1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2005 December 5
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19:
20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
21:
22: %%\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
23:
24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
25:
26: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
27:
28: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
29: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
30: %% use the longabstract style option.
31:
32: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
33:
34: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
35: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
36: %% the \begin{document} command.
37: %%
38: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
39: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
40: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
41: %% for information.
42:
43: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
44: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
45:
46: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
47:
48: %%-\slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
49:
50: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
51: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
52: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
53: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
54: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
55: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
56:
57: \shorttitle{Evidence for polar jets as precursors of polar plume formation}
58: \shortauthors{Raouafi et al. 2008}
59:
60: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
61: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
62:
63: \begin{document}
64:
65: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
66: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
67: %% you desire.
68:
69: \title{Evidence for polar jets as precursors of polar plume formation}
70:
71: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
72: %% author and affiliation information.
73: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
74: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
75: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
76: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
77: %
78: \author{N.-E. Raouafi\altaffilmark{1}, G. J. D. Petrie\altaffilmark{1}, A. A. Norton\altaffilmark{1},
79: C. J. Henney\altaffilmark{1}, and S. K. Solanki\altaffilmark{2}}
80:
81: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
82: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
83: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
84: %% affiliation.
85:
86: \altaffiltext{1}{National Solar Observatory, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA. nraouafi@nso.edu;
87: petrie@nso.edu; norton@nso.edu; henney@nso.edu.}
88: \altaffiltext{2}{Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research, 37191 Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany.
89: solanki@mps.mpg.de.}
90:
91: %%%%\altaffiltext{2}{Society of Fellows, Harvard University.}
92: %%%%\altaffiltext{3}{present address: Center for Astrophysics,
93: %%%% 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138}
94: %%%%\altaffiltext{4}{Visiting Programmer, Space Telescope Science Institute}
95: %%%%\altaffiltext{5}{Patron, Alonso's Bar and Grill}
96:
97: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
98: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
99: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
100: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
101: %% editorial office after submission.
102:
103: \begin{abstract}
104:
105: Observations from the Hinode/XRT telescope and STEREO/SECCHI/EUVI are utilized to study polar
106: coronal jets and plumes. The study focuses on the temporal evolution of both structures and their
107: relationship. The data sample, spanning April 7-8 2007, shows that over $90\%$ of the 28 observed
108: jet events are associated with polar plumes. EUV images (STEREO/SECCHI) show plume haze rising from
109: the location of approximately $70\%$ of the polar X-ray (Hinode/XRT) and EUV jets, with the plume
110: haze appearing minutes to hours after the jet was observed. The remaining jets occurred in areas
111: where plume material previously existed causing a brightness enhancement of the latter after the
112: jet event. Short-lived, jet-like events and small transient bright points are seen (one at a time)
113: at different locations within the base of pre-existing long-lived plumes. X-ray images also show
114: instances (at least two events) of collimated-thin jets rapidly evolving into significantly wider
115: plume-like structures that are followed by the delayed appearance of plume haze in the EUV. These
116: observations provide evidence that X-ray jets are precursors of polar plumes, and in some cases
117: cause brightenings of plumes. Possible mechanisms to explain the observed jet and plume
118: relationship are discussed.
119:
120: \end{abstract}
121:
122: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
123: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
124: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
125: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
126:
127: \keywords{Sun: corona --- Sun: magnetic fields --- Sun: UV radiation --- Sun: X-rays}
128:
129: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
130: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
131: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
132: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
133: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
134: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
135: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
136: %% each reference.
137:
138:
139: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
140: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so by tagging
141: %% their objects with \objectname{} or \object{}. Each macro takes the
142: %% object name as its required argument. The optional, square-bracket
143: %% argument should be used in cases where the data center identification
144: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper. The text appearing
145: %% in curly braces is what will appear in print in the published paper.
146: %% If the object name is recognized by the data centers, it will be linked
147: %% in the electronic edition to the object data available at the data centers
148: %%
149: %% Note that for sources with brackets in their names, e.g. [WEG2004] 14h-090,
150: %% the brackets must be escaped with backslashes when used in the first
151: %% square-bracket argument, for instance, \object[\[WEG2004\] 14h-090]{90}).
152: %% Otherwise, LaTeX will issue an error.
153:
154: \section{Introduction}
155:
156: Recent space missions, such as Hinode \citep{Kosugi07} and STEREO \citep{Kaiser08}, and
157: ground-based facilities such as SOLIS \citep{Keller03} provide a set of data unprecedented in
158: quality and cadence. The complementary observations from the different instruments provide the
159: necessary spatial, temporal and temperature coverage to observe the dynamics of jets and polar
160: plumes, helping to form a more complete picture of these structures.
161:
162: X-ray jets occur almost everywhere in the solar corona \citep[see][]{Shibata92}, in particular
163: in the polar holes. They are characterized by their transient nature and often appear as
164: collimated high-temperature emissive beam guided by open magnetic flux \cite[length of $10^5-10^6$
165: km and collimated widths of $\sim10^4$ km; see][]{Cirtain07}. \cite{Cirtain07} reported that the
166: plasma outflow speeds within X-ray jets range from $\sim100$ to $\sim1000$ km~s$^{-1}$ and that
167: Alfv\'en waves are responsible for the high outflow velocities.
168:
169: In contrast, polar coronal plumes are observed to be hazy in nature without sharp edges, as seen in
170: extreme ultra-violet (EUV) images from SOHO/EIT \citep{Boudin95} and STEREO/SECCHI/EUVI
171: \citep{Howard08}. Plumes are also observed to be significantly wider than X-ray jets
172: \cite[$\sim20-40$~Mm; see][]{Wilhelm06} and reach several solar radii in height
173: \cite[see][]{DeForest97}. Plumes are brighter, cooler and the plasma outflows are smaller than in
174: inter-plumes \citep[see][]{DeForest97,Wilhelm98,Raouafi07}.
175:
176: %%Plumes are brighter than the background due to higher densities compared
177: %%to inter-plume regions. Plumes are cooler and the plasma outflows are smaller than in inter-plumes
178: %%\citep[see][]{DeForest97,Wilhelm98,Raouafi07}.
179:
180: Recent studies of jets and polar plumes \citep[X-ray and EUV; see][]{Wang98,MInsertis08} treat
181: these coronal structures independently and the relationship between them is not investigated. The
182: present research is motivated by the fact that polar X-ray and EUV jets and plumes usually share
183: common properties. Both are episodic in nature and occur at magnetic field concentrations that
184: coincide with the chromospheric network where both structures form through flux emergence
185: \citep[see][]{Canfield96,Wang98}. Studying the relationship between jets and plumes is important to
186: understand their formation processes, evolution and the eventual contributions to the solar wind
187: and heating of the plasma in the polar coronal holes. The present work is motivated by the
188: observations of polar jets evolving into plumes such as the one shown in
189: Fig.~\ref{EUV_fig_jet_plume_070407_2200}. The aim of the paper is to investigate the relationship
190: between these prominent coronal structures.
191:
192: \section{Observations and Data Analysis}
193:
194: The XRT telescope \citep{Golub07} on Hinode provides high resolution images ($\approx1-2\arcsec$
195: depending on the location within the field of view) of the solar corona at temperatures ranging
196: from 1-20~MK. Observations of the southern coronal hole from XRT were utilized to study the
197: evolution of polar X-ray jets and their relation with plumes. The data cover several time intervals
198: on April 7-8, 2007 (07 April: 03:30 - 06:59 UT and 18:29 - 23:59 UT; 08 April: 11:49 - 17:59 UT and
199: 21:30 - 22:59 UT) with a cadence of less than a minute. The data were corrected for instrumental
200: effects utilizing XRT-calibration procedures.
201:
202: A total of 28 X-ray jets were identified, with at least two recurring events within an hour. Most
203: of the events are characterized by sharp collimated beams. The observed jets have different
204: properties with regards to brightness, spatial extension, lifetime, and evolution. The bright point
205: at the base of each jet is enhanced in brightness with every eruption and then fades after the jet
206: is no longer observed.
207:
208: In addition, 171~{\AA} images from the STEREO/SECCHI satellite ``A'' were utilized to study EUV
209: features in relation to the identified X-ray events. Particular attention was given to the presence
210: of plume material during or after the eruption of jets. The choice of 171~{\AA} was dictated by the
211: adequate temperature corresponding to polar plume emissions.
212:
213: %%Images recorded every one and a half minutes were selected for the present study.
214:
215: \section{Results}
216:
217: Fig.~\ref{solis_070407_jet_plume} displays the LOS-chromospheric magnetogram (Ca~{\sc{ii}}
218: 8542~{\AA}) of the south pole on April 7, 2007 recorded by the SOLIS/VSM instrument
219: \citep{Henney08}. Spatial location of the X-ray jets on April 7$^{\rm{th}}$ and 8$^{\rm{th}}$ are
220: marked by `+' and `$\times$' signs, respectively. No SOLIS/VSM chromospheric magnetograms were
221: available for April 8, 2007. The solar rotation effect on the events' spatial locations has been
222: corrected using the model by \citet{Howard90}. It is clear that most jet events, in particular
223: those of April 7$^{\rm{th}}$, are rooted in or near magnetic flux concentrations. At the base of
224: bright jets are relatively large flux elements of one polarity surrounded by more diffuse flux of
225: the opposite polarity (see Figs.~\ref{solis_070407_jet_plume} and \ref{fig_letter_080407_0332UT}).
226: Weaker and short-lived jets are based in areas of more diffuse magnetic flux.
227:
228: Top panels of Figs.~\ref{fig_letter_080407_0332UT}-\ref{fig_letter_080408_2240UT} show a sample of
229: nine X-ray jets recorded by Hinode/XRT on April 7$^{\rm{th}}$ and 8$^{\rm{th}}$ 2007, respectively.
230: The different events are indexed xj$_i$ ($i=1-9$) according to the time of their appearance.
231: Although the brevity of the polar observation sequences did not allow us to determine the real
232: lifetime of several events, jet lifetimes are estimated to range from minutes to a few tens of
233: minutes with a number of events recurring within an hour, such as the event xj$_1$.
234:
235: The middle and bottom panels of Figs.~\ref{fig_letter_080407_0332UT}-\ref{fig_letter_080408_2240UT}
236: display EUV images of the southern polar region corresponding to the X-ray observations. The data
237: cover time intervals spreading over several hours after the disappearance of the X-ray events. A
238: number of X-ray jet events are also present in EUV images (i.e., xj$_1$ and xj$_2$ in
239: Fig.~\ref{fig_letter_080407_0332UT}a and corresponding EUV structure in
240: Fig.~\ref{fig_letter_080407_0332UT}d; similarly xj$_7$ in Fig.~\ref{fig_letter_080408_2240UT}a and
241: Fig.~\ref{fig_letter_080408_2240UT}g-h). Some of these events look brighter and sharper in EUV than
242: in X-ray (see xj$_2$ in Fig.~\ref{fig_letter_080407_0332UT}a and EUV counterpart in
243: Fig.~\ref{fig_letter_080407_0332UT}d), perhaps for plasma temperature reasons. This highlights that
244: X-ray and EUV jet events are contiguous when plasma conditions allow emission in both temperature
245: ranges.
246:
247: \begin{deluxetable}{ccc}
248: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
249: \tablecaption{Correlation of X-ray jets to the EUV jet plume events shown in
250: Figs.\ref{fig_letter_080407_0332UT}-\ref{fig_letter_080408_2240UT}.
251: Events close to the limb (i.e., xj$_3$, xj$_4$ and xj$_8$) are not listed.\label{corr_jet_plume}}
252: \tablewidth{0pt}
253: \tablehead{
254: \colhead{X-ray jet} & \colhead{EUV jet} & \colhead{Polar plume} }
255: \startdata
256: xj$_1$ (Fig.\ref{fig_letter_080407_0332UT}a) & Fig.\ref{fig_letter_080407_0332UT}d &
257: Fig.\ref{fig_letter_080407_0332UT}e-i \\
258: xj$_2$ (Fig.\ref{fig_letter_080407_0332UT}a) & Fig.\ref{fig_letter_080407_0332UT}d &
259: Fig.\ref{fig_letter_080407_0332UT}e-f \\
260: xj$_5$ (Fig.\ref{fig_letter_080407_0332UT}c) & -- & Fig.\ref{fig_letter_080407_0332UT}g \\
261: xj$_6$ (Fig.\ref{fig_letter_080408_2240UT}a-c) & Fig.\ref{fig_letter_080408_2240UT}d &
262: Fig.\ref{fig_letter_080408_2240UT}e-i \\
263: xj$_7$ (Fig.\ref{fig_letter_080408_2240UT}a) & -- & Fig.\ref{fig_letter_080408_2240UT}g-i \\
264: xj$_9$ (Fig.\ref{fig_letter_080408_2240UT}c) & -- & Fig.\ref{fig_letter_080408_2240UT}g-i
265: \enddata
266: \end{deluxetable}
267:
268: The EUV data show that a significant number of polar jet eruptions are followed by rising polar
269: plume haze with a time delay ranging from minutes to hours. Table~\ref{corr_jet_plume} summarizes
270: the correlation and corresponding figures between the different X-ray and EUV events. A good
271: example of plume haze appearing after a jet is given by the event xj$_6$, where collimated plasma
272: emission is observed both in X-ray and in EUV images (see Fig.~\ref{fig_letter_080408_2240UT}). The
273: xj$_6$ event first appeared in X-ray images earlier than 21:31 UT (no X-ray data available to
274: determine the exact start time). This event dimmed around 21:47 UT and reappeared again around
275: 21:58 UT. The collimated EUV emission lasted longer than the X-ray one and evolved gradually into a
276: wider and hazy structure that lasted for several hours, showing a polar plume with time-varying
277: emission. Events xj$_3$, xj$_4$ and xj$_8$ were adjacent to off-limb plume emission locations.
278: Cases of polar jets erupting within the base of ongoing plumes resulted in emission enhancement of
279: the latter (compare P$_{07}$ in Fig.~\ref{fig_letter_080407_0332UT}f \& h and
280: Fig.~\ref{fig_letter_080407_0332UT}i; and P$_{08}$ in Fig.~\ref{fig_letter_080408_2240UT}d-i).
281:
282: \section{Discussion}
283:
284: X-ray and EUV observations indicate that more than 90\% of the jets observed in the southern polar
285: hole on April 7-8, 2007 are associated with plume haze. 70\% of these jets are followed by polar
286: plumes with a time delay ranging from minutes to tens of minutes. Emission of pre-existing plumes
287: is enhanced after every jet eruption within their base. A number of prominent plumes (e.g.,
288: P$_{07}$ and P$_{08}$) show evidence for short lived, jet-like events in the EUV that occur within
289: the plume base (see the sharp structures Fig.~\ref{fig_letter_080407_0332UT}(f) \& (h) and the
290: several bright points in panel (i)). Jet-like events ensure the continuous rise of haze and may
291: contribute to the change in plume brightness \cite[see][]{DeForest97}.
292:
293: %\citet{Wang98} points out that polar plumes lag the formation of bright points by several hours.
294:
295: The event xj$_7$ in Fig.~\ref{fig_letter_080408_2240UT} is an interesting case. It was observed in
296: X-rays from 21:58 - 22:16 UT on April 8, 2007. Fig.~\ref{fig_letter_080408_2240UT}(d-e) shows an
297: EUV collimated structure similar to the one observed in X-rays more than three hours earlier. This
298: may be caused by the plasma being heated to several MK and then becoming visible in X-rays, then
299: gradually cooling down until it appears in the EUV range. More data needs to be analyzed to confirm
300: the plausibility of this hypothesis.
301:
302: The event xj$_9$, illustrated by Fig.~\ref{fig_letter_080408_2240UT}(c), is also peculiar and
303: lasted less than 30 minutes. A narrow, collimated beam of plasma rose from the left edge of the
304: large bright point with a shape typical of X-ray jets. It evolved rapidly and after 4-5 minutes the
305: base width of the emission began to widen to cover the whole bright point. The width of the
306: emitting structure exceeded 20~Mm, which is the typical width of polar plumes
307: \cite[see][]{Wilhelm06}. EUV images showed a faint haze several hours after the X-ray event (see
308: Fig.~\ref{fig_letter_080408_2240UT}d-i). GONG magnetograms show that the flux at the base of xj$_9$
309: weakened during the event's lifetime. We believe that the initial jet event evolved into a plume
310: due to significant emerging magnetic flux causing a catastrophic magnetic reconnection on a
311: relatively short time scale but over a large spatial area. This may allow dissipation of the
312: magnetic energy budget of the structure over a short period of time with an associated ejection of
313: a significant amount of material over a relative large spatial scale, unlike other jet-plume events
314: that develop over intervals of several hours. This type of event is recorded twice in the data set
315: utilized here.
316:
317: It is likely that jets play a key role in the formation process of polar plumes. Both coronal
318: structures share numerous common characteristics, i.e., a magnetic field of mixed polarities at the
319: base, leading to magnetic reconnection. We believe that the magnetic flux emergence causes the jet,
320: opening of previously closed flux results in plume. Jet eruption seems to be the result of
321: gradually emerging magnetic flux from the solar interior that suddenly reconnects on a small scale
322: with the ambient photospheric field, leading to a collimated beam of plasma rising in the corona
323: \citep[e.g.,][]{Yokoyama95}. EUV images show that coronal plume haze is observed following the jet
324: events. They also provide evidence for several small bright points and short-lived, jet-like events
325: within the base of the plume. These may be the results of magnetic reconnection at smaller
326: spatio-temporal scales that modulate and sporadically brighten pre-existing polar plumes. This is
327: most often seen in long-lived polar plumes, since several phases of reconnection can develop in a
328: single long-lived structure. However, fast opening of magnetic flux can allow a plume to develop
329: almost immediately such as in the case of the xj$_9$ event.
330:
331: The transition from fast, impulsive, magnetically-driven dynamics of reconnection to the thermal
332: expansion of newly liberated gas along opened magnetic field could explain the time delay observed
333: between the jet and plume events. On the one hand, the jet eruption is the result of fast and
334: explosive dissipation of magnetic energy on a short time scale. On the other hand, the plume might
335: be a result of a pressure gradient within the open flux, which would lift the plume material in the
336: corona. This hypothesis is supported by the fact that plasma outflow velocities in plumes are
337: measured to be rather low up to $\sim1~R_\sun$ above the solar surface. The continuous emergence of
338: magnetic flux at a slow rate and relatively large scale might ultimately create a sizable bundle of
339: newly opened flux, allowing in turn a significant plume of escaping plasma to develop.
340:
341: It is beyond us to simulate the development of a jet into a plume in an MHD model. However, some
342: basic physics of such a development can be anticipated.
343:
344: If a bipolar field emerges into a unipolar, open field region, then the two fields are not, in
345: general, exactly parallel across the boundary between them. Then, according to Parker's (1994)
346: theory, a magnetic tangential discontinuity forms and current dissipation and field reconnection
347: become inevitable at this boundary. Any two non-parallel fields can be resolved into parallel and
348: anti-parallel components. The anti-parallel components will mutually annihilate at the
349: discontinuity. The dissipated magnetic energy is partially converted to kinetic and thermal energy,
350: which would cause a jet of energized plasma to escape along the open field next to the dissipating
351: current sheet. Whenever some quantity of open flux is locally annihilated along the current sheet
352: an equal quantity of closed flux must become open for magnetic flux continuity
353: (${\bf\nabla}\cdot{\bf B}=0$). This open flux can allow a plume of thermally expanding plasma,
354: formerly trapped by its closed field, to escape.
355:
356: A jet model with a single magnetic neutral point such as Yokoyama \& Shibata's (1996) anenome jet
357: model (see their Figure 1) could also result in a plume. Energy gained from emerging flux is
358: converted to kinetic and thermal energy at the X-type neutral point during reconnection producing a
359: jet of energized plasma. When the field has reconnected, there is a bundle of newly-opened
360: magnetic flux through which hitherto trapped coronal plasma can escape as a plume.
361:
362: The present results would benefit from future, more extensive analysis of larger data samples
363: recorded by different instruments in a simultaneous fashion over large time intervals.
364:
365: \acknowledgements
366: The authors would like to thank the anonymous referee and J. W. Harvey for helpful comments on the
367: manuscript. The National Solar Observatory (NSO) is operated by the Association of Universities for
368: Research in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation.
369: SOLIS data used here are produced cooperatively by NSF/NSO and NASA/LWS. NER's work is supported by
370: NASA grant NNH05AA12I. NER is a member of the coronal polar plume study team sponsored by the
371: International Space Science Institute (ISSI), Bern, Switzerland.
372:
373: \begin{thebibliography}{}
374:
375: \bibitem[Cirtain et al.(2007)]{Cirtain07} Cirtain, J. W., et al. 2007,
376: Science, 318, 1580
377:
378: \bibitem[Canfield et al.(1996)]{Canfield96} Canfield, R. C., Reardon, K. P., Leka, K. D.,
379: et al. 1996, \apj, 464, 1016
380:
381: \bibitem[DeForest et al.(1997)]{DeForest97} DeForest, C. E., et al.
382: 1997, \solphys, 175, 393
383:
384: %\bibitem[DeForest et al.(2001)]{DeForest01} DeForest, C. E., Lamy, P. L., Llebaria, A. 2001,
385: %\apj, 560, 490
386:
387: \bibitem[Delaboudini\`ere et al.(1995)]{Boudin95} Delaboudini\`ere, J.-P., et al. 1995, \solphys,
388: 162, 291
389:
390: \bibitem[Golub et al.(2007)]{Golub07} Golub, L., et al. 2007, \solphys, 243, 63
391:
392: \bibitem[Henney et al.(2008)]{Henney08} Henney, C. J., et al. 2008, SPW-5, ASP Conf. Series, in
393: press
394:
395: \bibitem[Howard et al.(1990)]{Howard90} Howard, R. F., Harvey, J. W., \& Forgach, S. 1990, \solphys,
396: 130, 295
397:
398: \bibitem[Howard et al.(2008)]{Howard08} Howard, R.A., et al. 2008, \ssr, 136, 67
399:
400: \bibitem[Kaiser et al.(2008)]{Kaiser08} Kaiser, M. L., Kucera, T. A., Davila, J. M., et al.
401: 2008, \ssr, 136, 5
402:
403: \bibitem[Keller et al.(2003)]{Keller03} Keller, C. U., Harvey, J. W., \& Giampapa, M. S. 2003,
404: Proc. SPIE, 4853, 194
405:
406: \bibitem[Kosugi et al.(2007)]{Kosugi07} Kosugi, T., et al. 2007, \solphys, 243, 3
407:
408: \bibitem[Moreno-Insertis et al.(2008)]{MInsertis08} Moreno-Insertis, F., Galsgaard, K., \&
409: Ugarte-Urra, I. 2008, \apj, 673, L211
410:
411: \bibitem[Parker(1994)]{Parker94} Parker, E. N. 1994, {\it{``Spontaneous current sheets in magnetic
412: fields : with applications to stellar x-rays''}}, New York : Oxford University Press
413:
414: \bibitem[Raouafi et al.(2007)]{Raouafi07} Raouafi, N.-E., Harvey, J. W., \& Solanki, S. K. 2007,
415: \apj, 658, 643
416:
417: \bibitem[Shibata et al.(1992)]{Shibata92} Shibata, K., et al. 1992, \pasj, 44, L173
418:
419: \bibitem[Wang(1998)]{Wang98} Wang, Y.-M. 1998, \apj, 501, L145
420:
421: \bibitem[Wilhelm et al.(1998)]{Wilhelm98} Wilhelm, K., Marsch, E., Dwivedi, B. N., et al. 1998,
422: ApJ, 500, 1023
423:
424: \bibitem[Wilhelm(2006)]{Wilhelm06} Wilhelm, K. 2006, \aap, 455, 697
425:
426: \bibitem[Yokoyama \& Shibata(1995)]{Yokoyama95} Yokoyama, T., \& Shibata, K. 1995, \nat, 375, 42
427:
428: \bibitem[Yokoyama \& Shibata(1996)]{Yokoyama96} Yokoyama, T., \& Shibata, K. 1996, \pasj, 48, 353
429:
430: \end{thebibliography}
431:
432: \clearpage
433:
434:
435: \begin{figure*}
436: \begin{center}
437: \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{f1.eps}
438: \caption{STEREO/SECCHI/EUVI ``A'' images illustrating an EUV polar jet evolving into a polar plume
439: with a time delay of 10-15 minutes. \label{EUV_fig_jet_plume_070407_2200}}
440: \end{center}
441: \end{figure*}
442:
443: \begin{figure*}
444: \begin{center}
445: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{f2.eps}
446: \caption{SOLIS/VSM line-of-sight chromospheric magnetogram (Ca~{\sc{ii}} 8542~{\AA}) showing the
447: location of the X-ray jets observed by Hinode/XRT on 2007 April 7$^{\rm{th}}$ (`+' signs) and
448: 8$^{\rm{th}}$ (`$\times$' signs). Their displacement due to solar differential rotation is taken
449: into account. \label{solis_070407_jet_plume}}
450: \end{center}
451: \end{figure*}
452:
453: \begin{figure*}
454: \begin{center}
455: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{f3a.eps}
456: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{f3b_small.eps}
457: \caption{Top: Hinode/XRT snapshots of the southern polar coronal hole recorded on 07 April 2007
458: showing several X-ray jet events. X-ray jets are labeled by xj$_i$ $(i=1,...,5)$ according to their
459: time of appearance. Middle and bottom: 171~{\AA} images from STEREO/SECCHI/EUVI ``A'' of the
460: southern polar hole of the same day. Polar plume haze clearly rise from the same locations as X-ray
461: and EUV jets with a time delay ranging from minutes to hours. A number of short-lived,
462: jet-like events also occur at the base of polar plumes.
463: \label{fig_letter_080407_0332UT}}
464: \end{center}
465: \end{figure*}
466:
467: \begin{figure*}
468: \begin{center}
469: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{f4a.eps}
470: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{f4b_small.eps}
471: \caption{Same as Fig.~\ref{fig_letter_080407_0332UT} but for 08 April 2007. EUV images are
472: recorded on 08 and 09 April 2007. \label{fig_letter_080408_2240UT}}
473: \end{center}
474: \end{figure*}
475:
476: %% The following command ends your manuscript. LaTeX will ignore any text
477: %% that appears after it.
478:
479:
480: \end{document}
481:
482: %%
483: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
484:
485: