1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\slugcomment{submitted to the Astrophysical Journal}
3:
4: %BEGIN USER-DEFINED SHORTFORMS
5: \def\spose#1{\hbox to 0pt{#1\hss}}
6: \def\simlt{\mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\mathchar"218$}}
7: \raise 2.0pt\hbox{$\mathchar"13C$}}}
8: \def\simgt{\mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\mathchar"218$}}
9: \raise 2.0pt\hbox{$\mathchar"13E$}}}
10: \def\eg{{\rm e.g.~}} \def\ie{{\rm i.e.~}}
11: \def\etal{{\rm et~al.~}}
12: \def\mic{{~$\mu$m\ }}
13: \def\mice{{~$\mu$m}}
14:
15: %END USER-DEFINED SHORTFORMS
16: %\received{May 4, 2008}
17: %\revised{June 30, 2008}
18: %\Accepted{}
19: %\journalid}{}
20: %\articleid{}{}
21: %\slugcomment{}
22: \lefthead{Mould et al}
23: \righthead{M31 Spitzer}
24: \begin{document}
25: \title{A Point Source Survey of M31 with the Spitzer Space Telescope}
26:
27: \author{Jeremy Mould}
28: \affil{School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia}
29: \authoraddr{E-mail: jmould@ph.unimelb.edu.au}
30:
31: \author{Pauline Barmby}
32: \affil{Department of Physics \& Astronomy, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond St, London ON N6A 3K7, Canada}
33:
34: \author{Karl Gordon}
35: \affil{Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218}
36: \authoraddr{E-mail: kgordon@stsci.edu}
37:
38: \author{S.P. Willner \& M.L.N. Ashby}
39: \affil{Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St, Cambridge, MA 02138}
40: \authoraddr{E-mail: willner@cfa.harvard.edu, mashby@cfa.harvard.edu}
41:
42: \author{R.D. Gehrz, Roberta Humphreys, \& Charles E. Woodward}
43: \affil{Department of Astronomy, University of Minnesota, 116 Church St SE,
44: Minneapolis, MN 55455}
45: \authoraddr{E-mail: gehrz@astro.umn.edu, roberta@astro.umn.edu, chelsea@astro.umn.edu}
46:
47:
48: \begin{abstract}
49: We explore the stellar population of M31 in a Spitzer Space Telescope survey utilizing
50: IRAC and MIPS observations. Red supergiants are the brightest objects seen
51: in the infrared; they are
52: a prominent evolutionary phase. Due to their circumstellar envelopes, many of these radiate the bulk
53: of their luminosity at IRAC wavelengths and do not stand out in the near
54: infrared or optically. Going fainter, we see large numbers of luminous asymptotic
55: giant branch stars, many of which are known long period variables. Relative to
56: M33 the AGB carbon star population of M31 appears sparse, but this needs
57: to be spectroscopically confirmed.
58: \end{abstract}
59:
60: \keywords{galaxies: individual (M31) -- galaxies: stellar content}
61:
62: \section{Introduction}
63: The disk and bulge of M31 were first resolved into stars by \cite{hub36}
64: and \cite{baa44}, respectively. Since then, many optical surveys have been carried out,
65: including those of \cite{hs53}, \cite{bs63}, \cite{hod76}, \cite{ber88}, \cite{mag92}, \cite{moc01}
66: and \cite{mas06}. More recent papers that included spectra and optical and near-infrared
67: photometry of individual stars are \cite{h79}, \cite{h88}, \cite{hmf90}, \cite{h94} and \cite{mas98}.
68: Near-infrared point-source photometry of M31
69: has been hampered by the lack of large-format detectors; for example, the recent work of \cite{ols06}
70: covers only a small portion of M31. The 2MASS Large Galaxy Atlas \citep{jar03}
71: presented integrated photometry of M31, but no galaxy-wide assessment of the M31 point
72: source population has been published.
73:
74: Spitzer Space Telescope characterization of the point source population of other Local Group galaxies
75: includes the Large Magellanic Cloud \citep{blu06}, M33 \citep{ver07,mcq07},
76: and NGC 6822 \citep{can07}. Other Local Group dwarfs studied include IC1613 and the WLM galaxy \citep{jaa07,jab07,jac06}.
77: The Andromeda galaxy, M31, presents a unique opportunity to study stellar evolution at a chemical composition
78: similar to that of the Milky Way. The red giant branch was
79: resolved in V \& I by \cite{mk86}, and the brightest evolved stars have been studied by \cite{mas98}.
80: However, an infrared survey of point sources in M31 has awaited the arrival of the Spitzer Space Telescope
81: \citep{wer04,geh07} and 2MASS \citep{jar03}.
82:
83: In the mid-infrared, integrated measurements of M31 have been made by IRAS
84: \citep{hab84,xuh96},
85: COBE/DIRBE \citep{ode98}, MSX \citep{kra02}
86: and {\it Spitzer} \citep{gor06,bar06}. With the aim of reaching stars
87: with the most significant mass loss rates this
88: paper presents a point source survey with the IRAC \citep{faz04}
89: and MIPS \citep{rie04} cameras.
90: We also utilize the 2MASS survey in order to include shorter wavelengths.
91: We present extensive tables, giving positions of the sources we identify, to enable follow-up of these observations.
92:
93: \section{IRAC Survey}
94: The IRAC data and reduction are described in \cite{bar06}. Briefly, the central
95: $1\fdg6 \times 0\fdg4$ of
96: M31 was imaged to a depth of six 12-second frames per position, and the
97: outer area to a size of $3\fdg7 \times 1\fdg6$ by four 30-second frames per position.
98: The survey was part of the Spitzer Cycle 3 program (Program Identification 3126).
99: The data analyzed here were produced by version 14 of the Spitzer Science Center (SSC) pipeline;
100: compared to the version 11 and 12 data used by \cite{bar06}, the newer version is
101: expected to have more accurate pointing refinement for the individual frames.
102: The 3000 individual frames per channel were combined with the MOPEX software
103: to create mosaics with a pixel scale of 0\farcs86, sub-sampling the native IRAC
104: pixel scale by a factor of $\sqrt{2}$ to better sample the point spread function
105: (FWHM $\sim1\farcs9$).
106:
107: The saturation limits given in the IRAC Data Handbook \footnote{http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/irac/sat.html}
108: correspond to Vega magnitudes of
109: $(9.9, 9.3, 6.7, 6.8)$ for 12-second frames and $(10.8, 10.4, 7.7, 7.8)$
110: for 30-second frames for the Spitzer 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, 8 \micron~ bands respectively.
111: The sensitivity can be estimated using the SSC Performance
112: Estimation Tool (http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/irac/sens.html);
113: assuming a medium background, the $5\sigma$ point source
114: detection limits correspond to Vega magnitudes of
115: $(19.0, 18.0, 15.6, 14.9)$ for six 12-second frames and $(19.6, 18.5, 16.0, 15.2)$
116: for four 30-second frames. However, point source photometry in the vicinity of M31
117: is affected by crowding and at longer wavelengths by the diffuse ISM, and these values are presented as a guide only.
118:
119: The IRAC flat-fields are derived from observations of the zodiacal light and
120: observations of calibration stars to correct for the fact that the large-scale sensitivity
121: pattern varies with spectral shape. Using the `photometric correction' images
122: from the Spitzer Science Center, we constructed correction mosaics and applied
123: them to the M31 mosaics.
124: We tested two different corrections for alternately red and blue sources and
125: found that the effect was small. The magnitude changes for the red source correction are
126: $(0.02, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0)$ in the sense that point sources become fainter
127: and the scatter about this mean is $(0.16, 0.04, 0.02, 0.02)$. With the blue source correction
128: stellar magnitudes in Table 1 become brighter by \\$(-0.11,-0.08,-0.06,-0.04)$.
129: The scatter about these means is $(0.20, 0.13, 0.13, 0.10)$. Therefore, we have not implemented
130: a correction of this type, as the effect is small, and the conclusions below are unaffected.
131:
132:
133: \section{MIPS Survey}
134:
135: The MIPS resolution ranges from 6 arcsec at 24\mic to 40 arcsec at 160\mice.
136: \cite{gor06} described the MIPS program surveying M31,
137: fit a stellar population plus dust grain model to the spectral energy distribution,
138: and discussed the structure of M31 in terms of its interactions with M32 and NGC 205.
139: Point sources were extracted from the 7 individual MIPS 24\mic
140: AOR mosaics that together cover approximately $1\times3$ degrees centered on
141: M31.
142:
143: The point source extraction was done using the PSF-fitting
144: program StarFinder \citep{dio00} using a MIPS 24\micron~ model PSF
145: appropriate for stars \citep{eng07}. This method of
146: extracting point source photometry has been extensively tested on LMC
147: Spitzer observations \citep{mei06} and found to produce high
148: quality point source catalogs at 24\mice.
149:
150: \section{Stellar Photometry}
151:
152: Point spread functions (PSFs) were taken from the MOPEX\footnote{http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/irac/postbcd/mopex.html}
153: analysis release by the Spitzer Science Center.
154: Sixteen realizations of the PSF differing in pixel phase were constructed for each of the IRAC channels
155: at the survey pixel scale and combined with DAOPHOT \citep{ste87}.
156: Two passes were made with the ALLSTAR PSF-fitting software
157: for each of the four channels, yielding over a quarter of a million point sources at 3.6\mic ~with
158: a detection threshold of 2.5$\sigma$. At 8.0\mic ~we detected
159: 160,000 sources with the same threshold. Source lists were merged with the DAOMASTER program \citep{ste92}, using a 1 pixel matching radius.
160: Calibrated following \cite{rea05}, and using aperture corrections based on the PSFs, Figure 1
161: is the IRAC 2-color diagram for these objects. It resembles the equivalent diagram for the Large
162: Magellanic Cloud \citep{mei06}. Dusty evolved stars are offset from the origin in Figure 1.
163: Objects with [5.8]--[8] $>$ 1 are young stellar objects and show some concentration to the ring
164: of star formation in M31 \citep{hab84}, as seen in Figure 2. Figure 3 compares
165: the luminosity functions in the inner and outer parts of the galaxy.
166:
167: An estimate of the
168: foreground star and background galaxy contamination may be obtained by comparison with a survey such as SWIRE
169: (Lonsdale \etal 2004). Its lowest galactic latitude
170: field is ELAIS-N2; $b~=~+42^\circ$, compared to M31's $b~=~-21.2^\circ$. Its IRAC 2-color diagram is reproduced in
171: Figure 4. The IRAC catalog in this field covers $\sim 4.2$~deg$^2$.
172: To a magnitude limit of [3.6] = 17, there are 40,953 objects in the ELAIS-N2 catalog;
173: scaled to the IRAC M31 area (3.08~deg$^2$), this corresponds to 29,895 objects, a tenth of the total to 17th mag in M31.
174: The color distribution of the SWIRE sources
175: extends further to the red in [5.8]--[8.0] than the IRAC M31 sources, but the M31 sources' color extends further
176: to the red in [3.6]--[4.5]. The brighter M31 sources
177: also extend further to the red in [3.6]--[8.0]. All of these properties of the color distributions
178: are consistent with the M31 sources being dominated by stellar objects rather than
179: galaxies, particularly at the faint end.
180:
181:
182: Figure 5 is a color magnitude diagram (CMD) depicting massive star evolution in M31. Most of the stars
183: fall on a strong vertical feature. These are main sequence and supergiant stars, together with significant
184: contamination from foreground stars. The horizontal feature at
185: [3.6] = 10 mag shows the growth of circumstellar envelopes radiating at 300--1000K. To enable
186: follow-up of these objects, magnitudes for
187: [3.6] $<$ 11 mag are recorded in Table 1. M31 is only a 29\%
188: overdensity for 9 $<$ K $<$ 11 mag in the 2MASS point source catalog. (We
189: determined this by catalog searches in the four cardinal directions around
190: M31.)
191: We therefore expect 1/1.29, \ie 77 $\pm$ 6 \%, of the entries in Table 1 to be foreground.
192: Figure 6 shows the SWIRE control field. Scaling the 268 ELAIS-N2 catalog
193: with [3.6] $<$ 11 mag to the area of our M31 field, we expect 196 such objects.
194: There are 426 stars in the M31 field with [3.6] $<$ 11 and measured [8.0] mags.
195: If we assume that foreground objects scale as cosec($b$), the estimate of 196 foreground
196: stars becomes 362, which provides an independent estimate of the percentage
197: foreground contamination of 85 $\pm$ 7\% . That is a 2$\sigma$ detection of evolved
198: stars in M31 with [3.6] $<$ 11 mag.
199:
200: The maximum
201: luminosity [3.6] = 9.5 mag corresponds to $M_{\rm bol}\approx -11.9$
202: according to the supergiant bolometric corrections of \cite{joh66} for a distance of $m-M = 24.4$ mag
203: \citep{hut95}. This is a conservative estimate, as $[3.6] = 9.5$ mag
204: exceeds the saturation limits noted in $\S$2. Such high luminosities (1--2.5 $\times~10^6~L_\odot$) are reached in the evolution of
205: 120 M$_\odot$ stars \citep{chi86}.
206:
207: The tip of the asymptotic giant branch (AGB) \citep{woo83}
208: at M31 lies at $[3.6] > 14$ mag: all the evolved stars shown in Figure 5 are supergiants.
209: The positions of $\eta$ Car and VY CMa are represented on the diagram, moved to the distance of M31.
210: Data for these objects are from \cite{smi01}, \cite{pol99}, and \cite{whi94}.
211: Most of the stars with $[3.6] \approx 10$ are bluer than these objects: they are presumably
212: in an earlier evolutionary phase of thickening circumstellar envelopes
213: \footnote{RY Scuti is another case in point \citep{geh01}. It has [3.8] -- [8.9] $\approx$ 2.9 mag, but is considerably fainter than $\eta$ Car and VY CMa at 3.6\micron.}.
214: Figure 7 extends deeper into the CMD for M31. Although photometric errors become significant for
215: [3.6] $\sim$~ 17, we see a large number of AGB stars, stretching from the tip at 14.4 to the detection
216: limit at 17 mag. Figure 8 is the corresponding SWIRE control field.
217:
218: We carried out completeness tests by adding artificial stars to the [3.6] image. Completeness falls to
219: 50\% at [3.6] = 15.5 mag and drops to almost zero at 16.5 mag.
220:
221: We cross-correlated our catalog with that of \cite{mas06}. Over 87,000 matches were found within
222: 1.6 arcsec, but only a handful of these have been spectroscopically classified. Indeed, only 11 of these
223: matches are included in Table 1, and these are (with two exceptions) 21st and 22nd V mag stars. Luminous
224: Blue Variables are also known in M31 \citep{sz96}, but these have K magnitudes between 13.9 and 17.6.
225: Clearly, there are many stars representing the latest stages of evolution in the stellar population of M31
226: that are most prominent in the infrared.
227:
228: We can also compare the CMD of M31 with that of M33 in Figure 9. \cite{mcq07}
229: plot the IRAC [3.6] -- [8] color distribution by [3.6] magnitude in
230: their figure 19. In M33 M$_{3.6} <$ --10 consists of AGB stars without dust;
231: the other two histograms are carbon stars with dust. We consider the carbon
232: star frequency of M31 in the next section.
233:
234: \section{Spectral Energy Distributions}
235: We cross-correlated our source catalog with the 2MASS Sky Survey \citep{skr06}
236: using the OpenSkyQuery facility (http://openskyquery.net/Sky/skysite )
237: of the National Virtual Observatory. Some 923 matches were found.
238: To go deeper in the near infrared, we downloaded a catalog from the ancillary
239: data products of the 2MASS Extended Mission. This derives from a set of
240: special observations made at the end of 2MASS survey operations that used
241: exposure times 6 times longer than the main survey. These measurements
242: reach $\sim$1 mag deeper than the survey. We found 3110 matches with the 6 $\times$ catalog within a 1.6 arcsec radius.
243:
244: Figure 10 is a CMD plotted from these matches. Following the deep JHK photometry
245: of M33 by \cite{ci08}, the strong vertical feature with J--K $<$ 1 and K $<$ 14.5 is foreground, mixed with M supergiants. The broader vertical feature with K $>$
246: 14.5 are M type AGB stars and stars with J--K $>$ 1.36\footnote{As M31 is more metal rich than M33, this cutoff is probably redder in M31. E(J--K) is only 0.01 mag larger in M31 than M33 \citep{sch98}.} are candidate carbon stars. The principal difference between M31 and M33, besides the fact that the
247: UKIRT M33 photometry goes deeper, is that the branch of carbon stars at
248: K = 16 mag (in
249: Figure 2) of \cite{ci08} is mostly absent, replaced by a dozen or so stars in M31
250: at K $\approx$ 14 mag. The product of third dredge up, carbon stars are harder to make in metal rich envelopes \citep{rv81}.
251:
252: \cite{blu06} have classified stars in the SAGE survey of the Large Magellanic
253: Cloud \citep{mei06} according to their position in the [3.6], J-[3.6] CMD.
254: Figure 11 reproduces this classification for an LMC distance modulus of 18.5
255: \citep{mo2000}. Supergiants are separated in color from AGB M stars, which
256: are in turn separated from AGB C stars. In the LMC this separation is clearly
257: made into distinct concentrations in the Hess diagram, in which the RGB
258: tip, the oxygen-rich and carbon-rich AGB branches are clearly visible.
259: In M31 the IRAC/2MASS CMD is sparser and noisier, and additional dredge up
260: may be required to overcome additional metallicity and
261: make carbon stars. Classification based on Figure 10 may be indicative
262: rather than exact, until spectroscopy can be obtained at 14 $<$ [3.6] $<$ 16
263: and J--K $\approx$ 2.
264:
265: Matching with 6$\times$ 2MASS allowed spectral energy
266: distributions (SED) to be plotted from 1--8~\micron. Foreground stars will tend to show photospheric SEDs.
267: For those stars showing a mid-infrared excess (defined as a peak at 3.6~\micron ~or beyond),
268: we display SEDs in Figure 12 and magnitudes in Table 2. Three broad classes of
269: sources are seen in Figure 12: (i) those that peak at 3.6~\micron, (ii) sources
270: with a longer wavelength excess, and (iii) relatively flat spectrum sources. The
271: first class are consistent with rather warm circumstellar envelopes ($\sim$1000K);
272: in class (ii) the envelope is cooler ($\simlt$500K); class (iii) would be consistent with compact
273: HII regions, supernovae remnants, or planetary nebulae, especially if the
274: approximately flat spectrum extends to 24~\micron~ (Verley \etal 2007). Omitted
275: from Figure 12 are cases where DAOMASTER failed to match a star at an individual wavelength.
276: There are approximately 20 such cases for which spurious peaks appear in the SED.
277:
278: Bolometric corrections are not tabulated for stars as red as some of these objects. Integrating these
279: SEDs from 1 -- 10~\micron, we obtain luminosities from 1 -- 20 $\times$ 10$^4$ L$_\odot$ for those
280: that are members of M31. The majority of these stars are AGB stars with
281: circumstellar envelopes; there are 12 that are nominally supergiants (
282: M$_{\rm bol}~<$ --7), mostly with warm circumstellar envelopes.
283: We cannot rule out that some of these stars may be late type dwarfs
284: in the foreground.
285:
286:
287: \section{Long Period Variables}
288:
289: The catalog was also cross-correlated with the long period variable (LPV) catalog of \cite{mou04}
290: which covers about half of the disk of M31.
291: We found 831 sources within 2.5 arcsec of LPVs, triple the number that
292: would have been expected by chance. The matches appear in Table 3
293: and comprise over 40\% of the LPV catalog. Figure 13 is the IRAC 2-color diagram for LPVs and Figure 14 is a color magnitude diagram.
294:
295: The distribution of points in Figure 14 is bounded by the limits of Mould, Saha \& Hughes's photometry
296: at J $\approx$ 18.5 and the present photometry [3.6] $\approx$ 17 mag.
297: With $\langle K\rangle = 16.38$ mag, these LPVs have $M_{\rm bol} \approx -5$ and are AGB stars. This contrasts
298: with the LMC and M33 which show significant numbers of supergiant LPVs with $M_{\rm bol}< -7$ in addition to
299: their AGB population \citep{woo83,mou90}.
300:
301:
302: \section{MIPS sources}
303: Over 25,000 sources from 1 Jy to 0.2 mJy were extracted from the MIPS 24~\micron ~image. Sources that are bright
304: at 24~\micron~ include HII regions, supernova remnants, and planetary nebulae (Verley \etal 2007).
305: Nevertheless, cross-correlation with the brightest six magnitudes of the IRAC stellar
306: catalog yielded 599 matches within 1 arcsec, and these are found in Table 4. Sixty matches would have been expected by chance.
307: Figure 15 shows that
308: that many of these matches fall on the dusty stars side of the IRAC-MIPS 2-color diagram,
309: rather than the young stellar objects side (Meixner \etal 2006). J004258.15+410731.3 is 667 day period
310: LPV 33133. J004031.89+410624.7 is 785 day period LPV 16094.
311: J004029.18+404453.8 is 575 day period LPV 14023. These are
312: 3 of the 20 longest periods in the LPV catalog. Their SEDs are shown in Figure 16. These can be compared
313: with some of the brighter MIPS sources in Figure 17. These extreme period LPVs appear to show two components,
314: a photospheric component, and a dust shell that is relatively cool compared with those illustrated in $\S$5.
315:
316: The luminosity function of 24~\micron~ sources is illustrated in Figure 18. Brighter sources tend to be contained
317: within M31's ring of star formation and are more likely to be compact HII
318: regions or young stellar objects.
319:
320: \section{Conclusions}
321: Our Spitzer Space Telescope survey reveals a rich population of evolved stars in M31. Although there is strong foreground contamination, supergiants are present as bright as
322: $1 - 2.5 \times 10^6$~$L_\odot$. These evolve into stars with extensive circumstellar envelopes like $\eta$~Carinae
323: and VY CMa in the Milky Way. A number of the brightest supergiants at 3.6\mic are so red that they
324: will be missed in optical surveys.
325: We also resolve stars below the tip of the AGB to $M_{\rm bol} = -5$~mag. Many of these are LPVs, which also have dusty envelopes. Photometric candidates for
326: AGB carbon stars are much fewer in M31 than M33, but spectroscopy is required
327: to quantify this.
328:
329: \acknowledgements
330: This work is based on observations made with the Spitzer Space Telescope,
331: which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology under a contract with NASA.
332: Support for this work was provided by NASA through an award issued by JPL/Caltech.
333: This work makes use of 2MASS data products, a joint project of the University of Massachusetts and IPAC/Caltech, funded by NASA and NSF.
334: In addition to DAOPHOT, this research has made use of IRAF, which is distributed by NOAO. NOAO is
335: operated by AURA under a cooperative agreement with NSF.
336:
337: \begin{thebibliography}{}
338: \bibitem[Baade (1944)]{baa44} Baade, W. 1944, \apj, 100, 137
339: \bibitem[Baade and Swope (1963)]{bs63}Baade, W. and Swope, H. 1963, \aj, 68, 436
340: \bibitem[Barmby \etal (2006)]{bar06}Barmby, P. \etal 2006, \apjl, 650, L45
341: \bibitem[Berkhuijsen \etal (1988)]{ber88}Berkhuijsen, E., Humphreys, R., Ghigo, F., \& Zumach, W. 1988, \aaps, 76, 65
342: \bibitem[Blum \etal (2006)]{blu06}Blum, R. \etal 2006 \aj, 132, 2034
343: \bibitem[Cannon \etal (2007)]{can07}Cannon, J. \etal 2007, \apj, 652, 1170
344: \bibitem[Chiosi \& Maeder (1986)]{chi86}Chiosi, C. \& Maeder, A., 1986, \araa, 24, 329
345: \bibitem[Cioni \etal (2008)]{ci08} Cioni, M.,-R. L. \etal 2008, A\&A (in press)
346: astro-ph 08051143
347: \bibitem[Dioliati \etal (2000)]{dio00}Diolaiti, E., Bendinelli, O., Bonaccini, D., Close, L., Currie, D., \& Parmeggiani, G. 2000, \aaps, 147, 335
348: \bibitem[Engelbracht \etal (2007)]{eng07}Engelbracht, C. W. et al. 2007, \pasp, 119, 994
349: \bibitem[Fazio \etal (2004)]{faz04}Fazio, G. G. \etal 2004, \apjs, 154, 10
350: \bibitem[Gehrz \etal (2001)]{geh01}Gehrz, R. D. \etal 2001, \apj, 559, 395
351: \bibitem[Gehrz \etal (2007)]{geh07}Gehrz, R. D. \etal 2007, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 78, 11302
352: \bibitem[Gordon \etal (2004)]{gor04}Gordon, K. \etal 2004, \apjs, 154, 215
353: \bibitem[Gordon \etal (2006)]{gor06}Gordon, K. \etal 2006, \apjl, 638, L87
354: %\bibitem[]{}Gordon, K. \etal 2006b, ASP Conf. Series, 357, 188
355: \bibitem[Habing \etal (1984)]{hab84}Habing, H. \etal 1984, \apjl, 278, L59
356: \bibitem[Herrero \etal (1994)]{h94}Herrero, A. \etal 1994, A\&A, 287, 885
357: \bibitem[Hodge (1976)]{hod76}Hodge, P. 1976, Atlas of the Andromeda Galaxy, (Seattle: Univ. of Washington Press)
358: \bibitem[Hubble (1936)]{hub36}Hubble, E. 1936, ``The Realm of the Nebulae'', (New Haven: Yale Univ. Press)
359: \bibitem[Hubble and Sandage (1953)]{hs53} Hubble, E. and Sandage, A. 1953, \apj, 118, 353
360: \bibitem[Humphreys (1979)]{h79}Humphreys, R. 1979 \apj, 234, 854
361: \bibitem[Humphreys \etal (1988)]{h88}Humphreys, R. \etal 1988, \aj, 96, 1884
362: \bibitem[Humphreys, Massey, \& Freedman (1990)]{hmf90}Humphreys, R., Massey, P. \& Freedman, W. 1990 \aj, 99, 84
363: \bibitem[Humphreys \etal (2006)]{h06}Humphreys, R. \etal 2006, \aj, 131, 2105
364: \bibitem[Huterer \etal (1995)]{hut95}Huterer, D., Sasselov, D., \& Schechter, P. 1995, \aj, 110, 2705
365: \bibitem[Jackson \etal (2006)]{jac06}Jackson, D. \etal 2006, \apj, 646, 192
366: \bibitem[Jackson \etal (2007a)]{jaa07}Jackson, D. \etal 2007a, \apj, 656, 818
367: \bibitem[Jackson \etal (2007b)]{jab07}Jackson, D. \etal 2007b, \apj, 667, 891
368: \bibitem[Jarrett \etal (2003)]{jar03}Jarrett, T. \etal 2003, \aj, 125, 525
369: \bibitem[Johnson (1966)]{joh66}Johnson, H. 1966, \araa, 4, 193
370: \bibitem[Kraemer \etal (2002)]{kra02}Kraemer, K. \etal 2002, \aj, 124, 2990
371: \bibitem[Lee \etal (2002)]{lee02}Lee, M.G. \etal 2002, \apj, 565, 959
372: \bibitem[Lonsdale, C. \etal (2004)]{lon04}Lonsdale, C. \etal 2004, \apjs, 154, 54
373: \bibitem[McQuinn \etal (2007)]{mcq07}McQuinn, K. \etal 2007, \apj, 664, 850
374: \bibitem[Magnier \etal (1992)]{mag92}Magnier, E. \etal 1992, A\&AS, 96, 379
375: \bibitem[Massey (1998)]{mas98}Massey, P. 1998, \apj, 501, 153
376: \bibitem[Massey \etal (2006)]{mas06}Massey, P. \etal 2006, \aj, 131, 2478
377: \bibitem[Meixner \etal (2006)]{mei06}Meixner, M. \etal 2006, \aj, 132, 2268
378: \bibitem[Mochjeska \etal (2001)]{moc01}Mochejska, B., Kaluzny, J., Stanek, K., \& Sasselov, D. 2001, \aj, 132, 271
379: \bibitem[Mould \& Kristian (1986)]{mk86}Mould, J. \& Kristian J. 1986, \apj, 305, 591
380: \bibitem[Mould \etal (1990)]{mou90}Mould, J. \etal 1990, \apj, 349, 503
381: \bibitem[Mould, Saha, \& Hughes (2004)]{mou04}Mould, J., Saha, A., \& Hughes, S. 2004, \apjs, 154, 623
382: \bibitem[Mould \etal (2000)]{mo2000}Mould, J. \etal 2000, \apj, 529, 786
383: \bibitem[Odenwald \etal (1998)]{ode98}Odenwald, S., Newmark, J.,\& Smoot, G. 1998, \apj, 500, 554
384: \bibitem[Olsen \etal (2006)]{ols06}Olsen, K. \etal 2006, \aj, 132, 271
385: \bibitem[Polomski \etal (1999)]{pol99}Polomski, E. \etal 1999, \aj, 118, 2369
386: \bibitem[Reach \etal (2005)]{rea05}Reach, W. \etal 2005, \pasp, 117, 978
387: \bibitem[Renzini \& Voli (1981)]{rv81}Renzini, A. \& Voli, M 1981, A\&A, 94, 175
388: \bibitem[Rieke \etal (2004)]{rie04}Rieke, G. H. \etal 2004, \apjs, 154, 25
389: \bibitem[Schlegel, Finkbeiner, \& Davis (1998)]{sch98} Schlegel, D., Finkbeiner, D., \& Davis, M. 1998, \apj, 500, 525
390: \bibitem[Skrutskie \etal (2006)]{skr06}Skrutskie, M. \etal 2006, \aj, 131, 1163
391: \bibitem[Smith \etal (2001)]{smi01}Smith, N. \etal 2001, \aj, 121, 1111
392: \bibitem[Stetson (1987)]{ste87}Stetson, P. 1987, \pasp, 99, 191
393: \bibitem[Stetson (1992)]{ste92}Stetson, P. 1992, in IAU Colloq. 136, Stellar
394: photometry -- Current techniques and future developments, ed C.J. Butler \&
395: I. Elliot, (Cambridge: CUP), p.291
396: \bibitem[Szeifert \etal (1996)]{sz96}Szeifert, Th. \etal 1996, A\&A, 314, 131
397: \bibitem[Verley \etal (2007)]{ver07}Verley, S. \etal 2007, \aap , 476, 1161
398: \bibitem[Werner \etal (2004)]{wer04}Werner, M.W. \etal 2004, \apjs, 154, 1
399: \bibitem[Whitelock \etal (1994)]{whi94}Whitelock, P. \etal 1994, \mnras , 270, 364
400: \bibitem[Wood \etal (1983)]{woo83}Wood, P., Bessell, M. \& Fox, M. 1983, \apj, 273, 99
401: \bibitem[Xu \& Helou (1996)]{xuh96}Xu, C. \& Helou, G. 1996, \apj, 456, 152
402: \end{thebibliography}
403:
404: %\pagebreak
405:
406: \begin{deluxetable} {rrrrrrr}
407: \tablecaption{\bf Photometry of the infrared brightest stars}\label{tab1}
408: \tablehead{
409: \colhead{\#} & \colhead{RA (2000)} & \colhead{ Dec } & \colhead{[3.6]} & \colhead{[4.5]} & \colhead{[5.8]} & \colhead{[8]} }
410: \startdata
411: J003648.82+395625.7& 9.20341& 39.94046& 10.87 7& 10.82 5& 10.80 2& 10.71 3 \nl
412: J003659.17+400336.6& 9.24653& 40.06018& 9.67 11& 9.36 2& 9.23 10& 9.00 1 \nl
413: J003700.47+395031.8& 9.25196& 39.84217& 10.26 5& 10.07 3& 10.02 5& 9.88 2 \nl
414: J003700.75+401914.0& 9.25311& 40.32055& 9.99 12& 9.76 5& 9.66 5& 9.60 2 \nl
415: J003700.97+395619.2& 9.25404& 39.93867& 10.18 18& 10.79 21& 12.12 40& 11.19 30 \nl
416: J003708.35+403034.8& 9.28479& 40.50966& 10.16 7& 9.24 10& 8.52 1& 8.37 1 \nl
417: J003708.38+403032.4& 9.28490& 40.50901& 10.33 7& & 11.03 11& 11.24 10 \nl
418: J003708.54+394701.7& 9.28557& 39.78380& 10.82 7& 10.92 5& 10.93 7& 10.79 5 \nl
419: J003709.07+401450.0& 9.28779& 40.24722& 10.07 10& 9.93 5& 9.87 3& 9.77 1 \nl
420: J003709.53+403350.1& 9.28970& 40.56393& 10.98 5& 10.81 7& 10.91 2& 10.87 7 \nl
421: J003716.53+395705.7& 9.31886& 39.95158& 9.78 7& 9.58 5& 9.61 1& 9.43 1 \nl
422: \ldots & \ldots & \dots & \ldots & \ldots & \ldots & \ldots \nl
423: \enddata
424: \tablecomments{Magnitudes are given together with an uncertainty in hundredths of a magnitude. Table 1 is published in its entirety in the electronic edition
425: of the $Astrophysical~ Journal$. A portion is shown here for guidance regarding
426: its form and content.}
427: \end{deluxetable}
428:
429: \begin{deluxetable} {rrrrrrrrrr}
430: \tablecaption{\bf 2MASS 6$\times$ matches}\label{tab2}
431:
432: \tablehead{
433: \colhead{\#} & \colhead{RA (2000)}&\colhead{Dec} &\colhead{ J} & \colhead{ H }&\colhead{K}& \colhead{[3.6]}&
434: \colhead{[4.5]}& \colhead{[5.8]} & \colhead{[8.0]}}
435: \startdata
436: 52& 9.62906& 40.30904& 17.17& 16.64& 17.16& 11.50& 11.59& 11.38& 11.35 \nl
437: 24& 9.67014& 40.47509& 17.57& 16.80& 16.16& 13.04& 12.98& 12.95& 12.85 \nl
438: 3& 9.72386& 40.49491& 18.25& 16.67& 16.22& 14.01& 13.28& 12.79& 12.28 \nl
439: 43& 9.72643& 40.62497& 17.69& 16.62& 16.30& 12.03& 12.10& 11.74& 12.17 \nl
440: 49& 10.07809& 40.60300& 17.69& 16.36& 16.26& 13.72& 12.52& 11.37& 10.41 \nl
441: 15& 10.08307& 40.56743& 17.65& 16.57& 16.43& 14.69& 13.47& 12.73& 11.82 \nl
442: 6& 10.08431& 40.67662& 17.23& 16.34& 15.86& 14.87& 13.70& 12.43& 11.57 \nl
443: 44& 10.12849& 40.70961& 16.99& 15.78& 15.59& 14.84& 14.19& 12.03& 10.87 \nl
444: 3075& 10.13519& 40.65016& 16.37& 16.20& 15.32& 15.18& 14.90& 11.97& 10.16 \nl
445: 2968& 10.29796& 41.13960& 18.31& 16.71& 16.26& 14.88& 14.34& 13.41& 12.57 \nl
446: 2947& 10.33984& 40.83079& 17.83& 16.77& 16.26& 14.45& 14.04& 11.49& 9.66 \nl
447: \ldots & \ldots & \ldots & \ldots & \ldots & \ldots & \ldots & \ldots & \ldots &\ldots \nl
448:
449: \enddata
450: \tablecomments{Table 2 is published in its entirety in the electronic edition
451: of the $Astrophysical~ Journal$. A portion is shown here for guidance regarding
452: its form and content.}
453: \end{deluxetable}
454:
455: \begin{deluxetable} {rrrrrrrr}
456: \tablecaption{\bf LPV matches}\label{tab3}
457: \tablehead{
458: \colhead{MSH(2004) \#} &\colhead{ J} & \colhead{ H }& \colhead{K}& \colhead{[3.6]}&
459: \colhead{[4.5]}& \colhead{[5.8]} & \colhead{[8]}}
460: \startdata
461: 11009& 18.05& 16.84& 16.38& 16.03& 15.93& & \\
462: 12008& 17.12& 16.07& 16.03& 16.23& & & \\
463: 12022& 17.63& 17.40& & 16.17& & & \\
464: 12026& & 17.42& & 16.45& & & \\
465: 12034& & 17.30& 17.20& 16.68& & & \\
466: 12040& 17.90& 17.03& 16.74& 15.84& 15.60& & \\
467: 12041& 18.43& 17.08& 17.54& 15.80& 15.98& & \\
468: 12042& 17.59& 17.03& 17.47& 16.00& 14.99& 14.36& 13.10 \\
469: 12052& & 17.97& & 16.30& & & \\
470: 12080& 18.58& & & 16.19& & & \\
471: 12090& 18.02& 17.43& 17.82& 15.42& & & \\
472: 12092& & 17.82& 17.80& 16.59& & & \\
473: 13002& 18.53& 17.76& 17.16& 16.04& 16.21& & \\
474: 13012& 17.98& 17.50& 16.98& 15.42& 15.29& 14.59& \\
475: 13013& 17.90& 17.26& 16.95& 15.70& 16.11& & \\
476: 13021& 16.15& 15.92& 14.90& 16.52& & & \\
477: \ldots & \ldots& \ldots& \ldots& \ldots& \ldots & \ldots &\ldots \\
478: \enddata
479: \tablecomments{Table 3 is published in its entirety in the electronic edition
480: of the $Astrophysical~ Journal$. A portion is shown here for guidance regarding
481: its form and content.}
482: \end{deluxetable}
483:
484: \clearpage
485: \begin{deluxetable} {rrrrrrrr}
486: \tablecaption{\bf MIPS 24$\mu$ sources}\label{tab4}
487: \tablehead{
488: \colhead{SSTM1M311 \#} & \colhead{RA (2000)} & \colhead{ Dec }&\colhead{[3.6]}&\colhead{ [4.5]}
489: &\colhead{ [5.8]}& \colhead{ [8]} &\colhead{[24]} }
490: \startdata
491: J003921.35+402142.2 & 9.83898& 40.36174& 13.98& 13.84& 13.67& 13.65& 9.50 \nl
492: J004004.56+403844.1 & 10.01900& 40.64558& 14.62& 14.55& 13.98& 13.51& 10.42 \nl
493: J004014.35+404836.3 & 10.05983& 40.81009& 15.12& 14.55& 13.83& 13.46& 10.59 \nl
494: J004031.52+404126.6 & 10.13134& 40.69073& 15.86& 15.49& 12.64& 10.75& 5.63 \nl
495: J004032.94+403901.7 & 10.13728& 40.65049& 14.89& 14.82& 12.36& 10.65& 8.32 \nl
496: J004043.74+404326.6 & 10.18226& 40.72406& 15.51& 15.20& 14.35& 12.88& 10.70 \nl
497: J004046.28+403324.6 & 10.19284& 40.55685& 16.04& 15.03& 14.19& 12.96& 9.93 \nl
498: J004054.09+404606.5 & 10.22541& 40.76847& 15.68& 15.58& 14.39& 12.43& 10.11 \nl
499: J004055.89+404644.3 & 10.23291& 40.77898& 16.03& 15.36& & 12.57& 9.16 \nl
500: J004057.04+404935.8 & 10.23771& 40.82663& 15.75& 15.22& 14.30& 13.92& 9.65 \nl
501: J004059.78+403530.7 & 10.24912& 40.59188& 11.39& 11.35& 11.14& 10.87& 10.35 \nl
502: J004102.24+410432.1 & 10.25936& 41.07561& 15.73& 15.51& 12.80& 10.77& 8.31 \nl
503: J004104.65+405428.4 & 10.26940& 40.90791& 12.43& 12.53& 12.28& 12.25& 11.34 \nl
504: \ldots & \ldots& \ldots& \ldots& \ldots& \ldots & \ldots &\ldots \\
505: \enddata
506: \tablecomments{Table 4 is published in its entirety in the electronic edition
507: of the $Astrophysical~ Journal$. A portion is shown here for guidance regarding
508: its form and content.}
509: \end{deluxetable}
510: \clearpage
511: \figcaption{IRAC 2-color diagram for sources in M31. The magnitudes are
512: standard IRAC Vega magnitudes.}
513:
514: \figcaption{Distribution of sources with measured [8.0] magnitudes in M31. Sources with [5.8] -- [8.0]
515: $>$ 1 are denoted by red triangles. The galaxy in the western ``fin" of this plot is NGC 205. The northern major axis of M31 is to the left.}
516:
517: \figcaption{Source counts as a function of magnitude. The shaded area
518: refers to the inner (deprojected) 9 kpc of M31. The unshaded area shows
519: the full source counts.}
520:
521: \figcaption{IRAC 2-color comparison diagram for the ELAIS-N2 SWIRE field.
522: Sources brighter than [3.6] = 17 mag are shown for comparison with Figure 1.}
523:
524: \figcaption{IRAC color magnitude diagram for sources in M31. The positions of two Galactic evolved
525: stars are shown at M31's distance. Also shown is M33 Variable A (Humphreys \etal 2006). The distance
526: modulus assumed for M33 is 24.52 mag (Lee \etal 2002).}
527:
528: \figcaption{IRAC color magnitude diagram for the ELAIS-N2 SWIRE control field.}
529:
530: \figcaption{Deep IRAC color magnitude diagram for sources in M31. This CMD extends to the AGB.
531: Photometric errors ($\pm 1\sigma$) are displayed at the right of the figure.}
532:
533: \figcaption{Deep IRAC color magnitude diagram for the ELAIS-N2 SWIRE control field.}
534:
535: \figcaption{Color distribution as a function of magnitude for comparison
536: with M33, see \cite{mcq07}. In M33 major peaks in the histograms
537: indicate AGB stars without dust ([3.6]--[8] $\approx$ 0), carbon stars
538: with dust (0.5 $\simlt$ [3.6]--[8] $\simlt$ 2.5) and M$_{3.6} <$ --9, and
539: YSOs ([3.6]--[8] $\simgt$ 4).}
540:
541: \figcaption{CMD for the matches with 6$\times$ 2MASS.}
542:
543: \figcaption{CMD following the classification by \cite{blu06} of stars into
544: supergiants (green), AGB oxygen-rich (blue), and AGB carbon-rich (red).}
545:
546: \figcaption{Spectral energy distributions for sources in 2MASS with mid-infrared excesses.
547: The colored numbers refer to Table 2.}
548:
549: \figcaption{Two color diagram for M31's LPVs.}
550:
551: \figcaption{CMD for M31's LPVs.}
552:
553: \figcaption{IRAC-MIPS 2-color diagram for bright sources in M31 from Table 4.
554: According to Meixner \etal 2006, young stellar objects lie on the
555: right side of the dashed line.}
556:
557: \figcaption{Spectral energy distributions for 3 LPVs.
558: The colored numbers are those of Mould, Saha, \& Hughes (2003).}
559:
560: \figcaption{Spectral energy distributions for 5 bright 24\micron ~sources in M31.}
561:
562: \figcaption{Luminosity function for 24\micron ~sources. The red (dashed) histogram is for sources
563: contained within M31's ring of star formation.}
564:
565: \clearpage
566:
567: \begin{figure}
568: \plotone{f1.eps}
569: \centerline{f1.eps}
570: \end{figure}
571: \clearpage
572:
573: \begin{figure}
574: %\plotone{f2.eps}
575: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.5\textwidth]{f2.eps}
576: \centerline{f2.eps}
577: \end{figure}
578: \clearpage
579:
580: \begin{figure}
581: \plotone{f3.eps}
582: \centerline{f3.eps}
583: \end{figure}
584: \clearpage
585:
586: \begin{figure}
587: \plotone{f4.eps}
588: \centerline{f4.eps}
589: \end{figure}
590: \clearpage
591:
592: \begin{figure}
593: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.8\textwidth]{f5.eps}
594: \centerline{f5.eps}
595: \end{figure}
596: \clearpage
597:
598: \begin{figure}
599: \plotone{f6.eps}
600: \centerline{f6.eps}
601: \end{figure}
602: \clearpage
603:
604: \begin{figure}
605: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.8\textwidth]{f7.eps}
606: \centerline{f7.eps}
607: \end{figure}
608: \clearpage
609:
610: \begin{figure}
611: \plotone{f8.eps}
612: \centerline{f8.eps}
613: \end{figure}
614: \clearpage
615:
616: \begin{figure}
617: \plotone{f9.eps}
618: %\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.8\textwidth]{f9.eps}
619: \centerline{f9.eps}
620: \end{figure}
621: \clearpage
622:
623: \begin{figure}
624: \plotone{f10.eps}
625: \centerline{f10.eps}
626: \end{figure}
627: \clearpage
628:
629: \begin{figure}
630: \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=1.2\textwidth]{f11.eps}
631: %\plotone{f11.eps}
632: \centerline{f11.eps}
633: \end{figure}
634: \clearpage
635:
636: \begin{figure}
637: \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=\textwidth]{f12a.eps}
638: \centerline{f12a.eps}
639: \end{figure}
640: \clearpage
641:
642: \begin{figure}
643: \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=\textwidth]{f12b.eps}
644: \centerline{f12b.eps}
645: \end{figure}
646: \clearpage
647:
648: \begin{figure}
649: \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=\textwidth]{f12c.eps}
650: \centerline{f12c.eps}
651: \end{figure}
652: \clearpage
653:
654: \begin{figure}
655: \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=\textwidth]{f12d.eps}
656: \centerline{f12d.eps}
657: \end{figure}
658: \clearpage
659:
660: \begin{figure}
661: \plotone{f13.eps}
662: \centerline{f13.eps}
663: \end{figure}
664: \clearpage
665:
666: \begin{figure}
667: \includegraphics[angle=-0,width=0.8\textwidth]{f14.eps}
668: \centerline{f14.eps}
669: \end{figure}
670: \clearpage
671:
672: \begin{figure}
673: \plotone{f15.eps}
674: \centerline{f15.eps}
675: \end{figure}
676: \clearpage
677:
678: \begin{figure}
679: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.8\textwidth]{f16.eps}
680: \centerline{f16.eps}
681: \end{figure}
682: \clearpage
683:
684: \begin{figure}
685: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.8\textwidth]{f17.eps}
686: \centerline{f17.eps}
687: \end{figure}
688: \clearpage
689:
690: \begin{figure}
691: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.8\textwidth]{f18.eps}
692: \centerline{f18.eps}
693: \end{figure}
694:
695: \end{document}
696:
697:
698:
699: \end{document}
700:
701: