disks around FGK stars in the 30 Myr old cluster NGC 2547
530: \citep{gorlova07}.
531: Assuming the same excess detection threshold of E$_{24}$=1.41
532: (K-[24]=0.42), we have calculated a median E$_{24}$ of
533: 2.1$^{+4.8}_{-1.6}$, 2.8$^{+14.2}_{-2.0}$ and 2.0$^{+2.3}_{-1.5}$
534: for F G type debris disk candidates in the $\gamma$ Velorum cluster,
535: Scorpius-Centaurus-Lupus sub-association and the NGC 2547 cluster, respectively.
536: The errors represent the upper and lower quartiles of each sample.
537: If interpreted as an evolutionary sequence, these
538: disk emissions would be consistent with a growth period of dust
539: production and a following decrease as dust particles
540: are removed, as predicted by theory \citep{kenyon05}.
541: Similar trends have been seen in A type stars \citep{hernandez06, currie08}.
542: However, given the small number of stars, the statistical significance of this
543: result is low.
544:
545: Only star 316 shows an excess at shorter wavelengths; it
546: represents the earliest star exhibiting excess in the
547: IRAC bands. The excesses around this star can be explained
548: if the disk is in an intermediate phase evolving from a
549: primordial to a debris disk (evolved disk). Another possibility is
550: that this star has a very massive debris disk produced
551: recently by a catastrophic collision between two
552: planetary-size bodies \citep{gorlova07,kenyon05}.
553:
554:
555: \subsection{Disks around late type stars}
556: \label{s:late}
557: Figure \ref{fig:sed3} shows the SEDs of late type stars sorted
558: by brightness in the V band. We display the median SED
559: of optically thick disk stars in Taurus \citep{furlan06} and
560: the photospheric fluxes for a star with spectral type M2 \citep{kh95}.
561: The diversity of disks in the $\gamma$ Velorum cluster
562: is apparent. We distinguish between
563: class II systems (CII, with SED slopes K-[5.8]$>$1.8),
564: and evolved disk (EV) systems exhibiting smaller IRAC/MIPS excesses than
565: class II systems (K-[5.8]$<$1.8).
566:
567: Two stars have photometric colors between K5 and M0;
568: one of them (star 52) shows infrared excesses similar
569: to pre-transitional disks objects \citep{espaillat07b}. The
570: other star (106) exhibits larger infrared excesses than the optically
571: thick median in Taurus.
572: % which might indicate a more highly flared disk structure \citep[e.g.,][]{dalessio06}.
573: The next two objects (stars 559 and 78), with photometric spectral type $\sim$ M3,
574: exhibit modest infrared emission, which could be explained by
575: decreasing the height of the irradiation surface in the disks due to
576: a higher degree of settling producing flatter disk structures
577: \citep{hernandez07a, hernandez07b, dalessio06}.
578: The remaining 13 stars with infrared excesses have photometric
579: spectral types M4 or later (see Figure \ref{fig:cmd2})
580: suggesting, as in other young stellar population \citep{hernandez07a,hernandez07b,carpenter06,lada06}
581: that primordial disk frequencies depend on the mass of the central object.
582: Using the number of members expected in our photometric sample
583: (dashed histogram in Figure \ref{fig:cmd2}),
584: we calculated disk fractions of 4.3$\pm$3.0\% for the color range 2$<$V-J$<$3
585: ($\sim$K5-M1), 3.5$\pm$2.4\% for the color range 3$<$V-J$<$4 ($\sim$M1-M3.5) and
586: 7.1$\pm$2.0\% for stars in with V-J$>$4 (later than M3.5).
587:
588: Stars 100, 154, 155 are too faint to be detected by MIPS. Two of them show
589: excesses in all IRAC bands, making identification of these stars (100 and 155) as
590: having dust disks fairly certain. However, star 154 shows excess only at 8{\micron},
591: which could be produced by either disk emission or PAH contamination.
592:
593: Figure \ref{fig:space} shows the spatial distribution of the stars
594: with infrared excesses in our sample. Different spectral type ranges
595: are represented with different symbols. As reference,
596: we identify X-ray sources and photometric candidates
597: with V-J$>$3.5 (little contamination by non-members is expected
598: in this color range). The projected distances from the $\gamma$
599: Velorum system are displayed in intervals of 0.5 pc. One debris disk
600: is located inside 0.25 pc,
601: while the only optically-thick
602: disks are in systems located at projected distances of $\ga$0.5 pc.
603: Since, about 10\% of the stars bearing disks are expected to
604: have transitional disks \citep[][; Muzerolle J., in preparation]{hernandez07b},
605: we can expect one or two transitional disks in the $\gamma$ Velorum cluster.
606: However, we did not detect any transitional disk objects in the cluster.
607: We can speculate that external mechanisms of disk dispersal
608: (like photodissociation and/or photoionization by strong stellar winds and/or strong UV radiation),
609: affecting mainly the disk surface and the outer region of the disk,
610: combined with the fast inner clearing characterizing transitional
611: disks, decrease the probability of observing a disk in this phase.
612: Given the small number of stars bearing disks, the statistical
613: significance of this speculation is very low.
614:
615: \section{Comparison with other young stellar populations}
616: \label{sec:comp}
617:
618: To compare the disk frequencies in $\gamma$ Vel with other regions,
619: we need to estimate the cluster age, which depends to some extent upon
620: the assumed distance to the cluster.
621: \citet{burningham06} confirmed that this group is a stellar cluster
622: belonging to the Vela OB2 association, analogous to the
623: $\sigma$ Orionis cluster in the Orion OB1b subassociation \citep{hernandez07a}.
624: The primary star in the $\gamma$ Vel system is the only WR star
625: with a distance from
626: Hipparcos \citep[258$^{+41}_{-31}$pc;][]{schaerer97}; but this distance is
627: in marked contrast to distances estimated by other methods (350-450 pc)
628: and to the Hipparcos distance of the Vela OB2 association
629: \citep[410$\pm$12 pc;][]{dezeeuw99}. Using interferometric
630: observations to estimate the geometrical parameters
631: of the orbit of the $\gamma$ Vel system, \citet{millour07}
632: and \citet{north07} give distances of 368$^{+38}_{-13}pc$
633: and 336$^{+8}_{-7}pc$, respectively. These values are in agreement
634: with the distance obtained by \citet[][ 349$^{+44}_{-35}$ pc]{leeuwen07} with the
635: new reduction of the Hipparcos data that includes modeling of the satellite dynamics
636: and eliminates the data correlation in the original catalog caused by
637: attitude-modeling errors \citep{maiz08}.
638: The age estimated
639: by \citet[3.5 Myr;][]{north07} for the O star is in
640: agreement with the age estimated by \citet[$\lesssim$5 Myr;][]{pozzo00}
641: for the cluster and the age estimated by \citet[3.6 Myr;][]{demarco99}
642: for the $\gamma$ Vel system.
643: We assume the corrected Hipparcos distance of 350 pc, which is
644: in agreement within 1.5$\sigma$ from the distance calculated by \citet{millour07}
645: and \citet{north07} and a reference age of 5 Myr.
646:
647:
648: To support the assumed age, we plot in Figure \ref{fig:cmd3} the
649: median absolute magnitudes versus the median V-J color for members
650: of several different stellar groups.
651: Regardless of the uncertainties introduced by theoretical
652: evolutionary tracks, Figure \ref{fig:cmd3} shows
653: that the $\gamma$ Velorum cluster is in a similar evolutionary
654: stage as the other stellar groups with ages normally quoted
655: as $\sim$5 Myr: the $\lambda$ Orionis cluster \citep{barrado07, dolan02},
656: the cluster NGC 2362 \citep{dahm07}, and the Orion OB1b subassociation
657: \citep{briceno07,hernandez07b}. We estimate an error of 1.5 Myr comparing
658: the standard deviation in the color V-J for the member sample
659: (see \S\ref{s:mem}) to the standard deviation obtained
660: using the theoretical isochrones from \citet{sf00} with a reference age of 5 Myr.
661:
662: Figure \ref{fig:fracD} shows the disk frequencies of late type stars
663: (stars K middle or later) with near-infrared disk emission in different stellar
664: groups, as a function of age \citep{hernandez05,hernandez07a,haisch01}.
665: Using the number of members with V-J$>$2.0 ($\sim$K5 or later)
666: expected in our photometric sample (dashed histogram in
667: Figure \ref{fig:cmd2}) and the disk detected in \S \ref{s:late},
668: we calculated a primordial disk frequency of 6$\pm$2\% for
669: the $\gamma$ Velorum cluster.
670: We include recent Spitzer results for the young stellar clusters
671: NGC 1333 \citep{gutermuth07}, NGC 2068/71\citep{flaherty07}, Taurus \citep{hartmann05a},
672: NGC 7129 \citep{gutermuth04}, Chameleons \citep{megeath05}, Tr 37 and NGC 7160
673: \citep{aurora06}, IC 348 \citep{lada06}, NGC 2244 \citep{balog07},
674: NGC 2264 \citep{cieza07}, $\sigma$ Ori \citep{hernandez07a}, NGC 2362 \citep{dahm07}, $\lambda$ Ori \citep{barrado07},
675: Upper Scorpius \citep{carpenter06}, and Orion OB1b and 25 Ori \citep{hernandez07b}.
676:
677: The disk frequencies decrease toward older ages with
678: a time scale for primordial disk dissipation of $\sim$5 Myr.
679: It is apparent that the disk frequency found in the $\gamma$ Velorum cluster
680: is lower than those found in young stellar populations with similar ages, and
681: comparable to the disk frequency in older stellar groups.
682: This could indicate that the low disk presence observed in
683: the $\gamma$ Velorum cluster is abnormal for its evolutionary stage,
684: and environmental effects, such as strong stellar winds and/or strong radiation
685: fields from the $\gamma$ Velorum system, could provide the physical
686: mechanism for the low disk frequency.
687: Moreover, $\sim$75\% of the disk bearing stars in the $\gamma$
688: Velorum cluster show IRAC SED slopes smaller than the median values
689: of other 5 Myr old stellar groups plotted in Figure \ref{fig:cmd3}
690: suggesting that the disks of the $\gamma$ Velorum cluster
691: have a higher degree of dust settling. In particular, the median
692: IRAC SED slopes for the disk population of NGC2362,
693: the $\lambda$ Orionis cluster, the OB1b subassociation
694: and the $\gamma$ Velorum cluster are
695: -1.72, -1.60, -1.70 and -1.82, respectively (with a typical error of 0.06).
696:
697: Studying the young (2-3 Myr) open cluster NGC2244, \citet{balog07} showed that
698: high-mass stars (O type stars) can affect the primordial disks of
699: lower mass members only if they are
700: within $\sim$0.5 pc of the high-mass star.
701: We find similar results for the $\gamma$ Velorum cluster.
702: Using the photometric members with V-J$>$3.5 ($\sim$M2 or later),
703: we find a disk frequency of 4$\pm$3\% at projected distance of
704: 0.25-1.0 pc; inside 0.25 pc the central objects of the cluster contaminate
705: the optical photometry used to select photometric candidates (\S \ref{s:mem}).
706: The closest primordial disk is located at projected distance of $\sim$0.5 pc.
707: At larger projected distance ($>$1.0 pc), the disk frequency is larger (8$\pm$2\%).
708: This suggests that the relative fast dispersion of disks in the $\gamma$
709: Velorum cluster is produced by the strong radiation fields
710: and strong stellar winds from the central objects.
711: This result must still be considered tentative given
712: the small number of stars with disks, which results
713: in large errors in disk frequencies.
714:
715: Alternatively, Figure \ref{fig:fracD} indicates
716: that the disk frequency drops rapidly at $\sim$5 Myr
717: and the relative low frequency of disks
718: observed in the $\gamma$ Velorum cluster
719: could be explained if the cluster is slightly
720: older than 5 Myr. Additional studies of photometric
721: members presented in Table \ref{tab:members} are necessary
722: to explain the disk population found in
723: $\gamma$ Velorum cluster.
724:
725:
726: \section{Conclusions}
727: \label{sec:conc}
728: We have used the IRAC and MIPS instruments on board the Spitzer Space Telescope
729: to conduct a study of disks around the $\gamma$ Velorum cluster. Since the
730: central object is a binary system consisting of the closest known Wolf Rayet
731: star and a high mass O star, a strong UV radiation field and stellar winds
732: are present in the cluster. Using optical photometry of X ray sources (2XMM)
733: and members confirmed by spectroscopy (Jeffries R.D. et al, in preparation),
734: 579 photometric candidates were selected as possible members of the cluster.
735: The level of contamination by non-members depends on the V-J color range,
736: showing the highest level of contamination ($\sim$68\%) at V-J = 1.5 - 3.5,
737: where the field giant
738: branch crosses the young stellar population. Combining optical, 2MASS and Spitzer
739: data we have detected infrared excess in 29 stars. One of the infrared
740: excess stars is a Be star. We report 5 debris
741: disks around A type stars, 5 debris disks around solar type stars
742: (spectral type range F - early-K) and one solar type stars with
743: infrared excess produced by a very massive debris disks or by a
744: primordial disk with a high degree of dust settling. Seventeen
745: disk bearing low mass stars (K5 or later) were found in the cluster
746: with a range of disk properties. We classified these objects in
747: three classes using the infrared excess at 5.8{\micron} and the
748: SED slope [8.0]-[24]: 9 class II stars, 7 evolved disks star
749: and one pretransitional candidate. We found that 76\% of the stars bearing
750: primordial disks have color V-J$>$4 ($\sim$later than M3.5), indicating a mass
751: dependent timescale for disk dissipation in the $\gamma$ Velorum cluster, similar
752: to results in other young star populations
753: \citep{carpenter06,hernandez07a,hernandez07b,lada06}.
754:
755: We found that the disk frequency observed in the $\gamma$ Velorum cluster
756: is lower than in other young stellar groups with similar ages ($\sim$5 Myr),
757: and comparable to values found in older populations ($\sim$10Myr).
758: Empirical isochrones support the age of $\sim$5 Myr for the overall
759: population of the $\gamma$ Velorum cluster. The relative low frequency
760: observed in the cluster is consistent with: (1) rapid disk dissipation due to the influence of
761: the strong radiation fields and winds from the WR and O star
762: cluster members or (2) the age of the cluster is slightly older
763: and the low frequency reflects the fast dropping in disk frequency
764: observed at $\sim$5 Myr. More than 75\% of the
765: primordial disk stars have inner disk emission lower than
766: the median observed in the disk population of other 5 Myr clusters,
767: indicating that the disks of the $\gamma$ Velorum cluster
768: have a larger degree of dust settling.
769:
770: We find no primordial disks closer than $\sim$0.75 pc from the
771: high mass central binary. At projected distance $>$1 pc,
772: the disk fraction seems to be constant around 5-7\%. This result is similar
773: to that found in the NGC 2244 cluster \citep{balog07} in which primordial
774: disks are affected only in the immediate vicinity of the O stars ($<$0.5pc).
775: Our results reinforce an emerging trend in studies of disk frequency,
776: specifically that optically thick disk dissipation is rapid for $\sim 90$\% of
777: systems, lasting less than 5 Myr, while $\sim 10$\% of disks can last for
778: 8 Myr or more.
779:
780:
781:
782:
783: \acknowledgements
784:
785: We thank to Aletta Tibbetts R.D. for helping us in the initial steps of the IRAC reduction data.
786: An anonymous referee provided many insightful comments.
787: This publication makes use of data products from
788: Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint project of the University
789: of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center/California
790: Institute of Technology. This work is based on observations
791: made with the {\em Spitzer Space Telescope} (GO-1 0037), which is
792: operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology under
793: a contract with NASA. Support for this work was provided by University of Michigan
794: and NASA Grants NAG5-13210, NASA-1277575, and NASA-1285169.
795:
796:
797:
798: \begin{thebibliography}
799:
800: \bibitem[Abt et al.(1976)]{abt76}
801: Abt, H.~A., Landolt, A.~U., Levy, S.~G., \& Mochnacki, S.\ 1976, \aj, 81, 541
802:
803:
804: \bibitem[Adams et al.(2004)]{adams04}
805: Adams, F.~C., Hollenbach, D., Laughlin, G., \& Gorti, U.\ 2004, \apj, 611, 360
806:
807: \bibitem[Balog et al.(2007)]{balog07} Balog, Z., Muzerolle, J.,
808: Rieke, G.~H., Su, K.~Y.~L., Young, E.~T., \& Megeath, S.~T.\ 2007, \apj,
809: 660, 1532
810:
811: \bibitem[Baraffe et al.(1998)]{baraffe98}
812: Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Allard, F., \& Hauschildt, P.~H.\ 1998, \aap, 337, 403
813:
814: \bibitem[Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s et al.(2007)]{barrado07}
815: Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s, D., et al.\ 2007, \apj, 664, 481
816:
817: \bibitem[B{\'e}jar et al.(1999)]{bejar99}
818: B{\'e}jar, V.~J.~S., Zapatero Osorio, M.~R. \& Rebolo, R.\ 1999, \apj, 521, 671
819:
820: \bibitem[Bessell \& Brett(1988)]{bessell88}
821: Bessell, M.~S., \& Brett, J.~M.\ 1988, \pasp, 100, 1134
822:
823: \bibitem[Brice{\~n}o et al.(2007)]{briceno07}
824: Brice{\~n}o, C., Hartmann, L., Hern{\'a}ndez, J., Calvet, N., Vivas, A.~K., Furesz, G., \&
825: Szentgyorgyi, A.\ 2007, \apj, 661, 1119
826:
827: \bibitem[Brown et al.(2008)]{brown08} Brown, J.~M., Blake,
828: G.~A., Qi, C., Dullemond, C.~P., \& Wilner, D.~J.\ 2008, \apjl, 675, L109
829:
830: \bibitem[Burningham et al.(2006)]{burningham06}
831: Burningham, B., 2005, PhD thesis, University of Exeter.
832:
833: \bibitem[Calvet et al.(2002)]{calvet02}
834: Calvet, N., D'Alessio, P., Hartmann, L., Wilner, D., Walsh, A., \& Sitko, M.\ 2002, \apj, 568, 1008
835:
836: \bibitem[Calvet et al.(2005)]{calvet05}
837: Calvet, N., et al.\ 2005, \apjl, 630, L185
838:
839: \bibitem[Cardelli et al.(1989)]{cardelli89}
840: Cardelli, J.~A., Clayton, G.~C., \& Mathis, J.~S.\ 1989, \apj, 345, 245
841:
842: \bibitem[Clarke(2007)]{clarke07}
843: Clarke, C.~J.\ 2007, \mnras, 376, 1350
844:
845:
846: \bibitem[Carpenter et al.(2006)]{carpenter06} Carpenter, J.~M.,
847: Mamajek, E.~E., Hillenbrand, L.~A., \& Meyer, M.~R.\ 2006, \apj, 651, 49
848:
849: \bibitem[Chen et al.(2005)]{chen05} Chen, C.~H., Jura, M.,
850: Gordon, K.~D., \& Blaylock, M.\ 2005, \apj, 623, 493
851:
852:
853: \bibitem[Cieza \& Baliber(2007)]{cieza07} Cieza, L., \&
854: Baliber, N.\ 2007, \apj, 671, 605
855:
856:
857: \bibitem[Crowther(2007)]{crowther07}
858: Crowther, P.~A.\ 2007, \araa, 45, 177
859:
860: \bibitem[Currie et al.(2008)]{currie08}
861: Currie, T., Kenyon, S.~J., Balog, Z., Rieke, G., Bragg, A., \& Bromley, B.\ 2008, \apj, 672,
862: 558
863:
864: \bibitem[Cutri et al.(2003)]{cutri03}
865: Cutri, R.~M., et al.\ 2003, VizieR Online Data Catalog, 2246, 0.
866:
867:
868: \bibitem[Dahm \& Hillenbrand(2007)]{dahm07}
869: Dahm, S.~E., \& Hillenbrand, L.~A.\ 2007, \aj, 133, 2072
870:
871: \bibitem[D'Alessio et al.(2005a)]{dalessio05a}
872: D'Alessio, P., Mer{\'{\i}}n, B., Calvet, N., Hartmann, L., \& Montesinos, B.\ 2005a,
873: Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica, 41, 61.
874:
875: \bibitem[D'Alessio et al.(2005b)]{dalessio05b}
876: D'Alessio, P., et al.\ 2005b, \apj, 621, 461
877:
878: \bibitem[D'Alessio et al.(2006)]{dalessio06} D'Alessio, P.,
879: Calvet, N., Hartmann, L., Franco-Hern{\'a}ndez, R., \& Serv{\'{\i}}n, H.\
880: 2006, \apj, 638, 314
881:
882: \bibitem[De Marco et al.(2000)]{demarco00} De Marco, O., Schmutz,
883: W., Crowther, P.~A., Hillier, D.~J., Dessart, L., de Koter, A., \&
884: Schweickhardt, J.\ 2000, \aap, 358, 187
885:
886:
887: \bibitem[De Marco \& Schmutz(1999)]{demarco99} De Marco, O., \&
888: Schmutz, W.\ 1999, \aap, 345, 163
889:
890:
891: \bibitem[de Zeeuw et al.(1999)]{dezeeuw99} de Zeeuw, P.~T.,
892: Hoogerwerf, R., de Bruijne, J.~H.~J., Brown, A.~G.~A., \& Blaauw, A.\ 1999,
893: \aj, 117, 354
894:
895: \bibitem[Dolan \& Mathieu(2002)]{dolan02}
896: Dolan, C.~J., \& Mathieu, R.~D.\ 2002, \aj, 123, 387
897:
898: \bibitem[Eggen(1980)]{eggen80}
899: Eggen, O.~J.\ 1980, \apj, 238, 627
900:
901: \bibitem[Eggen(1983)]{eggen83}
902: Eggen, O.~J.\ 1983, \aj, 88, 197
903:
904: \bibitem[Eggen(1986)]{eggen86}
905: Eggen, O.~J.\ 1986, \aj, 92, 1074
906:
907: \bibitem[Engelbracht et al.(2007)]{engelbracht07}
908: Engelbracht, C.~W., et al.\ 2007, \pasp, 119, 994
909:
910: \bibitem[Espaillat et al.(2007a)]{espaillat07a} Espaillat, C., et
911: al.\ 2007a, \apjl, 664, L111
912:
913: \bibitem[Espaillat et al.(2007b)]{espaillat07b} Espaillat, C.,
914: Calvet, N., D'Alessio, P., Hern{\'a}ndez, J., Qi, C., Hartmann, L., Furlan,
915: E., \& Watson, D.~M.\ 2007b, \apjl, 670, L135
916:
917: \bibitem[Fazio et al.(2004)]{fazio04}
918: Fazio, G.~G., et al.\ 2004, \apjs, 154, 39
919:
920: \bibitem[Flaherty \& Muzerolle(2007)]{flaherty07} Flaherty, K.~M.,
921: \& Muzerolle, J.\ 2007, ArXiv e-prints, 712, arXiv:0712.1601
922:
923: \bibitem[Furlan et al.(2006)]{furlan06}
924: Furlan, E., et al.\ 2006, \apjs, 165, 568
925:
926: \bibitem[G{\'o}mez \& Kenyon(2001)]{gomez01}
927: G{\'o}mez, M., \& Kenyon, S.~J.\ 2001, \aj, 121, 974
928:
929: \bibitem[Gordon et al.(2005)]{gordon05}
930: Gordon, K.~D., et al.\ 2005, \pasp, 117, 503
931:
932: \bibitem[Gorlova et al.(2004)]{gorlova04}
933: Gorlova, N., et al.\ 2004, \apjs, 154, 448
934:
935: \bibitem[Gorlova et al.(2006)]{gorlova06} Gorlova, N., Rieke,
936: G.~H., Muzerolle, J., Stauffer, J.~R., Siegler, N., Young, E.~T., \&
937: Stansberry, J.~H.\ 2006, \apj, 649, 1028
938:
939: \bibitem[Gorlova et al.(2007)]{gorlova07}
940: Gorlova, N., Balog, Z., Rieke, G.~H., Muzerolle, J., Su, K.~Y.~L., Ivanov, V.~D., \& Young, E.~T.\
941: 2007, \apj, 670, 516
942:
943: \bibitem[Gutermuth et al.(2004)]{gutermuth04}
944: Gutermuth, R.~A., Megeath, S.~T., Muzerolle, J., Allen, L.~E., Pipher, J.~L., Myers, P.~C.,
945: \& Fazio, G.~G.\ 2004, \apjs, 154, 374
946:
947: \bibitem[Gutermuth et al.(2007)]{gutermuth07} Gutermuth, R.~A., et
948: al.\ 2007, ArXiv e-prints, 710, arXiv:0710.1860
949:
950: \bibitem[Haisch et al.(2001)]{haisch01}
951: Haisch, K.~E., Lada, E.~A., \& Lada, C.~J.\ 2001, \apjl, 553, L153
952:
953: \bibitem[Hartmann(2003)]{hartmann03} Hartmann, L.\ 2003, \apj,
954: 585, 398
955:
956: \bibitem[Hartmann et al.(2005)]{hartmann05a}
957: Hartmann, L., Megeath, S.~T., Allen, L., Luhman, K., Calvet, N., D'Alessio, P., Franco-Hernandez,
958: R., \& Fazio, G.\ 2005, \apj, 629, 881
959:
960: \bibitem[Hartmann(2005)]{hartmann05b}
961: Hartmann, L.\ 2005, ASP Conf.~Ser.~341: Chondrites and the Protoplanetary Disk, 341, 131
962:
963:
964: \bibitem[Hern{\'a}ndez et al.(2005)]{hernandez05}
965: Hern{\'a}ndez, J., Calvet, N., Hartmann, L., Brice{\~n}o, C., Sicilia-Aguilar, A., \& Berlind, P.\ 2005, \aj, 129, 856.
966:
967: \bibitem[Hern{\'a}ndez et al.(2006)]{hernandez06} Hern{\'a}ndez,
968: J., Brice{\~n}o, C., Calvet, N., Hartmann, L., Muzerolle, J., \& Quintero,
969: A.\ 2006, \apj, 652, 472
970:
971: \bibitem[Hern{\'a}ndez et al.(2007a)]{hernandez07a} Hern{\'a}ndez,
972: J., et al.\ 2007a, \apj, 662, 1067
973:
974: \bibitem[Hern{\'a}ndez et al.(2007b)]{hernandez07b} Hern{\'a}ndez, J., et
975: al.\ 2007b, \apj, 671, 1784
976:
977: \bibitem[Hollenbach \& Adams(2004)]{hollenbach04}
978: Hollenbach, D., \& Adams, F.~C.\ 2004, Star Formation in the Interstellar Medium: In Honor of
979: David Hollenbach, 323, 3
980:
981: \bibitem[Houk(1978)]{houk78}
982: Houk, N., 1978, Michigan Catalogue for the HD Stars, Vol. 2
983: (Ann Arbor: Dept. Astron., Univ. Michigan),
984: VizieR Online Data Catalog III/51B
985:
986: \bibitem[Jeffries et al.(2000)]{jeffries00}
987: Jeffries, R.D., Pozzo, M., Naylor, T., Harmer, S., Walter, F.M. 2000 in
988: "X-ray astronomy 2000" eds. R. Giacconi, S. Seria, L. Stella, ASP Conference Series
989: Vol. 234
990:
991: \bibitem[Kenyon \& Bromley(2005)]{kenyon05}
992: Kenyon, S.~J.~\& Bromley, B.\ 2005, \aj, 130, 269
993:
994: \bibitem[Kenyon \& Hartmann(1995)]{kh95}
995: Kenyon, S.~J.~\& Hartmann, L.\ 1995, \apjs, 101, 117
996:
997: \bibitem[Kharchenko(2001)]{kharchenko01}
998: Kharchenko, N.~V.\ 2001, Kinematika i Fizika Nebesnykh Tel, 17, 409.
999:
1000: \bibitem[Lada et al.(2006)]{lada06}
1001: Lada, C.~J., et al.\ 2006, \aj, 131, 1574
1002:
1003: \bibitem[Landsman(1993)]{landsman93}
1004: Landsman, W.~B.\ 1993, ASP Conf.~Ser.~ 52: Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems II, 52, 246
1005:
1006: \bibitem[Lyra et al.(2006)]{lyra06} Lyra, W., Moitinho, A.,
1007: van der Bliek, N.~S., \& Alves, J.\ 2006, \aap, 453, 101
1008:
1009: \bibitem[MacConnell(1981)]{macconnell81}
1010: MacConnell, D.~J.\ 1981, \aaps, 44, 387
1011:
1012: \bibitem[Ma{\'{\i}}z Apell{\'a}niz et al.(2008)]{maiz08}
1013: Ma{\'{\i}}z Apell{\'a}niz, J., Alfaro, E.~J.,
1014: \& Sota, A.\ 2008, ArXiv e-prints, 804, arXiv:0804.2553
1015:
1016: \bibitem[Megeath et al.(2005a)]{megeath05}
1017: Megeath, S.~T., Hartmann, L., Luhman, K.~L., \& Fazio, G.~G.\ 2005a, \apjl, 634, L113
1018:
1019: \bibitem[Megeath et al.(2007)]{megeath07} Megeath, S.~T., Gaidos,
1020: E., Hester, J.~J., Adams, F.~C., Bally, J., Lee, J.~-., \& Wolk, S.\ 2007,
1021: ArXiv e-prints, 704, arXiv:0704.1045
1022:
1023:
1024: \bibitem[Meyer et al.(2008)]{meyer08}
1025: Meyer, M.~R., et al.\ 2008, \apjl, 673, L181
1026:
1027:
1028: \bibitem[Meyer et al.(1997)]{meyer97}
1029: Meyer, M.~R., Calvet, N., \& Hillenbrand, N. A.\ 1997, \aj, 114, 288
1030:
1031: \bibitem[Millour et al.(2007)]{millour07} Millour, F., et al.\
1032: 2007, \aap, 464, 107
1033:
1034:
1035: \bibitem[Naylor(1998)]{naylor98} Naylor, T.\ 1998, \mnras, 296,
1036: 339
1037:
1038: \bibitem[Naylor et al.(2002)]{naylor02} Naylor, T., Totten,
1039: E.~J., Jeffries, R.~D., Pozzo, M., Devey, C.~R., \& Thompson, S.~A.\ 2002,
1040: \mnras, 335, 291
1041:
1042: \bibitem[North et al.(2007)]{north07} North, J.~R., Tuthill,
1043: P.~G., Tango, W.~J., \& Davis, J.\ 2007, \mnras, 377, 415
1044:
1045:
1046: \bibitem[Pozzo et al.(2000)]{pozzo00}
1047: Pozzo, M., Jeffries, R.~D., Naylor, T., Totten, E.~J., Harmer, S., \& Kenyon, M.\ 2000, \mnras,
1048: 313, L23
1049:
1050: \bibitem[Reach et al. (2006)]{reach06}
1051: Reach, W. et al. \ 2006, Infrared Array Camera Data Handbook, version 3.0,
1052: {\em Spitzer} Science Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125 USA.
1053:
1054: \bibitem[Richling \& Yorke(2000)]{richling00} Richling, S., \&
1055: Yorke, H.~W.\ 2000, \apj, 539, 258
1056:
1057: \bibitem[Rieke et al.(2004)]{rieke04}
1058: Rieke, G. H., et al, 2004, \apjs, 154, 25
1059:
1060: \bibitem[Rieke et al.(2005)]{rieke05}
1061: Rieke, G. H., et al, 2005, \apj, 620, 1010
1062:
1063: \bibitem[Schaerer et al.(1997)]{schaerer97}
1064: Schaerer, D., Schmutz, W., \& Grenon, M.\ 1997, \apjl, 484, L153
1065:
1066: \bibitem[Sicilia-Aguilar et al.(2006)]{aurora06}
1067: Sicilia-Aguilar, A., et al.\ 2006, \apj, 638, 897
1068:
1069: \bibitem[Siegler et al.(2007)]{siegler07} Siegler, N., Muzerolle,
1070: J., Young, E.~T., Rieke, G.~H., Mamajek, E.~E., Trilling, D.~E., Gorlova,
1071: N., \& Su, K.~Y.~L.\ 2007, \apj, 654, 580
1072:
1073:
1074: \bibitem[Siess et al.(2000)]{sf00}
1075: Siess, L., Dufour, E., \& Forestini, M.\ 2000, \aap, 358, 593
1076:
1077: \bibitem[Strom et al.(1989)]{strom89}
1078: Strom, K.~M., Strom, S.~E., Edwards, S., Cabrit, S., \& Skrutskie, M.~F.\ 1989, \aj, 97, 1451
1079:
1080: \bibitem[Throop \& Bally(2005)]{throop05} Throop, H.~B., \&
1081: Bally, J.\ 2005, \apjl, 623, L149
1082:
1083: \bibitem[van Leeuwen(2007)]{leeuwen07}
1084: van Leeuwen, F.\ 2007, \aap, 474, 653
1085:
1086: \end{thebibliography}
1087:
1088: \clearpage
1089:
1090: \begin{deluxetable}{lllllllllllll}
1091: \rotate
1092: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
1093: \tablewidth{0pt}
1094: \tablecaption{Members of the $\gamma$ Velorum Cluster \label{tab:members}}
1095: \tablehead{
1096: \colhead{ID} & \colhead{2MASS name} & \colhead{B} & \colhead{V} & \colhead{Ic} & \colhead{Ref} & \colhead{[3.6]} & \colhead{[4.5]} & \colhead{[5.8]} & \colhead{[8.0]} & \colhead{Flux$_{24}$} & \colhead{X-ray} & \colhead{Disk} \\
1097: \colhead{ } & \colhead{ } &\colhead{mag}&\colhead{mag}&\colhead{mag} & \colhead{} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{mJy} & \colhead{source} & \colhead{type} \\
1098: }
1099: \startdata
1100: 1 & 08064389-4731532 & 19.21 $\pm$ 0.02 & 17.65 $\pm$ 0.01 & 14.98 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1 & 12.39 $\pm$ 0.03 & 12.38 $\pm$ 0.03 & 12.33 $\pm$ 0.04 & 12.32 $\pm$ 0.04 & \nodata & 0 & CIII \\
1101: 2 & 08064805-4728118 & 13.43 $\pm$ 0.01 & 12.31 $\pm$ 0.01 & 11.15 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1 & 9.52 $\pm$ 0.03 & 9.57 $\pm$ 0.03 & 9.56 $\pm$ 0.03 & 9.52 $\pm$ 0.03 & \nodata & 0 & CIII \\
1102: 3 & 08065006-4732219 & 19.65 $\pm$ 0.03 & 18.22 $\pm$ 0.01 & 15.50 $\pm$ 0.03 & 1 & 12.75 $\pm$ 0.03 & 12.66 $\pm$ 0.03 & 12.66 $\pm$ 0.06 & 12.71 $\pm$ 0.07 & \nodata & 0 & CIII \\
1103: 4 & 08065158-4728058 & 14.55 $\pm$ 0.01 & 13.34 $\pm$ 0.01 & 12.03 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1 & 10.20 $\pm$ 0.03 & 10.25 $\pm$ 0.03 & 10.21 $\pm$ 0.03 & 10.19 $\pm$ 0.03 & \nodata & 0 & CIII \\
1104: 5 & 08065419-4730210 & 14.54 $\pm$ 0.01 & 13.34 $\pm$ 0.01 & 12.05 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1 & 10.23 $\pm$ 0.03 & 10.25 $\pm$ 0.03 & 10.20 $\pm$ 0.03 & 10.17 $\pm$ 0.03 & \nodata & 0 & CIII \\
1105: 6 & 08070052-4732093 & 13.58 $\pm$ 0.01 & 12.82 $\pm$ 0.01 & 12.03 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1 & 10.98 $\pm$ 0.03 & 11.01 $\pm$ 0.03 & 10.99 $\pm$ 0.03 & 11.00 $\pm$ 0.03 & \nodata & 0 & CIII \\
1106: 7 & 08070716-4721462 & 12.99 $\pm$ 0.01 & 11.90 $\pm$ 0.01 & 10.74 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1 & 9.16 $\pm$ 0.03 & 9.18 $\pm$ 0.03 & 9.16 $\pm$ 0.03 & 9.12 $\pm$ 0.03 & 1.59 $\pm$ 0.61 & 0 & CIII \\
1107: 8 & 08071155-4719512 & 16.09 $\pm$ 0.01 & 14.77 $\pm$ 0.01 & 13.13 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1 & 11.10 $\pm$ 0.03 & 11.10 $\pm$ 0.03 & 11.07 $\pm$ 0.03 & 11.05 $\pm$ 0.03 & \nodata & 0 & CIII \\
1108: 9 & 08071312-4721124 & 18.05 $\pm$ 0.01 & 16.60 $\pm$ 0.01 & 14.03 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1 & 11.35 $\pm$ 0.03 & 11.33 $\pm$ 0.03 & 11.26 $\pm$ 0.03 & 11.22 $\pm$ 0.03 & \nodata & 0 & CIII \\
1109: 10 & 08071363-4725155 & 13.39 $\pm$ 0.01 & 12.73 $\pm$ 0.01 & 11.94 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1 & 10.86 $\pm$ 0.03 & 10.84 $\pm$ 0.03 & 10.81 $\pm$ 0.03 & 10.83 $\pm$ 0.03 & \nodata & 0 & CIII \\
1110:
1111: \enddata
1112:
1113: \tablenotetext{~}{References in columns 6: 1 this work; 2 \citet{kharchenko01}}
1114: \tablenotetext{~}{Column 12: 1 X-ray emission; 0 not X-ray emission}
1115: \tablenotetext{~}{Column 13: CIII=diskless, CII=optically thick disk, EV= evolved disk, PTD=pretransition disk candidate, DD=Debris disk candidate, Mgiant: Giant candidate based on 2MASS colors}
1116: \tablecomments{Table \ref{tab:members} is published in its entirety in the electronic edition of the {\it Astrophysical Journal}. Electronic edition
1117: includes 2MASS photometry}.
1118: \end{deluxetable}
1119:
1120: \clearpage
1121:
1122: \begin{figure}
1123: \epsscale{0.99}
1124: \plotone{f1_color.eps}
1125: \caption{ False color image of the $\gamma$ Velorum cluster. It
1126: is a three-color composite of IRAC images, 3.6 {\micron}(blue) and 4.5 {\micron}(green),
1127: and MIPS image, 24 \micron(red). The plot is centered on the $\gamma$ Velorum
1128: binary system. Solid and dashed lines show the IRAC and MIPS fields, respectively.
1129: Members confirmed spectroscopically by Jeffries R.D. et al (in preparation) are plotted as open squares.
1130: Crosses indicate the location of the X-ray sources from 2XMM catalog.}
1131: \label{fig:map}
1132: \end{figure}
1133:
1134: \begin{figure}
1135: \epsscale{1.0}
1136: \plotone{f2_color.eps}
1137: \caption{ Color magnitude diagrams illustrating the selection of photometric candidates
1138: of the $\gamma$ Velorum cluster. Open squares and crosses represent the spectroscopic
1139: members and the X ray sources, respectively.
1140: In the left panels, open triangles are stars used to augment the optical
1141: data set for the brightest objects \citep{kharchenko01}. In the upper-right panel,
1142: open diamonds represent stars without 2MASS counterparts, which are likely background objects.
1143: Arrows represent reddening vectors of \av=1.
1144: In the lower panels, big error bars represent the 2.5$\sigma$ limits from the median colors (thick solid line)
1145: of the high probability member sample; these error bars define the regions used to select the photometric
1146: candidates. Assuming a distance of 350 pc, the ZAMS (solid line) and the 5 Myr isochrone
1147: (dashed line) from \citep{sf00} are plotted in the upper panels
1148: as reference and do not affect the selection of photometric candidates.
1149: }
1150: \label{fig:cmd1}
1151: \end{figure}
1152:
1153: \begin{figure}
1154: \epsscale{1.0}
1155: \plotone{f3_color.eps}
1156: \caption{ Color magnitude diagram illustrating the contamination level of the photometric candidates sample.
1157: The upper panel shows the V-J distributions for the high probability member sample (solid histogram)
1158: and the photometric candidates (open histogram). Using the stars with V-J$>$3.5
1159: (where the contamination level is low), we normalized both distributions to estimate
1160: the expected members distribution (dashed histogram).
1161: It is apparent that the number of photometric candidates increases in the color range
1162: 1.5$<$V-J$<$3.5, where the giant branch crosses our sample. In this range, the
1163: contamination level by non-members is quite high ($\sim$68\%).
1164: In the lower panel, symbols are similar to those in Figure \ref{fig:cmd1}. We plotted the location
1165: of the spectral type sequence, using the standard V-J color from \citet{kh95}. Stars with infrared
1166: excess detected in \S \ref{sec:disks} are represented as open circles. The dotted line represents the
1167: completeness limit for MIPS photometry assuming K-[24]$\sim$0 (photospheric color) and
1168: the 5 Myr isochrone \citep{sf00} at 350 pc with a reddening of \av=0.2 (spectral type$\sim$K3).}
1169: \label{fig:cmd2}
1170: \end{figure}
1171:
1172: \begin{figure}
1173: \epsscale{1.0}
1174: \plotone{f4_color.eps}
1175: \caption{ 2MASS color color diagram, J-H versus H-K, illustrating the selection of M giant stars
1176: in the field of view of the $\gamma$ Velorum cluster. Solid and dashed lines represent the
1177: standard sequence from \citet{bessell88} for dwarfs and giants, respectively. The arrow indicates
1178: the reddening vector for \av=1. The error bar represents the typical 2MASS color uncertities
1179: in our sample. As a reference, we plot the loci of classical T Tauri stars (CTTS) defined by
1180: \citet{meyer97}. Other symbols are the same as Figure \ref{fig:cmd2}. }
1181: \label{fig:ccd}
1182: \end{figure}
1183:
1184: \begin{figure}
1185: \epsscale{0.8}
1186: \plotone{f5_color.eps}
1187: \caption{ Diagrams illustrating the detection of disks based
1188: on their infrared emission above the photospheric levels (dotted lines).
1189: The upper panel shows the IRAC SED slope diagram indicating stars with
1190: excess at 8\micron. The dashed line represents the class II limit
1191: proposed by \citet{lada06} and the inverse triangles are
1192: objects with IRAC excess but lacking MIPS detections. Stars with
1193: 24{\micron} excess are represented by points surrounded by large open circles.
1194: The color magnitude diagram V-J versus K-[24] is displayed in
1195: the bottom-left panel illustrating the detection of stars
1196: with excess at 24\micron. The bottom-right panel shows the SED
1197: slope for K-[5.8] versus the SED slope for [8.0]-[24] diagram.
1198: Disk bearing stars in different spectral type ranges
1199: are plotted with different symbols, stars with spectral
1200: type A are represented with open triangles,
1201: stars from F to early-K with open squares
1202: and late type stars (K5 and later) with circles.
1203: The error bar represents the median and quartiles
1204: for the Taurus disks \citep{hartmann05a,furlan06};
1205: solid circles are stars with disk emission similar
1206: than Taurus's disk population (class II objects).
1207: As reference,
1208: we also mark the locations of stars in other
1209: star-forming regions believed to have
1210: pre-transitional \citep[1, 2 and 3,][]{espaillat07b,furlan06} and transitional
1211: disks \citep[4, 5, 6 and 7,][]{calvet02,calvet05,dalessio05b,espaillat07a}.
1212: One class II object is a pre-transitional disk candidate.}
1213: \label{fig:disk}
1214: \end{figure}
1215:
1216: \begin{figure}
1217: \epsscale{1.0}
1218: \plotone{f6.eps}
1219: \caption{ SEDs for A type stars with infrared excess. Each panel
1220: shows the spectral type of the object \citep{houk78,abt76},
1221: and the excess ratio, {\rm$E_{24}$} \citep{rieke05}, calculated from the K-[24] color.
1222: Dotted lines show the corresponding photospheric colors \citep{kh95}.
1223: Star 105 (upper-left panel) is a Be star, the other five
1224: stars are debris disk candidates.}
1225: \label{fig:sed1}
1226: \end{figure}
1227:
1228:
1229: \begin{figure}
1230: \epsscale{1.0}
1231: \plotone{f7.eps}
1232: \caption{ SEDs for solar type stars with infrared excesses.
1233: Each panel shows the photospheric spectral type calculated
1234: from the color V-J assuming a reddening of \av=0.15 mag and
1235: intrinsic colors from \citet{kh95}. Dotted lines represent
1236: the corresponding photospheric level \citep{kh95}. The excess
1237: ratio at 24{\micron} is displayed in each panel.}
1238: \label{fig:sed2}
1239: \end{figure}
1240:
1241: \begin{figure}
1242: \epsscale{1.0}
1243: \plotone{f8.eps}
1244: \caption{ SED for low mass stars with infrared excess (solid lines).
1245: Dotted and dashed lines represent the median SED for
1246: class II stars in Taurus \citep{furlan06}, and the photospheric
1247: fluxes for stars with spectral type M2 \citep{kh95}, respectively.
1248: Each panel shows the disk classification:
1249: pretransitional disks (PTD), class II objects (CII), and
1250: evolved disk objects (EV).}
1251: \label{fig:sed3}
1252: \end{figure}
1253:
1254:
1255: \begin{figure}
1256: \epsscale{1.0}
1257: \plotone{f9_color.eps}
1258: \caption{Space distribution of stars with infrared excesses.
1259: Symbols for stars with infrared excess are the same as the bottom right panel of Figure \ref{fig:disk}.
1260: We display X-ray sources (crosses) and photometric candidates (small open circles)
1261: with V-J$>$3.5 (little contamination is expected in this color range)
1262: Dotted circles represent projected distance from the $\gamma$ Velorum system
1263: in intervals of 0.5 pc. We mark the position of the solar-type star with
1264: IRAC excess (EV), the Be star (Be) and the pre-transitional disk candidate(PTD).}
1265: \label{fig:space}
1266: \end{figure}
1267:
1268:
1269: \begin{figure}
1270: \epsscale{1.0}
1271: \plotone{f10_color.eps}
1272: \caption{Color - absolute magnitude diagram comparing
1273: the median color and magnitudes of members of several
1274: 5 Myr old stellar populations and the $\gamma$ Velorum cluster. As reference,
1275: the $\sim$8Myr old cluster 25 Orionis and the $\sim$3 Myr
1276: old cluster $\sigma$ Orionis are also displayed. The arrow indicates the reddening vector
1277: for \av=1. It is apparent that the
1278: $\gamma$ Velorum cluster has similar colors to the other 5 Myr old stellar groups.}
1279: \label{fig:cmd3}
1280: \end{figure}
1281:
1282:
1283: \begin{figure}
1284: \epsscale{1.0}
1285: \plotone{f11.eps}
1286: \caption{ Fraction of stars with near-infrared disk emission as a function
1287: of the age of the stellar group. Open circles represent the disk frequency
1288: for stars in the T Tauri mass range (TTS; $\sim$K5 or later), derived using JHKL observations:
1289: NGC2024 and Trapezium \citep{haisch01}, and Chameleon I \citep{gomez01}.
1290: Solid symbols represent the disk frequency calculated for stars in the TTS mass
1291: range using Spitzer data (see text for references).}
1292: \label{fig:fracD}
1293: \end{figure}
1294:
1295:
1296:
1297:
1298:
1299:
1300: \end{document}
1301: