1:
2: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
3:
4: \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
5:
6: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
7:
8: %
9: \newcommand\ms{M$_{\odot}$}
10: \newcommand\lum{$\log L/L_{\sun}$}
11: \newcommand\tef{$\log T_{\rm eff}$}
12: \newcommand\hb{H${\beta}$~}
13: \newcommand\ha{H${\alpha}$~}
14:
15:
16:
17: \slugcomment{to be submitted to The Astrophysical Journal}
18:
19: \shorttitle{Planetary Nebula Distance Scale}
20: \shortauthors{Stanghellini et~al.}
21:
22: \begin{document}
23:
24: \title{The Magellanic Cloud Calibration of the Galactic Planetary Nebula Distance Scale}
25: \author{Letizia Stanghellini}
26: \affil{National Optical Astronomy Observatory, 950 N. Cherry Av.,
27: Tucson, AZ 85719}
28: \email{lstanghellini@noao.edu}
29:
30:
31:
32: \author{Richard A. Shaw}
33: \affil{National Optical Astronomy Observatory, 950 N. Cherry Av.,
34: Tucson, AZ 85719}
35: \email{shaw@noao.edu}
36:
37:
38: \author{Eva Villaver\altaffilmark{1}}
39: \affil{Space Telescope Science Institute,
40: 3800 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218}
41: \email{villaver@stsci.edu}
42:
43: \altaffiltext{1}{Affiliated with the Hubble Space Telescope Division
44: of the European Space Agency}
45:
46:
47: %\clearpage
48: \begin{abstract}
49: Galactic planetary nebula (PN) distances are derived, except in a small
50: number of cases, through the calibration of statistical properties of
51: PNe. Such calibrations are limited by the accuracy of individual PN
52: distances which are obtained with several non-homogeneous methods, each
53: carrying its own set of liabilities. In this paper we use the physical
54: properties of the PNe in the Magellanic Clouds, and their accurately
55: known distances, to recalibrate the Shklovsky/Daub
56: distance technique. Our
57: new calibration is very similar (within 1\%) of
58: the commonly used distance scale by Cahn et al. (1992), although there
59: are important differences. We find that neither distance scale works well
60: for PNe with classic ("butterfly") bipolar morphology, and while the
61: radiation bounded PN sequences in both the Galactic and the Magellanic
62: Cloud calibration have similar slopes, the transition from optically
63: thick to optically thin appears to occur at higher surface brightness and smaller
64: size than that adopted by Cahn et al. The
65: dispersion in the determination of the scale factor suggests that PN
66: distances derived by this method are uncertain by at least 30\%, and
67: that this dispersion cannot be reduced significantly by using better
68: calibrators. We present a catalog of Galactic PN distances
69: using our re-calibration which can be used for future applications, and
70: compare the best individual Galactic PN distances to our new and several other
71: distance scales, both in the literature and newly recalibrated by us, finding that our
72: scale is the most reliable to date.
73:
74:
75:
76: \end{abstract}
77:
78: \keywords{Planetary nebulae: general; distances}
79:
80: \section{Introduction}
81:
82: The uncertainty associated with distances measurements of Galactic
83: planetary nebulae (PNe) is
84: a major obstacle to the advancement of PN research. Only $\sim$40 Galactic PNe
85: have distances that have been determined individually with reasonable accuracy.
86: Distances to Galactic PNe can be determined individually in various
87: ways, including cluster membership (Chen et al.~2003, CHW03; Alves et al.~2000, ABL00),
88: by measuring the rate of their expansion (e.~g., Liller \& Liller 1968, LL68; Hajian et al. 1995, HTB95),
89: by the reddening
90: method (e.~g., Gathier et al.~1986, GPP96; Kaler \& Lutz 1985, KL85), and by measuring their
91: spectroscopic parallax
92: (Ciardullo et al. 1999, C99) or trigonometric parallax (Harris et al. 2007, Hea07).
93:
94: For the remaining $>$1800 Galactic PNe (Acker et al.~1992) one has to rely on
95: statistical distance scales,
96: whose calibrations are based on the reliability of the individually known PN distances,
97: and the validity of a general correlation that links the distance-dependent to
98: the distance-independent physical properties of PNe.
99: The Cahn, Kaler, \& Stanghellini (1992, CKS) distance scale of
100: Galactic PNe is based on an attempt by Daub (1982, D82) to improve
101: Shklovsky's distance scale (Shklovsky 1956a, 1956b) for optically thick nebulae.
102: Shklovsky's distance scale assumes that all PNe have equal (observed) ionized mass.
103: D82 assumed that Shklovsky's constant mass approach was still valid, but only for
104: those PNe that are optically thin to the Lymann continuum radiation emitted by
105: the central stars (density
106: bounded). For the optically thick (radiation bounded) PNe, D82 based the
107: distance scale on a calibration
108: of an ionized mass versus surface brightness relation. CKS improved
109: D82's calibration with the
110: use of a larger number of calibrators (PNe with known individual distance), and calculated
111: the statistical distances
112: to 778 Galactic PNe.
113:
114:
115:
116: Since its publication, distances from the CKS catalog have been used
117: preferentially and widely in the literature. Other statistical methods that have
118: been commonly used include those by Maciel (1984), Zhang (1995, Z95), van de Steene \& Zijlstra
119: (1995, vdSZ), Schneider \& Buckley (1996, SB96) and Bensby \& Lundstr{\"o}m (2001, BL01). All these distance
120: scales rely on a set of Galactic calibrators whose distances are mostly
121: derived from reddening or expansion properties, or from the assumption of
122: Galactic Bulge membership, with all the consequent uncertainties.
123: With the publication over
124: the past decade of critical physical parameters for a large sample of
125: Magellanic Cloud PNe (Shaw et al. 2001, 2006; Stanghellini et al. 2002,
126: 2003), including highly accurate H$\beta$ fluxes, physical dimensions,
127: morphologies, and extinction constants, we have the opportunity to assess
128: and improve the distance scale for Galactic PNe. In this paper we take advantage of the
129: wealth of Magellanic Cloud PN data to re-calibrate the CKS
130: distance scale, as well as other distance scales for comparison. Homogeneously determined
131: photometric radii from {\it HST} of a PN sample with low Galactic reddening are the best way to determine
132: any relation that involves apparent diameters.
133: Furthermore, the relatively recent publication of trigonometric and spectroscopic parallax and cluster membership
134: distances to Galactic PNe allow us to
135: test with unprecedented reliability our own and other distance scales.
136:
137: The construction of any statistical distance scale for PNe is composed of three fundamental steps:
138: the selection of a \textit{method} that has some physical or empirical basis, the selection of a set of
139: \textit{calibrator PNe}, for which distances have been determined by some independent means, and an analysis
140: of the \textit{applicability} of the calibration to a wide variety of PNe. Until now it has been difficult
141: to compare the viability various methods, since their calibrations and applications have varied so widely.
142: In \S2 we describe in detail the Shklovsky/Daub/CKS distance scale and the superiority of the Magellanic
143: Cloud PNe as calibrators. We also derive our new calibration of this method and assess its inherent uncertainties.
144: In \S3 we discuss the physical underpinning of the CKS distance method in light of recent advances in modeling the
145: evolution of PNe. In \S4 we take a closer look at the viability of various methods for determining independent
146: distances to Galactic PNe (i.e., the set that had previously been used as calibrators), and discuss the
147: applicability of the Magellanic Cloud distance scale to Galactic PNe. In \S5 we recalibrate the most used statistical
148: distance methods with the Magellanic Cloud PNe, and then compare the accuracy of these methods to one another using
149: the best independently determined distances to Galactic PNe. We conclude in \S6 with our final prescription and
150: recommendation for determining statistical distances to Galactic PNe.
151:
152:
153:
154:
155: \section{The Magellanic Cloud
156: Calibration and the New PN Distance Catalog}
157:
158: The CKS statistical distance scale is based on the calibration of the relation
159: between D82's {\it ionized mass}
160:
161: $$\mu= (2.266 \times 10^{-21} D^5 \theta^3 F)^{1/2} \eqno(1)$$
162:
163: and the {\it optical thickness parameter}
164: $$\tau = {\rm log} {4 \theta^2\over F},\eqno(2)$$
165:
166: where D is the distance to the PN in parsecs, $\theta$ is the nebular radius
167: in arcsec, and F is the nebular flux at 5 GHz.
168: The parameter $\mu$ increases as the ionization front expands into the
169: nebula. Once a PN becomes density bounded, $\mu$ remains constant
170: for the rest of the observable PN lifetime.
171:
172: By calculating $\mu$ and $\tau$ for several PNe with known distances, dimensions, and fluxes, CKS
173: derived the $\mu$--$\tau$ relation:
174: $${\rm log}~\mu = \tau-4, ~\tau < 3.13 \eqno(3a)$$
175: $${\rm log}~\mu = -0.87, ~\tau > 3.13, \eqno(3b)$$
176:
177: where Eq. 3a holds for PNe of high surface brightness, and Eq. 3b for PNe with low surface brightness.
178:
179: The calibration of the above distance scale was based upon 19 Galactic PNe with independent distances
180: with comparatively poor accuracy.
181: At the time when the CKS paper was written there were hardly any Magellanic
182: Cloud PNe with accurately measured diameters, and the distances to the Magellanic
183: Clouds were also quite uncertain. We can now re-calibrate the distance scale using the
184: nebular parameters relative to the LMC and SMC PNe observed by us with the {\it Hubble Space
185: Telescope (HST)} (Shaw et al.~2001, 2006; Stanghellini et al.~2002, 2003).
186: In order to determine $\tau$ and $\mu$ for Magellanic Cloud PNe we use a transformation
187: between the 5 GHz and the H$\beta$ fluxes (Eq. 6 in CKS), since radio fluxes are not
188: available for Magellanic Cloud PNe. All other parameters are available in our
189: {\it HST} paper series. Note that we use the photometric radius as the proper measure of the
190: nebular dimension, which is defined as the radius that includes 85\% of
191: the flux in a monochromatic emission line.
192:
193:
194: We have adopted a distance to
195: the LMC of 50.6 {\rm kpc} (Freedman et al.~2001; Mould et al.~2000), which is accurate to
196: $\sim$10\% (Benedict et al.~2002).
197: The variation in the adopted distance
198: when applied to individual objects can be easily estimated given that
199: the three dimensional structure of the LMC has been well
200: established (Freeman, Illingworth, \& Oemler 1983; van
201: der Marel \& Cioni 2001). The LMC can be
202: considered a flattened disk with a tilt of the LMC plane to the plane of the
203: sky of 34$^\circ$ (van der Marel \& Cioni 2001). Freeman, Illingworth, \&
204: Oemler (1983) derived a scale height of 500
205: {\rm pc} for an old disk population. The scale
206: height of young objects is between 100 to 300 {\rm pc}
207: (Feast~1989). Using the scale height of an old disk population the 3D
208: structure of the LMC introduces a variation in the adopted
209: distance smaller than 1\% from object to object and therefore has been neglected in the
210: calibration.
211:
212: For the SMC we have used a distance of 58.3 {\rm kpc} (Westerlund 1997).
213: The accuracy of this distance is not as well established as for the LMC.
214: Moreover, the SMC is irregular with a large intrinsic line
215: of sight depth (between 6 and 12 {\rm kpc}: Crowl et al. 2001) which varies
216: with the location within the galaxy. We have estimated an average line of sight
217: depth of 5 {\rm kpc} for the PNe in our sample by combining the span of the
218: positions (400 {\rm pc} in right
219: ascension and 2 {\rm kpc} in declination) of the PNe with respect to the optical center
220: of the SMC with the dispersion in the distance to the SMC derived by Crowl
221: et al. (2001) using SMC clusters positions.
222: The distance uncertainty introduced by this
223: depth in the SMC is roughly 9\%, still low to significantly
224: affect the result but one order of magnitude larger than the one obtained for the LMC. In this
225: respect we consider LMC PNe to be better calibrators than the SMC
226: PN for the distance scale.
227:
228:
229: In Figure 1 we show the LMC PNe on the log~$\mu$ - $\tau$ plane.
230: We have calculated $\tau$ and log~$\mu$ as explained above, and assumed
231: D$_{\rm LMC}$=50.6 kpc. In the Figure we plot the different morphological types with different
232: symbols, following the classification in Shaw et al.~(2001, 2006).
233: To guide the eye we have plotted, on the figure, the
234: Galactic distance scale fit from CKS (solid line).
235: The optically thick
236: sequence of LMC PNe is very tight for $\tau<$2.1, and most LMC PNe are optically thin for
237: $\tau>$2.1. The fitted value of the function for optically thin LMC PNe
238: is almost
239: identical to that of Galactic PNe {\it if we exclude bipolar planetary
240: nebulae}.
241: The broken
242: line in Figure 1 corresponds to the Magellanic Cloud fit of the optically thick sequence of LMC PNe
243: (see Eq. 4a and 4b below).
244: Similarly, in Figure 2 we show the same plot of Figure 1, but for SMC PNe. The morphology and sizes of the nebulae are
245: from Stanghellini et al.~(2003).
246: Even with the scarcity of data points, the thick PN sequence is well defined by SMC PNe,
247: and it is identical to that of the LMC PNe.
248:
249: The observed ionized masses of bipolar PNe in both Figures 1 and 2 appear mostly well above the constant ionized
250: mass line. The parameters
251: $\mu$ and $\tau$ have been calculated with the photometric radii of the PNe,
252: that can be very different from the isophotal radii in the case
253: of PNe with large lobes. Furthermore, bipolar PNe might be optically thick for most of their
254: observed lifetime (Villaver et al. 2002a), and thus are not the ideal calibrators
255: for the optically thin PNe branch
256: of the log $\mu$ -- $\tau$ relation.
257: In deriving the distance scale based on Magellanic Cloud PNe we thus exclude
258: PNe with bipolar morphology. This leave us with 70 Magellanic Cloud calibrators,
259: a very large number of PNe with individual distances when compared to the 19
260: calibrators in CKS. In Figure 3 we show the
261: Magellanic Cloud calibration of the PN distance scale, where open symbols are LMC PNe and filled symbols are SMC PNe,
262: and where we exclude bipolar PNe. Note that we have assumed that the ionized mass for optically thin PNe is constant,
263: as in D82 and CKS.
264:
265: The fit to the distance scale based on the Magellanic Cloud PNe (this paper,
266: hereafter SSV) is:
267:
268: $${\rm log}~\mu = 1.21~ \tau -3.39, ~\tau < 2.1 \eqno(4a)$$
269: $${\rm log}~\mu = -0.86, ~\tau > 2.1 \eqno(4b)$$
270:
271: The solid line in Figure 3 shows this relation. The separation between optically thick and thin
272: PNe is very obvious from the figure, and the optically thick sequence is much better defined here than
273: in CKS, thanks to the use of the best calibrators available now.
274: The optically thick sequence has been derived by least-square fit, and has correlation coefficient R$_{\rm xy}$=0.8.
275: The
276: optically thin sequence is determined by the average of the log $\mu$ for $\tau>2.1$.
277: Using another estimate of the central tendency will change the horizontal scale by less than
278: 5$\%$, which is well within the uncertainty. Furthermore, if we were to fit
279: the data points of Figure 3 with just one line for all $\tau$ we would have a very poor correlation (R$_{\rm xy}$=0.14), which reinforce the
280: evolutionary scheme of optically thick to thin PNe, proposed by D82 to improve Shklovsky's method.
281:
282: By examining Figure 3 we infer that:
283: (1) Our analysis allows us to confirm the
284: CKS distance scale for optically thin PNe; (2) the optically
285: thick sequence
286: is very well defined by the Magellanic Cloud PNe and it is different from that of CKS;
287: (3) the new statistical distance for optically thin PNe increases slightly the assumed ionized mass, such that
288: distances for optically thin nebulae are tipically
289: 1$\%$ larger compared to those computed using the CKS calibration.
290: (4) bipolar PNe do not follow the empirical relation, and their ionized mass actually increases steadily
291: with $\tau$,
292: confirming that they stay in the ionization bound state for much longer than PNe with other morphological types.
293: The probable reason why the bipolar PN relation does not flatten out
294: for $\tau>$2.1 is because they are the progeny of the more
295: massive stars and they are expected to remain optically thick (given a
296: combination of the large circumstellar densities and fast evolution of the
297: central star).
298:
299: By using the SSV distance scale we calculated the statistical distances to all non-bipolar PNe in the LMC and
300: the SMC. We obtain distributions that are nicely narrow, with mean values (and dispersions),
301: D$_{\rm LMC}$=50.0$\pm$7.5 kpc and D$_{\rm SMC}$=57.5$\pm$5.5 kpc,
302: that are within 1$\%$ of the distances to the Magellanic Clouds.
303:
304: We applied our new distance scale to the large sample of Galactic PNe in
305: the original CKS catalog, and present the revised distances in Table 1.
306: Column (1) gives the usual name as in CKS, column (2) gives the calculated $\tau$, columns
307: (3) and (4) give the angular radius and the flux used in the calculation, and column (5)
308: gives the distance to the PNe. Note that the fluxes in (4) are the 5 GHz fluxes from CKS when available,
309: or their H$\beta$ equivalents.
310:
311: \section{The Physics of the Statistical Distance Scale}
312:
313:
314: As CKS pointed out, the assumption of constant ionized mass for optically
315: thin PNe (or that it can be computed for optically thick PNe with a
316: one-parameter model) would seem to be a doubtful proposition since the
317: progenitor stars vary in mass by nearly an order of magnitude. CKS minimized
318: the significance of the variation in ionized mass by pointing out that
319: distances so derived depend only on the square-root of the assumed mass.
320: One might also expect that the ionized
321: mass would be fairly directly correlated with the progenitor mass. However,
322: hydrodynamical models of the co-evolving PN and central star by Villaver et
323: al. (2002a) show that the decline of gas density with radius is generally
324: quite steep (except within the bright inner shell of gas) over a wide range
325: of progenitor masses and during the entire visible lifetime of the nebula.
326: The implication is that, for optically thin nebulae, the bulk of the mass
327: exists in the faint, low-density, outer halo. Since the volume emissivity
328: of recombination lines is proportional to the square of the gas density,
329: the massive nebular halo contributes very little to the observed emission.
330: Most published values for PN masses assume a constant density for the gas,
331: one that is only representative of the bright inner shell, leaving the bulk
332: of the PN mass unaccounted for. In part for these reasons, ionized masses
333: derived in this way reflect only a modest fraction of the total mass of the
334: nebula, such that the assumption of a constant mass is sufficiently accurate
335: to render the Shklovsky distance method useful.
336:
337: We have shown that the distance method of CKS is empirically sound, and derived
338: the scale factor for optically
339: thin PNe to that from observations of
340: Magellanic Cloud PNe. It is important to note the significance of the
341: {\it dispersion} in the PN masses (expressed in the $\mu$ parameter)
342: about the mean in the calibration shown in Figure 3. The $1-\sigma$
343: deviation about the mean value is 0.28, which translates to a
344: corresponding uncertainty in the distance of about 30\%. We regard this
345: value as a rough estimate of the minimum uncertainty that may be
346: associated with the distance to an individual PN derived using
347: this methodology. It is important to note that the uncertainty in the
348: distance scale {\it cannot} be reduced with improved calibrator nebulae,
349: since the distance uncertainty is of order 10\% (i.e., of order the size
350: of the symbols in Figure 3). The scatter in the data results from genuine
351: variations in the ionized masses of the calibrator nebulae, and quantifies
352: the fundamental limitation in this technique.
353:
354: The new PN distance scale (SSV) is very similar to
355: that of CKS, with the exception of the transition between optically thick and optically think stages.
356: From Eq.~4b, the definition of $\mu$, and the relation $D=206265 ~ R_{\rm PN}/\theta$
357: (where R$_{\rm PN}$ is the linear nebular radius in pc) we can determine the radius at which the PN becomes optically
358: thin. For $\tau$ =2.1 we obtain $R_{\rm PN}\sim$0.06 pc. The same calculation to determine the PN radius at which the thick to thin
359: transition occurs by using Eq. 3b and $\tau$=3.13 gives
360: $R_{\rm PN}\sim0.09$ pc. The uncertainty in the determination of $\tau$ at transition, and thus of
361: R$_{\rm PN}$, depends on the scatter of the ionized mass calibrators used in CKS. The new calibration is much more reliable.
362:
363:
364: The metallicities of the LMC and SMC are, on average, of the order of
365: half and a quarter that of the solar mix respectively
366: (Russell \& Bessell 1989; Russell \& Dopita 1990).
367: The AGB wind is likely to be dust driven, therefore it has a strong dependency
368: on metallicity. It is then
369: expected that LMC and SMC stars with dust-driven winds
370: lose smaller amounts of matter (Winters et al. 2000) during the AGB phase than their
371: Galactic counterparts. The mass-loss history
372: during the AGB determines the circumstellar density structure that will
373: eventually constitute the PN shell (Villaver et al. 2002b). A reduced mass-loss rate
374: during the AGB has the effect of decreasing the density of the
375: circumstellar envelope prior of PN formation.
376:
377: Furthermore, after the envelope is ejected, the remnant central star leaves the AGB and its effective temperature
378: increases. The stellar remnant becomes a strong emitter of ionizing photons,
379: responsible for ionizing
380: the nebula. The mechanism
381: that drives the wind during the central star phase (with velocities a few orders of
382: magnitude higher than that experienced during the AGB phase) is the transfer
383: of photon momentum to the gas through absorption by strong resonance lines
384: (Pauldrach et al. 1988). The efficiency of this mechanism depends on metallicity,
385: thus it is expected to be less efficient in Magellanic Cloud central stars than in the Galactic ones,
386: with correspondingly lower escape velocities for the winds, and a decreased efficiency in
387: shell snow-plow.
388:
389: As has been shown by Villaver et al. (2002a),
390: the propagation of the ionization front determines the density structure of
391: the nebula early in its evolution, while
392: the pressure provided by the hot bubble has no effect at this stage.
393: The propagation velocity of the Str\"omgren radius, which
394: ultimately determines the transition from the optically thick to the optically thin stages,
395: depends mainly on the ionizing flux
396: from the star and on the
397: density of the neutral gas. Given the dependency of the AGB mass-loss rates
398: on metallicity, the ionization front will
399: encounter a lower neutral density structure in Magellanic Cloud PNe than in Galactic PNe.
400: This would tend to make the transition from optically thick to thin at a smaller radius in Magellanic
401: Cloud PNe than in Galactic PNe.
402: The fact that our Magellanic Cloud calibration of the CKS scale occurs at smaller radii than that derived by CKS
403: is probably coincidence. On the other hand, if we really could
404: determine empirically the transition radius as a function of metallicity, we would expect two different
405: thick sequences for the SMC and the LMC PNe, given their different metallicity,
406: and yet the sequences are almost identical (Figs. 1 and 2).
407: That is, we do not see the effects of metallicity on our distance scale, and that is applicable to
408: Galactic PNe as well. We discuss below ($\S$4)
409: how the newly derived distances
410: match extremely well with the best individual distances to Galactic PNe independently of metallicity.
411:
412:
413:
414: \section{Comparison of our Distance Scale to Individual Galactic PN Distances}
415:
416:
417: We have assessed that our new calibration of the PN distance scale
418: is very similar to that of CKS, but with a revision in the transition between
419: the radiation bounded and the density bounded stages. The comparison between the CKS and the SSV scales
420: suffers from the fact that part of the CKS calibrators are obsolete, and that new Galactic calibrators have
421: become available. It is worthwhile to compare the SSV scale with the best available individual distances to
422: Galactic PNe to date before we confirm the validity of the new calibration.
423:
424: In Table 2 we give the best set of individual Galactic PN distances available to date.
425: Column (1) gives the common name; columns (2) and (3) give the best individual distance and, where available,
426: its
427: uncertainty; columns (4) and (5) give respectively the
428: statistical distances for the same PNe from CKS and the SSV; columns (6) and (7) give the distance
429: determination method (CM for cluster membership,
430: P for parallax, E for expansion, R for reddening, see explanations below) and
431: its reference. We have selected a sample of individual Galactic PN distances based on the literature, and
432: whose statistical distances have been calculated by CKS and can be derived for the SSV calibration as well.
433:
434: The best methods to get individual PN distances are (1) trigonometric parallax, (2) the use of a spectroscopic companion of the PN central
435: star, which allows to derive the spectroscopic parallax, and (3) the membership of the PN in an open or globular cluster.
436: Apart from trigonometric parallaxes, that are applicable only for nearby PNe, the distance to the PN is that of a companion or a cluster, whose uncertainties are typically much
437: lower than those related to other methods for PN distances.
438: In the past decade there have been two major studies of PN parallaxes. C99 used {\it HST} imaging to
439: determine central star companions of a PN sample, obtaining ten probable associations and the relative spectroscopic parallaxes. We list all of these
440: in Table 2, except for A~31, where
441: only a lower limit to the distance is given, and A~33 and K~1-27, whose distances seem to be controversial
442: in C99. Hea07 published trigonometric parallaxes of several Galactic PNe. Following the discussion in Hea07,
443: we include all their final determinations in Table 2, including the uncertainties.
444: Planetary nebulae whose distances have been derived through cluster membership are the PN in Ps~1, whose distances has been recalculated
445: by ABL00, and that in the open cluster NGC~2818, whose distance has been estimated by CHW03.
446: It is worth noting that Mermilliod et al. (2001) found that the radial velocity of the NGC~2818 PN is slightly lower than
447: that of the cluster, making its membership marginally questionable.
448:
449: Since CKS was published there have been other PNe observed in clusters,
450: including JaFu1 and JaFu2 (Jacoby et al.~1997), and a PN in M~22 (Monaco et al.~2004), but
451: their distances are not included in Table 2 either because their cluster membership is not
452: definitive or because their nature is still uncertain, as described in detail in the discovery papers.
453:
454:
455: An alternative method for PN distances is the determination of the secular PN expansion, a method that had
456: its renaissance with the use of the accurate relative astrometry afforded by the {\it HST}. In this category we found distances to several
457: PNe by Hajian et al. (1993, 1995, 1996; HBT93, HBT95, HT96), Palen et al. (2002, Pea02), Gomez et al. (1993, GRM93),
458: and also the work by LL68. Among the distances determined by expansion we have only listed in Table 2 those
459: deemed reliable by the authors listed above. In particular, in Pea02 there are several distances determined by different expansion algorithms, and
460: if the results are very different by different methods for the same PN we have excluded them. Uncertainties in expansion distances, when available,
461: are much higher than those of parallaxes or cluster membership, and the method is intrinsically less reliable, given the impossibility of
462: following the PN acceleration history, and the modeling difficulty given unknown process as such as differential mass-loss.
463:
464: Finally, a very rough individual distance can be derived in some cases by studying the reddening patches around the PN and then building
465: reddening-distance plots for the known stars surrounding the PN. This method, although providing several data-points in the literature, is the most uncertain
466: given the inhomogeneity of the Galactic ISM. GPP96 derived reddening distances for several
467: PNe, and we used in Table 2
468: only the reliable ones, as deemed by the authors. We have excluded NGC~2346, since the scatter in its distance-reddening plot is overly large.
469: KL85 also published several PN distances by the same method, and we
470: included their results in Table 2.
471:
472: In Figure 4 we plot the data of Table 2 on the $\tau$ -- log~$\mu$ plane, drawing also the CKS and the SSV distance scales (note that the
473: scales of Figures 3 and 4 are different). It is interesting to note that the best data points, those of the PNe whose distances
474: have been determined via parallax or cluster membership, follow very well the SSV calibration, and they are less compatible with that of CKS.
475: Naturally, the CKS calibration was based principally on reddening and expansion distances, since very few parallaxes were available at that time,
476: and we can see that the thinning sequence determined by the data points relative to expansion or reddening distances is compatible with
477: the CKS calibration (but these individual distances have much lower reliability than the parallaxes and cluster memberships represented by the filled symbols).
478: While the SSV seems to be the best statistical scale to be used for Galactic PNe, its preference, for
479: optically thick PNe, over the CKS scale is based only on one
480: data point (the parallax at $\tau<$2.1). But let us recall here that the filled symbols {\it are not} the calibrators of the SSV scale, rather
481: they are the Galactic PNe with best individual distances to date, used for comparison, while the calibration is based on $\sim$70 data points whose errorbars would be
482: smaller than the symbols.
483:
484: In Figure 5 we show the direct comparison of the individual PN distances and those from the SSV calibration, where the correspondence of the
485: parallax and cluster membership individual distances with the SSV distances is remarkable. It is worth noting that the two lower-left
486: filled circles, those for which the parallax and statistical distances do not coincide within 30$\%$, are A~7 and A~31; both are very large nebulae,
487: whose diameters are larger than the radio beam used to detect the 5 GHz flux (Milne 1979), and whose flux densities are deemed to be uncertain.
488: In Figure 6 we show the distribution of the relative differences of the SSV and individual distances versus $\tau$ for the four methods of deriving individual distances.
489: The thin vertical lines represent the $\tau$=2.1 and $\tau$=3.1, i.e., the thick-to-thin PN transition for the CKS and SSV scales.
490: We could conclude that the SSV scale fails to reproduce the individual distances for PNe around the transition between thick to
491: thin, but this failure seems to pertain only to the comparison with expansion and reddening distances, and
492: it does not occur for the comparison with parallax and cluster membership distances.
493:
494: \section{Comparison of Statistical Distance Scales}
495:
496: We compare the relative merits of the new SSV scale, calibrated on Magellanic Cloud PNe,
497: in relation to other distance scales in the literature. We compare the statistical distances from different methods
498: to individual Galactic PN distances, by using only the best individual PN distances of Table 2, those from parallax and
499: cluster membership. We also calculate the distances to all LMC and SMC PNe using the statistical methods, then
500: we compare the resulting averages with the actual distances to the Clouds. It is worth recalling that
501: all old scales have been calibrated with Galactic or Bulge PNe, thus we expect a lower reproducibility of the
502: Magellanic Cloud distances.
503:
504: For all scales we give in Table 3: in column (1) the reference, in column (2) the statistical method, in column (3)
505: the correlation coefficient between statistical and
506: individual PN distances, in column (4) the mean relative difference between the statistical and individual distances, in column (5) the
507: relative difference between the median distances to Large Magellanic Cloud PNe and the actual LMC distance, in column (6) the same relative difference, but for
508: the SMC PNe. Statistical distance scales in the literature use in this comparison are those by CKS, vdSZ, Z95, SB96, and BL01.
509:
510: The statistical scheme that best compares with the best individual distances is the SSV scale, with higher
511: (R$_{\rm xy}$=0.99) correlation and lower median difference between statistical and individual distances than any other scale, and
512: best reproduces the Magellanic Cloud distances.
513: This is hardly a surprise, since for the first time it was possible to calibrate a distance scale with absolute calibrators from the
514: Magellanic Clouds.
515: By comparison, the correlation coefficients between the distances from the CKS, vdSZ, Z95, SB96, and BL01 scales are always lower, and the
516: median of the relative differences are higher.
517:
518: We also want to test whether PN distances derived with other distance scales, if recalibrated with the Magellanic Cloud PNe,
519: would compare better than the SSV scale to the best individual distances of Galactic PNe. First, we consider
520: the relation between the brightness temperature and the linear nebular radius, which
521: vdSZ calibrated with Galactic bulge PNe. Our new calibration of the relation is
522: $${\rm log}~D({\rm T_b}) = 3.49 - 0.35~{\rm log}~\theta - 0.32 ~{\rm log}~ F, \eqno(5)$$
523:
524: based on a fit of the log T$_{\rm b}$ - log R$_{\rm PN}$ relation (R$_{\rm PN}=(\theta$ D)/206265).
525: We also calibrate the log M$_{\rm ion}$ - log R$_{\rm PN}$ relation as in Maciel \& Pottasch (1980), Z95, and BL01,
526: and found, by assuming that the filling factor is 0.6,
527:
528: $$ {\rm log}~ D({\rm M_{ion}}) = 3.45 - 0.34 ~{\rm log}~\theta - 0.33~ {\rm log}~ F.\eqno(6)$$
529:
530: Finally, we also recalibrate with the Magellanic Cloud PNe the relation between the surface brightness, I=F/($\pi~\theta^2$), and
531: R$_{\rm PN}$, as in SB96, and obtained:
532:
533: $$ {\rm log}~ D(I) = 3.68 - 0.50 ~{\rm log} ~\theta - 0.25 ~{\rm log} ~F. \eqno(7)$$
534:
535: The possibility of building a distance scale based on a log I -- log R$_{\rm PN}$ calibration was mentioned by Stanghellini et al. (2002),
536: and also used by Jacoby (2002).
537:
538: All three relations used to derive the distance scales in Eqs. (5), (6), and (7) have high correlation coefficients (R$_{\rm xy} \sim 0.8$).
539: In these relations, excluding the bipolar PNe does not change the coefficients by more than 5$\%$, thus their exclusion as calibrators is
540: irrelevant.
541:
542: Using the scales in Eqs. (5), (6), and (7) we have calculated the distances for those Galactic PNe whose individual distances are known either
543: through a trigonometric or spectroscopic parallax, or by cluster membership.
544: In Table 3 we give the comparison between these newly calibrated scales and the individual distances of PNe. We also give the
545: estimates for the LMC and SMC distances, and we infer that the SSV scale is superior to all other scales here recalibrated with the
546: Magellanic Cloud PNe as well.
547: We then
548: plot in Figure 7 the relative difference between the statistical and individual distances for the scales recalibrated with Magellanic Cloud PNe.
549: The filled symbols represent the SSV scale, triangles are the distances from the T$_{\rm b}$-R$_{\rm PN}$ relation (Eq. 5), crosses represent the
550: log M$_{\rm ion}$ - log R$_{\rm PN}$ scale (Eq. 6), pentagons are the distances from Eq. (7), based on the
551: log I -- log R$_{\rm PN}$ relation. We see that the SSV scale is the best possible Galactic statistical distance scale
552: with the calibrators and comparisons available to date. Since the log I -- log R$_{\rm PN}$ relation works for bipolar
553: PNe, it might be used to determine the distance to bipolar PNe instead of the SSV scale.
554:
555: \section{Conclusion}
556:
557: The wealth of new data available that describe the physical parameters of Magellanic PNe has allowed us to check and re-calibrate the Shklovsky/Daub/CKS
558: statistical distance scale, which is most commonly used in the literature, and provide distances of 645 Galactic PNe following the new distance scale calibration
559: (Table 1). To calculate the SSV distance for other PNe, or for the same PNe but using other
560: parameters than those in CKS, given $\theta$ and F, the 5 GHz flux, one can use the following equations:
561:
562: $$ {\rm log}~D_{\rm SSV} = 3.06 + 0.37~ {\rm log}~ \theta - 0.68~ {\rm log}~F, \tau<2.1 \eqno(8a), $$
563: $$ {\rm log}~D_{\rm SSV} = 3.79 - 0.6~ {\rm log}~ \theta - 0.2~ {\rm log}~F, \tau>2.1 \eqno(8b). $$
564:
565: If the 5 GHz flux is not available for the given PN, one can use Eq. (6) in CKS to derive the equivalent 5 GHz flux from the H$\beta$ flux.
566:
567: In this paper we have used recent data on PNe in the Magellanic Clouds to construct a set of calibrators for which the distances are known
568: to high absolute accuracy ($\sim10$\%), and for which the dispersion among the distances is extraordinarily small (a few percent).
569: Furthermore, the great distance of these nebulae allows us to establish a distance scale factor that is insensitive to uncertainties
570: in distances to Galactic PNe that are drawn from a heterogeneous, nearby (few hundred pc) sample; a local sample has generally been necessary
571: given the limited range over which many independent distance methods (notably trigonometric and expansion parallaxes)
572: can provide accurate distances. In addition, we use consistent and reliable means to determine angular sizes (from photometric radii),
573: and the H$\beta$ fluxes and extinction constants, derived from \textit{HST} calibrations, are among the most reliable in the literature.
574: There has never been a better set of calibrators for statistical distance determinations. For comparison, we selected Galactic PNe where
575: the independent distances are the best available (including recently published data), and we evaluated the reliability of various independent
576: distance methods by the degree to which they are consistent with our distance scale.
577:
578: With this study we show that:
579: (1) the distance scale as calibrated from the Magellanic Cloud PNe is very similar to that derived by CKS;
580: (2) our revised distance scale agrees superbly with the most accurate distances measured for individual Galactic PNe. We also show that other
581: methods of statistical distance determination generally do not yield results that are better than this statistical method;
582: (3) the distance scale does not work for PNe with bipolar morphology, and we believe this is because progenitors
583: of bipolars are often not fully ionized during the course of PN evolution (the log I -- log R$_{\rm PN}$ relation could be used
584: instead for these PNe);
585: (4) with the Magellanic Cloud calibration we provide a more robust physical basis for why the Shklovsky/Daub distance scale works, despite wide
586: variations in the expected ionized mass; we also show that the recalibration of other distance scales with Magellanic Cloud PNe
587: might not work as well as the recalibrated Shklovsky/Daub distance scale;
588: (5) we point out that the dispersion in the distance scale is an inherent property of the method, and cannot be reduced significantly by using
589: better calibrators;
590: (6) the radiation-bounded sequence for Magellanic Cloud PNe may terminate at higher surface
591: brightness than previously derived. It seems that the new sequence and the radiation bounded to density bounded transition does not depend
592: on metallicity very much, as it is the same for the LMC and the SMC PNe; the best available data show that the Magellanic Cloud calibration
593: of this sequence is entirely consistent with Galactic PNe.
594:
595:
596:
597: \acknowledgments
598:
599: Many thanks to Bruce Balick for scientific discussion on the importance of the
600: PN distance scale, and an anonymous referee for giving suggestions that improved the paper.
601: Letizia Stanghellini is grateful to the Aspen Center for Physics for their hospitality on July 2006, when
602: parts of this paper were completed.
603:
604: %\clearpage
605:
606: \begin{thebibliography}{}
607: \bibitem[Acker et al.(1992)]{1992secg.book.....A} Acker, A., Marcout, J.,
608: Ochsenbein, F., Stenholm, B., \& Tylenda, R.\ 1992, Garching: European
609: Southern Observatory, 1992
610:
611: \bibitem[Alves et al.(2000)]{2000AJ....120.2044A} Alves, D.~R., Bond,
612: H.~E., \& Livio, M.\ 2000, \aj, 120, 2044 (ABL00)
613:
614: \bibitem[Benedict et al.(2002)]{Ben:02} Benedict, G.~F., et
615: al.\ 2002, \aj, 123, 473
616:
617: \bibitem[Bensby \& Lundstr{\"o}m(2001)]{2001A&A...374..599B} Bensby, T., \& Lundstr{\"o}m, I.\ 2001, \aap, 374,599 (BL01)
618:
619: \bibitem[Cahn et al.(1992)]{1992A&AS...94..399C} Cahn, J.~H., Kaler, J.~B.,
620: \& Stanghellini, L.\ 1992, \aaps, 94, 399 (CKS)
621:
622: \bibitem[Chen et al.(2003)]{2003AJ....125.1397C} Chen, L., Hou, J.~L., \&
623: Wang, J.~J.\ 2003, \aj, 125, 1397 (CHW03)
624:
625: \bibitem[Ciardullo et al.(1999)]{1999AJ....118..488C} Ciardullo, R., Bond,
626: H.~E., Sipior, M.~S., Fullton, L.~K., Zhang, C.-Y., \& Schaefer, K.~G.\
627: 1999, \aj, 118, 488 (C99)
628:
629: \bibitem[Crowl et al.(2001)]{Cetal:01} Crowl, H.~H., Sarajedini,
630: A., Piatti, A.~E., Geisler, D., Bica, E., Clari{\' a}, J.~J., \& Santos,
631: J.~F.~C.\ 2001, \aj, 122, 220
632:
633: \bibitem[Daub(1982)]{1982ApJ...260..612D} Daub, C.~T.\ 1982, \apj, 260, 612 (D82)
634:
635: \bibitem[Feast(1989)]{Fea:89} Feast, M. W. 1989, Recent Developments of Magellanic Cloud Research,
636: ed. K. S. de Boer, F. Spite, \& G. Stasinska (Paris: Observatoire de Paris), 75
637:
638: \bibitem[Freeman, Illingworth, \& Oemler(1983)]{Fio:83}
639: Freeman, K.~C., Illingworth, G., \& Oemler, A.\ 1983, \apj, 272, 488
640:
641: \bibitem[Freedman et al.(2001)]{Freed:01} Freedman, W.~L., et
642: al.\ 2001, \apj, 553, 47
643:
644: \bibitem[Gathier et al.(1986)]{1986A&A...157..171G}
645: Gathier, R., Pottasch,
646: S.~R., \& Pel, J.~W.\ 1986, \aap, 157, 171 (GPP86)
647:
648: \bibitem[Gomez et al.(1993)]{1993ApJ...416..620G} Gomez, Y., Rodriguez,
649: L.~F., \& Moran, J.~M.\ 1993, \apj, 416, 620 (GRM93)
650:
651: \bibitem[Hajian et al.(1993)]{1993AJ....106.1965H} Hajian, A.~R., Terzian,
652: Y., \& Bignell, C.\ 1993, \aj, 106, 1965 (HTB93)
653:
654: \bibitem[Hajian et al.(1995)]{1995AJ....109.2600H} Hajian, A.~R., Terzian,
655: Y., \& Bignell, C.\ 1995, \aj, 109, 2600 (HTB95)
656:
657: \bibitem[Hajian \& Terzian(1996)]{1996PASP..108..258H} Hajian, A.~R., \&
658: Terzian, Y.\ 1996, \pasp, 108, 258 (HT96)
659:
660: \bibitem[Harris et al.(2007)]{2007AJ....133..631H} Harris, H.~C., et al.\
661: 2007, \aj, 133, 631 (Hea07)
662:
663: \bibitem[Jacoby et al.(1997)]{1997AJ....114.2611J} Jacoby, G.~H., Morse,
664: J.~A., Fullton, L.~K., Kwitter, K.~B., \& Henry, R.~B.~C.\ 1997, \aj, 114,
665: 2611
666:
667: \bibitem[Jacoby et al.(2002)]{2002AJ....124.3340J} Jacoby, G.~H.,
668: Feldmeier, J.~J., Claver, C.~F., Garnavich, P.~M., Noriega-Crespo, A.,
669: Bond, H.~E., \& Quinn, J.\ 2002, \aj, 124, 3340
670:
671: \bibitem[Kaler \& Lutz(1985)]{1985PASP...97..700K} Kaler, J.~B., \& Lutz,
672: J.~H.\ 1985, \pasp, 97, 700 (KL85)
673:
674: \bibitem[Liller \& Liller(1968)]{1968IAUS...34...38L} Liller, M.~H., \&
675: Liller, W.\ 1968, IAU Symp.~ 34: Planetary Nebulae, 34, 38 (LL68)
676:
677: \bibitem[Maciel \& Pottasch(1980)]{1980A&A....88....1M} Maciel, W.~J., \& Pottasch, S.~R.\ 1980, \aap, 88, 1
678:
679: \bibitem[Maciel(1984)]{1984A&AS...55..253M} Maciel, W.~J.\ 1984, \aaps, 55, 253
680:
681: \bibitem[Mermilliod et
682: al.(2001)]{2001A&A...375...30M} Mermilliod, J.-C., Clari{\'a}, J.~J., Andersen, J., Piatti, A.~E., \& Mayor, M.\ 2001, \aap, 375, 30
683:
684:
685: \bibitem[Milne(1979)]{1979A&AS...36..227M} Milne, D.~K.\ 1979, \aaps, 36,
686: 227
687:
688: \bibitem[Monaco et al.(2004)]{2004MNRAS.349.1278M} Monaco, L., Pancino, E.,
689: Ferraro, F.~R., \& Bellazzini, M.\ 2004, \mnras, 349, 1278
690:
691: \bibitem[Mould et al.(2000)]{Moul:00} Mould, J.~R., et al.\
692: 2000, \apj, 529, 786
693:
694: \bibitem[Palen et al.(2002)]{2002AJ....123.2666P} Palen, S., Balick, B.,
695: Hajian, A.~R., Terzian, Y., Bond, H.~E., \& Panagia, N.\ 2002, \aj, 123,
696: 2666 (Pea02)
697:
698: \bibitem[Pauldrach et al.(1988)]{1988A&A...207..123P} Pauldrach, A., Puls,
699: J., Kudritzki, R.~P., Mendez, R.~H., \& Heap, S.~R.\ 1988, \aap, 207, 123
700:
701: \bibitem[Russell \& Bessell(1989)]{Rb:89} Russell, S.~C.~\&
702: Bessell, M.~S.\ 1989, \apjs, 70, 865
703: \bibitem[Russell \& Dopita(1990)]{Rd:90} Russell, S.~C.~\&
704: Dopita, M.~A.\ 1990, \apjs, 74, 93
705:
706: \bibitem[Sabbadin et al.(2004)]{2004A&A...416..955S} Sabbadin, F., Turatto,
707: M., Cappellaro, E., Benetti, S., \& Ragazzoni, R.\ 2004, \aap, 416, 955 (Sea04)
708:
709: \bibitem[Schneider \& Buckley(1996)]{1996ApJ...459..606S} Schneider, S.~E., \& Buckley, D.\ 1996, \apj, 459, 606 (SB96)
710:
711: \bibitem[Shaw et al.(2001)]{2001ApJ...548..727S} Shaw, R.~A., Stanghellini,
712: L., Mutchler, M., Balick, B., \& Blades, J.~C.\ 2001, \apj, 548, 727
713:
714: \bibitem[Shaw et al.(2006)]{2006ApJS..167..201S} Shaw, R.~A., Stanghellini,
715: L., Villaver, E., \& Mutchler, M.\ 2006, \apjs, 167, 201
716:
717: \bibitem[]{734}Shklovsky, I.~S.\ 1956a, Astr. Zh., 33, 222
718:
719: \bibitem[]{736}Shklovsky, I.~S.\ 1956b, Astr. Zh., 33, 315
720:
721: \bibitem[Stanghellini et al.(2002)]{2002ApJ...575..178S} Stanghellini, L.,
722: Shaw, R.~A., Mutchler, M., Palen, S., Balick, B., \& Blades, J.~C.\ 2002,
723: \apj, 575, 178
724:
725: \bibitem[Stanghellini et al.(2003)]{2003ApJ...596..997S} Stanghellini, L.,
726: Shaw, R.~A., Balick, B., Mutchler, M., Blades, J.~C., \& Villaver, E.\
727: 2003, \apj, 596, 997
728:
729: \bibitem[van der Marel \& Cioni(2001)]{Vdm:01}
730: van der Marel, R.~P.~\& Cioni, M.~L.\ 2001, \aj, 122, 1807
731:
732: \bibitem[van de Steene \& Zijlstra(1995)]{1995A&A...293..541V} van de Steene, G.~C., \& Zijlstra, A.~A.\ 1995, \aap, 293, 541 (vdSZ)
733:
734:
735:
736: \bibitem[Villaver et al.(2002a)]{2002ApJ...571..880V} Villaver, E.,
737: Garc{\'{\i}}a-Segura, G., \& Manchado, A.\ 2002a, \apj, 571, 880
738:
739:
740: \bibitem[Villaver et al.(2002b)]{2002ApJ...581.1204V} Villaver, E.,
741: Manchado, A., \& Garc{\'{\i}}a-Segura, G.\ 2002b, \apj, 581, 1204
742:
743: \bibitem[Westerlund (1997)]{Wes} Westerlund, B. E. 1997, The Magellanic
744: Clouds (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press)
745:
746: \bibitem[Winters et al.(2000)]{Wetal:00} Winters, J.~M., Le
747: Bertre, T., Jeong, K.~S., Helling, C., \& Sedlmayr, E.\ 2000, \aap, 361,
748: 641
749:
750: \bibitem[Zhang(1995)]{1995ApJS...98..659Z} Zhang, C.~Y.\ 1995, \apjs, 98, 659 (Z95)
751:
752: \end{thebibliography}
753:
754: \clearpage
755:
756:
757: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrr }
758: \tablewidth{16truecm}
759: \tablecaption{Catalog of Galactic PN Distances}
760: \tablewidth{0pt}
761: \tablehead{
762: \colhead{Name}&
763: \colhead{$\tau$}&
764: \colhead{$\theta$}&
765: \colhead{F\tablenotemark{a}}&
766: \colhead{D$_{\rm SSV}$}\\
767:
768: \colhead{}&
769: \colhead{}&
770: \colhead{\arcsec}&
771: \colhead{}&
772:
773: \colhead{[pc]} \\
774:
775: }
776:
777: \startdata
778: NGC40 & 3.46 & 18.20& 0.460 & 1249 \\
779: NGC246 & 5.31 & 112.00 & 0.248 & 475 \\
780: NGC650 & 5.24 & 69.20 & 0.110 & 746 \\
781: NGC1360 & 5.82 & 192.00 & 0.222 & 351 \\
782: NGC1501 & 4.08 & 25.90 & 0.224 & 1167 \\
783: NGC1514 & 4.59 & 50.20 & 0.262 & 760 \\
784: NGC1535 & 3.31 & 9.20 & 0.166 & 2305 \\
785: NGC2022 & 3.62 & 9.70 & 0.091 & 2518 \\
786: NGC2346 & 4.54 & 27.30 & 0.086 & 1369 \\
787: NGC2371 & 4.33 & 21.80 & 0.090 & 1554 \\
788: NGC2392 & 3.93 & 22.40 & 0.237 & 1259 \\
789: NGC2438 & 4.83 & 35.20 & 0.073 & 1215 \\
790: NGC2440 & 3.42 & 16.40 & 0.411 & 1359 \\
791: NGC2452 & 3.81 & 9.40 & 0.055 & 2838 \\
792: NGC2610 & 4.58 & 17.20 & 0.031 & 2215 \\
793: NGC2792 & 3.16 & 6.50 & 0.116 & 3050 \\
794: NGC2818 & 4.69 & 20.00 & 0.033 & 1998 \\
795: NGC2867 & 2.93 & 8.00 & 0.299 & 2228 \\
796: NGC2899 & 4.97 & 45.00 & 0.086 & 1014 \\
797: NGC3132 & 3.94 & 22.50 & 0.230 & 1263 \\
798: NGC3195 & 4.66 & 20.00 & 0.035 & 1975 \\
799: NGC3211 & 3.51 & 8.00 & 0.080 & 2901 \\
800: NGC3242 & 3.22 & 18.60 & 0.835 & 1094 \\
801: NGC3587 & 5.64 & 100.00 & 0.091 & 621 \\
802: NGC3699 & 4.48 & 22.40 & 0.067 & 1620 \\
803: NGC3918 & 2.62 & 9.40 & 0.857 & 1639 \\
804: NGC4071 & 5.18 & 31.50 & 0.026 & 1596 \\
805: NGC4361 & 4.45 & 40.50 & 0.230 & 887 \\
806: NGC5189 & 4.59 & 70.00 & 0.507 & 546 \\
807: NGC5307 & 3.22 & 6.30 & 0.095 & 3235 \\
808: % NGC5315 & 1.94 & 3.00 & 0.415 & 0 \\
809: NGC5873 & 3.08 & 3.50 & 0.041 & 5445 \\
810: NGC5882 & 2.77 & 7.00 & 0.334 & 2362 \\
811: NGC5979 & 2.74 & 4.00 & 0.117 & 4075 \\
812: NGC6026 & 4.72 & 16.90 & 0.022 & 2398 \\
813: NGC6058 & 5.03 & 13.20 & 0.007 & 3538 \\
814: NGC6072 & 4.43 & 35.00 & 0.181 & 1017 \\
815: NGC6153 & 2.98 & 12.30 & 0.632 & 1482 \\
816: NGC6210 & 3.01 & 8.10 & 0.256 & 2282 \\
817: NGC6302 & 2.77 & 22.30 & 3.403 & 741 \\
818: NGC6309 & 3.06 & 6.90 & 0.167 & 2736 \\
819: NGC6326 & 3.30 & 6.00 & 0.073 & 3511 \\
820: NGC6337 & 4.19 & 23.50 & 0.143 & 1354 \\
821: NGC6369 & 2.59 & 14.00 & 2.002 & 1089 \\
822: NGC6439 & 2.67 & 2.50 & 0.053 & 6330 \\
823: NGC6445 & 3.48 & 16.60 & 0.368 & 1380 \\
824: % NGC6537 & 1.41 & 2.00 & 0.624 & 0 \\
825: NGC6543 & 2.59 & 9.40 & 0.899 & 1623 \\
826: NGC6563 & 4.42 & 21.50 & 0.070 & 1646 \\
827: NGC6565 & 3.29 & 4.50 & 0.042 & 4660 \\
828: NGC6567 & 2.68 & 4.40 & 0.161 & 3610 \\
829: NGC6572 & 2.16 & 7.20 & 1.429 & 1736 \\
830: NGC6578 & 2.65 & 4.30 & 0.166 & 3638 \\
831: NGC6620 & 3.40 & 2.50 & 0.010 & 8836 \\
832: NGC6629 & 2.93 & 7.50 & 0.266 & 2372 \\
833: % NGC6644 & 1.84 & 1.30 & 0.098 & 0 \\
834: NGC6720 & 4.10 & 34.60 & 0.384 & 880 \\
835: NGC6741 & 2.49 & 3.90 & 0.197 & 3728 \\
836: NGC6751 & 3.85 & 10.50 & 0.063 & 2585 \\
837: NGC6765 & 4.91 & 19.00 & 0.018 & 2334 \\
838: NGC6772 & 4.74 & 32.40 & 0.076 & 1266 \\
839: NGC6778 & 3.66 & 7.90 & 0.055 & 3150 \\
840: NGC6781 & 4.54 & 53.00 & 0.323 & 706 \\
841: % NGC6790 & 1.96 & 2.50 & 0.272 & 0 \\
842: NGC6803 & 2.52 & 2.80 & 0.094 & 5273 \\
843: NGC6804 & 3.84 & 15.70 & 0.142 & 1726 \\
844: NGC6807 & 2.17 & 1.00 & 0.027 & 12550 \\
845: NGC6818 & 3.04 & 9.10 & 0.304 & 2055 \\
846: NGC6826 & 3.20 & 12.70 & 0.404 & 1590 \\
847: % NGC6833 & 1.40 & 0.40 & 0.022 & 0 \\
848: NGC6842 & 4.25 & 23.70 & 0.126 & 1380 \\
849: NGC6852 & 4.59 & 14.00 & 0.020 & 2736 \\
850: NGC6853 & 4.94 & 170.00 & 1.325 & 264 \\
851: NGC6879 & 3.10 & 2.50 & 0.020 & 7692 \\
852: NGC6881 & 2.30 & 2.50 & 0.124 & 5340 \\
853: NGC6884 & 2.49 & 3.80 & 0.186 & 3830 \\
854: NGC6886 & 2.77 & 3.80 & 0.098 & 4354 \\
855: NGC6891 & 3.00 & 5.10 & 0.103 & 3613 \\
856: NGC6894 & 4.50 & 22.00 & 0.061 & 1669 \\
857: NGC6905 & 4.42 & 20.20 & 0.062 & 1751 \\
858: NGC7008 & 4.53 & 42.80 & 0.217 & 869 \\
859: NGC7009 & 3.03 & 14.10 & 0.735 & 1325 \\
860: NGC7026 & 2.91 & 7.50 & 0.277 & 2352 \\
861: % NGC7027 & 1.46 & 7.10 & 6.921 & 0 \\
862: NGC7048 & 4.91 & 27.50 & 0.037 & 1613 \\
863: NGC7094 & 5.72 & 47.50 & 0.017 & 1358 \\
864: NGC7139 & 5.30 & 38.00 & 0.029 & 1396 \\
865: NGC7293 & 5.70 & 402.00 & 1.292 & 159 \\
866: NGC7354 & 2.83 & 10.00 & 0.597 & 1698 \\
867: NGC7662 & 2.57 & 7.70 & 0.634 & 1962 \\
868: IC289 & 3.81 & 18.40 & 0.212 & 1448 \\
869: IC351 & 3.15 & 3.50 & 0.035 & 5620 \\
870: % IC418 & 1.95 & 6.20 & 1.733 & 0 \\
871: IC972 & 5.51 & 23.50 & 0.007 & 2488 \\
872: IC1295 & 5.42 & 54.10 & 0.045 & 1034 \\
873: IC1297 & 2.85 & 3.50 & 0.069 & 4908 \\
874: IC1454 & 5.95 & 17.00 & 0.001 & 4207 \\
875: IC1747 & 3.12 & 6.50 & 0.128 & 2991 \\
876: IC2003 & 2.97 & 3.30 & 0.047 & 5489 \\
877: IC2120 & 4.24 & 23.50 & 0.126 & 1388 \\
878: IC2149 & 2.36 & 4.20 & 0.309 & 3258 \\
879: IC2165 & 2.50 & 4.00 & 0.202 & 3653 \\
880: IC2448 & 3.17 & 5.00 & 0.067 & 3985 \\
881: % IC2501 & 1.17 & 1.00 & 0.267 & 0 \\
882: IC2553 & 2.77 & 4.50 & 0.137 & 3679 \\
883: IC2621 & 2.10 & 2.50 & 0.197 & 4867 \\
884: IC3568 & 3.64 & 9.00 & 0.075 & 2738 \\
885: IC4191 & 3.06 & 7.00 & 0.170 & 2703 \\
886: IC4406 & 3.56 & 10.00 & 0.110 & 2381 \\
887: IC4593 & 3.25 & 6.40 & 0.092 & 3225 \\
888: IC4634 & 2.76 & 4.20 & 0.122 & 3924 \\
889: IC4637 & 3.42 & 9.30 & 0.132 & 2396 \\
890: IC4642 & 3.66 & 8.30 & 0.060 & 3006 \\
891: IC4663 & 3.66 & 7.20 & 0.045 & 3467 \\
892: IC4673 & 3.56 & 7.40 & 0.060 & 3220 \\
893: IC4699 & 3.10 & 2.50 & 0.020 & 7692 \\
894: IC4732 & 2.83 & 2.50 & 0.037 & 6801 \\
895: IC4776 & 2.88 & 3.50 & 0.065 & 4966 \\
896: % IC4846 & 1.92 & 1.10 & 0.059 & 0 \\
897: % IC4997 & 1.66 & 1.00 & 0.087 & 0 \\
898: % IC5117 & 0.96 & 0.70 & 0.232 & 0 \\
899: IC5148 & 5.71 & 60.00 & 0.028 & 1068 \\
900: IC5217 & 2.98 & 3.40 & 0.048 & 5369 \\
901: A1 & 5.55 & 23.50 & 0.006 & 2534 \\
902: A2 & 5.62 & 15.50 & 0.002 & 3967 \\
903: A3 & 6.12 & 30.00 & 0.003 & 2585 \\
904: A4 & 5.43 & 10.00 & 0.001 & 5621 \\
905: A5 & 6.80 & 63.70 & 0.003 & 1658 \\
906: A6 & 6.45 & 93.00 & 0.012 & 967 \\
907: A7 & 6.28 & 382.00 & 0.305 & 218 \\
908: A8 & 5.15 & 30.00 & 0.026 & 1648 \\
909: A9 & 6.02 & 18.50 & 0.001 & 3999 \\
910: A10 & 5.20 & 10.00 & 0.002 & 5075 \\
911: A11 & 5.01 & 16.00 & 0.010 & 2901 \\
912: A12 & 4.58 & 18.50 & 0.036 & 2058 \\
913: A13 & 6.47 & 76.30 & 0.008 & 1191 \\
914: A14 & 5.38 & 16.40 & 0.004 & 3353 \\
915: A15 & 5.67 & 17.00 & 0.002 & 3691 \\
916: A16 & 6.59 & 70.50 & 0.005 & 1363 \\
917: A17 & 5.79 & 21.40 & 0.003 & 3100 \\
918: A18 & 5.50 & 36.60 & 0.017 & 1588 \\
919: A19 & 6.12 & 33.50 & 0.003 & 2310 \\
920: A20 & 5.78 & 33.50 & 0.007 & 1978 \\
921: A23 & 5.63 & 27.00 & 0.007 & 2289 \\
922: A24 & 6.54 & 177.40 & 0.036 & 530 \\
923: A26 & 5.82 & 20.00 & 0.002 & 3376 \\
924: A28 & 7.13 & 134.00 & 0.005 & 920 \\
925: A30 & 6.85 & 63.50 & 0.002 & 1702 \\
926: A31 & 6.97 & 486.00 & 0.102 & 235 \\
927: A32 & 6.05 & 67.00 & 0.016 & 1118 \\
928: A33 & 6.71 & 134.00 & 0.014 & 758 \\
929: A34 & 6.79 & 145.00 & 0.013 & 728 \\
930: A35 & 6.37 & 386.00 & 0.255 & 225 \\
931: A36 & 5.89 & 183.50 & 0.174 & 379 \\
932: A39 & 6.72 & 87.00 & 0.006 & 1175 \\
933: A40 & 5.76 & 17.00 & 0.002 & 3859 \\
934: A41 & 4.83 & 9.20 & 0.005 & 4644 \\
935: A43 & 5.76 & 40.00 & 0.011 & 1634 \\
936: A44 & 5.50 & 28.00 & 0.010 & 2074 \\
937: A46 & 5.91 & 31.70 & 0.005 & 2211 \\
938: A50 & 5.86 & 13.50 & 0.001 & 5091 \\
939: A51 & 5.19 & 33.50 & 0.029 & 1503 \\
940: A53 & 4.05 & 15.50 & 0.086 & 1924 \\
941: A54 & 6.10 & 28.00 & 0.002 & 2736 \\
942: A55 & 5.58 & 24.00 & 0.006 & 2519 \\
943: A59 & 5.61 & 43.00 & 0.018 & 1425 \\
944: A60 & 5.70 & 37.00 & 0.011 & 1721 \\
945: A62 & 4.70 & 80.50 & 0.522 & 499 \\
946: A65 & 6.45 & 54.00 & 0.004 & 1671 \\
947: A66 & 6.09 & 133.40 & 0.058 & 572 \\
948: A67 & 5.82 & 33.50 & 0.007 & 2011 \\
949: A69 & 5.01 & 11.00 & 0.005 & 4206 \\
950: A70 & 5.17 & 21.00 & 0.012 & 2376 \\
951: A71 & 5.48 & 79.00 & 0.083 & 729 \\
952: A72 & 6.00 & 63.70 & 0.016 & 1151 \\
953: A73 & 5.86 & 36.60 & 0.007 & 1875 \\
954: A75 & 5.28 & 28.50 & 0.017 & 1845 \\
955: A77 & 4.15 & 32.90 & 0.308 & 949 \\
956: A78 & 6.37 & 53.50 & 0.005 & 1622 \\
957: A79 & 5.12 & 27.10 & 0.022 & 1801 \\
958: A80 & 6.59 & 54.80 & 0.003 & 1752 \\
959: A81 & 5.92 & 16.50 & 0.001 & 4283 \\
960: A82 & 6.09 & 40.50 & 0.005 & 1887 \\
961: A84 & 6.05 & 47.50 & 0.008 & 1579 \\
962: AGCAR & 3.56 & 17.80 & 0.348 & 1338 \\
963: % Ap1-8 & 0.00 & 5.50 & 0.004 & 0 \\
964: Ap1-11 & 4.41 & 6.00 & 0.006 & 5847 \\
965: Ap1-12 & 4.26 & 6.00 & 0.019 & 4610 \\
966: Ap2-1 & 3.53 & 16.40 & 0.320 & 1429 \\
967: Ap2-1 & 4.58 & 50.00 & 0.262 & 762 \\
968: % Ap3-1 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.014 & 0 \\
969: Ba-1 & 5.05 & 19.00 & 0.013 & 2483 \\
970: % BoBn1 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.002 & 0 \\
971: BD+30 & 2.10 & 4.00 & 0.511 & 3034 \\
972: BlM & 3.10 & 2.30 & 0.017 & 8354 \\
973: % BlO & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.018 & 0 \\
974: % Bl2-1 & 1.68 & 0.80 & 0.054 & 0 \\
975: % Bl3-13 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.010 & 0 \\
976: BV-1 & 4.99 & 20.80 & 0.018 & 2211 \\
977: % BV-3 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.004 & 0 \\
978: % Cn1-1 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.038 & 0 \\
979: % Cn1-2 & 0.00 & 2.50 & 0.015 & 0 \\
980: Cn1-5 & 3.05 & 3.50 & 0.044 & 5369 \\
981: Cn2-1 & 2.35 & 1.70 & 0.052 & 8008 \\
982: Cn3-1 & 2.57 & 2.50 & 0.067 & 6040 \\
983: CRL618 & 3.33 & 6.00 & 0.067 & 3572 \\
984: DdDm-1 & 2.22 & 0.50 & 0.006 & 25700 \\
985: % DHW-1 & 0.00 & 64.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
986: Fg-1 & 3.67 & 8.00 & 0.055 & 3127 \\
987: % Fg-2 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
988: % Fg-3 & 1.57 & 1.00 & 0.107 & 0 \\
989: Ha1-1 & 3.14 & 1.20 & 0.004 & 16400 \\
990: % Ha1-2 & 1.01 & 0.40 & 0.062 & 0 \\
991: Ha1-3 & 2.79 & 7.90 & 0.405 & 2113 \\
992: Ha1-8 & 2.57 & 1.70 & 0.031 & 8881 \\
993: % Ha1-9 & 1.29 & 0.40 & 0.025 & 0 \\
994: Ha1-11 & 3.44 & 3.00 & 0.013 & 7515 \\
995: Ha1-14 & 3.30 & 3.30 & 0.022 & 6389 \\
996: Ha1-15 & 3.17 & 2.20 & 0.013 & 9052 \\
997: % Ha1-17 & 1.36 & 0.50 & 0.035 & 0 \\
998: Ha1-17 & 2.13 & 0.50 & 0.006 & 25700 \\
999: % Ha1-18 & 0.00 & 12.50 & 0.041 & 0 \\
1000: % Ha1-19 & 1.88 & 0.70 & 0.026 & 0 \\
1001: Ha1-20 & 2.56 & 2.00 & 0.044 & 7514 \\
1002: Ha1-23 & 2.35 & 1.40 & 0.035 & 9750 \\
1003: Ha1-24 & 3.70 & 4.30 & 0.015 & 5892 \\
1004: Ha1-27 & 3.18 & 2.60 & 0.018 & 7673 \\
1005: % Ha1-29 & 0.00 & 5.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1006: % Ha1-31 & 0.00 & 2.50 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1007: Ha1-33 & 2.82 & 1.40 & 0.012 & 12060 \\
1008: % Ha1-34 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1009: % Ha1-35 & 1.65 & 1.00 & 0.089 & 0 \\
1010: % Ha1-36 & 1.50 & 0.80 & 0.081 & 0 \\
1011: Ha1-39 & 2.37 & 0.90 & 0.014 & 15290 \\
1012: Ha1-40 & 2.36 & 1.90 & 0.063 & 7200 \\
1013: Ha1-41 & 3.86 & 4.80 & 0.013 & 5686 \\
1014: Ha1-42 & 2.92 & 2.90 & 0.040 & 6126 \\
1015: Ha1-43 & 3.18 & 1.50 & 0.006 & 13300 \\
1016: % Ha1-44 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1017: % Ha1-45 & 2.04 & 0.80 & 0.023 & 0 \\
1018: % Ha1-46 & 1.53 & 0.60 & 0.043 & 0 \\
1019: % Ha1-47 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1020: % Ha1-50 & 1.80 & 0.70 & 0.031 & 0 \\
1021: % Ha1-53 & 0.00 & 12.50 & 0.028 & 0 \\
1022: Ha1-54 & 2.13 & 1.00 & 0.029 & 12340 \\
1023: % Ha1-55 & 0.00 & 5.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1024: % Ha1-56 & 0.00 & 1.50 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1025: % Ha1-58 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1026: Ha1-59 & 3.94 & 3.00 & 0.004 & 9421 \\
1027: Ha1-60 & 3.11 & 1.90 & 0.011 & 10170 \\
1028: % Ha1-61 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1029: % Ha1-62 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1030: Ha1-65 & 3.21 & 2.60 & 0.017 & 7780 \\
1031: Ha1-66 & 3.86 & 3.30 & 0.006 & 8284 \\
1032: Ha1-67 & 3.51 & 3.00 & 0.011 & 7770 \\
1033: Ha2-1 & 2.68 & 2.80 & 0.065 & 5677 \\
1034: % Ha2-4 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1035: Ha2-7 & 3.29 & 2.10 & 0.009 & 10020 \\
1036: Ha2-10 & 2.30 & 1.00 & 0.020 & 13330 \\
1037: Ha2-10 & 2.42 & 1.00 & 0.015 & 14060 \\
1038: % Ha2-11 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.023 & 0 \\
1039: % Ha2-13 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1040: Ha2-15 & 3.76 & 1.70 & 0.002 & 15360 \\
1041: Ha2-16 & 4.91 & 8.40 & 0.003 & 5268 \\
1042: Ha2-17 & 3.10 & 1.80 & 0.010 & 10720 \\
1043: % Ha2-18 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1044: Ha2-20 & 2.95 & 1.90 & 0.016 & 9447 \\
1045: % Ha2-23 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1046: Ha2-24 & 3.21 & 2.30 & 0.013 & 8814 \\
1047: Ha2-25 & 3.68 & 2.20 & 0.004 & 11460 \\
1048: Ha2-33 & 4.11 & 4.00 & 0.005 & 7655 \\
1049: % Ha2-37 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1050: % Ha2-39 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1051: Ha2-41 & 4.26 & 3.80 & 0.003 & 8632 \\
1052: Ha2-43 & 3.49 & 4.50 & 0.026 & 5114 \\
1053: % Ha2-46 & 0.00 & 12.50 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1054: % Ha2-48 & 1.69 & 0.90 & 0.066 & 0 \\
1055: Ha3-29 & 3.90 & 6.00 & 0.018 & 4646 \\
1056: % Ha3-75 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.024 & 0 \\
1057: Ha4-1 & 3.83 & 1.50 & 0.001 & 18050 \\
1058: Hb-4 & 2.18 & 2.50 & 0.166 & 5037 \\
1059: Hb-5 & 2.81 & 10.00 & 0.620 & 1685 \\
1060: % Hb-6 & 2.02 & 2.50 & 0.240 & 0 \\
1061: Hb-7 & 2.73 & 2.00 & 0.030 & 8109 \\
1062: Hb-8 & 3.49 & 2.50 & 0.008 & 9239 \\
1063: % Hb-12 & 0.91 & 0.40 & 0.080 & 0 \\
1064: He1-5 & 5.39 & 18.00 & 0.005 & 3081 \\
1065: He1-6 & 4.39 & 11.20 & 0.020 & 3119 \\
1066: He2-5 & 2.49 & 1.50 & 0.029 & 9702 \\
1067: He2-7 & 4.63 & 22.30 & 0.047 & 1744 \\
1068: % He2-9 & 2.00 & 2.20 & 0.195 & 0 \\
1069: % He2-10 & 0.00 & 5.60 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1070: He2-11 & 3.98 & 32.50 & 0.445 & 888 \\
1071: He2-15 & 3.73 & 11.90 & 0.105 & 2165 \\
1072: % He2-18 & 0.00 & 5.50 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1073: He2-21 & 2.56 & 1.20 & 0.016 & 12490 \\
1074: % He2-25 & 1.37 & 2.20 & 0.828 & 0 \\
1075: He2-26 & 4.56 & 19.00 & 0.040 & 1983 \\
1076: He2-28 & 3.70 & 5.00 & 0.020 & 5075 \\
1077: He2-29 & 3.91 & 7.00 & 0.024 & 3999 \\
1078: % He2-34 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1079: He2-35 & 3.02 & 2.50 & 0.024 & 7416 \\
1080: He2-36 & 3.81 & 11.00 & 0.075 & 2427 \\
1081: He2-37 & 4.37 & 11.50 & 0.023 & 3004 \\
1082: % He2-41 & 0.00 & 5.00 & 0.041 & 0 \\
1083: % He2-47 & 0.00 & 2.50 & 0.170 & 0 \\
1084: He2-50 & 4.09 & 5.90 & 0.011 & 5151 \\
1085: He2-51 & 3.15 & 4.50 & 0.057 & 4384 \\
1086: He2-63 & 2.88 & 1.50 & 0.012 & 11570 \\
1087: % He2-67 & 0.00 & 2.50 & 0.041 & 0 \\
1088: % He2-68 & 0.00 & 5.00 & 0.034 & 0 \\
1089: % He2-71 & 0.00 & 2.50 & 0.035 & 0 \\
1090: He2-73 & 2.32 & 2.00 & 0.076 & 6733 \\
1091: % He2-77 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 2.626 & 0 \\
1092: % He2-78 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1093: He2-85 & 2.97 & 5.10 & 0.112 & 3555 \\
1094: % He2-86 & 2.02 & 1.80 & 0.125 & 0 \\
1095: % He2-90 & 0.00 & 5.00 & 0.025 & 0 \\
1096: % He2-97 & 0.00 & 2.50 & 0.030 & 0 \\
1097: He2-99 & 4.21 & 8.50 & 0.018 & 3770 \\
1098: He2-102 & 3.39 & 4.50 & 0.033 & 4891 \\
1099: He2-103 & 4.35 & 10.00 & 0.018 & 3419 \\
1100: % He2-104 & 0.00 & 2.50 & 0.169 & 0 \\
1101: He2-105 & 4.84 & 15.50 & 0.014 & 2764 \\
1102: % He2-106 & 0.00 & 5.00 & 0.065 & 0 \\
1103: He2-107 & 3.19 & 5.00 & 0.065 & 4009 \\
1104: He2-108 & 3.56 & 5.50 & 0.033 & 4336 \\
1105: He2-109 & 3.54 & 3.70 & 0.016 & 6373 \\
1106: He2-111 & 3.30 & 6.00 & 0.073 & 3511 \\
1107: He2-112 & 3.41 & 7.30 & 0.082 & 3050 \\
1108: % He2-113 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.115 & 0 \\
1109: He2-114 & 5.09 & 18.30 & 0.011 & 2626 \\
1110: % He2-115 & 1.76 & 1.50 & 0.156 & 0 \\
1111: He2-116 & 5.58 & 25.50 & 0.007 & 2369 \\
1112: % He2-117 & 1.91 & 2.50 & 0.308 & 0 \\
1113: % He2-118 & 0.00 & 2.50 & 0.008 & 0 \\
1114: He2-119 & 4.47 & 26.40 & 0.094 & 1372 \\
1115: He2-120 & 4.45 & 13.50 & 0.026 & 2653 \\
1116: He2-123 & 2.28 & 2.30 & 0.110 & 5750 \\
1117: He2-125 & 2.65 & 1.50 & 0.020 & 10410 \\
1118: % He2-127 & 0.00 & 2.50 & 0.315 & 0 \\
1119: % He2-128 & 0.00 & 2.50 & 0.040 & 0 \\
1120: % He2-129 & 1.86 & 0.80 & 0.035 & 0 \\
1121: % He2-131 & 2.03 & 3.00 & 0.335 & 0 \\
1122: He2-132 & 4.10 & 8.90 & 0.025 & 3434 \\
1123: % He2-133 & 1.82 & 2.00 & 0.245 & 0 \\
1124: % He2-134 & 0.00 & 5.00 & 0.010 & 0 \\
1125: % He2-136 & 0.00 & 5.00 & 0.023 & 0 \\
1126: He2-138 & 2.81 & 3.50 & 0.076 & 4813 \\
1127: % He2-140 & 1.93 & 1.30 & 0.080 & 0 \\
1128: He2-141 & 3.57 & 6.90 & 0.051 & 3469 \\
1129: He2-142 & 2.30 & 1.80 & 0.065 & 7400 \\
1130: He2-143 & 2.35 & 2.60 & 0.120 & 5250 \\
1131: He2-146 & 3.42 & 11.00 & 0.186 & 2024 \\
1132: He2-149 & 3.12 & 1.50 & 0.007 & 12970 \\
1133: % He2-151 & 0.00 & 2.50 & 0.023 & 0 \\
1134: He2-152 & 2.79 & 5.50 & 0.196 & 3036 \\
1135: He2-153 & 5.17 & 6.50 & 0.001 & 7744 \\
1136: He2-155 & 3.48 & 7.30 & 0.070 & 3148 \\
1137: % He2-156 & 0.00 & 5.00 & 0.104 & 0 \\
1138: He2-157 & 2.48 & 1.50 & 0.030 & 9637 \\
1139: He2-158 & 3.17 & 1.00 & 0.003 & 19890 \\
1140: He2-159 & 3.60 & 5.00 & 0.025 & 4853 \\
1141: He2-161 & 3.80 & 5.00 & 0.016 & 5313 \\
1142: % He2-162 & 0.00 & 2.50 & 0.028 & 0 \\
1143: He2-163 & 5.07 & 10.00 & 0.003 & 4772 \\
1144: He2-164 & 3.42 & 8.00 & 0.097 & 2791 \\
1145: He2-165 & 5.20 & 25.00 & 0.016 & 2023 \\
1146: He2-169 & 3.74 & 10.90 & 0.086 & 2374 \\
1147: % He2-170 & 0.00 & 2.50 & 0.015 & 0 \\
1148: % He2-171 & 0.00 & 5.00 & 0.011 & 0 \\
1149: He2-175 & 3.21 & 3.30 & 0.027 & 6141 \\
1150: % He2-176 & 0.00 & 2.50 & 0.016 & 0 \\
1151: He2-180 & 2.23 & 0.90 & 0.019 & 14350 \\
1152: % He2-181 & 1.01 & 0.40 & 0.062 & 0 \\
1153: % He2-182 & 0.00 & 5.00 & 0.062 & 0 \\
1154: % He2-185 & 0.00 & 5.00 & 0.018 & 0 \\
1155: He2-186 & 2.63 & 1.50 & 0.021 & 10350 \\
1156: % He2-187 & 0.00 & 3.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1157: % He2-248 & 0.00 & 2.50 & 0.013 & 0 \\
1158: % He2-260 & 1.89 & 0.50 & 0.013 & 0 \\
1159: He2-262 & 2.60 & 1.60 & 0.026 & 9540 \\
1160: % He2-406 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1161: He2-429 & 2.41 & 2.10 & 0.069 & 6659 \\
1162: % He2-430 & 1.82 & 0.80 & 0.038 & 0 \\
1163: He2-432 & 2.17 & 1.10 & 0.033 & 11420 \\
1164: He2-433 & 3.66 & 4.00 & 0.014 & 6231 \\
1165: % He2-434 & 0.00 & 5.00 & 0.020 & 0 \\
1166: He2-435 & 3.19 & 2.40 & 0.015 & 8349 \\
1167: % He2-436 & 0.00 & 5.00 & 0.023 & 0 \\
1168: % He2-439 & 1.64 & 1.50 & 0.204 & 0 \\
1169: % He2-440 & 2.05 & 1.10 & 0.043 & 0 \\
1170: % He2-447 & 1.38 & 0.60 & 0.060 & 0 \\
1171: He2-453 & 4.52 & 11.20 & 0.015 & 3313 \\
1172: % He2-459 & 1.86 & 1.00 & 0.055 & 0 \\
1173: % He2-468 & 0.81 & 0.20 & 0.025 & 0 \\
1174: % He3-1333 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1175: % Hf4 & 0.00 & 10.60 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1176: Hf2-1 & 3.99 & 4.70 & 0.009 & 6165 \\
1177: Hu1-1 & 3.03 & 2.50 & 0.023 & 7460 \\
1178: % Hu1-2 & 1.93 & 2.50 & 0.293 & 0 \\
1179: % Hu2-1 & 1.94 & 1.50 & 0.103 & 0 \\
1180: J320 & 3.39 & 3.60 & 0.021 & 6120 \\
1181: J900 & 2.51 & 3.00 & 0.110 & 4903 \\
1182: Jn-1 & 7.05 & 166.00 & 0.010 & 716 \\
1183: K1-1 & 5.22 & 21.70 & 0.011 & 2362 \\
1184: % K1-2 & 0.00 & 29.20 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1185: K1-3 & 3.88 & 46.00 & 1.117 & 599 \\
1186: K1-4 & 4.93 & 23.00 & 0.025 & 1943 \\
1187: K1-7 & 5.76 & 17.00 & 0.002 & 3859 \\
1188: K1-8 & 5.02 & 39.50 & 0.059 & 1183 \\
1189: % K1-9 & 0.00 & 21.50 & 0.001 & 0 \\
1190: % K1-10 & 0.00 & 31.10 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1191: K1-12 & 5.14 & 18.50 & 0.010 & 2659 \\
1192: K1-13 & 5.67 & 83.00 & 0.059 & 758 \\
1193: K1-14 & 6.20 & 23.50 & 0.001 & 3413 \\
1194: K1-16 & 5.07 & 47.00 & 0.076 & 1013 \\
1195: % K1-17 & 0.00 & 22.50 & 0.002 & 0 \\
1196: K1-20 & 5.95 & 17.00 & 0.001 & 4207 \\
1197: K1-21 & 5.23 & 14.50 & 0.005 & 3535 \\
1198: K1-22 & 6.45 & 90.50 & 0.012 & 997 \\
1199: K1-32 & 6.00 & 29.50 & 0.003 & 2479 \\
1200: K2-1 & 5.92 & 66.00 & 0.021 & 1071 \\
1201: K2-2 & 6.50 & 207.00 & 0.054 & 446 \\
1202: K2-4 & 6.37 & 343.00 & 0.202 & 253 \\
1203: K2-5 & 4.88 & 12.30 & 0.008 & 3561 \\
1204: K3-1 & 3.70 & 2.50 & 0.005 & 10150 \\
1205: K3-2 & 2.41 & 1.40 & 0.031 & 9991 \\
1206: K3-3 & 3.47 & 5.50 & 0.041 & 4144 \\
1207: K3-4 & 4.10 & 8.10 & 0.021 & 3762 \\
1208: K3-5 & 4.52 & 5.00 & 0.003 & 7416 \\
1209: % K3-6 & 1.07 & 0.40 & 0.055 & 0 \\
1210: K3-7 & 3.14 & 3.20 & 0.030 & 6116 \\
1211: K3-9 & 3.89 & 3.80 & 0.007 & 7280 \\
1212: K3-11 & 2.72 & 1.50 & 0.017 & 10800 \\
1213: K3-13 & 2.63 & 1.90 & 0.034 & 8156 \\
1214: K3-14 & 2.32 & 0.50 & 0.005 & 26880 \\
1215: K3-16 & 3.37 & 2.00 & 0.007 & 10910 \\
1216: K3-17 & 2.74 & 7.40 & 0.398 & 2205 \\
1217: K3-18 & 3.09 & 2.00 & 0.013 & 9600 \\
1218: % K3-19 & 1.80 & 0.60 & 0.023 & 0 \\
1219: K3-23 & 3.03 & 1.50 & 0.008 & 12460 \\
1220: K3-24 & 3.17 & 3.10 & 0.026 & 6405 \\
1221: K3-27 & 4.63 & 8.20 & 0.006 & 4752 \\
1222: % K3-29 & 1.24 & 0.50 & 0.058 & 0 \\
1223: K3-30 & 2.70 & 1.70 & 0.023 & 9427 \\
1224: % K3-31 & 1.82 & 0.80 & 0.039 & 0 \\
1225: % K3-33 & 1.93 & 0.60 & 0.017 & 0 \\
1226: % K3-35 & 1.91 & 0.90 & 0.040 & 0 \\
1227: K3-37 & 2.60 & 1.30 & 0.017 & 11760 \\
1228: K3-38 & 2.52 & 1.50 & 0.025 & 9978 \\
1229: % K3-39 & 1.96 & 0.50 & 0.011 & 0 \\
1230: K3-40 & 2.90 & 2.00 & 0.020 & 8794 \\
1231: K3-41 & 2.17 & 0.25 & 0.002 & 50140 \\
1232: % K3-42 & 1.88 & 0.60 & 0.019 & 0 \\
1233: K3-48 & 3.02 & 3.00 & 0.034 & 6201 \\
1234: % K3-49 & 0.00 & 0.10 & 0.007 & 0 \\
1235: % K3-52 & 0.88 & 0.40 & 0.065 & 0 \\
1236: % K3-53 & 0.99 & 0.40 & 0.050 & 0 \\
1237: % K3-54 & 1.95 & 0.40 & 0.007 & 0 \\
1238: K3-55 & 2.87 & 4.10 & 0.090 & 4231 \\
1239: K3-57 & 2.83 & 3.20 & 0.060 & 5325 \\
1240: K3-58 & 2.87 & 2.40 & 0.031 & 7221 \\
1241: % K3-60 & 1.97 & 1.00 & 0.043 & 0 \\
1242: K3-61 & 3.41 & 3.00 & 0.014 & 7405 \\
1243: % K3-62 & 1.77 & 1.30 & 0.115 & 0 \\
1244: K3-63 & 3.23 & 3.50 & 0.029 & 5836 \\
1245: K3-65 & 3.80 & 2.50 & 0.004 & 10610 \\
1246: K3-66 & 2.43 & 1.10 & 0.018 & 12860 \\
1247: K3-67 & 3.73 & 7.50 & 0.042 & 3430 \\
1248: K3-68 & 4.46 & 6.00 & 0.005 & 6002 \\
1249: % K3-69 & 1.42 & 0.23 & 0.008 & 0 \\
1250: K3-70 & 2.63 & 0.80 & 0.006 & 19390 \\
1251: K3-72 & 5.55 & 11.50 & 0.001 & 5168 \\
1252: % K3-73 & 0.00 & 8.00 & 0.001 & 0 \\
1253: % K3-74 & 0.00 & 10.00 & 0.001 & 0 \\
1254: % K3-76 & 0.00 & 0.10 & 0.012 & 0 \\
1255: K3-77 & 3.32 & 3.80 & 0.027 & 5618 \\
1256: K3-78 & 3.05 & 2.20 & 0.017 & 8540 \\
1257: K3-82 & 4.32 & 12.50 & 0.030 & 2700 \\
1258: K3-83 & 3.59 & 2.50 & 0.006 & 9631 \\
1259: % K3-86 & 0.00 & 4.70 & 0.001 & 0 \\
1260: K3-87 & 3.90 & 3.00 & 0.004 & 9291 \\
1261: K3-90 & 3.77 & 4.50 & 0.014 & 5814 \\
1262: K3-91 & 4.82 & 5.00 & 0.001 & 8519 \\
1263: K3-92 & 4.93 & 6.50 & 0.002 & 6871 \\
1264: K3-94 & 4.26 & 5.00 & 0.005 & 6570 \\
1265: K4-16 & 3.48 & 1.50 & 0.003 & 15270 \\
1266: % K4-26 & 5.00 & 0.00 & 0.004 & 0 \\
1267: % K4-28 & 1.28 & 0.30 & 0.019 & 0 \\
1268: K4-30 & 2.51 & 1.30 & 0.021 & 11280 \\
1269: % K4-36 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.007 & 0 \\
1270: K4-39 & 2.65 & 1.00 & 0.009 & 15640 \\
1271: K4-41 & 2.78 & 1.50 & 0.015 & 11070 \\
1272: K4-45 & 3.25 & 4.50 & 0.046 & 4576 \\
1273: K4-47 & 4.31 & 3.90 & 0.003 & 8609 \\
1274: K4-48 & 2.54 & 1.10 & 0.014 & 13520 \\
1275: K4-58 & 4.30 & 5.00 & 0.005 & 6696 \\
1276: K4-60 & 2.85 & 10.00 & 0.560 & 1719 \\
1277: % Lo-4 & 0.00 & 24.00 & 0.001 & 0 \\
1278: % Lo-13 & 0.00 & 71.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1279: LoTr5 & 4.29 & 5.30 & 0.006 & 6321 \\
1280: M1-1 & 3.58 & 3.00 & 0.009 & 8002 \\
1281: % M1-2 & 0.00 & 0.25 & 0.057 & 0 \\
1282: M1-4 & 2.28 & 2.00 & 0.084 & 6600 \\
1283: % M1-5 & 1.82 & 1.10 & 0.071 & 0 \\
1284: % M1-6 & 1.93 & 1.40 & 0.091 & 0 \\
1285: M1-7 & 3.77 & 4.40 & 0.013 & 5963 \\
1286: M1-8 & 4.17 & 9.20 & 0.023 & 3423 \\
1287: M1-9 & 2.20 & 1.10 & 0.030 & 11580 \\
1288: % M1-11 & 1.60 & 1.10 & 0.122 & 0 \\
1289: % M1-12 & 1.87 & 0.90 & 0.044 & 0 \\
1290: M1-13 & 3.82 & 5.00 & 0.015 & 5375 \\
1291: M1-14 & 2.61 & 2.40 & 0.056 & 6416 \\
1292: % M1-15 & 0.00 & 0.50 & 0.046 & 0 \\
1293: M1-16 & 2.51 & 1.50 & 0.028 & 9770 \\
1294: M1-17 & 2.72 & 1.50 & 0.017 & 10800 \\
1295: M1-18 & 5.82 & 15.20 & 0.001 & 4433 \\
1296: M1-19 & 2.42 & 1.30 & 0.026 & 10810 \\
1297: % M1-20 & 1.70 & 0.80 & 0.051 & 0 \\
1298: M1-22 & 4.01 & 3.00 & 0.003 & 9770 \\
1299: M1-25 & 2.59 & 2.30 & 0.055 & 6605 \\
1300: % M1-26 & 1.24 & 1.40 & 0.454 & 0 \\
1301: M1-27 & 3.01 & 4.00 & 0.063 & 4612 \\
1302: M1-28 & 4.04 & 7.40 & 0.020 & 4011 \\
1303: M1-29 & 2.82 & 4.10 & 0.102 & 4127 \\
1304: % M1-30 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1305: M1-31 & 2.93 & 3.50 & 0.057 & 5098 \\
1306: M1-32 & 2.96 & 3.80 & 0.064 & 4741 \\
1307: M1-33 & 2.38 & 1.90 & 0.060 & 7280 \\
1308: M1-34 & 3.93 & 5.60 & 0.015 & 5042 \\
1309: M1-35 & 2.68 & 2.60 & 0.057 & 6093 \\
1310: % M1-38 & 0.00 & 2.50 & 0.045 & 0 \\
1311: M1-39 & 2.20 & 2.00 & 0.100 & 6374 \\
1312: % M1-40 & 2.08 & 2.50 & 0.208 & 0 \\
1313: M1-41 & 4.22 & 38.00 & 0.350 & 848 \\
1314: M1-42 & 3.45 & 4.10 & 0.024 & 5512 \\
1315: M1-44 & 3.25 & 2.00 & 0.009 & 10320 \\
1316: % M1-45 & 0.00 & 5.00 & 0.018 & 0 \\
1317: M1-46 & 3.15 & 5.50 & 0.086 & 3580 \\
1318: M1-47 & 3.35 & 2.80 & 0.014 & 7718 \\
1319: M1-48 & 3.58 & 2.40 & 0.006 & 10030 \\
1320: M1-50 & 2.80 & 2.80 & 0.050 & 5983 \\
1321: M1-51 & 2.85 & 7.50 & 0.319 & 2287 \\
1322: M1-52 & 3.90 & 4.00 & 0.008 & 6969 \\
1323: M1-53 & 2.83 & 3.00 & 0.053 & 5674 \\
1324: M1-54 & 3.65 & 6.50 & 0.038 & 3813 \\
1325: % M1-55 & 0.00 & 12.50 & 0.011 & 0 \\
1326: % M1-56 & 1.97 & 0.70 & 0.021 & 0 \\
1327: M1-57 & 3.01 & 4.20 & 0.069 & 4398 \\
1328: M1-58 & 2.83 & 3.20 & 0.060 & 5325 \\
1329: M1-59 & 2.16 & 2.30 & 0.148 & 5419 \\
1330: M1-60 & 2.11 & 1.30 & 0.052 & 9407 \\
1331: % M1-61 & 1.52 & 0.90 & 0.097 & 0 \\
1332: % M1-62 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1333: M1-63 & 3.24 & 2.10 & 0.010 & 9771 \\
1334: M1-64 & 5.08 & 8.50 & 0.002 & 5640 \\
1335: M1-65 & 2.77 & 1.80 & 0.022 & 9191 \\
1336: M1-66 & 2.12 & 1.40 & 0.059 & 8773 \\
1337: M1-67 & 4.76 & 60.20 & 0.250 & 688 \\
1338: % M1-72 & 1.28 & 0.40 & 0.026 & 0 \\
1339: M1-73 & 2.76 & 2.50 & 0.043 & 6600 \\
1340: % M1-74 & 1.51 & 0.50 & 0.031 & 0 \\
1341: M1-75 & 3.87 & 7.00 & 0.026 & 3929 \\
1342: M1-77 & 3.41 & 4.00 & 0.025 & 5549 \\
1343: % M1-78 & 1.57 & 3.20 & 1.104 & 0 \\
1344: M1-79 & 4.68 & 15.00 & 0.019 & 2652 \\
1345: M1-80 & 3.41 & 4.00 & 0.025 & 5549 \\
1346: M2-2 & 2.96 & 3.50 & 0.054 & 5153 \\
1347: % M2-4 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1348: % M2-5 & 3.39 & 2.70 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1349: % M2-6 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1350: M2-7 & 3.96 & 4.00 & 0.007 & 7157 \\
1351: M2-8 & 2.90 & 1.90 & 0.018 & 9262 \\
1352: M2-9 & 4.64 & 23.00 & 0.048 & 1705 \\
1353: % M2-10 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1354: M2-11 & 2.56 & 1.40 & 0.021 & 10750 \\
1355: % M2-12 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1356: M2-13 & 2.29 & 0.80 & 0.013 & 16610 \\
1357: M2-15 & 3.40 & 2.90 & 0.013 & 7623 \\
1358: M2-16 & 3.07 & 2.70 & 0.025 & 7035 \\
1359: M2-17 & 3.81 & 4.00 & 0.010 & 6664 \\
1360: M2-18 & 2.18 & 0.80 & 0.017 & 15740 \\
1361: M2-19 & 3.25 & 2.50 & 0.014 & 8261 \\
1362: % M2-20 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1363: M2-21 & 2.59 & 1.50 & 0.023 & 10160 \\
1364: M2-22 & 3.41 & 2.60 & 0.010 & 8546 \\
1365: M2-23 & 3.04 & 4.40 & 0.070 & 4262 \\
1366: M2-24 & 4.19 & 3.40 & 0.003 & 9347 \\
1367: M2-26 & 3.99 & 3.50 & 0.005 & 8294 \\
1368: M2-27 & 2.14 & 1.00 & 0.029 & 12400 \\
1369: M2-28 & 3.29 & 2.20 & 0.010 & 9540 \\
1370: M2-29 & 3.59 & 2.80 & 0.008 & 8632 \\
1371: M2-30 & 3.06 & 2.00 & 0.014 & 9444 \\
1372: M2-33 & 2.87 & 2.00 & 0.021 & 8668 \\
1373: % M2-35 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1374: M2-36 & 3.27 & 3.40 & 0.025 & 6117 \\
1375: M2-38 & 3.90 & 4.00 & 0.008 & 6969 \\
1376: M2-39 & 3.11 & 1.60 & 0.008 & 12080 \\
1377: M2-40 & 2.87 & 2.50 & 0.033 & 6942 \\
1378: M2-42 & 3.06 & 2.00 & 0.014 & 9444 \\
1379: % M2-43 & 1.38 & 1.20 & 0.243 & 0 \\
1380: M2-44 & 3.07 & 4.00 & 0.054 & 4756 \\
1381: M2-45 & 2.47 & 3.20 & 0.139 & 4502 \\
1382: M2-46 & 3.81 & 2.20 & 0.003 & 12140 \\
1383: M2-47 & 3.14 & 4.10 & 0.049 & 4788 \\
1384: M2-48 & 2.73 & 1.60 & 0.019 & 10160 \\
1385: % M2-49 & 1.82 & 1.10 & 0.074 & 0 \\
1386: M2-50 & 3.51 & 2.30 & 0.006 & 10120 \\
1387: M2-51 & 4.58 & 19.60 & 0.041 & 1941 \\
1388: M2-52 & 4.15 & 7.00 & 0.014 & 4454 \\
1389: M2-53 & 4.56 & 10.00 & 0.011 & 3773 \\
1390: M2-54 & 2.10 & 0.50 & 0.008 & 24270 \\
1391: M2-55 & 4.93 & 20.00 & 0.019 & 2232 \\
1392: M3-1 & 3.72 & 5.60 & 0.024 & 4571 \\
1393: M3-2 & 4.32 & 3.80 & 0.003 & 8930 \\
1394: M3-3 & 4.42 & 6.10 & 0.006 & 5810 \\
1395: M3-4 & 4.90 & 6.90 & 0.002 & 6392 \\
1396: M3-5 & 3.62 & 3.40 & 0.011 & 7208 \\
1397: M3-6 & 2.87 & 4.10 & 0.091 & 4222 \\
1398: M3-7 & 3.14 & 3.10 & 0.028 & 6320 \\
1399: M3-8 & 3.12 & 2.70 & 0.022 & 7206 \\
1400: M3-9 & 3.91 & 8.40 & 0.035 & 3324 \\
1401: M3-10 & 2.55 & 1.60 & 0.029 & 9334 \\
1402: M3-11 & 3.67 & 3.60 & 0.011 & 6965 \\
1403: M3-12 & 3.29 & 2.70 & 0.015 & 7780 \\
1404: M3-14 & 3.24 & 3.60 & 0.030 & 5699 \\
1405: M3-16 & 3.41 & 3.30 & 0.017 & 6727 \\
1406: M3-17 & 2.88 & 1.50 & 0.012 & 11570 \\
1407: % M3-18 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 1.312 & 0 \\
1408: M3-19 & 3.88 & 3.50 & 0.006 & 7870 \\
1409: M3-20 & 2.60 & 2.00 & 0.040 & 7655 \\
1410: % M3-21 & 0.00 & 2.50 & 0.030 & 0 \\
1411: M3-22 & 3.64 & 3.20 & 0.009 & 7714 \\
1412: M3-23 & 3.71 & 6.00 & 0.028 & 4253 \\
1413: % M3-25 & 1.41 & 0.70 & 0.076 & 0 \\
1414: M3-26 & 3.79 & 3.50 & 0.008 & 7550 \\
1415: % M3-27 & 1.27 & 0.50 & 0.053 & 0 \\
1416: M3-28 & 3.40 & 4.50 & 0.033 & 4903 \\
1417: M3-29 & 3.55 & 4.10 & 0.019 & 5794 \\
1418: M3-30 & 4.61 & 8.60 & 0.007 & 4484 \\
1419: % M3-31 & 2.05 & 0.50 & 0.009 & 0 \\
1420: M3-32 & 3.68 & 3.80 & 0.012 & 6627 \\
1421: M3-33 & 3.68 & 3.00 & 0.007 & 8389 \\
1422: M3-34 & 3.03 & 2.80 & 0.029 & 6649 \\
1423: % M3-35 & 1.23 & 0.80 & 0.149 & 0 \\
1424: M3-36 & 3.47 & 1.60 & 0.003 & 14250 \\
1425: M3-37 & 2.99 & 1.10 & 0.005 & 16610 \\
1426: M3-38 & 2.19 & 0.90 & 0.021 & 14060 \\
1427: M3-39 & 3.06 & 9.00 & 0.284 & 2098 \\
1428: M3-40 & 2.57 & 1.30 & 0.018 & 11630 \\
1429: M3-41 & 2.37 & 2.10 & 0.075 & 6556 \\
1430: M3-42 & 4.14 & 4.50 & 0.006 & 6901 \\
1431: M3-43 & 2.73 & 1.90 & 0.027 & 8528 \\
1432: % M3-50 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1433: M3-52 & 4.68 & 6.00 & 0.003 & 6648 \\
1434: M3-54 & 3.59 & 2.80 & 0.008 & 8632 \\
1435: % M3-55 & 0.00 & 3.60 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1436: M4-1 & 2.72 & 2.20 & 0.037 & 7344 \\
1437: M4-2 & 3.28 & 3.00 & 0.019 & 6966 \\
1438: M4-7 & 3.01 & 2.90 & 0.033 & 6366 \\
1439: % M4-8 & 2.02 & 0.70 & 0.019 & 0 \\
1440: M4-9 & 4.67 & 22.10 & 0.042 & 1794 \\
1441: % M4-10 & 1.64 & 0.60 & 0.033 & 0 \\
1442: % M4-11 & 0.00 & 10.60 & 0.008 & 0 \\
1443: M4-14 & 3.67 & 3.70 & 0.012 & 6756 \\
1444: % M4-16 & 1.43 & 0.20 & 0.006 & 0 \\
1445: M4-18 & 2.87 & 1.90 & 0.019 & 9133 \\
1446: % MaC2-1 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1447: Me1-1 & 2.73 & 2.40 & 0.043 & 6757 \\
1448: Me2-1 & 3.18 & 3.00 & 0.024 & 6665 \\
1449: % Me2-2 & 1.89 & 0.70 & 0.025 & 0 \\
1450: My60 & 2.98 & 3.80 & 0.060 & 4803 \\
1451: MyCn18 & 3.18 & 6.30 & 0.106 & 3165 \\
1452: % MyCn26 & 0.00 & 2.50 & 0.016 & 0 \\
1453: Mz1 & 4.04 & 12.90 & 0.061 & 2299 \\
1454: Mz2 & 3.85 & 11.50 & 0.075 & 2364 \\
1455: Mz3 & 3.00 & 12.70 & 0.649 & 1446 \\
1456: NA1 & 3.37 & 4.00 & 0.027 & 5464 \\
1457: % PB1 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.018 & 0 \\
1458: PB2 & 2.35 & 1.50 & 0.040 & 9098 \\
1459: PB3 & 2.85 & 3.50 & 0.070 & 4893 \\
1460: PB4 & 3.25 & 5.60 & 0.071 & 3680 \\
1461: % PB5 & 0.00 & 2.50 & 0.131 & 0 \\
1462: PB6 & 3.61 & 5.50 & 0.030 & 4419 \\
1463: PB8 & 2.98 & 2.50 & 0.026 & 7299 \\
1464: PB9 & 3.31 & 4.50 & 0.040 & 4706 \\
1465: PB10 & 3.11 & 4.00 & 0.050 & 4830 \\
1466: % PC11 & 0.00 & 2.50 & 0.046 & 0 \\
1467: PC12 & 2.23 & 0.90 & 0.019 & 14350 \\
1468: PC14 & 3.21 & 3.50 & 0.030 & 5796 \\
1469: PC17 & 3.23 & 2.50 & 0.015 & 8180 \\
1470: PC19 & 2.49 & 1.40 & 0.025 & 10390 \\
1471: % PC21 & 0.00 & 6.70 & 0.024 & 0 \\
1472: % PC22 & 5.00 & 0.00 & 0.012 & 0 \\
1473: PC23 & 2.43 & 1.10 & 0.018 & 12860 \\
1474: PC24 & 3.14 & 2.50 & 0.018 & 7856 \\
1475: % Pe1-1 & 1.86 & 1.50 & 0.125 & 0 \\
1476: % Pe1-3 & 0.00 & 4.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1477: % Pe1-4 & 0.00 & 5.20 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1478: Pe1-5 & 2.71 & 5.50 & 0.233 & 2932 \\
1479: Pe1-6 & 3.11 & 3.60 & 0.040 & 5380 \\
1480: % Pe1-7 & 0.00 & 2.50 & 0.135 & 0 \\
1481: Pe1-11 & 4.01 & 4.50 & 0.008 & 6493 \\
1482: Pe1-12 & 4.63 & 6.00 & 0.003 & 6484 \\
1483: Pe1-13 & 4.21 & 3.50 & 0.003 & 9186 \\
1484: Pe1-15 & 3.25 & 2.50 & 0.014 & 8249 \\
1485: Pe1-17 & 3.91 & 3.50 & 0.006 & 7997 \\
1486: % Pe1-18 & 1.54 & 0.60 & 0.042 & 0 \\
1487: Pe1-19 & 3.51 & 2.20 & 0.006 & 10570 \\
1488: Pe1-20 & 3.14 & 3.20 & 0.029 & 6141 \\
1489: Pe1-21 & 3.39 & 4.30 & 0.030 & 5123 \\
1490: % Pe2-8 & 1.41 & 0.80 & 0.100 & 0 \\
1491: Pe2-12 & 4.10 & 2.50 & 0.002 & 12190 \\
1492: % Pe2-13 & 0.00 & 6.60 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1493: % Pe2-14 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1494: Pe2-15 & 2.88 & 1.30 & 0.009 & 13360 \\
1495: PHL932 & 6.92 & 135.00 & 0.009 & 828 \\
1496: Ps1 & 2.93 & 1.80 & 0.014 & 10000 \\
1497: Pu-1 & 5.80 & 33.00 & 0.007 & 2024 \\
1498: PW1 & 7.83 & 200.00 & 0.085 & 416 \\
1499: Sa1-8 & 3.46 & 2.80 & 0.011 & 8099 \\
1500: Sa2-21 & 5.82 & 20.00 & 0.002 & 3376 \\
1501: Sa2-22 & 4.15 & 4.00 & 0.004 & 7818 \\
1502: Sh1-89 & 4.53 & 19.00 & 0.043 & 1959 \\
1503: Sh1-118 & 5.80 & 57.50 & 0.021 & 1161 \\
1504: Sh2-71 & 5.18 & 49.80 & 0.066 & 1006 \\
1505: Sh2-207 & 5.12 & 100.00 & 0.300 & 489 \\
1506: Sh2-266 & 4.49 & 33.50 & 0.145 & 1091 \\
1507: % ShWi-1 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.012 & 0 \\
1508: % ShWi-5 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.007 & 0 \\
1509: % ShWi-7 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.016 & 0 \\
1510: Sn1 & 3.11 & 1.50 & 0.007 & 12890 \\
1511: Sp1 & 4.84 & 36.00 & 0.075 & 1192 \\
1512: Sp3 & 4.32 & 17.80 & 0.061 & 1895 \\
1513: % SwSt1 & 0.96 & 0.70 & 0.216 & 0 \\
1514: Tc1 & 3.18 & 7.50 & 0.147 & 2669 \\
1515: Th2-A & 3.95 & 11.50 & 0.060 & 2471 \\
1516: % Th3-6 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1517: Th3-10 & 2.13 & 1.00 & 0.029 & 12330 \\
1518: % Th3-12 & 0.00 & 0.90 & 0.004 & 0 \\
1519: % Th3-14 & 0.00 & 0.70 & 0.004 & 0 \\
1520: Th3-19 & 2.98 & 1.00 & 0.004 & 18210 \\
1521: % Th3-20 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1522: Th3-25 & 2.26 & 0.90 & 0.018 & 14500 \\
1523: Th3-26 & 3.64 & 3.30 & 0.010 & 7480 \\
1524: % Th3-27 & 2.00 & 0.00 & 0.027 & 0 \\
1525: % Th4-3 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.008 & 0 \\
1526: % Th4-4 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1527: Th4-5 & 3.49 & 3.50 & 0.016 & 6573 \\
1528: % Th4-7 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.038 & 0 \\
1529: % Th4-8 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.076 & 0 \\
1530: % Th4-10 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1531: % Th4-11 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1532: % Vd1-2 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1533: % Vd1-3 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1534: % Vd1-5 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1535: % Vd1-8 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.000 & 0 \\
1536: VV-47 & 6.88 & 190.00 & 0.019 & 578 \\
1537: VV1-2 & 5.41 & 130.00 & 0.265 & 428 \\
1538: VV1-4 & 4.46 & 63.20 & 0.553 & 570 \\
1539: VV1-5 & 5.02 & 162.00 & 1.002 & 288 \\
1540: VV1-7 & 6.03 & 124.00 & 0.057 & 600 \\
1541: VV1-8 & 4.72 & 45.00 & 0.156 & 901 \\
1542: VV3-4 & 2.38 & 0.60 & 0.006 & 23040 \\
1543: % VV3-6 & 2.00 & 0.50 & 0.010 & 0 \\
1544: Vy1-1 & 3.12 & 3.10 & 0.029 & 6281 \\
1545: Vy1-2 & 3.26 & 2.30 & 0.012 & 9002 \\
1546: Vy1-4 & 3.20 & 2.00 & 0.010 & 10100 \\
1547: Vy2-1 & 2.59 & 1.90 & 0.038 & 7997 \\
1548: % Vy2-2 & 0.88 & 0.40 & 0.084 & 0 \\
1549: Vy2-3 & 3.85 & 2.30 & 0.003 & 11820 \\
1550: We-1 & 5.38 & 9.50 & 0.001 & 5796 \\
1551: We-2 & 3.63 & 46.00 & 2.000 & 534 \\
1552: % We-3 & 0.00 & 58.00 & 0.002 & 0 \\
1553: % We-5 & 0.00 & 7.50 & 0.001 & 0 \\
1554: We-6 & 6.68 & 31.00 & 0.001 & 3233 \\
1555: We2-5 & 6.18 & 97.00 & 0.025 & 820 \\
1556: We2-262 & 6.80 & 65.00 & 0.003 & 1625 \\
1557: YM29 & 6.06 & 307.50 & 0.327 & 245 \\
1558:
1559: \enddata
1560: \tablenotetext{a}{This is the 5GHz flux when available, otherwise equivalent 5GHz flux from H$\beta$.}
1561: \end{deluxetable}
1562:
1563: \clearpage
1564:
1565:
1566: \clearpage
1567:
1568:
1569:
1570: \begin{deluxetable}{lcrrrrrr }
1571: \tablewidth{0pt}
1572: \tablecaption{Individual Distances of Galactic PNe}
1573:
1574: \tablehead{
1575: \colhead{Name}&
1576: \colhead{D$_{\rm ind}$} &
1577: \colhead{$\sigma_{\rm D}$} &
1578: \colhead{$\tau$}&
1579: \colhead{D$_{\rm CKS}$}&
1580: \colhead{D$_{\rm SSV}$}&
1581: \colhead{Method\tablenotemark{a}}&
1582: \colhead{Ref\tablenotemark{b}}\\
1583:
1584: \colhead{}&
1585: \colhead{[pc]} &
1586: \colhead{[pc]} &
1587: \colhead{}&
1588: \colhead{[pc]}&
1589: \colhead{[pc]} &
1590: \colhead{}&
1591: \colhead{}\\
1592:
1593: }
1594:
1595: \startdata
1596:
1597: A~7 & 676 & $_{-150}^{+267}$& 6.28 & 216 & 218 & P & Hea07\\
1598: A~24 & 521 & $_{-79}^{+112}$& 6.54 & 525 & 530 & P & Hea07\\
1599: A~31 & 568 & $_{-90}^{+131}$& 6.97 & 233 & 235 & P & Hea07\\
1600: BD+30 & 2680 & 810& 2.1 & 1162 & 3034 & E & HTB93\\
1601: IC~289 & 2190 & 1630& 3.81 & 1434 & 1448 & R & KL85\\
1602: IC~1747 & 2450 & 1150& 3.12 & 2937 & 2991 & R & KL85\\
1603: IC~2448 & 1410 & 640& 3.17 & 3947 & 3984 & E & Pea02\\
1604: HE~2-131 & 590 & 180& 2.03 & 1413 & 3666 & P & C99\\
1605: K~1-14 & 3000 & $\dots$& 6.2 & 3378 & 3413 & P & C99\\
1606: K~1-22 & 1330 & $\dots$& 6.45 & 988 & 997 & P & C99\\
1607: Mz~2 & 2160 & $\dots$& 3.85 & 2341 & 2363 & P & C99\\
1608: NGC~2392 & 1600 & 130& 3.93 & 1247 & 1258 & E & LL68\\
1609: NGC~2452 & 3570 & 560& 3.81 & 2811 & 2838 & R & GPP86\\
1610: NGC~2792 & 1910 & 220& 3.16 & 3021 & 3050 & R & GPP86\\
1611: NGC~2818 & 1855 & 200& 4.69 & 1979 & 1998 & CM & CHW03\\
1612: NGC~3132 & 770 & $\dots$& 3.94 & 1251 & 1263 & P & C99\\
1613: NGC~3211 & 1910 & 500& 3.51 & 2873 & 2901 & R & GPP86\\
1614: NGC~3242 & 420 & 160& 3.22 & 1083 & 1094 & E & HTB95\\
1615: NGC~3918 & 2240 & 840& 2.62 & 1010 & 1639 & R & GPP86\\
1616: NGC~5189 & 1730 & 530& 4.59 & 540 & 546 & R & GPP86\\
1617: NGC~5315 & 2620 & 1030& 1.94 & 1242 & 3177 & R & GPP86\\
1618: NGC~6210 & 1570 & 400& 3.01 & 2025 & 2281 & E & HTB95\\
1619: NGC~6302 & 1600 & 600& 2.77 & 525 & 741 & E & GRM93\\
1620: NGC~6565 & 1000 & 440& 3.29 & 4616 & 4660 & R & GPP86\\
1621: NGC~6567 & 1680 & 170& 2.68 & 2367 & 3610 & R & GPP86\\
1622: NGC~6572 & 703 & 95& 2.16 & 705 & 1736 & E & HTB95\\
1623: NGC~6720 & 704 & $_{-196}^{+445}$& 4.1 & 872 & 880 & P & Hea07\\
1624: NGC~6741 & 1540 & 770& 2.49 & 2047 & 3727 & R & KL85\\
1625: NGC~6853 & 379 & $_{-42}^{+54}$& 4.94 & 262 & 264 & P & Hea07\\
1626: NGC~6894 & 1090 & 110& 4.5 & 1653 & 1669 & R & KL85\\
1627: NGC~7009 & 1400 & $\dots$& 3.03 & 1201 & 1325 & E & Sea04\\
1628: NGC~7026 & 1450 & 840& 2.91 & 1902 & 2352 & R & KL85\\
1629: NGC~7027 & 790 & $\dots$& 1.46 & 273 & 632 & P & HTB95\\
1630: NGC~7293 & 219 & $_{-21}^{+27}$& 5.7 & 157 & 159 & P & Hea07\\
1631: NGC~7354 & 2460 & 1440& 2.83 & 1271 & 1697 & R & KL85\\
1632: NGC~7662 & 790 & 750& 2.57 & 1163 & 1962 & E & HT96\\
1633: PS~1 & 1.23e+4& 600 & 2.93 & 8380 &1.0e+4 & CM & ABL00\\
1634: Pw~We~1 & 365 & $_{-37}^{+47}$& 7.83 & 141 & 416 & P & Hea07\\
1635: Sp~3 & 2380 & $\dots$& 4.32 & 1877 & 1895 & P & C99\\
1636:
1637:
1638: \enddata
1639: \tablenotetext{a} { P: parallax; CM: cluster membership; E: expansion; R: reddening.}
1640: \tablenotetext{b} { ABL00: Alves et al. 2000; CHW03: Chen et al. 2003; C99: Ciardullo et al. 1999; GPP86:
1641: Gathier et al. 1996; GRM93: Gomez et al. 1993;
1642: HTB93: Hajian et al. 1993; HTB95: Hajian et al. 1995;
1643: HT96: Hajian \& Terzian 1996; Hea07: Harris et al. 2007; KL85: Kaler \& Lutz 1985; LL68: Liller \& Liller 1968;
1644: Pea02: Palen et al. 2002: Sea04: Sabbadin et al. 2004.
1645: }
1646:
1647: \end{deluxetable}
1648:
1649: \clearpage
1650:
1651:
1652: \begin{deluxetable}{llcccc }
1653: \tablewidth{18 truecm}
1654: \tablecaption{Comparison of Statistical and Individual Distances}
1655:
1656: \tablehead{
1657: \colhead{Ref.}&
1658: \colhead{Method}&
1659: \colhead{R$_{\rm xy}$} &
1660:
1661: \colhead{$<{{\delta{\rm D}} \over {{\rm D}}}>_{\rm Gal}$} &
1662:
1663:
1664: \colhead{${<D_{\rm stat}>-D_{\rm LMC}} \over {D_{\rm LMC}}$} &
1665:
1666:
1667: \colhead{${<D_{\rm stat}>-D_{\rm SMC}} \over {D_{\rm SMC}}$} \\
1668:
1669:
1670: }
1671:
1672: \startdata
1673:
1674: SSV& $\mu\tau$& 0.99& 0.26& 0.01& 0.01\\
1675: &&&&\\
1676:
1677: Old scales \\
1678: \hline\\
1679:
1680:
1681: CKS& $\mu\tau$& 0.97& 0.32& 0.04& 0.05\\
1682: vdSZ& log T$_{\rm b}$ -- log R$_{\rm PN}$& 0.74& 0.86& 0.13& 0.12\\
1683: Z95& log M$_{\rm ion}$ -- log R$_{\rm PN}$& 0.70& 1.10& 0.19& 0.22\\
1684: BL01& log M$_{\rm ion}$ -- log R$_{\rm PN}$& 0.61& 1.35& 0.12& 0.12\\
1685: SB96& log I -- log R$_{\rm PN}$& 0.95& 0.46& 0.02& 0.02\\
1686:
1687: &&&&\\
1688: LMC/SMC calibrations\\
1689: \hline\\
1690:
1691: this paper& log T$_{\rm b}$ -- log R$_{\rm PN}$& 0.82& 0.74& 0.07& 0.02\\
1692: this paper&log M$_{\rm ion}$ -- log R$_{\rm PN}$& 0.80& 0.72& 0.11& 0.08\\
1693: this paper&log I -- log R$_{\rm PN}$& 0.96& 0.36& 0.03& 0.02\\
1694: &&&&\\
1695:
1696:
1697:
1698: \enddata
1699:
1700: \end{deluxetable}
1701:
1702: \clearpage
1703:
1704: \begin{figure}
1705:
1706: \plotone{f1.eps}
1707: \vspace{-2cm}
1708: \caption{Plotted are log~$\mu$ versus $\tau$ for the
1709: sample of LMC PNe observed with the {\it HST}.
1710: Symbols indicate morphology types: Round (open circles), Elliptical
1711: (asterisks), Bipolar core (triangles) and Bipolar (squares). The thinning
1712: sequence is clearly defined for $\tau<$2.1. The solid line reflect CKS calibration,
1713: the broken line is the new calibration (SSV). }
1714:
1715: \end{figure}
1716:
1717:
1718: \begin{figure}
1719:
1720: \plotone{f2.eps}
1721:
1722: \caption{Same as in Figure 1, but for the SMC PNe.}
1723:
1724: \end{figure}
1725:
1726: \begin{figure}
1727:
1728: \plotone{f3.eps}
1729:
1730: \caption{LMC (open symbols) and SMC (filled symbols) PN, all morphologies
1731: except bipolar PN are plotted. Solid line: our new calibration for
1732: the Magellanic Cloud PNe.}
1733:
1734: \end{figure}
1735:
1736: \begin{figure}
1737:
1738: \plotone{f4.eps}
1739:
1740: \caption{The Galactic PNe of known distances plotted on the $\tau$ -- log~$\mu$ plane. Lines as in Figure 3. Symbols denote the
1741: method used for individual distance determination. Filled circles: P; filled squares: CM;
1742: open circles: R; open triangles: E.
1743: }
1744:
1745: \end{figure}
1746:
1747:
1748: \begin{figure}
1749:
1750: \plotone{f5.eps}
1751: \vspace{-2cm}
1752: \caption{Comparison of statistical distances form our new calibration (SSV) with individual distances of Table 2. Symbols represent
1753: the individual distance determination method, as in Fig.~5. Solid line: 1:1. Broken lines represent the 30$\%$ differences
1754: between statistical and individual distances.
1755: }
1756:
1757: \end{figure}
1758:
1759:
1760: \begin{figure}
1761:
1762: \plotone{f6.eps}
1763:
1764: \caption{Relative differences between SSV statistical and individual PN distances, as a function of $\tau$, separated
1765: in the panels by individual distance method. Symbols as in Fig.~6. Vertical lines denotes
1766: the $\tau$ of the thick to thin transition
1767: for the CKS and the SSV scales.
1768: }
1769:
1770: \end{figure}
1771:
1772: \begin{figure}
1773:
1774: \plotone{f7.eps}
1775:
1776: \caption{Relative differences between statistical and individual PN distances, plotted against the individual distances,
1777: for the Magellanic Cloud PN-calibrated scales of CKS (filled symbols), vdSZ (triangles), BL01 (crosses) and SB96 (pentagons).}
1778:
1779: \end{figure}
1780:
1781: \end{document}
1782:
1783:
1784:
1785: