1: %% Modified 2005 June 21
2: %%
3: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
4: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
5:
6: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
7: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
8: %% any data that comes before this command.
9:
10: %% The command below calls the preprint style
11: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
12: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
13: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
14: %%
15: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
16:
17: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
18:
19: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
20:
21: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
22:
23: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
24:
25: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
26: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
27: %% use the longabstract style option.
28:
29: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
30:
31: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
32: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
33: %% the \begin{document} command.
34: %%
35: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
36: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
37: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
38: %% for information.
39:
40: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
41: \newcommand{\myemail}{dgandolfi@oact.inaf.it}
42:
43: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
44:
45: \slugcomment{The L1615/L1616 PMS population: \today}
46:
47: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
48: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
49: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
50: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
51: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
52: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
53:
54: \shorttitle{The star formation in the L1615/L1616 cometary cloud}
55: \shortauthors{Gandolfi et al.}
56:
57: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
58: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
59:
60: \begin{document}
61:
62: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
63: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
64: %% you desire.
65:
66: \title{The star formation in the L1615/L1616 Cometary Cloud}
67:
68: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
69: %% author and affiliation information.
70: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
71: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
72: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
73: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
74:
75: \author{
76: Davide~Gandolfi\altaffilmark{1,2,3},
77: Juan~M.~Alcal\'a\altaffilmark{2},
78: Silvio~Leccia\altaffilmark{2},
79: Antonio~Frasca\altaffilmark{1},
80: Loredana~Spezzi\altaffilmark{1,2},
81: Elvira~Covino\altaffilmark{2},
82: Leonardo~Testi\altaffilmark{4},
83: Ettore~Marilli\altaffilmark{1},
84: Jouni~Kainulainen\altaffilmark{5}
85: }
86:
87: %%\affil{}
88:
89: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
90: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
91: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
92: %% affiliation.
93:
94: \altaffiltext{1}{INAF, Osservatorio Astrofisico di Catania, Via S. Sofia 78, 95123 Catania, Italy; dgandolfi@oact.inaf.it}
95: \altaffiltext{2}{INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte, Salita Moiariello 16, 80131 Napoli, Italy; jmae@na.astro.it}
96: \altaffiltext{3}{Th\"uringer Landessternwarte Tautenburg, Sternwarte 5, 07778 Tautenburg, Germany; davide@tls-tautenburg.de}
97: \altaffiltext{4}{INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Arcetri, L.go E. Fermi 5, 50125 Firenze, Italy; lt@arcetri.astro.it}
98: \altaffiltext{5}{Observatory, PO Box 14, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland; jouni.kainulainen@helsinki.fi}
99:
100: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
101: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
102: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
103: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
104: %% editorial office after submission.
105:
106: \begin{abstract}
107:
108: The present work aims at performing a comprehensive census and
109: characterisation of the pre-main sequence (PMS) population in
110: the cometary cloud L1615/L1616, in order to assess the significance
111: of the triggered star formation scenario and investigate the impact
112: of massive stars on its star formation history and mass spectrum.
113: Our study is based on $UBVR_CI_C$ and $JHKs$ photometry, as well as
114: optical multi-object spectroscopy. We performed a physical
115: parametrisation of the young stellar population in L1615/L1616.
116: We identified 25 new T~Tauri stars mainly projected on the dense head
117: of the cometary cloud, almost doubling the current number of known members.
118: We studied the spatial distribution of the cloud members as a function
119: of the age and H$\alpha$ emission. The star formation efficiency in
120: the cloud is $\sim$~7--8\,\%, as expected for molecular clouds in the vicinity
121: of OB associations. The slope of the initial mass function (IMF), in
122: the mass range $0.1{\le}M{\le}5.5$~$M_{\odot}$, is consistent with that of
123: other T and OB associations, providing further support of an universal
124: IMF down to the hydrogen burning limit, regardless of environmental
125: conditions. The cometary appearance, as well as the high star formation
126: efficiency, can be explained in terms of triggered star formation induced
127: by the strong UV radiation from OB stars or supernovae shockwaves. The
128: age spread as well as both the spatial and age distribution of the PMS
129: objects provide strong evidence of sequential, multiple events and
130: possibly still ongoing star formation activity in the cloud.
131:
132: \end{abstract}
133:
134: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
135: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
136: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
137: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
138:
139: \keywords{cometary cloud: individual (L1615/L1616) --- dust, extinction ---
140: stars: circumstellar matter --- stars: formation ---
141: stars: fundamental parameters --- stars: pre-main sequence}
142:
143: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
144: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
145: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
146: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
147: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
148: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
149: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
150: %% each reference.
151:
152: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
153: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so by tagging
154: %% their objects with \objectname{} or \object{}. Each macro takes the
155: %% object name as its required argument. The optional, square-bracket
156: %% argument should be used in cases where the data center identification
157: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper. The text appearing
158: %% in curly braces is what will appear in print in the published paper.
159: %% If the object name is recognized by the data centers, it will be linked
160: %% in the electronic edition to the object data available at the data centers
161:
162: \section{Introduction}
163: \label{sec:Intro}
164:
165: The Lynds clouds L1615 and L1616 \citep{Lynds62} are both located
166: at an angular distance of about $6\degr$ West of the Orion OB1
167: associations. These clouds actually form a cometary-shaped single
168: cloud with a ``head-tail'' distribution subtending about $40\arcmin$
169: \citep[5.2~pc assuming a distance of 450~pc;][]{Alcala04} roughly
170: in the East-West direction. The dense head of the cloud complex
171: (i.e. L1616 only), pointing toward East and facing the bright
172: Orion-belt stars, harbours the IRAS Small Scale Structure
173: X0504-034 \citep{Helou88,Ramesh95} and a bright reflection nebula,
174: NGC\,1788 \citep[= DG\,51, Ced\,40, vdB\,33, RNO\,35, LBN\,916;][]{Lynds65},
175: which is illuminated by a small cluster of stars \citep{Stanke02}. The two
176: intermediate-mass stars HD\,293815 and Kiso\,A-0974~15 are the
177: brightest visible members of this cluster.
178:
179: L1615/L1616, like many other cometary clouds off the main Orion
180: star forming regions, clearly shows evidence of ongoing star formation
181: activity which might have been triggered by the strong impact of
182: the UV radiation from the massive, luminous stars in the Orion
183: complex \citep{Maddalena86,Stanke02, Alcala04,Kun04,Lee05,Lee07}.
184: The illumination of dense clumps in molecular clouds by OB stars
185: could be responsible for their collapse and subsequent star formation.
186: The UV radiation from the OB stars may sweep the molecular material
187: of the cloud into a cometary shape with a dense core located at
188: the head of the cometary cloud.
189:
190: The radiation and wind of OB stars may also have an important
191: impact on the mass accretion during the star formation process.
192: While in a T~association a protostar may accumulate a significant
193: fraction of mass, the mass accretion of a low-mass protostar in a
194: region exposed to the wind of OB stars can be terminated earlier
195: because of the photo-evaporation of the circumstellar matter
196: \citep{Kroupa01,Kroupa02}. Therefore, many low-mass protostars may
197: not complete their accretion and hence can result as brown dwarfs
198: (BDs). This mechanism might affect the low-mass end of the initial
199: mass function (IMF). Recent studies have provided some information
200: about the shape of the IMF in the very low-mass and sub-stellar regimes.
201: While the IMF in the Orion Nebula Cluster appears to rise below
202: 0.1 M$_{\odot}$ \citep{Hillenbrand00}, in T~association like
203: Taurus-Auriga and Cha\,II there is some indication of a deficit of
204: sub-stellar objects \citep{Luhman00,Briceno02,Spezzi08}. Other studies
205: of the young cluster IC\,348, which is devoid of very massive stars,
206: have also revealed a deficit of BDs relative to the Orion Nebula
207: Cluster \citep{Preibisch03,Muench03,Lada06}.
208:
209: Because of its vicinity to the Orion OB associations the L1615/L1616
210: cometary cloud constitutes an ideal laboratory to investigate the
211: triggered star formation scenario.
212: The most recent census of the pre-main sequence (PMS) stars in L1616
213: was provided by \citet{Alcala04}, who presented a multi-wavelength
214: study of the region, from X-ray to near-infrared wavelengths. They
215: found 22 new low-mass PMS stars distributed mainly to the East of
216: L1616, in about 1~square degree field. By adding the 22~new PMS stars
217: to the previously confirmed members of the cloud
218: \citep{Cohen79,Sterzik95,Nakano95,Stanke02} and counting the
219: millimeter radio-source, i.e. the Class-0 protostar MMS1A found by
220: \citet{Stanke02}, \citet{Alcala04} ended up with a sample of 33~young
221: stellar objects associated with L1616. However, the latter work could
222: not investigate important aspects of the star formation in this cloud,
223: like the IMF and the impact of environmental conditions on the mass
224: spectrum, because their sample was rather incomplete.
225:
226: Therefore, the aim of the present study is to perform a comprehensive
227: census and characterisation of the PMS population in L1615/L1616,
228: in order to investigate the star formation history, the relevance
229: of the triggered scenario, and to study the IMF.
230: To this aim, we report both optical and near-infrared
231: observations, as well as multi-object optical spectroscopy in
232: L1615/L1616. An important goal of our study is to compare the mass
233: function in L1615/L1616 with that of other T and OB~associations.
234:
235: % This will allow us to further investigate whether the environmental
236: % star-forming conditions could have an impact on the IMF in the very-low
237: % mass domain.
238:
239: The outline of the paper is as follows: we describe our observations
240: and data reduction in Section~\ref{sec:PhotObs} and \ref{sec:Spec-Obs};
241: the results are reported in Section~\ref{sec:PMS-Ident}, while the data
242: analysis and the physical proprieties of the new PMS stars are presented
243: in Section~\ref{sec:Data analysis}. Our discussion and conclusions are
244: developed in Section~\ref{sec:Discussion}. Some details on the
245: spectral-type classification as well as reddening, radius, and
246: luminosity determination are given in the Appendix~\ref{App-A} and
247: \ref{App-B}, respectively.
248:
249: \section{Photometry}
250: \label{sec:PhotObs}
251:
252: \subsection{Optical}
253: \label{sec:OptPhot}
254:
255: %% In a manner similar to \objectname authors can provide links to dataset
256: %% hosted at participating data centers via the \dataset{} command. The
257: %% second curly bracket argument is printed in the text while the first
258: %% parentheses argument serves as the valid data set identifier. Large
259: %% lists of data set are best provided in a table (see Table 3 for an example).
260: %% Valid data set identifiers should be obtained from the data center that
261: %% is currently hosting the data.
262:
263: Most of the optical photometry comes from previous $B$, $V$,
264: $R_C$ and $I_C$ broad-band imaging observations performed
265: by \citet{Alcala04}, who obtained CCD mosaic images with the
266: Wide Field Imager (WFI) camera at the ESO/MPIA 2.2\,m telescope
267: (La Silla Observatory, Chile, program No. 64.I-0355), covering
268: a sky-area of about $36{\arcmin}\times34{\arcmin}$ around
269: NGC\,1788. The pre-reduction of the raw images, as well as the
270: astrometric and photometric calibration have been already discussed
271: in \citet{Alcala04}. In order to improve the photometry of the
272: blended sources, we carried out point spread function fitting
273: photometry on the images using the DAOPHOT package \citep{Stetson87}
274: under the IRAF\footnote{IRAF is distributed by the National Optical
275: Astronomy Observatory, which is operated by the Association of the
276: Universities for Research in Astronomy, inc. (AURA) under
277: cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation.}
278: environment.
279:
280: %%%%%%%%Serra La Nave Photometric Observations%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
281: Further photometric observations of six previously known members of
282: L1615/L1616 \citep{Alcala04}, still lacking optical photometry and
283: falling outside the sky-area covered by WFI, were carried out in
284: November 17th and 18th, 2006 with the 91\,cm telescope at Catania
285: Astrophysical Observatory (OAC). The observations were performed in
286: the Johnson $UBV$ standard system under photometric sky conditions,
287: by using a photon-counting single-head photometer equipped with an
288: EMI\,9893QA/350 photomultiplier. In order to determine the
289: transformation coefficients to the Johnson standard system, several
290: standard stars selected from the General Catalogue of Photometric
291: Data \citep[GCPD,][]{Mermilliod97} and from \citet{Landolt92} were
292: also observed in between the targets observations. The observing
293: set-up and the data reduction were the standard ones already adopted during
294: previous observational campaigns of low-mass stars
295: \citep[see, e.g.,][]{Marilli07}.
296:
297: \subsection{Near-infrared}
298: \label{sec:NIRPhot}
299:
300: Near-infrared $J$, $H$ and $Ks$ photometry of a
301: $\sim30{\arcmin}\times30{\arcmin}$ region centered on NGC\,1788 was
302: obtained using the SOFI camera at the ESO NTT telescope
303: (program No. 70.C-0629) on December 17th, 2002 and January 16th, 2003.
304: 36 pointings of the $5{\arcmin}\times5{\arcmin}$ field
305: of view were required to cover the field in each band.
306: Several dithered exposures were obtained for a total integration time per
307: pointing of 80 seconds in the $J$ band and $180$ seconds in the $H$ and
308: $Ks$ bands. The data were corrected for electronic crosstalk,
309: differential flat fielding, and illumination following standard
310: SOFI procedures under IRAF.
311:
312: Photometric calibration was obtained observing a set of standard stars
313: from the list of \citet{Persson98} (Las Campanas Observatory standards).
314: Source extraction and aperture photometry were performed using the
315: SExtractor software package \citep{Bertin96}; aperture corrections were
316: estimated from sources away from crowded regions and applied to all
317: extracted sources. The limiting magnitudes at 3$\sigma$ level achieved
318: in our survey are 19, 18 and 17.5 mag at $J$, $H$, and $Ks$, respectively.
319:
320:
321: \section{Spectroscopy}
322: \label{sec:Spec-Obs}
323:
324: Based on $I_C$ versus $(R_C-I_C)$ colour-magnitude diagram and
325: theoretical isochrones from \citet{Baraffe98}, \citet{Alcala04}
326: selected a sample of about 200 PMS star and BD candidates in L1615/L1616,
327: by using the spectroscopically confirmed young low-mass stars to define
328: the PMS locus, as shown in their Figure\,12. In addition
329: to this sample, 8 X-ray emitting stars detected by the
330: ROSAT All-Sky Survey (RASS), as well as mid-infrared sources
331: \citep{Stanke02} and H$\alpha$ emission-line objects \citep{Nakano95},
332: were also selected as further PMS star candidates by \citet{Alcala04}.
333: We performed the spectroscopic follow-up of about 70\,\% of the candidates
334: in this sample, down to $I_C\approx19$~mag, in order to definitively
335: assess their nature and single out the young objects. Additionally,
336: about 30\,\% of field stars with $I_C\lesssim20.0$~mag was also observed
337: in order to detect possible ``veiled" PMS stars which might have escaped
338: the selection criterion (see later Figure~\ref{Fig:isoc_Bes}).
339:
340: Intermediate- and low-resolution spectra were acquired during different
341: runs at the ESO Very Large Telescope (VLT; Paranal Observatory, Chile),
342: by using the FOcal Reducer and low-dispersion Spectrograph 2
343: \citep[FORS2;][]{Appenzeller98} and the VIsible Multi-Object
344: Spectrograph \citep[VIMOS;][]{LeFevre03}. Multi-object
345: intermediate-resolution spectroscopy was also performed with the Fibre
346: Large Area Multi-Element Spectrograph \citep[FLAMES;][]{Pasquini02},
347: but these observations will be described in more detail in a forthcoming
348: paper. The journal of the FORS2 and VIMOS observations is given in
349: Table~\ref{Tab:Spec-Log}. The distribution on the sky of the area covered
350: by the FORS2, VIMOS, and FLAMES spectroscopic follow-ups is shown in
351: Figure~\ref{Fig:SpecSurvey}. In the following sub-sections a brief
352: description of the spectroscopic observations and data reduction is
353: presented.
354:
355: \clearpage
356: \begin{figure}
357: \centering
358: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[draft=false]{f1.eps}}%[height=6in,width=6in]
359: %\includegraphics[height=5.7in,width=5.8in]{./Images/L1616_RaDec_flag_Ha.ps}
360: \caption{Sky areas surveyed by the FORS2 (continuous lines), VIMOS
361: (dashed lines), and FLAMES (dotted lines) spectroscopic
362: follow-ups overlaid on the IRAS $100~\mu$m dust emission
363: map covering a sky-area of about $1^\circ\times1^\circ$
364: around L1615/L1616. Note that the gaps of about $2\arcmin$
365: between the four VIMOS quadrants are not reproduced in
366: the figure.}
367: \label{Fig:SpecSurvey}
368: \end{figure}
369: \clearpage
370:
371: \subsection{FORS2 observations}
372: \label{sec:FORS2-Obs}
373:
374: Intermediate-resolution ($\lambda$/$\Delta\lambda$=$2140$) FORS2
375: spectra of the PMS candidates mainly projected on the NGC\,1788
376: reflection nebula were collected in service mode (ESO program
377: No. 70.C-0536) on the nights 7, 22, 25 February and 8 March 2003,
378: under mostly clear and stable weather conditions, with seeing
379: typically in the range $0{\farcs}8-1{\farcs}0$. These observations
380: were performed setting the spectrograph in the multi-object
381: spectroscopy mode. A total of 5 mask configurations, each
382: including 18--19 objects, were observed. Three consecutive spectra
383: of 960~sec were obtained for each mask configuration in order to
384: remove cosmic-ray hits and improve the signal to noise (S/N) ratio. Bias,
385: flat-spectrum lamp, and Ar/He/Ne lamp exposures for each mask were
386: taken in daytime according to the FORS2 standard calibration plan.
387: The typical S/N ratio for a $I_C\approx16$~mag star was on the order of 90.
388:
389: The standard data reduction process was carried out with a
390: semi-automatic pipeline that we have developed on the basis of both
391: MIDAS\footnote{MIDAS is developed and maintained by ESO.}
392: \citep{Warmels91} and IRAF package. The reduction includes bias
393: subtraction, flat-field division, wavelength calibration, sky
394: subtraction and one-dimensional spectra extraction. Relative flux
395: calibration was achieved observing five spectrophotometric standard
396: stars from \citet{Hamuy92,Hamuy94}.
397:
398: \subsection{VIMOS observations}
399: \label{sec:VIMOS-Obs}
400:
401: The VIMOS observations were performed in service mode (ESO program
402: No. 074.C-0111) during the period from 9 December 2004 to 12 March
403: 2005. The weather conditions were photometric with seeing varying
404: between $0{\farcs}6$ and $1{\farcs}2$. The larger sky-area covered
405: with VIMOS allowed us to extend the spectroscopic survey in a wider
406: region around the NGC\,1788 reflection nebula\footnote{Note, however,
407: that the gaps of about $2{\arcmin}$ between the four VIMOS quadrants
408: prevented us from performing a uniform coverage.}. Furthermore, we
409: carried out both intermediate- ($\lambda$/$\Delta\lambda$=$2500$) and
410: low-resolution ($\lambda$/$\Delta\lambda$=$580$) spectroscopy, in
411: order to detect the Li\,{\sc i} $\lambda$6708~{\AA} absorption line
412: and measure its equivalent width, as well as to obtain a wider
413: wavelength range for spectral type classification purpose (see
414: Section~\ref{sec:Spec-Type-Class}).
415:
416: A total of 3 intermediate- and 6 low-resolution mask configurations,
417: each including an average number of about 100 targets,
418: were observed. To efficiently pursue our programme and maximise the
419: number of observed fields, only one exposure of 900 sec and one of
420: 2000 sec were obtained for each low- and intermediate-resolution
421: mask configuration, respectively.
422: The typical S/N ratio at $I_C\approx16$~mag was about 80 and 180
423: for the intermediate- and low-resolution spectra, respectively.
424: %For the low-resolution spectra we found that a single exposure of
425: %900 sec was a good compromise between reaching an adequate S/N
426: %ratio and avoiding a high contamination of cosmic ray hits.
427:
428: Five spectrophotometric standard stars from \citet{Oke90} and
429: \citet{Hamuy92,Hamuy94} were observed to perform the absolute flux
430: calibrations. Bias and flat field frames as well as wavelength
431: calibration exposures were acquired during daytime, following
432: the service mode VIMOS calibration plan.
433:
434: The VIMOS spectra were automatically reduced by using the ESO
435: pipeline, full details of which are given by \citet{Izzo04}. In
436: order to check the reliability of the data reduction, the spectra
437: were also independently processed by using the VIMOS Interactive
438: Pipeline Graphical Interface \citep[VIPGI;][]{Scodeggio05},
439: obtaining consistent results.
440:
441: \subsection{FLAMES-GIRAFFE observations}
442: \label{sec:FLAMES-Obs}
443:
444: The FLAMES-GIRAFFE observations were performed in visitor mode
445: (ESO program No. 076.C-0385) during the nights 28 February 2006
446: and 1, 2 March 2006, under good seeing conditions
447: ($0{\farcs}7-1{\farcs}0$), setting the spectrograph in the MEDUSA
448: configuration. The low-resolution grating LR06 was used in
449: conjunction with an order separating filter and a slit width of
450: $1{\arcsec}$. The adopted configuration yielded a spectral coverage
451: of about 750~{\AA} (6438--7184~{\AA}) with a mean resolving power
452: $\lambda$/$\Delta\lambda$=$8600$.
453:
454: Since these observations are part of a separate study on radial
455: velocities in L1615/L1616, these data will be described in more
456: detail in a future paper. Here we have used the FLAMES spectra
457: of only three objects, namely TTS\,050644.4$-$032913,
458: RX\,J0507.3$-$0326, and TTS\,050741.0$-$032253
459: (see Table~\ref{Tab:List-PMS}), for which both FORS2 and VIMOS
460: observations are missing.
461:
462: \section{PMS objects in L1615/L1616}
463: \label{sec:PMS-Ident}
464:
465: Since lithium is rapidly destroyed in the convective layers of low-mass
466: stars in the early phases of their stellar evolution \citep{Bodenheimer65},
467: the presence of strong Li\,{\sc i} $\lambda$6708~{\AA} absorption line
468: has been considered as the primary criterion for definitely assessing
469: the PMS nature of the observed stars. The H$\alpha$ emission has been
470: used as further indicator of youth, though its presence alone
471: does not guarantee the PMS nature of the observed object.
472: %In first instance, the presence of H$\alpha$ emission line has not
473: %been considered by itself as criterion for establishing the PMS
474: %nature of the objects, but only as further signature confirming
475: %their youth, especially for classical T Tauri stars (CTTSs).
476: Therefore, all the K and M stars with H$\alpha$ in emission but lacking
477: the Li\,{\sc i} absorption line have been rejected and classified as
478: older dKe and dMe field stars projected onto L1615/L1616.
479:
480: In addition to the above criteria, the presence of forbidden
481: emission lines, as well as non-photospheric UV and infrared continuum
482: excesses (as evidence of bipolar jets, accretion columns, and
483: circumstellar disk, respectively) have yielded further arguments
484: on the PMS nature of the young stars identified in L1615/L1616.
485:
486: Based on these criteria, we have identified 25 new PMS stars with
487: spectral type later than about K1. By adding these sources to the previously
488: reported PMS objects \citep{Alcala04}, the number of optically detected
489: young stars known so far in L1615/L1616 rises to 56 objects\footnote{Note
490: that the star Kiso\,A-0974~17 \citep{Nakano95,Alcala04} has been
491: excluded from our list of PMS objects (see below).}.
492: The full sample is listed in Table~\ref{Tab:List-PMS}; coordinates
493: are those from the 2\,Micron All Sky Survey \citep[2MASS;][]{Cutri03}
494: point source catalogue, which have a precision of about $0{\farcs}1$.
495: All the PMS stars revealed by our spectroscopic follow-up,
496: but not detected in previous X-ray and H$\alpha$ surveys, have been
497: designated with ``TTS'' followed by their position, according to the
498: IAU convention. By adding the millimeter Class-0 protostar discovered
499: by \citet{Stanke02}, which is not reported in Table~\ref{Tab:List-PMS}, the
500: young population of L1615/L1616 increases to 57. Thus, our spectroscopic
501: survey almost has doubled the number of confirmed PMS objects associated
502: to L1615/L1616. Some examples of FORS2 and VIMOS spectra are shown in
503: Figure~\ref{Fig:Spectra}.
504: %Figures showing the whole set of spectra are
505: %included in the electronically available appendix.
506:
507: In total, 4 out of the 8 X-ray emitting sources listed by
508: \citet{Alcala04}, namely RX\,J0506.8$-$0305, RX\,J0507.4$-$0317,
509: RX\,J0507.6$-$0318, and RX\,J0507.3$-$0326, have been spectroscopically
510: confirmed as PMS stars; the other X-ray sources (RX\,J0506.5$-$0320,\\
511: RX\,J0506.4$-$0323, RX\,J0506.4$-$0328W, and RX\,J0506.4$-$0328E)
512: turned out to be field active stars. Note that lithium has been
513: detected for the first time in the spectrum of the mid-infrared
514: source L1616\,MIR4 \citep{Stanke02}.
515:
516: The S/N ratio of the spectra of the faint sources
517: TTS\,050654.5$-$032046 and\\
518: TTS\,050730.9$-$031846 turned out
519: to be insufficient for a reliable measurement of their Li\,{\sc i}
520: equivalent width. Nevertheless, the presence of a broad and strong
521: H$\alpha$ emission in both spectra (Table~\ref{Tab:SpT-W})
522: can not be explained by chromospheric activity only and is typical
523: of classical T Tauri stars. Indeed, according to the definition
524: by \citet{White03}, the upper limit on the H$\alpha$ equivalent width
525: for chromospheric activity, in the spectral range M3--M5.5, is $40$~\AA.
526: TTS\,050654.5$-$032046 and TTS\,050730.9$-$031846 have spectral type
527: M4 and M5.5 and equivalent width $60$~\AA~ and $290$~\AA, respectively;
528: thus, they are clearly accretors.
529:
530: The star Kiso\,A-0974~17 was first classified as a H$\alpha$
531: emission-line object by \citet{Nakano95}. Although \citet{Alcala04}
532: did not obtain any spectrum of this source, they included it in
533: their list of PMS stars. We observed this object during the
534: FLAMES spectroscopic run. Neither H$\alpha$ emission nor
535: Li\,{\sc i} absorption line were observed in its spectrum.
536: This could be due to a mismatch between the H$\alpha$
537: emission source and the optical counterpart detected by
538: \citet{Nakano95}. Thus we excluded this object from our list
539: of PMS stars.
540:
541: The optical ($UBVR_CI_C$) and near-infrared ($JHKs$) magnitudes
542: of the 56 optically confirmed PMS stars in L1615/L1616 is
543: presented in Table~\ref{Tab:phot}. Some of the objects
544: lack WFI, OAC, and/or SOFI photometry because they fall outside
545: the sky-area covered by our survey, are saturated in our images
546: or are too faint to be observed with the 91\,cm telescope at
547: the OAC observatory. Nevertheless, for these stars we
548: retrieved $I_C$ magnitudes from the TASS Mark IV photometric
549: survey \citep{Droege06}, $I_CJ$ magnitudes from the DEep
550: Near-Infrared Survey \citep[DENIS;][]{Epchtein97}, and $JHKs$
551: photometry from the 2MASS point source catalogue. Both the SOFI
552: and DENIS NIR magnitudes were homogenised to the 2MASS photometric
553: system using the transformation equations provided by
554: \citet{Carpenter01}. For a few sources, we used the optical photometry
555: from the literature \citep{Lee68,Mundt80,Taylor89,Alcala96,Cieslinski97,
556: Frasca03,Vieira03} as explained in the footnotes of Table~\ref{Tab:phot}.
557:
558: \clearpage
559: \begin{figure}
560: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[draft=false]{f2.eps}}
561: \caption{VIMOS and FORS2 spectra of three PMS objects in L1615/L1616,
562: namely TTS\,050650.7-032008, TTS\,050733.6-032517, and
563: RX\,J0507.6-0318. The spectra have been arbitrarily normalised to
564: the flux at 6760~{\AA}. For each object the whole observed spectrum
565: is shown in the left panel. The spectral range encompassing the
566: H$\alpha$ and Li\,{\sc i} $\lambda$6708~{\AA} lines is plotted in
567: more detail in the right panel.}
568: \label{Fig:Spectra}
569: \end{figure}
570: \clearpage
571:
572: \section{Data analysis}
573: \label{sec:Data analysis}
574:
575: \subsection{H$\alpha$ and Li\,{\sc i} equivalent widths}
576: \label{sec:Equivalent-Widths}
577:
578: H$\alpha $ and Li\,{\sc i} $\lambda$6708~{\AA} line equivalent
579: widths, W(H$\alpha$) and W(Li), respectively, were determined
580: by direct integration of the line profiles, as described in
581: \citet{Alcala04} and \citet{Spezzi08}, adopting the convention that
582: a negative equivalent width means an emission line. The main
583: source of error on these measurements comes from the uncertainty
584: in the placement of the photospheric continuum, especially for
585: stars later than M1, whose spectra are strongly affected by
586: molecular absorption bands. W(H$\alpha$) and W(Li) for the
587: L1615/L1616 members are reported in the third and fourth
588: columns of Table~\ref{Tab:SpT-W}, respectively.
589:
590: According to the intensity of the H$\alpha$ emission line and the
591: definitions by \citet{White03}, we assigned the classical
592: (CTTS) or weak (WTTS) T Tauri star classification to the PMS
593: objects in L1615/L1616 (Table~\ref{Tab:SpT-W}).
594:
595: The additional emission lines observed in the spectra, including
596: the lines of He\,{\sc i} $\lambda$5876, $\lambda$6678.7 and
597: $\lambda$7065.2~{\AA}, and Na\,{\sc i} $\lambda$5889.9 and
598: $\lambda$5895.9~{\AA}, as well as the forbidden lines of
599: [N\,{\sc ii}] $\lambda$6583.5~{\AA}, [O\,{\sc i}] $\lambda$6300.3
600: and $\lambda$6363.8~{\AA}, and [S\,{\sc ii}] $\lambda$6716.4 and
601: $\lambda$6730.8~{\AA}, are also reported in Table~\ref{Tab:SpT-W}.
602: Note that almost only those PMS stars classified as CTTSs show
603: forbidden emission lines in their spectra.
604:
605: \subsection{Spectral types and effective temperatures}
606: \label{sec:Spec-Type-Class}
607:
608: Spectral types were determined using a modified version of
609: ROTFIT, a code for spectral type and $v\sin i$ determination
610: developed by \citet{Frasca03,Frasca06} under the
611: IDL\footnote{IDL is distributed by ITT Visual Information
612: Solutions, Boulder, Colorado.} environment. The general idea of
613: the method, already adopted in \citet{Alcala06} and
614: \citet{Spezzi08}, is to recover the spectral type of a star by
615: comparing its spectrum with a suitable grid of templates,
616: taking into account the amount of extinction along the line of
617: sight. Since our spectra are flux calibrated, the method allowed
618: us to get a rough estimate of the extinction ($A_{\mathrm V}$)
619: along the line of sight to the star.
620:
621: To this aim, a library of relative flux calibrated and
622: extinction-corrected templates, with a wavelength coverage
623: encompassing that of the observed spectra, is needed. A suitable
624: grid of intermediate-resolution ($R\approx1000-5000$) templates
625: has been obtained by collecting spectra of dwarf and giant
626: stars from the libraries provided by
627: \citet{Martin99}, %($R\sim700$),
628: \citet{Hawley02}, %($R\sim1500$),
629: \citet{LeBorgne03}, %($R\sim2000$),
630: \citet{Valdes04}, %($R\sim3500$),
631: and \citet{Bochanski07}. %($R\sim1800$).
632: %All these templates are intermediate resolution spectra in the
633: %range $R\approx1000-3000$.
634:
635: In performing the spectral type classification, we first took
636: into account the PMS nature of the stars we were dealing with.
637: Due to the presence of TiO and VO absorption bands which are
638: strongly sensitive to the surface gravity \citep{Torres-Dodgen93},
639: most of M-type PMS objects show optical spectroscopic features
640: that can be closely reproduced averaging dwarf and giant spectra
641: with the same spectral type \citep{Luhman99,Luhman03,Guieu06}.
642: Though the spectra of G-type and K-type PMS stars have been usually
643: compared with template of normal dwarf stars in several works
644: \citep[e.g.][]{Basri90}, we found that also the
645: late K-type objects in our sample are best represented by using an
646: average of dwarf and giant templates of the same spectral type.
647: Indeed TiO and VO absorption molecular bands are still present
648: in late K-type stars, although they are very weak.
649:
650: Thus, both late-type dwarf and giant templates were included in our
651: grid of reference spectra; moreover, for spectral types later or equal
652: than K5, we also built up an \emph{ad hoc} grid of templates by averaging
653: dwarf and giant spectra of the same spectral sub-class. Furthermore,
654: starting from spectral types later than K7, we constructed templates
655: for the half sub-classes (e.g. K8.5, M0.5, M1.5, etc.) by averaging
656: the two contiguous spectra. Indeed, the intensity of the absorption
657: molecular bands characterising late-type stars displays a rather
658: strong variation from one spectral sub-class to the other, allowing
659: to appreciate differences of half a sub-class. Some details on
660: the spectra fitting procedure is provided in
661: Appendix~\ref{App-A}.
662:
663: The spectral types of the PMS objects in our sample are reported in
664: the second column of Table~\ref{Tab:SpT-W}. From an inspection of the
665: residuals of the fitting procedure we have estimated an accuracy
666: of about $\pm\,1$ sub-class for stars earlier than K7 and about
667: $\pm\,0.5$ sub-class for cooler objects. A typical uncertainty on
668: $A_{\mathrm V}$ of $\pm\,0.2$~mag was found. For all the objects
669: observed at least twice, with different spectrographs and/or resolving
670: powers, we obtained consistent results, regardless of spectral
671: resolution and wavelength coverage.
672: For the sake of homogeneity, we re-determined the spectral types also
673: for the previously known low-mass members, by using the spectra from
674: \citet{Alcala04}. A general agreement within one/two spectral
675: sub-classes was found between our classification and the one
676: reported in the literature \citep{Cohen79,Alcala04}.
677:
678: For the two early-type stars HD\,293815 and Kiso\,A-0974~15,
679: we have adopted the spectral types from \citet{Sharpless52}
680: and \citet{Vieira03}, respectively. Both stars were
681: spectroscopically observed by us, but many photospheric features
682: suitable for an accurate early-type classification were not covered
683: in our spectra. Nevertheless, we attempted a spectral type estimate
684: for both stars by applying the \citet{Hernandez04}'s criteria. The
685: main features we used are the He\,{\sc i} $\lambda$5876 and
686: $\lambda$7065.2~{\AA} absorption lines. The results are consistent
687: with those reported by \citet{Sharpless52} and \citet{Vieira03}.
688: % %, based on the measurement of the equivalent width of suitable
689: % %photospheric features which are sensitive to changes in effective
690: % %temperature ($T_\mathrm{eff}$).
691:
692: In line with our spectral type classification, the effective temperature
693: ($T_\mathrm{eff}$) of each PMS star was assigned on the basis of the
694: following criteria: the dwarf temperature scale
695: from the compilation of \citet{KenyonHartmann95} was adopted for all
696: the objects with spectral type earlier or equal to K4;
697: for later spectral types an intermediate temperature
698: scale was derived by averaging the giant compilation provided by
699: \citet{vanBelle99} with the dwarf one from \citet{KenyonHartmann95}
700: for K0-M0 and from \citet{Leggett96} for M1-M7 spectral types, respectively.
701: The $T_\mathrm{eff}$ values corresponding to the half spectral
702: sub-classes were computed by linear interpolation.
703: The effective temperatures assigned to each PMS object are reported
704: in the second column of Table~\ref{Tab:Param}. In assessing the errors
705: on $T_\mathrm{eff}$ the uncertainty on the spectral type classification
706: was taken into account.
707:
708: \subsection{Extinction, stellar radii, and luminosities}
709: \label{sec:IntExt-Rad-Lum}
710:
711: The method we used for computing %interstellar/circumstellar
712: extinction, stellar radii, and luminosities follows the general
713: guidelines described in \citet{Romaniello02,Romaniello06},
714: although we modified their scheme to match our purposes.
715: The eight broad-band magnitudes available for the L1615/L1616
716: PMS population allowed us to construct the spectral energy
717: distribution (SED) of each PMS star covering a wide spectral
718: range, from optical to near-infrared wavelengths
719: (see Table~\ref{Tab:abs-flux-calib}). By using simultaneously
720: all the photospheric colours encompassed by the SED, we
721: computed for each object both the interstellar extinction
722: ($A_{\mathrm V}$) and the ratio of total-to-selective extinction
723: ($R_{\mathrm V}=A_{\mathrm V}/E_{\mathrm {B-V}}$), as well as
724: the stellar radius ($R_{\star}$) and luminosity ($L_{\star}$).
725:
726: Apart for eventual ultraviolet and infrared excesses caused by
727: the presence of an interacting accretion disk around the PMS
728: star and by the related boundary layer, or hot accretion spots,
729: the shape of the observed SED is mostly determined by the
730: effective temperature of the object, the amount of dust along
731: the line of sight, and the dust-grain mean size in the
732: interstellar/cicumstellar environment.
733: Therefore, once the effective temperature is known, both the
734: value of $A_{\mathrm V}$ and $R_{\mathrm V}$ may be recovered
735: simultaneously by fitting the observed SED with a grid of
736: theoretical ones. Indeed, both the star radius and distance
737: cause just a rigid shift of the flux on a logarithmic scale,
738: without affecting the shape of the SED. Theoretical SEDs may
739: be obtained by using stellar atmosphere models with the same
740: effective temperature as the star and reddened by various
741: amount of $A_{\mathrm V}$ and $R_{\mathrm V}$.
742:
743: A detailed description of the SED fitting procedure is
744: reported in Appendix~\ref{App-B}. Here we want to stress
745: that, our two-parameter fitting procedure can be applied
746: only to the objects which are significantly affected by
747: extinction, i.e to the stars which are still deeply embedded
748: in their parent cloud. Indeed, for slightly reddened stars the
749: value of $A_{\mathrm V}$ is relatively insensitive to changes
750: in the slope of the reddening law ($R_{\mathrm V}$), as shown
751: in Appendix~\ref{App-B}. Therefore, for all the objects for
752: which $A_{\mathrm V}$ turned out to be less than about 0.5 mag
753: we reiterated the fitting procedure fixing $R_{\mathrm V}$ to
754: the standard value of 3.1. The same assumption was adopted
755: for all the objects lacking optical photometry and
756: for the veiled star TTS\,050649.8$-$032104.
757:
758: The values of $A_{\mathrm V}$, $R_{\mathrm V}$, $R_{\star}$,
759: and $L_{\star}$ are listed in Table~\ref{Tab:Param}.
760: For all the objects spectroscopically observed in this work,
761: we found that the value of $A_{\mathrm V}$ derived from the SED
762: fitting procedure is in agreement, within $\sim0.2$~mag, with
763: the one obtained from the spectral type classification.
764:
765: $R_{\mathrm V}$ was derived for 15 out of the 56 PMS stars in
766: L1615/L1616 (Table~\ref{Tab:Param}). We found a weighted mean
767: value of $3.32\pm0.04$, closely matching the standard
768: one of 3.1, typical of the diffuse interstellar medium.
769: For the Herbig star Kiso\,A-0974~15 we obtained a value of
770: $R_{\mathrm V}=5.5$ (see Table~\ref{Tab:Param}). This may
771: be related to the presence of dust grains around the
772: intermediate-mass star which are larger in size than those
773: characteristic of the interstellar medium, as already found
774: by different authors in large samples of HAeBe stars
775: \citep{The81, Herbst82, Waters98, Whittet01, Hernandez04}.
776:
777: \subsection{Masses and Ages}
778: \label{sec:Masses-Ages}
779:
780: The mass and age of each member of L1615/L1616 have been derived by
781: comparing the location of the object on the H-R diagram with the
782: theoretical PMS evolutionary tracks by \citet{Baraffe98} \&
783: \citet{Chabrier00}, \citet{Dantona97}, and \citet{Palla99}
784: (Figure~\ref{HR}).
785:
786: Since stellar evolutionary models are still rather uncertain,
787: particularly in the low-mass star and sub-stellar regimes
788: \citep[$M<0.5 M_{\odot}$,][]{Baraffe02}, the use of different
789: evolutionary tracks allowed us to estimate the model-dependent
790: uncertainties associated with the derived stellar parameters.
791:
792: Table~\ref{Tab:mass_age} lists masses and ages of the
793: L1615/L1616 members as inferred by the three sets of models.
794: Note that the evolutionary tracks by \citet{Baraffe98} \&
795: \citet{Chabrier00}, \citet{Dantona97}, and \citet{Palla99} are
796: available in the mass range $0.003\leq M \leq 1.40$~$M_{\odot}$,
797: $0.017\leq M \leq 3$~$M_{\odot}$, and $0.1\leq M \leq 6$~$M_{\odot}$,
798: respectively. Note also that isochrones by \citet{Baraffe98}
799: \& \citet{Chabrier00} are available only for ages greater or
800: equal than 1~Myr.
801:
802: \clearpage
803: \begin{figure}
804: \centering
805: %\includegraphics[height=8in,width=5.5in]{./Images/L1616_HR.ps}
806: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[draft=false]{f3.eps}}
807: \caption{H-R diagram for the young population in L1615/L1616; the PMS
808: evolutionary tracks by \citet{Baraffe98} \& \citet{Chabrier00}
809: (upper panel), \citet{Dantona97} (central panel), and \citet{Palla99}
810: (lower panel) are over-plotted. The H-R diagram for the intermediate-mass
811: members of L1615/L1616, namely HD\,293815 and Kiso\,A-0974~15, is shown
812: in the inset of the lower panel.}
813: \label{HR}
814: \end{figure}
815: \clearpage
816:
817:
818: \section{Discussion}
819: \label{sec:Discussion}
820:
821: Once the physical parameters of the PMS objects are known, we can
822: study the star formation in L1615/L1616. In the next sub-sections
823: we discuss the history, rate and efficiency of star formation,
824: and some issues related to the mass-spectrum.
825:
826: \subsection{The star formation history}
827: \label{sec:Star-Form-Hist}
828:
829: \clearpage
830: \begin{figure*}
831: \centering
832: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[draft=false]{f4.eps}}%[height=6in,width=6in]
833: %\includegraphics[height=5.7in,width=5.8in]{./Images/L1616_RaDec_flag_Ha.ps}
834: \caption{IRAS 100$\mu$m dust emission map covering a sky-area of $5^\circ\times5^\circ$ around L1615/L1616
835: (left panel). The Classical and Weak T Tauri stars are represented with filled dots and
836: squares, respectively. The upper arrow shows the direction to the Orion OB1 associations, located
837: at about 7.5$^\circ$ ($\sim60$ pc at a distance of 450 pc) to the North-East of L1615/L1616. The
838: lower arrow points toward the Orion A Giant Molecular Cloud, also located at about 7.5$^\circ$ to
839: the South-East of L1615/L1616. The dashed square defines the area surveyed with WFI. This region is
840: zoomed in the right panel, where the two intermediate-mass members HD\,293815 and Kiso\,A-0974~15
841: are marked with five-pointed star symbols.}
842: \label{Fig:IRAS-Image}
843: \end{figure*}
844: \clearpage
845:
846: Based on the most complete census of the L1615/L1616's population
847: performed in this work, we further investigated the triggered star
848: formation scenario suggested by \citet{Ramesh95}, \citet{Stanke02},
849: and \citet{Alcala04}.
850:
851: In left panel of Figure~\ref{Fig:IRAS-Image} the IRAS~100~$\mu$m
852: dust emission map of a $5^\circ\times5^\circ$ sky-area around
853: L1615/L1616 is shown. About $64$\,\% of the CTTSs are clustered,
854: in the densest part of L1615/L1616, i.e.~within the boundaries of
855: the NGC\,1788 reflection nebula and to the West of the bright rim
856: of the cloud (Figure~\ref{Fig:IRAS-Image}, right panel). Such rim
857: is located to the East of NGC\,1788, at $\sim6.5{\arcmin}$ from the
858: head of the cometary cloud (about 0.85 pc at a distance of 450 pc)
859: and it is directly exposed to the UV radiation from the Orion OB
860: stars. On the other hand, the WTTSs are more scattered (only $\sim22$\,\%
861: is projected on NGC\,1788) and mainly occupy the side of the cloud
862: facing the OB1 associations and to the East of the bright rim.
863:
864: By applying the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to the WTTS and CTTS age
865: distributions we found that the two populations are similar at a
866: confidence level of $\sim 80$~\%. Thus, it seems there are no
867: age differences between CTTSs and WTTSs in our PMS sample.
868: This result is consistent with previous PMS populations studies
869: \citep[see][and reference therein]{Feigelson99}; CTTSs are predicted to
870: have ages between about 0.5 and 3 Myr, although some stars retain CTTS
871: characteristics even at ages as old as 20~Myr. On the other hand, many
872: WTTSs occupy the same region on the H-R diagram as CTTSs do, whereas
873: some of them are approaching the zero-age main sequence.
874:
875: The age distribution of the L1615/L1616 population peaks between
876: 1 and 3 Myr, depending on the adopted evolutionary tracks
877: (Figure~\ref{Fig:Hist_Ages_Masses}, right panels). This is in agreement
878: with the findings by \citet{Alcala04}, but the age spread found by us
879: is significantly higher than what these authors claim, exceeding the
880: value expected on the basis of the uncertainties on luminosity and
881: temperature. The L1615/L1616 members span a wide range in age, from less
882: than 0.1~Myr up to about 30~Myr. This might suggest multiple events of
883: star formation in the cloud, which would further support the hypothesis
884: of triggered star formation.
885:
886: In order to investigate a possible age difference between ``on-cloud''
887: and ``off-cloud'' PMS objects, we divided the sample in two groups,
888: fixing as dividing line the bright rim of the cloud.
889: Twenty of 56 objects in our sample are located within the
890: boundaries of NGC\,1788, i.e. to the West of the bright rim, while
891: 36 are off-cloud members. The age distributions of the two groups
892: are shown in Figure~\ref{Compare_Age}. The on-cloud PMS stars are
893: statistically younger than those located to the East of the bright rim,
894: regardless of the adopted evolutionary tracks. Applying a Kolmogorov-Smirnov
895: test we found that the probability that the two sets are sub-sample
896: of the same statistical population is very low; in particular, we
897: found confidence levels of 1.29, 0.18, and 0.19\,\% when using the
898: PMS evolutionary tracks by \citet{Baraffe98} \& \citet{Chabrier00},
899: \citet{Dantona97}, and \citet{Palla99}, respectively. We thus concluded
900: that there is a clear age difference between the two groups of stars.
901:
902: The above findings further support the scenario of triggered star
903: formation in L1615/L1616, as proposed by \citet{Stanke02}.
904: In this context, the spatial dispersion and older age of the ``off-cloud''
905: members can be explained as a consequence of the ``rocket acceleration''
906: effect. As recently pointed out by \citet{Kun04}, this acceleration continues
907: after the onset of star formation and the parental cloud is further accelerated
908: with respect to the newly formed objects. As a consequence, the cloud is soon
909: swept off the newly formed stars.
910: This hypothesis, together with the rapid dispersion typical of small clouds,
911: causes the spatial displacement of the oldest cloud members. The conspicuous
912: number of PMS stars found apparently isolated from classical star forming
913: regions \citep[e.g.][]{Alcala95,Covino97,Guillout98a,Guillout98b,Frasca03,
914: Zickgraf05} might be a consequence of this mechanism as well.
915:
916: \clearpage
917: \begin{figure}
918: \centering
919: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[draft=false]{f5.eps}}
920: %\includegraphics[height=6.5in,width=5.7in]{./Images/Compare_Mass_Age_L1616_NOZAMS.ps}
921: \caption{Mass (left panel) and age (right panel) distributions of the L1615/L1616 PMS population derived by using the evolutionary tracks
922: by \citet{Baraffe98} \& \citet{Chabrier00} (upper panels), \citet{Dantona97} (central panels) and \citet{Palla99} (lower panels).}
923: \label{Fig:Hist_Ages_Masses}
924: \end{figure}
925:
926: \clearpage
927: \thispagestyle{empty}
928: \setlength{\voffset}{-15mm}
929: \begin{figure}
930: \centering
931: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[draft=false]{f6.eps}}
932: %\includegraphics[height=6.5in,width=5.7in]{./Images/Compare_Age.ps}
933: \caption{Age distributions of the on-cloud and off-cloud PMS stars in L1615/L1616 derived by using the evolutionary
934: tracks by \citet{Baraffe98} \& \citet{Chabrier00} (upper panel),
935: \citet{Dantona97} (central panel) and \citet{Palla99} (lower panel).}
936: \label{Compare_Age}
937: \end{figure}
938: \clearpage
939: \setlength{\voffset}{0mm}
940:
941: \subsection{The star formation efficiency}
942: \label{sec:SFE}
943:
944: Based on $^{12}$CO and $^{13}$CO column density maps, \citet{Ramesh95}
945: estimated that the mass of L1616 alone is in the range $169-193$~$M_{\sun}$,
946: depending on the used tracer. \citet{Yonekura99} mapped both L1615
947: and L1616 in the CO J=1-0 transition line. They inferred that the mass of
948: the cloud system as a whole is $\sim 530$~$M_{\sun}$, $\sim 350$~$M_{\sun}$
949: and $\sim 440 ~M_{\sun}$ based on $^{12}$CO, $^{13}$CO and $^{18}$CO
950: observations respectively. They also derived the mass of the $^{13}$CO
951: and $^{18}$CO cores (i.e. L1616 only) finding a value of $\sim
952: 146$~$M_{\sun}$ and $\sim 161$~$M_{\sun}$, in good agreement with the
953: \citet{Ramesh95}'s determination.
954:
955: \citet{Alcala04} estimated the SFE in L1616 to be $\sim14$\,\%, i.e.
956: higher than the average value measured in other low-mass star forming region
957: ($\la3$\,\%). The SFE reported by \citet{Alcala04} for L1616 is based
958: on the cloud mass reported by \citet{Ramesh95} and the total stellar
959: mass of the 32 members of the cloud investigated by the authors
960: (i.e. $\sim30~M_{\odot}$).
961:
962: Since the star formation history of L1615 and L1616 is intimately
963: connected, we have re-calculated the SFE considering the system L1615
964: plus L1616 as a whole. By using the NICER color excess method by
965: \citet{Lombardi01}, we mapped the dust extinction of the cloud complex
966: and derived its mass. In the NICER technique the $J-H$ and $H-Ks$
967: colours of the field stars are compared to the colours of stars in a
968: nearby reference field. The colour-excesses of the field stars are
969: then combined and transformed to the visual extinction $A_{\mathrm V}$,
970: fixing the form of the reddening curve. The normal interstellar extinction
971: law derived by \citep{Cardelli89} has been adopted by us for this
972: purpose. We retrieved the 2MASS colours of all the point-like sources
973: located in a $50{\arcmin}\times50{\arcmin}$ region centered on NGC\,1788
974: and in a reference field close to the L1615/L1616 cloud\footnote{The SOFI
975: survey is only centered on the densest part of the cloud and can not be
976: used to map the cloud as a whole.}. The latter field was selected by
977: using the nearby low-intensity regions of the IRAS~100$\mu$m dust
978: emission map, according to prescription by \citet{Kainulainen06}.
979: Finally, the visual extinction map resulting from the NICER method
980: was converted to cloud mass by assuming the standard gas-to-dust
981: ratio \citep{Bohlin78}. We found a value of $\sim550$~$M_{\odot}$,
982: in good agreement with the one inferred by \citet{Yonekura99} on the
983: basis of $^{12}$CO observations. Based on this value and on the total
984: mass of the 56 present-day known members of the complex (i.e.
985: 41--46~$M_{\odot}$, depending on the adopted evolutionary tracks), we
986: derived a SFE in L1615/L1616 of 7--8\,\%, i.e. significantly lower
987: than the previous estimate by \citet{Alcala04}, but still in good
988: agreement with the one generally found in giant molecular clouds
989: hosting OB associations (5--10\,\%) and predicted by theoretical
990: calculations on the formation of OB associations
991: \citep[see][and reference therein]{Clark05}.
992:
993: \subsection{Density of star formation and star formation rate}
994: \label{sec:SFR}
995:
996: An interesting question is whether L1615/L1615 can be considered as
997: a cluster. According to the definition suggested by \citet{Lada03},
998: a cluster is a group of some 35 members with a total mass density
999: larger than 1.0~M$_{\odot}$\,pc$^{-3}$.
1000: To estimate the density of PMS objects in L1615/L1615, we considered the
1001: region spectroscopically surveyed by us (Figure~\ref{Fig:SpecSurvey}).
1002: This region covers an area of approximately 0.25 square degrees and includes
1003: about 40 PMS objects. Assuming a distance of 450~pc, the resulting area is
1004: about 4~pc$^2$, which means a surface density of about 10-11 PMS objects
1005: per pc$^2$ and a volume density on the order of 7 PMS objects per pc$^3$.
1006: In the latter calculation we estimated the volume as $V = 0.752{\times}Area^{1.5}$
1007: \citep[see][]{Jorgensen07}, assuming a locally spherical distribution of sources.
1008: The average mass of the 40 PMS objects, as determined from the results in
1009: Section~\ref{sec:Masses-Ages}, is on the order of 0.7~M$_{\odot}$,
1010: which implies a volume density of about 4-5~M$_{\odot}$\,pc$^{-3}$.
1011: Therefore, the group of 40 PMS objects confined in the spectroscopically
1012: surveyed area can be considered as a cluster according to the criterion
1013: by \citet{Lada03}.
1014:
1015: Now, it is interesting to estimate the rate at which the stars in this
1016: small cluster are formed. According to the results of Section~\ref{sec:Masses-Ages},
1017: we estimated that the total mass in PMS objects in that region is on the
1018: order of 41--46~M$_\odot$. Therefore, considering the average age
1019: of 2~Myr for these objects (see Figure~\ref{Fig:Hist_Ages_Masses}), we found
1020: that the cometary cloud is turning some 20-23~$M_{\odot}$ into PMS objects
1021: every Myr, which is lower than the star formation rate in other clusters
1022: like those in Serpens \citep{Harvey07}, but higher than in
1023: other T~associations like Chamaeleon~II \citep{Alcala07} and Lupus \citep{Merin07}.
1024: Thus we concluded that L1615/L1616 is a small cluster with a moderate star
1025: formation rate.
1026:
1027: \subsection{The Initial Mass Function}
1028:
1029: Though based on a low-number statistics, the first clue on the Initial
1030: Mass Function in L1615/L1616 was given by \citet{Alcala04}. Based on
1031: this study, the IMF in this region appears roughly consistent with
1032: that of the solar neighbourhood in the mass range $0.3<M<2.5~M_{\odot}$
1033: \citep{Miller79}. The authors also found several candidates for young
1034: BDs and estimated the expected number of BDs relative to more massive
1035: PMS stars in L1615/L1616 to be intermediate between Taurus
1036: \citep[$\sim13$\,\%,][]{Briceno02} and the Trapezium cluster
1037: \citep[$\sim26$\,\%,][]{Luhman00}.
1038:
1039: The depth of the spectroscopic survey conducted in this work
1040: goes down to $I_C\approx19.0$~mag (i.e. $M\approx0.03-0.05 ~M_{\odot}$,
1041: see Section~\ref{sec:BD-fraction}), leading to the discovery of young
1042: objects with a mass close to the Hydrogen burning limit. We have
1043: thus attempted a fair IMF determination down to the low-mass stellar
1044: regime (i.e. $M \gtrsim 0.1~M_{\odot}$).
1045:
1046: All the present-day known members of L1615/L1616 have masses in the
1047: range between $\sim$0.1 and 5.5~$M_{\odot}$; their mean mass varies
1048: between 0.6 and 0.8~$M_{\odot}$ depending on the adopted evolutionary
1049: tracks (see Table~\ref{Tab:mass_age} and Fig~\ref{Fig:Hist_Ages_Masses},
1050: left panels). However, although our survey recovers most of the
1051: previously known young objects in L1615/L1616, the completeness of our
1052: PMS sample is different from the one of \citet{Alcala04} sample. The
1053: latter includes bright and solar-like objects located in areas not
1054: covered by the deeper WFI survey. Therefore, we restriced our IMF
1055: analysis to the sample of objects that lie on the sky-area covered
1056: with WFI (Figure~\ref{Fig:IRAS-Image}, right panel).
1057:
1058: The shape of the IMF in the cloud may then be constrained using the usual
1059: approximation for the low-mass function ($\frac{dN}{dM} \propto M^{-\alpha}$),
1060: as reported by \citep{Moraux03}. We divided the mass range into mass bins
1061: of about $0.2~M_{\odot}$; this value is larger than the accuracy on mass
1062: estimates as derived from the uncertainties on temperatures and luminosities
1063: and, at the same time, allows us to have a statistically significant
1064: number of objects in each bin.
1065:
1066: \clearpage
1067: \begin{figure}
1068: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[draft=false]{f7.eps}}
1069: \caption{The L1615/L1616 IMF between 0.1 and 5.5~$M_{\odot}$ as derived by
1070: using the evolutionary tracks by \citet{Baraffe98} \&
1071: \citet{Chabrier00} (upper panel), \citet{Dantona97} (central panel) and
1072: \citet{Palla99} (lower panel).}
1073: \label{Fig:IMF}
1074: \end{figure}
1075: \clearpage
1076:
1077: Figure~\ref{Fig:IMF} shows the IMF in L1615/L1616 as obtained by using the
1078: three sets of evolutionary tracks by \citet{Baraffe98} \& \citet{Chabrier00},
1079: \citet{Dantona97} and \citet{Palla99}. Values of {\large $\alpha$} in the
1080: three cases agree within the errors and we can derive a weighted mean
1081: value of:
1082: $$
1083: \alpha=0.84 \pm 0.07
1084: $$
1085: as the best approximation of the IMF slope in L1615/L1616 in the
1086: mass range $0.1{\le}M{\le}5.5$~$M_{\odot}$. We notice, however, that the
1087: evolutionary models by \citet{Dantona97} tend to produce a steeper IMF with
1088: respect to those by \citet{Baraffe98} \& \citet{Chabrier00} and
1089: \citet{Palla99}, as already found by \citet{Spezzi08}.
1090:
1091: In Table~\ref{Tab:IMF} the $\alpha$ slope obtained for the IMF in
1092: L1615/L1616 is compared with those obtained in other star forming regions
1093: with different ages and environmental conditions. These values indicate
1094: a common shape of IMF in the mass range from $\sim0.1$ to $\sim1~M_{\odot}$.
1095: This provides further evidence of a universal IMF also
1096: in the low-mass regime and is in agreement with the results already
1097: established for the intermediate and massive star domains \citep{Kroupa02}.
1098:
1099:
1100: \subsection{No sub-stellar objects in L1615/L1616\,?}
1101: \label{sec:BD-fraction}
1102:
1103: Prior to our survey, no confirmed BDs in L1615/L1616 were reported in
1104: the literature. However, \citet{Alcala04} photometrically selected
1105: some 30--40 candidates for BDs in this region and estimated a fraction
1106: of sub-stellar objects relative to PMS stars ($R_{SS}$) in the range
1107: from 18\,\% to 25\,\%, i.e. similar to the value measured in the
1108: Trapezium cluster \citep{Hillenbrand00,Briceno02,Muench02} and in other
1109: OB associations.
1110:
1111: Our spectroscopic observations, which investigated about 50\,\%
1112: of the BD candidates with $I_C\lesssim19.0$ mag reported by
1113: \citet{Alcala04}, revealed 3--4 young objects with mass $M\le0.1~M_{\odot}$
1114: (see Table~\ref{Tab:mass_age}), close to the Hydrogen burning limit,
1115: and no objects with lower mass. However, taking into account the
1116: accuracy with which we estimated the masses, these objects could be BDs
1117: with a mass just below the Hydrogen burning limit. The $R_{SS}$ in the
1118: cloud would be then around 5--7\,\%. Though the very low-mass BDs
1119: ($M\la0.03~M_{\odot}$) and some deeply embedded low-mass objects might
1120: have escaped detection in our survey, this value should be slightly
1121: lower than the one estimated for other T~associations
1122: \citep[12--15\,\%;][]{Briceno02,Lopez04}.
1123:
1124: The photometric survey conducted by us in L1615/L1616 is spatially and
1125: photometrically complete down to $I_C\approx21.5$~mag at $10\,\sigma$
1126: level. However, only objects brighter than $I_C\approx19.0$ mag could
1127: be observed spectroscopically with a S/N ratio sufficient for spectral
1128: type classification purpose. A 1--3~Myr old object (i.e. the typical
1129: age of the L1615/L1616 population) at the distance of 450~pc (i.e. a
1130: distance modulus of 8.27~mag) with a mass $M\ga0.03~M_{\odot}$ would
1131: have $I_C\la19.0$~mag in the absence of extinction \citep{Baraffe98}.
1132: Thus, in the off-cloud regions of L1615/L1616, where $A_{\mathrm V}\approx0$~mag,
1133: our survey is sensitive down to $\sim0.03~M_{\odot}$.
1134: The visual extinction occurring in the dense head of the cloud varies in
1135: the range 1--5~mag which displaces the limiting mass of the objects with
1136: $I_C\la19.0$~mag to 0.05--0.50~$M_{\odot}$ \citep{Baraffe98}. We conclude
1137: that we are probably missing the very low-mass objects only in the
1138: small dense core of the cloud. Given the peculiar star formation history
1139: in this cloud (Section~\ref{sec:Star-Form-Hist}), the knowledge of its
1140: sub-stellar mass spectrum could give crucial insights into the process
1141: forming BDs under particular environmental conditions.
1142:
1143: \clearpage
1144: \begin{figure}
1145: \centering
1146: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[draft=false]{f8.eps}}
1147: \caption{$I_C$ versus $(R_C-I_C)$ diagram for the point-like objects in
1148: L1615/L1616 detected in our WFI survey above $3\,\sigma$ level
1149: (grey little dots). The theoretical isochrones by \citet{Baraffe98} \&
1150: \citet{Chabrier00} for the Cousins photometric system of Bessel
1151: (continuous line) and for the WFI-Cousins system
1152: \citep[dashed lines,][]{Spezzi07} are overplotted. The PMS stars
1153: with both $R_C$- and $I_C$-band measurements (see Table~\ref{Tab:phot})
1154: are overplotted with black big dots. The $A_{\mathrm V}=2$~mag
1155: reddening vector is also shown. The confirmed PMS object falling well
1156: below the 10~Myr isochrone is the veiled star TTS\,050649.8$-$032104}.
1157: \label{Fig:isoc_Bes}
1158: \end{figure}
1159: \clearpage
1160:
1161: The BD candidates sample by \citet{Alcala04} was selected by inspection
1162: of $I_C$ versus $(R_C-I_C)$ colour-magnitude diagram in comparison with
1163: the theoretical isochrones by \citet{Baraffe98} \& \citet{Chabrier00}.
1164: This approach to search for PMS star and young BD candidates is the most
1165: direct way to tackle the problem using optical photometric data; however,
1166: in order to select cluster members on the basis of their magnitudes and
1167: colours, isochrones that adequately model the data must be used, since
1168: the shape of the isochrones may vary significantly from one photometric
1169: system to another.
1170: The theoretical isochrones for low-mass stars and BDs are provided by
1171: \citet{Baraffe98} \& \citet{Chabrier00} in the Cousins photometric
1172: system \citep{Cousins76}, while the observations by \citet{Alcala04}
1173: were performed by using the WFI camera at the ESO 2.2m telescope.
1174: The WFI filters transmission curves are somewhat different from the
1175: original Cousins ones, in particular for the $I$-band. \citet{Spezzi07}
1176: have computed \emph{ad hoc} isochrones for the WFI-Cousins system. In
1177: Figure~\ref{Fig:isoc_Bes} these isochrones are compared with those by
1178: \citet{Baraffe98} \& \citet{Chabrier00}. The two sets of isochrones
1179: appear significantly different, in particular for the coolest objects,
1180: i.e. $(R_C-I_C)>1.7$, where the use of the isochrones in the Cousins
1181: system would produced many spurious member candidates. This
1182: consideration, together with the contamination by background/foreground
1183: stars in the field taken into account by the authors, could explain
1184: why \citet{Alcala04} overestimated the number of BD candidates. The use
1185: of the adequate isochrones for the WFI-Cousins system would produce
1186: much less BD candidates, in agreement with the number of PMS objects
1187: with mass close to the Hydrogen burning limit confirmed by our
1188: spectroscopic follow-up (see Table~\ref{Tab:mass_age}).
1189:
1190: Though the $R_{SS}$ estimated by us for L1615/L1616 needs further
1191: refinements, the region seems to be poor of BDs, with a $R_{SS}$ ratio
1192: close to that observed in T~associations or, perhaps, even lower.
1193: Though in L1615/L1616 the radiation from the massive stars in the
1194: Orion OB1 associations is likely responsible for the star formation
1195: (Section~\ref{sec:Star-Form-Hist}), this primordial process does not seems
1196: to favour the formation of BDs. As reported in \citet{Alcala04}, the
1197: radial velocity (RV) distribution of the stars in L1615/L1616 shows
1198: a well defined peak at $22.3$~Km/s with the standard deviation of
1199: $4.6$~Km/s which is consistent with the average RV error (i.e. $\sim5$~Km/s).
1200: This may indicate that the velocity dispersion of the stars must be
1201: less than $5$~Km/s. Considering a velocity dispersion of a few Km/s,
1202: $2$~Myr old objects would disperse over a distance of about $2$~pc,
1203: which is the approximate projected size of the head of the cometary
1204: cloud and has been completely covered by our photometric and
1205: spectroscopic observations.
1206:
1207: Thus, the results of our study in L1615/L1616 does not play in favour
1208: of dynamical ejection or photoevaporation by ionising radiation from
1209: massive stars being triggering factors of the BDs formation mechanism.
1210:
1211: \section{Summary}
1212:
1213: We have undertaken a study of the star formation process in the
1214: L1615/L1616 cometary cloud, a small star forming region located in
1215: the outskirt of the Orion OB associations. We aimed at characterising
1216: its PMS population and studying both its IMF and star formation
1217: history, in order to assess the role of the triggered star formation
1218: scenario.
1219:
1220: Our study is based on optical and near-infrared photometric observations,
1221: as well as multi-object follow-up spectroscopy, both carried out
1222: using ESO and OAC facilities. Complementary $JHKs$ photometric
1223: data from the 2MASS and DENIS surveys has been used as well.
1224:
1225: One of the major goal of this work has been the physical
1226: parametrisation of the young stellar population in L1615/L1616. The
1227: spectral type classification has been performed by using a grid of
1228: reference spectra of giants, dwarfs, and intermediate templates,
1229: constructed by averaging spectra of giant and dwarf stars
1230: of the same spectral type. We have computed stellar luminosities by
1231: means of a SED fitting procedure properly developed by us, which also
1232: evaluates the interstellar/circumstellar reddening. This allowed us
1233: to derive the mass and age of each member of L1615/L1616 by comparing
1234: the location of the object on the H-R diagram with different sets of
1235: theoretical PMS evolutionary tracks.
1236:
1237: Our analysis of the young population in L1615/L1616 yielded the
1238: following results:
1239:
1240: \begin{itemize}
1241: \item By using the H$\alpha$ emission line intensity, as well as the
1242: strength of the lithium $\lambda$6708~{\AA} absorption line
1243: as main diagnostics of the PMS nature of the objects, we
1244: identified 25 new members of L1615/L1616, almost doubling the
1245: number of previously known young objects in this cloud.
1246: \item The age distribution of the L1615/L1616 population peaks
1247: between 1 and 3 Myr; however, the members of the cloud span a
1248: wide range in age, from $\sim$0.1~Myr up to 30~Myr,
1249: suggesting multiple events of star formation.
1250: \item The evidence of multiple star formation events, the spatial
1251: distribution of the classical and weak T~Tauri populations,
1252: as well as the cloud shape, support the hypothesis of the star
1253: formation in L1615/L1616 being triggered by the massive stars
1254: in the nearby Orion OB associations.
1255: \item The slope of the IMF in L1615/L1616 in the mass range
1256: $0.1{\le}M{\le}5.5$~$M_{\odot}$ is $0.84\pm0.07$, i.e. similar to that
1257: obtained in other star forming regions by different authors.
1258: This provides further support of a universal IMF in the stellar
1259: domain, regardless of the environmental conditions.
1260: \item The star formation efficiency is about 7--8\,\% as expected for
1261: molecular clouds in the vicinity of OB associations.
1262: According to the criterion by \citet{Lada03}, L1615/L1616
1263: is a small cluster with moderate star formation.
1264: \item A very low-fraction of possible sub-stellar objects ($\sim$~5--7\,\%)
1265: is found in L1615/L1616; thus, the dynamical interaction with the
1266: close massive stars in the Orion OB associations and/or the
1267: photoevaporation induced by their ionising radiation do not
1268: appear as efficient triggering factors for BD formation.
1269: \end{itemize}
1270:
1271: %% If you wish to include an acknowledgments section in your paper,
1272: %% separate it off from the body of the text using the \acknowledgments
1273: %% command.
1274:
1275: %% Included in this acknowledgments section are examples of the
1276: %% AASTeX hypertext markup commands. Use \url without the optional [HREF]
1277: %% argument when you want to print the url directly in the text. Otherwise,
1278: %% use either \url or \anchor, with the HREF as the first argument and the
1279: %% text to be printed in the second.
1280:
1281: \acknowledgments
1282:
1283: We thank the anonymous referee for his/her careful reading, useful
1284: comments, and suggestions which helped to improve the manuscript.
1285: This paper is based on observations carried out at the European Southern
1286: Observatory, La Silla and Paranal (Chile), under observing programs
1287: numbers 64.I-0355, 70.C-0629, 70.C-0536, 074.C-0111 and 076.C-0385.
1288: The authors are grateful to Menadora Barcellona and Salvatore Spezzi
1289: for their supports during the preparation of this paper. We thank
1290: J.~Hernandez for providing the calibration curves for spectral
1291: classification, and for discussions concerning the spectral
1292: classification of early-type stars. We are also grateful to Matula for
1293: her assiduous and warm assistance during the writing of this manuscript.
1294: This work was partially financed by the Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica
1295: (INAF) through PRIN-INAF-2005. D.G. acknowledges financial support from
1296: PRIN-INAF-2005 (``Stellar clusters: a benchmark for star formation and
1297: stellar evolution''). This publication makes use of data products from the
1298: Two-Micron All-Sky Survey, which is a joint project of the University
1299: of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center/California
1300: Institute of Technology, funded by NASA and the National Science Foundation.
1301: This research has made use of the SIMBAD database, operated at CDS,
1302: Strasbourg, France. This paper includes data from the DENIS project,
1303: which has been partly funded by the SCIENCE and the HCM plans of the
1304: European Commission under grants CT920791 and CT940627.
1305:
1306: %% To help institutions obtain information on the effectiveness of their
1307: %% telescopes, the AAS Journals has created a group of keywords for telescope
1308: %% facilities. A common set of keywords will make these types of searches
1309: %% significantly easier and more accurate. In addition, they will also be
1310: %% useful in linking papers together which utilize the same telescopes
1311: %% within the framework of the National Virtual Observatory.
1312: %% See the AASTeX Web site at http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX
1313: %% for information on obtaining the facility keywords.
1314:
1315: %% After the acknowledgments section, use the following syntax and the
1316: %% \facility{} macro to list the keywords of facilities used in the research
1317: %% for the paper. Each keyword will be checked against the master list during
1318: %% copy editing. Individual instruments or configurations can be provided
1319: %% in parentheses, after the keyword, but they will not be verified.
1320:
1321: % {\it Facilities:} \facility{WFI@2.2m}, \facility{SOFI@NTT}, \facility{FORS2@VLT, VIMOS@VLT, FLAMES@VLT}.
1322:
1323: %% Appendix material should be preceded with a single \appendix command.
1324: %% There should be a \section command for each appendix. Mark appendix
1325: %% subsections with the same markup you use in the main body of the paper.
1326:
1327: %% Each Appendix (indicated with \section) will be lettered A, B, C, etc.
1328: %% The equation counter will reset when it encounters the \appendix
1329: %% command and will number appendix equations (A1), (A2), etc.
1330:
1331: \appendix
1332:
1333: \section{Spectral Type Classification}
1334: \label{App-A}
1335:
1336: In order to find the template spectrum which better reproduces the target
1337: spectrum, we proceed as follows:
1338:
1339: \begin{itemize}
1340:
1341: \item We have first performed a spline interpolation of each
1342: standard spectra onto the wavelength points of the target
1343: spectrum. This allowed us to get a homogeneous wavelength
1344: grid with the same step as the observed spectrum.
1345: Moreover, the spectral regions encompassing
1346: both the O$_{3}$ and H$_2$O telluric bands near 6900, 7250,
1347: and 7600~{\AA}, have been excluded in the fitting procedure.
1348:
1349: \item The standard spectra have been shifted in wavelength to
1350: the radial velocity of the target; a cross-correlation algorithm
1351: was used to find the velocity shift between the templates and
1352: target spectrum and superimpose each other.
1353:
1354: \item The extinction law derived by \citet{Cardelli89} have been adopted
1355: to redden the wavelength-shifted standard spectra before comparing
1356: them to the observed one. We assumed a normal slope
1357: of the reddening law, i.e. we adopted a value of the ratio of
1358: total-to-selective extinction $R_{\mathrm V}=A_{\mathrm V}/E(B-V)$
1359: equal to 3.1.
1360: Each standard spectrum has been progressively reddened assuming
1361: an increasing value of the extinction in the $V$-band
1362: ($A_{\mathrm V}$); we let it vary from 0 to 15 mag, with a step
1363: of 0.05 mag.
1364:
1365: \item After each reddening step, the standard spectrum was subtracted
1366: to the observed one. The sum of the residuals was taken as
1367: indicator for the goodness of the ``fit''. The reddened standard
1368: spectrum which gave the lowest value of this indicator provided the
1369: spectral type of the target as well as a first estimation of the
1370: extinction value $A_{\mathrm V}$.
1371:
1372: \end{itemize}
1373:
1374: As an example, the FORS2 spectra of two PMS stars, namely RX\,J0507.6$-$0318
1375: and RX\,J0507.4$-$0320, as well as the low- and the intermediate-resolution
1376: VIMOS spectra of TTS\,050752.0$-$032003 are shown in
1377: Figure~\ref{FORS2-spectra-fit} and Figure~\ref{VIMOS-spectra-fit},
1378: respectively; the best-fitting templates (thick lines)
1379: are superimposed on the observed spectra (thin lines). Note that the
1380: two VIMOS spectra yielded the same spectral type and a consistent
1381: value of $A_{\mathrm V}$, well within the errors, regardless
1382: of the different resolving power and wavelength coverage.
1383:
1384: \clearpage
1385: \begin{figure}
1386: \centering
1387: \includegraphics[width=10cm]{f9a.eps}
1388: \includegraphics[width=10cm]{f9b.eps}
1389: \caption{FORS2 spectra (thin lines) of RX\,J0507.6$-$0318
1390: (upper panel) and RX\,J0507.4$-$0320 (lower panel).
1391: Overplotted with thick lines are the best-fitting
1392: K7 and M4 templates, reddened with
1393: $A_{\mathrm V}=0.1$ and $0.2$ mag, respectively,
1394: as derived by the spectrum fitting procedure.
1395: The spectra are arbitrarily normalised to the flux at
1396: 6500~{\AA}. The O$_2$ absorption telluric bands near
1397: $\sim$6900~{\AA} are marked. This spectral region has
1398: been excluded in the fitting procedure. The Li\,{\sc i}
1399: $\lambda$6708~{\AA} absorption and the H$\alpha$ emission
1400: lines are shown in more detail in the inset of each panel.
1401: Note the differences in H$\alpha$ and Li\,{\sc i}
1402: between the template and the observed spectra, confirming
1403: the PMS nature of the two stars. Also note the good
1404: agreement in the two independent determinations of
1405: $A_{\mathrm V}$, as obtained from the spectral type
1406: classification and the SED fitting procedure
1407: (Table~\ref{Tab:Param}).}
1408: \label{FORS2-spectra-fit}
1409: \end{figure}
1410:
1411: \begin{figure}
1412: \centering
1413: \includegraphics[width=10cm]{f10a.eps}
1414: \includegraphics[width=10cm]{f10b.eps}
1415: \caption{Low- (upper panel) and intermediate-resolution
1416: (lower panel) VIMOS spectra of TTS\,050752.0$-$032003. The
1417: observed spectra are displayed with thin lines,
1418: while the best-fitting M5.5 template, reddened with
1419: $A_{\mathrm V}=0.6$ and $0.5$ mag, respectively, is
1420: overplotted with a thick line. The spectra have
1421: been arbitrarily normalised to the flux at 6760~{\AA}.
1422: The O$_2$ absorption telluric bands near $\sim$6900 and
1423: $\sim$7600~{\AA}, as well as the H$_2$O one
1424: near~$\sim$7250~{\AA} are marked. Note that these spectral
1425: regions have been excluded in the fitting procedure.
1426: The main TiO an VO bands are marked also. The Li\,{\sc i}
1427: $\lambda$6708~{\AA} absorption and the H$\alpha$
1428: emission lines are shown in more detail in the inset of
1429: the lower panel. Note the differences in H$\alpha$ and
1430: Li\,{\sc i} between the template and the observed spectra,
1431: confirming the PMS nature of the star. Also note the
1432: good agreement between the two values of $A_{\mathrm V}$
1433: and the one derived from the SED fitting procedure
1434: (Table~\ref{Tab:Param}).}
1435: \label{VIMOS-spectra-fit}
1436: \end{figure}
1437: \clearpage
1438:
1439: \section{SED fitting procedure}
1440: \label{App-B}
1441:
1442: The method we employed to determine both the reddening parameters (i.e.
1443: $A_{\mathrm V}$ and $R_{\mathrm V}$) and the stellar intrinsic properties
1444: (i.e. $R_{\star}$ and $L_{\star}$) of each PMS star, is based
1445: on the use of appropriate stellar atmosphere models.
1446: Taking into account the effective temperature range of the L1615/L1616
1447: members (see Table~\ref{Tab:Param}), as well as the wide wavelength
1448: coverage required to encompass their SEDs
1449: (see Table~\ref{Tab:abs-flux-calib}), we merged three distinct sets of
1450: low-resolution synthetic spectra, adopting the following criteria:
1451:
1452: \begin{itemize}
1453:
1454: \item for the two intermediate-mass stars, namely the B9V-type
1455: HD\,293815 and the Herbig B3e-type star Kiso\,A-0974~15,
1456: we chose the grid of stellar atmosphere models computed by \citet{Kurucz79};
1457:
1458: \item for sources covering the effective temperature interval between
1459: 4000 and 10000 K we used the low-resolution synthetic spectra
1460: calculated by \citet{Hauschildt99} with their \emph{NextGen}
1461: model-atmosphere code;
1462:
1463: \item for objects cooler than 4000~K we used the synthetic
1464: low-resolution \emph{StarDusty} spectra for low-mass stars and
1465: BDs by \citet{Allard00}. The \emph{StarDusty} spectra,
1466: which take into account dust grain formation in the model
1467: atmosphere due to an efficient gravitational settling process,
1468: are the most suitable for simulating cool objects, down
1469: to the very low-mass end. Indeed, \citet{Allard01} found that
1470: silicate dust grains can form abundantly in the outer
1471: atmospheric layers of the latest M dwarfs and BDs.
1472:
1473: \end{itemize}
1474:
1475: Each set of atmosphere models contains flux density spectra at the
1476: stellar surface, computed for different value of gravity and
1477: metallicity. We kept the gravity of the atmosphere models to a
1478: fixed value of $\log(g)=4.0$ (cgs units), which is appropriate
1479: for low-mass stars and BDs younger than $10$~Myr \citep{Chabrier00}.
1480: Furthermore, this value closely matches the one expected for HAeBe
1481: and early type main sequence stars \citep{Kurucz79,Schmidt-Kaler82}.
1482: We also adopted a solar metallicity.
1483: However, we remind the reader that \citet{Romaniello02} have analysed the
1484: influence of gravity and metallicity on the fitting-procedure and
1485: found that neither of them affects the values of the derived
1486: parameters significantly.
1487:
1488: A grid of models matching the adopted effective temperature scale
1489: (see Section~\ref{sec:Spec-Type-Class}) was first derived by
1490: performing a linear interpolation of the merged set of synthetic
1491: spectra.
1492: In order to compare the observed SEDs with theoretical ones,
1493: synthetic magnitudes in the same photometric systems in which the
1494: observations were performed are required. Thus, for each adopted
1495: temperature we derived a look-up table of synthetic $UBVR_CI_CJHKs$
1496: absolute magnitudes by reddening the corresponding theoretical
1497: spectrum with an increasing value of $A_{\mathrm V}$ (from 0 to 15
1498: mag with a step of 0.05 mag) and $R_{\mathrm V}$ (from 1 to 9 with
1499: a step of 0.1), and subsequently integrating the reddened spectrum
1500: over each photometric pass-band. The extinction law by
1501: \citet{Cardelli89} was adopted to perform this reddening procedure. Since
1502: the model spectra are given as flux density at the star's surface,
1503: the synthetic magnitudes were computed for a star\footnote{This choice
1504: is only conventional, since at this step we were only interested in
1505: the shape of the flux distribution.} with one solar radius, as seen
1506: from a distance of $10$~pc. The Johnson-Cousins $UBVR_CI_C$ and
1507: 2MASS $JHKs$ transmission curves from {\it The Asiago Database on
1508: Photometric Systems} \citep{Moro00, Fiorucci02}, as well as the
1509: absolute flux calibration constants reported in
1510: Table~\ref{Tab:abs-flux-calib} were used to integrate each
1511: progressively reddened theoretical spectra.
1512:
1513: Finally, the values of $A_{\mathrm V}$ and $R_{\mathrm V}$ of each
1514: PMS star (see Table~\ref{Tab:Param}) were derived simultaneously by
1515: fitting the corresponding observed SED to the look-up table of
1516: reddened synthetic magnitudes having the same effective temperature
1517: as the given object. In order to eliminate the magnitude shift
1518: introduced by the unknown star's radius and distance, the observed
1519: and the synthetic magnitudes were previously normalised to the
1520: $I_C$-band. For PMS stars
1521: showing clear evidence of near-infrared excess associated with
1522: the presence of circumstellar material, the fit was performed to
1523: the short-wavelength portion ($\lambda\leq\lambda_J$) of the SED,
1524: which is less contaminated by near-infrared excess. The error on
1525: $A_{\mathrm V}$ and $R_{\mathrm V}$ has been evaluated taking
1526: into account both the accuracy on the spectral type classification
1527: (Section~\ref{sec:Spec-Type-Class}) and the photometric errors on
1528: the observed magnitudes.
1529:
1530: An example of the output of the fitting procedure is shown in the
1531: upper panel of Figure~\ref{Fig:CountourPlot} , where a countour plot
1532: of the $\chi^2$ value in the $R_{\mathrm V}$-$A_{\mathrm V}$ plane
1533: is reported. As already stated in Section~\ref{sec:IntExt-Rad-Lum},
1534: our two-parameter fitting procedure can be applied only to stars
1535: which suffer a visual extinction larger than about 0.5~mag. For
1536: low-reddened stars the value of $A_{\mathrm V}$ is fairly independent
1537: of changes in $R_{\mathrm V}$. As clearly evident in the lower panel
1538: of Figure~\ref{Fig:CountourPlot}, in this case a unique solution could not be found
1539: simultaneously in the $R_{\mathrm V}$-$A_{\mathrm V}$ plane.
1540: Therefore, the value of $R_{\mathrm V}=3.1$, typical of the diffuse
1541: interstellar medium, was assumed for all the object with
1542: $A_{\mathrm V}\lesssim0.5$~mag.
1543:
1544: Once the extinction parameters were determined, the value of
1545: $R_{\star}$ for each PMS object was obtained from the magnitude
1546: shifts required to match the observed magnitudes to the theoretical
1547: ones, reddened with the best-fitting $A_{\mathrm V}$ and
1548: $R_{\mathrm V}$. Only the photometric bands actually used in the
1549: fitting procedure for each given object were employed to determine
1550: its stellar radius. As suggested by \citet{Alcala04}, we made the
1551: assumption that all the members of L1615/L1616 are located at
1552: $450\pm20$ pc. Finally the value of $L_{\star}$ was derived assuming
1553: a black body emission at the star's effective temperature and radius.
1554: The associated uncertainties were derived taking into account the
1555: errors on the distance and effective temperature.
1556:
1557: \clearpage
1558: \begin{figure}
1559: \centering
1560: \resizebox{11cm}{!}{\includegraphics[draft=false]{f11a.eps}}
1561: \resizebox{11cm}{!}{\includegraphics[draft=false]{f11b.eps}}
1562: \caption{$\chi^2$ contour plots produced by the SED fitting procedure for the
1563: two stars RX\,J0506.9$-$0320E and RX\,J0506.8$-$0327.}
1564: \label{Fig:CountourPlot}
1565: \end{figure}
1566: \clearpage
1567:
1568: %% The reference list follows the main body and any appendices.
1569: %% Use LaTeX's thebibliography environment to mark up your reference list.
1570: %% Note \begin{thebibliography} is followed by an empty set of
1571: %% curly braces. If you forget this, LaTeX will generate the error
1572: %% "Perhaps a missing \item?".
1573: %%
1574: %% thebibliography produces citations in the text using \bibitem-\cite
1575: %% cross-referencing. Each reference is preceded by a
1576: %% \bibitem command that defines in curly braces the KEY that corresponds
1577: %% to the KEY in the \cite commands (see the first section above).
1578: %% Make sure that you provide a unique KEY for every \bibitem or else the
1579: %% paper will not LaTeX. The square brackets should contain
1580: %% the citation text that LaTeX will insert in
1581: %% place of the \cite commands.
1582:
1583: %% We have used macros to produce journal name abbreviations.
1584: %% AASTeX provides a number of these for the more frequently-cited journals.
1585: %% See the Author Guide for a list of them.
1586:
1587: %% Note that the style of the \bibitem labels (in []) is slightly
1588: %% different from previous examples. The natbib system solves a host
1589: %% of citation expression problems, but it is necessary to clearly
1590: %% delimit the year from the author name used in the citation.
1591: %% See the natbib documentation for more details and options.
1592:
1593: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1594:
1595: \bibitem[Alcal\'{a} et~al.(1995)]{Alcala95} Alcal\'{a} J.M., Krautter J., Schmitt J.H.M.M. et~al. 1995,A\&AS 114, 109
1596: \bibitem[Alcal\'{a} et~al.(1996)]{Alcala96} Alcal\'{a} J.M., Terranegra, L., Wichmann, R. et~al. 1996, A\&A 119, 7
1597: \bibitem[Alcal\'{a} et~al.(2004)]{Alcala04} Alcal\'{a} J.M., Wachter S., Covino E. et~al. 2004, A\&A 416, 677
1598: \bibitem[Alcal\'{a} et~al.(2006)]{Alcala06} Alcal\'{a} J.M., Spezzi L., Frasca A. et~al. 2006, A\&A 453, L1
1599: \bibitem[Alcal\'{a} et~al.(2007)]{Alcala07} Alcal\'{a} J.M., Spezzi L., Chapman, N. et~al. 2006, ApJ 676, 427
1600: \bibitem[Allard et~al.(2000)]{Allard00} Allard F., Hauschildt P.H. \& Schwenke D. 2000, ApJ 540, 1005
1601: \bibitem[Allard et~al.(2001)]{Allard01} Allard F., Hauschildt P.H., Alexander D.R. et~al. 2001, ApJ 556, 357
1602: \bibitem[Appenzeller et~al.(1998)]{Appenzeller98} Appenzeller I., Fricke K., Furtig, W. et~al. 1998, \emph{The Messenger} 94,~1
1603: \bibitem[Baraffe et~al.(1998)]{Baraffe98} Baraffe I., Chabrier G., Allard F. et~al. 1998, A\&A 337, 403
1604: \bibitem[Baraffe et~al.(2002)]{Baraffe02} Baraffe I., Chabrier G., Allard F. \& Hauschildt P.H. 2002, A\&A 382, 563
1605: \bibitem[Barrado Y Navascu\`{e}s et~al.(1998)]{Barrado98b} Barrado Y Navascu\`{e}s D., Stauffer J.R., Bouvier J. \& Mart\'{i}net E.L. 1998, Ap\&SS 263, 1-4,303
1606: \bibitem[Barrado Y Navascu\`{e}s et~al.(2002)]{Barrado02b} Barrado Y Navascu\`{e}s D., Bouvier J., Stauffer J.R. et~al. 2002, A\&A 395, 813
1607: \bibitem[Barrado Y Navascu\`{e}s et~al.(2004b)]{Barrado04b} Barrado Y Navascu\`{e}s D., Stauffer J.R., Bouvier J. et~al. 2004, ApJ 610, 1064
1608: \bibitem[Basri \& Batalha(1990)]{Basri90} Basri G. \& Batalha C. 1990, ApJ 363, 654
1609: \bibitem[B\`ejar et~al.(2001)]{Bejar01} B\`ejar V.J.S., Mart\'{i}n E.L., Zapatero Osorio M. R. et~al. 2001, ApJ 556, 830
1610: \bibitem[Bertin \& Arnouts(1996)]{Bertin96} Bertin E. \& Arnouts S. 1996, A\&AS 117, 393
1611: \bibitem[Blecha et~al.(2000)]{Blecha00} Blecha A., Cayatte V., North P. et~al. 2000,SPIE 4008, 467
1612: \bibitem[Bochanski et~al.(2007)]{Bochanski07} Bochanski J.J., West A.A., Hawley S.L. et~al. 2007, AJ 133, 531
1613: \bibitem[Bodenheimer(1965)]{Bodenheimer65} Bodenheimer P. 1965, ApJ 142, 451
1614: \bibitem[Bohlin et~al.(1978)]{Bohlin78} Bohlin R.C., Savage B.D. \& Drake J.F. 1978, ApJ 224, 132
1615: \bibitem[Brice\~no et~al.(2002)]{Briceno02} Brice\~no C., Luhman K.L., Hartmann L. et~al. 2002, ApJ 580, 317
1616: \bibitem[Cardelli et~al.(1989)]{Cardelli89} Cardelli J.A., Clayton G.C. \& Mathis J.S. 1989, ApJ 345, 245
1617: \bibitem[Carpenter(2001)]{Carpenter01} Carpenter J.M. 2001, AJ 121, 2851
1618: \bibitem[Chabrier et~al.(2000)]{Chabrier00} Chabrier G., Baraffe I., Allard F. \& Hauschildt P.H. 2000, ApJ 542, 464
1619: \bibitem[Cieslinski et~al.(1997)]{Cieslinski97} Cieslinski D., Jablonski F.J. \& Steiner J.E. 1997, A\&AS 124, 55
1620: \bibitem[Clark et~al.(2005)]{Clark05} Clark P.C., Bonnell I.A., Zinnecker H. \& Bate M.R. 2005, MNRAS 359, 809
1621: \bibitem[Cohen \& Kuhi(1979)]{Cohen79} Cohen M. \& Kuhi L.V. 1979, ApJS 41, 743
1622: \bibitem[Cohen et~al.(2003)]{Cohen03} Cohen M., Wheaton W.A.\& Megeath S.T. 2003, AJ 126, 1096
1623: \bibitem[Covino et~al.(1997)]{Covino97} Covino E., Alcal\'{a} J.M., Allain S. et~al. 1997, A\&A 328, 187
1624: \bibitem[Comer\'on et~al.(2000)]{Comeron00} Comeron F., Neuh\"{a}user R. \& Kaas A.A. 2000, A\&A 359, 269
1625: \bibitem[Cousins(1976)]{Cousins76} Cousins A.W.J. 1976, MmRAS 81, 25
1626: \bibitem[Cutri et~al.(2003)]{Cutri03} Cutri R.M., Skrutskie M.F., van Dyk S. et~al. 2003, \emph{2MASS All-Sky Catalog of Point Sources}, NASA/IPAC Infrared Science Archive
1627: \bibitem[D'Antona \& Mazzitelli(1997)]{Dantona97} D'Antona F. \& Mazzitelli I. 1997, Mem. S.A.It. 68, 807
1628: \bibitem[Droege et~al.(2006)]{Droege06} Droege T.F., Richmond M.W., Sallman M.P., Creager R.P. 2006, \pasp~118, 1666
1629: \bibitem[Epchtein et~al.(1997)]{Epchtein97} Epchtein, N., et al. 1997, Messenger, 87, 27
1630: \bibitem[Feigelson \& Montmerle(1999)]{Feigelson99} Feigelson E.D. \& Montmerle T. 1999, ARA\&A 37, 363
1631: \bibitem[Fiorucci \& Munari(2002)]{Fiorucci02} Fiorucci M. \& Munari U. 2002, Ap\&SS 280, 77
1632: \bibitem[Frasca et~al.(2003)]{Frasca03} Frasca A., Alcal\'{a} J.M., Covino E. et~al. 2003, A\&A 405, 149
1633: \bibitem[Frasca et~al.(2006)]{Frasca06} Frasca A., Guillout P., Marilli E. et~al. 2006, A\&A 454, 301
1634: \bibitem[Guillout et~al.(1998a)]{Guillout98a} Guillout P., Sterzik M.F., Schmitt J.H.M.M.et~al. 1998, A\&A 334, 540
1635: \bibitem[Guillout et~al.(1998b)]{Guillout98b} Guillout P., Sterzik M.F., Schmitt J.H.M.M.et~al. 1998, A\&A 337, 113
1636: \bibitem[Guieu et~al.(2006)]{Guieu06} Guieu S., Dougados C., Monin J.-L. et~al. 2006, A\&A 446, 485
1637: \bibitem[Hamuy et~al.(1992)]{Hamuy92} Hamuy M., Walker A.R., Suntzeff N.B. et~al. 1992, PASP 104, 533
1638: \bibitem[Hamuy et~al.(1994)]{Hamuy94} Hamuy M., Suntzeff N.B., Heathcote S.R. et~al. 1994, PASP 106, 566
1639: \bibitem[Harvey et al.(2007)]{Harvey07} Harvey, P., et al. 2007, ApJ, 663, 1139 (H07)
1640: \bibitem[Hauschildt et~al.(1999)]{Hauschildt99} Hauschildt P.H., Allard F. \& Baron E. 1999, ApJ 512, 377
1641: \bibitem[Hawley et~al.(2002)]{Hawley02} Hawley S.L., Covey K.R., Knapp G.R.et~al. 2002, AJ 123, 3409
1642: \bibitem[Helou \& Walker(1988)]{Helou88} Helou G. \& Walker D.W. 1988, Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS) Catalogs and Atlases, Vol.7: \emph{The Small Scale Structure Catalog} (NASA RP-1190; Washington: GPO)
1643: \bibitem[Herbst et~al.(1982)]{Herbst82} Herbst W., Warner J.W., Miller D.P. et~al. 1982, AJ 87, 98
1644: \bibitem[Hern\'{a}ndez et~al.(2004)]{Hernandez04} Hern\'{a}ndez J., Calvet N., Brice\~{n}o C. et~al. 2004, AJ 127, 1682
1645: \bibitem[Hillenbrand \& Carpenter(2000)]{Hillenbrand00} Hillenbrand L.A. \& Carpenter J. 2000, ApJ 540, 236
1646: \bibitem[Izzo et~al.(2004)]{Izzo04} Izzo C., Kornweibel N., McKay D. et al. 2004, Msngr 177, 33
1647: \bibitem[Johnson(1965)]{Johnson65} Johnson H.L. 1965, ApJ 141, 923
1648: \bibitem[J{\o}rgensen et al.(2007)]{Jorgensen07} J{\o}rgensen, J.K., et al., 2007, ApJ, submitted
1649: \bibitem[Kainulainen et~al.(2006)]{Kainulainen06} Kainulainen J., Lehtinen K. \& Harju J. 2006, A\&A 447, 597
1650: \bibitem[Kenyon \& Hartmann(1995)]{KenyonHartmann95} Kenyon S.J. \& Hartmann L. 1995, ApJS 101, 117
1651: \bibitem[Kroupa(2001)]{Kroupa01} Kroupa P. 2001, MNRAS 322, 231
1652: \bibitem[Kroupa(2002)]{Kroupa02} Kroupa P. 2002, Science Vol. 295, Issue 5552, pag. 82
1653: \bibitem[Kun et~al.(2004)]{Kun04} Kun M., Prusti T., Nikolic S., Johansson L.E.B. \& Walton N.A. 2004, A\&A 418, 89
1654: \bibitem[Kurucz(1979)]{Kurucz79} Kurucz R.L. 1979, ApJS 40, 191
1655: \bibitem[Lada \& Lada(2003)]{Lada03} Lada, C.J., Lada, E.A., A.R.A\&A, 41, 57 (LL03)
1656: \bibitem[Lada et~al.(2006)]{Lada06} Lada, C.J., Muench, A.A., Luhman, K.L., et al. 2006, AJ 131, 1574
1657: \bibitem[Landolt(1992)]{Landolt92} Landolt A.U. 1992, AJ 104, 340
1658: \bibitem[Lee(1968)]{Lee68} Lee T.A. 1968, ApJ 152, 913
1659: \bibitem[Lee et~al.(2005)]{Lee05} Lee H.-T., Chen W.P., Zhang Z.-W. \& Hu J.-Y. 2005, ApJ 624, 808
1660: \bibitem[Lee et~al.(2007)]{Lee07} Lee H.-T. \& Chen W.P. 2007, ApJ 657, 884
1661: \bibitem[Le~Borgne et~al.(2003)]{LeBorgne03} Le Borgne J.F., Bruzual G., Pell\'{o} R. et~al. 2003, A\&A 402, 433
1662: \bibitem[LeFevre et~al.(2003)]{LeFevre03} LeFevre O., Saisse M., Mancini D. et~al. 2003, SPIE 4841, 1670
1663: \bibitem[Leggett et~al.(1996)]{Leggett96} Leggett S.K., Allard F., Berriman G. et~al. 1996, ApJS 104, 117
1664: \bibitem[Lombardi \& Alves(2001)]{Lombardi01} Lombardi, M., \& Alves, J. 2001, A\&A, 377, 1023
1665: \bibitem[L\'opez Mart\'i et~al.(2004)]{Lopez04} L\'opez Mart\'i B., Eisl\"{o}ffel J., Scholz A. \& Mundt R. 2004, A\&A 416, 555
1666: \bibitem[Luhman(1999)]{Luhman99} Luhman K.L. 1999, ApJ 525, 466
1667: \bibitem[Luhman \& Rieke(1999)]{Luhman99b} Luhman K.L. \& Rieke G.H. 1999, ApJ 525, 440
1668: \bibitem[Luhman et~al.(2000)]{Luhman00} Luhman K.L., Rieke G.H., Young E.T. et~al. 2000, ApJ 540, 1016
1669: \bibitem[Luhman et~al.(2003)]{Luhman03} Luhman K.L., Stauffer J.R., Muench A.A. et~al. 2003, ApJ 593, 1093
1670: \bibitem[Lynds(1962)]{Lynds62} Lynds B.T. 1962, ApJS 7, 1L
1671: \bibitem[Lynds(1965)]{Lynds65} Lynds B.T. 1965, ApJS 12, 163
1672: \bibitem[Maddalena et~al.(1986)]{Maddalena86} Maddalena R.J., Morris M., Moscowitz J. \& Thaddeus P. 1986, ApJ 303, 375
1673: \bibitem[Marilli et~al.(2007)]{Marilli07} Marilli E., Frasca A., Covino E. et~al. 2007, A\&A 463, 1081
1674: \bibitem[Mart\'{i}n et~al.(1999)]{Martin99} Mart\'{i}n E.L., Delfosse X., Basri G. et~al. 1999, AJ 118, 2466
1675: \bibitem[Mer\'{i}n et~al.(2007)]{Merin07} Mer\'{i}n et~al., 2007, ApJ, submitted
1676: \bibitem[Mermilliod et~al.(1997)]{Mermilliod97} Mermilliod J.C., Mermilliod M., \& Hauck B. 1997, A\&AS, 124, 349
1677: \bibitem[Miller \& Scalo(1979)]{Miller79} Miller G.E. \& Scalo J.M. 1979, ApJS 41, 513
1678: \bibitem[Moraux et~al.(2003)]{Moraux03} Moraux E., Bouvier J., Stauffer J.R. et~al. 2003, A\&A 400, 891
1679: \bibitem[Moro \& Munari(2000)]{Moro00} Moro D. \& Munari U. 2000, A\&AS 147, 361
1680: \bibitem[Muench et~al.(2002)]{Muench02} Muench A.A., Lada E.A., Lada C.J. et~al. 2002, ApJ 573, 366
1681: \bibitem[Muench et~al.(2003)]{Muench03} Muench A.A., Lada E.A., Lada C.J. et al. 2003, AJ 125, 2029
1682: \bibitem[Mundt \& Bastian(1980)]{Mundt80} Mundt R. \& Bastian U. 1980, A\&AS 39, 245
1683: \bibitem[Nakano et~al.(1995)]{Nakano95} Nakano M., Wiramihardja S.D.\& Kogure T. 1995, PASJ 47, 889
1684: \bibitem[Oke(1990)]{Oke90} Oke J.B. 1990, AJ 99, 1621
1685: \bibitem[Palla \& Stahler(1999)]{Palla99} Palla F. \& Stahler S.W. 1999, ApJ 525, 772
1686: \bibitem[Pasquini et~al.(2002)]{Pasquini02} Pasquini L., Avila G., Blecha A.et~al. 2002, \emph{The Messenger} 110, 1
1687: \bibitem[Persson et~al.(1998)]{Persson98} Persson, S. E., Murphy, D. C., Krzeminski, W., Roth, M., \& Rieke, M. J. 1998, AJ, 116, 2475
1688: \bibitem[Preibisch et~al.(2003)]{Preibisch03} Preibisch T., Stanke T. \& Zinnecker H. 2003, A\&A 409, 147
1689: \bibitem[Ramesh(1995)]{Ramesh95} Ramesh B. 1995, MNRAS 276, 923
1690: \bibitem[Romaniello et~al.(2002)]{Romaniello02} Romaniello R., Panagia N., Scuderi S. et~al. 2002, AJ 123, 915
1691: \bibitem[Romaniello et~al.(2006)]{Romaniello06} Romaniello R., Scuderi S., Panagia N. et~al. 2006, A\&A 446, 955
1692: \bibitem[Schmidt-Kaler(1982)]{Schmidt-Kaler82} Schmidt-Kaler Th. 1982, in Landoldt-B\"{o}rnstein, New Ser., ed. K.H. Hellwege, Vol. VI/2b (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York), 12
1693: \bibitem[Scodeggio et~al.(2005)]{Scodeggio05} Scodeggio M., Franzetti P., Garilli B.et~al. 2005, PASP 117, 1284
1694: \bibitem[Sharpless(1952)]{Sharpless52} Sharpless S. 1952, ApJ 116, 251
1695: \bibitem[Spezzi et~al.(2007)]{Spezzi07} Spezzi L., Alcal\'a J.M., Fasca A., Covino E. \& Gandolfi D. 2007, A\&A, 470, 281
1696: \bibitem[Spezzi et~al.(2008)]{Spezzi08} Spezzi L., Alcal\'a J.M., Covino E., et al. 2008, ApJ, in press (arXiv:0802.4351)
1697: \bibitem[Stanke et~al.(2002)]{Stanke02} Stanke T., Smith M.D., Gredel R. et~al. 2002, A\&A 393, 251
1698: \bibitem[Sterzik et~al.(1995)]{Sterzik95} Sterzik M.F., Alcal\'{a} J.M., Neuh\"auser R. et~al. 1995, A\&A 297, 418
1699: \bibitem[Stetson(1987)]{Stetson87} Stetson P.B. 1987, PASP 99, 191
1700: \bibitem[Taylor et~al.(1989)]{Taylor89} Taylor B.J., Joner M.D. \& Johnson S.B. 1989, AJ 97, 1798
1701: \bibitem[Tej et~al.(2002)]{Tej02} Tej A., Sahu K.C., Chandrasekhar T. \& Ashok N.M. 2002, ApJ 578, 523
1702: \bibitem[Th\'{e} et~al.(1981)]{The81} Th\'{e} P.S., Tjin-A-Djie H.R.E., Bakker R. et~al. 1981, A\&AS 44, 451
1703: \bibitem[Torres-Dodgen \& Weaver(1993)]{Torres-Dodgen93} Torres-Dodgen A.V. \& Weaver W.B. 1993, PASP 105, 693
1704: \bibitem[Valdes et~al.(2004)]{Valdes04} Valdes F., Gupta R., Rose J.A. et~al. 2004, ApJS 152, 251
1705: \bibitem[van Belle et~al.(1999)]{vanBelle99} van Belle G.T., Lane B.F., Thompson R.R. et~al. 1999, AJ 117, 521
1706: \bibitem[Vieira et~al.(2003)]{Vieira03} Vieira S.L.A., Corradi W.J.B., Alencar S.H.P. et~al. 2003, AJ 126, 2971
1707: \bibitem[Voges et~al.(1999)]{Voges99} Voges W., Aschenbach B., Boller Th. et~al. 1999, A\&A 349, 389
1708: \bibitem[Warmels(1991)]{Warmels91} Warmels R.H. 1992, in \emph{Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems I}, D.M. Worrall, C. Biemesderfer \& J. Barnes eds., ASP Conf. Series Vol. 25, 115
1709: \bibitem[Waters \& Waelkenset(1998)]{Waters98} Waters, L.B.F.M. \& Waelkens C. 1998, ARA\&A 36, 233
1710: \bibitem[White \& Basri(2003)]{White03} White, R. J. \& Basri, G. 2003, ApJ 582, 1109
1711: \bibitem[Whittet et~al.(2001)]{Whittet01} Whittet D.C.B., Gerakines P.A., Hough J.H. et~al. 2001, ApJ 547, 872
1712: \bibitem[Yonekura et~al.(1999)]{Yonekura99} Yonekura Y., Hayakawa T., Mizuno N et~al. 1999, PASJ 51, 837
1713: \bibitem[Zickgraf et~al.(2005)]{Zickgraf05} Zickgraf F.J., Krautter J., Reffert S. et~al. 2005, A\&A 433, 151
1714:
1715: \end{thebibliography}{}
1716:
1717: \clearpage
1718:
1719: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Table 1 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1720:
1721: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccccccc}
1722: %\tabletypesize{\tiny}
1723: \tablecaption{Journal of the FORS2 and VIMOS spectroscopic observations.\label{Tab:Spec-Log}}
1724: \tablewidth{0pt}
1725: \rotate
1726: \tablehead{
1727:
1728: \colhead{Spectrograph} & \colhead{Period} &
1729: \colhead{Grism} & \colhead{Order sorting} &
1730: \colhead{$\lambda/\Delta\lambda^\ast$} & \colhead{$\lambda_{range}$} &
1731: \colhead{$T_{exp}$} & \colhead{$N_{mask}$} &
1732: \colhead{$N_{object}$} \\
1733:
1734: & &
1735: & \colhead{filter} &
1736: & \colhead{(\AA)} &
1737: \colhead{(sec)} & &
1738: \colhead{per mask}
1739:
1740: }
1741:
1742: \startdata
1743: FORS2@VLT & Feb--Mar 2003 & GRIS-1200R & GG435 & 2140 & 5700--7300$^\dag$ & 960 & 5 & 18--19 \\
1744: VIMOS@VLT & Dec 2004--Mar 2005 & HR\_red & GG475 & 2500 & 6300--8700$^\dag$ & 2000 & 3 & $\sim80$ \\
1745: VIMOS@VLT & Dec 2004--Mar 2005 & MR & GG475 & 580 & 5000--8000~ & 900 & 6 & $\sim120$ \\
1746: \enddata
1747:
1748: \tablenotetext{\ast}{Achieved at $\lambda=6500$~{\AA} with a $1{\arcsec}$ slit width.}
1749: \tablenotetext{\dagger}{Corresponding to a slit projected onto the centre of the detector.}
1750:
1751: \end{deluxetable}
1752:
1753: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1754:
1755: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Table 2 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1756:
1757: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}
1758: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
1759: \tablecaption{PMS stars in L1615/L1616. Coordinates are from
1760: the 2MASS catalogue. The PMS objects identified
1761: in this work and the previously known ones are
1762: labelled with ``NEW'' and ``P.K.", respectively.
1763: For each star, additional designations found in
1764: literature are listed in the last column.
1765: \label{Tab:List-PMS}}
1766: \tablewidth{0pt}
1767:
1768: \tablehead{
1769:
1770: \colhead{Star} & \colhead{$\alpha$(2000)}&
1771: \colhead{$\delta$(2000)} & \colhead{Note} &
1772: \colhead{Other Designations} \\
1773:
1774: & \colhead{(hh:mm:ss)} &
1775: \colhead{(dd:mm:ss)} & &
1776:
1777: }
1778:
1779: \startdata
1780: 1RXS~J045912.4$-$033711 & 04:59:14.59 & $-$03:37:06.3 & P.K. & \\
1781: 1RXS~J050416.9$-$021426 & 05:04:15.93 & $-$02:14:50.5 & P.K. & \\
1782: TTS\,050513.5$-$034248 & 05:05:13.47 & $-$03:42:47.8 & NEW & \\
1783: TTS\,050538.9$-$032626 & 05:05:38.85 & $-$03:26:26.4 & NEW & \\
1784: RX\,J0506.6$-$0337 & 05:06:34.95 & $-$03:37:15.9 & P.K. & \\
1785: TTS\,050644.4$-$032913 & 05:06:44.42 & $-$03:29:12.8 & NEW & \\
1786: TTS\,050646.1$-$031922 & 05:06:46.05 & $-$03:19:22.4 & P.K. & \\
1787: RX\,J0506.8$-$0318 & 05:06:46.64 & $-$03:18:05.6 & P.K. & \\
1788: TTS\,050647.5$-$031910 & 05:06:47.45 & $-$03:19:09.7 & NEW & \\
1789: RX\,J0506.8$-$0327 & 05:06:48.32 & $-$03:27:38.2 & P.K. & \\
1790: RX\,J0506.8$-$0305$^a$ & 05:06:48.98 & $-$03:05:42.9 & NEW & \\
1791: TTS\,050649.8$-$031933 & 05:06:49.77 & $-$03:19:33.1 & NEW & \\
1792: TTS\,050649.8$-$032104 & 05:06:49.78 & $-$03:21:03.6 & NEW & 1RXS\,J050651.9$-$032031 \\
1793: TTS\,050650.5$-$032014 & 05:06:50.50 & $-$03:20:14.3 & NEW & \\
1794: TTS\,050650.7$-$032008 & 05:06:50.74 & $-$03:20:08.0 & NEW & \\
1795: RX\,J0506.9$-$0319NW & 05:06:50.83 & $-$03:19:35.2 & P.K. & \\
1796: RX\,J0506.9$-$0319SE & 05:06:50.99 & $-$03:19:38.0 & P.K. & L1616~MIR5 \\
1797: HD~293815 & 05:06:51.05 & $-$03:19:59.9 & P.K. & \\
1798: RX\,J0506.9$-$0320W & 05:06:52.86 & $-$03:20:53.2 & P.K. & L1616~MIR2 \\
1799: RX\,J0506.9$-$0320E & 05:06:53.32 & $-$03:20:52.6 & P.K. & L1616~MIR1 \\
1800: TTS\,050654.5$-$032046 & 05:06:54.53 & $-$03:20:46.0 & NEW & \\
1801: LkH$\alpha$~333 & 05:06:54.65 & $-$03:20:04.8 & P.K. & HBC~82, Kiso\,A-0974~14, CSI-03-05045 \\
1802: L1616~MIR4$^b$ & 05:06:54.93 & $-$03:21:12.7 & P.K. & \\
1803: Kiso\,A-0974~15 & 05:06:55.52 & $-$03:21:13.2 & P.K. & NSV~1832, IRAS~05044$-$0325, L1616~MIR3 \\
1804: RX\,J0507.0$-$0318 & 05:06:56.94 & $-$03:18:35.5 & P.K. & \\
1805: TTS\,050657.0$-$031640 & 05:06:56.97 & $-$03:16:40.4 & NEW & \\
1806: TTS\,050704.7$-$030241 & 05:07:04.71 & $-$03:02:41.0 & NEW & \\
1807: TTS\,050705.3$-$030006 & 05:07:05.32 & $-$03:00:06.2 & NEW & \\
1808: RX\,J0507.1$-$0321 & 05:07:06.10 & $-$03:21:28.2 & P.K. & Kiso\,A-0974~16 \\
1809: TTS\,050706.2$-$031703 & 05:07:06.22 & $-$03:17:02.9 & NEW & \\
1810: RX\,J0507.2$-$0323 & 05:07:10.95 & $-$03:23:53.4 & P.K. & Kiso\,A-0974~18 \\
1811: TTS\,050713.5$-$031722 & 05:07:13.52 & $-$03:17:22.1 & NEW & \\
1812: RX\,J0507.3$-$0326$^a$ & 05:07:14.99 & $-$03:26:47.3 & NEW & \\
1813: TTS\,050717.9$-$032433 & 05:07:17.85 & $-$03:24:33.1 & P.K. & \\
1814: RX\,J0507.4$-$0320 & 05:07:22.28 & $-$03:20:18.5 & P.K. & \\
1815: RX\,J0507.4$-$0317$^a$ & 05:07:25.93 & $-$03:17:12.3 & NEW & \\
1816: TTS\,050729.8$-$031705 & 05:07:29.80 & $-$03:17:05.1 & NEW & \\
1817: TTS\,050730.9$-$031846 & 05:07:30.85 & $-$03:18:45.6 & NEW & \\
1818: TTS\,050733.6$-$032517 & 05:07:33.58 & $-$03:25:16.7 & NEW & \\
1819: TTS\,050734.8$-$031521 & 05:07:34.83 & $-$03:15:20.7 & NEW & \\
1820: RX\,J0507.6$-$0318$^a$ & 05:07:37.67 & $-$03:18:15.6 & NEW & \\
1821: TTS\,050741.0$-$032253 & 05:07:41.00 & $-$03:22:53.0 & NEW & \\
1822: TTS\,050741.4$-$031507 & 05:07:41.35 & $-$03:15:06.7 & NEW & \\
1823: TTS\,050752.0$-$032003 & 05:07:51.95 & $-$03:20:02.8 & NEW & \\
1824: TTS\,050801.4$-$032255 & 05:08:01.43 & $-$03:22:54.5 & P.K. & \\
1825: TTS\,050801.9$-$031732 & 05:08:01.94 & $-$03:17:31.6 & P.K. & \\
1826: TTS\,050804.0$-$034052 & 05:08:04.00 & $-$03:40:51.7 & P.K. & \\
1827: TTS\,050836.6$-$030341 & 05:08:36.55 & $-$03:03:41.4 & P.K. & Kiso\,A-0974~21 \\
1828: TTS\,050845.1$-$031653 & 05:08:45.10 & $-$03:16:52.5 & P.K. & \\
1829: RX\,J0509.0$-$0315 & 05:09:00.66 & $-$03:15:06.6 & P.K. & 1RXS\,J050859.6$-$031503 \\
1830: RX\,J0510.1$-$0427 & 05:10:04.60 & $-$04:28:03.7 & P.K. & 1RXS\,J051004.9$-$042757 \\
1831: 1RXS\,J051011.5$-$025355 & 05:10:10.86 & $-$02:54:04.9 & P.K. & V1011~Ori, IRAS~05076$-$0257 \\
1832: RX\,J0510.3$-$0330 & 05:10:14.78 & $-$03:30:07.4 & P.K. & 1RXS\,J051015.7$-$033001 \\
1833: 1RXS\,J051043.2$-$031627 & 05:10:40.50 & $-$03:16:41.6 & P.K. & RXJ\,0510.7$-$0316 \\
1834: RX\,J0511.7$-$0348 & 05:11:38.93 & $-$03:48:47.1 & P.K. & \\
1835: RX\,J0512.3$-$0255 & 05:12:20.53 & $-$02:55:52.3 & P.K. & V531~Ori, 1RXS\,J051219.9$-$025547 \\
1836: \enddata
1837:
1838: \tablenotetext{a}{X-ray source by \citet{Alcala04}}
1839: \tablenotetext{b}{Mid-infrared source by \citet{Stanke02}}
1840:
1841: \end{deluxetable}
1842:
1843: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1844:
1845: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Table 3 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1846:
1847:
1848: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccccc}
1849: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1850:
1851: \tablecaption{Optical ($UBVR_CI_C$) and near-infrared ($JHKs$) photometry of the PMS stars in L1615/L1616.
1852: Labels are as explained in the footnotes.\label{Tab:phot}}
1853: \tablewidth{0pt}
1854: \rotate
1855: \tablehead{
1856:
1857: \colhead{PMS Star} & \colhead{$U$} & \colhead{$B$} & \colhead{$V$} & \colhead{$R_C$} & \colhead{$I_C$} & \colhead{$J$} & \colhead{$H$} & \colhead{$Ks$} & \colhead{Notes}
1858:
1859: }
1860:
1861: \startdata
1862: 1RXS~J045912.4$-$033711 & 12.74$\pm$0.05 & 12.45$\pm$0.04 & 11.73$\pm$0.03 & NO & 10.72$\pm$0.06 & 10.07$\pm$0.02 & 9.62$\pm$0.02 & 9.47$\pm$0.02 & a,b,c \\
1863: 1RXS~J050416.9$-$021426 & 14.84$\pm$0.09 & 13.99$\pm$0.08 & 12.96$\pm$0.02 & NO & 11.59$\pm$0.03 & 10.66$\pm$0.02 & 10.10$\pm$0.02 & 9.98$\pm$0.03 & a,c,d \\
1864: TTS\,050513.5$-$034248 & NO & ND & ND & 18.97$\pm$0.02 & 17.03$\pm$0.02 & 15.12$\pm$0.04 & 14.60$\pm$0.05 & 14.20$\pm$0.06 & c \\
1865: TTS\,050538.9$-$032626 & NO & 18.88$\pm$0.02 & 17.30$\pm$0.02 & 16.21$\pm$0.02 & 14.67$\pm$0.01 & 13.29$\pm$0.02 & 12.60$\pm$0.02 & 12.39$\pm$0.02 & c \\
1866: RX\,J0506.6$-$0337 & 13.12$\pm$0.04 & 12.93$\pm$0.02 & 12.23$\pm$0.01 & NO & 11.24$\pm$0.05 & 10.66$\pm$0.02 & 10.30$\pm$0.03 & 10.20$\pm$0.02 & a,b,c \\
1867: TTS\,050644.4$-$032913 & NO & 19.33$\pm$0.01 & 17.69$\pm$0.02 & 16.68$\pm$0.02 & 15.08$\pm$0.01 & 13.64$\pm$0.03 & 13.04$\pm$0.03 & 12.78$\pm$0.03 & c \\
1868: TTS\,050646.1$-$031922 & NO & 18.88$\pm$0.01 & 17.34$\pm$0.02 & 16.09$\pm$0.01 & 14.81$\pm$0.01 & 12.60$\pm$0.01 & 11.09$\pm$0.01 & 10.22$\pm$0.01 & \\
1869: RX\,J0506.8$-$0318 & NO & 16.26$\pm$0.01 & 14.86$\pm$0.02 & 13.91$\pm$0.01 & 13.01$\pm$0.01 & 11.95$\pm$0.01 & 11.22$\pm$0.01 & 10.97$\pm$0.01 & \\
1870: TTS\,050647.5$-$031910 & NO & 22.55$\pm$0.12 & 20.51$\pm$0.03 & 19.01$\pm$0.03 & 16.75$\pm$0.02 & 14.30$\pm$0.01 & 13.38$\pm$0.01 & 13.04$\pm$0.01 & \\
1871: RX\,J0506.8$-$0327 & NO & 17.59$\pm$0.01 & 15.96$\pm$0.02 & 14.90$\pm$0.02 & 13.30$\pm$0.01 & 11.74$\pm$0.01 & 10.92$\pm$0.01 & 10.59$\pm$0.01 & \\
1872: RX\,J0506.8$-$0305 & NO & 18.99$\pm$0.01 & 17.33$\pm$0.02 & 16.23$\pm$0.02 & 14.59$\pm$0.01 & 13.02$\pm$0.01 & 12.39$\pm$0.01 & 12.13$\pm$0.01 & \\
1873: TTS\,050649.8$-$031933 & NO & 19.42$\pm$0.03 & 17.63$\pm$0.02 & 16.32$\pm$0.02 & 14.48$\pm$0.01 & 12.44$\pm$0.01 & 11.52$\pm$0.01 & 11.18$\pm$0.01 & \\
1874: TTS\,050649.8$-$032104 & NO & 19.91$\pm$0.02 & 18.59$\pm$0.02 & 17.30$\pm$0.02 & 15.56$\pm$0.01 & 12.69$\pm$0.01 & 11.43$\pm$0.01 & 10.51$\pm$0.01 & \\
1875: TTS\,050650.5$-$032014 & NO & 23.58$\pm$0.77 & 21.11$\pm$0.05 & 19.18$\pm$0.03 & 16.51$\pm$0.02 & 13.78$\pm$0.01 & 13.09$\pm$0.01 & 12.60$\pm$0.01 & \\
1876: TTS\,050650.7$-$032008 & NO & 21.50$\pm$0.13 & 19.54$\pm$0.03 & 18.14$\pm$0.02 & 16.03$\pm$0.02 & 13.78$\pm$0.01 & 13.07$\pm$0.01 & 12.59$\pm$0.01 & \\
1877: RX\,J0506.9$-$0319NW & NO & 18.18$\pm$0.01 & 16.73$\pm$0.02 & 15.70$\pm$0.02 & 14.31$\pm$0.01 & 12.46$\pm$0.01 & 11.60$\pm$0.01 & 11.33$\pm$0.01 & \\
1878: RX\,J0506.9$-$0319SE & NO & 16.34$\pm$0.01 & 14.82$\pm$0.02 & 13.80$\pm$0.02 & 12.67$\pm$0.01 & 11.09$\pm$0.01 & 10.16$\pm$0.01 & 9.97$\pm$0.01 & \\
1879: HD~293815 & 10.33$\pm$0.01 & 10.28$\pm$0.01 & 10.08$\pm$0.01 & 9.94$\pm$0.01 & 9.77$\pm$0.01 & 9.50$\pm$0.02 & 9.48$\pm$0.03 & 9.37$\pm$0.03 & c,e \\
1880: RX\,J0506.9$-$0320W & NO & 17.36$\pm$0.01 & 15.33$\pm$0.02 & 13.94$\pm$0.02 & 12.39$\pm$0.01 & 10.66$\pm$0.01 & 9.51$\pm$0.01 & 8.94$\pm$0.01 & \\
1881: RX\,J0506.9$-$0320E & NO & 17.66$\pm$0.01 & 15.74$\pm$0.02 & 14.36$\pm$0.02 & 12.87$\pm$0.01 & 10.75$\pm$0.01 & 9.51$\pm$0.01 & 8.76$\pm$0.01 & \\
1882: TTS\,050654.5$-$032046 & NO & ND & ND & 20.98$\pm$0.08 & 18.92$\pm$0.03 & 15.92$\pm$0.02 & 14.92$\pm$0.01 & 14.23$\pm$0.01 & \\
1883: LkH$\alpha$~333 & 16.55$\pm$0.02 & 15.74$\pm$0.01 & 14.19$\pm$0.01 & S & S & 10.34$\pm$0.02 & 9.24$\pm$0.02 & 8.44$\pm$0.03 & c,f \\
1884: L1616~MIR4 & NO & 21.12$\pm$0.13 & 18.99$\pm$0.04 & 17.59$\pm$0.02 & 15.94$\pm$0.01 & 12.78$\pm$0.02 & 10.83$\pm$0.01 & 9.66$\pm$0.01 & \\
1885: Kiso\,A-0974~15 & 13.54$\pm$0.01 & 13.65$\pm$0.01 & 12.84$\pm$0.01 & 12.18$\pm$0.01 & 11.42$\pm$0.01 & 9.89$\pm$0.03 & 9.13$\pm$0.03 & 8.49$\pm$0.03 & c,g \\
1886: RX\,J0507.0$-$0318 & NO & 16.89$\pm$0.01 & 15.21$\pm$0.02 & 14.08$\pm$0.02 & 12.91$\pm$0.01 & 11.48$\pm$0.01 & 10.48$\pm$0.01 & 10.13$\pm$0.01 & \\
1887: TTS\,050657.0$-$031640 & NO & 18.80$\pm$0.01 & 17.69$\pm$0.02 & 16.48$\pm$0.02 & 14.88$\pm$0.01 & 13.12$\pm$0.01 & 12.48$\pm$0.01 & 12.11$\pm$0.01 & \\
1888: TTS\,050704.7$-$030241 & NO & 21.87$\pm$0.04 & 20.04$\pm$0.02 & 18.81$\pm$0.02 & 16.75$\pm$0.02 & 14.94$\pm$0.01 & 14.32$\pm$0.01 & 14.00$\pm$0.01 & \\
1889: TTS\,050705.3$-$030006 & NO & 16.95$\pm$0.01 & 15.50$\pm$0.02 & 14.55$\pm$0.02 & 13.60$\pm$0.01 & 12.63$\pm$0.01 & 11.75$\pm$0.01 & 11.63$\pm$0.01 & \\
1890: RX\,J0507.1$-$0321 & NO & 17.56$\pm$0.01 & 16.13$\pm$0.02 & 15.08$\pm$0.02 & 13.87$\pm$0.01 & 12.40$\pm$0.01 & 11.53$\pm$0.01 & 11.20$\pm$0.01 & \\
1891: TTS\,050706.2$-$031703 & NO & 21.83$\pm$0.04 & 19.99$\pm$0.02 & 18.71$\pm$0.02 & 16.66$\pm$0.02 & 14.69$\pm$0.01 & 14.18$\pm$0.01 & 13.84$\pm$0.01 & \\
1892: RX\,J0507.2$-$0323 & NO & 15.09$\pm$0.01 & 13.95$\pm$0.01 & S & 12.61$\pm$0.02 & 11.79$\pm$0.01 & 11.01$\pm$0.01 & 10.95$\pm$0.01 & d \\
1893: TTS\,050713.5$-$031722 & NO & 19.09$\pm$0.01 & 17.57$\pm$0.02 & 16.55$\pm$0.01 & 15.61$\pm$0.01 & 14.05$\pm$0.01 & 13.02$\pm$0.01 & 12.61$\pm$0.01 & \\
1894: RX\,J0507.3$-$0326 & NO & 15.72$\pm$0.01 & 14.31$\pm$0.01 & 13.42$\pm$0.02 & 12.58$\pm$0.02 & 11.45$\pm$0.02 & 10.78$\pm$0.02 & 10.63$\pm$0.02 & c,d \\
1895: TTS\,050717.9$-$032433 & NO & 18.24$\pm$0.01 & 16.67$\pm$0.02 & 15.64$\pm$0.01 & 14.40$\pm$0.01 & 13.17$\pm$0.01 & 12.48$\pm$0.01 & 12.23$\pm$0.01 & \\
1896: RX\,J0507.4$-$0320 & NO & 18.37$\pm$0.01 & 16.71$\pm$0.02 & 15.58$\pm$0.01 & 13.98$\pm$0.01 & 12.42$\pm$0.01 & 11.73$\pm$0.01 & 11.49$\pm$0.01 & h \\
1897: RX\,J0507.4$-$0317 & NO & 18.68$\pm$0.01 & 17.19$\pm$0.02 & 16.17$\pm$0.02 & 14.70$\pm$0.01 & 13.25$\pm$0.01 & 12.61$\pm$0.01 & 12.34$\pm$0.01 & \\
1898: TTS\,050729.8$-$031705 & NO & 22.77$\pm$0.08 & 20.83$\pm$0.03 & 19.39$\pm$0.02 & 17.16$\pm$0.02 & 14.94$\pm$0.04 & 14.23$\pm$0.04 & 13.96$\pm$0.05 & c \\
1899: TTS\,050730.9$-$031846 & NO & ND & 22.12$\pm$0.08 & 21.09$\pm$0.04 & 18.93$\pm$0.02 & 16.49$\pm$0.03 & 15.94$\pm$0.03 & 15.40$\pm$0.02 & \\
1900: TTS\,050733.6$-$032517 & NO & 21.36$\pm$0.03 & 19.62$\pm$0.02 & 18.39$\pm$0.02 & 16.49$\pm$0.02 & 14.79$\pm$0.01 & 14.21$\pm$0.01 & 13.90$\pm$0.01 & \\
1901: TTS\,050734.8$-$031521 & NO & 20.59$\pm$0.02 & 19.05$\pm$0.02 & 17.85$\pm$0.02 & 16.10$\pm$0.01 & 14.51$\pm$0.01 & 13.87$\pm$0.01 & 13.60$\pm$0.01 & \\
1902: RX\,J0507.6$-$0318 & NO & 16.52$\pm$0.01 & 15.16$\pm$0.02 & 14.27$\pm$0.01 & 13.42$\pm$0.01 & 12.44$\pm$0.01 & 11.71$\pm$0.01 & 11.50$\pm$0.01 & \\
1903: TTS\,050741.0$-$032253 & NO & 19.16$\pm$0.01 & 17.55$\pm$0.02 & 16.51$\pm$0.02 & 14.96$\pm$0.01 & 13.52$\pm$0.03 & 12.81$\pm$0.03 & 12.57$\pm$0.03 & c \\
1904: TTS\,050741.4$-$031507 & NO & 19.43$\pm$0.01 & 17.92$\pm$0.02 & 16.86$\pm$0.02 & 15.13$\pm$0.01 & 13.60$\pm$0.01 & 12.90$\pm$0.01 & 12.66$\pm$0.01 & \\
1905: TTS\,050752.0$-$032003 & NO & 21.30$\pm$0.03 & 19.55$\pm$0.02 & 18.27$\pm$0.02 & 16.32$\pm$0.02 & 14.52$\pm$0.03 & 13.98$\pm$0.04 & 13.51$\pm$0.04 & c \\
1906: TTS\,050801.4$-$032255 & NO & NO & NO & NO & 13.82$\pm$0.04 & 12.51$\pm$0.02 & 11.63$\pm$0.02 & 11.23$\pm$0.02 & c,d \\
1907: TTS\,050801.9$-$031732 & NO & NO & NO & NO & 13.84$\pm$0.04 & 12.39$\pm$0.02 & 11.66$\pm$0.02 & 11.33$\pm$0.03 & c,d \\
1908: TTS\,050804.0$-$034052 & NO & NO & NO & NO & 14.28$\pm$0.04 & 13.00$\pm$0.03 & 12.33$\pm$0.03 & 12.07$\pm$0.02 & c,d \\
1909: TTS\,050836.6$-$030341 & NO & NO & NO & NO & 13.46$\pm$0.03 & 11.93$\pm$0.02 & 11.16$\pm$0.03 & 10.73$\pm$0.02 & c,d \\
1910: TTS\,050845.1$-$031653 & NO & NO & NO & NO & 13.88$\pm$0.04 & 12.37$\pm$0.04 & 11.82$\pm$0.04 & 11.46$\pm$0.03 & c,d \\
1911: RX\,J0509.0$-$0315 & 12.26$\pm$0.04 & 12.09$\pm$0.03 & 11.39$\pm$0.02 & NO & 10.51$\pm$0.04 & 9.91$\pm$0.02 & 9.53$\pm$0.02 & 9.41$\pm$0.02 & a,b,c \\
1912: RX\,J0510.1$-$0427 & 13.36$\pm$0.01 & 12.65$\pm$0.01 & 11.73$\pm$0.01 & NO & 10.41$\pm$0.05 & 9.68$\pm$0.02 & 9.14$\pm$0.03 & 8.99$\pm$0.02 & a,b,c \\
1913: 1RXS~J051011.5$-$025355 & 14.27$\pm$0.24 & 13.43$\pm$0.23 & 12.42$\pm$0.23 & 11.81$\pm$0.23 & 11.24$\pm$0.23 & 10.45$\pm$0.02 & 9.95$\pm$0.02 & 9.73$\pm$0.02 & c,i \\
1914: RX\,J0510.3$-$0330 & NO & 12.53$\pm$0.04 & 11.74$\pm$0.03 & 11.29$\pm$0.02 & 10.87$\pm$0.02 & 10.04$\pm$0.15 & 9.81$\pm$0.06 & 9.75$\pm$0.05 & l,m,n \\
1915: 1RXS~J051043.2$-$031627 & 12.11$\pm$0.04 & 12.01$\pm$0.03 & 11.38$\pm$0.03 & NO & 10.57$\pm$0.04 & 10.08$\pm$0.03 & 9.73$\pm$0.02 & 9.65$\pm$0.03 & b,c,p \\
1916: RX\,J0511.7$-$0348 & 13.13$\pm$0.07 & 12.77$\pm$0.06 & 12.02$\pm$0.04 & NO & 11.01$\pm$0.04 & 10.34$\pm$0.03 & 9.87$\pm$0.02 & 9.81$\pm$0.02 & a,b,c \\
1917: RX\,J0512.3$-$0255 & 14.10$\pm$0.06 & 13.56$\pm$0.04 & 12.61$\pm$0.03 & 12.05$\pm$0.04 & 11.49$\pm$0.04 & 10.43$\pm$0.02 & 9.69$\pm$0.02 & 9.14$\pm$0.02 & c,i \\
1918: \enddata
1919:
1920: \tablenotetext{S~~}{Saturated object.}
1921: \tablenotetext{ND~~}{Object not detected.}
1922: \tablenotetext{NO~~}{Object not observed.}
1923: \tablenotetext{a~~}{$UBV$ from observations carried out at the Catania Astrophysical Observatory (Section~\ref{sec:OptPhot}).}
1924: \tablenotetext{b~~}{$I_C$ from TASS Mark IV catalogue \citep{Droege06}.}
1925: \tablenotetext{c~~}{$JHKs$ from \emph{2MASS} point source catalogue \citep{Cutri03}.}
1926: \tablenotetext{d~~}{$I_C$ from \emph{DENIS} catalogue \citep{Epchtein97}.}
1927: \tablenotetext{e~~}{$U$ and $B$ from \citet{Lee68}; $V$,$R_C$, and $I_C$ from \citet{Taylor89}.}
1928: \tablenotetext{f~~}{$U$ from \citet{Mundt80}.}
1929: \tablenotetext{g~~}{$UBVR_CI_C$ from \citet{Vieira03}.}
1930: \tablenotetext{h~~}{Source blended with another star of similar brightness: the WFI $BVR_CI_C$ photometry corresponds to the combined light of both stars.}
1931: \tablenotetext{i~~}{Weighted mean optical photometry from \citet{Cieslinski97}.}
1932: \tablenotetext{l~~}{$BVR_CI_C$ from \citet{Alcala96}.}
1933: \tablenotetext{m~~}{$J$ from \emph{DENIS} catalogue \citep[][converted to the 2MASS photometric system using the transformation equations provided by \citet{Carpenter01}]{Epchtein97}.}
1934: \tablenotetext{n~~}{$HKs$ from \emph{2MASS} point source catalogue \citep{Cutri03}.}
1935: \tablenotetext{p~~}{$UBV$ from \citet{Frasca03}.}
1936:
1937: \end{deluxetable}
1938:
1939: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1940:
1941: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Table 4 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1942:
1943: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrccc}
1944: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
1945:
1946: \tablecaption{Spectral type, H$\alpha$ and Li\,{\sc i} equivalent widths of the PMS stars in L1615/L1616.
1947: Additional emission lines observed in the spectra are also tabulated.\label{Tab:SpT-W}}
1948:
1949: \tablewidth{0pt}
1950:
1951: \tablehead{
1952: \colhead{Star} & \colhead{~SpT} & \colhead{W(H$\alpha$)~~} & \colhead{W(Li)~} & \colhead{Type} & \colhead{Other emission lines} & \colhead{Notes} \\
1953: & & \colhead{(\AA)~~~~} & \colhead{(m\AA)~} & & &
1954: }
1955: \startdata
1956: 1RXS~J045912.4$-$033711 & G8 & $ 1.80\pm0.20$ & $355\pm10$ & WTTS & & a \\
1957: 1RXS~J050416.9$-$021426 & K3 & $ 0.03\pm0.20$ & $475\pm10$ & WTTS & & a \\
1958: TTS\,050513.5$-$034248 & M5.5 & $ -9.80\pm0.40$ & $800\pm100$ & WTTS & & \\
1959: TTS\,050538.9$-$032626 & M3.5 & $ -4.90\pm0.20$ & $350\pm20$ & WTTS & He\,{\sc i} & \\
1960: RX\,J0506.6$-$0337 & G9 & $ 1.00\pm0.20$ & $299\pm10$ & WTTS & & a \\
1961: TTS\,050644.4$-$032913 & M4.5 & $ -4.70\pm0.30$ & $560\pm40$ & WTTS & & \\
1962: TTS\,050646.1$-$031922 & K4 & $ -41.00\pm2.00$ & $560\pm20$ & CTTS & He\,{\sc i}, [N\,{\sc ii}], [S\,{\sc ii}] & \\
1963: RX\,J0506.8$-$0318 & K8.5 & $ -3.80\pm0.20$ & $570\pm30$ & WTTS & He\,{\sc i} & \\
1964: TTS\,050647.5$-$031910 & M5.5 & $ -10.20\pm0.80$ & $560\pm50$ & WTTS & & \\
1965: RX\,J0506.8$-$0327 & M3.5 & $ -6.75\pm0.20$ & $470\pm10$ & WTTS & & \\
1966: RX\,J0506.8$-$0305 & M4.5 & $ -4.80\pm0.30$ & $590\pm50$ & WTTS & He\,{\sc i} & \\
1967: TTS\,050649.8$-$031933 & M3.5 & $ -15.50\pm1.00$ & $540\pm50$ & WTTS & He\,{\sc i}, [O\,{\sc i}] & \\
1968: TTS\,050649.8$-$032104 & M1: & $-195.00\pm5.00$ & $190\pm20$ & CTTS & He\,{\sc i}, Na\,{\sc i}, [O\,{\sc i}] & b \\
1969: TTS\,050650.5$-$032014 & M6.5 & $ -14.00\pm1.00$ & $680\pm40$ & WTTS & & \\
1970: TTS\,050650.7$-$032008 & M4.5 & $ -26.00\pm0.50$ & $620\pm50$ & CTTS & He\,{\sc i}, [O\,{\sc i}], [N\,{\sc ii}], [S\,{\sc ii}] & \\
1971: RX\,J0506.9$-$0319NW & M2.5 & $ -3.50\pm0.30$ & $590\pm50$ & WTTS & & \\
1972: RX\,J0506.9$-$0319SE & K5 & $ -4.80\pm0.50$ & $470\pm10$ & CTTS & [O\,{\sc i}], [N\,{\sc ii}], [S\,{\sc ii}] & \\
1973: HD~293815 & B9V & $ 8.60\pm0.50$ & & & & c \\
1974: RX\,J0506.9$-$0320W & K8.5 & $ -2.90\pm0.50$ & $500\pm20$ & WTTS & & \\
1975: RX\,J0506.9$-$0320E & K0 & $ -1.50\pm0.50$ & $380\pm10$ & WTTS & & \\
1976: TTS\,050654.5$-$032046 & M4 & $ -60.00\pm5.00$ & & CTTS & & \\
1977: LkH$\alpha$~333 & K4 & $ -60.00\pm2.00$ & $430\pm10$ & CTTS & He\,{\sc i}, [O\,{\sc i}], [S\,{\sc ii}] & \\
1978: L1616~MIR4 & K1 & $ -60.00\pm6.00$ & $370\pm50$ & CTTS & [O\,{\sc i}], [N\,{\sc ii}], [S\,{\sc ii}] & \\
1979: Kiso\,A-0974~15 & B3e & $ -67.50\pm1.00$ & & HAeBe & & e \\
1980: RX\,J0507.0$-$0318 & M0 & $ -2.00\pm0.50$ & $570\pm30$ & WTTS & & \\
1981: TTS\,050657.0$-$031640 & M4.5 & $ -94.00\pm2.00$ & $430\pm40$ & CTTS & He\,{\sc i}, [O\,{\sc i}] & \\
1982: TTS\,050704.7$-$030241 & M6 & $ -17.50\pm1.00$ & $740\pm50$ & WTTS & & \\
1983: TTS\,050705.3$-$030006 & M0 & $ -2.00\pm0.40$ & $400\pm20$ & WTTS & & \\
1984: RX\,J0507.1$-$0321 & M1 & $ -38.50\pm3.00$ & $590\pm20$ & CTTS & He\,{\sc i}, [O\,{\sc i}] & \\
1985: TTS\,050706.2$-$031703 & M6 & $ -13.50\pm0.50$ & $730\pm50$ & WTTS & & \\
1986: RX\,J0507.2$-$0323 & K4 & $ -1.10\pm0.10$ & $480\pm20$ & WTTS & & \\
1987: TTS\,050713.5$-$031722 & K8.5 & $ -10.50\pm0.50$ & $520\pm30$ & CTTS & & \\
1988: RX\,J0507.3$-$0326 & M0 & $ -1.90\pm0.20$ & $550\pm10$ & WTTS & & \\
1989: TTS\,050717.9$-$032433 & M2.5 & $ -3.50\pm0.50$ & $470\pm10$ & WTTS & & \\
1990: RX\,J0507.4$-$0320 & M4 & $ -5.00\pm0.50$ & $530\pm50$ & WTTS & He\,{\sc i} & \\
1991: RX\,J0507.4$-$0317 & M3 & $ -14.50\pm0.50$ & $510\pm50$ & WTTS & He\,{\sc i} & \\
1992: TTS\,050729.8$-$031705 & M6.5 & $ -12.00\pm0.50$ & $450\pm20$ & WTTS & & \\
1993: TTS\,050730.9$-$031846 & M5.5 & $-290.00\pm30.00$ & & CTTS & He\,{\sc i} & \\
1994: TTS\,050733.6$-$032517 & M5.5 & $ -2.30\pm0.20$ & $610\pm20$ & WTTS & & \\
1995: TTS\,050734.8$-$031521 & M5 & $ -6.80\pm0.40$ & $610\pm50$ & WTTS & He\,{\sc i} & \\
1996: RX\,J0507.6$-$0318 & K7 & $ -1.60\pm0.20$ & $520\pm50$ & WTTS & & \\
1997: TTS\,050741.0$-$032253 & M4 & $ -4.30\pm0.10$ & $540\pm20$ & WTTS & & \\
1998: TTS\,050741.4$-$031507 & M4.5 & $ -6.80\pm0.40$ & $550\pm20$ & WTTS & & \\
1999: TTS\,050752.0$-$032003 & M5.5 & $ -9.50\pm0.20$ & $530\pm30$ & WTTS & & \\
2000: TTS\,050801.4$-$032255 & M0.5 & $ -21.50\pm0.50$ & $510\pm25$ & CTTS & He\,{\sc i}, [S\,{\sc ii}] & a \\
2001: TTS\,050801.9$-$031732 & M1 & $ -15.50\pm0.50$ & $410\pm25$ & CTTS & He\,{\sc i}, [S\,{\sc ii}] & a \\
2002: TTS\,050804.0$-$034052 & M2.5 & $ -2.20\pm0.20$ & $410\pm20$ & WTTS & & a \\
2003: TTS\,050836.6$-$030341 & M1.5 & $ -68.50\pm1.00$ & $560\pm30$ & CTTS & He\,{\sc i} & a \\
2004: TTS\,050845.1$-$031653 & M3.5 & $ -6.70\pm1.00$ & $530\pm50$ & WTTS & & \\
2005: RX\,J0509.0$-$0315 & G8 & $ 1.10\pm0.20$ & $320\pm10$ & WTTS & & a \\
2006: RX\,J0510.1$-$0427 & K4 & $ -0.20\pm0.20$ & $230\pm10$ & WTTS & & a \\
2007: 1RXS~J051011.5$-$025355 & K0 & $ -0.10\pm0.20$ & $415\pm10$ & WTTS & & a \\
2008: RX\,J0510.3$-$0330 & G8 & $ 1.50\pm0.20$ & $320\pm10$ & WTTS & & a \\
2009: 1RXS~J051043.2$-$031627 & G2 & $ 2.40\pm0.20$ & $235\pm10$ & WTTS & & a \\
2010: RX\,J0511.7$-$0348 & K1 & $ 1.80\pm0.20$ & $370\pm15$ & WTTS & & a \\
2011: RX\,J0512.3$-$0255 & K2 & $ -6.50\pm0.50$ & $440\pm10$ & CTTS & & a \\
2012: \enddata
2013:
2014: \tablenotetext{a}{W(H$\alpha$) and W(Li) from \citet{Alcala04}.}
2015: \tablenotetext{b}{Veiled CTTS.}
2016: \tablenotetext{c}{Spectral type from \citet{Sharpless52}.}
2017: \tablenotetext{e}{Spectral type from \citet{Vieira03}.}
2018:
2019: \end{deluxetable}
2020:
2021: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2022:
2023: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Table 5 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2024:
2025: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccr}
2026: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
2027:
2028: \tablecaption{Stellar parameters of the PMS stars in L1615/L1616.\label{Tab:Param}}
2029:
2030: \tablewidth{0pt}
2031:
2032: \tablehead{
2033:
2034: \colhead{PMS Star} & \colhead{$\log T_{\mathrm eff}$} & \colhead{$R_{\mathrm V}$} & \colhead{$A_{\mathrm V}$} & \colhead{$R_{\star}$} & \colhead{$\log L/L_{\odot}$} \\
2035: & & & \colhead{(mag)} & \colhead{($R_{\odot}$)} &
2036: }
2037:
2038: \startdata
2039: 1RXS~J045912.4$-$033711 & $3.746\pm0.009$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $0.30\pm0.12$ & $2.63\pm0.12$ & $ 0.78\pm0.05$ \\
2040: 1RXS~J050416.9$-$021426 & $3.675\pm0.014$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $0.35\pm0.22$ & $2.35\pm0.11$ & $ 0.40\pm0.07$ \\
2041: TTS\,050513.5$-$034248 & $3.494\pm0.010$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $0.49\pm0.20$ & $0.55\pm0.03$ & $-1.60\pm0.06$ \\
2042: TTS\,050538.9$-$032626 & $3.531\pm0.009$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $0.05\pm0.10$ & $1.08\pm0.05$ & $-0.85\pm0.05$ \\
2043: RX\,J0506.6$-$0337 & $3.733\pm0.013$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $0.05\pm0.10$ & $1.92\pm0.09$ & $ 0.45\pm0.06$ \\
2044: TTS\,050644.4$-$032913 & $3.513\pm0.009$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $0.00 + 0.05$ & $1.00\pm0.05$ & $-0.99\pm0.05$ \\
2045: TTS\,050646.1$-$031922 & $3.662\pm0.026$ & $4.2\pm0.4$~ & $4.33\pm0.35$ & $1.91\pm0.11$ & $ 0.17\pm0.11$ \\
2046: RX\,J0506.8$-$0318 & $3.597\pm0.008$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $0.00 + 0.05$ & $1.62\pm0.07$ & $-0.24\pm0.05$ \\
2047: TTS\,050647.5$-$031910 & $3.494\pm0.010$ & $3.0\pm0.2$~ & $2.30\pm0.17$ & $1.03\pm0.05$ & $-1.04\pm0.05$ \\
2048: RX\,J0506.8$-$0327 & $3.531\pm0.009$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $0.44\pm0.10$ & $2.43\pm0.11$ & $-0.15\pm0.05$ \\
2049: RX\,J0506.8$-$0305 & $3.513\pm0.009$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $0.05\pm0.10$ & $1.28\pm0.06$ & $-0.78\pm0.05$ \\
2050: TTS\,050649.8$-$031933 & $3.531\pm0.009$ & $4.1\pm0.4$~ & $1.67\pm0.10$ & $2.04\pm0.09$ & $-0.30\pm0.05$ \\
2051: TTS\,050649.8$-$032104 & $3.573\pm0.008$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $4.72\pm0.12$ & $2.29\pm0.10$ & $-0.03\pm0.05$ \\
2052: TTS\,050650.5$-$032014 & $3.476\pm0.008$ & $1.7\pm0.1$~ & $2.93\pm0.19$ & $1.30\pm0.06$ & $-0.91\pm0.05$ \\
2053: TTS\,050650.7$-$032008 & $3.513\pm0.009$ & $3.4\pm0.2$~ & $2.20\pm0.17$ & $1.28\pm0.06$ & $-0.78\pm0.05$ \\
2054: RX\,J0506.9$-$0319NW & $3.549\pm0.008$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $0.00 + 0.05$ & $1.22\pm0.05$ & $-0.68\pm0.05$ \\
2055: RX\,J0506.9$-$0319SE & $3.622\pm0.025$ & $4.1\pm0.4$~ & $1.62\pm0.49$ & $2.78\pm0.14$ & $ 0.33\pm0.11$ \\
2056: HD~293815 & $4.021\pm0.049$ & $3.5\pm0.5$~ & $0.76\pm0.05$ & $2.03\pm0.09$ & $ 1.65\pm0.20$ \\
2057: RX\,J0506.9$-$0320W & $3.597\pm0.008$ & $2.4\pm0.2$~ & $2.24\pm0.12$ & $3.98\pm0.18$ & $ 0.54\pm0.05$ \\
2058: RX\,J0506.9$-$0320E & $3.720\pm0.014$ & $3.3\pm0.1$~ & $4.72\pm0.15$ & $3.65\pm0.17$ & $ 0.96\pm0.07$ \\
2059: TTS\,050654.5$-$032046 & $3.522\pm0.009$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $4.33\pm0.10$ & $0.58\pm0.03$ & $-1.42\pm0.05$ \\
2060: LkH$\alpha$~333 & $3.662\pm0.026$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $2.60\pm0.44$ & $3.92\pm0.29$ & $ 0.79\pm0.12$ \\
2061: L1616~MIR4 & $3.706\pm0.015$ & $4.1\pm0.1$~ & $7.09\pm0.15$ & $2.45\pm0.12$ & $ 0.56\pm0.07$ \\
2062: Kiso\,A-0974~15 & $4.272\pm0.058$ & $5.5\pm0.1$~ & $5.20\pm0.20$ & $2.59\pm0.15$ & $ 2.87\pm0.24$ \\
2063: RX\,J0507.0$-$0318 & $3.589\pm0.008$ & $4.2\pm0.5$~ & $1.08\pm0.15$ & $2.56\pm0.12$ & $ 0.13\pm0.05$ \\
2064: TTS\,050657.0$-$031640 & $3.513\pm0.009$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $0.44\pm0.12$ & $1.30\pm0.06$ & $-0.76\pm0.05$ \\
2065: TTS\,050704.7$-$030241 & $3.484\pm0.009$ & $2.5\pm0.4$~ & $0.74\pm0.47$ & $0.71\pm0.08$ & $-1.41\pm0.10$ \\
2066: TTS\,050705.3$-$030006 & $3.589\pm0.008$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $0.00 + 0.05$ & $1.25\pm0.06$ & $-0.49\pm0.05$ \\
2067: RX\,J0507.1$-$0321 & $3.573\pm0.008$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $0.49\pm0.15$ & $1.55\pm0.07$ & $-0.37\pm0.05$ \\
2068: TTS\,050706.2$-$031703 & $3.484\pm0.009$ & $3.0\pm0.1$~ & $0.88\pm0.22$ & $0.78\pm0.04$ & $-1.33\pm0.06$ \\
2069: RX\,J0507.2$-$0323 & $3.662\pm0.026$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $0.25\pm0.22$ & $1.53\pm0.07$ & $-0.03\pm0.11$ \\
2070: TTS\,050713.5$-$031722 & $3.597\pm0.008$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $1.18\pm0.15$ & $0.79\pm0.04$ & $-0.86\pm0.05$ \\
2071: RX\,J0507.3$-$0326 & $3.589\pm0.008$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $0.00 + 0.05$ & $2.23\pm0.10$ & $ 0.01\pm0.05$ \\
2072: TTS\,050717.9$-$032433 & $3.549\pm0.008$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $0.00 + 0.05$ & $1.09\pm0.05$ & $-0.77\pm0.05$ \\
2073: RX\,J0507.4$-$0320 & $3.522\pm0.009$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $0.20\pm0.10$ & $1.68\pm0.08$ & $-0.51\pm0.05$ \\
2074: RX\,J0507.4$-$0317 & $3.540\pm0.009$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $0.00 + 0.05$ & $1.04\pm0.05$ & $-0.85\pm0.05$ \\
2075: TTS\,050729.8$-$031705 & $3.476\pm0.008$ & $2.5\pm0.1$~ & $1.32\pm0.19$ & $0.73\pm0.03$ & $-1.42\pm0.05$ \\
2076: TTS\,050730.9$-$031846 & $3.494\pm0.010$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $1.81\pm0.15$ & $0.33\pm0.01$ & $-2.02\pm0.05$ \\
2077: TTS\,050733.6$-$032517 & $3.494\pm0.010$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $0.54\pm0.20$ & $0.69\pm0.03$ & $-1.39\pm0.06$ \\
2078: TTS\,050734.8$-$031521 & $3.504\pm0.009$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $0.05\pm0.10$ & $0.67\pm0.03$ & $-1.37\pm0.05$ \\
2079: RX\,J0507.6$-$0318 & $3.604\pm0.008$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $0.00 + 0.05$ & $1.26\pm0.06$ & $-0.43\pm0.05$ \\
2080: TTS\,050741.0$-$032253 & $3.522\pm0.009$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $0.05\pm0.10$ & $1.02\pm0.05$ & $-0.94\pm0.05$ \\
2081: TTS\,050741.4$-$031507 & $3.513\pm0.009$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $0.05\pm0.07$ & $1.00\pm0.05$ & $-0.99\pm0.05$ \\
2082: TTS\,050752.0$-$032003 & $3.494\pm0.010$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $0.64\pm0.20$ & $0.74\pm0.03$ & $-1.33\pm0.06$ \\
2083: TTS\,050801.4$-$032255 & $3.581\pm0.008$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $0.54\pm0.12$ & $1.47\pm0.07$ & $-0.39\pm0.05$ \\
2084: TTS\,050801.9$-$031732 & $3.573\pm0.008$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $0.39\pm0.12$ & $1.46\pm0.07$ & $-0.42\pm0.05$ \\
2085: TTS\,050804.0$-$034052 & $3.549\pm0.008$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $0.00 + 0.05$ & $1.15\pm0.05$ & $-0.73\pm0.05$ \\
2086: TTS\,050836.6$-$030341 & $3.565\pm0.008$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $0.64\pm0.10$ & $1.97\pm0.09$ & $-0.20\pm0.05$ \\
2087: TTS\,050845.1$-$031653 & $3.531\pm0.009$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $0.00 + 0.05$ & $1.61\pm0.07$ & $-0.51\pm0.05$ \\
2088: RX\,J0509.0$-$0315 & $3.746\pm0.009$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $0.00 + 0.05$ & $2.62\pm0.12$ & $ 0.78\pm0.05$ \\
2089: RX\,J0510.1$-$0427 & $3.662\pm0.026$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $0.00 + 0.05$ & $3.74\pm0.17$ & $ 0.75\pm0.11$ \\
2090: 1RXS~J051011.5$-$025355 & $3.720\pm0.014$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $0.60\pm0.22$ & $2.37\pm0.11$ & $ 0.59\pm0.07$ \\
2091: RX\,J0510.3$-$0330 & $3.746\pm0.009$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $0.10\pm0.08$ & $2.16\pm0.10$ & $ 0.61\pm0.05$ \\
2092: 1RXS~J051043.2$-$031627 & $3.768\pm0.004$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $0.00 + 0.05$ & $2.25\pm0.10$ & $ 0.73\pm0.04$ \\
2093: RX\,J0511.7$-$0348 & $3.706\pm0.015$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $0.00 + 0.10$ & $2.40\pm0.11$ & $ 0.54\pm0.07$ \\
2094: RX\,J0512.3$-$0255 & $3.690\pm0.016$ & $3.1\pm0.1$\tablenotemark{\star} & $0.00 + 0.10$ & $1.99\pm0.10$ & $ 0.31\pm0.08$ \\
2095: \enddata
2096:
2097: \tablenotetext{\star}{Assumed (see Section~\ref{sec:IntExt-Rad-Lum}).}
2098:
2099: \end{deluxetable}
2100:
2101: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2102:
2103: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Table 6 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2104:
2105:
2106: \begin{table}
2107: \caption{Effective wavelengths and absolute flux calibration constants for the Joh\-nson-Cousins and 2MASS
2108: passbands. The main reference papers are listed in the last column.}
2109: \begin{center}
2110: \begin{tabular}{cccc}
2111: \hline
2112: \hline
2113: \noalign{\medskip}
2114: Filter & $\lambda_{\mathrm eff}$ & $F^0_\lambda$ & Reference \\
2115: & ($\mu$m) & ($erg/s^{2}/cm^{2}/$\AA)& \\
2116: \noalign{\medskip}
2117: \hline
2118: \noalign{\smallskip}
2119: $U_J$ & 0.36 & 4.350$\cdot 10^{-9} $ & \citet{Johnson65} \\
2120: $B_J$ & 0.44 & 7.200$\cdot 10^{-9} $ & \citet{Johnson65} \\
2121: $V_J$ & 0.55 & 3.920$\cdot 10^{-9} $ & \citet{Cousins76} \\
2122: $R_C$ & 0.64 & 2.254$\cdot 10^{-9} $ & \citet{Cousins76} \\
2123: $I_C$ & 0.79 & 1.196$\cdot 10^{-9} $ & \citet{Cousins76} \\
2124: $J$ & 1.24 & 3.129$\cdot 10^{-10}$ & \citet{Cohen03} \\
2125: $H$ & 1.66 & 1.133$\cdot 10^{-10}$ & \citet{Cohen03} \\
2126: $Ks$ & 2.16 & 4.283$\cdot 10^{-11}$ & \citet{Cohen03} \\
2127: \noalign{\smallskip}
2128: \hline
2129: \end{tabular}
2130: \end{center}
2131: \label{Tab:abs-flux-calib}
2132: \end{table}
2133:
2134: \clearpage
2135:
2136: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2137:
2138: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Table 7 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2139:
2140:
2141: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}
2142: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
2143:
2144: \tablecaption{Masses and ages for the PMS stars in L1615/L1616 as inferred by the evolutionary models by \citet{Baraffe98}
2145: \& \citet{Chabrier00}, \citet{Dantona97} and \citet{Palla99}.\label{Tab:mass_age}}
2146:
2147: \tablewidth{0pt}
2148:
2149: \tablehead{
2150:
2151:
2152: \colhead{PMS Star} & \colhead{$M_{Ba98+Ch00}$} & \colhead{$Age_{Ba98+Ch00}$} & \colhead{$M_{DM97}$} & \colhead{$Age_{DM97}$} & \colhead{$M_{PS99}$} & \colhead{$Age_{PS99}$} \\
2153:
2154: & \colhead{($M_{\odot}$)} & \colhead{(Myr)} & \colhead{($M_{\odot}$)} & \colhead{(Myr)} & \colhead{($M_{\odot}$)} & \colhead{(Myr)}
2155: }
2156:
2157: \startdata
2158: 1RXS~J045912.4$-$033711 & $>1.40$ & $-$ & 2.00 & 5.00 & 1.70 & 3.50 \\
2159: 1RXS~J050416.9$-$021426 & $>1.40$ & $-$ & 0.95 & 0.70 & 1.60 & 3.00 \\
2160: TTS\,050513.5$-$034248 & 0.12 & 6.00 & 0.17 & 10.00 & 0.14 & 10.00 \\
2161: TTS\,050538.9$-$032626 & 0.35 & 4.04 & 0.25 & 2.20 & 0.26 & 2.80 \\
2162: RX\,J0506.6$-$0337 & 1.35 & 14.00 & 1.65 & 5.50 & 1.40 & 8.00 \\
2163: TTS\,050644.4$-$032913 & 0.25 & 3.17 & 0.20 & 2.50 & 0.19 & 2.70 \\
2164: TTS\,050646.1$-$031922 & $>1.40$ & $-$ & 0.75 & 1.00 & 1.35 & 4.00 \\
2165: RX\,J0506.8$-$0318 & 1.05 & 5.00 & 0.50 & 1.00 & 0.68 & 3.00 \\
2166: TTS\,050647.5$-$031910 & 0.18 & 2.00 & 0.16 & 2.00 & 0.13 & 2.00 \\
2167: RX\,J0506.8$-$0327 & 0.55 & $<1.00$ & 0.20 & 0.10 & 0.25 & 0.40 \\
2168: RX\,J0506.8$-$0305 & 0.26 & 1.78 & 0.19 & 1.50 & 0.18 & 1.50 \\
2169: TTS\,050649.8$-$031933 & 0.47 & 1.00 & 0.22 & 0.20 & 0.25 & 0.70 \\
2170: TTS\,050649.8$-$032104 & 0.87 & 1.30 & 0.35 & 0.40 & 0.50 & 0.80 \\
2171: TTS\,050650.5$-$032014 & 0.09 & $<1.00$ & 0.13 & 1.00 & $<0.10$ & 0.70 \\
2172: TTS\,050650.7$-$032008 & 0.26 & 1.60 & 0.19 & 1.50 & 0.18 & 1.50 \\
2173: RX\,J0506.9$-$0319NW & 0.50 & 4.50 & 0.33 & 2.00 & 0.35 & 2.50 \\
2174: RX\,J0506.9$-$0319SE & 1.40 & 1.30 & 0.45 & 0.30 & 0.93 & 0.80 \\
2175: HD\,293815 & $>1.40$ & $-$ & 2.50 & 3.00 & 2.50 & 3.00 \\
2176: RX\,J0506.9$-$0320W & 1.25 & $<1.00$ & 0.32 & 0.07 & 0.68 & 0.40 \\
2177: RX\,J0506.9$-$0320E & $>1.40$ & $-$ & 2.30 & 0.90 & 2.30 & 1.50 \\
2178: TTS\,050654.5$-$032046 & 0.26 & 14.20 & 0.25 & 14.00 & 0.22 & 10.00 \\
2179: LkH$\alpha$~333 & $>1.40$ & $-$ & 0.75 & 0.20 & 1.70 & 0.50 \\
2180: L1616~MIR4 & $>1.40$ & $-$ & 1.70 & 1.70 & 1.75 & 3.00 \\
2181: Kiso\,A-0974~15 & $>1.40$ & $-$ & $>3.00$ & $-$ & 5.50 & 0.30 \\
2182: RX\,J0507.0$-$0318 & 1.10 & 1.45 & 0.35 & 0.30 & 0.60 & 0.80 \\
2183: TTS\,050657.0$-$031640 & 0.27 & 1.60 & 0.19 & 1.50 & 0.18 & 1.50 \\
2184: TTS\,050704.7$-$030241 & 0.11 & 3.00 & 0.15 & 4.50 & 0.10 & 3.00 \\
2185: TTS\,050705.3$-$030006 & 0.90 & 10.05 & 0.55 & 3.00 & 0.63 & 4.50 \\
2186: RX\,J0507.1$-$0321 & 0.80 & 4.30 & 0.40 & 1.00 & 0.50 & 2.50 \\
2187: TTS\,050706.2$-$031703 & 0.12 & 2.55 & 0.15 & 4.00 & 0.10 & 2.50 \\
2188: RX\,J0507.2$-$0323 & 1.25 & 11.30 & 0.85 & 2.00 & 1.20 & 7.50 \\
2189: TTS\,050713.5$-$031722 & 0.73 & 35.80 & 0.70 & 20.00 & 0.60 & 20.00 \\
2190: RX\,J0507.3$-$0326 & 1.05 & 2.00 & 0.37 & 0.40 & 0.60 & 0.80 \\
2191: TTS\,050717.9$-$032433 & 0.50 & 6.32 & 0.34 & 2.80 & 0.35 & 3.00 \\
2192: RX\,J0507.4$-$0320 & 0.36 & 1.13 & 0.20 & 0.70 & 0.22 & 0.80 \\
2193: RX\,J0507.4$-$0317 & 0.42 & 5.50 & 0.28 & 2.80 & 0.31 & 3.00 \\
2194: TTS\,050729.8$-$031705 & 0.09 & 2.53 & 0.13 & 4.00 & $<0.10$ & 3.00 \\
2195: TTS\,050730.9$-$031846 & 0.11 & 20.11 & 0.15 & 30.00 & 0.13 & 30.00 \\
2196: TTS\,050733.6$-$032517 & 0.14 & 4.00 & 0.17 & 5.50 & 0.13 & 4.00 \\
2197: TTS\,050734.8$-$031521 & 0.17 & 5.65 & 0.20 & 6.50 & 0.16 & 5.00 \\
2198: RX\,J0507.6$-$0318 & 1.00 & 11.27 & 0.62 & 3.00 & 0.75 & 7.00 \\
2199: TTS\,050741.0$-$032253 & 0.30 & 3.60 & 0.23 & 2.50 & 0.22 & 2.50 \\
2200: TTS\,050741.4$-$031507 & 0.25 & 3.17 & 0.20 & 2.50 & 0.18 & 2.50 \\
2201: TTS\,050752.0$-$032003 & 0.15 & 3.56 & 0.17 & 4.50 & 0.13 & 3.00 \\
2202: TTS\,050801.4$-$032255 & 0.88 & 5.67 & 0.47 & 1.60 & 0.56 & 3.00 \\
2203: TTS\,050801.9$-$031732 & 0.80 & 5.02 & 0.44 & 1.50 & 0.50 & 2.70 \\
2204: TTS\,050804.0$-$034052 & 0.50 & 5.67 & 0.33 & 2.50 & 0.35 & 2.80 \\
2205: TTS\,050836.6$-$030341 & 0.75 & 2.01 & 0.32 & 0.60 & 0.44 & 1.00 \\
2206: TTS\,050845.1$-$031653 & 0.40 & 1.61 & 0.23 & 0.90 & 0.26 & 1.00 \\
2207: RX\,J0509.0$-$0315 & $>1.40$ & $-$ & 2.00 & 4.50 & 1.75 & 3.50 \\
2208: RX\,J0510.1$-$0427 & $>1.40$ & $-$ & 0.70 & 0.20 & 1.70 & 0.50 \\
2209: 1RXS~J051011.5$-$025355 & $>1.40$ & $-$ & 1.85 & 2.50 & 1.65 & 4.00 \\
2210: RX\,J0510.3$-$0330 & $>1.40$ & $-$ & 1.70 & 7.00 & 1.50 & 6.00 \\
2211: 1RXS~J051043.2$-$031627 & $>1.40$ & $-$ & 1.65 & 8.00 & 1.50 & 6.50 \\
2212: RX\,J0511.7$-$0348 & $>1.40$ & $-$ & 1.70 & 2.00 & 1.70 & 4.00 \\
2213: RX\,J0512.3$-$0255 & $>1.40$ & $-$ & 1.30 & 2.00 & 1.50 & 5.00 \\
2214: \enddata
2215:
2216: \end{deluxetable}
2217:
2218: \clearpage
2219:
2220: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2221:
2222: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Table 8 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2223:
2224:
2225: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccc}
2226:
2227: \tablecaption{ ~$\alpha$ slopes of the IMF in different clusters and associations.\label{Tab:IMF}}
2228: \tablewidth{0pt}
2229:
2230: \tablehead{
2231: \colhead{Cluster} & \colhead{Age} & \colhead{Mass range} & \colhead{$\alpha$} & \colhead{Ref.} \\
2232: & \colhead{(Myr)} & \colhead{($M_{\odot}$)} & &
2233: }
2234:
2235: \startdata
2236:
2237: M35 & 150 & 0.1-0.4 & 0.58 & a \\
2238: \noalign{\smallskip}
2239: $\alpha$ Per & 80 & 0.06-0.2 & 0.56 & b \\
2240: \noalign{\smallskip}
2241: Pleiades & 120 & 0.03-0.45 & 0.60$\pm$0.11 & c \\
2242: \noalign{\smallskip}
2243: $\lambda$ Orionis& 5 & 0.02-1.2 & 0.60$\pm$0.06 & d \\
2244: \noalign{\smallskip}
2245: $\sigma$ Orionis & 5 & 0.013-0.2 & 0.8$\pm$0.4 & e \\
2246: \noalign{\smallskip}
2247: Trapezium & 0.4 & 0.035-0.56 & $\sim$0.3 & f \\
2248: & & 0.25-3 & $\sim$0.7 & \\
2249: \noalign{\smallskip}
2250: $\rho$ Oph & 0.1-1 & 0.02-0.4 & $\sim$0.5 & g \\
2251: \noalign{\smallskip}
2252: IC 348 & 3 & 0.035-0.5 & 0.7$\pm$0.2 & h \\
2253: \noalign{\smallskip}
2254: Taurus-Auriga & 1-2 & 0.08-1 & 1.35 & i \\
2255: \noalign{\smallskip}
2256: Cha~I & $\approx 3$ & 0.08-1.2 & 0.6-1.1 & j, k \\
2257: \noalign{\smallskip}
2258: Cha~II & 2-5 & 0.1-1 & 0.5-0.6 & l \\
2259: \noalign{\smallskip}
2260: L1615/L1616 & 1-3 & 0.1-5.5 & 0.84$\pm$0.07 & This work \\
2261: \noalign{\smallskip}
2262:
2263: \enddata
2264: \tablerefs{
2265: a) \citet{Barrado98b}; b) \citet{Barrado02b}; c) \citet{Moraux03}; d) \citet{Barrado04b}; e) \citet{Bejar01};
2266: f) \citet{Luhman00}; g) \citet{Luhman99b}; h) \citet{Tej02}; i) \citet{Briceno02}; j) \citet{Lopez04}; k) \citet{Comeron00};
2267: l) \citet{Spezzi08}.}
2268: \end{deluxetable}
2269:
2270:
2271: %% If you are not including electonic art with your submission, you may
2272: %% mark up your captions using the \figcaption command. See the
2273: %% User Guide for details.
2274: %%
2275: %% No more than seven \figcaption commands are allowed per page,
2276: %% so if you have more than seven captions, insert a \clearpage
2277: %% after every seventh one.
2278:
2279: %% Tables should be submitted one per page, so put a \clearpage before
2280: %% each one.
2281:
2282: %% Two options are available to the author for producing tables: the
2283: %% deluxetable environment provided by the AASTeX package or the LaTeX
2284: %% table environment. Use of deluxetable is preferred.
2285: %%
2286:
2287: %% Three table samples follow, two marked up in the deluxetable environment,
2288: %% one marked up as a LaTeX table.
2289:
2290: %% In this first example, note that the \tabletypesize{}
2291: %% command has been used to reduce the font size of the table.
2292: %% We also use the \rotate command to rotate the table to
2293: %% landscape orientation since it is very wide even at the
2294: %% reduced font size.
2295: %%
2296: %% Note also that the \label command needs to be placed
2297: %% inside the \tablecaption.
2298:
2299: %% This table also includes a table comment indicating that the full
2300: %% version will be available in machine-readable format in the electronic
2301: %% edition.
2302:
2303: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before
2304: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark
2305: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.
2306:
2307: %% If you use the table environment, please indicate horizontal rules using
2308: %% \tableline, not \hline.
2309: %% Do not put multiple tabular environments within a single table.
2310: %% The optional \label should appear inside the \caption command.
2311:
2312: %% If the table is more than one page long, the width of the table can vary
2313: %% from page to page when the default \tablewidth is used, as below. The
2314: %% individual table widths for each page will be written to the log file; a
2315: %% maximum tablewidth for the table can be computed from these values.
2316: %% The \tablewidth argument can then be reset and the file reprocessed, so
2317: %% that the table is of uniform width throughout. Try getting the widths
2318: %% from the log file and changing the \tablewidth parameter to see how
2319: %% adjusting this value affects table formatting.
2320:
2321: %% The \dataset{} macro has also been applied to a few of the objects to
2322: %% show how many observations can be tagged in a table.
2323:
2324: %% Tables may also be prepared as separate files. See the accompanying
2325: %% sample file table.tex for an example of an external table file.
2326: %% To include an external file in your main document, use the \input
2327: %% command. Uncomment the line below to include table.tex in this
2328: %% sample file. (Note that you will need to comment out the \documentclass,
2329: %% \begin{document}, and \end{document} commands from table.tex if you want
2330: %% to include it in this document.)
2331:
2332: %% \input{table}
2333:
2334: %% The following command ends your manuscript. LaTeX will ignore any text
2335: %% that appears after it.
2336:
2337:
2338: \end{document}
2339:
2340: