1: %%
2: %% This is file `template-6s.tex',
3: %% generated with the docstrip utility.
4: %%
5: %% The original source files were:
6: %%
7: %% template.raw (with options: `6s')
8: %%
9: %% Template for the LaTeX class aipproc.
10: %%
11: %% (C) 1998,2000,2001 American Institute of Physics and Frank Mittelbach
12: %% All rights reserved
13: %%
14: %%
15: %% $Id: template.raw,v 1.12 2005/07/06 19:22:14 frank Exp $
16: %%
17:
18: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
19: %% Please remove the next line of code if you
20: %% are satisfied that your installation is
21: %% complete and working.
22: %%
23: %% It is only there to help you in detecting
24: %% potential problems.
25: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
26:
27: %\input{aipcheck}
28:
29: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
30: %% SELECT THE LAYOUT
31: %%
32: %% The class supports further options.
33: %% See aipguide.pdf for details.
34: %%
35: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
36:
37: \documentclass[ % use final for the camera ready runs
38: ,draft % use draft while you are working on the paper
39: %% ,numberedheadings % uncomment this option for numbered sections
40: %% , % add further options here if necessary
41: ]
42: {aipproc}
43:
44: \layoutstyle{6x9}
45:
46: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
47: %% FRONTMATTER
48: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
49: \usepackage{graphicx}
50: \usepackage{epsfig}
51: \begin{document}
52:
53: \newcommand{\be}[1]{\begin{equation}\label{#1}}
54: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
55:
56:
57: \title{Evolution of relativistic jets from XTE J1550-564
58: and the environment of microquasars}
59:
60: \classification{04.20.-q; 04.20.Cv; 04.20.Dw; 04.20.Gz; 04.20.Jb;
61: 04.70.-s; 04.70.Bw; 95.30.Sf; 97.60.Lf} \keywords {microquasars;
62: jets; outflows; black hole accretion; XTE J1550-564; X-ray; ISM; GRB
63: afterglow theory}
64:
65: \author{Shuang Nan Zhang}{
66: address={Physics Department and Center for Astrophysics,
67: Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China\footnote{email:
68: zhangsn@tsinghua.edu.cn, jingfang.hao@hotmail.com}} }
69:
70: \author{JingFang Hao}{}
71:
72:
73:
74: \begin{abstract}
75: Two relativistic X-ray jets have been detected with the \textit{Chandra} X-ray
76: observatory in the black hole X-ray transient XTE J1550-564. We report a full analysis
77: of the evolution of the two jets with a gamma-ray burst external shock model. A
78: plausible scenario suggests a cavity outside the central source and the jets first
79: travelled with constant velocity and then are slowed down by the interactions between
80: the jets and the interstellar medium (ISM). The best fitted radius of the cavity is
81: $\sim$0.36 pc on the eastern side and $\sim$0.46 pc on the western side, and the
82: densities also show asymmetry, of $\sim$0.015 cm$^{-3}$ on the east to $\sim$0.21
83: cm$^{-3}$ on the west. Large scale low density region is also found in another
84: microquasar system, H 1743-322. These results are consistent with previous suggestions
85: that the environment of microquasars should be rather vacuous, compared to the normal
86: Galactic environment. A generic scenario for microquasar jets is proposed, classifying
87: the observed jets into three main categories, with different jet morphologies (and
88: sizes) corresponding to different scales of vacuous environments surrounding them.
89: \end{abstract}
90:
91: \maketitle
92:
93: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
94: %% MAINMATTER
95: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
96:
97: \section{Introduction}
98:
99: Microquasars are well known miniatures of quasars, with a central
100: black hole (BH), an accretion disk and two relativistic jets very
101: similar to those found in the centers of active galaxies, only on
102: much smaller scales (Mirabel $\&$ Radr\'{\i}guez 1999).
103:
104: Since discovered in 1992, radio jets have been observed in several BH binary systems
105: and some of them showed apparent superluminal features. In the two well known
106: microqusars, GRS 1915+105 (Mirabel $\&$ Radr\'{\i}guez 1999) and GRO J1655-40 (Tingay
107: et al.1995; Hjellming $\&$ Rupen 1995), relativistic jets with actual velocities
108: greater than 0.9$c$ were observed. In some other systems, small-size ``compact jets",
109: e.g. Cyg X-1 (Stirling et al. 2001), and large scale diffuse emission, e.g. SS433
110: (Dubner et al. 1998), were also detected.
111:
112: XTE J1550-564 was discovered with RXTE in 1998 during its strong X-ray outburst on
113: September 7 (Smith 1998). It is believed to be an X-ray binary system at a distance of
114: $\sim$5.3 kpc, containing a black hole of 10.5$\pm$1.0 solar masses and a low mass
115: companion star (Orosz et al. 2002). Soon after the discovery of the source, a jet
116: ejection with an apparent velocity greater than 2$c$ was reported (Hannikainen et al.
117: 2001). In the period between 1998 and 2002, several other outbursts occurred but no
118: similar radio and X-ray flares were detected again in these outbursts (Tomsick et al.
119: 2003).
120:
121: With the help of the \textit{Chandra} satellite, Corbel et al (2002)
122: found two large scale X-ray jets lying to the east and the west of
123: the central source, which were also in good alignment with the
124: central source. The eastern jet has been detected first in 2000 at a
125: projected distance of $\sim$21 arcsec from the central black hole.
126: Two years later, it could only be seen marginally in the X-ray
127: image, while a western counterpart became visible at $\sim$22 arcsec
128: on the other side. The corresponding radio maps are consistent with
129: the X-ray observations (Corbel et al. 2002).
130:
131: There are altogether eight 2-dimentional imaging observations of XTE J1550-564 in
132: \textit{Chandra} archive during June 2000 and October 2003 (henceforth observations
133: 1$\sim$8). Here we report a full analysis of these X-ray data, together with the
134: kinematic and spectral evolution fittings for all these observations.
135:
136: \section{OBSERVATIONS of XTE J1550-564}
137:
138: The basic information of observations 1$\sim$8 is listed in Table 1, including the
139: observation ID, date, and the angular separation between the eastern and western jets
140: and the central source. The positions are obtained by the \textit{Chandra} Interactive
141: Analysis of Observations (CIAO) routine $wavdetect$ (Freeman et al. 2002). In
142: observations 5 and 6, no X-ray source is detected by $wavdetect$ at the position of the
143: eastern jet. However, from the smoothed images (Fig.1), a weak source could be
144: recognized in observation 6. We thus select the center of the strongest emission region
145: as the position of the jet in that observation. We calculate the source centroid for
146: the central source and the X-ray jet respectively and for all the five observations,
147: the calculated position changed by less than 0.5$^{\prime}$$^{\prime}$. Therefore, an
148: upper limit of 0.5$^{\prime}$$^{\prime}$ is set for the error of the jet distance.
149:
150:
151: \begin{figure}
152: \begin{minipage}[b]{.5\textwidth}
153: \centering
154: \includegraphics[scale=0.3]{fig2.eps}
155: \end{minipage}%
156: \begin{minipage}[b]{.5\textwidth}
157: {\bf FIGURE 1.} The smoothed \textit{Chandra} X-ray images of the eight observations of
158: XTE J1550-564 and the two jets together. The green elliptical regions are source
159: emission regions by $wavdect$. Observation 4 shows the good alignment of the two jets
160: and the central source.
161: \end{minipage}
162:
163: \end{figure}
164:
165:
166:
167: From Table 1 and Fig.1, we could see clearly that an X-ray emission source is detected
168: to the east of the central source in the first four observations and another source is
169: detected to the west in the last five observations. Calculations also show that these
170: two sources, when presented in a single combined image, are in good alignment with the
171: central compact object with an inclination angle of
172: 85.9\textordmasculine$\pm$0.3\textordmasculine. By calculating the average proper
173: motion, an approximate estimate of deceleration could be seen for both jets.
174:
175:
176:
177:
178: \section{ENERGY SPECTRUM and FLUX}
179:
180: Since the emission from the eastern jet has been studied fully (Corbel et al. 2002;
181: Tomsick et al. 2003), we mainly focus our spectral analysis on the western jet. The
182: X-ray spectrum in 0.3-8 keV energy band is extracted for each observation of the
183: western jet. We use a circular source region with a radius of 4$^{\prime}$$^{\prime}$,
184: an annular background region with an inner radius of 5$^{\prime}$$^{\prime}$ and an
185: outer radius of 15$^{\prime}$$^{\prime}$, for each observation. Instrument response
186: matrices (rmf) and weighted auxiliary response files (warf) are created using CIAO
187: programs mkacisrmf and mkwarf, and then added to the spectra. We re-bin the spectra
188: with 10 counts per bin and fit them in \textit{Xspec}.
189:
190:
191: The results of spectra fitting with an absorbed power-law model are
192: also shown in table 1. We use the Cash statistic since it is a
193: better method when counts are low. The absorption column density is
194: fixed to the Galactic value in the direction of XTE J1550-564
195: obtained by the radio observations ($N_{H}=9\times10^{21}$cm$^{-2}$
196: ) (Dickey \& Lockman 1990). Our results are quite consistent with
197: previous works by Karret et al.(2003). The calculated absorbed
198: energy flux in 0.3-8 keV band is comparable to the value of the
199: eastern jet. The observed flux decayed rather quickly, from
200: $\sim1.9\times10^{-13}$erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ in March 2002 to only
201: one sixth of this value in October 2003 (see section 4.2).
202:
203:
204: \begin{table}
205: \centering
206: \caption{XTE J1550-564 \textit{Chandra} Observations}\label{table1}
207: \begin{tabular}{ccccccc}
208: \hline
209: & & &\multicolumn{2}{c}{Angular Separations (arcsec)} &\multicolumn{2}{c}{Powerlaw Fitting for the western jet} \\
210: \cline{4-5} \cline{6-7}\\
211: Num & ID & Date & Eastern Jet & Western jet &Photon Index & Flux (ergs cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$) \\
212: \hline
213: 1 &679 & 2000 06 09 &21.5$\pm$0.5 & && \\
214: 2 &1845 & 2000 08 21 &22.8$\pm$0.5 & & &\\
215: 3 &1846 & 2000 09 11 &23.4$\pm$0.5 & & & \\
216: 4 &3448 & 2002 03 11 &28.6$\pm$0.5 &22.6$\pm$0.5 &1.75$\pm$0.11 &$(1.9\pm0.4)\times10^{-13}$\\
217: 5 &3672 & 2002 06 19 & &23.2$\pm$0.5 &1.71$\pm$0.15 &$(1.6\pm0.3)\times10^{-13}$ \\
218: 6 &3807 & 2002 09 24 &29.2$\pm$0.5 &23.4$\pm$0.5 &1.94$\pm$0.17 &$(8.6\pm1.5)\times10^{-14}$\\
219: 7 &4368 & 2003 01 28 & &23.7$\pm$0.5 &1.81$\pm$0.22 &$(5.5\pm1.0)\times10^{-14}$ \\
220: 8 &5190 & 2003 10 23 & &24.5$\pm$0.5 &1.97$\pm$0.20 &$(3.1\pm0.6)\times10^{-14}$\\
221: \hline
222: \end{tabular}
223: \end{table}
224:
225:
226:
227: \section{JET MODEL}
228:
229: \subsection{Kinematic Model}
230:
231: In the external shock model for afterglows of GRBs, the kinematic
232: and radiation evolution could be understood as the interaction
233: between the outburst ejecta and the surrounding ISM. Microquasar jet
234: systems are also expected to encounter such interactions. In this
235: section, we describe our attempts after Wang et al. (2003) in
236: constructing the kinetic and radiation model based on these
237: theories.
238:
239: We adopt the model of a collimated conical beam with a half opening
240: angle $\theta_{j}$ expanding into the ambient medium with the number
241: density $n$. The initial kinetic energy and Lorentz factor of the
242: outflow material are $E_{0}$ and $\Gamma_{0}$ , respectively. Shocks
243: should arise as the outflow moves on and heat the ISM, and its
244: kinetic energy will turn into the internal energy of the medium
245: gradually. Neglect the radiation loss, the energy conservation
246: function writes (Huang, Dai, \& Lu 1999):
247: \begin{equation}\label{a}
248: (\Gamma-1)M_{0}c^{2}+\sigma(\Gamma_{\textrm{\tiny
249: sh}}^{2}-1)m_{\textrm{\tiny SW}}c^{2}=E_{0}
250: \end{equation}
251:
252: The first term on the left of the equation represents the kinematic
253: energy of the ejecta, where $\Gamma$ is the Lorentz factor and
254: $M_{0}$ is the mass of the original ejecta. The second term
255: represent the internal energy of the swept-up ISM, where
256: $\Gamma_{\textrm{\tiny sh}}$ and $m_{\textrm{\tiny SW}}$ are the
257: corresponding Lorentz Factor and mass of the shocked ISM
258: respectively, and $ m_{\textrm{\tiny
259: SW}}=(4/3){\pi}R^{3}m_{\textrm{\tiny p}}n(\theta_{j}^{2}/4)$.
260:
261: Coefficient $\sigma$ differs from 6/17 to 0.73 for ultrarelativistic
262: and nonrelativistic jets. We adopt the approximation of
263: $\sigma\sim$0.7 after Wang et al.(2003). Equation (1) and the
264: relativistic kinematic equations
265: \begin{equation}
266: (\frac{dR}{dt})_{\textrm{a}}=\frac{\beta(\Gamma)c}{1-\beta(\Gamma)\cos\theta};
267: (\frac{dR}{dt})_{\textrm{r}}=\frac{\beta(\Gamma)c}{1+\beta(\Gamma)\cos\theta}
268: \end{equation}
269: can be solved and give the relation between the projected angular separation $\mu$ and
270: time $t$. In equation (2), the subscript a and r represent the approaching and receding
271: jets in a pair of relativistic jets respectively. $R$ is the distance between the jet
272: and the source, which can be transformed into the proper motion separation by
273: $\mu=R\sin\theta/5.3$ kpc, and $\theta$ is the jet inclination angle to the line of
274: sight. We can get the $\mu-t$ curve numerically with the above equations. To be
275: consistent with the work done to the eastern jet, we choose the same initial conditions
276: that $\Gamma_{0}=3$, $E_{0}=3.6\times10^{44}$ erg, and
277: $\theta_{j}=1.\textordmasculine5$. Then the parameters needed to be fit are $n$ and
278: $\theta$.
279:
280: In the case of the eastern jet, the number density of the ISM was assumed as a constant
281: in the whole region outside the central source. This assumption does not work well in
282: the case of its western counterpart. The western jet decelerated quite fast, requiring
283: a local dense environment, but if the ISM is dense everywhere, the jet will be unable
284: to travel that far from the central BH. As a result, we consider a model that the ISM
285: density varies as the distance changes. For simplicity, we test the ideal case that the
286: jet travelled first through a ``cavity" with a constant velocity and then through a
287: dense region and was decelerated there. A new parameter $r$, the outer radius of the
288: cavity, is introduced and the ISM number density is set to be a constant $n$ outside
289: this region and zero inside. The fittings improved a lot but not well constrained
290: because of the limited number of the data points. A combination of Lightcurve fitting
291: is required to help the determination.
292:
293:
294:
295:
296: \subsection{Radiation Model}
297: In the standard GRB scenario, the afterglow emission is produced by
298: the synchrotron radiation or inverse Compton emission of the
299: accelerated electrons in the shock front of the jets (Wang et al.
300: 2003 and references there). Wang et al.(2003) found that the reverse
301: shock emission, originating from the electrons of the jet when a
302: shock moves back through the ejecta, decay rather fast and describe
303: the data of the eastern jet quite well. We thus take this model in
304: our work as well.
305:
306: Assuming the distribution of the electrons obeys a power-law form,
307: $n{\gamma_{\textrm{\tiny e}}}d\gamma_{\textrm{\tiny
308: e}}=K\gamma_{\textrm{\tiny e}}^{-p}d\gamma_{\textrm{\tiny e}}$, for
309: $\gamma_{\textrm{\tiny m}}<\gamma_{e}<\gamma_{\textrm{\tiny M}}$,
310: the volume emissivity at frequency $\nu'$ in the comoving frame is
311: given by
312: \begin{equation}
313: j_{\nu'}=\frac{\sqrt{3}q^{3}}{2m_{\textrm{\tiny
314: e}}c^{2}}(\frac{4{\pi}m_{\textrm{\tiny
315: e}}c\nu'}{3q})^{\frac{(1-p)}{2}}B_{\pm}^{\frac{(p+1)}{2}}KF_{1}(\nu,\nu'_{\textrm{\tiny
316: m}},\nu'_{\textrm{\tiny M}}),
317: \end{equation}
318: where $F_{1}(\nu,\nu'_{\textrm{\tiny m}},\nu'_{\textrm{\tiny
319: M}})=\int_{\nu'/\nu'_{\textrm{\tiny M}}}^{\nu'/\nu'_{\textrm{\tiny
320: m}}}F(x)x^{(p-3)/2}dx$, with $F(x)=x\int_{0}^{+\infty}K_{5/3}(t)$
321: and $K_{5/3}(t)$ is the Bessel function. The physical quantities in
322: these equations include $q$ and $m_{\textrm{\tiny e}}$, the charge
323: and mass of the electron, $B_{\perp}$, the magnetic field strength
324: perpendicular to the electron velocity, and $\nu'_{\textrm{\tiny
325: m}}$ and $\nu'_{\textrm{\tiny M}}$, the characteristic frequencies
326: for electrons with $\gamma_{\textrm{\tiny m}}$ and
327: $\gamma_{\textrm{\tiny M}}$.
328:
329: Assuming the reverse shock heats the ejecta at time $t_{0}$ at the
330: radius $R_{0}$, the physical quantities in the adiabatically
331: expanding ejecta with radius $R$ will evolve as
332: $\gamma_{\textrm{\tiny m}}=\gamma_{\textrm{\tiny m}}(t_{0})R_{0}/R,
333: \gamma_{\textrm{\tiny m}}=\gamma_{\textrm{\tiny m}}(t_{0})R_{0}/R$
334: and $K=K(t_{0})(R/R_{0})^{-(2+p)},
335: B_{\perp}=B_{\perp}(t_{0})(R/R_{0})^{-2}$, where the initial values
336: of these quantities are free parameters to be fitted in the
337: calculation.
338:
339: With these assumptions, we can then calculate the predicted flux
340: evolution of the jets. The comoving frequency $\nu'$ relates to our
341: observer frequency $\nu$ by $\nu=D\nu'$, where $D$ is the Doppler
342: factor and we have $D_{\textrm{\tiny
343: a}}=1/\Gamma(1-\beta\cos\theta)$ and $D_{\textrm{\tiny
344: r}}=1/\Gamma(1+\beta\cos\theta)$ for the approaching and receding
345: jets respectively. Considering the geometry of the emission region,
346: the observed X-ray flux in 0.3-8 keV band could be estimated by
347: \begin{equation}
348: F(\textrm{0.3-8
349: keV})=\int_{\nu_{1}}^{\nu_{2}}[\frac{\theta_{j}^{2}}{4}(\frac{R}{d}){\Delta}RD^{3}j_{\nu'}]d\nu,
350: \end{equation}
351: where ${\Delta}R$ is the width of the shock region and is assumed to
352: be ${\Delta}R=R/10$ in the calculation.
353:
354: To reduce the number of free parameters, we set
355: $\gamma_{\textrm{\tiny m}}=100$ in our calculation because the
356: results are quite insensitive to this value. We choose the time that
357: the reverse shock takes place according to our kinematic model in
358: section 3.1. Then we fit the data to find out the initial values of
359: $K$ and $B_{\perp}$.
360:
361: Next step, we combine the kinematic and radiation fitting together.
362: We know that the energy and the number density of the gas in the
363: pre-shock and post-shock regions are connected by the jump
364: conditions $n'=\zeta(\Gamma)n$ and $e'=\eta(\Gamma)nm_{\textrm{\tiny
365: p}}c^{2}$, where $\zeta(\Gamma)$ and $\eta(\Gamma)$ are coefficients
366: related to the jet velocity. Therefore if we assume the shocked
367: electrons and the magnetic field acquire constant fractions
368: ($\epsilon_{\textrm{\tiny e}}$ and $\epsilon_{\textrm{\tiny B}}$) of
369: the total shock energy, we have $\gamma_{\textrm{\tiny
370: m}}=\epsilon_{\textrm{\tiny e}}(p-2){m_{\textrm{\tiny
371: p}}}(\Gamma-1)/(p-1){m_{\textrm{\tiny e}}}$,
372: $K=(p-1)n'\gamma_{\textrm{\tiny m}}^{p-1}$, and
373: $B_{\perp}=\sqrt{8\pi\epsilon_{\textrm{\tiny B}}e'}$.
374:
375: If we further assume that the $\epsilon_{\textrm{\tiny e}}$ of the
376: eastern and the western jets is the same, we may infer that
377: $K\propto{e'}\propto{n}$ for the two jets. As a result, we search
378: for the combination of parameters that could satisfy the kinematic
379: and radiation fitting, as well as the relationship $K_{\textrm{\tiny
380: e}}/K_{\textrm{\tiny w}}{\sim}n_{\textrm{\tiny e}}/n_{\textrm{\tiny
381: w}}$.
382:
383: A set of parameters has finally been found (Please refer to the \textit{left} panel in
384: Fig.2). The boundary of the cavity lies at $r\sim$14 arcsec to the east and $\sim$18
385: arcsec to the west of the central source. The corresponding number density of the ISM
386: outside this boundary is $\sim$0.00675 cm$^{-3}$ and $\sim$0.21 cm$^{-3}$,
387: respectively. These values are both lower than the canonical ISM value of $\sim$1
388: cm$^{-3}$, although the value in the western region is much higher than in the eastern
389: region. The electron energy fraction relationship is satisfied as $K_{\textrm{\tiny
390: e}}/K_{\textrm{\tiny w}}{\sim}n_{\textrm{\tiny e}}/n_{\textrm{\tiny w}}\sim0.03$. But
391: the other relation concerning the magnetic field strength could not be satisfied
392: simultaneously by these parameters. Although the cavity radius and the number density
393: are allowed to vary significantly, the best fitted magnetic field strength remains
394: quite stable($\sim$0.4-0.6 mG). One possible interpretation for this is that the
395: equipartition parameter varies as the physical conditions of the jet varies; an
396: alternative explanation may involve the {\it in situ} generation (or amplification) of
397: the magnetic field.
398:
399: \addtocounter{figure}{1}
400: \begin{figure}
401: \begin{minipage}[b]{.5\textwidth}
402: \centering
403: % \includegraphics[scale=0.4]{fig4a_bw.eps}
404: \includegraphics[scale=0.4]{fig4c_bw.eps}
405: \end{minipage}
406: \begin{minipage}[b]{.5\textwidth}
407: \centering
408: % \includegraphics[scale=0.4]{fig4b_bw.eps}
409: \includegraphics[scale=0.4]{fig5_bw.eps}
410: \end{minipage}
411: \begin{minipage}[t]{.99\textwidth}
412: \caption{{\it Left}: Proper motion fitting with asymmetric
413: cavity. Parameters: $\theta$=68\textordmasculine, $r_{\textrm{\tiny
414: e}}$=14 arcsec, $r_{\textrm{\tiny w}}$=18 arcsec, $n_{\textrm{\tiny
415: e}}$=0.00675 cm$^{-3}$, $n_{\textrm{\tiny w}}$=0.21 cm$^{-3}$. {\it
416: Right}: Reverse shock emission fitting to the X-ray light curve of
417: the jets. $K_{\textrm{\tiny e}}$=0.09 cm$^{-3}$, $K_{\textrm{\tiny
418: w}}$=0.3 cm$^{-3}$, $B_{\textrm{\tiny e}}$=0.5 mG, $B_{\textrm{\tiny
419: w}}$=0.4 mG.}
420: \end{minipage}
421: \end{figure}
422:
423: \section{Conclusion and Discussions}
424: External shock model shows that a large scale cavity exists outside XTE J1550-564. This
425: model has also been applied to another X-ray transient H 1743-322. Chandra X-ray and
426: ATCA radio observations of this source from 2003 November to 2004 June revealed the
427: presence of large-scale ($\sim$0.3 pc) jets with velocity $v/c\sim0.8$ (Rupen et al.
428: 2004; Corbel et al. 2005). Deceleration is also confirmed in this system. The external
429: shock model describes the data of this source consistently. A cavity of size $\sim$0.12
430: pc is likely to exist, but not very clear in this case. Even if there is no vacuum
431: cavity, the ISM density is found to be extremely low($\sim3\times10^{-4}$ cm$^{-4}$),
432: compared to the canonical Galactic value.
433:
434: These studies led us to the suggestion that in microquasars the
435: interactions between the ejecta and the environmental gas play major
436: roles in the jet evolution and the low density of the environment is
437: a necessary requirement for the jet to develop to a long distance.
438:
439: When putting together all the analyses of microquasar jets, we found that microquasar
440: jets can be classified into roughly three groups: small scale moving jets, large scale
441: moving jets and large scale jet relics. For the first type, the ``small jets", only
442: radio emissions are detected. The jets are always relatively close to the central
443: source and dissipate very quickly, including GRS 1915+105 (Rodr\'{\i}guez \& Mirabel
444: 1999; Miller-Jones et al. 2007), GRO J1655-40 (Hjellming \& Rupen 1995), and Cyg X-3
445: (Marti et al. 2001). The typical spatial scale is 0$\sim$0.05 pc and the time scale is
446: several tenths of days. No obvious deceleration is observed before the jets become too
447: faint. For the second type, the ``large jets", both X-ray and radio detections are
448: obtained, at a place far from the central source several years after the outburst.
449: Examples are XTE J1550-564, H1743-322, and GX 339-4 (Gallo et al.2004). The typical jet
450: travelling distance for this type is 0.2$\sim$0.5 pc from the central engine and
451: deceleration is clearly observed. The last type, the ``large relics", is a kind of
452: diffuse structures observed in radio, optical and X-ray band, often ring or nebula
453: shaped that are not moving at all. In this class, some well studied sources, Cygnus X-1
454: (Gallo et al.2005), SS433 (Dubner el al.1998), Circinus X-1 (Stewart et al. 1993) and
455: GRS1758-258 (Rodr\'{\i}guez et al. 1992) are included. The typical scale for this kind
456: is 1$\sim$30 pc, an order of magnitude larger than the second type. The estimated
457: lifetime often exceeds one million years, indicating that they are related to previous
458: outbursts.
459:
460: From these properties, it is reasonable to further suggest a consistent picture
461: involving all the sources together. We make a conjecture that large scale cavities,
462: exist in all microquasar systems. The ``small jets" observed right after the ejection
463: are just travelling through these cavities. Since there are few or none interactions
464: between the jets and the surrounding gas in this region, the jets travel without
465: obvious deceleration. The emission mechanism is synchrotron radiation by particles
466: accelerated in the initial outburst. The emissions of jets decay very quickly and are
467: not detectable after several tenths of days. In some cases (e.g. XTE J1550-564), the
468: cavity has a dense (compared to the cavity) boundary at some radius and the
469: interactions between the jets and the boundary gas heat the particles again and thus
470: make the jets detectable again. Those are the ``large jets". The emission mechanism
471: then is synchrotron radiation by the re-heated particles in the external shocks. Then,
472: after these interactions, the jets lost most of their kinetic energy into the ISM
473: gradually, causing the latter to expand to large scale structures, the ``large relics",
474: in a comparatively long time (several millions of years).
475:
476: The creation of the cavities is not clear at this stage. Possible mechanism may involve
477: supernova explosion, companion star winds or disk winds. Since some of the sources most
478: likely never had supernovae before and the winds from the companion stars are not
479: strong enough, the accretion disk winds may be the most plausible possibility. However,
480: these assumptions all require further observations to justify.
481:
482: Microquasars are powerful probes of both the central engine and
483: their surrounding environment. More studies of the jets behaviors
484: may give us information on the ISM gas properties, as well as the
485: ejecta components. It will provide insights of the jet formation
486: process and offer another approach into black hole physics and
487: accretion flow dynamics.
488:
489:
490: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
491: %% BACKMATTER
492: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
493:
494: \begin{theacknowledgments}
495: We thank Dr. Yuan Liu, Shichao Tang and Weike Xiao for
496: useful discussions and Xiangyu Wang for providing the model codes. SNZ is grateful to
497: Prof. Sandip Chakrabarti for his great effort in organizing this conference, and to the
498: great hospitality of S.N. Bose National Centre for Basic Sciences, Kolkata, India. SNZ
499: acknowledges partial funding support by the Yangtze Endowment from the Ministry of
500: Education at Tsinghua University, Directional Research Project of the Chinese Academy
501: of Sciences under project No. KJCX2-YW-T03 and by the National Natural Science
502: Foundation of China under project no. 10521001, 10733010 and 10725313.
503: \end{theacknowledgments}
504:
505: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
506: %% The bibliography can be prepared using the BibTeX program or
507: %% manually.
508: %%
509: %% The code below assumes that BibTeX is used. If the bibliography is
510: %% produced without BibTeX comment out the following lines and see the
511: %% aipguide.pdf for further information.
512: %%
513: %% For your convenience a manually coded example is appended
514: %% after the \end{document}
515: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
516:
517: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
518: %% You may have to change the BibTeX style below, depending on your
519: %% setup or preferences.
520: %%
521: %%
522: %% For The AIP proceedings layouts use either
523: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
524:
525: \bibliographystyle{aipproc} % if natbib is available
526: %\bibliographystyle{aipprocl} % if natbib is missing
527:
528: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
529: %% You probably want to use your own bibtex database here
530: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
531: \bibliography{sample}
532:
533: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
534: %% Just a reminder that you may have to run bibtex
535: %% All of it up to \end{document} can be removed
536: %% if you don't like the warning.
537: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
538: \IfFileExists{\jobname.bbl}{}
539: {\typeout{}
540: \typeout{******************************************}
541: \typeout{** Please run "bibtex \jobname" to optain}
542: \typeout{** the bibliography and then re-run LaTeX}
543: \typeout{** twice to fix the references!}
544: \typeout{******************************************}
545: \typeout{}
546: }
547:
548:
549:
550: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
551: %% The following lines show an example how to produce a bibliography
552: %% without the help of the BibTeX program. This could be used instead
553: %% of the above.
554: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
555:
556: \begin{thebibliography}{20}
557: \bibitem[Corbel et al.(2001)]{cor01} Corbel S., Kaaret P., Jain R.K.,et al. 2001, ApJ, 554, 43,
558: \bibitem[Corbel et al.(2002)]{cor02} Corbel, S., Fender, P. R., et al. 2002, Science, 298, 196
559: \bibitem[Corbel et al.(2005)]{cor05} Corbel, S., Kaaret, P., et al. 2005, ApJ, 632, 504
560: \bibitem[Corbel et al.(2006)]{cor06} Corbel, S, Tomsick, J. A, \& Kaaret, P, 2006, ApJ, 636, 971
561: \bibitem[Dickey and Lockman(1990)]{dic90} Dickey, J. M., \& Lockman, F. J. 1990, ARA\&A, 28, 215
562: \bibitem[Dubner et al.(1998)]{dub98} Dubner, G. M., Holdaway, M., Goss, W. M., \& Mirabel, I. F., 1998, ApJ 116,1842
563: \bibitem[Fender et al.(2004)]{fen04} Fender, R.P., Belloni, T.£Í, \& Gallo, E., 2004, MNRAS, 355,1105
564: \bibitem[Fender et al.(2004)]{fend04} Fender, R.P., Gallo, E.,\& Jonker, P., 2004, Nucl.Phys. B, 132,346
565: \bibitem[Freeman et al. (2002)]{fre02} Freeman, P. E., Kashyap, V., Rosner, R., \& Lamb, D. Q. 2002, ApJS, 138, 185
566: \bibitem[Gallo et al.(2004)]{gal04} Gallo, E., Corbel, S., Fender, R. P., et al., 2004, MNRAS, 347, L52
567: \bibitem[Gallo et al.(2005)]{gal05} Gallo, E., Fender, R. P., Kaiser, C., et al. 2005, arXiv:astro-ph/0508228v1
568: \bibitem[Hannikainen et al.(2001)]{han01} Hannikainen, D., Campbell-Wilson, D., Hunstead, R., et al. 2001, ApSS Supp., 276, 45
569: \bibitem[Heinz(2002)]{hei02} Heinz, S., 2002, AA, 388, L40
570: \bibitem[Hjellming(1995)]{hje95} Hjellming, R.M., \& Rupen, M. P., 1995, Nature, Vol.375, 464
571: \bibitem[Huang et al.(1999)]{hua99} Huang, Y. F., Dai, Z.G., \& Lu, T. 1999, MNRAS, 309, 513
572: \bibitem[Karret et al.(2003)]{kar03} Karret, P, Corbel, S, \& Tomsick, J.A, 2003, ApJ, 582, 945
573: \bibitem[Marti et al.(2001)]{mar01} Marti, J., Paredes, J., M., \& Peracaula, M., 2001, A\&A 375,476
574: \bibitem[Miller-Jones et al.(2007)]{mil07} Miller-Jones, J. C. A., Rupen, M. P., Fender, R. P., et al., 2007, MNRAS, 375,1087
575: \bibitem[Mirabel et al.(1993)]{mir93} Mirabel, I. F., Rodr\'{\i}guez, L. F., Cordier B., et al. 1993, A\&A, suppl.Ser., 97, 193
576: \bibitem[Mirabel and Rodr\'{\i}guez(1994)]{mir94} Mirabel, I. F., \& Rodr\'{\i}guez, L. F. 1994, Nature, 371, 46
577: \bibitem[Mirabel and Radr\'{\i}guez(1999)]{mir99} Mirabel, I. F., \& Rodr\'{\i}guez, L. F. 1999, ARA\&A, 37, 409
578: \bibitem[Mirabel and Radr\'{\i}guez(2003)]{mir03} Mirabel, I. F., \& Rodr\'{\i}guez, L. F. 2003, Science, Vol300, 1119
579: \bibitem[Orosz et al.(2002)]{oro02} Orosz, J. A., Groot, P. J., van der Klis, M., et al., 2002, ApJ, 568, 845
580: \bibitem[Rodr\'{\i}guez et al.(1992)]{rod92} Rodriguez, L. F., \& Mirabel, I. F., \& Marti, J. 1992, ApJ, 401,L15
581: \bibitem[Rupen et al.(2004)]{rup04} ------- 2004, BAAS, 204, 5.16
582: \bibitem[Smith(1998)]{smi98} Smith, D. A., 1998, Int. Astron. Union Circ. No. 7008
583: \bibitem[Sobczak et al.(2000)]{sob00} Sobczak, G. J, McClintock, J. E, et al., 2000, ApJ, 544,993
584: \bibitem[Stewart et al.(1993)]{ste93} Stewart, R. T., Caswell, J. L., Haynes, R. F., \& Nelson, G. J., 1993, MNRAS, 261, 593
585: \bibitem[Stirling et al.(2001)]{sti01} Stirling, A. M., Spencer, R. E., de la Force, C. J., et al. 2001, MNRAS, 327, 1273
586: \bibitem[Sturner and Shrader(2005)]{stu05} Sturner S. J., \& Shrader, C. R. 2005, ApJ, 625,923
587: \bibitem[Tingay et al.(1995)]{tin95} Tingay, S. J., Jauncey, D. L., Prestonet, R. A., et al. 1995, Nature, 374, 141
588: \bibitem[Tomsick et al.(2003)]{tom03} Tomsick, J. A., Corbel, S., \& Fender, R. 2003, ApJ, 582,933
589: \bibitem[Wang et al.(2003)]{wan03} Wang, X. Y., Dai, Z. G., \& Lu, T. 2003, ApJ, 592,347
590: \end{thebibliography}
591:
592: \end{document}
593: \endinput
594: %%
595: %% End of file `template-6s.tex'.
596: