1: %aastex v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
2: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
4: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
5: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
6: % \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}l
7: \slugcomment{To appear in The Astrophysical Journal}
8:
9: \def\ssp{\def\baselinestretch{1.1}\small\normalsize}
10: \def\tighttable{\def\baselinestretch{1.0}}
11: \rightskip 0 pt plus 2 pt
12: \def\kms{${\rm km\,s}^{-1}$}
13: \def\Hubble{${\rm km\,s}^{-1}\,{\rm Mpc}^{-1}$}
14: \def\ergsec{ergs s$^{-1}$}
15: \def\ergscm{${\rm ergs\,s}^{-1}\,{\rm cm}^{-2}$}
16: \def\Msun{M$_{\odot}$}
17: \def\Ho{H$_{0}$}
18: \def\tc{\tablenotemark{c}}
19: \def\HST{{\it HST}}
20: \newcommand {\lya}{Ly$\alpha$}
21: \newcommand {\lyb}{Ly$\beta$}
22: \newcommand {\ciii}{\ion{C}{3}}
23: \newcommand {\civ}{\ion{C}{4}}
24: \newcommand {\niii}{\ion{N}{3}}
25: \newcommand {\nii}{\ion{N}{2}}
26: \newcommand {\ovi}{\ion{O}{6}}
27: \newcommand {\oiii}{\ion{O}{3}}
28: \newcommand{\he}{\ion{He}{2}}
29: \newcommand {\lm}{$\lambda$}
30: \newcommand {\etal}{et al.}
31: \newcommand {\ngc}{NGC 1068}
32: \shorttitle{NGC 1068}
33: \shortauthors{Zheng et al.}
34:
35: \begin{document}
36:
37: \title{Spatially Resolved Far-Ultraviolet Spectroscopy of\\the Nuclear Region
38: of NGC 1068
39: \altaffilmark{1}}
40:
41: \author{
42: Wei Zheng\altaffilmark{2},
43: Jun-Xian Wang\altaffilmark{2,3},
44: Gerard A. Kriss\altaffilmark{2,4},
45: David Sahnow\altaffilmark{2},
46: Mark Allen\altaffilmark{5},
47: Michael Dopita\altaffilmark{6},
48: Zlatan Tsvetanov\altaffilmark{2,7},
49: and
50: Geoffrey Bicknell\altaffilmark{6}
51: }
52: \altaffiltext{1}{
53: Based on observations made with the NASA-CNES-CSA Far Ultraviolet
54: Spectroscopic Explorer (FUSE), which is operated for NASA by the Johns Hopkins
55: University under NASA contract NAS5-32985,
56: and observations with the NASA/ESA {\it Hubble Space Telescope}, obtained at
57: the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the Association of
58: Universities of Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract NAS5-26555.}
59: \altaffiltext{2}{Center for Astrophysical Sciences, Department of Physics and
60: Astronomy, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218}
61: \altaffiltext{3}{Center for Astrophysics, University of Science and Technology
62: of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230026, China}
63: \altaffiltext{4}{Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700
64: San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218}
65: \altaffiltext{5}{
66: Observatoire de Strasbourg,
67: 67000 Strasbourg, France
68: }
69: \altaffiltext{6}{
70: Mount Stromlo \& Siding Spring Observatories, Australian National University,
71: ACT 2611, Australia
72: }
73: \altaffiltext{7}{NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC 20546-0001}
74:
75: \begin{abstract}
76: We carry out high-resolution FUSE spectroscopy of the nuclear region of NGC 1068.
77: The first set of spectra was obtained with a 30\arcsec\ square aperture that
78: collects all emission from the narrow-line region. The data reveal a strong
79: broad \ion{O}{6} component of FWHM $\sim 3500$ $\rm km s^{-1}$ and two narrow
80: \ion{O}{6} $\lambda\lambda 1031/1037$ components of $\sim 350\ \rm
81: km s^{-1}$. The \ion{C}{3} $\lambda 977$ and \ion{N}{3} $\lambda 991$
82: emission lines in this spectrum can be fitted with a narrow component of
83: FWHM $\sim 1000$ $\rm km s^{-1}$ and a broad one of $\sim 2500$ $\rm km s^{-1}$.
84: Another set of seven spatially
85: resolved spectra were made using a long slit of $1\farcs 25 \times 20 \arcsec$,
86: at steps of $\sim 1$\arcsec\ along the axis of the emission-line cone.
87: We find that (1) Major emission lines in the FUSE wavelength range consist of
88: a broad and a narrow component; (2) There is a gradient in the velocity field
89: for the narrow \ion{O}{6} component of $\sim 200$ $\rm km s^{-1}$ from
90: $\sim 2 \arcsec$ southwest of the nucleus to $\sim 4 \arcsec$ northeast.
91: A similar pattern is also observed with the broad \ovi\ component, with a
92: gradient of $\sim 3000\ \rm km s^{-1}$. These are consistent with the HST/STIS
93: findings and suggest a biconical structure in which the velocity field is mainly radial
94: outflow;
95: (3) A major portion of the \ion{C}{3} and \ion{N}{3} line flux is produced in
96: the compact core. They are therefore not effective
97: temperature diagnostics for the conical region; and (4) The best-fitted UV
98: continuum suggests virtually no reddening, and the \ion{He}{2} 1085/1640 ratio
99: suggests a consistently low extinction
100: factor across the cone. At $\sim 2 \arcsec$ northeast of
101: the nucleus there is a region characterized by (a) a strong Ly$\alpha$ flux, but normal
102: \ion{C}{4} flux; (b) a broad \ion{O}{6} line; and (c) a significantly enhanced \ion{C}{3}
103: flux.
104: \end{abstract}
105:
106: \keywords{
107: galaxies: individual (NGC 1068) ---
108: galaxies: Seyfert
109: galaxies: active ---
110: }
111:
112: \section{INTRODUCTION}
113:
114: NGC 1068 is a prototypical Seyfert 2 galaxy. Because of its proximity
115: ($z=0.0038$) and brightness, it has been studied in nearly every possible
116: detail. The polarimetric observation by \citet{antonucci}, which reveals
117: a Seyfert 1 spectrum in scattered light, suggests that the
118: nucleus and its associated broad-line region (BLR) are obscured.
119: This finding provides strong evidence for the unified theory in which viewing
120: angles account for the differences between various active galactic nuclei
121: \citep{antonucci2}
122:
123: The nuclear region of NGC 1068 harbors a variety of astrophysical phenomena.
124: At the very center of the nucleus there is a bright compact ($<$0\farcs 3) region
125: commonly referred as ``the hot spot''.
126: Within a few arcseconds from the nucleus, there are several bright and compact
127: clouds that coincide with knots in the radio jets \citep{wilson,evans}.
128: The narrow-line region (NLR) is conical in shape toward the northeast (Fig. 1),
129: along a position angle of $\sim 200 \deg$ and with an opening angle
130: of $\sim 40 \deg$.
131: Beyond a 6\arcsec\ radius the surface brightness drops dramatically, and emission
132: is dominated by two ring-like filaments at $\sim10$\arcsec\ and
133: 15\arcsec\ from the nucleus.
134:
135: High-spatial-resolution spectroscopy of NGC 1068 has been carried out in the
136: optical \citep{caganoff,unger,inglis,emsellem,gmos} as well as in the UV
137: \citep{caganoff,krm2,krm,cecil,groves}. From approximately 2\arcsec\ southwest of the nucleus
138: to 4\arcsec\ northeast,
139: emission lines exhibit multiple components \citep{cecil90,krm0}: (1) major
140: emission lines consist of narrow and broad lines; (2) broad lines are approximately
141: 2500-4000 \kms\ wide, which may be linked to those that are found in polarized light and
142: believed to be reflected light from the inner BLR, and (3) narrow lines
143: consist of a pair of red and blue components. The [\oiii] and [\nii] line profiles suggest
144: that the separation of these two components varies across the conical NLR.
145: In addition to an overall
146: biconical ionization configuration, there are compact knots whose optical spectra
147: resemble kinematically the associated absorption line systems in quasars
148: \citep{cecil,ckg,krm4}.
149: These line-emitting knots
150: have blueshifted radial velocities up to 3000 \kms\ relative to the galaxy's
151: systemic velocity, contributing mostly to the emission-line flux but not the continuum.
152: Between $\sim$2\farcs 5 and 4\farcs 5 northeast from the nucleus, UV line emission is
153: redshifted relative to the systemic value, a pattern that is interpreted as the
154: expansion of the plasma in the radio lobe \citep{axon}.
155:
156: Several important emission lines in the far-UV (FUV) region between 912
157: and 1150~\AA\ are observable only with specially crafted UV instruments.
158: During the Astro-1 mission the Hopkins Ultraviolet Telescope (HUT)
159: observed NGC 1068 with 18\arcsec\ and 30\arcsec\ apertures.
160: The most striking features in the wavelengths below 1150 \AA\
161: are the strong \ciii\ \lm 977 and \niii\ \lm 991 lines.
162: The line intensity ratios of \ciii\ I(\lm 1909)/I(\lm 977) and
163: \niii\ I(\lm 1750)/I(\lm 991) are temperature sensitive, and the derived
164: temperature is $> 25$ 000 K \citep{kriss}, higher than the values expected for a region
165: producing \ion{C}{3} and \ion{N}{3} emission by photoionization,
166: The line ratios in \ngc\
167: are similar to those of the Cygnus Loop supernova remnant \citep{blair},
168: suggesting a significant contribution from shock-heating mechanisms.
169: Astro-2 observations of NGC 1068 were obtained with a 12\arcsec\ aperture
170: at three different positions. The results \citep{grimes} suggest
171: that the emission lines observed with HUT likely arise in the inner nuclear region
172: imaged with HST. However, the poor angular resolution of the HUT instrument
173: ($> 10\arcsec$) does not allow a study of the NLR in terms of spatial details.
174:
175: The line-emitting mechanisms in the NLR, {\em i.e.} photoionization from
176: the nucleus or shocks produced by jets, have long been under debate.
177: \citet{dopita} and \citet{bicknell} proposed that
178: emission in the NLR may be entirely caused by shocks.
179: Velocity splitting over 1000 \kms, reported by \citet{axon},
180: in the vicinity of some of the bright emission-line
181: knots provides evidence that fast shocks exist in
182: the NLR of NGC~1068. However, Seyfert galaxies host powerful nuclear
183: sources of ionizing radiation, and the situation
184: can be more complex with shocks or nuclear photoionization prevailing
185: in different environments \citep{allen,morganti}.
186: \citet{morse} suggested that
187: photoionizing shocks are important when a radio jet interacts with the
188: interstellar medium, but not in the objects where sharp, straight-edged
189: ionization cones are observed. \citet{ferguson}
190: argued that strong \ciii\ \lm 977 and \niii\ \lm 991 emission may arise from
191: fluorescence in photoionized gas if turbulent velocities exceed
192: $\sim$1000 \kms. However, \citet{grimes} found that such a
193: velocity would lead to extreme physical conditions that are inconsistent with
194: the Astro-2 data. More recent HST data \citep{krm,cecil} found that the emission-line
195: ratios are consistent with photoionization instead of shock heating mechanism.
196:
197: We have carried out observations with the {\em Far Ultraviolet
198: Spectroscopic Explorer} (FUSE) to study the spatial distribution
199: of FUV emission lines. In this paper we present the results of both large-aperture
200: and spatially resolved spectroscopic observations with FUSE. For the first time, we
201: are able to study the position dependence of several important diagnostic lines
202: in the FUV band.
203:
204: \section{DATA}
205:
206: \subsection{FUSE data}
207:
208: FUSE covers a wavelength range between 904 and 1188 \AA, with a
209: spectral resolution of $R \sim 20 000$ \citep{moos}. It is
210: based on a Rowland circle design and consists of four separate optical paths
211: or channels. Each channel consists of a mirror coated with aluminum plus LiF
212: or SiC, a focal plane assembly, which includes the spectrograph apertures, a
213: diffraction grating coated with aluminum plus LiF or SiC, and a portion of
214: FUV detector (two named A and B).
215: In all, data are collected from eight traces, and the pairs of A and B are
216: called channels. Our original plan was to
217: take spectra of the nuclear region of \ngc\ at seven positions separated by
218: $\sim$ 1\arcsec.
219: Because of thermal instability of the optical structure in orbit, the four
220: channels in the FUSE spectrograph are not perfectly aligned, with
221: orbit-dependent drifts possibly as large as 6\arcsec.
222: Therefore, a new observing strategy was
223: developed to counter the drifting effect.
224: The high-resolution aperture
225: (HIRS: $1\farcs 25 \times 20 \arcsec$) is used for spectroscopy on the finest
226: spatial scales, to ensure that maximum
227: resolution is maintainable even if the telescope imaging or pointing
228: stability degrades below specifications.
229: Since the LiF1 channel is mounted on the same optical system as the FUSE
230: fine error sensor, the spatial knowledge and stability is fully available
231: for the data from this channel.
232:
233: The observations of \ngc\ were carried out with two modes between 2001
234: November 28 and December 02. The first set of data of 21951 seconds
235: was taken with fixed pointing and the LWRS (low-resolution) square aperture
236: of 30\arcsec. With such a
237: large aperture, fluxes of the nuclear region are all collected (Fig. 2),
238: even with the thermally-induced mirror motions anticipated.
239: The second set of observations was carried out in a scanning mode across
240: the conical emission-line region, with a total exposure of 94434 seconds.
241: A narrow HIRS slit at a position angle of $137 \deg$ was used.
242: Because of orbital constraints, we were not able to place the slit
243: completely perpendicular to the conical axis. The slit actually makes
244: an angle of $\sim 97 \deg$ with respect to the conical axis.
245:
246: Over years of FUSE operation, a large amount of engineering data have been
247: collected,
248: and the drift pattern among the four channels has been well studied. After
249: peak-up alignments of channels with a bright point source at the beginning
250: of orbital nights, the relative drifts exhibit a dependence on orbital time
251: (Fig. 3). The LiF2 channel exhibits relatively small drifts, within one
252: arcsecond
253: with respect to the LiF1 channel. The SiC channels exhibit drifts that can be
254: represented by a constant drift rate during
255: orbital nights. For example, the SiC2 channel drifts relative to the LiF1
256: channel at a rate of approximately 4\arcsec\ per 30 minutes.
257: The starting drift at the orbital sunset is however variable, depending on
258: the degree of occultation because the drift is generally in the reverse
259: direction during orbital days.
260:
261: NGC 1068 itself is too diffuse to appear in the guide-star camera.
262: For target acquisition, we used an offset guide star $\sim 85$\arcsec\ from
263: the nucleus. We also used a FUV-bright star, Feige 23, which is approximately
264: four degrees away from the source, for instrumental peak-up alignments at
265: the beginning of each pointing.
266: One orbit of peak-up operation on Feige 23 was made to establish the drift
267: pattern due to orbital motion. During the second orbit, one peak-up with the
268: MDRS aperture ($4\arcsec \times 20$\arcsec) and another with HIRS were carried
269: out on Feige 23.
270: The instrument was then pointed to the southwest part of the nucleus of
271: \ngc, and we started observations in a scanning mode.
272: As shown in Table 1, each of the five pointings consists of 7-9 orbits on the
273: target. The observation window varied orbit by orbit, between $\sim 1200$ and
274: 2600 sec. The scanning speed in each individual orbit was set to complete
275: 10\arcsec\ within the designated observation window.
276: After accumulating a total exposure time of $\sim 18000$ sec, FUSE
277: returned to Feige 23 and carried out one peak-up with MDRS and another with
278: HIRS, then moved back to \ngc\ for a new set of scans. After a total of
279: five pointings, FUSE returned to Feige 23 for one last orbit of peak-up with MDRS, to
280: acquire additional information on the drift pattern.
281:
282: Since the channel alignments are not perfect except at the beginning of the
283: first orbit, the orbit-time dependence of channel drifts derived from the
284: engineering data is only useful in terms of the relative drift speed, not for
285: the absolute timing.
286:
287: The drifts in the SiC channels can be as large as 6\arcsec, which is
288: near the size of the ionization cone. The drift direction
289: is mainly along +x on the FUSE aperture plate, i.e., along the conical
290: direction of NGC 1068 at the desired FUSE aperture position angle of $\sim
291: 105 \deg$.
292: Therefore the observation procedure was designed so that each observation
293: starts $\sim 5\arcsec$ from the nucleus in the anti-cone (southwest) direction
294: and sweeps across the cone towards the northeast direction at a constant
295: angular velocity.
296: Fig. 4 illustrates the time sequence in one orbit of observation: with a constant
297: angular speed,
298: the FUSE HIRS slit swept across the nuclear region of NGC 1068. We identified the peak
299: position of the count rate in the LiF1 channel as the nuclear position.
300: Based on the angular speed illustrated in Fig. 3, seven time intervals were defined,
301: and the spectral extraction in these segments yields the data A-G.
302: The upper panel of Fig. 4 marks the segments for the LiF1 channel, whose spatial information
303: is fully available. For the other three channels, their count rates peaked
304: at different times as a result of drifting. We marked their
305: respective peak positions. The sweeping speeds in these channels are the sum of
306: two terms: that of the LiF1 channel plus the relative drift speed of each
307: channel (Fig. 3) with respect to LiF1. Their time segments A-G are also
308: illustrated in Fig. 4.
309: The observation results in a series of segments that are dependent on the
310: relative positions with respect to the nucleus. In each time sequence, one can
311: determine the time when the observation slits coincide with the nucleus, as
312: determined by the peak in the count rate.
313:
314: The LiF1 slit positions are illustrated in Fig. 1. Seven sets of data are
315: extracted with a relative shift of 1 arcsec (1\farcs 25 at the nucleus),
316: starting from 2\arcsec\ southwest from the nucleus
317: (in the opposite direction of the cone), to $\sim 4\arcsec$ northeast of it.
318: They were named as A,B,C (the nucleus, see Fig. 1), D,E,F and G.
319: The significant astigmatism of FUSE yields a spatial resolution of
320: $\sim 5\arcsec$ at best, therefore it cannot be used like a normal long-slit
321: spectrograph to dissect the fine details along its slit. Not all the segment data
322: are extracted: If a time segment is incomplete (``G'' in Fig. 4, for example),
323: they are not used.
324:
325: Four pairs of spectra were derived from the FUSE channels. Each pair of ``A''
326: and ``B'' data is subject to the same normalization factor. We used the \ovi\ emission
327: flux, which is common to all four channels,
328: to normalize the spectra to the level in LiF1A. We first calculated the continuum level
329: between 1050 and 1070 \AA\ for LiF2B, SiC1A, SiC 2B and LiF1A, then subtracted it from the
330: spectrum to enable the measurement of emission-line fluxes. We then calculated the
331: \ovi\ flux in two bins: a narrow component between 1041.1 and 1043.6
332: \AA, and a broad component between 1027 and 1048 \AA. The flux ratios with respect to their
333: values in the LiF1A spectrum were calculated, then their mean values were used
334: as the normalization factors (Table 2).
335: For the first set of data, taken with LWRS, we corrected the
336: ``worm effect'' in the LiF1A,B channel, according to the procedures described
337: in the {\it FUSE Instrument and Data Handbook}
338: (http://fuse.pha.jhu.edu/analysis/dhbook.html).
339:
340:
341: FUSE data reduction was carried out with pipeline version CALFUSE2.3, with specific timing
342: flags to extract time-dependent (hence position-dependent) segments of
343: spectra in eight traces.
344: The FUSE spatial
345: resolution is 1\farcs 5, and the spacecraft jitter, as determined from the FUSE
346: engineering data, is approximately 0\farcs 6. The total spatial resolution is
347: therefore 1\farcs 6. Since the data were obtained with a 1\farcs 25 slit,
348: there is overlap between positions. This can be seen by the fact that the sum
349: of the fluxes in all positions is larger than that taken with one large
350: 30\arcsec\ aperture.
351:
352: The normalized spectra in the four channels are binned to 0.1\AA, then merged,
353: weighted by their signal-to-noise ratio. The merged spectra at the
354: seven slit positions are plotted in Fig. 5. The wavelength bin between $\sim 1077$
355: and 1087 \AA\ falls into a gap between the LiF channels, and only data in the
356: SiC2B channel exist.
357:
358:
359: \subsection{HST data}
360:
361: We retrieved archival HST/STIS spectroscopic data to complement our FUSE data.
362: Two sets of UV spectra are available: one taken at a position angle of $218
363: \deg$ and four adjacent slit positions of $0\farcs 2 \times 52$\arcsec\
364: \citep[][STIS-A hereafter]{cecil}, and another at a position angle of
365: $202 \deg$ taken with a slit of $0\farcs 1 \times 52$\arcsec\ \citep[][STIS-B]{krm}.
366: Both sets (see Fig. 1) contain data taken with grating G140L and G230L,
367: covering a wavelength range of $\sim 1150$ to 3170 \AA\ at a resolution of $R \sim 1000$.
368: These STIS observations were made between 1988 and 2000, therefore
369: not simultaneous with the FUSE data.
370: For STIS-A, we only used three slit positions as the other does not have G140L
371: data. The fluxes in the three extracted spectra are summed up.
372:
373: Since the FUSE spatial resolution ($\ge 5\arcsec$ along its slit) is considerably
374: lower than that of STIS, and
375: since the position angles of these two sets of observations are nearly
376: perpendicular, we must normalize the STIS data to that of
377: FUSE. Using the continuum level around 1180 \AA\ in these spectra
378: did not result in
379: satisfactory matches as the line/continuum ratios are not constant at these spatial scales
380: across the nucleus. We therefore use HST WPFC2 images retrieved from MAST to determine the
381: normalization factor between STIS and FUSE data.
382:
383: To extract the STIS spectra, we first smoothed the 2-D images by 30
384: pixels (0\farcs 67) with a Gaussian kernel along the spatial direction of
385: the FUSE scans, to
386: match the spatial resolution of the corresponding FUSE data. We then ran the
387: standard STIS pipeline task ``x1d''
388: with steps of one arcsecond (1\farcs 25 at the nucleus) that correspond
389: to the respective moving FUSE slit positions, and a slit width of 1\farcs 25.
390: To normalize the STIS fluxes, we used a HST/WFPC2 image of \ngc, taken with
391: filter F218W, and smoothed it along the same direction with the same kernel size
392: as the STIS 2-D image. We then measured the flux in each STIS window.
393: To normalize the FUSE fluxes, we
394: smoothed the WFPC2 image to the FUSE resolution, namely 0\farcs 67 and 5\farcs,
395: respectively, along the direction perpendicular and parallel to that of the
396: FUSE slit (Fig. 1). The flux ratios in respective extraction windows are used
397: to derive the normalization factors (Table 2). To the northwest direction from
398: the source, there are several bright spots whose fluxes may be picked up
399: because of FUSE's low spatial resolution along its slit. We tested with several
400: extraction windows that are sufficiently short not to include the fluxes from
401: these bright spots in the smoothed WFPC2 image. Since it is
402: unlikely that these bright spots contribute to the redshifted UV emission lines, we used
403: the flux values measured in a short window in calculating the scaling factor.
404: Any uncertainties introduced by this window selection only affect the scaling
405: of \lya\ and \civ\ in position A and G.
406:
407: Since the FUSE slit positions are accurate to $\sim$ 0\farcs 3, we measured
408: the fluxes in the neighboring regions, to make sure that the
409: normalization factors are accurate to at least 20\%.
410: The height of STIS extraction windows is the same as that of FUSE
411: ($\sim 1$\arcsec), but their widths (0\farcs 1-0\farcs 2) are much smaller than
412: FUSE (20\arcsec). Therefore considerable STIS normalization factors were
413: applied. The matching STIS spectra are plotted in Fig. 6.
414:
415: We compared extracted spectra from the STIS-A and STIS-B datasets, and their
416: line ratios are comparable within 25\%. In the following section, we only use
417: the data from STIS-A, as they cover a spatial region six times as wide ($0\farcs 2
418: \times 3 \arcsec$) as that of STIS-B.
419:
420: \section{FITTING}
421:
422: Spectral analyses were carried out using IRAF task {\it Specfit}
423: \citep{specfit}.
424: For the FUSE spectrum taken with a large aperture, we used a pair of narrow components
425: and one broad component in the \ovi\ emission line profile. Each narrow \ovi\ component
426: was modeled as a doublet whose wavelength ratio is fixed by atomic data and whose
427: line widths are identical.
428: The \ovi\ emission feature is heavily absorbed by interstellar absorption
429: at $\sim$ 1037\AA, therefore we introduced several absorption components. The \lyb\
430: emission is not prominent, and it is often overwhelmed by the broad \ovi\ emission.
431: Only in one or two positions is the \lyb\ emission visible. We therefore only
432: modeled one component with a fixed line width. For \niii\ and \ciii\
433: emission line features, one narrow
434: component and one broad component were included in fitting. We fitted a power law with no
435: extinction to the continuum. The fitted results are listed in Table 3.
436:
437: For the FUSE spectra taken at positions A-G, we used one narrow component plus
438: one
439: broad component to model the \ovi\ emission, and one component for the \niii\ and \ciii\
440: lines. To reduce the effect of channel drifts, the FUSE spectra were fitted
441: individually for each channel. The fitting results in Table 4 are primarily
442: derived from the LiF1 data, which are not affected by channel drifts. For
443: wavelengths below 995 \AA, we used the fitting results from the scaled SiC2A
444: channel, which extends to
445: 1005 \AA\ and is therefore less susceptible than the SiC1B channel to the detector
446: edge effects. For \ion{He}{2} 1085, LiF2A data were used.
447: The fluxes of fitted components were normalized by the values in Table 2, and
448: then tabulated in Table 4. The profiles of four major emission lines at
449: seven different slit positions are plotted in Fig. 7, to show the changes in
450: the narrow and broad components as a function of spatial location.
451:
452: The UV spectra suggest a low extinction level. We first fitted the continuum
453: in the wavelength windows that are free of emission
454: and absorption lines, and the results suggest a power-law index of
455: $\alpha = 0.90 \pm 0.04$ ($f_\lambda \propto \lambda^\alpha$)
456: and an extinction of $E_{B-V}=0.005 \pm 0.002$. As a comparison, the HUT
457: spectrum between 912 and 1800 \AA\ was fitted with a power-law continuum of
458: $\alpha=0.62 \pm 0.15$ and $E_{B-V}=0.065 \pm 0.02$. If we adopt this
459: extinction value, the power-law index is $\alpha = 0.85 \pm 0.06$. The
460: similar power indices suggest that one single power-law continuum can fit the
461: far-UV spectrum of NGC 1068 without introducing significant reddening,
462: as suggested from the UV/optical line ratios \citep{krm0}.
463:
464: \section{Discussion}
465:
466: Many previous studies have gradually unraveled the kinematical
467: complexities of gas in the nuclear region of NGC 1068. The X-ray data
468: \citep{xmm} suggest that emission lines are formed mainly in a photoionied
469: plasma of a temperature around a few eV. The spatial resolution afforded by
470: HST leads to a picture of decelerating jet \citep{das}:
471: a biconical outflow from the nuclear region sweeps up denser, ambient
472: clouds in the interstellar medium (ISM) of NGC 1068. Other possibilities
473: include overlapping, discrete ejection that gradually dissipates
474: \citep{axon,capetti}. In addition, a high-velocity radio jet
475: impinges on some of the clouds. Some gas expands perpendicularly to the
476: axis of the jet, and the expanding radio lobe at the end of the jet also
477: pushes on the ambient ISM. Near the nucleus, kinematic components span
478: several thousand kilometers per second in velocity, and the continuum
479: hot spot visible in HST images reflects a polarized view of the broad
480: lines in the active nucleus.
481:
482: Our spatially resolved FUSE observations, while not at the resolution of
483: HST, add information from major emission lines shortward of the HST
484: bandpass at high spectral resolution. We plot the fluxes of major UV
485: emission lines from our observations at seven slit positions in Fig. 8,
486: and list the fitted line properties in Table 4. In this section, we discuss
487: the four emission lines in the FUSE spectral range, along with a comparison to
488: emission lines observed in the STIS spectra.
489:
490: \subsection{\ovi\ emission}
491:
492: The most prominent feature in the FUSE spectra is the \ovi\ \lm\lm 1031,1037
493: emission line. In the data taken with LWRS, the two narrow \ovi\
494: components are of FWHM $\sim 350$ \kms\ and a separation of $\sim 200$ \kms.
495: In the
496: seven spectra taken with a narrow slit, we resolve this blend into one
497: narrow component with FWHM of $\sim 350$ \kms\ and one broad component.
498: In Fig. 9 we plot the \ovi\ profiles at the seven different slit positions.
499: The high spectral resolution of FUSE data enables us to compare with the
500: results of optical Fabry-Perot spectroscopy \citep{cecil90}, which reveal
501: a narrow core of $\sim 300$ \kms.
502: According to the optical data, nearly 75\% of the [\nii] \lm 6583 flux is from
503: components of $\sim 1500$ \kms\ wide. Line widths at such a scale are
504: consistent with that derived from HST UV spectroscopy.
505: The narrow-line flux in the FUSE spectra is highly concentrated (60\%)
506: at the compact core, suggesting that
507: the ``true'' NLR probably remains unresolved, at a sub-arcsecond scale.
508: While the narrow O VI emission line is not the
509: dominant component, its distribution is different from its broad
510: counterpart, while only 40\% of the broad \ovi\ line flux is from
511: slit position C.
512:
513: It is surprising that the \ovi\ emission is dominated by a component
514: that is broader than those seen in polarized light: in the LWRS spectrum, more
515: than 3/4 of the \ovi\
516: flux is from a component with FWHM $\sim 3500$ \kms\ that is blue-shifted
517: relative to the narrow component by $\sim 500$ \kms. This broad component
518: is present in
519: all seven FUSE slit spectra with considerable strength. It may arise from the
520: reflected emission from the hidden BLR, and/or may be the result of a
521: significant velocity dispersion in the NLR. The HST FOC data \citep{axon}
522: reveal that emission
523: lines near the hot knots 2\arcsec\ northeast (FUSE slit positions D and E)
524: are split into two velocity systems separated by $\sim 1500$ \kms.
525: The STIS spectra discussed by \citet{groves} show [\oiii] emission
526: knots spanning such a broad velocity range in the immediate vicinity of
527: the nucleus, but not at distances of several arcseconds.
528: Since the FUSE slit collects emission from a block of regions spanning
529: several arcseconds perpendicular to the conical axis, the total line
530: emission from these regions may be blended into one broad component.
531:
532: The ratios of \civ/\ovi\ may provide insight into the physical conditions of the
533: line-emitting regions. The value is higher for the narrow components than their
534: broad counterparts, implying a range of the ionization parameter $U \sim
535: 0.05-1.0$ in a typical photionization calculation. High values of $U>1$
536: are consistent with models that assume the same origin for the
537: associated absorbers and BLR \citep{n7469}, suggesting that the clouds that produce
538: the broad emission components may be of the same origin as associated absorbers.
539:
540: \subsection{Velocity field}
541:
542: The narrow \ovi\ line exhibits a systematic velocity shift from position
543: A to G by approximately
544: 220 \kms. This gradient in the spatially resolved spectra explains why
545: there are two narrow-line components in the integrated flux from the
546: large-aperture FUSE spectrum, where it is unresolved.
547: \citet{krm0} reported a similar velocity pattern in their
548: HST spectra. \citet{das} successfully modeled this as a biconical
549: outflow in which radial velocity changes as a function of the distance
550: to the central nucleus: the emission line knots show evidence for radial
551: acceleration
552: to a projected distance of 2\arcsec\ to the northeast direction, followed by
553: deceleration up to 4\arcsec. The \ovi\ line widths also increase at
554: $\pm 2$\arcsec\ from the nucleus, probably implying a larger dispersion in
555: these regions.
556:
557: The broad component of \ovi\ exhibits a qualitatively similar kinematic
558: pattern, but at a larger amplitude: its centroid shifts by $\sim 1500$ \kms\
559: (Fig. 10) across the same spatial region.
560: Fig. 11 shows similar trends for the narrow and broad components of \civ\
561: in the HST spectra which have not been explicitly noted in previous
562: studies: the narrow component follows the kinematic pattern of the
563: optical lines modeled by \citet{das}; the broad component of \civ\
564: shows behavior similar to that of \ovi\ in the FUSE spectra.
565: Prior observations that noted this blue-shifted broad component
566: invariably attributed it to the reflection of the BLR. The
567: blue shift and width (at the position of the hot spot, and in
568: integrated light) are comparable to the broad polarized H$\beta$ line
569: observed by \citet{antonucci}.
570:
571: In a scattered BLR picture, a blue shift is caused by the
572: outflowing wind from the torus along our line of sight, and a line width is
573: due to the intrinsic broad line width convolved with the thermal width
574: of the hot reflecting wind. As a broad component is present in the FUSE spectra at all
575: seven positions, it is possible to assume that this is reflected light from the hidden BLR.
576: However, a large covering factor is needed to
577: explain the observed fluxes. Assuming a covering factor of 0.1, the intrinsic
578: flux of the broad \ovi\ emission in NGC 1068 would exceed that in NGC 4151.
579: A more reasonable explanation for the observed broad line widths is the large
580: velocity dispersion between bright knots.
581: At approximately 2\arcsec\ from
582: the core (position A and E), the FWHMs of broad components are the
583: broadest at 3200 \kms. These maxima coincide with the widest spliting of
584: velocity in bright knots \cite{krm0}. With an intrinsic dispersion of
585: $\sim$800 \kms\ and a separation in velocity of $\sim$2500 \kms\ between bright
586: knots (from STIS results), data collected by the long FUSE slit would
587: exhibit a broad component of $\sim$3200 \kms, which is what observed at
588: positions A and E. Extended regions of hot, photoionized
589: gas are seen in X-ray images of NGC 1068 \citep{young,xmm} that could be
590: visible manifestations of this hot outflow.
591: It is natural to assume that these high-velocity clouds may be related to the
592: associated absorbers \citep[][and references therein]{ckg} in AGN, which are
593: mostly blueshifted.
594: As with the lower-velocity, lower ionization emission-line gas, the
595: acceleration of this high ionization gas eventually is brought to a halt
596: by an unknown deceleration mechanism, which might plausibly be
597: interaction with the ambient ISM of NGC 1068. The evidence for deceleration
598: at arcsecond scale may suggest that acceleration of the outflow materials may
599: take place at sub-arcsecond scales.
600:
601: \subsection{\ciii\ \lm 977}
602:
603: The flux ratio of \ciii\ \lm 1909 to 977 is extremely sensitive to temperature, and the
604: value measured in N1068 suggests a high temperature that is consistent with shock-heating
605: \citep{kriss}. The FUSE data taken with a large aperture (Table 3) reveal that this emission
606: line consists of a narrow and a broad component. The broad component is weak and
607: hence cannot be well separated in the data segments taken with a narrow FUSE slit.
608: The STIS data reveal that \ciii\ \lm 1909 emission can be fitted with a narrow and a broad
609: component of FWHM $\sim 900$ and 3500 \kms, respectively. In principal, the ratio of \ciii\
610: \lm 1909 to 977 should be calculated only between the narrow components.
611:
612: As shown in Fig. 8, the flux of \ciii\ \lm 977 is highly concentrated in position C and D.
613: High temperatures implied by this line emission may therefore be associated with the compact core. In a large portion of the ionization cone, the line ratios (\lm 1909/\lm 977) are
614: considerably higher, suggesting a lower temperature. However, the line ratios
615: are considerably lower than that derived from the HUT data, where broad \ciii\
616: \lm 1909 component was included in the calculation.
617:
618: \subsection{\niii\ \lm 991}
619:
620: The line ratio of \niii\ \lm 1750 to \lm 991 is also temperature dependent, and its value has
621: also been used to derive a high temperature in the ionization cone. The FUSE data also
622: reveal a pair of components in the data taken with a large aperture. Unlike \ciii\ \lm 977,
623: the broad component of \niii\ \lm 991 , as shown in Table 3, is stronger than its narrow
624: counterpart. The FUSE data taken with a narrow slit shows that nearly a half of this broad
625: component is in position C. In other positions, the \niii\ \lm 991 emission can only be
626: fitted with one component of FWHM $\sim 1000$ \kms. In combination with the trend for
627: \ciii\ \lm 977, we conclude that a bulk of flux in these temperature-sensitive emission lines
628: is from the compact core of NGC 1068, and their intensity is not directly tied to the physical
629: conditions in the ionization cone.
630:
631: \subsection{\he\ 1085}
632:
633: The distribution of \he\ \lm 1085 is different from other emission lines in the FUSE spectra:
634: as shown in Fig. 8, the \he\ flux varies smoothly across the NLR region, like that of \lya,
635: \civ\ and other lines in the STIS spectra. Since \he\ emission is believed to be produced mainly by
636: recombination and is insensitive to the gas temperature, this pattern of variation may simply
637: reflect the distribution of NLR gas across the ionization cone.
638: The ratio of \he\ emission \lm 1640 to \lm 1085 is believed to be a reddening
639: indicator. As shown in Fig. 12, the ratio is nearly constant ($\sim 5.5$)
640: between slit
641: positions B and F. This is consistent with the HUT result
642: of $5.8 \pm 1.6$, suggesting an insignificant level of extinction
643: ($E_{B-V} \le 0.05$). The low values at positions A and G may suggest that
644: the data at these positions are not reliable.
645:
646: The \he\ I(1640)/I(1085) ratio is slightly lower than that expected
647: from recombination, and this may suggest that the \he\ \lm 1085 may be
648: slightly contaminated by other weak UV emission lines.
649: \ion{N}{2} \lm 1085 is a likely candidate, and the trend of decreasing
650: \he\ (1640)/I(1085) ratio with distance from the nucleus supports this as
651: there is a noticeable decrease in ionization state at larger distances
652: from the nucleus \citep{axon,krm2,krm3}.
653: As with \ovi\ and \civ, there appears to be a broad component
654: that is considerably blueshifted. However, the relevant wavelength range
655: is in a gap between the LiF channels, and only SiC2B data are
656: available. Because of the low
657: S/N ratio, the reality of such a broad component is still questionable,
658: as no such counterpart is found in the corresponding HST spectra of \he\
659: \lm 1640.
660:
661: \section{Summary}
662:
663: We have carried out high-spectral resolution, spatially resolved spectroscopy of
664: the nuclear region of the Seyfert 2 galaxy NGC 1068. The high spectral resolution
665: of FUSE data enables us to study the line profiles of \ion{O}{6}, \ion{N}{3},
666: and \ion{C}{3} as a function of position across the nuclear region. Our observations
667: using a long slit of $1\farcs 25 \times 20 \arcsec$ at steps of $\sim 1 \arcsec$
668: along the axis of the emission-line cone resulted in a set of seven spatially
669: resolved spectra running from $\sim 2 \arcsec$ southwest of the nucleus to
670: $\sim 4 \arcsec$ northeast.
671:
672: The \ion{O}{6} profiles exhibit considerable structure: a prominent broad component with
673: FWHM $\sim 3500$ $\rm km s^{-1}$, and a narrow component of $\sim 300$ $\rm
674: km s^{-1}$ . Both components show a position-dependent velocity gradient along
675: the conical axis with a velocity shift of $\sim 220$ $\rm km s^{-1}$ in the
676: narrow component and a shift of $\sim 1500$ $\rm km s^{-1}$ in the broad component.
677: Both patterns
678: are consistent with radial outflow from the nuclear region. Both the continuum
679: and emission lines suggest low extinction: the UV continuum is flat to the shortest
680: wavelengths in the FUSE spectrum, and the best fit is a power law with virtually no
681: reddening. The \ion{He}{2} 1640/1085 ratio also is reflective of a consistently low
682: extinction factor across the emission-line cone. The majority of the \ion{C}{3} and
683: \ion{N}{3} emission arises in the compact core, suggesting that the region with
684: extremely high temperature is very close to the nucleus and remains unresolved.
685: The line emission at $\sim 2 \arcsec$ northeast of the nucleus is strong and broad,
686: characterized by (a) a strong Lya flux, but normal \ion{C}{4} flux; (b) a broad
687: \ion{O}{6} line; and (c) a significantly enhanced \ion{C}{3} flux, possibly the result
688: of hot knots associated with shock heating.
689:
690: \acknowledgments
691:
692: W.Z. would like to thank the FUSE team, particularly W. Blair,
693: for their painstaking help in planning the observations of NGC 1068 and
694: post-observation studies of engineering data.
695:
696: This work has been supported in part by NASA grant NAG-8-1527 and NAG-8-1133.
697: The FUSE and HST data presented in this paper were obtained from
698: the Multimission Archive at the Space Telescope Science Institute (MAST).
699:
700:
701: \begin{thebibliography}{}
702: \bibitem[Allen et al.(1998)]{allen} Allen, M. G., Dopita, M. A., \& Tsvetanov,
703: Z. I. 1998, \apj, 493, 571
704: \bibitem[Antonucci(1993)]{antonucci2} Antonucci, R. 1993, ARAA, 31, 473
705: \bibitem[Antonucci et al.(1985)]{antonucci} Antonucci, R. R. J., \& Miller,
706: J. S. 1985, \apj, 297, 621
707: \bibitem[Axon et al.(1998)]{axon} Axon, D. J., Marconi, A., Capetti, A.,
708: Machetto, F. D., Schreier, E., \& Robinson, A. 1998, \apj, 496, L75
709: \bibitem[Bicknell et al.(1998)]{bicknell} Bicknell, G. V., Dopita, M. A.,
710: Tsvetanov, Z. I., \& Sutherland, R. S. 1998, \apj, 495, 680
711: \bibitem[Blair et al.(1991)]{blair} Blair, W. P., et al.\ 1991, \apj, 379, L33
712: \bibitem[Caganoff et al. (1991)]{caganoff} Caganoff, S., et al.\ 1991, \apj, 377, L9
713: \bibitem[Capetti et al.(1997)]{capetti} Capetti, A., Axon, D. J., \& Macchetto,
714: F. D. 1997, \apj, 487, 560
715: \bibitem[Capetti et al.(1996)]{capetti2} Capetti, A., Axon, D. J.,
716: Machetto, F. D., Sparks, W. B., \& Boksenberg, A. 1996, \apj, 469, 554
717: \bibitem[Cecil et al.(1990)]{cecil90} Cecil, G., Bland, J., \& Tully, R. B.
718: 1990, \apj, 355, 70
719: \bibitem[Cecil et al.(2002)]{cecil} Cecil, G., Dopita, M. A.; Groves, B.,
720: Wilson, A. S.; Ferruit, P., P\'{e}contal, E., \& Binette, L. 2002, \apj,
721: 568, 627
722: \bibitem[Crenshaw \& Kraemer(2000a)]{krm0}Crenshaw, D. M., \& Kraemer, S. B.
723: 2000$a$, \apj, 532, L101
724: \bibitem[Crenshaw \& Kraemer(2000b)]{krm}\underline {\hskip 7em}
725: 2000$b$, \apj, 532, 247
726: \bibitem[Crenshaw \& Kraemer(2005)]{krm4}\underline {\hskip 7em}
727: 2005, \apj, 625, 680
728: \bibitem[Crenshaw, et al. (2003)]{ckg}Crenshaw, D. M., Kraemer, S. B., \&
729: George, I. M. 2003, ARA\&A, 41, 117
730: \bibitem[Das et al.(2006)]{das} Das, V., Crenshaw, D. M., Kraemer, S. B., \&
731: Deo, R. P. 2006, \aj, 132, 620
732: \bibitem[Dopita \& Sutherland(1996)]{dopita} Dopita, M. A., \& Sutherland,
733: R. S. 1996, \apjs, 102, 161
734: \bibitem[Dopita et al.(1997)]{dopita2} Dopita, M. A., et al.\ 1997, \apj,
735: 490, 202
736: \bibitem[Emsellem et al.(2005)]{emsellem} Emsellem, E., Fathi, K., Wozniak,
737: H., Ferruit, P., Mundell, C. G., \& Schinnerer, E. 2006, \mnras, 365, 367
738: \bibitem[Evans et al.(1991)]{evans} Evans, I. N., Ford, H. C., Kinney, A. L.,
739: Antonucci, R. R. J., Armus, L., \& Caganoff, S. 1991, \apj, 369, L27
740: \bibitem[Ferguson et al.(1995)]{ferguson} Ferguson, J. W., Ferland, G. J.,
741: \& Pradhan, A. K. 1995, \apj, 438, L55
742: \bibitem[Gerssen et al.(2006)]{gmos} Gerssen, J., Allington-Smith, J.,
743: Miller, B. W., Turner, J. E. H., \& Walker, A. 2006, \mnras, 365, 29
744: \bibitem[Grimes et al.(1999)]{grimes} Grimes, J. P., Kriss, G. A., \&
745: Espey, B. R. 1999, \apj, 526, 130
746: \bibitem[Groves et al.(2004)]{groves} Groves, B. A., Cecil, G., Ferruit,
747: P., \& Dopita, M. A. 2004, \apj, 611, 786
748: \bibitem[Inglis et al.(1995)]{inglis} Inglis, M. D. Young, S., Hough, J. H.,
749: Gledhill, T., Axon, D. J., Bailey, J. A., \& Ward, M. J. 1995, \mnras, 275,
750: 398
751: \bibitem[Kinkhabwala et al.(2002)]{xmm}Kinkhabwala, A, et al. 2002, \apj, 575, 732
752: \bibitem[Kraemer, et al.(2000$a$)]{krm2}Kraemer, S. B., \& Crenshaw, D. M.
753: 2000$a$, \apj, 532, 256
754: \bibitem[Kraemer \& Crenshaw(2000$b$)]{krm3} \underline{\hskip 7em}
755: 2000$b$, \apj, 544, 763
756: \bibitem[Kriss(1994)]{specfit} Kriss, G. A. 1994, in {\it Astronomical Data
757: Analysis Software and Systems III}, eds. D. R. Crabtree, R. J. Hanisch, \&
758: J. Barnes, ({\it A. S. P. Conf. Series 61}, ASP, San Francisco), 437
759: \bibitem[Kriss et al.(1992)]{kriss} Kriss, G. A., Davidsen, A. F., Blair,
760: W. P., Ferguson, H. C., \& Long, K. S. 1992, \apj, 394, L37
761: \bibitem[Kriss et al.(2003)]{n7469} Kriss, G. A., Blustin, A.,
762: Branduardi-Raymont, G., Green, R. F., Hutchings, J., \& Kaiser, M. E.
763: 2003, \aa, 403, 473
764: \bibitem[Moos et al.(2000)]{moos} Moos, H. W., et al.\ 2000, \apj, 538, L1
765: \bibitem[Morganti et al.(1998)]{morganti} Morganti, R., Oosterloo, T., \&
766: Tsvetanov, Z. 1998, \aj, 115, 915
767: \bibitem[Morse et al.(1996)]{morse} Morse, J. A., Raymond, J. C., \&
768: Wilson, A. S. 1996, PASP, 108, 426
769: \bibitem[Sutherland et al.(1993)]{sutherland} Sutherland, R. S., Bicknell,
770: G. V., \& Dopita, M. A. 1993, \apj, 414, 510
771: \bibitem[Unger et al.(1992)]{unger} Unger, S. W., Lewis, J. R., Pedlar, A., \&
772: Axon, D. J. 1992, \mnras, 258, 371
773: \bibitem[Wilson \& Ulvestad(1983)]{wilson}Wilson, A. S., \& Ulvestad, J. S.
774: 1983, \apj, 275, 8
775: \bibitem[Young, Wilson \& Shopbell(2001)]{young}Young, A. J., Wilson, A. S.,
776: Shopbell, P. L. 2001, \apj, 556, 6
777:
778: \end{thebibliography}
779:
780:
781: \clearpage
782:
783: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccl}
784: \tablecolumns{6}
785: \tablewidth{0pc}
786: \tablecaption{FUSE Observations of NGC 1068\label{tbl-1}}
787: \tablehead{
788: \colhead{Data Set} & \colhead{Start Time} & \colhead{Orbit} &
789: \colhead{Integration Time} & \colhead{Aperture} & \colhead{Peak-up} \\
790: \colhead{(Pointing)} & \colhead{UT} & \colhead{} & \colhead{(sec)} & \colhead{}
791: & \colhead{}
792: }
793: \startdata
794: P1110202000 & 2001-Nov-28 09:57:00 & 8 & 21951 & LWRS & MDRS \\
795: A1390201000 & 2001-Nov-29 01:23:46 & 9 & 19541 & HIRS & MDRS, HIRS\\
796: A1390202000 & 2001-Nov-29 16:34:46 & 9 & 19828 & HIRS & MDRS, HIRS\\
797: A1390203000 & 2001-Nov-30 08:38:00 & 7 & 18023 & HIRS & MDRS, HIRS\\
798: A1390204000 & 2001-Nov-30 20:53:34 & 9 & 17962 & HIRS & MDRS, HIRS\\
799: A1390205000 & 2001-Dec-01 11:52:20 & 8 & 19080 & HIRS & MDRS, HIRS\\
800: \enddata
801: \end{deluxetable}
802:
803: \clearpage
804:
805: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccc}
806: \tablecolumns{6}
807: \tablewidth{0pc}
808: \tablecaption{Flux Normalization Factor\label{tbl-2}}
809: \tablehead{
810: \colhead{Position} & \colhead{LiF1A} & \colhead{LiF2A} &
811: \colhead{SiC1B} & \colhead{SiC2B} & \colhead{STIS}}
812: \startdata
813: A & 1.00 & 1.51 & 0.86 & 2.48 & 2.50 \\
814: B & 1.00 & 1.42 & 0.97 & 1.70 & 2.03 \\
815: C & 1.00 & 1.17 & 1.03 & 1.07 & 1.74 \\
816: D & 1.00 & 1.29 & 0.96 & 1.29 & 2.28 \\
817: E & 1.00 & 1.15 & 0.78 & 0.87 & 3.95 \\
818: F & 1.00 & 1.10 & 1.28 & 1.17 & 4.84 \\
819: G & 1.00 & 1.51 & 2.75 & 1.83 & 6.05 \\
820: \enddata
821: \end{deluxetable}
822:
823: \clearpage
824: {
825: \begin{deluxetable}{llccc}
826: \tablecaption{UV Emission Lines in Spectrum with Large LWRS Aperture\label{tbl-3}}
827: \tablewidth{0pt}
828: \footnotesize
829: \tighttable
830: \tablehead{
831: \multicolumn{2}{c}{Emission Line} &
832: \colhead{Flux\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{FWHM}&
833: \colhead{Velocity\tablenotemark{b}}
834: \\
835: &\colhead{\AA}& \colhead{($10^{-14}$ \ergscm)} & \colhead{(\kms)}
836: & \colhead{(\kms)} }
837: \startdata
838: \ion{C}{3} Narrow & 977.02 & $46.2 \pm 4.0$ &$ 720 \pm 52$ & $28 \pm 16$ \\
839: \ion{C}{3} Broad & & $10.1 \pm 5.3$ &$ 3489 \pm 1626$ & $1047 \pm 544$ \\
840: \ion{N}{3} Narrow & 990.98 & $19.8 \pm 5.2$ &$ 934 \pm 177$ & $381 \pm 47$ \\
841: \ion{N}{3} Broad & & $28.5 \pm 6.5$ &$ 3393 \pm 315$ & $1371 \pm 431$ \\
842: \lyb\ &1025.72 & $28.4 \pm 6.5$ &$ 3392 \pm 314$ & $1340 \pm 46$ \\
843: \ion{O}{6} Narrow r &1037.63 & $41.1 \pm 2.5$ &$ 390 \pm 31$ & $290 \pm 6$ \\
844: \ion{O}{6} Narrow b & & $59.7 \pm 3.7$ &$ 340 \pm 6$ & $76 \pm 4$ \\
845: \ion{O}{6} Broad &1034.00 & $338 \pm 8.1$ &$ 3584 \pm 184$ & $52\pm 61$ \\
846: \ion{He}{2} Narrow &1085.15 & $45 \pm 2$ &$ 993 \pm 44$ & $167 \pm 16$ \\
847: \ion{He}{2} Broad & & $14.4 \pm 3.2$ &$ 4286 \pm 235$ & $-3912\pm 354$ \\
848: \enddata
849: \tablenotetext{a}{With $E_{B-V}=0.00$.}
850: \tablenotetext{b}{With respect to the systemic redshift $z=0.0038$~\kms.}
851: \end{deluxetable}
852: }
853: \clearpage
854:
855: {
856: \begin{deluxetable}{llcccl}
857: \tablecaption{UV Emission Lines at Position A-G \label{tbl-4}}
858: \tablewidth{0pt}
859: \footnotesize
860: \tighttable
861: \tablehead{
862: \multicolumn{2}{c}{Line} &
863: \colhead{Flux\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{FWHM\tablenotemark{b}}&
864: \colhead{Velocity\tablenotemark{b,c}} & \colhead{Comment}
865: \\
866: &\colhead{\AA}& \colhead{($10^{-14}$ \ergscm)} & \colhead{(\kms)}
867: & \colhead{(\kms)} &
868: }
869: \startdata
870: \multicolumn{5}{l}{Position A}\\
871: \ion{C}{3} & 977.02 & $2.3 \pm 1.5$ &$ 564 \pm 243$ & $604 \pm 198$ \\
872: \ion{N}{3} Narrow & 990.98 & $2.0 \pm 1.0$ &$ 230 \pm 108$ & $140 \pm 60$ \\
873: \ion{N}{3} Broad & & $0.0 \pm 0.0$ &$ 25434 \pm 92630$ & $1284 \pm 30138$ \\
874: \lyb\ & 1025.72 & $0.7 \pm 0.4$ &$ 878 \pm 0$ & $257 \pm 192$ \\
875: \ion{O}{6} Narrow & 1037.63 & $7.9 \pm 0.6$ &$ 655 \pm 38$ & $376 \pm 6$ \\
876: \ion{O}{6} Broad & 1034.00 & $7.8 \pm 0.8$ &$ 3131 \pm 488$ & $1192 \pm 207$ \\
877: \ion{He}{2} & 1085.15 & $3.1 \pm 1.0$ &$ 1098 \pm 968$ & $16 \pm 116$ \\
878: \lya\ Narrow & 1215.67 & $37.1 \pm 2.8$ &$ 1580 \pm 96$ & $393 \pm 37$ \\
879: \lya\ Broad & & $19.2 \pm 2.1$ &$ 5283 \pm 743$ & $393 \pm 0$ \\
880: \ion{C}{4} Narrow & 1549.50 & $18.8 \pm 6.5$ &$ 1432 \pm 95$ & $374 \pm 96$ \\
881: \ion{C}{4} Broad & & $7.6 \pm 1.4$ &$ 6178 \pm 1623$ & $507 \pm 424$ \\
882: \ion{He}{2} & 1640.46 & $9.8 \pm 0.7$ &$ 1858 \pm 134$ & $10 \pm 67$ \\
883: \ion{N}{3} & 1750.00 & $0.3 \pm 0.5$ &$ 1818 \pm 1916$ & $3691 \pm 1758$ \\
884: \ion{C}{3}] Narrow & 1908.73 & $6.8 \pm 1.3$ &$ 2111 \pm 228$ & $43 \pm 72$ \\
885: \ion{C}{3}] Broad & & $9.4 \pm 1.3$ &$ 6883 \pm 1106$ & $-535 \pm 348$ \\
886: \multicolumn{5}{l}{Position B}\\
887: \ion{C}{3} & 977.02 & $14.1 \pm 3.5$ &$ 596 \pm 290$ & $-31 \pm 55$ \\
888: \ion{N}{3} Narrow & 990.98 & $8.8 \pm 3.5$ &$ 1048 \pm 351$ & $519 \pm 190$ \\
889: \ion{N}{3} Broad & & $2.4 \pm 2.7$ &$ 2005 \pm 2083$ & $2332 \pm 1454$ \\
890: \lyb\ & 1025.72 & $5.2 \pm 1.0$ &$ 878 \pm 0$ & $-2 \pm 105$ \\
891: \ion{O}{6} Narrow & 1037.63 & $23.9 \pm 5.1$ &$ 385 \pm 34$ & $333 \pm 12$ \\
892: \ion{O}{6} Broad & 1034.00 & $123.5 \pm 2.5$ &$ 2535 \pm 35$ & $298 \pm 49$ \\
893: \ion{He}{2} & 1085.15 & $10.2 \pm 1.5$ &$ 1108 \pm 177$ & $-18 \pm 74$ \\
894: \lya\ Narrow & 1215.67 & $158.2 \pm 0.4$ &$ 1528 \pm 18$ & $366 \pm 10$ \\
895: \lya\ Broad & & $119.9 \pm 7.8$ &$ 7676 \pm 787$ & $366 \pm 0$ \\
896: \ion{C}{4} Narrow & 1549.50 & $95.8 \pm 2.9$ &$ 1348 \pm 32$ & $284 \pm 12$ \\
897: \ion{C}{4} Broad & & $60.3 \pm 3.1$ &$ 4424 \pm 172$ & $-92 \pm 66$ \\
898: \ion{He}{2} & 1640.46 & $47.0 \pm 1.6$ &$ 1872 \pm 66$ & $-234 \pm 31$ \\
899: \ion{N}{3} & 1750.00 & $4.1 \pm 1.0$ &$ 1848 \pm 569$ & $299 \pm 169$ \\
900: \ion{C}{3}] Narrow & 1908.73 & $29.6 \pm 2.4$ &$ 2229 \pm 95$ & $-126 \pm 27$ \\
901: \ion{C}{3}] Broad & & $36.7 \pm 2.2$ &$ 6296 \pm 408$ & $-678 \pm 110$ \\
902: \multicolumn{5}{l}{Position C}\\
903: \ion{C}{3} & 977.02 & $38.6 \pm 4.3$ &$ 911 \pm 99$ & $-7 \pm 49$ \\
904: \ion{N}{3} Narrow & 990.98 & $11.0 \pm 10.3$ &$ 989 \pm 558$ & $-8 \pm 202$ \\
905: \ion{N}{3} Broad & & $29.0 \pm 14.8$ &$ 3207 \pm 767$ & $870 \pm 770$ \\
906: \lyb\ & 1025.72 & $12.6 \pm 2.9$ &$ 878 \pm 132$ & $-84 \pm 61$ \\
907: \ion{O}{6} Narrow & 1037.63 & $46.2 \pm 6.3$ &$ 333 \pm 22$ & $290 \pm 9$ \\
908: \ion{O}{6} Broad & 1034.00 & $325.3 \pm 43.4$ &$ 2523 \pm 118$ & $162 \pm 55$ \\
909: \ion{He}{2} & 1085.15 & $17.0 \pm 1.7$ &$ 1149 \pm 116$ & $-70 \pm 55$ \\
910: \lya\ Narrow & 1215.67 & $278.5 \pm 4.7$ &$ 1352 \pm 21$ & $395 \pm 7$ \\
911: \lya\ Broad & & $253.3 \pm 13.5$ &$ 9104 \pm 641$ & $395 \pm 0$ \\
912: \ion{C}{4} Narrow & 1549.50 & $167.6 \pm 9.9$ &$ 1472 \pm 59$ & $172 \pm 19$ \\
913: \ion{C}{4} Broad & & $131.0 \pm 9.8$ &$ 4193 \pm 244$ & $-390 \pm 73$ \\
914: \ion{He}{2} & 1640.46 & $92.0 \pm 3.8$ &$ 1830 \pm 82$ & $-406 \pm 35$ \\
915: \ion{N}{3} & 1750.00 & $10.1 \pm 1.6$ &$ 2605 \pm 456$ & $118 \pm 160$ \\
916: \ion{C}{3}] Narrow & 1908.73 & $38.4 \pm 4.4$ &$ 1902 \pm 107$ & $-270 \pm 28$ \\
917: \ion{C}{3}] Broad & & $80.3 \pm 4.0$ &$ 5053 \pm 219$ & $-672 \pm 56$ \\
918: \multicolumn{5}{l}{Position D}\\
919: \ion{C}{3} & 977.02 & $31.2 \pm 3.2$ &$ 900 \pm 0$ & $183 \pm 52$ \\
920: \ion{N}{3} Narrow & 990.98 & $11.1 \pm 3.3$ &$ 888 \pm 243$ & $372 \pm 93$ \\
921: \ion{N}{3} Broad & & $44.1 \pm 71.1$ &$ 5775 \pm 3455$ & $-3804 \pm 4077$ \\
922: \lyb\ & 1025.72 & $6.2 \pm 1.8$ &$ 878 \pm 0$ & $-46 \pm 0$ \\
923: \ion{O}{6} Narrow & 1037.63 & $14.9 \pm 0.9$ &$ 380 \pm 31$ & $287 \pm 9$ \\
924: \ion{O}{6} Broad & 1034.00 & $181.8 \pm 17.1$ &$ 2506 \pm 126$ & $-283 \pm 32$ \\
925: \ion{He}{2} & 1085.15 & $15.6 \pm 1.2$ &$ 940 \pm 85$ & $21 \pm 36$ \\
926: \lya\ Narrow & 1215.67 & $291.4 \pm 14.3$ &$ 1248 \pm 42$ & $388 \pm 7$ \\
927: \lya\ Broad & & $145.9 \pm 10.6$ &$ 5718 \pm 1708$ & $388 \pm 0$ \\
928: \ion{C}{4} Narrow & 1549.50 & $143.7 \pm 18.7$ &$ 1777 \pm 125$ & $6 \pm 21$ \\
929: \ion{C}{4} Broad & & $105.9 \pm 18.4$ &$ 3388 \pm 130$ & $-793 \pm 17$ \\
930: \ion{He}{2} & 1640.46 & $88.6 \pm 3.4$ &$ 1928 \pm 73$ & $-504 \pm 35$ \\
931: \ion{N}{3} & 1750.00 & $9.1 \pm 2.3$ &$ 2415 \pm 404$ & $15 \pm 188$ \\
932: \ion{C}{3}] Narrow & 1908.73 & $45.3 \pm 2.9$ &$ 2181 \pm 493$ & $-367 \pm 114$ \\
933: \ion{C}{3}] Broad & & $58.8 \pm 0.0$ &$ 5201 \pm 0$ & $-877 \pm 39538$ \\
934: \multicolumn{5}{l}{Position E}\\
935: \ion{C}{3} & 977.02 & $17.7 \pm 4.2$ &$ 1149 \pm 412$ & $27 \pm 119$ \\
936: \ion{N}{3} Narrow & 990.98 & $6.7 \pm 2.6$ &$ 577 \pm 177$ & $375 \pm 84$ \\
937: \ion{N}{3} Broad & & $12.9 \pm 15.0$ &$ 2584 \pm 2236$ & $-764 \pm 1615$ \\
938: \lyb\ & 1025.72 & $3.6 \pm 1.2$ &$ 878 \pm 0$ & $68 \pm 0$ \\
939: \ion{O}{6} Narrow & 1037.63 & $13.0 \pm 1.2$ &$ 639 \pm 42$ & $252 \pm 17$ \\
940: \ion{O}{6} Broad & 1034.00 & $52.9 \pm 2.9$ &$ 3145 \pm 168$ & $-475 \pm 78$ \\
941: \ion{He}{2} & 1085.15 & $12.1 \pm 0.8$ &$ 818 \pm 58$ & $208 \pm 25$ \\
942: \lya\ Narrow & 1215.67 & $359.0 \pm 9.4$ &$ 1265 \pm 24$ & $474 \pm 7$ \\
943: \lya\ Broad & & $72.4 \pm 6.4$ &$ 4953 \pm 1166$ & $474 \pm 0$ \\
944: \ion{C}{4} Narrow & 1549.50 & $107.2 \pm 10.9$ &$ 1812 \pm 141$ & $79 \pm 71$ \\
945: \ion{C}{4} Broad & & $63.5 \pm 11.0$ &$ 3241 \pm 134$ & $-981 \pm 99$ \\
946: \ion{He}{2} & 1640.46 & $64.0 \pm 2.9$ &$ 4490 \pm 157$ & $1112 \pm 5$ \\
947: \ion{N}{3} & 1750.00 & $9.1 \pm 1.6$ &$ 2986 \pm 549$ & $362 \pm 237$ \\
948: \ion{C}{3}] Narrow & 1908.73 & $30.3 \pm 4.2$ &$ 2185 \pm 135$ & $82 \pm 55$ \\
949: \ion{C}{3}] Broad & & $39.3 \pm 4.3$ &$ 4489 \pm 251$ & $-1026 \pm 162$ \\
950: \multicolumn{5}{l}{Position F}\\
951: \ion{C}{3} & 977.02 & $15.8 \pm 4.3$ &$ 900 \pm 270$ & $424 \pm 119$ \\
952: \ion{N}{3} Narrow & 990.98 & $7.1 \pm 5.8$ &$ 1056 \pm 625$ & $164 \pm 289$ \\
953: \ion{N}{3} Broad & & $8.0 \pm 9.4$ &$ 3540 \pm 1540$ & $333 \pm 1681$ \\
954: \lyb\ & 1025.72 & $9.0 \pm 0.7$ &$ 878 \pm 0$ & $257 \pm 47$ \\
955: \ion{O}{6} Narrow & 1037.63 & $11.4 \pm 1.9$ &$ 219 \pm 30$ & $152 \pm 17$ \\
956: \ion{O}{6} Broad & 1034.00 & $96.1 \pm 15.6$ &$ 1785 \pm 16$ & $456 \pm 20$ \\
957: \ion{He}{2} & 1085.15 & $8.3 \pm 0.7$ &$ 665 \pm 66$ & $266 \pm 25$ \\
958: \lya\ Narrow & 1215.67 & $299.6 \pm 9.6$ &$ 1223 \pm 33$ & $520 \pm 10$ \\
959: \lya\ Broad & & $46.8 \pm 7.4$ &$ 4582 \pm 1014$ & $520 \pm 0$ \\
960: \ion{C}{4} Narrow & 1549.50 & $73.3 \pm 5.9$ &$ 1181 \pm 72$ & $313 \pm 29$ \\
961: \ion{C}{4} Broad & & $34.7 \pm 5.3$ &$ 3365 \pm 323$ & $-461 \pm 178$ \\
962: \ion{He}{2} & 1640.46 & $42.6 \pm 2.8$ &$ 1132 \pm 74$ & $305 \pm 33$ \\
963: \ion{N}{3} & 1750.00 & $4.7 \pm 1.6$ &$ 1289 \pm 702$ & $1040 \pm 211$ \\
964: \ion{C}{3}] Narrow & 1908.73 & $29.1 \pm 1.2$ &$ 1500 \pm 77$ & $400 \pm 41$ \\
965: \ion{C}{3}] Broad & & $14.3 \pm 0.9$ &$ 3848 \pm 392$ & $-1679 \pm 139$ \\
966: \multicolumn{5}{l}{Position G}\\
967: \ion{C}{3} & 977.02 & $12.5 \pm 5.4$ &$ 344 \pm 133$ & $91 \pm 80$ \\
968: \ion{N}{3} Narrow & 990.98 & $8.7 \pm 4.2$ &$ 833 \pm 398$ & $417 \pm 148$ \\
969: \ion{N}{3} Broad & & $10.8 \pm 58.4$ &$ 3237 \pm 7653$ & $-2085 \pm 9897$ \\
970: \lyb\ & 1025.72 & $4.3 \pm 0.9$ &$ 878 \pm 0$ & $-61 \pm 93$ \\
971: \ion{O}{6} Narrow & 1037.63 & $13.3 \pm 2.6$ &$ 372 \pm 16$ & $189 \pm 14$ \\
972: \ion{O}{6} Broad & 1034.00 & $37.6 \pm 4.9$ &$ 2852 \pm 422$ & $416 \pm 95$ \\
973: \ion{He}{2} & 1085.15 & $7.5 \pm 1.4$ &$ 617 \pm 105$ & $150 \pm 58$ \\
974: \lya\ Narrow & 1215.67 & $152.2 \pm 5.8$ &$ 1208 \pm 35$ & $523 \pm 12$ \\
975: \lya\ Broad & & $32.2 \pm 3.9$ &$ 4627 \pm 848$ & $523 \pm 0$ \\
976: \ion{C}{4} Narrow & 1549.50 & $50.8 \pm 3.0$ &$ 1227 \pm 62$ & $251 \pm 27$ \\
977: \ion{C}{4} Broad & & $19.5 \pm 2.3$ &$ 4877 \pm 581$ & $-283 \pm 216$ \\
978: \ion{He}{2} & 1640.46 & $28.0 \pm 1.7$ &$ 1047 \pm 58$ & $265 \pm 29$ \\
979: \ion{N}{3} & 1750.00 & $1.5 \pm 0.8$ &$ 708 \pm 334$ & $1453 \pm 195$ \\
980: \ion{C}{3}] Narrow & 1908.73 & $12.5 \pm 3.1$ &$ 1797 \pm 252$ & $333 \pm 83$ \\
981: \ion{C}{3}] Broad & & $12.4 \pm 3.5$ &$ 4491 \pm 658$ & $-870 \pm 510$ \\
982: \enddata
983: \tablenotetext{a}{With $E_{B-V}=0.00$.}
984: \tablenotetext{b}{Values with zero errors are pre-fixed.}
985: \tablenotetext{c}{With respect to the systemic redshift $z=0.0038$ \kms.}
986: \end{deluxetable}
987: }
988: \clearpage
989:
990:
991: \centerline{\bf Figure Captions}
992: \bigskip
993:
994: \figcaption{HST image of the central region of NGC 1068 obtained with
995: WFPC2/F218W, with a field of view of $\sim 25$\arcsec.
996: The north is up, east is to the left, and the nucleus is marked with a cross.
997: Seven FUSE slit positions
998: are marked with letters A-G, while C is at the nucleus. Note that the actual
999: slit width is slightly wider than that in the illustration. The narrow slits
1000: along the near-perpendicular direction are that of HST/STIS: The three
1001: parallel slits along the northeast and southwest direction are
1002: 0\farcs 2 wide \citep[STIS-A,][]{cecil}, and the single long slit is another
1003: that is 0\farcs 1 wide \citep[STIS-B, ][]{krm}.
1004: \label{fig1}}
1005:
1006: \figcaption{FUSE spectrum of NGC 1068 at full aperture (30\arcsec\ square).
1007: The data are binned to 0.1 \AA. Propagation errors are plotted in the lower
1008: panel. The effect of major geocoronal emission lines are marked with the
1009: Earth symbols, and data at these wavelength bins are removed.
1010: \label{fig2}}
1011:
1012: \figcaption{Typical relative drifts of the FUSE SiC2 channel vs. orbital time
1013: (after orbital sunset), with respect to the LiF1 channel. Data are collected
1014: from various orbits with occultation.
1015: \label{fig3}}
1016:
1017: \figcaption{Count rate vs. orbital time in a sample data set A1390201001.
1018: Different channels register their peaks at different times, which are
1019: presumed to coincide with the nucleus position.
1020: Incomplete segments are not used (Position A in SiC channels and position G
1021: in LiF channels).
1022: \label{fig4}}
1023:
1024: \figcaption{Merged FUSE spectra at seven FUSE slit positions, binned to 0.5
1025: \AA. The nucleus is at position C.
1026: \label{fig5}}
1027:
1028: \figcaption{STIS spectra extracted at different windows that correspond
1029: to the respective FUSE slits. Fluxes are normalized to the corresponding FUSE data.
1030: \label{fig6}}
1031:
1032: \figcaption{Line profiles at different FUSE slit positions. The lines are
1033: redshifted \ovi\
1034: \lm 1037 (centered at 0 \kms), \civ\ \lm 1549, \niii\ \lm 991, and \ciii\
1035: \lm 977, respectively.
1036: \label{fig7}}
1037:
1038: \figcaption{Intensities of major emission lines at different FUSE positions,
1039: from STIS (left panels) and FUSE (right panels). When a line is fitted with
1040: multiple components with reasonably accuracy, the flux presented is their sum.
1041: For \ciii\ \lm 977, only one narrow component is fitted.
1042: \label{fig8}}
1043:
1044: \figcaption{Emission and absorption lines near the \ion{O}{6} wavelength,
1045: from position A to G
1046: after subtraction of the fitted continuum. The spectrum marked ``All'' in the
1047: lower bottom panel is from the data with a large LWRS aperture.
1048: The dashed lines mark the wavelengths of redshifted Ly$\beta$, \ion{O}{6}
1049: \lm\lm 1031.95/1037.63, respectively, from left to right.
1050: \label{fig9}}
1051:
1052: \figcaption{Properties of fitted \ion{O}{6} emission line at different FUSE slit
1053: positions. Line fluxes are in units of $10^{-14}$ \ergscm, FWHM and velocity
1054: are in units of \kms.
1055: \label{fig10}}
1056:
1057: \figcaption{Properties of fitted \ion{C}{4} emission line (from HST/STIS) at
1058: different FUSE positions. Line fluxes are in units of $10^{-14}$ \ergscm,
1059: FWHM and velocity
1060: are in units of \kms.
1061: \label{fig11}}
1062:
1063: \figcaption{Line ratios at different slit positions.
1064: The fitting results of \civ\
1065: and \ovi\ are for their narrow-line components.
1066: \label{fig12}}
1067:
1068: \clearpage
1069:
1070: \setcounter{figure}{0}
1071: \begin{figure}
1072: \plotone{f1.eps}% {7in}{-90}{75}{75}{-275}{500}
1073: \caption{~}
1074: \end{figure}
1075: \clearpage
1076:
1077: \begin{figure}
1078: \plotone{f2.eps}% {7in}{-90}{75}{75}{-275}{500}
1079: \caption{~}
1080: \end{figure}
1081: \clearpage
1082:
1083: \begin{figure}
1084: \plotone{f3.eps}% {7in}{-90}{75}{75}{-275}{500}
1085: \caption{~}
1086: \end{figure}
1087: \clearpage
1088:
1089: \begin{figure}
1090: \plotone{f4.eps}% {7in}{-90}{75}{75}{-275}{500}
1091: \caption{~}
1092: \end{figure}
1093:
1094: \begin{figure}
1095: \plotone{f5.eps}% {7in}{-90}{75}{75}{-275}{500}
1096: \caption{~}
1097: \end{figure}
1098:
1099: \clearpage
1100: \begin{figure}
1101: \plotone{f6.eps}% {7in}{-90}{75}{75}{-275}{500}
1102: \caption{~}
1103: \end{figure}
1104:
1105: \clearpage
1106: \begin{figure}
1107: \plotone{f7.eps}% {7in}{-90}{75}{75}{-275}{500}
1108: \caption{~}
1109: \end{figure}
1110:
1111: \clearpage
1112: \begin{figure}
1113: \plotone{f8.eps}% {7in}{-90}{75}{75}{-275}{500}
1114: \caption{~}
1115: \end{figure}
1116:
1117: \clearpage
1118: \begin{figure}
1119: \plotone{f9.eps}% {7in}{-90}{75}{75}{-275}{500}
1120: \caption{~}
1121: \end{figure}
1122:
1123: \clearpage
1124: \begin{figure}
1125: \plotone{f10.eps}% {7in}{-90}{75}{75}{-275}{500}
1126: \caption{~}
1127: \end{figure}
1128:
1129: \clearpage
1130: \begin{figure}
1131: \plotone{f11.eps}% {7in}{-90}{75}{75}{-275}{500}
1132: \caption{~}
1133: \end{figure}
1134:
1135: \clearpage
1136: \begin{figure}
1137: \plotone{f12.eps}% {7in}{-90}{75}{75}{-275}{500}
1138: \caption{~}
1139: \end{figure}
1140:
1141: \end{document}
1142: