1: \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
2: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3: \shorttitle{Radio Image of the R CrA Region}
4: \shortauthors{Choi et al.}
5:
6: % For preprint only
7: \usepackage{times}
8: \frenchspacing
9:
10: % Custom macros
11: \newcommand{\Jypb}{{Jy beam$^{-1}$}}
12: \usepackage{epsfig}
13: \newcommand{\ploteps}[2]{\centerline{\ifdim#2=0mm\epsfig{file=#1}%
14: \else\epsfig{file=#1,width=#2}\fi}}
15: \newcounter{panel}[figure]
16: \renewcommand{\thepanel}
17: {{\count20=1\advance\count20by\value{figure}%
18: \stepcounter{panel}\small%
19: \sc Fig. \the\count20\it\alph{panel}}}
20: \newcommand{\plotpanel}[3]
21: {\vbox{\hsize=#2\epsfig{file=#1,width=#2}
22: \ifnum#3=1\makebox[\hsize]{\thepanel}\fi}}
23: %%% parameters for floats
24: \renewcommand{\floatpagefraction}{0.8}
25: \renewcommand{\dblfloatpagefraction}{0.8}
26: \renewcommand{\topfraction}{0.9}
27: \renewcommand{\dbltopfraction}{0.9}
28: \renewcommand{\bottomfraction}{0.9}
29: \renewcommand{\textfraction}{0.1}
30: \setcounter{topnumber}{4}
31: \setcounter{dbltopnumber}{2}
32: \setcounter{bottomnumber}{4}
33: \setcounter{totalnumber}{6}
34:
35: \slugcomment{To appear in the Astrophysical Journal}
36:
37: \begin{document}
38: \fontsize{10}{10.6}\selectfont
39: \title{Centimeter Imaging of the R Coronae Australis Region}
40: \author{\sc Minho Choi\altaffilmark{1}, Kenji Hamaguchi\altaffilmark{2,3},
41: Jeong-Eun Lee\altaffilmark{4},
42: and Ken'ichi Tatematsu\altaffilmark{5}}
43: \altaffiltext{1}{International Center for Astrophysics,
44: Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute,
45: Hwaam 61-1, Yuseong, Daejeon 305-348, South Korea;
46: minho@kasi.re.kr.}
47: \altaffiltext{2}{CRESST and X-ray Astrophysics Laboratory NASA/GSFC,
48: Greenbelt, MD 20771.}
49: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Physics, University of Maryland,
50: Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD 21250.}
51: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Astronomy and Space Science,
52: Astrophysical Research Center
53: for the Structure and Evolution of the Cosmos,
54: Sejong University, Gunja 98, Gwangjin,
55: Seoul 143-747, South Korea.}
56: \altaffiltext{5}{National Astronomical Observatory of Japan,
57: 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan.}
58: \setcounter{footnote}{5}
59:
60: \begin{abstract}
61: \fontsize{10}{10.6}\selectfont
62: The R CrA region was observed in the 3.5 and 6.2 cm continuum
63: with high angular resolutions (0.6--1.7 arcseconds)
64: using the Very Large Array.
65: Archival data sets were also analyzed for comparison,
66: which provided angular resolutions up to 0.3 arcseconds.
67: A cluster of young stellar objects was detected,
68: and a rich array of star forming activities was revealed.
69: IRS 7A showed an enhanced outflow activity recently.
70: The main peak of IRS 7A positionally coincides with an X-ray source,
71: which suggests that the X-ray emission
72: is directly related to the central protostar.
73: The Class 0 source SMA 2 is
74: associated with a double radio source, B 9a and 9b,
75: and seems to be driving two outflows.
76: The B 9 complex is probably a multiple-protostar system.
77: Both B 9a and 9b are nonthermal radio sources
78: with negative spectral indices.
79: IRS 7B is a compact radio source surrounded by an extended structure.
80: The compact source corresponds to the Class 0/I source SMA 1,
81: and it is also closely associated with an X-ray source,
82: suggesting that magnetic activities start early
83: in the protostellar stage of evolution.
84: The extended structure of IRS 7B may be a bipolar outflow.
85: IRS 5 was resolved into two sources with a separation of 0.9 arcseconds.
86: Both IRS 5a and 5b display radio flares and X-ray emission,
87: suggesting that energetic magnetic processes are active in both members.
88: The month-scale active phase of IRS 5b implies
89: that the flare activity must involve large-scale magnetic fields.
90: During the strong flare event of IRS 5b in 1998,
91: IRS 5a also showed an enhanced level of radio emission.
92: This concurrent activity suggests
93: that IRS 5 may be an interacting young binary system,
94: but the interaction mechanism is unknown.
95: Alternatively, what was seen in the radio images
96: could be a circumbinary halo.
97: The variable radio source B 5 was found to be a nonthermal source at times,
98: and the size of the 6.2 cm source is about 1 arcsecond,
99: suggesting that B 5 is a Galactic object.
100: A radio outburst of IRS 6 was detected once,
101: and the radio/X-ray source was identified as IRS 6a.
102: The other member of the IRS 6 system, IRS 6b, was undetected in X-rays,
103: suggesting that only IRS 6a has detectable magnetic activities.
104: Properties of other radio sources, IRS 1, IRS 2, and R CrA, are discussed,
105: and the radio detections of T CrA and WMB 55 are reported.
106: The proper motion of R CrA was marginally detected.
107: Also presented is the classification of infrared sources
108: in the R CrA region based on an infrared color-color diagram.
109: \end{abstract}
110:
111: \keywords{binaries: general --- ISM: individual (R Coronae Australis)
112: --- ISM: structure --- radio continuum: ISM
113: --- stars: flare --- stars: formation}
114:
115: \section{INTRODUCTION}
116:
117: The Corona Australis molecular cloud is
118: one of the nearest star-forming regions,
119: and the R CrA region is
120: the most active site of star formation in this cloud
121: (Harju et al. 1993; Chini et al. 2003).
122: The R CrA cloud core contains a cluster of young stellar objects
123: known as the ``Coronet'' cluster
124: (Taylor \& Storey 1984; Wilking et al. 1992, 1997).
125: Deeply embedded protostars and preprotostellar cores were detected
126: in the (sub)millimeter continuum
127: (Henning et al. 1994; Choi \& Tatematsu 2004;
128: Nutter et al. 2005; Groppi et al. 2004, 2007).
129: Star forming activities,
130: such as infall, accretion, molecular outflows,
131: and Herbig-Haro objects,
132: were revealed by millimeter spectroscopic observations and optical imaging
133: (Strom et al. 1974; Hartigan \& Graham 1987; Anderson et al. 1997;
134: Groppi et al. 2004, 2007; Nisini et al. 2005; Wang et al. 2004).
135: Centimeter continuum imaging with interferometers
136: has been especially effective
137: in probing the nature of the deeply embedded objects
138: and determining their precise positions
139: (Brown 1987; Suters et al. 1996; Feigelson et al. 1998;
140: Forbrich et al. 2006; Miettinen et al. 2008).
141: High-energy processes around some of the young stellar objects
142: were discovered in X-ray observations (Koyama et al. 1996;
143: Hamaguchi et al. 2005, 2008; Forbrich et al. 2006, 2007;
144: Forbrich \& Preibisch 2007).
145: The distance to the CrA molecular cloud is $\sim$170 pc
146: (Knude \& H{\o}g 1998).
147:
148: Among the near-IR sources discovered by Taylor \& Storey (1984)
149: in the R CrA cloud core,
150: IRS 7 is the most deeply embedded and probably the youngest object.
151: In the centimeter continuum imaging by Brown (1987),
152: IRS 7 was resolved into three radio sources: IRS 7A, IRS 7B, and B 9.
153: Single-dish observations of submillimeter continuum emission
154: suggested that they are deeply embedded objects (Nutter et al. 2005).
155: Several radio continuum sources were detected around IRS 7A
156: (Choi \& Tatematsu 2004; Forbrich et al. 2006),
157: suggesting that this small region contains a multiple-protostar system.
158: The IRS 7A region is interesting
159: because it appears to contain objects with inhomogeneous spectral classes
160: or in different stages of evolution (Choi \& Tatematsu 2004).
161: While IRS 7A appears to be a Class I protostar
162: as it was detected in near-IR,
163: the other members of the multiple system (CT 3 and B 9)
164: were suggested to be probable Class 0 protostars.
165: Recent interferometric observations in the millimeter continuum confirmed
166: that B 9 (SMA 2) is a Class 0 source
167: while IRS 7A and CT 3 were undetected (Groppi et al. 2007).
168:
169: \input{tab1.tex}
170:
171: IRS 7B attracted attention
172: because it is a rare example of Class 0 protostars showing X-ray emission
173: (Feigelson \& Montmerle 1999; Hamaguchi et al. 2005).
174: Recent interferometric observations in the millimeter continuum suggested
175: that IRS 7B (SMA 1) may be a Class 0/I transitional object
176: (Groppi et al. 2007).
177: Hamaguchi et al. (2005) demonstrated
178: that the X-ray emission from IRS 7B comes from two different components:
179: one hot and variable, and the other cool and constant.
180: The cool component was interpreted as originating from collisional shock
181: of the protostellar jet with circumstellar gas,
182: and such X-ray emission has been found around several Class 0/I protostars,
183: for example, HH 2, L1551 IRS 5, and OMC 3 MMS 2
184: (Pravdo et al. 2001; Favata et al. 2002; Bally et al. 2003;
185: Tsujimoto et al. 2004).
186: The hot variable X-ray emission
187: had not been detected from other Class 0 protostars.
188: This component would be related to the reconnection of magnetic fields
189: around the protostar during mass accretion (e.g., Montmerle et al. 2000).
190: Spatially separating the jet collision region from the central protostar
191: with a high resolution imaging
192: is therefore important in understanding the structure
193: of the protostellar system.
194:
195: IRS 5 is an interesting young binary system.
196: It was spatially resolved in the near-IR and X-ray images
197: (Nisini et al. 2005; Hamaguchi et al. 2008).
198: Both members of the system show quiescent X-ray emission,
199: but flare activities of them were remarkably different:
200: only IRS 5a frequently showed solar type X-ray flares
201: (Hamaguchi et al. 2008).
202: IRS 5 also displays radio outbursts
203: and emits circularly polarized radio emission
204: (Suters et al. 1996; Feigelson et al. 1998;
205: Forbrich et al. 2006; Miettinen et al. 2008).
206: However, the radio properties of each binary member
207: need to be characterized separately to understand the radio activities.
208:
209: The R CrA region also contains other radio sources
210: displaying interesting star-formation activities of their own.
211: IRS 1 and IRS 2 are Class I protostars and variable X-ray sources
212: (Forbrich et al. 2006).
213: IRS 1 is the driving source of the HH 100 outflow (Strom et al. 1974).
214: WMB 55 is a Class I source without an X-ray detection
215: (Wilking et al. 1997; Nutter et al. 2005).
216: IRS 6 is probably an X-ray emitting T Tauri star
217: driving a giant Herbig-Haro flow
218: (Wang et al. 2004; Forbrich et al. 2006).
219: R CrA and T CrA are Herbig Ae/Be stars,
220: and each of them may be a binary system (Takami et al. 2003).
221: B 5 is a radio source of unknown nature, and its flux varies rapidly
222: (Brown 1987; Suters et al. 1996; Feigelson et al. 1998).
223:
224: To obtain high-quality images of the young stellar objects
225: despite the low declination,
226: we observed the R CrA region with the Very Large Array (VLA)
227: using a fast-switching phase calibration technique.
228: In this paper, we present
229: our centimeter continuum observations of the R CrA region.
230: We describe our radio continuum observations in \S~2
231: and archival data in \S~3.
232: In \S~4 we briefly report the results of the continuum imaging.
233: In \S~5 we discuss the star forming activities
234: of the radio sources in the R CrA region.
235: A summary is given in \S~6.
236:
237: \section{OBSERVATIONS}
238:
239: The R CrA IRS 7 region was observed
240: using VLA of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory (NRAO)
241: in the standard $X$-band continuum mode (8.5 GHz or $\lambda$ = 3.5 cm)
242: and in the standard $C$-band continuum mode
243: (4.9 GHz or $\lambda$ = 6.2 cm).
244: Twenty-three antennas were used in the BnA-array configuration
245: on 2005 February 3 for the 3.5 cm observations
246: and on 2005 February 12 for the 6.2 cm observations
247: (Tr 13/14 in Table 1).
248: The phase-tracking center was
249: $\alpha_{2000}$ = 19$^{\rm h}$01$^{\rm m}$55.33s,
250: $\delta_{2000}$ = --36\arcdeg57$'$21.66$''$.
251: The phase was determined
252: by observing the nearby quasar 1924--292 (QSO B1921--293).
253: The target-calibrator cycle was 4 and 5 minutes
254: for the 3.5 and 6.2 cm observations, respectively.
255: In the 3.5 cm observations, the flux was calibrated
256: by setting the flux density of 1924--292 to 13.7 Jy,
257: which is the flux density measured within 16 days of our observations
258: (VLA Calibrator Flux Density Database%
259: \footnote{See http://aips2.nrao.edu/vla/calflux.html.}).
260: To check the flux scale,
261: the quasar 1331+305 (4C 30.26) was observed in the same track.
262: Comparison of the amplitude gave a flux density of 5.30 Jy for 1331+305,
263: which agrees with the value in the VLA Calibrator Flux Density Database
264: to within 3\%.
265: In the 6.2 cm observations, the flux was calibrated
266: by setting the flux density of 1331+305 to 8.25 Jy,
267: which is the flux density measured within 2 days of our observations
268: according to the VLA Calibrator Flux Density Database.
269: Comparison of the amplitude gave a flux density of 13.52 Jy for 1924--292.
270: Because of the short cycle time,
271: the quality of phase calibration was good.
272: We tried a self-calibration,
273: but it did not make a noticeable difference
274: in the quality of resulting images.
275: Therefore, the Tr 13/14 images presented in this paper
276: were made without self-calibration.
277: Maps were made using a CLEAN algorithm.
278:
279: \section{ARCHIVAL DATA}
280:
281: In addition to our data, we also analyzed several VLA data sets
282: retrieved from the NRAO Data Archive System.
283: We searched for 3.5/6.2 cm continuum observations of the R CrA region
284: made in the A-, BnA-, or B-array configuration
285: and found four observing projects in recent years.
286: Including our observations,
287: we present the results of 14 observing runs.
288: A summary of the observing runs is given in Table 1.
289: The archival VLA data were obtained from observations
290: with a typical target-calibrator cycle time of 10--15 minutes.
291: To improve the phase calibration
292: we used the phase-only self-calibration technique
293: (see Forbrich et al. 2006).
294: The Tr 1--12 images presented in this paper were made
295: with the self-calibration applied.
296:
297: \subsection{Project AB 807}
298:
299: The NRAO observing project AB 807 includes a single observing run (Tr 1).
300: The data set contains data from the observations of the R CrA IRS 7 region
301: in the standard $X$-band continuum mode
302: and in the standard $C$-band continuum mode in a single track.
303: Twenty-five antennas were used in the A-array configuration.
304: The phase-tracking center was
305: $\alpha_{1950}$ = 18$^{\rm h}$58$^{\rm m}$33.0s,
306: $\delta_{1950}$ = --37\arcdeg01$'$41.0$''$.
307: The phase calibrators were the quasars QSO B1921--293 and QSO B1933--400,
308: and the flux calibrator was the quasar 3C48.
309: The bootstraped flux densities were
310: 17.4 Jy for QSO B1921--293 and 0.96 Jy for QSO B1933--400 in the $X$-band
311: and
312: 16.2 Jy for QSO B1921--293 and 0.98 Jy for QSO B1933--400 in the $C$-band.
313:
314: \subsection{Project AC 481}
315:
316: The NRAO observing project AC 481 includes two observing runs (Tr 2 and 3).
317: Details of the observations and results
318: were presented by Feigelson et al. (1998).
319: The flux densities of sources in the images produced by us
320: agree well with the values reported by Feigelson et al. (1998).
321: However, the positions of compact sources have an offset
322: compared with those found in the images of the other data sets.
323: The amount of the position offset is
324: 0.1$''$ to the east and 0.4$''$ to the north.
325: A probable cause of this offset is
326: that the phase calibrator used in the project AC 481 was 1744--312.
327: In the other projects
328: the phase calibrator was 1924--292, as in our observations.
329: The position accuracy of 1744--312 is worse than that of 1924--292:
330: 1744-312 is a code-C calibrator while 1924--292 is a code-A calibrator.
331: The angular distance from the target source is also larger:
332: 17.5\arcdeg\ for 1744--312 and 9.2\arcdeg\ for 1924--292.
333: Therefore, we conclude that the astrometry of the AC 481 images
334: is less reliable than that of the other images.
335: In all the figures presented in this paper,
336: a position correction was applied to the AC 481 images.
337:
338: \subsection{Projects AK 469 and AM 596}
339:
340: The NRAO observing projects AK 469 and AM 596
341: include nine observing runs (Tr 4--12).
342: Details of the observations and results
343: were presented by Forbrich et al. (2006).
344: The flux densities and positions of compact sources
345: in the images produced by us
346: agree well with the values reported by Forbrich et al. (2006).
347:
348: \subsection{Spitzer Data}
349:
350: In addition to the radio data,
351: we analyzed archival infrared data
352: to classify the young stellar objects in the R CrA region.
353: From the {\it Spitzer} data archive,
354: GTO observations for the R CrA region
355: (AOR keys: IRAC 3650816 and MIPS 3664640) were retrieved.
356: The aperture photometry was performed with mosaic post-BCD images,
357: which were processed by the SSC pipeline
358: (Ver. S14 and S16 for IRAC and MIPS, respectively),
359: at all IRAC bands (3.6, 4.5, 5.8, and 9.0 $\mu$m)
360: and MIPS 24 and 70 $\mu$m using the SSC Mopex package.
361: The short-exposure high-dynamic range observations
362: were used for the IRAC photometry.
363:
364: \section{RESULTS}
365:
366: \input{tab2.tex}
367:
368: Table 2 lists all the 16 sources detected in the radio maps.
369: Figure 1$a$ shows the average map of the R CrA region
370: in the 3.5 cm continuum from all the data sets,
371: and Figure 1$b$ shows the maps of the IRS 7 region from our observations.
372: All the images presented in this paper
373: are corrected for the primary beam response,
374: and the lowest contour level roughly corresponds to the 3$\sigma$ value,
375: where $\sigma$ is the rms of noise.
376: Objects associated with the centimeter continuum sources
377: are marked in the figures,
378: and the size of markers roughly corresponds
379: to the position uncertainty of the objects.
380: Tables 2 and 3 list the parameters of detected sources,
381: and Figure 2 shows the flux variability of bright sources.
382: We briefly summarize
383: the overall properties of detected sources in this section,
384: and detailed discussion on individual sources will be given in \S~5.
385:
386: The IRS 7 region shows a complex of several compact sources
387: and some extended emission structures.
388: Since there are several published papers
389: reporting the centimeter continuum sources in this region
390: (many of them have their own list of sources),
391: simply using source numbers can be confusing.
392: In this paper, the source names listed in Table 3 are used.
393: We tried to list the most commonly used names.
394: In some cases, for example, a name may be a combination of
395: an acronym (names of authors who identified the source first)
396: and a sequence (source number) used by those authors.
397:
398: \subsection{Source Structure}
399:
400: IRS 7A is the strongest centimeter-continuum source in this region
401: and is composed of a compact source and an extended emission structure.
402: B 9 is associated with the 7 mm source CT 2 and the 1.1 mm source SMA 2
403: and is probably the most deeply embedded source in this region.
404: B 9 was resolved into two compact sources.
405: FPM 10 and FPM 13 are extended emission structures,
406: and their shapes and peak positions
407: change depending on the $uv$ coverage and the epoch of observations.
408:
409: IRS 7B is also composed of a compact source
410: surrounded by an extended emission structure.
411: The compact source is associated with the 1.1 mm source SMA 1.
412: The extended structure clearly has a bipolar morphology
413: elongated in the northeast-southwest direction.
414: The northeastern lobe corresponds to FPM 15 (Forbrich et al. 2006)
415: and shows a clumpy structure.
416:
417: IRS 5 was resolved into two compact sources,
418: and they displayed interesting flux variability.
419: B 5 is slightly extended in the northeast-southwest direction,
420: and the deconvolved size along the elongation is $\sim$1$''$.
421: Most of the other detected sources in the R CrA field
422: are point-like objects.
423:
424: \subsection{Spectral Energy Distribution}
425:
426: Table 3 lists $\alpha$, the spectral index in the centimeter band.
427: For most sources, the spectral index
428: is consistent with the value expected for the free-free emission
429: from collimated thermal radio jets or coronal winds
430: ($-0.1 \leq \alpha \lesssim 1$; Reynolds 1986; Anglada et al. 1998).
431: However, there are a few exceptions.
432: The spectral index of B 9 is negative
433: in both Tr 1 and Tr 13/14 estimates,
434: suggesting that the centimeter emission
435: is from a nonthermal process at least partially.
436: The spectral index of IRS 7B needs some discussion (see \S~5.2).
437: The spectral index of B 5 varies wildly,
438: which is probably due to a combined effect
439: of nonthermal emission processes and flare activities (see \S~5.4).
440:
441: It should be noted that,
442: even though the spectral index of IRS 5 is consistent with free-free emission,
443: its circularly polarized flux certainly tells
444: that it has a nonthermal emission component.
445: There are other examples of nonthermal emitter
446: with a slightly positive spectral index,
447: such as T Tau Sb (Loinard et al. 2007).
448: These sources suggest that the spectral index alone
449: is not a very reliable indicator of emission process.
450: On the other hand, in radio surveys of star forming clouds,
451: sources displaying negative spectral indices
452: are usually considered background nonthermal sources
453: (e.g., Rodr{\'\i}guez et al. 1999),
454: but the existence of young stellar objects such as B 9
455: tells that the spectral index alone is not a good criterion
456: for distinguishing young stellar objects from extragalactic objects.
457:
458: \subsection{Long-Term Variability}
459:
460: Figure 2 shows long-term (8--13 years) variability
461: of the 3.5 cm flux density.
462: Considering the month-scale variability,
463: most sources do not show clear trends.
464: IRS 7A seems to show a steady increase of flux density.
465: More observations are needed to confirm this trend.
466: If real, such long-term variability
467: is likely due to changes in outflow activity
468: rather than circumstellar magnetic activities.
469:
470: \input{fig1.tex} \input{tab3.tex} \input{fig2.tex}
471:
472: \subsection{Proper Motion}
473:
474: Proper motions of bright compact sources were measured
475: by comparing the uniform-weight 3.5 cm maps of Tr 1 and Tr 13.
476: Most sources did not show a detectable proper motion.
477: R CrA is the only source
478: showing a marginally detectable proper motion:
479: 0.23$''$ $\pm$ 0.11$''$ toward the southeast over the 8.1 yr time-baseline,
480: or (20, --21) mas yr$^{-1}$,
481: which is consistent with the proper motion of the R CrA association,
482: (5.5, --27.0) mas yr$^{-1}$ (Neuh{\"a}user et al. 2000).
483:
484: \subsection{Polarimetry}
485:
486: Circularly polarized 3.5 cm emission was detected toward three sources
487: while none of the radio sources
488: showed detectable polarization in the 6.2 cm band.
489: IRS 5b showed detectable polarization in most observing runs,
490: but IRS 5a was never detected in the Stokes-$V$ flux maps.
491: Polarized emission from IRS 7A and B 5 was detected once each.
492: Details of the polarimetry results will be presented separately
493: in Paper II (Choi et al. 2008).
494:
495: \subsection{Infrared Photometry}
496:
497: \input{tab4.tex}
498: \input{fig3.tex}
499:
500: Since flux measurements and images based on {\it Spitzer} data
501: are reported previously for many of the sources in the R CrA region
502: (Groppi et al. 2007; Forbrich \& Preibisch 2007),
503: we report the photometry of IRS 2 and IRS 6 only (Table 4).
504: The IRAC color-color diagram for the infrared sources in the R CrA region
505: is shown in Figure 3.
506:
507: For IRS 2 and IRS 6,
508: the bolometric temperature and luminosity
509: were calculated using the {\it Spitzer} data
510: along with the Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) data.
511: Although IRS 2 has a greater bolometric luminosity
512: than IRS 6 by a factor of 25,
513: they have a similar bolometric temperature of $\sim$450 K,
514: indicative of Class I sources (Chen et al. 1995).
515: According to the [3.6]--[4.5] versus [5.8]--[8.0] color-color diagram
516: (Allen et al. 2004; Lee et al. 2006),
517: both IRS 2 and IRS 6 are also classified
518: as embedded Class 0/I sources (Fig. 3).
519:
520: \section{DISCUSSION}
521:
522: \subsection{IRS 7A Region}
523:
524: \input{fig4.tex}
525: \input{fig5.tex}
526: \input{fig6.tex}
527:
528: The IRS 7A region is a very complicated site of star formation.
529: There are at least two young stellar objects in this small region,
530: IRS 7A and B 9 (SMA 2),
531: and each of them have subcomponents.
532: All these sources seem to be embedded
533: in the dense core SMM 1C%
534: \footnote{In this paper,
535: we use the submillimeter source numbers given by Nutter et al. (2005).
536: Choi \& Tatematsu (2004) referred to SMM 1A, 1B, and 1C
537: as vdA 4, 5, and 3, respectively,
538: following the source numbers given by van den Ancker (1999).
539: There is a difference in astrometry
540: between Nutter et al. (2005) and Groppi et al. (2007),
541: and we use the positions given by Groppi et al., if possible.}
542: (Nutter et al. 2005; Groppi et al. 2007).
543: Figures 4--6 show the centimeter continuum maps of this region.
544: We will try to dissect this region
545: by comparing the radio maps with the images in other wavelengths.
546:
547: \subsubsection{IRS 7A}
548:
549: The Tr 1 map of Figure 6 has the highest resolution
550: and shows the accurate position of the compact component of IRS 7A.
551: In addition to the compact component,
552: the other maps of Figure 6 as well as the average map (Fig. 4)
553: show the extended structure
554: that seems to be elongated roughly in the north-south direction.
555: Judging from the spectral index and the morphology,
556: the centimeter emission of IRS 7A most likely traces a thermal radio jet.
557: The outflow activity may have become enhanced in recent years
558: as the 3.5 cm flux density in 2005 (Tr 13) is significantly higher
559: than those in the 1996--1998 period (Fig. 2).
560: The 3.5 cm map of Tr 13 (Fig. 6) also shows
561: a newly appearing subcomponent at 0.85$''$ southeast of the main peak,
562: which may be a bright knot of recently ejected material.
563: Since this subcomponent is not present in the images of earlier epoch,
564: its proper motion is at least 130 mas yr$^{-1}$
565: ($\sim$100 km s$^{-1}$ at 170 pc).
566:
567: The peak position of the 3.5 cm maps
568: has not changed over the 8 years of monitoring
569: and may indicate the location of the central object.
570: As shown in Figure 6, the 3.5 cm source position agrees well
571: with the positions of the sources detected in other wavelengths:
572: the mid-IR source IRAC 5, the 7 mm source CT 4,
573: and a {\it Chandra} X-ray source
574: (Groppi et al. 2007; Choi \& Tatematsu 2004; Hamaguchi et al. 2005).
575: Despite all these detections over a wide range of wavelength,
576: the classification (hence the evolutionary status) of IRS 7A
577: is frustratingly uncertain because of the complicated environment.
578: IRS 7A is certainly not a T Tauri star.
579: The nondetection at 1.1 mm (Groppi et al. 2007)
580: seems to rule out the possibility of IRS 7A being a Class 0 source,
581: and Hamaguchi et al. (2005) suggested
582: that IRS 7A may be a Class I source seen at a large inclination angle
583: based on the near-IR magnitude
584: and the column density measurement from X-ray observations.
585: The IRAC color-color diagram places IRS 7A near IRS 7B
586: and above the other Class I sources (Fig. 3),
587: which suggests that IRS 7A may be
588: either a Class 0/I transitional object
589: or a Class I object in the younger part of the class.
590:
591: Hamaguchi et al. (2005) could reproduce
592: the {\it XMM-Newton} spectrum of the X-ray source X$_{\rm W}$
593: using a single-temperature plasma model,
594: which could also reproduce the {\it Chandra} data.
595: Comparing the 3.5 cm maps with the {\it Chandra} X-ray positions (Fig. 6),
596: the X-ray source seems to be associated with the main radio peak itself
597: but not with the subcomponent on the southeast side
598: or the more extended component on the south side of the main peak.
599: (The {\it Chandra} observations were made in 2000 October and 2003 June.)
600: This geometry suggests that the X-ray source
601: may be closely related with the central star.
602: The X-ray emission may come from either
603: the protostellar magnetosphere or near the base of outflow.
604: The detection of circularly polarized radio emission (Paper II)
605: strongly suggests the existence of an active magnetosphere.
606:
607: \subsubsection{B 9 Complex}
608:
609: The centimeter source B 9 was resolved into two sources, B 9a and 9b,
610: with a separation of 0.5$''$ (Fig. 6).
611: B 9a is slightly elongated in the east-west direction
612: with a deconvolved size of $\sim$0.5$''$,
613: and B 9b is a point-like source.
614: Both of them show negative spectral indices (--0.9 to --0.2, see Table 3),
615: suggesting that the centimeter emission
616: comes from a nonthermal process at least partially.
617: In contrast, Miettinen et al. (2008) reported positive (0.4) spectral index,
618: which suggests that either the nonthermal component is highly variable
619: or their flux measurement included
620: a significant contribution from the extended thermal emission source.
621: The proper motion of B 9a/b is uncertain
622: because they were not clearly separated in the Tr 13 image.
623:
624: The centimeter source B 9 and the 7 mm source CT 2
625: are located close to each other,
626: but not exactly at the same position.
627: It is unlikely that this position difference (1.2$''$)
628: is caused by an instrumental uncertainty
629: because the position agreement of IRS 7A and CT 4 is good.
630: The peak position of the 1.1 mm source SMA 2 is 0.4$''$ south of B 9a,
631: but B 9b and CT 2 are also located
632: within the beam size of the 1.1 mm map of Groppi et al. (2007).
633: We will use the name `B 9 complex'
634: to refer to all these compact sources collectively.
635: The spectral energy distribution (SED) of the B 9 complex
636: (see Fig. 8 of Groppi et al. 2007) suggests
637: that it may be harboring a Class 0 source,
638: but it is not clear what is the true nature of the B 9 complex.
639: Considering the complexity of the centimeter-millimeter maps
640: and the existence of two outflows (see below),
641: we suggest that the B 9 complex may be a multiple-protostar system.
642: A subarcsecond-resolution map of dust emission
643: is needed to locate the central stellar object(s)
644: and understand the situation better.
645:
646: Radio sources with significantly negative spectral index
647: are rare in star forming regions but not unique.
648: Examples include outflow lobes of Serpens SMM 1 and IRAS 16547--4247
649: (Rodr{\'\i}guez et al. 1989; Garay et al. 2003).
650: The suggested radiation mechanism is nonthermal synchrotron emission,
651: but the existence of highly relativistic electrons is not easy to explain.
652: It is possible to accelerate a small fraction of electrons
653: in the shocked region of outflow (e.g., Crusius-W{\"a}tzel 1990),
654: but the density of the medium should be low enough
655: to avoid being dominated by thermal radiation (Henriksen et al. 1991).
656: It is also possible to produce energetic electrons in active magnetospheres,
657: as observed around more evolved young stellar objects
658: (Massi et al. 2006, 2008; Loinard et al. 2007).
659: Other types of nonthermal radiation (such as gyrosynchrotron radiation,
660: electron cyclotron maser, and plasma maser)
661: cannot be ruled out (G{\"u}del 2002),
662: but they are less likely
663: because circular polarization was not detected toward B 9 (Paper II).
664: It remains to be seen if B 9a/b
665: are indeed shocked regions of outflowing gas,
666: and measurements of proper motion and linear polarization
667: will be helpful.
668:
669: \subsubsection{FPM 10 and FPM 13}
670:
671: FPM 10 and 13 are extended sources,
672: and their shape and peak position
673: change depending on the epoch of observations.
674: Their centimeter spectra are flat,
675: suggesting optically thin free-free emission.
676: They are highly elongated (Figs. 1, 4, and 5),
677: and the major axes point to the B 9 complex.
678: Therefore, they are most likely ionized gas of outflows
679: driven by young stellar object(s) in the B 9 complex.
680: However, they cannot be a single bipolar outflow system
681: because their directions with respect to B 9
682: are nearly perpendicular to each other.
683: Forbrich \& Preibisch (2007) found diffuse X-ray emission
684: in a region just north of FPM 13,
685: but the relation between the extended X-ray structure and the B 9 complex
686: is not clear.
687:
688: FPM 10 is located about 3$''$ west of the B 9 complex
689: and elongated in the east-west direction.
690: The size along the major axis is $\sim$3$''$.
691: The location and the flow direction of FPM 10 match well
692: with the redshifted lobe of the bipolar outflow
693: mapped in several molecular lines
694: including HCO$^+$ $J$ = 1$\rightarrow$ 0 and CO $J$ = 3 $\rightarrow$ 2
695: (Anderson et al. 1997; Groppi et al. 2004, 2007).
696: Therefore, FPM 10 and the molecular bipolar outflow
697: seem to belong to a single outflow system.
698:
699: FPM 13 is located about 4$''$ north of the B 9 complex
700: and elongated in the north-south direction.
701: The size along the major axis is $\sim$3$''$.
702: There is no known molecular outflow that can be associated with FPM 13,
703: but this is probably because the molecular line maps
704: do not have a sufficiently high angular resolution.
705: Because of the flow direction,
706: the driving source of FPM 13 may be an object in the B 9 complex
707: but cannot be the same object that is driving FPM 10.
708: It should also be noted
709: that we cannot completely rule out the possibility
710: that FPM 13 may be driven by IRS 7A.
711:
712: \subsubsection{CT 3}
713:
714: CT 3 was nearly as bright as CT 2 in the 7 mm map
715: (Choi \& Tatematsu 2004)
716: but not clearly detected in the centimeter maps.
717: It is located in the ``bridge'' of radio emission structure
718: between IRS 7A and B 9 (Fig. 4).
719: This ``bridge'' may be tracing an outflow
720: either from IRS 7A or from the B 9 complex
721: (or a superposition of outflows from both).
722: A marginally detectable amount of 3.5 cm emission
723: can be seen in the Tr 13 map (Fig. 1$b$ {\it left panel}).
724: Choi \& Tatematsu (2004) suggested
725: that CT 3 may be a deeply embedded young stellar object,
726: but the nondetection at 1.1 mm (Groppi et al. 2007)
727: seems to rule out this possibility.
728: A possible explanation is
729: that CT 3 may be a knot of outflowing gas
730: that was temporarily brightened at the time of the 7 mm observations.
731:
732: \subsection{IRS 7B}
733:
734: The IRS 7B region is less complicated than the IRS 7A region
735: but still needs a careful analysis to understand the structure.
736: Figures 7--9 show the centimeter continuum maps of the IRS 7B region.
737: There is a single compact source surrounded by an extended structure
738: elongated in the northeast-southwest direction.
739: The spectral index was highly negative (--1.4) during Tr 1
740: but only mildly negative (--0.2) during Tr 13/14 (Table 3).
741: This difference is due to the low 3.5 cm flux during Tr 1,
742: which probably means that the extended structure
743: was resolved out in the A-array observations.
744: If only the compact source is considered,
745: the spectral index is $\sim$0.1 during Tr 1 and $\sim$0.7 during Tr 13/14.
746: Therefore, the centimeter flux from the central compact source of IRS 7B
747: may be mostly from free-free emission.
748:
749: \input{fig7.tex}
750: \input{fig8.tex}
751: \input{fig9.tex}
752:
753: The peak position of the 3.5 cm maps
754: did not show a detectable proper motion over the 8 years of monitoring
755: and may indicate the location of the central object.
756: As shown in Figure 9,
757: the 3.5 cm peak position agrees with the positions
758: of the mid-IR source IRAC 4, the 1.1 mm source SMA 1,
759: and the {\it Chandra} X-ray source
760: (Groppi et al. 2007; Hamaguchi et al. 2005).
761: Groppi et al. (2007) suggested that IRS 7B is a Class 0/I source
762: based on the SED analysis.
763: Therefore, IRS 7B may be a protostar embedded in the dense core SMM 1B.
764:
765: The extended component of IRS 7B shown in Figure 7
766: has a length of $\sim$9$''$ and a position angle of $\sim$20\arcdeg.
767: The bipolar morphology suggests
768: that the extended component traces a bipolar outflow driven by IRS 7B.
769: The northeastern lobe (FPM 15) is brighter than the opposite lobe.
770: The outflow in our maps
771: is probably the base of the large-scale ($\sim$2$'$) bipolar jet
772: in the 6 cm maps of Brown (1987) and Miettinen et al. (2008).
773: Large-scale maps of molecular lines from single-dish observations
774: did not show any sign of molecular outflow parallel to the IRS 7B outflow.
775: Again, this nondetection is
776: probably caused by a confusion with the east-west outflow of B 9.
777: The interferometric map in the HCO$^+$ line (Fig. 6 of Groppi et al. 2007)
778: seems to show a molecular outflow around SMA 1:
779: blueshifted emission on the south of SMA 1
780: and redshifted emission on the northeast of SMA 1.
781: The size and direction of the HCO$^+$ emission structure
782: seem to agree with the outflow seen in our centimeter continuum maps.
783: However, note that Groppi et al. (2007) interpreted
784: the HCO$^+$ emission structure as a part of a large spherical shell.
785:
786: Similarly to IRS 7A, the {\it Chandra} X-ray source
787: is associated with the main peak of the centimeter source, IRS 7B,
788: but not with the secondary peaks in the outflow lobe such as FPM 15.
789: This geometry suggests that the X-ray source
790: is associated with the central protostar.
791: Hamaguchi et al. (2005) found
792: that the {\it XMM-Newton} spectra of X$_{\rm E}$
793: could be reproduced better using a two-temperature model.
794: They concluded that the hard X-ray component
795: comes from a mass accretion spot on the protostar
796: while the soft component probably comes from shock-heated plasma
797: related to a jet/outflow.
798: The high plasma temperature and the large X-ray luminosity
799: require a large amount of gas at a very high outflow velocity
800: (Hamaguchi et al. 2005; Forbrich et al. 2006).
801: A possible model reconciling the radio and the X-ray observations is
802: that the hard and time-variable X-ray component
803: may be emitted by circumstellar magnetic activity
804: and that the soft and constant X-ray component and the centimeter emission
805: may come from plasma
806: heated by the collision of a steady jet with ambient gas
807: (Hamaguchi et al. 2005; Forbrich \& Preibisch 2007).
808: Since the X-ray spectra from {\it Chandra} observations
809: were dominated by the soft component
810: and the spatial resolution of {\it XMM-Newton} is limited ($\sim$6$''$),
811: the exact position of the hard component is unknown.
812: To understand the IRAS 7B system clearly,
813: it is necessary to observe the X-ray source with a high resolution
814: during an active phase of the hard component.
815:
816: \subsubsection{CHLT 13}
817:
818: CHLT 13 is a 6.2 cm continuum source detected during Tr 14 (Fig. 1$b$).
819: Since it was not detected in the 6.2 cm map of Tr 1
820: and never detected in the 3.5 cm continuum,
821: it must be a transient source.
822: Its location is near the dense core SMM 1A.
823: Nutter et al. (2005) suggested
824: that the submillimeter source SMM 1A may be a prestellar object
825: because it was not detected in other wavelengths.
826: On the other hand, the 6 cm maps of Miettinen et al. (2008) show
827: extended clumpy structure around this region,
828: but none of their emission peaks coincides with CHLT 13 exactly.
829: On the nature of CHLT 13, we suggest two possibilities.
830: First, CHLT 13 may indicate a star forming activity in SMM 1A.
831: Second, CHLT 13 may be a temporarily brightened knot of the IRS 7B outflow.
832: More speculatively, the southwestern outflow of IRS 7B
833: may be colliding with a dense clump in SMM 1A
834: and producing transient radio emission at the shock front.
835:
836: \subsection{IRS 5}
837:
838: \input{fig10.tex}
839: \input{fig11.tex}
840:
841: IRS 5 is a very interesting binary system.
842: Figures 10--12 show the centimeter continuum maps of the IRS 5 region.
843: IRS 5 was clearly resolved into two sources
844: when the resolution is high enough
845: (see the maps of Tr 1, Tr 2, and Tr 13 in Fig. 12).
846: Even when the resolution is not high enough,
847: the 3.5 cm maps usually show an extended structure
848: that can be best interpreted as a combination of two point-like sources
849: (see the maps of Tr 4 and Tr 6--12 in Fig. 12).
850: In addition, comparison with the Stokes-$V$ maps (Paper II)
851: clearly shows that the southwestern source
852: was detected in the Stokes-$I$ maps.
853: Since the 3.5 cm sources are
854: similar to the near-IR sources (Chen \& Graham 1993; Nisini et al. 2005)
855: in separation and position angle,
856: we identify the southwestern and the northeastern sources
857: as IRS 5a and 5b, respectively.
858: The Stokes-$V$ maps show a point-like source at the position of IRS 5b
859: while IRS 5a was undetected in the Stokes-$V$ flux,
860: and there is a good correlation
861: between the Stokes-$V$ and Stokes-$I$ fluxes of IRS 5b
862: (see the discussion in Paper II).
863:
864: IRS 5a is brighter in the near-IR images of Nisini et al. (2005),
865: but IRS 5b is usually brighter in radio.
866: The separation between them in the 3.5 cm Tr 1 image
867: is 0.9$''$ (160 AU at 170 pc).
868: They were not clearly separated in the 6.2 cm maps,
869: but the Tr 1 map (Fig. 11 {\it left panel}) shows
870: that both IRS 5a and 5b have detectable 6.2 cm fluxes.
871: Since circularly polarized flux was detected from IRS 5,
872: the centimeter flux clearly has a nonthermal component,
873: and we will discuss this issue in Paper II.
874: Another Class I source in this region, IRS 5N (FPM 5),
875: was not clearly detected
876: though Forbrich et al. (2006) reported
877: that it was detected when several data sets were combined.
878:
879: \input{fig12.tex}
880:
881: Table 5 lists the 3.5 cm flux densities of each binary component.
882: For the maps of Tr 4--12,
883: the flux was measured by fitting the image
884: with a sum of two point-like sources
885: (see the end note of Table 5 for details).
886: The uncertainty of total flux from this fitting method
887: was estimated by performing simple Monte Carlo simulations.
888: Since we assumed that both sources are point-like,
889: the uncertainty can be larger if this assumption is not valid.
890: The light curves of IRS 5a and 5b are shown in Figure 13.
891: The flux uncertainty shown in Figure 13
892: is the statistical uncertainty listed in Table 5,
893: but one should also consider the uncertainty in the absolute flux scale,
894: which was not explicitly measured but usually about 1--2\%
895: (VLA Calibrator Manual%
896: \footnote{See http://www.vla.nrao.edu/astro/calib/manual.}).
897: The radio light curves clearly show that both sources are highly variable.
898: IRS 5b is usually brighter and more active than IRS 5a,
899: but IRS 5a outshone its companion at least once (Tr 4)
900: during the monitoring.
901: This behavior clearly tells
902: that the flux variability of each source should be analyzed separately,
903: but previous authors considered the flux of the IRS 5 system as a whole,
904: which may have caused some confusion.
905:
906: The radio positions of IRS 5a/b agree well
907: with the position of X-ray sources (Hamaguchi et al. 2008).
908: The separation between the X-ray sources is $\sim$0.8$''$,
909: which is in good agreement with the radio value.
910: There seems to be a difference
911: in the relative degree of flare activity between the two sources.
912: IRS 5b is more active in radio (Fig. 13),
913: but IRS 5a is more active in X-rays (Hamaguchi et al. 2008).
914: To understand this difference,
915: it is necessary to monitor the IRS 5 system
916: in both radio and X-rays simultaneously.
917: Forbrich et al. (2007) attempted such a study,
918: but IRS 5 was not active in radio during their observations
919: and their angular resolution was not high enough to resolve the system.
920:
921: The position and relative brightness of the near-IR counterparts
922: need some consideration.
923: Nisini et al. (2005) reported
924: that the separation between the two near-IR sources is $\sim$0.6$''$,
925: but their Figure 1 shows that the separation is actually $\sim$0.9$''$,
926: in agreement with the radio/X-ray value.
927: The absolute position of the near-IR sources
928: in the image of Nisini et al. (2005)
929: has an offset of $\sim$1$''$ to the southeast
930: relative to the radio/X-ray position.
931: We presume that this offset was caused
932: by an instrumental uncertainty of the near-IR observations.
933: It is interesting to note
934: that the 2MASS position agrees with the radio position of IRS 5b
935: while the mid-IR source IRAC 10 coincides with IRS 5a (Fig. 10).
936: This difference between the 2MASS and the IRAC positions
937: is not an astrometric problem
938: because the positions of IRS 5N show a good agreement.
939: Therefore, we suppose that the primary object in the near-IR brightness
940: can be either one depending on the epoch of observations.
941: That is, either one or both of them may be variable in near-IR.
942: Alternatively, they may have different intrinsic colors.
943: The relation between the variability in near-IR and in radio/X-rays
944: has not been well understood so far (Forbrich et al. 2007).
945:
946: \input{tab5.tex}
947: \input{fig13.tex}
948:
949: IRS 5a/b (and IRS 5N) are young stellar objects
950: probably embedded in the dense core SMM 4
951: (Nutter et al. 2005; Groppi et al. 2007).
952: IRS 5 as a whole is a Class I source
953: (Fig. 3; Wilking et al. 1997; Nutter et al. 2005; Hamaguchi et al. 2008).
954: However, Nisini et al. (2005) suggested
955: that IRS 5a may be a more evolved object, such as a T Tauri star,
956: on the basis of the lack of significant accretion activity.
957: It is not clear if IRS 5 has any outflow activity.
958: Groppi et al. (2007) reported a CO outflow in this region
959: though the driving source could not be specified clearly.
960: Subarcsecond-resolution imaging in the millimeter or submillimeter band
961: is necessary to understand the situation more clearly.
962:
963: \subsubsection{IRS 5b}
964:
965: The flux variability of IRS 5b needs a detailed discussion.
966: Though more extensive monitoring is necessary
967: to understand the flare activities,
968: it may be useful to consider two phases:
969: quiescent phase and active phase, depending on the total flux.
970: We suggest a flux threshold of 0.8 mJy for IRS 5b,
971: which is somewhat arbitrary.
972: The flux density in the quiescent phase (Tr 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 13)
973: is about 0.5 mJy on average.
974:
975: Examining the light curve shown in Figure 13,
976: two periods of active phase can be recognized:
977: a short one in 1997 January (Tr 2)
978: and a long one in 1998 September--October (Tr 7--12).
979: Detailed information on the 1997 flare activity is not available,
980: and the duration of the active phase must have been less than 22 days.
981: The 1998 flare activity can be discussed in more detail.
982: The duration of the active phase was about 30 days,
983: and the flux fluctuated wildly during this period.
984: The average flux density during this active phase
985: was higher than that of the quiescent phase by a factor of about 4.
986: The light curve shows three flux peaks (Tr 7, 9, and 11)
987: with peak-to-peak intervals of about 10 days,
988: but the flux might have fluctuated more rapidly
989: if the sampling interval had been shorter.
990:
991: The time scale of the flare activity of IRS 5b is much longer than
992: that of the radio bursts of the Sun or flare stars,
993: typically a few minutes or shorter.
994: This month-scale flare activity of IRS 5b implies
995: that the cause of the flare
996: is not a local magnetic activity on the surface of the (proto)star
997: but probably a reconnection event
998: of global magnetic fields around the star
999: or even magnetic fields connecting the star and the circumstellar disk.
1000: More details of the flare activity will be discussed in Paper II.
1001:
1002: \subsubsection{IRS 5a}
1003:
1004: IRS 5a is usually weak ($\sim$0.13 mJy) or undetectable,
1005: but showed at least two active periods during the monitoring.
1006: (Here, we set the quiescent-active phase threshold at 0.2 mJy.)
1007: In 1998 June (Tr 4), IRS 5a went through an outburst
1008: with the flux higher than the quiescent level by a factor of $\sim$15.
1009: It is not clear how long was the duration of this outburst.
1010:
1011: \input{fig14.tex}
1012:
1013: In 1998 September--October (Tr 7--11),
1014: the flux of IRS 5a increased mildly
1015: and stayed at a level about twice the quiescent level.
1016: This increase of flux is not an artifact of the image fitting process
1017: used in measuring the flux of each binary component.
1018: If the flux of IRS 5a had been at the quiescent level,
1019: it would have been barely noticeable in the images,
1020: but IRS 5a is clearly recognizable in the images during this active period.
1021: For example, compare the Tr 9 image with the Tr 12 image:
1022: the source structures in these two images are clearly different
1023: even though the beam sizes are almost identical,
1024: which clearly shows that the flux of IRS 5a
1025: was significantly higher during Tr 9 than during Tr 12.
1026:
1027: \subsubsection{Concurrent Activity in 1998}
1028:
1029: What is really interesting
1030: about the flare activity in 1998 September--October
1031: is that both objects in the binary system are active at the same time.
1032: If this concurrency is not a chance coincidence
1033: but has a real physical reason,
1034: there are three possibilities.
1035: First, the binary companions may be interacting directly
1036: through a physical process unknown so far.
1037: Second, what was observed may be a giant magnetic structure
1038: such as a circumbinary halo of ionized gas.
1039: Third, they may be responding to an external cause,
1040: such as an enhanced accretion of material from the envelope.
1041:
1042: The possibility of the interacting (proto)binary
1043: requires an underlying physical mechanism that is unknown so far.
1044: If the intense flare activity of IRS 5b
1045: was the cause of the flux enhancement of IRS 5a,
1046: the light curves indicate
1047: that such an interaction should happen in a time scale of several days.
1048: The projected separation between IRS 5a and 5b is $\sim$0.9 light-day.
1049: Then the order-of-magnitude velocity of the interaction agent
1050: must be about 10\% of the speed of light or faster.
1051: Such a high velocity is not completely unreasonable
1052: because the circularly polarized radio emission of IRS 5b
1053: implies the existence of mildly relativistic electrons.
1054: Intrabinary magnetic fields between stars are often suggested
1055: to explain the activity of stellar systems
1056: such as RS CVn binaries (Dulk 1985),
1057: and interacting helmet streamers were observed
1058: around a young binary system (Massi et al. 2008).
1059: The size of the IRS 5 system is probably too large
1060: to have directly interacting stellar magnetic fields.
1061: However, large-scale magnetic fields
1062: involving circumstellar disk(s) and/or outflows
1063: might provide a new mechanism of interaction.
1064:
1065: Circumbinary halos and large-scale magnetic structures
1066: are often suggested to explain the radio activity
1067: of RS CVn binaries and related objects,
1068: and some halos were imaged using the VLBI technique
1069: (Mutel et al. 1985; Phillips et al. 1991).
1070: It is unknown if a circumbinary halo can be as large as the IRS 5 system.
1071: In principle, this possibility can be tested by imaging IRS 5
1072: with an angular resolution of $\sim$0.2$''$ during an active phase.
1073:
1074: In the third possibility,
1075: the responses of IRS 5a and 5b can be synchronized
1076: down to the crossing time of the accreting material.
1077: The velocity of accreting gas can be approximated
1078: by the free-fall velocity, $v_{\rm ff} \approx (2GM/r)^{1/2}$.
1079: Assuming $M = 1 M_\odot$ and taking $r$ to be the binary separation,
1080: we get $v_{\rm ff} \approx$ 3 km s$^{-1}$.
1081: Then the crossing time is $\sim$200 yr,
1082: which is too long to explain the concurrent activities of IRS 5a/b.
1083: Therefore, the third possibility is improbable
1084: unless there is a very fast triggering mechanism.
1085:
1086: \subsection{B 5}
1087:
1088: \input{fig15.tex}
1089: \input{fig16.tex}
1090:
1091: B 5 is a variable radio source (Fig. 2; Suters et al. 1996).
1092: Figure 14 shows the radio continuum maps of B 5.
1093: While the 3.5 cm map of Tr 1 did not have enough sensitivity
1094: to see the source structure,
1095: the 6.2 cm map of Tr 1 shows that B 5 is extended
1096: along the northeast-southwest direction (P.A. = 44\arcdeg)
1097: with a deconvolved size (FWHM) of 1.3$''$.
1098: In the 3.5 cm map of Tr 13,
1099: B 5 appears slightly extended along a similar direction (P.A. = 53\arcdeg)
1100: with a deconvolved size of $\lesssim$0.6$''$.
1101: The proper motion measurement of B 5 is unreliable
1102: because the source is extended.
1103: The peak position of the 6.2 cm source
1104: has a small offset (0.6$''$ toward northeast)
1105: with respect to the position of the 3.5 cm source.
1106:
1107: The spectral index was highly negative (--1.3) during Tr 1
1108: but positive (1.1) during Tr 13/14 (Table 3).
1109: This difference is due to the high 3.5 cm flux during Tr 13,
1110: which probably means
1111: that B 5 went through an outburst during Tr 13.
1112: This outburst was accompanied with circularly polarized emission,
1113: suggesting magnetospheric origin (Paper II).
1114: The centimeter flux during Tr 1
1115: was obviously from a nonthermal emission process.
1116: Such a large fluctuation of spectral index
1117: was also reported by Suters et al. (1996)
1118: based on monitoring observations in 1992.
1119: However, the spectral index was never highly negative
1120: in the 1992 observations,
1121: and Suters et al. concluded
1122: that the fluctuation was caused by an optical depth effect
1123: of thermal free-free emission.
1124: Miettinen et al. (2008) reported a negative spectral index,
1125: confirming the nonthermal nature of the emission from B 5.
1126: The complicated variability of the centimeter emission from B 5
1127: may be caused by a combined effect of nonthermal emission process
1128: and frequent flare events.
1129:
1130: The nature of B 5 is an enigma.
1131: Suters et al. (1996) argued against an extragalactic source
1132: on the basis of the rapid variability.
1133: The source size also supports this argument
1134: because the radio flux from such an extended source cannot vary rapidly
1135: if it is extragalactic.
1136: Examinations of archival {\it Spitzer} images
1137: did not produce any positive detection at the position of B 5.
1138: The nondetection in the mid-IR or millimeter continuum
1139: suggests that it is not a deeply embedded object
1140: if located at the distance of the CrA cloud.
1141: Feigelson et al. (1998) suggested B 5 to be a brown dwarf
1142: based on a faint source in the near-IR images of Wilking et al. (1997),
1143: but this region is confusing in optical and near-IR images
1144: because of the nebulosity around IRS 2.
1145:
1146: \subsection{IRS 1}
1147:
1148: IRS 1 (HH 100 IR) is a point-like source,
1149: and its flux is relatively stable.
1150: Figure 15 shows the centimeter continuum maps toward the IRS 1 region.
1151: The spectral index is positive
1152: and consistent with optically thick thermal emission,
1153: which agrees with the conclusion of Suters et al. (1996).
1154: IRS 1 probably showed a proper motion
1155: of 21 $\pm$ 10 mas yr$^{-1}$ toward the east,
1156: but more observations are needed to confirm this value.
1157:
1158: The 3.5 cm peak position agrees well
1159: with the position of the mid-IR source IRAC 7 (Groppi et al. 2007).
1160: IRS 1 is a variable X-ray source (Forbrich et al. 2006),
1161: which suggests that the low variability of the radio flux
1162: is probably due to the large optical depth in the centimeter band.
1163: IRS 1 is a Class I object embedded in SMM 3,
1164: and most of its bolometric luminosity is due to accretion
1165: (Fig. 3; Wilking et al. 1992; Nisini et al. 2005;
1166: Nutter et al. 2005; Groppi et al. 2007).
1167: It is the driving source of HH 100
1168: and probably other Herbig-Haro objects
1169: (Strom et al. 1974; Hartigan \& Graham 1987; Wang et al. 2004).
1170:
1171: \subsection{IRS 2}
1172:
1173: IRS 2 is a point-like source,
1174: and Figure 16 shows the radio continuum maps.
1175: IRS 2 is located outside the field of view in our 3.5 cm observations,
1176: but is within the field of view of the 3.5 cm observations
1177: of projects AC 481 and AM 596.
1178: The 3.5 cm flux density varies between 0.25 and 0.64 mJy.
1179: The spectral index between 3.5 and 6.2 cm,
1180: estimated from the average flux densities, is 1.3 $\pm$ 0.7,
1181: but this value is highly uncertain
1182: because there was no observation
1183: made simultaneously in both wavelength bands.
1184: The positive spectral index implies
1185: that thermal free-free radiation
1186: may be the emission mechanism at the centimeter band.
1187:
1188: \input{fig17.tex}
1189: \input{fig18.tex}
1190:
1191: The 3.5 cm peak position agrees well
1192: with the near-IR source position (Fig. 16).
1193: IRS 2 is a strong and variable X-ray source (Forbrich et al. 2006).
1194: IRS 2 seems to be embedded in SMM 5
1195: and shows evidences of active accretion
1196: (Nisini et al. 2005; Nutter et al. 2005).
1197: The bolometric temperature and luminosity of IRS 2,
1198: calculated using the infrared fluxes
1199: from {\it Spitzer} archival data (Table 4),
1200: are 457 $\pm$ 17 K and 10.0 $\pm$ 0.1 $L_\odot$, respectively.
1201: This temperature confirms that IRS 2 is a Class I protostar
1202: as previously suggested by Wilking et al. (1992).
1203: The IRAC color-color diagram also places IRS 2
1204: inside the Class 0/I domain (Fig. 3).
1205:
1206: \subsection{R CrA}
1207:
1208: R CrA is a point-like source,
1209: and Figure 17 shows the radio continuum maps.
1210: While R CrA is dominating this region in the optical and near-IR bands,
1211: it is relatively weak in radio.
1212: R CrA is detectable in all the data sets analyzed
1213: and shows some flux variability (Fig. 2).
1214: The spectral index of the centimeter continuum is positive,
1215: suggesting that the radio flux comes from optically thick thermal emission.
1216: The proper motion of R CrA is consistent
1217: with that of the R CrA association (see \S~4.4).
1218:
1219: The 3.5 cm peak position agrees well
1220: with the near-IR source position (Fig. 17).
1221: It is not clear how strong the submillimeter emission from R CrA is
1222: (Groppi et al. 2007).
1223: R CrA is a Herbig Ae star of $\sim$3.5 $M_\odot$,
1224: and it is also an interesting X-ray source
1225: with a plasma temperature of $\sim$100 MK (Forbrich et al. 2006).
1226: To explain the X-ray emission,
1227: Forbrich et al. (2006) suggested that R CrA may be a binary system:
1228: an optically bright Herbig Ae star and an X-ray bright Class I source.
1229: Takami et al. (2003) also suggested that R CrA may be a binary system
1230: based on spectro-astrometric observations,
1231: but, in this case, both members must be visible in the H$\alpha$ line.
1232:
1233: \subsection{T CrA}
1234:
1235: Radio emission from T CrA has not been reported before,
1236: but it was detected in our maps as a weak point-like source.
1237: Careful examinations of archival data revealed
1238: that T CrA was detectable most of the time.
1239: Figure 18 shows the radio continuum maps,
1240: and Table 6 lists the flux densities.
1241: The spectral index is negative,
1242: but the uncertainty is too large to constrain the emission mechanism.
1243:
1244: \input{tab6.tex}
1245:
1246: The 3.5 cm peak position agrees well
1247: with the position of the mid-IR source IRAC 1 (Groppi et al. 2007).
1248: T CrA is a weak X-ray source (Forbrich et al. 2007)
1249: and was not detected in the submillimeter continuum (Groppi et al. 2007).
1250: T CrA is a Herbig star of type F0e.
1251: Takami et al. (2003) suggested that T CrA may be a binary system.
1252: Wang et al. (2004) suggested
1253: that T CrA may be the driving source of the Herbig-Haro object HH 733.
1254:
1255: \subsection{WMB 55}
1256:
1257: \input{fig19.tex}
1258:
1259: Centimeter continuum emission from WMB 55 has not been reported before,
1260: but it was detected in our 3.5 cm map as a weak point-like source.
1261: Examinations of archival data revealed
1262: that the 3.5 cm flux of WMB 55 was detectable in a few observing runs,
1263: but it was not detected in the 6.2 cm continuum.
1264: Table 6 lists the flux densities,
1265: and Figure 19 shows the 3.5 cm continuum maps.
1266: The nondetection in the 6.2 cm continuum implies
1267: that the spectral index is positive,
1268: but the uncertainty is too large to constrain the emission mechanism.
1269:
1270: The 3.5 cm peak position agrees well
1271: with the position of the mid-IR source IRAC 3 (Groppi et al. 2007).
1272: WMB 55 was not detected in the X-ray band.
1273: WMB 55 is a Class I source embedded in SMM 2
1274: (Fig. 3; Chini et al. 2003; Nutter et al. 2005).
1275: Wang et al. (2004) suggested
1276: that WMB 55 is a probable driving source
1277: of the Herbig-Haro objects HH 733 and/or HH 734.
1278: HH 104 A/B are also located in the vicinity of WMB 55,
1279: but it is not clear if they are related with WMB 55.
1280:
1281: \subsection{IRS 6}
1282:
1283: IRS 6 was not detected in our maps,
1284: though Forbrich et al. (2006) reported
1285: that it was detected when several data sets were combined.
1286: Surprisingly, examinations of archival data revealed
1287: that IRS 6 went through an outburst on 1998 October 13 (Tr 12)
1288: while it was undetectable or only marginally detectable in the other epochs.
1289: Miettinen et al. (2008) reported another outburst detected in 1998 January.
1290:
1291: \input{fig20.tex}
1292:
1293: Figure 20 shows the 3.5 cm continuum map at the epoch of the outburst.
1294: The source was slightly elongated
1295: along the northwest-southeast direction (P.A. $\approx$ --41\arcdeg)
1296: with a deconvolved size of 0.7$''$,
1297: and the total flux density was 0.44 $\pm$ 0.05 mJy.
1298: Since IRS 6 was undetected during Tr 11,
1299: the onset time-scale was less than 3 days.
1300: It is not clear how long was the duration of this outburst
1301: because Tr 12 was the last observing track of the 1998 observing campaign.
1302:
1303: The peak position at the outburst
1304: agrees well, within 0.2$''$, with the X-ray source position,
1305: which suggests that the same source is responsible
1306: for both the radio and the X-ray emission.
1307: (The X-ray source position was determined
1308: using the images discussed in Hamaguchi et al. 2008.)
1309: Since IRS 6 is a near-IR binary system (Nisini et al. 2005),
1310: the radio/X-ray source may be one of the binary members.
1311: Comparing the near-IR source positions with the radio source position,
1312: after applying the astrometric correction
1313: determined using IRS 5a/b (see \S~5.3),
1314: the radio source can be identified as IRS 6a.
1315: Interestingly, the mid-IR source IRAC 8
1316: is located halfway between IRS 6a and 6b,
1317: suggesting that the mid-IR fluxes of the binary members are comparable.
1318: X-ray emission was never detected at the position of IRS 6b.
1319: In contrast to the IRS 5 system,
1320: only one member of the IRS 6 system
1321: seems to show detectable magnetic activities.
1322:
1323: IRS 6a showed little sign of accretion activity (Nisini et al. 2005)
1324: and was suggested to be a T Tauri star (Forbrich et al. 2006).
1325: However, the spectral class of IRS 6 was unclear
1326: because a detailed SED was not available.
1327: The 850 $\mu$m continuum map of Groppi et al. (2007)
1328: does show an unnumbered local peak at the position of IRS 6,
1329: which indicates that IRS 6 may be an embedded object.
1330: The bolometric temperature and luminosity of IRS 6,
1331: calculated using the infrared fluxes
1332: from the {\it Spitzer} archival data (Table 4),
1333: are 424 $\pm$ 12 K and $\sim$0.4 $L_\odot$, respectively.
1334: This temperature suggests that IRS 6 is a Class I protostar.
1335: The IRAC color-color diagram also places IRS 6
1336: in the Class 0/I domain (Fig. 3).
1337: Wang et al. (2004) suggested
1338: that IRS 6 may be driving a giant Herbig-Haro flow:
1339: HH 730, HH 860, HH 104 C/D, and HH 99.
1340:
1341: \section{SUMMARY}
1342:
1343: We observed the R CrA region using the VLA in the 3.5 and 6.2 cm continuum
1344: to image the young stellar objects
1345: and study the star forming activities in this region.
1346: Archival VLA data from recent observations
1347: made in extended configurations were also analyzed.
1348: A total of 16 sources was detected.
1349: The source properties were studied by investigating source structure,
1350: flux variability, spectral slope, and proper motion
1351: and also by comparing with the sources detected in shorter wavelength.
1352: The main results are summarized as follows:
1353:
1354: 1.
1355: The centimeter emission of IRS 7A traces the thermal radio jet
1356: that seems to be flowing in the north-south direction,
1357: and the outflow activity has become enhanced in recent years.
1358: A recently ejected outflow knot was found to be moving
1359: at a speed of 100 km s$^{-1}$ or higher.
1360: The main peak position of the radio emission
1361: agrees with the mid-IR and X-ray positions,
1362: which suggests that the X-ray emission comes
1363: from the central (proto)star or a very vicinity of it.
1364:
1365: 2.
1366: The Class 0 source SMA 2 is associated
1367: with the centimeter continuum sources B 9a/b
1368: and the 7 mm continuum source CT 2.
1369: While the detailed structure of the B 9 complex needs further studies,
1370: it may be a multiple-protostar system
1371: that is driving at least two outflows (FPM 10 and FPM 13).
1372: The negative spectral slope of B 9a/b indicates
1373: that the radiation process is nonthermal.
1374:
1375: 3.
1376: The centimeter continuum images of IRS 7B show
1377: a combination of a compact source and an extended structure.
1378: The compact source corresponds to the Class 0/I source SMA 1.
1379: The X-ray source position also agrees well with the radio peak position,
1380: and IRS 7B (SMA 1) is one of the youngest known objects
1381: that were detected in X-rays,
1382: which suggests that energetic magnetic activities
1383: start very early in the protostellar stage.
1384: The extended structure is probably a bipolar outflow driven by IRS 7B.
1385:
1386: 4.
1387: The Class I binary system IRS 5 was resolved in the 3.5 cm continuum maps.
1388: The binary separation is 0.9$''$ (160 AU).
1389: Both members of the system show radio flare activities and X-ray emission.
1390: IRS 5 is one of the youngest known binary systems
1391: that is showing magnetic activities in both members.
1392:
1393: 5.
1394: The radio light curve of IRS 5b shows at least two flare activities,
1395: and the duration of active phase is about a month.
1396: Such a long time-scale suggests
1397: that the flare activity involves large-scale magnetic fields.
1398:
1399: 6.
1400: During the 1998 September--October flare event of IRS 5b,
1401: the radio flux of IRS 5a also showed a significant enhancement.
1402: This concurrent activity suggests a few possibilities:
1403: IRS 5a and 5b are interacting directly,
1404: they are surround by a circumbinary halo,
1405: or they are responding to an external trigger.
1406: IRS 5 may be the youngest known example of interacting binaries.
1407:
1408: 7.
1409: The variable radio source B 5
1410: was found to be an extended ($\sim$1$''$) object.
1411: The spectral slope also varies significantly,
1412: suggesting that both thermal and nonthermal radiation processes are working.
1413: The rapid variability and the source size rule out an extragalactic source.
1414: The nature of B 5, however, still remains unclear.
1415:
1416: 8.
1417: The Class I sources IRS 1 and IRS 2 show
1418: positive spectral slopes.
1419: The centimeter emission of these sources
1420: is likely coming from optically thick thermal free-free radiation.
1421: The flux density of IRS 1 is relatively stable.
1422:
1423: 9.
1424: The Herbig Ae star R CrA is a relatively weak radio source,
1425: and the spectral slope is consistent with thermal emission.
1426: The marginally detected proper motion, 28 mas yr$^{-1}$ toward southeast,
1427: is consistent with that of the R CrA association.
1428:
1429: 10.
1430: Radio detections of the Herbig star T CrA and the Class I source WMB 55
1431: are reported here for the first time.
1432: The emission mechanism of these sources is not clear.
1433:
1434: 11.
1435: The near-IR binary IRS 6 is
1436: usually weak or undetectable in the centimeter continuum,
1437: but a radio flare event was detected in 1998 October.
1438: The radio source positionally coincides with the X-ray source
1439: and was tentatively identified as IRS 6a.
1440: Only one member of the IRS 6 binary system
1441: seems to show detectable magnetic activities.
1442: Infrared data suggests that IRS 6 is a Class I source.
1443:
1444: \acknowledgements
1445:
1446: We thank K.-H. Kim for helpful discussions.
1447: This work was supported by the LRG Program of KASI.
1448: K. H. is supported by the NASA Astrobiology Program under CAN 03-OSS-02.
1449: J.-E. L. gratefully acknowledges the support
1450: by the Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF)
1451: under a cooperative agreement with the Astrophysical Research Center
1452: for the Structure and Evolution of the Cosmos (ARCSEC).
1453: The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is
1454: a facility of the National Science Foundation
1455: operated under cooperative agreement by Associated Universities, Inc.
1456: This work is based in part on observations
1457: made with the {\it Spitzer} Space Telescope,
1458: which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
1459: California Institute of Technology under a contract with NASA.
1460: This publication makes use of data products
1461: from the Two Micron All Sky Survey,
1462: which is a joint project of the University of Massachusetts
1463: and the Infrared Processing
1464: and Analysis Center/California Institute of Technology,
1465: funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration
1466: and the National Science Foundation.
1467:
1468: \enlargethispage{-14\baselineskip}
1469:
1470: \begin{references}
1471: \reference{} Allen, L. E., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 363
1472: \reference{} Anderson, I. M., Harju, J., Knee, L. B. G.,
1473: \& Haikala, L. K. 1997, A\&A, 321, 575
1474: \reference{} Anglada, G., Villuendas, E., Estalella, R.,
1475: Beltr{\'a}n, M. T., Rodr{\'\i}guez, L. F., Torrelles, J. M.,
1476: \& Curiel, S. 1998, AJ, 116, 2953
1477: \reference{} Bally, J., Feigelson, E., \& Reipurth, B. 2003, ApJ, 584, 843
1478: \reference{} Brown, A. 1987, ApJ, 322, L31
1479: \reference{} Chen, H., Myers, P. C., Ladd, E. F., \& Wood, D. O. S. 1995,
1480: ApJ, 445, 377
1481: \reference{} Chen, W. P., \& Graham, J. A. 1993, ApJ, 409, 319
1482: \reference{} Chini, R., et al. 2003, A\&A, 409, 235
1483: \reference{} Choi, M., \& Tatematsu, K. 2004, ApJ, 600, L55
1484: \reference{} Choi, M., Tatematsu, K., Hamaguchi, K., \& Lee, J.-E. 2008,
1485: ApJ, submitted (Paper II)
1486: \reference{} Crusius-W{\"a}tzel, A. R. 1990, ApJ, 361, L49
1487: \reference{} Dulk, G. A. 1985, ARA\&A, 23, 169
1488: \reference{} Favata, F., Fridlund, C. V. M., Micela, G., Sciortino, S.,
1489: \& Kaas, A. A. 2002, A\&A, 386, 204
1490: \reference{} Feigelson, E. D., Carkner, L., \& Wilking, B. A. 1998,
1491: ApJ, 494, L215
1492: \reference{} Feigelson, E. D., \& Montmerle, T. 1999, ARA\&A, 37, 363
1493: \reference{} Forbrich, J., \& Preibisch, T. 2007, A\&A, 475, 959
1494: \reference{} Forbrich, J., Preibisch, T., \& Menten, K. M. 2006,
1495: A\&A, 446, 155
1496: \reference{} Forbrich, J. et al. 2007, A\&A, 464, 1003
1497: \reference{} Garay, G., Brooks, K. J., Mardones, D., \& Norris, R. P. 2003,
1498: ApJ, 587, 739
1499: \reference{} Groppi, C. E., Hunter, T. R., Blundell, R., \& Sandell, G. 2007,
1500: ApJ, 670, 489
1501: \reference{} Groppi, C. E., Kulesa, C., Walker, C., \& Martin, C. L. 2004,
1502: ApJ, 612, 946
1503: \reference{} Hamaguchi, K., Choi, M., Corcoran, M. F., Choi, C.-S.,
1504: Tatematsu, K., \& Petre, R. 2008, ApJ, in press
1505: \reference{} Hamaguchi, K., Corcoran, M. F., Petre, R., White, N. E.,
1506: Stelzer, B., Nedachi, K., Kobayashi, N.,
1507: \& Tokunaga, A. T. 2005, ApJ, 623, 291
1508: \reference{} Harju, J., Haikala, L. K., Mattila, K., Mauersberger, R.,
1509: Booth, R. S., \& Nordh, H. L. 1993, A\&A, 278, 569
1510: \reference{} Hartigan, P., \& Graham, J. A. 1987, AJ, 93, 913
1511: \reference{} Henning, Th., Launhardt, R., Steinacker, J., \& Thamm, E. 1994,
1512: A\&A, 291, 546
1513: \reference{} Henriksen, R. N., Ptuskin, V. S., \& Mirabel, I. F. 1991,
1514: A\&A, 248, 221
1515: \reference{} Knude, J., \& H{\o}g, E. 1998, A\&A, 338, 897
1516: \reference{} Koyama, K., Hamaguchi, K., Ueno, S., Kobayashi, N.,
1517: \& Feigelson, E. D. 1996, PASJ, 48, L87
1518: \reference{} Lee, J.-E., et al. 2006, ApJ, 648, 491
1519: \reference{} Loinard, L., Rodr{\'\i}guez, L. F., D'Alessio, P.,
1520: Rodr{\'\i}guez, M. I., \& Gonz{\'a}lez, R. F. 2007, ApJ, 657, 916
1521: \reference{} Massi, M., Forbrich, J., Menten, K. M.,
1522: Torricelli-Ciamponi, G., Neidh{\"o}fer, J., Leurini, S.,
1523: \& Bertoldi, F. 2006, A\&A, 453, 959
1524: \reference{} Massi, M., et al. 2008, A\&A, 480, 489
1525: \reference{} Miettinen, O., Kontinen, S., Harju, J., \& Higdon, J. L. 2008,
1526: A\&A, in press
1527: \reference{} Montmerle, T., Grosso, N., Tsuboi, Y., \& Koyama, K. 2000,
1528: ApJ, 532, 1097
1529: \reference{} Mutel, R. L., Lestrade, J. F., Preston, R. A.,
1530: \& Phillips, R. B. 1985, ApJ, 289, 262
1531: \reference{} Neuh{\"a}user, R., et al. 2000, A\&AS, 146, 323
1532: \reference{} Nisini, B., Antoniucci, S., Giannini, T.,
1533: \& Lorenzetti, D. 2005, A\&A, 429, 543
1534: \reference{} Nutter, D. J., Ward-Thompson, D., \& Andr{\'e}, P. 2005,
1535: MNRAS, 357, 975
1536: \reference{} Phillips, R. B., Lonsdale, C. J., \& Feigelson, E. D. 1991,
1537: ApJ, 382, 261
1538: \reference{} Pravdo, S. H., Feigelson, E. D., Garmire, G., Maeda, Y.,
1539: Tsuboi, Y., \& Bally, J. 2001, Nature, 413, 708
1540: \reference{} Reynolds, S. P. 1986, ApJ, 304, 713
1541: \reference{} Rodr{\'\i}guez, L. F., Anglada, G., \& Curiel, S. 1999,
1542: ApJS, 125, 427
1543: \reference{} Rodr{\'\i}guez, L. F., Curiel, S., Moran, J. M., Mirabel, I. F.,
1544: Roth, M., \& Garay, G. 1989, ApJ, 346, L85
1545: \reference{} Strom, K. M., Strom, S. E., \& Grasdalen, G. L. 1974,
1546: ApJ, 187, 83
1547: \reference{} Suters, M., Stewart, R. T., Brown, A., \& Zealey, W. 1996,
1548: AJ, 111, 320
1549: \reference{} Takami, M., Bailey, J., \& Chrysostomou, A. 2003, A\&A, 397, 675
1550: \reference{} Taylor, K. N. R., \& Storey, J. W. V. 1984, MNRAS, 209, 5P
1551: \reference{} Tsujimoto, M., Koyama, K., Kobayashi, N., Saito, M.,
1552: Tsuboi, Y., \& Chandler, C. J. 2004, PASJ, 56, 341
1553: \reference{} van den Ancker, M. E. 1999, Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Amsterdam
1554: \reference{} Wang, H., Mundt, R., Henning, T., \& Apai, D. 2004,
1555: ApJ, 617, 1191
1556: \reference{} Wilking, B. A., Greene, T. P., Lada, C. J., Meyer, M. R.,
1557: \& Young, E. T. 1992, ApJ, 397, 520
1558: \reference{} Wilking, B. A., McCaughrean, M. J., Burton, M. G., Giblin, T.,
1559: Rayner, J. T., \& Zinnecker, H. 1997, AJ, 114, 2029
1560: \end{references}
1561:
1562: %\TimeStamp
1563:
1564: \end{document}
1565:
1566: