1: To whom it may concern:
2:
3: We would like to re-submit our paper entitled "Cyclotron Modeling
4: Phase-Resolved Infrared Spectroscopy of Polars III: AM Herculis and ST Leo
5: Minoris" for consideration for publication in the Astrophysical Journal.
6: New Mexico State University will assume all costs associated with page charges.
7: As ennumerated below, we have made all of the changes recommended by the
8: referee.
9:
10: Sincerely,
11:
12: Ryan Campbell
13:
14: Astronomy Department
15: New Mexico State University
16: Box 30001/MSC 4500
17: 1320 Frenger Street
18: Las Cruces, NM 88003
19: Ph: 505-646-4914
20: Fax: 505-646-1602
21:
22: There are 9 figures that go along with this paper. Figures 2 & 6 are in black &
23: White, the rest are in color.
24:
25: *******************************************************************************
26: Changes Made to Manuscript
27: *******************************************************************************
28: 1. In Section 2, addition of references for the SPEX and SQIID instruments
29: would be useful. =>
30:
31: Added the references: Rayner et al.(2003) for SPEX, and Ellis et al. (1992) for
32: SQIID.
33:
34: *******************************************************************************
35:
36: 2. In Section 2, for consistency and completeness, the definition of 'R'
37: in '...produces R~250 spectra...' should be given. =>
38:
39: Included! Now reads, R(=lambda/(delta lambda)) ~ 250.
40:
41: *******************************************************************************
42:
43: 3. In Section 2, it would help to give a table listing the various
44: observations of each object (i.e. an observation log), which includes
45: dates/times/instruments of the various runs, number of spectra obtained,
46: exposure times, duration of photometric observations, etc. collated in one
47: place. =>
48:
49: Added an observation log as new Table 1. Renamed old Table 1 => 2 and table
50: 2 => 3.
51:
52: *******************************************************************************
53: 4. In Section 3, I don't understand the word 'namesake' in '...and
54: namesake \Lambda...' =>
55:
56: I suppose that the wording is a little weird. REMOVED.
57:
58:
59: *******************************************************************************
60: 5. In Section 3.1, the text refers to BVRIJHK observations taken on 2006
61: May 20, but in Section 2 these are said to be from 2005 May 20 and in the
62: caption to Figure 3, they are from 2002 May 20. I presume these are in fact
63: all from the same date! =>
64:
65: Good Catch! The correct date was 2005 May 20. The text has been changed to
66: reflect this.
67:
68: *******************************************************************************
69: 6. In Section 3.2, it is unclear why there are gaps in Fig 8b for the spectra
70: of ST LMi in the 2005 extreme low state ... there are no gaps in the spectra
71: from 2006 (in Fig 8a) yet these data were obtained with the same instrument
72: weren't they? Please clarify. =>
73:
74: Because the object was much fainter during the extreme low-state, the spectra
75: were very noisy and telluric correction was not possible in the regions which
76: have been clipped.
77:
78: *******************************************************************************
79: 7. In the 5th paragraph of Section 3.2, the i and beta values previously
80: derived for ST LMi are listed for the first time. I think these should be in
81: the appropriate place in Section 1, where the similar parameters for AM Her
82: are listed. =>
83:
84: Added the following sentence to the end of the ST LMi section of Section 1.
85: " The accretion geometry of the primary emission region has also been
86: previously determined, with 55$^{\circ}$ $\leq i \leq$ 64$^{\circ}$ and
87: 140$^{\circ}$ $\leq \beta \leq$ 150$^{\circ}$ (Schmidt et al., 1983;
88: Potter, 2000)". I left in similar information in section 3.2 to act as a
89: reminder to the reader.
90:
91:
92: *******************************************************************************
93: 8. I think Section 4 would benefit from another subsection heading to
94: encompass some or all of the 5 paragraphs that precede Subsection 4.1 =>
95:
96: A new subsection called "Analysis of Results" has been added.
97:
98: *******************************************************************************
99: 9. In the 4th paragraph of Section 4, the word 'both' should be deleted
100: from '...WE find both the similarity of...' and the word 'infer' towards
101: the end of the paragraph should I think be 'imply'. =>
102:
103: Done.
104:
105: *******************************************************************************
106: 10. The caption to Fig 4 says 'no cyclotron emission was observed from \phi =
107: 0.31 to \phi=0.70' yet the text of the paper refers to the appropriate phase
108: range as 0.27 to 0.74. Please make them consistent. =>
109:
110: Phi = 0.27 to 0.74 is correct. Figure caption changed.
111:
112: *******************************************************************************
113: 11. In the caption to Fig 5, lose the word 'on' from '...SQIID on of the
114: April 9' =>
115:
116: Done.
117:
118:
119: *******************************************************************************
120:
121: 12. The caption to Fig 6 says that the zoomed part has labels 'P' and 'S'
122: indicating the times of photometry and spectroscopy, but the 'P' label is
123: only in the time region covered by the un-zoomed part. =>
124:
125: The Fig. 6 caption now reads, "Long-term lightcurves of ST LMi. top: $V$-band
126: photometry following ST LMi from late 1991 to early 2006. bottom: Zoom-in of
127: the year surrounding our IRTF/SPEX spectroscopy. The ``P'' denotes the epoch
128: of our photometry, while ``S'' marks our spectroscopic data during the 2005
129: extreme low-state and the 2006 low-state, respectively." The new wording should
130: clear-up things.
131:
132: *******************************************************************************
133: End of Comments
134: *******************************************************************************
135: