1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

2: 

3: \begin{document}

4: 

5: \def\arcsecpoint{$''\!.$}

6: \def\arcminpoint{$'\!.$}

7: \def\deg{$^{\rm o}$}

8: \def\ltsim{\raisebox{-.5ex}{$\;\stackrel{<}{\sim}\;$}}

9: \def\gtsim{\raisebox{-.5ex}{$\;\stackrel{>}{\sim}\;$}}

10: %\journalid{}{}

11: %\articleid{}{}

12: 

13: %\slugcomment{submitted to {\it Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific }}

14: 

15: \shortauthors{Dunn, et al.}

16: \shorttitle{Intrinsic Absorption Characterization with $\it FUSE$}

17: 

18: \title{Intrinsic Absorption Properties in Active Galaxies Observed with the Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer\altaffilmark{1}}

19: 

20: \author{Jay P. Dunn\altaffilmark{2},

21: D. Michael Crenshaw\altaffilmark{2},

22: S. B. Kraemer\altaffilmark{3},

23: \& M. L. Trippe\altaffilmark{2}}

24: 

25:  

26: \altaffiltext{1}{Based on observations made with the NASA-CNES-CSA Far Ultraviolet 

27: Spectroscopic Explorer. $\it FUSE$ is operated for NASA by the Johns Hopkins University 

28: under NASA contract NAS5-32985.}

29: 

30: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303. 

31: Email: dunn@chara.gsu.edu, crenshaw@chara.gsu.edu, trippe@chara.gsu.edu}

32: 

33: \altaffiltext{3}{Institute for Astrophysics and Computational Sciences, 

34: Department of Physics, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC 

35: 20064; kraemer@yancey.gsfc.nasa.gov.} 

36: 

37: 

38: \begin{abstract}

39: 

40: In a continuing survey of active galactic nuclei observed by the

41: $\it Far~Ultraviolet~Spectroscopic~Explorer$, we provide a 

42: deeper analysis of intrinsic absorption features found in 35 objects. 

43: Our survey is for low-redshift and

44: moderate-luminosity objects, mostly Seyfert galaxies.

45: We find a strong correlation between maximum radial velocity and 

46: luminosity. We also examine the relationships between equivalent 

47: width (EW), full width at half maximum, velocity and continuum flux. The 

48: correlation between velocity and luminosity has been explored previously 

49: by Laor \& Brandt,

50: but at a significantly higher redshift and heavily weighted by

51: broad absorption line quasars. We also have 

52: examined each object with multiple observations for variability in each 

53: of the aforementioned quantities, and have characterized the variation 

54: of EW with the continuum flux. In our survey, we find 

55: that variability of O VI $\lambda$$\lambda$1032, 1038 is less common 

56: than of the UV doublets of C IV and N V seen at longer wavelengths, 

57: because the O VI absorption is usually saturated. Lyman $\beta$ 

58: absorption variability is more frequent. In a target-by-target 

59: examination we find that broad absorption line and narrow 

60: absorption line absorbers are related in terms of maximum outflow

61: velocity and luminosity, and both can be exhibited in similar 

62: luminosity objects. We also find one object that shows radial velocity 

63: change, seven objects that show equivalent width variability and two 

64: objects that show either transverse velocity changes or a change in 

65: ionization.

66: 

67: \end{abstract}

68: 

69: \keywords{galaxies: Seyfert -- ultraviolet: galaxies}

70: 

71: \section{Introduction}

72: 

73: It is commonly known that intrinsic UV absorption occurs in a large

74: fraction ($\sim$ 50\%) of Seyfert galaxies. First noticed by Anderson 

75: \& Kraft (1969), several surveys have been done in recent years 

76: (Crenshaw et al. 1999; Kriss 2002; and Dunn et al. 2007, hereafter 

77: Paper I) to

78: characterize these features. In the first step of our survey we 

79: examined low-z active galactic nuclei (AGN) (Paper I). Seyfert 

80: galaxies are moderately luminous, relatively nearby, and mostly spiral 

81: galaxies, which make up a large portion of our survey, while the 

82: remainder are low-redshift quasars. We concentrate only on AGN that 

83: show broad permitted emission lines and narrow emission lines (i.e., 

84: Seyfert 1's, Kachikian \& Weedman 1974). This is because intrinsic

85: absorption is only readily detectable if seen against the broad 

86: emission lines and central continuum source characteristic of 

87: type 1 objects. Seyfert 2 galaxies have 

88: only narrow permitted and forbidden lines, and thus intrinsic 

89: absorption cannot be easily detected. 

90: 

91: Crenshaw et al. (1999) performed a survey of Seyfert galaxies that

92: had been observed with the Faint Object Spectrograph (FOS) and

93: investigated the properties of the intrinsic absorption lines.

94: They found that nearly 60\% of the targets in the survey showed

95: narrow C IV absorption features (FWHM $<$ 500 km s$^{-1}$) and  

96: outflow velocities up to 2000 km s$^{-1}$. Also in this survey,

97: they found a link between warm X-Ray absorbers and UV intrinsic 

98: absorption, in the sense that Seyfert galaxies that show one also

99: show the other. 

100: 

101: Broad absorption line (BAL) quasars have been studied even more 

102: extensively. These objects show lines with much larger velocity 

103: widths, up to $\sim$ 10,000 km s$^{-1}$ (Weymann et al. 1981, Turnshek 

104: 1988), which appear in $\sim$ 10\% of all quasars (Foltz et al. 

105: 1990). This is a much smaller percentage than the percentage that

106: exhibit narrow absorption lines only, so the global covering factor is 

107: an important consideration in determining their nature.

108: 

109: Laor \& Brandt (2002) looked for various trends concerning intrinsic 

110: absorption in data from the {\it Hubble Space Telescope (HST)} and the 

111: {\it International Ultraviolet Explorer (IUE)}. Their survey was 

112: derived from the PG quasar sample (Boroson \& Green 1992). One of the 

113: more notable trends they found was a dependence of maximum outflow 

114: velocity on luminosity (v$_{max}$  $\propto$ L$^{0.62 \pm 0.08}$). Their 

115: plot contains both BAL and narrow absorption lines (NALs). They found 

116: that the equivalent 

117: width (EW) also followed an increase with increasing luminosity. This

118: trend is based on Soft X-Ray Weak Quasars (SXWQs), which show larger

119: values of EW and v$_{max}$ than any other quasar across the luminosity

120: span. They furthermore showed that $[$O III$]$ EW and v$_{max}$ are 

121: correlated. SXWQs showed a significant correlation of 

122: EW versus v$_{max}$. Of the 56 objects they investigated, 28 showed 

123: intrinsic UV absorption. This agrees well with the $\sim$60\% frequency 

124: Crenshaw et al. (1999) found in their lower-luminosity sample and the 

125: $\sim$50\% frequency we found in Paper I.

126: 

127: For a purely BAL sample, Ganguly et al. (2007) recently used

128: data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) to investigate their 

129: properties.

130: They conclude that the overall fit between v$_{max}$ and luminosity 

131: found by Laor \& Brandt applies to their much larger sample of over

132: 5000 objects. In Ganguly \& Brotherton (2008), they compile all intrinsic

133: absorption features for all known surveys and show that the fit still

134: holds.

135: 

136: Our knowledge of the variability for intrinsic absorption is limited. 

137: Variability is important because it is our only link to several key 

138: physical parameters concerning the AGN. Cromwell \& Weymann (1970) were the 

139: first to detect variability, in the Seyfert 1 NGC 4151. Later, in 

140: data from the {\it IUE}, more absorption variability was seen (Crenshaw et 

141: al. 1999). Nearly all of the variability has been due to changes in 

142: the ionic column densities, as a result of changes in the ionizing 

143: flux from the continuum source. However, in four Seyfert galaxies (NGC 

144: 3516, NGC 3783, NGC 4151, and NGC 5548), bulk transverse motion of gas 

145: across the line of sight was identified as a likely culprit 

146: (Crenshaw et al. 2003). In the bright Seyfert galaxy NGC 4151, 

147: both ionization change and bulk transverse motion were detected. Kraemer 

148: et al. (2006) performed a detailed analysis of the absorption from the

149: Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS) data. 

150: For the component they dubbed D+Ed, they found a transverse velocity lower 

151: limit of v$_t$ $\ge$ 2100 km s$^{-1}$.  

152: 

153: NGC 3783 has shown previously to be variable (Gabel et al. 2005, Maran 

154: et al. 1996). In

155: 1993 February data from STIS,

156: NGC 3783 showed a spectrum with no narrow intrinsic absorption. By 

157: 1994 January, two obvious absorption features arose for each member of 

158: the C IV doublet. By 2000 February another pair of absorption lines 

159: had emerged. Gabel et al. (2003) showed that the radial velocity 

160: changed as well. In a series of several spectra the radial velocity of 

161: the line changed in two time spans. They first found a change of 

162: $\sim$35~km~ s$^{-1}$ and in the second span they saw a change of $\sim$ 55 km 

163: s$^{-1}$. This is the first well-documented case of a change in radial 

164: velocity for an intrinsic absorber in a Seyfert galaxy. Transverse 

165: velocity was also measurable, where they found a lower limit of v$_t$ 

166: $\ge$ 540 km s$^{-1}$, which is comparable to the radial velocity 

167: ($\sim$$-$450 km s$^{-1}$). Motivated by their findings, we

168: undertook a survey of O VI and Ly$\beta$ absorption in $\it Far 

169: Ultraviolet Sepctroscopic Explorer (FUSE)$ 

170: spectra of low-redshift AGN.

171: 

172: The penultimate goal of our research is to understand the general 

173: dynamics of mass outflow and to ultimately help complete the picture 

174: of the 

175: AGN central engine. Several dynamical scenarios have been offered as 

176: explanations for the outflow (see Crenshaw et al. 2003 for a review of

177: the models). One method, Compton heated winds assumes that EUV 

178: and X-ray photons from the accretion disk are irradiating the gas 

179: at larger distances and creating a thermal wind (Begelman et al. 

180: 1983). Radiative driving is also a promising method to explain 

181: fast-moving outflows such as BALs (deKool \& Begelman 1995, Arav et al. 

182: 1994). Another possibility is that magnetic 

183: fields from the accretion disk are lifting plasma from the disk in 

184: magnetohydromagnetic (MHD) flows, where the plasma follows a helical 

185: magnetic field line (Blandford \& Payne 1982). Depending on how far from 

186: the central core these clouds can follow the field lines, this could also 

187: be an explanation for the high transverse velocities.

188: 

189: In Paper I we cataloged 35 AGN with intrinsic absorption and 

190: presented approximate velocities. We found 11 new UV intrinsic 

191: absorption objects in a sample of 90 nearby AGN observed by $\it 

192: FUSE$. We calculated the frequency of O VI absorption to be on the order of 

193: 50\%, slightly lower than the value Crenshaw et al. (1999) found for C IV. 

194: The global covering factor, based on an estimate of the average covering 

195: factor in the line of sight ($<$C$_f$$>$) was similar to previous 

196: results of $\sim$0.4. We continue our study of that absorption 

197: measurements of the absorption lines we found in the 35 objects from Paper I.

198: 

199: \section{Optical Observations and Measurements}

200: 

201: We obtained ground-based optical spectra to obtain redshifts and/or 

202: estimate black-hole masses and to supplement the {\it FUSE} data for 

203: three objects: IRAS F22456-5125, MR 2251-178 and WPVS 007. These data are 

204: readily available in the literature for most of the other objects. Each 

205: galaxy was observed in both the blue and red optical regions with the 

206: R-C spectrograph on the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory (CTIO)

207: 1.5-m telescope in Chile. Table 1 chronicles the dates, integration times 

208: and wavelength coverage for these data. The blue spectra (spanning from 

209: approximately 3360 to 5440 \AA) were taken using a grating with a 

210: dispersion of $\sim$1.47 \AA pixel$^{-1}$, providing a resolution of 4.3 

211: \AA. The red spectra (5652 to 6972 \AA) were taken using a Schott GG495 

212: filter and a grating with a 1.10 \AA pixel$^{-1}$ dispersion grating giving 

213: us a resolution of 3.1 \AA. All objects were observed through a long slit 

214: with a width of 4$^{\prime\prime}$. The stars LTT 4364 and 

215: Feige 110 were observed with the same settings for the purpose of flux 

216: calibration. The spectra were reduced and calibrated using standard

217: IRAF reduction packages for long-slit spectroscopy. We show the 

218: reduced spectra in Figure 1.

219: 

220: For the source IRAS F22456-5125, which had a redshift estimate listed

221: on NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) of 0.1 (Mason et al. 1995), we 

222: used our spectra to estimate the redshift based on the positions of lines 

223: in the blue spectrum. 

224: The centroids of the emission lines $[$O II$]$ $\lambda$3727, $[$Ne III$]$ 

225: $\lambda$3869, $[$Ne V$]$ $\lambda$3424 and H$\beta$ were available

226: in the wavelength coverage of the blue setting and we found an 

227: average redshift of z=0.1016$\pm$0.0001. The redshifts from 

228: NED for WPVS 007 and MR-2251-178 are consistent with our measurements.

229: 

230: The optical spectra allowed us to determine mass estimates for the central 

231: supermassive black hole (SMBH) of these objects via the empirical 

232: relationships between SMBH mass and the

233: H$\beta$ FWHM and continuum luminosity at $\lambda$=5100\AA\ 

234: (or, equivalently the H$\beta$ line luminosity) 

235: calibrated by Vestergaard and Peterson (2006) using emission-line 

236: reverberation mapping. We present these masses along with the masses of 

237: the rest of the sample later in this paper.

238: 

239: \section{UV Observations and Measurement}

240: 

241: We have 105 observations from $\it FUSE$ of the 35 targets 

242: found with intrinsic absorption from Paper I (see Table 1 from Paper I). 

243: $\it FUSE$ consists of four telescopes each with four gratings and two detectors 

244: with a spectral resolution of $\sim$15 km s$^{-1}$, which provides 8 spectra 

245: per observation covering the wavelength range of 905 \AA\ to 1187 \AA. 

246: The detectors have two different coatings, LiF and SiC. The detector

247: with the LiF coating provides a (nearly twice) higher reflectivity than the 

248: SiC coating (Sahnow 2002). The SiC and Lif detectors do have 

249: overlapping regions that allow for the spectra to be coadded, weighted by 

250: exposure time, and scaled to the LiF 1a spectrum. We downloaded the spectra

251: from MAST and used CalFUSE 3.1 to process the raw data in time-tag mode 

252: (Dixon et al. 2002). Further details of the reduction process can be 

253: found in Paper I.

254: 

255: \subsection{Light Curves}

256: 

257: Generating a continuum light curve for $\it FUSE$ data proved to be a 

258: difficult task due to the nature of the two detectors and redshifted 

259: broad emission lines. Using the same method as described by Dunn et al. 

260: (2006), we 

261: chose 1110 \AA\ in the observed frame as a good position to measure 

262: the continuum flux. In a 10 \AA\ bin, both detectors contribute to the 

263: measured flux at that wavelength. In some spectra from either the LiF 

264: detector or the SiC detector, the target was sometimes out of the 

265: aperture.  In these cases we did not include the segments. Also, due 

266: to redshift considerations, we were forced to move the bin when the 

267: redshift was $\ge$ 0.6. At those particular redshifts the broad 

268: line would provide a measured flux value too high for the continuum by 

269: up to 20-30\%. For the majority of the observations, the flux we 

270: provide is an average flux within the 10 \AA\ bin at 1110 \AA; this 

271: avoids interstellar medium (ISM) lines (Morton 1991) and geocoronal 

272: dayglow lines (Feldman 

273: et al. 2001). The rest of the observations were measured in a 20 \AA\ 

274: bin taken at 1160 or 1020 \AA, depending on which was closest to and 

275: unobstructed by the O VI broad line. We converted our fluxes to log 

276: specific luminosity, and provide flux, log luminosity, bin position, 

277: and errors in Table 2.

278: 

279: \subsection{Measured Absorption Quantities}

280: 

281: We measured the EW, full width at half-maximum (FWHM) and 

282: radial velocity centroid with respect to systemic redshift of each 

283: intrinsic absorption feature identified in Paper I. These 

284: measurements are listed in Table 3 for the Ly$\beta$, O VI $\lambda$ 

285: 1032 (O VIb) and O VI $\lambda$ 1038 (O VIr) lines. Many features 

286: were blended or too contaminated by galactic absorption features to 

287: be measured accurately, thus they have been excluded. Because $\it FUSE$ 

288: has no onboard 

289: calibration lamp, CalFUSE is designed to apply a fit to the spectrum 

290: based on a predetermined wavelength solution (Sahnow 2000). This can 

291: lead to an inaccuracy of up to 20 km s$^-$$^1$ (Gillmon et al. 2006). 

292: We measured available ISM lines near our intrinsic absorption features, 

293: in order to avoid nonlinear calibration effects, to correct the 

294: velocities. These corrections have already been accounted for in our 

295: velocities in Table 3.

296: 

297: Errors for EWs were based upon the signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio

298: of the data along with the standard deviation of three measurements of 

299: each line with three different continuum estimates. The quoted error

300: is a sum of these two values. Because velocity centroids, which are

301: depth weighted, have small standard deviation errors for one line, we 

302: used the mean standard deviation for the three lines (Ly$\beta$, O VIb, 

303: O VIr) in each observation. For FWHM we estimated the error as the 

304: standard deviation of the three measurements per line, similar to EW.

305: 

306: We estimated flux error from the standard deviation within the 10 or 

307: 20 \AA\ bin. This is typically an overestimate of the error due to

308: oversampling, similar to the case for IUE data (Dunn et al. 2006).

309: We find that we overestimate by nearly a factor of 2.5

310: by examining spectra close in time ($\lesssim$ 1 day) for like 

311: objects. Because most of these objects are Seyfert galaxies, the flux 

312: level is not likely to change significantly in the span of $\lesssim$ 

313: 1 day. We therefore scaled our flux errors by this amount.

314: 

315: Our listed redshifts for the objects are provided by NED. We chose

316: them based on the recommended most accurate value, preferably from 

317: HI-21 cm measurements. However, not all objects have very accurate 

318: values for the redshift, such as IRASF 22456-5125 ($\oint$2). Some 

319: of the redshifts are from narrow emission lines, which are often 

320: blue shifted with respect to HI-21 cm values (Crenshaw et al. 1999). 

321: This may explain the slightly positive radial velocities found for 

322: some components in a few objects.

323: 

324: In several cases we found that of the three lines we examined, only 

325: one or two of the lines were measurable. This is due to either poor 

326: signal-to-noise, Ly$\beta$ being too weak, or heavy blending with

327: ISM features.

328: 

329: \section{Correlations}

330: 

331: All of our correlations involving EW, FWHM and/or luminosity show 

332: measurements from each absorption component in each observation, 

333: because many of these quantities can be variable over time. In order

334: to inspect our plots for correlations we simply examine by eye the

335: data for either a direct trend or for an envelope fit to the data, as

336: in Laor \& Brandt (2002).

337: 

338: The plots containing velocity measurements are averaged over time due 

339: to the lack of significant variability in velocity space. Also, error

340: bars for many of the points are contained within the plot symbol. The 

341: most tantalizing correlation we have found 

342: is that of velocity with luminosity. While this was seen in C IV by 

343: Laor \& Brandt (2002), their objects were mostly quasars with high 

344: luminosities and redshifts beyond 1.5, which was our redshift cutoff 

345: on the high end. We share four objects in common. We plot in Figure 2 

346: all of our velocities measured for each object and each component. In 

347: general as the luminosity increases, it appears that the maximum 

348: velocity at each luminosity does as well. This confirms the trend 

349: that Laor \& Brandt found for higher-luminosity objects and shows

350: that the trend also holds for lower-luminosity objects such as Seyfert

351: galaxies. To confirm this further, we converted the magnitudes

352: provided by Laor \& Brandt to log L$_{\lambda}$ by using the four

353: targets we share and found a scale factor of 1.7. We plot the

354: Laor \& Brandt observations along with our own measurements in Figure

355: 3 and see that the two data sets follow remarkably similar trends. The 

356: relation given by Laor \& Brandt is v$_{max}$  $\propto$L$^{0.62 \pm 0.08}$.

357: While we do not calculate this, we can see by Figure 3 that all of 

358: our points fall beneath this maximum velocity trend. 

359: 

360: Ganguly \& Brotherton (2008) show a similar plot. They have plotted 

361: the Laor \& Brandt (2002) data along with their SDSS data from Ganguly 

362: et al. (2007), and data from several other sources (references within). 

363: The plot shows that for all available data the trend from Laor \& 

364: Brandt holds for all luminosities and velocities.

365: 

366: Along with the measured black hole-masses from the optical data,

367: we compiled all of the known masses for our survey objects in

368: Table 4 (we exclude those few without the necessary measured

369: quantities) and calculated the Eddington ratio. For all objects

370: referencing Peterson et al. (2004), the masses are from reverberation

371: mapping; all others were calculated using the relationship found by

372: Kaspi et al. 2000 and calibrated by Vestergaard \& Peterson (2006):

373: \begin{equation}

374: M_{BH} = log\left[\left(\frac{FWHM(H \beta)}{1000\;km\;s^{-1}}\right)^2\left(\frac{\lambda\;L_{5100}}{10^{43}\;ergs\;s^{-1}}\right)^{0.5}\right]

375: \end{equation}

376: using the FWHM of the broad H$\beta$ emission line and the

377: luminosity at 5100 \AA. We find our value for

378: L$_{Bo}l$=9.8$\lambda$L$_{5100}$ from McLure \& Dunlop (2004).

379: 

380: We plot the maximum velocity, as before with luminosity, against the

381: Eddington ratio (L/L$_{Edd}$)in Figure 4. There appears to be a weak trend of

382: maximum velocity the with Eddington ratio. It should be noted that 

383: the two objects with the highest velocities have low ratios, 

384: and the two objects with a high ratio have low velocities. In order to 

385: complete the picture we would require more data and a wider range 

386: of objects spanning the range of ratios as most of our targets are 

387: moderate Eddington accreting objects. 

388: 

389: We examined how the EW relates to the specific luminosity 

390: in our sample, which we show in Figure 5. Overall there appears to be 

391: no trend. This contradicts the findings of Laor \& Brandt (2002) for

392: C IV lines, but this could be a simple case of saturation affecting

393: our EW measurements. The only notable feature in the plot is the lack 

394: of points for low luminosity and 

395: low EW. The paucity of points is most likely a selection effect 

396: of low signal-to-noise for weak lines in objects with low-continuum 

397: fluxes. It should be noted that, some of our measured EWs are 

398: measured over what have been seen, in less saturated UV absorption 

399: lines, to be multiple components (e.g., NGC 4151 in Kraemer et al. 

400: 2005). Due to the heavy blending and saturation in O VI, we simply

401: measure across blends as one component. We have removed any 

402: measurements of lines in spectra with a luminosity signal-to-noise 

403: of $<$ 30 and measurements from spectra that are saturated with 

404: multiple components, and still find that there is no trend. 

405: 

406: We additionally investigated the relation between EW and maximum 

407: velocity (not shown). Again, there appears to be very little trend. 

408: We also examined the relation between FWHM and 

409: the specific luminosity, as shown in Figure 6. There appears to be no 

410: relation between FWHM and luminosity. However, as seen with EW, there 

411: does appear to be a lack of absorption for O VI at low luminosities

412: and small FWHMs.

413: 

414: \section{Variability}

415: 

416: Our survey is the first to date with a significant number of objects 

417: with multiple spectra to provide enough data for a time series 

418: analysis of intrinsic absorption variability in the far ultraviolet. 

419: Of the 35 targets found in the Paper I survey, 22 of the

420: objects have multiple observations. Using the EWs,

421: velocities and FWHMs we provided in Table 3, we examined a time

422: series of each along with the corresponding fluxes for

423: each observation from Table 2. Along with the times series data,

424: we plotted the spectra for each object in chronological

425: order to see visually how the absorption features changed.

426: While most objects showed no real trends between EW, FWHM, or

427: velocity vs. continuum flux, we found a handful of cases that do.

428: 

429: Mrk 79 is one case of a likely variation. Ly$\beta$ is clearly

430: visible in the observations in Figure 7. Component 1 of O VIb is a 

431: broad feature due to blending with ISM lines. O VIr is a narrow, most 

432: likely saturated line. The variability for Mrk 79 is seen in the O VIr 

433: line. O VIr changes in EW for component 1, but does not appear to be 

434: correlated with continuum luminosity in Figure 8.

435: 

436: NGC 4151 has broad, saturated absorption troughs.

437: These troughs are comprised of several blended components seen

438: as individual features in STIS data (Kraemer et al. 2001). Because

439: they are blended, it makes measuring individual EWs, FWHMs and velocities 

440: difficult. 

441: One interesting point is that in the first two observations, seen in 

442: Figure 9, the broad trough shows some structure, but in the subsequent 

443: observations, they blend too much to discern any one particular 

444: absorber. As shown in Kraemer et al. (2001), one particular component, 

445: labeled D$^{\prime}$, only appears in weak flux states. In 

446: Table 2 we see that the earlier observations are weaker in flux, 

447: and that the D$^{\prime}$ component flattens the region between 

448: $\sim$1029 and 1032 \AA, which is consistent with the interpretation of 

449: Kraemer et al.

450: 

451: Mrk 817 is another object that shows evidence of variability. One of 

452: the labels in Dunn et al. (2007) is incorrect; the Lyman $\beta$ 

453: line is weak, and the line marked component 1 at 1064 \AA\ is H$_2$. 

454: In Figure 10, we see that Mrk 817 shows in O VIb that component 

455: 1 evolves from two subcomponents to a smoother single component. It 

456: is possible that these subcomponents are hidden within the 

457: artificially broadened O VIr line due to galactic Fe II $\lambda$ 

458: 1055. Lyman $\beta$ is not visible most likely due to high 

459: ionization. This is confirmed by STIS spectra that show weak 

460: absorption in Lyman $\alpha$ (Penton, Stocke \& Shull 2002). The EW

461: for the original lines shows a correlation with the decreasing 

462: continuum flux (Figure 11), and FWHM shows the same. While this is

463: a 2$\sigma$ detection in O VIb, the similar behavior of all three lines 

464: leads us to believe that the change is real. The velocity 

465: seems to drop for Mrk 817 showing a significant decrease between the 

466: first observation and the last. All of this suggests two blended 

467: components in the original observation, and that the higher-velocity 

468: component decreased with time.

469: 

470: Mrk 817 also demonstrates the appearance of a previously unseen

471: line. At $\sim$ 1052 \AA\ and $\sim$ 1058 \AA\ we see that in the 

472: first spectrum there is no significant sign of an absorption feature. 

473: However in the third spectrum there appears to be a slightly depressed 

474: broad feature, and in the final spectrum the broad line is clear with 

475: two O~VI features on either side at the appropriate locations in velocity

476: space v$_r$=3700 \& 3430 km s$^{-1}$. However, we cannot rule out the 

477: possibility that the new component is present in the previous 

478: observations but not detectable due to the lower S/N. 

479: 

480: In Figure 12, we present the available spectra for Mrk 279. Figure 

481: 13 shows the relation of EW and continuum flux for Mrk 279, which 

482: shows a weak trend. In both O VI lines the EW increases with 

483: decreasing flux. For Ly$\beta$ the relationship with flux is much 

484: flatter. During the last three observations we see the flux drop 

485: by $\sim$60\% and then increase by $\sim$50\%, while the EW for all three

486: lines shows a chronological decrease. We see that O VIb varies more than

487: O VIr in Mrk 279. This is most likely due to contamination in both of the

488: O VI lines from ISM and H$_2$. While these lines are heavily contaminated

489: (see Paper I), we can still measure variation as the ISM 

490: lines should experience no change.

491: 

492: Mrk 290 (Figure 14) provides a case for a weak anti-correlation between 

493: EW and flux. 

494: In this object the EWs for both members of the O VI doublet 

495: $\lambda$$\lambda$ 1032 and 1038 

496: lines show a slight decrease with a significant increase in continuum 

497: flux over a 1200 day interval, and a moderate decrease in the Ly $\beta$

498: width, as shown in Figure 15. 

499: 

500: The variability in Mrk 509 was complex, as shown in Figure 16. What we 

501: measured for component 1, can be seen in Lyman $\beta$ to be at least two

502: subcomponents in two of our three spectra. What we call component 

503: 2 can be seen in Lyman $\beta$ to be comprised of at least two or three 

504: subcomponents. Kraemer et al. (2003) confirm this by identifying 8 

505: components in spectra from FOS and STIS, which are blended together 

506: with the two main components we see in the $\it FUSE$ data. The 

507: components labeled 1-3 by Kraemer et al. are subcomponents that are 

508: contained in our measured component 1, while those labeled 4-8 by 

509: Kraemer et al. make up our measured component 2. Subcomponents 3 and 6 

510: in Lyman $\beta$, labeled by Kraemer et al. appear to vary. 

511: Subcomponent 3 shows an decrease in depth while subcomponent 6 

512: increases in depth over time. We discuss the depth further in the next 

513: section. Our measured component 1 shows no change in EW or velocity 

514: over time (Figure 17), but our measured component 2 shows a slight 

515: increase in Ly$\beta$ (Figure 18).

516: 

517: Figure 19 shows the spectra of PG 0804+761, which exhibits evidence of 

518: radial velocity change. This change is seen in all three lines as a 

519: centroid shift to more negative velocities, while the ISM lines 

520: remain stationary. We plot these centroid velocities vs. time (Figure 

521: 20). PG 0804+761 has a poor estimate of redshift, similar to 

522: IRAS~F22456-5125. Thus the absolute values of velocity reflect 

523: redshifted lines, but this might change with a more accurate redshift.

524: 

525: In the object NGC 3783, we find variability of EW in the Ly $\beta$ line.

526: Figure 21 shows the time evolution of the spectrum, and Figure 22 shows 

527: the relation between flux and EW and velocity over time. The EWs for 

528: O~VI $\lambda$1038 and O~VI $\lambda$1032 show no correlation,

529: across the dashed average EW line. Ly$\beta$ decreases from low flux 

530: to high flux. However, this is evidently a blended combination of two 

531: lines labeled 2 and 3 in a paper by Gabel et al. (2003). Thus it is

532: difficult to determine if one or both lines are responding to continuum

533: change. In Figure 21, we see that components 1 and 4 from Gabel et al.

534: (2003) are visible in Ly $\beta$, and are hard to discern in O VI $\lambda$

535: 1032 due to heavy contamination from C II and H$_2$. For O VI $\lambda$ 1038

536: there are two H$_2$ lines nearby, but the weak component 4 is not visible.

537: 

538: \section{Discussion}

539: 

540: In the Kraemer et al. (2005, 2006) study of the variability in NGC~4151, 

541: they found some cases where the EWs of lines were anti-correlated with 

542: the continuum flux level, while others showed no relation to the flux.

543: We see similar events in only a few objects such as Mrk 817, where the 

544: O~VI lines seem to follow the continuum, and Mrk 79, where the EWs 

545: vary but the continuum stays relatively constant. The paucity of O~VI

546: variability suggests that O~VI, which is usually predicted to be very 

547: strong in absorber models, is saturated in most cases. It should also

548: be noted that in many cases there is a lack of change in Ly$\beta$, 

549: this is presumably also due to saturation. The changes we do

550: see in EW must be due to one of the three events: a covering factor change

551: in the line of sight, a change in ionization, or a total column change

552: (characterized by N$_H$) due for example, to bulk motion of gas into 

553: our line of sight.

554: 

555: \subsection{Potential Cases of Bulk Motion}

556: 

557: There are three targets in our survey that show changes in the 

558: absorption are the best candidates for bulk motion of gas across the

559: line of sight with a transverse velocity (v$_t$), as described below. 

560: These three objects are Mrk 79, Mrk 817 and Mrk 509.

561: 

562: Mrk 79 is an interesting target because while the EW of component 1 

563: is variable, the continuum does not change. This lends itself to a

564: case of changing the total column, most likely due to bulk motion. We can 

565: calculate the transverse velocity by using the measured broad line 

566: diameter from Peterson et al. (1998) of 36 light days and a time

567: interval between observations ($\Delta$t) of 83.7 days the absorber 

568: would be moving at a transverse velocity $\ge$126,000 km s$^{-1}$. 

569: Given the average radial velocity of the absorber v$_r$$\approx$300 

570: km s$^{-1}$, the estimate for the transverse velocity is inordinately 

571: high. We will tackle further explanations in the next section.

572: 

573: In the case of Mrk 817, if we assume that the appearance of the new 

574: absorption components (2 and 3) are due to transverse motion of 

575: material into the line of sight, we can follow the methods used by 

576: Gabel et al. (2005) for NGC 3783. Assuming the O~VI doublet is 

577: not saturated we can use the covering factor in the line of sight 

578: for O VI at the conclusion of the variability event with the equation:

579: \begin{equation}

580: C_f = \frac{I_1^2 - 2I_1 + 1}{I_2 - 2I_1 + 1}

581: \end{equation}

582: (Crenshaw et al. 2003), where I$_1$ is the intensity at the core of the 

583: stronger oscillator strength line and I$_2$ is for the weaker line. This 

584: number can be skewed an by additional flux from the Narrow Emission Line 

585: Region (NELR) (Kraemer et al. 2002, Arav et al. 2002, Crenshaw et al. 

586: 2003), but for Mrk 817 the narrow emission lines are not prominent, and 

587: we find C$_f$ = 0.70. If we compare this to the line-of-sight covering 

588: factor of 0.51 and 0.33 for the blue and red lines respectively we verify

589: that the lines are not saturated due to the fact that as lines approach 

590: saturation in a doublet, the line-of-sight covering factor approaches the

591: doublet covering factor. The transverse size of the absorbing cloud is 

592: d=d$_{BLR}$$\times$$\sqrt{C_f}$ (Crenshaw et al. 2003). For Mrk 817, the 

593: BLR is 31 light-days across (Peterson et al. 1998). The absorption 

594: appeared over $\sim$310 days, which gives a lower limit to the transverse 

595: velocity of $\sim$25,100 km s$^{-1}$. This is exceptionally large 

596: compared to the radial velocity of 3700 and 3430 km s$^{-1}$ for the two 

597: new components. Thus, either the components were buried in the noise

598: in the earlier observations or we are witnessing their appearance due to 

599: ionization changes.

600: 

601: Mrk 509 was shown in Peterson et al. (1998) to have a BLR size of 159

602: light days. If we assume that subcomponents 3 and 6 are saturated in 

603: Ly$\beta$, then we can calculate the change in covering factor (C$_f$)

604: from the residual intensities in the cores (C$_f$ = 1-I$_r$). In the 

605: case of subcomponent 6, we measured the core and found average 

606: covering factors C$_f$=0.78 and 0.96 for observations 1 and 3 

607: ($\Delta$t=307.3 days). For subcomponent 3, we find covering factors 

608: C$_f$=0.93 and 0.77 for observations 2 and 3 ($\Delta$t=304.0 days). 

609: Subcomponent 6 therefore, showed an increase in covering factor by 0.18 

610: while subcomponent 3 showed a decrease by 0.16. Based on the changes 

611: in covering factors, from our previous equation we can find lower limits 

612: for transverse velocity for these of 65,600 km s$^{-1}$ for subcomponent 

613: 6 and 125,200 km s$^{-1}$ for subcomponent 3. This seems extremely high 

614: for a transverse velocity when compared to the radial velocities of 

615: $\sim$300 km s$^{-1}$. Therefore, the changes in the depths of these two

616: subcomponents are almost certainly due to ionic column variation and 

617: not covering factor changes.

618: 

619: Thus, even in the most favorable cases, we find no evidence for EW changes

620: due to bulk motion. Because there is no evidence that transverse velocities

621: of UV absorbers can reach these inordinately high values (Crenshaw et al. 

622: 2003), the only viable alternative is ionic column changes due to changes 

623: in the ionizing continuum.

624: 

625: \subsection{Ionization Changes}

626: 

627: The three objects we have ruled out bulk motion for and the other six 

628: objects that showed signs of absorption variability all seem to be the

629: result of changes in the ionizing flux. Mrk 279 and Mrk 290 showed an 

630: anticorrelation between ionization parameter (U) and O VI EW, while 

631: NGC 3783 showed anticorrelation in Ly$\beta$. For Mrk 279 and 

632: Mrk 290 this means that the ionization state is high, and NGC 3783 is

633: indeterminate due to no detectable change in O VI. Mrk 817, component 1,

634: is the only case where the EW for O VI is correlated with the flux, which 

635: means that U is relatively low. For NGC 4151 we see the D$^{\prime}$ 

636: component decrease with increasing flux, thus it is another high-U 

637: component. PG 0804+764 showed correlation between flux and EW for both

638: the O VIb line and Ly$\beta$. This object stands out because it is the 

639: only object in the survey that showed an unexplainable change in 

640: radial velocity.

641: 

642: Mrk 79 showed a change in EW and no change in flux. Because we only have 

643: three observations, we believe what we are seeing a change in ionization 

644: with a time delay. Our observations do not accurately sample the 

645: lightcurve and there must be a delay between the EW response and the 

646: continuum, due to low densities and/or large distances of the absorbers

647: from the continuum source (Crenshaw et al. 2003).

648: 

649: The appearance of the absorption components 2 and 3 in Mrk 817 is most 

650: likely due to a change in ionization. The light curve shown at the 

651: bottom of Fig. 11, shows that in the last observation where the two 

652: components are visible, the flux level had decreased significantly. 

653: The appearance of these lines may therefore be due to a decrease in 

654: ionizing flux. We can also use the possible disappearing subcomponent 

655: in component 1 to place limitations on the absorption systems. As the 

656: continuum flux decreases the line weakens and vanishes/blends with 

657: the component at $\sim$1049.2 \AA, and could be the explanation of 

658: the EW variations we noted in $\oint$5. In order to place these 

659: constraints, we need CLOUDY modeling of the absorbers.

660: 

661: Mrk 279 presents a similar situation. In Figure 13 we have a range

662: of $\sim$58 days where the continuum flux drops and rises. The EW for

663: the absorbers respond by decreasing. We could estimate a lower

664: limit to the distance and density provided a model of the absorber 

665: and assuming the response is complete after 58 days.

666: Ideally, we would need a monitoring campaign with several observations

667: for an event such as this to fully explain the variations.

668: 

669: For the component Kraemer et al. (2002) labeled 3 in Mrk 509, we can 

670: assume that the ionizing flux increased and  

671: the column changed. We know from Kraemer et al. (2003) that the ionization

672: parameter (U) for Mrk 509 in subcomponent 3 is 0.03. 

673: Given the change in time, $\Delta$t = 2.6$\times$10$^{7}$~s, we can use the

674: equation as seen in Krolik \& Kriss (1995):

675: \begin{equation}

676: t_{ion} = \frac{h \nu}{F_{ion}<\sigma_{ion}>},

677: \end{equation}

678: where $\nu$ is the transition frequency, F$_{ion}$ is the ionizing flux

679: at the cloud front and $<$$\sigma$$_{ion}$$>$ is the ionization cross section

680: (Osterbrock 1989). Using our known limit on the timescale, and a calculated 

681: value of L$_{ion}$=2.1$\times$10$^{44}$ ergs s${-1}$, we can get a limit on 

682: the distance from the source to the cloud from  

683: F$_{ion}$=L$_{ion}$/4$\pi$d$^2$. That gives us the lower limit to the 

684: distance of 14 pc.

685: 

686: Finally, we can estimate the density of the absorbing cloud assuming a change in

687: ionization, from the ionization parameter:

688: \begin{equation}

689: U = \frac{\int\frac{L_\nu d\nu}{h\nu}}{4 \pi c r^2 n_e}

690: \end{equation}

691: For our subcomponent 3 we find n$_e$$\le$1.38$\times$10$^3$ cm$^{-3}$.

692: 

693: \subsection{NALs and BALs}

694: 

695: From both the Paper I survey and the Laor \& Brandt surveys, one

696: object, PG 1411+442, appeared in both surveys with BAL and NAL 

697: signatures. The NALs appear superimposed on the BAL in both 

698: members of the O VI doublet, as seen in Paper I. This evidence 

699: tied with the Laor \& Brandt and our relationship from section 

700: $\oint$4, shows that both BALs and NALs are related and follow the 

701: same trends and that they both may exist simultaneously in an object.

702: 

703: Also from our previous survey, WPVS 007

704: was omitted from the search for NALs due to the discovery of a newly

705: appearing BAL by Leighly et al. (2007, in prep). We have reexamined

706: this object and found that the NALs seen by Crenshaw et al. (1999)

707: are still visible in the {\it FUSE} spectrum. The

708: NALs for O VI and Ly $\beta$ are buried in the BAL and have a velocity of

709: -399 $\pm$ 10 km s$^{-1}$ seen in Figure 23. This matches the velocity

710: Crenshaw et al. (1999) found of -390 km s$^{-1}$.

711: 

712: We can evaluate the configuration of the NAL and the appearing BAL in 

713: WPVS 007. The time difference between the $\it FUSE$ spectrum and the 

714: last FOS spectrum is 2655 days. If we use the relationship from 

715: Vestergaard \& Peterson (2006):

716: \begin{equation}

717: R \propto L_\nu(\lambda 5100)^{0.50\pm0.06},

718: \end{equation}

719: with a BLR size that has been estimated from reverberation mapping, we 

720: find that the BLR size for WPVS 007 is $\sim$23 light days across. This 

721: gives a lower limit on the transverse velocity of the BAL of 2565 km 

722: s$^{-1}$. The NAL however is still apparent in the O VI doublet and Lyman 

723: $\beta$ lines. This leaves us with two situations. Either the NAL is 

724: interior to the BAL and is still receiving sufficient ionizing flux to 

725: maintain the absorption, or the NAL is exterior to the BAL and is no 

726: longer receiving ionizing flux due to the BAL absorption. If the latter 

727: is true, then the recombination timescale is larger than the 2655 days

728: between observations, which could be used to estimate a density and 

729: distance provided photoionization modeling.

730: 

731: \section{Conclusions}

732: 

733: Our goal was to explore the Dunn et al. (2007) $\it FUSE$ survey in

734: depth for correlations and variability. We sought to characterize the

735: intrinsic absorption seen in nearly 50\% of all nearby active galaxies

736: in order to help characterize the outflow from the nuclear engine.

737: 

738: As shown by Laor \& Brandt (2002), there is a relation between the

739: maximum outflow velocity and the luminosity. Their survey contained

740: moderate redshift objects and BAL quasars, while our survey was for 

741: smaller redshifts and luminosities. However, as shown previously, our 

742: relation between v$_{max}$ and L is consistent with theirs. In both 

743: our surveys there is a distinct upper limit on the maximum velocity 

744: dependent upon the luminosity of the object. This leads us to believe that

745: both classical narrow intrinsic absorption lines and broad absorption

746: lines are governed by the same relationship, thus they may be related,

747: in the sense that they may share a common driving mechanism. Due to 

748: their simultaneous presence in WPVS 007 and PG 1411+442 however, we 

749: feel that the nature of their origins may be different.

750: 

751: Laor \& Brandt (2002) also found for higher redshift galaxies that 

752: EW \& luminosity are correlated for C IV. We examined correlations 

753: between the observed lines and the AGN properties. We found no link 

754: between the EW and the luminosity. Because EW

755: increases with column density of the particular ion in question, 

756: it would seem that an increase in flux would increase the O VI EW in 

757: cases where the ionization parameter is low and vise versa for a 

758: highly ionized cloud, at least until the line reaches heavy 

759: saturation. We do not see this trend for either O VI or Ly$\beta$. 

760: This is most likely due to the heavy saturation in O VI and even 

761: Ly$\beta$ in many cases while C IV and N V do not saturate as easily.

762: 

763: It has been seen in the past that some objects show bulk transverse

764: motion along with the more easily detectable radial motion (Crenshaw

765: et al. 2003). Of the 35 objects available we have 22 with more than 

766: one observation. Two of these objects have only one usable observation, 

767: leaving 20 total useful data sets. In the survey we find 8 that show 

768: change. The frequency of variability events seems to be low, in the 

769: $\it FUSE$ data. With 22 available objects, only 8 show variability. 

770: This could mean the events are rare, that only weak absorption 

771: is subject to this change and/or the sample is biased by small number 

772: statistics, or the O VI saturation makes detecting variability 

773: difficult.

774: 

775: None of our objects with EW changes can be explained with transverse 

776: bulk motion. We have 7 that can be explained with ionization changes. 

777: In the case of Mrk 509 with modeling of the subcomponents, we can find 

778: a distance and density (n$_H$) of the third subcomponent of 0.3 pc and 

779: 3.8$\times$10$^{8}$ cm$^{-1}$, respectively. Also, we find one object 

780: that shows evidence for radial velocity changes (PG 0804+761); we 

781: currently have no explanation for this.

782: 

783: We find in Mrk 817 that the absorption appears in relatively weak lines, 

784: and furthermore even the changes in the absorption features for Mrk 509 

785: are in relatively weak lines. This is the case for most transversely 

786: moving clouds seen in the past. With the low signal-to-noise $\it FUSE$ 

787: data it may be that these weak lines are swamped by the surrounding 

788: noise and only strong absorption features are noticeable, or it may be 

789: that bulk transverse motion is not a common event. Given that these 

790: changes are in weak absorbers, it suggests that strong absorbers appear 

791: more static in the far UV than weak absorbers due to saturation and 

792: blending in many of the lines.

793: 

794: \acknowledgments

795: 

796: This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED)

797: which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of

798: Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space

799: Administration. This research has also made use of NASA's Astrophysics Data

800: System Abstract Service. We acknowledge support of this research under NASA

801: grants NNG05GC55G, NNG06G185G and NAG5-13109.

802: 

803: 

804: \clearpage			       

805: \begin{references}

806: 

807: \reference{and1969}Anderson, K. S., \& Kraft, R. P. 1969, \apj, 158, 859

808: 

809: \reference{arav1994}Arav, N., Li, Z.-Y. \& Begelman, M. C. 1994, \apj, 432, 62

810: 

811: \reference{arav2002}Arav, N., Korista, K. T. \& de Kool, M. 2002, \apj, 566, 699

812: 

813: \reference{beg1983}Begelman, M. C., McKee, C. F., \& Shields, G. A. 1983, \apj, 271, 70

814: 

815: \reference{blan1982}Blandford R. D. \& Payne D. G. 1982, MNRAS, 199, 883

816: 

817: \reference{bor1992}Boroson T. A. \& Green R. F. 1992, ApJS, 80, 109

818: 

819: \reference{bot2004}Botte, V., Ciroi, S., Rafanelli, P. \& Di Mille, F. 2004, AJ, 127, 3168

820: 

821: \reference{cren1999}Crenshaw, D. M., Kraemer, S. B., Boggess, A., Maran, S. P., Mushotzky, R. F., \& Wu, C.-C.  1999, \apj, 516, 750

822: 

823: \reference{cren2003}Crenshaw, D. M., Kraemer, S.B., \& George, I.M. 2003, \araa, 41, 117

824: 

825: \reference{crom1970}Cromwell, R., \& Weymann, R. 1970, \apj, 159, 147

826: 

827: \reference{dix2002}Dixon, W. V. D., Kruk, J. \& Murphy, E. 2002, The CalFUSE Pipeline Reference Guide

828: 

829: \reference{dek}deKool, M. \& Begelman, M. C. 1995, \apj, 455, 448

830: 

831: \reference{dunn2006}Dunn, J. P., Jackson, B., Deo, R. P., Farrington, C., Das, V., \& Crenshaw, D. M.  2006, PASP, 118, 572

832: 

833: \reference{dunn2007}Dunn, J. P.,Crenshaw, D. M., Kraemer, S.B., \& Gabel, J. R. 2007, \aj, 134, 1061 (Paper I)

834: 

835: \reference{feld2001}Feldman, P. D., Sahnow, D. J., Kruk, J. W., Murphy, E. M. \& Moos, H. W. 2001, JGR, 106.8119

836: 

837: \reference{fol1990}Foltz, C. B., Chaffee, F. H., Hewett, P. C., Weymann, R. J., \& Morris, S. L. 1990, AAS, 22, 806

838: 

839: \reference{gab2005}Gabel, J. et al. 2005, \apj, 631, 741

840: 

841: \reference{gab2003}Gabel, J. et al. 2003, \apj, 595, 120

842: 

843: \reference{gang2003}Ganguly, R., Masiero, J., Charlton, J. C., Sembach, K. R. 2003, \apj, 598, 922

844: 

845: \reference{gang2007}Ganguly, R., Brotherton, M. S., Cales, S., Scoggins, B., Shang, Z., \& Vestergaard, M. 2007, 665, 990

846: 

847: \reference{gang2008}Ganguly, R. \& Brotherton, M. S. 2008, \apj, 672, 102

848: 

849: \reference{gill2006}Gillmon, K., Shull, J. M., Tumlinson, J. \& Danforth, C. 2006, \apj, 636, 891

850: 

851: \reference{grup2004}Grupe, D. \& Mathur, S. 2004, ApJ, 606, 41

852: 

853: \reference{kach1974}Khachikian \& Weedman 1974, \apj, 192, 581

854: 

855: \reference{kas2000}Kaspi et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 631

856: 

857: \reference{kra1999}Kraemer, S. B., Turner, T. J., Crenshaw, D. M. \& George, I. M. 1999, \apj, 519, 69

858: 

859: \reference{kra2001}Kraemer, S. B., Crenshaw, D. M., \& Gabel, J. R. 2001, \apj, 557, 30

860: 

861: \reference{kra2002}Kraemer, S. B., Crenshaw, D.~M., Yaqoob, T., McKernan, B., Gabel, J.~R., George, I.~M., Turner, T.~J. \& Dunn, J.~P. 2002, ApJ, 582, 125

862: 

863: \reference{kra2003}Kraemer et al. 2003, \apj, 582, 125

864: 

865: \reference{kra2005}Kraemer et al. 2005, \apj, 633, 693

866: 

867: \reference{kra2006}Kraemer, S. B., Crenshaw, D. M., Gabel, J. R., Kriss, G. A., Netzer, H., Peterson, B. M., George, I. M., Gull, T. R., Hutchings, J. B., Mushotzky, R. F. \& Turner, T. J. 2006, ApJS, 167, 161

868: 

869: \reference{kris2002}Kriss, G. A. 2002, ASPC, 255, 69

870: 

871: \reference{krol1995}Krolik, J. H. \& Kriss, G. A. 1995 \apj, 447,512

872: 

873: \reference{laor2002}Laor, A. \& Brandt, W. N. 2002, \apj, 569, 641

874: 

875: \reference{mas1995}Mason et al. 1995, MNRAS, 274, 1194

876: 

877: \reference{mar1996}Maran, S. P., Crenshaw, D. M., Mushotzky, R. F., Reichert, G. A., Carpenter, K. G., Smith, A. M., Hutchings, J. B., Weymann, R. J. 1996, \apj, 465, 733

878: 

879: \reference{marz2003}Marziani, P., Sulentic, J. W., Zamanov, R., Calvani, M., Dultzin-Hacyan, D., Bachev, R. \& Zwitter, T. 2003 ApjS, 145, 199 

880: 

881: \reference{mc2004}McLure, R. J. \& Dunlop, J. S. 2004, MNRAS, 352, 1390

882: 

883: \reference{mort1991}Morton, D. C. 1991, \apjs, 77, 119

884: 

885: \reference{ost1989}Osterbrock, D. E. 1989, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei (Research supported by the University of California, John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation, University of Minnesota , et al. Mill Valley, CA, University Science Books, 1989, 422 p.)

886: 

887: \reference{pen2002}Penton, S. V., Stocke, J. T. \& Shull, J. M. 2002 \apj, 565, 720

888: 

889: \reference{pet1998}Peterson, B. M., Wanders, I., Bertram, R., Hunley, J. F., Pogge, R. W., \& Wagner, R. M. 1998, \apj, 501, 82

890: 

891: \reference{pet2004}Peterson et al. 2004, \apj, 613, 682

892: 

893: \reference{san2001}Sahnow et al. 2000, \apj, 538, 7

894: 

895: \reference{san2002}Sahnow, D. 2002, The $\it FUSE$ Instrument and Data Handbook

896: 

897: \reference{turn1988}Turnshek, D. A., Grillmair, C. J., Foltz, C. B. \& Weymann, R. J. 1988, \apj, 325, 651

898: 

899: \reference{vest2006}Vestergaard, M. \& Peterson B. M. 2006, \apj, 641, 689

900: 

901: \reference{wey1981}Weymann, R. J., Carswell, R. F., \& Smith, M. G. 1981, ARA \& A, 19, 41

902: 

903: \reference{wey1997}Weymann, R. J., Morris, S. L., Gray, M. E., Hutchings, J. B. 1997,\apj, 483, 717

904: 

905: \reference{xu2003}Xu, D. W., Komossa, Stefanie, Wei, J. Y., Qian, Y. \& Zheng, X. Z. 2003, \apj, 590, 73

906: 

907: \end{references}

908: 

909: \clearpage

910: 

911: \figcaption[Fig1.eps]{New spectra taken at CTIO, plotted in the observed frame.}

912: 

913: \figcaption[Fig2.eps]{The relation between luminosity and velocity using only data from $\it FUSE$.}

914: 

915: \figcaption[Fig3.eps]{Extended plot of luminosity and velocity using data measured by Laor \& Brandt (2002). 

916: Crosses are data from our $\it FUSE$ observations and asterisks are from the Laor \& Brandt (2002) survey.}

917: 

918: \figcaption[Fig4.eps]{Relationship between Eddington Ratio and maximum outflow velocity. Crosses are

919: objects with reverberation mapping.}

920: 

921: \figcaption[Fig5.eps]{EW vs. specific luminosity for our sample. The top plot is for O VI $\lambda$1032, 

922: the middle is for O VI $\lambda$1037 and the bottom plot is for Ly $\beta$. Plus symbols are components 

923: labeled 1 from Paper I and asterisks any component other than the first.}

924: 

925: \figcaption[Fig6.eps]{FWHM vs.specific luminosity. The top plot is for O VI $\lambda$1032, the middle 

926: is for O VI $\lambda$1037 and the bottom plot is for Ly $\beta$.}

927: 

928: \figcaption[Fig7.eps]{The available spectra for Mrk 79 plotted in order of increasing time from

929: bottom to top. The upper spectra are offset by: 6.0$\times$10$^{-14}$ \& 1.2$\times$10$^{-13}$ ergs

930: s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ \AA$^{-1}$. Component 1 (as identified by Paper I)

931: is labeled by a dashed line and component 2 by a dotted and dashed line in each of the three lines 

932: (Ly$\beta$, O VIb and O VIr in order of increasing wavelength).}

933: 

934: \figcaption[Fig8.eps]{This plot shows the relation for each of the three lines between EW, average 

935: velocity \&  flux over time. Top to bottom the lines are plotted in order of decreasing wavelength. The 

936: dashed line represents the average value line of the data, which is mostly to guide the eye. The continuum 

937: seems to increase slightly while Ly$\beta$ and O VI 1038 seem to vary.}

938: 

939: \figcaption[Fig9.eps]{Plotted in chronological order from bottom to top. The earlier spectra for NGC 4151 

940: show the flattening of the region between 1029 and 1032 \AA by an additional absorption component. 

941: The offsets for these data are: 4.0$\times$10$^{-13}$, 8.0$\times$10$^{-13}$ \& 1.2$\times$10$^{-12}$ ergs

942: s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ \AA$^{-1}$.}

943: 

944: \figcaption[Fig10.eps]{These spectra show the changes seen in Mrk 817. We see variability in the O VIb 

945: line, and find absorption appearing between 1051 and 1052 \AA\ and 1056 and 1057 \AA (components 2 and 3). 

946: There is one point we were able to measure the continuum for, but the lines were lost in the S/N. We have

947: included the lightcurve point for completeness.}

948: 

949: \figcaption[Fig11.eps]{Mrk 817 relationships of EW, velocity and flux for component 1over time. Both O VI 

950: lines show indications of decreasing EW with decreasing flux.}

951: 

952: \figcaption[Fig12.eps]{We present the spectral time series for Mrk 279 with offsets in flux of: 1.0, 2.5, 

953: 3.5, 5.0 \& 6.0 $\times$10$^{-13}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ \AA$^{-1}$. This shows the variability seen in 

954: the lines.}

955: 

956: \figcaption[Fig13.eps]{Flux, EW and velocity against time for Mrk 279, similar to Figure 8. These quantities

957: exhibit definite 

958: variability with time, and appears to be slightly anticorrelated with the flux. The last three points

959: show signs of decrease in all three lines with the drop and rise of flux for those three observations,

960: which hints at a lag in response time.}

961: 

962: \figcaption[Fig14.eps]{These are spectra of Mrk 290, which show the line trends with time (bottom to top). 

963: The offsets for these spectra are: 3.0$\times$10$^{-14}$ \& 9.0$\times$10$^{-14}$ ergs

964: s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ \AA$^{-1}$.}

965: 

966: \figcaption[Fig15.eps]{We see in these plots (similar to Figure 8), that there is an decrease of EW with an 

967: increase in flux for all three lines. The trend for Lyman $\beta$ is less convincing, however, 

968: due to the larger error bars.}

969: 

970: \figcaption[Fig16.eps]{We show the spectra for Mrk 509 and overplot the components 3 and 6 found by Kraemer 

971: et al. (2005), along with the dashed-dotted and dashed lines indicating our measured components 2 and 1 

972: respectively. We have placed dotted lines to show the change in the slope of component 3 with respect to 

973: component 2. The offsets for these are: 2.5 \& 5.0 $\times$10$^{-13}$ ergs

974: s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ \AA$^{-1}$.}

975: 

976: \figcaption[Fig17.eps]{Mrk 509 relations for component 1, plotted similar to Figure 8.}

977: 

978: \figcaption[Fig18.eps]{Mrk 509 relations for component 2, plotted similar to Figure 8.}

979: 

980: \figcaption[Fig19.eps]{Spectra for PG 0804+761. The lines are marked with the dashed average velocity line, 

981: and the lines clearly appear to move. The dotted line labels a galactic Fe II line $\lambda$1044.2 to 

982: show that the centroid for the ISM lines are not moving. Offsets for these are: 2.5, 5.0, 7.5 

983: $\times$10$^{-13}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ \AA$^{-1}$.}

984: 

985: \figcaption[Fig20.eps]{PG 0804+761 relationships similar to Figure 8. We see definite correlations between 

986: velocity and EW with the flux levels with the exception of the Ly$\beta$ EW which seems to be low in the 

987: second observation.}

988: 

989: \figcaption[Fig21.eps]{Spectra showing the time evolution of NGC 3783. The measured component is labeled 

990: with the dashed line. Offsets for these are: 1.5, 3.0, 4.5, 6.0, 7.5 \& 9.0 $\times$10$^{-13}$ ergs

991: s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ \AA$^{-1}$.}

992: 

993: \figcaption[Fig22.eps]{This shows the relation for NGC 3783 between EW, velocity and flux over time. Similar

994: to Figure 8. We see definite variability in the EW over time for all three lines. There appears to be a

995: possible correlation between the change in Ly$\beta$ EW and continuum flux.}

996: 

997: \figcaption[Fig23.eps]{Spectrum for WPVS 007. The three absorption features are marked with dashed lines.}

998: 

999: \clearpage

1000: \begin{figure}

1001: \plotone{Fig1.eps}

1002: \\Fig.~1.

1003: \end{figure}

1004: 

1005: \clearpage

1006: \begin{figure}

1007: \plotone{Fig2.eps}

1008: \\Fig.~2.

1009: \end{figure}

1010: 

1011: \clearpage

1012: \begin{figure}

1013: \plotone{Fig3.eps}

1014: \\Fig.~3.

1015: \end{figure}

1016: 

1017: \clearpage

1018: \begin{figure}

1019: \plotone{Fig4.eps}

1020: \\Fig.~4.

1021: \end{figure}

1022: 

1023: \clearpage

1024: \begin{figure}

1025: \plotone{Fig5.eps}

1026: \\Fig.~5.

1027: \end{figure}

1028: 

1029: \clearpage

1030: \begin{figure}

1031: \plotone{Fig6.eps}

1032: \\Fig.~6a.

1033: \end{figure}

1034: 

1035: \clearpage

1036: \begin{figure}

1037: \plotone{Fig7.eps}

1038: \\Fig.~7.

1039: \end{figure}

1040: 

1041: \clearpage

1042: \begin{figure}

1043: \plotone{Fig8.eps}

1044: \\Fig.~8.

1045: \end{figure}

1046: 

1047: \clearpage

1048: \begin{figure}

1049: \plotone{Fig9.eps}

1050: \\Fig.~9.

1051: \end{figure}

1052: 

1053: \clearpage

1054: \begin{figure}

1055: \plotone{Fig10.eps}

1056: \\Fig.~10.

1057: \end{figure}

1058: 

1059: \clearpage

1060: \begin{figure}

1061: \plotone{Fig11.eps}

1062: \\Fig.~11.

1063: \end{figure}

1064: 

1065: \clearpage

1066: \begin{figure}

1067: \plotone{Fig12.eps}

1068: \\Fig.~12.

1069: \end{figure}

1070: 

1071: \clearpage

1072: \begin{figure}

1073: \plotone{Fig13.eps}

1074: \\Fig.~13.

1075: \end{figure}

1076: 

1077: \clearpage

1078: \begin{figure}

1079: \plotone{Fig14.eps}

1080: \\Fig.~14.

1081: \end{figure}

1082: 

1083: \clearpage

1084: \begin{figure}

1085: \plotone{Fig15.eps}

1086: \\Fig.~15.

1087: \end{figure}

1088: 

1089: \clearpage

1090: \begin{figure}

1091: \plotone{Fig16.eps}

1092: \\Fig.~16.

1093: \end{figure}

1094: 

1095: \clearpage

1096: \begin{figure}

1097: \plotone{Fig17.eps}

1098: \\Fig.~17.

1099: \end{figure}

1100: 

1101: \clearpage

1102: \begin{figure}

1103: \plotone{Fig18.eps}

1104: \\Fig.~18.

1105: \end{figure}

1106: 

1107: \clearpage

1108: \begin{figure}

1109: \plotone{Fig19.eps}

1110: \\Fig.~19.

1111: \end{figure}

1112: 

1113: \clearpage

1114: \begin{figure}

1115: \plotone{Fig20.eps}

1116: \\Fig.~20.

1117: \end{figure}

1118: 

1119: \clearpage

1120: \begin{figure}

1121: \plotone{Fig21.eps}

1122: \\Fig.~21.

1123: \end{figure}

1124: 

1125: \clearpage

1126: \begin{figure}

1127: \plotone{Fig22.eps}

1128: \\Fig.~22.

1129: \end{figure}

1130: 

1131: \clearpage

1132: \begin{figure}

1133: \plotone{Fig23.eps}

1134: \\Fig.~23.

1135: \end{figure}

1136: 

1137: \newpage

1138: \clearpage

1139: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}

1140: \tablecolumns{5}

1141: \footnotesize

1142: \tablecaption{Observation Log for CTIO Spectra}

1143: \tablehead{

1144: \colhead{Object} &

1145: \colhead{Date} &

1146: \colhead{Integration Time} &

1147: \colhead{Resolution FWHM} &

1148: \colhead{$\lambda$ Coverage} \\

1149: 

1150: \colhead{\footnotesize{ }} &

1151: \colhead{\footnotesize{ }} &

1152: \colhead{\footnotesize{(s)}} &

1153: \colhead{\footnotesize{(\AA)}} &

1154: \colhead{\footnotesize{(\AA)}} \\

1155: }

1156: 

1157: \startdata

1158: IRAS F22456-5125 & 2007 August 9 & 2400 & 4.3 & 3667-5409 \\

1159: IRAS F22456-5125 & 2007 August 16 & 2400 & 3.1 & 5639-6947 \\

1160: MR 2251-178 & 2007 August 15 & 2400 & 4.3 & 3667-5423 \\

1161: MR 2251-178 & 2007 August 17 & 2400 & 3.1 & 5639-6947 \\

1162: WPVS 007 & 2007 August 15 & 2400 & 4.3 & 3667-5423 \\

1163: WPVS 007 & 2007 August 17 & 1800 & 3.1 & 5638-6947 \\

1164: 

1165: \enddata

1166: \normalsize

1167: \end{deluxetable}

1168: \thispagestyle{empty}

1169: 

1170: \newpage

1171: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}

1172: \tablecolumns{7}

1173: \footnotesize

1174: \tablecaption{AGN Continuum Levels}

1175: \tablewidth{1.0\textwidth}

1176: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

1177: \tablehead{

1178: \colhead{Object} &

1179: \colhead{Observation ID} &

1180: \colhead{Julian Date} &

1181: \colhead{Flux} &

1182: \colhead{Bin} &

1183: \colhead{Log L$_{\lambda}$} &

1184: \colhead{$\sigma$$_{Log L_{\lambda}}$}\\

1185: \colhead{ } &

1186: \colhead{ } &

1187: \colhead{+2400000 days} &

1188: \colhead{$\times$10$^{14}$} &

1189: \colhead{(\AA)} &

1190: \colhead{ergs s$^{-1}$ \AA $^{-1}$} &

1191: \colhead{ergs s$^{-1}$ \AA $^{-1}$}\\

1192: \colhead{ } &

1193: \colhead{ } &

1194: \colhead{ } &

1195: \colhead{ergs s$^{-1}$ \AA $^{-1}$} &

1196: \colhead{ } &

1197: \colhead{ } &

1198: \colhead{ }\\

1199: }

1200: 

1201: \startdata

1202: WPVS 007 & D8060201000 & 52950.360 & 0.48 & 1020 & 39.88 & 0.11 \\

1203: QSO0045+3926  & Z0020401000  & 51874.176 & 1.01 & 1110 & 41.54 & 0.03 \\

1204:  & D1310101000  & 52921.336 & 1.34 & 1110 & 41.66 & 0.05 \\

1205:  & D1310102000  & 52922.707 & 1.40 & 1110 & 41.68 & 0.05 \\

1206:  & D1310103000  & 52924.391 & 1.14 & 1110 & 41.60 & 0.04 \\

1207:  & D1310104000  & 52983.242 & 0.88 & 1110 & 41.48 & 0.06 \\

1208:  & D1310105000  & 53335.281 & 1.28 & 1110 & 41.65 & 0.07 \\

1209:  & D1310106000  & 53336.105 & 1.24 & 1110 & 41.63 & 0.07 \\

1210:  & D1310107000  & 53337.000 & 1.23 & 1110 & 41.63 & 0.07 \\

1211: TONS180  & P1010502000  & 51524.742 & 6.16 & 1160 & 41.66 & 0.05 \\

1212:  & D0280101000  & 53199.973 & 4.49 & 1160 & 41.52 & 0.05 \\

1213: MRK1044  & D0410101000  & 53006.246 & 2.52 & 1020 & 40.12 & 0.09 \\

1214: NGC985  & P1010903000  & 51536.551 & 2.45 & 1020 & 40.94 & 0.05 \\

1215: EUVEJ0349-537  & E8970301000  & 53237.559 & 0.36 & 1110 & 41.06 & 0.04 \\

1216: IRASF04250-5718  & D8080801000  & 52886.609 & 3.66 & 1110 & 41.89 & 0.07 \\

1217: MRK79  & P1011701000  & 51512.949 & 1.15 & 1110 & 40.04 & 0.11 \\

1218:  & P1011702000  & 51558.152 & 1.13 & 1110 & 40.03 & 0.10 \\

1219:  & P1011703000  & 51596.613 & 1.41 & 1110 & 40.12 & 0.08 \\

1220: MRK10  & Z9072801000  & 52673.195 & 1.07 & 1110 & 40.24 & 0.11 \\

1221: IR07546+3928  & S6011801000  & 52317.062 & 0.11 & 1160 & 40.29 & 0.08 \\

1222: PG0804+761  & P1011901000  & 51456.504 & 7.84 & 1160 & 42.18 & 0.01 \\

1223:  & P1011903000  & 54548.312 & 14.08 & 1160 & 42.44 & 0.02 \\

1224:  & S6011001000  & 52311.059 & 5.72 & 1160 & 42.05 & 0.02 \\

1225:  & S6011002000  & 52315.406 & 5.90 & 1160 & 42.06 & 0.02 \\

1226: Ton951  & P1012002000  & 53080.004 & 4.62 & 1160 & 41.56 & 0.06 \\

1227:  & D0280304000  & 51595.316 & 3.42 & 1160 & 41.43 & 0.03 \\

1228:  & D0280301000  & 53079.102 & 2.90 & 1160 & 41.36 & 0.07 \\

1229: IRAS09149-62  & A0020503000  & 51581.129 & 1.42 & 1110 & 40.95 & 0.04 \\

1230:  & S7011003000  & 53461.098 & 0.80 & 1110 & 40.70 & 0.09 \\

1231:  & U1072202000  & 53929.031 & 0.74 & 1110 & 40.67 & 0.06 \\

1232: MKN141  & D8061001000  & 53085.585 & 0.07 & 1110 & 39.09 & 0.38 \\

1233: NGC3516  & P1110404000  & 51651.957 & 1.24 & 1020 & 38.97 & 0.18 \\

1234:  & G9170101000  & 53776.217 & 0.69 & 1020 & 38.71 & 0.20 \\

1235:  & G9170102000  & 54123.776 & 0.63 & 1020 & 38.67 & 0.23 \\

1236: ESO265-G23 

1237:  & A1210405000  & 51978.219 & 0.38 & 1110 & 40.36 & 0.13 \\

1238:  & A1210407000  & 52341.223 & 0.39 & 1110 & 40.37 & 0.07 \\

1239:  & A1210408000  & 52393.352 & 0.73 & 1110 & 40.64 & 0.03 \\

1240:  & A1210409000  & 52394.416 & 1.03 & 1110 & 40.79 & 0.04 \\

1241: NGC3783  & P1013301000  & 51576.621 & 4.90 & 1160 & 39.95 & 0.03 \\

1242:  & B1070102000  & 51969.199 & 4.94 & 1160 & 39.95 & 0.03 \\

1243:  & B1070103000  & 51979.535 & 3.49 & 1160 & 39.80 & 0.03 \\

1244:  & B1070104000  & 51999.453 & 5.81 & 1160 & 40.02 & 0.03 \\

1245:  & B1070105000  & 52087.727 & 4.47 & 1160 & 39.91 & 0.04 \\

1246:  & B1070106000  & 51975.855 & 2.87 & 1160 & 39.72 & 0.03 \\

1247:  & E0310101000  & 53130.965 & 4.11 & 1160 & 39.87 & 0.03 \\

1248: NGC4051  & B0620201000  & 52362.582 & 1.29 & 1020 & 38.13 & 0.05 \\

1249:  & C0190101000  & 52657.988 & 1.35 & 1020 & 38.15 & 0.07 \\

1250:  & C0190102000  & 52717.824 & 1.51 & 1020 & 38.20 & 0.07 \\

1251: NGC4151  & P1110505000  & 51609.410 & 2.50 & 1020 & 38.72 & 0.05 \\

1252:  & P2110201000  & 52008.199 & 1.71 & 1020 & 38.56 & 0.08 \\

1253:  & C0920101000  & 52423.469 & 21.52 & 1020 & 39.66 & 0.03 \\

1254:  & P2110202000  & 52427.199 & 12.67 & 1020 & 39.43 & 0.05 \\

1255: RXJ1230.8+0115  & P1019001000  & 51715.832 & 5.24 & 1110 & 42.14 & 0.06 \\

1256: TOL1238-364  & D0100101000  & 51945.742 & 1.47 & 1110 & 39.53 & 0.06 \\

1257: PG1351+640  & P1072501000  & 51562.117 & 1.19 & 1160 & 41.25 & 0.03 \\

1258:  & S6010701000  & 52306.922 & 1.68 & 1160 & 41.40 & 0.02 \\

1259: MRK279  & P1080303000  & 51540.527 & 11.45 & 1110 & 41.31 & 0.01 \\

1260:  & P1080304000  & 51554.562 & 9.61 & 1110 & 41.23 & 0.02 \\

1261:  & C0900201000  & 52413.258 & 0.61 & 1110 & 40.04 & 0.02 \\

1262:  & D1540101000  & 52772.410 & 9.20 & 1110 & 41.21 & 0.01 \\

1263:  & F3250103000  & 53711.961 & 7.35 & 1110 & 41.12 & 0.02 \\

1264:  & F3250104000  & 53713.277 & 2.86 & 1110 & 40.70 & 0.08 \\

1265:  & F3250106000  & 53769.598 & 4.53 & 1110 & 40.90 & 0.05 \\

1266: RXJ135515+561244  & D8061601000  & 52712.387 & 0.39 & 1110 & 41.04 & 0.02 \\

1267: PG1404+226  & P2100401000  & 52071.652 & 0.93 & 1110 & 41.23 & 0.10 \\

1268: PG1411+442  & A0601010000  & 51675.637 & 2.01 & 1160 & 41.49 & 0.06 \\

1269: NGC5548  & P1014601000  & 51703.055 & 1.55 & 1020 & 39.94 & 0.05 \\

1270: MRK817  & P1080401000  & 51591.965 & 9.05 & 1110 & 41.23 & 0.03 \\

1271:  & P1080402000  & 51592.766 & 7.20 & 1110 & 41.13 & 0.03 \\

1272:  & P1080403000  & 51902.176 & 3.89 & 1110 & 40.87 & 0.003 \\

1273:  & P1080404000  & 51958.891 & 6.25 & 1110 & 41.07 & 0.01 \\

1274: MRK290  & P1072901000  & 51620.230 & 0.45 & 1110 & 39.87 & 0.08 \\

1275:  & D0760101000  & 52819.457 & 3.44 & 1110 & 40.76 & 0.06 \\

1276:  & E0840101000  & 53171.730 & 3.83 & 1110 & 40.81 & 0.06 \\

1277: MRK876  & P1073101000  & 51467.766 & 0.24 & 1110 & 40.88 & 0.03 \\

1278:  & D0280201000  & 52776.450 & 5.77 & 1110 & 42.26 & 0.08 \\

1279:  & D0280203000  & 53049.797 & 5.71 & 1110 & 42.26 & 0.03 \\

1280: MRK509  & X0170101000  & 51485.445 & 7.41 & 1020 & 41.23 & 0.05 \\

1281:  & X0170102000  & 51488.703 & 8.00 & 1020 & 41.26 & 0.06 \\

1282:  & P1080601000  & 51792.750 & 9.14 & 1020 & 41.32 & 0.05 \\

1283: IIZW136  & P1018301000  & 51863.473 & 2.36 & 1160 & 41.25 & 0.04 \\

1284:  & P1018302000  & 53152.684 & 3.72 & 1160 & 41.45 & 0.07 \\

1285:  & P1018303000  & 53153.727 & 2.79 & 1160 & 41.33 & 0.07 \\

1286:  & P1018304000  & 53310.586 & 3.71 & 1160 & 41.45 & 0.04 \\

1287: AKN564  & B0620101000  & 52089.816 & 1.03 & 1110 & 40.08 & 0.02 \\

1288: IRAS F22456-5125  & Z9073901000  & 52541.902 & 1.12 & 1110 & 41.33 & 0.10 \\

1289:  & Z9073902000 & 52542.457 & 1.75 & 1110 & 41.52 & 0.04 \\

1290:  & E8481401000  & 53194.629 & 6.08 & 1110 & 42.07 & 0.08 \\

1291: MR 2251-178  & P1111010000  & 52081.012 & 0.99 & 1160 & 40.89 & 0.04 \\

1292: NGC7469  & P1074101000  & 51724.101 & 1.30 & 1020 & 39.52 & 0.08 \\

1293:  & C0900101000  & 52621.797 & 2.11 & 1020 & 39.73 & 0.14 \\

1294:  & C0900102000  & 52621.767 & 2.17 & 1020 & 39.74 & 0.15 \\

1295: 

1296: \enddata

1297: \normalsize

1298: \end{deluxetable}

1299: \thispagestyle{empty}

1300: 

1301: 

1302: \newpage

1303: \begin{deluxetable}{rcc|ccc|ccc|ccc|cc}

1304: \tablecolumns{14}

1305: \rotate

1306: \tablewidth{1.2\textwidth}

1307: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

1308: \tablecaption{Measured Quantities}

1309: \tablehead{

1310: \multicolumn{1}{c}{\textbf{Object}} &

1311: \multicolumn{1}{c}{\textbf{Obs ID}} &

1312: \multicolumn{1}{c}{\textbf{Comp}} &

1313: \multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Equivalent Width}} &

1314: \multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{$\sigma$$_{EW}$}} &

1315: \multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{FWHM}} &

1316: \multicolumn{1}{c}{\textbf{V$_r$}} &

1317: \multicolumn{1}{c}{\textbf{$\sigma$$_{vel}$}}\\ 

1318: \colhead{ } &

1319: \colhead{ } &

1320: \colhead{ } &

1321: \colhead{Ly$\beta$} &

1322: \colhead{O VIb} &

1323: \colhead{O VIr} &

1324: \colhead{Ly$\beta$} &

1325: \colhead{O VIb} &

1326: \colhead{O VIr} &

1327: \colhead{Ly$\beta$} &

1328: \colhead{O VIb} &

1329: \colhead{O VIr} &

1330: \colhead{ } &

1331: \colhead{ }\\

1332: \colhead{\footnotesize{ }} &

1333: \colhead{\footnotesize{ }} &

1334: \colhead{\footnotesize{ }} &

1335: \colhead{\footnotesize{(\AA)}} &

1336: \colhead{\footnotesize{(\AA)}} &

1337: \colhead{\footnotesize{(\AA)}} &

1338: \colhead{\footnotesize{(\AA)}} &

1339: \colhead{\footnotesize{(\AA)}} &

1340: \colhead{\footnotesize{(\AA)}} &

1341: \multicolumn{3}{c}{(\footnotesize{km s$^{-1}$})} &

1342: \colhead{\footnotesize{(km s$^{-1}$})} &

1343: \colhead{\footnotesize{(km s$^{-1}$})}\\

1344: }

1345: 

1346: \startdata

1347: WPVS 007

1348:  & D8060201000 & 1 & 1.91 & 2.06 & 1.76 & 0.14 & 0.13 & 0.14 & 714 & 639 & 615 & -397 & 26 \\

1349: QSO0045+3926 

1350:  & Z0020401000  & 1 & 0.29 & 0.61 & 0.29 & 0.04 & 0.06 & 0.05 & 100 & 172 & 69 & 361 & 13 \\

1351:  & D1310101000  & 1 & 0.19 & 0.45 & 0.38 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 56 & 128 & 98 & 351 & 5 \\

1352:  & D1310102000  & 1 & 0.19 & 0.38 & 0.29 & 0.02 & 0.02 & 0.02 & 69 & 101 & 107 & 345 & 12 \\

1353:  & D1310103000  & 1 & 0.29 & 0.41 & 0.27 & 0.08 & 0.06 & 0.06 & 77 & 121 & 63 & 340 & 22 \\

1354:  & D1310104000  & 1 & 0.17 & 0.36 & 0.31 & 0.01 & 0.02 & 0.02 & 82 & 107 & 74 & 346 & 16 \\

1355:  & D1310105000  & 1 & 0.13 & 0.40 & 0.33 & 0.02 & 0.02 & 0.02 & 86 & 107 & 94 & 371 & 6 \\

1356:  & D1310106000  & 1 & 0.16 & 0.42 & 0.28 & 0.02 & 0.02 & 0.02 & 69 & 91 & 85 & 375 & 7 \\

1357:  & D1310107000  & 1 & 0.14 & 0.33 & 0.32 & 0.02 & 0.03 & 0.02 & 60 & 77 & 73 & 396 & 9 \\

1358: TONS180 

1359:  & P1010502000  & 1 &  &  & 0.13 &  &  & 0.03 &  &  & 65 & -1732 & \\

1360:  & D0280101000  & 1 &  &  & 0.17 &  &  & 0.03 &  &  & 85 & -1792 & \\

1361: MRK1044 

1362:  & D0410101000  & 1 & 0.20 & 0.22 &  & 0.04 & 0.03 &  & 65 & 92 &  & -1110 & 2 \\

1363: NGC985 

1364:  & P1010903000  & 1 &  & 0.11 & 0.06 &  & 0.01 & 0.01 &  & 96 & 77 & -814 & 20 \\

1365:  & P1010903000  & 2 & 0.12 & 0.26 & 0.20 & 0.02 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 34 & 72 & 55 & -678 & 6 \\

1366:  & P1010903000  & 3 & 0.56 & 0.71 & 0.65 & 0.02 & 0.02 & 0.01 & 158 & 199 & 180 & -454 & 51 \\

1367:  & P1010903000  & 4 & 0.15 & 0.16 & 0.23 & 0.02 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 41 & 44 & 63 & -268 & 17 \\

1368: EUVEJ0349-537 

1369:  & E8970301000  & 1 & 0.47 & 0.71 & 0.60 & 0.04 & 0.04 & 0.06 & 128 & 218 & 165 & 26 & 21 \\

1370: IRASF04250-5718 

1371:  & D8080801000  & 1 & 0.56 & 0.62 & 0.64 & 0.06 & 0.07 & 0.07 & 159 & 195 & 184 & -216 & 5 \\

1372:  & D8080801000  & 2 & 0.15 & 0.25 & 0.20 & 0.06 & 0.03 & 0.03 & 41 & 66 & 51 & -64 & 2 \\

1373: MRK79 

1374:  & P1011701000  & 1 & 0.35 & 0.65 & 0.76 & 0.18 & 0.17 & 0.17 & 117 & 242 & 220 & -350 & 12 \\

1375:  & P1011702000  & 1 & 0.30 & 0.52 & 0.43 & 0.10 & 0.09 & 0.08 & 175 & 240 & 160 & -325 & 35 \\

1376:  & P1011703000  & 1 & 0.18 & 0.57 & 0.52 & 0.07 & 0.08 & 0.06 & 86 & 198 & 194 & -326 & 27 \\

1377:  & P1011701000  & 2 &  &  & 0.39 &  &  & 0.13 &  &  & 255 & -1404 & \\

1378:  & P1011702000  & 2 &  &  & 0.31 &  &  & 0.08 &  &  & 87 & -1387 & \\

1379:  & P1011703000  & 2 &  &  & 0.28 &  &  & 0.07 &  &  & 81 & -1367 & \\

1380: MRK10  & Z9072801000  & 1 & 1.03 &  & 0.92 & 0.09 &  & 0.13 & 344 &  & 227 & -126 & 18 \\

1381: IR07546+3928 

1382:  & S6011801000  & 1 & 1.07 & 1.49 & 1.00 & 0.05 & 0.03 & 0.02 & 280 & 436 & 351 & -1777 & 9 \\

1383:  & S6011801000  & 2 & 0.98 & 1.48 & 1.37 & 0.03 & 0.03 & 0.03 & 263 & 395 & 361 & -1116 & 12 \\

1384: PG0804+761 

1385:  & P1011901000  & 1 & 0.21 & 0.13 & 0.09 & 0.004 & 0.003 & 0.003 & 69 & 67 & 64 & 363 & 7 \\

1386:  & P1011903000  & 1 & 0.23 & 0.14 & 0.06 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 75 & 66 & 55 & 370 & 2 \\

1387:  & S6011001000  & 1 & 0.19 & 0.11 & 0.10 & 0.01 & 0.004 & 0.01 & 63 & 64 & 81 & 356 & 1 \\

1388:  & S6011002000  & 1 & 0.20 & 0.11 & 0.09 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 74 & 66 & 71 & 358 & 5 \\

1389: TON951 

1390:  & P1012002000  & 1 & 0.60 & 0.43 & 0.43 & 0.02 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 159 & 123 & 118 & 179 & 16 \\

1391:  & D0280304000  & 1 & 0.69 & 0.42 & 0.46 & 0.05 & 0.03 & 0.02 & 190 & 150 & 128 & 173 & 25 \\

1392:  & D0280301000  & 1 & 0.66 & 0.52 & 0.41 & 0.05 & 0.05 & 0.02 & 186 & 149 & 114 & 149 & 23 \\

1393: IRAS09149-62 

1394:  & A0020503000  & 1 &  & 1.72 & 1.26 &  & 0.22 & 0.12 &  & 504 & 389 & 18 & 18 \\

1395:  & S7011003000  & 1 &  &  & 1.08 &  &  & 0.11 &  &  & 377 & 31 & \\

1396:  & U1072202000  & 1 &  &  & 1.33 &  &  & 0.08 &  &  & 431 & 56 & \\

1397: NGC3516 

1398:  & P1110404000  & 1 & 0.27 & 1.76 & 0.06 & 0.07 & 0.09 & 0.03 & 168 & 510 & 52  & -1511 & 360 \\

1399:  & G9170101000  & 1 & 0.33 & 1.40 & 0.14 & 0.13 & 0.17 & 0.20 & 177 & 468 & 133 & -1362 & 6.8 \\

1400:  & G9170102000  & 1 & 0.23 & 0.53 & 0.15 & 0.07 & 0.07 & 0.04 & 133 & 202 & 63  & -1343 & 101 \\

1401:  & P1110404000  & 2 &      & 0.54 & 0.08 &      & 0.06 & 0.05 &     & 250 & 162 & -866 & 125\\

1402:  & G9170101000  & 2 & 0.38 & 0.57 & 0.64 & 0.16 & 0.12 & 0.20 & 212 & 239 & 331 & -888 & 38 \\

1403:  & G9170102000  & 2 & 0.15 & 0.28 & 0.34 & 0.06 & 0.05 & 0.05 & 112 & 99  & 198 & -911 & 52 \\

1404:  & P1110404000  & 3 &      & 0.28 & 0.35 &      & 0.04 & 0.03 &     & 123 & 46  & -410 & 15 \\

1405:  & G9170101000  & 3 & 0.38 &      & 0.58 & 0.15 &      & 0.12 & 168 &     & 196 & -460 & 10 \\

1406:  & G9170102000  & 3 & 0.34 & 0.32 & 0.38 & 0.06 & 0.06 & 0.05 & 113 & 98  & 100 & -456 & 2 \\

1407:  & P1110404000  & 4 & 0.38 & 0.38 & 0.40 & 0.08 & 0.05 & 0.06 & 110 & 163 & 239 & -216 & 1  \\

1408:  & G9170101000  & 4 & 0.58 &      & 0.46 & 0.17 &      & 0.23 & 226 &     & 174 & -236 & 30 \\

1409:  & G9170102000  & 4 & 0.67 & 0.79 & 0.80 & 0.06 & 0.06 & 0.07 & 233 & 287 & 302 & -227 & 6  \\

1410: ESO265-G23 

1411:  & A1210405000  & 1 &  & 0.29 & 0.15 &  & 0.15 & 0.09 &  & 127 & 126 & -178 & 13 \\

1412:  & A1210407000  & 1 &  & 0.34 & 0.32 &  & 0.05 & 0.04 &  & 141 & 73  & -157 & 5  \\

1413:  & A1210408000  & 1 &  & 0.29 & 0.36 &  & 0.10 & 0.08 &  & 63  & 288 & -124 & 14 \\

1414:  & A1210409000  & 1 &  & 0.34 & 0.30 &  & 0.13 & 0.10 &  & 92  & 81  & -157 & 26 \\

1415: NGC3783 

1416:  & P1013301000  & 1 & 1.03 & 1.19 & 0.78 & 0.02 & 0.02 & 0.03 & 403 & 463 & 404 & -660 & 10 \\

1417:  & B1070102000  & 1 & 1.12 & 1.18 & 0.62 & 0.03 & 0.02 & 0.03 & 394 & 467 & 456 & -668 & 20 \\

1418:  & B1070103000  & 1 & 1.11 & 1.19 & 0.70 & 0.04 & 0.03 & 0.03 & 400 & 452 & 449 & -663 & 16 \\

1419:  & B1070104000  & 1 & 0.99 & 1.12 & 0.78 & 0.03 & 0.03 & 0.02 & 332 & 443 & 393 & -675 & 19 \\

1420:  & B1070105000  & 1 & 0.88 & 1.16 & 0.65 & 0.03 & 0.03 & 0.03 & 377 & 459 & 404 & -682 & 13 \\

1421:  & B1070106000  & 1 & 1.17 & 1.20 & 0.76 & 0.04 & 0.03 & 0.03 & 427 & 457 & 395 & -664 & 12 \\

1422:  & E0310101000  & 1 & 1.05 & 1.30 & 0.80 & 0.02 & 0.03 & 0.02 & 380 & 467 & 371 & -657 & 30 \\

1423: NGC4051 

1424:  & B0620201000  & 1 &  & 2.28 &      &  & 0.00 &      &  & 672 &     & -374 & \\

1425:  & C0190101000  & 1 &  & 2.13 &      &  & 0.04 &      &  & 696 &     & -348 & \\

1426:  & C0190102000  & 1 &  & 2.14 & 1.88 &  & 0.05 & 0.04 &  & 670 & 627 & -359 & 12 \\

1427: NGC4151 

1428:  & P1110505000  & 1 &  & 0.91 &      &  & 0.04 &      &  & 473 &     & -706 & \\

1429:  & P2110201000  & 1 &  & 1.48 & 1.21 &  & 0.07 & 0.04 &  & 514 & 522 & -574 & 222 \\

1430:  & C0920101000  & 1 &  & 1.77 & 1.95 &  & 0.01 & 0.01 &  & 718 & 681 & -397 & 41 \\

1431:  & P2110202000  & 1 &  & 1.66 & 1.99 &  & 0.08 & 0.05 &  & 662 & 716 & -413 & 56 \\

1432: RXJ1230.8+0115 

1433:  & P1019001000  & 1 &  & 1.90 & 1.57 &  & 0.09 & 0.08 &  & 542 & 476 & -2994 & 16 \\

1434:  & P1019001000  & 2 &  & 0.27 & 0.26 &  & 0.06 & 0.05 &  & 71  & 69  & -2420 & 50 \\

1435:  & P1019001000  & 3 &  & 1.19 & 1.07 &  & 0.08 & 0.06 &  & 311 & 278 & -2014 & 3 \\

1436:  & P1019001000  & 4 &  & 1.17 & 1.08 &  & 0.06 & 0.08 &  & 304 & 280 &  120  & 2 \\

1437: TOL1238-364 

1438:  & D0100101000  & 1 &  & 1.10 & 1.51 &  & 0.14 & 0.15 &  & 339 & 454 & -252 & 75 \\

1439: PG1351+640 

1440:  & P1072501000  & 1 & 0.60 & 1.31 & 1.20 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 182 & 453 & 447 & -1705 & 73 \\

1441:  & S6010701000  & 1 & 0.54 & 1.37 & 1.42 & 0.02 & 0.02 & 0.02 & 208 & 455 & 429 & -1715 & 60 \\

1442:  & P1072501000  & 2 & 1.51 & 2.08 & 1.94 & 0.02 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 407 & 559 & 516 & -883 & 24 \\

1443:  & S6010701000  & 2 & 1.23 & 2.16 & 2.12 & 0.02 & 0.02 & 0.02 & 333 & 579 & 565 & -899 & 11 \\

1444: MRK279 

1445:  & P1080303000  & 1 & 0.77 & 1.20 & 0.75 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 321 & 478 & 301 & -312 & 6  \\

1446:  & P1080304000  & 1 & 0.82 & 1.15 & 0.77 & 0.02 & 0.02 & 0.02 & 328 & 482 & 307 & -328 & 4  \\

1447:  & C0900201000  & 1 & 1.01 & 0.96 & 1.06 & 0.07 & 0.06 & 0.06 & 299 & 497 & 312 & -351 & 2  \\

1448:  & D1540101000  & 1 & 0.76 & 1.32 & 0.97 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 290 & 474 & 319 & -308 & 8  \\

1449:  & F3250103000  & 1 & 1.19 & 1.80 & 0.97 & 0.13 & 0.10 & 0.10 & 285 & 508 & 306 & -404 & 33 \\

1450:  & F3250104000  & 1 & 0.87 & 1.64 & 0.93 & 0.13 & 0.13 & 0.11 & 392 & 518 & 366 & -302 & 12 \\

1451:  & F3250106000  & 1 & 0.69 & 1.26 & 0.90 & 0.22 & 0.21 & 0.16 & 324 & 502 & 328 & -308 & 28 \\

1452: RXJ135515+561244 

1453:  & D8061601000  & 1 & 0.34 & 0.61 & 0.76 & 0.04 & 0.04 & 0.05 & 86 & 160 & 205 & -834 & 12 \\

1454:  & D8061601000  & 2 &      & 0.69 & 0.48 &      & 0.05 & 0.03 &    & 180 & 186 & -163 & 28 \\

1455: PG1404+226 

1456:  & P2100401000  & 1 & 0.19 & 0.54 & 0.36 & 0.04 & 0.03 & 0.04 & 88  & 151 & 127 & -166 & 57 \\

1457:  & P2100401000  & 2 &      & 1.47 & 1.11 &      & 0.06 & 0.07 &     & 330 & 284 &  134 & 17 \\

1458: PG1411+442 

1459:  & A0601010000  & 1 &  &  & 0.64 &  &  & 0.03 &  &  & 170 & 55 & \\

1460: NGC5548 

1461:  & P1014601000  & 1 &  & 0.35 & 0.25 &  & 0.02 & 0.02 &  & 161 & 195 & -441 & 4 \\

1462:  & P1014601000  & 2 &  & 0.25 & 0.31 &  & 0.02 & 0.02 &  & 111 & 142 & -683 & 5 \\

1463: MRK817 

1464:  & P1080401000  & 1 & 0.08 & 0.60 & 0.41 & 0.05 & 0.04 & 0.05 & 319 & 207 & 143 & -4198 & 5 \\

1465:  & P1080402000  & 1 & 0.12 & 0.51 & 0.39 & 0.05 & 0.05 & 0.06 & 236 & 237 & 146 & -4184 & 16 \\

1466:  & P1080403000  & 1 & 0.10 & 0.41 & 0.36 & 0.01 & 0.02 & 0.02 & 134 & 273 & 265 & -4166 & 32 \\

1467:  & P1080404000  & 1 & 0.06 & 0.40 & 0.33 & 0.01 & 0.00 & 0.01 & 210 & 208 & 154 & -4144 & 12 \\

1468:  & P1080404000  & 2 &      & 0.12 & 0.05 &      & 0.01 & 0.01 &     & 243 & 142 & -3680 & 27 \\

1469:  & P1080404000  & 3 &      & 0.12 & 0.09 &      & 0.01 & 0.01 &     & 118 & 139 & -2966 & 6  \\

1470: MRK290 

1471:  & P1072901000  & 1 & 0.71 & 0.62 & 0.54 & 0.12 & 0.10 & 0.08 & 185 & 190 & 142 & -225 & 14 \\

1472:  & D0760101000  & 1 & 0.51 & 0.59 & 0.48 & 0.07 & 0.05 & 0.05 & 141 & 192 & 165 & -212 & 17 \\

1473:  & E0840101000  & 1 & 0.54 & 0.48 & 0.43 & 0.05 & 0.05 & 0.05 & 180 & 157 & 158 & -187 & 72 \\

1474: MRK876 

1475:  & P1073101000  & 1 &  & 0.11 & 0.09 &  & 0.01 & 0.01 &  & 73  & 99 & -3735 & 3 \\

1476:  & D0280203000  & 1 &  & 0.15 & 0.11 &  & 0.00 & 0.00 &  & 101 & 94 & -3724 & 0.8 \\

1477: MRK509 

1478:  & X0170101000  & 1 & 0.55 & 0.70 & 0.52 & 0.02 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 217 & 217 & 182 & -305 & 16 \\

1479:  & X0170102000  & 1 & 0.65 & 0.80 & 0.58 & 0.03 & 0.02 & 0.02 & 218 & 204 & 190 & -304 & 19 \\

1480:  & P1080601000  & 1 & 0.61 & 0.67 & 0.56 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 170 & 201 & 177 & -300 & 18 \\

1481:  & X0170101000  & 2 & 0.95 & 1.23 & 1.12 & 0.02 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 303 & 329 & 346 & 103 & 12 \\

1482:  & X0170102000  & 2 & 1.05 & 1.27 & 1.16 & 0.03 & 0.02 & 0.03 & 321 & 331 & 322 & 27 & 11 \\

1483:  & P1080601000  & 2 & 1.15 & 1.15 & 1.19 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 330 & 333 & 341 & 90 & 12 \\

1484: IIZW136 

1485:  & P1018301000  & 1 &  & 0.42 &      &  & 0.02 &      &  & 146 &    & -1487 & \\

1486:  & P1018302000  & 1 &  & 0.47 &      &  & 0.03 &      &  & 173 &    & -1512 & \\

1487:  & P1018303000  & 1 &  & 0.49 &      &  & 0.04 &      &  & 96  &    & -1517 & \\

1488:  & P1018304000  & 1 &  & 0.45 &      &  & 0.03 &      &  & 167 &    & -1512 & \\

1489:  & P1018301000  & 2 &  &      & 0.28 &  &      & 0.02 &  &     & 87 & 9  & \\

1490:  & P1018302000  & 2 &  &      & 0.30 &  &      & 0.04 &  &     & 96 & -2 & \\

1491:  & P1018303000  & 2 &  &      & 0.18 &  &      & 0.03 &  &     & 61 & 9  & \\

1492:  & P1018304000  & 2 &  &      & 0.31 &  &      & 0.02 &  &     & 99 & -7 & \\

1493: AKN564 

1494:  & B0620101000  & 1 & 1.64 & 1.28 & 1.31 & 0.04 & 0.02 & 0.03 & 528 & 304 & 280 & -65 & 10 \\

1495: IRAS F22456-5125 

1496:  & Z9073901000 & 1 & 0.06 & 0.32 & 0.28 & 0.04 & 0.06 & 0.06 & 42  & 110 & 105 & -787 & 11 \\

1497:  & Z9073902000 & 1 & 0.07 & 0.19 & 0.17 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 81  & 64  & 69  & -803 & 22 \\

1498:  & E8481401000 & 1 & 0.06 & 0.24 & 0.29 & 0.05 & 0.04 & 0.07 & 50  & 73  & 99  & -812 & 28 \\

1499:  & Z9073901000 & 2 & 0.42 &      &      & 0.05 &      &      & 130 &     &     & -596 & \\

1500:  & Z9073902000 & 2 & 0.35 &      &      & 0.01 &      &      & 97  &     &     & -612 & \\

1501:  & E8481401000 & 2 & 0.44 &      &      & 0.06 &      &      & 110 &     &     & -617 & \\

1502:  & Z9073901000 & 3 & 0.38 & 0.23 & 0.25 & 0.06 & 0.05 & 0.05 & 117 & 66  & 101 & -424 & 9 \\

1503:  & Z9073902000 & 3 & 0.27 & 0.20 & 0.21 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 77  & 67  & 69  & -455 & 5 \\

1504:  & E8481401000 & 3 & 0.33 & 0.38 & 0.26 & 0.05 & 0.06 & 0.06 & 96  & 151 & 94  & -447 & 13 \\

1505:  & Z9073901000 & 4 & 0.09 & 0.17 & 0.10 & 0.05 & 0.05 & 0.04 & 56  & 66  & 42  & -311 & 3 \\

1506:  & Z9073902000 & 4 & 0.08 & 0.21 & 0.14 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 40  & 63  & 66  & -323 & 5 \\

1507:  & E8481401000 & 4 & 0.12 & 0.18 & 0.14 & 0.05 & 0.05 & 0.04 & 35  & 105 & 39  & -327 & 1 \\

1508:  & Z9073901000 & 5 & 0.70 & 0.51 & 0.54 & 0.08 & 0.06 & 0.07 & 190 & 142 & 143 & -118 & 19 \\

1509:  & Z9073902000 & 5 & 0.68 & 0.67 & 0.46 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 182 & 136 & 134 & -135 & 22 \\

1510:  & E8481401000 & 5 & 0.72 & 0.54 & 0.57 & 0.07 & 0.06 & 0.07 & 178 & 147 & 137 & -136 & 21 \\

1511: MR 2251-178 

1512:  & P1111010000  & 1 & 1.62 & 0.70 & 0.40 & 0.03 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 418 & 234 & 155 & -300 & 23 \\

1513: NGC7469 

1514:  & C0900101000  & 1 &  & 0.40 & 0.30 &  & 0.002 & 0.01 &  & 151 & 137 & -1847 & 17 \\

1515:  & C0900102000  & 1 &  & 0.48 & 0.40 &  & 0.01 & 0.01 &  & 209 & 190 & -1878 & 3 \\

1516: \enddata

1517: 

1518: \end{deluxetable}

1519: 

1520: \newpage

1521: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}

1522: \tablecolumns{7}

1523: \footnotesize

1524: \tablecaption{Central Black Hole Masses}

1525: \tablehead{

1526: \colhead{Object} &

1527: \colhead{FWHM H$\beta$} &

1528: \colhead{Mass} &

1529: \colhead{log $\lambda$L$_{\lambda}$} &

1530: \colhead{log L$_{Bol}$} &

1531: \colhead{L/L$_{Edd}$} &

1532: \colhead{reference$^b$}\\

1533: 

1534: \colhead{\footnotesize{ }} &

1535: \colhead{\footnotesize{km s$^{-1}$}} &

1536: \colhead{\footnotesize{$\times$10$^{6}$}} &

1537: \colhead{\footnotesize{ergs s$^{-1}$}} &

1538: \colhead{\footnotesize{ergs s$^{-1}$}} &

1539: \colhead{\footnotesize{ }} &

1540: \colhead{\footnotesize{ }}\\

1541: }

1542: 

1543: \startdata

1544: Mrk 79  &  & 52.4 & 43.72 & 44.71 & 0.08 & 1 \\

1545: PG 0804+761 &  & 693 & 44.94 & 45.93 & 0.10 & 1 \\

1546: NGC 3516 &  & 42.7 & 42.88 & 43.87 & 0.01 & 1 \\

1547: NGC 3783 &  & 29.8 & 43.26 & 44.25 & 0.05 & 1 \\

1548: NGC 4051 &  & 1.91 & 41.93 & 42.92 & 0.03 & 1 \\

1549: NGC 4151 &  & 13.3 & 42.88 & 43.87 & 0.04 & 1 \\

1550: Mrk 279 &  & 34.9 & 43.88 & 44.87 & 0.17 & 1 \\

1551: PG 1411+422 &  & 443 & 44.63 & 45.62 & 0.07 & 1 \\

1552: NGC5548 &  & 67.1 & 43.51 & 44.50 & 0.04 & 1 \\

1553: Mrk 817 &  & 49.4 & 43.82 & 44.81 & 0.10 & 1 \\

1554: Mrk 509 &  & 143 & 44.28 & 45.27 & 0.10 & 1 \\

1555: NGC 7469 &  & 12.2 & 43.72 & 44.71 & 0.33 & 1 \\

1556: Mrk 876 &  & 279 & 44.98 & 45.97 & 0.27 & 1 \\

1557: Ton 951 &  & 92.4 & 44.35 & 45.34 & 0.19 & 1 \\

1558: II Zw 136 &  & 457 & 44.46 & 45.45 & 0.05 & 1 \\

1559: PG 1351+640 & 1170 & 46 & 44.64 & 45.63 & 0.74 & 2 \\

1560: QSO 0045+3926 & 5970 & 564.9 & 44.60 & 45.59 & 0.05 & 7 \\

1561: Ton S180 & 970 & 10.2 & 44.27 & 45.26 & 1.42 & 3 \\

1562: NGC 985 & 5670 & 202.8 & 43.80 & 44.79 & 0.02 & 3 \\

1563: IRAS F04250-5718 & 2580 & 144.0 & 44.87 & 45.86 & 0.40 & 3 \\

1564: Mrk 10 & 3050 & 25.6 & 43.08 & 44.07 & 0.04 & 4 \\

1565: IR 07546+3928 & 2120 & 176.9 & 45.39$^a$ & 46.39 & 1.10 & 8 \\

1566: Mrk 141 & 3600 & 65.0 & 43.60 & 44.59 & 0.05 & 3 \\

1567: RXJ 135515+561244 & 1100 & 9.4 & 43.98 & 44.97 & 0.79 & 3 \\

1568: PG 1404+226 & 790 & 7.7 & 44.38 & 44.37 & 2.43 & 5 \\

1569: Mrk 290 & 5320 & 157.3 & 43.69 & 44.68 & 0.02 & 5 \\

1570: Akn 564 & 970 & 4.8 & 43.62 & 44.61 & 0.67 & 4 \\

1571: MR 2251-5125 & 3768 & 240.0 & 44.64 & 45.63 & 0.14 & 6 \\

1572: IRAS F22456-5125 & 3297 & 154.9 & 42.76$^a$ & 45.53 & 0.16 & 6 \\

1573: WPVS 007 & 1502 & 11.5 & 43.59 & 44.58 & 0.27 & 6 \\

1574: RXJ 1230.8+0115 &  &  &  & 45.0 &  0.13 & 9 \\

1575: 

1576: \enddata

1577: \tablenotetext{a}{Mass calculated from H$\beta$ luminosity}

1578: \tablenotetext{b}{1-Peterson et al. 2004, 2-Kaspi et al. 2000, 3-Grupe et al. 2004, 4-Botte et al. 2004, 

1579: 5-Vestergaard et al. 2006 6-This Paper, 7-Xu et al. 2003, 8-Marziani et al. 2003, 9-Ganguly et al. 2003}

1580: \tablenotetext{c}{L$_{Bol}$ = 9.8 $\lambda$L$_{5100}$}

1581: \normalsize

1582: \end{deluxetable}

1583: \thispagestyle{empty}

1584: 

1585: \end{document}

1586: