1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% file template.tex %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %
3: % This is a template file for these proceedings
4: %
5: % Copy it to a new file with a new name and use it as the basis
6: % for your article
7: %
8: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% EDP Sciences %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
9:
10: \documentclass{eas}
11: \usepackage{graphicx}
12:
13: %%%%%%%%%%%%%--PREAMBLE--%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
14: %%-----------------------------
15: % ...........
16: % your macros
17: % ...........
18: %%-------------------------%%----
19: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%--BODY--%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
20: %
21: %\TitreGlobal{The Title of this Volume}
22:
23: \begin{document}
24:
25: %%-----------------------------
26: %% the top matter
27: %%-----------------------------
28:
29:
30: \title{Blazhko Effect in Double Mode Cepheids}
31:
32: \author{P. Moskalik}\address{Copernicus Astronomical Center, Bartycka 18, 00-716 Warsaw, Poland}
33: \author{Z. Ko{\l}aczkowski}\address{Universidad de Concepcion, Departamento de Fisica,
34: Casilla 160-C, Concepcion, Chile}
35:
36:
37: \begin{abstract}
38: Systematic survey for multiperiodicity in the LMC Cepheids
39: (Moskalik, Ko{\l}aczkowski \& Mizerski \cite{MKM04}, \cite{MKM06})
40: has led to discovery of several new forms of pulsational
41: behaviour. One of them is periodic amplitude and phase modulation
42: observed in many first/second overtone (FO/SO) double mode
43: Cepheids. In the current paper we present detailed discussion of
44: this newly discovered phenomenon, based on a combined OGLE+MACHO
45: sample of double mode pulsators.
46: \end{abstract}
47:
48: \maketitle
49:
50: %%-----------------------------
51: %% your text
52: %%-----------------------------
53:
54:
55: \section{Time Series Analysis}
56:
57: We searched for additional signal in the data using a standard
58: consecutive pre\-white\-ning technique. To that effect, we first
59: fitted the data with the double frequency Fourier sum representing
60: pulsations in two radial modes:
61:
62: \vskip 0pt
63:
64: $$m(t) = \langle m\rangle + \sum_{j,k} {\rm A}_{jk} \sin [2\pi(j{\rm f}_1 + k{\rm f}_2)t + \phi_{jk}].\eqno(1)$$
65:
66: \smallskip
67:
68: \noindent The frequencies of the modes, ${\rm f}_1$ and ${\rm f}_2$,
69: were also optimized. The residuals of the fit were then
70: searched for additional periodicities. This was done with the
71: Fourier transform, calculated over the range of $0-5$\thinspace c/d. In
72: the next step, a new Fourier fit with all frequencies discovered
73: so far was performed and the fit residuals were searched for
74: additional frequencies again. The process was stopped when no new
75: frequencies were detected.
76:
77:
78: \section{LMC Sample}
79:
80: \begin{table}%1
81: \caption{Blazhko FO/SO Double-Mode Cepheids in the LMC}
82: \begin{center}
83: \footnotesize
84: \begin{tabular}{lcccccccccc}
85: \hline
86: \noalign{\smallskip}
87: & & & & & $A_1^{-}$
88: & $A_1^{- -}$
89: & & $A_2^{-}$
90: & $A_2^{- -}$
91: \\
92: \noalign{\smallskip}
93: OGLE ID/ & ${\rm P}_1$
94: & ${\rm P}_2$
95: & ${\rm P}_{\rm B}$
96: & $A_1$ & $A_1^{+}$
97: & $A_1^{++}$
98: & $A_2$ & $A_2^{+}$
99: & $A_2^{++}$
100: \\
101: \noalign{\smallskip}
102: ~/MACHO ID & [day] & [day] & [day] & [mag] & [mag] & [mag] & [mag] & [mag] & [mag] \\
103: \noalign{\smallskip}
104: \hline
105: \noalign{\smallskip}
106:
107: SC1--44845 & 0.9520 & 0.7660 & ~~794.0 & 0.165 & 0.021 & --- & 0.046 & 0.021 & --- \\
108: & & & & & 0.011 & --- & & 0.010 & --- \\
109:
110: \noalign{\smallskip}
111:
112: SC1--285275 & 0.8566 & 0.6892 & ~~891.6 & 0.177 & 0.031 & --- & 0.040 & 0.022 & 0.008 \\
113: & & & & & 0.014 & --- & & 0.013 & --- \\
114:
115: \noalign{\smallskip}
116:
117: SC1--335559 & 0.7498 & 0.6036 & ~~779.2 & 0.227 & 0.019 & --- & 0.062 & 0.023 & --- \\
118: & & & & & --- & --- & & --- & --- \\
119:
120: \noalign{\smallskip}
121:
122: SC2--55596 & 0.9325 & 0.7514 & ~~768.2 & 0.146 & 0.007 & --- & 0.039 & --- & --- \\
123: & & & & & 0.007 & --- & & --- & --- \\
124:
125: \noalign{\smallskip}
126:
127: SC6--142093 & 0.8963 & 0.7221 & 1101.6 & 0.154 & 0.028 & --- & 0.043 & 0.017 & 0.012 \\
128: & & & & & 0.013 & --- & & 0.017 & 0.006 \\
129:
130: \noalign{\smallskip}
131:
132: SC6--267410 & 0.8885 & 0.7168 & ~~856.9 & 0.120 & --- & --- & 0.036 & --- & --- \\
133: & & & & & --- & --- & & 0.033 & --- \\
134:
135: \noalign{\smallskip}
136:
137: SC8--10158 & 0.6900 & 0.5557 & 1060.7 & 0.175 & 0.011 & --- & 0.031 & 0.019 & --- \\
138: & & & & & --- & --- & & 0.012 & --- \\
139:
140: \noalign{\smallskip}
141:
142: SC11--233290 & 1.2175 & 0.9784 & 1006.2 & 0.186 & 0.019 & --- & 0.043 & 0.017 & 0.006 \\
143: & & & & & 0.010 & --- & & 0.010 & --- \\
144:
145: \noalign{\smallskip}
146:
147: SC15--16385 & 0.9904 & 0.7957 & 1123.1 & 0.258 & 0.017 & --- & 0.049 & 0.020 & --- \\
148: & & & & & 0.016 & --- & & --- & --- \\
149:
150: \noalign{\smallskip}
151:
152: SC20--112788 & 0.7377 & 0.5943 & 1379.2 & 0.164 & 0.062 & 0.022 & 0.015 & 0.016 & --- \\
153: & & & & & 0.019 & --- & & 0.013 & --- \\
154:
155: \noalign{\smallskip}
156:
157: SC20--138333 & 0.8598 & 0.6922 & ~~795.0 & 0.189 & 0.013 & --- & 0.060 & 0.018 & --- \\
158: & & & & & 0.008 & --- & & 0.010 & --- \\
159:
160: \noalign{\smallskip}
161:
162: 2.4909.67 & 1.0841 & 0.8700 & 1019.7 & 0.216 & 0.012 & --- & 0.055 & 0.013 & --- \\
163: & & & & & 0.010 & --- & & 0.009 & --- \\
164:
165: \noalign{\smallskip}
166:
167: 13.5835.55 & 0.8987 & 0.7228 & 1074.9 & 0.244 & 0.037 & 0.010 & 0.040 & 0.026 & 0.012 \\
168: & & & & & 0.021 & --- & & 0.016 & --- \\
169:
170: \noalign{\smallskip}
171:
172: 14.9585.48 & 0.9358 & 0.7528 & 1092.5 & 0.139 & 0.024 & --- & 0.036 & 0.025 & 0.012 \\
173: & & & & & 0.008 & --- & & 0.010 & --- \\
174:
175: \noalign{\smallskip}
176:
177: 17.2463.49 & 0.7629 & 0.6140 & 1069.9 & 0.235 & 0.018 & --- & 0.051 & 0.013 & --- \\
178: & & & & & 0.014 & --- & & 0.015 & --- \\
179:
180: \noalign{\smallskip}
181:
182: 18.2239.43 & 1.3642 & 1.0933 & ~~706.8 & 0.230 & 0.035 & 0.010 & 0.063 & 0.017 & --- \\
183: & & & & & 0.014 & --- & & 0.015 & --- \\
184:
185: \noalign{\smallskip}
186:
187: 22.5230.61 & 0.6331 & 0.5101 & ~~804.3 & 0.221 & --- & --- & 0.045 & 0.016 & --- \\
188: & & & & & --- & --- & & 0.014 & --- \\
189:
190: \noalign{\smallskip}
191:
192: 23.2934.45 & 0.7344 & 0.5918 & ~~797.6 & 0.207 & 0.023 & --- & 0.055 & 0.031 & 0.015 \\
193: & & & & & --- & --- & & 0.026 & 0.011 \\
194:
195: \noalign{\smallskip}
196:
197: 23.3184.74 & 0.8412 & 0.6778 & 1126.0 & 0.160 & 0.015 & --- & 0.048 & 0.011 & --- \\
198: & & & & & --- & --- & & 0.013 & --- \\
199:
200: \noalign{\smallskip}
201:
202: 80.7080.2618 & 0.7159 & 0.5780 & ~~920.3 & 0.168 & 0.010 & --- & 0.055 & 0.006 & --- \\
203: & & & & & --- & --- & & 0.009 & --- \\
204:
205: \noalign{\smallskip}
206: \hline
207: \end{tabular}
208: \end{center}
209: \label{table1}
210: \end{table}
211:
212: \begin{figure}[h]%1
213: \begin{center}
214: \includegraphics[width=11cm]{pam_fig1.eps}
215: \end{center}
216: \vskip -2.5truecm
217: \caption{Power spectrum of FO/SO double mode Cepheid
218: LMC/SC1--44845 after prewhitening with frequencies of the two
219: radial modes (and their linear combinations). Removed radial
220: frequencies are indicated by dashed lines. Lower panels display
221: the fine structure around the radial modes.}
222: \label{fig1}
223: \end{figure}
224:
225: Our initial analysis was performed with DIA-reduced OGLE-II
226: photometry (\.Ze\-bru\'n {\em et~al.\/} \cite{ZEB01}). There are
227: 56 FO/SO double mode Cepheids in the OGLE catalog (Soszy\'nski
228: {\em et~al.\/} \cite{SOSZ00}). In one-third of these stars we
229: detected residual signal close to one or both primary (radial)
230: pulsation frequencies. In all cases, however, the secondary
231: frequencies were not resolved from the primary ones. Clearly,
232: $\sim\! 1200$\thinspace days timebase provided by OGLE-II data was
233: insufficient for our purpose. Therefore, the final frequency
234: analysis was performed with MACHO photometry (Allsman \& Axelrod
235: \cite{AA01}), which had lower precision, but offered much longer
236: timebase ($2700-2800$\thinspace days).
237:
238: The OGLE-II sample was supplemented by 51 additional FO/SO double
239: mode Cepheids discovered by MACHO team outside the area covered by
240: OGLE-II (Alcock {\em et~al.\/} \cite{MACHO99}, \cite{MACHO03}).
241: Our final FO/SO Cepheid sample consisted of 107 objects.
242:
243:
244: \section{Results}
245:
246: Residual power close to the primary pulsation frequencies was
247: detected in 37 FO/SO double mode Cepheids (35\% of the sample). In
248: 20 of these stars, which constitute 19\% of the entire sample, we
249: were able to resolve this power into indi\-vi\-dual frequencies. We
250: consider two frequencies to be resolved if $1/\Delta{\rm f} <
251: 1400$\thinspace days. All resolved stars are listed in
252: Table\thinspace\ref{table1}.
253:
254:
255: \subsection{Frequency Domain}
256:
257: Resolved FO/SO double mode Cepheids display very characteristic
258: frequency pattern. In most cases, we detect two peaks in the
259: vicinity of each radial frequency. They are located on the
260: opposite sides of the primary (radial) peak and together with the
261: primary frequency they form an {\it equally spaced frequency
262: triplet}. In majority of cases, such a structure is detected
263: around {\it both} radial modes. Typical example of this pattern is
264: displayed in Fig.\thinspace\ref{fig1}. In two Cepheids we detect
265: {\it equally spaced frequency quintuplets} centered on the second
266: overtone. One of these objects is presented in
267: Fig.\thinspace\ref{fig2}. Incomplete quintuplets are also seen in
268: 6 other stars.
269:
270: \begin{figure}[t]%2
271: \begin{center}
272: \includegraphics[width=11cm]{pam_fig2.eps}
273: \end{center}
274: \vskip -2.45truecm
275: \caption{Same as Fig.\thinspace\ref{fig1}, but for LMC/SC6--142093.}
276: \label{fig2}
277: \end{figure}
278:
279: The secondary peaks are always very small, with amplitudes of only
280: 15\thinspace mmag on average and never higher than 62\thinspace
281: mmag. The separation of components in triplets/quintuplets,
282: $\Delta{\rm f}$, is also very small and never exceed
283: 0.00142\thinspace c/d. This corresponds to the beat period of
284: ${\rm P}_{\rm B} > 700$\thinspace day. The lower limit for
285: $\Delta{\rm f}$ (upper limit for ${\rm P}_{\rm B}$) is currently
286: given by resolution of the data. The physical upper limit for the
287: beat period ${\rm P}_{\rm B}$ is unknown.
288:
289: When present around both radial modes, the two
290: triplets/quintuplets have nearly the same frequency spacings.
291: Specifically, the difference between the two spacings,
292: $|\Delta{\rm f}_2\! -\!\Delta{\rm f}_1|$ is always below $9\times
293: 10^{-5}$\thinspace c/d. According to simulations of Alcock {\em
294: et~al.\/} (\cite{MACHO00}; their Fig.\thinspace 14), for MACHO
295: data such a frequency difference is statistically consistent with
296: no difference at all. In other words, triplets/quintuplets around
297: both radial modes have {\it the same frequency separation} within
298: accuracy of the data.
299:
300:
301: \subsection{Time Domain}
302:
303: The triplet/quintuplet frequency pattern can be interpreted as a
304: result of periodic modulation of amplitudes and/or phases of both
305: radial modes, with common period ${\rm P}_{\rm B} = 1/\Delta{\rm
306: f}$. In Fig.\thinspace\ref{fig3} we show this modulation for one
307: of the stars. The plot has been constructed by dividing the data
308: into 10 subsets, each spanning 10\% of the modulation cycle, and
309: then fitting radial modes and their linear combinations (Eq.(1))
310: to each subset separately. The resulting amplitudes and phases of
311: the modes are plotted {\it vs.} modulation phase.
312:
313: \begin{figure}[t]%3
314: \begin{center}
315: \includegraphics[width=10cm]{pam_fig3.eps}
316: \end{center}
317: \vskip -1.6truecm
318: \caption{Periodic modulation of FO/SO double mode Cepheid
319: LMC/SC1--285275. First and second overtones are displayed with
320: filled and open circles, respectively. Modulation period is
321: ${\rm P}_{\rm B} = 891.6$\thinspace day.}
322: \label{fig3}
323: \end{figure}
324:
325: Fig.\thinspace\ref{fig3} shows that both {\it amplitudes and
326: phases} undergo modulation. The amplitude variability is much
327: stronger for the second than for the first overtone (80\% {\it
328: vs.} 30\% change). {\it Minimum amplitude of one mode coincides
329: with maximum amplitude of the other mode}. Maximum phase of the
330: first overtone occurs just before maximum of its amplitude. For
331: the second overtone, maximum phase coincides with minimum
332: amplitude.
333:
334: Characteristic pattern of periodic modulation displayed in
335: Fig.\thinspace\ref{fig3} is common to all Cepheids listed in
336: Table\thinspace\ref{table1}. The phenomenon is similar to the
337: Blazhko effect in RR~Lyrae stars ({\it e.g.} Kurtz {\em et~al.\/}
338: \cite{KUR00}). By analogy, variables of
339: Table\thinspace\ref{table1} can be called "Blazhko double mode
340: Cepheids".
341:
342:
343: \subsection{Stars with Unresolved Power Spectrum}
344:
345: In 17 FO/SO double mode Cepheids (16\% of the sample) we find
346: after pre\-white\-ning a significant residual power unresolved
347: from the primary pulsation frequencies. This is a signature of
348: slow amplitude and/or phase variability, not resolved within the
349: length of available data ({\it i.e.} $\sim 2700$\thinspace days).
350:
351: \begin{figure}[t]%4
352: \begin{center}
353: \includegraphics[width=10cm]{pam_fig4.eps}
354: \end{center}
355: \vskip -1.6truecm
356: \caption{Slow amplitude and phase variability of FO/SO double mode
357: Cepheid LMC/SC17--186042. First and second overtones are displayed
358: with filled and open circles, respectively.}
359: \label{fig4}
360: \end{figure}
361:
362: For closer examination of this slow variability we have performed
363: for each star a similar analysis to that presented in
364: Fig.\thinspace\ref{fig3}. Specifically, we have divided the data
365: into 10 subsets, each spanning 10\% of the total timebase, and
366: then have fitted Eq.(1) separately to each subset. In some stars
367: we have detected only changes of pulsation phases, but in 10
368: variables we have also detected clear changes of the amplitudes.
369: In Fig.\thinspace\ref{fig4} we show typical example of such
370: behaviour. The pattern of amplitude and phase variability is very
371: much the same as that displayed in Fig.\thinspace\ref{fig3}. In
372: particular, the amplitudes of the two radial modes vary in
373: opposite directions. This similarity suggests, that at least some
374: of the unresolved FO/SO double mode Cepheids experience the same
375: type of periodic modulation as Cepheids listed in
376: Table\thinspace\ref{table1}, but on timescales longer than the
377: current data.
378:
379: \begin{table}%2
380: \caption{Unresolved FO/SO Double-Mode Cepheids in the LMC}
381: \begin{center}
382: \small
383: \begin{tabular}{lcccclcc}
384: \hline
385: \noalign{\smallskip}
386: MACHO Star & $P_1$\thinspace [day]
387: & $P_2$\thinspace [day]
388: &&& OGLE Star & $P_1$\thinspace [day]
389: & $P_2$\thinspace [day]
390: \\
391: \noalign{\smallskip}
392: \hline
393: \noalign{\smallskip}
394: 6.6934.67 & 0.9202 & 0.7400 &&& SC4--176400 & 1.1089 & 0.8951 \\
395: 11.9348.78 & 0.7378 & 0.5944 &&& SC4--220148 & 0.7408 & 0.5951 \\
396: 14.9098.35 & 0.7278 & 0.5865 &&& SC7--120511 & 1.2511 & 1.0037 \\
397: 15.10428.60 & 0.6518 & 0.5253 &&& SC10--204083 & 0.5263 & 0.4229 \\
398: 23.3061.82 & 0.5957 & 0.4810 &&& SC16--266808 & 1.3529 & 1.0810 \\
399: 24.2853.69 & 0.7088 & 0.5717 &&& SC17--186042 & 0.6110 & 0.4912 \\
400: 24.2855.80 & 0.5938 & 0.4783 &&& SC20--188572 & 1.0152 & 0.8145 \\
401: 47.2127.102 & 0.5785 & 0.4666 &&& SC21--12012 & 1.3415 & 1.0749 \\
402: 80.7079.62 & 1.3479 & 1.0764 &&& & & \\
403: \noalign{\smallskip}
404: \hline
405: \end{tabular}
406: \end{center}
407: \label{table2}
408: \end{table}
409:
410:
411: \section{What Causes the Modulation ?}
412:
413: Periodic amplitude and phase modulation in FO/SO double mode
414: Cepheids is by no mean a rare phenomenon. According to our
415: analysis its incidence rate is at least 19\% and perhaps as high
416: as 35\%.
417:
418: Any model of modulated double mode Cepheids has to explain two
419: most basic properties of these stars:
420:
421: \begin{itemize}
422: \item both radial modes are modulated with the same period.
423: \item amplitudes of the two modes change in opposite phase: maximum of
424: one amplitude coincides with minimum of the other.
425: \end{itemize}
426:
427: \noindent Two models have been proposed to explain Blazhko
428: modulation in RR~Lyrae stars: the oblique magnetic pulsator model
429: (Shibahashi \cite{SHI95}, \cite{SHI00}) and 1:1 resonance model
430: (Nowakowski \& Dziembowski \cite{NW01}). We will argue, that both
431: these models fail to account for modulation observed in the FO/SO
432: double mode Cepheids.
433:
434: The oblique magnetic pulsator model assumes presence of a dipole
435: magnetic field, which is inclined to the rotation axis of the
436: star. The field introduces distortion to the radial pulsation. As
437: the star rotates, this distortion is viewed from different angles,
438: causing variation of the pulsation amplitude. However, in this
439: scenario both modes should display maximum amplitude
440: simultaneously, because they are both distorted in the same way.
441: This is not what we observe.
442:
443: The model proposed by Nowakowski \& Dziembowski (\cite{NW01})
444: assumes resonant coupling of a radial mode to {\it nonradial}
445: modes of $\ell=1$. Such a mechanism ge\-ne\-ra\-tes in a natural
446: way a triplet of equally spaced frequencies. The beating of these
447: frequencies causes apparent amplitude and phase modulation.
448: Generalizing this model to coupling with modes of $\ell=2$, we can
449: also explain frequency quintuplets. However, in this resonance
450: model, modulation of each radial mode is an independent effect.
451: Therefore, there is no reason why both modes should be modulated
452: with the same period. There is also no reason why amplitude
453: variations of the modes should be in any particular phase relation
454: to each other (as is observed). Finally, the 1:1 resonance model
455: does not explain why in vast majority of cases modulation is
456: observed either in both radial modes or in none of them.
457:
458: At this stage, the mechanism causing amplitude and phase
459: modulation of FO/SO double mode Cepheids remains unknown.
460: Nevertheless, the available observations already provide some
461: important clues. The fact that the two modes are always modulated
462: with the same period proves that their behaviour is not
463: independent. Both modes must be part of the same dynamical system.
464: The fact that high amplitude of one mode always coincides with low
465: amplitude of the other mode strongly suggests that energy transfer
466: between the two modes is involved. Thus, available evidence
467: clearly points towards some form of mode coupling in which both
468: radial modes take part.
469:
470: \medskip
471:
472: {\bf Acknowledgements}. This work has been supported by the Polish MNiSW Grant No. 1 P03D 011 30.
473:
474:
475: %%-----------------------------
476: %% your bibliography
477: %%-----------------------------
478:
479: %%% Using \cite{Bei} in the text
480:
481: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
482: \bibitem[1999]{MACHO99}Alcock,~C., Allsman,~R.~A., Alves,~D.~R., {\em et~al.\/} 1999,
483: ApJ,~511,~185
484: \bibitem[2000]{MACHO00}Alcock,~C., Allsman,~R.~A., Alves,~D.~R., {\em et~al.\/} 2000,
485: ApJ,~542,~257
486: \bibitem[2003]{MACHO03}Alcock,~C., Alves,~D.~R., Becker,~A. {\em et~al.\/} 2003,
487: ApJ,~598,~597
488: \bibitem[2001]{AA01} Allsman,~R.~A. \& Axelrod,~T.~S. 2001, astro-ph/0108444
489: \bibitem[2000]{KUR00} Kurtz,~D.~W., Alcock,~C., Allsman,~R.~A., {\em et~al.\/} 2000,
490: in L.~Szabados \& D.~W.~Kurtz eds., The Impact of Large-Scale
491: Surveys on Pulsating Star Research, IAU~Coll.~176, ASP~Conference
492: Series,~203,~291
493: \bibitem[2004]{MKM04} Moskalik,~P., Ko{\l}aczkowski,~Z. \& Mizerski,~T. 2004, in
494: D.~W.~Kurtz \& K.~Pollard eds., Variable Stars in the Local Group,
495: IAU~Coll.~193, ASP~Conference Series,~310,~498
496: \bibitem[2006]{MKM06} Moskalik,~P., Ko{\l}aczkowski,~Z. \& Mizerski,~T. 2006, in
497: A.~R.~Walker \& G. Bono eds., Stellar Pulsation and Evolution,
498: Mem.~Soc.~Astron.~Ital., 77, 563.
499: \bibitem[2001]{NW01} Nowakowski,~R.~M. \& Dziembowski,~W.~A. 2001, Acta~Astron.,~51,~5
500: \bibitem[1995]{SHI95} Shibahashi,~H. 1995, in R.~K.~Ulrich, E.~J.~Rhodes~Jr. \&
501: W.~D\"appen eds., GONG'94: Helio- and Asteroseismology from Earth
502: and Space, ASP~Conference Series,~76,~618
503: \bibitem[2000]{SHI00} Shibahashi,~H. 2000, in L.~Szabados \& D.~W.~Kurtz eds., The
504: Impact of Large-Scale Surveys on Pulsating Star Research,
505: IAU~Coll.~176, ASP~Conference Series,~203,~299
506: \bibitem[2000]{SOSZ00} Soszy\'nski,~I., Udalski,~A., Szyma\'nski,~M., {\em et~al.\/}
507: 2000, Acta~Astron.,~50,~451
508: \bibitem[2001]{ZEB01} \.Zebru\'n,~K., Soszy\'nski,~I., Wo\'zniak,~P.~R. {\em et~al.\/}
509: 2001, Acta~Astron.,~51,~317
510: \end{thebibliography}
511:
512: \end{document}
513: