1: % OZI-forbidden B decays
2: %June 30, 2008
3: %MG added paragraph on B0->K+K-, K*+K*- after submission to PLB
4: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
5: \usepackage{graphicx}
6: \usepackage{cite}
7: \def\gsim{\grtsim}
8: \def\lsim{\lesssim}
9: \def \bea{\begin{eqnarray}}
10: \def \beq{\begin{equation}}
11: \def \b{{\cal B}}
12: \def \bo{B^0}
13: \def \eea{\end{eqnarray}}
14: \def \eeq{\end{equation}}
15: \def \ite{{\it et al.}}
16: \def \ob{\overline{B}^0}
17: \def \s{\sqrt{2}}
18: \def \st{\sqrt{3}}
19: \def \sx{\sqrt{6}}
20: \def \half{\frac{1}{2}}
21: \def\smhalf{\small{\frac{1}{2}}}
22: \def \3half{\frac{3}{2}}
23: \def \ko{K^0}
24: \def \ok{\overline{K}^0}
25: \renewcommand{\thetable}{\Roman{table}}
26: \textwidth 6.2in
27: \textheight 9.0in
28: \hoffset -0.3in
29: \voffset -0.4in
30: \begin{document}
31: \begin{flushright}
32: EFI 08-19 \\
33: June 2008 \\
34: %arXiv:0806.3584 \\
35: \end{flushright}
36: \centerline{\bf $B$ decays dominated by $\omega$--$\phi$ mixing}
37: \bigskip
38: \centerline{Michael Gronau\footnote{On sabbatical leave from the Physics
39: Department, Technion, Haifa 32000, Israel.} and Jonathan L. Rosner}
40: \medskip
41: \centerline{\it Enrico Fermi Institute and Department of Physics,
42: University of Chicago}
43: \centerline{\it Chicago, IL 60637, U.S.A.}
44: \bigskip
45: \begin{quote}
46: Recently Belle has established the 90\% confidence level (CL) upper
47: limit $\b < 9.4 \times 10^{-7}$ for the branching ratio for $B^0\to J/\psi
48: \phi$, a process expected to be suppressed by the Okubo-Zweig-Iizuka (OZI)
49: rule disfavoring disconnected quark diagrams.
50: We use information on
51: $\omega$--$\phi$ mixing to establish likely lower bounds on this and related
52: processes. We find that the Belle result is about a factor of five above
53: our limit, while other decays such as $B^0 \to \bar D^0 \phi$ and $B^+
54: \to \pi^+ \phi$, for which upper limits have been obtained by BaBar, could be
55: observable with similar improvements in data.
56: We argue that a significant enhancement of our predicted decay rates by
57: rescattering is unlikely.
58: \end{quote}
59:
60: \leftline{\qquad PACS codes: 12.15.Hh, 12.15.Ji, 13.25.Hw, 14.40.Nd}
61:
62: \medskip
63: Certain $B$ meson decay processes are expected to be suppressed, as they
64: involve either the participation of a spectator quark or, equivalently in
65: terms of flavor topology, the rescattering of final states into one another.
66: A number of such processes were suggested in Ref.\ \cite{Blok:1997yj}.
67: Recently the Belle Collaboration has greatly improved upper limits on one
68: such process, the decay $B^0 \to J/\psi \phi$, finding a 90\% CL upper limit
69: for the branching ratio of $\b < 9.4 \times 10^{-7}$ \cite{Liu:2008bt}.
70: This process is expected to be suppressed by the Okubo-Zweig-Iizuka (OZI)
71: rule disfavoring disconnected quark diagrams~\cite{Okubo:1963fa}.
72: In the present Letter we evaluate one potential mechanism for production of
73: such a final state, the existence of $\omega$--$\phi$ mixing, and find that
74: it leads to a predicted branching ratio about a factor of five below the
75: present upper limit. We also evaluate the effect of this mixing upon
76: several other processes and find that for $B^0 \to \bar D^0 \phi$ and $B^+
77: \to \pi^+ \phi$ a similar improvement in data should lead to observable
78: signals.
79:
80: Extensive discussions of $\omega$--$\phi$ mixing have been given in Refs.\
81: \cite{Benayoun:1999fv,Benayoun:1999au,Benayoun:2000ti,Benayoun:2001qz,%
82: Benayoun:2007cu}. We shall neglect isospin-violation and admixtures with
83: the $\rho$. Then one can parametrize $\omega$--$\phi$ mixing in terms of an
84: angle $\delta$ such that the physical $\omega$ and $\phi$ are related to the
85: ideally mixed states $\omega^I \equiv (u \bar u + d \bar d)/\s$ and $\phi^I
86: \equiv s \bar s$ by
87: \beq\label{mixing}
88: \left( \begin{array}{c} \omega \\ \phi \end{array} \right) =
89: \left( \begin{array}{c c}
90: \cos \delta & \sin \delta \\ - \sin \delta & \cos \delta
91: \end{array} \right)
92: \left( \begin{array}{c} \omega^I \\ \phi^I \end{array} \right)
93: \eeq
94: A simplified analysis \cite{Benayoun:1999fv} implies a mixing angle
95: of $\delta = - (3.34 \pm 0.17)^\circ$, while the most
96: recent treatment~\cite{Benayoun:2007cu} implies an energy-dependent mixing
97: which varies from $-0.45^\circ$ at the $\omega$ mass to $-4.64^\circ$ at
98: the $\phi$ mass.
99:
100: %Fig.~{fig:csjpsi}.
101: %This is Figure 1
102: \begin{figure}
103: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=6.0cm]{csjpsi.ps}}
104: \caption{Quark diagrams for OZI-allowed $B^0\to J/\psi \omega^I$
105: and $B^0\to \bar D^0\omega^I$.}
106: \label{fig:csjpsi}
107: \end{figure}
108: %
109: %Fig.~{fig:jpsiphi}.
110: %This is Figure 2
111: \begin{figure}
112: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=5.0cm]{jpsiphi.ps}}
113: \caption{Quark diagrams for OZI-suppressed $B^0\to J/\psi \phi^I$ and
114: $B^0\to \bar D^0\phi^I$.}
115: \label{fig:jpsiphi}
116: \end{figure}
117:
118: A systematic study of the effects of $\omega$--$\phi$
119: mixing on hadronic decays of non-strange $B$ mesons, $B^0\equiv \bar bd,
120: B^+\equiv \bar bu$, requires considering the three $\Delta S=0$ quark
121: subprocesses, $\bar b \to \bar cu\bar d, \bar b\to \bar c c\bar d$
122: and $\bar b\to \bar u u\bar d$. Each one of these subprocesses leads
123: to OZI-allowed decays involving $\omega^I$, while decays into final states
124: with $\phi^I$ are OZI-suppressed.
125: Quark diagrams describing two examples of OZI-allowed decays, $B^0\to J/\psi \omega^I$
126: and $B^0\to \bar D^0\omega^I$, and corresponding OZI-suppressed decays,
127: $B^0\to J/\psi\phi^I$ and $B^0\to \bar D^0\phi^I$, are shown in Figs.~\ref{fig:csjpsi} and
128: \ref{fig:jpsiphi}. The first two processes are described by color-suppressed tree diagrams,
129: while the other two processes involve $W$-exchange diagrams, to which an $s\bar s$ pair
130: is attached through three gluons.
131:
132: The situation in decays of $B_s\equiv \bar bs$ is the opposite relative to that
133: in non-strange $B$ decays. That is, the $\omega$ and $\phi$ exchange roles.
134: Here one considers the $\Delta S=1$ quark subprocess $\bar b\to \bar c c\bar s$
135: which leads to OZI-allowed decays involving $\phi^I$ and OZI-suppressed decays
136: with $\omega^I$. (The quark subprocess $\bar b\to \bar c\bar us$ leads through
137: W-exchange diagrams to OZI-allowed $B_s$ decays involving $\omega^I$ including
138: $\bar D^0\omega^I$.) Examples of quark diagrams describing the OZI-allowed
139: decay $B_s\to J/\psi \phi^I$ and the corresponding OZI-suppressed decay $B_s\to
140: J/\psi \omega^I$ are shown in Figs.~\ref{fig:csbs} and \ref{fig:bsjpsiom}. As
141: in the above examples of $B^0$ decays, the first process is governed by a
142: color-suppressed tree amplitude, while the second decay is described by a
143: W-exchange diagram, to which a $u\bar u$ or $d\bar d$ pair is attached by three
144: gluons.
145:
146: Neglecting contributions of OZI-suppressed amplitudes and small phase space
147: differences between processes with $\omega$ or $\phi$ in the final state,
148: Eq.~(\ref{mixing}) implies
149: \bea\label{Xphi}
150: \b(B^{0,+} \to X^{0,+}\phi) &=& \tan^2\delta\,\b(B^{+,0}\to X^{+,0}\omega)~,\\
151: \label{Xomega}
152: \b(B_s \to X^0\omega) &=& \tan^2\delta\,\b(B_s\to X^0\phi)~.
153: \eea
154: The examples shown in Figs.~\ref{fig:csjpsi} and \ref{fig:csbs} correspond to
155: $X^0=J/\psi, \bar D^0$ in $B^0$ decays and $X^0=J/\psi$ in $B_s$ decays.
156:
157: %Fig.~{fig:csbs}.
158: %This is Figure 3
159: \begin{figure}
160: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=6.0cm]{csbs.ps}}
161: \caption{Quark diagrams for OZI-allowed $B_s\to J/\psi \phi^I$.}
162: \label{fig:csbs}
163: \end{figure}
164: %
165: %Fig.~{fig:bsjpsiom}.
166: %This is Figure 4
167: \begin{figure}
168: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=5.0cm]{bsjpsiom.ps}}
169: \caption{Quark diagrams for OZI-suppressed $B_s\to J/\psi \omega^I$.}
170: \label{fig:bsjpsiom}
171: \end{figure}
172:
173: In Table I we list OZI-allowed branching ratios of $B^0, B^+$ and
174: $B_s$ decays, for which nonzero values have been measured, and upper limits on
175: corresponding OZI-suppressed decays.
176: The upper left part of the table, addressing non-strange $B$
177: mesons, includes also processes involving $\rho^0$, for which
178: branching ratios are expected to be approximately equal to corresponding
179: processes with $\omega$. (See Fig.~\ref{fig:csjpsi}.)
180: The approximately equal decay rates measured for
181: $B^0\to\bar D^0\rho^0$ and $B^0\to \bar D^0\omega$ confirm this assumption.
182: OZI-allowed branching ratios for $B_s$ decays involving $\phi$ are listed
183: in the lower left part of the Table I.
184:
185: Using Eqs.~(\ref{Xphi}) and (\ref{Xomega}) with a universal value of $\delta = -4.64^\circ$
186: and the measured OZI-allowed branching ratios, we obtain predictions for the
187: OZI-suppressed rates shown in the right-hand column of Table I.
188: Values in parentheses, quoting predictions for OZI-suppressed $B_s$ decays
189: involving $\omega$, are obtained for the small mixing angle
190: $\delta = -0.45^\circ$~\cite{Benayoun:2007cu}.
191: Predictions for $B^0$ and $B^+$ decays are compared with current upper bounds measured for
192: these branching ratios. We note that the predictions for $\b(B^0\to \bar D^0\phi)$,
193: $\b(B^0\to J/\psi\phi)$ and $\b(B^+\to \pi^+\phi)$ are about a factor five smaller
194: than the current upper limits on these branching ratios.
195:
196: % This is Table 1
197: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.1}
198: \begin{table}
199: \caption{Comparison of some OZI--allowed and OZI--suppressed branching ratios,
200: in units of $10^{-5}$ and $10^{-7}$, respectively. Averages are taken from
201: Ref.~\cite{PDGup}. Upper limits
202: are 90\% CL. Predictions are based on an $\omega$-$\phi$ mixing angle
203: $\delta= -4.64^\circ$. Parentheses denote predictions based on the very small
204: admixture of $s \bar s$ expected in the $\omega$ in Ref.\
205: \cite{Benayoun:2007cu}.
206: \label{tab:comp}}
207: \begin{center}
208: \begin{tabular}{r r c r c c} \hline \hline
209: \multicolumn{1}{c}{~} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{OZI--allowed}
210: & \multicolumn{3}{c}{OZI--suppressed} \\
211: Quark~~~~& Decay & ${\cal B}~(10^{-5})$ & Decay
212: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{${\cal B}~(10^{-7})$} \\
213: subprocess & mode & ~ & mode & Upper limit & Predicted\\ \hline
214: $\bar b\to\bar cu\bar d$ & $B^0 \to \bar D^0 \rho^0$
215: & 32$\pm$5~\cite{Kuzmin:2006mw} &
216: $\bar D^0 \phi$ & $< 116$~\cite{Aubert:2007nw} & 21$\pm$3 \\
217: ~ & $\bar D^0 \omega$ & 25.9$\pm$3.0~\cite{Aubert:2003sw} & $\bar D^0 \phi$
218: & $< 116$~\cite{Aubert:2007nw} & 17$\pm$2\\
219: ~ & $\bar D^{*0} \omega$ & 27$\pm$8~~\cite{Aubert:2003sw} & $\bar D^{*0} \phi$
220: & -- & 18$\pm$5\\
221: $\bar b \to \bar cc\bar d$ & $J/\psi \rho^0$ & 2.7$\pm$0.4~\cite{Aubert:2007xw}
222: & $J/\psi \phi$ & $< 9.4$~\cite{Liu:2008bt} & 1.8$\pm$0.3 \\
223: $\bar b\to \bar uu\bar d$ & $B^+ \to\pi^+\omega$ & 0.69$\pm$0.05~\cite{Jen:2006in}
224: & $B^+ \to \pi^+\phi$ & $<2.4$~\cite{Aubert:2006nn} & 0.45$\pm$0.03 \\
225: ~ & $\rho^+ \omega$ & $1.06^{+0.26}_{-0.23}$~\cite{Aubert:2006vt}
226: & $\rho^+ \phi$ & $<160$~\cite{Bergfeld:1998ik} & 0.7$\pm$0.2 \\ \hline
227: $\bar b\to \bar cc\bar s$ & $B_s \to J/\psi \phi$ & 93$\pm$33~\cite{Abe:1996kc}
228: & $B_s \to J/\psi \omega$ & -- & 61$\pm$22~(0.6) \\
229: ~ & $\psi(2S) \phi$ & 48$\pm$22~\cite{Abulencia:2006jp} & $\psi(2S) \omega$
230: & -- & 32$\pm 15$~(0.3)\\
231: \hline \hline
232: \end{tabular}
233: \end{center}
234: \end{table}
235:
236: %Fig.~{fig:ewp}.
237: %This is Figure 5
238: \begin{figure}[b]
239: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=6.0cm]{ewp.ps}}
240: \caption{Electroweak penguin diagram for OZI-suppressed $B^+\to \pi^+\phi^I$
241: and $B^+\to \rho^+\phi^I$.}
242: \label{fig:ewp}
243: \end{figure}
244:
245: While most OZI-allowed processes in Table I are described by color-suppressed
246: tree diagrams as shown in Figs.~\ref{fig:csjpsi} and \ref{fig:csbs},
247: the CKM-suppressed charmless decays $B^+\to \pi^+\omega$ and $B^+\to
248: \rho^+\omega$ are dominated by color-allowed tree
249: diagrams~\cite{Gronau:1994rj,Chiang:2003pm}. Contributions to these processes
250: from color-suppressed tree diagrams are considerably smaller.
251: This is demonstrated by 90$\%$ CL upper limits measured for corresponding
252: color-suppressed branching ratios,
253: $\b(B^0\to \pi^0\omega) < 0.12\times 10^{-5}$~\cite{Aubert:2004ih}
254: and $\b(B^0\to \rho^0\omega) < 0.15\times 10^{-5}$~\cite{Aubert:2006vt}, which are
255: a factor six or seven below $\b(B^+\to \pi^+\omega)$ and
256: $\b(B^+\to \rho^+\omega)$ given in Table I.
257: The corresponding OZI-suppressed amplitudes for $B^+\to \pi^+\phi$ and
258: $B^+\to \rho^+\phi$ each obtain an electroweak penguin
259: contribution~\cite{Gronau:1995hn} and a contribution
260: from a singlet penguin diagram~\cite{Dighe:1997wj}, shown in Figs.~\ref{fig:ewp}
261: and~\ref{fig:p3g}, respectively.
262: These amplitudes have been calculated in Ref.~\cite{Beneke:2003zv}
263: and~\cite{Beneke:2006hg} within the framework of QCD factorization neglecting
264: $\omega$-$\phi$ mixing. Branching ratios $\b(B^+\to \pi^+\phi)=(2-10)\times
265: 10^{-9}$ and $\b(B^+\to \rho^+\phi)=(1-3)\times 10^{-8}$ were obtained,
266: considerably smaller than the two corresponding predictions in Table I
267: originating in $\omega$-$\phi$ mixing.
268:
269: %Fig.~{fig:p3g}.
270: %This is Figure 6
271: \begin{figure}
272: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=6.0cm]{p3g.ps}}
273: \caption{Singlet penguin diagram for OZI-suppressed $B^+\to \pi^+\phi^I$
274: and $B^+\to \rho^+\phi^I$.}
275: \label{fig:p3g}
276: \end{figure}
277:
278: Assuming that small OZI-suppressed amplitudes do not
279: interfere destructively with amplitudes due to $\omega$-$\phi$ mixing,
280: the predictions presented in Table I for branching ratios of OZI-suppressed
281: decays should be considered as
282: likely lower bounds. In principle, these branching ratios
283: may be enhanced by rescattering through intermediate states with larger
284: decay rates. This possibility had been envisaged a few years before starting
285: the operation of $e^+e^-$ $B$ factories~\cite{Blok:1997yj}. We will now argue
286: that experimental evidence obtained in certain experiments
287: indicates that a significant enhancement by rescattering is unlikely in OZI-suppressed
288: and other suppressed decays.
289:
290: Consider the decay $B^0\to D^-_sK^+$, which is governed by a $W$-exchange
291: amplitude represented by a quark subprocess $(\bar bd)\to (\bar cu)$,
292: associated with a popping of an $s\bar s$ pair out of the vacuum. This exchange
293: amplitude is expected to be suppressed by an order of magnitude ($\sim
294: \Lambda_{\rm QCD}/m_b$) relative to the corresponding color-favored tree
295: amplitude for $B^0\to D^-\pi^+$ induced by the same quark subprocess,
296: $\bar b\to \bar cu\bar d$~\cite{Gronau:1994rj,Beneke:2000ry,Mantry:2003uz}.
297: This would imply $\b(B^0\to D^-_s K^+)/\b(B^0\to D^-\pi^+)\sim 10^{-2}$.
298: Rescattering through dynamically favored intermediate states including
299: $B^0\to D^-\pi^+\to D^-_sK^+$ and rescattering through other intermediate $C=-1, S=0$
300: states, with decay branching ratios at a level of a fraction of a percent, could enhance
301: the branching ratio for $B^0\to D^-_sK^+$ relative to the above expectation.
302: Experimentally, one
303: finds~\cite{Krokovny:2002pe} $\b(B^0\to D^-_sK^+)=(2.9\pm 0.5)\times 10^{-5}$,
304: in comparison with~\cite{PDGup} $\b(B^0\to D^-\pi^+)=(2.68\pm 0.13)\times10^{-3}$ which
305: is two orders of magnitude larger. That is, rescattering effects do not enhance
306: the rate for $B^0\to D^-_sK^+$ beyond the estimate based on an exchange
307: amplitude.
308:
309: One possible conclusion is that a significant enhancement of
310: diagramatically suppressed decay rates by rescattering requires
311: intermediate states with rates which are larger than the suppressed rates
312: by {\em more than two orders of magnitude}. This requirement seems to follow from the
313: multi-channel nature of the rescattering process occurring between the initial
314: $B$ meson and the final state to which it decays. Examples for processes which
315: have been shown to need an enhancement by rescattering are the decays
316: $B\to K\pi$~\cite{Ciuchini:1997rj}. The short-distance loop-suppressed penguin
317: amplitude dominating these processes is too small to account for the measured
318: decay rates and requires an enhancement by long-distance
319: rescattering~\cite{Jain:2007dy}. The branching ratios of intermediate states
320: including $B\to D^{(*)-}_s D^{(*)}$ are at a percent level, {\em three orders
321: of magnitude} larger than the branching ratios calculated for $B\to K\pi$ using
322: short short-distance physics. This is sufficient for a significant enhancement
323: of the $B\to K\pi$ decay rates relative to this calculation.
324:
325: %MG par added after submission to PLB
326: A well-known charmless $B$ decay process dominated by a $W$-exchange
327: amplitude is $B^0\to K^+K^-$~\cite{Blok:1997yj,Gronau:1994rj}.
328: This process receives rescattering contributions from
329: tree-dominated intermediate states including $\pi^+\pi^-$
330: with a branching ratio~\cite{PDGup}
331: $\b(B^0\to\pi^+\pi^-) = (5.13\pm 0.24)\times 10^{-6}$. Assuming an order of
332: magnitude suppression of the exchange amplitude relative to a tree amplitude
333: as in $B^0\to D^-_sK^+$,
334: and using the above criterion for no significant enhancement by rescattering,
335: one expects $\b(B^0\to K^+K^-) \sim 5\times 10^{-8}$, almost an order of magnitude
336: below the current 90\% CL upper limit of~\cite{PDGup} $4.1\times 10^{-7}$.
337: Similarly, using~\cite{PDGup} $\b(B^0\to\rho^+\rho^-) = (2.42\pm 0.31)\times 10^{-5}$,
338: we predict $\b(B^0\to K^{*+}K^{*-})\sim 2\times 10^{-7}$. Very recently an upper limit
339: at 90\% CL has been measured~\cite{Aubert:2008ap},
340: %MG corrected
341: $\b(B^0\to K^{*+}K^{*-}) <2.0\times 10^{-6}$, an order of magnitude above our prediction.
342:
343: Consider now the OZI-suppressed decay $B^0\to \bar D^0\phi$. The quark diagram
344: for this process shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:jpsiphi} describes an exchange amplitude
345: $(\bar bd)\to (\bar cu)$ as in $B^0\to D^-_sK^+$, to which a pair of $s\bar s$ is
346: attached by three gluons. The above argument for no significant rescattering effects in
347: $B^0\to D^-_sK^+$ implies the absence of such effects also in $B^0\to \bar D^0\phi$.
348: To demonstrate this explicitly, let us consider the two kinds of intermediate states through
349: which rescattering into $\bar D^0\phi$ can occur:
350: \begin{enumerate}
351: \item States dominated by tree amplitudes such as $D^-\rho^+~[(\bar cd)(\bar du)]$. Rescattering
352: through these intermediate states into $\bar D^0\phi$ $[(\bar cu)(\bar ss)]$ is OZI-suppressed
353: [see Fig.~\ref{fig:OZI}(a)] and is not expected to enhance the rate for $B^0\to\bar D^0\phi$.
354: \item States governed by exchange amplitudes including $D^-_sK^{*+}~[(\bar cs)(\bar su)]$.
355: Rescattering through these states into $\bar D^0\phi~[(\bar cu)(\bar ss)]$ is OZI-allowed [see
356: Fig.~\ref{fig:OZI}(b)]. This rescattering
357: is not expected to enhance the predicted branching ratio, $\b(B^0\to \bar D^0\phi)\simeq
358: 2\times 10^{-6}$, because $\b(B^0\to D^-_sK^{*+})$ is expected to be only
359: one order of magnitude larger, assuming that it does not differ much from
360: $\b(B^0\to D^-_sK^+)=(2.9\pm 0.5)\times 10^{-5}$ .
361: \end{enumerate}
362:
363: \begin{figure}
364: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=0.98\textwidth]{OZI.ps}}
365: \caption{Quark diagrams for (a) OZI-suppressed rescattering $D^- \rho^+
366: \to \bar D^0 \phi$, (b) OZI-allowed rescattering $D_s^- K^{*+} \to \bar D^0
367: \phi$.
368: \label{fig:OZI}}
369: \end{figure}
370:
371: A similar situation exists in $B^0\to J/\psi\phi$. Here OZI-suppressed
372: rescattering occurs through intermediate tree-dominated states including
373: $D^{(*)+}D^{(*)-}$, while OZI-allowed rescattering involves intermediate states
374: such as $D^{(*)+}_sD^{(*)-}_s$. $B^0$ decays into the latter states are
375: dominated by exchange amplitudes, which are expected to be suppressed by about
376: an order of magnitude relative to the tree amplitudes in $B^0\to
377: D^{(*)+}D^{(*)-}$.
378: Using the suppression measured for the exchange amplitude in $B^0\to D^-_sK^+$,
379: this implies, for instance~\cite{Gronau:2008ed}, $\b(B^0\to D^+_sD^-_s) =
380: (4.0^{+1.8}_{-1.4})\times 10^{-6}$, an order of magnitude below the current
381: upper limit on this branching ratio~\cite{Zupanc:2007pu}. This branching ratio
382: is only twenty times larger than the value predicted for
383: $\b(B^0\to J/\psi\phi)$, which is expected to be insufficient for an
384: enhancement of the latter branching ratio by rescattering through this class of
385: intermediate states.
386:
387: In the case of $B\to \pi^+\phi$ (or $B^+\to\rho^+\phi$) the situation is
388: slightly different, but the condition for a significant enhancement by
389: rescattering is also not met. The final state $\pi^+\phi$ may be reached by
390: OZI-suppressed rescattering through intermediate states such as $\pi^+\rho^0$,
391: or by OZI-allowed rescattering through states including $K^+\bar K^{*0}$. $B^+$
392: decay into the latter mode is dominated by a suppressed $\Delta S=0$ penguin
393: amplitude~\cite{Chiang:2003pm} implying a small branching ratio. The current
394: 90$\%$ CL upper limit~\cite{Aubert:2007ua}, $\b(B^+\to K^+\bar K^{*0})<
395: 1.1\times 10^{-6}$, shows that this branching ratio is at most twenty-five
396: times larger than the predicted $\b(B^+\to\pi^+\phi)$. As discussed above,
397: this is insufficient for enhancing the latter branching ratio by rescattering.
398:
399: In conclusion, we have studied the consequences of $\omega$--$\phi$ mixing in
400: OZI-suppressed hadronic decays of $B$ and $B_s$ mesons. We calculated branching
401: ratios for $B$ decays involving $\phi$, which in the cases of $B^0\to \bar
402: D^0\phi$, $B^0\to J/\psi\phi$ and $B^+\to \pi^+\phi$ are each about a factor
403: of five below the corresponding current upper limits. We used the observed
404: suppression of branching ratios for decays dominated by $W$-exchange including
405: $B^0\to D^-_sK^+$ to argue that a significant enhancement of these rates by
406: rescattering is unlikely. Thus, the above three processes are predicted to be
407: detectable with a factor of five increase in data.
408: Effects of $\omega$--$\phi$ mixing in OZI-suppressed $B_s$ decays involving
409: $\omega$ are much smaller than in nonstrange $B$ decays if one assumes a very
410: small admixture of $s \bar s$
411: in the $\omega$ as suggested in Ref.\ \cite{Benayoun:2007cu}.
412: The predicted branching ratios become a factor two smaller than in Table I for
413: an energy-independent $\omega$-$\phi$ mixing angle of
414: $\delta=-3.34^\circ$~\cite{Benayoun:1999fv}.
415: \bigskip
416:
417: M.G. would like to thank the Enrico Fermi Institute at
418: the University of Chicago for its kind and generous hospitality. We thank
419: Pavel Krokovny, Shunzo Kumano, and Yoshi Sakai for
420: useful communications. This work was supported in part by
421: the United States Department of Energy through Grant No.\ DE FG02 90ER40560.
422:
423: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
424:
425: %1
426: %\cite{Blok:1997yj}
427: \bibitem{Blok:1997yj} B.~Blok, M.~Gronau and J.~L.~Rosner,
428: %``Annihilation, rescattering, and CP asymmetries in B meson decays,''
429: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 78} (1997) 3999 [arXiv:hep-ph/9701396].
430:
431: %2
432: %\cite{Liu:2008bt}
433: \bibitem{Liu:2008bt}
434: Y. Liu {\it et al.} [Belle Collaboration], arXiv:0805.3225 [hep-ex].
435:
436: %3
437: %\cite{Okubo:1963fa}
\bibitem{Okubo:1963fa}
S.~Okubo,
%``Phi meson and unitary symmetry model,''
Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf 5} (1963) 165;
438: G. Zweig, CERN Report No. 8419/TH--412 (1964);
439: %\bibitem{Iizuka:1966fk}
J.~Iizuka,
%``Systematics and phenomenology of meson family,''
Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 37} (1966) 21.
440:
441: %4
442: \bibitem{Benayoun:1999fv}
443: M.~Benayoun, L.~DelBuono, S.~Eidelman, V.~N.~Ivanchenko and H.~B.~O'Connell,
444: %``Radiative decays, nonet symmetry and SU(3) breaking,''
445: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 59} (1999) 114027
446: [arXiv:hep-ph/9902326].
447: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D59,114027;%%
448: See also
A.~Kucukarslan and U.~G.~Meissner,
%``omega-phi mixing in chiral perturbation theory,''
Mod.\ Phys.\ Lett.\ A {\bf 21} (2006) 1423
[arXiv:hep-ph/0603061].
449:
450: %5
451: \bibitem{Benayoun:1999au}
452: M.~Benayoun, L.~DelBuono and H.~B.~O'Connell,
453: %``VMD, the WZW Lagrangian and ChPT: The Third mixing angle,''
454: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 17} (2000) 593
455: [arXiv:hep-ph/9905350].
456: %%CITATION = EPHJA,C17,593;%%
457:
458: %6
459: %\cite{Benayoun:2000ti}
460: \bibitem{Benayoun:2000ti}
461: M.~Benayoun, L.~DelBuono, P.~Leruste and H.~B.~O'Connell,
462: %``An Effective approach to VMD at one loop order and the departures from
463: %ideal mixing for vector mesons,''
464: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 17} (2000) 303
465: [arXiv:nucl-th/0004005].
466: %%CITATION = EPHJA,C17,303;%%
467:
468: %7
469: %\cite{Benayoun:2001qz}
470: \bibitem{Benayoun:2001qz}
471: M.~Benayoun and H.~B.~O'Connell,
472: %``Isospin symmetry breaking within the HLS model: A Full ($\rho$, $\omega$,
473: %$\phi$) mixing scheme,''
474: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 22} (2001) 503
475: [arXiv:nucl-th/0107047].
476: %%CITATION = EPHJA,C22,503;%%
477:
478: %8
479: %\cite{Benayoun:2007cu}
480: \bibitem{Benayoun:2007cu}
481: M.~Benayoun, P.~David, L.~DelBuono, O.~Leitner and H.~B.~O'Connell,
482: %``The Dipion Mass Spectrum In e+e- Annihilation and tau Decay: A Dynamical
483: %(rho0, omega, phi) Mixing Approach,''
484: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 55} (2008) 199
485: [arXiv:0711.4482 [hep-ph]].
486: %%CITATION = EPHJA,C55,199;%%
487:
488: %9
489: %\cite{PDGup}
490: \bibitem{PDGup} W.-M. Yao {\it et al.} [Particle Data Group], 2007 update,
491: {\tt http://pdglive.lbl.gov/listings1.brl?exp=Y} and 2008 update.
492:
493: %10
494: %\cite{Kuzmin:2006mw}
495: \bibitem{Kuzmin:2006mw} A.~Kuzmin [Belle Collaboration],
496: %``Study of anti-B0 --> D0 pi+ pi- decays,''
497: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 76} (2007) 012006
498: [arXiv:hep-ex/0611054].
499:
500: %11
501: %%\cite{Aubert:2007nw}
502: \bibitem{Aubert:2007nw} B.~Aubert {\it et al.} [BaBar Collaboration],
503: %``Search for B0 --> Phi (K+ pi-) decays with large K+ pi- invariant mass,''
504: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 76} (2007) 051103
505: [arXiv:0705.0398 [hep-ex]].
506:
507: %12
508: %\cite{Aubert:2003sw}
509: \bibitem{Aubert:2003sw}
510: B.~Aubert {\it et al.} [BaBar Collaboration],
511: %``Measurement of branching fractions of color-suppressed decays of the
512: %$\overline{B}^0$ meson to $D^{(*)0} \pi^0$, $D^{(*)0} \eta$, $D^{(*)0}
513: %\omega$, and $D^0 \eta^\prime$,''
514: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 69} (2004) 032004
515: [arXiv:hep-ex/0310028];
516: %\cite{Blyth:2006at}
517: %\bibitem{Blyth:2006at}
518: S.~Blyth {\it et al.} [Belle Collaboration],
519: %``Improved measurements of color-suppressed decays anti-B0 --> D0 pi0, D0
520: %eta, D0 omega, D*0 pi0, D*0 eta and D*0 omega,''
521: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 74} (2006) 092002
522: [arXiv:hep-ex/0607029].
523:
524: %13
525: %\cite{Aubert:2007xw}
526: \bibitem{Aubert:2007xw}
527: B.~Aubert {\it et al.} [BaBar Collaboration],
528: %``Branching fraction and charge asymmetry measurements in B --> J/psi pi pi
529: %decays,''
530: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 76} (2007) 031101
531: [arXiv:0704.1266 [hep-ex]].
532:
533: %14
534: %\cite{Jen:2006in}
535: \bibitem{Jen:2006in}
536: C.~M.~Jen {\it et al.} [Belle Collaboration],
537: %``Improved measurements of branching fractions and CP partial rate
538: %asymmetries for B--->omegaK and B--->omegapi,''
539: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 74} (2006) 111101
540: [arXiv:hep-ex/0609022];
541: %\cite{Aubert:2007si}
542: %\bibitem{Aubert:2007si}
543: B.~Aubert {\it et al.} [BaBar Collaboration],
544: %``Branching fraction and CP-violation charge asymmetry measurements for
545: %B-meson decays to eta K+-, etapi+-, eta'K, eta'pi+-, omega K, and
546: %omegapi+-,''
547: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 76} (2007) 031103
548: [arXiv:0706.3893 [hep-ex]].
549:
550: %15
551: %\cite{Aubert:2006nn}
552: \bibitem{Aubert:2006nn}
553: B.~Aubert {\it et al.} [BaBar Collaboration],
554: %``Search for B+ --> Phi pi+ and B0 --> Phi pi0 decays,''
555: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 74} (2006) 011102
556: [arXiv:hep-ex/0605037].
557:
558: %16
559: %\cite{Aubert:2006vt}
560: \bibitem{Aubert:2006vt}
561: B.~Aubert {\it et al.} [BaBar Collaboration],
562: %``B meson decays to omega K*, omega rho, omega omega, omega Phi, and omega
563: %f0,''
564: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 74} (2006) 051102
565: [arXiv:hep-ex/0605017].
566:
567: %17
568: %\cite{Bergfeld:1998ik}
569: \bibitem{Bergfeld:1998ik}
570: T.~Bergfeld {\it et al.} [CLEO Collaboration],
571: %``Observation of B+ --> omega K+ and search for related B decay modes,''
572: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 81} (1998) 272
573: [arXiv:hep-ex/9803018].
574:
575: %18
576: %\cite{Abe:1996kc}
577: \bibitem{Abe:1996kc}
578: F.~Abe {\it et al.} [CDF Collaboration],
579: %``Ratios of bottom meson branching fractions involving $J/\psi$ mesons and
580: %determination of $b$ quark fragmentation fractions,''
581: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 54} (1996) 6596
582: [arXiv:hep-ex/9607003].
583:
584: %19
585: %\cite{Abulencia:2006jp}
586: \bibitem{Abulencia:2006jp}
587: A.~Abulencia {\it et al.} [CDF Collaboration],
588: %``Observation of $B_s^0 \to \psi(2S) \phi$ and measurement of ratio of
589: %branching fractions $B(B_s^0 \to \psi(2S) \phi)/B(B_s^0 \to J/\psi \phi)$,''
590: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 96} (2006) 231801
591: [arXiv:hep-ex/0602005].
592:
593: %20
594: %\cite{Gronau:1994rj}
595: \bibitem{Gronau:1994rj}
596: M.~Gronau, O.~F.~Hernandez, D.~London and J.~L.~Rosner,
597: %``Decays of B mesons to two light pseudoscalars,''
598: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 50} (1994) 4529
599: [arXiv:hep-ph/9404283].
600:
601: %21
602: %\cite{Chiang:2003pm}
603: \bibitem{Chiang:2003pm}
604: C.~W.~Chiang, M.~Gronau, Z.~Luo, J.~L.~Rosner and D.~A.~Suprun,
605: %``Charmless B --> V P decays using flavor SU(3) symmetry,''
606: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 69} (2004) 034001
607: [arXiv:hep-ph/0307395].
608:
609: %22
610: %\cite{Aubert:2004ih}
611: \bibitem{Aubert:2004ih}
612: B.~Aubert {\it et al.} [BaBar Collaboration],
613: %``$B$ meson decays to $\eta^{(\prime)} K^*$, $\eta^{(\prime)} \rho$,
614: %$\eta^{(\prime)} \pi^0$, $\omega \pi^0$, and $\phi \pi^0$,''
615: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 70} (2004) 032006
616: [arXiv:hep-ex/0403025].
617:
618: %23
619: %\cite{Gronau:1995hn}
620: \bibitem{Gronau:1995hn}
621: M.~Gronau, O.~F.~Hernandez, D.~London and J.~L.~Rosner,
622: %``Electroweak Penguins And Two-Body B Decays,''
623: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 52} (1995) 6374
624: [arXiv:hep-ph/9504327].
625:
626: %24
627: %\cite{Dighe:1997wj}
628: \bibitem{Dighe:1997wj}
629: A.~S.~Dighe, M.~Gronau and J.~L.~Rosner,
630: %``B decays to charmless V P final states,''
631: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 57} (1998) 1783
632: [arXiv:hep-ph/9709223];
633: %\cite{Gronau:1999hq}
634: %\bibitem{Gronau:1999hq}
635: M.~Gronau and J.~L.~Rosner,
636: %``New information on B decays to charmless V P final states,''
637: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 61} (2000) 073008
638: [arXiv:hep-ph/9909478].
639:
640: %25
641: %\cite{Beneke:2003zv}
642: \bibitem{Beneke:2003zv}
643: M.~Beneke and M.~Neubert,
644: %``QCD factorization for B --> P P and B --> P V decays,''
645: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 675} (2003) 333
646: [arXiv:hep-ph/0308039].
647:
648: %26
649: %\cite{Beneke:2006hg}
650: \bibitem{Beneke:2006hg}
651: M.~Beneke, J.~Rohrer and D.~Yang,
652: %``Branching fractions, polarisation and asymmetries of B -> VV decays,''
653: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 774} (2007) 64
654: [arXiv:hep-ph/0612290].
655:
656: %27
657: %\cite{Beneke:2000ry}
\bibitem{Beneke:2000ry}
M.~Beneke, G.~Buchalla, M.~Neubert and C.~T.~Sachrajda,
%``QCD factorization for exclusive, non-leptonic B meson decays: General
%arguments and the case of heavy-light final states,''
Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 591} (2000) 313
[arXiv:hep-ph/0006124].
658:
659: %28
660: %\cite{Mantry:2003uz}
\bibitem{Mantry:2003uz}
S.~Mantry, D.~Pirjol and I.~W.~Stewart,
%``Strong phases and factorization for color suppressed decays,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68} (2003) 114009
[arXiv:hep-ph/0306254].
661:
662: %29
663: %\cite{Krokovny:2002pe}
664: \bibitem{Krokovny:2002pe}
665: P.~Krokovny {\it et al.} [Belle Collaboration],
666: %``Observation of D/s+ K- and evidence for D/s+ pi- final states in neutral B
667: %decays. ((B)),''
668: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 89} (2002) 231804
669: [arXiv:hep-ex/0207077];
670: %\cite{Aubert:2006hu}
671: %\bibitem{Aubert:2006hu}
672: B.~Aubert {\it et al.} [BaBar Collaboration],
673: %``Observation of decays B0 --> D/s(*)+ pi- and B0 --> D/s(*)- K+,''
674: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 98} (2007) 081801
675: [arXiv:hep-ex/0604012].
676:
677: %30
678: %\cite{Ciuchini:1997rj}
679: \bibitem{Ciuchini:1997rj}M.~Ciuchini, R.~Contino, E.~Franco, G.~Martinelli and
680: L.~Silvestrini,
681: %``Charming-penguin enhanced B decays,''
682: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 512} (1998) 3 [Erratum-ibid.\ B {\bf 531} (1998) 656]
683: [arXiv:hep-ph/9708222];
684: %\cite{Isola:2001ar}
685: %\bibitem{Isola:2001ar}
686: C.~Isola, M.~Ladisa, G.~Nardulli, T.~N.~Pham and P.~Santorelli,
687: %``Charming penguin contributions to B --> K pi,''
688: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64} (2001) 014029
689: [arXiv:hep-ph/0101118].
690:
691: %31
692: %\cite{Jain:2007dy}
693: \bibitem{Jain:2007dy}
694: A.~Jain, I.~Z.~Rothstein and I.~W.~Stewart,
695: %``Penguin Loops for Nonleptonic B-Decays in the Standard Model: Is there a
696: %Penguin Puzzle?,''
697: arXiv:0706.3399 [hep-ph].
698:
699: %MG added reference
700: %32
701: %\cite{Aubert:2008ap}
\bibitem{Aubert:2008ap}
~B.~Aubert [The BABAR Collaboration],
%``Search for B0 -> K*+ K*-,''
arXiv:0806.4467 [hep-ex].
702:
703: %33
704: %\cite{Gronau:2008ed}
705: \bibitem{Gronau:2008ed}
706: M.~Gronau, J.~L.~Rosner and D.~Pirjol,
707: %``Small amplitude effects in $B^0\to D^+D^-$ and related decays,''
708: arXiv:0805.4601 [hep-ph].
709:
710: %34
711: %\cite{Zupanc:2007pu}
712: \bibitem{Zupanc:2007pu}
713: A.~Zupanc {\it et al.} [Belle Collaboration],
714: %``Improved measurement of $\bbar\to D_s^-D^+$ and search for $\bdsds$ at
715: %Belle,''
716: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 75} (2007) 091102
717: [arXiv:hep-ex/0703040].
718:
719: %35
720: %\cite{Aubert:2007ua}
721: \bibitem{Aubert:2007ua}
722: B.~Aubert {\it et al.} [BaBar Collaboration],
723: %``Search for the decay B+ -> Kbar*0(892) K+,''
724: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 76} (2007) 071103
725: [arXiv:0706.1059 [hep-ex]].
726:
727: \end{thebibliography}
728: \end{document}
729:
730: