1: %\documentclass[12pt,referee]{aastex}

2: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

3: \usepackage{epsf}

4: 

5: %======================================================================

6: %                 author's own macros

7: %======================================================================

8: 

9: \newcommand{\sect}[1]{\S\,\ref{#1}}

10: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{displaymath}}

11: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{displaymath}}

12: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}

13: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}

14: \newcommand\msol{M_{\odot}}

15: \newcommand\cc{$^{12}$C/$^{13}$C}

16: %======================================================================

17:  

18: %\received{}

19: %\accepted{}

20: %\journalid{}{}

21: %\articleid{}{}

22: 

23: %\slugcomment{Astrophysical Journal, submitted}

24: 

25: \shortauthors{Denissenkov, Pinsonneault, \& MacGregor}

26: \shorttitle{Magneto\,-Thermohaline Mixing in Red Giants}

27: 

28: %\received{2007 December 1}

29: \begin{document}

30: 

31: \title{MAGNETO\,-THERMOHALINE MIXING IN RED GIANTS}

32: 

33: \author{Pavel A. Denissenkov\altaffilmark{1,2}, Marc Pinsonneault\altaffilmark{1}, and Keith B. MacGregor\altaffilmark{3}}

34: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Astronomy, The Ohio State University, 4055 McPherson Laboratory,

35:        140 West 18th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210; dpa@astronomy.ohio-state.edu, pinsono@astronomy.ohio-state.edu.}

36: \altaffiltext{2}{On leave from Sobolev Astronomical Institute of St. Petersburg State University,

37:    Universitetsky Pr. 28, Petrodvorets, 198504 St. Petersburg, Russia.}

38: \altaffiltext{3}{High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 3000,

39:    Boulder, CO 80307-3000; kmac@hao.ucar.edu.}

40:  

41: \begin{abstract}

42: We revise a magnetic buoyancy model that has recently been proposed as a mechanism for

43: extra mixing in the radiative zones of low-mass red giants. The most important revision is

44: our accounting of the heat exchange between rising magnetic flux rings and their surrounding

45: medium. This increases the buoyant rising time by five orders of magnitude, therefore 

46: the number of magnetic flux rings participating in the mixing has to be increased correspondingly.

47: On the other hand, our revised model takes advantage of the fact that the mean molecular weight of the rings

48: formed in the vicinity of the hydrogen burning shell has been reduced by $^3$He burning. This

49: increases their thermohaline buoyancy (hence, decreases the total ring number) considerably, 

50: making it equivalent to the pure magnetic buoyancy produced by

51: a frozen-in toroidal field with $B_\varphi\approx 10$\,MG. We emphasize that some toroidal field

52: is still needed for the rings to remain cohesive while rising. Besides, this field prevents 

53: the horizontal turbulent diffusion from eroding the $\mu$ contrast between the rings and their

54: surrounding medium. We propose that the necessary toroidal magnetic field is generated

55: by differential rotation of the radiative zone, that stretches a pre-existing poloidal field around the rotation axis,

56: and that magnetic flux rings are formed as a result of its buoyancy-related instability.

57: \end{abstract} 

58: 

59: \keywords{stars: abundances --- stars: evolution --- stars: interiors}

60: 

61: \section{Introduction}

62: 

63: During their first ascent on the red giant branch (RGB),

64: a majority of low-mass stars (those with $M\la 2\,M_\odot$) experience extra mixing in their radiative zones

65: separating the H burning shell from the bottom of convective envelope 

66: (\citealt{sm79,chdn98,dv03}). Despite 30 years of effort, however, the underlying physical mechanism

67: is still not understood. Observationally, the RGB extra mixing manifests itself through

68: changes of the surface abundances of Li, C, N, and of the isotopic ratio $^{12}$C/$^{13}$C

69: correlating with an increasing luminosity (\citealt{grea00,sm03}). 

70: These changes are produced by the joint operation of thermonuclear reactions that take place 

71: in the vicinity of the H shell and a nonconvective mixing process that transports reaction products through the radiative zone

72: to the convective envelope. Observations support the idea that this mixing process starts (or, gets much more efficient)

73: when an RGB star reaches a luminosity at which the differential luminosity function for a population of stars

74: having the same age and chemical composition shows a prominent bump (a local pile-up of stars). The luminosity bump

75: results from a temporary slowing down of the star's evolution caused by its structural readjustment.

76: This happens when the H shell crosses and erases a discontinuity in the H-abundance profile left behind by

77: the bottom of convective envelope at the end of the first dredge-up. During the first dredge-up, that occurs on the subgiant branch and on the lower RGB,

78: the convective envelope grows in mass, which causes its bottom to penetrate the layers whose chemical composition

79: had been altered yet on the main sequence (MS). This produces changes of the surface abundances of

80: Li, C, N, and of the $^{12}$C/$^{13}$C ratio similar to but by far less substantial than those 

81: incurred from the subsequent operation of the RGB extra mixing.

82: 

83: Until recently, it has been thought that the only reason why the RGB extra mixing does not manifest itself

84: below the bump luminosity is a strong gradient of the mean molecular weight $\mu$ caused by the onset of

85: a deep convective envelope (e.g., \citealt{chea98}). Any mixing mechanism

86: has to overcome the stable thermal stratification of the radiative zone, and in the presence of

87: a positive $\nabla_\mu$ such mixing is correspondingly more difficult. 

88: In an RGB star above the bump luminosity, the H shell has already crossed the H-profile

89: discontinuity, therefore the radiative zone is now chemically uniform everywhere except in a very close neighborhood of

90: the H shell. This circumstance was repeatedly emphasized in the past. 

91: In particular, it has been used to model the RGB extra mixing with rotation-driven

92: meridional circulation and turbulent diffusion. It was not until recently that it has become clear that rotational mixing

93: fails to explain the chemical element transport in the radiative zones of upper RGB stars (\citealt{chea05,pea06}). 

94: In short, this failure is due to the following main causes: firstly, rotation period measurements for young cluster stars

95: and helioseismic data indicate that MS stars with $M\la 1\,M_\odot$ loose a great amount of their initial angular momentum via

96: magnetized stellar winds and that they most likely become slow and nearly solid-body rotators before leaving the MS; 

97: secondly, the chemical element transport by meridional

98: circulation is strongly hindered by rotation-induced horizontal turbulence in stellar radiative zones (\citealt{chz92});

99: thirdly, the vertical turbulent diffusion powered by differential rotation in the radiative zones of RGB stars operates

100: at a low level too because it also redistributes the angular momentum, thus reducing the degree of differential rotation

101: in a self-regulating way.

102: 

103: A new class of RGB extra mixing models has emerged since \cite{eea06} noticed that 

104: a tiny $\mu$-gradient inversion ($\nabla_\mu \approx -10^{-4}$) becomes visible at the outer tail of the H burning shell

105: precisely at the moment when the H shell erases the H-profile discontinuity.

106: This inversion is produced by the reaction $^3$He($^3$He,\,2p)$^4$He that locally reduces the mean molecular weight by $\Delta\mu\approx\mu^2\Delta X_3/6$,

107: where $X_3$ is the $^3$He mass fraction. The mechanism can be effective in the low-mass RGB stars 

108: because their MS progenitors synthesize large amounts of $^3$He in their outer radiative cores through non-equilibrium pp burning.

109: Even though this $^3$He-rich material gets diluted in the convective envelope during the first dredge-up,

110: the radiative zone of a low-mass RGB star above the bump luminosity can still have $X_3$ increased up to a value of $2\times 10^{-3}$

111: (the solar initial $^3$He abundance is $3\times 10^{-5}$). For this mass fraction,

112: the $^3$He burning leads to $\Delta\mu\approx -10^{-4}$, assuming that $\mu\approx 0.6$ and $\Delta X_3\approx -X_3$. 

113: Below the bump luminosity, the $\mu$-gradient inversion is overridden by the strong positive $\mu$-gradient built up

114: on the MS. It shows up and may come into play only when the $^3$He burning shell, advancing in mass in front of the major H shell, finds itself

115: in the chemically homogeneous part of the radiative zone. This happens at the bump luminosity.

116: \cite{eea06} found that a rapid mixing process occurred in their 3D simulations above this point, 

117: although the underlying cause was not identified (see \citealt{dp08b}).

118: 

119: Inspired by this work, \cite{chz07a} have proposed that the $\mu$-gradient inversion maintained by the $^3$He burning drives thermohaline convection in

120: the radiative zones of low-mass RGB stars above the bump luminosity and that this is the long-sought physical mechanism for the RGB extra mixing. 

121: Thermohaline convection is a mixing process triggered by a double diffusive

122: instability (e.g., \citealt{v04}). Consider a stratified ideal gas with a stable temperature gradient 

123: ($\nabla\equiv d\ln T/d\ln P < \nabla_{\rm ad}$, where ``ad'' stands for adiabatic changes)

124: but with an unstable composition gradient ($\nabla_\mu < 0$). If we isolate a gas blob and shift it up in the vertical direction

125: then its further motion will depend on how fast the blob exchanges heat and composition with its surrounding medium horizontally.

126: Indeed, the relative difference in density between the surrounding medium and the blob is $\Delta\rho/\rho \approx \Delta\mu/\mu - \Delta T/T$,

127: assuming that $\Delta P = 0$. For the blob to continue rising, we need $\Delta\rho > 0$. Our assumptions about the gradients mean that

128: $\Delta\mu > 0$ and $\Delta T > 0$ in the absence of both heat and molecular diffusion. Because these differences grow when

129: the blob rises, $\Delta\rho$ may stay positive or it may ultimately become negative depending on the ratio $r_\mu = |\nabla_\mu|/(\nabla_{\rm ad}-\nabla)$.

130: In our particular case, $r_\mu\ll 1$. Therefore, our idealized impermeable and adiabatic blob will rise a short distance and then stop, when

131: the accumulated difference in $T$ compensates that in $\mu$.

132: In reality, the heat exchange, whose rate is specified by

133: the radiative diffusivity $K$, constantly works to reduce the difference in $T$. On the other hand, molecular diffusion $\nu_{\rm mol}$

134: tries to smooth out the difference in $\mu$. The double diffusive instability may therefore develop only if $K\gg \nu_{\rm mol}$.

135: In this case, the blob's rising speed can be estimated as $v\sim l/\tau_{\rm th}$, where $l$ is the mean path that the blob travels before

136: it gets dissolved, while $\tau_{\rm th}\sim d^2/K$ is the characteristic thermal time scale for a spherical blob of the diameter $d$.

137: An approximate expression for the thermohaline diffusion coefficient can be obtained as

138: $D_{\rm thc}\sim lvr_\mu \sim Kr_\mu(l/d)^2$. \cite{chz07a} and \cite{dp08b} have demonstrated that the observed RGB mixing patterns can be explained by

139: stellar evolutionary models with the $^3$He-driven thermohaline convection only if $l/d\ga 10$\,--\,$30$. A similarly large parameter ratio for

140: thermohaline convection in stellar radiative zones was postulated by \cite{u72}, as opposed to a ratio $l/d\sim 1$ advocated by \cite{kea80}.

141: Besides, the double-diffusive instability has been shown to result in formation of elongated (large $l$ to $d$ ratios) structures

142: known as ``salt fingers'' in laboratory experiments with the saltier and warmer water overlying the fresher and colder water (\citealt{s60}). 

143: 

144: However, there appears to exist observational and theoretical

145: arguments challenging this model. First of all, a large number of old metal-poor MS stars with $M\la 0.9\,M_\odot$, both in globular clusters and

146: in the halo field, that had accreted He- and C-rich high-$\mu$ material from their evolved cluster or binary companions

147: do not seem to have been thoroughly mixed by thermohaline convection (\citealt{nt07,dp08a,aea08}), as it would be expected even

148: if the less efficient prescription by \cite{kea80} were used for $D_{\rm thc}$. Second, thermohaline convection is expected to be suppressed

149: by the rotation-induced horizontal turbulence that works together with the molecular diffusion to reduce the $\mu$ contrast

150: between the rising gas blob and its surroundings (\citealt{dp08b}). Third, strong differential rotation is predicted to hinder 

151: thermohaline convection as well, because the ``salt fingers'' may be tilted by the rotational shear so rapidly that they will get damped before

152: they produce significant mixing (\citealt{c99}, and references therein). We anticipate that a similar effect is also produced by

153: the Coriolis force in a uniformly rotating radiative zone. Contrary to these expectations, a much larger fraction of

154: Li-rich objects has been found among rapidly rotating ($v\sin\,i\geq 8$\,km\,s$^{-1}$) K giants than

155: among their more common slowly rotating ($v\sin\,i\la 1$\,km\,s$^{-1}$) counterparts (\citealt{dea02}). 

156: The Li-rich K giants are low-mass stars located above the bump luminosity (\citealt{chb00}) in which large amounts of Li are thought to be synthesized      

157: via the $^7$Be-transport mechanism (\citealt{cf71}). To be efficient, this mechanism needs a 10 to 100 times faster mixing

158: than that required to reproduce the abundance patterns in the majority of upper RGB stars (\citealt{dh04}). It is not clear how thermohaline convection

159: can explain the phenomenon of Li-rich K giants given that its efficiency should be lower in the more rapidly rotating stars.

160: These arguments have motivated our search for an alternative RGB mixing mechanism.

161: 

162: In this paper, we use a simple model of toroidal magnetic field generation in a differentially rotating radiative zone of a bump-luminosity RGB star 

163: to obtain order-of-magnitude estimates demonstrating that the buoyant rise of magnetic flux rings being

164: formed close to the local minimum in $\mu$ may be a good alternative to the $^3$He-driven thermohaline convection.

165: A similar model has recently been proposed by \cite{bea07} (hereafter, referred to as BWNC). However, they assumed that

166: a rising ring always stays in thermal equilibrium with its surrounding medium, and we argue that this leads to a substantial

167: overestimate of the ring's radial velocity. We account for the impact of $\mu$ gradients and discuss the origin of

168: the magnetic rings.  We show that, as a mechanism for the RGB extra mixing,

169: magnetic buoyancy has some advantages over thermohaline convection

170: and, therefore, it is worth further investigating by means of multidimensional MHD simulations.

171: 

172: \section{The RGB Stellar Model}

173: 

174: Our background RGB stellar model, in the radiative zone of which the formation and buoyant rise of magnetic flux rings are studied, represents a typical metal-poor upper RGB

175: star. It has the initial mass $M=0.8\,M_\odot$, helium and heavy-element mass fractions $Y=0.24$ and $Z=0.0005$, and

176: the luminosity $\log\,L/L_\odot = 2.085$ corresponding to the age of 13.65 Gyrs. The RGB extra mixing is free to work in this star

177: because the H burning shell has already erased the H-profile discontinuity in it.

178: The model has been computed using the stellar evolution code described by \cite{dea06}.

179: Its chemical element mass fraction, $\mu$, and $\nabla_\mu$ profiles immediately above the H shell are plotted in Fig.~\ref{fig:f1}.

180: 

181: For extra mixing to dredge up material deficient in C but not enriched in Na, as required by the observed abundance patterns

182: in the metal-poor field RGB stars (\citealt{grea00}), it has to reach a depth between $0.045\,R_\odot$ and 

183: $0.055\,R_\odot$ (Fig.~\ref{fig:f1}a). We will assume the mixing depth

184: $r_{\rm mix} = 0.05\,R_\odot$ (shown by the vertical solid line in Fig.~\ref{fig:f1}). In previous works (e.g., \citealt{dw96,dv03}),

185: the mixing depth was specified using either the relative mass coordinate $\delta M_{\rm mix} = (M_{\rm mix}-M_{\rm c})/(M_{\rm bce}-M_{\rm c})$ or

186: the logarithmic temperature difference $\Delta\log T = \log T(r_{\rm c}) - \log T(r_{\rm mix})$, where the subscripts ``c'' and ``bce'' refer

187: to the He core boundary and to the bottom of convective envelope, respectively. However, we have noticed that, when plotted as functions of $r$, 

188: the abundance profiles remain nearly stationary in spite of the slow mass inflow from the radiative zone that feeds the H burning shell.

189: Therefore, we have decided to simply use the radius for the RGB mixing depth specification. The value of $r_{\rm mix} = 0.05\,R_\odot$

190: corresponds to $\delta M_{\rm mix} = 0.135$ and $\Delta\log T = 0.245$.

191: 

192: For subsequent estimates of various quantities characterizing the efficiencies of magnetic flux ring formation and buoyant rise in

193: the radiative zone of our RGB model we need to know some of its structure parameters   

194: at $r=r_{\rm mix}$. These are summarized in Table~\ref{tab:tab1} along with the parameter values at $r=r_{\rm bce}$.

195: We have also listed the values used by BWNC. Note that they have considered a half-solar metallicity bump luminosity

196: model with the initial mass of $1.5\,M_\odot$.

197: 

198: \section{Rotation in the Radiative Zone}

199: 

200: In our magnetic buoyancy model, it is assumed that a toroidal magnetic field in the radiative zone of

201: an RGB star is generated by its differential rotation that stretches a pre-existing poloidal field around the rotation axis.

202: To elaborate on the model, we therefore need an estimate of the degree of differential rotation in the radiative zone.

203: For this, we use the rotation profile M2 presented by \cite{pea06} in their Fig.~2 (the dotted curve in upper panel C). It shows the angular velocity $\Omega$ as

204: a function of $\delta M = (M_r-M_{\rm c})/(M_{\rm bce}-M_{\rm c})$ in the radiative zone of a bump luminosity model

205: with initial values of $M$, $Y$, and $Z$ almost identical to ours. The model's rotational

206: evolution was computed using the stellar evolution code STAREVOL designed for 1D simulations of 

207: the angular momentum and chemical element transport in stellar radiative zones (\citealt{sea00,pea03}).

208: The code takes proper account of

209: the rotation-induced meridional circulation, horizontal and vertical turbulent diffusion, as well as atomic diffusion and mass-loss.

210: The initial zero-age MS model for the M2 run has been assumed to be a slow solid-body rotator with the surface rotational velocity of 5 km\,s$^{-1}$.

211: This choice is a reasonable replacement for detailed computations of the pre-MS and early MS evolution during which

212: a low-mass star experiences a strong magnetic breaking of its much faster initial surface rotation

213: and a core-envelope rotational coupling leading to its nearly uniform internal rotation on a much shorter time scale than

214: its MS life time. 

215: 

216: Another important assumption made by \cite{pea06} is uniform specific angular

217: momentum distribution in the RGB convective envelope. 

218: This is required to explain the origin of rapidly rotating red horizontal branch stars (\citealt{sp00}).

219: This empirical demand for a strong differential rotation in the convective envelopes of low-mass RGB stars is supported by recent 3D hydrodynamic

220: simulations of the interaction of turbulent convection and rotation performed by \cite{pb06}. 

221: 

222: The M2 bump luminosity model has $\Omega(r_{\rm bce})\approx 10^{-6}$ rad\,s$^{-1}$,

223: and $\Omega(r_{\rm mix})\approx 10^{-3}$ rad\,s$^{-1}$. We will use these values in our following discussion.

224: So, in the absence of transport processes other than those considered by \cite{pea06}, the angular velocity in the radiative zone 

225: of our RGB stellar model could vary with the radius

226: approximately as $\Omega(r) = \Omega(r_{\rm mix})(r_{\rm mix}/r)^2$. This steep rotation profile results from the conservation of

227: angular momentum in the mass inflow and modest angular momentum redistribution by meridional circulation and vertical turbulent diffusion.

228: 

229: \section{Suppression of Thermohaline Convection by Horizontal Turbulence}

230: \label{sec:suppress}

231: 

232: \cite{dp08b} have derived a general criterion for convective instability in the presence of a negative $\nabla_\mu$

233: and strong horizontal turbulence, the latter being  characterized by a diffusion coefficient $D_{\rm h}\gg \nu_{\rm mol}$. They have allowed for a

234: possibility that a convective element of the diameter $d$ can travel a distance $l > d$. One of the consequences of this criterion is

235: that thermohaline convection may be suppressed by the horizontal turbulent diffusion unless

236: \bea

237: \frac{|\nabla_\mu|}{\nabla_{\rm rad}-\nabla_{\rm ad}} > \frac{1}{3}\frac{D_{\rm h}}{K+D_{\rm h}},

238: \label{eq:ourcrit}

239: \eea

240: where $\nabla_{\rm rad}$ is the radiative temperature gradient

241: (compare this inequality with condition 5 from \citealt{v04}).

242: Note that a similar result can be obtained from the dispersion relation (10) derived and analysed by \cite{u72}.

243: One should only take into account that, in the presence of the strong horizontal turbulence,

244: Ulrich's molecular diffusion coefficient $\mathbf{D}$ has to be replaced with $D_{\rm h}$. Then, for the thermally

245: limited modes, one readily finds

246: \bea

247: D_{\rm thc} \approx D_{\rm Ulrich}\times \left(1-\frac{D_{\rm h}}{K}\frac{\nabla_{\rm rad}-\nabla_{\rm ad}}{|\nabla_\mu|}\right),

248: \label{eq:modulrich}

249: \eea

250: where $D_{\rm Ulrich}$ is Ulrich's original thermohaline diffusion coefficient.

251: From the last expression it follows that thermohaline convection may operate ($D_{\rm thc} > 0$) only when

252: $|\nabla_\mu|/(\nabla_{\rm ad}-\nabla_{\rm rad}) > D_{\rm h}/K$, which is close to the requirement (\ref{eq:ourcrit}),

253: provided that $D_{\rm h} < K$. The difference in the right-hand-side ratios between the two conditions comes about from the fact that, unlike \cite{dp08b},

254: Ulrich neglected the contribution of $\mathbf{D}$ to the heat diffusion. That was warranted for the nonrotating case considered by him, in which

255: $D_{\rm h}=0$, and therefore $\mathbf{D}=\nu_{\rm mol}\ll K$.

256: 

257: \cite{pea06} have shown that $D_{\rm h}$ always stays comparable to $K$ at $r\approx r_{\rm mix}$ in their M2 RGB model. Moreover,

258: the ratio $D_{\rm h}/K$ turns out to be larger than $\sim$\,$10^{-3}$ at all radii between $r_{\rm mix}$ and $r_{\rm bce}$, both in the bump luminosity

259: model and in the more evolved model shown in their Fig.~5 (panels C and D). Given that the $^3$He burning can make the ratio 

260: $|\nabla_\mu|/(\nabla_{\rm rad}-\nabla_{\rm ad}) \sim 10^{-3}$ at most, while the RGB extra mixing will necessarily reduce it

261: below this limit (by smoothing out the $\mu$-gradient), the linear analysis predicts that thermohaline convection 

262: may be suppressed in these models, especially in the vicinity of $r_{\rm mix}$. 

263: It would be inconsistent to ignore this prediction because similar eroding effects of the horizontal turbulence

264: on the model rotational and mixing properties have already been included in the simulations performed by \cite{pea06}. They are responsible for

265: the significant reduction of the efficiency of mixing by meridional circulation (\citealt{chz92}) and for the erasing of

266: the latitudinal differential rotation, the latter effect allowing to consider $\Omega$ as a function of $r$ alone (\citealt{z92}).

267: Besides, Zahn's concept of the rotation-induced anisotropic turbulence in stellar radiative zones, with horizontal 

268: components of the turbulent viscosity strongly dominating over those in the vertical direction,

269: was repeatedly used in stellar evolution computations to facilitate the penetration of $\mu$-gradient barriers by the

270: vertical turbulent diffusion both in MS stars and in upper RGB stars (\citealt{tz97,tea97,m03,pea03,pea06}).

271: 

272: \section{Generation of Toroidal Magnetic Field}

273: \label{sec:gen}

274: 

275: Following \cite{mw87}, we assume that, like in the solar-type MS stars, the differential rotation in the radiative zone of the RGB star

276: creates a toroidal magnetic field $B_\varphi$ by shearing a pre-existing constant poloidal field 

277: $\mathbf{B}_{\rm p} = \{B_r,\,B_\theta,\,0\}$ (we use the spherical polar coordinates).

278: As a result of its buoyancy-related undular instability (e.g., \citealt{a78,svb82}), the toroidal field is prompted

279: to form magnetic flux rings that will rise toward the bottom of convective envelope, thus producing

280: chemical mixing and also participating in angular momentum redistribution.

281: 

282: At the stellar equator ($\theta = 90^\circ$), the momentum and induction equations (\citealt{chmg93}) can be reduced to

283: \bea

284: \label{eq:mom}

285: \frac{\partial\Omega}{\partial t} & = & \omega_{{\rm A},r}^2\,\frac{\partial b}{\partial r}, \\

286: \frac{\partial b}{\partial t} & = & r^2\,\frac{\partial\Omega}{\partial r},

287: \label{eq:ind}

288: \eea

289: where $\omega_{{\rm A},r} = B_r/(\sqrt{4\pi\rho}\,r)$ is the local Alfv\'{e}n frequency associated with the radial field component $B_r$, and $b = rB_\varphi/B_r$.

290: In equations (\ref{eq:mom}\,--\,\ref{eq:ind}), we have omitted the viscosity and magnetic diffusivity, for these

291: will be shown to work on much longer time scales than the formation and buoyant rise of magnetic rings.

292: For the sake of simplicity, we have additionally assumed that the poloidal field's configuration is such that $B_\theta = 0$ at the equator.

293: Neglecting changes with the radius of the coefficients in equations (\ref{eq:mom}\,--\,\ref{eq:ind}), we find that

294: the variations of $\Omega$ and $b$ can locally be described by the same Alfv\'{e}n wave equation

295: $$

296: \frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial r^2} - \frac{1}{(r^2\omega_{{\rm A},r}^2)}\,\frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial t^2} = 0.

297: $$

298: So, at a given radius, the initial (continuing while $t\ll \omega_{{\rm A},r}^{-1}$) decrease of $\Omega$ and increase of $|b|$ 

299: can be approximated as $\Omega(t,r)\approx\Omega_{\rm max}(r)\cos (\omega_{{\rm A},r}\,t)$, and

300: $b(t,r)\approx b_{\rm max}(r)\sin (\omega_{{\rm A},r}\,t)$.

301: From (\ref{eq:mom}\,--\,\ref{eq:ind}) we can also estimate the ratio of the wave amplitudes

302: $\Omega_{\rm max}/b_{\rm max}\approx \omega_{{\rm A},r}/r$, hence $(B_\varphi)_{\rm max}\approx B_r(\Omega_{\rm max}/\omega_{{\rm A},r})$.

303: This ensures that the sum of the rotational kinetic and toroidal field potential energy (per unit gram) is conserved,

304: \bea

305: \label{eq:energy}

306: \frac{1}{2}\left(r\Omega\right)^2 + \frac{B_\varphi^2}{8\pi\rho} = \frac{1}{2}\left(r\Omega_{\rm max}\right)^2.

307: \eea

308: 

309: Substituting the values of $r=r_{\rm mix}$ and $\rho=\rho\,(r_{\rm mix})$ from our RGB model (Table~\ref{tab:tab1}) into

310: the above relations, we find that

311: \bea

312: \label{eq:tbphi}

313: \omega_{{\rm A},r}^{-1} & = & 1.50\times 10^3\,B_r^{-1}\ \ \mbox{yr\,rad}^{-1}, \\

314: \label{eq:bphi0}

315: (B_\varphi)_{\rm max} & = & 4.75\times 10^5\,(\Omega_{\rm max})_{-5}\,B_r,

316: \eea

317: where $(\Omega_{\rm max})_{-5} \equiv \Omega_{\rm max}/(10^{-5}\,\mbox{rad}\,\mbox{s}^{-1})$.

318: Equation (\ref{eq:bphi0}) gives an order-of-magnitude estimate of the toroidal field maximum 

319: strength that may be generated by the differential rotation at $r=r_{\rm mix}$, while equation (\ref{eq:tbphi}) estimates

320: its growth time. For example, we may expect (from equation \ref{eq:ind}) that, after a time $\Delta t\ll \omega_{{\rm A},r}^{-1}$,

321: a toroidal field $B_\varphi\approx \Omega_{\rm max}B_r\,q\,\Delta t \approx (B_\varphi)_{\rm max}\, \omega_{{\rm A},r}\,q\,\Delta t 

322: = 3.16\times 10^2(\Omega_{\rm max})_{-5} B_r\,q\,\Delta t$

323: will be created, where $q = (\partial\ln\Omega/\partial\ln r) < 0$ is the initial rotational shear, and $\Delta t$ is expressed in years. Assuming that 

324: $\Omega_{\rm max} = \Omega(r_{\rm mix}) = 10^{-3}$\,rad\,s$^{-1}$ (Table~\ref{tab:tab1}) 

325: at the moment when the differential rotation begins to stretch the poloidal field, we obtain the estimate 

326: \bea

327: B_\varphi(\Delta t,\,r_{\rm mix}) \approx 3.16\times 10^4 B_r\,q\,\Delta t,

328: \label{eq:bphiin1yr}

329: \eea

330: where $\Delta t \ll 1.50\times 10^3\,B_r^{-1}$ yrs.

331: The relative decrease of $\Omega$ for the same period of time is $|\Delta\Omega/\Omega_{\rm max}|\approx 4.42\times 10^{-7}\,B_r^2\,q^2\,(\Delta t)^2\ll 1$.

332: In the general case of $B_\theta\neq 0$ and $\Omega = \Omega(r,\theta)$ we would have $B_\varphi \approx r\sin\theta\,(\nabla\Omega,\mathbf{B}_{\rm p})\,\Delta t$

333: for $\Delta t\ll \omega_{{\rm A},r}^{-1}$ (\citealt{s99}), i.e. the both poloidal field components would be involved into the winding up of

334: toroidal field.

335: 

336: If the uniform rotation of the solar radiative core and the core-envelope rotational coupling in the low-mass MS stars 

337: are both produced by the back reaction of the azimuthal component of the Lorentz force emerging in the process of

338: generation of toroidal magnetic fields by the shearing of pre-existing poloidal fields, as proposed by

339: \cite{chmg93}, then the MS progenitors of low-mass RGB stars are required to possess poloidal magnetic fields with

340: strengths of the order of 0.01\,G to 10\,G in their radiative interiors. The low magnetic diffusivity $\eta\sim 10^2$\,sm$^2$\,s$^{-1}$

341: in the low-mass MS stars excludes the ohmic dissipation of these fields. Therefore, the post-MS contraction of the H-exhausted core

342: from its MS radius of $\sim$\,$0.2\,R_\odot$ down to its RGB radius $r_{\rm c} \approx 0.02\,R_\odot$ and magnetic flux conservation

343: might lead to the amplification of $B_r$ up to the values 1\,G to 1\,kG. From the same considerations,

344: it also follows that $B_r$ in the radiative zone of the RGB star may decrease with the radius as $B_r\approx B_r(r_{\rm mix})\,(r_{\rm mix}/r)^2$.

345: It is true that the mass inflow in the radiative zone may sweep the frozen-in poloidal field toward the H burning shell

346: on a long time scale of the order of $\Delta r/|\dot{r}| = (r_{\rm bce}-r_{\rm mix})/|\dot{r}|\sim 3\times 10^7$ yrs (Table~\ref{tab:tab1}). 

347: However, the poloidal field

348: may be replenished by a dynamo operating at the bottom of convective envelope. It may then be entrained and redistributed all over

349: the radiative zone by the mass inflow, which could also produce the dependence $B_r\propto r^{-2}$.

350: These estimates will be used in our further analysis.

351: 

352: \section{The Buoyant Rise of Magnetic Flux Rings}

353: \label{sec:ringmotion}

354: 

355: \subsection{General Results}

356: 

357: Because we assume a differential rotation in the radiative zone, the inertial frame of reference has been chosen.

358: The magnetic flux rings are assumed to be axisymmetric with respect to the rotation axis.

359: In the spherical polar coordinates their radial and latitudinal accelerations are

360: \bea

361: \label{eq:durdt}

362: \frac{du_r}{dt} & = & \frac{u_{\theta}^2}{r}+\left(\frac{u_{\varphi}^2}{r}-\Omega^2r\sin^2\theta\right)+

363: \frac{\rho_{\rm e}-\rho}{\rho_{\rm e}+\rho}\left(\frac{GM_r}{r^2}-\Omega^2r\sin^2\theta\right) \nonumber \\

364: & & -\frac{B_{\varphi}^2}{4\pi r(\rho_{\rm e}+\rho)} - \frac{C_{\rm D}}{\pi a}\frac{\rho_{\rm e}}{\rho_{\rm e}+\rho}u_r\sqrt{u_r^2+u_{\theta}^2}, \\

365: \label{eq:duthetadt}

366: \frac{du_\theta}{dt} & = & -\frac{u_ru_\theta}{r}+\left(\frac{u_{\varphi}^2}{r}\cot\theta - \Omega^2r\sin\theta\cos\theta\right)

367: - \frac{\rho_{\rm e}-\rho}{\rho_{\rm e}+\rho}\,\,\Omega^2r\sin\theta\cos\theta \nonumber \\

368: & & - \frac{B_{\varphi}^2}{4\pi r(\rho_{\rm e}+\rho)}\cot\theta - \frac{C_{\rm D}}{\pi a}\frac{\rho_{\rm e}}{\rho_{\rm e}+\rho}u_\theta\sqrt{u_r^2+u_{\theta}^2}.

369: \eea

370: These equations (\citealt{chg87,mgc03,mdm04}) take into account the centrifugal reduction of the local gravitational acceleration, 

371: the buoyant force, the magnetic tension force, and the aerodynamic drag force (we employ the drag coefficient $C_{\rm D} = 1$). 

372: They are supplemented with the equation

373: \bea

374: \label{eq:duphidt}

375: \frac{d}{dt}(u_\varphi r\sin\theta) = 0

376: \eea

377: describing the conservation of the azimuthal component of the specific angular momentum. The subscript ``e'' means that the respective quantity

378: is referred to the external medium surrounding the rings, while all other quantities, except $\Omega$, refer to ring properties.

379: 

380: At its starting position $(r_0,\,\theta_0)$, a ring is specified by its initial cross-section radius $a_0$, the strength of the frozen-in

381: toroidal magnetic field $B_{\varphi,0}$, and internal thermodynamic properties: $P_0$, $T_0$, $\rho_0$, and $\mu_0$. The dynamic equilibrium

382: between the ring and its surrounding medium requires that

383: \bea

384: P_{\rm e} = P + \frac{B_{\varphi}^2}{8\pi},\ \ \mbox{or}\ \ \frac{\Delta P}{P_{\rm e}} \equiv \frac{(P_{\rm e}-P)}{P_{\rm e}} = 

385: \frac{1}{(1+\beta)}\approx\frac{1}{\beta},

386: \label{eq:p}

387: \eea

388: where $\beta\equiv P/(B_\varphi^2/8\pi)\gg 1$ is the ratio of the thermodynamic to magnetic pressure in the ring.

389: The conservation of mass and magnetic flux of the ring determine how its radius and toroidal field evolve during its motion

390: \bea

391: \left(\frac{a}{a_0}\right)^2 & = & \frac{\rho_0r_0\sin\theta_0}{\rho r\sin\theta} = \frac{B_{\varphi,0}}{B_\varphi},

392: \label{eq:conserv}

393: \eea

394: where $r_0 \leq r\leq r_{\rm bce}$.

395: For the equation of state, we use the ideal gas law. Finally, the entropy change in the ring is described by the simple equation

396: \bea

397: \frac{dS}{dt} = \frac{32(\gamma-1)\sigma T_{\rm e}^4}{3\kappa_{\rm e}\rho_{\rm e}a^2P}\,\delta T =

398: 2\gamma K\,\frac{\delta T}{a^2}

399: \label{eq:dsdt}

400: \eea

401: derived by \cite{mgc03}. Here, $S=\ln\,[(P/P_0)(\rho_0/\rho)^\gamma]$,  $\delta T = (T_{\rm e} - T)/T_{\rm e}$, and $\gamma = 5/3$.

402: 

403: The initial conditions for the ring are specified by $r_0=r_{\rm mix} = 0.05\,R_\odot$, $0 < \theta_0\leq 90^\circ$,

404: $u_r = 0$, $u_\theta = 0$, $u_\varphi = r_0\sin\theta_0\,\Omega(r_0,\,\theta_0)$, $\beta =\beta_0$,

405: $a = a_0$, $S=0$, $\delta P\equiv (P_{\rm e} - P)/P_{\rm e} = (1+\beta_0)^{-1}$,

406: $\delta\rho\equiv (\rho_{\rm e} - \rho)/\rho_{\rm e} = (1+\beta_0)^{-1}$, and $\delta T=0$.

407: The ring's radius $a$ will be measured in units of the local pressure scale height $H_P = P_{\rm e}/g\rho_{\rm e}$, where

408: $g=GM_r/r^2$ is the gravitational acceleration. 

409: The implicit assumption of uniform pressure inside the ring requires that $a\ll H_P$ (the thin ring approximation).

410: For brevity, we will denote $a\equiv (a/H_P)$ and, given the previous remark, we will only consider cases with $a\ll 1$. 

411: 

412: The above differential and algebraic equations have been solved numerically. The motion of the ring in the equatorial plane ($\theta_0 = 90^\circ$)

413: is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:f2} for our assumed rotation law $\Omega(r,\theta) = \Omega(r_{\rm mix})(r_{\rm mix}/r)^2$, in which case $\theta(t)=\theta_0$. Solid curves

414: correspond to the initial value of $a_0 = 10^{-4}$, while dashed curves have $a_0 = 10^{-3}$. The powers of ten

415: near the curves give their specified values of $\beta_0$, the respective toroidal field strengths (in MG) being displayed in parentheses.

416: Our computations have shown that for $\beta_0\ga 10^8$ (in other words, for  $(B_\varphi)_0 \la 0.1$ MG) 

417: and $a_0 \ga 2\times 10^{-4}$ the dependence of the total buoyant rising time on $\beta_0$ and $a_0$ can be approximated as

418: \bea

419: t_{\rm b} \approx 1.4\times 10^2\,\left(\frac{\beta_0}{10^8}\right)\, \left(\frac{a_0}{10^{-4}}\right)^2\ \ \mbox{yr}.

420: \label{eq:tb}

421: \eea

422: This is transformed into the average buoyant velocity

423: \bea

424: \langle v_{\rm b} \rangle = \frac{\Delta r}{t_{\rm b}} = \frac{(r_{\rm bce} - r_{\rm mix})}{t_{\rm b}} \approx

425: 15\,\left(\frac{10^8}{\beta_0}\right)\,\left(\frac{10^{-4}}{a_0}\right)^2\ \ \mbox{cm\,s}^{-1},

426: \label{eq:vb}

427: \eea

428: which is nearly five orders of magnitude smaller than the appropriately scaled average velocity used by BWNC

429: (for the scaling, we have used the data from the fifth column of Table~\ref{tab:tab1} and the column RGB-1 of Table~\ref{tab:tab2}).

430: We have tested that this big difference is entirely caused by the assumption of thermal equilibrium between the ring and its surroundings

431: made in the cited paper.

432: 

433: The dashed and dot-dashed curves in Fig.~\ref{fig:f3} show the dependences of $t_{\rm b}$ on $a_0$ for $\beta_0 = 10^8$ 

434: and $\beta_0 = 10^7$ obtained by solving equations (\ref{eq:durdt}\,--\,\ref{eq:duphidt}), while the dotted lines

435: represent their approximations by (\ref{eq:tb}). It is seen that the exact solutions strongly deviate from the approximate ones

436: at $a_0 \la 2\times 10^{-4}$. This limit corresponds to a regime in which the aerodynamic drag force comes into play.

437: Indeed, the last terms on the right-hand-sides of equations (\ref{eq:durdt}\,--\,\ref{eq:duthetadt}), that describe the drag

438: force, are negative and inversely proportional to $a$. They lead to a slowing down of the ring's buoyant rise at small $a$,

439: which is not reflected in equation (\ref{eq:tb}).

440: 

441: \subsection{Rings with $\mu$ Reduced by $^3$He Burning}

442: \label{sec:mured}

443: 

444: Our numerical computations can optionally take into account the fact that the rings carrying the nuclear processed material

445: are necessarily formed in the region of the local $\mu$ depression maintained by the $^3$He burning (Fig.~\ref{fig:f1}b).

446: They must therefore have a lower $\mu$ than the bulk of the radiative zone through which they move. 

447: As a result, their average buoyant velocity is found to weakly depend on the toroidal field

448: strength. However, the frozen-in toroidal field is still needed for them to remain cohesive

449: while rising.

450: 

451: Dotted curve in Fig.~\ref{fig:f2} shows the path of a ring with 

452: $\Delta\mu = \mu_{\rm e} - \mu = 5\times 10^{-5}$,

453: $a_0 = 10^{-4}$, and $\beta_0 = 10^{10}$ that corresponds to $(B_\varphi)_0 \approx 11$ kG. Its buoyant rising time is

454: $t_{\rm b}\approx 1.3$ yrs. Approximately the same short time is obtained for a ring with

455: $(B_\varphi)_0 \approx 1.1$ kG ($\beta_0 = 10^{12}$). If those two rings had $\mu = \mu_{\rm e}$ then their rising times would be much longer

456: and vastly different, namely: $t_{\rm b}\approx 10^4$ yrs, and $t_{\rm b}\approx 10^6$ yrs, respectively (eq. \ref{eq:tb}).

457: This means that their buoyancy is now controlled by the $\mu$ difference alone.

458: Let us neglect, for a moment, the difference in temperature between the surrounding medium and the ring,

459: $\delta T\equiv (T_{\rm e}-T)/T_{\rm e} \approx 0$. The buoyant acceleration is

460: $a_{\rm b} \approx g\delta\rho$. In the case of $\Delta\mu = 0$, the initial positive difference in density 

461: $\delta\rho \approx\delta P\approx \beta_0^{-1}$

462: is simply due to the excess magnetic pressure inside the ring (eq. \ref{eq:p}). On the other hand, in the case of

463: $\Delta\mu > 0$, and for a weak toroidal field ($\delta P\approx 0$), 

464: we have $\delta\rho\approx\delta\mu\equiv\Delta\mu/\mu_{\rm e}$. We can introduce

465: the effective toroidal magnetic field $B_{\rm eff}$ associated with a specified value of $\delta\mu$ such that

466: $\delta\mu = \beta_{\rm eff}^{-1}$. It turns out that $B_{\rm eff}\approx 9.8$ MG for $\Delta\mu = 5\times 10^{-5}$ at

467: $r=r_{\rm mix}$ in our RGB model. Hence, toroidal magnetic fields with $(B_\varphi)_0\ll B_{\rm eff}$ will have a negligible effect

468: on the motion of the ring with the reduced $\mu$. For $\Delta\mu = 5\times 10^{-5}$, $\beta_0 = 10^{10}$, and $a_0 = 10^{-3}$

469: the rising time $t_{\rm b}\approx 1.6$ yrs is still short. However, it increases up to 

470: $t_{\rm b}\approx 33$ yrs and $t_{\rm b}\approx 132$ yrs for rings with the initial radii $a_0 = 5\times 10^{-3}$ and $a_0 = 10^{-2}$, respectively,

471: following the dependence $t_{\rm b}\propto a_0^2$ for the thicker rings (eq. \ref{eq:tb}).

472: 

473: The role that the reduced $\mu$ plays in the acceleration of the buoyant rise of the ring containing a weak magnetic field can be elucidated

474: if we consider, for simplicity, that the ring's vertical motion consists of the following recurring sequence. Initially, let the ring

475: have $\delta T=0$ but $\delta\mu > 0$, hence $\delta\rho = \delta\mu + \beta_0^{-1} >0$. Now, let the ring rise adiabatically

476: until the accumulated difference in $T$ compensates that in $\rho$, i.e. $\delta T = \delta\rho$. At this moment, the ring stops and waits a while   

477: for the heat exchange to make $\delta T = 0$ before starting to rise adiabatically again, and so on. But the waiting time is in fact 

478: the thermal time $\tau_{\rm th}$, therefore it is inversely proportional to

479: the heating rate $dS/dt$ that linearly depends on the ratio $\delta T/a^2$ (eq. \ref{eq:dsdt}). When the ring stops, it has $\delta T = \delta\mu + \beta_0^{-1}$.

480: Therefore, if $\delta\mu \gg \beta_0^{-1}$ then $\delta T\approx \delta\mu$, hence we have 

481: $t_{\rm b}\propto\tau_{\rm th}\propto\delta\mu^{-1}\,a^2 = \beta_{\rm eff}\,a^2$. On the other hand,

482: if $\delta\mu \ll \beta_0^{-1}$ then $\delta T \approx \beta_0^{-1}$, and $t_{\rm b}\propto\tau_{\rm th}\propto \beta_0\,a^2$

483: (eq. \ref{eq:tb}). The transition from the one to the other regime occurs at $\beta_0^{-1}\approx\delta\mu = \beta_{\rm eff}^{-1}$.

484: 

485: We have checked that equation (\ref{eq:tb}) gives a correct order-of-magnitude estimate 

486: (this time, at $a_0\ga 8\times 10^{-4}$ though) for the buoyant rising time of

487: a ring with a reduced $\mu$ provided that $\beta_0$ is replaced by $\beta_{\rm eff} = \delta\mu^{-1}$ (the dotted line approximating

488: the solid curve in Fig.~\ref{fig:f3}). It is also important to note

489: that the coefficients in equations (\ref{eq:tb}\,--\,\ref{eq:vb}) have been obtained for a particular RGB model (our model

490: from Table~\ref{tab:tab1}), therefore they are model dependent. For example, given that $t_{\rm b}$ is expected to be

491: inversely proportional to the thermal diffusivity $K$ as well (eq. \ref{eq:dsdt}), the latter being roughly proportional to

492: the luminosity, we predict that these coefficients should change by a factor of 10 ($t_{\rm b}$ decreases, while $\langle v_{\rm b}\rangle$

493: increases) toward the RGB tip ($\log\,L/L_\odot\approx 3.3$). This scaling is indeed confirmed by our computations.

494: 

495: \subsection{Comparison with Results Obtained by BWNC}

496: 

497: Given that one rising magnetic flux ring carries the mass $m_{\rm b}=2\pi^2r_0\,a_0^2\,\rho_0\sin\theta_0=2\pi^2ra^2\rho\sin\theta$, $N$ such rings

498: present in the radiative zone at the same time will provide chemical mixing with the mass rate

499: \bea

500: \dot{M}_{\rm b} = \frac{Nm_{\rm b}}{t_{\rm b}},

501: \label{eq:dmdt}

502: \eea

503: where $t_{\rm b}$ is their buoyant rising time. The quantity $\dot{M}_{\rm b}$ has to match the observationally constrained

504: rate of the RGB extra mixing $\dot{M}_{\rm mix}\approx 4\times 10^{-8}\,M_\odot$\,yr$^{-1}$ (BWNC).

505: The right-hand-side of equation (\ref{eq:dmdt}) is a function of the ring parameters $N$, $a_0$, and $(B_\varphi)_0$.

506: For a ring with a reduced $\mu$, the third parameter should be replaced with $\Delta\mu$, unless $\delta\mu\ll 1/\beta_0$ (\sect{sec:mured}).

507: In the case of $\Delta\mu = 0$, considered by BWNC, the equating of $\dot{M}_{\rm b}$ to $\dot{M}_{\rm mix}$

508: gives a relationship between $N$, $a_0$, and $(B_\varphi)_0$. To estimate a reasonable value of $a_0$ at $r=r_{\rm mix}$, they have referred to

509: the characteristic dimension $a_\odot\sim$\,1000\,--\,2000 km of magnetic flux tubes that are believed to exist deep in the solar convective zone.

510: Beside the RGB model, they have also considered a representative model for low-mass asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars, whose structure above the H burning shell

511: resembles that of upper RGB stars. There is indirect evidence, such as distinctive $^{18}$O/$^{16}$O, $^{17}$O/$^{16}$O, $^{12}$C/$^{13}$C, and

512: N/C abundance ratios in the meteorite grains of AGB circumstellar origin (\citealt{wea06}) and in the atmospheres of carbon-enhanced metal-poor stars 

513: (\citealt{rea05,sea06,mea06,dp08a,lea08}), indicating that extra mixing may operate in the radiative zones of these stars too (\citealt{nbw03}). In their RGB-1

514: and RGB-2 magnetic buoyancy models, BWNC have employed the values of $a_0$ obtained 

515: assuming that $a(r_{\rm bce})=a_\odot$ and using equation (\ref{eq:conserv}) with the stellar structure parameters

516: from their AGB and RGB stellar models, respectively. These values are listed in our Table~\ref{tab:tab2}

517: along with the corresponding estimates for our RGB model.

518: 

519: BWNC have also assumed that there is only one magnetic flux ring floating in the radiative zone at any time. 

520: Substituting the number $N=1$ together with the values of $a_0$ from

521: Table~\ref{tab:tab2} and $\dot{M}_{\rm mix}=4\times 10^{-8}\,M_\odot$\,yr$^{-1}$ into equation (\ref{eq:dmdt}) constrains

522: the required values for $t_{\rm b}$ and $\langle v_{\rm b}\rangle$ (Table~\ref{tab:tab2}). 

523: Under the assumptions, made by BWNC, that the ring always stays in the thermal equilibrium with

524: its surrounding medium ($\delta T =0$) and that the only force impeding its motion is the aerodynamic drag force, it is easy to show that

525: $t_{\rm b}\propto \sqrt{\beta_0/a_0}\propto (B_\varphi)_0/\sqrt{a_0}$. 

526: It is from the last relation that BWNC have determined the toroidal field strengths 

527: needed to drive the RGB extra mixing by magnetic buoyancy (Table~\ref{tab:tab2}, $(B_\varphi)_0$ is transformed 

528: to $(B_\varphi)_{\rm bce}$ using equation \ref{eq:conserv}).

529: They pointed out that these results are consistent with existing observations of magnetic fields in red giants (e.g., \citealt{bea01}).

530: 

531: However, as we have noted, BWNC underestimated the ring's rising time by assuming that the heat exchange

532: between the surrounding medium and the ring occurs instantaneously, which maintains $\Delta T = 0$ all the time.

533: Our more conservative assumption explicitly takes into consideration the radiative heat exchange, which

534: leads to a much longer ring's rising time, as approximated by equation (\ref{eq:tb}). Employing the values of

535: $a_0$, $t_{\rm b}$, and $\beta_0$ from the columns RGB-1 and RGB-2 of Table~\ref{tab:tab2}, we find that the rising times have

536: been underestimated by the factors $6\times 10^4$ and $4\times 10^6$ for these buoyancy models. To keep

537: the same estimates for the toroidal field strength, the ring number $N$ has to be increased by the corresponding factors.

538: However, the volume occupied by $\sim$\,$10^5$\,--\,$10^6$ rings is comparable to the total volume of

539: the radiative zone, in which case the stellar structure would be greatly disturbed, especially at the bottom of

540: convective envelope where the rings encounter turbulent convection. Here, the frozen-in toroidal field

541: is either quickly dissipated via the strong turbulent diffusion, thus depositing its energy at the radiative/convective

542: interface, or it inhibits convective motions if its potential energy exceeds the turbulent kinetic energy 

543: (\citealt{moss03}). In either case, the stellar structure would be strongly modified.

544: In the next section, we will show that a reasonably small number of $N$ can be obtained only for

545: rings with a reduced $\mu$.

546: 

547: \subsection{There Still May Be a Solution}

548: 

549: By assigning $N=1$, BWNC have implicitly assumed that the average time $t_{\rm form}$ needed to form

550: a magnetic flux ring is equal to its buoyant rising time $t_{\rm b}$. Indeed, instead of  (\ref{eq:dmdt}) the buoyancy mixing mass rate

551: ought to be calculated as $\dot{M}_{\rm b} = m_{\rm b}/t_{\rm form} = Nm_{\rm b}/t_{\rm b}$, where $N = t_{\rm b}/t_{\rm form}$.

552: We assume that, like in the case of the solar tachocline (e.g., \citealt{sr83}), 

553: the appropriate MHD mechanism responsible for the formation of magnetic flux rings in the vicinity of the H burning shell is the undular buoyancy instability.

554: The criterion for its development has been extensively discussed in the literature, e.g. by \cite{a78}, \cite{svb82}, \cite{s99}, and \cite{f01}.

555: It has been shown that a diffusive toroidal magnetic field gets broken into distinct arching flux tubes when

556: \bea

557: B_\varphi > (B_\varphi)_{\rm crit} \approx \sqrt{4\pi\rho\,r^2 N^2\,\frac{H_P}{r}\,\frac{\eta}{K}},

558: \label{eq:bcrit}

559: \eea

560: provided that $(\partial\ln B_\varphi/\partial\ln r) = O(1)$. A profile of $(B_\varphi)_{\rm crit}$ in the radiative zone of our RGB model is

561: plotted with the dashed curve in Fig.~\ref{fig:f4}a. Its corresponding profile of $\beta_{\rm crit}$ is shown with

562: the dot-dashed curve. At $r=r_{\rm mix}$ ($\log\,r_{\rm mix}/R_\odot\approx -1.30$), the critical toroidal field is 254 kG

563: and $\beta_{\rm crit} = 1.8\times 10^7$ (Table~\ref{tab:tab2}).

564: 

565: In the presence of rapid rotation, such that $\Omega\gg\omega_{{\rm A},\varphi} \equiv B_\varphi/(\sqrt{4\pi\rho}\,r)$,

566: the Coriolis force reduces the instability's growth rate $\omega_{{\rm A},\varphi}$ by the factor $\omega_{{\rm A},\varphi}/\Omega$ (\citealt{pt85,s99}).

567: In our RGB model, $\Omega(r_{\rm mix}) = 10^{-3}$\,rad\,s$^{-1}$ strongly exceeds $\omega_{{\rm A},\varphi}\,(r_{\rm mix}) = 2.11\times 10^{-11}\,B_\varphi$\,rad\,s$^{-1}$

568: for all reasonable strengths of $B_\varphi\ll 47$ MG. Therefore, we use

569: the estimate of $t_{\rm inst}\approx \Omega/\omega_{{\rm A},\varphi}^2$ for the instability growth time. 

570: The winding up of a toroidal field by differential rotation continues until $B_\varphi\approx \Omega B_r\Delta t\,q$ 

571: reaches the critical value (\ref{eq:bcrit}). 

572: This takes $(\Delta t)_{\rm crit}\approx 3.17\times 10^{-3}\,(B_\varphi)_{\rm crit}/(B_r\,\Omega_{-5}\,q)$ years.

573: After that, it will take another $t_{\rm inst}\approx 1.93\times 10^{10}\,\left[\,\rho\,(r/R_\odot)^2\,\Omega_{-5}\right]/(B_\varphi)_{\rm crit}^2$ years

574: for the buoyancy instability to occur and assemble the rings. So, the total ring formation time is $t_{\rm form} = (\Delta t)_{\rm crit} + t_{\rm inst}$.

575: For our simple estimates to be true, $t_{\rm form}$ should be shorter than 

576: $\omega_{{\rm A},r}^{-1} = 7.82\times 10^3\,\sqrt{\rho}\,(r/R_\odot)/B_r$ yrs, which allows to consider that the rotational shear

577: is nearly constant and that, for our assumed rotation law in the radiative zone $\Omega_{-5} = 10^2\,(r_{\rm mix}/r)^2$, 

578: $q = O(1)$. For this case, and assuming that

579: $B_r = 7.32\,(r_{\rm mix}/r)^2$ G, the four characteristic time scales are plotted in Fig.~\ref{fig:f4}b.

580: In particular, we have $t_{\rm form} = 2.20$ yrs at $r = r_{\rm mix}$.

581: Note that $(\Delta t)_{\rm crit}\propto (B_r\Omega)^{-1}$, $t_{\rm inst}\propto\Omega$, and

582: $\omega_{{\rm A},r}^{-1}\propto B_r^{-1}$.

583: We have used the parameter $B_r(r_{\rm mix}) = 7.32$ G for which

584: the time scales $(\Delta t)_{\rm crit}$ and $t_{\rm inst}$ coincide.

585: Its value scales as $\Omega^{-2}(r_{\rm mix})$. At a fixed value of $\Omega(r_{\rm mix})$, $B_r(r_{\rm mix})$

586: determines which of the two time scales, $(\Delta t)_{\rm crit}$ or $t_{\rm inst}$, makes a predominant

587: contribution to $t_{\rm form}$.

588: 

589: It is very likely that the buoyancy instability forms not just one but a number $n > 1$ of magnetic flux rings during the time $t_{\rm form}$,

590: therefore $N = n(t_{\rm b}/t_{\rm form})$.

591: The equating of $\dot{M}_{\rm b}=n m_{\rm b}/t_{\rm form}$ to $\dot{M}_{\rm mix} = 4\times 10^{-8}\,M_\odot$\,yr$^{-1}$ constrains

592: the ring's minimum radius as a function of $t_{\rm form}$, $n$, and the initial colatitude 

593: \bea

594: \left(\frac{a_0}{H_P}\right)^2 = \frac{\dot{M}_{\rm mix}\,t_{\rm form}}{n\,2\pi^2r_0^3\rho_0\sin\theta_0}\left(\frac{H_P}{r_0}\right)^{-2} =

595: 9.78\times 10^{-5}\,\frac{t_{\rm form}}{n\,\sin\theta_0},

596: \label{eq:a0}

597: \eea

598: where $r_0 = r_{\rm mix}$, and $t_{\rm form}$ is expressed in years.

599: 

600: For the values of $t_{\rm form} = 2.20$ yrs, $n = 1$, and $\theta_0 = 90^\circ$, we calculate $a_0=1.47\times 10^{-2}$ (in units of $H_P$, as usually), and the total

601: number of rings in the radiative zone $N = 0.454\,t_{\rm b}$. 

602: As we have mentioned before, the ring with the radius $a_0 = 10^{-2}$ and $\mu$ reduced by $\Delta\mu = 5\times 10^{-5}$ has the buoyant rising time $t_{\rm b}\approx 132$ yrs.

603: This means that the ring with $a_0 = 1.47\times 10^{-2}$ and the same mean molecular weight would cross the radiative zone

604: in $t_{\rm b}\approx (1.47)^2\times 132 = 285$ yrs (eq. \ref{eq:tb}). Hence, we have $N = 129$.

605: Note that this number does not change if the values of the parameters $t_{\rm form}$ and $n$ are varied, provided that

606: our buoyancy mixing mass rate is still constrained to match $\dot{M}_{\rm mix}$. Indeed, in this case

607: both the ratio $t_{\rm form}/n$ (eq. \ref{eq:a0}) and $t_{\rm b}$ (eq. \ref{eq:tb}) 

608: are proportional to $a_0^2$ which leads to its cancellation in the relationship $N = n(t_{\rm b}/t_{\rm form})$.

609: 

610: We have shown that the reduced mean molecular weight in the magnetic flux rings formed in the region of $^3$He burning

611: accelerates their buoyant rise quickly enough for their total number needed to maintain the RGB extra mixing to be reasonably small

612: ($N\approx 10^2$ rings would only occupy $\sim$\,$10^{-3}$\,--\,$10^{-4}$ part of the radiative zone).

613: However, the estimated value of $N\approx 1.3\times 10^2$ is in fact a lower limit obtained under the most favourable

614: assumptions. In particular, we have silently assumed that all rings have the same formation time and cross-section radius related by

615: equation (\ref{eq:a0}), and that no rings are formed above the radius $r_{\rm mix}$. These assumptions are obviously not true.

616: Relaxing either of them will certainly increase the total ring number in the radiative zone.

617: To figure out what effect may be produced by relaxing the first assumption we would have to determine 

618: a relationship between $t_{\rm form}$ and $a_0$ for a spectrum of rings created by the buoyancy instability, e.g. like it has been done

619: for the solar tachocline by \cite{sr83}. This problem is out of scope of the present preliminary study.

620: 

621: We find it more important to address here the second issue. Indeed, given that the critical strength of

622: toroidal magnetic field for triggering the buoyancy instability decreases rapidly with the radius

623: (dashed curve in Fig.~\ref{fig:f4}a), while our estimated ring formation time stays much shorter than

624: the toroidal field growth time $\omega^{-1}_{{\rm A},r}$ (Fig.~\ref{fig:f4}b),

625: the formation of magnetic flux rings at $r_0 > r_{\rm mix}$ appears to be unavoidable. These rings

626: would contribute to the total ring number present in the radiative zone at the same time but they would not

627: participate in the chemical element transport because their constituent material has not been nuclearly processed.

628: In fact, the buoyancy of these "parasitic" rings should be reduced compared to the buoyancy of the rings

629: originating at $r\approx r_{\rm mix}$ because their mean molecular weight does not differ

630: from that of the surrounding medium through which they rise. On the other hand, they are formed

631: in a region where the thermal diffusivity $K$ is higher than at $r = r_{\rm mix}$, therefore their heat exchange

632: with the surroundings goes faster, which should accelerate their buoyant rise. Our computations show that the rings

633: formed in the region of constant $\mu$ (at $r\ga r_{\rm mix} + 0.05\,R_\odot$) rise $10^3$ to $10^4$ times

634: slower than the rings formed in the $\mu$-depression domain. Given that their formation takes between

635: 10 and 100 yrs (solid curve in Fig.~\ref{fig:f4}b), a number of the "parasitic" rings present in the radiative zone

636: at the same time may be as large as $10^5$.

637: Unfortunately, our model is too simple to be able to predict if and how the "parasitic" rings could impede the large-scale

638: magnetic buoyancy mixing, but we do realize that they may create a real problem for the mechanism proposed by

639: BWNC that has been revised in our paper. Indeed, although BWNC did not discuss a formation of magnetic rings, it is difficult to understand why

640: the rings can not be formed at $r > r_{\rm mix}$ as easily as they are created at $r=r_{\rm mix}$.

641: 

642: \section{Discussion}

643: \label{sec:disc}

644: 

645: Our approximate analysis of the magnetic flux ring formation and buoyant rise in the differentially rotating radiative zone of

646: the bump-luminosity RGB star gives some support to a combined ``magneto-thermohaline'' mode of the RGB extra mixing, as opposed

647: to the pure thermohaline and pure magnetic buoyancy modes proposed by \cite{chz07a} and by BWNC, respectively.

648: A key component to the operation of our mixing mechanism, which is certainly present in all upper RGB and low-mass AGB stars, is

649: the mass inflow in the radiative zone. It makes two important things. First, the conservation of the specific angular momentum in

650: the mass inflow results in a steep $\Omega$-profile with a rotational shear $q\approx O(1)$ that does not appear to be strongly reduced

651: by the meridional circulation and turbulent diffusion (\citealt{dt00,pea06}). Second, the mass inflow entrains a diffusive

652: magnetic field that is probably generated via an $\alpha$\,--\,$\Omega$ or $\alpha^2$ dynamo 

653: just beneath the bottom of convective envelope (\citealt{nea07,nb07,m01}).

654: A very high ratio of the ohmic dissipation time

655: to the average inflow time $((\Delta r)^2/\langle\eta\rangle)/(\Delta r/\langle |\dot{r}|\rangle ) \approx 1.2\times 10^4$

656: guarantees that this field will be redistributed over the whole radiative zone. Because the volume occupied by this field 

657: is squeezed when the flow approaches the H burning shell, the field may become stronger at a smaller radius. 

658: In general, this random field has an unstable configuration that will decay on a short Alfv\'{e}n time scale (\citealt{s99}).

659: However, in their 3D MHD simulations \cite{bn06} have shown that such unstable random field 

660: may evolve into a stable ``twisted torus'' configuration with toroidal and poloidal field components of comparable strength. 

661: The poloidal field lines get wrapped around an axisymmetric torus, thus forming an approximate dipole. 

662: These simulations have provided the first plausible explanation of the origin and stability of dipole magnetic fields in

663: presently non-convective stars. It is assumed that the seed random magnetic field in those stars had been a dynamo left over from

664: the period of their protostellar convective contraction. 

665: 

666: Our RGB extra mixing model has much in common with the solar magnetic spindown model that postulates

667: the presence of a weak poloidal field in the solar radiative core (\citealt{mw87,chmg93}).

668: Note that even the values of $r_{\rm bce} = 0.996\,R_\odot$ and $\Omega (r_{\rm bce}) = 10^{-6}$\,rad\,s$^{-1}$ 

669: used in our RGB model are close to the corresponding solar values.

670: The important difference is the assumption of strong differential rotation in the radiative zone of our model,

671: while the present-day Sun is known to be a nearly solid-body rotator, at least above $r=0.2\,R_\odot$ (\citealt{cea03}). However,

672: the young Sun did possess a strong differential rotation in the core which had resulted from its spinning up during

673: the pre-MS contraction and angular momentum loss from the surface via a magnetized stellar wind. The magnetic spindown

674: model assumes that the differential rotation in the young Sun was broken by the back reaction of the Lorentz force

675: that emerged when the differential rotation was winding up a toroidal field from the pre-existing poloidal field (\citealt{chmg93}),

676: or by the magneto-rotational instability (\citealt{mlm06}).

677: 

678: Whereas an important role in damping large-scale toroidal field oscillations in the young Sun is thought to be played by the phase mixing (\citealt{chmg93}),

679: we do not think that this is also true for our magnetic buoyancy model. Indeed, the phase mixing time scale at $r=r_{\rm mix}$

680: in our RGB stellar model is

681: \bea

682: \label{eq:tp}

683: t_{\rm p} = \left(\frac{3\pi^3r^2}{\eta\omega_{{\rm A},r}^2q_{\rm A}^2}\right)^{1/3}\approx 2.9\times 10^5\ \ \mbox{yrs},

684: \eea

685: where we have used an estimate of $t_{\rm p}$ obtained by \cite{s99}, assuming that $q_{\rm A} = 1$.

686: This is comparable with the time needed for the whole radiative zone to be thoroughly mixed,

687: $t_{\rm mix} = (M_{\rm bce} - M_{\rm mix})/\dot{M}_{\rm mix}\approx 5.5\times 10^5$ yrs. Hence, long before

688: the toroidal field oscillations on neighboring magnetic surfaces get out of phase the magnetic buoyancy instability

689: will come into play, the magnetic flux rings will be formed and reach the convective envelope.

690: 

691: Compared with the pure thermohaline mixing, our model has the following advantages.

692: First, the horizontal turbulent diffusion is unlikely to hinder the buoyant rise of magnetic flux rings

693: with a reduced $\mu$ because the frozen-in toroidal field will not allow turbulence to penetrate plasma in the rings

694: and decrease the $\mu$ contrast between the ring and surrounding material. On the contrary,

695: there is nothing to prevent the horizontal turbulent diffusion from eroding the $\mu$ contrast in

696: thermohaline convective elements (\sect{sec:suppress}). 

697: 

698: Second, thermohaline convection

699: may fail to explain the operation of enhanced extra mixing in rapidly rotating Li-rich K-giants, which is needed

700: to activate the Cameron-Fowler mechanism, because one would expect

701: that the growth of ``salt fingers'' is impeded by rotation (\citealt{c99}). Oppositely, it would be natural to suppose

702: that magnetic flux rings are formed more efficiently in the more rapidly rotating stars. This hypothesis is

703: supported by the fact that the fastest rotators among young cluster solar-type stars appear to have the shortest time scale of rotational

704: coupling between the core and envelope (e.g., \citealt{iea07}). 

705: 

706: Third, whereas the efficiency of thermohaline convection in upper RGB stars is dependent exclusively on the abundance of $^3$He

707: left in the radiative zone, magnetic buoyancy can in principle be driven by differential rotation alone, 

708: provided that it succeeds in winding up a sufficiently strong toroidal field. By the end of

709: the RGB evolution of a low-mass star, its envelope $^3$He abundance gets depleted by a factor of ten or more (\citealt{chz07a}). 

710: So, what will then drive extra mixing in this star on the AGB? The higher rate of heat exchange between ``salt fingers''          

711: and their surrounding medium increased in proportion to the luminosity will not help because the evolutionary time scale

712: decreases inversely proportional to the luminosity which cancels the former effect. Thus, there is a need for an additional

713: driving parameter that would not let extra mixing die out. Such parameter might be the rotational velocity.

714: Indeed, it is known that a surprisingly fast rotation has somehow survived in red horizontal branch stars, in spite of the RGB mass loss (\citealt{p83,sp00,b03}).

715: It could be used on the subsequent AGB evolutionary phase to drive our magneto-thermohaline mixing.

716: The much lower (compared to the RGB phase) $^3$He abundance left in these stars could be compensated by a stronger toroidal magnetic field

717: or a larger number of magnetic flux rings generated in the presence of a higher mass inflow rate ($\dot{M}_{\rm mix}\approx 10^{-6}\,M_\odot$\,yr$^{-1}$,

718: according to BWNC).

719: 

720: Fourth, thermohaline convection cannot penetrate below the radius $r_{\rm min}\approx 0.063\,R_\odot$ at which $\mu$ has a minimum 

721: (the right vertical dotted line in Fig.~\ref{fig:f1}).

722: However, mixing down to this depth would be too shallow to reduce the surface carbon abundance (Fig.~\ref{fig:f1}a),

723: as required by observations (\citealt{grea00,sm03}).

724: An overshooting on a length scale of order $H_P$ could solve the problem (the left vertical dotted line

725: in Fig.~\ref{fig:f1} is placed at a distance $H_P$ below $r_{\rm min}$) but then

726: thermohaline ``fingers'' would have to penetrate a region of higher $\mu$ where they

727: experience a strong breaking. It should also be noted that the penetration of

728: a region with the positive $\nabla_\mu$ below $r_{\rm min}$ would reduce the average mixing rate $D_{\rm thc}\propto |\nabla_\mu|$ by

729: decreasing the slope of the negative $\nabla_\mu$ in the mixed radiative zone.

730: In the magnetic buoyancy model, there is at least a potential possibility to dredge up the nuclear processed material from below

731: $r_{\rm min}$. This can be done by rings with a frozen-in magnetic field of a few MG if such

732: are formed closer to the major H burning shell.

733: Of course, all the above assumptions need to be verified by more rigorous models.

734: 

735: Fifth, it is interesting to note that the operation of our RGB mixing mechanism seems to produce environment in which

736: the functioning of the $^3$He-driven thermohaline convection is impossible. Indeed, \cite{chz07b} have estimated that 

737: a toroidal magnetic field of $B_\varphi\approx 100$ kG would entirely suppress the thermohaline mixing at $r\approx r_{\rm mix}$,

738: while a field of 10 kG would be sufficient to inhibit the thermohaline instability in the upper one third of the narrow $\mu$-depression domain.

739: These fields are weaker than those needed for our mechanism to work.

740: 

741: It is also important to note that the flux rings considered in our paper are a convenient proxy for the more 

742: realistic $\Omega$-shaped loops that are the likely products of the magnetic buoyancy instability that operates

743: in a layer of strong toroidal field (e.g., \citealt{cea95}). Downflows/upflows that take place in the

744: loop legs during formation and rise may affect the efficiency of transport of processed material relative to the behavior

745: obtained in the case of a flux ring.  It is not clear how the strong rotational shear that is present within the

746: radiative zone would affect this process.  In principle, the only place where significant shear is required is within

747: the layers where $\mu$ is depressed and flux tube formation takes place.  If the overlying portion of the radiative

748: zone were in a state of near-uniform rotation, the loop legs might form a kind of conduit connecting the

749: region containing processed material with the bottom of the convection zone.  In any case, it is difficult to give

750: an air-tight argument for what the rotational state of the radiative zone should be, either differential rotation

751: of the kind assumed in our paper or near-uniform rotation enforced by the fields, that permeate the region.  

752: 

753: Another aspect of our computations that should be noted is that the results of sections 6.1 and 6.2 were obtained for rings

754: initially in thermal equilbrium with their surroundings, a state of maximal initial buoyancy.  If, alternatively,

755: the rings were in an initial mechanical equilibrium state (zero net force), the rise would be slower by virtue of the

756: heating required to overcome the neutral buoyancy at $t=0$. This would also increase the total ring number.

757: 

758: \section{Conclusion}

759: 

760: In this work, we have presented a simple model of the formation and buoyant rise of magnetic flux rings in

761: the radiative zone of the bump luminosity RGB star. Our model is based on ideas and equations published

762: by \cite{svb82}, \cite{sr83}, \cite{mw87}, \cite{chg87}, \cite{chmg93}, \cite{s99}, \cite{eea06},

763: BWNC, and \cite{dp08b}. It qualitatively describes a possible

764: mechanism for the RGB extra mixing, which we call the magneto-thermohaline mixing, as an alternative to

765: the pure $^3$He-driven thermohaline convection that has recently been proposed by \cite{chz07a}. For our mechanism to work, the radiative zone has to possess

766: a strong differential rotation and a poloidal magnetic field $B_{\rm p}\ga 1$\,--\,10 G. We assume that

767: the differential rotation stretches the poloidal field around the rotation axis, thus creating a strong

768: toroidal magnetic field $B_\varphi\approx 0.1$\,--\,1 MG. When the latter exceeds a critical value,

769: the buoyancy-related undular instability comes into play to form magnetic flux rings. These rings

770: turn out to be buoyant, therefore they rise toward the bottom of convective envelope. 

771: 

772: We have shown that,

773: when the radiative heat exchange between the ring and its surrounding medium is taken into account,

774: the ring's buoyant rising time increases by about five orders of magnitude compared to the case considered by BWNC, when

775: the ring and its surrounding medium are assumed to be in thermal equilibrium all the time. 

776: However, given that our model still neglects possible internal heating of the ring's material

777: by residual nuclear reactions and anisotropic thermal exchanges in the presence of strong oriented

778: magnetic field, while it uses the aerodynamic drag coefficient that is 20 times as large as the one

779: employed by BWNC, it is fair to say that BWNC might have fixed a safe upper limit while our paper

780: fixes a conservative lower limit for the magnetic ring's rising velocity.

781: 

782: We have found that the number of rings

783: needed to be present in the radiative zone at the same time to produce the observationally constrained

784: rate of the RGB extra mixing is unrealistically large unless these rings originate from the region of the $\mu$ inversion

785: maintained by the $^3$He burning. Such rings have a deficit of the mean molecular weight compared to

786: the bulk of the radiative zone through which they move. Their buoyancy is mainly caused by the difference

787: in $\mu$ rather than by a deficit in density due to the excess magnetic pressure. The frozen-in toroidal

788: magnetic field is still needed for the rings to remain cohesive while rising. That is why we have coined

789: the term ``magneto-thermohaline'' mixing. Our model has some advantages over the pure

790: thermohaline mixing model, the most important of which being

791: the robustness of the magnetic rings against the eroding effect produced by the horizontal turbulent diffusion. 

792: Leaving aside the problem of the "parasitic" rings that are formed at $r\ga r_{\rm mix} + 0.05\,R_\odot$, our model looks promising. 

793: However, because it is based

794: on a number of assumptions whose legality is impossible to confirm in the framework of our 1D computations

795: we call for its future verification by 3D MHD simulations.

796: 

797: \acknowledgements

798: PAD and MP acknowledge support from the NASA grant NNG05 GG20G.

799: The National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the National Science Foundation.

800: 

801: %\newpage

802: 

803: \begin{thebibliography}{}

804: 

805: \bibitem[Acheson(1978)]{a78}

806: Acheson, D.~J.~1978, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A, 289, 459

807: 

808: \bibitem[Aoki et al.(2008)]{aea08}

809: Aoki, W., Beers, T.~C., Sivarani, T., Marsteller, B., Lee, Y.~S., Honda, S.,

810: Norris, J.~E., Ryan, S.~G., \& Carollo, D.~2008, ApJ, 678, 1351

811: 

812: \bibitem[Behr et al.(2003)]{b03}

813: Behr, B.~B.~2003, ApJS, 149, 101

814: 

815: \bibitem[Blackman et al.(2001)]{bea01}

816: Blackman, E.~G., Frank, A., Markiel, J.~A., Thomas, J.~H., \& Van Horn, H.~M.~2001, Nature, 409, 485

817: 

818: \bibitem[Braithwaite \& Nordlund(2006)]{bn06}

819: Braithwaite, J., \& Nordlund, \AA.~2006, A\&A, 450, 1077

820: 

821: \bibitem[Busso et al.(2007)]{bea07}

822: Busso, M., Wasserburg, G.~J., Nollett, K.~M., \& Calandra, A.~2007, ApJ, 671, 802 (BWNC)

823: 

824: \bibitem[Caligari, Moreno-Insertis, \& Schussler(1995)]{cea95}

825: Caligari, P., Moreno-Insertis, F., \& Schussler, M.~1995, ApJ, 441, 886

826: 

827: \bibitem[Cameron \& Fowler(1971)]{cf71}

828: Cameron, A.~G.~W., \& Fowler, W.~A.~1971, ApJ, 164, 111

829: 

830: \bibitem[Canuto(1999)]{c99}

831: Canuto, V.~M.~1999, ApJ, 524, 311

832: 

833: \bibitem[Chaboyer \& Zahn(1992)]{chz92}

834: Chaboyer, B., \& Zahn, J.-P.~1992, A\&A, 253, 173

835: 

836: \bibitem[Chanam\'{e}, Pinsonneault, \& Terndrup(2005)]{chea05}

837: Chanam\'{e}, J., Pinsonneault, M., \& Terndrup, D.~M.~2005, ApJ, 631, 540

838: 

839: \bibitem[Charbonneau \& MacGregor(1993)]{chmg93}

840: Charbonneau, P., \& MacGregor, K.~B.~1993, ApJ, 417, 762

841: 

842: \bibitem[Charbonnel \& Do Nascimento(1998)]{chdn98}

843: Charbonnel, C., \& Do Nascimento, J.~D., Jr.~1998, A\&A, 336, 915

844: 

845: \bibitem[Charbonnel, Brown, \& Wallerstein(1998)]{chea98}

846: Charbonnel, C., Brown, J.~A., \& Wallerstein, G.~1998, A\&A, 332, 204

847: 

848: \bibitem[Charbonnel \& Balachandran(2000)]{chb00}

849: Charbonnel, C., \& Balachandran, S.~C.~2000, A\&A, 359, 563

850: 

851: \bibitem[Charbonnel \& Zahn(2007a)]{chz07a}

852: Charbonnel, C., \& Zahn, J.-P.~2007a, A\&A, 467, L15

853: 

854: \bibitem[Charbonnel \& Zahn(2007b)]{chz07b}

855: Charbonnel, C., \& Zahn, J.-P.~2007b, A\&A, 476, L29

856: 

857: \bibitem[Choudhuri \& Gilman(1987)]{chg87}

858: Choudhuri, A.~R., \& Gilman, P.~A.~1987, ApJ, 316, 788

859: 

860: \bibitem[Couvidat et al.(2003)]{cea03}

861: Couvidat, S., Garc\'{\i}a, R.~A., Turck-Chi\`{e}ze, Corbard, T., Henney, C.~J.,

862: \& Jim\'{e}nez-Reyes, S.~2003, ApJ, 597, L77

863: 

864: \bibitem[Denissenkov \& Tout(2000)]{dt00}

865: Denissenkov, P.~A., \& Tout, C.~A.~2000, MNRAS, 316, 395

866: 

867: \bibitem[Denissenkov \& VandenBerg(2003)]{dv03}

868: Denissenkov, P.~A., \& VandenBerg, D.~A.~2003, ApJ, 593, 509

869: 

870: \bibitem[Denissenkov \& Herwig(2004)]{dh04}

871: Denissenkov, P.~A., \& Herwig, F.~2004, ApJ, 612, 1081

872: 

873: \bibitem[Denissenkov et al.(2006)]{dea06}

874: Denissenkov, P.~A., Chaboyer, B., \& Li, K.~2006, ApJ, 641, 1087

875: 

876: \bibitem[Denissenkov \& Pinsonneault(2008a)]{dp08a}

877: Denissenkov, P.~A., \& Pinsonneault, M.~2008a, ApJ 679, 1541

878: 

879: \bibitem[Denissenkov \& Pinsonneault(2008b)]{dp08b}

880: Denissenkov, P.~A., \& Pinsonneault, M.~2008b, ApJ, 684, 626

881: 

882: \bibitem[Denissenkov \& Weiss(1996)]{dw96}

883: Denissenkov, P.~A., \& Weiss, A.~1996, A\&A, 308, 773

884: 

885: \bibitem[Drake et al.(2002)]{dea02}

886: Drake, N.~A., de la Reza, R., da Silva, L., \& Lambert, D.~L.~2002, AJ,

887: 123, 2703

888: 

889: \bibitem[Eggleton, Dearborn, \& Lattanzio(2006)]{eea06}

890: Eggleton P.~P., Dearborn, D.~S.~P., \& Lattanzio, J.~C.~2006, Science, 314, 1580

891: 

892: \bibitem[Fan(2001)]{f01} 

893: Fan, Y.~2001, ApJ, 546, 509

894: 

895: \bibitem[Gratton et al.(2000)]{grea00}

896: Gratton, R.~G., Sneden, C., Carretta, E., \& Bragaglia, A.~2000, A\&A, 354, 169

897: 

898: \bibitem[Irwin et al.(2007)]{iea07}

899: Irwin, J., Hodgkin, S., Aigrain, S., Hebb, L., Bouvier, J., Clarke, C.,

900: Moraux, E., \& Bramich, D.~M. 2007, MNRAS, 377, 741

901: 

902: \bibitem[Kippenhahn et al.(1980)]{kea80}

903: Kippenhahn, R., Ruschenplatt, G., \& Thomas, H.-C.~1980, A\&A, 91, 175

904: 

905: \bibitem[Lebzelter et al.(2008)]{lea08}

906: Lebzelter, T., Lederer, M.~T., Cristallo, S., Hinkle, K.~H., Straniero, O., \& Aringer, B.~2008,

907: A\&A, 486, 511L

908: 

909: \bibitem[MacDonald \& Mullan(2004)]{mdm04}

910: MacDonald, J., \& Mullan, D.~J.~2004, MNRAS, 348, 702

911: 

912: \bibitem[MacGregor \& Cassinelli(2003)]{mgc03}

913: MacGregor, K.~B., \& Cassinelli, J.~P.~2003, ApJ, 586, 480

914: 

915: \bibitem[Maeder(2003)]{m03}

916: Maeder, A.~2003, A\&A, 399, 263 

917: 

918: \bibitem[Masseron et al.(2006)]{mea06}

919: Masseron, T., Van Eck, S., Famaey, B., Goriely, S., Plez, B., Siess, L.,

920: Beers, T.~C., Primas, F., \& Jorissen, A.~2006, A\&A, 455, 1059

921: 

922: \bibitem[Menou \& Le Mer(2006)]{mlm06}

923: Menou, K., \& Le Mer, J.~2006, ApJ, 650, 1208

924: 

925: \bibitem[Mestel(2001)]{m01}

926: Mestel, L.~2001, in Magnetic Fields across the Hertzsprung-Russel Diagram, eds. G. Mathys,

927: S. K. Solanki, and D. T. Wickramasinghe, ASP Conference Series, 248, 3

928: 

929: \bibitem[Mestel \& Weiss(1987)]{mw87}

930: Mestel, L., \& Weiss, N.~O.~1987, MNRAS, 226, 123

931: 

932: \bibitem[Moss(2003)]{moss03}

933: Moss, D.~2003, A\&A, 403, 693 

934: 

935: \bibitem[Newsham \& Terndrup(2007)]{nt07}

936: Newsham, G. \& Terndrup, D.~M.~2007, ApJ, 664, 332 

937: 

938: \bibitem[Nollett, Busso, \& Wasserburg(2003)]{nbw03}

939: Nollett, K.-M., Busso, M., \& Wasserburg, G.~J.~2003, ApJ, 582, 1036

940: 

941: \bibitem[Nordhaus, Blackman, \& Frank(2007)]{nea07}

942: Nordhaus, J., Blackman, E.~G., \& Frank, A.~2007, MNRAS, 376, 599 

943: 

944: \bibitem[Nordhaus \& Blackman(2007)]{nb07}

945: Nordhaus, J., \& Blackman, E.~G.~2008, in IXth Torino Workshop on Evolution and Nucleosynthesis

946: in AGB Stars and the IInd Perugia Workshop on Nuclear Astrophysics, AIP Conference Proc., 1001, 306

947: 

948: \bibitem[Palacios et al.(2003)]{pea03}

949: Palacios, A., Charbonnel, C., Talon, S., \& Forestini, M.~2003, A\&A, 399, 603

950: 

951: \bibitem[Palacios et al.(2006)]{pea06}

952: Palacios, A., Charbonnel, C., Talon, S., \& Siess, L.~2006, A\&A, 453, 261

953: 

954: \bibitem[Palacios \& Brun(2006)]{pb06}

955: Palacios, A., \& Brun, A.~S.~2006, in IAU Symp. 239, Convection in Astrophysics,

956: ed. F. Kupka, I. Roxburgh \& K.~L. Chan, 431 (arXiv:astro-ph/0610040v1)

957: 

958: \bibitem[Peterson(1983)]{p83}

959: Peterson, R.~C.~1983, ApJ, 275, 737

960: 

961: \bibitem[Pitts \& Tayler(1985)]{pt85}

962: Pitts, E., \& Tayler, R.~J.~1985, MNRAS, 216, 139

963: 

964: \bibitem[Ryan et al.(2005)]{rea05}

965: Ryan, S.~G., Aoki, W., Norris, J.~E., \& Beers, T.~C.~2005, ApJ, 635, 349

966: 

967: \bibitem[Schmitt \& Rosner(1983)]{sr83}

968: Schmitt, J.~H.~M.~M., \& Rosner, R.~1983, ApJ, 265, 901

969: 

970: \bibitem[Siess, Dufour, \& Forestini(2000)]{sea00}

971: Siess, L., Dufour, E., \& Forestini, M.~2000, A\&A, 358, 593

972: 

973: \bibitem[Sills \& Pinsonneault(2000)]{sp00}

974: Sills, A., \& Pinsonneault, M.~H.~2000, ApJ, 540, 489

975: 

976: \bibitem[Sivarani et al.(2006)]{sea06}

977: Sivarani, T., et al.~2006, A\&A, 459, 125

978: 

979: \bibitem[Smith \& Martell(2003)]{sm03}

980: Smith, G.~H., \& Martell, S.~L.~2003, PASP, 115, 1211

981: 

982: \bibitem[Spruit(1999)]{s99}

983: Spruit, H.~C.~1999, A\&A, 349, 189

984: 

985: \bibitem[Spruit \& van Ballegooijen(1982)]{svb82}

986: Spruit, H.~C., \& van Ballegooijen, A.~A.~1982, A\&A, 106, 58 

987: 

988: \bibitem[Stern(1960)]{s60}

989: Stern, M.~E.~1960, Tellus, 12, 172

990: 

991: \bibitem[Sweigart \& Mengel(1979)]{sm79}

992: Sweigart, A.~V., \& Mengel, J.~G.~1979, ApJ, 229, 624

993: 

994: \bibitem[Talon \& Zahn(1997)]{tz97}

995: Talon, S., \& Zahn, J.-P.~1997, A\&A, 317, 749

996: 

997: \bibitem[Talon et al.(1997)]{tea97}

998: Talon, S., Zahn, J.-P., Maeder, A., \& Meynet, G.~1997, A\&A, 322, 209

999: 

1000: \bibitem[Tayler(1973)]{t73}

1001: Tayler, R.~J.~1973, MNRAS, 161, 365

1002: 

1003: \bibitem[Ulrich(1972)]{u72}

1004: Ulrich, R.~K.~1972, ApJ, 172, 165

1005: 

1006: \bibitem[Vauclair(2004)]{v04}

1007: Vauclair, S.~2004, ApJ, 605, 874

1008: 

1009: \bibitem[Wasserburg et al.(2006)]{wea06}

1010: Wasserburg, G.~J., Busso, M., Gallino, R., \& Nollett, K.~M.~2006, Nucl. Phys. A, 777, 5

1011: 

1012: \bibitem[Zahn(1992)]{z92}

1013: Zahn, J.-P.~1992, A\&A, 256, 115

1014: 

1015: \end{thebibliography}

1016: 

1017: %-----------------------------------------------------------------

1018: %\pagestyle{empty}

1019: %\voffset=-3 cm

1020: \begin{figure}

1021: %\epsfxsize=15cm

1022: %\epsffile [60 180 580 695] {f1.eps}

1023: \plotone{f1.eps}

1024: \caption{(a) The element mass fractions, (b) the mean molecular weight, and (c) its logarithmic (with respect

1025:          to the pressure) gradient as functions of the radius in the vicinity of the H burning shell

1026:          in our bump-luminosity RGB model. The vertical solid line shows the observationally constrained depth of 

1027:          the RGB extra mixing $r_{\rm mix} = 0.05\,R_\odot$, the right dotted line -- the radius $r_{\rm min}$ of

1028:          the minimum $\mu$, while the left dotted line is placed at $r = r_{\rm min} - H_P$.

1029:          }

1030: \label{fig:f1}

1031: \end{figure}

1032: 

1033: %-----------------------------------------------------------------

1034: 

1035: %-----------------------------------------------------------------

1036: %\pagestyle{empty}

1037: %\voffset=-3 cm

1038: \begin{figure}

1039: %\epsfxsize=15cm

1040: %\epsffile [60 180 580 695] {f2.eps}

1041: \plotone{f2.eps}

1042: \caption{The motion of the equatorial magnetic flux rings with the cross-section radii $a_0 = 10^{-4}\,H_P$

1043:          (solid and dotted curves) and $a_0 = 10^{-3}\,H_P$ (dashed curves). The powers of ten show

1044:          the specified values of $\beta_0$, while the numbers in parentheses give the corresponding

1045:          strengths (in MG) of the frozen-in toroidal magnetic field. The dotted curve corresponds

1046:          to the ring with $\beta_0 = 10^{10}$ ($B_\varphi\approx 11$ kG) whose mean molecular weight

1047:          has been reduced by $\Delta\mu = 5\times 10^{-5}$.

1048:          }

1049: \label{fig:f2}

1050: \end{figure}

1051: 

1052: %-----------------------------------------------------------------

1053: 

1054: %-----------------------------------------------------------------

1055: %\pagestyle{empty}

1056: %\voffset=-3 cm

1057: \begin{figure}

1058: %\epsfxsize=15cm

1059: %\epsffile [60 180 580 695] {f3.eps}

1060: \plotone{f3.eps}

1061: \caption{The dashed and dot-dashed curves show the dependences of the buoyant rising time on the ring

1062:          cross-section radius for the rings with $\beta_0 = 10^8$ and $\beta_0 = 10^7$, respectively,

1063:          whose chemical composition has not been changed by nuclear reactions ($\Delta\mu = \mu_{\rm e} - \mu = 0$),

1064:          while the solid curve corresponds to the ring with $\beta_0 = 10^{10}$ and $\Delta\mu = 5\times 10^{-5}$

1065:          ($\mu$ reduced by $^3$He burning).

1066:          These three curves represent our numerical solutions of equations (\ref{eq:durdt}\,--\,\ref{eq:duphidt}).

1067:          The dotted lines give their corresponding approximations by equation (\ref{eq:tb}), in which

1068:          $\beta_0$ has been replaced by $\beta_{\rm eff} = \delta\mu^{-1} = (\mu/\Delta\mu)$ for the third case.

1069:          }

1070: \label{fig:f3}

1071: \end{figure}

1072: 

1073: %-----------------------------------------------------------------

1074: 

1075: %-----------------------------------------------------------------

1076: %\pagestyle{empty}

1077: %\voffset=-3 cm

1078: \begin{figure}

1079: \epsfxsize=12cm

1080: \epsffile [30 130 400 700] {f4.eps}

1081: %\plotone{f4.eps}

1082: \caption{(a) The critical toroidal field (dashed curve) and parameter $\beta$ (dot-dashed curve) for the triggering of the buoyancy instability

1083:          (equation \ref{eq:bcrit}), and the evolution of the toroidal field strength in the rising ring

1084:          (solid curve, equation \ref{eq:conserv}). (b) The time scales for the winding up of the critical

1085:          toroidal filed ($\Delta t_{\rm crit}$) and for the development of the buoyancy instability ($t_{\rm inst}$),

1086:          as well as the total ring formation time ($t_{\rm form} = \Delta t_{\rm crit} + t_{\rm inst}$).

1087:          These time scales should be shorter than the toroidal field growth time $\omega_{{\rm A},r}^{-1}$.

1088:          In these computations, it has been assumed that $B_r = 7.32\,(r_{\rm mix}/r)^2$ G, which makes

1089:          $(\Delta t)_{\rm crit} = t_{\rm inst}$ at $r = r_{\rm mix}$, where $\log (r_{\rm mix}/R_\odot)\approx -1.30$.

1090:          }

1091: \label{fig:f4}

1092: \end{figure}

1093: 

1094: %-----------------------------------------------------------------

1095: 

1096: \clearpage

1097: \begin{deluxetable}{llllll}

1098: \tablecolumns{6}

1099: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}

1100: \tablecaption{RGB Model Structure Parameters}

1101: \tablewidth{0pt}

1102: \tablehead{

1103: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Our Model} &

1104: \multicolumn{2}{c}{BWNC Model} \\

1105: \cline{3-4} \cline{5-6} \\

1106: \colhead{Parameter} & \colhead{Units} &

1107:           \colhead{$r_{\rm mix}=0.0500\,R_\odot$} & \colhead{$r_{\rm bce}=0.996\,R_\odot$} &

1108:           \colhead{$r_{\rm mix}=0.0495\,R_\odot$} & \colhead{$r_{\rm bce}=0.912\,R_\odot$} }

1109: \startdata

1110: $M_r$ & $M_\odot$ & 0.309 & 0.331 & 0.252 & 0.256 \\

1111: $H_P$ & $r$ & 0.257 & 0.449 & 0.371 & 0.622 \\

1112: $\mu$ & AMU & 0.593406 & 0.593474 & & \\

1113: $T$ & K & $2.16\times 10^7$ & $2.02\times 10^6$ & $2.51\times 10^7$ & $2.26\times 10^6$ \\

1114: $\rho$ & g\,cm$^{-3}$ & 14.8 & $1.03\times 10^{-2}$ & 5.19 & $2.55\times 10^{-3}$ \\

1115: $P$ & dyn\,cm$^{-2}$ & $4.49\times 10^{16}$ & $2.93\times 10^{12}$ & $1.87\times 10^{16}$ & $8.49\times 10^{11}$ \\

1116: $K$ & cm$^2$\,s$^{-1}$ & $9.35\times 10^7$ & $8.15\times 10^{10}$ & & \\

1117: $N_T^2$ & s$^{-2}$ & $5.40\times 10^{-4}$ & $1.13\times 10^{-9}$ & & \\

1118: $N_\mu^2$ & s$^{-2}$ & $1.48\times 10^{-7}$ & $0.00$ & & \\

1119: $\nu_{\rm mol}$ & cm$^2$\,s$^{-1}$ & $1.80\times 10^2$ & $6.76\times 10^2$ & & \\

1120: $\nu_{\rm rad}$ & cm$^2$\,s$^{-1}$ & $1.74\times 10^2$ & $1.43\times 10^4$ & & \\

1121: $\eta$ & cm$^2$\,s$^{-1}$ & 19.3 & $6.90\times 10^2$ & & \\

1122: $\kappa$ & cm$^2$\,g$^{-1}$ & 0.382 & 0.728 & & \\

1123: $|\dot{r}|$ & cm\,s$^{-1}$ & $3.91\times 10^{-5}$ & $8.50\times 10^{-5}$ & & \\

1124: $\Omega$ & rad\,s$^{-1}$ & $10^{-3}$ & $10^{-6}$ & & \\

1125: \enddata

1126:    \label{tab:tab1}

1127: \end{deluxetable}

1128: 

1129: %-----------------------------------------------------------------

1130: 

1131: \clearpage

1132: \begin{deluxetable}{llllll}

1133: \tablecolumns{6}

1134: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}

1135: \tablecaption{Magnetic Flux Ring Parameters}

1136: \tablewidth{0pt}

1137: \tablehead{

1138: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Our Model\ \ ($\Delta\mu = 5\times 10^{-5}$)} &

1139: \multicolumn{2}{c}{BWNC Model\ \ ($\Delta\mu = 0$)} \\

1140: \cline{3-4} \cline{5-6} \\

1141: \colhead{Parameter} & \colhead{Units} &

1142:           \colhead{$B_r = 7.3$\,G} & \colhead{$B_r = 73$\,G} & 

1143:           \colhead{RGB-1} & \colhead{RGB-2} }

1144: \startdata

1145: $a_0$ & cm & $1.3\times 10^7$ & $9.7\times 10^6$ & $6.5\times 10^6$ & $1.5\times 10^7$ \\

1146: $a_0$ & $H_P$ & $1.5\times 10^{-2}$ & $1.1\times 10^{-2}$ & $5.1\times 10^{-3}$ & $1.2\times 10^{-2}$ \\

1147: $t_{\rm b}$ & yr & $2.9\times 10^2$ & $1.6\times 10^2$  & 0.19 & 1.1 \\

1148: $\langle v_{\rm b}\rangle$ & cm\,s$^{-1}$ & 7.3 & 13 & $9.8\times 10^3$ & $1.8\times 10^3$ \\

1149: $(B_\varphi)_0$ & kG & 254  & 254 & 380 & 48 \\

1150: $\beta_0$ & & $1.8\times 10^7$ & $1.8\times 10^7$ & $3.3\times 10^6$ & $2.0\times 10^8$ \\

1151: $(B_\varphi)_{\rm bce}$ & kG & 3.5 & 3.5 & 3.5 & 0.44 \\

1152: $N$ & & $1.3\times 10^2$ & $1.3\times 10^2$ & 1.0 & 1.0 \\

1153: $\dot{N}=N/t_{\rm b}$ & yr$^{-1}$ & 0.45 & 0.83 & 5.3 & 0.91 \\

1154: \enddata

1155:    \label{tab:tab2}

1156: \end{deluxetable}

1157: 

1158: \end{document}

1159: