1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\documentclass[apj]{emulateapj}
3: %\documentclass[onecolumn]{emulateapj}
4: %\documentclass[preprint2]{emulateapj}
5:
6: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
7: %\newcommand{\myemail}{}
8: %{tww@iras.ucalgary.ca}
9:
10: %\usepackage{graphics}
11: %\usepackage{epsfig}
12:
13: \newcommand{\radm}{\mbox{rad~m$^{-2}$}}
14: \newcommand{\xmm}{{\em XMM-Newton}}
15: \def\rosat{{\sl ROSAT}}
16: \def\ROSAT{{\sl ROSAT}}
17: \def\asca{{\sl ASCA}}
18: \def\ASCA{{\sl ASCA}}
19: \def\chandra{{\em Chandra\ }}
20: \def\Chandra{{\em Chandra\ }}
21: \def\ha{H$\alpha$}
22: \def\HI{H{\small I}\ }
23: \def\hii{H{\small II}\ }
24: \newcommand{\as}{$^{\prime\prime}~$}
25: \newcommand{\am}{$^{\prime}~$}
26: \hyphenation{arc-min}
27: \hyphenation{reich}
28:
29: \shorttitle{Distance to PWN G54.1+0.3 and Search for its SNR Shell}
30:
31: \shortauthors{Leahy, Tian and Wang}
32:
33: \begin{document}
34:
35: \title{Distance Determination to the Crab-like PWN G54.1+0.3 and Search for its Supernova Remnant Shell}
36:
37: \author{Denis A. Leahy\altaffilmark{1}, Wenwu Tian\altaffilmark{2,1},
38: Q.D. Wang\altaffilmark{3} }
39: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics \& Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada, leahy@iras.ucalgary.ca}
40: \altaffiltext{2}{National Astronomical Observatories, CAS, Beijing 100012, China, tww@iras.ucalgary.ca}
41: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Astronomy, University of Massachusetts, 710 North Pleasant Street, Amherst, MA 01003, USA}
42:
43: \begin{abstract}
44: We discover a large-scale shell G53.9+0.2 around the Crab-like pulsar wind nebula
45: (PWN) G54.1+0.3 with 1420 MHz continuum VLA observations. This is confirmed by a new
46: infrared image at 8 $\mu$m from the GLIMPSE Legacy Project, which reveals an intriguing
47: infrared shell just surrounding the large radio shell.
48: We analyze the 21 cm HI absorption spectra and $^{13}$CO emission spectra towards PWN
49: G54.1+0.3 and bright sources on both radio and IR shells. Continuous HI absorption up to
50: the tangent point and absence of negative HI absorption features imply that PWN G54.1+0.3 has
51: a distance beyond the tangent point but within the Solar circle,
52: i.e. 4.5 to 9 kpc. G54.1+0.3 is likely at distance of $\simeq$6.2 kpc due to
53: the morphological association between the PWN and a CO molecular cloud at velocity of
54: $\simeq$53 km/s, as revealed by high-resolution $^{13}$CO images. Based on the HI absorption
55: spectrum and recombination line velocity ($\simeq$40 km/s) of the bright HII region
56: G54.09-0.06, which is on the IR shell, the IR shell is likely located at a distance of
57: $\simeq$7.3 kpc, which is also the distance of the associated large-scale radio shell. At this
58: distance, the radio shell has a radius of $\sim$30 pc.
59: The radio shell may be thermal and lack IR emission due to dust destruction,
60: or it may be nonthermal and
61: part of a newly found old SNR. In either case it is located at a different distance than
62: PWN G54.1+0.3.
63:
64: \end{abstract}
65:
66: \keywords{supernova remnants ISM: molecules
67: radio continuum: ISM radio lines: ISM}
68:
69: \section{Introduction}
70: PWN G54.1+0.3 is a Crab Pulsar Wind Nebula (PWN) analog, with a young central pulsar PSR J1930+1852
71: spinning down to energize its PWN (Velusamy \& Becker, 1988).
72: The Crab Nebula, so far, despite intensive searches (Frail et al. 1995)
73: shows no evidence for an outer shock (i.e. supernova remnant (SNR) shell)
74: from the supernova explosion which produced the pulsar. No satisfactory explanation
75: has been proposed for this lack of an outer SNR shell. Like the Crab, G54.1+0.3
76: also, as yet, has no identified outer SNR shell. Here we search for such a shell for
77: G54.1+0.3. We find an SNR-like shell around G54.1+0.3 and then study its properties to
78: determine if it is associated with G54.1+0.3.
79:
80: The distance of PWN G54.1+0.3 is important for determination of the luminosity and
81: energetics of the pulsar and its PWN and for comparison with other PWN.
82: The distance has been estimated by several times previously.
83: Based on Chandra X-ray observations, Lu et al. (2002) estimated an absorption column density
84: of about half the total Galactic absorption in the direction to G54.1+0.3, and therefore
85: suggested a distance of $\sim$5 kpc. From an HI absorption spectrum,
86: Weisberg et al. (2008) found PSR J1930+1852, which is the central pulsar of PWN
87: G54.1+0.3, is at a distance of $>$5 kpc. Using an improved free-electron density/distance model
88: (Cordes \& Lazio 2002), Camilo et al. (2002) gave a DM distance of $\le$8 kpc to PSR J1930+1852. %Assuming the SNR to be associated with the star-forming region G53.9+0.3, Velusamy \& Becker (1988) obtained the distance of $\sim$ 3.2 kpc.
89: The distance uncertainty on the system is thus still large, and improved distance
90: determination to the PWN system is needed. Recently, we have revised distances to several
91: SNR/PWN or SNR/HESS source or SNR/CO cloud interaction systems with good precision by analyzing HI+CO
92: spectra of these system (Leahy \& Tian 2008; Tian, Leahy \& Wang 2007; Tian et al. 2008). Here, we use these
93: effective methods to constrain the distance to the PWN G54.1+0.3/ PSR J1930+1852 system,
94: and to revise its X-ray luminosity.
95:
96: \section{Radio and Infrared Continuum Emission}
97: The radio continuum at 1420 MHz and HI-line emission data sets come from the Very Large Array
98: (VLA) Galactic Plane Survey (VGPS), described in detail by Stil et al. (2006). The spatial
99: resolution of the continuum images of SNR G54.1+0.3 is 1$^{\prime}$ (FWHM) at 1420 MHz. The
100: synthesized beam for the HI line images is 1$^{\prime}$, the radial velocity resolution is 1.56
101: km$/$s, and the rms noise is 2 K per channel. The short-spacing information for the HI spectral
102: line images in the VGPS is from additional observations with the 100 m Green Bank Telescope of the NRAO.
103: The CO-line ($J=1-0$) data set is from the Galactic ring survey (Jackson et al. 2006) made with
104: the Five College Radio Astronomy Observatory 14 m telescope. The CO-line data in this paper
105: have velocity coverage of -5 to 135 km/s, an angular sampling of 22$^{\prime\prime}$, radial
106: velocity resolution of 0.21 km/s, and rms noise of $\sim$0.13 K.
107:
108: Figure 1 (left panel) gives the 1420 MHz continuum image of the area around PWN G54.1+0.3.
109: The first panel of Figure 2 provides a finding chart for the objects in Figure 1.
110: A large elliptical SNR-like shell (centered at $l=53.9^\circ$, $b=0.2^\circ$) with angular size
111: of 30$^{\prime}\times$26$^{\prime}$, with major axis tilted at about 45$^\circ$ clockwise
112: with respect to the $l$ direction, is clearly seen. Several
113: bright small compact sources are situated along the low-latitude part of the shell. A few
114: filamentary structures are seen in the high-latitude part of the shell. The brightest
115: extended source in the image is a known HII region G54.09-0.06 (Lockman 1989), and is
116: just outside the low-latitude part of the shell. Another known HII region G53.64+0.24 is
117: detected within the large radio shell.
118:
119: Figure 1 (right) shows a new high resolution image at 8$\mu$m from the Galactic Legacy Infrared
120: Midplane Survey Extraordinaire (GLIMPSE) Legacy Project (Benjamin et al. 2003), with the 1420
121: MHz radio contours overlaid. % and a mid-IR image at 21 $\mu$m from the Midcourse Space Experiment (Price et al. 2001).
122: The image, centred on the radio shell G53.9+0.2, shows that bright thermal emission (an IR
123: shell including the HII regions G53.64+0.24 and G54.09-0.06) just surrounds the large-scale
124: 1420 MHz shell (down to a limit of 0.4 mJy (5 $\sigma$) at 8$\mu$m), and that little thermal
125: emission comes from the radio shell or from its interior.
126:
127: \section{HI Absorption and CO Emission}
128: We have searched the VGPS radial velocity range from -110 to 160 km/s for features in the HI
129: emission which might be related to the morphologies of the large SNR-like shell or PWN
130: G54.1+0.3. We have found no convincing HI emissions coincident with either object.
131:
132: HI emission and absorption spectra were constructed for the extended sources PWN G54.1+0.3
133: and HII region G54.09-0.06, and for the compact sources G53.83-0.06 and G54.1+0.1.
134: The filamentary emission of the radio shell is too faint to yield an HI absorption spectrum.
135: The source regions were taken as rectangular areas covering the region of bright 1420
136: MHz continuum emission, and the background regions were larger rectangular regions (with
137: the source rectangle excluded) (see Tian et al. 2007 and Leahy \& Tian 2008 for a
138: detailed description of the methods for HI spectrum analysis).
139: The resulting spectra are given in Fig. 2.
140: Also given in Figure 2 is the distance vs. radial velocity relation in the direction
141: $l$=54.1$^\circ$ for our adopted rotation curve (see the section on Kinematic Distances below).
142: For G54.1+0.3, absorption features are seen all the way up to the tangent velocity, at
143: $\sim$62 km/s, but no significant features at negative velocities are seen.
144: We conclude that G54.1+0.3 lies beyond the tangent point but within the Solar circle in that direction.
145: G54.09-0.06 has a similar absorption spectrum to that of G54.1+0.3, i.e
146: absorption features between sun and the tangent
147: point and no absorption at negative velocities. Thus it is located at the far side of its
148: recombination line at velocity ($\sim$42 km/s, Lockman 1989). Both G53.83-0.06 and G54.1+0.1
149: are outside the Solar circle, since prominent absorption features appear at negative
150: velocities, so they have nothing with PWN G54.1+0.3 or the large radio and IR shells.
151:
152: $^{13}$CO-line data was extracted from the survey of Jackson et al.(2006).
153: The $^{13}$CO images show that a several clumps of molecular gas
154: with radial velocity of $\sim$37 km/s are located just outside the large SNR-like shell (Fig.3a).
155:
156: We also find a molecular cloud with radial velocity of $\sim$53
157: km/s is morphologically associated with PWN G54.1+0.3 (Fig. 3b) and thus should be at the same
158: distance os G54.1+0.3.
159: The $^{13}$CO spectrum in the direction of PWN G54.1+0.3 shows high-brightness emission with
160: a width of $\sim$3 km/s centered at a radial velocity of 53 km/s. This may be explained as
161: evidence of interaction between the PWN shock and this CO cloud.
162: >From the CO emission spectrum in this direction,
163: several CO clouds have HI absorption identified at the same velocity (see third panel of Fig. 2).
164: This means these clouds are in front of G54.1+0.3 (except in the case of the 53 km/s
165: CO cloud which is located adjacent to G54.1+0.3, and only needs to be partially in front).
166:
167: \section{Discussion}
168: \subsection{Kinematic Distances}
169:
170: The flat Galactic circular rotation curve model is widely used in order to estimate kinematic
171: distances to Galactic objects. Taking the commonly-used parameter of V$_{0}$ as 220 km/s
172: (the circular velocity of the Sun), one finds a tangent point velocity, $V_T$ of 42 km/s in the
173: direction of $l$=54.1$^{0}$.
174: This is not consistent with the observed value of $V_T\simeq$62 km/s
175: obtained from the HI emission spectra in Fig. 2. To obtain $V_T=$62 km/s,
176: one finds V$_{R}\sim$240 km/s.
177: Alternately, the high $V_T$ could be due to peculiar motions, such as spiral arm velocity
178: perturbations, near the tangent point in the direction of $l$=54.1$^{0}$.
179: A better knowledge of the rotation curve and
180: non-circular motions is therefore needed in order to determine better distances to the
181: Galactic objects. However, this is beyond the scope of this paper.
182: For simplicity, hereafter,
183: we calculate kinematic distance to an object by using a rotation curve model with
184: R$_{0}$= 7.6 kpc (the improved distance to the Galactic
185: center from the Sun, Eisenhauer et al. 2005), V$_{0}$=220 km/s and V$_{R}$ linearly
186: increasing to 240 km/s as R decreases to its value at the tangent point ($R_T=6.16$kpc).
187: We note that Reid et al.(2007) has given an updated value for $\theta_0/R_0$ which results
188: in V$_{0}$=224 km/s and a similar value of V$_{R}$(243 km/s) at the tangent point.
189: Levine et al.(2008) also find a high value of rotation velocity ($\sim$236 km/s)
190: at longitudes hear 53 degrees.
191: We estimate an uncertainty in distance
192: determination caused by streaming and random gas motions at $\sim$7 km/s (Shaver et al. 1982).% and non-circular motion ($\sim$ 5 km/s).
193:
194: The most distant reliable absorption feature seen against G54.1+0.3 is at $\sim$62 km/s, which
195: is at the tangent point, thus giving a lower limit distance of $\simeq$4.5 kpc.
196: No HI absorption feature at negative velocities means that G54.1+0.3 is within the
197: Solar circle, i.e. an upper limit distance of $\simeq$9.0 kpc. The morphological association
198: between G54.1+0.3 and the CO cloud at $\sim$53 km/s suggests that G54.1+0.3 is at the
199: far kinematic distance for the velocity 53$\pm$12 km/s, i.e. at a distance of
200: 6.2$^{+1.0}_{-0.6}$ kpc.
201:
202: Two extended HII regions G54.09-0.06 and G53.64+0.24 in the IR shell have been detected in
203: a previous recombination line survey at velocities of 42.1$\pm$0.8 km/s and 38$\pm$1.8 km/s,
204: respectively. G54.09-0.06 is at the far side of its recombination line velocity due to the
205: HI absorption feature at tangent point, i.e. 7.1$^{+0.7}_{-0.6}$ kpc. Absorption in the
206: spectrum of G53.64+0.24 indicates that it is also at the far side of its recombination line
207: velocity, i.e. at 7.5$^{+0.7}_{-0.6}$ kpc. If the HII regions are actually part of the IR
208: shell, then the IR Shell is likely at the same distance of $\sim$7.3 kpc.
209:
210: \subsection{Physical Relation Between the IR Shell, the Radio Shell and the PWN G54.1+0.3}
211:
212: Infrared images here show the large IR shell just surrounds the large 1420 MHz shell
213: and there is no IR emission within the IR shell interior.
214: The coincidence of the IR shell morphology and
215: the radio shell morphology indicates that the radio shell is inside the IR shell and
216: at same distance ($\sim$ 7.3 kpc).
217:
218: We next discuss whether the radio shell is thermal or non-thermal.
219: The radio shell had been described as a bright ring by previous
220: low-resolution WSRT observations at 609 MHz (Velusamy et al. 1986).
221: The WSRT data has no zero-spacing data, so that the fluxes are lower limits.
222: >From the WSRT image of the SNR shell and our 1420 MHz image, we find a lower limit to
223: spectral index of $\alpha>$-0.5 (with $S_{\nu}=S_0 \nu^{-\alpha}$), which is not useful
224: to distinguish thermal and non-thermal emission.
225: We also obtained the GB6 survey (Condon et al. 1991) 6cm image to determine
226: 1420-4850MHz spectral index.
227: The GB6 maps were made using a differencing technique, so they miss large scale flux.
228: We calculate the spectral index of the bright filament at (l,b)=(53.75,0.30) and the
229: fainter filament at (l,b)=(54.10,0.35) and find in both cases upper limits of $\alpha <$ 1.7.
230: To check this result we calculate spectral index for the nearby supernova remnant G54.4-0.3,
231: which has a spectral index of 0.5 (Caswell, 1985) and find the same upper limit on $\alpha$.
232: Thus the existing radio data does not give definitive evidence on whether the radio shell
233: has a thermal or non-thermal spectrum.
234:
235: Velusamy et al. (1986) roughly classify the radio shell as an HII region G53.9+0.3 due to
236: possible thermal IR emission from the shell.
237: However our present images, which have higher spatial resolution, clearly show the radio
238: and IR shells are physically separated, invalidating the previous conclusion.
239: The radio shell might have a thermal radio spectrum and still show no IR emission
240: if the dust in the inner side of the IR shell has mainly been destroyed, e.g., by intense UV
241: radiation from young stars in the interior. Then the radio shell could be
242: a stellar wind bubble produced by a group of young stars.
243: PWN G54.1+0.3 could be associated with the same star cluster, but since the
244: the radial velocity of G54.1+0.3 is so different than than of the IR shell
245: (53 km/s vs. 40 km/s) we don't think that they are associated.
246: Ignoring the velocity difference, and assuming G54.1+0.3
247: and the radio/IR shells are at the same distance, then we can explain the lack of an outer
248: shock for PWN G54.1+0.3 as being caused by the low density interior of the stellar wind bubble
249: inside the radio and IR shells.
250:
251: If the radio shell is non-thermal, then it is likely a SNR.
252: G54.1+0.3 is $\sim$0.25$^\circ$ offset from the radio shell center, has a young age of $\sim$2000
253: yrs (Lu et al 2002) and appears to be significantly nearer (6.1 kpc compared to 7.3 kpc).
254: If we assume the pulsar in PWN G54.1+0.3 is born at the center
255: of the radio shell and at same distance as the radio (and IR) shell, the offset
256: corresponds to a distance of $\sim$32 pc, which gives an implausible high proper motion
257: velocity of $\sim$16000 km/s for the pulsar. So, we conclude PWN G54.1+0.3 is highly unlikely
258: to be the compact remnant of the same explosion that caused the SNR-like shell.
259: Considering that the radio shell may be a new SNR G53.9+0.2, it has a distance of
260: $\simeq$7.3 kpc and mean radius $\simeq$30 pc. The Sedov age is then
261: 80,000$(n_0/\epsilon_0)^{1/2}$yr, with $n_0$ the ambient density and $\epsilon_0$ the explosion
262: energy in units of 0.75$\times 10^{51}$ erg.
263: For such a large SNR to still be in the Sedov phase requires a low ambient density or large
264: explosion energy: $\epsilon_0 /n_0 > 4.9$ (e.g. using the limit that $t<t^{(d)}$, the time
265: that the dynamics are affected by cooling, Cox, 1972). If the SNR is in the shell phase,
266: one can take the current radius of 30 pc as the cooling radius, to estimate a lower limit to
267: the age as the time when it enters the shell phase, $t^{(c)}=62000 n_0^{-37/85}$ yr. In
268: either case it is clear that G53.9+0.2 is an old SNR, and is not expected to be detected
269: in X-rays. We have verified there is no soft X-ray emission detected in the ROSAT
270: All-Sky-Survey.
271:
272: The distance we find for PWN G54.1+0.3 is 6.2$^{+1.0}_{-0.6}$ kpc, consistent but better
273: constrained that previous distance estimates. Camillo et al. (2002) discuss the energetics
274: of the Crab-like PSR J1930+1852 in G54.1+0.3 using a distance of 5 kpc.
275: The larger distance here implies
276: that the 2-10 keV X-ray luminosity is larger by a factor of 1.54, thus significantly reducing
277: the difference in luminosity with PWN/PSR J1124-5916, which has nearly identical spin
278: parameters to PSR J1930+1852.
279:
280: \section{Conclusion}
281: Here we have searched for a SNR shell counterpart to the PWN G54.1+0.3 using radio continuum,
282: HI and CO line emission, and infrared observation. In addition we have used HI absorption and
283: CO emission data to constrain distances to PWN G54.1+0.3 and other nearby sources. We determine
284: a distance of $\simeq$6.2 kpc to G54.1+0.3 using an associated CO cloud, consistent with the HI
285: absorption spectrum which limits G54.1+0.3 to be between the tangent point and the far side
286: of the solar circle. In addition, we find a SNR-like shell in 1420 MHz continuum
287: emission, G53.9+0.2, which is offset from G54.1+0.3.
288: The radio shell has no thermal IR emission from
289: its shell but is surrounded by an IR shell with an embedded HII region and associated CO
290: clumps, both of which are located at 7.3 kpc distance. The radio shell
291: may be thermal and lack IR emission due to dust destruction, or it may be nonthermal and
292: part of a newly found old SNR. In either case it is located at a different distance than
293: PWN G54.1+0.3.
294:
295: \begin{acknowledgements}
296: DAL and TWW acknowledge support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
297: TWW thanks the Natural Science Foundation of China for support.
298: This publication makes use
299: of molecular line data from the Boston University-FCRAO Galactic Ring Survey (GRS). The NRAO
300: is a facility of the National Science Foundation operated under cooperative agreement by
301: Associated Universities, Inc.
302:
303: \end{acknowledgements}
304: \begin{thebibliography}{}
305: \bibitem[2003]{Benet03}Benjamin, R.A., Churchwell, E., Babler, B.L. et al. 2003, PASP, 115, 953
306: \bibitem[Camilo et al.(2002)]{2002ApJ...574L..71C} Camilo, F., Lorimer,
307: D.R., Bhat, N.D.R., et al. 2002, ApJ, 574, L71
308: \bibitem[Caswell 1985]{cas85}Caswell, J. 1985 AJ 90 1224
309: \bibitem[Condon et al.(1991)]{1991AJ....102.2041C} Condon, J.~J.,
310: Broderick, J.~J., \& Seielstad, G.~A.\ 1991, AJ, 102, 2041
311: \bibitem[2002]{Coret02}Cordes, J.M. \& Lazio, T.J.W. 2002, astroph/0207156
312: \bibitem[1972]{Cox72}Cox, D.P. 1972, ApJ, 178, 159
313: \bibitem[2005]{Eiset05}Eisenhauer, F., Genzel, R., Alexander, T. et al. 2005, ApJ, 628, 246
314: \bibitem[1995]{Fraet95}Frail, D.~A., Kassim,
315: N.E., Cornwell, T.J., \& Goss, W.M. 1995, ApJ, 454, L129
316: \bibitem[2006]{Jaket06}Jackson, J.M., Rathborne, J.M., Shah, R.H. et al. 2006, ApJ Suppl., 163, 145
317: \bibitem[2008]{Leaet07}Leahy, D.A., Tian, W.W. 2008, AJ, 135, 167
318: \bibitem[2008]{Lev08} Levine, E.~S., Heiles, C., \& Blitz, L.\ 2008, ApJ, 679, 1288
319: \bibitem[1989]{Loket89}Lockman, F, J. 1989, ApJS, 71, 469
320: \bibitem[2002]{Luet02}Lu, F.J. Wang, Q.D., Aschenbach, B. et al. 2002, ApJ, 568, L49
321: \bibitem[Reid et al.(2007)]{2007IAUS..242..348R} Reid, M.~J., Brunthaler, A., Menten, K.~M., Ye, X., Xing-Wu, Z., \& Moscadelli, L.\ 2007, IAU Symposium, 242, 348
322: \bibitem[1982]{Shaet82}Shaver, P.A., Radhakrishnan, V.,
323: Anantharamaiah, K.R., et al. 1982, A\&A, 106, 105
324: \bibitem[2006]{Stiet06}Stil, J.M., Taylor, A.R., Dickey, J.M. et al. 2006, AJ, 132, 1158
325: \bibitem[2007]{Tiaet07}Tian, W.W., Leahy, D.A., Wang, Q.D. 2007, A\& A, 474, 541
326: \bibitem[2008]{Tiaet08}Tian, W.W., Leahy, D.A., Haverkorn, M. Jiang, B. 2008, ApJ, 679L, 85
327: \bibitem[1988]{Velet88}Velusamy, T.\& Becker, R.H. 1988, AJ, 95, 1162
328: \bibitem[1986]{Velet86}Velusamy, T. Goss, W.M. \& Arnal, E.M. 1986, A\& A, 7, 105
329: \bibitem[Weisberg et al.(2008)]{2008ApJ...674..286W} Weisberg, J.M.,
330: Stanimirovi{\'c}, S., Xilouris, K., et al. 2008, \apj, 674, 286
331:
332: \end{thebibliography}
333:
334: \begin{figure}
335: \vspace{70mm}
336: \begin{picture}(80,80)
337: \put(-20,250){\special{psfile=f1a.eps hoffset=0 voffset=0 hscale=130 vscale=130 angle=-90}}
338: \put(230,280){\special{psfile=f1b.eps hoffset=0 voffset=0 hscale=55 vscale=55 angle=-90}}
339: \end{picture}
340: \caption[xx]{Left: 1420 MHz continuum image centered at $l=53.95^\circ$ $b=0.25^\circ$ with a
341: size of $1.2^{\circ}\times1.2^{\circ}$. The positions of PWN G54.1+0.3 and other sources are
342: shown in the first panel of Fig. 2.
343: Right: 8 $\mu$m mid-infrared image of the same region from the GLIMPSE Legacy survey with resolution of $\le$ 2 arcsec and sensitivity of 0.4 mJy, and with contours (10, 15, 18, 25, 50)K of the 1420 MHz continuum emission.}
344: \end{figure}
345:
346: \clearpage
347:
348: \begin{figure}
349: \vspace{180mm}
350: \begin{picture}(80,80)
351: \put(-15,470){\special{psfile=f2a.eps hoffset=0 voffset=0 hscale=45 vscale=35 angle=0}}
352: \put(225,455){\special{psfile=f2b.eps hoffset=0 voffset=0 hscale=50 vscale=45 angle=0}}
353: \put(-40,260){\special{psfile=f2c.eps hoffset=0 voffset=0 hscale=45 vscale=35 angle=0}}
354: \put(230,260){\special{psfile=f2d.eps hoffset=0 voffset=0 hscale=45 vscale=35 angle=0}}
355: \put(-40,50){\special{psfile=f2e.eps hoffset=0 voffset=0 hscale=45 vscale=35 angle=0}} \put(230,50){\special{psfile=f2f.eps hoffset=0 voffset=0 hscale=45 vscale=35 angle=0}}
356: \end{picture}
357: \caption{The top left gives a finding chart for objects in Fig. 1. The top right shows
358: the relation between distance and radial velocity for the assumed rotation curve.
359: The HI emission and absorption spectra of four bright sources are given in the
360: second and third rows.}
361: \end{figure}
362:
363: \begin{figure}
364: \vspace{70mm}
365: \begin{picture}(80,80)
366: \put(-20,50){\special{psfile=f3a.eps hoffset=0 voffset=0 hscale=58 vscale=42 angle=0}}
367: \put(230,270){\special{psfile=f3b.eps hoffset=0 voffset=0 hscale=37 vscale=37 angle=-90}}
368: \end{picture}
369: \caption{The maps of CO emission at 37 km/s covering 1.2$^\circ\times 1.2^{\circ}$(left)
370: and at 53 km/s covering 0.2$^\circ \times 0.2^{\circ}$(right). The rectangle in the left panel
371: shows the area around PWN G54.1+0.3 covered by the right panel. These maps have superimposed
372: contours (11 14 18 30 60 K) of the 1420 MHz continuum emission.}
373: \end{figure}
374:
375:
376:
377: \clearpage
378:
379:
380: \end{document}
381: