1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %%%%%% template.tex for PTPTeX.cls <ver.0.91> %%%%%
3: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
4: \documentclass[letter]{ptptex}
5: %\documentclass[letter]{ptptex}
6: %\documentclass[seceq,supplement]{ptptex}
7: %\documentclass[seceq,addenda]{ptptex}
8: %\documentclass[seceq,errata]{ptptex}
9: %\documentclass[seceq,preprint]{ptptex}
10:
11: \usepackage{graphicx}
12: %\usepackage{wrapft}
13:
14: %%%%% Personal Macros %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
15: \newcommand{\VEV}[1]{\langle{#1}\rangle}
16: \newcommand{\chibar}{{\bar{\chi}}}
17: \newcommand{\Psfig}[2]{\includegraphics[width=#1]{#2}}
18: \newcommand{\Feff}[1]{{\cal F}_\mathrm{#1}}
19: \newcommand{\Vq}{{\cal V}_\mathrm{q}}
20: \newcommand{\Mc}{{\cal M}}
21: \newcommand{\Od}{{\cal O}}
22: \newcommand{\Vp}{V^{+}}
23: \newcommand{\Vm}{V^{-}}
24: \newcommand{\bsig}{b_\sigma}
25: \newcommand{\mqSCL}{m_q^\mathrm{SCL}}
26: \newcommand{\ssN}{{\scriptscriptstyle N}}
27: \newcommand{\ssB}{{\scriptscriptstyle B}}
28: \newcommand{\rhoB}{\rho_{\scriptscriptstyle B}}
29: \newcommand{\Fint}{{\cal D}}
30: \newcommand{\Kern}{K}
31: \newcommand{\comment}[1]{}
32: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
33:
34: %\pubinfo{Vol.~11X, No.~X, Mmmmm YYYY}%Editorial Office will fill in this.
35: %\setcounter{page}{} %Editorial Office will fill in this.
36: %\def\ptype{p} %Editorial Office will fill in this.
37: %\def\ptpsubject{} %Editorial Office will fill in this.
38: %\def\pageinfo{X-X} %Editorial Office will fill in this.
39: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------
40: %\nofigureboxrule %to eliminate the rule of \figurebox
41: %\notypesetlogo %comment in if to eliminate PTPTeX
42: %---- When [preprint] you can put preprint number at top right corner.
43: %\preprintnumber[3cm]{%<-- [..]: optional width of preprint # column.
44: %KUNS-1325\\PTPTeX ver.0.8\\ August, 1997}
45: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------
46:
47: \markboth{% %running head for odd-page (authors' name)
48: K.~Miura, T.~Z.~Nakano and A.~Ohnishi%
49: }{% %running head for even-page (`short' title)
50: Quarkyonic matter in SC-LQCD
51: }
52:
53: \title{% %You can use \\ for explicit line-break
54: Quarkyonic matter in lattice QCD at strong coupling
55: }
56: %\subtitle{Subtitle} %use this when you want a subtitle
57: \author{
58: Kohtaroh \textsc{Miura}$^1$,
59: Takashi Z. \textsc{Nakano}$^2$
60: and
61: Akira \textsc{Ohnishi}$^1$
62: }
63: %
64: \inst{% %Affiliation, neglected when [addenda] or [errata]
65: $^1$Yukawa Institute of Theoretical Physics, Kyoto University,
66: Kyoto 606-8502, Japan\\
67: $^2$Department of Physics, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502
68: }
69:
70: %\publishedin{% %Write this ONLY in cases of [addenda] and [errata].
71: %Prog.~Theor.~Phys.\ \textbf{XX} (19YY), page.}
72:
73: %\recdate{Mmmmm DD, YYYY}% %Editorial Office will fill in this.
74:
75: \abst{% %This abstract is neglected when [addenda] or [errata].
76: We study the phase diagram of quark matter
77: at finite temperature and density
78: in the strong coupling lattice QCD
79: with one species of unrooted staggered fermions
80: including finite coupling ($1/g^2$) effects
81: for color SU($N_c$).
82: We find that we may have partially chiral restored medium density matter
83: at $N_c=3$,
84: which would correspond to the quarkyonic matter suggested at large $N_c$.
85: }
86:
87: %\PTPindex{123, 456} %Input the subject index(es) of your paper,
88: %neglected when [supplement], [addenda] or [errata].
89: % The list of Subject Index is available at
90: % http://solution.dynacom.jp/cgi-bin/ptp/submission/subject_index.cgi
91:
92: \begin{document}
93:
94: \maketitle
95:
96: %\section{Introduction}\label{Sec:Introduction}
97:
98: The QCD phase transition at finite temperature ($T$)
99: is the latest vacuum phase transition in our universe,
100: and it can be experimentally investigated at RHIC and LHC.
101: Phase transitions at finite chemical potential ($\mu$) in dense matter
102: may be also realized during black hole formation or in neutron stars,
103: where we have the following central question.
104: {\em ``What is the next to the hadronic Nambu-Goldstone phase
105: in the larger $\mu$ direction ?''}
106: Monte-Carlo (MC) simulations are not yet reliable
107: in the region $\mu/T>1$ because of the notorious sign problem,
108: then it is necessary to invoke some approximations
109: such as the large number of colors ($N_c$)~\cite{QY}
110: or the strong coupling limit (SCL)~\cite{SCL,DKS,KMOO,Jolicoeur:1983tz,FP,Bilic,Ohnishi2007,Bringoltz}
111: in order to answer this question in QCD.
112:
113: Recently, McLerran and Pisarski have shown that
114: the {\em next} phase at large $N_c$ should be
115: the so called {\em quarkyonic} phase,
116: in which the colors are confined and the baryon density is high~\cite{QY}.
117: At large $N_c$, gluon contribution to the pressure $\sim \Od(N_c^2)$
118: is larger than those
119: from hadrons $\sim \Od(1)$ and quarks $\sim \Od(N_c)$,
120: then the deconfinement transition temperature $T_d$ is independent
121: of the quark chemical potential $\mu$
122: as far as it is moderate $\mu \sim \Od(1)$.
123: In the confined region $T < T_d$,
124: quark number density is exponentially suppressed
125: if $\mu$ is below the quark mass $m_q \sim \Od(1)$,
126: but it rapidly grows at $\mu>m_q$ and soon reaches high density $\sim \Od(N_c)$.
127: This dense matter has a characteristic feature that
128: it is made of {\it quark}s,
129: while only bar{\it yonic} excitations are allowed
130: because it is confined.
131: If the quarkyonic phase is the {\em next} at $N_c=3$,
132: it may be formed at high densities
133: in compact astrophysical phenomena
134: or in heavy-ion collisions at 10-100 $A$ GeV.
135: MC results with the density of state method
136: also show the transition to high density phase~\cite{FKS},
137: but its nature is not yet known.
138: Very recently, quarkyonic matter is found to exist at $N_c=3$
139: in effective models of QCD~\cite{Glozman,PNJL},
140: while the results may depend on the details~\cite{McLerran:2008ua}.
141: It is now very important and urgently required to discuss
142: the possibility of the quarkyonic matter phase in QCD for $N_c=3$.
143:
144: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
145: \begin{figure}[bt]
146: \centerline{~\Psfig{7.0cm}{QYpd.eps}~}
147: \caption{
148: Schematic %picture of the
149: phase diagram with the quarkyonic matter.
150: }
151: \label{Fig:QY}
152: \end{figure}
153: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
154:
155: The above discussion tells us that
156: the quarkyonic transition, the transition from the
157: chiral broken Nambu-Goldstone (NG) phase to the quarkyonic matter,
158: is characterized by the quark number density.
159: If the quarkyonic matter exists,
160: the quarkyonic transition occurs at $\mu\sim m_q$
161: where density rapidly grows as $\rho_q=\mathcal{O}(1)\to\mathcal{O}(N_c)$,
162: and the chiral restoration follows at higher chemical potential
163: as shown in Fig.~\ref{Fig:QY}.
164: In this paper, we discuss the possibility of the quarkyonic matter
165: in the strong coupling lattice QCD
166: (SC-LQCD)~\cite{SCL,DKS,KMOO,Jolicoeur:1983tz,FP,Bilic,Ohnishi2007},
167: which is another powerful tool in studying dense matter.
168: We take account of the finite coupling effects
169: in the next-to-leading order (NLO, $1/g^2$)
170: ~\cite{Jolicoeur:1983tz,FP,Bilic,Ohnishi2007},
171: and introduce an auxiliary field representing the quark number density $\rho_q$
172: as an order parameter in addition to the chiral condensate $\sigma$.
173: In a previous work on the phase diagram with NLO effects~\cite{Bilic},
174: the order parameter representing $\rho_q$ was not introduced.
175: As shown later, the multi-order parameter ($\sigma$ and $\rho_q$) treatment
176: is essential in understanding the quarkyonic transition.
177: %
178: In SC-LQCD, we consider the situation where
179: $g^2$ is large while $N_c$ is fixed.
180: This condition is somewhat different from that assumed in the large $N_c$
181: argument, where $N_c$ is assumed to be large and the 't Hooft coupling
182: $N_cg^2$ is fixed.
183: As we show later, we find the quarkyonic matter to appear
184: in some region of $1/g^2$ at $N_c=3$.
185: This observation together with the large $N_c$ discussion~\cite{QY}
186: support the existence of the quarkyonic matter
187: in a wide region of the $(N_c, 1/g^2)$ plane.
188:
189: We start from the lattice action
190: with one species (unrooted, four flavors) of staggered fermions ($\chi$)
191: in the lattice unit,
192: %
193: \begin{align}
194: S_\mathrm{LQCD}
195: =\frac12\sum_x \left[ V^+(\mu) - V^-(\mu)\right]
196: +\sum_x m_0 M_x
197: +S^{(s)}
198: -\frac{1}{g^2}\sum_\square
199: \mathrm{tr} \left[ U_\square + U^\dagger_\square \right]
200: \ ,\label{Eq:SLQCD}
201: \end{align}
202: where $m_0$ and $\mu$ are
203: the bare quark mass and the lattice chemical potential, respectively.
204: The mesonic composites are defined as
205: $M_x=\chibar_x\chi_x$,
206: $\Vp_x=e^{\mu}\chibar_xU_{0,x}\chi_{x+\hat{0}}$
207: and
208: $\Vm_x=e^{-\mu}\chibar_{x+\hat{0}}U_{0,x}^{\dagger}\chi_x$,
209: where sum over color indices are assumed.
210: The spatial hopping action of quarks $S^{(s)}$
211: is given as,
212: \begin{align}
213: S^{(s)}
214: =&\frac{1}{2}\sum_{x}\sum_{j=1}^d\eta_{j,x} \left[
215: \chibar_x U_{j,x} \chi_{x+\hat{j}}
216: -\chibar_{x+\hat{j}} U^\dagger_{j,x}\chi_x
217: \right]
218: \ ,
219: \end{align}
220: where
221: $d$ is the spatial dimension
222: and $\eta_{j,x}=(-1)^{x_0+\cdots+x_{j-1}}$ is the staggered sign factor.
223: %
224: The gluon degrees of freedom are described by
225: the temporal and spatial link variables and plaquettes,
226: $U_{0}$, $U_{j}$, $U_\square$.
227: This lattice action is invariant under the chiral transformation
228: $\chi\to e^{i\theta\epsilon_x}\chi$
229: with the $\gamma_5$-related factor $\epsilon_x=(-1)^{x_0+\cdots+x_{d}}$.
230:
231: In the strong coupling region ($g\gg 1$),
232: we can evaluate the plaquette effects
233: through the expansion in the power series of $1/g^2$
234: (strong coupling expansion).
235: In each order of $1/g^2$ or the number of plaquette,
236: we can exactly carry out the integral over link variables
237: by using the SU($N_c$) group integral formulae,
238: $\int dU~ U_{ab} U^\dagger_{cd} = \delta_{ad}\delta_{bc}/N_c$
239: and so on,
240: and obtain the effective action of hadronic
241: composites~\cite{SCL}.
242:
243: %...[ SCL ---------------------------------------------------------------------%
244: Before discussing the NLO effects,
245: we briefly summarize the procedure to obtain the effective potential
246: in the leading order, i.e. the strong coupling limit (SCL),
247: where the sophisticated framework based on
248: the $1/d$ expansion~\cite{largeD},
249: mean field approximation
250: and finite $T$ treatments of the quark determinant~\cite{DKS,FP},
251: has been established.
252: After the spatial link ($U_j$) integral,
253: we obtain the hadronic hopping action
254: shown in the third graph in Fig. \ref{Fig:plaq}~\cite{SCL}
255: from the spatial quark action $S^{(s)}$.
256: The SCL effective action is given as,
257: %
258: \begin{align}
259: S_\mathrm{SCL}
260: = \frac12\sum_x\left[V^+(\mu)-V^-(\mu)\right]+\sum_x m_0 M_x
261: %\nonumber\\
262: -\frac{b_\sigma}{2d}\sum_{x,j>0}M_xM_{x+\hat{j}}
263: +{\cal O}\Bigl(\frac{1}{\sqrt{d}},\frac{1}{g^2}\Bigr)
264: \ ,
265: \label{Eq:SCL_Action}
266: \end{align}
267: %
268: where $b_\sigma=d/2N_c$.
269: In this work, we adopt the leading order terms of
270: the $1/d$ expansion~\cite{largeD}
271: and omit higher order terms ${\cal O}(1/\sqrt{d})$.
272: In the $1/d$ expansion,
273: the leading term $\sum_j M_xM_{x+\hat{j}}$ is assumed to remain finite
274: at large $d$,
275: then the quark fields scale as $\chi,\bar{\chi} \propto d^{-1/4}$
276: and higher power terms of quarks are found to be suppressed
277: as ${\cal O}(1/\sqrt{d})$ for $N_c \geq 3$.
278: Through the Hubbard-Stratonovich (HS) transformation,
279: the chirally invariant four-fermi term $S_\mathrm{SCL}$ is converted
280: to the quark mass term $b_\sigma\sigma\chibar\chi$,
281: where the finite chiral condensate $\sigma=-\langle M_x\rangle$
282: breaks the chiral symmetry spontaneously
283: and generates the quark mass dynamically.
284: %
285: We can carry out the Gauss integral over the quark fields $\chi$ and $\chibar$
286: in the so-called finite temperature treatment:
287: The determinant of the temporal quark hopping matrix
288: with the anti-periodic boundary condition is obtained
289: by utilizing the Matsubara product technique~\cite{DKS}
290: or the recursion relation~\cite{FP}.
291: It is possible to carry out the temporal link integral of this determinant
292: over $U_0$ in the Polyakov \cite{DKS} or temporal gauge~\cite{FP}.
293: Then the effective potential is obtained as,
294: \begin{align}
295: \Feff{eff}^{\mathrm{SCL}}
296: &=\frac{b_{\sigma}}{2}\sigma^2+{\cal V}_q(m_q;\mu,T)\ ,\\
297: %
298: {\cal V}_q(m_q;\mu,T)
299: &=-T\log\left[
300: X_{N_c}
301: +2\cosh\Bigl[\frac{N_c{\mu}}{T}\Bigr]
302: \right]
303: \ ,\\
304: X_{N_c}(m_q)
305: &=
306: \frac{\sinh[(N_c+1)E_q(m_q)/T]}{\sinh[E_q(m_q)/T]}\ ,
307: \label{Eq:FeffMq}
308: \end{align}
309: where we have regarded
310: the inverse of the temporal extension
311: $1/N_\tau$ as temperature $T$,
312: and $E_q(m_q)=\mathrm{arcsinh}\,(m_q)$ represents
313: the one dimensional quark excitation energy
314: coming from the constituent quark mass $m_q=b_{\sigma}\sigma+m_0$.
315: %...] SCL ---------------------------------------------------------------------%
316:
317: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
318: \begin{figure}
319: \centerline{~\Psfig{8.5cm}{plaq.eps}~}
320: \caption{
321: Effective action terms
322: in the strong coupling limit and NLO ($1/g^2$) corrections.
323: Open circles, Filled circles, and arrows show $\chi$, $\chibar$, and
324: $U_\nu$, respectively.
325: }
326: \label{Fig:plaq}
327: \end{figure}
328: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
329:
330: %...[ 1/g^2: Effective Action -------------------------------------------------%
331: We shall now evaluate NLO ($1/g^2$) correction terms
332: coming from the plaquette action in $S_\mathrm{LQCD}$.
333: We concentrate on the leading order of the $1/d$ expansion.
334: By integrating out spatial link variables,
335: two types of terms shown in the last two graphs in Fig.~\ref{Fig:plaq}
336: are found to appear from temporal and spatial plaquettes~\cite{Jolicoeur:1983tz,FP},
337: \begin{align}
338: &\Delta S_\beta^{(\tau)}
339: =\frac{\beta_\tau}{4d}
340: \sum_{x,j>0}
341: (
342: \Vp_x \Vm_{x+\hat{j}}
343: +\Vp_x \Vm_{x-\hat{j}}
344: )
345: \label{Eq:ActionGT}
346: \ ,\\
347: &\Delta S_\beta^{(s)}
348: =\frac{-\beta_s}{d(d-1)}
349: \sum_{x,0<k<j}
350: M_{x}
351: M_{x+\hat{j}}
352: M_{x+\hat{k}}
353: M_{x+\hat{k}+\hat{j}}
354: \ ,
355: \label{Eq:ActionGS}
356: \end{align}
357: where
358: $\beta_\tau=d/N_c^2g^2$
359: and
360: $\beta_s=d(d-1)/8N_c^4g^2$.
361: %...] 1/g^2: Effective Action -------------------------------------------------%
362:
363: %...[ Extended Hubbard Stratonovich transformation ----------------------------%
364: The NLO terms contain the product of different types,
365: such as $V^+V^-$ in $\Delta S_\beta^{(\tau)}$.
366: In order to treat these terms,
367: we propose a new mean field technique,
368: named Extended Hubbard-Stratonovich (EHS) transformation.
369: Let us consider to evaluate a quantity
370: $e^{\alpha A B}$,
371: where $(A,B)$ and $\alpha$
372: represent arbitrary composite fields and an positive constant,
373: respectively.
374: We can represent $e^{\alpha AB}$ in the form of Gaussian integral
375: over two auxiliary fields $(\varphi,\phi)$,
376: \begin{align}
377: e^{\alpha A B}
378: &= \int\, d\varphi\, d\phi\,
379: e^{-\alpha\left\{
380: (\varphi-(A+B)/2)^2
381: +(\phi-i(A-B)/2)^2
382: \right\}+\alpha A B}
383: \nonumber\\
384: &= \int\, d\varphi\, d\phi\,
385: e^{-\alpha\left\{
386: \varphi^2-(A+B)\varphi
387: + \phi^2 - i(A-B)\phi
388: \right\}}
389: \label{Eq:EHSa}
390: \ .
391: \end{align}
392: The integral over the new fields $(\varphi,\phi)$
393: is approximated by the saddle point value,
394: $\varphi = \VEV{A+B}/2$ and $\phi = i\VEV{A-B}/2$.
395: Specifically
396: in the case where both $\VEV{A}$ and $\VEV{B}$ are real,
397: which applies to the later discussion,
398: the stationary value of $\phi$ becomes pure imaginary.
399: Thus we replace $\phi \to i\omega$
400: and require the stationary condition for the real value of $\omega$,
401: \begin{eqnarray}
402: e^{\alpha A B}
403: &\approx& e^{-\alpha\left\{
404: \varphi^2-(A+B)\varphi-\omega^2+(A-B)\omega
405: \right\}}\Big|_{\mathrm{stationary}}
406: \label{Eq:EHSc}
407: \ .
408: \end{eqnarray}
409: In the case of $A=B$, Eq.~(\ref{Eq:EHSc}) reduces to
410: the standard HS transformation.
411: We find that the $e^{\alpha AB}$ is invariant
412: under the scale transformation,
413: $A\to\lambda A$ and $B\to \lambda^{-1}B$.
414: This invariance is kept
415: in rhs of Eq.~(\ref{Eq:EHSc}),
416: since the combinations
417: $\varphi-\omega=\langle A\rangle$
418: and
419: $\varphi+\omega=\langle B\rangle$
420: transform in the same way
421: as $A$ and $B$, respectively.
422: This means that the effective potential is independent
423: of the choice of $\lambda$.
424:
425: We apply the EHS transformation to the NLO terms.
426: For the temporal and spatial plaquette action terms,
427: $\Delta S_\beta^{(\tau)}$ and $\Delta S_\beta^{(s)}$,
428: we substitute
429: %
430: $(\alpha,A,B)=(\beta_\tau/4d,-\Vp_x,\Vm_{x+\hat{j}})$
431: and
432: $(\beta_s/d(d-1), M_xM_{x+\hat{j}},
433: M_{x+\hat{k}}M_{x+\hat{k}+\hat{j}})$ in Eq.~(\ref{Eq:EHSc}),
434: respectively, and obtain,
435: \begin{align}
436: &\Delta S_\beta^{(\tau)}
437: \approx \frac{\beta_\tau}{4d}\sum_{x,j>0}\left[
438: \varphi_\tau^2-\omega_\tau^2
439: +(\varphi_\tau-\omega_\tau)\Vp_x(\mu)
440: \right.
441: \left.
442: -(\varphi_\tau+\omega_\tau)\Vm_x(\mu)
443: \right]
444: +(j\leftrightarrow -j)
445: \label{Eq:EHStauA}
446: \ ,\\
447: &\Delta S_\beta^{(s)}
448: \approx\frac{\beta_s}{d(d-1)}
449: \sum_{x,0<k<j}
450: \bigl[
451: \varphi_s^2-\omega_s^2
452: -(\varphi_s-\omega_s)M_xM_{x+\hat{j}}
453: -(\varphi_s+\omega_s)M_{x+\hat{k}}M_{x+\hat{k}+\hat{j}}
454: \bigr]
455: \label{Eq:EHSsA}
456: \ .
457: \end{align}
458:
459: We can absorb NLO terms, $\Delta S_\beta^{(\tau,s)}$
460: in Eqs.~(\ref{Eq:EHStauA}) and (\ref{Eq:EHSsA}),
461: in the coefficient modification
462: of the SCL effective action, $S_\mathrm{SCL}$ in Eq.~(\ref{Eq:SCL_Action}).
463: %
464: We assume that auxiliary fields take constant and isotropic values,
465: which are independent from the space-time $x$ and spatial directions $j, k$.
466: %
467: In $\Delta S_\beta^{(s)}$,
468: effects of $\omega_s$ disappear for constant auxiliary fields,
469: and $\varphi_s$ modifies the coefficient of $MM$ terms
470: in $S_\mathrm{SCL}$ as $-b_\sigma/2d \to -\tilde{b}_\sigma/2d$,
471: where $\tilde{b}_\sigma=b_\sigma+2\beta_s\varphi_s$.
472: %
473: Combined with the temporal hopping term in $S_\mathrm{LQCD}$,
474: the coefficients of $V^{\pm}$ are found to be,
475: $Z_\mp/2$, where $Z_\pm =1+\beta_{\tau}(\phi_{\tau}\pm\omega_{\tau})$.
476: We rewrite these coefficients as
477: $Z_\pm = Z_\chi \exp(\pm\delta\mu)$,
478: then NLO effective action containing fermions is written as,
479: \begin{align}
480: S_\mathrm{NLO}^{(F)}
481: = \frac{Z_\chi}{2}\sum_x\left[V^+(\tilde{\mu})-V^-(\tilde{\mu})\right]+\sum_x m_0 M_x
482: -\frac{\tilde{b}_\sigma}{2d}\sum_{x,j>0}M_xM_{x+\hat{j}}
483: +{\cal O}\Bigl(\frac{1}{\sqrt{d}},\frac{1}{g^2}\Bigr)
484: \ ,
485: \label{Eq:NLO_Action}
486: \end{align}
487: where $\tilde{\mu}=\mu-\delta\mu=\mu-\log\sqrt{Z_+/Z_-}$
488: and $Z_\chi=\sqrt{Z_+Z_-}$
489: represent shifted chemical potential
490: and the wave function renormalization factor.
491:
492:
493: Now we can repeat the same procedure as the standard SCL prescription.
494: Bosonization of the four-fermi interaction in
495: $S_\mathrm{NLO}$
496: leads to the quark mass term $(\tilde{b}_\sigma\sigma+m_0)M$,
497: and the quark integral and the temporal link integral
498: are also analogous to the SCL case.
499: The effects of wave functional renormalization factor
500: $Z_\chi$ would be a little bit non-trivial:
501: %
502: Let us define the temporal hopping matrix as
503: $\sum_{xy}\chibar_x\Kern_{xy}^{(\tau)}\chi_y\equiv\sum_x[V^+_x-V^-_x]/2$,
504: then the quark determinant in SCL reads
505: $\mathrm{Det}\bigl[\Kern^{(\tau)}+\mathbf{1}(b_{\sigma}\sigma+m_0)\bigr]$.
506: With NLO effects, this determinant is replaced with,
507: %
508: %The quark determinant in SCL,
509: %$\mathrm{Det}\bigl[\Kern^{(\tau)}+\mathbf{1}(b_{\sigma}\sigma+m_0)\bigr]$,
510: %is now replaced with,
511: \begin{align}
512: \mathrm{Det}
513: \Bigl[Z_\chi\Kern^{(\tau)}(\tilde{\mu})+\mathbf{1}(\tilde{b}_{\sigma}\sigma+m_0)\Bigr]
514: =\mathrm{Det}\bigl[Z_\chi\bigr]
515: \mathrm{Det}\Bigl[\Kern^{(\tau)}(\tilde{\mu})+\mathbf{1}(\tilde{b}_{\sigma}\sigma+m_0)/Z_\chi\Bigr]
516: \ ,\label{Eq:QDet_NLO}
517: \end{align}
518: where $\mathrm{Det}$ represents the determinant of the temporal
519: and the color matrix.
520: From the factor $\mathrm{Det}\bigl[Z_\chi\bigr]$
521: in Eq.~(\ref{Eq:QDet_NLO}),
522: the additional term $-N_c\log Z_\chi$ appears in the effective potential.
523: %
524: The second factor in the second line of Eq.~(\ref{Eq:QDet_NLO})
525: leads to $\Vq$ with modified quark mass and chemical potential.
526: %
527: Note that the quark mass is also modified by $Z_\chi$.
528: Finally the effective potential is found to be,
529: \begin{align}
530: \Feff{eff}=&\Feff{aux}+\Vq(\tilde{m}_q;\tilde{\mu},T)
531: \ ,\label{Eq:Feff}\\
532: \Feff{aux}
533: =&\frac{\tilde{b}_{\sigma}}{2}\sigma^2
534: +\frac{\beta_\tau}{2}(\varphi_\tau^2-\omega_\tau^2)
535: +\frac{\beta_s}{2}\varphi_s^2-N_c\log Z_\chi
536: \ ,\label{Eq:Faux}\\
537: \tilde{m}_q
538: =&(\tilde{b}_{\sigma}\sigma+m_0)/Z_\chi
539: \ .\label{Eq:mqNLO}
540: \end{align}
541: %From the NLO effective potential $\Feff{eff}$,
542: We find that the plaquette contributes to the effective potential
543: in the modification of the wave function renormalization factor $Z_\chi$,
544: the quark mass $\tilde{m}_q$,
545: and the shift of the effective potential $\tilde{\mu}$
546: in addition to some auxiliary field terms, $\Feff{aux}$.
547:
548:
549: Since the $1/g^4$ contributions have ambiguities in the present NLO treatment,
550: we here compare the results in several ways of truncation.
551: In the first treatment,
552: abbreviated as NLO-A,
553: % we do not perform any additional approximations.
554: $\Feff{eff}$ in Eq.~(\ref{Eq:Feff}) is treated as it is,
555: and we do not invoke any further approximations.
556: In the second treatment (NLO-B),
557: %${\cal O}(1/g^4)$ contributions in $Z_\chi$ and $\tilde{\mu}$ are removed,
558: ${\cal O}(1/g^4)$ contributions in $Z_\chi$ and $\tilde{\mu}$ are truncated,
559: and simplified as
560: $Z_\chi=1+\beta_\tau\varphi_\tau$
561: and
562: $\tilde{\mu}=\mu-\beta_\tau\omega_\tau$.
563: In this treatment, we find that $\varphi_\tau$ and $\omega_\tau$ couple to quarks
564: separately through $\tilde{m}_q$ and $\tilde{\mu}$ in $\Vq$, respectively.
565: %
566: In the third prescription (NLO-C),
567: we further truncate ${\cal O}(1/g^4)$ terms in
568: $\tilde{m}_q$ and in $\log Z_\chi$.
569: It is also possible to expand $\Vq$
570: with respect to $\delta\mu=\mu-\tilde{\mu}$ (NLO-D),
571: \begin{align}
572: \Vq(\tilde{m}_q;\tilde{\mu},T)
573: \simeq \Vq(\tilde{m}_q;\mu,T)-\beta_\tau\omega_\tau{\partial\Vq}/{\partial\mu}
574: \ .
575: \end{align}
576:
577: In each treatment NLO-A,B,C, and D,
578: we evaluate $\Feff{eff}$ under the stationary condition
579: with respect to the auxiliary fields,
580: $\Phi=\sigma,\varphi_s,\varphi_{\tau},\omega_{\tau}$,
581: \begin{align}
582: \frac{\partial\Feff{eff}}{\partial\Phi}
583: =
584: \frac{\partial\Feff{aux}}{\partial\Phi}
585: +\frac{\partial\Vq}{\partial\tilde{m}_q}
586: \frac{\partial\tilde{m}_q}{\partial\Phi}
587: +\frac{\partial\Vq}{\partial\tilde{\mu}}
588: \frac{\partial\tilde{\mu}}{\partial\Phi}=0
589: \label{Eq:Stationary}\ .
590: \end{align}
591: Note that $\Vq$ depends on the auxiliary fields
592: via the two dynamical variables $\tilde{m}_q$ and $\tilde{\mu}$.
593: Here we show the stationary conditions in NLO-A, as an example.
594: Substituting $\sigma$ for $\Phi$ in Eq.~(\ref{Eq:Stationary}),
595: we obtain the relation,
596: $\sigma = -(1/Z_{\chi})(\partial\Vq/\partial m_{q})$.
597: %
598: By utilizing this result,
599: the stationary condition for $\varphi_s$
600: %$\Phi=\varphi_s$ in Eq.~(\ref{Eq:Stationary})
601: leads to $\varphi_s=\sigma^2$.
602: We can solve the coupled equation for
603: the stationary conditions
604: of $\varphi_{\tau}$ and $\omega_{\tau}$ as,
605: \begin{align}
606: \varphi_\tau=\frac{2\varphi_0}{1+\sqrt{1+4\beta_\tau\varphi_0}}
607: \ ,\qquad
608: \omega_\tau=-\frac{\partial\Vq}{\partial\tilde{\mu}}\equiv\rho_q
609: \label{Eq:StatSW}
610: \ ,
611: \end{align}
612: where $\varphi_0=N_c-Z_{\chi}\tilde{m}_q+\beta_{\tau}\omega_{\tau}^2$.
613: The second equation in Eq.~(\ref{Eq:StatSW}) indicates
614: the auxiliary field $\omega_{\tau}$ is
615: nothing but the quark number density $\rho_q$.
616: %
617: The equilibrium condition is determined self-consistently
618: by minimizing $\Feff{eff}$ in terms of $\sigma$
619: under the constraint $\omega_{\tau}=\rho_q(T,\mu;\sigma,\omega_\tau)$.
620: %
621: Stationary conditions in NLO-B, C and D are solved similarly.
622: In NLO-D, $\omega_\tau$ is explicitly obtained as a function of $\sigma$,
623: $\omega_\tau=-\partial\Vq(m_q(\sigma);\mu,T)/\partial\mu$,
624: where the rhs does not contain $\omega_\tau$.
625: In this meaning, the NLO-D gives a similar formulation
626: to that in the previous work~\cite{Bilic}.
627:
628: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
629: \begin{figure}
630: \centerline{~\Psfig{7.5cm}{pd.eps}~}
631: \caption{
632: Phase diagram in NLO-A, B, C and D with $N_c=3, 6/g^2=4.5$
633: Solid and dashed lines show the first and second order phase transition
634: boundary, respectively.
635: }
636: \label{Fig:PD}
637: \end{figure}
638: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
639:
640: One of the most interesting features in the multi-order parameter
641: %(chiral condensate $\sigma$ and quark number density $\omega_\tau$)
642: treatments (NLO-A, B and C)
643: is that it predicts the existence of partially chiral restored (PCR) matter
644: at $N_c=3$ for relatively large $\beta=6/g^2$ values.
645: In Fig.~\ref{Fig:PD}, we show the phase diagram at $\beta=4.5$
646: in the chiral limit.
647: %First (second) order phase boundaries are shown in solid (dashed) curves.
648: In NLO-A and B,
649: the highest temperature of the first order phase boundary decreases,
650: and the critical point deviates from the second order phase transition boundary
651: at $6/g^2 \simeq 4.5$ and $3.0$ in NLO-A and NLO-B, respectively.
652: In NLO-C, the second order critical chemical potential $\mu_c^{(2nd)}$ at $T=0$
653: overtakes the first order one at $6/g^2 \simeq 3.5$.
654: Between the first and second order phase boundaries, we find PCR matter.
655:
656: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
657: \begin{figure}[bt]
658: \centerline{~\Psfig{7.5cm}{pdrhosig.eps}~}
659: \caption{
660: In the upper panel,
661: solid and dashed curves show the first and second order
662: phase transition boundaries,
663: and dots show the critical end point.
664: In the middle and lower panels,
665: solid, dotted, dashed, and dot-dashed curves
666: show the results in NLO-A, B, C and D, respectively,
667: and dots and open squares show the first and second order
668: transition points.
669: }\label{Fig:pdrhosig}
670: \end{figure}
671: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
672:
673: In Fig.~\ref{Fig:pdrhosig}, we show the comparison of $\rho_q$ and $\sigma$
674: in the present treatments NLO-A, B, C and D.
675: The gradual increase of the quark density is a common feature
676: of the multi-order parameter treatments.
677: At low temperatures,
678: we can investigate the appearance of the medium density matter
679: more intuitively.
680: % analytically.
681: The quark number density
682: $\rho_q=-\partial\Feff{eff}/\partial\mu$ is evaluated as,
683: \begin{align}
684: \frac{\rho_q}{N_c}=\frac{2\sinh\bigl[N_c\tilde{\mu}/T\bigr]}
685: {X_{N_c}+2\cosh\bigl[N_c\tilde{\mu}/T\bigr]}
686: \
687: \raisebox{-2ex}{$\stackrel{\longrightarrow}{{\scriptstyle T\to 0}}$}
688: \
689: \frac{x^{N_c}}{1+x^{N_c}}
690: \ ,\label{Eq:rho}
691: \end{align}
692: where $x=\exp[-(E_q-\tilde{\mu})/T]$.
693: When $E_q>\tilde{\mu}$ is satisfied at small $T$,
694: we obtain $x\to 0$ and $\rho_q\to 0$,
695: while $E_q<\tilde{\mu}$ leads to $x\to\infty$ and $\rho_q\to N_c$.
696: %How can the medium density $0<\rho_q<N_c$
697: %be realized as NLO-B and NLO-C at small or zero temperature?
698: Medium density $0<\rho_q<N_c$ can appear
699: only in the case where the energy and chemical potential balances,
700: $E_q=\tilde{\mu}$, and
701: %The condition $E_q=\tilde{\mu}$ could be the answer,
702: $x$ stays finite at $T=0$.
703: Since $\tilde{\mu}$ is a decreasing function of $\omega_\tau$,
704: we may have a medium density solution of Eq.~(\ref{Eq:StatSW}) in the region
705: $\tilde{\mu}(\sigma,\omega_\tau=N_c)<E_q(\sigma,\omega_\tau)<\mu$.
706: Specifically in NLO-B and C,
707: $E_q=\tilde{\mu}$ is found to be equivalent
708: to the density condition $\rho_q=(\mu-E_q)/\beta_{\tau}$,
709: which can take the a medium value.
710: %
711: In the large $\beta$ region,
712: this medium density matter can emerge in equilibrium
713: %gives the vacuum
714: as indicated in Fig.~\ref{Fig:pdrhosig}.
715: %
716: Also in NLO-A, medium density matter appears in a similar mechanism.
717: %similar mechanism would be dominant in the appearance of
718: Thus the multi-order parameter treatment
719: is essential to obtain the medium density matter at low $T$,
720: and we observe chiral transitions twice as $\mu$ increases.
721: After the first one, the condition $E_q=\tilde{\mu}$
722: is approximately satisfied.
723: This state may correspond to the quarkyonic matter
724: where we expect $\mu\sim $(constituent quark mass)~\cite{McLerran:2008ua}.
725:
726: In summary, we have evaluated the effective potential
727: in the next-to-leading order strong coupling lattice QCD (NLO SC-LQCD),
728: where $1/g^2$ effects are taken into account.
729: %
730: We have discussed the chiral transition
731: and the possibility of the quarkyonic transition.
732: Here the order parameter of the latter is the quark number density,
733: which can be naturally introduced via the NLO effects.
734: The $\mathcal{O}(1/g^4)$ ambiguities have
735: been examined by comparing the results in several truncation schemes,
736: and we have found the following common properties
737: as far as the quark number density is treated as the order parameter
738: in addition to the chiral condensate.
739: (I)~The partially chiral restored (PCR) matter
740: can appear in the large $6/g^2$ region,
741: %when the quark number density is treated as the order parameter,
742: (II)~PCR sits next to the hadronic Nambu-Goldstone (NG) phase
743: in the $\mu$ direction,
744: (III)~the quark number density is high as $\Od(N_c)$ in PCR,
745: (IV)~after the ``NG$\to$PCR transition'',
746: the effective chemical potential is approximately the same as
747: the quark excitation energy,
748: (V)~and the chiral transition to the Wigner phase follows
749: after NG$\to$PCR transition.
750: All these properties would be the essence of
751: the quarkyonic matter and transition proposed in Ref.~\cite{QY}.
752: %
753: In the previous work,
754: the quark-driven Polyakov loop evaluated in SC-LQCD is shown
755: to be small as ${\cal O}(1/N_c)$~\cite{FP},
756: and it would not grow much at low temperatures.
757: This feature also agrees with the proposed property of the quarkyonic matter.
758: %
759: In the present analyses,
760: we have found the two sequential chiral transitions
761: can occur along the $\mu$ direction at low $T$,
762: and the first one involves the quarkyonic transition.
763: Thus we can conclude that we have examined the quarkyonic picture
764: with the clear connection to the finite coupling effects in the strong coupling expansion.
765: The detailed analyses of the phase diagram evolution
766: due to the finite coupling effects will be shown elsewhere~\cite{PDevol}.
767:
768: There are many points to be improved in the present analysis.
769: First, ${\cal O}(1/g^4)$ ambiguities is not small, and
770: it is necessary to extend the analysis to the next-to-next-to-leading
771: order (NNLO).
772: Higher orders in $1/d$ expansion may be also necessary.
773: %
774: The quarkyonic transition
775: % condition $E_q=\tilde{\mu}$
776: may be related to the so-called baryon mass puzzle~\cite{Bringoltz,BMP};
777: $N_c\mu_c$ is calculated to be smaller than the baryon mass
778: in the strong coupling limit.
779: This means that the chiral transition takes place
780: before nuclear matter is formed.
781: The chemical potential shift discussed in this paper
782: may be the key to solve this problem.
783: %
784: Competition with the color superconducting (CSC) phase
785: and comparison with the MC results
786: at finite baryon density~\cite{FKS,MC_LQCD}
787: are other interesting subjects to be investigated.
788:
789: %\section*{Acknowledgements}
790: This work has been motivated by the discussions during
791: the international workshop on ``New Frontiers in QCD 2008''.
792: We would like to thank Prof. Larry McLerran, Prof. Kenji Fukushima,
793: and other participants in that workshop.
794: We would like to thank Prof.~Noboru Kawamoto
795: and Prof. Philippe de Forcrand for useful discussions.
796: This work was supported in part
797: by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from MEXT and JSPS
798: under the grant numbers,
799: 17070002 % (Tokutei, Strangeness)
800: and 19540252, % ((C)(2), 2003), Ohnishi
801: the Global COE Program
802: "The Next Generation of Physics, Spun from Universality and Emergence",
803: and the Yukawa International Program for Quark-hadron Sciences (YIPQS).
804:
805: %\appendix
806: %\section{First Appendix} %Empty argument \section{} yields `Appendix'.
807: %
808: %\section{Second Appendix}
809:
810: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
811: % Some macros are available for the bibliography:
812: % o for general use
813: % \JL : general journals \andvol : Vol (Year) Page
814: % o for individual journal
815: % \AJ : Astrophys. J. \NC : Nuovo Cim.
816: % \ANN : Ann. of Phys. \NPA, \NPB : Nucl. Phys. [A,B]
817: % \CMP : Commun. Math. Phys. \PLA, \PLB : Phys. Lett. [A,B]
818: % \IJMP : Int. J. Mod. Phys. \PRA - \PRE : Phys. Rev. [A-E]
819: % \JHEP : J. High Energy Phys. \PRL : Phys. Rev. Lett.
820: % \JMP : J. Math. Phys. \PRP : Phys. Rep.
821: % \JP : J. of Phys. \PTP : Prog. Theor. Phys.
822: % \JPSJ : J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. \PTPS : Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.
823: % Usage:
824: % \PRD{45,1990,345} ==> Phys.~Rev.\ \textbf{D45} (1990), 345
825: % \JL{Nature,418,2002,123} ==> Nature \textbf{418} (2002), 123
826: % \andvol{B123,1995,1020} ==> \textbf{B123} (1995), 1020
827: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
828:
829: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
830: \bibitem{QY}
831: %\cite{McLerran:2007qj}
832: L.~McLerran and R.~D.~Pisarski,
833: %``Phases of Cold, Dense Quarks at Large N_c,''
834: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 796} (2007), 83;
835: %[arXiv:0706.2191 [hep-ph]].
836: %%CITATION = NUPHA,A796,83;%%
837: %\cite{Hidaka:2008yy}
838: %\bibitem{Hidaka:2008yy}
839: Y.~Hidaka, L.~D.~McLerran and R.~D.~Pisarski,
840: %``Baryons and the phase diagram for a large number of colors and flavors,''
841: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 808} (2008), 117.
842: %[arXiv:0803.0279 [hep-ph]].
843: %%CITATION = NUPHA,A808,117;%%
844: \bibitem{SCL}
845: N. Kawamoto and J. Smit,
846: %``Effective Lagrangian And Dynamical Symmetry Breaking
847: % in Strongly Coupled Lattice QCD,''
848: Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 192} (1981), 100;
849: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B192,100;%%
850: %\bibitem{KlubergStern:1981wz}
851: H.~Kluberg-Stern, A.~Morel, O.~Napoly and B.~Petersson,
852: %{\em Spontaneous Chiral Symmetry Breaking For A U(N) Gauge Theory On A
853: %Lattice,}
854: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 190} (1981), 504;
855: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B190,504;%%
856: %
857: %\bibitem{Hoek:1981uv}
858: J.~Hoek, N.~Kawamoto and J.~Smit,
859: %``Baryons In The Effective Lagrangian Of Strongly Coupled Lattice QCD,''
860: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 199} (1982), 495;
861: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B199,495;%%
862: %
863: K.~Fukushima,
864: %``Toward understanding the lattice QCD results from the strong coupling
865: %analysis,''
866: Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 153} (2004), 204;
867: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0312057].
868: %%CITATION = PTPSA,153,204;%%
869: Y. Nishida,
870: %``Phase structures of strong coupling lattice QCD
871: % with finite baryon and isospin density,''
872: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 69} (2004), 094501.
873: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0312371].
874: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0312371;%%
875: \bibitem{DKS}
876: P. H. Damgaard, N. Kawamoto, K. Shigemoto,
877: %``Chiral Symmetry Restoration In Lattice Gauge Theories At Finite
878: %Temperature,''
879: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 53} (1984), 2211;
880: %%CITATION = PRLTA,53,2211;%%
881: %P.~H.~Damgaard, N.~Kawamoto and K.~Shigemoto,
882: %{\em Strong Coupling Analysis Of The Chiral Phase Transition At Finite
883: %Temperature,}
884: Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf B264} (1986), 1.
885: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B264,1;%%
886: \bibitem{KMOO}
887: N. Kawamoto, K. Miura, A. Ohnishi, T. Ohnuma,
888: %``Phase diagram at finite temperature and quark density in the strong
889: %coupling limit of lattice QCD for color SU(3),''
890: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 75} (2007), 014502.
891: %[arXiv:hep-lat/0512023].
892: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0512023;%%
893: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
894: % NLO
895: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
896: \bibitem{Jolicoeur:1983tz}
897: T.~Jolicoeur, H.~Kluberg-Stern, M.~Lev, A.~Morel and B.~Petersson,
898: %``The Strong Coupling Expansion Of Lattice Gauge Theories With Susskind
899: %Fermions,''
900: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 235} (1984), 455.
901: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B235,455;%%
902: \bibitem{FP}
903: G. Faldt and B. Petersson,
904: %``Strong Coupling Expansion Of Lattice Gauge Theories At Finite
905: %Temperature,''
906: Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 265} (1986), 197.
907: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B265,197;%%
908: \bibitem{Bilic}
909: N. Bili{\'c}, F. Karsch and K. Redlich,
910: %``Flavor dependence of the chiral phase transition
911: % in strong coupling QCD,''
912: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 45} (1992), 3228.
913: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D45,3228;%%
914: %\bibitem{Bilic1995}
915: N. Bili{\'c} and J. Cleymans,
916: %``Entropy per baryon in strong coupling QCD,''
917: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 355} (1995), 266.% [arXiv:hep-lat/9501019].
918: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9501019;%%
919: \bibitem{Ohnishi2007}
920: A.~Ohnishi, N.~Kawamoto and K.~Miura,
921: %``Phase diagram at finite temperature and quark density in the strong
922: %coupling region of lattice QCD for color SU(3),''
923: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 34} (2007), S655;
924: %[arXiv:hep-lat/0701024].
925: %%CITATION = JPHGB,G34,S655;%%
926: A.~Ohnishi, N.~Kawamoto, K.~Miura, K.~Tsubakihara and H.~Maekawa,
927: %``Strong coupling limit/region of lattice QCD,''
928: Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 168} (2007), 261.
929: %[arXiv:0704.2823 [nucl-th]].
930: %%CITATION = PTPSA,168,261;%%
931: \bibitem{Bringoltz}
932: %\bibitem{Bringoltz:2006pz}
933: B.~Bringoltz,
934: %``Chiral crystals in strong-coupling lattice QCD at nonzero chemical
935: %potential,''
936: JHEP {\bf 0703} (2007), 016;
937: %[arXiv:hep-lat/0612010].
938: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0703,016;%%
939: %\bibitem{Bringoltz:2002qc}
940: B.~Bringoltz and B.~Svetitsky,
941: %``Lattice gauge theory with baryons at strong coupling,''
942: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68} (2003), 034501.
943: %[arXiv:hep-lat/0211018].
944: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D68,034501;%%
945: \bibitem{FKS}
946: Z.~Fodor, S.~D.~Katz and C.~Schmidt,
947: %``The density of states method at non-zero chemical potential,''
948: JHEP {\bf 0703} (2007), 121.
949: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0701022].
950: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0703,121;%%
951: \bibitem{largeD}
952: M.~E.~Fisher and D.~S.~Gaunt,
953: Phys.\ Rev.\ 1A {\bf 133} (1964), A244;
954: %%%
955: %\bibitem{KlubergStern:1982bs}
956: H.~Kluberg-Stern, A.~Morel and B.~Petersson,
957: %{\em Spectrum Of Lattice Gauge Theories With Fermions From A 1/D Expansion At
958: %Strong Coupling,}
959: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 215} (1983), 527.
960: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B215,527;%%
961: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
962: % QY
963: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
964: \bibitem{Glozman}
965: %\bibitem{Glozman:2007tv}
966: %\bibitem{Glozman2007}
967: L.~Y.~Glozman and R.~F.~Wagenbrunn,
968: %``Chirally symmetric but confining dense and cold matter,''
969: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 77} (2008), 054027.
970: %[arXiv:0709.3080 [hep-ph]].
971: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D77,054027;%%
972: \bibitem{PNJL}
973: %\bibitem{Fukushima:2008wg}
974: K.~Fukushima,
975: %``Phase diagrams in the three-flavor Nambu--Jona-Lasinio model with the
976: %Polyakov loop,''
977: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 77} (2008), 114028;
978: %[arXiv:0803.3318 [hep-ph]];
979: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D77,114028;%%
980: %\cite{Abuki:2008nm}
981: %\bibitem{Abuki:2008nm}
982: H.~Abuki, R.~Anglani, R.~Gatto, G.~Nardulli and M.~Ruggieri,
983: %``Chiral crossover, deconfinement and quarkyonic matter within a Nambu-Jona
984: %Lasinio model with the Polyakov loop,''
985: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 78} (2008), 034034.
986: %[arXiv:0805.1509 [hep-ph]].
987: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D78,034034;%%
988: \bibitem{McLerran:2008ua}
989: L.~McLerran, K.~Redlich and C.~Sasaki,
990: %``Quarkyonic Matter and Chiral Symmetry Breaking,''
991: arXiv:0812.3585.% [hep-ph].
992: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0812.3585;%%
993: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
994: %\bibitem{RMF}
995: % B.~D.~Serot and J.~D.~Walecka,
996: % %``The Relativistic Nuclear Many Body Problem,''
997: % Adv.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf 16}, 1 (1986);
998: % %%CITATION = ANUPB,16,1;%%
999: %%
1000: % K.~Tsubakihara and A.~Ohnishi,
1001: % %``A chiral symmetric relativistic mean field model with logarithmic sigma
1002: % %potential,''
1003: % Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ {\bf 117}, 903 (2007).
1004: % %[arXiv:nucl-th/0607046].
1005: % %%CITATION = PTPKA,117,903;%%
1006: \bibitem{MC_LQCD}
1007: %\cite{D'Elia:2002gd}
1008: %\bibitem{D'Elia:2002gd}
1009: M.~D'Elia and M.~P.~Lombardo,
1010: %``Finite density QCD via imaginary chemical potential,''
1011: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67} (2003), 014505;
1012: %[arXiv:hep-lat/0209146].
1013: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D67,014505;%%
1014: %
1015: P.~de Forcrand and O.~Philipsen,
1016: %``The QCD phase diagram for three degenerate flavors and small baryon
1017: %density,''
1018: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 673} (2003), 170;
1019: %[arXiv:hep-lat/0307020].
1020: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B673,170;%%
1021: %
1022: P.~de Forcrand and S.~Kim,
1023: %``The spectrum of lattice QCD with staggered fermions at strong coupling,''
1024: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 645} (2007), 339;
1025: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0608012].
1026: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B645,339;%%
1027: %\cite{Fromm:2008ab}
1028: %\bibitem{Fromm:2008ab}
1029: M.~Fromm and P.~de Forcrand,
1030: %``Revisiting strong coupling QCD at finite temperature and baryon density,''
1031: arXiv:0811.1931.% [hep-lat].
1032: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0811.1931;%%
1033: \bibitem{PDevol}
1034: K.~Miura, T.Z.~Nakano, A.~Ohnishi, N.~Kawamoto, in preparation.
1035: \bibitem{BMP}
1036: %\cite{deForcrand:2006gu}
1037: %\bibitem{deForcrand:2006gu}
1038: P.~de Forcrand and S.~Kim,
1039: %``The spectrum of lattice QCD with staggered fermions at strong coupling,''
1040: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 645} (2007), 339;
1041: %[arXiv:hep-lat/0608012].
1042: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B645,339;%%
1043: %\cite{Barbour:1997bh}
1044: %\bibitem{Barbour:1997bh}
1045: I.~M.~Barbour, S.~E.~Morrison, E.~G.~Klepfish, J.~B.~Kogut and M.~P.~Lombardo,
1046: %``The critical points of strongly coupled lattice QCD at nonzero chemical
1047: %potential,''
1048: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 56} (1997), 7063;
1049: %[arXiv:hep-lat/9705038].
1050: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D56,7063;%%
1051: %
1052: K.~Miura, A~Ohnishi, N~Kawamoto,
1053: PoS {\bf LAT2008} (2008), 075.
1054: \end{thebibliography}
1055:
1056: \end{document}
1057:
1058:
1059:
1060:
1061:
1062:
1063:
1064:
1065:
1066:
1067:
1068:
1069: