1: \documentclass{emulateapj}
2:
3:
4:
5: \newcommand{\tab}[1]{Table~\ref{#1}}
6: \newcommand{\fig}[1]{Figure~\ref{#1}}
7: \newcommand{\eqn}[1]{equation~(\ref{#1})}
8:
9: \newcommand{\name}{J121839.7+295325}
10: \newcommand{\zarc}{\ensuremath{2.48_{-0.05}^{+0.14}}}
11: \newcommand{\jlim}{\ensuremath{22.0}}
12: \newcommand{\hlim}{\ensuremath{20.7}}
13: \newcommand{\vlim}{\ensuremath{25.5}}
14:
15:
16: \begin{document}
17: \title{Is the Optically Unidentified Radio Source, FIRST
18: J121839.7+295325, a Dark Lens?\footnote{Observations reported here
19: were obtained at the MMT Observatory, a joint facility of the
20: University of Arizona and the Smithsonian Institution}}
21: \shorttitle{FIRST \name}
22:
23:
24:
25: \author{R. E. Ryan Jr.\altaffilmark{2}, S. H. Cohen\altaffilmark{3},
26: R. A. Windhorst\altaffilmark{3,2}, C. R. Keeton\altaffilmark{4}, and
27: T. J. Veach\altaffilmark{2}}
28:
29: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Physics, Arizona State University,
30: Tempe, AZ 85287-1504}
31: \altaffiltext{3}{School of Earth and Space
32: Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287-1404}
33: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers
34: University, Piscataway, NJ, 08854}
35:
36: \shortauthors{Ryan Jr. et al.}
37:
38:
39: \email{russell.ryanjr@asu.edu}
40:
41:
42: \begin{abstract}
43:
44:
45: We present evidence that the optically unidentified radio source,
46: FIRST J121839.7+295325, may be strongly lensing a background galaxy.
47: We estimate the redshift of the assumed gravitational arc, discovered
48: in parallel imaging with HST, from MMT-Blue Channel spectroscopy to be
49: $z_{\rm arc}\!=\!\zarc$. We present lens models with an Einstein
50: radius of $R_E\!=\!1\farcs3$ which contains a mass of
51: $M_{dyn}\!=\!10^{12\pm0.5}$~M$_{\odot}$, where the uncertainty
52: reflects the range of possible lens redshifts. The putative lens is
53: not detected to $J_{\rm lim}\!=\!\jlim$~mag and $H_{\rm
54: lim}\!=\!\hlim$~mag in our MMT-SWIRC imaging. Using the flux limits
55: from WFPC2 and SWIRC, we estimate that the dynamical mass-to-light
56: ratio of J121839.7+295325 is
57: $M_{dyn}/L_B\!\gtrsim\!10$~M$_{\odot}$~L$_{\odot}^{-1}$ for
58: $A_V\!=\!1$~mag, and this lower limit could be as high as
59: $30$~M$_{\odot}$~L$_{\odot}^{-1}$ for $A_V\!=\!0$~mag. Since the
60: radio source is optically unidentified ($V_{\rm lim}\!=\!25.5$~mag)
61: and has a radio flux of $S_{1.4~{\rm GHz}}\!=\!33$~mJy, it is likely a
62: massive early-type galaxy which hosts a radio-loud AGN at
63: $0.8\!\lesssim\!z_{\rm radio}\!\lesssim\!1.5$. However, the present
64: data cannot uniquely determine the mass-to-light ratio of the lensing
65: galaxy, and hence the possibility that this system may be a reasonably
66: dark lens is not ruled out.
67:
68:
69: \end{abstract}
70:
71: \keywords{gravitational lensing --- cosmology: dark matter --- galaxies: individual (FIRST J121839.7+295325)}
72:
73:
74: \section{Introduction} \label{intro}
75:
76:
77: In the $\Lambda$-dominated, cold dark matter ($\Lambda$CDM) cosmology,
78: massive galaxies form hierarchically inside of dark matter haloes
79: \citep[eg.][]{wf91,kauf93}. The mass evolution of these CDM haloes
80: can place stringent constraints on the cosmological models
81: \citep[eg.][]{gre02}, and the most reliable measurements of CDM halo
82: masses are generally derived from modeling gravitationally lensed
83: images. Furthermore, gravitational lensing has become a powerful tool
84: for studying properties of both the lensing objects and the more
85: distant sources. Of particular interest are constraints on the mass
86: profiles \citep[eg.][]{koop06,more} and the mass-to-light ratios
87: \citep[eg.][]{kkf98,rk05,tr06} of lens galaxies, and the host galaxies
88: of active galactic nuclei \citep[eg.][]{kkm01,peng06}. While all of
89: these studies are advancing due to increased numbers of known lensing
90: systems \citep{rat99,leh00,bol06}, they are still limited by
91: relatively small sample sizes.
92:
93:
94: In this work, we report the discovery of an optical arc which is
95: $\sim\!4\farcs0$ southwest of the optically unidentified radio source,
96: FIRST \name. This radio source was discovered in the Faint Images of
97: the Radio Sky at Twenty-centimeters (FIRST) with the Very Large Array
98: \citep[VLA;][]{beck,white} and later detected at 610~MHz \citep{reng}
99: and 74~MHz \citep{cohen}. Its relatively bright flux of $S_{\rm
100: 1.4~{\rm GHz}}\!=\!33$~mJy suggests that it is at $z_{\rm
101: radio}\!\lesssim\!1.5$ \citep[eg.][]{deb01,wad01}. Additionally,
102: \name\ was \textit{undetected} in the pure-parallel observations
103: (PropID:~8090, PI: S.~Casertano) with the Wide Field and Planetary
104: Camera~2 (WFPC2) on the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) to
105: F606W$\gtrsim\!25.5$~mag \citep[$V$-band hereafter;][]{jqr07}, which
106: indicates it is likely at $z_{\rm radio}\!\gtrsim\!0.8$
107: \citep[eg.][]{win85,kron85,deb02,win03}. These two independent
108: constraints yield a coarse redshift estimate of $0.8\!\lesssim\!z_{\rm
109: radio}\!\lesssim\!1.5$. By correlating the WFPC2 archive with the
110: catalog of FIRST sources, \citet{jqr07} note an arc-like feature with
111: $V_{\rm Vega}\!=\!24.0\pm0.1$~mag. Based on the astrometric
112: uncertainties for the HST-WFPC2 and FIRST imaging, they conclude that
113: the likelihood that this arc is the optical identification of the
114: radio source is ${\cal L}\!\lesssim\!10^{-10}$, following the work of
115: \citet{der}. Since \citet{jqr07} rule out the possibility that the
116: arc is the optical identification of \name, we will investigate the
117: hypothesis that the optical arc is a gravitationally lensed imaged by
118: the optically unidentified radio source.
119:
120:
121: This work is organized as follows: \S~\ref{mmt} describes our MMT
122: observations, \S~\ref{model} outlines the lensing analysis,
123: \S~\ref{discuss} discusses the lensing interpretation of these
124: observations, and \S~\ref{con} gives some closing remarks with
125: thoughts toward possible future observations. Unless explicitly
126: stated, all magnitudes are in the AB system \citep{abmag}. We adopt
127: the following cosmological model: $\Omega_0\!=\!0.24$,
128: $\Omega_{\Lambda}\!=\!0.76$, and $H_0\!=\!100h$~km~s$^{-1}$~Mpc$^{-1}$
129: where $h\!=\!0.73$ \citep{wmap}.
130:
131: \section{The MMT Observations}\label{mmt}
132:
133: \subsection{Blue Channel Spectroscopy} \label{bcspec}
134:
135: While the radio and optical properties provide a broad redshift
136: constraint on the lensing object of $0.8\!\lesssim\!z_{\rm
137: radio}\!\lesssim\!1.5$, little is known about the optical arc.
138: Therefore, we observed the putative gravitational arc on May 18, 2007
139: with the blue-channel spectrograph on the 6.5~m MMT, and obtained
140: 4$\times$2400~s and 1$\times$1200~s exposures. For these
141: observations, our $1\arcsec\!\times\!180\arcsec$ slit tracked through
142: the sky at the parallactic angle, as the object varied in airmass of
143: $\sec z\!\leq\!1.17$, which was very closely aligned with the position
144: angle of the arc seen in the left panel of \fig{mod}. With the
145: 500~grooves~mm$^{-1}$ grating, the spectral resolution was 3.6~\AA\
146: with a dispersion of 1.2~\AA~pix$^{-1}$. We observed Feige~34
147: throughout the night to determine the spatial point-spread function
148: (PSF) and to serve as the spectrophotometric flux standard star.
149:
150: The two dimensional spectra were reduced by standard algorithms using
151: custom routines in IDL\footnote{http://www.ittvis.com/idl}. The CCD
152: read noise, gain, and dark rate were ${\cal R}\!=\!2.5$~$e^{-}$,
153: ${\cal G}\!=\!1.1$~$e^{-}$~adu$^{-1}$, and ${\cal
154: D}\!=\!28.7$~$e^{-}$~pix$^{-1}$~hr$^{-1}$, respectively. To determine
155: an accurate trace, we simply rebinned the two dimensional spectrum in
156: wavelength to boost the relatively poor signal-to-noise ratio. The
157: one dimensional spectrum was extracted from a given frame using the
158: observed PSF as weights in both axes. Finally, the wavelength
159: solution for each frame was determined from an HeNeAr comparison lamp,
160: which was observed at the corresponding position on the sky.
161:
162:
163:
164: Despite the long integration time (3~hours) on the arc, the total
165: signal-to-noise per pixel is relatively low. Therefore, we rebinned
166: the calibrated, sky-subtracted, and stacked spectrum to
167: $\Delta\lambda\!=\!125$~\AA\ for $\lambda\!<\!5400$~\AA\ and
168: $\Delta\lambda\!=\!375$~\AA\ for $\lambda\!\geq\!5400$~\AA. At this
169: resolution, a weak spectral break is identifiable at
170: $\lambda\!\simeq\!4300$~\AA, however we cannot conclusively determine
171: whether it is the Lyman ($\lambda_{\rm rest}\!=\!1216$~\AA) or the
172: Balmer/4000~\AA\ break. Therefore, to determine the most likely
173: redshift with its associated uncertainty and relative probability, we
174: computed a spectrophotometric redshift \citep[eg.][]{ryan07} with the
175: redshift code, \texttt{HyperZ} \citep{hyperz}. We did not include the
176: $V$-band flux in the fit, since the MMT slit did not fully encompass
177: the HST-WFPC2 aperture. We adopted a grid of synthetic spectra
178: \citep{bc03} parameterized by an exponential star formation history
179: with $e$-folding times of $\tau\!=\!0,~1,~2,~3,~5,~15,~30,~\infty$~Gyr
180: and ages of $1~{\rm Myr}\!\leq\!t\!\leq\!T(z)$, where $T(z)$ is the
181: age of the Universe. The final grid of spectral templates is defined
182: by the extinction of $A_V\!\leq\!3~{\rm mag}$ for $z\!\leq\!6$.
183:
184:
185: In \fig{spec}, we show the observed spectrum as filled points with the
186: best fit template as a solid line. In the inset, we show the relative
187: probability, which indicates two possible redshift solutions: the
188: Balmer/4000~\AA\ break at $z\!\sim\!0.13$ or the Lyman break at
189: $z\!\sim\!2.5$. If the arc-like object is at $z\!\sim\!0.13$, then it
190: is likely an unrelated foreground galaxy to \name\ with
191: $M_V\!\sim\!-14$~mag. However, if it is at the higher redshift, then
192: the observed arc morphology in the HST-WFPC2 imaging suggests that
193: \name\ may be gravitationally lensing a background source. Without a
194: flux measurement blueward of the blue channel spectrum ($\lambda_{\rm
195: obs}\!\lesssim\!3800$~\AA) to break this redshift degeneracy
196: \citep[eg.][]{hyperz}, we can only make statistical statements
197: regarding the redshift of the arc and the physical interpretations of
198: the system. From the inset in \fig{spec}, the integrated
199: probabilities of the two peaks are 13\% and 87\% for the
200: Balmer/4000~\AA\ and Lyman breaks, respectively. Since the Lyman break
201: redshift is $\sim\!6.7$ times more likely, we will further develop the
202: lensing hypothesis. The best-fit template found by \texttt{HyperZ}
203: has an age of $t\!=\!11.5$~Myr, instantaneous burst with
204: $A_V\!=\!1.2$~mag, which is similar to the Lyman break galaxies at
205: $2\!\lesssim\!z\!\lesssim\!3.5$ \citep{pap01}. Therefore the most
206: likely redshift of arc is $z_{\rm arc}\!=\!\zarc$, which we derive
207: from $\chi^2(z)\!=\!\min{[\chi^2(z)]}$ and $\Delta\chi^2(z)\!=\!1$.
208:
209: \begin{figure}
210: \epsscale{1.0}
211: \plotone{fig1.ps}
212: \caption{The observed MMT spectrum of the arc. To increase the
213: signal-to-noise to a usable level, we resampled the one dimensional
214: spectrum to $\Delta\lambda\!=\!125$~\AA\ for
215: $\lambda\!\leq\!5400$~\AA\ and $\Delta\lambda\!=\!375$~\AA\ for
216: $\lambda\!>\!5400$~\AA, which is shown as filled circles. Since a
217: weak spectral break is readily apparent at $\lambda\!\sim\!4300$~\AA\
218: with no other noticeable spectral features, we determine the redshift
219: from the photometric redshift code \texttt{HyperZ} \citep{hyperz}. In
220: the inset, we show the relative probability and reduced $\chi^2$ used
221: to determine the redshift. In the upper right, we give the relevant
222: \texttt{HyperZ} fitted parameters.}\label{spec}
223: \end{figure}
224:
225:
226:
227:
228: \subsection{SWIRC Infrared Imaging} \label{swirc}
229:
230:
231: We observed \name\ with the SAO Wide-field InfraRed Camera (SWIRC) on
232: March 19, 2008 and obtained $80\times120$~s and $245\times30$~s
233: dithered images in the $J$- and $H$-bands, respectively. These data
234: were reduced by standard algorithms with a similar suite of IDL
235: routines used for the blue-channel reductions. The seeing was
236: relatively constant through the night at $\sim\!0\farcs8$ and
237: $\sim\!0\farcs6$ in the $J$- and $H$-bands, respectively. The sky
238: image per object frame was created using \texttt{SExtractor}
239: \citep{sex}. In the $5\farcm12\times5\farcm12$ field-of-view, each
240: object frame contained three stars from the Two Micron All Sky Survey
241: (2MASS) point source catalog \citep{cut,skrut}, which we used to
242: calibrate the astrometry of each frame and to determine the flux
243: zeropoint, with the ($m_{\rm Vega}-m_{\rm AB}$) magnitude conversions
244: of \citet{rud}. The astrometrically corrected, sky-subtracted images
245: were averaged together with a 1$\sigma$-clip into stacked science
246: frames.
247:
248:
249: We disregard a small portion of the SWIRC field-of-view owing to
250: appreciable cosmetic defects. Therefore, the stacked images each
251: contain $\sim\!100$~objects and yield number counts which are
252: consistent with the $J$-band galaxy counts of the Chandra Deep Field
253: and Hubble Deep Field, South \citep[][see their Figure 2]{sara}.
254: Based on a power-law fit to our observed counts, we estimate the
255: $3\sigma$, 50\% completeness limits are $J_{50\%}\!=\!21.0$~mag and
256: $H_{50\%}\!=\!19.6$~mag. The assumed lensing galaxies is not detected
257: in either of these bandpasses, which may suggest that \name\ is indeed
258: a rather dark object. To estimate our detection limits in the
259: infrared imaging, we determine the limit corresponding to a $3\sigma$
260: fluctuation at the position of the radio source. For a circular
261: aperture with a radius of $3\times{\rm FWHM}$, these limits are
262: $J_{\rm lim}\!=\!\jlim$~mag and $H_{\rm lim}\!=\!\hlim$~mag and are
263: used below to derive the limits on the mass-to-light ratios.
264:
265:
266: \section{The Gravitational Lens Model}\label{model}
267:
268: If we are to interpret this system in the context of gravitational
269: lensing, we must investigate whether lensing can provide a sensible
270: explanation of the optical arc. The morphology of the arc immediately
271: implies that the lensing galaxy cannot be circular: a circular lens
272: that produces such a long arc (compared with the radius of curvature)
273: would produce a prominent counter-arc as well. In contrast, an
274: elongated galaxy can produce a single long arc either as a
275: highly-distorted single image, or as a merged triplet of images. That
276: leaves the question of how to interpret the compact, high surface
277: brightness knot just off the East end of the arc. Since there is no
278: natural way to interpret the arc and knot as lensed images of single
279: source, the knot is either a lensed image of a second source, or an
280: unrelated foreground object. We attempted to model the knot as a
281: lensed image, although it has little impact on the results since the
282: observed image merely determines the properties of the assumed second
283: source.
284:
285: We did not make a prior assumption about whether the arc is a single
286: image or merged triplet. Instead, we merely postulated that there are
287: two sources behind an elongated lens galaxy. We treated the sources
288: as circular Gaussians for simplicity, fitting for their positions,
289: sizes, and fluxes. We treated the lens galaxy as an isothermal
290: ellipsoid, fitting for its position, Einstein radius, ellipticity, and
291: position angle. For a given set of model parameters, we used the
292: software package \texttt{lensmodel} \citep{kee01} to find the images
293: of the two sources, which we compared to the observed arc and knot on
294: a pixel-by-pixel basis to compute the $\chi^2$ goodness-of-fit. We
295: used a downhill simplex method to search the parameter space, with an
296: inner loop to optimize the source parameters for a fixed lens galaxy,
297: and an outer loop to optimize the galaxy parameters as well. In the
298: best-fit model, the lens has an Einstein radius of $R_E\!=\!1\farcs3$
299: and ellipticity of $e\!=\!0.5$, the two sources are separated by
300: $\Delta\theta\!=\!0\farcs6$, and the reduced-chi squared is
301: $\min{[\chi^2_{\nu}]}\!=\!0.94$. In \fig{mod}, we show the HST-WFPC2
302: image (left), the lens model (middle), and the reconstructed source
303: plane (right). The mass enclosed within the Einstein radius slowly
304: varies with the lens redshift between
305: $M_{dyn}\!=\!10^{12.5\pm0.5}$~M$_{\odot}$ (see the upper panel of
306: \fig{mass}), which is a relatively large mass to have been undetected
307: in the HST-WFPC2 and MMT-SWIRC imaging.
308:
309: There are three additional points to make regarding the lens models.
310: (1) In successful models, the arc is a single highly-distorted image
311: of a source lying just outside a cusp caustic in the source plane. We
312: did not impose this as an assumption, it emerged naturally from the
313: modeling. (2) The present model does not explain the variation in
314: surface brightness along the arc, because we used a simple Gaussian
315: source simply to reproduce the shape of the arc. If the arc is indeed
316: singly-imaged, then the surface brightness variation along the arc
317: merely represents the intrinsic variations of the source. (3) Our
318: model predicts a compact, faint counter-image just beyond the center
319: of the lensing galaxy (see middle panel of \fig{mod}). There appears
320: to be some flux in roughly the right location in the HST-WFPC2 image,
321: however it is likely associated with a hot pixel. We did not use the
322: portion of the image as constraints to the lens models.
323:
324: \begin{figure*}\centerline{\epsfxsize=0.75\hsize{\epsfbox{fig2.ps}}}\vspace*{0.1in}
325: \caption{The gravitational lens model. We show the HST-WFPC2
326: observations with the radio position indicated by the tick marks (left
327: panel) and the 1$\sigma$ astrometric uncertainties, the model
328: reconstruction (middle panel), and the source plane configuration
329: (right panel). We show the critical curves and the caustics on the
330: model and source plane, respectively. We model the source plane as two
331: Gaussians and minimize the $\chi^2$ between the WFPC2 imaging and the
332: lens model to determine their positions, fluxes, and
333: sizes.}\label{mod}
334: \end{figure*}
335:
336:
337:
338:
339:
340: Since \name\ is undetected in the HST and MMT imaging, we can only
341: determine a lower limit on its mass-to-light ratio. We must convert
342: the above detection limits ($J_{\rm lim}$ and $H_{\rm lim}$) to the
343: luminosity in a fixed bandpass to determine a mass-to-light ratio,
344: which is independent of redshift. To facilitate direct comparisons
345: with other galaxies, we opt to $k$-correct our limiting apparent
346: magnitudes to the rest-frame $B$-band absolute magnitudes. These
347: conversions require assuming a template SED for the undetected lensing
348: galaxy \citep[eg.][]{hogg}. To highlight two extreme possibilities,
349: we show the range of the dynamical mass-to-light ratio consistent with
350: the $V$-band (blue), $J$-band (green), and $H$-band (red) imaging as
351: derived from the E (middle) and Im (bottom) templates \citep{cww80} in
352: \fig{mass}. The shaded region shows the likely lens redshift, as
353: discussed in \S~\ref{intro}. If a stellar component to \name\ exists,
354: then we expect it likely has an early-type based on its radio flux
355: \citep[eg.][]{win85}. Therefore, to be compatible with the
356: observations, \name\ likely has
357: $M_{dyn}/L_B\!\gtrsim\!30$~M$_{\odot}$~L$_{\odot}^{-1}$, and could be
358: as dark as $M_{dyn}/L_B\!\gtrsim\!150$~M$_{\odot}$~L$_{\odot}^{-1}$
359: for the late-type SED. These limits will slightly decrease/brighten
360: by including dust obscuration, since some fraction of the stellar
361: light may be extincted and increase the maximum luminosity, for fixed
362: flux limits. However, even with a modest amount of extinction
363: ($A_V\!=\!1.0$~mag), the intrinsic mass-to-light ratio would still be
364: $M_{dyn}/L_B\!\gtrsim\!10$~M$_{\odot}$~L$_{\odot}^{-1}$ (for the
365: early-type template). Nevertheless, the WFPC2 $V$-band observations
366: generally provide the strongest constraint, owing to the relatively
367: shallow SWIRC observations.
368:
369:
370: \begin{figure}
371: \epsscale{1.0}
372: \plotone{fig3.ps}
373: \caption{The lens properties. In the upper panel, we show the total
374: mass enclosed by the Einstein radius of $R_E\!=\!1\farcs3$. In the
375: middle and lower panels, we show the limits on the dynamical
376: mass-to-light ratio in the rest-frame $B$-band ($M_{dyn}/L_B$) derived
377: from the $V_{\rm lim}\!=\!\vlim$~mag (blue), $J_{\rm
378: lim}\!=\!\jlim$~mag (green), and $H_{\rm lim}\!=\!\hlim$~mag (red)
379: observed flux limits for $A_V\!=\!0$~mag. We show the range of most
380: probable lens redshift with the shaded region (see
381: \S~\ref{intro}).}\label{mass}
382: \end{figure}
383:
384:
385:
386: \section{Discussion} \label{discuss}
387:
388:
389:
390: The HST-WFPC2 imaging suggests that \name\ is gravitationally lensing
391: a background object. Our blue channel spectroscopy supports this
392: hypothesis by placing the optical arc is likely at high redshift
393: ($z_{\rm arc}\!=\!\zarc$). Given the flux limits from HST-WFPC2 and
394: MMT-SWIRC ($V_{\rm lim}\!=\!\vlim$~mag, $J_{\rm lim}\!=\!\jlim$~mag,
395: and $H_{\rm lim}\!=\!\hlim$~mag), we find the lensing object may be
396: rather dark, with a $B$-band mass-to-light ratio of
397: $M_{dyn}/L_B\!\gtrsim\!30$~M$_{\odot}$~L$_{\odot}^{-1}$. From the K20
398: survey, \citet{sper} find a dynamical mass-to-light ratio of
399: $M_{dyn}/L_B\!\lesssim\!2$~M$_{\odot}$~L$_{\odot}^{-1}$ for their
400: sample of 18~early-type galaxies at $z\!\simeq\!1$. Their upper limit
401: can be extended to
402: $M_{dyn}/L_B\!\lesssim\!8$~M$_{\odot}$~L$_{\odot}^{-1}$ by including a
403: sample of 28~galaxies from the Coma cluster \citep{guit}. This
404: mass-to-light ratio is roughly consistent with the $z\!\simeq\!0.5$
405: early-type galaxies of \citet{vnd}, which have
406: $2.5\!\lesssim\!M_{dyn}/L_B\!\lesssim\!6.8$~M$_{\odot}$~L$_{\odot}^{-1}$.
407: By comparing to a series of $z\!\simeq\!0$ studies, they find the
408: mass-to-light ratio of early-type galaxies evolves as
409: $\Delta\log{(M_{dyn}/L_B)}/\Delta z\!=\!-0.457\pm0.046~(\rm
410: random)\pm0.78~(\rm systematic)$, since the low redshift ellipticals
411: have $M_{dyn}/L_B\!\lesssim\!15$~M$_{\odot}$~L$_{\odot}^{-1}$
412: \citep{pad}. Therefore, if our lower limits derived in \S~\ref{model}
413: are correct, then \name\ may be a relatively dark galaxy, whose total
414: mass is dominated by dark matter. While there are solid statistical
415: arguments that such objects should exist \citep{ps74,bla01}, there are
416: currently no confirmed examples. Since direct optical observations of
417: these extreme mass-to-light objects will be nearly impossible, they
418: will likely manifest themselves as ``dark lenses'' \citep{rus02}.
419:
420:
421: The most common suggestions of dark lensing have arisen from
422: wide-separation quasar pairs (WSQPs), quasars with nearly identical
423: optical spectra separated by
424: $3\arcsec\!\lesssim\!\Delta\theta\!\lesssim\!10\arcsec$, with no
425: identifiable lensing source. Detailed analyses of the spectra of
426: these quasars, from the radio to the $X$-rays, have revealed that all
427: known WSQPs are simply binary quasars
428: \citep{haw97,mun98,mor99,peng99,mor00,gre02}. Additionally, the
429: Cosmic Shear survey with HST \citep{css} has identified a number of
430: gravitational lenses. In one particular field, \citet{mir02}
431: suggested that the conspicuous tangential alignment of galaxies with
432: arc-like morphologies and no obvious over-density of foreground
433: galaxies may be a dark lens. However, \citet{erb03} ruled out this
434: hypothesis by demonstrating the colors of these galaxies are
435: inconsistent with high redshift, lensed objects.
436:
437: Since \name\ remains unidentified in the optical and near-infrared, it
438: is a good candidate for a dark lens. However, the bright radio
439: emission of $S_{1.4~{\rm GHz}}\!=\!33$~mJy suggests that the lens
440: object likely contains an active galactic nucleus
441: \citep[eg.][]{win85}. If a baryonic counterpart to this radio source
442: exists, then it likely corresponds to a massive and perhaps extincted
443: galaxy, which would make it similar to the distant red galaxies
444: \citep[DRGs;][]{fs04} or the extremely red objects
445: \citep[EROs;][]{eros}. If we assume the optical/infrared color of
446: $(R-K)\!\gtrsim\!5.5$~mag typical of an ERO, then \name\ must have
447: $K\!\gtrsim\!20$~mag and a stellar mass of
448: $M_{*}\!\lesssim\!10^{10}$~M$_{\odot}$ \citep[][based on their
449: Figure~7]{cons08}. In this case, our lens models imply that \name\
450: would have a dynamical-to-stellar mass ratio of
451: $M_{dyn}/M_{*}\!\gtrsim\!100$, which is significantly higher than the
452: $z\!\simeq\!2$ star-forming galaxies with $M_{dyn}/M_{*}\!\simeq\!2$
453: \citep{erb}.
454:
455:
456:
457:
458: \section{Conclusion} \label{con}
459: The HST-WFPC2 and MMT data suggest that \name\ is an extremely dark
460: galaxy worthy of follow-up observations to confirm or exclude this
461: hypothesis. In particular, with deeper optical spectroscopy of the
462: arc, our redshift analysis can be verified. Moreover, observations
463: blueward of the blue channel spectroscopy will break the redshift
464: degeneracy of $z\!\simeq\!0.15$ and $z\!\simeq\!2.5$. Owing to the
465: necessary wavelength ($\lambda_{\rm obs}\!\lesssim\!3800$~\AA) and
466: flux limit (${\rm AB}\!\gtrsim\!26$~mag), these observations could be
467: conducted with the ultraviolet channel of the Wide Field Camera~3
468: (WFC3) for HST. Since the radio source has not been optically
469: identified, its redshift can only be very coarsely constrained. The
470: majority of millijansky radio sources have early-type morphologies and
471: colors at $0.8\!\lesssim\!z\!\lesssim\!1.5$
472: \citep[eg.][]{win85,jqr07}, consequently its Balmer/4000~\AA\ break
473: will occur at $7000~{\rm \AA}\!\lesssim\!\lambda_{\rm
474: obs}\!\lesssim\!1~\mu{\rm m}$. Furthermore, \name\ is undetected to
475: faint flux-levels, and may require a rather deep (${\rm
476: AB}\!\gtrsim\!25$~mag) imaging campaign. Therefore, medium-band or
477: grism observations in the infrared mode with WFC3 would better
478: constrain the lens redshift. Should such observations support our
479: proposed lensing scenario, this system could be among the most distant
480: known gravitational lenses
481: \citep{castles}\footnote{\url{http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/castles/}}, a
482: dusty ERO with $M_*\!\lesssim\!10^{10}$~M$_{\odot}$, or a genuine dark
483: lens, which would be a unique confirmation of the $\Lambda$CDM
484: paradigm.
485:
486:
487:
488:
489:
490:
491:
492: \acknowledgments We acknowledge support from NASA grant HST
493: AR-10974.01A (to RER), HST AR-08357.01A (to RAW) awarded by STScI,
494: which is operated by AURA for NASA under contract NAS 5-26555, and
495: NASA JWST grant NAG5-12460 (to RAW). We thank Warren Brown, Jacob
496: Russell, Rolf Jansen, Alejandra Milone, and Nimish Hathi for helpful
497: discussions and guidance. We are particularly grateful for the
498: excellent comments and suggestions of the anonymous referee.
499:
500:
501:
502:
503:
504: \begin{thebibliography}{}
505: \bibitem[Becker, White, \& Helfand(1995)]{beck} Becker, R. H., White, R. L., \& Helfand, D. J. 1995, \apj, 450, 559
506: \bibitem[Bertin \& Arnouts(1996)]{sex} Bertin, E. \& Arnouts, S. 1996, A\&AS, 117, 393
507: \bibitem[Blanton et al.(2001)]{bla01} Blanton, M. R., et al. 2001, \apj, 121, 2358
508: \bibitem[Bolton et al.(2006)]{bol06} Bolton, A. S., Burles, S., Koopmans, L. V. E., Treu, T., \& Moustakas, L. A. 2006, \apj, 638, 703
509: \bibitem[Bolzonella, Miralles, \& Pell\'o(2000)]{hyperz} Bolzonella, M., Miralles, J.-M., \& Pell\'o, R. 2000, A\&A, 363, 476
510: \bibitem[de Breuck et al.(2001)]{deb01} de Breuck, C., et al. 2001, \aj, 121, 1241
511: \bibitem[de Breuck et al.(2002)]{deb02} de Breuck, C., van Breugel, W., Stanford, S. A., R\"ottgering, H., Miley, G., \& Stern, D. 2002, \aj, 123, 637
512: \bibitem[Bruzual \& Charlot(2003)]{bc03} Bruzual, G. \& Charlot, S. 2003, \mnras, 344, 1000
513: \bibitem[Cohen et al.(2004)]{cohen} Cohen, A. S., R\"ottgering, H. J. A., Jarvis, M. J., Kassim, N. E., \& Lazio, T. J. W. 2004, \apjs, 150, 417
514: \bibitem[Coleman, Wu, \& Weedman(1980)]{cww80} Coleman, G. D., Wu, C.-C., \& Weedman, D. W., 1980, \apjs, 43, 393
515: \bibitem[Conselice et al.(2008)]{cons08} Conselice, C. J., Bundy, K., Vivian, U., Eisenhardt, P., Lotz, J., \& Newman, J. 2008, \mnras, 383, 1366
516: \bibitem[Cutri et al.(2003)]{cut} Cutri, R. M., et al. 2003, 2MASS All-Sky Catalog of Point Sources (Pasadena: IPAC/Caltech)
517: \bibitem[di Serego Alighieri et al.(2005)]{sper} di Serego Alighieri, S., et al. 2005, A\&A, 442, 125
518: \bibitem[Erb et al.(2006)]{erb} Erb D. K., Steidel, C. C., Shapley, A. E., Pettini, M., Reddy, N. A., \& Adelberger, K. L. 2006, \apj, 646, 107
519: \bibitem[Erben et al.(2003)]{erb03} Erben, T., et al. 2003, A\&A, 410, 45
520: \bibitem[F\"orster Schreiber(2004)]{fs04} F\"orster Schreiber, N. M., et al. 2004, \apj, 616, 40
521: \bibitem[Franx et al.(2003)]{eros} Franx, M., et al. 2003, \apj, 587, L79
522: \bibitem[Green et al.(2002)]{gre02} Green, P. J., et al. 2002, \apj, 571, 721
523: \bibitem[Guti\'errez et al.(2004)]{guit} Guti\'errez, C. M., et al. 2004, \apj, 602, 664
524: \bibitem[Hawkins et al.(1997)]{haw97} Hawkins, M. R. S., Clements, D., Fried, J. W., Heavens, A. F., Veron, P., Minty, E. M., van der Werf, P. 1997, \mnras, 291, 811
525: \bibitem[Hogg et al.(2002)]{hogg} Hogg, D. W., Baldry, I. K., Blanton, M. R., \& Eisenstein, D. J. 2002, astro-ph/0210394
526: \bibitem[Kauffmann, White, \& Guiderdoni(1993)]{kauf93} Kauffmann, G., White, S. D. M., \& Guiderdoni, B. 1993, \mnras, 264, 201
527: \bibitem[Keeton(2001)]{kee01} Keeton, C. R. 2001, astro-ph/0102340
528: \bibitem[Keeton, Kochanek, \& Falco(1998)]{kkf98} Keeton, C. R., Kochanek, C. S., \& Falco, E. E. 1998, \apj, 509, 561
529: \bibitem[Kochanek, Keeton, \& McLeod(2001)]{kkm01} Kochanek, C. S., Keeton, C. R., \& McLeod, B. A. 2001, \apj, 547, 50
530: \bibitem[Kochanek et al.(2007)]{castles} Kochanek, C. S., Falco, E. E., Impey, C., Leh\'ar, J., McLeod, B., \& Rix, H.-W. 2007, \url{http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/castles/}
531: \bibitem[Koopmans et al.(2006)]{koop06} Koopmans, L. V. E., Treu, T., Bolton, A. S., Burles, S., \& Moustakas, L. A. 2006, \apj, 649, 599
532: \bibitem[Kron, Koo, \& Windhorst(1985)]{kron85} Kron, R. G., Koo, D. C., \& Windhorst, R. A. 1985, A\&A, 146, 38
533: \bibitem[Leh\'ar et al.(2000)]{leh00} Leh\'ar, J., et al. 2000, \apj, 536, 584
534: \bibitem[Miralles et al.(2002)]{mir02} Miralles, J.-M., et al. 2002, A\&A, 388, 68
535: \bibitem[More et al.(2008)]{more} More, A., McKean, J.-P., Muxlow, T. W. B., Porcas, R. W., Fassnacht, C. D., \& Koopmans, L. V. E. 2008, MNRAS, 384, 1701
536: \bibitem[Morgan et al.(2000)]{mor00} Morgan, D. N., et al. 2000, \aj, 119, 1083
537: \bibitem[Mortlock Webster, \& Francis(1999)]{mor99} Mortlock, D. J., Webster, R. L., \& Francis, P. J. 1999, \mnras, 309, 836
538: \bibitem[Mu\~noz et al.(1998)]{mun98} Mu\~noz, J. A., Falco, E. E., Kochanek, C. S., Leh\'ar, J., Herold, L. K., Fletcher, A. B., Burke, B. F. 1998, \apj, 492, L9
539: \bibitem[Oke \& Gunn(1983)]{abmag} Oke, J. B. \& Gunn, J. E. 1983, \apj, 266, 713
540: \bibitem[Padmanabhan et al.(2004)]{pad} Padmanabhan, N., et al. 2004, NewA, 9, 329
541: \bibitem[Papovich, Dickinson, \& Ferguson(2001)]{pap01} Papovich, C., Dickinson, M., \& Ferguson, H. C. 2001, \apj, 559, 620
542: \bibitem[Peng et al.(1999)]{peng99} Peng, C. Y., et al. 1999, \apj, 524, 572
543: \bibitem[Peng et al.(2006)]{peng06} Peng, C. Y., et al. 2006, \apj, 649, 616
544: \bibitem[Pirzkal et al.(2001)]{css} Pirzkal, N. et al. 2001, A\&A, 375, 351
545: \bibitem[Press \& Schechter(1974)]{ps74} Press, W. H. \& Schechter, P. 1974, \apj, 187, 425
546: \bibitem[Ratnatunga, Griffiths, \& Ostrander(1999)]{rat99} Ratnatunga, K. U., Griffiths, R. E., \& Ostrander, E. J. 1999, \aj, 117, 2010
547: \bibitem[Rengelink et al.(1997)]{reng} Rengelink, R. B., Tang, Y., de Bruyn, A. G., Miley, G. K., Bremer, M. N., R\"ottgering, H. J. A., \& Bremer, M. A. R. 1997, A\&AS, 124, 259
548: \bibitem[Rudnick et al.(2001)]{rud} Rudnick, G., et al. 2001, \aj, 122, 2205
549: \bibitem[Rusin(2002)]{rus02} Rusin, D. 2002, \apj, 572, 705
550: \bibitem[Rusin \& Kochanek(2005)]{rk05} Rusin, D., \& Kochanek, C. S. 2005, \apj, 623, 666
551: \bibitem[Russell et al.(2008)]{jqr07} Russell, J., Ryan Jr., R. E., Cohen, S H., Windhorst, R. A., \& Waddington, I. 2007, \apjs, accepted, astro-ph/0807.2281
552: \bibitem[de Ruiter, Willis, \& Arp(1977)]{der} de Ruiter, H. R., Willis, A. G., \& Arp, H. C. 1977, A\&AS, 28, 211
553: \bibitem[Ryan et al.(2007)]{ryan07} Ryan, R. E., Jr., et al. 2007, \apj, 668, 839
554: \bibitem[Saracco et al.(2001)]{sara} Saracco, P., Giallongo, E., Cristiani, S., D'Odorico, S., Fontana, A., Iovino, A., Poli, F., \& Vanzella, E. 2001, A\&A, 375, 1
555: \bibitem[Spergel et al.(2007)]{wmap} Spergel, D. N., et al. 2007, \apjs, 170, 377
556: \bibitem[Skrutskie et al.(2006)]{skrut} Skrutskie, M. F., et al. 2006, \aj, 131, 1163
557: \bibitem[Treu et al.(2006)]{tr06} Treu, T., Koopmans, L. V., Bolton, A. S., Burles, S., Moustakas, L. A. 2006, \apj, 640, 662
558: \bibitem[van der Marel \& van Dokkum(2007)]{vnd} van der Marel, R. P. \& van Dokkum, P. G. 2007, \apj, 668, 756
559: \bibitem[Waddington et al.(2001)]{wad01} Waddington, I., Dunlop, J. S., Peacock, J. A., \& Windhorst, R. A. 2001, \mnras, 328, 882
560: \bibitem[Windhorst et al.(1985)]{win85} Windhorst, R. A., Miley, G. K., Owen, F. N., Kron, R. G., \& Koo, D. C. 1985, \apj, 289, 494
561: \bibitem[Windhorst(2003)]{win03} Windhorst, R. A. 2003, NewA, 47, 357
562: \bibitem[White et al.(1997)]{white} White, R. L., Becker, R. H., Helfand, D. J., \& Gregg, M. D. 1997, \apj, 475, 479
563: \bibitem[White \& Frenk(1991)]{wf91} White, S. D. M. \& Frenk, C. 1991, \apj, 379, 52
564: \end{thebibliography}
565:
566:
567:
568:
569:
570:
571:
572:
573: \end{document}
574: