1: %%\documentclass{jpsj2}
2: %%\documentclass[twocolumn]{jpsj2}
3: %%\documentclass[letter]{jpsj2} %% for letters
4: \documentclass[twocolumn,letter]{jpsj2} %% two-column for letters
5: %%\documentclass[shortnote]{jpsj2} %% for short notes
6: %%\documentclass[comment]{jpsj2} %% for comments
7: %%\documentclass[addenda]{jpsj2} %% for addenda
8: %%\documentclass[errata]{jpsj2} %% for errata
9: %%\documentclass[twocolumn,shortnote]{jpsj2} %% two-column layout
10: %%\documentclass[seceq]{jpsj2} %% It makes equation numbers included within the section number (for regular paper only).
11: %%% The following is the list of packages loaded automatically into this class file.
12: %% amsmath.sty
13: %% amssymb.sty
14: %% graphicx.sty
15: %% overcite.sty
16: % 2002/12/16
17: %\usepackage[mtbold]{mathtime}
18:
19: \def\runtitle{$^{75}$As NMR study of BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$}
20: \def\runauthor{H. Fukazawa {\it et al.}}
21:
22: \title{%
23: $^{75}$As NMR study of the ternary iron arsenide BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$
24: }
25:
26: \author{%
27: Hideto~Fukazawa$^{1}$\thanks{E-mail address: hideto@nmr.s.chiba-u.ac.jp},
28: Kenji~Hirayama$^{1}$,
29: Kenji~Kondo$^{1}$,
30: Takehiro~Yamazaki$^{1}$,
31: Yoh~Kohori$^{1}$, \\
32: Nao~Takeshita$^{2}$,
33: Kiichi~Miyazawa$^{2,3}$,
34: Hijiri~Kito$^{2}$,
35: Hiroshi~Eisaki$^{2}$,
36: Akira~Iyo$^{2}$
37: }
38:
39: \inst{%
40: $^{1}$Department of Physics, Chiba University, Chiba 263-8522, \\
41: $^{2}$Nanoelectronics Research Institute, National Institute of
42: Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba 305-8562\\
43: $^{3}$Department of Applied Electronics, Tokyo University of Science, Noda 278-8510
44: }
45:
46: \recdate{\today}
47:
48: \abst{%
49: We report $^{75}$As nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements of the ternary iron arsenide BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$.
50: $^{75}$As-NMR spectra clearly revealed that magnetic transition occurs at around 131~K in our samples,
51: which corresponds to the emergence of spin density wave.
52: Temperature dependence of the internal magnetic field
53: suggests that the transition is likely of the first order.
54: The critical-slowing-down phenomenon in the spin-lattice relaxation rate $1/T_{1}$ is not pronounced in this material.
55: %, which is contrast to the obvious critical-slowing-down phenomenon observed in $1/T_{1}$ of $^{139}$La in LaFeAsO~\cite{Nak1}.
56: }
57:
58: \kword{%
59: BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$, spin density wave, magnetic transition, nuclear magnetic resonance
60: }
61:
62: \begin{document}
63: \maketitle
64:
65:
66:
67:
68:
69: %\section{\label{sec:level1} Introduction}
70:
71: The discovery of superconductivity in F-doped LaFeAsO with $T_{\rm c} = 26$~K~\cite{Kam1}
72: has accelerated the world-wide investigations of the related superconductors
73: ~\cite{Kit1,Take1,Nak1,Mat1,Ish1,Sat1,Taka1,GCh1,Ren1,Ren2,XCh1,Cru1}.
74: The common feature of these compounds is the possession of FeAs layer which is analogous to CuO$_{2}$ plane
75: in high superconducting transition temperature (high $T_{\rm c}$) cuprates.
76: In addition, non-doped materials commonly exhibit spin density wave (SDW) or
77: antiferromagnetic order with adjacent structural phase transition,
78: which is also resemblance of the parent materials of high $T_{\rm c}$ cuprates.
79: At present stage, the suppression of spin density wave (or antiferromagnetic order of localized moment)
80: and/or the carrier control of non-doped materials
81: seem to have a key role of the emergence of this new-class superconductivity.
82: Recent nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) studies of some of these superconducting oxypnictides strongly suggest that
83: the superconductivity in the materials is unconventional one with nodes in the superconducting gap~\cite{Nak1,Mat1}.
84:
85: Soon after the intensive investigations of the oxypnictides,
86: oxygen-free iron pnictides BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$~\cite{Rot1} and SrFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$~\cite{Kre1}
87: were proposed as a next candidate of the parent materials of superconductors with high $T_{\rm c}$.
88: The lattice parameter and the magnetic susceptibility of these materials were already reported about 25-30 years ago~\cite{Pfi1,Pfi2}.
89: However, the deeper studies of the compounds have just started with consideration as the parent materials of superconductors.
90: The crystal structure of these pnictides is the ThCr$_{2}$Si$_{2}$-type structure
91: which is familiar in the heavy fermion systems.
92: This structure possesses the similar FeAs layer to that realized in LaFeAsO.
93: Moreover, both the materials exhibit the SDW anomalies
94: at $T_{\rm SDW} =$~140~K (BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$)~\cite{Rot1,Hua1} and $T_{\rm SDW} =$~205~K (SrFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$)~\cite{Kre1,Yan1}.
95: It is important to notice that both the compounds exhibit structural phase transition
96: from tetragonal one ($I4/mmm$) to orthorhombic one ($Fmmm$) simultaneously with the SDW anomaly~\cite{Rot1,Kre1,Hua1,Yan1}.
97: The orders of these anomalies are reported as a second one for BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$~\cite{Rot1} and
98: a first one for SrFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$~\cite{Kre1,Yan1}.
99: However, quite recent neutron diffraction measurements of BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$ report
100: hysteresis of tetragonal (220) peak between on-cooling sequence and on-warming sequence,
101: which indicates the structural order at $T_{\rm SDW}$ is of the first order also in BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$~\cite{Hua1}.
102:
103: The most striking feature of these compounds is that the SDW anomaly disappears and the superconductivity indeed sets in
104: by hole doping, for example, K substitution for Ba~\cite{Rot2} or Sr~\cite{GCh2}.
105: In order to understand the superconductivity in these doped oxygen-free iron-based pnictides,
106: it is also important to study the magnetic and the electronic properties of the parent materials.
107: Especially the relation between the SDW instability and the superconductivity
108: should be revealed by local-probe measurements in addition to bulk measurements.
109: Hence, we performed $^{75}$As-NMR measurements of BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$.
110: %In this paper, we report $^{75}$As-NMR of BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$.
111: $^{75}$As-NMR spectra clearly exhibited the magnetic transition at around 131~K in our samples.
112: Temperature $T$ dependence of the internal magnetic field
113: suggests that the transition is likely of the first order.
114: The critical-slowing-down phenomenon in the spin-lattice relaxation rate $1/T_{1}$ is not pronounced in this material.
115:
116:
117:
118:
119:
120:
121: %\section{\label{sec:level2}Experimental}
122:
123: The polycrystalline BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$ was synthesized by the high temperature and high pressure method.
124: The samples were confirmed as nearly single phase by x-ray diffraction.
125: The standard four-probe resistivity measurement revealed the rapid decrease of the resistivity below 131~K,
126: which corresponds to the SDW anomaly~\cite{Tom1}.
127: The $T_{\rm SDW}$ of our samples is slightly lower than those reported by Rotter {\it et al.}~\cite{Rot1} and Huang {\it et al.}~\cite{Hua1}
128: The samples were crushed into powder for the experiments.
129: The NMR experiments of the $^{75}$As nucleus ($I=3/2$, $\gamma = 7.292$~MHz/T) have been carried out
130: by using phase-coherent pulsed NMR spectrometers and a superconducting magnet.
131: The NMR spectra were measured both by sweeping the applied fields at a constant resonance frequency
132: and by sweeping the resonance frequency at a constant applied field.
133: The origin of the Knight shift $K=0$ of $^{75}$As nucleus was determined by the $^{75}$As NMR of GaAs~\cite{Bas1}.
134: The $1/T_{1}$ was measured with the saturation recovery method.
135:
136:
137:
138:
139:
140:
141: %\section{\label{sec:level3}Results and Discussions}
142:
143: \begin{figure}
144: \centering
145: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{Fig1_BaFe2As2_radom_BSpec_141K_43o83MHz}
146: \caption{
147: (Color online) $^{75}$As-NMR spectrum of BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$ at 141~K.
148: Inset shows the center line of the enlarged spectrum between 5.975 and 6~T.
149: }
150: \end{figure}
151:
152: In Fig.~1, we show the $^{75}$As-NMR spectrum of BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$ at 141~K in paramagnetic state.
153: At this temperature, the crystal structure of BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$ is tetragonal~\cite{Rot1,Hua1}.
154: The obtained spectrum is a powder pattern expected for weak electric quadrupole coupling~\cite{Car1}.
155: The nuclear-spin Hamiltonian with external magnetic field $H_{\rm ext}$ is given by
156: $\mathcal{H} = -\gamma H_{\rm ext}I_{z} + \frac{e^{2}qQ}{4hI(2I-1)}\left( 3I_{z'}^{2}-I(I+1)\right), $
157: %\begin{equation}
158: % \mathcal{H} = -\gamma H_{\rm ext}I_{z} + \frac{e^{2}qQ}{4hI(2I-1)}\left( 3I_{z'}^{2}-I(I+1)\right) \nonumber
159: %\end{equation}
160: where $h$,$eq$, $eQ$ represent the Planck constant, the electric field gradient (EFG) and
161: the nuclear quadrupole moment, respectively.
162: The principal axis of the EFG is along the crystal $c$ axis since As site above $T_{\rm SDW}$
163: has a local four-fold symmetry around the $c$ axis~\cite{Rot1,Hua1}.
164: Because of the same reason, the $\mathcal{H}$ above $T_{\rm SDW}$ does not contain the asymmetry parameter $\eta$ of EFG.
165: Sharp central peak was observed at around 5.98~T.
166: In addition, rather broader satellite peaks were observed at around 5.83 and 6.13~T,
167: which is due to the first-order perturbation effect of the electric quadrupole term against the Zeeman term in $\mathcal{H}$.
168: %and suggests that the crystals are not fully oriented along the magnetic easy axis.
169: From the difference of the resonance fields of the satellite lines, a nuclear quadrupole resonance frequency,
170: $\nu_{\rm Q} \equiv \frac{3e^{2}qQ}{2hI(2I-1)}$, was estimated as 2.2~MHz.
171: This value is about 4-5 times smaller than the values in iron-based oxypnictide superconductors~\cite{Nak1,Mat1,Gra1,Muk1}.
172: This smaller value might suggest the low career density in the parent materials.
173: Similar discussion was done in the nuclear quadrupole resonance
174: of the oxygen-deficient iron oxypnictides~\cite{Muk1} and the high $T_{\rm c}$ cuprates~\cite{Zhe1}.
175:
176: In the inset of Fig.~1, we show the center line of the enlarged spectrum between 5.975 and 6~T.
177: This line shape is due to the second-order perturbation effect of the electric quadrupole term.
178: The large peak at around 5.984~T and the edge-like structure at around 5.993~T originate from
179: the resonance components perpendicular and 41.8$^{\rm o}$-inclined to the principal axis (crystal $c$ axis) of the EFG, respectively.
180: The enhancement of the perpendicular component, which is parallel to the crystal $ab$ plane,
181: is due to the partial orientation of the crystals in the $H_{\rm ext}$.
182: This suggests that the magnetic easy axis of BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$ is within the $ab$ plane,
183: which is consistent with the magnetic susceptibility parallel to the $ab$ plane is
184: about 1.5 times larger than that parallel to the $c$ axis~\cite{Wan1}.
185:
186: \begin{figure}
187: \centering
188: % \includegraphics[width=8cm]{Fig2_BaFe2As2_oriented_BSpec_4o2_141K_43o83MHz.eps}
189: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{Fig2_BaFe2As2_oriented_BSpec_4o2_141K_43o83MHz_2.eps}
190: \caption{
191: (Color online) $^{75}$As-NMR spectra of BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$ at various temperatures.
192: Circles denote the spectrum with much oriented powders in external magnetic field
193: and triangles the spectrum with partially oriented powders.
194: Inset shows the zero-external-field $^{75}$As-NMR spectrum at 1.5~K.
195: }
196: \end{figure}
197:
198: In Fig.~2, we show the $^{75}$As-NMR spectra of BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$ at various temperatures.
199: The spectrum broadens below 130~K.
200: This is clearly ascribable to the SDW magnetic ordering below $T_{\rm SDW} = 131$~K.
201: The quite weak signals from the center line observed in the paramagnetic state remains at around 6~T even in the magnetically ordered state.
202: Since the signal intensity of this center peak below $T_{\rm SDW}$ becomes about 1/10 of that above $T_{\rm SDW}$,
203: we may speculate that the SDW ordered state and the paramagnetic state separately exist just below $T_{\rm SDW}$,
204: which implies that the order of the SDW anomaly in BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$ is of the first order.
205: Note that the spectral broadening below $T_{\rm SDW}$ cannot be explained
206: by the change of the $\nu_{\rm Q}$ associated with the structural phase transition at $T_{\rm SDW}$.
207: Because the $\nu_{\rm Q}$ is roughly inversely proportional to unit cell volume
208: and the change of the unit cell volume associated with the SDW anomaly is at most 5\%,
209: the change of the $\nu_{\rm Q}$ gives the spectral broadening of at most 0.02~T at half maximum of the intensity at 6~T.
210: This is clearly much less than the experimental spectral broadening of 0.5~T at 120~K.
211:
212: In Fig.~2, we also show two $^{75}$As-NMR spectra at 4.2~K.
213: One is obtained with much oriented powders and another is with partially oriented powders.
214: The orientation of the micro crystals in powders was estimated from the fraction of the perpendicular component
215: of the center line spectrum in the paramagnetic state.
216: Clear difference of the spectra was observed.
217: The broader spectrum with partially oriented powders indicates
218: the larger projection of the internal magnetic field $H_{\rm int}$ at As site along the $H_{\rm ext}$.
219: Since the $c$ axis of each micro crystal in fully oriented powders is perpendcicular to the $H_{\rm ext}$,
220: we deduce that the $H_{\rm int}$ at As site directs the crystal $c$ axis.
221: Recent neutron diffraction measurements revealed the ordered moment of 0.87$\mu_{\rm B}$ (Bohr magneton) at Fe site
222: with the $q$ vector of $(1,0,1)$ for the orthorhombic structure~\cite{Hua1}.
223: Indeed, the antiferromagnetic Fe ordered moment within the $ab$ plane will make the $H_{\rm int}$ at As site parallel to the $c$ axis
224: because the As site locates at the top of the AsFe$_{4}$ pyramid.
225: The sharper $^{75}$As-NMR spectrum at 4.2~K is obtained in a condition that
226: the $H_{\rm ext}$ and the $H_{\rm int}$ orient nearly perpendicular.
227: Hence, the line width of the spectrum in Fig.~2 arises from the small angle distribution of the alignment,
228: which is reduced from the bare $H_{\rm int}$.
229: However, the $T$ dependence of the line width corresponds to that of the $H_{\rm int}$.
230: %Since the fully oriented powders are parallel to the crystal $ab$ plane,
231: %we deduce that the $H_{\rm int}$ at As site directs the crystal $c$ axis.
232: %This implies that the ordered moment at Fe site is within the $ab$ plane
233: %because the As site locates at the top of the AsFe$_{4}$ pyramid.
234: %This is consistent with the fact that the magnetic easy axis of this compound is within $ab$ plane.
235: %Recent neutron diffraction measurements revealed the ordered moment of 0.87$\mu_{\rm B}$ (Bohr magneton) at Fe site
236: %with the $q$ vector of $(1,0,1)$ for the orthorhombic structure~\cite{Hua1}.
237: %This is consistent with the fact that the magnetic easy axis of this compound is within $ab$ plane.
238: Assuming this ordered structure and the moment along the $a$ or the $b$ axis,
239: we evaluated that the dipole field at As site is approximately 0.3~T.
240: This is less than the $H_{\rm int}$ estimated from the spectral width of the $^{75}$As-NMR.
241: The contribution of conduction electrons is involved in the actual $H_{\rm int}$,
242: though the direction of the $H_{\rm int}$ depends on that of the ordered moments and the ordered structure.
243:
244: In the inset of Fig.~2, we show zero-field $^{75}$As-NMR spectrum at 1.5~K.
245: These narrow center line and broad satellites indicate that the $H_{\rm int}$ at As site had a magnitude of about 1.3~T
246: and its orientation is the maximum EFG direction at As site ($c$ axis).
247: The narrow lines suggest that the magnetically ordered state is basically formed with the commensurate $q$ vector,
248: which is consistent with neutron scattering measurements~\cite{Hua1}.
249: The origin of the broader satellites is probably due to the slight distribution of the EFG in the orthorhombic structure
250: through the first order structural phase transition.
251: Note that the broadening of the NMR spectra in the $H_{\rm ext}$ is due to the distribution of
252: the projection component of the $H_{\rm int}$ along the $H_{\rm ext}$.
253: Quite recent $^{75}$As-NMR measurements of single crystals and polycrystals of BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$ by Baek {\it et al.}
254: apparently revealed that the magnetically ordered state is incommensurate~\cite{Bae1}.
255: However, our zero-field $^{75}$As-NMR spectrum indicates that the magnetically ordered state is commensurate.
256:
257: %In the inset of Fig.~2, the temperature $T$ dependence of the spectral intensity of the center peak
258: %observed in the paramagnetic state at around 5.984~T.
259: %The data was obtained on warming and on cooling with the rate of 5~K/min.
260: %The signal intensity drastically decreases below about 135~K.
261: %The middle point of the transition is 131~K and this temperature is
262: %consistent with $T_{\rm SDW}$ determined by resistivity in our samples~\cite{Tom1}.
263: %No clear hysteresis of $T$ dependence of the signal intensity was observed.
264: %This experimental result suggests that the order of the SDW anomaly in BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$ is of the second order.
265: %Since our temperature control rate is three times slower than that operated by Huang {\it et al.}~\cite{Hua1},
266: %the apparent hysteresis observed in experiments by Huang {\it et al.}~\cite{Hua1} is possibly due to the rapid temperature control rate.
267:
268: \begin{figure}
269: \centering
270: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{Fig3_BaFe2As2_oriented_B_FWHM_43o83MHz.eps}
271: \caption{
272: (Color online) $T$ dependence of the full width at half maximum $FWHM$ (closed circle) and
273: quarter maximum $FWQM$ (closed triangle) of the $^{75}$As-NMR spectra of BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$.
274: Closed squares denote the $FWHM$ of the center line in the paramagnetic state.
275: Inset shows Knight shift $K_{ab}$ along the $ab$ plane of $^{75}$As-NMR of BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$
276: versus the magnetic susceptibility $\chi_{ab}$~\cite{Wan1}.
277: }
278: \end{figure}
279:
280: In Fig.~3, we show the $T$ dependence of the full width at half maximum $FWHM$ and quarter maximum $FWQM$
281: of the $^{75}$As-NMR spectra with much oriented powders.
282: As already described above, spectral width can be considered as the rough measure of
283: the distribution of the internal magnetic field $H_{\rm int}$ at As site.
284: The $FWHM$ are nearly $T$ independent and the $FWQM$ slightly decreases on warming between 4.2 and 130~K.
285: Then they abruptly decrease from finite field toward zero field at around $T_{\rm SDW}$.
286: This discontinuous tendency of the magnetic internal field at $T_{\rm SDW}$
287: can be interpreted that the order of the SDW anomaly is likely of the first one.
288:
289: % \begin{figure}
290: % \centering
291: % \includegraphics[width=8cm]{Fig4_BaFe2As2_Kab_chiab_5o98T.eps}
292: % \caption{
293: % (Color online)
294: % }
295: % \end{figure}
296:
297: In the inset of Fig.~3, we show the Knight shift $K_{ab}$ along the $ab$ plane of $^{75}$As-NMR of BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$
298: versus $\chi_{ab}$, magnetic susceptibility parallel to the $ab$ plane above $T_{\rm SDW}$.
299: The $K_{ab}$ above $T_{\rm SDW}$ was obtained from the perpendicular component of
300: the center line of the frequency-swept spectra at a constant applied field of 5.98~T.
301: The second order quadrupole effect was taken into account to obtain $K_{ab}$~\cite{Car1}.
302: The data of $\chi_{ab}$ was taken from ref.~\ref{Wang}.
303: The hyperfine coupling constant $A_{ab}$ parallel to the $ab$ plane was evaluated from the Knight shift at As site parallel to the $ab$ plane
304: and the magnetic susceptibility parallel to the $ab$ plane by assuming the following formulae,
305: $K_{ab}(T) = \frac{A_{ab}^{d}}{N_{\rm A}\mu_{\rm B}}\chi_{ab}^{d}(T)
306: + \frac{A_{ab0}}{N_{\rm A}\mu_{\rm B}}\chi_{ab0}$
307: $\left( \chi_{ab}(T) = \chi_{ab}^{d}(T) + \chi_{ab0}\right).$
308: %$$K_{ab}(T) = \frac{A_{ab}^{d}}{N_{\rm A}\mu_{\rm B}}\chi_{ab}^{d}(T)
309: %+ \frac{A_{ab0}}{N_{\rm A}\mu_{\rm B}}\chi_{ab0}, $$
310: %$$\chi_{ab}(T) = \chi_{ab}^{d}(T) + \chi_{ab0}.$$
311: Here, $N_{\rm A}$ represents Avogadro number.
312: The evaluated hyperfine coupling constant $A_{ab}^{d}$ originating from
313: the coupling between $^{75}$As nuclear spin and 3$d$ conduction electron of Fe is +19(2)~kOe/$\mu_{\rm B}$.
314: This is the same magnitude of the coupling constant as that reported for the $^{75}$As-NMR of LaFeAsO$_{0.9}$F$_{0.1}$~\cite{Gra1}.
315: %Note that the estimation of $A_{ab}$ has an ambiguity
316: %since the $T_{\rm SDW}$ of our samples are slightly different from that of single crystals grown by the authors of ref.~\ref{Wang}.
317: %However, the reasonable magnitude of the $A_{ab}^{d}$ supports that the estimation is roughly adequate.
318:
319: \begin{figure}
320: \centering
321: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{Fig4_BaFe2As2_T1T_43o835MHz_5o98T.eps}
322: \caption{
323: (Color online) $T$ dependence of spin-lattice relaxation rate $1/T_{1}$ of $^{75}$As of BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$.
324: The inset shows the typical recovery curve obtained at 266~K.
325: }
326: \end{figure}
327:
328: In Fig.~4, we show $T$ dependence of $1/T_{1}$ of $^{75}$As of BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$.
329: We obtained $T_{1}$ at a fixed frequency of 43.83~MHz with the external field of 5.75-5.98~T in the $T$ range of 4.2-131~K and
330: at a fixed field of 5.98~T with the frequency of 43.83-43.87~T in the $T$ range of 131-300~K.
331: The nuclear magnetization recovery curve was fitted by a following double exponential function
332: as expected for the center line of the spectrum of the nuclear spin $I=3/2$ of the $^{75}$As nucleus~\cite{Sim1},
333: %$$1-\frac{M(t)}{M_{0}} = 0.1\exp\left( -\frac{t}{T_{1}}\right) + 0.9\exp\left( -\frac{6t}{T_{1}}\right) ,$$
334: $1-\frac{m(t)}{m_{0}} = 0.1\exp\left( -\frac{t}{T_{1}}\right) + 0.9\exp\left( -\frac{6t}{T_{1}}\right) ,$
335: where $m(t)$ and $m_{0}$ are nuclear magnetizations after time $t$ and enough time from the NMR saturation pulse.
336: In the inset of Fig.~4, we show typical recovery curve obtained at 266~K.
337: Clearly the data are well fitted to the above ideal curve with a single $T_{1}$ component.
338: We used this formula even below $T_{\rm SDW}$, where the recovery curve should be more complicated and the concrete form cannot be derived.
339: However, the analysis below $T_{\rm SDW}$ yielded good fitting with a single $T_{1}$ component.
340: $1/T_{1}$ exhibits rapid decrease between 180 and 300~K.
341: The slope of the $1/T_{1}$ is greater than $T$ linear dependence.
342: This anomalous $T$ dependence is quite different from that reported in the related parent compound LaFeAsO
343: where $1/T_{1}$ of $^{139}$La is nearly $T$ independent sufficiently above $T_{\rm SDW}$~\cite{Nak1}.
344: Below about 180~K, $1/T_{1}$ exhibits gradual increase and sudden decrease below 131~K~$=T_{\rm SDW}$.
345: %This $T$ dependence around $T_{\rm SDW}$ is ascribable to a critical-slowing-down phenomenon associated with the SDW magnetic order.
346: Note that the critical-slowing-down phenomenon in this material is not pronounced,
347: which is contrast to the case of LaFeAsO in which the phenomenon was more clearly observed in $1/T_{1}$ of $^{139}$La~\cite{Nak1}.
348: The steep decrease of $1/T_{1}$ below $T_{\rm SDW}$ is probably due to a gap formation of the SDW at part of the Fermi surface.
349: %However, it should be noted that the comparison of $1/T_{1}$ between $T < T_{\rm SDW}$ and $T > T_{\rm SDW}$ is quite difficult
350: %since we used different part of the spectrum to evaluate $1/T_{1}$ below $T_{\rm SDW}$ and above $T_{\rm SDW}$.
351: %We analyzed the data between 100~K and $T_{\rm SDW}$ by assuming the gap function $1/T_{1} \propto \exp(-\Delta/T)$.
352: %This analysis yielded $\Delta \simeq 1000$~K which is much larger than the expected SDW gap of about 200~K.
353: $1/T_{1}$ below about 100~K is nearly proportional to $T$.
354: This is attributable to the relaxation due to the remaining conduction electron at the Fermi level even below $T_{\rm SDW}$.
355:
356: In BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$ and its isomorph SrFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$, the magnetic anomaly and the structural anomaly coincide
357: with each other at $T_{\rm SDW}$~\cite{Rot1,Kre1,Hua1,Yan1}.
358: This is in contrast to the case in the related compound LaFeAsO in which the magnetic anomaly and the structural anomaly
359: occur with the separation of about 10~K~\cite{Nak1}.
360: Moreover, the present results of $^{75}$As NMR measurements of BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$ support that
361: the magnetic transition at $T_{\rm SDW}$ is likely of the first order.
362: Further investigation of the relation between the coincidence/separation of the magnetic anomaly and the structural anomaly
363: and the order of the phase transition in the parent materials is quite important to understand the superconductivity
364: adjacent to the magnetic and the structural anomalies in the iron-based oxypnictides/pnictides.
365:
366: In summary, we performed $^{75}$As NMR measurements of the ternary iron arsenide BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$
367: which is a parent compound of new-class iron-based superconductors.
368: $^{75}$As-NMR spectra clearly revealed that magnetic transition occurs at around 131~K in our samples,
369: which corresponds to the emergence of SDW.
370: $T$ dependence of the $H_{\rm int}$ suggests that the transition is likely of the first order.
371: However, it is still an open question whether this transition is of the first order or of the second one.
372: The detailed specific heat measurements will answer this question and is strongly required.
373: The critical-slowing-down phenomenon in $1/T_{1}$ is not pronounced in this compound.
374: Finally we comment about the pressure effect on these iron-based oxypnictides/pnictides.
375: Not only doping study but also recent pressure study of the oxypnictides revealed that
376: the pressure much affects these materials in the electronic states in the broad pressure range up to about 30~GPa~\cite{Take1,Taka1}.
377: This indicates that the subsequent NMR/NQR studies of iron-based oxypnictides/pnictides under high pressure
378: requires such high pressure of 10~GPa class.
379: Recent development of high pressure NMR/NQR technique by the authors' group~\cite{Fuk1,Hir1} will
380: help for giving further insights into the understanding of these fascinating iron-based oxypnictides/pnictides.
381:
382:
383:
384:
385: %\section{Summary}
386:
387:
388:
389: %\section*{Acknowledgment}
390:
391: This work is supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the MEXT.
392:
393:
394:
395:
396:
397:
398:
399:
400: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
401:
402: \bibitem{Kam1} Y. Kamihara {\it et al.}: J. Am. Chem. Soc. {\bf 130} (2008) 3296.
403:
404: \bibitem{Kit1} H. Kito {\it et al.}: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 77} (2008) 063707.
405:
406: \bibitem{Take1} N. Takeshita {\it et al.}: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 77} (2008) 075003.
407:
408: \bibitem{Nak1} Y. Nakai {\it et al.}: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 77} (2008) 073701.
409:
410: \bibitem{Mat1} K. Matano {\it et al.}: to be published in J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 77} (2008).
411:
412: \bibitem{Ish1} S. Ishibashi {\it et al.}: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 77} (2008) 053709.
413:
414: \bibitem{Sat1} T. Sato {\it et al.}: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 77} (2008) 063708.
415:
416: \bibitem{Taka1} H. Takahashi {\it et al.}: Nature {\bf 453} (2008) 376.
417:
418: \bibitem{Ren1} Z. A. Ren {\it et al.}: Chin. Physics. Lett. {\bf 25} (2008) 2215.
419:
420: \bibitem{GCh1} G. F. Chen {\it et al.}: Chin. Physics. Lett. {\bf 25} (2008) 2235.
421:
422: \bibitem{Ren2} Z. A. Ren {\it et al.}: Euro. Phys. Lett. {\bf 82} (2008) 57002.
423:
424: \bibitem{XCh1} X. H. Chen {\it et al.}: Nature {\bf 453} (2008) 761.
425:
426: \bibitem{Cru1} C. Cruz {\it et al.}: Nature {\bf 453} (2008) 899.
427:
428: \bibitem{Rot1} M. Rotter {\it et al.}: arXiv:0805.4021v1.
429:
430: \bibitem{Kre1} C. Krellner {\it et al.}: arXiv: 0806.1043v1.
431:
432: \bibitem{Pfi1} M. Pfisterer and G. Nagorsen: Z. Naturforsch. B: Chem. Sci. {\bf 35} (1980) 703.
433:
434: \bibitem{Pfi2} M. Pfisterer and G. Nagorsen: Z. Naturforsch. B: Chem. Sci. {\bf 38} (1983) 811.
435:
436: \bibitem{Hua1} Q. Huang {\it et al.}: arXiv:0806.2776v1.
437:
438: \bibitem{Yan1} J.-Q. Yan {\it et al.}: arXiv:0806.2711v1.
439:
440: \bibitem{Rot2} M. Rotter {\it et al.}: arXiv:0805.4630v1.
441:
442: \bibitem{GCh2} G. F. Chen {\it et al.}: arXiv:0806.1209v1.
443:
444: \bibitem{Tom1} Y. Tomioka: private communications.
445:
446: \bibitem{Bas1} T. J. Bastow: J. Phys.: Condens. Matter {\bf 11} (1999) 569.
447:
448: \bibitem{Car1} G. C. Carter {\it et al.}: {\it Metallic Shifts in NMR}
449: (Pergamon Press, Oxford, New York, Toronto, Sydney, Paris, Frankfurt, 1977) Chap. 2\&6.
450:
451: \bibitem{Gra1} H.-J. Grafe {\it et al.}: arXiv:0805.2595v2.
452:
453: \bibitem{Muk1} H. Mukuda {\it et al.}: arXiv:0806.3238v1.
454:
455: \bibitem{Zhe1} G.-q. Zheng {\it et al.}: Physica C {\bf 260} (1996) 197.
456:
457: \bibitem{Wan1}\label{Wang} X. F. Wang {\it et al.}: arXiv:0806.2452v1.
458:
459: \bibitem{Bae1} S.-H. Baek {\it et al.}: arXiv: 0807.1084v2.
460:
461: \bibitem{Sim1} W. W. Simmons {\it et al.}: Rhys. Rev. {\bf 127} (1962) 1168.
462:
463: \bibitem{Fuk1} H. Fukazawa {\it et al.}: Rev. Sci. Instrum. {\bf 78} (2007) 015106.
464:
465: \bibitem{Hir1} K. Hirayama {\it et al.}: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 77} (2008) 075001.
466:
467:
468:
469:
470:
471:
472:
473: %\bibitem{Kam1} Y. Kamihara, T. Watanabe, M. Hirano, and H. Hosono: J. Am. Chem. Soc. {\bf 130} (2008) 3296.
474:
475: %\bibitem{Kit1} H. Kito, H. Eisaki, and A. Iyo: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 77} (2008) 063707.
476:
477: %\bibitem{Take1} N. Takeshita, A. Iyo, H. Eisaki, H. Kito, and T. Ito: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 77} (2008) 075003.
478:
479: %\bibitem{Nak1} Y. Nakai, K. Ishida, Y. Kamihara, M. Hirano, and H. Hosono: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 77} (2008) 073701.
480:
481: %\bibitem{Mat1} K. Matano, Z. A. Ren, X. L. Dong, L. L. Sun, Z. X. Zhao, and G.-q. Zheng:
482: %to be published in J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 77} (2008).
483:
484: %\bibitem{Ish1} S. Ishibashi, K. Terakura, and H. Hosono: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 77} (2008) 053709.
485:
486: %\bibitem{Sat1} T. Sato, S. Souma, K. Nakayama, K. Terashima, K. Sugawara, T. Takahashi, Y. Kamihara, M. Hirano, and H. Hosono:
487: %J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 77} (2008) 063708.
488:
489: %\bibitem{Taka1} H. Takahashi, K. Igawa, K. Arii , Y. Kamihara, M. Hirano, and H. Hosono: Nature {\bf 453} (2008) 376.
490:
491: %\bibitem{Ren1} Z. A. Ren, W. Lu, J. Yang, W. Yi, X. L. Shen, Z. C. Li, G. C. Che, X. L. Dong, L. L. Sun, F. Zhou, and Z. X. Zhao:
492: %Chin. Physics. Lett. {\bf 25} (2008) 2215.
493:
494: %\bibitem{GCh1} G. F. Chen, Z. Li , D. Wu, J. Dong, G. Li, W. Z. Hu, P. Zheng, J. L. Luo, and N. L. Wang:
495: %Chin. Physics. Lett. {\bf 25} (2008) 2235.
496:
497: %\bibitem{Ren2} Z. A. Ren, J. Yang, W. Lu, W. Yi, X. L. Shen, Z. C. Li, G. C. Che, X. L. Dong, L. L. Sun, F. Zhou, and Z. X. Zhao:
498: %Euro. Phys. Lett. {\bf 82} (2008) 57002.
499:
500: %\bibitem{XCh1} X. H. Chen, T. Wu, G. Wu, R. H. Liu, H. Chen, and D. F. Fang: Nature {\bf 453} (2008) 761.
501:
502: %\bibitem{Cru1} C. Cruz, Q. Huang, J. W. Lynn, J. Li, W. Ratcliff, J. L. Zarestky, H. A. Mook,
503: %G. F. Chen, J. L. Luo, N. L. Wang, and P. Dai: Nature {\bf 453} (2008) 899.
504:
505: %\bibitem{Rot1} M. Rotter, M. Tegel, D. Johrendt, I. Schellenberg, W. Hermes, R. P$\ddot{\rm o}$ttgen: arXiv:0805.4021v1.
506:
507: %\bibitem{Kre1} C. Krellner, N. Caroca-Canales, A. Jesche, H. Rosner, A. Ormeci, and C. Geibel: arXiv: 0806.1043v1.
508:
509: %\bibitem{Pfi1} M. Pfisterer and G. Nagorsen: Z. Naturforsch. B: Chem. Sci. {\bf 35} (1980) 703.
510:
511: %\bibitem{Pfi2} M. Pfisterer and G. Nagorsen: Z. Naturforsch. B: Chem. Sci. {\bf 38} (1983) 811.
512:
513: %\bibitem{Hua1} Q. Huang, Y. Qiu, W. Bao, J. W. Lynn, M. A. Green, Y. C. Gasparovic, T. Wu, G. Wu, and X. H. Chen: arXiv:0806.2776v1.
514:
515: %\bibitem{Yan1} J.-Q. Yan, A. Kreyssig, S. Nandi, N. Ni, S. L. Bud'ko, A. Kracher, R. J. McQueeney, R. W. McCallum,
516: %T. A. Lograsso, A. I. Goldman, and P. C. Canfield: arXiv:0806.2711v1.
517:
518: %\bibitem{Rot2} M. Rotter, M. Tegel, and D. Johrendt: arXiv:0805.4630v1.
519:
520: %\bibitem{GCh2} G. F. Chen, Z. Li, G. Li, W. Z. Hu, J. Dong, X. D. Zhang, P. Zheng, N. L. Wang, and J. L. Luo: arXiv:0806.1209v1.
521:
522: %\bibitem{Tom1} Y. Tomioka: private communications.
523:
524: %\bibitem{Bas1} T. J. Bastow: J. Phys.: Condens. Matter {\bf 11} (1999) 569.
525:
526: %\bibitem{Car1} G. C. Carter, L. H. Bennett, and D. J. Kahan: {\it Metallic Shifts in NMR}
527: %(Pergamon Press, Oxford, New York, Toronto, Sydney, Paris, Frankfurt, 1977) Chap. 2\&6.
528:
529: %\bibitem{Gra1} H.-J. Grafe, D. Paar1, G. Lang, N. J. Curro, G. Behr, J. Werner,
530: %J. Hamann-Borrero, C. Hess, N. Leps, and R. Klingeler, B. B$\ddot{\rm u}$chner: arXiv:0805.2595v2.
531:
532: %\bibitem{Muk1} H. Mukuda, N. Terasaki, H. Kinouchi, M. Yashima, Y. Kitaoka,
533: %S. Suzuki, S. Miyasaka, S. Tajima, K. Miyazawa, P. Shirage, H. Kito, H. Eisaki, and A. Iyo: arXiv:0806.3238v1.
534:
535: %\bibitem{Zhe1} G.-q. Zheng, Y. Kitaoka, K. Asayama, K. Hamada, H. Yamauchi, and S. Tanaka: Physica C {\bf 260} (1996) 197.
536:
537: %\bibitem{Wan1}\label{Wang} X. F. Wang, T. Wu, G. Wu, H. Chen, Y. L. Xie, J. J. Ying, Y. J. Yan, R. H. Liu, and X. H. Chen: arXiv:0806.2452v1.
538:
539: %\bibitem{Bae1} S.-H. Baek, T. Klimczuk, F. Ronning, E. D. Bauer, N. J. Curro, and J. D. Thompson: arXiv: 0807.1084v2.
540:
541: %\bibitem{Sim1} W. W. Simmons, W. J. O'Sullivan, and W. A. Robinson: Rhys. Rev. {\bf 127} (1962) 1168.
542:
543: %\bibitem{Fuk1} H. Fukazawa, N. Yamatoji, Y. Kohori, C. Terakura, N. Takeshita, Y. Tokura, and H. Takagi:
544: %Rev. Sci. Instrum. {\bf 78} (2007) 015106.
545:
546: %\bibitem{Hir1} K. Hirayama, T. Yamazaki, H. Fukazawa, Y. Kohori, N. Takeshita: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 77} (2008) 075001.
547:
548:
549:
550:
551:
552:
553:
554:
555:
556:
557:
558:
559:
560:
561:
562: %\bibitem{Fuj3} N. Fujiwara, N. Mori, Y. Uwatoko, T. Matsumoto, N. Motoyama and S. Uchida,
563: %Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 90}, 1370001 (2003).
564:
565: %\bibitem{Fuk2} H. Fukazawa, T. Okazaki, K. Hirayama, Y. Kohori, G. Chan, S. Ohara and I. Sakamoto:
566: %J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 76} (2007) 124703.
567:
568: %\bibitem{Ere1} M.I. Eremets: High Pressure Experimental Methods, Oxford University Press (1996).
569:
570: %\bibitem{Wal1} I.R. Walker: Rev. Sci. Instrum. {\bf 70} (1999) 3402.
571:
572: %\bibitem{Fuk3} H. Fukazawa, K. Hirayama, T. Yamazaki, Y. Kohori, and T. Matsumoto:
573: %J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 76} (2007) 125001.
574:
575: %\bibitem{Fuj2} K. Fujiwara, Y. Shimaoka and T.C. Kobayashi, Rev. High Pressure Sci. Technol. {\bf 13}, 314 (2003).
576:
577: %\bibitem{Fuk1} H. Fukazawa, N. Yamatoji, Y. Kohori, C. Terakura, N. Takeshita, Y. Tokura and H. Takagi:
578: %Rev. Sci. Instrum. {\bf 78} (2007) 015106.
579:
580: %\bibitem{Han1} N. M$\hat{\rm{o}}$ri, H. Takahashi and N. Takeshita:
581: %High Pressure Research {\bf 24} (2004) 225.
582:
583: %\bibitem{Tak1} N. Takeshita: manuscript in preparation.
584:
585: %\bibitem{Rey1} A.P. Reyes, E.T. Ahrens, R.H. Heffner, P.C. Hammel and J.D. Thompson,
586: %Rev. Sci. Instrum. {\bf 63}, 3120 (1992).
587:
588: %\bibitem{Fuj1} N. Fujiwara, T. Matsumoto, K. Koyama-Nakazawa, A. Hisada, and Y. Uwatoko,
589: %Rev. Sci. Instrum. {\bf 78} (2007) 073905.
590:
591: %\bibitem{Kus1} T. Kushida, G.B. Benedek, and N. Bloembergen, Phys. Rev. {\bf 104}, 1364 (1956).
592:
593: %\bibitem{Gra1} R.G. Graham, P.C. Riedi and B.M. Wanklyn, J. Phys. Condens. Matter {\bf 3}, 135 (1991).
594:
595: %\bibitem{Wij1} H.W. de Wijn and J.L. de Wildt, Phys. Rev. {\bf 150}, 200 (1966).
596:
597:
598:
599: \end{thebibliography}
600: \end{document}
601: