1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %
3: % Regulus orbit
4: %
5: %
6: % Revision history:
7: %
8: % Apr. 28, 2008: Draft by Gies
9: % May 06, 2008: Revisions by Gies
10: % June 16, 2008: Revised in response to referee's report
11: %
12: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
13: %
14: %\documentclass{aastex}
15: %\usepackage{/nfs/morgan4/gies/TeX/Papers/emulateapj5}
16: %\voffset -0.5truein
17:
18: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19: %\voffset 0.7truein
20: %
21: \newcommand{\myemail}{gies@chara.gsu.edu}
22: %
23: \shorttitle{Orbit of Regulus}
24: \shortauthors{Gies et al.}
25: %
26: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
27:
28: \begin{document}
29: %%\received{}
30: %%\accepted{}
31:
32: \title{A Spectroscopic Orbit for Regulus}
33:
34: \author{D. R. Gies\altaffilmark{1,2},
35: S. Dieterich\altaffilmark{1},
36: N. D. Richardson\altaffilmark{1},
37: A. R. Riedel\altaffilmark{1},
38: B. L. Team\altaffilmark{1}, \\
39: H. A. McAlister\altaffilmark{1},
40: W. G. Bagnuolo, Jr.\altaffilmark{1},
41: E. D. Grundstrom\altaffilmark{1,2,3}, \\
42: S. \v{S}tefl\altaffilmark{4},
43: Th. Rivinius\altaffilmark{4}, and
44: D. Baade\altaffilmark{5}}
45:
46: \altaffiltext{1}{Center for High Angular Resolution Astronomy,
47: Department of Physics and Astronomy,
48: Georgia State University, P. O. Box 4106, Atlanta, GA 30302-4106;
49: gies@chara.gsu.edu, dieterich@chara.gsu.edu, richardson@chara.gsu.edu,
50: riedel@chara.gsu.edu, team@chara.gsu.edu, hal@chara.gsu.edu, bagnuolo@chara.gsu.edu,
51: erika.grundstrom@vanderbilt.edu}
52:
53: \altaffiltext{2}{Visiting Astronomer, Kitt Peak National Observatory,
54: National Optical Astronomy Observatory, operated by the Association
55: of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under contract with
56: the National Science Foundation.}
57:
58: \altaffiltext{3}{Current address: Physics and Astronomy Department,
59: Vanderbilt University, 6301 Stevenson Center, Nashville, TN 37235}
60:
61: \altaffiltext{4}{European Organisation for Astronomical Research
62: in the Southern Hemisphere, Alonso de Cordova 3107, Vitacura,
63: Santiago de Chile, Chile; sstefl@eso.org, triviniu@eso.org}
64:
65: \altaffiltext{5}{European Organisation for Astronomical Research
66: in the Southern Hemisphere, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 2,
67: 85748 Garching bei M\"{u}nchen, Germany; dbaade@eso.org}
68:
69: %%\paperid{}
70:
71: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
72:
73: \begin{abstract}
74: We present a radial velocity study of the rapidly rotating B-star
75: Regulus that indicates the star is a single-lined spectroscopic
76: binary. The orbital period (40.11~d) and probable semimajor axis
77: (0.35 AU) are large enough that the system is not interacting at
78: present. However, the mass function suggests that the secondary
79: has a low mass ($M_2 > 0.30 M_\odot$), and we argue that the companion
80: may be a white dwarf. Such a star would be the remnant of a former
81: mass donor that was the source of the large spin angular momentum of
82: Regulus itself.
83: \end{abstract}
84:
85: \keywords{binaries: spectroscopic
86: --- stars: early-type
87: --- stars: individual (Regulus, $\alpha$ Leo)}
88:
89: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
90:
91: \setcounter{footnote}{5}
92:
93: \section{Introduction} % Section 1
94:
95: Regulus ($\alpha$ Leo; HD~87901; HR~3982; HIP~49669) is a nearby
96: ($d=24.3\pm0.2$ pc; \citealt{van07}) intermediate mass star of
97: spectral type B7~V \citep{joh53} or B8~IVn \citep{gra03}.
98: It is one of a number of nearby B- and A-type stars exhibiting
99: extremely fast rotation. The very broad shape of its photospheric
100: absorption lines indicates a projected rotational velocity of
101: $V\sin i = 317 \pm 3$ km~s$^{-1}$ \citep{mca05}. The full picture
102: of its fast spin came with the first interferometric observations
103: of Regulus with the CHARA Array optical long baseline interferometer
104: \citep{mca05}. These observations showed that the star is rotationally
105: flattened and gravity darkened at its equator. Models of the
106: spectrum and interferometry demonstrate that the star has a rotation
107: period of 15.9~hr, with an equatorial velocity equal to $86\%$ of the
108: critical velocity, where centripetal acceleration balances gravity.
109:
110: The fast spin of Regulus is puzzling given its probable age ($\approx 150$
111: Myr; \citealt*{ger01}). Stars born as fast rotators are expected to slow
112: down relatively quickly after birth, and only again achieve
113: rapid rotation at the conclusion of core H-burning through a redistribution
114: of angular momentum \citep{eks08}. Thus, it is surprising to find
115: rapid rotation in Regulus, a star which is still
116: in the middle of its core H-burning stage. On the other hand, stars
117: that are members of interacting binaries can experience large changes
118: in spin due to tidal interactions and mass exchange. \citet{lan08}
119: discuss how mass transfer may lead to the spin up of the mass gainer in
120: a large fraction of these binaries. Depending on the initial separation
121: and mass ratio, the system may merge or it
122: may widen following mass ratio inversion, leaving the donor remnant in
123: a large orbit that shuts down mass transfer once the donor's envelope is
124: lost. We know of several examples of such post-mass transfer binaries
125: with rapid rotators, including the Be X-ray binaries with neutron star
126: companions \citep{coe00} and Be binaries with He-star companions
127: \citep{gie98,mai05,pet08}.
128:
129: Regulus does have a known wide companion ($\alpha$~Leo~B
130: at a separation of $\approx 175\arcsec$, which is itself a binary
131: consisting of K2~V and M4~V pair; \citealt{mca05}), but this companion
132: has far too great a separation to have ever interacted directly with
133: Regulus. There are no known closer companions, but the
134: last significant radial velocity investigation was made in 1912 -- 1913
135: by \citet{mel23}. The scatter in the results introduced by the broad and
136: shallow appearance of the spectral lines may have discouraged other
137: investigators, but this early work and others \citep*{mau92,fro26,cam28,pal68}
138: suggest that any velocity variations present are relatively small. However,
139: a low mass donor remnant would probably create only a modest reflex
140: motion in Regulus, so the lack of demonstrated variability is not
141: unexpected. We have made spectroscopic observations of Regulus on
142: many occasions over the last few years, and here we present a
143: summary of the velocities measured in these spectra. We find that
144: Regulus is in fact a low amplitude, single-lined, spectroscopic
145: binary, and we discuss the possible nature of the companion.
146:
147: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
148:
149: \section{Observations and Radial Velocities} % Section 2
150:
151: Table~1 lists the sources and properties of the spectra of
152: Regulus we used to measure radial velocity. The spectra from
153: run numbers 1 -- 8 were made by us and have moderate resolving power
154: and good S/N (usually better than 100 per pixel). These include spectra
155: obtained with the Kitt Peak National Observatory Coud\'{e} Feed Telescope
156: \citep{val04}, the Czech Academy of Sciences Ondrejov Observatory
157: telescope and HEROS spectrograph \citep{ste00}, and
158: the Multiple-Telescope Telescope at the Georgia State University
159: Hard Labor Creek Observatory \citep*{bar02}.
160: We have also obtained a number of spectra from on-line archives including
161: the ESO La Silla 50 cm telescope and HEROS spectrograph,
162: University of Toledo Ritter Observatory echelle spectrograph \citep{mor97},
163: the Elodie spectrograph of the Observatoire de Haute Provence \citep{mou04},
164: the ESO VLT and UVES (UVES Paranal Observatory Project,
165: ESO DDT Program ID 266.D-5655; \citealt{bag03}),
166: La Silla 3.6 m telescope and HARPS spectrograph \citep{may03}, and
167: La Silla 2.2 m telescope and FEROS spectrograph \citep{kau99,wes08}.
168: In many cases, the archival spectra included a series made within a
169: few minutes time, and we report here the average velocity of such groups.
170: Finally, we also collected a series of 12 UV high dispersion
171: spectra from the archive of the {\it International Ultraviolet
172: Explorer (IUE)}. All these spectra were reduced to a rectified
173: continuum format using standard routines in
174: IRAF\footnote{IRAF is distributed by the
175: National Optical Astronomy Observatory, which is operated by
176: the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc.,
177: under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation.},
178: and then each group was transformed onto a uniform, heliocentric
179: wavelength grid in increments of $\log\lambda$. Many of these
180: observations record the red spectrum in the vicinity of H$\alpha$,
181: and we usually removed the atmospheric telluric lines in this
182: part of the spectrum using contemporaneous spectra of rapidly
183: rotating A-type stars or using the atlas of atmospheric
184: transmission\footnote{ftp://ftp.noao.edu/catalogs/atmospheric\_transmission/}
185: made by L.\ Wallace, W.\ Livingston, and K.\ Hinckle (KPNO).
186: The {\it IUE} spectra were similarly transformed
187: to a uniform $\log \lambda$ grid \citep*{pen97}. In prior studies of more
188: distant O-stars, we have checked the wavelength calibration
189: by registering the positions of interstellar lines with those in the
190: average spectrum. Regulus, however, is so close that most of the
191: interstellar lines are too weak, and in the end we relied on the
192: measurement of a single feature, \ion{O}{1} $\lambda 1302$, for
193: registration, which introduces some additional scatter into our
194: radial velocities from the {\it IUE} spectra.
195:
196: \placetable{tab1} % Table 1 - journal of observations
197:
198: All the radial velocities were measured using the cross-correlation
199: method with errors estimated according to the scheme described
200: by \citet{zuc03}. All the optical spectra were cross-correlated
201: with a synthetic model spectrum taken from the work of \citet{mar05}.
202: This spectrum is based upon a Kurucz model atmosphere for solar
203: abundances, interpolated to $T_{\rm eff} = 12200$~K and $\log g = 3.5$,
204: which are close to average values over the visible hemisphere
205: \citep{mca05}. The model template was smoothed with a rotational
206: broadening function to better match the actual spectrum, and in
207: each case the model was transformed to the observed wavelength grid.
208: Unfortunately, the models of \citet{mar05} do not extend to UV wavelengths,
209: so for the {\it IUE} spectra we used a model UV template from the
210: TLUSTY/Synspec models of \citet{lan07} for $T_{\rm eff} = 15000$~K
211: (the lowest temperature in their grid) and $\log g = 3.75$. The
212: use of a different template for the UV spectra may introduce
213: systematic differences from those obtained from the optical spectra,
214: but these errors are probably comparable to the measurement errors
215: (see \S3).
216:
217: Our 168 measurements are gathered in Table~2 (given in full in the
218: electronic version) that lists the heliocentric
219: Julian date of mid-observation, the orbital phase (\S3), the
220: radial velocity and its internal error, the observed minus
221: calculated residual (\S3), and the run number corresponding
222: the observational journal in Table~1.
223:
224: \placetable{tab2} % Table 2 - velocities
225:
226: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
227:
228: \section{Orbital Elements} % Section 3
229:
230: The range in the radial velocities is larger than that expected
231: from measurement errors, so we searched for evidence of periodic
232: variations using the discrete Fourier transform and CLEAN
233: method \citep*{rob87} and phase dispersion minimization \citep{ste78}.
234: Both procedures identified the presence of one significant
235: period at $P=40.11 \pm 0.02$~d, with a power indicating a
236: false alarm probability of $\sim 10^{-22}$ that the peak results
237: from random errors \citep{sca82}. This period is too long to
238: be related to rotational or pulsational variations, so we
239: assume that it results from orbital motion in a binary.
240: We then derived the remaining orbit elements using the
241: nonlinear, least squares fitting program of \citet{mor74}
242: by keeping the orbital period fixed at the value given above.
243: Each measurement was assigned a weight proportional to the
244: inverse square of the larger of the measurement error
245: or 1~km~s$^{-1}$ (to account for possible systematic
246: errors between results from different groups of observations).
247: Trials with other weighting schemes gave similar results.
248: Elliptical solutions made no significant improvement in the
249: residuals from the fit \citep{luc71}, so we adopted a
250: circular fit. We present in Table~3 the standard orbital
251: elements where $T_0$ is the epoch of the ascending node.
252: Note that the error in $T_0$ increases to $\pm 3.9$~d
253: when the full range in acceptable period is considered.
254: The derived systemic velocity $V_0$ is similar to the
255: radial velocity of $\alpha$~Leo~B of $6.56\pm 0.22$ km~s$^{-1}$
256: \citep{tok02}, which strengthens the case for a physical connection
257: in this common proper motion pair.
258:
259: \placetable{tab3} % Table 3 - orbital elements
260:
261: The radial velocity curve and measurements are illustrated in
262: Figure~1. The {\it IUE} measurements ({\it open circles})
263: show the largest scatter around the curve, which we think
264: derives from errors related to registering the wavelength
265: scale with a single interstellar line (\S2). Most of the
266: residuals for the optical spectra have a size comparable
267: to the measurement errors and are mainly free from
268: systematic trends. However, several of the runs that
269: recorded the red spectrum around H$\alpha$ do have
270: residuals that are systematically low (see run $\#3$).
271: We suspect that these trends are due to subtle differences
272: in data treatment, but because these specific runs cover
273: only a limited part of the orbital cycle, we did not apply
274: any corrections for systematic differences.
275:
276: \placefigure{fig1} % Figure 1 - radial velocity curve
277:
278: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
279:
280: \section{Discussion} % Section 4
281:
282: The orbital variation has a small semiamplitude that eluded
283: detection in earlier studies. Consequently, the derived
284: mass function is also small (Table~3), and we show in Figure~2
285: the constraints on the possible masses from the mass function.
286: \citet{mca05} used model fits to derive a probable mass of
287: the primary star of $M_1 = 3.4 \pm 0.2 M_\odot$, and the
288: boundaries of this range are indicated by the vertical
289: dotted lines. Larger orbital inclinations are favored for
290: random orientations, and it is possible that the orbital
291: inclination is comparable to the spin inclination
292: of Regulus, $i\approx 90^\circ$ \citep{mca05}. Thus, the
293: mass of the companion may be close to the minimum mass
294: shown (for $i= 90^\circ$) of $M_2 > 0.30\pm 0.01 M_\odot$.
295:
296: \placefigure{fig2} % Figure 2 - mass plane
297:
298: A companion this small may be a low mass white dwarf or
299: main sequence star. If Regulus was spun up by mass
300: transfer in an interacting binary, then the remnant of
301: the donor star is probably a low mass white dwarf \citep{rag01,wil04}.
302: Indeed, the lowest mass white dwarfs are usually found in
303: binary systems \citep*{mar95} where they lost a significant
304: fraction of their mass, and some reach masses as low
305: as $0.17 M_\odot$ \citep{kil07}. Models by \citet{wil04}
306: for mass transfer during H-shell burning (their ``evolutionary
307: channel 1'') often lead to remnant and gainer masses and
308: orbital periods similar to the case of Regulus. Since Regulus
309: and its wider companion $\alpha$~Leo~B are not too old
310: ($<150$ Myr; \citealt{ger01}), a white dwarf companion would
311: not have progressed too far along its cooling track and
312: would probably have an effective temperature $>16000$~K
313: \citep*{alt01}, much higher than that of the primary
314: B7~V star. Consequently, we might expect to observe
315: a modest FUV flux excess if the companion is a white dwarf,
316: and, in fact, \citet{mor01} find that the spectral energy
317: distribution of Regulus is about a factor of two brighter
318: in the 1000 -- 1200~\AA ~range than predicted by model
319: atmospheres for a single B7~V star. We note for completeness
320: that a neutron star companion is probably ruled out
321: because it would require a very small inclination (see Fig.~2)
322: and an unlikely evolutionary scenario in which only a modest
323: amount of mass transfer occurred before the supernova explosion
324: (no more than the present mass of the primary).
325:
326: On the other hand, the companion could be a low mass, main
327: sequence star (making Regulus one of the most extreme mass
328: ratio binaries among the massive stars after exclusion of the
329: massive X-ray binaries). Adopting the minimum mass, the companion
330: would be an M4~V star that would be too faint to alter
331: significantly the spectral energy distribution from that
332: for the primary alone (see Fig.~4 in \citealt{mca05}).
333: It is very unlikely that the companion is the outer
334: component of a once compact triple system.
335: If the fast spin of Regulus is the result of
336: prior mass transfer, then an M4~V star in the orbit we find
337: would have been too close to the central binary for orbital
338: stability (and would have likely been ejected or become a
339: merger product). Thus, in binary models for rapid rotation,
340: the companion cannot be a low mass main sequence star but must
341: be the remnant of the donor.
342:
343: The angular separation of the binary is probably small.
344: If we assume masses of $M_1=3.4 M_\odot$ and $M_2=0.3 M_\odot$,
345: then according to Kepler's third law, the semimajor axis is
346: 0.35~AU. Thus, for a distance of 24.3~pc, the maximum
347: angular separation will be approximately 15 mas, too small for
348: detection by speckle interferometric or adaptive optics techniques.
349: The binary could be resolved in principle by lunar occultation
350: methods or optical long baseline interferometry, but the fact that
351: there is no evidence of a binary from these methods is consistent
352: with the expected faintness of the companion \citep*{han74,rad81,rid82,mca05}.
353: For example, the magnitude difference in the $K$-band is probably close
354: to $\triangle m \approx 10$ and 6 mag for the cases of a white dwarf
355: and an M4~V star companion, respectively. Thus, the flux of the
356: companion has no influence on the analysis of the interferometry
357: presented by \citet{mca05}.
358:
359: Our study has led to the discovery of a binary companion to
360: the twenty second brightest star in the sky, and it may, like
361: Sirius, offer another example of a bright
362: star that is orbited by a faint white dwarf. If the companion
363: is a white dwarf, then it may be the closest case of a star
364: stripped to its core by mass transfer in a close binary.
365: The best opportunity to test the white dwarf hypothesis
366: will come from very short wavelength observations where a hot
367: companion may outshine the B7~V primary.
368:
369: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
370:
371: \acknowledgments
372:
373: We thank the staff of Kitt Peak National Observatory for
374: their support in obtaining these observations.
375: This work is partially based on spectral data retrieved from
376: the ELODIE archive at Observatoire de Haute-Provence (OHP).
377: Additional spectroscopic data were retrieved from Ritter
378: Observatory's public archive, which is supported by the National
379: Science Foundation Program for Research and Education with Small
380: Telescopes (NSF-PREST) under grant AST-0440784.
381: The {\it IUE} data presented in this paper were obtained from
382: the Multimission Archive at the Space Telescope Science
383: Institute (MAST). Support for MAST for non-HST data is
384: provided by the NASA Office of Space Science via grant
385: NAG5-7584 and by other grants and contracts.
386: This work was also supported by the National Science
387: Foundation under grant AST-0606861 (DG).
388: Institutional support has been provided from the GSU College
389: of Arts and Sciences and from the Research Program Enhancement
390: fund of the Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia,
391: administered through the GSU Office of the Vice President
392: for Research. We are grateful for all this support.
393:
394: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
395:
396: \begin{thebibliography}{}
397: \bibitem[Althaus et al.(2001)Althaus, Serenelli, \& Benvenuto]{alt01}
398: Althaus, L. G., Serenelli, A. M., \& Benvenuto, O. G.
399: 2001, \mnras, 323, 471
400: \bibitem[Bagnulo et al.(2003)]{bag03}
401: Bagnulo, S., Jehin, E., Ledoux, C., Cabanac, R., Melo, C.,
402: Gilmozzi, R., \& The ESO Paranal Science Operations Team
403: 2003, Messenger, 114, 10
404: \bibitem[Barry et al.(2002)Barry, Bagnuolo, \& Riddle]{bar02}
405: Barry, D. J., Bagnuolo, W. G., Jr., \& Riddle, R. L.
406: 2002, \pasp, 114, 198
407: \bibitem[Campbell(1928)]{cam28}
408: Campbell, W. W. 1928, Publ. Lick Obs., 16, 1
409: \bibitem[Coe(2000)]{coe00}
410: Coe, M. 2000, in The Be Phenomenon in Early-Type Stars,
411: IAU Coll. 175 (ASP Conf. Proc. 214), ed. M. A. Smith,
412: H. F. Henrichs, \& J. Fabregat (San Francisco: ASP), 656
413: \bibitem[Ekstr\"{o}m et al.(2008)]{eks08}
414: Ekstr\"{o}m, S., Meynet, G., Maeder, A., \& Barblan, F.
415: 2008, \aap, 478, 467
416: \bibitem[Frost et al.(1926)Frost, Barrett, \& Struve]{fro26}
417: Frost, E. B., Barrett, S. B., \& Struve, O.
418: 1926, \apj, 64, 1
419: \bibitem[Gerbaldi et al.(2001)Gerbaldi, Faraggiana, \& Balin]{ger01}
420: Gerbaldi, M., Faraggiana, R., \& Balin, N. 2001, \aap, 379, 162
421: \bibitem[Gies et al.(1998)]{gie98}
422: Gies, D. R., Bagnuolo, W. G., Jr., Ferrara, E. C.,
423: Kaye, A. B., Thaller, M. L., Penny, L. R., \& Peters, G. J.
424: 1998, \apj, 493, 440
425: \bibitem[Gray et al.(2003)]{gra03}
426: Gray, R. O., Corbally, C. J., Garrison, R. F.,
427: McFadden, M. T., \& Robinson, P. E. 2003, \aj, 126, 2048
428: \bibitem[Hanbury Brown et al.(1974)Hanbury Brown, Davis, \& Allen]{han74}
429: Hanbury Brown, R., Davis, J., \& Allen, L. R. 1974, \mnras, 167, 121
430: \bibitem[Johnson \& Morgan(1953)]{joh53}
431: Johnson, H. L., \& Morgan, W. W. 1953, \apj, 117, 313
432: \bibitem[Kaufer et al.(1999)]{kau99}
433: Kaufer, A., Stahl, O., Tubbesing, S., N\o rregaard, P.,
434: Avila, G., Francois, P., Pasquini, L., \& Pizzella, A.
435: 1999, Messenger, 95, 8
436: \bibitem[Kilic et al.(2007)]{kil07}
437: Kilic, M., Brown, W. R., Allende Prieto, C., Pinsonneault, M. H., \&
438: Kenyon, S. J. 2007, \apj, 664, 1088
439: \bibitem[Langer et al.(2008)]{lan08}
440: Langer, N., Cantiello, M., Yoon, S. -C., Hunter, I., Brott, I.,
441: Lennon, D. J., de Mink, S. E., \& Verheijdt, M. 2008, in
442: Massive Stars as Cosmic Engines (IAU Symp. 250), ed. F. Bresolin,
443: P. Crowther, \& J. Puls (San Francisco: ASP), in press
444: (arXiv:0803.0621)
445: \bibitem[Lanz \& Hubeny(2007)]{lan07}
446: Lanz, T. \& Hubeny, I. 2007, \apjs, 169, 83
447: \bibitem[Lucy \& Sweeney(1971)]{luc71}
448: Lucy, L. B., \& Sweeney, M. A. 1971, \aj, 76, 544
449: \bibitem[Maintz et al.(2005)]{mai05}
450: Maintz, M., Rivinius, T., Stahl, O., \v{S}tefl, S., \&
451: Appenzeller, I. 2005, Publ. Astron. Inst. Cz., 93, 21
452: \bibitem[Marsh et al.(1995)Marsh, Dhillon, \& Duck]{mar95}
453: Marsh, T. R., Dhillon, V. S., \& Duck, S. R.
454: 1995, \mnras, 275, 828
455: \bibitem[Martins et al.(2005)]{mar05}
456: Martins, L. P., Delgado, R. M. Gonz\'{a}lez, Leitherer, C., Cervi\~{n}o, M., \&
457: Hauschildt, P. 2005, \mnras, 358, 49
458: \bibitem[Maunder(1892)]{mau92}
459: Maunder, E. W. 1892, Observatory, 15, 393
460: \bibitem[Mayor et al.(2003)]{may03}
461: Mayor, M., et al. 2003, Messenger, 114, 20
462: \bibitem[McAlister et al.(2005)]{mca05}
463: McAlister, H. A., et al. 2005, \apj, 628, 439
464: \bibitem[Morales et al.(2001)]{mor01}
465: Morales, C., et al. 2001, \apj, 552, 278
466: \bibitem[Mellor(1923)]{mel23}
467: Mellor, L. L. 1923, Publ. Michigan Obs., 3, 61
468: \bibitem[Morbey \& Brosterhus(1974)]{mor74}
469: Morbey, C. L., \& Brosterhus, E. B. 1974, \pasp, 86, 455
470: \bibitem[Morrison et al.(1997)]{mor97}
471: Morrison, N. D., Knauth, D. C., Mulliss, C. L., \& Lee, W.
472: 1997, \pasp, 109, 676
473: \bibitem[Moultaka et al.(2004)]{mou04}
474: Moultaka, J., Ilovaisky, S. A., Prugniel, P., \& Soubiran, C.
475: 2004, \pasp, 116, 693
476: \bibitem[Palmer et al.(1968)]{pal68}
477: Palmer, D. R., Walker, E. N., Jones, D. H. P., \& Wallis, R. E.
478: 1968, R. Obs. Bull., 135, 385
479: \bibitem[Penny et al.(1997)Penny, Gies, \& Bagnuolo]{pen97}
480: Penny, L. R., Gies, D. R., \& Bagnuolo, W. G., Jr.
481: 1997, \apj, 483, 439
482: \bibitem[Peters et al.(2008)]{pet08}
483: Peters, G. J., Gies, D. R., Grundstrom, E. D., \& McSwain, M. V.
484: 2008, \apj, submitted
485: \bibitem[Raguzova(2001)]{rag01}
486: Raguzova, N. V. 2001, \aap, 367, 848
487: \bibitem[Radick (1981)]{rad81}
488: Radick, R. 1981, \aj, 86, 1685
489: \bibitem[Ridgway et al.(1982)]{rid82}
490: Ridgway, S. T., Jacoby, G. H., Joyce, R. R.,
491: Seigel, M. J., \& Wells, D. C. 1982, \aj, 87, 680
492: \bibitem[Roberts et al.(1987)Roberts, Leh\'{a}r, \& Dreher]{rob87}
493: Roberts, D. H., Leh\'{a}r, J., \& Dreher, J. W. 1987, AJ, 93, 968
494: \bibitem[Scargle(1982)]{sca82}
495: Scargle, J. D. 1982, \apj, 263, 835
496: \bibitem[\v{S}tefl et al.(2000)\v{S}tefl, Hummel, \& Rivinius]{ste00}
497: \v{S}tefl, S., Hummel, W., \& Rivinius, Th.
498: 2000, \aap, 358, 208
499: \bibitem[Stellingwerf(1978)]{ste78}
500: Stellingwerf, R. F. 1978, \apj, 224, 953
501: \bibitem[Tokovinin \& Smekhov(2002)]{tok02}
502: Tokovinin, A. A., \& Smekhov, M. G. 2002, \aap, 382, 118
503: \bibitem[Valdes et al.(2004)]{val04}
504: Valdes, F., Gupta, R., Rose, J. A., Singh, H. P., \& Bell, D. J.
505: 2004, \apjs, 152, 251
506: \bibitem[van Leeuwen(2007)]{van07}
507: van Leeuwen, F. 2007, Hipparcos, the New Reduction of the Raw Data
508: (ASSL 350) (Dordrecht: Springer)
509: \bibitem[Weselak et al.(2008)]{wes08}
510: Weselak, T., Galazutdinov, G., Musaev, F., \& Kre\l owski, J.
511: 2008, \aap, 479, 149
512: \bibitem[Willems \& Kolb(2004)]{wil04}
513: Willems, B., \& Kolb, U. 2004, \aap, 419, 1057
514: \bibitem[Zucker(2003)]{zuc03}
515: Zucker, S. 2003, \mnras, 342, 1291
516: \end{thebibliography}
517:
518: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
519: % Tables
520:
521: \clearpage
522: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccl}
523: \tablewidth{0pc}
524: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
525: %\rotate
526: \tablenum{1}
527: \tablecaption{Journal of Spectroscopy \label{tab1}}
528: \tablehead{
529: \colhead{Run} &
530: \colhead{Dates} &
531: \colhead{Range} &
532: \colhead{Resolving Power} &
533: \colhead{} &
534: \colhead{Observatory/Telescope/} \\
535: \colhead{Number} &
536: \colhead{(BY)} &
537: \colhead{(\AA)} &
538: \colhead{($\lambda/\triangle\lambda$)} &
539: \colhead{$N$} &
540: \colhead{Spectrograph}}
541: \startdata
542: 1\dotfill & 1989.3 & 4453 -- 4597 &\phn\phn6280 &\phn6 & KPNO/0.9m/Coud\'{e} \\
543: 2\dotfill & 2000.9 & 6445 -- 6700 &\phn 12100 & 30 & KPNO/0.9m/Coud\'{e} \\
544: 3\dotfill & 2004.8 & 6466 -- 6700 &\phn\phn9500 & 16 & KPNO/0.9m/Coud\'{e} \\
545: 4\dotfill & 2005.9 & 4240 -- 4580 &\phn 10300 &\phn2 & KPNO/0.9m/Coud\'{e} \\
546: 5\dotfill & 2006.8 & 6434 -- 6700 &\phn\phn7600 &\phn2 & KPNO/0.9m/Coud\'{e} \\
547: 6\dotfill & 2006.8 & 4240 -- 4580 &\phn 10200 &\phn2 & KPNO/0.9m/Coud\'{e} \\
548: 7\dotfill & 2000.9 -- 2002.4 & 3780 -- 5700, 5832 -- 8483 &\phn 20000 & 46 & Ond\v{r}ejov/2m/HEROS \\
549: 8\dotfill & 1999.1 -- 2000.3 & 6500 -- 6700 &\phn 14000 &\phn6 & HLCO/MTT 1m/Ebert-Fastie \\
550: 9\dotfill & 1999.4 & 5832 -- 8483 &\phn 20000 &\phn1 & La Silla/0.5m/HEROS \\
551: 10\dotfill & 2004.2 -- 2007.1 & 6527 -- 6596 &\phn 26000 & 37 & Ritter/1m/Echelle \\
552: 11\dotfill & 1996.3 & 4000 -- 5000 &\phn 34100 &\phn2 & OHP/1.9m/Elodie \\
553: 12\dotfill & 2003.0 & 3760 -- 4500, 4800 -- 5100 &\phn 80000 &\phn1 & VLT/8m/UVES \\
554: 13\dotfill & 2004.0 & 3800 -- 5000 & 120000 &\phn2 & La Silla/3.6m/HARPS \\
555: 14\dotfill & 2006.1 -- 2007.1 & 3750 -- 5150 &\phn 48000 &\phn3 & La Silla/2.2m/FEROS \\
556: 15\dotfill & 1979.0 -- 1995.3 & 1200 -- 1900 &\phn 10000 & 12 & {\it IUE}/0.45m/Echelle (SWP) \\
557: \enddata
558: \end{deluxetable}
559:
560: % Table 2
561: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccc}
562: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
563: \tablewidth{0pt}
564: \tablenum{2}
565: \tablecaption{Radial Velocity Measurements \label{tab2}}
566: \tablehead{
567: \colhead{Date} &
568: \colhead{Orbital} &
569: \colhead{$V_r$} &
570: \colhead{$\triangle V_r$} &
571: \colhead{$(O-C)$} &
572: \colhead{Run} \\
573: \colhead{(HJD$-$2,400,000)} &
574: \colhead{Phase} &
575: \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} &
576: \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} &
577: \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} &
578: \colhead{Number} }
579: \startdata
580: 43881.848 \dotfill & 0.933 &
581: \phs $ 15.3$ & 3.2 & \phn\phs $ 4.0$ & $ 15$ \\
582: 44333.437 \dotfill & 0.191 &
583: \phn\phs $ 9.9$ & 2.8 & \phn\phs $ 2.9$ & $ 15$ \\
584: 44333.458 \dotfill & 0.191 &
585: \phs $ 17.4$ & 3.5 & \phs $ 10.4$ & $ 15$ \\
586: 44529.050 \dotfill & 0.068 &
587: \phs $ 26.1$ & 3.7 & \phs $ 14.8$ & $ 15$ \\
588: 45360.745 \dotfill & 0.802 &
589: \phs $ 11.1$ & 2.9 & \phn\phs $ 4.4$ & $ 15$ \\
590: \enddata
591: \tablecomments{Table 2 is available in its entirely in the electronic edition.
592: A portion is shown here for guidance regarding its form and content.}
593: \end{deluxetable}
594:
595: % Table 3 $-$ Orbital Elements
596:
597: \begin{deluxetable}{lc}
598: \tablewidth{0pc}
599: \tablenum{3}
600: \tablecaption{Circular Orbital Elements\label{tab3}}
601: \tablehead{
602: \colhead{Element} & \colhead{Value} }
603: \startdata
604: $P$ (d) \dotfill & 40.11 (2)\tablenotemark{a} \\
605: $T_0$ (HJD -- 2,400,000) \dotfill & 44526.3 (3) \\
606: $K_1$ (km s$^{-1}$) \dotfill & 7.7 (3) \\
607: $V_0$ (km s$^{-1}$) \dotfill & 4.3 (2) \\
608: $a_1\sin i$ ($R_\odot$) \dotfill & 6.1 (3) \\
609: $f(M)$ ($M_\odot$) \dotfill & 0.0019 (2) \\
610: $(M_2 \sin i) / (1+M_2/M_1)^{2/3}$ ($M_\odot$) \dotfill & 0.279 (14) \\
611: r.m.s. (km s$^{-1}$) \dotfill & 2.8 \\
612: \enddata
613: \tablenotetext{a}{Fixed.}
614: \tablecomments{Numbers in parentheses give the error in the last digit quoted.}
615: \end{deluxetable}
616:
617: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
618:
619: % Figure captions
620: \input{epsf}
621:
622: \clearpage
623:
624: % Figure 1 $-$ Radial velocity curve
625: \begin{figure}[h]
626: \begin{center}
627: {\includegraphics[angle=90,height=12cm]{f1.eps}}
628: \end{center}
629: \caption{The observed and derived radial velocity curves.
630: The open circles indicate the {\it IUE}
631: UV measurements while the solid circles represent the optical
632: spectra measurements.}
633: \label{fig1}
634: \end{figure}
635:
636: \clearpage
637:
638: % Figure 2 $-$ Mass plane
639: \begin{figure}[h]
640: \begin{center}
641: \plotone{f2.eps}
642: \end{center}
643: \caption{The mass diagram constraints for the mass of
644: Regulus ($M_1$) and its faint companion ($M_2$). Each solid
645: line gives the relation from the mass function for the
646: orbital inclination indicated on the right hand side.
647: The vertical dotted lines show the probable mass range for
648: Regulus \citep{mca05}.}
649: \label{fig2}
650: \end{figure}
651:
652: \clearpage
653:
654: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
655:
656: \center{\large ONLINE MATERIAL}
657:
658: {\tt
659: \begin{verbatim}
660: Title: A Spectroscopic Orbit for Regulus
661: Authors: Gies et al.
662: Table: Radial Velocity Measurements
663: ================================================================================
664: Byte-by-byte Description of file: datafile2.txt
665: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
666: Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
667: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
668: 1- 10 F10.3 d Date HJD-2400000
669: 11- 16 F6.3 -- Phase Orbital phase from ascending node
670: 17- 21 F5.1 km/s HRV Heliocentric radial velocity
671: 22- 26 F5.1 km/s e_HRV Mean error on HRV
672: 27- 31 F5.1 km/s O-C Observed minus calculated residual
673: 32- 34 I3 -- Run Run number from Table 1
674: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
675: 43881.848 0.933 15.3 3.2 4.0 15
676: 44333.437 0.191 9.9 2.8 2.9 15
677: 44333.458 0.191 17.4 3.5 10.4 15
678: 44529.050 0.068 26.1 3.7 14.8 15
679: 45360.745 0.802 11.1 2.9 4.4 15
680: 45360.787 0.803 13.3 3.1 6.5 15
681: 45360.817 0.803 -3.1 2.8 -9.9 15
682: 45377.118 0.210 7.9 2.9 1.7 15
683: 46184.477 0.337 -6.6 3.2 -6.9 15
684: 46876.553 0.591 12.2 2.8 14.4 15
685: 47645.697 0.766 1.3 6.3 -3.7 1
686: 47646.702 0.791 3.4 5.5 -2.8 1
687: 47647.706 0.816 3.6 4.4 -3.7 1
688: 47648.682 0.840 3.6 4.4 -4.8 1
689: 47649.686 0.865 6.6 5.0 -2.7 1
690: 47650.685 0.890 9.5 4.5 -0.7 1
691: 47899.708 0.098 10.6 2.9 0.1 15
692: 49810.478 0.734 9.8 3.1 6.3 15
693: 50204.407 0.554 -2.7 1.0 0.3 11
694: 50206.381 0.603 0.8 0.6 2.7 11
695: 51197.705 0.317 11.2 1.6 10.1 8
696: 51254.792 0.740 6.7 2.1 2.9 8
697: 51307.569 0.056 13.9 1.6 2.4 9
698: 51603.630 0.437 2.2 1.7 5.0 8
699: 51650.663 0.609 -7.9 1.7 -6.2 8
700: 51654.610 0.708 2.4 1.9 0.2 8
701: 51663.620 0.932 4.6 1.7 -6.7 8
702: 51860.664 0.845 10.0 0.4 1.4 7
703: 51890.018 0.576 -3.9 1.3 -1.4 2
704: 51890.019 0.576 -4.1 1.3 -1.6 2
705: 51890.019 0.576 -1.7 1.3 0.8 2
706: 51890.982 0.600 -1.4 1.3 0.5 2
707: 51890.982 0.600 -4.5 1.3 -2.6 2
708: 51890.982 0.600 -2.7 1.3 -0.8 2
709: 51892.005 0.626 1.3 1.3 2.4 2
710: 51893.001 0.651 0.2 2.0 0.4 2
711: 51893.001 0.651 1.9 1.8 2.1 2
712: 51893.002 0.651 -1.5 2.1 -1.3 2
713: 51894.011 0.676 0.5 1.3 -0.3 2
714: 51894.011 0.676 3.5 1.2 2.7 2
715: 51894.012 0.676 4.0 1.3 3.2 2
716: 51896.029 0.726 -1.3 1.4 -4.4 2
717: 51898.054 0.777 6.6 1.3 1.1 2
718: 51898.054 0.777 6.3 1.2 0.8 2
719: 51898.054 0.777 2.4 1.2 -3.1 2
720: 51898.055 0.777 7.0 1.2 1.5 2
721: 51898.055 0.777 5.3 1.2 -0.2 2
722: 51899.060 0.802 7.3 1.2 0.6 2
723: 51899.061 0.802 7.0 1.2 0.3 2
724: 51899.061 0.802 9.9 1.3 3.2 2
725: 51899.634 0.816 8.2 2.6 0.8 7
726: 51900.047 0.826 8.9 1.2 1.1 2
727: 51900.047 0.826 9.2 1.2 1.4 2
728: 51900.048 0.827 8.3 1.2 0.5 2
729: 51901.048 0.851 11.3 1.2 2.5 2
730: 51901.048 0.851 10.5 1.2 1.7 2
731: 51901.603 0.865 9.4 0.4 0.1 7
732: 51901.612 0.865 8.5 1.6 -0.9 7
733: 51901.643 0.866 9.2 0.4 -0.2 7
734: 51902.021 0.876 14.2 1.2 4.5 2
735: 51902.021 0.876 11.3 1.2 1.6 2
736: 51902.022 0.876 13.8 1.2 4.1 2
737: 51919.488 0.311 1.4 2.4 0.0 7
738: 51919.506 0.312 2.6 1.4 1.2 7
739: 51954.413 0.182 7.7 1.6 0.3 7
740: 51954.423 0.182 4.0 2.8 -3.4 7
741: 51954.512 0.184 7.5 1.9 0.2 7
742: 51954.524 0.185 5.9 1.3 -1.4 7
743: 51954.538 0.185 6.0 1.6 -1.3 7
744: 51968.455 0.532 -2.5 2.2 0.8 7
745: 51968.602 0.536 -2.2 1.7 1.0 7
746: 52000.362 0.327 -2.2 0.9 -2.9 7
747: 52000.377 0.328 -3.3 0.9 -4.0 7
748: 52001.352 0.352 -3.8 0.7 -3.5 7
749: 52001.384 0.353 -1.9 0.7 -1.5 7
750: 52009.403 0.553 -4.6 0.9 -1.6 7
751: 52018.361 0.776 8.0 2.8 2.5 7
752: 52018.370 0.776 8.8 4.8 3.3 7
753: 52030.361 0.075 8.9 1.0 -2.2 7
754: 52031.310 0.099 14.1 1.5 3.6 7
755: 52031.317 0.099 16.8 2.4 6.3 7
756: 52032.345 0.125 13.3 2.3 3.6 7
757: 52032.353 0.125 13.4 1.9 3.7 7
758: 52339.495 0.782 6.9 0.6 1.1 7
759: 52363.372 0.377 0.7 0.5 1.9 7
760: 52363.377 0.377 0.0 2.1 1.2 7
761: 52364.384 0.402 1.2 0.2 3.2 7
762: 52367.374 0.477 -1.7 0.4 1.6 7
763: 52368.382 0.502 0.3 2.9 3.7 7
764: 52369.352 0.526 -1.1 1.5 2.2 7
765: 52370.437 0.553 -7.6 1.1 -4.6 7
766: 52370.447 0.554 1.4 5.7 4.4 7
767: 52386.300 0.949 17.8 2.6 6.3 7
768: 52389.301 0.024 12.2 0.7 0.4 7
769: 52396.317 0.198 6.5 2.8 -0.2 7
770: 52397.310 0.223 4.2 2.5 -1.3 7
771: 52398.338 0.249 2.1 2.8 -2.2 7
772: 52402.334 0.348 -2.9 3.2 -2.7 7
773: 52404.309 0.398 -2.6 2.6 -0.7 7
774: 52406.312 0.448 -1.5 2.0 1.5 7
775: 52407.308 0.472 -2.6 3.4 0.7 7
776: 52408.314 0.498 -1.6 1.9 1.8 7
777: 52411.341 0.573 0.8 1.6 3.4 7
778: 52638.871 0.245 7.1 0.8 2.6 12
779: 53004.861 0.369 1.8 1.0 2.8 13
780: 53039.774 0.240 7.7 0.9 3.0 13
781: 53075.679 0.135 8.1 0.9 -1.2 10
782: 53084.676 0.359 -0.3 0.9 0.3 10
783: 53084.796 0.362 -2.3 0.9 -1.6 10
784: 53103.639 0.832 6.2 0.9 -1.8 10
785: 53107.682 0.933 9.7 0.9 -1.6 10
786: 53111.641 0.032 9.1 1.0 -2.7 10
787: 53117.685 0.182 5.0 1.0 -2.4 10
788: 53119.683 0.232 3.5 1.2 -1.6 10
789: 53123.648 0.331 4.7 1.1 4.2 10
790: 53125.581 0.379 -0.9 1.3 0.4 10
791: 53129.595 0.479 -4.7 1.1 -1.4 10
792: 53138.614 0.704 0.5 1.1 -1.6 10
793: 53145.582 0.878 5.3 1.1 -4.5 10
794: 53152.620 0.053 9.1 0.9 -2.4 10
795: 53168.591 0.451 -8.1 1.4 -5.0 10
796: 53292.008 0.528 -9.3 2.0 -6.0 3
797: 53292.013 0.528 -8.2 2.0 -4.9 3
798: 53292.016 0.528 -5.2 2.0 -1.9 3
799: 53292.017 0.528 -8.4 2.0 -5.1 3
800: 53292.019 0.528 -8.2 2.0 -4.9 3
801: 53292.021 0.528 -8.7 2.0 -5.4 3
802: 53293.016 0.553 -6.7 1.9 -3.7 3
803: 53293.018 0.553 -6.5 2.1 -3.5 3
804: 53293.019 0.553 -6.9 2.0 -3.9 3
805: 53293.021 0.553 -6.7 2.0 -3.7 3
806: 53295.019 0.603 -2.4 2.6 -0.5 3
807: 53295.021 0.603 -3.3 2.6 -1.4 3
808: 53295.022 0.603 -5.4 2.0 -3.5 3
809: 53295.024 0.603 -5.1 2.7 -3.2 3
810: 53295.025 0.603 -4.8 2.2 -2.9 3
811: 53295.026 0.603 -8.5 2.1 -6.6 3
812: 53405.772 0.364 -0.6 1.1 0.2 10
813: 53426.701 0.886 7.9 1.2 -2.1 10
814: 53428.789 0.938 12.7 1.3 1.3 10
815: 53445.666 0.359 2.6 1.2 3.2 10
816: 53458.653 0.683 -2.7 1.2 -3.8 10
817: 53460.651 0.732 1.8 1.1 -1.6 10
818: 53465.694 0.858 9.2 1.1 0.1 10
819: 53466.718 0.884 11.4 1.3 1.4 10
820: 53496.636 0.629 -1.9 1.1 -0.9 10
821: 53528.577 0.426 -1.4 1.2 1.2 10
822: 53529.596 0.451 -4.9 1.4 -1.8 10
823: 53685.005 0.325 1.2 1.1 0.4 4
824: 53689.034 0.426 -1.9 1.1 0.7 4
825: 53772.781 0.514 -1.7 0.8 1.7 14
826: 53816.668 0.608 3.7 1.2 5.4 10
827: 53845.674 0.331 3.6 1.3 3.1 10
828: 53859.639 0.679 1.6 1.2 0.6 10
829: 53860.645 0.704 0.4 1.4 -1.7 10
830: 53878.565 0.151 6.5 1.3 -2.2 10
831: 53882.610 0.252 -1.2 1.5 -5.4 10
832: 53883.617 0.277 0.8 1.9 -2.2 10
833: 53892.575 0.500 -0.2 1.4 3.2 10
834: 53904.589 0.800 4.4 1.8 -2.2 10
835: 53914.592 0.049 9.6 2.1 -2.0 10
836: 54020.987 0.702 -3.3 2.7 -5.3 5
837: 54020.988 0.702 -0.9 1.9 -2.9 5
838: 54032.015 0.976 12.7 1.2 0.9 6
839: 54032.016 0.976 12.3 1.1 0.5 6
840: 54137.731 0.612 1.4 0.5 3.0 14
841: 54154.761 0.036 12.9 0.5 1.2 14
842: 54155.696 0.060 5.1 1.6 -6.3 10
843: \end{verbatim}
844: }
845:
846: \end{document}
847:
848: