1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %
3: % FY CMa
4: %
5: %
6: % Revision history:
7: %
8: % August 13, 2007: First draft by Gies
9: % January 29, 2008: Revised figures, text
10: % February 27, 2008: Text revisions & text/figure addition by Peters
11: % March 19, 2008: Additional text revisions by Peters
12: % June 5, 2008: Text revisions by Peters
13: % June 10, 2008: Text revisions by Peters
14: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
15: %
16: %\documentclass{aastex}
17: %\usepackage{emulateapj5}
18: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19: %\voffset 0.7truein
20: %
21: %
22: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
23:
24: \shorttitle{Hot Subdwarf Companion to the Be Star FY~CMa}
25: \shortauthors{Peters et al.}
26:
27: \begin{document}
28:
29: \received{2008 March 21}
30: \accepted{}
31:
32: \title{Detection of a Hot Subdwarf Companion to the Be Star FY~Canis Majoris}
33:
34: \author{Geraldine J. Peters\altaffilmark{1,2}}
35: \affil{Space Sciences Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-1341;
36: gjpeters@mucen.usc.edu}
37:
38: \author{Douglas R. Gies\altaffilmark{1}, Erika D. Grundstrom\altaffilmark{1,3}}
39: \affil{Center for High Angular Resolution Astronomy and
40: Department of Physics and Astronomy,\\
41: Georgia State University, P. O. Box 4106, Atlanta, GA 30302-4106;
42: gies@chara.gsu.edu, erika.grundstrom@vanderbilt.edu}
43:
44: \author{M. Virginia McSwain\altaffilmark{1}}
45: \affil{Department of Physics, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18105;
46: mcswain@lehigh.edu
47: }
48:
49: \altaffiltext{1}{Visiting Astronomer, Kitt Peak National Observatory,
50: National Optical Astronomy Observatory, operated by the Association
51: of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under contract with
52: the National Science Foundation.}
53: \altaffiltext{2}{Guest Observer with the International Ultraviolet Explorer
54: Satellite.}
55: \altaffiltext{3}{Current address: Department of Physics and Astronomy,
56: Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37206.}
57:
58:
59: %\slugcomment{Second Submission (6/11/2008)}
60: %\paperid{}
61:
62: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
63:
64: \begin{abstract}
65: The rapid rotation of Be stars may be caused in some cases
66: by past mass and angular momentum accretion in an interacting
67: binary in which the mass donor is currently viewed as a small, hot
68: subdwarf stripped of its outer envelope. Here we report on the
69: spectroscopic detection of such a subdwarf in the Be binary system
70: FY~Canis Majoris from the analysis of data acquired by the {\it IUE}
71: spacecraft and KPNO Coud\'{e} Feed Telescope over the course of
72: 16 and 21 years, respectively.
73: We present a double-lined spectroscopic orbit for the binary
74: based upon radial velocities from the {\it IUE} spectra
75: and use the orbital solutions with a Doppler tomography
76: algorithm to reconstruct the components' UV spectra.
77: The subdwarf is hot ($T_{\rm eff} = 45\pm5$~kK) and has a mass of
78: about $1.3 M_\odot$ and a radius of about $0.6~R_\odot$.
79: It contributes about $4\%$ as much flux as the Be star does in the
80: FUV. We also present observations of the H$\alpha$ and \ion{He}{1}
81: $\lambda 6678$ emission features that are formed in the
82: circumstellar disk of the Be star. Orbital flux and velocity
83: variations in the \ion{He}{1} $\lambda 6678$
84: profile indicate that much of the emission forms along the
85: disk rim facing the hot subdwarf where the disk is
86: probably heated by the incident radiation from the subdwarf.
87: A study of
88: the FUV infall shell lines discovered in the 1980s confirms
89: their episodic presence but reveals that they tend to be found
90: around both quadrature phases, unlike the pattern in Algol
91: binaries. Phase-dependent variations in the UV \ion{N}{5} doublet
92: suggest the presence of a N-enhanced wind from the subdwarf and a
93: possible shock-interaction region between the stars where
94: the subdwarf's wind collides with the disk of the Be star.
95:
96:
97:
98: \end{abstract}
99:
100: \keywords{stars: emission-line, Be
101: --- stars: individual (HR~2855, HD~58978, FY~CMa)
102: --- stars: binaries: spectroscopic
103: --- stars: evolution
104: --- stars: subdwarfs}
105:
106: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
107:
108: \setcounter{footnote}{3}
109:
110: \section{Introduction} % Section 1
111:
112: The component stars of massive interacting binaries experience
113: profound transformations over their lifetimes. Their evolutionary
114: stages are defined by how mass and angular momentum are shared and
115: lost during the mass transfer stages \citep*{wel01}. The originally
116: more massive star grows faster and upon reaching a size comparable to
117: its Roche lobe begins mass and angular momentum transfer to the
118: mass gainer companion. The orbit shrinks until the mass ratio reverses,
119: but mass transfer will continue with an expanding orbit as long as
120: the donor grows in proportion. The result will be a donor that is
121: stripped of most of its outer envelope and a gainer that now appears
122: rejuvenated by mass transfer \citep{dra07}. Mass transfer may
123: also cause the gainer to spin up to a rotational speed close to the
124: critical value where centripetal and gravitational accelerations
125: are equal at the equator \citep*{pet05}. \citet{pol91} and
126: \citet{van97} suggest that these mass gainer stars may include
127: some of the rapidly rotating, classical Be stars,
128: B-type stars that display emission lines formed in outflowing,
129: circumstellar disks \citep{por03}.
130:
131: There is now a substantial body of evidence that the supports
132: the idea that some Be stars were spun up by mass transfer in interacting
133: binaries. Most of the known massive X-ray binaries consist of a Be star
134: and neutron star companion, the remains of the former donor star \citep{coe00}.
135: Donor stars that end up with a mass lower than the Chandrasekhar limit
136: will probably avoid a supernova explosion, but will appear first as a
137: hot subdwarf star and then eventually as a massive white dwarf. Although
138: there are no known examples of Be plus white dwarf binaries, there are
139: a few identified cases of Be plus hot subdwarf binaries. The first
140: discovery of the spectrum of a subdwarf companion was made from the
141: analysis of UV spectra from the
142: {\it International Ultraviolet Explorer (IUE)} spacecraft \citep{tha95}
143: and the {\it Hubble Space Telescope}
144: \citep{gie98} of the well-known Be star $\phi$~Persei. The hot companion in
145: \object{$\phi$~Per} is an object of solar mass and radius but with an effective
146: temperature of $53$~kK. However, the hot subdwarf is much fainter
147: than the Be star, and its presence is perhaps best observed through its heating
148: effects on the disk gas nearest to the subdwarf \citep*{ste00,hum01}.
149: \citet{mai05} show that the binary 59~Cygni shows many of the same
150: characteristics found in $\phi$~Per and is probably the second example
151: of a Be plus hot subdwarf system. A third candidate,
152: \object{HR~2142} \citep{pet83}, may also
153: belong this category \citep{wat91} but at the present the evidence is
154: not compelling. The fact that the nature of the companions in $\phi$~Per
155: and \object{59~Cyg} were only discovered after a century of spectroscopic
156: observation, however, highlights the difficulties
157: of their detection \citep{gie00}.
158:
159: Here we report on the identification of a hot subdwarf companion in the Be
160: binary \object{FY~CMa} (HR 2855, HD 58978). Balmer emission lines in the
161: Be star primary in this system (B0.5~IVnpe,
162: \citealt*{hil69}; B0.5~IVe, \citealt*{sle82}) were first discovered
163: by \citet{pic05}.
164: Although at first glance it appears to be a classical Be star,
165: it has historically displayed much more spectroscopic variability
166: in its optical and UV spectrum than is typical for Be stars
167: \citep{sle82,pet82,pet88,gra88,cao01}. Some of the first
168: {\it IUE} observations of FY~CMa showed evidence of sharp, red-shifted,
169: ``shell'' spectral lines that varied significantly on a timescale of days
170: \citep{gra88}. \citet{pet88} argued that the time scales of
171: variability indicated a binary origin. Spectroscopic variability with a
172: period of 37.26~d was subsequently found by \citet{riv04} who showed that
173: the strength and profile of the \ion{N}{5} $\lambda 1240$
174: wind line fluctuates with this period. \citet{riv04} also
175: presented observations of the H$\alpha$ and \ion{He}{1} $\lambda6678$
176: emission lines that suggested that they also varied in radial velocity
177: and strength in much the same way as observed in $\phi$~Per and 59~Cyg,
178: and suggested that FY~CMa might be generically similar to these systems.
179: However, \citet{riv04} could not confirm binarity as the orbital
180: elements and the nature of the companion remained unknown.
181:
182: Below we present an investigation of FY~CMa that is based upon
183: a re-examination of the {\it IUE} spectra and
184: an analysis of a large collection of optical spectra obtained between
185: 1985 and 2006 (\S2). We first discuss the use of cross-correlation
186: measurements of the {\it IUE} spectra to obtain radial velocities for
187: both components and to derive the orbital elements (\S3). We then
188: use the orbital velocity curves to reconstruct the individual UV spectra
189: of the components using a Doppler tomography algorithm, and we compare
190: the reconstructed spectra to models to estimate basic stellar properties (\S4).
191: We then describe the orbital and temporal variations we find in the
192: H$\alpha$ and \ion{He}{1} $\lambda6678$ emission lines (\S5). We argue
193: in \S6 that the emission line variations are probably due to heating
194: of the part of the disk rim that faces the hot subdwarf companion.
195: We also discuss the long-term and phase-dependent variability in the
196: strength and velocity of the \ion{Fe}{3} shell-type infall lines that were
197: discovered in the mid-1980s and suggest two possible mechanisms for their
198: formation. Finally, we show that phase-dependent profile, strength, and
199: velocity variability in the \ion{N}{5} wind lines suggest that
200: the subdwarf's wind is N-enhanced and that there is a significant
201: interaction between the subdwarf's wind and the disk of the Be
202: star.
203:
204: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
205:
206: \section{Observations} % Section 2
207:
208: Ninety-seven high resolution FUV spectra were obtained with {\it IUE}
209: over the period from 1979 to 1995.
210: The spectra were secured with the Short Wavelength Prime (SWP) camera
211: in echelle mode, and the extracted and flux calibrated
212: spectra from the final archive were downloaded from the Multimission Archive at
213: the Space Telescope Science Institute\footnote{http://archive.stsci.edu/iue/}.
214: We binned each spectrum onto a uniform $\log\lambda$ wavelength grid
215: (bin size equivalent to 10 km~s$^{-1}$),
216: aligned them with a global average using cross--correlation
217: shifts from the vicinity of strong interstellar lines (after which the
218: interstellar lines are removed by interpolation), and then rectified the
219: fluxes by a spline fit to a series of pseudo-continuum zones.
220: We discuss the radial velocity measurements and the appearance of the
221: UV spectra in the next two sections.
222:
223: We also obtained 158 red spectra of FY~CMa with the Kitt Peak
224: National Observatory 0.9~m Coud\'{e} Feed Telescope between 1985 and
225: 2006. The various observing runs are summarized in Table~1 that
226: lists the heliocentric Julian dates of observation,
227: Besselian year range, wavelength range,
228: spectral resolving power, number of individual spectra
229: obtained, and a summary of the instrumental configuration.
230: The spectra all record the H$\alpha$ $\lambda 6563$ emission line
231: and all but six also record the \ion{He}{1} $\lambda 6678$ feature.
232: All the spectra were made with the long collimator, camera 5,
233: and either grating A (632 grooves mm$^{-1}$) or
234: grating B (312 grooves mm$^{-1}$) in second order.
235: The CCD detector of choice changed over the years
236: as better instruments became available, and these are
237: listed in the final column using their standard KPNO
238: designations. Most of the spectra are well exposed
239: and have a S/N of 200 or better in the continuum.
240:
241: \placetable{tab1} % Table 1 - Journal of runs
242:
243: The spectra were extracted and calibrated
244: using standard routines in IRAF\footnote{IRAF is distributed by the
245: National Optical Astronomy Observatory, which is operated by
246: the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc.,
247: under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation.}.
248: All the spectra were rectified to a unit continuum by fitting
249: line-free regions with a low-order polynomial. During most of the runs
250: from 2000 to 2006, we also observed a number of rapidly rotating
251: A-type stars (primarily $\zeta$~Aql) for the removal of
252: atmospheric telluric lines from the target spectra. We
253: created a library of atmospheric spectra for each run by removing
254: the broad stellar features, and then we divided each target
255: spectrum by the modified atmospheric spectrum that most closely
256: matched the target spectrum in a selected region dominated by
257: atmospheric absorptions. The spectra from runs before 2000 were
258: transformed to the wavelength grid for the fourth to last run listed
259: in Table~1 and then were corrected for telluric absorption using the atmospheric
260: spectra from that run (sometimes with less than optimal results because
261: of differences in spectral resolution). The spectra from each run were then
262: transformed to a common heliocentric wavelength grid.
263: Measurements of these red spectra are presented in \S5.
264:
265: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
266:
267: \section{Radial Velocities and Orbital Elements} % Section 3
268:
269: The first detection of the UV spectrum of the hot subdwarf in
270: $\phi$~Per was based upon {\it IUE} spectra that recorded many
271: lines of high excitation transitions especially in the 1310 -- 1385 \AA
272: ~range \citep{tha95}. Thus, we began our search for evidence of
273: a hot companion by calculating cross-correlation functions (ccfs) of
274: each spectrum with a template spectrum within this restricted
275: wavelength range (where the lines of the primary are relatively
276: broad and weak). We formed the template spectrum from the synthetic
277: spectral atlas associated with the non-LTE, line-blanketed models of
278: \citet{lan03} that were rebinned to the {\it IUE} wavelength grid.
279: We selected a solar abundance model with $T_{\rm eff}=50$~kK and
280: $\log g = 4.5$ for the template (close to the optimal values; \S4).
281: The resulting ccfs immediately revealed a narrow but
282: weak signal that displayed a coherent Doppler shift
283: when plotted against the orbital period from \citet{riv04} (see Fig.~1).
284: We then made Gaussian fits of these ccfs to determine the radial
285: velocity shifts for 50 of the 97 spectra where the ccf signal was
286: clearly visible. We used the method of \citet{zuc03} to estimate
287: errors in the ccf velocities, and these range from 7 to 20 km~s$^{-1}$
288: depending on the S/N ratio of the spectrum.
289:
290: \placefigure{fig1} % Figure 1 - Subdwarf ccf plot
291:
292: We also measured ccf radial velocities for the Be star primary
293: using two spectral regions where its photospheric lines are
294: particularly strong (1423 -- 1523 and 1570 -- 1800 \AA ).
295: In this case we used a template spectrum derived from the
296: models of \citet{lan03} for $T_{\rm eff}=30$~kK and $\log g = 4.0$,
297: first guesses based upon calibrations for the star's spectral
298: classification. The resulting ccfs are broad because of the
299: star's large projected rotational velocity, and instead of
300: fitting these with a Gaussian, we determined the radial velocity
301: shifts relative to the average ccf. According to the method
302: of \citet{zuc03}, the errors in the ccf velocities for the Be star
303: are about 3~km~s$^{-1}$. We then added the Gaussian-fitted
304: radial velocity of the average ccf ($V_r = 34.3\pm 0.3$ km~s$^{-1}$)
305: to each of these relative velocities to end up with the primary
306: star velocities listed in Table~2. This table lists the heliocentric
307: Julian and UT dates of mid-exposure, the {\it IUE} image number
308: for the spectrum, the orbital phase (see below), and
309: the radial velocities $V_1$ and $V_2$ for the Be star (subscript 1) and
310: the hot subdwarf (subscript 2), respectively. Also given with the same
311: subscripts are the observed minus calculated residuals $(O-C)$ from the
312: orbital fits (see Table~3), and we see that in general the
313: deviations from the fit are comparable to the error estimates
314: and to the scatter between measurements of pairs of spectra obtained
315: close in time.
316:
317: \placetable{tab2} % Table 2 - IUE ccf velocities
318:
319: We made a period search of the two sets of velocities using
320: the discrete Fourier transform methods of \citet*{rob87}, and this
321: analysis confirmed the period found by \citet{riv04}.
322: We then used the non-linear, least-squares program of
323: \citet{mor74} to determine independent orbital elements for
324: the primary and secondary. These produced consistent results
325: for the orbital period and epoch, and we adopted the period and
326: epoch from the larger amplitude secondary that had significantly
327: lower errors. We found that elliptical solutions did not yield
328: any significant improvement in the residuals to the fits, so we
329: assumed that the orbit is circular.
330: Our final orbital elements are presented in column 3 of Table~3
331: and the radial velocity curves are plotted in Figure~2.
332: Table~3 lists period, $P$, epoch of the superior
333: conjunction of the Be star, $T_{SC}$ (defining orbital phase 0.0),
334: semiamplitudes, $K$, and systemic velocities, $\gamma$, for
335: both components, mass ratio, $M_2/M_1$, mass--inclination functions,
336: $M\sin ^3 i$, projected semimajor axis, $a\sin i$,
337: and r.m.s.\ residuals for each fit (where subscripts 1 and 2
338: refer to the orbits of the Be and subdwarf star, respectively)
339:
340: \placetable{tab3} % Table 3 - Orbital elements
341:
342: \placefigure{fig2} % Figure 2 - Velocity curves
343:
344: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
345:
346: \section{Tomographic Reconstruction of UV Spectra} % Section 4
347:
348: We used the Doppler tomography algorithm described by
349: \citet{bag94} to reconstruct the individual primary and
350: secondary spectra from the composite {\it IUE} spectra.
351: We took the radial velocity shifts for each component
352: from the orbital solutions in Table~3, and then the reconstruction
353: was run for 50 iterations with a gain of 0.8 (the results
354: are insensitive to these values). The flux ratio required for
355: the reconstruction was determined from the secondary's line
356: depths after making a comparison of the secondary's spectral properties
357: with those in model spectra.
358:
359: We began our comparison of the reconstructed secondary spectrum
360: and model spectra from \citet{lan03} by considering the
361: appropriate line broadening. We selected several strong and
362: minimally blended metallic lines to compare with a grid of
363: synthetic profiles formed by convolution with a rotational broadening
364: function for a linear limb darkening law \citep{wad85} and
365: a range in assumed projected rotational velocity $V\sin i$.
366: The resulting mean of $V\sin i = 41 \pm 5$ km~s$^{-1}$ indicates
367: that the secondary's lines are narrow and only barely resolved in the
368: {\it IUE} spectra. We then experimented with a range of model
369: effective temperatures and gravities to try to reproduce
370: the relative patterns of line strength (especially in the
371: region surrounding the weak \ion{Si}{3} $\lambda 1299$ feature).
372: We also compared the reconstructed and model profiles of
373: the Stark broadened \ion{He}{2} $\lambda 1640$ feature to
374: help estimate the appropriate value of gravity $\log g$.
375: The parameters for the best matching solar abundance model
376: spectrum are listed in column 3 of Table~4.
377:
378: \placetable{tab4} % Table 4 - Physical properties
379:
380: We then estimated the mean UV flux ratio to be
381: $F_2/F_1 = 0.04 \pm 0.01$ based upon a comparison of the
382: line strengths in the best match model and in the reconstructed
383: secondary spectrum for a range in test values of flux ratio.
384: We show in Figures 3 and 4 the good agreement between the
385: reconstructed secondary and model spectra for two regions
386: of the UV spectrum that contain a number of prominent
387: \ion{Fe}{5} and \ion{O}{5} photospheric lines.
388:
389: \placefigure{fig3} % Figure 3 - Sec. reconstruction
390:
391: \placefigure{fig4} % Figure 4 - Sec. reconstruction
392:
393: We also explored the range in synthetic spectral matches
394: that were consistent with the appearance of the reconstructed
395: Be star spectrum. Once again we compared the profile widths
396: of several conspicuous absorption lines with models for
397: a range in projected rotational velocity, and we found
398: a mean value of $V\sin i = 340 \pm 40$ km~s$^{-1}$.
399: This estimate is similar to the result from \citet{fre05},
400: 375 km~s$^{-1}$, but it is larger than those reported
401: in other optical studies (280 km~s$^{-1}$, \citealt{sle82};
402: 155 km~s$^{-1}$, \citealt*{abt02}). We suspect that
403: the optical lines may at times appear narrower
404: because of unrecognized shell components formed in
405: the Be star's disk. We estimated the best match effective
406: temperature based on the metallic line strengths
407: (avoiding the use of narrow features like \ion{Si}{3} $\lambda 1299$
408: that are probably partially formed in the disk; \S6),
409: and the best match model has a temperature consistent with
410: the star's spectral classification (Table~4). We simply
411: assumed the gravity for the Be star based on its luminosity class
412: since there are no easily made gravity estimates from the
413: UV photospheric lines. We note that both the temperature
414: and the gravity agree well with estimates made by \citet{pet76}
415: based upon the continuum colors and the profiles of
416: H$\gamma$ and H$\delta$.
417:
418: FY~CMa is not a known eclipsing binary, so we cannot directly
419: determine the system inclination and masses. However, the appearance
420: of shell lines in the UV and optical spectra suggests that the
421: inclination is probably large, $i > 77^\circ$ \citep{han96}, if the
422: disk resides in the orbital plane. The typical mass for a B0.5~V star
423: is $\approx 13.2 M_\odot$ \citep{har88}, and from the value of $M_1 \sin ^3 i$
424: in Table~3, this would imply that the inclination could be as small
425: as $i=66^\circ$. The range in probable masses is given in Table~4.
426:
427: We can estimate the radius of the Be star primary from its visual
428: magnitude $V$ and its parallax $\pi$ as measured by {\it Hipparcos} \citep{esa97}.
429: Adopting $V=5.63$ \citep*{ste96}, $E(B-V)=0.14$ \citep{kai89},
430: $A_V=3.1 E(B-V)$, $\pi = 2.30\pm 0.70$ mas, and a bolometric correction
431: of $BC=-2.65$ \citep{lan03}, then the radius from the luminosity
432: and adopted temperature is $R_1 = 5.3 R_\odot$, where we
433: have ignored the minor flux contributions from the disk and subdwarf.
434: The radius of the subdwarf then follows from the observed and model
435: UV flux ratios, $R_2 = 0.63 R_\odot$. These mass and radius
436: estimates yield gravities that are similar within errors to those
437: from spectroscopic considerations.
438:
439: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
440:
441: \section{Red Spectra Measurements} % Section 5
442:
443: The H$\alpha$ feature in our spectra always appeared as a
444: strong emission line indicating that the Be disk was present
445: throughout the period 1985 -- 2006. We show in Figure~5 a montage
446: of all the H$\alpha$ profiles arranged according to orbital phase.
447: The profile is often double-peaked, usually in the sense that
448: the red peak is stronger around phase $\phi=0.25$ while the
449: blue peak is stronger near phase $\phi=0.75$. Thus, the
450: observations appear to confirm the suggestion by \citet{riv04}
451: that the variations are orbitally modulated. On the other hand,
452: our spectra also show that there are temporal variations present
453: unrelated to orbital phase that appear as alternating bright and
454: dark horizontal segments in the gray-scale representation.
455: We measured the H$\alpha$ equivalent widths by making a
456: numerical integration of the line flux over the interval
457: from 6528 to 6599 \AA ~(a region including weak emission
458: components of \ion{C}{2} $\lambda 6578,6582$), and these
459: are listed in Table~5. The typical equivalent width measurement
460: error is 0.04 \AA . We find that there are significant variations
461: in line strength over time scales of a week or so that appear to be
462: unrelated to orbital phase and that probably reflect changes in the
463: disk density distribution.
464:
465: \placefigure{fig5} % Figure 5 - H-alpha gray-scale
466:
467: \placetable{tab5} % Table 5 - Red spectra measurements
468:
469: The outer wings of H$\alpha$ show a hint of an ``S''-shaped
470: velocity variation that is similar to the orbital velocity
471: curve of the Be star. Since the outer parts of the profile
472: are formed in the disk gas closest to the star, the line wings may
473: share in the orbital motion of the underlying star. We measured
474: the bisector position of the emission line wings near the
475: 25\% maximum flux level using the method of \citet*{sha86},
476: and these wing velocities are listed in column 4 of Table~5
477: and are plotted together with the UV ccf velocities in Figure~2.
478: The typical error for the radial
479: velocities from the H$\alpha$ wings is 1.0 km~s$^{-1}$.
480: The H$\alpha$ wing velocities indeed follow the orbital
481: motion of the Be star, and the orbital elements based
482: upon them are in substantial agreement with those from
483: the UV ccfs (see column 2 of Table 2). The differences in
484: systemic velocity $\gamma$ are not significant given the asymmetries
485: and line blending present in the H$\alpha$ profile.
486:
487: We show the dramatic variations of the \ion{He}{1} $\lambda 6678$
488: profile with orbital phase in Figure~6. Here the emission displays
489: a backwards ``S''-shaped velocity variation that is similar to
490: the secondary's orbital velocity curve. The emission is
491: strongest around orbital phase 0.0 when the hot subdwarf is in
492: the foreground. The emission sometimes assumes a pronounced
493: double-peaked shape, especially when the emission is relatively
494: strong. In the same way as H$\alpha$, the \ion{He}{1} line also
495: displays non-orbital related variations that give a banded
496: appearance to the gray-scale representation of the variations.
497: We also see the occasional development of a central
498: shell absorption feature at phases prior to superior conjunction
499: of the Be star.
500:
501: \placefigure{fig6} % Figure 6 - He I 6678 gray-scale
502:
503: We made simple measurements of the peak velocity positions by
504: locating the maximum flux positions in the \ion{He}{1} profile.
505: If two peaks were present and clearly separated by a local
506: minimum, then we measured both peaks and recorded their
507: mean position $V_r$ and their separation $\triangle V_r$.
508: If only one peak was visible, then only $V_r$ was measured.
509: These measurements are given in the final two columns of
510: Table~5 for all those cases where at least one strong peak
511: was visible. They are also plotted in Figure~7 together
512: with the orbital velocity curve of the hot subdwarf.
513: We see that the velocity amplitude of the \ion{He}{1} emission
514: is actually larger than that of the subdwarf and that
515: the episodes of greatest peak separation occur just prior
516: to the orbital conjunctions. We show in the next section
517: that these characteristics are consistent with an emission
518: origin in the outer part of the disk that faces the subdwarf.
519:
520: \placefigure{fig7} % Figure 7 - He I 6678 peak velocities
521:
522: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
523:
524: \section{Discussion} % Section 6
525:
526: Our spectroscopic results provide the ingredients to estimate
527: the basic elements of the system geometry. Here we discuss
528: the system dimensions and the evidence that the hot subdwarf
529: is implicated in local heating of the Be star's disk in
530: much the same way as was found for $\phi$~Per by \citet{ste00}
531: and \citet{hum01} and for 59~Cyg by \citet{mai05}.
532: We present in Figure~8 a sketch of the inferred system geometry as
533: viewed from above the orbital plane. For the purpose of this
534: illustration, we assume an orbital inclination of $i=70^\circ$
535: and a semimajor axis of $112~R_\odot$ (where the acceptable
536: range is probably $105 - 115 R_\odot$ for $i=90^\circ - 66^\circ$).
537: We also adopt a Be star radius of $R_1=5.3 R_\odot$
538: (where the probable range is $4.1 - 7.6 R_\odot$ for distances
539: of $333 - 625$~pc). The Be star is represented by the solid disk
540: on the left while the hot subdwarf is shown by the small dot
541: on the right. The double-lobe surrounding them shows the
542: much larger Roche surface boundary. We can estimate the half light
543: radius of the H$\alpha$ emitting disk using the method described by
544: \citet{gru06}. This estimate is derived from a simple density power
545: law for the disk, the mean equivalent width ($W_\lambda = -13.6$ \AA ),
546: the adopted Be star temperature and disk inclination, and an assumed
547: disk outer boundary equal to the volume-equivalent, Roche radius.
548: These parameters lead to an estimated disk to star radius ratio of
549: $R_d/R_1=9.4$, or a half-light emitting radius of $50 R_\odot$ for
550: the adopted radius of the Be star.
551: We caution that the simplicity of the models
552: may lead to errors in the half-light radius of $\pm 30\%$ and that the models
553: assume an azimuthal symmetry for the emission flux, which is probably not the case
554: for the disk emission of FY~CMa (see below). Nevertheless, this simple estimate
555: of disk radius is indicated by the lighter gray shaded region on the left side of
556: Figure~8. \citet{oka01} argue that the disks of Be stars in binaries
557: with nearly circular orbits are truncated at the 3:1 orbital resonance radius,
558: and this occurs at a distance from the Be star of $52 R_\odot$ that is only
559: slightly larger than our disk half-light radius estimate.
560:
561: \placefigure{fig8} % Figure 8 - Cartoon of system geometry
562:
563: We showed in \S5 that the \ion{He}{1} $\lambda 6678$ emission has
564: an orbital modulation that leads to greatest emission strength
565: when the hot subdwarf is in the foreground. Furthermore we found that the
566: semiamplitude of the orbital Doppler shift of the emission peaks
567: was larger than that of the subdwarf (from Fig.~7, $K_{em}\approx 173$
568: km~s$^{-1}$ $> K_2 = 128$ km~s$^{-1}$). These facts suggest that a
569: significant fraction of the emission forms in the part of the disk near the
570: subdwarf where the Keplerian velocity of the disk gas is larger than the
571: orbital velocity of the subdwarf. Ignoring three-body effects, we can
572: estimate the radius of the emission source by assuming both
573: the disk gas and the subdwarf obey Keplerian motion around the Be star,
574: $R_{em}/a = (M_1/(M_1+M_2)) ((K_1+K_2)/(K_1+K_{em}))^2 = 0.51$
575: or $R_{em}=58 R_\odot$.
576: This radius is about $15\%$ larger than the half-light radius,
577: which suggests that the emission forms mainly along the outer rim
578: of a disk that may be extended towards the hot subdwarf (see Fig.~8).
579: We suspect that this outer disk region is heated by the combined
580: effects of the incident subdwarf radiation and the impact of the
581: subdwarf's wind on the disk. We imagine that the rest of the disk also
582: contributes to the line emission flux, and, for example, those times
583: when weak emission is observed (see Fig.~7) may correspond to episodes
584: when the gas density declines in the outer rim facing the subdwarf
585: and the flux from the rest of the disk dominates.
586:
587: Since the heated disk gas nearest the hot subdwarf will
588: have a higher Keplerian velocity, the center of the heated region
589: will move ahead of the axis joining the stars by an amount that
590: depends on the cooling and orbital timescales. We can estimate
591: the phase offset $\triangle \phi$ of this asymmetry in two
592: ways. First, the central heated region should reach inferior
593: conjunction about midway between the observed velocity extrema
594: at phases $\phi=0.77$ and 0.17 (see Fig.~7), i.e., at $\phi=0.96$.
595: Second, the velocity peak separation is presumably caused by
596: the heated region forming in a sector of a ring. We will observe
597: the largest velocity separations when the mid-point of the ring segment
598: is oriented along our line of sight. According to the peak separations
599: plotted in Figure~7, greatest peak separations occur around
600: $\phi=0.42$ and $\phi=0.92$. This suggests that the apex of the
601: heated rim is offset by about 0.06 in phase ($22^\circ$) ahead of the
602: subdwarf inferior junction at $\phi=0.0$. From simple geometric
603: arguments, we expect that the maximum half-peak separation
604: $V_m = {\rm max}(\triangle V_r /2)$ is related to the emission
605: semiamplitude by $V_m=K_{em} \sin \theta$, where $\theta$ is
606: half the ring sector opening angle. From the values of
607: peak separation in Table~5, we estimate $V_m=66$ km~s$^{-1}$ and
608: $\theta = 22^\circ$. These values were used to plot a
609: representative heated region in the darker gray shaded area
610: of Figure~8. The actual extent of the heated ring is probably
611: larger than shown since the separated emission peaks actually
612: sample a range of ring azimuthal angles and not just the termination
613: angles.
614:
615: The subdwarf may also affect the kinematics of the
616: gas motion in the disk rim. We show in Figure~9 the orbital
617: phase variations in the appearance of the \ion{Si}{3} lines
618: near \ion{Si}{3} $\lambda 1299$. The cores of these
619: lines are shell-type features formed in the disk gas seen in projection
620: against the photosphere of the Be star. We see evidence that
621: the shell feature broadens from $\phi=0.5$ to $\phi=0.0$ and
622: apparently shifts from a redshifted to a blueshifted position
623: at phases surrounding conjunction at $\phi=0.0$.
624: We imagine that the motion of the outer disk gas is influenced by
625: subdwarf as the disk gas passes and overtakes the star.
626: The gravitational attraction would cause acceleration and outward motion
627: as the disk gas approaches the subdwarf, but the same forces would cause
628: deceleration and inward motion following closest passage.
629: Thus, we would observe infalling (redshifted) disk gas before $\phi=0.0$
630: and then outward moving (blueshifted) gas after $\phi=0.0$.
631: On the other hand, the disk gas projected against the Be star has
632: more nearly Keplerian and tangential motion at $\phi=0.5$ leading to
633: the appearance of narrow shell lines at that phase.
634: This kind of perturbation in the Keplerian motions may also partially
635: explain the appearance of a redshifted shell feature in the
636: \ion{He}{1} $\lambda6678$ profiles near $\phi=0.9$ (Fig.~6),
637: an orientation where the disk gas projected against the Be star
638: would be infalling and relatively dense.
639:
640: \placefigure{fig9} % Figure 9 - Si III 1300 variations
641:
642:
643: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
644:
645: In addition to the shell features discussed above that predominantly are
646: formed in the disk, another circumstellar component is seen in some
647: intermediately-ionized species (e.g. \ion{S}{3}, \ion{Fe}{3}).
648: These variable features, which rarely show velocities
649: less than the photospheric value and can display velocities as large as
650: 50~$\rm km~s^{-1}$ relative to the photosphere of the Be star, were discovered
651: in {\it IUE} images obtained in the 1980s \citep*{pet88,gra88} and they clearly
652: show the presence of significant infall of material toward the Be star. Often
653: times these lines are asymmetric with enhanced absorption on the red side
654: of the profile. \citet*{gra88} identified six infall episodes that are best
655: seen in the \ion{Fe}{3} (multiplet~34) line at 1895.456~\AA, since the feature
656: does not have to compete with a strong photospheric component and it is not
657: blended with interstellar or other circumstellar lines.
658:
659: From the entire set of 97 {\it IUE} SWP high resolution (HIRES)
660: images that span more than 15 years of observation and our
661: knowledge of the orbit of the system, we now have more insight on the
662: nature of the infall lines. Their behavior in strength and velocity are shown in
663: Figures~10, 11, and 12. Representative examples of the three basic types of
664: observed features, photospheric, photospheric with additional absorption from the
665: Be star's disk, and infall are given in Figure~10. In order to eliminate
666: phase-dependent effects, we have chosen spectra taken at approximately the same
667: quadrature phase on the {\it trailing} hemisphere of the Be star but at different
668: epochs. Note that the central core of the profile taken during a period of enhanced
669: disk absorption shows the same velocity as the photospheric line, but that the
670: feature formed in infalling material has a significant redshift.
671: In the upper two-part panel of Figure~11 we plot the residual intensity\footnote{The
672: observed flux divided by the flux in the local continuum outside of the spectral
673: feature.} of the
674: deepest part of the \ion{Fe}{3} line and its radial velocity versus observation date.
675: All data are included in the intensity plot, but in the velocity plot we use a
676: different symbol for observations that show no, or minimal shell absorption. Points
677: that fall above the {\it dashed} horizontal line in the upper panel visually appeared
678: to be mostly photospheric. The double horizontal {\it dashed lines} in the second
679: panel delineate the domain of photospheric motion. Features that fall above the
680: double line are clearly associated with infall phases. Seven or eight clear infall
681: episodes are observed. The data suggest that the duration of the infall phases varies
682: from days to a year, but significant data gaps from 1979-85 and 1990-94 render it
683: impossible to determine a firm value or its degree of variability. An apparently
684: extended infall phase of about 300 days was seen from HJD~2446919--2447215. In
685: the lower two panels of Figure~11, the same data are plotted versus orbital phase.
686: From the third panel it can be seen that on the average the shell-type absorption is
687: enhanced in the phase interval 0.3--0.7. But from the display in the fourth panel it
688: is apparent that features seen around phase 0.5 tend to display the systemic velocity,
689: implying they are formed in the disk of the Be star.
690: In the fourth panel core velocities from only the spectra
691: showing enhanced shell absorption are compared with the radial velocity curve of
692: the Be star. It is clear that infall features with velocities up
693: to 50~$\rm km~s^{-1}$ relative to the photosphere are seen {\it at most phases}
694: with a minimal occurrence around phase 0.5. The infall features tend to cluster
695: around the quadrature points at which their velocities are highest relative to the
696: Be star's photosphere. Many of the phase dependent strength and velocity variations
697: discussed above can also be seen in the gray-scale plot presented in Figure~12.
698:
699: The episodic infall of material is fundamentally different from that observed in
700: the Algol-type binaries \citep{pet01}, where mass motion toward a mass gainer
701: is typically seen only between phases 0.75--0.95. In the case of FY~CMa, the infall
702: features predominantly cluster around the quadrature phases from 0.15--0.35 and
703: 0.65--0.90. The velocities of the shell features around phase 0.5 tend to be either
704: photospheric or negative relative to the Be star\footnote{Evidence for material
705: outflow is often seen in interacting binaries of the Algol type \citep{pet01} and
706: similar hydrodynamics might be occuring in this Be + subdwarf system.}. \citet{pet88}
707: discussed various scenarios to explain the observed simultaneous presence of infall
708: and outflow features in this system including a sudden accretion event,
709: the possible presence of magnetic loops, or flow from a polar jet.
710: \citet{cao01} reported that infall components in the \ion{N}{5} doublet
711: were contemporaneously observed with those in \ion{He}{1} $\lambda5876$ and also
712: suggested that magnetic loops might be involved, but the phase-dependence of the infall
713: features does not support this speculation. The infall is more likely a consequence of an
714: interaction between the wind from the subdwarf and the periphery of the massive disk
715: of the Be star or disk perturbations due to the tidal force produced by the subdwarf.
716: The motion of a shock-interaction region would result from variations in the location of
717: the interface where there is a balance between the
718: dynamic pressure of the subdwarf's wind and the gas pressure at the periphery
719: of the Be star's disk. It is not clear at this time whether it is the subdwarf or
720: the Be star that might be driving the variability though. Epochs when no enhanced shell
721: absorption is observed would correspond to minimal wind-disk interaction.
722: Alternatively the episodic infall features could simply be
723: a result of gas dynamics in the disk due to a tidal effect from the subdwarf.
724: Hydrodynamical simulations\footnote{cf.
725: http://harmas.arc.hokkai-s-u.ac.jp/\%7Eokazaki/BeX/sim/index.html} of the
726: gas motion in a perturbed disk in a Be/X-Ray binary
727: \citep{oka02} reveal turbulence in the outer disk and even the formation of
728: spiral structure. Similar disk variability could be operating in FY~CMa.
729: The details are probably complex but an interplay of such gravitationally related
730: forces could create time variable and sometimes coherent gas flows.
731: For example, the tidal deformation of the disk leads to an axial elongation
732: that moves ahead of the motion binary. Disk gas returning from the
733: extended regions would be observed to be moving inwards when
734: viewed at the quadrature phases.
735:
736:
737:
738:
739: \placefigure{fig10} % Figure 10 - Selected Fe III profiles
740: \placefigure{fig11} % Figure 11 - Fe III core strength and velocity vs. HJD and phase
741: \placefigure{fig12} % Figure 12 - Fe III 1895 variations - gray-scale
742:
743:
744:
745: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
746:
747:
748:
749:
750: Finally, we return to the cyclic variation in the \ion{N}{5} $\lambda1240$
751: wind line that first led \citet{riv04} to find the orbital period
752: of the binary. The plot of these variations in Figure~13 shows that
753: the greatest extent of blueshifted absorption occurs around $\phi=0.0$
754: when the subdwarf is in the foreground. We note that such a strong \ion{N}{5}
755: wind feature is quite unusual for Be stars \citep*{gra87}, and the orbital
756: phasing suggests instead that the feature may form through absorption of
757: the Be star's flux by the wind of the hot subdwarf when it is in the foreground.
758: The profile would mainly be affected by blueshifted wind absorption since
759: any redshifted absorption component would probably by canceled by redshifted emission
760: in the subdwarf's wind. This kind of orbital wind variation is not seen in the
761: other major wind line, the \ion{C}{4} $\lambda 1550$ doublet, and this may suggest
762: that the subdwarf is N-enriched and C-depleted as expected for a star that has
763: been stripped down to near the CNO-burning core. One problem with this
764: explanation is that the largest wind speeds observed, $\approx 400$ km~s$^{-1}$,
765: are much smaller than the wind terminal velocity of a few thousand km~s$^{-1}$
766: expected for a radiatively driven wind from the subdwarf \citep{lam99}. However,
767: it may be that the wind optical depths are too small for absorption to occur at
768: higher outflow velocities.
769:
770: \placefigure{fig13} % Figure 13 - N V 1240 orbital variations
771:
772: In 1995 March a sequence of daily {\it IUE} SWP HIRES spectra of FY~CMa
773: were obtained over the course of 16 days. Fortuitously these spectra
774: were centered in time around orbital phase 0.0 and extended from
775: phases 0.784 to 0.213. The temporal variations in the \ion{N}{5} $\lambda1240$
776: doublet are illustrated in a gray-scale diagram in Figure~14. More detail can be seen
777: from the plot of selected observations shown in Figure~15. The \ion{N}{5}
778: features initially showed very little structure until a core with the velocity of
779: the center-of-mass of the system appeared around phase 0.97. The core, still
780: with no velocity shift, reached its greatest strength at conjunction.
781: It broadened by phase 0.08, and had completely vanished by phase 0.21.
782: The core is probably formed in a shock-heated region between the stars
783: where the N-enhanced wind from the subdwarf collides with the disk of
784: the Be star.
785:
786:
787:
788: \placefigure{fig14} % Figure 14 - N V doublet - selected profiles
789: \placefigure{fig15} % Figure 15 - N V 1240 temporal variations in 1995 March
790:
791:
792:
793: Our work demonstrates that FY~CMa represents the third known case of
794: a Be star with a hot subdwarf companion, the remains of an intense
795: binary interaction that stripped down the mass donor to a tiny fraction
796: of its original mass and left the mass gainer spinning rapidly.
797: The subdwarf secondary in FY~CMa has a mass that is close to the
798: Chandrasekhar limit, and lacking a significant H-envelope, it may represent
799: the progenitor of a supernova type SN~Ibc. The system is now wide enough
800: that it is unlikely that the Be star will be substantially spun down by tidal
801: effects, so its rapid rotation will be important throughout its subsequent evolution.
802: Such rapidly rotating massive stars may be related to the progenitors of
803: collapsars and gamma-ray bursters \citep{can07}.
804:
805: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
806:
807: \acknowledgments
808:
809: We thank Daryl Willmarth and the staff of KPNO for their assistance
810: in making these observations possible and
811: Diana Gudkova for her assistance in organizing the optical spectra.
812: The {\it IUE} data presented in this paper were obtained from
813: the Multimission Archive at the Space Telescope Science
814: Institute (MAST). STScI is operated by the Association of
815: Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA
816: contract NAS5-26555. Support for MAST for non-HST data is
817: provided by the NASA Office of Space Science via grant
818: NAG5-7584 and by other grants and contracts.
819: Many researchers contributed to the 97 {\it IUE} SWP HIRES images
820: used in this study, including programs by K. S. Bjorkman,
821: C. A. Grady, H. Henrichs, J. Nichols, G. J. Peters, and C.-C. Wu.
822: We especially thank Carol Grady, who had the foresight to obtain the
823: unique set of daily {\it IUE} spectra in 1995, more than a decade
824: before analysis software allowed us to suggest an interpretation for the
825: striking short-term variability seen in the \ion{N}{5} doublet and other
826: wind features. We also thank an anonymous referee whose suggestions led to
827: several improvements in the paper. This work was supported in part by the
828: National Science Foundation under grant AST-0606861.
829: Institutional support has been provided from the USC
830: Women in Science \& Engineering (WiSE) program and from the GSU College
831: of Arts and Sciences and the Research Program Enhancement
832: fund of the Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia,
833: administered through the GSU Office of the Vice President
834: for Research.
835:
836: {\it Facilities:} \facility{IUE }, \facility{KPNO:CFT }
837:
838: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
839:
840: % References
841:
842: \clearpage
843:
844: \begin{thebibliography}{}
845: \bibitem[Abt et al.(2002)Abt, Levato, \& Grosso]{abt02}
846: Abt, H. A., Levato, H., \& Grosso, M. 2002, \apj, 573, 359
847: \bibitem[Bagnuolo et al.(1994)]{bag94}
848: Bagnuolo, W. G., Jr., Gies, D. R.,
849: Hahula, M. E., Wiemker, R., \&
850: Wiggs, M. S. 1994, \apj, 423, 446
851: \bibitem[Cantiello et al.(2007)]{can07}
852: Cantiello, M., Yoon, S.-C., Langer, N., \& Livio, M.
853: 2007, \aap, 465, L29
854: \bibitem[Cao(2001)]{cao01}
855: Cao, H.-L. 2001, Chinese J. Astron. Astrophys., 1, 514
856: \bibitem[Coe(2000)]{coe00}
857: Coe, M. 2000, in The Be Phenomenon in Early-Type Stars,
858: IAU Coll. 175 (ASP Conf. Proc. 214), ed. M. A. Smith,
859: H. F. Henrichs, \& J. Fabregat (San Francisco: ASP), 656
860: \bibitem[Dray \& Tout(2007)]{dra07}
861: Dray, L. M., \& Tout, C. A. 2007, \mnras, 376, 61
862: \bibitem[ESA(1997)]{esa97}
863: ESA 1997, The Hipparcos Catalogue, ESA SP-1200 (Noordwijk: ESA)
864: \bibitem[Fr\'{e}mat et al.(2005)]{fre05}
865: Fr\'{e}mat, Y., Zorec, J., Hubert, A.-M., \& Floquet, M.
866: 2005, \aap, 440, 305
867: \bibitem[Gies(2000)]{gie00}
868: Gies, D. R. 2000, in The Be Phenomenon in Early-Type Stars,
869: IAU Coll. 175 (ASP Conf. Proc. 214), ed. M. A. Smith,
870: H. F. Henrichs, \& J. Fabregat (San Francisco: ASP), 668
871: \bibitem[Gies et al.(1998)]{gie98}
872: Gies, D. R., Bagnuolo, W. G., Jr., Ferrara, E. C.,
873: Kaye, A. B., Thaller, M. L., Penny, L. R., \& Peters, G. J.
874: 1998, \apj, 493, 440
875: \bibitem[Grady et al.(1987)Grady, Bjorkman, \& Snow]{gra87}
876: Grady, C. A., Bjorkman, K. S., \& Snow, T. P.
877: 1987, \apj, 320, 376
878: \bibitem[Grady et al.(1988)]{gra88}
879: Grady, C. A., Peters, G. J., Bjorkman, K. S., \&
880: Henrichs, H. F. 1988, in A Decade of UV Astronomy with the
881: IUE Satellite (ESA SP-281) (Paris: ESA), 1, 257
882: \bibitem[Grundstrom \& Gies(2006)]{gru06}
883: Grundstrom, E. D., \& Gies, D. R. 2006, \apj, 651, L53
884: \bibitem[Hanuschik(1996)]{han96}
885: Hanuschik, R. W. 1996, \aap, 308, 170
886: \bibitem[Harmanec(1988)]{har88}
887: Harmanec, P. 1988, Bull. Astron. Inst. Cz., 39, no. 6, 329
888: \bibitem[Hiltner et al.(1969)Hiltner, Garrison, \& Schild]{hil69}
889: Hiltner, W. A., Garrison, R. F., \& Schild, R. E. 1969,
890: \apj, 157, 313
891: \bibitem[Hummel \& \v{S}tefl(2001)]{hum01}
892: Hummel, W., \& \v{S}tefl, S. 2001, \aap, 368, 471
893: \bibitem[Kaiser(1989)]{kai89}
894: Kaiser, D. 1989, \aap, 222, 187
895: \bibitem[Lamers \& Cassinelli(1999)]{lam99}
896: Lamers, H. J. G. L. M., \& Cassinelli, J. P. 1999,
897: Introduction to Stellar Winds (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press)
898: \bibitem[Lanz \& Hubeny(2003)]{lan03}
899: Lanz,T., \& Hubeny, I. 2003, \apjs, 146, 417
900: \bibitem[Maintz et al.(2005)]{mai05}
901: Maintz, M., Rivinius, T., Stahl, O., \v{S}tefl, S., \&
902: Appenzeller, I. 2005, Publ. Astron. Inst. Cz., 93, 21
903: \bibitem[Morbey \& Brosterhus(1974)]{mor74}
904: Morbey, C. L., \& Brosterhus, E. B. 1974, \pasp, 86, 455
905: \bibitem[Okazaki et al. (2002)]{oka02}
906: Okazaki, A. T., Bate, M. R., Ogilvie, G. I., \& Pringle, J. E. 2002,
907: \mnras, 337, 967
908: \bibitem[Okazaki \& Negueruela(2001)]{oka01}
909: Okazaki, A. T., \& Negueruela, I. 2001, \aap, 377, 161
910: \bibitem[Peters(1976)]{pet76}
911: Peters, G. J. 1976, in Be and Shell Stars, IAU Symp. 70, ed.
912: A. Slettebak (Dordrecht: Reidel), 69
913: \bibitem[Peters(1982)]{pet82}
914: Peters, G. J. 1982, in Be stars, IAU Symp. 98, ed.
915: M. Jaschek \& H.-G. Groth (Dordrecht: Reidel), 411
916: \bibitem[Peters(1983)]{pet83}
917: Peters, G. J. 1983, \pasp, 95, 311
918: \bibitem[Peters(1988)]{pet88}
919: Peters, G. J. 1988, \apj, 331, L33
920: \bibitem[Peters (2001)]{pet01}
921: Peters, G. J. 2001, in The Influence of Binaries on Stellar Population
922: Studies, ed. D. Vanbeveren (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 79
923: \bibitem[Petrovic et al.(2005)Petrovic, Langer, \& van der Hucht]{pet05}
924: Petrovic, J., Langer, N., \& van der Hucht, K. A.
925: 2005, \aap, 435, 1013
926: \bibitem[Pickering \& Fleming(1905)]{pic05}
927: Pickering, E. C., \& Fleming, W. P. 1905, \apj, 22, 87
928: \bibitem[Pols et al.(1991)]{pol91}
929: Pols, O. R., Cot\'{e}, J., Waters, L. B. F. M., \&
930: Heise, J. 1991, \aap, 241, 419
931: \bibitem[Porter \& Rivinius(2003)]{por03}
932: Porter, J. M., \& Rivinius, T. 2003, \pasp, 115, 1153
933: \bibitem[Rivinius et al.(2004)]{riv04}
934: Rivinius, T., \v{S}tefl, S., Maintz, M., Stahl, O., \&
935: Baade, D. 2004, \aap, 427, 307
936: \bibitem[Roberts et al.(1987)Roberts, Leh\'{a}r, \& Dreher]{rob87}
937: Roberts, D. H., Leh\'{a}r, J., \& Dreher, J. W. 1987, \aj, 93, 968
938: \bibitem[Shafter et al.(1986)Shafter, Szkody, \& Thorstensen]{sha86}
939: Shafter, A. W., Szkody, P., \& Thorstensen, J. R. 1986, \apj, 308, 765
940: \bibitem[Slettebak(1982)Slettebak]{sle82}
941: Slettebak, A. 1982, \apjs, 50, 55
942: \bibitem[\v{S}tefl et al.(2000)\v{S}tefl, Hummel, \& Rivinius]{ste00}
943: \v{S}tefl, S., Hummel, W., \& Rivinius, T. 2000, \aap, 358, 208
944: \bibitem[Sterken et al.(1996)Sterken, Vogt, \& Mennickent]{ste96}
945: Sterken, C., Vogt, N., \& Mennickent, R. E. 1996, \aap, 311, 579
946: \bibitem[Thaller et al.(1995)]{tha95}
947: Thaller, M. L., Bagnuolo, W. G., Jr., Gies, D. R., \&
948: Penny, L. R. 1995, \apj, 448, 878
949: \bibitem[van Bever \& Vanbeveren(1997)]{van97}
950: van Bever, J., \& Vanbeveren, D. 1997, \aap, 322, 116
951: \bibitem[Wade \& Rucinski(1985)]{wad85}
952: Wade, R. A., \& Rucinski, S. M. 1985, \aaps, 60, 471
953: \bibitem[Waters et al.(1991) Waters, Cot\'{e}, \& Pols]{wat91}
954: Waters, L. B. F. M., Cot\'{e}, J., \& Pols, O. R.
955: 1991, \aap, 250, 437
956: \bibitem[Wellstein et al.(2001)Wellstein, Langer, \& Braun]{wel01}
957: Wellstein, S., Langer, N., \& Braun, H. 2001, \aap, 369, 939
958: \bibitem[Zucker(2003)]{zuc03}
959: Zucker, S. 2003, \mnras, 342, 1291
960: \end{thebibliography}
961:
962:
963: \clearpage
964:
965: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
966:
967:
968: % Tables
969:
970: % Table 1
971: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccl}
972: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
973: \tablewidth{0pc}
974: \tablecaption{Journal of Spectroscopy \label{tab1}}
975: \tablehead{
976: \colhead{Dates} &
977: \colhead{Besselian} &
978: \colhead{Range} &
979: \colhead{Resolving Power} &
980: \colhead{Number of} &
981: \colhead{Telescope/} \\
982: \colhead{(HJD-2,400,000)} &
983: \colhead{Year} &
984: \colhead{(\AA)} &
985: \colhead{($\lambda/\triangle\lambda$)} &
986: \colhead{Spectra} &
987: \colhead{Grating/Detector}}
988: \startdata
989: 44170 -- 49804 & 1979.8 -- 1995.2 & 1200 -- 1900 & 10000 & 97 & {\it IUE}/Echelle/SWP \\
990: 46123 & 1985.2 & 6477 -- 6654 & 13000 &\phn1 & KPNO CF/B/TI3 \\
991: 46153 & 1985.2 & 6514 -- 6691 & 13000 &\phn1 & KPNO CF/B/TI3 \\
992: 46735 & 1986.8 & 6511 -- 6688 & 13000 &\phn1 & KPNO CF/B/TI3 \\
993: 46903 -- 46906 & 1987.3 -- 1987.3 & 6522 -- 6698 & 13000 &\phn3 & KPNO CF/B/TI3 \\
994: 46918 -- 46922 & 1987.3 -- 1987.3 & 6520 -- 6698 & 13000 &\phn6 & KPNO CF/B/TI3 \\
995: 47033 -- 47034 & 1987.6 -- 1987.7 & 6518 -- 6695 & 13000 &\phn2 & KPNO CF/B/TI3 \\
996: 47303 -- 47307 & 1988.4 -- 1988.4 & 6517 -- 6694 & 13000 &\phn9 & KPNO CF/B/TI3 \\
997: 47470 -- 47473 & 1988.8 -- 1988.9 & 6495 -- 6717 & 11000 & 11 & KPNO CF/B/RCA2 \\
998: 47561 -- 47562 & 1989.1 -- 1989.1 & 6514 -- 6690 & 14000 &\phn3 & KPNO CF/B/TI3 \\
999: 47637 -- 47641 & 1989.3 -- 1989.3 & 6520 -- 6697 & 14000 &\phn4 & KPNO CF/B/TI3 \\
1000: 47940 -- 47941 & 1990.1 -- 1990.1 & 6523 -- 6699 & 14000 &\phn2 & KPNO CF/B/TI3 \\
1001: 47982 -- 47984 & 1990.2 -- 1990.3 & 6520 -- 6697 & 14000 &\phn2 & KPNO CF/B/TI3 \\
1002: 48314 -- 48315 & 1991.2 -- 1991.2 & 6542 -- 6690 & 18000 &\phn3 & KPNO CF/A/ST1K \\
1003: 48319 -- 48322 & 1991.2 -- 1991.2 & 6520 -- 6696 & 14000 &\phn4 & KPNO CF/B/TI3 \\
1004: 48515 -- 48517 & 1991.7 -- 1991.7 & 6517 -- 6693 & 14000 &\phn5 & KPNO CF/B/TI3 \\
1005: 49058 -- 49061 & 1993.2 -- 1993.2 & 6384 -- 6723 & 19000 &\phn3 & KPNO CF/A/T2KB \\
1006: 49444 -- 49448 & 1994.2 -- 1994.3 & 6525 -- 6693 & 18000 &\phn4 & KPNO CF/A/T1KA \\
1007: 51123 -- 51126 & 1998.8 -- 1998.9 & 6359 -- 6677 & 20000 &\phn4 & KPNO CF/A/F3KB \\
1008: 51192 -- 51197 & 1999.0 -- 1999.0 & 6420 -- 6737 & 20000 &\phn5 & KPNO CF/A/F3KB \\
1009: 51502 -- 51512 & 1999.9 -- 1999.9 & 6415 -- 6733 & 20000 & 16 & KPNO CF/A/F3KB \\
1010: 51613 -- 51614 & 2000.2 -- 2000.2 & 6459 -- 6776 & 20000 &\phn8 & KPNO CF/A/F3KB \\
1011: 51615 -- 51618 & 2000.2 -- 2000.2 & 6413 -- 6730 & 20000 &\phn9 & KPNO CF/A/F3KB \\
1012: 51818 -- 51831 & 2000.7 -- 2000.8 & 6440 -- 7105 &\phn9500 &\phn9 & KPNO CF/B/F3KB \\
1013: 51850 -- 51852 & 2000.8 -- 2000.8 & 6413 -- 6733 & 20000 &\phn7 & KPNO CF/A/F3KB \\
1014: 51890 -- 51902 & 2000.9 -- 2001.0 & 6440 -- 7105 &\phn9500 & 12 & KPNO CF/B/F3KB \\
1015: 51914 -- 51918 & 2001.0 -- 2001.0 & 6432 -- 6749 & 20000 & 18 & KPNO CF/A/F3KB \\
1016: 53292 -- 53295 & 2004.8 -- 2004.8 & 6470 -- 7140 &\phn9500 &\phn4 & KPNO CF/B/T2KB \\
1017: 54021 -- 54025 & 2006.8 -- 2006.8 & 6473 -- 7143 &\phn9500 &\phn2 & KPNO CF/B/T2KB \\
1018: \enddata
1019: \end{deluxetable}
1020: \newpage
1021:
1022:
1023:
1024: % Table 2
1025: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccc}
1026: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1027: \tablewidth{0pc}
1028: \tablenum{2}
1029: \tablecaption{{\it IUE} Radial Velocity Measurements\label{tab2}}
1030: \tablehead{
1031: \colhead{Date} &
1032: \colhead{UT} &
1033: \colhead{SWP} &
1034: \colhead{Orbital} &
1035: \colhead{$V_1$} &
1036: \colhead{$(O-C)_1$} &
1037: \colhead{$V_2$} &
1038: \colhead{$(O-C)_2$} \\
1039: \colhead{(HJD--2,400,000)} &
1040: \colhead{(yyyy-mm-dd)} &
1041: \colhead{Number} &
1042: \colhead{Phase} &
1043: \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} &
1044: \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} &
1045: \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} &
1046: \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} }
1047: \startdata
1048: 44170.044 \dotfill & 1979-10-23 & \phn6963 & 0.985 &
1049: \phn\phs $ 51.5$ &\phs $ 16.6$ &
1050: \phn\phn\phs $ 1.6$ & $ -17.9$ \\
1051: 44330.226 \dotfill & 1980-03-31 & \phn8617 & 0.285 &
1052: \phn\phs $ 23.9$ &\phn\phs $ 4.4$ &
1053: \phs $ 159.8$ &\phn\phs $ 3.4$ \\
1054: 44853.156 \dotfill & 1981-09-05 & 14910 & 0.321 &
1055: \phn\phs $ 22.2$ &\phn\phs $ 1.6$ &
1056: \phs $ 138.6$ &\phn $ -8.4$ \\
1057: 44867.935 \dotfill & 1981-09-20 & 15053 & 0.717 &
1058: \phn\phs $ 40.5$ &\phn $ -7.3$ &
1059: $-123.5$ & $ -29.2$ \\
1060: 44920.747 \dotfill & 1981-11-12 & 15478 & 0.135 &
1061: \phn\phs $ 39.0$ &\phs $ 16.2$ &
1062: \nodata & \nodata \\
1063: \enddata
1064: \tablecomments{A machine readable version of the full Table 2 is available
1065: in the electronic edition of the {\it Astrophysical Journal.} A portion
1066: is shown here for guidance regarding its form and content.}
1067: \end{deluxetable}
1068:
1069: \newpage
1070:
1071:
1072:
1073: % Table 3
1074: \begin{deluxetable}{lcc}
1075: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1076: \tablewidth{0pc}
1077: \tablenum{3}
1078: \tablecaption{Orbital Elements for FY CMa\label{tab3}}
1079: \tablehead{
1080: \colhead{Element} &
1081: \colhead{H$\alpha$ Wings} &
1082: \colhead{{\it IUE} ccfs}}
1083: \startdata
1084: $P$~(days) \dotfill & $37.253 \pm 0.007$ & $37.257 \pm 0.003$ \\
1085: $T_{SC}$ (HJD--2,448,000) \dotfill & $530.19 \pm 0.76$ & $529.64 \pm 0.15$ \\
1086: $K_1$ (km s$^{-1}$) \dotfill & $17.4 \pm 0.9$ & $14.4 \pm 0.9$ \\
1087: $K_2$ (km s$^{-1}$) \dotfill & \nodata & $128.2 \pm 2.2$ \\
1088: $\gamma_1$ (km s$^{-1}$) \dotfill & $47.1 \pm 0.6$ & $33.6 \pm 0.7$ \\
1089: $\gamma_2$ (km s$^{-1}$) \dotfill & \nodata & $31.2 \pm 1.7$ \\
1090: $M_2/M_1$ \dotfill & \nodata & $0.113 \pm 0.007$ \\
1091: $M_1\sin ^3 i$ ($M_\odot$)\dotfill & \nodata & $10.1 \pm 0.4$ \\
1092: $M_2\sin ^3 i$ ($M_\odot$)\dotfill & \nodata & $1.13 \pm 0.08$ \\
1093: $a\sin i$ ($R_\odot$) \dotfill & \nodata & $105.0 \pm 1.7$ \\
1094: rms$_1$ (km s$^{-1}$) \dotfill & 7.6 & 6.5 \\
1095: rms$_2$ (km s$^{-1}$) \dotfill & \nodata & 14.5 \\
1096: \enddata
1097: \end{deluxetable}
1098: \newpage
1099:
1100: % Table 4
1101: \begin{deluxetable}{lcc}
1102: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1103: \tablewidth{0pc}
1104: \tablenum{4}
1105: \tablecaption{Stellar Parameters for FY CMa\label{tab4}}
1106: \tablehead{
1107: \colhead{Parameter} &
1108: \colhead{Primary} &
1109: \colhead{Secondary} }
1110: \startdata
1111: $T_{\rm eff}$ (kK) & $27.5 \pm 3.0$ & $45 \pm 5$ \\
1112: $\log g$ (cgs) & $4.0$ & $4.3 \pm 0.6$ \\
1113: $V\sin i$ (km s$^{-1}$) & $340 \pm 40$ & $41 \pm 5$ \\
1114: $M/M_\odot$ & $10 - 13$ & $1.1 - 1.5$ \\
1115: $R/R_\odot$ & $4.1 - 7.6$ & $0.5 - 0.9$ \\
1116: \enddata
1117: \end{deluxetable}
1118: \newpage
1119:
1120:
1121: % Table 5
1122: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccc}
1123: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1124: \tablewidth{0pc}
1125: \tablenum{5}
1126: \tablecaption{Red Spectra Measurements\label{tab5}}
1127: \tablehead{
1128: \colhead{Date} &
1129: \colhead{Orbital} &
1130: \colhead{$W_\lambda$(H$\alpha$)} &
1131: \colhead{$V$(H$\alpha$ wings)} &
1132: \colhead{$V$(He I peaks)} &
1133: \colhead{$\triangle V$(He I peaks)} \\
1134: \colhead{(HJD--2,400,000)} &
1135: \colhead{Phase} &
1136: \colhead{(\AA )} &
1137: \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} &
1138: \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} &
1139: \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} }
1140: \startdata
1141: 46122.805 \dotfill & 0.399 &
1142: $-10.98$ &\phn\phs $ 26.8$ & \nodata & \nodata \\
1143: 46152.702 \dotfill & 0.201 &
1144: $-13.32$ &\phn\phs $ 21.8$ &\phs $ 216$ & \nodata \\
1145: 46734.931 \dotfill & 0.829 &
1146: $-11.22$ &\phn\phs $ 71.1$ & $ -154$ & \nodata \\
1147: 46902.728 \dotfill & 0.333 &
1148: $-11.76$ &\phn\phs $ 30.2$ & \nodata & \nodata \\
1149: 46903.703 \dotfill & 0.359 &
1150: $-12.39$ &\phn\phs $ 25.2$ & \nodata & \nodata \\
1151: \enddata
1152: \tablecomments{Table 5 is available in its entirely in the electronic edition of the
1153: {\it Astrophysical Journal.} A portion is shown here for guidance regarding its
1154: form and content.}
1155: \end{deluxetable}
1156:
1157: %\newpage
1158:
1159:
1160:
1161: \clearpage
1162:
1163: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1164:
1165: % Figures
1166:
1167: % Figure 1
1168: \begin{figure}
1169: \begin{center}
1170: {\includegraphics[height=16cm]{f1.eps}}
1171: \end{center}
1172: \caption{The orbital phase variations in the cross-correlation
1173: functions of the spectra in the $1310-1385$ \AA ~region with
1174: a hot star template spectrum. The ccfs are shown as
1175: linear plots ({\it top panel}) and as a gray-scale image ({\it lower panel}).
1176: The intensity in the gray-scale image is assigned one of 16 gray levels
1177: based on its value between the minimum (dark) and maximum (bright) observed values.
1178: The intensity between observed ccfs is calculated by a linear interpolation
1179: between the closest observed phases (shown by arrows along the right axis).
1180: The weak signal from the hot subdwarf spectrum appears as a backwards ``S''
1181: feature in the lower panel. The scale bar at top right indicates the
1182: amplitude of the ccf variation relative to the mean sum of the
1183: squared differences far away from the optimal correlation shift.
1184: \label{fig1}}
1185: \end{figure}
1186:
1187:
1188:
1189: % Figure 2
1190: \begin{figure}
1191: \begin{center}
1192:
1193: %\plotone{f2.eps}
1194: {\includegraphics[angle=90,height=12cm]{f2.eps}}
1195: \end{center}
1196: \caption{Radial velocity curves for the Be star and its companion.
1197: Orbital phase 0.0 corresponds to the Be star superior conjunction time.
1198: The solid circles represent the {\it IUE} cross-correlation
1199: velocities for the Be star while the open circles show the
1200: {\it IUE} cross-correlation results for the hot subdwarf.
1201: The plus signs indicate the velocities from measurements of the
1202: H$\alpha$ wing bisector positions. The typical radial velocity errors are
1203: 3 and 7 km~s$^{-1}$ for measurements of the Be star and hot subdwarf,
1204: respectively.
1205: \label{fig2}}
1206: \end{figure}
1207:
1208: % Figure 3
1209: \begin{figure}
1210: {\includegraphics[angle=90,height=12cm]{f3.eps}}
1211: \caption{A comparison of a part of the reconstructed UV spectrum of the
1212: secondary star ({\it solid line}) with a model spectrum ({\it dotted line}).
1213: Line identifications for some of the stronger lines are given above the spectra.
1214: \label{fig3}}
1215: \end{figure}
1216:
1217: % Figure 4
1218: \begin{figure}
1219: {\includegraphics[angle=90,height=12cm]{f4.eps}}
1220: \caption{A comparison of another part of the reconstructed UV spectrum of the
1221: secondary star ({\it solid line}) with a model spectrum ({\it dotted line}).
1222: \label{fig4}}
1223: \end{figure}
1224:
1225: % Figure 5
1226: \begin{figure}
1227: \begin{center}
1228: {\includegraphics[height=16cm]{f5.eps}}
1229: \end{center}
1230: \caption{The orbital phase variations in the H$\alpha$
1231: emission line in the spectra of FY~CMa are shown in
1232: linear plots ({\it top panel}) and as a gray-scale image ({\it lower panel}).
1233: The intensity in the gray-scale image is assigned one of 16 gray levels
1234: based on its value between the minimum (dark) and maximum (bright) observed values.
1235: The intensity between observed spectra is calculated by a linear interpolation
1236: between the closest observed phases (shown by arrows along the right axis).
1237: The scale bar at top right indicates the spectral flux
1238: relative to the local continuum flux.
1239: \label{fig5}}
1240: \end{figure}
1241:
1242: % Figure 6
1243: \begin{figure}
1244: \begin{center}
1245: {\includegraphics[height=16cm]{f6.eps}}
1246: \end{center}
1247: \caption{The orbital phase variations in the \ion{He}{1} $\lambda 6678$
1248: emission line plotted in the same format as Fig.~5.
1249: \label{fig6}}
1250: \end{figure}
1251:
1252: % Figure 7
1253: \begin{figure}
1254: {\includegraphics[angle=90,height=12cm]{f7.eps}}
1255: \caption{The radial velocities of the prominent emission peaks in
1256: the profile of \ion{He}{1} $\lambda 6678$ plotted as
1257: a function of orbital phase. Single dots represent measurements
1258: of one peak (possibly blended) while dots with vertical segments
1259: represent the midpoint velocity where two prominent peaks
1260: were observed. The end points of these line segments correspond
1261: to the velocity of each resolved peak. The dotted line
1262: represents the orbital velocity curve of the hot subdwarf.
1263: \label{fig7}}
1264: \end{figure}
1265:
1266: % Figure 8
1267: \begin{figure}
1268: \begin{center}
1269: {\includegraphics[angle=90,height=12cm]{f8.eps}}
1270: \end{center}
1271: \caption{An empirical model of the system geometry as viewed
1272: from above the orbital plane. Each tick mark corresponds to a
1273: length of $0.5 a$. The Be primary ({\it left}) is surrounded
1274: by an equatorial disk ({\it lightly shaded region}) that is heated along
1275: the edge ({\it darker shaded region}) facing the subdwarf secondary ({\it right}).
1276: The outer boundary of the Be star disk is probably within the critical Roche surface
1277: ({\it solid curve}). The center-of-mass of the system is indicated by the vertical tick
1278: mark on the line-of-centers. The orbital phases are indicated on the periphery.
1279: \label{fig8}}
1280: \end{figure}
1281:
1282: % Figure 9
1283: \begin{figure}
1284: \begin{center}
1285: {\includegraphics[height=16cm]{f9.eps}}
1286: \end{center}
1287: \caption{The orbital phase variations in \ion{Si}{3} $\lambda 1299$
1288: and other nearby \ion{Si}{3} lines
1289: plotted in the same format as Fig.~5. These features are a composite
1290: of broad photospheric lines and narrower ``shell'' features formed in the disk.
1291: \label{fig9}}
1292: \end{figure}
1293:
1294: % Figure 10
1295: \begin{figure}
1296: \begin{center}
1297: {\includegraphics[height=10cm]{f10.eps}}
1298: \end{center}
1299: \caption{Selected profiles of the \ion{Fe}{3} $\lambda 1895$ feature,
1300: all observed near phase 0.75 but at different epochs. Examples include an
1301: apparently pure, rotationally-broadened photospheric profile ({\it dotted line}),
1302: a profile with weak shell absorption ({\it thin, solid line}), and an observation
1303: made during a prominent infall phase ({\it thick, solid line}). The vertical
1304: line above the profiles shows the observed line center that includes the velocity
1305: shift of the Be star.
1306: \label{fig10}}
1307: \end{figure}
1308:
1309: % Figure 11
1310: \begin{figure}
1311: \begin{center}
1312: {\includegraphics[height=14.5cm]{f11.eps}}
1313: \end{center}
1314: \caption{The absorption strength and velocity of the core of the \ion{Fe}{3}
1315: $\lambda 1895$~\AA\, line versus time and orbital phase.
1316: \textit{Panel 1}: The horizontal {\it dashed line} represents the core intensity
1317: above which the feature appears to be primarily photospheric.
1318: \textit{Panel 2}: The double {\it dashed lines} represent the range in photospheric
1319: velocity of the Be star. The observations shown with the {\it open diamonds}
1320: showed either no or minimal shell components. All observations above the top
1321: line were obtained during infall epochs.
1322: \textit{Panel 3}: The {\it dashed line} has the same meaning as in panel 1.
1323: Enhanced shell absorption is seen between phases 0.3 and 0.7.
1324: \textit{Panel 4}: The velocity of the center-of-mass of the system
1325: is indicted by a {\it dashed line} and the radial velocity curve of the Be star
1326: with a {\it solid line}. Only observations showing a
1327: shell component are included. Note the obvious presence of infalling material at
1328: most phases except perhaps near phase 0.5 where material outflow is commonly seen
1329: in close binaries with early type primaries (Peters~2001). The errors for all
1330: observations are less than or equal to the dimension of the plotted point.
1331: \label{fig11}}
1332: \end{figure}
1333:
1334: % Figure 12
1335: \begin{figure}
1336: \begin{center}
1337: {\includegraphics[height=16cm]{f12.eps}}
1338: \end{center}
1339: \caption{The orbital phase variations in \ion{Fe}{3} $\lambda 1895$ line
1340: plotted in the same format as Fig.~5. A narrow ``shell'' feature can be seen
1341: around orbital phase 0.5.
1342: \label{fig12}}
1343: \end{figure}
1344:
1345: % Figure 13
1346: \begin{figure}
1347: \begin{center}
1348: {\includegraphics[height=16cm]{f13.eps}}
1349: \end{center}
1350: \caption{The orbital phase variations in the \ion{N}{5} $\lambda 1240$
1351: doublet plotted in the same format as Fig.~5 (in the velocity frame
1352: of the blue member of the doublet). The strong absorption occurs
1353: when the Be star is viewed through the wind of the hot subdwarf.
1354: \label{fig13}}
1355: \end{figure}
1356:
1357:
1358: % Figure 14
1359: \begin{figure}
1360: \begin{center}
1361: {\includegraphics[height=16cm]{f14.eps}}
1362: \end{center}
1363: \caption{The temporal variations in the \ion{N}{5} $\lambda 1240$
1364: doublet observed in a daily sequence of {\it IUE} observations obtained
1365: in 1995 March. The lower portion shows the average profile while the upper
1366: panel shows a gray-scale representation of the deviations from
1367: the average as a function of time. A shell feature
1368: appeared near orbital phase 0.0 at HJD~2449796.4.
1369: \label{fig14}}
1370: \end{figure}
1371:
1372: % Figure 15
1373: \begin{figure}
1374: \begin{center}
1375: {\includegraphics[height=16cm]{f15.eps}}
1376: \end{center}
1377: \caption{Selected profiles of the \ion{N}{5} doublet observed during the 1995 March
1378: sequence show the details of the development and fading of the \ion{N}{5} shell
1379: component. The feature was strongest at inferior conjunction of the subdwarf and
1380: essentially absent near the quadrature points. The vertical {\it dotted} lines show
1381: the locations of the observed line centers in the velocity frame of the center-of-mass
1382: of the system. The y-axis flux offsets are (from top to bottom) $0, -4, -10, -15,$ and
1383: $-20$ in the flux units plotted.
1384: \label{fig15}}
1385: \end{figure}
1386:
1387: \clearpage
1388:
1389: {\Huge
1390:
1391: \begin{center}
1392: ONLINE MATERIAL
1393: \end{center}
1394:
1395: }
1396:
1397: \clearpage
1398:
1399: \begin{verbatim}
1400:
1401: Title: Detection of a Hot Subdwarf Companion to the Be Star FY CMa
1402: Authors: G. J. Peters, D. R. Gies, E. D. Grundstrom, M. V. McSwain
1403: Table: IUE Radial Velocity Measurements
1404: ================================================================================
1405: Byte-by-byte Description of file: tab2.txt
1406: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1407: Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
1408: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1409: 1- 9 F9.3 d Date HJD-2400000
1410: 11- 14 I4 -- Obs.y Observation UT year
1411: 16- 17 I2 -- Obs.m Observation UT month
1412: 19- 20 I2 -- Obs.d Observation UT day
1413: 21- 26 I6 -- SWP IUE SWP number
1414: 27- 32 F6.3 -- Phase Orbital phase from Be star superior conjunction
1415: 33- 38 F6.1 km/s HRV1 Heliocentric radial velocity for Be star
1416: 39- 44 F6.1 km/s OMC1 Observed minus calculated velocity for Be star
1417: 45- 51 A7 km/s HRV2 Heliocentric radial velocity for subdwarf
1418: 52- 57 A6 km/s OMC2 Observed minus calculated velocity for subdwarf
1419: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1420: 44170.044 1979-10-23 6963 0.985 51.5 16.6 1.6 -17.9
1421: 44330.226 1980-03-31 8617 0.285 23.9 4.4 159.8 3.4
1422: 44853.156 1981-09-05 14910 0.321 22.2 1.6 138.6 -8.4
1423: 44867.935 1981-09-20 15053 0.717 40.5 -7.3 -123.5 -29.2
1424: 44920.747 1981-11-12 15478 0.135 39.0 16.2 ? ?
1425: 44972.649 1982-01-03 15933 0.528 36.8 0.7 ? ?
1426: 44974.604 1982-01-05 15957 0.580 33.9 -6.7 ? ?
1427: 44975.736 1982-01-06 15979 0.611 34.4 -8.5 -67.0 -16.0
1428: 45571.096 1983-08-24 20769 0.591 43.7 2.3 -48.6 -10.7
1429: 45573.015 1983-08-26 20805 0.642 52.5 7.6 ? ?
1430: 45576.057 1983-08-29 20837 0.724 57.4 9.5 -105.8 -10.5
1431: 45578.924 1983-09-01 20874 0.801 50.7 3.4 ? ?
1432: 46338.986 1985-09-30 26810 0.201 23.1 3.3 146.0 -7.5
1433: 46340.871 1985-10-02 26829 0.252 8.4 -10.8 ? ?
1434: 46342.778 1985-10-04 26847 0.303 15.0 -5.0 ? ?
1435: 46343.927 1985-10-05 26868 0.334 11.1 -10.0 142.2 0.2
1436: 46430.639 1985-12-31 27426 0.661 52.3 6.4 -74.0 3.7
1437: 46436.586 1986-01-06 27459 0.821 37.1 -9.5 -61.0 23.4
1438: 46440.366 1986-01-09 27479 0.923 40.8 0.4 -24.4 4.4
1439: 46440.609 1986-01-10 27484 0.929 34.0 -5.8 -16.1 8.0
1440: 46440.784 1986-01-10 27488 0.934 29.2 -10.3 -21.3 -0.7
1441: 46441.374 1986-01-10 27496 0.950 38.5 0.4 ? ?
1442: 46441.513 1986-01-11 27499 0.953 35.5 -2.3 ? ?
1443: 46441.720 1986-01-11 27504 0.959 36.6 -0.7 10.0 11.6
1444: 46590.362 1986-06-08 28457 0.949 41.6 3.4 -8.5 1.1
1445: 46691.971 1986-09-18 29238 0.676 49.1 2.6 ? ?
1446: 46705.946 1986-10-02 29349 0.051 27.2 -1.9 ? ?
1447: 46709.960 1986-10-06 29386 0.159 25.0 3.5 ? ?
1448: 46744.776 1986-11-10 29646 0.093 29.0 3.4 ? ?
1449: 46823.765 1987-01-28 30182 0.213 19.3 -0.2 145.4 -10.6
1450: 46823.786 1987-01-28 30183 0.214 20.7 1.2 ? ?
1451: 46852.535 1987-02-26 30392 0.985 40.3 5.4 15.9 -3.6
1452: 46861.455 1987-03-06 30443 0.225 11.5 -7.8 163.1 5.3
1453: 46919.233 1987-05-03 30901 0.776 35.9 -12.0 ? ?
1454: 47060.818 1987-09-22 31900 0.576 31.4 -8.8 ? ?
1455: 47085.860 1987-10-17 32114 0.248 16.8 -2.4 ? ?
1456: 47103.822 1987-11-04 32222 0.730 45.6 -2.3 -81.4 14.6
1457: 47106.832 1987-11-07 32265 0.811 47.1 0.1 ? ?
1458: 47113.690 1987-11-14 32317 0.995 34.4 0.3 18.8 -8.4
1459: 47125.983 1987-11-26 32398 0.325 21.9 1.2 ? ?
1460: 47141.568 1987-12-12 32505 0.743 48.7 0.7 ? ?
1461: 47167.580 1988-01-07 32677 0.441 27.5 -0.9 ? ?
1462: 47169.553 1988-01-09 32688 0.494 28.6 -4.5 ? ?
1463: 47172.522 1988-01-12 32702 0.574 46.5 6.4 -25.6 0.7
1464: 47198.348 1988-02-06 32872 0.267 18.1 -1.1 ? ?
1465: 47206.425 1988-02-14 32925 0.484 30.4 -1.8 ? ?
1466: 47215.342 1988-02-23 32968 0.723 47.0 -0.9 -103.4 -8.2
1467: 47225.456 1988-03-04 33039 0.995 39.4 5.3 29.1 2.0
1468: 47240.674 1988-03-20 33119 0.403 27.7 2.3 92.9 -11.5
1469: 47258.449 1988-04-06 33221 0.880 42.9 -0.6 -69.2 -12.9
1470: 47262.396 1988-04-10 33245 0.986 29.1 -5.7 13.1 -7.2
1471: 47271.315 1988-04-19 33315 0.226 23.6 4.3 170.4 12.5
1472: 47293.289 1988-05-11 33508 0.816 47.9 1.0 -72.4 13.9
1473: 47305.145 1988-05-23 33616 0.134 17.1 -5.7 ? ?
1474: 47307.279 1988-05-25 33640 0.191 10.7 -9.4 171.8 21.1
1475: 47426.980 1988-09-22 34288 0.404 29.6 4.2 ? ?
1476: 47460.861 1988-10-26 34606 0.313 19.8 -0.5 ? ?
1477: 47478.914 1988-11-13 34736 0.798 48.7 1.3 ? ?
1478: 47514.647 1988-12-19 35074 0.757 38.1 -9.9 -110.3 -13.4
1479: 47515.683 1988-12-20 35082 0.785 55.1 7.4 ? ?
1480: 47517.675 1988-12-22 35094 0.838 54.9 9.0 ? ?
1481: 47518.576 1988-12-23 35101 0.862 36.4 -8.2 ? ?
1482: 47519.662 1988-12-24 35112 0.892 38.4 -4.3 ? ?
1483: 47537.921 1989-01-11 35320 0.382 18.1 -5.7 108.1 -9.9
1484: 47581.733 1989-02-24 35614 0.558 35.8 -2.9 27.8 42.0
1485: 47619.671 1989-04-03 35919 0.576 44.3 4.1 -17.7 9.9
1486: 47656.154 1989-05-09 36229 0.555 40.2 1.7 ? ?
1487: 47908.837 1990-01-17 38034 0.337 18.9 -2.4 ? ?
1488: 47928.730 1990-02-06 38148 0.871 44.4 0.3 ? ?
1489: 47999.467 1990-04-17 38626 0.770 48.7 0.8 -103.3 -7.3
1490: 48004.512 1990-04-23 38655 0.905 43.1 1.4 ? ?
1491: 48175.728 1990-10-11 39806 0.501 21.4 -12.3 42.8 12.3
1492: 48232.662 1990-12-07 40284 0.029 36.1 5.1 36.2 -18.3
1493: 48297.434 1991-02-09 40846 0.768 42.1 -5.9 ? ?
1494: 48349.522 1991-04-03 41276 0.166 10.4 -10.7 ? ?
1495: 49313.649 1993-11-22 49290 0.043 29.7 -0.0 67.6 1.8
1496: 49442.353 1994-03-30 50426 0.498 31.3 -2.1 ? ?
1497: 49470.349 1994-04-27 50635 0.249 22.7 3.5 ? ?
1498: 49686.641 1994-11-30 52938 0.055 29.0 0.3 ? ?
1499: 49762.511 1995-02-14 53907 0.091 29.1 3.3 90.1 -10.7
1500: 49788.326 1995-03-11 54102 0.784 56.3 8.6 -100.7 -6.6
1501: 49789.386 1995-03-12 54111 0.813 54.9 7.9 -93.4 -6.2
1502: 49790.383 1995-03-13 54123 0.839 52.7 6.9 -92.8 -15.5
1503: 49791.385 1995-03-14 54134 0.866 45.9 1.5 ? ?
1504: 49792.457 1995-03-15 54147 0.895 39.0 -3.5 ? ?
1505: 49793.349 1995-03-16 54155 0.919 51.6 10.9 2.7 34.0
1506: 49794.351 1995-03-17 54163 0.946 46.0 7.6 26.9 38.4
1507: 49795.397 1995-03-18 54173 0.974 18.6 -17.4 ? ?
1508: 49796.460 1995-03-19 54183 0.002 31.7 -1.7 32.8 -0.4
1509: 49797.356 1995-03-20 54187 0.027 20.9 -10.3 49.8 -2.7
1510: 49798.385 1995-03-21 54202 0.054 32.2 3.4 72.6 -1.4
1511: 49799.568 1995-03-23 54210 0.086 35.8 9.6 87.2 -9.9
1512: 49800.577 1995-03-24 54215 0.113 25.6 1.4 ? ?
1513: 49801.415 1995-03-24 54220 0.135 35.6 12.9 ? ?
1514: 49802.348 1995-03-25 54223 0.161 31.7 10.3 142.7 3.0
1515: 49803.365 1995-03-26 54230 0.188 20.1 -0.2 ? ?
1516: 49804.296 1995-03-27 54238 0.213 23.5 3.9 154.1 -1.8
1517:
1518: \end{verbatim}
1519:
1520: \clearpage
1521:
1522: \begin{verbatim}
1523:
1524: Title: Detection of a Hot Subdwarf Companion to the Be Star FY CMa
1525: Authors: G. J. Peters, D. R. Gies, E. D. Grundstrom, M. V. McSwain
1526: Table: Red Spectra Measurements
1527: ================================================================================
1528: Byte-by-byte Description of file: tab5.txt
1529: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1530: Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
1531: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1532: 1- 9 F9.3 d Date HJD-2400000
1533: 10- 15 F6.3 -- Phase Orbital phase from Be star superior conjunction
1534: 16- 22 F7.2 0.1nm EQW H-alpha equivalent width (Angstroms)
1535: 23- 28 F6.1 km/s HRV(HA) Heliocentric radial velocity H-alpha wings
1536: 29- 33 A5 km/s HRV(HE) Heliocentric radial velocity He I peaks
1537: 34- 37 A4 km/s DVR(HE) He I peak velocity separation
1538: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1539: Note (1): HRV(HA) values omitted in Fig. 1 and in the orbital solution of
1540: Table 3, column 2, for HJD-2400000 = 47639.671 and 47983.611.
1541: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1542: 46122.805 0.399 -10.98 26.8 ? ?
1543: 46152.702 0.201 -13.32 21.8 216 ?
1544: 46734.931 0.829 -11.22 71.1 -154 ?
1545: 46902.728 0.333 -11.76 30.2 ? ?
1546: 46903.703 0.359 -12.39 25.2 ? ?
1547: 46905.682 0.412 -13.46 34.7 ? ?
1548: 46917.654 0.733 -13.94 56.7 -81 56
1549: 46918.676 0.761 -14.15 42.9 -88 81
1550: 46919.674 0.787 -13.37 56.3 -79 94
1551: 46920.675 0.814 -11.87 52.9 -75 102
1552: 46921.670 0.841 -11.76 46.4 -70 115
1553: 46921.684 0.841 -12.86 43.3 -70 120
1554: 47033.012 0.830 -8.52 62.2 -68 107
1555: 47034.004 0.856 -12.34 53.6 -63 113
1556: 47302.650 0.067 -15.87 33.1 ? ?
1557: 47303.636 0.093 -15.65 32.5 143 ?
1558: 47303.642 0.093 -14.93 40.4 147 ?
1559: 47304.622 0.120 -13.67 35.4 160 ?
1560: 47304.631 0.120 -14.61 39.6 158 ?
1561: 47305.623 0.147 -11.51 45.5 171 ?
1562: 47305.633 0.147 -13.28 42.0 171 ?
1563: 47306.622 0.173 -10.57 44.4 173 ?
1564: 47306.632 0.174 -12.96 41.2 175 ?
1565: 47469.823 0.554 -13.56 49.0 -94 ?
1566: 47469.831 0.554 -13.43 47.0 -99 ?
1567: 47469.914 0.556 -13.15 52.8 -98 ?
1568: 47469.997 0.559 -13.47 54.1 -92 ?
1569: 47470.026 0.559 -13.63 54.6 -96 ?
1570: 47470.826 0.581 -11.53 57.0 -100 ?
1571: 47471.014 0.586 -11.66 54.7 -107 ?
1572: 47471.846 0.608 -11.87 57.9 -111 ?
1573: 47471.995 0.612 -12.00 62.8 -124 ?
1574: 47472.848 0.635 -11.39 66.6 -128 ?
1575: 47473.033 0.640 -11.66 66.3 -132 ?
1576: 47560.654 0.992 -11.66 49.9 ? ?
1577: 47561.681 0.019 -15.26 46.5 ? ?
1578: 47561.792 0.022 -14.90 46.4 ? ?
1579: 47636.683 0.033 -10.94 36.0 ? ?
1580: 47639.671 0.113 -10.92 -13.9 203 ?
1581: 47639.680 0.113 -11.53 33.1 207 ?
1582: 47640.635 0.139 -12.13 32.1 207 ?
1583: 47939.622 0.164 -10.96 18.8 226 ?
1584: 47940.860 0.197 -11.92 10.1 233 ?
1585: 47981.708 0.293 -5.32 10.3 ? ?
1586: 47983.611 0.344 -10.74 4.4 ? ?
1587: 48313.702 0.204 -13.26 28.5 ? ?
1588: 48313.788 0.207 -13.20 29.4 175 ?
1589: 48314.619 0.229 -12.31 35.4 173 ?
1590: 48318.615 0.336 -12.59 20.8 138 113
1591: 48319.800 0.368 -15.66 26.3 122 124
1592: 48320.616 0.390 -12.22 26.3 113 132
1593: 48321.610 0.416 -12.08 43.9 113 137
1594: 48514.969 0.606 -12.09 50.5 -66 ?
1595: 48515.030 0.608 -10.42 53.9 -68 ?
1596: 48515.972 0.633 -11.30 58.2 -96 ?
1597: 48516.017 0.634 -11.93 53.9 -92 ?
1598: 48517.021 0.661 -12.21 58.6 ? ?
1599: 49058.749 0.202 -14.58 34.4 179 ?
1600: 49061.769 0.283 -14.06 39.0 162 94
1601: 49061.773 0.283 -15.28 30.5 160 94
1602: 49443.771 0.536 -14.61 42.9 -52 ?
1603: 49444.729 0.562 -10.59 49.0 -68 ?
1604: 49445.749 0.589 -10.22 52.3 -77 ?
1605: 49447.755 0.643 -13.23 51.7 -96 ?
1606: 51123.027 0.608 -16.17 52.1 ? ?
1607: 51123.034 0.609 -15.94 53.7 ? ?
1608: 51124.020 0.635 -16.40 56.9 ? ?
1609: 51126.033 0.689 -16.83 55.3 ? ?
1610: 51191.897 0.457 -13.75 41.1 ? ?
1611: 51192.937 0.485 -14.95 41.7 ? ?
1612: 51193.927 0.512 -13.53 46.0 ? ?
1613: 51196.937 0.592 -13.35 53.9 -68 ?
1614: 51197.933 0.619 -14.21 55.1 -73 ?
1615: 51502.936 0.806 -13.04 59.8 -141 ?
1616: 51503.977 0.833 -14.12 59.4 -137 ?
1617: 51504.994 0.861 -13.71 57.7 -112 ?
1618: 51506.025 0.888 -13.94 54.6 -132 ?
1619: 51507.019 0.915 -14.53 49.8 -130 ?
1620: 51508.023 0.942 -14.07 47.1 -53 124
1621: 51509.013 0.969 -13.77 46.8 -14 100
1622: 51510.006 0.995 -15.13 46.0 -6 120
1623: 51510.053 0.997 -15.52 44.6 -2 111
1624: 51510.798 0.017 -15.91 43.7 72 ?
1625: 51510.847 0.018 -15.76 42.2 73 ?
1626: 51510.918 0.020 -15.41 44.6 78 ?
1627: 51510.969 0.021 -15.33 43.5 83 ?
1628: 51511.946 0.047 -16.08 40.7 97 ?
1629: 51512.015 0.049 -15.34 41.3 98 ?
1630: 51512.037 0.050 -15.39 40.7 100 ?
1631: 51612.632 0.750 -12.91 69.1 -162 ?
1632: 51612.693 0.751 -13.83 69.8 -160 ?
1633: 51612.802 0.754 -12.84 69.0 -159 ?
1634: 51612.822 0.755 -11.87 66.8 -154 ?
1635: 51613.617 0.776 -12.95 66.5 -157 ?
1636: 51613.703 0.779 -12.81 67.5 -152 ?
1637: 51613.712 0.779 -13.04 67.3 -160 ?
1638: 51613.751 0.780 -13.07 69.2 -158 ?
1639: 51614.612 0.803 -13.18 69.5 -156 ?
1640: 51614.829 0.809 -13.68 69.7 -160 ?
1641: 51615.607 0.830 -13.24 68.1 -158 ?
1642: 51615.717 0.833 -13.08 67.0 -160 ?
1643: 51615.759 0.834 -14.07 67.1 -160 ?
1644: 51615.801 0.835 -14.01 65.8 -152 ?
1645: 51615.842 0.836 -14.39 65.8 -146 ?
1646: 51616.623 0.857 -14.39 60.0 -163 ?
1647: 51617.608 0.883 -13.96 58.7 -138 ?
1648: 51817.984 0.262 -13.96 35.3 193 ?
1649: 51818.977 0.288 -14.02 33.6 158 77
1650: 51819.980 0.315 -14.27 35.5 144 96
1651: 51820.996 0.342 -14.20 37.9 140 100
1652: 51821.996 0.369 -13.28 40.9 140 117
1653: 51822.982 0.396 -14.00 44.4 133 122
1654: 51823.971 0.422 -13.46 46.9 131 126
1655: 51824.981 0.449 -12.68 53.2 123 126
1656: 51830.997 0.611 -14.50 57.6 -96 ?
1657: 51849.861 0.117 -15.69 43.4 175 ?
1658: 51849.914 0.119 -15.47 40.1 179 ?
1659: 51849.961 0.120 -14.25 39.9 177 ?
1660: 51851.046 0.149 -17.06 39.3 181 ?
1661: 51851.055 0.149 -16.71 40.9 183 ?
1662: 51851.839 0.170 -16.05 38.9 184 ?
1663: 51851.854 0.171 -15.72 35.1 184 ?
1664: 51889.975 0.194 -15.07 29.4 187 ?
1665: 51890.901 0.219 -14.71 34.3 203 ?
1666: 51892.904 0.273 -14.60 31.6 195 ?
1667: 51893.902 0.299 -14.78 32.1 161 83
1668: 51894.901 0.326 -14.63 35.1 147 98
1669: 51895.969 0.355 -14.29 40.9 144 122
1670: 51896.942 0.381 -14.66 40.7 131 135
1671: 51897.937 0.408 -14.56 46.4 126 141
1672: 51898.948 0.435 -14.27 44.7 116 135
1673: 51899.942 0.461 -13.67 48.4 127 143
1674: 51900.935 0.488 -13.71 53.7 112 160
1675: 51901.944 0.515 -13.92 51.0 11 ?
1676: 51913.671 0.830 -13.54 72.2 -160 ?
1677: 51913.717 0.831 -13.25 72.8 -164 ?
1678: 51913.761 0.832 -13.98 72.2 -160 ?
1679: 51913.807 0.834 -14.11 72.6 -162 ?
1680: 51913.831 0.834 -14.14 71.6 -160 ?
1681: 51913.851 0.835 -14.19 71.5 -162 ?
1682: 51913.931 0.837 -13.91 72.0 -160 ?
1683: 51913.969 0.838 -13.81 69.8 -160 ?
1684: 51914.014 0.839 -12.79 69.0 -159 ?
1685: 51914.706 0.858 -14.23 66.8 -158 ?
1686: 51914.808 0.860 -14.34 68.7 -157 ?
1687: 51915.693 0.884 -13.88 66.5 -154 ?
1688: 51915.709 0.885 -13.94 66.8 -152 ?
1689: 51915.766 0.886 -13.82 67.5 -151 ?
1690: 51916.919 0.917 -14.32 64.7 -147 ?
1691: 51916.960 0.918 -14.32 60.8 -147 ?
1692: 51916.976 0.919 -14.22 60.9 -152 ?
1693: 51917.757 0.940 -13.90 57.3 -144 ?
1694: 53291.988 0.825 -15.21 52.0 -73 98
1695: 53293.014 0.853 -15.12 49.4 -64 107
1696: 53294.994 0.906 -15.09 41.1 -43 132
1697: 53294.996 0.906 -15.00 38.1 -45 132
1698: 54020.984 0.392 -13.53 31.7 ? ?
1699: 54024.967 0.499 -13.95 39.9 ? ?
1700:
1701:
1702: \end{verbatim}
1703:
1704: \end{document}
1705: