1: %%%% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
2: %%
3: %% Modified 2005 December 5
4: %%
5: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
6: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
7:
8: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
9: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
10: %% any data that comes before this command.
11:
12: %% The command below calls the preprint style
13: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
14: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
15: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
16: %%
17: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
18:
19: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
20:
21: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
22:
23: % preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
24:
25: %\documentclass[preprint2]{emulateapj}
26:
27: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
28: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
29: %% use the longabstract style option.
30:
31: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
32:
33: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
34: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
35: %% the \begin{document} command.
36: %%
37: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
38: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
39: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
40: %% for information.
41:
42: \newcommand{\Msun}{{\mbox{$\rm\, M_{\odot}$}}}
43: \newcommand{\kTe}{$kT_{\rm e}$}
44: \newcommand{\rX}{reduced-$\chi^2$}
45:
46: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
47:
48: %\slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
49:
50: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
51: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
52: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
53: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
54: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
55: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
56:
57: \shorttitle{{\it Chandra} Observations of the Cygnus Loop NE Rim}
58: \shortauthors{Katsuda et al.}
59:
60: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
61: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
62:
63: \begin{document}
64:
65: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
66: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
67: %% you desire.
68:
69: \title{{\it Chandra} Observations of the Northeastern Rim of the
70: Cygnus Loop}
71:
72: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
73: %% author and affiliation information.
74: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
75: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
76: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
77: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
78:
79: \author{Satoru Katsuda\altaffilmark{1}, Hiroshi Tsunemi\altaffilmark{1},
80: Masashi Kimura\altaffilmark{1}, and Koji Mori\altaffilmark{2}}
81: %\affil{Department of Earth and Space Science, Graduate
82: % School of Science, Osaka University, 1-1 Machikaneyama, Toyonaka,
83: % Osaka 560-0043, Japan}
84: \email{katsuda@ess.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp, tsunemi@ess.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp,
85: mkimura@ess.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp, mori@astro.miyazaki-u.ac.jp}
86:
87: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
88: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
89: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
90: %% affiliation.
91:
92: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Earth and Space Science, Graduate
93: School of Science, Osaka University, 1-1 Machikaneyama, Toyonaka,
94: Osaka 560-0043, Japan}
95: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Applied Physics, Faculty of Engineering,
96: University of Miyazaki, 1-1 Gakuen Kibana-dai Nishi, Miyazaki, 889-2192,
97: Japan}
98:
99: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
100: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
101: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
102: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
103: %% editorial office after submission.
104:
105: \begin{abstract}
106:
107: We present results from spatially resolved spectral analyses of the
108: northeastern (NE) rim of the Cygnus Loop supernova remnant (SNR)
109: based on two {\it
110: Chandra} observations. One pointing includes northern outermost
111: abundance-enhanced regions discovered by recent {\it
112: Suzaku} observations, while the other pointing is located on regions
113: with ``normal'' abundances in the NE rim of the Cygnus Loop. The
114: superior spatial resolving power of {\it Chandra} allows us to reveal
115: that the abundance-enhanced region is concentrated in a
116: $\sim$200$^{\prime\prime}$-thickness region behind the shock front.
117: We confirm absolute metal abundances (i.e., relative to H) as well
118: as abundance ratios between metals are consistent with those of the
119: solar values within a factor of $\sim$2. Also, we find that the emission
120: measure in the region gradually decreases toward the shock front.
121: These features are in contrast with those of the ejecta fragments around
122: the Vela SNR, which leads us to believe that the abundance
123: enhancements are not likely due to metal-rich ejecta. We suggest
124: that the origin of the plasma in this region is the interstellar
125: medium (ISM). In the ``normal''
126: abundance regions, we confirm that abundances are depleted to the
127: solar values by a factor of $\sim$5 that is not expected in the ISM
128: around the Cygnus Loop. Introduction of non-thermal emission in our
129: model fitting can not naturally resolve the abundance-depletion problem.
130: The origin of the depletion still remains as an open question.
131:
132: \end{abstract}
133:
134: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
135: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
136: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
137: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
138:
139: \keywords{ISM: abundances --- ISM: individual (Cygnus Loop) --- supernova
140: remnants --- X-rays: ISM }
141:
142: \section{Introduction}
143:
144: The Cygnus Loop is one of the nearest (540 pc: Blair et al.\ 2005)
145: supernova remnants (SNRs). The angular dimensions are
146: $2^\circ.8\times3^\circ.5$ (Leahy et al.\ 1997) and the age is
147: considered to be $\sim$10000 yrs. The low column density of the
148: foreground material makes it an ideal target to study UV and soft
149: X-ray emission from the remnant.
150: The X-ray boundary in the northeastern (NE) rim of the Cygnus Loop is
151: associated with Balmer-dominated filaments which mark current
152: locations of the blast wave (Chevalier 1978). Balmer-dominated
153: filaments in this region have been well studied by optical as well as UV
154: observations (e.g., Raymond et al.\ 1983; Sankrit et al.\ 2000;
155: Ghavamian et al.\ 2001). Hester et al.\ (1994) studied a
156: Balmer-dominated filament in detail and reported that it was recently
157: (in past 1000 yrs) decelerated from $\sim$400 km\,sec$^{-1}$ to
158: $\sim$180 km\,sec$^{-1}$. The rapid deceleration of the shock
159: velocity was considered to be a result of the blast wave hitting the
160: wall of a cavity which
161: surrounded the supernova precursor. The cavity wall/blast wave
162: interaction was also suggested by X-ray observations. For example,
163: Levenson et al.\ (1999) revealed that a soft spatially thin ($<5'$) shell
164: surrounded almost the entire rim of the Loop based on a {\it ROSAT} PSPC
165: hardness map. They concluded that the soft shell occurred where the
166: cavity wall decelerated the blast wave.
167:
168: {\it ASCA} observations of the NE rim of the
169: Cygnus Loop revealed low abundances relative to the solar values by a
170: factor of $\sim$5 (Miyata \& Tsunemi 1999). A follow-up {\it Suzaku}
171: observation of the region confirmed the depleted abundances there
172: (Miyata et al.\ 2007). {\it Chandra} observation of the southwestern
173: rim of the Cygnus Loop revealed that oxygen abundance there is also
174: depleted by the same factor as that observed in the NE rim (Leahy
175: 2004). The low abundances were considered to be a common feature in
176: the rim of the Cygnus Loop. However, recent {\it Suzaku} observations
177: of the northern outermost region in NE rim of the Cygnus Loop revealed
178: enhanced abundances: a white dashed polygon in Fig.~\ref{fig:HRI
179: image} showed high metal abundances relative to those in the other
180: region: C$\sim$0.7, N$\sim$0.7, O$\sim$0.4, Ne$\sim$0.6, Mg$\sim$0.3,
181: and Fe$\sim$0.3 times the solar values (Katsuda et al.\ 2008).
182: Neither a circumstellar medium, fragments of ejecta, nor abundance
183: inhomogeneities of the local interstellar medium around the Cygnus
184: Loop can explain the relatively enhanced abundance in the region.
185: The origin of the abundance inhomogeneity in the NE rim remained as an
186: open question.
187:
188: Here, we present results from {\it Chandra} observations of the NE rim
189: of the Cygnus Loop. Utilizing the high spatial resolving power
190: of {\it Chandra}, we reveal detailed spatial distributions of metal
191: abundances, emission measure, and thermodynamic parameters from our
192: spatially resolved spectral analysis. In this paper, we attempt to
193: reveal the origin of the abundance enhancements in the northern
194: outermost region of the NE rim as well as to understand the cause of
195: the abundance depletion in the rest of the NE rim.
196:
197: \section{Observations}
198:
199: {\it Chandra} Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer (ACIS) observed the
200: NE rim of the Cygnus Loop in two pointings (PI: Gaetz, T.). The
201: nominal position of one pointing (ObsID.\ 2821), which covers the
202: northern portion of the
203: NE rim, is [(RA,DEC)=(20$^h$54$^m$38$^s$.8,
204: 32$^\circ$16$^\prime$27$^{\prime\prime}$.9) J2000], while that of
205: the other pointing (ObsID.\ 2822), which covers the southern portion of
206: the NE rim, is [(RA,DEC)=(20$^h$56$^m$10$^s$.6,
207: 31$^\circ$55$^\prime$19$^{\prime\prime}$.3) J2000]. The observation
208: dates are 2001 December 24 and 16 for ObsID.\ 2821 and 2822,
209: respectively. The total fields of view (FOV) of twelve CCDs for the two
210: pointings are shown as white boxes in Fig.~\ref{fig:HRI image}.
211: We start our analysis from level 2 event files processed with
212: calibration data files in CALDB ver.\ 3.3.0. We exclude the
213: high-background periods for data from ObsID.\ 2821. On the other
214: hand, there seems no significant background flares for the data from
215: ObsID.\ 2822 so that we reject no data from the level 2 event file for
216: our analysis. The resulting net exposure times for ObsID.\ 2821 and
217: 2822 are 35\,ks and 59\,ks, respectively.
218:
219: \section{Spatially Resolved Spectral Analysis}
220:
221: In order to investigate the post-shock plasma structures in detail, we
222: perform spatially resolved spectral analysis for the cleaned {\it
223: Chandra} data. To this end, we concentrate on the data taken
224: by the S3 (Back-illuminated: BI) chip, since its energy resolving
225: power is better than that of another BI (S1) chip, and the numbers
226: of photons detected in BI chips are richer than those in
227: Front-illuminated (FI) chips for the spectra from the Cygnus Loop.
228: Figure~\ref{fig:Chandra image} shows ACIS S3 chip images.
229: We hereafter name the area covered by the S3 chip in ObsID.\ 2821
230: as ``area-1'' (see, Fig.~\ref{fig:Chandra image} {\it upper}),
231: while that covered by the S3 chip in ObsID.\ 2822 as ``area-2''
232: (see, Fig.~\ref{fig:Chandra image} {\it lower}). Area-1
233: includes the abundance-enhanced region, while area-2 is located on the
234: region with ``normal'' abundances in the NE rim of the Cygnus Loop.
235: As indicated by arrows in Fig.~\ref{fig:Chandra image},
236: discontinuities in X-ray intensity can be seen inside the X-ray
237: boundaries in both of the two areas. This fact suggests that the
238: shock structures in these regions can be considered as multiple shocks
239: along the line of sight. We extract spectra from
240: 20$^{\prime\prime}$-spaced (annular for area-1, rectangle for area-2)
241: regions inside the discontinuities of X-ray intensity (from Reg-1 to
242: Reg-26/19 for area-1/2). We arrange the regions such that each
243: region overlaps with each other by half of its size. Outside the
244: discontinuities, X-ray surface brightness is relatively low so that we
245: extract spectra from only one region to obtain enough photons to
246: perform spectral analysis in good statistics. The region is named as
247: Reg-0. We show all the spectral extraction regions in
248: Fig.~\ref{fig:Chandra image}.
249:
250: We subtract background emission from a source free (i.e., outside
251: the X-ray boundary of the Cygnus Loop) region in the same chip for
252: area-1 (see, Fig.~\ref{fig:Chandra image} {\it upper}). On the other
253: hand, it is quite difficult to subtract background emission from the
254: same chip for area-2, since the X-ray emission from the Cygnus Loop is
255: extended in almost the entire FOV of the chip (see, Fig.~\ref{fig:Chandra
256: image} {\it lower}). We thus subtract background emission from a
257: source free region in the S1 chip of the same observation, after we
258: investigate that the spectral shape and count rate in the energy band
259: of 3--5\,keV, where the emission from the Cygnus Loop is negligible,
260: are similar between the S1 and S3 chip. We should note that the
261: background-subtraction method was successfully performed by Miyata et
262: al.\ (2001). We use data in the energy range of 0.5--2.0\,keV for our
263: spectral analysis.
264:
265: We apply an absorbed non-equilibrium ionization (NEI) model with a
266: single temperature (the {\tt wabs}; Morrison \& McCammon (1983) and
267: the {\tt vpshock} model (NEI version 2.0); e.g., Borkowski et al.\
268: (2001) in XSPEC v\,12.3.1). Free parameters are electron temperature,
269: $kT_\mathrm{e}$; ionization timescale, $\tau$; emission measure, EM
270: (EM $=\int n_\mathrm{e}n_\mathrm{H} dl$, where $n_\mathrm{e}$ and
271: $n_\mathrm{H}$ are number densities of electrons and protons,
272: respectively and $l$ is the plasma depth); abundances of C, N, O, Ne,
273: Mg, Si, and Fe. Above, $\tau$ is the electron density times the elapsed
274: time after shock heating and the {\tt vpshock} model assumes a range of
275: $\tau$ from zero up to a fitted maximum value. Based on previous
276: {\it Suzaku} observations of these regions (Katsuda et al.\ 2008),
277: we here fix the values of $N_\mathrm{H}$ and abundance of S to be 0.02
278: $\times10^{22}$\,cm$^{-2}$ and 0.2 times the solar value, respectively.
279: We also set abundance ratios of C/O and N/O to be 2 and 1.4 times the
280: solar values which are mean values measured in the NE rim of the Cygnus Loop
281: [calculated from Table~2 in Katsuda et al.\ (2008)], because emission
282: lines from C and N are not visible in our data. We set
283: abundances of Ni equal to that of Fe. Abundances of other elements
284: included in the {\tt vpshock} model (i.e., Ar and Ca) are fixed to the
285: solar values (Anders \& Grevesse 1989). In this way, we fit all the
286: spectra by the one-component {\tt vpshock} model. We then find apparent
287: discrepancies between our data and the best-fit model in the energy
288: band around 0.73\,keV. Around this energy band, the dominant
289: emission comes from either Fe-L shell lines or K-shell lines from O
290: {\scshape VII} and O {\scshape VIII}. However, the poorly
291: known atomic physics of Fe-L shell lines and missing O-K shell
292: lines in the model employed are reported by Warren \& Hughes (2004) and
293: Yamaguchi et al.\ (2008), respectively. We thus introduce systematic
294: error of 5\% on the model in quadrature, following as Warren \& Hughes
295: (2004) did. This model give us fairly good fits for all the spectra
296: (reduced $\chi^2$ ranges from 0.8 to 1.4). Figure~\ref{fig:ex_spec}
297: shows the example spectra in Reg-3 from both area-1 and area-2. The
298: spectra are remarkably different; emission lines are stronger
299: for the spectrum in area-1 than those for the one in area-2. The
300: best-fit parameters and fit statistics for the two example spectra are
301: summarized in Table~\ref{tab:param}.
302:
303: Figure~\ref{fig:param_dist} shows abundances of O, Ne, Mg, and Fe,
304: \kTe, log($\tau$), EM as a function of region number.
305: Data points with open circles are from area-1, while those with open
306: triangles are from area-2. In area-2, abundances are constant at O$\sim$0.1,
307: Ne$\sim$0.2, Mg$\sim$0.15, and Fe$\sim$0.2, while in area-1 they
308: increase toward the outer region of the Loop. They start to increase
309: from around Reg-10 ($\sim$200$^{\prime\prime}$ behind the shock
310: front) to the outer regions. Inside Reg-10, the values of
311: abundances are the same level as those in area-1, while they become up
312: to the solar values or even higher than the solar values in the
313: outermost three regions. The electron temperature is almost constant
314: at $\sim$0.2\,keV in area-2, while it gradually increases from inner
315: regions (0.25\,keV) toward outer regions (0.35\,keV) in area-1. These
316: values are similar to those of the hot component among the two
317: components revealed by {\it Suzaku} data (Miyata et al.\ 2007).
318: The ionization states for the abundance-enhanced region show NEI conditions
319: that are consistent with the previous results from {\it Suzaku}. On
320: the other hand, we find that the other regions show almost collisional
321: ionization equilibrium (CIE) conditions. In contrast
322: to the electron temperature and abundances, the ionization timescale
323: as well as the EM gradually decreases toward the outer regions in area-1.
324:
325: We can see apparent correlations between abundances and thermodynamic
326: parameters (i.e., \kTe~and $\tau$). Therefore, we investigate
327: whether the abundance enhancements in the outermost
328: ($\sim$200$^{\prime\prime}$-thickness) region in area-1 are significant or
329: not, by generating confidence contours between O abundance and the
330: thermodynamic parameters. Figure~\ref{fig:conf_cont} shows the
331: confidence contours of O abundance against \kTe~and $\tau$ for Reg-3
332: in area-1 (abundance-enhanced region) and Reg-3 in area-2 (the region
333: with ``normal'' abundances). We confirm that O abundance for the
334: abundance-enhanced region is significantly higher than that in the
335: region with ``normal'' abundances. We thus conclude that the metal
336: abundances in the northern outermost region
337: ($\sim$200$^{\prime\prime}$-thickness regions behind the shock front)
338: of the NE rim are significantly enhanced relative to those in the rest
339: of the NE rim.
340:
341: The analyses above are all concentrated in data taken by the S3 chip.
342: For the sake of consistency, we analyze data from adjacent FI chips.
343: We extract spectra from two regions which are located in
344: the northernmost chips of ObsID.\ 2821 and 2822, respectively.
345: These regions are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:HRI image} as white ellipses.
346: Subtracting the background emission from the same chips, we apply the same
347: {\tt vpshock} model used before. The two spectra with their best-fit
348: models are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:ex_spec}. The apparent difference
349: between the two spectra is the intensity of line emission, as seen in the
350: two example spectra from the S3 chip in each observation (see,
351: Fig.~\ref{fig:ex_spec} {\it upper left} and {\it upper right}). The
352: best-fit parameters and fit statistics are summarized in
353: Table.~\ref{tab:param}. Both absolute and relative abundances for the
354: northern ellipse are almost consistent with those outside Reg-10 in
355: area-1 (i.e., abundance-enhanced region), whereas those in the
356: southern ellipse are consistent with those in area-2 (i.e., the region
357: with ``normal'' abundances). Therefore, we confirm that the
358: abundances derived are independent on ACIS chips.
359:
360:
361: \section{Discussion}
362:
363: \subsection{Possible Origin of the Plasma in the Abundance-Enhanced Region}
364:
365: We confirm the enhanced abundances in the northern outermost region in
366: the NE rim of the Cygnus Loop and reveal that the
367: abundance-enhanced region is confined in a
368: $\sim$200$^{\prime\prime}$-thickness region behind the shock front.
369: The abundances derived here are higher than those derived by {\it
370: Suzaku} by factor of $\sim$2.
371: The width, $\sim$200$^{\prime\prime}$, of the abundance-enhanced region is
372: comparable to the half-power diameter, $\sim$120$^{\prime\prime}$, of
373: the {\it Suzaku} X-ray telescope (Serlemitsos et al.\ 2007) so that
374: significant amount of emission from the plasma with ``normal''
375: abundances should have contaminated in the abundance-enhanced region
376: for the {\it Suzaku} data. The superior spatial resolution of the
377: {\it Chandra} XRT allows us to accurately determine the metal
378: abundances in the abundance-enhanced region as well as to reveal the
379: detailed plasma structures there.
380:
381: Are the abundance enhancements caused by metal-rich ejecta such as
382: fragments of ejecta in the vicinity of the Vela SNR (i.e., Vela
383: shrapnels; Aschenbach et al.\ 1995)? In the Vela shrapnels A and D,
384: anomalous abundance ratios between heavy elements are observed:
385: Si/O$\sim$10 times the solar value in the Vela shrapnel A (Katsuda \&
386: Tsunemi 2005), Ne/Fe$\sim$10 times the solar value in the Vela
387: shrapnel D (Katsuda \& Tsunemi 2006). On the contrary, we measure
388: abundance ratios among metals in the abundance-enhanced region of the
389: NE rim of the Cygnus Loop to be consistent with the solar values
390: within a factor of $\sim$2. Furthermore, the feature that the EM in the
391: abundance-enhanced region gradually decreases toward the shock front
392: is in contrast with those observed in the Vela shrapnels A and D.
393: These facts lead us to consider that the origin of the abundance
394: enhancements in the NE rim is not likely due to fragments of ejecta.
395: Therefore, a natural explanation of the abundance enhancements is the
396: interstellar medium (ISM) origin, since the abundances are roughly
397: consistent with the solar values.
398:
399: We should note that the electron temperature in the abundance-enhanced
400: region tends to increase toward the shock front. This feature
401: resembles those in the Vela shrapnels A and D, rather than that
402: expected in Sedov phase SNRs where we expect to see temperature
403: decrease toward the shock front as seen in the other NE rim of the
404: Cygnus Loop found in previous observations (e.g., Miyata et al.\ 1994;
405: Katsuda \& Tsunemi 2008).
406:
407: \subsection{Non-Thermal Emission?}
408:
409: What causes such depleted (typically $\sim$0.2 times the solar value)
410: abundances observed in the rest of the NE rim? One possibility is
411: resonance scattering which can affect our abundance estimation.
412: Raymond et al.\ (2003) studied effects of resonance scattering of O
413: {\scshape VI} photons in the NE rim of the Cygnus Loop, by using FUV
414: observations. They concluded that resonance scattering affected O
415: {\scshape VI} intensities by a factor of 2 level. More recently,
416: Miyata et al.\ (2008) also investigated the resonance-scattering
417: effect by their {\it Suzaku} data covering the NE rim of the
418: Cygnus Loop. In their analysis, the abundances derived were all
419: depleted to typically 0.23 times the solar values with exception of
420: O; O is depleted by an additional factor of two, which is well
421: consistent with the results obtained here by {\it Chandra}. Miyata
422: et al.\ (2008) concluded that about a factor of 2 depletion for only
423: O abundance can be attributed to resonance scattering, while it is
424: not sufficient to account for the abundance depletion observed.
425: The other possibility is dust
426: sputtering (Spitzer \& Jenkins 1976). However, this mechanism is also
427: ruled out due to the fact that even Ne is measured to be depleted to
428: the solar values; Ne is a rare gas so that there is no observational
429: evidence of Ne depletion. These facts require the other mechanisms for
430: the origin of the abundance depletion.
431:
432: We here consider effects of non-thermal emission. If the spectra are
433: contaminated by non-thermal emission, we should have overestimated
434: thermal continuum emission in our spectral modeling in which we attempt to
435: reproduce spectra by only thermal emission. This will result in
436: underestimation of metal abundances. We thus
437: investigate whether the spectra require non-thermal emission or not.
438: First, we introduce a {\tt power-law} model in addition to the {\tt
439: vpshock} model for the spectral modeling. In this fitting procedure,
440: we fix O abundance to the solar value, since absolute abundances
441: (i.e., relative to H) are not constrained due to difficulty in
442: dividing continuum emission into two (i.e., thermal and non-thermal)
443: components. Free parameters are photon index and normalization of the
444: {\tt power-law} component and electron temperature, ionization timescale,
445: EM, and abundances of Ne, Mg, Si, and Fe(=Ni) in the {\tt vpshock}
446: component. Abundances of other elements are fixed to the solar values
447: (Anders \& Grevesse 1989). In this way, we re-fit all the spectra by
448: this model. From statistical point of view alone, this model
449: significantly improves the fits for some spectra. As an example, we
450: show the spectrum from Reg-3 in area-1 with the best-fit model in
451: Fig.~\ref{fig:ex_spec2}. The best-fit parameters are summarized in
452: Table~\ref{tab:param}. The improvements of this {\tt
453: power-law}$+${\tt vpshock} model compared with the previous {\tt
454: vpshock} model (see, Fig.~\ref{fig:ex_spec} {\it right}) mainly
455: comes from the energy band around 0.73\,keV. Since the uncertainty of
456: the plasma code is reported in this energy range, we should carefully
457: judge whether the {\tt power-law} component is really required or not.
458:
459: In this context, we evaluate multi-wavelength emission. For this
460: purpose, instead of the {\tt power-law} model, we employ the {\tt
461: srcut} model, which describes synchrotron radiation from an
462: exponentially cut off power-law distribution of electrons in a
463: homogeneous magnetic field (Reynolds \& Keohane 1999). In this model,
464: we fix radio spectral index to 0.42 (Uyaniker et al.\ 2004), while rolloff
465: frequency and flux at 1 GHz are left as free parameters. The other
466: parameters are treated as the same in the previous {\tt
467: power-law}$+${\tt vpshock} model fitting. The
468: best-fit parameters are summarized in Table~\ref{tab:param}. We find
469: that the derived best-fit value of the flux at 1 GHz obtained in the
470: example spectrum (which is extracted from a small portion of the
471: remnant), 1400 Jy, is about an order of magnitude higher than that
472: estimated in the entire remnant of about 170 Jy (Uyaniker et al.\
473: 2004). Therefore, the derived flux of non-thermal emission in the
474: example spectrum seems to be unreasonably high. However, we can not
475: conclude whether or not non-thermal emission is significant in the NE
476: rim of the Cygnus Loop, without radio data for the region which exactly
477: corresponds to our spectral extraction region, as well as a more
478: sophisticated model for non-thermal emission.
479:
480: \subsection{Speculation on the Origin of the Abundance Inhomogeneity
481: in the Rim of the Cygnus Loop}
482:
483: It is believed that the Cygnus Loop is a result from a core-collapse
484: SN (e.g., Miyata et al.\ 1998) which exploded in a pre-existing cavity
485: (e.g., McCray et al.\ 1979). There are a number of evidence that the
486: blast wave is recently encountered into a rigid wall of the cavity;
487: the NE rim (Hester et al.\ 1994; Miyata \& Tsunemi 1999), the
488: southeast rim (Graham et al.\ 1995; Miyata \& Tsunemi 2001), the
489: eastern rim (Levenson et al.\ 1996), and the western rim (Levenson et
490: al.\ 2002). According to previous X-ray observations, deficient metal
491: abundances are commonly reported in these regions; metal abundances
492: are typically $\sim$0.2 times the solar values in the NE rim (e.g.,
493: Miyata \& Tsunemi 1999; this work), O group abundance is $\sim$0.2
494: times the solar value in the western rim (Leahy 2004). In these
495: regions, the X-ray--emitting plasma should be the shock heated gas
496: originating from either the cavity wall or
497: swept-up matter in the cavity. Although the reason of the depletion
498: still remains as an open question, these plasma seem to show depleted
499: abundances.
500:
501: Meanwhile, there is an apparent break of the cavity wall
502: that is seen as the south blowout region (see, e.g., figures in
503: Aschenbach \& Leahy 1999). The wall of the cavity there is considered
504: to be so thin (or negligible) that the blast wave already overran the
505: wall, although Uyaniker et al.\ (2002) proposed another possibility,
506: i.e., a different SNR interacting with the Cygnus Loop, for the south
507: blowout region. The similar structure is expected at the circular
508: shell in the northwest of the Cygnus Loop along the line of sight
509: (Tsunemi et al.\ 2007). Looking at the NE rim of the Loop, we see
510: somewhat large expansion of the X-ray boundary at
511: the abundance-enhanced region (see, Fig.~\ref{fig:HRI image}).
512: Therefore, we presume that the blast wave here also overran the cavity
513: wall and now is proceeding into the surrounding ISM with about solar
514: metallicity, resulting in relatively enhanced abundances there. In
515: this context, we predict that abundances show about solar values
516: around the X-ray boundaries where cavity wall seems to be broken.
517: This will be checked by future X-ray observations.
518:
519: \section{Conclusion}
520:
521: We analyzed archival {\it Chandra} data of the Cygnus Loop NE rim
522: where abundance inhomogeneities were found by recent
523: {\it Suzaku} observations (Katsuda et al.\ 2008). Thanks to the
524: superior spatial resolving power of {\it Chandra}, we were able to
525: carry out detailed spatially resolved spectral analyses for the region.
526: We revealed that the abundance-enhanced region was concentrated
527: in a $\sim$200$^{\prime\prime}$-thickness region behind the shock
528: front and confirmed that the values of abundances were consistent with
529: the solar values by a factor of $\sim$2. Also, we found that the emission
530: measure decreased toward the shock front. These features showed stark
531: contrast with those seen in the Vela shrapnels, indicating that the
532: abundance enhancements in the NE rim of the Cygnus Loop were not
533: likely due to fragments of ejecta. We suggested that the plasma in
534: the abundance-enhanced region originated from the ISM, whereas the
535: plasma in the rest of the NE rim (i.e., abundance-depleted region)
536: originated from the cavity wall or the gas in the cavity.
537:
538: \acknowledgments
539:
540: This work is partly supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific
541: Research by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and
542: Technology (16002004). This study is also carried out as part of
543: the 21st Century COE Program, \lq{\it Towards a new basic science:
544: depth and synthesis}\rq. S.K.\ is supported by JSPS Research Fellowship
545: for Young Scientists.
546:
547:
548: %\end{document}
549: \newpage
550:
551: \begin{thebibliography}{}
552:
553: \bibitem[Anders \& Grevesse 1989]{Anders1989}
554: Anders, E., \& Grevesse, N. 1989, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 53, 197
555: \bibitem[Aschenbach et al.\ 1995]{Aschenbach1995}
556: Aschenbach, B., Egger, R., \& Trumper, J. 1995, Nature, 373, 587
557: \bibitem[Aschenbach \& Leahy 1999]{Aschenbach1999}
558: Aschenbach, B. \& Leahy, D. A. 1999, A\&A, 341, 602
559: \bibitem[Blair et al.\ 2005]{Blair2005}
560: Blair, W. P., Sankrit, R., \& Raymond, J. C., 2005, AJ, 129, 2268
561: \bibitem[Borkowski et al.\ 2001]{borkowski01}
562: Borkowski, K. J., Lyerly, W. J., \& Reynolds, S. P. 2001, ApJ,
563: 548, 820
564: \bibitem[Chevalier \& Raymond 1978]{Chevalier1978}
565: Chevalier, R. \& Raymond, J. C. 1978, ApJ, 225, 27
566: \bibitem[Ghavamian et al.\ 2001]{Ghavamian2001}
567: Ghavamian, P., Raymond, John., Smith, R. C., \& Hartigan,
568: P. 2001, ApJ, 547, L995
569: \bibitem[Graham et al.\ 1995]{Graham1995}
570: Graham, J. R., Levenson, N. A., Hester, J. J., Raymond, J. C.,
571: \& Petre, R. 1995, ApJ, 444, 787
572: \bibitem[Hester et al.\ 1994]{Hester1994}
573: Hester, J. J., Raymond, J. C., \& Blair, W. P. 1994, ApJ,
574: 420, 721
575: %\bibitem[Inoue et al.\ 1980]{Inoue1980}
576: % Inoue, H., Koyama, K., Matsuoka, M., Ohashi, T., Tanaka, Y.,
577: % Tsunemi, H. 1980, ApJ, 238, 886
578: %\bibitem[Kahn et al.\ 1980]{Kahn1980}
579: % Kahn, S. M., Charles, P. A., Bowyer, S., Blissett, R. J. 1980,
580: % ApJ, 242, L19
581: \bibitem[Katsuda(2005)]{Katsuda2005}
582: Katsuda, S., \& Tsunemi, H. 2005, PASJ, 57, 620
583: \bibitem[Katsuda(2006)]{Katsuda2006}
584: Katsuda, S., \& Tsunemi, H. 2006, ApJ, 642, 917
585: \bibitem[Katsuda et al.\ 2008]{Katsuda2008}
586: Katsuda, S., Tsunemi, H., Uchida, H., Miyata, E., Nemes, N.,
587: Miller, E. D., Mori, K., \& Hughes, J. P. 2008, PASJ in press
588: \bibitem[Katsuda \& Tsunemi 2008]{Katsuda2008}
589: Katsuda, S. \& Tsunemi, H. 2008, Adv. Space Res., 41, 383
590: %\bibitem[Ku et al.\ 1984]{Ku1984}
591: % Ku, W. H.-M., Kahn, S. M., Pisarski, R., Long, K. S. 1984, ApJ,
592: % 278, 615
593: \bibitem[Levenson et al.\ 1996]{Levenson1996}
594: Levenson, N. A., Graham, J. R., \& R. Petre 1996, ApJ, 468,
595: 323
596: %\bibitem[Levenson et al.\ 1998]{levenson98}
597: % Levenson, N. A., Graham, J. R., Keller, L. D., Richter,
598: % M. J. 1998, ApJS, 118, 541
599: \bibitem[Leahy et al.\ 1997]{Leahy1997}
600: Leahy, D., Roger, R., \& Ballantyne, D. 1997, AJ, 114, 2081
601: \bibitem[Leahy 2004]{Leahy2004}
602: Leahy, D. A. 2004, MNRAS, 351, 385
603: \bibitem[Levenson et al.\ 1996]{Levenson1996}
604: Levenson, N. A., Graham, J. R., Hester, J. J., \& Petre, R. 1996, ApJ,
605: 468, 323
606: \bibitem[Levenson et al.\ 1999]{Levenson1999}
607: Levenson, N. A., Graham, J. R., \& Snowden, S. L. 1999, ApJ,
608: 526, 874
609: \bibitem[Levenson et al.\ 2002]{Levenson2002}
610: Levenson, N. A., Graham, J. R., \& Walters, J. L. 2002, ApJ,
611: 576, 798
612: \bibitem[McCray \& Snow 1979]{mccray79}
613: McCray, R. \& Snow, T. P., Jr. 1979, ARA\&A, 17, 213.
614: %\bibitem[Mitsuda et al.\ 2007]{Mitsuda2007}
615: % Mitsuda, K. et al., 2007, PASJ, {\bf 59S}, 1.
616: \bibitem[Miyata et al.\ 1994]{Miyata1994}
617: Miyata, E., Tsunemi, H., Pisarki, R., and Kissel, S. E. 1994,
618: PASJ, 46, L101
619: \bibitem[Miyata et al.\ 1998]{Miyata1998}
620: Miyata, E., Tsunemi, H., Kohmura, T., Suzuki, S., and Kumagai,
621: S. 1998, PASJ, 50, 257
622: \bibitem[Miyata \& Tsunemi 1999]{Miyata1999}
623: Miyata, E., \& Tsunemi, H. 1999, ApJ, 525, 305
624: \bibitem[Miyata et al.\ 2001]{Miyata2001a}
625: Miyata, E., Tsunemi, H., Aschenbach, B., \& Mori, K. 2001,
626: ApJ, 559, L45
627: \bibitem[Miyata \& Tsunemi 2001]{Miyata2001b}
628: Miyata, E., \& Tsunemi, H. 2001, ApJ, 552, 624
629: \bibitem[Miyata et al.\ 2007]{Miyata2007}
630: Miyata, E., Katsuda, S., Tsunemi, H., Hughes, J. P., Kokubun,
631: M., \& Porter, F. S. 2007, PASJ, 59, S163.
632: \bibitem[Miyata et al.\ 2008]{Miyata2008}
633: Miyata, E., Masai, K., \& Hughes, J. P. 2008, PASJ, in press
634: \bibitem[Morrison \& McCammon 1983]{Morrison1983}
635: Morrison, R. \& McCammon, D. 1983, ApJ, 270, 119
636: %\bibitem[Rakowski 2004]{Rakowski2004}
637: % Rakowski, C. 2004, Adv. Space Res. 35, 1017
638: \bibitem[Raymond et al.\ 1983]{Raymond1983}
639: Raymond, J. C., Blair, W. P., Fesen, R. A., \& Gull, T. R. 1983,
640: ApJ, 275, 636
641: \bibitem[Raymond et al.\ 2003]{Raymond2003}
642: Raymond, J. C., Ghavamian, P., Sankrit, R., Blair, W. P., \&
643: Curiel, S. 2003, ApJ, 584, 770
644: \bibitem[Raynolds \& Keohane 1999]{Raynolds1999}
645: Raynolds, S. P. \& Keohane, J. W. 1999, ApJ, 525, 368
646: \bibitem[Sankrit et al.\ 2000]{Sankrit2000}
647: Sankrit, R., Blair, W. P., Raymond, J. C., \& Long, K. S. 2000,
648: AJ, 120, 1925
649: \bibitem[Serlemitsos et al.\ 2007]{Serlemitsos2007}
650: Serlemitsos, P. J. et al. 2007, PASJ, 59, S9
651: \bibitem[Spitzer \& Jenkins 1976]{Spitzer1976}
652: Spitzer, L., \& Jenkins, E. B. 1976, ARA\&A, 13, 133
653: \bibitem[Tsunemi et al.\ 2007]{Tsunemi2007}
654: Tsunemi, H., Katsuda, S., Nemes, N., \& Miller, E. D. 2007, ApJ,
655: \bibitem[Uyaniker et al.\ 2002]{Uyaniker2002}
656: Uyaniker, B., Reich, W., Yar, A., Kothes, R., \& Furst, E. 2002, A\&A,
657: 389, L61
658: \bibitem[Uyaniker et al.\ 2004]{Uyaniker2004}
659: Uyaniker, B., Reich, W., Yar, A., \& Furst, E. 2004, A\&A,
660: 426, 909
661: \bibitem[Warren \& Hughes (2004)]{Warren2004}
662: Warren, J. S. \& Hughes, J. P. 2004, ApJ, 608, 261
663: \bibitem[Yamaguchi et al.\ (2007)]{Yamaguchi2007}
664: Yamaguchi, H., Koyama, K., Katsuda, S., Nakajima, H., Hughes,
665: J. P., Bamba, A., Hiraga, J. S., Mori, K., Ozaki, M., Tsuru,
666: G. T. 2007, PASJ, in press
667: \bibitem[]{}
668:
669:
670: \end{thebibliography}
671:
672:
673: \begin{deluxetable}{lcc|cccc}
674: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
675: \tablecaption{Spectral-fit parameters for example spectra.}
676: \tablehead{
677: & \colhead{Reg-3 in Area-1}& \colhead{Northern Ellipse}&
678: &\colhead{Reg-3 in Area-2}& & \colhead{Southern Ellipse}
679: }
680: \startdata
681: Model&{\tt vpshock}&{\tt vpshock}&{\tt vpshock}&{\tt power-law}$+${\tt
682: vpshock}&{\tt srcut}$+${\tt vpshock}&{\tt vpshock}\\
683: &&&&\\
684: Photon Index$^a$&\dotfill&\dotfill&\dotfill&7.0$^{+0.9}_{-0.5}$&0.42 (fixed)&\dotfill\\
685: Flux$^b$&\dotfill&\dotfill&\dotfill&3.3$\pm$0.1&1400$^{+5000}_{-1100}$&\dotfill\\
686: $\nu_{\rm rolloff}$
687: ($\times10^{14}$Hz)&\dotfill&\dotfill&\dotfill&\dotfill&2.9$\pm$0.6&\dotfill\\
688: &&&&\\
689: $kT_{\rm e}$ (keV)\dotfill & 0.32$\pm0.04$ & 0.32$^{+0.3}_{-0.4}$& 0.19$\pm0.01$ &0.27$\pm$0.05&0.26$^{+0.05}_{-0.06}$&0.23$\pm0.01$\\
690: log$(\tau /\rm cm^{-3}\,sec)$\dotfill &10.58$^{+0.20}_{-0.16}$&10.90$^{+0.14}_{-0.16}$ &11.8$<$ &11.2$^{+0.4}_{-0.2}$&11.3$^{+0.7}_{-0.2}$&11.5$\pm0.1$\\
691: O\dotfill& 1.4$^{+0.2}_{-0.3}$&0.8$^{+0.2}_{-0.1}$&0.10$\pm0.02$ &1 (fixed)&1 (fixed)&0.11$\pm0.01$\\
692: Ne\dotfill& 2.3$^{+0.7}_{-0.4}$ & 1.3$^{+0.5}_{-0.3}$& 0.19$^{+0.06}_{-0.04}$ &1.6$\pm0.2$&1.7$^{+0.4}_{-0.1}$&0.21$\pm0.03$\\
693: Mg\dotfill & 1.1$^{+0.7}_{-0.5}$ &0.7$^{+0.4}_{-0.2}$ &0.14$^{+0.11}_{-0.07}$ &1.2$\pm0.4$&1.2$\pm0.4$&0.17$^{+0.06}_{-0.05}$\\
694: Si\dotfill&$<$20&$<$0.3& $<$1 &$<$3&$<$3&0.6$\pm0.3$\\
695: Fe(=Ni)\dotfill&1.4$^{+0.7}_{-0.4}$&0.75$^{+0.25}_{-0.19}$&0.23$^{+0.16}_{-0.07}$ &1.2$^{+0.3}_{-0.2}$&1.2$^{+0.4}_{-0.2}$&0.21$^{+0.04}_{-0.03}$\\
696: EM ($\times10^{19}$ cm$^{-5}$)\dotfill& 0.20$^{+0.05}_{-0.03}$&0.37$^{+0.09}_{-0.07}$&6.5$^{+2.9}_{-1.9}$ &0.27$^{+0.15}_{-0.06}$&0.28$^{+0.26}_{-0.08}$&7.0$^{+1.0}_{-0.9}$\\
697: &&&&\\
698: $\chi^2$/d.o.f.\dotfill&56/52 &111/92&60/54 &52/52&50/52&62/70\\
699: \enddata
700: \tablecomments{The best-fit parameters for example spectra in
701: Fig.~\ref{fig:ex_spec} and Fig.~\ref{fig:ex_spec2}.
702: The errors are in the range $\Delta\,\chi^2\,<\,2.7$.
703: Errors for abundances and fluxes in {\tt power-law} and {\tt srcut}
704: models are estimated with the EM fixed at the best-fit
705: value. Errors for the EM are estimated with the O abundance fixed at the
706: best-fit value. $^a$Photon index in the {\tt power-law} model is
707: determined by the X-ray spectrum, while it is determined in a radio
708: spectrum for the {\tt srcut} model. $^b$The units are
709: 10$^{-5}$ photons\,cm$^{-2}$\,sec\,$^{-1}$\,keV$^{-1}$ at 1 keV for
710: the {\tt power-law} model, and Jy at 1 GHz for the {\tt srcut}
711: model. \\
712: }\\
713: \label{tab:param}
714: \end{deluxetable}
715:
716: \begin{figure}
717: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.6]{f1.eps}
718: \caption{Exposure-corrected {\it ROSAT} HRI image of the NE quadrant
719: of the Cygnus Loop. The FOV of {\it Chandra} are overlaid on this
720: image as white solid boxes. A white dashed polygon shows the
721: abundance-enhanced region discovered by {\it Suzaku} (Katsuda et al.\
722: 2008). Two ellispes are the regions where we extract spectra other
723: than S3 chips.}
724: \label{fig:HRI image}
725: \end{figure}
726:
727: \begin{figure}
728: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=0.8]{f2.eps}
729: \caption{{\it Upper}: Exposure and vignetting corrected {\it Chandra}
730: S3 chip image for ObsID.\ 2821. The spectral extraction regions are
731: shown as white annuli. Several point sources indicated by white
732: circles are excluded from our spectral analysis. An arrow seen in the
733: upper right indicates the position of the discontinuity of the X-ray
734: intensity. {\it Lower}: Same as Fig.~\ref{fig:Chandra image} {\it upper}
735: but for ObsID.\ 2822.}
736: \label{fig:Chandra image}
737: \end{figure}
738:
739: \begin{figure}
740: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.6]{f3.eps}
741: \caption{Example spectra (crosses) with the best-fit model
742: (solid lines). Lower panel shows the residuals. {\it Upper left},
743: {\it upper right}, {\it lower left}, and {\it lower right} spectra
744: are from Reg-3 in Area-1, Reg-3 in Area-2, the northern ellispe in
745: Fig.~\ref{fig:HRI image}, and the southern ellispe in
746: Fig.~\ref{fig:HRI image}, respectively.}
747: \label{fig:ex_spec}
748: \end{figure}
749:
750: \begin{figure}
751: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.7]{f4.eps}
752: \caption{Abundance, \kTe, $\tau$, and EM as a
753: function of region number. Open circles represent data points from
754: area-1, while open triangles represent those from area-2.
755: }
756: \label{fig:param_dist}
757: \end{figure}
758:
759: \begin{figure}
760: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.65]{f5.eps}
761: \caption{Confidence contour maps of O abundance against \kTe~or
762: $\tau$. Upper panels are those for Reg-3 in area-1, while lower
763: panels are those for Reg-3 in area-2. Solid, dashed, and dotted
764: lines represent 68\%, 90\%, and 99\% confidence levels,
765: respectively.}
766: \label{fig:conf_cont}
767: \end{figure}
768:
769: \begin{figure}
770: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.65]{f6.eps}
771: \caption{Same as Fig.~\ref{fig:ex_spec} {\it Left} but with the
772: best-fit {\tt power-law}$+${\tt vpshock} model. The two
773: components are separately shown as dotted lines.
774: }
775: \label{fig:ex_spec2}
776: \end{figure}
777:
778:
779: \end{document}
780:
781: