1: % mn2esample.tex
2:
3: \documentclass[useAMS,usenatbib,onecolumn]{mn2e}
4:
5: %%%%% AUTHORS - PLACE YOUR OWN MACROS HERE %%%%%
6: \usepackage{graphicx}
7: \def\om{\eps}\def\ome{\om_e}\def\cte{\cos\theta_e}\def\ste{\sin\theta_e}
8: \def\ctqe{\cos^2\theta_e}\def\stqe{\sin^2\theta_e}
9: \def\eps{\epsilon}\def\vphi{\varphi}
10: \def\=={\ =\ }\def\--{\ -\ }\def\++{\ +\ }\def\su#1#2{\displaystyle{{#1}\over{#2}}}
11: \def\ct{\,\cos\theta}\def\st{\,\sin\theta}\def\ctq{\,\cos^2\theta}\def\stq{\,\sin^2\theta}
12: \let\lsim\la\let\gsim\ga
13: \def\Tn#1{\,T^{n,\ell}_{#1}}\def\Gn#1{\,\Gamma^{n}_{#1}}
14: \def\RN#1{{\cal U\,}_{#1}}\def\bk{{\beta^{(n)}_k}}
15: \def\Ome{\Omega}\def\V#1{{\cal M}_{#1}\,}
16: \def\Mat#1#2#3#4{\left(\matrix{#1 & #2 \cr #3 & #4 \cr }\right)}
17: \def\PMQ{G\,}\def\PPQ{H\,}
18: \def\ERF{ERF}\def\ERFS{ERF$^\star$}\def\ERFSS{ERF$^{\star\star}$}
19: \def\bfcorr{\bf }
20:
21: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
22:
23: \title[X-ray spectra from magnetar candidates. II]{
24: X-ray spectra from magnetar candidates.
25: II. Resonant cross sections for electron-photon scattering in the
26: relativistic regime}
27: \author[L. Nobili, R. Turolla and S. Zane]{L. Nobili$^{1}$\thanks{E-mail: nobili@pd.infn.it (LN);
28: turolla@pd.infn.it (RT); sz@mssl.ucl.ac.uk (SZ)}, R. Turolla$^{1, 2}$ and S. Zane$^{2}$\\ $^{1}$Department of
29: Physics, University of Padova, via Marzolo 8, 35131 Padova, Italy\\ $^{2}$Mullard Space Science Laboratory,
30: University College London, Holmbury St. Mary, Dorking, Surrey, RH5 6NT, UK}
31:
32: \begin{document}
33:
34: \date{}
35:
36: \pagerange{\pageref{firstpage}--\pageref{lastpage}}\pubyear{2008}
37: \maketitle \label{firstpage}
38: \begin{abstract}
39:
40: Recent models of spectral formation in magnetars called renewed attention on electron-photon scattering in the
41: presence of ultra-strong magnetic fields. Investigations presented so far mainly focussed on mildly relativistic
42: particles and magnetic scattering was treated in the non-relativistic (Thomson) limit. This allows for
43: consistent spectral calculations up to a few tens of keVs, but becomes inadequate in modelling the hard tails
44: ($\la 200$ keV) detected by {\em INTEGRAL} from magnetar sources.
45: In this paper, the second in a series devoted to model the X-/soft
46: $\gamma$-ray persistent spectrum of magnetar candidates, we present
47: explicit, relatively simple expressions for the magnetic Compton
48: cross-section at resonance which account for Landau-Raman scattering up to
49: the second Landau level. No assumption is made on the magnetic field
50: strength. We find that sensible departures from the Thomson
51: regime can be already
52: present at $B\sim 5\times 10^{12}$~G. The form of the magnetic cross section we derived can be easily implemented
53: in Monte Carlo transfer codes and
54: a direct application to magnetar spectral calculations will be presented in a forthcoming study.
55: %We show how our results can be implemented in a Monte Carlo code
56: %by presenting an explicit derivation of the scattering optical depth and
57: %discussing how the choice among the different channels through which
58: %scattering may occur can be handled. A direct application of these results
59: %to magnetar spectral calculations will be presented in a forthcoming study.
60: \end{abstract}
61: \begin{keywords}
62: Radiation mechanisms: non-thermal -- stars: neutron -- X-rays: stars.
63: \end{keywords}
64:
65: \section{Introduction}\label{intro}
66:
67: The recent discovery with the {\em INTEGRAL} satellite of hard X-ray tails
68: in the (persistent) spectra of the magnetar candidates (the anomalous
69: X-ray pulsars, AXPs, and the soft $\gamma$-repeaters, SGRs; e.g.
70: \citealt{sandrorev}) provides evidence that a sizeable fraction (up to
71: $\sim 50\%$) of the energy output of these sources is emitted above $\sim
72: 20$ keV. Up to now, high-energy emission has been detected in two SGRs,
73: 1806-20 and 1900+14
74: \citep{sandro05, diego06},
75: and three AXPs, 4U 0142+614, 1RXS J170849-4009 and 1E
76: 1841-045 \cite[][see also for an updated summary of {\em INTEGRAL}
77: observations \citealt{diego08}]{kui04, kui06}
78: \footnote{Very recently \cite{Leyder08} reported the
79: {\em INTEGRAL} detection of the AXP 1E~1048.1-5937, but no spectral
80: information are available yet.}. This result come somehow unexpected, since the
81: spectra of SGRs/AXPs in the soft X-ray range ($\sim 0.1$--10 keV) are well
82: described by a two component model, a blackbody at $kT\sim 0.2$--0.6 keV,
83: and a rather steep power-law with photon index $\Gamma_{soft}\sim 1.5$--4.
84: {\em INTEGRAL} observations have shown that in SGRs the power-law tail
85: extends unbroken (or steepens) in the $\sim 20$--200 keV range,
86: $\Gamma_{hard}\ga\Gamma_{soft}\sim 1.5$. In AXPs, which have steeper
87: spectra in the soft X-ray band, a spectral upturn appears, i.e. the
88: high-energy power-law is harder than the soft one, $\Gamma_{hard}\sim 1$
89: while $\Gamma_{soft}\sim 3$--4 \cite[see e.g.][for a joint spectral
90: analysis of {\em XMM-Newton} and {\em INTEGRAL} data]{nanda08}.
91:
92: Within the magnetar scenario, the persistent 0.1--10 keV emission of SGRs and AXPs has been successfully
93: interpreted in terms of the twisted magnetosphere model \citep{tlk02}. In an ultra-magnetized neutron star the
94: huge toroidal field stored in the interior produces a deformation of the crust. The displacement of the
95: footprints of the external (initially dipolar) field drives the growth of a toroidal component which, in turn,
96: requires supporting currents. Charges flowing in the magnetosphere provide a large optical depth to resonant
97: cyclotron scattering (RCS) and repeated scatterings of thermal photons emitted by the star surface may then lead
98: to the formation of a power-law tail. The original picture by \cite{tlk02} has been further
99: explored by \cite{lg06}, \cite{ft07} and \cite{papI}.
100: Recently \cite{nanda08} presented a systematic application
101: of the 1D, analytical RCS model of \cite{lg06} to a large sample of magnetars X-ray spectra finding a good
102: agreement with data in the 0.1--10 keV range. As shown in paper I, more sophisticated 3D Monte Carlo calculations
103: of RCS spectra successfully reproduce soft X-ray observations.
104:
105: Despite the twisted magnetosphere scenario appears quite promising in explaining the magnetars soft X-ray
106: emission, if and how it can account also for the hard tails detected with {\em INTEGRAL} has not been
107: unambiguously shown as yet. \cite{tb05} suggested that the hard X-rays may be produced either by thermal
108: bremsstrahlung in the surface layers heated by returning currents, or by synchrotron emission from pairs created
109: higher up ($\approx 100$ km) in the magnetosphere.
110: \cite{bh07,bh08} have recently proposed a further possibility,
111: according to which the soft $\gamma$-rays may originate from resonant up-scattering of seed photons on a
112: population of highly relativistic electrons. Previous investigations (\citealt{lg06}; \citealt{ft07}; paper I)
113: mainly focussed on mildly relativistic particles and magnetic scattering was treated in the non-relativistic
114: (Thomson) limit. This is perfectly adequate in assessing the spectral properties up to energies $\ll
115: m_ec^2/\gamma$ (here $\gamma$ is the typical electron Lorentz factor) since i) the energy of primary photons is
116: low enough ($\approx 1$ keV) to make resonant scattering onto electrons possible only where the magnetic field
117: has dropped well below the QED critical field, ii) up-scattering onto electrons with $\gamma\approx 1$ hardly
118: boosts the photon energy in the hundred keV range, so electron recoil is not important. However, some photons do
119: actually gain quite a large energy (because they scatter many times on the most energetic electrons) and fill a
120: tail at energies $\ga 50$ keV. We caveat that, despite in previous works
121: %(e.g. \citealt{lg06}; \citealt{ft07}; paper I)
122: spectra have been computed up to the MeV range, they become untrustworthy above some tens of keV and
123: can not be used to assess the spectral features that can arise due to electron recoil effects (i.e. a
124: high-energy spectral break). Proper investigation of the latter demands a complete QED treatment of magnetic
125: Compton scattering. This is mandatory if highly relativistic particles are considered because a photon can be
126: boosted to quite large energies in a single scattering and, if it propagates towards the star, it may scatter
127: again where the field is above the QED limit.
128:
129: Monte Carlo numerical codes for radiation transport in a magnetized,
130: scattering medium, as the one we presented in paper I, make an excellent tool to
131: investigate in detail the properties of RCS in the case in which energetic electrons
132: are present in addition to the mildly
133: relativistic particles which are responsible for the formation of the soft X-ray spectrum.
134: The Compton cross-section for electron
135: scattering in the presence of a magnetic field was first studied in the
136: non relativistic limit by \cite{clr71}, and the QED
137: expression was derived long ago by many authors
138: \citep{her79,dh86,bam86,hd91}.
139: However, its form is so complicated to be often of little practical
140: use in numerical calculations. Moreover, because of their inherent complexity, many of the
141: published expressions are affected by misprints and the comparison between different derivations
142: is often problematic.
143: On the other hand, the use of the full expression of the cross section is especially needed
144: when a detailed model of cyclotron line formation has to be
145: evaluated, including expectations for the line profile \citep[see e.g.][]{dv78, ah99}.
146: In the situation we are considering, it is reasonable to assume that nearly all photons scatter
147: at resonance. Non-resonant scattering contributions
148: have negligible effects on shaping the overall spectrum, except
149: possibly in the very neighborhood of a cyclotron line peak.
150:
151: Motivated by this, we present here explicit, relatively simple expressions for the
152: magnetic Compton cross-section at resonance that can be then included in Monte Carlo calculations
153: such as that described in Paper I.
154: In doing so, we investigate the behaviour of the different terms and assess their relative importance.
155: The final expressions have been cross-checked by comparing different
156: published formulations, when specialized at resonance. A direct application of the
157: results discussed here to spectral calculations will be presented in a forthcoming study
158: (Nobili, Turolla \& Zane, in preparation). The paper is
159: organized as follows. In \S\ref{first} we formulate the problem and
160: summarize the main ingredients needed for a Monte Carlo simulation. In
161: \S\ref{Master} we compute the relevant cross sections, specified at
162: the resonance, while the transition rates (which are related to the
163: natural width of the excited resonant levels) are given in \S\ref{TranRate}.
164: The creation of photon via spawning effects is discussed in \S\ref{Spawning},
165: while \S\ref{abs} contains a brief comparison between scattering and
166: absorption. In \S\ref{mean} we compute the optical depth, which yields the probability of scattering.
167: %and, finally, in \S\ref{mc} we show how the various expressions can be used in Monte Carlo
168: %numerical simulations.
169: Conclusions follow in \S\ref{conc}.
170:
171: \section{Formulation of the problem}\label{first}
172:
173: In this section we briefly outline our approach, discuss our working assumptions and introduce
174: the mathematical notation. In dealing with relativistic scattering it is convenient to express
175: all relevant physical quantities in a dimensionless form.
176: To this end we introduce the dimensionless photon energy and magnetic field strength
177: \begin{eqnarray}\label{adim}
178: \om & =& \hbar \omega/m_e c^2\, , \\
179: B & =& {\cal B}/{\cal B}_{cr} \== \om_B
180: \end{eqnarray}
181: where $\omega$ is the photon angular frequency, ${\cal B}$ the
182: magnetic field and ${\cal B}_{cr} = m_e^2 c^3/e\hbar = 4.414 \times 10^{13}$~G the critical
183: QED field, at which the fundamental cyclotron energy $\hbar \omega_B$ equals the electron rest mass energy.
184: Similarly, we denote with $E$ the particle energy expressed in units of $m_e c^2$,
185: and with $p$ the component of the particle momentum parallel to the magnetic field, expressed in units
186: of $m_e c$.
187:
188: The process of electron-photon scattering can be schematized as follows:
189: \begin{enumerate}
190: {\item an electron in the lowest Landau level at a certain position $P$ in
191: the magnetosphere; the initial spin orientation is necessarily {\it down};}
192: %
193: \item{an incoming photon with energy $\om$ which propagates in a direction forming
194: angles $\theta$ and $\vphi$ with respect to the magnetic field direction in $P$ (see Figure~\ref{Figone}).
195: The incoming photon may have either linear\footnote{In general photons propagating in the ``vacuum plus
196: cold plasma'' are elliptically polarized. However, in our applications, particle density is low enough
197: ($\la 10^{16}\, {\rm cm}^{-3}$) to make the plasma contribution to the dielectric tensor negligible.
198: The two normal modes are then linearly polarized \cite[e.g.][]{hl06}.} polarization $s=1$,
199: also indicated by $\parallel$, i.e. parallel to the magnetic field ({\it ordinary photon\/}) or
200: $s=2$, also denoted by $\perp$, i.e. orthogonal to $\vec {\cal B}$ ({\it extraordinary photon\/}).}
201: %
202: \item{an excited electron which occupies an intermediate Landau level with quantum number
203: $n>0$ and energy $E_n$.}
204: %
205: \item{a scattered photon with energy $\om'$, direction $\theta',\ \vphi'$ and polarization $s'=1,2$.}
206: %
207: \item{a recoiled electron in the Landau level $\ell<n$,
208: with energy $E_\ell = 1+\om-\om'\,$ and parallel momentum $p'$. If $\ell>0 $ the spin of the recoiled electron
209: can be either {\it up} ({\it spin-flip\/} transition) or {\it down} ({\it no
210: spin-flip} transition). In the following sections these two possibilities will be denoted, following
211: \cite{hd91}, with $f=1$ and $f=0$ respectively.}
212: %
213: \item{If $\ell>0$ electron de-excitation to the ground level
214: is accompanied by the emission of one or more photons (Landau-Raman scattering).}
215: \end{enumerate}
216:
217: In order to derive the relevant expressions at
218: resonance, we start from the fully relativistic magnetic Compton scattering cross section as
219: derived by \cite{dh86} and \cite{hd91}.
220: We do not refer to the ultra-relativistic limit discussed in \cite{gon00}, because our final
221: goal is to derive expressions that can be used in simulations where
222: different electron populations are present, from non-relativistic to
223: mildly and ultra-relativistic.
224: The cross section derived by \cite{dh86} and \cite{hd91} includes excitation of the electron to
225: arbitrary Landau levels. However, since we are interested in computing spectra up to
226: a few hundred keVs, scattering occurs (for all resonances) where $B\la 1$. For such fields the
227: probability of exciting the second Landau levels is already modest, although non-negligible (see
228: \S\ref{Master} and Figure~\ref{Figdue}), and becomes even smaller
229: (typically by a factor $\ga 10$) for $n>2$. For this reason we will assume
230: that the scattering process occurs only via intermediate states $n\leq 2$ and, consequently, the final level
231: of the electron (i.e. after the scattering) can be either $\ell=0$ or $\ell=1$. In the latter case the
232: electron remains in an excited state and the rapid de-excitation
233: to the ground level is accompanied by the emission of a new photon.
234: The relevance of this process (photon spawning) is discussed in Section \ref{Spawning}.
235:
236: In the following sections we will make use of four different reference
237: frames: a fixed frame (LAB), centered on the neutron star; a frame in
238: which the electron has vanishing parallel momentum before the scattering
239: (the electron rest frame, \ERF); a frame in which the recoiled charge has
240: vanishing parallel momentum (\ERFS); a frame in which the electron is at
241: rest in its virtual excited state $n$ (\ERFSS). Unprimed (primed) variables
242: refer to quantities before (after) the scattering.
243:
244:
245: \begin{figure*}
246: %\includegraphics[width=10cm]{Figure/ScattGeometry2.eps}
247: \includegraphics[width=10cm]{f1.eps}
248: \caption{Geometry for electron-photon scattering. The left (right) panel refers to
249: the situation before (after) scattering; all relevant angles are indicated. The direction of the
250: spawned photon with energy $\om''$ is also shown (note that this is only allowed for intermediate
251: states with quantum number $n \ge 2$). The figure has only illustrative purposes and here all quantities
252: are referred to an observer at rest with the star.}\label{Figone}
253: \end{figure*}
254:
255: \section{Resonant cross sections for photon-electron
256: scattering}\label{Master}
257:
258: In strong magnetic fields the transverse momentum of a
259: charge is not conserved upon scattering since the field can absorb or add momentum
260: to the particle. The charge momentum parallel to the
261: magnetic field, $p$, instead,
262: is related to the parallel components of the photon momentum before and after the collision by
263: the usual conservation law, which, in the \ERF\ reads
264: \begin{eqnarray}\label{emomentum}
265: p' &=& \om\ct-\om'\ct'.
266: \end{eqnarray}
267: After the collision the particle is left in a state with principal quantum number $\ell\ge 0$ and
268: energy $E'_\ell \==\sqrt{1+{p'}^2+2\ell B}$. Energy and parallel momentum
269: as measured in the \ERF\ and in the frame where the recoiled electron
270: is at rest, \ERFS, are then related by the Lorentz transformations
271: \begin{eqnarray}\label{EpLorentz}
272: \sqrt{1+2\ell B} &=& E^*_\ell \== \gamma'\, (E'_\ell - \beta'\, p' )\qquad\quad {\rm and} \qquad\quad
273: 0 \== p^* \== \gamma'\, (p'-\beta'\, E'_\ell),
274: \end{eqnarray}
275: from which the velocity and energy of the excited particle in the \ERF\ follows
276: \begin{eqnarray}\label{velocity}
277: \beta' &=& \su{p'}{\sqrt{1+{p'}^2+2\ell B}}\,\, ,\qquad
278: \gamma' \== \su{\sqrt{1+{p'}^2+2\ell B}}{\sqrt{1+2\ell B}}\,\, .
279: \end{eqnarray}
280: Finally, parallel momentum and energy conservation yields the final photon energy
281: \begin{eqnarray}\label{omegap}
282: \om' &=& \su{\om^2\stq +2\om - 2\ell B }{1+\om (1-\ct\ct')
283: + \sqrt{\,1+2\om\ct' (\ct'-\ct) + \om^2 (\ct-\ct')^2 + 2\ell B\stq'}}\, .
284: \end{eqnarray}
285:
286: A strong magnetic field greatly affects the scattering cross section, but its
287: effect is substantially different in the case the photon electric vector
288: is parallel or perpendicular to $\vec{\cal B}$.
289: For frequencies below $\omega_B$ the cross section of the extraordinary mode ($\perp$-mode)
290: is greatly suppressed with respect to the Thomson value, $\sigma_T$
291: \citep{clr71}. Both polarization modes manifest, however, a singular behavior at nearly
292: regular frequencies $\omega_n$, which correspond to excitations of the
293: quantum Landau levels.
294: In the frame where the electron is initially at rest and using the dimensionless variables defined
295: in \S\ref{first} the relativistic second order cross section for the transition from the ground
296: to an arbitrary state $\ell$ is
297: \begin{eqnarray}\label{crosssection}
298: \su{d\sigma_{s\to s'}}{d\Omega'} &=& \su{3\sigma_T}{16\pi}\,\su{\om'}{\om}\,\su{(2+\om-\om')\,
299: \exp{[-(\om^2\stq+{\om'}^2\stq')/2B}]}{[1+\om-\om'- (\om\ct-\om'\ct')\ct']}\,
300: \left\vert\,\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\,\left[ F_{n,-}^{(1)} + F_{n,+}^{(1)}+
301: \left( F_{n,-}^{(2)} + F_{n,+}^{(2)} \right) \exp{(2i\Phi)}\right]\,\right\vert^2
302: \end{eqnarray}
303: (see equation [11] of \citealt{hd91} where some misprints have been corrected).
304: Here $d\Omega'=\sin\theta'd\theta' d\varphi'$, the phase $\Phi$ depends on the difference $\vphi-\vphi'$, and
305: the complete expressions for the functions $F_{n,\pm}^{(k)}$ can be found in the Appendix of
306: \cite{hd91}\footnote{Note that, due to a typo, in equations A1-A5
307: of \cite{hd91}, all
308: terms $N\eps_{.}\eps'_{.}\Lambda_{..}\Lambda_{..}$
309: must be replaced by $N^2\eps_{.}\eps'_{.}\Lambda_{..}\Lambda_{..}$}.
310: The major complication in equation (\ref{crosssection}) derives from the presence of
311: an infinite sum over all intermediate (virtual) states with principal quantum number $n$.
312: In addition, the $F_{n,\pm}^{(k)}$ are
313: complicated complex functions of $B,\,\om$, $\om'$, $\theta\,,\theta'$, $\vphi\,,\vphi'$.
314: They depend also on the initial and final photon polarization mode, $s,\,s'$, and
315: on the spin orientation of the electron in the intermediate state, i.e. {\it spin-up} (labelled by the index
316: $+$) or {\it spin-down} (index $-$). Finally, if $\ell>0$, the form of these functions is different if
317: the orientation of the electron spin in the final state is {\it up} ($f=1$) or {\it down}
318: ($f=0$). If the final state is the ground state only spin down is allowed.
319:
320: All the $F_{n,\pm}^{(1)}$ exhibit a divergent behaviour at
321: the resonant energies
322: \begin{eqnarray}\label{omres}
323: \om_n &=& \su{2nB}{1+\sqrt{1+2nB\sin^2\theta}}\, .
324: \end{eqnarray}
325: while the $F_{n,\pm}^{(2)}$, which are obtained
326: from $F_{n,\pm}^{(1)}$ by plane crossing symmetry replacement of variables \cite[see again][]{hd91}, remain
327: instead finite\footnote{
328: Actually also the $F_{n,\pm}^{(2)}$
329: diverge, but this occur only at photon energies
330: $>2/\sin\theta$
331: which is the threshold for pair production and where
332: expression (\ref{crosssection}) is not
333: valid any more (e.g. \citealt{her79})}. Since, as mentioned
334: earlier on, we are interested only in resonant scattering, this leads
335: to a major simplification. Neglecting all non-resonant
336: contributions in (\ref{crosssection})
337: when $\om\simeq \om_n$, which amounts to disregard both the $F_{n,\pm}^{(2)}$
338: and the non-resonant terms in the $F_{n,\pm}^{(1)}$, makes it possible to express the cross section
339: as a infinite sum of separated terms
340: \begin{eqnarray}
341: \su{d\sigma_{s\to s'}}{d\Omega'} &=& \sum_{n=1}^\infty\su{d\sigma^{(n)}_{s\to s'}}{d\Omega'}
342: \label{pcross}
343: \end{eqnarray}
344: where each resonant contribution is given by
345: \begin{eqnarray}
346: \su{d\sigma^{(n)}_{s\to s'}}{d\Omega'} &=& \su{3\sigma_T}{16\pi}\,\su{\om'}{\om}\,
347: \su{(2+\om-\om')\,\exp{[-(\om^2\stq+{\om'}^2\stq')/2B]}}{[1+\om-\om'- (\om\ct-\om'\ct')\ct']}
348: \, \left\vert\, F_{n,+}^{(1)}\++ F_{n,-}^{(1)} \,\right\vert^2\label{pcrossn}.
349: \end{eqnarray}
350: %Equation (\ref{pcrossn}) is valid only for negative charges (electrons), to which we will refer throughout the
351: %rest of this paper. The corresponding
352: %expressions for photon-positron scattering can be easily obtained by performing the substitution
353: %$F_{n,\pm}^{(1)} \to F_{n,\pm}^{(2)}$ and show similar properties.
354:
355: The quantities $F_{n,\pm}^{(1)}$ are independent on $\vphi$ and have the general form
356: \begin{eqnarray}\label{FunF}
357: F_{n,\pm}^{(1)} &=& \left(\su{1+E_n}{2E_n}\right)
358: \, \su{\Tn{\pm} (\om,\om', \theta, \theta',B;\, s,s',f)}{1+\om-E_n}
359: \end{eqnarray}
360: where
361: \begin{eqnarray}\label{Enelectron}
362: E_n &=& \sqrt{1+\om^2\ctq+2nB}
363: \end{eqnarray}
364: is the energy of the electron in the intermediate state. As discussed in
365: \S\ref{first}, we restrict our treatment to situations in which scattering
366: occur only via excitation of intermediate states $n \leq 2$, i.e. we only
367: consider the first two resonant terms in equation~(\ref{pcrossn}); the
368: corresponding expression for $\Tn{\pm}$ are given explicitly in the Appendix.
369:
370: Actually, the divergence of the $F_{n,\pm}^{(1)}$, which
371: occurs when the denominator $1+\om -E_n$
372: vanishes, reflects an unphysical behaviour of the cross section and is
373: merely a consequence of the fact that the expressions presented so
374: far have been computed without accounting for the finite
375: lifetime of the electron in the excited Landau levels.
376: In a realistic situation, according to the Heisenberg principle,
377: each excited level has an energy indeterminacy which is
378: proportional to the inverse of the lifetime of the electron in that state, i.e. to the
379: decay rate.
380: This is standardly accounted for by introducing
381: the natural line widths, which amounts to perform the substitution
382: \begin{eqnarray}
383: E_n \ &\to & \ E_n - {i}\Gn\pm/2,
384: \end{eqnarray}
385: in the denominator of equation (\ref{FunF}); here the $\Gn\pm$ are related
386: to the relativistic decay rate out of the $n$-th intermediate state
387: and their explicit expressions will be presented in \S \ref{TranRate}. With this
388: substitution, the functions (\ref{FunF}) become
389: \begin{eqnarray}\label{FnLorentz}
390: F_{n,\pm}^{(1)} &=& \left(\su{1+E_n}{2E_n}\right)\, \su{\Tn{\pm}}{1+\om-E_n + i\Gn{\pm}/2}.
391: \end{eqnarray}
392: A more useful representation is obtained
393: by replacing the Lorentzian that naturally arises from (\ref{FnLorentz}),
394: with a $\delta$-function. By taking the limit
395: \begin{eqnarray}\label{Lorentian}
396: \lim_{\Gn\pm\to 0} \su{ \Gn\pm /2\pi }{(\om-E_n+1)^2+ (\Gn\pm/2)^2} &=& \delta (\om-E_n+1)
397: \end{eqnarray}
398: we obtain, after a lengthy but straightforward calculation,
399: \begin{eqnarray}\label{ResTerm}
400: \left\vert\, F_{n,+}^{(1)} + F_{n,-}^{(1)}\,\right\vert^2 & = &
401: \su{\pi}{2} \, \left( \su{1+E_n}{E_n} \right)^2 \, \left[\su{({\Tn+})^2}{\Gn+} + \su{({\Tn-})^2 }{\Gn-} +
402: \su{ 4\, \Tn+ \, \Tn- }{\Gn+ +\Gn-}\right] \su{E_n(\om_n)\, \delta(\om-\om_n)}{\sqrt{1+2nB\sin^2\theta}}\, .
403: \end{eqnarray}
404: We note that the factor
405: $E_n(\om_n)/\sqrt{1+2nB\sin^2\theta}$ in eq. (\ref{ResTerm}) arises because
406: of the change in the argument of the $\delta$-function,
407: from $\om -E_n(\om)+1$ to $\om-\om_n$. Ultimately
408: it reflects the fact that the ``effective'' width of the scattering line profile near resonance is
409: $\Gamma_nE_n(\om_n)/(2\sqrt{1+2nB\stq})$ \cite[see][]{hd91}.
410:
411: Substituting back equation~(\ref{ResTerm}) into equation (\ref{pcrossn})
412: and upon a trivial integration on $\vphi'$, brings the $n$-th resonant term
413: (\ref{pcrossn}) in the form
414: \begin{eqnarray} \label{npcross}
415: \su{d\sigma^{(n)}_{s\to s'}}{d{\ct\,}'} & = & {\cal D}^{(n)}_{s\to s'}(B,\theta,\theta')\, \delta (\om-\om_n),
416: \end{eqnarray}
417: where
418: \begin{equation}\label{npcrossa}
419: {\cal D}^{(n)}_{s\to s'}= \su{3\pi\sigma_T}{16}
420: \su{(1+E_n)^2}{E_n \sqrt{1+2nB\sin^2\theta} }\,\su{\om'\,(2+\om-\om')
421: \exp{[-(\om^2\stq+{\om'}^2\stq')/2B]}}{\om[1+\om-\om'-(\om\ct-\om'\ct')\ct']}
422: \left[\su{({\Tn+})^2}{\Gn+}+\su{({\Tn-})^2 }{\Gn-}+\su{ 4\,\Tn+\,\Tn-}{\Gn+ +\Gn-}\right]\, ,
423: \end{equation}
424: and $\om'$ is given by equation (\ref{omegap}). In the previous expression one can
425: safely put $\om=\om_n$ since ${\cal D}^{(n)}_{s\to s'}$ in multipled by $\delta (\om-\om_n)$.
426:
427: \begin{figure*}
428: %\includegraphics[width=\figd]{Figure/Sigma12o.eps}
429: %\includegraphics[width=8.5cm, height=6.6cm]{f2a.eps}
430: %\hskip0mm
431: %\includegraphics[width=\figd]{Figure/Sigma12s.eps}
432: %\includegraphics[width=8.8cm, height=6.6cm]{f2b.eps}
433: \includegraphics[width=17cm, height=6.6cm]{f2.eps}
434: \caption{The resonance factors for the first (upper curves, solid red lines) and second (lower curves, dashed blue lines)
435: intermediate Landau levels as a function of $\log B$; the $S^{(n)}_s$ are in unit of the Thomson cross section.
436: Different curves are labelled by the value of the angle between the incident photon direction and the magnetic
437: field. {\it Left:} ordinary photons.
438: {\it Right:} extraordinary photons (note the weaker angular dependence in
439: the latter case). Clearly, for a photon propagating parallel to the magnetic field only the
440: first resonance exists and $S^{(2)}_s$ vanishes.}
441: \label{Figdue}
442: \end{figure*}
443:
444: The $n$-th resonant term in the angle-integrated cross section is
445: \begin{eqnarray}
446: \label{Icross}
447: \sigma^{(n)}_{s\to s'} &=& {S}^{(n)}_{s\to s'} (B,\theta; \ell, f)\delta(\om-\om_n) \, ,
448: \end{eqnarray}
449: where the integral
450: \begin{eqnarray}\label{IcrossT}
451: {S}^{(n)}_{s\to s'} (B,\theta;, \ell, f) & = & \int_{-1}^{1} {\cal D}^{(n)}_{s\to s'} d({\ct\,}')
452: \end{eqnarray}
453: can be evaluated numerically.
454: The $n$-th resonant term of the {\it total \/} cross section is then
455: obtained by summing equation~(\ref{Icross}) over the polarization states of
456: the scattered photon, $s'$, and over the energy
457: levels $\ell$, and the spin states, $f$, of the recoiled electron.
458:
459: When $n=1$, the terms $\, S^{(1)}_{s\to s'}$ and ${\cal D}^{(1)}_{s\to s'}\, $
460: are not associated with a choice of different quantum states $\ell$ and
461: $f$, because in this case it necessarily follows that $\ell=0 $ and $f=0$.
462: Therefore, for a photon with given initial polarization $s$, the first resonant term
463: of the {\it total\/} cross section is simply given by the sum of two contributions, i.e.
464: \begin{eqnarray}\label{cross1}
465: \sigma^{(1)}_{s} (\om,B,\theta) & = & \left[S^{(1)}_{s\to 1} (B,\theta;\, \ell=0, f=0) \++
466: S^{(1)}_{s\to 2} (B,\theta;\, \ell=0,f=0) \right]\delta (\om-\om_1) \==
467: S^{(1)}_s(B,\theta) \, \delta (\om-\om_1).
468: \end{eqnarray}
469: Instead, the second resonant term of the {\it total\/} cross section,
470: corresponding to the intermediate state $n=2$, must account for
471: both final states $\ell=0,\, 1$ and, if $\ell=1$, for two different
472: orientations of the electron spin. Its expression is then % \bigskip
473: \begin{eqnarray}
474: \nonumber
475: \sigma^{(2)}_{s} (\om, B,\theta) & = &
476: \left\{\left[S^{(2)}_{s\to 1} (B,\theta; \ell=0,f=0) \++ S^{(2)}_{s\to 2}(B,\theta; \ell=0,f=0)
477: \right] \++ \right. \\
478: && \left.\left[S^{(2)}_{s\to 1} (B,\theta; \ell=1,f=0)\++ S^{(2)}_{s\to 2} (B,\theta; \ell=1,f=0) \right] \++
479: \right.\\
480: \nonumber
481: &&\left. \left[S^{(2)}_{s\to 1}(B,\theta; \ell=1,f=1)+S^{(2)}_{s\to 2}(B,\theta; \ell=1,f=1)\right]
482: \right\}\delta (\om-\om_2)\== S^{(2)}_s(B,\theta)\, \delta (\om-\om_2)\, .
483: \label{cross2} \end{eqnarray}
484: Finally, the total cross section is obtained by adding the different resonant terms
485: \begin{eqnarray}\label{TotalCross} \sigma_s (\om, B,\theta) &=&
486: \sigma^{(1)}_{s} (\om, B,\theta) + \sigma^{(2)}_{s} (\om, B,\theta) =
487: \sum_{n=1}^2 \, S_s^{(n)} (B, \theta)\,\delta (\om-\om_n).
488: \end{eqnarray}
489: The eight functions $\, S^{(n)}_{s\to s'}\, $ which appear in
490: equations~(\ref{cross1})-(\ref{cross2}) are the fundamental ingredients for
491: any computational investigation of photon diffusion in strong magnetized plasmas.
492: In particular, when performing Monte Carlo simulations, proper
493: combinations of these expressions can be used to evaluate the probability of transition
494: between different states.
495: % (see \S\S \ref{mean}, \ref{mc}).
496:
497: Figure \ref{Figdue} illustrates the dependence of the functions
498: $S^{(1)}_{s}$ and $S^{(2)}_{s}$ on the magnetic field strength for both
499: polarization states and different incident photon direction. The
500: non-relativistic limit
501: %(not shown in the plots) is given by the straight lines
502: tangent to the low $B$-field limit of each curve and
503: takes the form
504: \begin{eqnarray}\nonumber
505: S_\perp^{(1)} &\sim& \su{3\pi}{8\alpha}(2+B\ctq)\,, \hskip1.cm S_\parallel^{(1)} \sim \su{3\pi}{8\alpha}(2\ctq+B)\cr
506: \nonumber
507: &&\cr
508: \nonumber
509: S_\perp^{(2)} &\sim& \su{3\pi}{2\alpha}B\stq\,, \hskip1.775cm S_\parallel^{(2)} \sim \su{3\pi}{2\alpha}B\stq(B+\ctq)\,,
510: \end{eqnarray}
511: where $\alpha=1/137$ is the fine structure constant.
512: In the ultra-relativistic limit no simple analytical expansion can be derived. Approximate expressions, which hold for
513: $\theta\neq 0$, are
514: $S^{(1)}_\parallel\simeq S^{(1)}_\perp\propto 1/(1+2\sqrt{B\stq }\,)$ and $S^{(2)}_\parallel\simeq S^{(2)}_\perp\propto
515: 1/(1+\sqrt{B\stq }\,)$. As it can be seen,
516: relativistic corrections are already $\sim 10\%$ at $ {\cal B} \sim 0.1\,
517: {\cal B}_{cr}$ for photons with large values of the
518: incident angle $\theta$ (see Figure \ref{Figdue}).
519: Furthermore, we may note that the number of excitations of the second
520: Landau level, totally negligible in the weak $B$ limit, becomes sizable in
521: moderately relativistic regimes.
522:
523: This result is more evident in Figure \ref{RapportiLFinal} (left panel), where we show the
524: ratio between the second resonant term and the total cross section in the case of
525: unpolarized incident photons, obtained averaging over ordinary and
526: extraordinary modes ($s=1,\, 2)$. As it can be seen, in strong magnetic fields a non-negligible
527: fraction of collisions can excite electrons to the higher Landau level ($n=2$).
528: It is also worth noticing that, when $n=2$, de-excitation of the electron to $\ell=1$ state
529: is generally more likely than the direct transition to the ground level, as it can be seen from
530: the right panel in Figure~\ref{RapportiLFinal}. Only for magnetic field strengths largely exceeding
531: the critical quantum limit, the two transitions are have comparable probabilities.
532: This has important consequences on the transfer problem, since it implies that collisions
533: involving the intermediate state $n=2$ lead more frequently to the creation of extra photons
534: as the electron returns to the ground level.
535: In other words, the resonant magnetic scattering may not conserve the total photon number.
536:
537: \def\figd{7.5cm}
538: \begin{figure*}
539: %\includegraphics[width=\figd]{Figure/Rapporti.eps}
540: \includegraphics[width=\figd]{f3a.eps}
541: \hskip5mm
542: %\includegraphics[width=\figd]{Figure/LFinal.eps} \
543: \includegraphics[width=\figd]{f3b.eps} \
544: \caption{{\it Left:\/} The ratio $S^{(2)}/( S^{(1)}+S^{(2)})$ versus the
545: magnetic field strength for three different scattering angles. The functions $S^{(n)}$
546: are obtained by summing over the two initial photon polarization states, i.e.
547: $S^{(n)}=S^{(n)}_1+S^{(n)}_2$.
548: {\it Right: \/} The $2\to 1$ transition probability versus magnetic field
549: strength.
550: }\label{RapportiLFinal}
551: \end{figure*}
552:
553: \section{Transition Rates}\label{TranRate}
554:
555: For the sake of completeness, in this section we present the explicit
556: expressions for the transition rates and for the natural line widths
557: $\Gn\pm$. The differential transition rates (number of decays per second
558: and per sterad) for electrons with initial spin {\it up} ($+$) or {\it
559: down} ($-$) were derived in a general form by \cite{dv78} and \cite{hrw82}
560: \cite[see also][]{la86,bgh05}.
561: Here we will use the derivation presented by \cite{hrw82}, by focussing
562: only on those cases which are of immediate relevance to the present investigation.
563: In this respect, we note that, while performing a Monte Carlo simulation,
564: the transitions rates have a twofold role. First, as discussed in \S~\ref{Master}, they
565: fix the natural width of the Landau levels, and therefore enter directly into the numerical
566: computation of the resonant scattering cross section. Second, as we will see in \S~\ref{Spawning},
567: they determine the properties of the photons emitted by successive
568: de-excitations when, in Landau-Raman scattering the electron is left in an
569: excited state $\ell >0$.
570: In practice, in the particular case we are discussing (i.e. only levels
571: up to $n=2$ can be excited), it is the differential transition rate $d R_{\pm}^{\, 1\to 0}
572: /d\Omega$ (see equation~\ref{Transn} below) that fixes the properties of the photon which is emitted
573: through the decay of an electron from $\ell=1$ to the ground level.
574:
575: The cross sections discussed in the previous sections have been computed
576: in the frame in which the electron is at rest before scattering (ERF, see
577: \S\ref{Master}), and the parallel component of the momentum in the
578: intermediate state $n$ is $p=\om_n\ct$. However, in this section we
579: find more convenient to proceed by first introducing the transition rates
580: and line widths $\,\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\pm}^{n}\,$ as computed in the reference frame \ERFSS\,
581: in which the electron is momentarily at rest in the virtual state $n$, and
582: then to transform them back in the \ERF. In fact, in the \ERFSS\ the equations governing the
583: de-excitation and the consequent photon emission take their simpler form. Furthermore, in this
584: section we will indicate with $\, E_n\, $ and $\, E_\ell\,$ the energy of the electron in the state
585: $n$, $\ell$, and with $\ome$ and $\theta_e$
586: the energy and direction (wrt the magnetic field) of the emitted photon,
587: respectively. All these quantities are computed in the \ERFSS.
588:
589: In the \ERFSS, the energy of an electron which is excited to the level $n$ is therefore
590: \begin{eqnarray} \label{Eemission}
591: E_n &=& \sqrt{1+2nB}\, .
592: \end{eqnarray}
593: By applying again energy and parallel momentum conservation we obtain the energy of the electron
594: de-excited to the level $\ell$ and that of the emitted photon
595: \begin{eqnarray}
596: \label{Emisfe}
597: E_\ell &=& E_n \-- \ome \== \sqrt{1+2\,\ell\,B + \ome^2\ctqe}\\
598: \label{Emisfp}
599: \ome &=& \su{2(n-\ell)B }{E_n+\sqrt{1+2B (n\ctqe+\ell\stqe)}}
600: \end{eqnarray}
601: respectively.
602:
603: The differential rate for transitions between a generic level $n>0$ and
604: the ground state $\ell=0$, as given by \cite{hrw82}, takes the form
605: \begin{eqnarray}\label{Transn}
606: \nonumber
607: \su{d R_{\pm}^{\, n\to 0} }{d\Omega} & = & \su{\alpha mc^2}{4\pi\hbar}\,\su{\ome\, \exp{(-Z)}\,
608: Z^{n-1}}{(n-1)!\, E_n\,(E_n-\ome\stqe)}\left\{\su{Z}{n}\,\left[\su{}{}
609: 2nB-\ome\,(E_n\,\mp\,1)\right]\langle\stqe,0\rangle \++ \right. \\
610: && \left. \++ \left[\su{}{} 2nB-\ome\,(E_n\,\pm\,1)\right]\,\langle\ctqe,1\rangle
611: \++ 2\om^2\,\ctqe\langle\stqe,0\rangle\right\},
612: \end{eqnarray}
613: where $Z=\ome^2 \stqe/2B$.
614: The angular factors in ``$\langle\,\rangle$'' refer to two possible linear polarization states
615: $s=1,2$. The rate for transition from $n=2$ to $\ell=1$ is
616: \begin{eqnarray}\label{Trans1}
617: \nonumber \su{d R_{\pm}^{2\to 1}}{d\Omega} &=& \su{\alpha mc^2}{4\pi\hbar}
618: \,\su{\ome \, \exp{(-Z)} }{\, E_n\, (E_n-\ome\stqe\, ) \, } \left\{Z\, \left[[\su{}{} 4 B-\ome\,
619: \,(E_n\, \mp \, 1)]{(Z-2)^2}/{2}\++\right.\right. \\
620: \nonumber && \left. +\ \su{}{}4B-\ome\,(E_n\,\pm\,1)+4B\,(2Z-3)\right]\,\langle{\stqe},0\rangle
621: \++\left[\su{}{}[\,4B-\ome\,(E_n\,\pm\,1)]\,(Z-1)^2\++\right. \\
622: &&\left. +\ [\su{}{}4B-\ome\,(E_n\,\mp\,1)]\, Z^2/2\right]\,\langle\ctqe,{1}\rangle
623: \++\left. 2\ome^2\,\ctqe (Z^2-2Z+2)\,\langle{\stqe,\,0}\rangle\su{}{}\right\}.
624: \end{eqnarray}
625: Since we are considering only the first two resonances, the two previous expressions are all we
626: need in order to evaluate the natural widths and photon emission following Landau-Raman scattering
627: (see \S\ref{Spawning}).
628:
629: Total rates can be obtained by integrating over the solid angle and summing over
630: the two polarization states $s$ of the emitted photon, and in general take the form
631: \begin{eqnarray}\label{TotRate}
632: R_{\pm}^{n\to\ell} &=& 2\pi\int_{-1}^1 \,\sum_{s=1}^2\,\su{d R^{n\to\ell}_{\pm}}{d(\cte)}\, d(\cte)\, .
633: \end{eqnarray}
634: The reciprocal of the transition rate gives the mean lifetime of the
635: electron in the excited Landau level. Then, due the Heisemberg principle,
636: each term $R_{\pm}^{n\to\ell}$ is proportional to the energy width for the
637: particular transition $n\to\ell$.
638: The total energy width of the $n$-th level is therefore obtained by
639: summing over all contributions associated with level $n$
640: \begin{eqnarray}\label{TTRate}
641: \widetilde{\Gamma}_{\pm}^{n} &=& \su{\hbar}{m_e c^2}\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}R^{n\to k}_{\pm}\,.
642: \end{eqnarray}
643:
644: As previously stated, these expressions are valid in the reference frame in which the
645: excited electron is at rest, \ERFSS. In order to obtain the energy widths $\Gn{\pm}$ that
646: must be used in the expressions given in \S~\ref{Master}, we need to perform a
647: Lorentz transformation back to the \ERF. This gives
648: \begin{eqnarray}\label{ATRate}
649: \Gn{\pm} &=&\su{\sqrt{1+2nB}}{\sqrt{1+\om_n^2\ctq+2nB}} \,\,\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\pm}^{n}\, ,
650: \end{eqnarray}
651: where $\om_n$ and $\theta$ are the incident photon energy (equation [\ref{omres}]) and direction.
652: Figure \ref{Widths} shows the dependence on the magnetic field strength of the
653: total energy widths for the first two Landau levels, $\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\pm}^{1,2}$, in the range
654: $10^{-3} \leq {\cal B}/{\cal B}_{cr} \leq 10^2$. For weak fields they are proportional to $B^2$
655: (in particular $\widetilde\Gamma^{1}_- \sim 4\alpha B^2/3$),
656: except for the spin flip transition for which $\widetilde\Gamma^{1}_+ \sim 2\alpha B^3/3$
657: \cite[e.g.][]{hrw82,la86}.
658: Similarly to what happens for the cross sections, remarkable deviations from the simple, non-relativistic
659: power-law dependence appears at $B> 0.1$. We note that in the strong field limit all energy widths have a similar
660: dependence on the field strength, $\sim 0.4 \alpha\sqrt{B}$, a result similar to
661: that found by \cite{la86} for the total transition rate.
662: The
663: limiting behaviours of $\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\pm}^{1}$ can be usefully
664: checked against those derived by \cite{bgh05} who obtained an analytical
665: form (in terms of a series of elementary functions) for the spin-dependent
666: transition rates $R^{n\to 0}_{\pm}$. In fact, for $n=1$, it follows from
667: eq. (\ref{TTRate}) that
668: $\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\pm}^{1}=(\hbar/m_ec^2)R^{1\to 0}_{\pm}$.
669: As noticed by \cite{bgh05}, their weak field limit coincides with those derived (analitycally) by
670: \cite{la86} and discussed above. In the ultra-relativistic limit, on the other hand, one gets
671: $\widetilde\Gamma^{1}_-\sim\widetilde\Gamma^{1}_+
672: \sim \alpha(1-1/\mathrm e)(B/2)^{1/2}\sim 0.45\alpha\sqrt{B}$, close to the $B\gg 1$ limit given above.
673: A direct numerical comparison of our result for $\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\pm}^{1}$ with that of \cite{bgh05}
674: shows that the fractional difference is below 10\% for $B<100$, with the largest deviations appearing at
675: large $B$.
676:
677:
678: \begin{figure*}\label{Widths}
679: \includegraphics[width=7cm]{f4a.eps}
680: \includegraphics[width=7cm]{f4b.eps}
681: %\includegraphics[width=15cm]{f4.eps}
682: \caption{Energy widths of the Landau levels (in units of $m_e c^2$) for the two spin orientations
683: as a function of the magnetic field strength. {\it Left:} $n=1$. {\it Right:} $n=2$. In each panel
684: the full lines refer to the widths as computed in the excited electron frame [eq. (\ref{TTRate})] and
685: the dashed lines to the same quantities but referred to the ERF [eq. (\ref{ATRate})] for $\cos\theta=\pm 1$,
686: i.e. in the case in which the incoming photon is parallel to $\mathbf B$. }
687: \label{FigWidth}
688: \end{figure*}
689:
690: \section{Photon spawning}\label{Spawning}
691:
692: As discussed in the previous sections, some scatterings occur
693: at the second resonance and excite the electron in the intermediate state $n=2$.
694: In order to have a significant number of second harmonic excitations
695: the magnetic field must be sufficiently intense, say
696: $B\ \gsim \ 0.05$ (${\cal B}
697: \gsim 2.2 \times 10^{12}$~G; see Figure~\ref{RapportiLFinal} ).
698: Moreover, the incoming photon must have an energy $\om=\om_2 \approx 2B$. The two conditions together
699: require that a significant number of photons with
700: energy $\hbar\omega \ga50$ keV are present in the magnetosphere.
701: We do not expect such high-energy photons to be emitted directly by
702: the stellar surface, which temperature, as inferred by observed X-ray
703: spectra, is $\sim 0.5$--1 keV, but it must be noted that,
704: if electrons are relativistic, the photon energy as seen by the moving
705: particle will be amplified by a factor $\sim\gamma$. Besides,
706: repeated collisions populate the hard tail of the spectrum and may provide
707: photons of the required energy.
708:
709: %While we do not expect such high-energy photons to be emitted
710: %directly by the stellar surface, which temperature,
711: %as inferred by observed X-ray spectra, is $\sim 0.5$--1 keV, repeated collisions populate the hard tail
712: %of the spectrum and may provide photons of the required energy. Besides, if electrons are relativistic, the photon
713: %energy as seen by the moving particle will be amplified by a factor $\sim\gamma$.
714:
715: Once an electron is excited to the second Landau level, it is more likely
716: left after scattering in the $\ell=1$ rather than in the $\ell=0$ state
717: (see \S~\ref{Master} and Figure~\ref{RapportiLFinal}).
718: This implies that an additional photon will be produced by the prompt radiative de-excitation $1\to 0$.
719: In general, the transition rate depends also on the rate at which collisions populate the $\ell=1$ level.
720: The excitation rate due to Coulomb collisions is \citep{bhp79}
721: \begin{eqnarray}
722: \nonumber
723: R_{coll} &\approx& 3\times 10^{10}\left(\su{n_e}{10^{21} {\rm cm}^{-3}}\right)T^{-3/2}\ {\rm s}^{-1}
724: \quad\approx\quad 1.6\times 10^{6}\left(\su{n_e}{10^{21} {\rm cm}^{-3}}\right)\,B^{-3/2}\ {\rm s}^{-1}\,,
725: \end{eqnarray}
726: where the second (approximate) equality follows from the requirement that it has to be $kT\sim \hbar\omega_B$
727: for the collision to excite the first Landau level. As noticed by \cite{ah99}, in a strongly magnetized,
728: low-density plasma $R_{coll}$ is negligible when compared to the radiative cyclotron rate
729:
730: \begin{eqnarray}
731: R_{rad} &\approx & 10^{18}\, B^q\ {\rm s}^{-1}
732: \end{eqnarray}
733: where the exponent $q$ varies in the range 1/2--2 (see \S\ref{TranRate}).
734: The population of the excited Landau levels is, therefore, solely regulated in the present case
735: by magnetic Compton scattering. The large value of $R_{rad}$ justifies the assumption
736: that electrons remain in the ground level. In fact, the typical time between two scatterings is $\approx
737: (n_e\sigma c)^{-1}\approx L/(\tau c)\approx 10^{-5}\, {\rm s}\gg 1/R_{rad}$, where the lengthscale $L$ is
738: a few star radii and the scattering depth $\tau\approx 1$ (see paper I). In a sense, one may view Raman
739: scattering at the second
740: resonance, and the ensuing, quick radiative de-excitation to the $\ell=0$ level
741: (photon spawning) as more akin to double Compton
742: scattering \cite[e.g.][]{gou84} rather than to absorption followed by
743: the emission of two photons.
744:
745: As discussed in \S~\ref{TranRate}, the de-excitation of an electron which is initially at rest in the
746: $\ell=1$ level with energy $E = \sqrt{1+2B}$ produces a photon with energy
747: \begin{eqnarray}\label{emission1}
748: \ome &=& \su{E-\sqrt{{E}^2-2B\stq_e }}{\stq_e}\==\su{2B}{\sqrt{1+2B} + \sqrt{1+2B\ctq_e }}\, ,
749: \end{eqnarray}
750: as computed in its rest frame. The rate at which photons are emitted is given by equation
751: (\ref{TotRate}) with $n=1,\ \ell=0$, and, when performing a Monte Carlo
752: simulation, the differential form (\ref{Transn}) can be used to derive, on
753: a probabilistic ground, the direction of the emitted photon (i.e. the angle
754: $\theta_e$, emission is isotropic in $\phi_e$). Once again, we stress
755: that care must be payed to the frame in which these quantities are evaluated.
756: In fact, the emission angle $\theta_e$ and the photon energy $\ome$ introduced above,
757: are both referred to the rest frame of the recoiled electron, while in applications they
758: need to be evaluated in the stellar frame (LAB). This is readily done by means of a Lorentz transformation.
759: In this respect, we note that the parallel momentum of the recoiled electron is in the LAB
760: \begin{eqnarray}\label{recoil}
761: p' &=& \gamma\beta + \om\,\mu - \om'\,\mu'
762: \end{eqnarray}
763: where $\om$ and $\mu$ are the photon energy and the cosine of
764: the propagation angle with respect to the magnetic field, both measured in the stellar frame, and,
765: again, unprimed (primed) variables refer to quantities before (after) the scattering. The corresponding
766: velocity and the Lorentz factor are
767: $\,\beta' = p'/\sqrt{1+{p'}^2+2B} \, $ and $\,\gamma' = \sqrt{1+{p'}^2+2B}/\sqrt{1+2B}\, $ respectively
768: (see \S \ref{Master}), from which we obtain
769: \begin{eqnarray}\label{recoilangle}
770: \cos \theta_e^{(L)} &=& \su{\cte + \beta'}{1+\beta'\cte}
771: \end{eqnarray}
772: and
773: \begin{eqnarray}\label{recoilEn}
774: \om_e^{(L)} &=& \gamma'\ome \left(1+\beta'\cte \right)\, ;
775: \end{eqnarray}
776: here the index $(L)$ denotes the photon energy and propagation angle as measured in the stellar frame
777: to distinguish them from the same quantities but referred to the recoiled electron frame.
778:
779: \begin{figure*}
780: %\includegraphics[width=8cm]{Figure/RapAbScN1.eps}
781: %\includegraphics[width=8cm, height=6.3cm]{Figure/AngularN1.eps}
782: \includegraphics[width=8cm, height=6.3cm]{f5a.eps}
783: \includegraphics[width=8cm, height=6.3cm]{f5b.eps}
784: \caption{{\it Left:} the ratio $\sigma_{abs}/\sigma_{s}$
785: versus the magnetic field strength for
786: ordinary (upper panel) and extraordinary (lower panel) photons,
787: and three different directions of the incident
788: photon, $\ct =0,0.5, 1$.
789: {\it Right:} the angular distribution of scattered photons (upper panel) for a given incident
790: photon direction $\theta = 30^\circ$. The lower panel shows the fractional difference
791: between emission and scattering, $(Q_e-Q_s)/Q_s$.
792: Each curve is labelled by the magnetic field strength.
793: }\label{Angular}
794: \end{figure*}
795:
796: \section{Absorption-emission vs. scattering}
797: \label{abs}
798:
799: As noted by \cite{hd91} and \cite{ah99}, in the non-relativistic regime
800: the on-resonance second order scattering process $\,\gamma + e \to \gamma'+ e'\, $
801: is well approximated by the sequence of two separated first order processes: photon
802: absorption, $\, \gamma+e\to e^*$, immediately followed by photon emission $\, e^*\to e'+\gamma'$.
803: Because of its much simpler form, one would like to use the cyclotron absorption cross section
804: instead of the cumbersome QED scattering cross section in numerical work. It is therefore of interest
805: to explore the conditions under which absorption plus emission reproduces relativistic resonant scattering
806: with reasonable accuracy.
807:
808: In the \ERF, summed over the final spin states, the angle-averaged absorption cross section can be
809: written as \citep{dv78}
810: \begin{eqnarray}\label{absorption}
811: \sigma_{abs}^{(n)}({\parallel,\perp}) &=& \su{3\pi\sigma_T}{4\alpha} \su{\exp{(-Z)}Z^{n-1}}{(n-1)!
812: \sqrt{1+2nB\stq}}\left[1\--\su{\om_n}{nB}\, \langle\stq,0\rangle\right] \delta{(\om-\om_n)},
813: \end{eqnarray}
814: where the angular factor $\langle\stq,0\rangle$ refers to the two linear polarizations ($\parallel,\ \perp$)
815: of the incident photon, $Z = \om^2_n \stq/2B$, and the cyclotron harmonic
816: energy $\, \om_n\, $ is equal to the scattering resonant energy (see equation [\ref{omres}]).
817:
818: The reliability and the limits of validity of this approach can be assessed by directly comparing
819: equation (\ref{absorption}) with the scattering cross sections
820: (equations [\ref{cross1}] and [\ref{cross2}]), since these expressions are all explicitly written
821: in terms of a $\delta$-function of the same argument. Figure \ref{Angular} (left panel) shows the ratio
822: of the absorption to the scattering cross sections for $n=1$ and both ordinary and
823: extraordinary photons in the range $-2 \leq \log B\leq 2$ and three different directions of the incident
824: photon (corresponding to $\ct =0,0.5, 1$). The agreement is very good up to $B\sim 0.1$ for both
825: polarization modes and deviations are within $\sim 20\%$ up to $B\sim 1$.
826: However, this does not imply that the two descriptions of the photon-electron interaction are to be
827: regarded as equivalent for $B\la 1$. To claim this, one should prove that they produce also the same angular
828: redistribution of radiation in the final state. The angular distribution of the scattered photons
829: is given (in the \ERF) by equation (\ref{npcrossa}) once $B$ and $\theta$ are fixed, while that
830: of emitted photons by equation (\ref{Transn}). The latter is evaluated in the zero-momentum frame
831: of the excited electron, exhibits forward-backward symmetry, and lacks any
832: information on the incoming photon. However, in the case under examination, the electron has
833: been excited by the absorption of a photon with parallel momentum $\om_n\cos\theta$. In order
834: to compare the two angular distributions the transition rate must be properly transformed to the
835: ERF \citep{ah99}, or, alternatively, it should be computed ab initio in the ERF, by exploiting the
836: general expressions derived in \cite{la86} and valid for an arbitrary value of the electron parallel
837: momentum. Since $p = \om_n\ct$, this clearly introduces a dependence on the incoming photon kinematical
838: quantities in the transition rate.
839:
840: Figure \ref{Angular} (right) shows the angular distribution $\, Q_s(\theta')\, $ of
841: the scattered photons (upper panel) for $n=1$, a representative value of the incident photon angle,
842: $\theta=30^\circ$, and different values of the magnetic field, $0.01\leq B\leq 10$.
843: $\, Q_s\, $ has been computed by normalizing equation (\ref{npcrossa}) to its
844: maximum value, which occurs at $\theta'=0$ and is the same for any $B$. Photons are more and more
845: forward-scattered as the field increases. We verified that, as expected, this asymmetry strongly
846: increases for $\theta\sim 0$ and $\theta\sim 180^\circ$, while the curves become symmetric for
847: $\theta=90^\circ$. The lower panel shows instead (again, for $n=1$) the fractional difference between
848: $\, Q_s(\theta')\, $ and the analogous quantity for emission $\, Q_e(\theta')\, $ (here $\theta'\equiv \theta_e$),
849: obtained normalizing the Lorentz-transformed transition rate (\ref{Transn}).
850: It is interesting to note that in this case the forward beaming is entirely
851: due the relativistic Lorentz boosting in going from the \ERFSS\ to the \ERF. As the plot shows, there are
852: significant differences in the angular distributions even at magnetic
853: field below $0.1 {\cal B}_{cr}$. This means that photon-electron scattering can be safely treated as
854: the superposition of absorption and emission only for resonant photon energies $\la 10$ keV.
855:
856: Similar results are obtained for transitions involving higher Landau levels, although in this case
857: sensible differences arise even for lower magnetic field strengths.
858: However, when $n>1$ major complications arise because of the necessity to discriminate transitions
859: toward final levels different from the ground state, and to account for the possible changes
860: of the photon polarization and electron spin orientation.
861:
862: \section{Scattering probability}
863: \label{mean}
864:
865: Let us assume that a photon propagates in a strongly magnetized medium
866: populated by electrons with a one-dimensional relativistic
867: velocity distribution along the magnetic field direction
868:
869: \begin{eqnarray}\label{DistrF}
870: \su{d n_e}{d\beta} &=& \gamma^{3} n_e f_e(\vec r, \gamma\beta)\, ,
871: \end{eqnarray}
872: where $\, f_e = n_e^{-1} d n_e/d(\gamma\beta)\, $ is the
873: momentum distribution function
874: %\footnote{Note that this definition differs
875: %from that given in Eq.~4 of paper I, in which $f_e(\vec r,
876: %\beta)$ was the velocity
877: %distribution function.}
878: and $\, n_e(\vec r) \, $ is the charge number density. As discussed in \S \ref{Spawning}, all
879: electrons can be taken to be initially in the ground Landau level. Having in mind the results
880: obtained in Section \ref{Master}, equation (\ref{TotalCross}), the optical depth after a photon
881: has travelled an infinitesimal distance $\, d\ell\,$ is
882: \begin{eqnarray}\label{optdep}
883: \nonumber
884: d\tau_{s} & =& d\ell\int_{\beta_{min}}^{\beta_{max}} d\beta\,
885: \su{d n_e}{d\beta} \,(1-\beta\mu)\,\sigma_{s}= \\
886: & = & d\ell\sum_{n=1}^2 \int_{\beta_{min}}^{\beta_{max}} d\beta\, n_e(\vec r)
887: \,\gamma^3\, f_e(\vec r, \gamma\beta)\,(1-\beta\mu)\, S_s^n \,
888: \delta \left[ \gamma (1-\beta\mu) \om^{(L)}-\om_n\right],
889: \end{eqnarray}
890: in which $\,[\beta_{min},\beta_{max}]\,$ is the charge velocity spread and
891: $\,\mu\,$ is the cosine of the propagation angle with respect to the
892: magnetic field in the stellar frame (LAB). The latter quantity is related
893: to the same angle as measured in the \ERF\ by the usual transformations
894: \begin{eqnarray}\label{AngleLorentz}
895: \ct &=& \su{\mu-\beta}{1-\beta\mu}\, ,\qquad \st\==\su{\sqrt{1-\mu^2}}{\gamma (1-\beta\mu)}\, .
896: \end{eqnarray}
897: The factor $\, (1-\beta\mu)\, $ in the integral (\ref{optdep}) appears because
898: of the change of reference between \ERF\ and LAB, and, for the sake of clarity, the
899: argument of the $\delta$-function has been explicitly written in terms of the
900: energy $ \om^{(L)}$ measured by an observer at rest in the LAB.
901:
902: The integral (\ref{optdep}) can be readily performed exploiting the well-known
903: properties of the $\delta$-function. Denoting by $\,\bk\, (k=1,2) $ the two roots
904: (for each $n$) of the quadratic equation $\gamma (1-\beta\mu) \om^{(L)} -\om_n =0 $,
905: the $\delta$-function in energy can be transformed into a $\delta$-function in velocity by
906: \begin{eqnarray}\label{delta}
907: \delta [\gamma (1-\beta\mu) \om^{(L)} -\om_n ] &=& \sum_{k=1}^2
908: \su{\delta(\beta-\bk)} {\left\vert\gamma^3\, g(\bk)\,\right\vert}\end{eqnarray}
909: where
910: \begin{eqnarray}
911: g(\beta)\, &\==& \su{(\mu-\beta\,)\,\om_n }{\sqrt{\gamma^2\,(1-\beta\,\mu)^2+2nB\,(1-\mu^2)}}\,
912: \label{gprime} \\
913: \bk &\==& \su{1}{m^2+\mu^2}\left[\mu\ \pm \ m\,\sqrt{m^2+\mu^2-1 }\right]\label{betak}\\
914: m &\==& \su{nB}{\om_n } \left\vert 1\--\su{\om_n^2\, (1-\mu^2)}{2nB} \right\vert\, .
915: \end{eqnarray}
916: It is worth noticing that with this transformation
917: the role played by the resonant photon is replaced by that of a pair of
918: resonant electrons selected among all charges of the distribution.
919: Accordingly, the elementary optical depth (\ref{optdep}) for a photon with
920: initial polarization state $s=(1,2)$, becomes
921: \begin{eqnarray}\label{optdep1}
922: d{\tau}_s &=& {n_e} d\ell\,\sum_{n=1}^2\,\sum_{k=1}^2 \, \su{ (1-\mu\,\beta_k^{(n)})\,
923: f_e(\vec r, \gamma\bk)\, S_s^{(n)} (B,\theta(\mu,\bk)) }{\vert\, g(\bk)\,\vert}
924: \=={n_e}\, d\ell\, \sum_{n=1}^2\, A^{(n)}_{s};
925: \end{eqnarray}
926: the quantities $\, A^{(n)}_{s}\, $ are implicitly defined by equation (\ref{optdep1}), and we made
927: evident the dependence of the resonant factors $S_s^{(n)}$, which are computed in the \ERF,
928: on the LAB variables.
929:
930: Once energy, polarization and initial photon direction are fixed, equation
931: (\ref{optdep1}) can be integrated numerically along the optical path until
932: a scattering, if any, occurs. As it is apparent from equation
933: (\ref{gprime}), scattering may occur only when the roots $\bk$ are real,
934: i.e. only where $\, h(r,\mu) \equiv m^2 +\mu^2-1 \ge 0 $. Since the
935: function $h$ depends only on position and photon direction, at every point
936: in the magnetosphere the previous condition discriminates those pairs of
937: energy and angle for which scattering is possible.
938:
939:
940: \section{Conclusions}
941: \label{conc}
942:
943: Recent models of spectral formation in magnetars called renewed attention on electron-photon
944: scattering in the presence of ultra-strong magnetic fields. The complete expression for
945: the QED cross section is known since long \cite[e.g.][]{hd91} but its practical application
946: in the relativistic regime is numerically challenging. In many astrophysical problems, including
947: the one which motivated us, it is reasonable to assume that scattering occurs only at
948: resonance, i.e. when the incident photon frequency equals the cyclotron frequency (or
949: one of its harmonics). Restricting to resonant scattering introduces a major simplification, and here
950: we presented explicit expressions for the magnetic Compton cross section in this
951: particular case. Our main goal has been to provide a complete, workable set of formulae which can be
952: used in Monte Carlo simulations of photon scattering in strongly magnetized media.
953:
954: Our results are fairly general and can be applied to resonant photon scattering under a variety of conditions.
955: In particular, no assumption is made on the field strength.
956: % and our expressions, which have been explicitly derived for electrons, are easily generalized to positrons.
957: Having in mind applications to spectral modelling in
958: the $\,\sim 0.1$--200 keV range, resonant scattering necessarily occurs where $\, {\cal B}/{\cal B}_{cr}\la 1$.
959: Under these conditions, and although the expressions we derived are still valid for $\, {\cal B}/{\cal
960: B}_{cr}>1$, we restricted to the case in which the electron is excited at most up to the second Landau level. We
961: find that deviations from the non-relativistic limit in both the first and second resonant contributions to the
962: cross section become significant for $\, {\cal B}/{\cal B}_{cr} \ga 0.1$. The probability that scattering occurs
963: at the second resonance, which is negligible below $\, {\cal B}/{\cal B}_{cr} \la 0.01$, becomes sizeable at
964: higher $B$ and, depending on the scattering angle, it can be up to $\,\sim 30\%\, $ for $\, {\cal B} \sim {\cal
965: B}_{cr}$. In case the second Landau level is excited, its is more likely that the recoiled electron is left in
966: the first than in the ground level with the ensuing emission of a new photon (spawning). Using our results for
967: the cross section together with known expressions for the transition rates, we checked under which conditions
968: resonant Compton scattering can be treated as the combination of two first-order processes, photon absorption
969: followed by emission. While the scattering and absorption cross sections differ by at most $\,\sim 20\%\, $ for
970: $\, {\cal B} \la {\cal B}_{cr}$, the angular distribution of the scattered/emitted photons shows deviations
971: already at $\,{\cal B} \sim 0.1{\cal B}_{cr}$. Finally, having in mind the
972: implementation in a Monte Carlo code (Nobili, Turolla \& Zane, in
973: preparation), we presented an explicit derivation of the scattering
974: optical depth along the photon path.
975:
976:
977: \section*{Acknowledgments}
978:
979: We are grateful to an anonymous referee whose constructive criticism helpd in improving a previous
980: version of this paper. The work of LN and RT is partially supported by INAF-ASI through grant AAE TH-58.
981: SZ acknowledges STFC (ex-PPARC) for support through an Advanced Fellowship.
982:
983: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
984:
985: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Araya \& Harding}{1999}]{ah99}
986: Araya A.A., Harding A.K. 1999, ApJ, 517, 334
987: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Baring, Gonthier \& Harding}{2005}]{bgh05}
988: Baring M.G., Gonthier P.L., Harding A.K. 2005, ApJ, 630, 430
989: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Baring \& Harding}{2007}]{bh07}
990: Baring M.G., Harding A.K. 2007, Ap\&SS, 308, 109
991: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Baring \& Harding}{2008}]{bh08}
992: Baring M.G., Harding A.K. 2008, in Proc. of the Huangshan conference
993: "Astrophysics of Compact Objects," eds. Y.-F. Yuan, X.-D. Li and
994: D.Lai, (AIP Conf. Proc. 968, New York) p. 93
995: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Bonazzola, Heyvaerts \& Puget}{1979}]{bhp79}
996: Bonazzola S., Heyvaerts J., Puget. J. 1979, A\&A, 78, 53
997: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Bussard, Alexander \& M\'esz\'aros}{1986}]{bam86}
998: Bussard R.W., Alexander S.B., M\'esz\'aros P. 1986, Phys. Rev. D, 34, 440
999: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Canuto, Lodenquai \& Ruderman}{1971}]{clr71}
1000: Canuto, V., Lodenquai J., Ruderman M., 1971, Phys. Rev. D, 3, 2303
1001: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Daugherty \& Harding}{1986}]{dh86}
1002: Daugherty J.K., Harding A.K. 1986, ApJ, 309, 362
1003: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Daugherty \& Ventura}{1978}]{dv78}
1004: Daugherty J.K., Ventura J. 1978, Phys. Rev. D, 18, 1053
1005: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Fernandez \& Thompson}{2007}]{ft07}
1006: Fernandez R., Thompson C. 2007, ApJ, 660, 615
1007: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Gonthier et al.}{2000}]{gon00}
1008: Gonthier P.L., Harding A.K., Baring M.G., Costello, R.M., Mercer, C.L. 2000, ApJ, 540, 907
1009: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{G\"otz et al.}{2006}]{diego06}
1010: G\"otz D., Mereghetti S., Tiengo A., Esposito P. 2006, A\&A, 449, L31
1011: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{G\"otz}{2008}]{diego08}
1012: G\"otz D. 2008, talk presented at the Simbol X International Workshop, The Hard X-ray Universe in Focus,
1013: Bologna 14-16 May 2007, Mem. SAIt, in press (arXiv:0801.2465)
1014: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Gould}{1984}]{gou84}
1015: Gould R. J. 1984, ApJ, 285, 275
1016: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Harding \& Daugherty}{1991}]{hd91}
1017: Harding A.K., Daugherty J.K. 1991, ApJ, 374, 687
1018: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Harding \& Lai}{2006}]{hl06}
1019: Harding A.K., Lai D. 2006, Rep. Prog. Phys., 69, 2631
1020: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Herold}{1979}]{her79}
1021: Herold H., 1979, Phys. Rev. D, 19, 2868
1022: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Herold, Ruder \& Wunner}{1982}]{hrw82}
1023: Herold H., Ruder H., Wunner G. 1982, A\&A, 115, 90
1024: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Kuiper, Hermsen \& Mendez}{2004}]{kui04}
1025: Kuiper L., Hermsen W., Mendez M. 2004, ApJ, 613, 1173
1026: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Kuiper et al.}{2006}]{kui06}
1027: Kuiper L., Hermsen W., den Hartog P. R., Collmar W. 2006, ApJ, 645, 556
1028: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Latal}{1986}]{la86}
1029: Latal H.G. 1986, ApJ, 309, 372
1030: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Leyder, Walter \& Rauw}{2008}]{Leyder08}
1031: Leyder J.-C., Walter R., Rauw G. 2008, A\&A, 477, L29
1032: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Lyutikov \& Gavriil}{2006}]{lg06}
1033: Lyutikov M., Gavriil F.P. 2006, MNRAS, 368, 690
1034: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Mereghetti et al.}{2005}]{sandro05}
1035: Mereghetti S., G\"otz D., Mirabel I. F., Hurley, K. 2005, A\&A, 433, L9
1036: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Mereghetti}{2008}]{sandrorev}
1037: Mereghetti S. 2008, A\&A Rev., in press (arXiv:0804.0250)
1038: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Nobili, Turolla \& Zane}{2008, hereafter paper I}]{papI}
1039: Nobili L., Turolla R., Zane S. 2008, MNRAS, 386, 1527 (paper I)
1040: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Rea et al.}{2008}]{nanda08}
1041: Rea N., Zane S., Turolla R., Lyutikov M., G\"otz D. 2008, ApJ, in press (arXiv:0802.1923)
1042: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Thompson, Lyutikov \& Kulkarni}{2002}]{tlk02}
1043: Thompson C., Lyutikov M., Kulkarni S.R. 2002, ApJ, 274, 332
1044: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Thompson \& Belobodorov}{2005}]{tb05}
1045: Thompson C., Beloborodov A.M. 2005, ApJ, 634, 565
1046: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Ventura}{1979}]{vent79}
1047: Ventura J. 1979, Phys Rev. D, 19, 1684
1048: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Woods \& Thompson}{2006}]{woodsrew}
1049: %Woods P.M., Thompson C. 2006, in Lewin W. H. G., van der Klis M., eds., Compact Stellar X-ray Sources,
1050: %Cambridge University Press, p. 547
1051:
1052: \end{thebibliography}
1053:
1054: \vfill\eject
1055:
1056: \appendix{}\section{}
1057:
1058: The expressions below explicitly give the functions $T_\pm^{n\to\ell}(\om,\om',\theta,\theta',B; s, s', f)$
1059: introduced in equation (\ref{FunF}) for the relevant values of $n$ and $\ell$. In the following, to simplify
1060: notation, only the dependence on $f$ is shown in the argument: $f=0$ refers to the {\it no-flip} and
1061: $f=1$ to the {\it flip} case.
1062: \begin{eqnarray*}\label{AppendA}
1063: T_+^{1\to0}(0) & = & \su{\om\om'}{(2+\om)^2 }\left[ \su{\PMQ}{\Ome}
1064: \,(\V1\ct - \V3 \st) + \st'\, (\V0\st -\V2\ct)\right] \\
1065: T_-^{1\to0}(0) & = & \su{1}{(2+\om)^2}\left[\su{\PPQ\om'\st'}{2B\Ome}\,(2B\,\V2+\V0 \om^2 \st\ct)
1066: + (2B \V1 + \V3 \om^2\st\ct)\right]\\
1067: T_+^{2\to0}(0) & = & \su{\om^2\om'^2\st\st'}{ 2B\,(2+\om)^2}\left[\su{\PMQ}{\Ome}
1068: \,(\V1\ct -\V3\st) + \st'\, (\V0\st -\V2\ct)\right] \\
1069: T_-^{2\to0}(0) & = & \su{\om\om'\st\st'}{2 B\,(2+\om)^2}
1070: \left[\su{\PPQ\om'\st'}{4B\Ome}\, (4B\,\V2 + \V0\om^2\st\ct)+(4B\,\V1+\V3\om^2\st\ct)\right]\\
1071: %
1072: T_+^{2\to1}(0) & = & \su{\sqrt{2\,}\,\om^2\om' \st\, }{4B^{3/2}(2+\om)^2}
1073: \left\{\su{\PMQ}{\Ome}\, (2B-\om'^2\stq') (\V1\ct -\V3\st) \++ \su{}{}\right.\\
1074: && + \left.\st'\left[\su{ 2B\, (2+\om-2\om')}{\Ome}-\om'^2\stq'\right](\V0\st -\V2\ct)\right\}\\
1075: %
1076: T_-^{2\to1}(0) & = & \su{\sqrt{2\,}\,\om\st\,}{8\, B^{3/2}\,(2+\om)^2}\left\{\su{\PPQ\om'\st'
1077: (4B-\om'^2\stq')}{2B\Ome}\,(4B\V2+\om^2 \V0 \st\ct) + \phantom{\su{|}{}}\right.\\
1078: && \left. + (4B-2\om'^2\stq')\, (4B\V1+\V3\om^2\st\ct) +
1079: \su{\om'^2\stq' (2+\om)}{\Ome}\, (4B\V5+\V4\om^2\st\ct)\right\}\\
1080: %
1081: T_+^{2\to1}(1) & = & \su{\om^2\st}{2B\,\Omega\, (2+\om)^2}
1082: \left\{ \su{}{} \PPQ \om'\st'\, (\V2\ct -\V0\st)+(2+\om)(2B-\om'^2\stq')(\V1\ct -\V3\st) \++ \right.\\
1083: && \left. \su{}{} + \Omega\om'^2\stq'(\V5\ct -\V4\st) \right\}\\
1084: %
1085: T_-^{2\to1}(1) & = & -\, \su{\om\,\om'^2\st\st'}{8\,\Omega\, B^{2}\,(2+\om)^2}\,
1086: \left\{\PMQ\om' \st'\,(4B\, \V5 + \V4\om^2\ct\st) +\right. \\
1087: &&
1088: \left.+\left[4B -\om'\stq' (2+\om)\right]\, (4B\,\V2+\V0\om^2\st\ct)\su{}{} \right\} \\
1089: \end{eqnarray*}
1090: where
1091: \begin{eqnarray*}\label{AppendB}
1092: \PMQ &=& (2+\om)\ct'- \om\ct\quad , \qquad \PPQ =\om (4+2\om-\om')\ct-\om' (2+\om) \ct' \quad , \qquad \Ome=2+
1093: \om-\om'
1094: \end{eqnarray*}
1095: and
1096: \begin{eqnarray*}\label{AppendC}
1097: \qquad\V0 \== &\Mat{\st\st'}{0}{0}{0} \, \, , \, \, \, \, & \qquad \V1
1098: \==\Mat{\ct\ct'}{\ct}{-\ct'}{1}\\
1099: \qquad\V2 \== &\Mat{-\ct\st'}{0}{\st'}{0} \, \, , \, \, \, \, & \qquad \V3
1100: \==
1101: \Mat{-\st\ct'}{-\st}{0}{0} \\
1102: \qquad\V4 \== &\Mat{-\st\ct'}{\st}{0}{0} \, \, , \, \, \, \, & \qquad \V5
1103: \== \Mat{\ct\ct'}{-\ct}{-\ct'}{-1}.
1104: \end{eqnarray*}
1105: In each expression the functional form for given values of the photon polarization, $s, \,s'$, is recovered inserting the matrix
1106: element $\V{k} (s,s')$ .
1107:
1108: %\subsection{Subsection title}%\bsp
1109: \label{lastpage}
1110: \end{document}
1111:
1112: \section{Playing dice}
1113: \label{mc}
1114:
1115: Given a photon with known energy, polarization and propagation direction (in the stellar frame), the scattering point can
1116: be determined following the same procedure outlined in paper I. However, the present relativistic approach is much
1117: more involved then the non-relativistic one adopted there, not only because the cross section is more complicated,
1118: but also because scattering may occur in a higher number of different channels,
1119: each entailing different outputs. In fact, the solution of the relativistic kinematical problem, from
1120: which the new photon direction and energy are obtained, requires the knowledge of the relevant
1121: quantum numbers that enter the differential cross section: {\it i}) the intermediate state of the
1122: excited electron, $n=1,\, 2$, {\it ii}) the final electron level, $\ell=0,\, 1$, and {\it iii}) the orientation
1123: of the electron spin in the final state $f=0,\, 1$. These in addition to {\it iv}) the velocity of the
1124: (resonant) electron target $\beta=\beta^{(n)}_1,\, \beta^{(n)}_2 $, and {\it v}) the polarization of the
1125: scattered photon $s'=1,2$. We stress that all these parameters must be known before the scattering
1126: kinematics is solved.
1127:
1128: Let's consider a process which occurs through two different channels, with cross sections $\Sigma_a$ and
1129: $\Sigma_b$. In a Monte Carlo scheme, the choice between the two channels is done by generating an uniform deviate,
1130: $\RN{}$, and comparing it with the probability that the process occurs in a given channel, say $a$,
1131: $\Sigma_a/(\Sigma_a+\Sigma_b)$. If $\RN{} < \Sigma_a/(\Sigma_a+\Sigma_b)$ channel $a$ is selected, otherwise one
1132: has to choose channel $b$. As discussed above, resonant scattering requires the determination of five quantities
1133: and this is done by generating a set of uniform deviates $\RN{i},\, i=1$-5. Assuming that a scattering has occurred,
1134: the photon energy in the \ERF\ can be either $\om_1$ or $\om_2$, depending on the (resonant) electron velocity.
1135: Then, we first fix the primary quantum number of the intermediate level, by means of the inequality
1136: \begin{eqnarray}\label{nchoice}
1137: \RN{n} & < & A^{(1)}_s/(A^{(1)}_s+A^{(2)}_s)\,.
1138: \end{eqnarray}
1139: where the $A^{(n)}_s$ are proportional to the probability that the $n$-th level
1140: is excited (see equation [\ref{optdep1}]; the index $s$ refers to the incident photon polarization).
1141: If the condition (\ref{nchoice}) is satisfied scattering occurs at the first resonance, otherwise at
1142: the second. Having fixed $n$, we can determine which of the two electrons is the resonant one
1143: (see equations [\ref{cross1}], [\ref{cross2}])
1144: \begin{eqnarray}\label{vchoice}
1145: \RN{\beta} & < & \su{S_s^{(n)} (B,\theta(\mu,\beta_1^{(n)}))}{
1146: [ S_s^{(n)} (B,\theta(\mu,\beta_1^{(n)})) + S_s^{(n)} (B,\theta(\mu,\beta_2^{(n)}))]}\, ;
1147: \end{eqnarray}
1148: if the inequality is satisfied the resonant electron has velocity $\beta_1^{(n)}$, if not
1149: $\beta_2^{(n)}$. In case the second resonance is excited, the final state can be either $\ell=0$ or $\ell=1$.
1150: The final quantum number is $\ell=0$ if
1151: \begin{eqnarray}
1152: \RN{\ell} & < & \su{\left[S^{(2)}_{s\to 1} (B,\theta) +
1153: S^{(2)}_{s\to 2} (B,\theta)\right]_{{\ell=0}\atop{f=0}}}{S^{(2)}_s}\, ,
1154: \end{eqnarray}
1155: $\ell=1$ otherwise (see again equation [\ref{cross2}]). We remark that in the previous expression, as well as in the following ones,
1156: the electron velocity in the stellar frame is already known, and so is $\theta(\mu,\beta)$
1157: as given by equation (\ref{AngleLorentz}). In case the recoiled electron is left in the excited state ($\ell=1$),
1158: one must decide the final orientation of the electron spin. Again, this is fixed according to the inequality
1159: \begin{eqnarray}
1160: \RN{f} & < & \su{\left[S^{(2)}_{s\to 1} (B,\theta) +
1161: S^{(2)}_{s\to 2} (B,\theta) \right]_{{\ell=1}\atop{f=0}}}
1162: {\left[S^{(2)}_{s\to 1} (B,\theta) + S^{(2)}_{s\to 2} (B,\theta) \right]_{{\ell=1}\atop{f=0}}+
1163: \left[S^{(2)}_{s\to 1} (B,\theta) + S^{(2)}_{s\to 2} (B,\theta) \right]_{{\ell=1}\atop{f=1}}}\, .
1164: \end{eqnarray}
1165: Finally, the final photon polarization state is selected by checking if
1166: \begin{eqnarray}
1167: {\cal U}_{\,s} & < & \su{S^{(n)}_{s\to 1}(B,\theta)}{[S^{(n)}_{s\to 1}(B,\theta)+S^{(n)}_{s\to 2}(B,\theta)]}\, ,
1168: \end{eqnarray}
1169: where the quantities $S^{(n)}_{s\to s'} (B,\theta)$ are evaluated with the previously selected values of $\ell$ and $f$.
1170:
1171: Once all the above tests have provided the required parameters, the kinematics of the scattering can be
1172: solved. This is tantamount to derive the new photon direction, i.e. the two angles $\vphi'$ and $\theta'$.
1173: The former is directly obtained by $\,\vphi' = 2\pi\,\RN{\phi}$, since the differential cross section is
1174: independent on $\vphi'$. The determination of the angle $\theta'$ is not so straightforward, and demands
1175: the numerical solution of the equation
1176: \begin{eqnarray}
1177: \su{ \int_{-1}^{\cos\theta'}{\cal D}^{(n)}_{s\to s'}d \cos\theta'}
1178: {\int_{-1}^{+1} {\cal D}^{(n)}_{s\to s'}d \cos\theta'} = \RN\theta\, ,
1179: \end{eqnarray}
1180: where ${\cal D}^{(n)}_{s\to s'}$, defined by equation (\ref{npcrossa}), is the differential cross section at
1181: resonance. The energy of the scattered photon in the LAB follows from
1182: \begin{eqnarray}\label{finalab}
1183: \om_{(L)}' \quad &\==& \gamma\om'_n (1+\beta\ct') \\
1184: \cos\theta_{(L)}' &\==& \su{\ct' + \beta}{1+\beta\ct'} \\
1185: \varphi_{(L)}' \quad &\==& \varphi'
1186: \end{eqnarray}
1187: where $\om'_n$ is obtained from equation (\ref{omegap}) with $\om=\om_n$.
1188:
1189: As we have seen in Section \ref{Spawning}, a fraction of higher harmonic resonant
1190: collisions results in photon spawning. In a Monte Carlo scheme, the direction of the emitted photon
1191: can be obtained by solving (again, numerically) for the emission angle
1192: $\theta_e$ in the \ERFS\
1193: the equation
1194: \begin{eqnarray}\label{emission}
1195: \su{\int_{-1}^{\cos\theta_e} \left({d R^{1\to 0}_{\pm}}/{d\cos \theta}\right) d\cos \theta}{\int_{-1}^{+1}
1196: \left({d R^{1\to 0}_{\pm}}/{d\cos \theta}\right)d\cos \theta} &=& \RN2,
1197: \end{eqnarray}
1198: where the differential transition rate is given by equation (\ref{Transn}) with $n=1$. The photon angle and energy
1199: in the stellar frame are then computed according to equations (\ref{recoilangle}) and (\ref{recoilEn}),
1200: respectively.
1201: