1: \documentclass{emulateapj}
2: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3:
4: \newcommand{\che} {\log\ ({\rm C/He})}
5: \newcommand{\ch} {\log\ ({\rm C/H})}
6: \newcommand{\mv} {M_V}
7: \newcommand{\msun} {$M_{\odot}$}
8: \newcommand{\rsun} {$R_{\odot}$}
9: \newcommand{\lsun} {$L_{\odot}$}
10: \newcommand{\halpha} {H$\alpha$}
11: \newcommand{\hbeta} {H$\beta$}
12: \newcommand{\hgamma} {H$\gamma$}
13: \newcommand{\hdelta} {H$\delta$}
14: \newcommand{\Te} {T_{\rm eff}}
15: \newcommand{\logg} {\log g}
16: \newcommand{\nh} {\log\ ({\rm H/He})}
17:
18: \begin{document}
19:
20: \title{SDSS~J142625.71+575218.3: The First Pulsating White Dwarf with a
21: Large Detectable Magnetic Field}
22:
23: \author{P. Dufour\altaffilmark{1},
24: G. Fontaine\altaffilmark{2},
25: James Liebert\altaffilmark{1},
26: Kurtis Williams\altaffilmark{3,4},
27: David K. Lai\altaffilmark{5},
28: }
29:
30: \altaffiltext{1}{Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 North
31: Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721; dufourpa@as.arizona.edu,
32: liebert@as.arizona.edu}
33:
34: \altaffiltext{2}{D\'{e}partement de Physique, Universit\'{e} de
35: Montr\'{e}al, C.P. 6128, Succ. Centre-Ville, Montr\'{e}al,
36: Qu\'{e}bec, Canada H3C 3J7; fontaine@astro.umontreal.ca}
37:
38: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Astronomy, University of Texas at
39: Austin, Austin, TX, USA; kurtis@astro.as.utexas.edu}
40:
41: \altaffiltext{4}{NSF Astronomy and Astrophysics Postdoctoral Fellow}
42:
43: \altaffiltext{5}{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University
44: of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064; dklai@ucsc.edu}
45:
46: \begin{abstract}
47: We report the discovery of a strong magnetic field in the unique
48: pulsating carbon-atmosphere white dwarf SDSS J142625.71+575218.3. From
49: spectra gathered at the MMT and Keck telescopes, we infer a surface
50: field of $B_s$ $\simeq$ 1.2 MG, based on obvious Zeeman components
51: seen in several carbon lines. We also detect the presence of
52: a Zeeman-splitted He I 4471 line, which is an indicator of the
53: presence of a non-negligible amount of helium in the atmosphere of this
54: Hot DQ star. This is important for understanding its pulsations, as
55: nonadabatic theory reveals that some helium must be present in the envelope
56: mixture for pulsation modes to be excited in the range of effective
57: temperature where the target star is found. Out of nearly 200 pulsating
58: white dwarfs known today, this is the first example of a star with a
59: large detectable magnetic field. We suggest that SDSS
60: J142625.71+575218.3 is the white dwarf equivalent of a roAp star.
61: \end{abstract}
62:
63: \keywords{stars: abundances -- stars: atmospheres -- stars: individual
64: (SDSS~J1426+5752) -- stars: magnetic fields -- white dwarfs -- roAp}
65:
66: \section{INTRODUCTION}
67:
68: Recently, \citet{dufournat} reported the discovery of a new type of
69: white dwarf stars with an atmosphere composed primarily of carbon with
70: little or no traces of hydrogen or helium (the ''Hot DQ'' spectral
71: type). Prior to that discovery, white dwarfs cooler than $\sim $ 80,000 K
72: were known to come in essentially two flavors: those with an almost pure
73: hydrogen surface composition (forming the DA spectral type), and those
74: with a helium-dominated surface composition (the non-DA stars, which
75: comprise the DO, DB, DC, DZ, and DQ spectral types). Pulsationally
76: unstable stars are found among these two broad families of white dwarfs,
77: in each case occupying a narrow range of effective temperature.
78: Variable white dwarfs situated in these instability strips are,
79: respectively, classified ZZ Ceti stars (hydrogen atmospheres, $\Te \sim$
80: 12,000 K) and V777 Her stars (helium atmospheres, $\Te \sim$ 25,000
81: K). Since each of these instability regions is associated with
82: the presence of a partial ionization zone of the primary atmospheric
83: constituent (H or He), it was naturally expected that some
84: carbon-atmosphere white dwarfs could be unstable as well in a
85: certain regime of effective temperature corresponding to partial
86: ionization of carbon. And indeed, \citet{fontaine76} found
87: long ago strong similarities between the partial ionization regions and
88: associated superficial convection zones of white dwarf models with H-,
89: He-, and C-dominated atmospheres/envelopes. Theoretical considerations
90: thus suggested that some of the Hot DQ white dwarfs, because they are
91: located in a narrow range of effective temperature around 20,000 K
92: \citep{dufournat,dufour08}, could possibly pulsate. Following this, a systematic
93: search for pulsations in carbon-atmosphere white dwarfs carried out by
94: \citet{montgomery08} successfully discovered the first pulsating
95: carbon-dominated atmosphere white dwarf: SDSS~J142625.71+575218.3
96: (hereafter SDSS~J1426+5752). They uncovered a single pulsation (and its
97: first harmonic) with a period of 417 s in that star.
98:
99: In parallel with this observational effort, \citet{fontaine08} carried
100: out the first detailed stability study, based on the full nonadiabatic
101: approach, to investigate the asteroseismological potential of
102: carbon-atmosphere white dwarfs. They showed that pulsational
103: instabilities in the range of effective temperature where the Hot DQs
104: are found are indeed possible, but only if a fair amount of helium is
105: present in the atmosphere/envelope compositional mixture. White dwarf
106: models with pure carbon envelopes are found to pulsate, but only at
107: much higher temperatures than those characterizing Hot DQ's discovered
108: up to now. However, the SDSS spectra analyzed in \citet{dufour08},
109: even though quite noisy, rule out large amounts of helium (from the
110: absence of the He~\textsc{i} $\lambda$4471 line) for all objects
111: except SDSS~J1426+5752 which, because of its higher surface gravity
112: and lower effective temperature, could perhaps have an He/C abundance
113: ratio as high as 0.5. So, according to the full nonadiabatic models,
114: SDSS~J1426+5752 should be the only object pulsating, as observed,
115: provided helium is present in a relatively large amount at the
116: surface. However, even with such an abundance (He/C = 0.5), only a
117: tiny depression at the He~\textsc{i} $\lambda$4471 line is predicted
118: by synthetic models. Given the noisy SDSS spectrum for this object, no
119: firm conclusion could be reached concerning the presence of helium,
120: although the above mentioned abundance looked quite compatible with
121: the spectroscopic observation (see the SDSS spectrum and fits in
122: Figure 1).
123:
124: All this motivated us to obtain higher sensitivity observations for
125: this special object in order (1) to confirm, as may be the case, the
126: presence of a relatively large amount of helium (thus increasing our
127: confidence in the nonadiabatic approach), and (2) to be able to
128: eventually carry out a full asteroseismological analysis using better
129: constraints/determinations of the atmospheric parameters ($\Te$,
130: $\logg$ and He/C) from spectroscopy. In this Letter, we thus report
131: new high signal-to-noise ratio spectroscopic observations (MMT and
132: Keck) that revealed, to our great surprise, that SDSS~J1426+5752 is
133: the first pulsating white dwarf showing clear evidence for the
134: presence of a strong magnetic field. This is certainly an unexpected
135: result, given that strong magnetism in white dwarfs is generally
136: thought to extinguish, or at least greatly diminish, pulsational
137: activity. We discuss below the implications of this discovery.
138:
139: \section{OBSERVATIONS}\label{observation}
140:
141: Since the signal-to-noise ratio for the SDSS spectra of the faint
142: known carbon-atmosphere white dwarfs is not sufficient for a precise
143: determination of the atmospheric parameters, a program to reobserve
144: all the Hot DQ stars with the MMT 6.5 m telescope was recently
145: undertaken. The complete analysis of these new Hot DQ spectra will be
146: presented in due time, once the program is completed. As a part of the
147: program, SDSS~J1426+5752 was observed for a total of 180 minutes with
148: the Blue Channel spectrograph on the night of 2008 May 5. We used the
149: 500 line mm$^{-1}$ grating with a 1'' slit, resulting in a $\sim$~3.6
150: \AA~FWHM spectral resolution over a wavelength range of 3400-6300
151: \AA. The spectra were reduced with standard IRAF packages. The final
152: combined spectrum, shown in Figure 1, has a signal-to-noise ratio of
153: $\sim$75 at 4500 \AA.
154:
155: A lower signal-to-noise observation was obtained at the Keck
156: Observatory on the night of UT 2008 May 4 with the blue channel of
157: LRIS. The 400 groove mm$^{-1}$, 3400\AA~ grism was used with the D560
158: dichoric and the atmospheric dispersion corrector was active. Two
159: exposures with a total exposure time of 1260 seconds were taken with a
160: 0\farcs7 slit in 0\farcs9 seeing at an airmass of 2.3. The spectra
161: were reduced and extracted using standard IRAF packages. The spectra
162: were corrected for atmospheric extinction using the IRAF KPNO
163: extinction curve; the measured signal-to-noise is $\approx 54$ per
164: 5\AA~ resolution element at 4500\AA.
165:
166: In Figure 1, we present our new high signal-to-noise ratio MMT
167: spectrum, the Keck observation, as well as the SDSS
168: data that were used for the \citet{dufour08} analysis. The most
169: striking revelation brought by these new observations is that many of
170: the carbon features are clearly well separated into three Zeeman
171: components (see bottom panels in Figure 1). The separation between the
172: components of the C~\textsc{ii} features corresponds to a surface field
173: $B_s \approx$ 1.2 MG. Note that with the poor signal-to-noise
174: ratio of the SDSS observation, \citet{dufour08} could not resolve
175: the Zeeman structure and, as a result, their spectroscopic solution (see
176: Fig. 1) can now only be considered as an approximation of the true atmospheric
177: parameters. Our new observations also reveal a small but quite
178: significant depression near the 4471 He~\textsc{i} line, indicating that
179: helium is indeed present in relatively large abundance in this
180: object. However, since our atmosphere models do not include a magnetic
181: field yet, no exact abundance can be derived at this point, although it
182: is probably not too far from the 0.5 value mentioned above.
183:
184: \begin{figure}[h]
185: \plotone{f1.eps}
186: \caption{{\it Top:} Spectroscopic observations from SDSS, Keck and
187: MMT, normalized to unity at 4500 \AA~ and offset from each other for
188: clarity. In red is the solution of \citet{dufour08} based on the
189: nonmagnetic fit of the noisy SDSS spectrum ($\logg$ = 9.0, $\Te$ =
190: 19,830 K and He/C = 0.5). The dotted line marks the position of the
191: He~\textsc{i} $\lambda 4471$ line. We also added, to show the presence
192: of the small helium absorption, a line representing approximatively
193: the continuum for the MMT spectrum (the other depression near 4625
194: \AA~ is a carbon feature usually observed in higher $\Te$ objects,
195: indicating that the solution of \citet{dufour08} is perhaps slightly
196: underestimated). Note that the SDSS and Keck spectra have been
197: smoothed with a 3 pts average window for clarity {\it Bottom:}
198: Selected carbon lines from the Keck and MMT spectra that demonstrate
199: the presence of a 1.2 MG magnetic field through Zeeman splitting.}
200: \end{figure}
201:
202: \section{DISCUSSION}\label{results}
203:
204: \subsection{Origin of the Magnetic Field}
205:
206: It is generally believed that many magnetic white dwarfs are the
207: likely descendants of magnetic main sequence stars (the Ap and Bp
208: stars), and that the high fields observed in some white dwarfs are the
209: result of (partial) magnetic flux conservation of a fossil field as
210: the star shrinks in radius by a factor of $\sim$ 100 as it becomes a
211: white dwarf. Since, however, about ten per cent of isolated white
212: dwarfs are high field magnetic white dwarfs \citep[recognizable from
213: Zeeman split spectral lines,][]{liebert03,kawka07}, another origin may
214: also be necessary, possibly as proposed by \citet{tout08}.
215:
216: Dynamo-type mechanisms have also been proposed to explain the putative
217: weak magnetic field in the pulsating DB white dwarf GD 358
218: \citep{markiel94,thomas95}. However, it is quite unlikely that such
219: mechanisms could account for a field as high as 1.2 MG in the
220: carbon-rich atmosphere of SDSS~J1426+5752, or in a white dwarf in
221: general. Indeed, to produce a dynamo-type magnetic field, convective
222: motions must be strong enough to twist and move seed magnetic
223: lines. As the field grows, due to dynamo amplification, convection is
224: having a harder time to move the field lines. Thus, the final
225: large-scale field can never reach an amplitude comparable to the
226: so-called equipartition field strength given by the condition
227: $B_{eq}^2/8\pi = 1/2 ~ <\rho ~ v_{conv}^2>$, where the last term
228: corresponds to a suitable average over the convection zone of the
229: convective energy density.
230:
231: Typical values of $B_{eq}$, calculated for H-, He- and even
232: C-atmosphere white dwarfs by \citet{fontaine73} are $\sim$ 10-100
233: kG. While these results need to be revisited, in particular using a
234: state-of-the art model for SDSS~J1426+5752, it would be extremely
235: surprising to find that the order of magnitude estimates of
236: \citet{fontaine73} could change significantly. We thus believe that
237: the 1.2 MG magnetic field found in SDSS~J1426+5752 is a fossil field,
238: probably originating from an Ap star.
239:
240: \subsection{Magnetism and Pulsations in White Dwarf Stars}
241:
242: To date, there is no clear evidence for the presence of an
243: observable magnetic field in any of the known pulsating white
244: dwarfs. None of the 51 bright ZZ Ceti stars from the Bergeron sample
245: show any sign of Zeeman splitting in the optical spectra, which
246: translates, given the typical S/N ratio and resolution of the
247: observations, to limits on the magnetic field strength of about 500 kG
248: (P. Bergeron, private communication). Also, none of the known pulsating
249: DB white dwarfs have a magnetic field strong enough to be detected from
250: Zeeman splitting. This is also the case for the 18 known pulsating white
251: dwarfs of the GW Vir type.
252:
253: In order to detect weaker magnetic fields down to a few kG,
254: spectropolarimetric measurements are needed. Unfortunately, only a small
255: number of pulsating white dwarfs have been investigated with this more
256: precise method. Nevertheless, no significant magnetic field has ever
257: been found in any of the few pulsating white dwarfs for which
258: spectropolarimetric measurements are available
259: \citep{schmidt97,valyavin06}, and very small upper limits of a few kG
260: are obtained in all cases (with perhaps an uncertain marginal detection
261: in one case).
262:
263: The fact that the samples of magnetic and pulsating white dwarfs do not
264: intersect may not be very surprising from a theoretical point of
265: view. Indeed, pulsating white dwarfs of both the V777 Her and ZZ Ceti types
266: are found in a regime of effective temperature where an important
267: superficial convection zone is present. The latter is due to the partial
268: ionization of either He or H, and contributes significantly to the
269: excitation of pulsation modes. For a large scale magnetic field of
270: magnitude much stronger than the equipartition field strength, it is
271: likely that the convective motions are largely quenched, which perhaps
272: extinguishes completely pulsational driving. One example of a
273: white dwarf where a magnetic field \citep[$B_e = -1000 \pm
274: 500$ kG,][]{putney97} might have ''killed'' the pulsations is the constant
275: DB star LB~8827 \citep[PG~0853+164,][]{wesemael01}. Unfortunately, the
276: effective temperature of this object is uncertain, and it is not
277: known with certainty whether it is inside the DB instability strip or
278: not.
279:
280: The only case where the detection of a magnetic field has been claimed
281: in a pulsating white dwarf is that of GD~358. In that case, the magnetic
282: field has been indirectly inferred from asteroseismological analysis
283: \citep{winget94}. It should be noted that this interpretation of the
284: asteroseismological data in terms of a magnetic field is far from being
285: accepted by all (see, e.g., Fontaine \& Brassard 2008, in preparation). In any
286: case, follow-up circular polarization measurements of GD ~358 by
287: \citet{schmidt97} have not succeeded in detecting the presence of a
288: weak field, but their detection threshold was significantly above
289: the value of 1300 $\pm$ 300 gauss suggested by \citet{winget94}. Such
290: a small field is certainly not strong enough to affect the convection zone
291: significantly, and is apparently unable to stop the pulsations in this
292: variable white dwarf.
293:
294: \subsection{Rotation or Pulsations?}
295:
296: In this section, we briefly discuss the possibility that rotation might
297: be a significant ingredient in this puzzle. Indeed, rapid rotation is
298: known to be important in at least two variable magnetic white dwarf
299: systems where the variability is explained by changes with rotational
300: phase instead of pulsational instabilities. The first of these cases,
301: RE~J0317-853 \citep{barstow95, burleigh99}, is a highly magnetic,
302: rotating white dwarf with a period of 725 s that is most probably the
303: result of a double degenerate merger. The second case, Feige 7
304: \citep{liebert77}, is also a rotating magnetic white dwarf but, this
305: time, with a period of 2.2 hours. Its spectrum shows Zeeman splitting
306: for both hydrogen and helium that appears to vary with rotational phase
307: \citep{achilleos92}.
308:
309: Could it be that SDSS~J1426+5752 is a rare magnetic white dwarf
310: spinning very fast (which would make it, with a period of 417 s, the
311: fastest white dwarf amongst isolated white dwarfs)? Several factors
312: lead us to believe that, on the contrary, this star is most likely a
313: pulsator and not a rotator. The exposure time for each of our
314: integrations at the MMT (600 s) is well above the period of 417 s
315: found by \citet{montgomery08}, meaning that our spectra are averaged
316: over a variability cycle. If the luminosity variations are due to fast
317: rotation of the star, it is quite probable that the average magnetic
318: field along our line of sight, depending on the geometry and the
319: alignment of the field with respect to the rotation axis or the
320: presence of magnetic spots, would vary over one cycle. The resulting
321: Zeeman splitting of atomic line should thus vary in magnitude as the
322: field strength changes, leading to very broad or blended lines in our
323: average spectra, not three well separated and sharp components as
324: observed (see bottom panels in Figure 1).
325:
326: Of course, one could imagine a situation where a dipole field is well
327: aligned with the rotation axis, or a more complex field geometry that
328: is such that the field remains almost constant over the rotation
329: period although our knowledge of other magnetic white dwarfs suggests
330: that this is quite rare and unlikely \citep{wickramasinghe02}. This,
331: alone, is not an argument strong enough to discard completely this
332: possibility of fast rotation.
333:
334: However, our own rapid photometry campaign at the 61'' telescope at
335: Mount Bigelow with the Mont4K CCD imager brings an important new piece
336: to this puzzle (Fontaine et al. 2008, in preparation). Indeed, based
337: on a total of 107 hours of observations spread over one month (half in
338: early April and half in early May 2008), the presence of a
339: low-amplitude second mode with a period of 319 s (a 4.9 sigma result)
340: has now been revealed. That SDSS~J1426+5752 is therefore very likely a
341: multiperiodic pulsator is certainly a strong argument against the fast
342: rotator hypothesis. A more standard pulsation mechanism, although
343: involving a strong magnetic field, is thus probably at work here (see
344: below).
345:
346: Finally, if we look individually at each combination of two
347: consecutive 600 s MMT exposures (a single exposure is too noisy
348: to reveal the splitting in the lines), we do not find any evidence for
349: a change in the separation of the Zeeman components over a three hour
350: period, indicating that the magnetic field strength remains constant
351: over that timescale. Using the Keck data from the previous night,
352: we find that, within the limits of the noise, the spectrum looks
353: unchanged on a $\sim$20 h period as well. Unless we are dealing
354: with a complicated magnetic field geometry or that a dipole field is
355: perfectly aligned with the rotation axis, this probably indicates that
356: this star is rotating very slowly, which is more in line with our
357: understanding that magnetic white dwarfs are generally slow rotators
358: \citep{wickramasinghe02}.
359:
360: \subsection{A roAp Star Analog?}
361:
362: As discussed above, the magnetic field in SDSS~J1426+5752 is certainly
363: much stronger than $B_{eq}$, which immediately suggests that the
364: convective motions are smothered by the field and perhaps even that
365: there is no convection at all. At the very least, because ionized matter
366: cannot freely cross field lines, one would expect the suppression of
367: convective motions in the magnetic equatorial regions while some
368: ``channeled'' motions could resist near the magnetic poles. Since
369: convection plays a role in the driving of pulsation modes in nonmagnetic
370: models of SDSS~J1426+5752, how is it possible then that a white dwarf
371: with such a high magnetic field, and perhaps no significant convection
372: zone, pulsates?
373:
374: If we take a look across the wide field of stellar oscillations, we
375: find that there is a perfect example of a class of objects where
376: pulsations and magnetism are found to coexist: the rapidly oscillating
377: Ap (roAp) stars \citep{kurtz2006}. These stars have a strong (by main
378: sequence standards) magnetic field (1000-10,000 G), no convection, and
379: pulsation modes are excited through a kappa-type mechanism. It could thus
380: be that SDSS~J1426+5752 is a white dwarf analog of the roAp stars.
381: Amusingly, it is also not impossible that it might have pulsated as a
382: roAp itself in a distant past! The full nonadiabatic calculations
383: presented in \citet{dufour08} rely on equilibrium models that all have
384: convection zones, and are thus likely inappropriate for the case of
385: SDSS~J1426+5752. One interesting avenue we intend to explore is to
386: construct models in which we would prevent artificially convection in
387: order to mimic the effects of the magnetic field. Would artificially
388: radiative models pulsate? We do not know yet, but it would not be
389: surprising that they could via the usual kappa-mechanism since there
390: would still be, convection or not, a huge opacity peak in the envelope
391: of such models. While the magnetic field is probably sufficiently strong
392: to inhibit convective motions, it is not strong enough to stop the
393: pulsations themselves, very obviously because we detect oscillation
394: modes. The effect of the strong field on the pulsations is probably
395: indirect in that it changes the conditions for driving, but much more
396: work is required before we understand exactly how this occurs. The
397: presence of the field may also force the pulsations to align themselves
398: on the magnetic axis as in roAp stars. The body of knowledge gathered so
399: far on these stars should be extremely useful as a guide for future
400: investigations of the pulsation properties of SDSS~J1426+5752.
401:
402: \section{CONCLUSION}\label{conclusion}
403:
404: We presented evidence that SDSS~J1426+5752 is the first pulsating white
405: dwarf with the clear presence of a strong (i.e., strong enough for Zeeman
406: splitting to be observed) magnetic field ($\approx$ 1.2 MG). Such a
407: strong magnetic field probably inhibits the convective motions in this
408: object, but it is unclear yet how the pulsations are affected. We
409: proposed that this strange object could be a white dwarf analog of the
410: rapidly oscillating Ap stars and that a usual kappa-mechanism, even
411: in the absence of convection, might still explain the pulsational
412: instabilities. The confirmed presence of helium in the
413: envelope/atmosphere of SDSS~J1426+5752 is likely to play a key role in
414: this process. Future work testing this hypothesis is underway.
415:
416: \acknowledgements
417:
418: The authors would like to thank Constance Rockosi for her assistance
419: in obtaining the Keck Observations and Michael Bolte for facilitating
420: these observations. P.D. acknowledges the financial support of
421: NSERC. This work was also supported by the NSF through grant AST
422: 03-07321 and AST-0602288. Support from the Reardon Foundation is also
423: gratefully acknowledged. G.F. acknowledges the contribution of the
424: NSERC and the Canada Research Chair Program.
425:
426: \begin{thebibliography}{}
427:
428: \bibitem[Achilleos et al.(1992)]{achilleos92} Achilleos, N.,
429: Wickramasinghe, D.~T., Liebert, J., Saffer, R.~A., \& Grauer, A.~D.\
430: 1992, \apj, 396, 273
431:
432: \bibitem[Barstow et al.(1995)]{barstow95} Barstow, M.~A., Jordan, S.,
433: O'Donoghue, D., Burleigh, M.~R., Napiwotzki, R., \& Harrop-Allin,
434: M.~K.\ 1995, \mnras, 277, 971
435:
436: \bibitem[Burleigh et al.(1999)]{burleigh99} Burleigh, M.~R.,
437: Jordan, S., \& Schweizer, W.\ 1999, \apjl, 510, L37
438:
439: \bibitem[Dufour et al.(2007)]{dufournat} Dufour, P., Liebert, J.,
440: Fontaine, G., \& Behara, N.\ 2007, \nat, 450, 522
441:
442: \bibitem[Dufour et al.(2008)]{dufour08} Dufour, P., Fontaine,
443: G., Liebert, J., Schmidt, G.~D., \& Behara, N.\ 2008, ArXiv e-prints, 805, arXiv:0805.0331
444:
445: \bibitem[Fontaine et al.(1973)]{fontaine73} Fontaine, G., Thomas,
446: J.~H., \& van Horn, H.~M.\ 1973, \apj, 184, 911
447:
448: \bibitem[Fontaine et al.(2008)]{fontaine08} Fontaine, G., Brassard, P., \& Dufour, P.\ 2008, \aap, 483, L1
449:
450: \bibitem[Fontaine \& Van Horn (1976)]{fontaine76} Fontaine, G., \& Van
451: Horn, H.M. 1976, \apjs, 31, 467
452:
453: \bibitem[Kawka et al.(2007)]{kawka07} Kawka, A., Vennes, S.,
454: Schmidt, G.~D., Wickramasinghe, D.~T., \& Koch, R.\ 2007, \apj, 654, 499
455:
456: \bibitem[Kurtz (2006)]{kurtz2006} Kurtz, D.W. 2006, CoAst., 147, 6
457:
458: \bibitem[Liebert et al.(1977)]{liebert77} Liebert, J., Angel,
459: J.~R.~P., Stockman, H.~S., Spinrad, H.,
460: \& Beaver, E.~A.\ 1977, \apj, 214, 457
461:
462: \bibitem[Liebert et al.(2003)]{liebert03} Liebert, J., Bergeron,
463: P., \& Holberg, J.~B.\ 2003, \aj, 125, 348
464:
465: \bibitem[Markiel et al.(1994)]{markiel94} Markiel, J.~A., Thomas,
466: J.~H., \& van Horn, H.~M.\ 1994, \apj, 430, 834
467:
468: \bibitem[Montgomery et al.(2008)]{montgomery08} Montgomery, M.~H.,
469: Williams, K.~A., Winget, D.~E., Dufour, P., DeGennaro, S.,
470: \& Liebert, J.\ 2008, \apjl, 678, L51
471:
472: \bibitem[Putney(1997)]{putney97} Putney, A.\ 1997, \apjs, 112,
473: 527
474:
475: \bibitem[Schmidt \& Grauer(1997)]{schmidt97} Schmidt, G.~D., \& Grauer, A.~D.\ 1997, \apj, 488, 827
476:
477: \bibitem[Thomas et al.(1995)]{thomas95} Thomas, J.~H., Markiel,
478: J.~A., \& van Horn, H.~M.\ 1995, \apj, 453, 403
479:
480: \bibitem[Tout et al.(2008)]{tout08} Tout, C.~A., Wickramasinghe, D.~T., Liebert, J., Ferrario, L., \& Pringle, J.~E.\ 2008, ArXiv e-prints, 805, arXiv:0805.0115
481:
482: \bibitem[Valyavin et al.(2006)]{valyavin06} Valyavin, G., Bagnulo,
483: S., Fabrika, S., Inwoo Han, D., Monin, D., Reisenegger, A.,
484: \& Wade, G.~A.\ 2006, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, 358, 413
485:
486: \bibitem[Wesemael et al.(2001)]{wesemael01} Wesemael, F., Liebert,
487: J., Schmidt, G.~D., Beauchamp, A., Bergeron, P., \& Fontaine, G.\ 2001, \apj, 554, 1118
488:
489: \bibitem[Wickramasinghe \& Ferrario(2000)]{wickramasinghe02} Wickramasinghe, D.~T., \& Ferrario, L.\ 2000, \pasp, 112, 873
490:
491: \bibitem[Winget et al.(1994)]{winget94} Winget, D.~E., et al.\ 1994, \apj, 430, 839
492:
493: \end{thebibliography}
494:
495: \end{document}
496:
497:
498:
499: