1: \documentclass[12pt]{iopart}
2: \newcommand{\gguide}{{\it Preparing graphics for IOP journals}}
3: %Uncomment next line if AMS fonts required
4: %\usepackage{iopams}
5: \usepackage{epsfig}
6: \begin{document}
7:
8: \title[$H^0 \to \mu^+ \mu^-$ in multi-TeV $e^+e^-$ Collisions]{Testing the
9: Higgs Mechanism in the Lepton Sector with multi-TeV $e^+e^-$ Collisions}
10:
11: \author{M Battaglia}
12:
13: \address{Department of Physics, University of California at Berkeley and \\
14: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA}
15: \ead{MBattaglia@lbl.gov}
16:
17: \begin{abstract}
18: Multi-TeV $e^+e^-$ collisions provide with a large enough sample of $H^0$ bosons
19: to enable measurements of its suppressed decays. Results of a detailed study of
20: the determination of the muon Yukawa coupling at $\sqrt{s}$ = 3~TeV,
21: based on full detector simulation and event reconstruction, are presented.
22: The muon Yukawa coupling can be determined with a relative accuracy of 0.04 to
23: 0.08 for Higgs bosons masses from 120~GeV to 150~GeV, with an integrated
24: luminosity of 5~ab$^{-1}$. The result is not affected by overlapping
25: $\gamma \gamma \to {\mathrm{hadrons}}$ background.
26: \end{abstract}
27:
28: %Uncomment for PACS numbers title message
29: \pacs{13.66.Fg, 14.80.Bn}
30: % Keywords required only for MST, PB, PMB, PM, JOA, JOB?
31: %\vspace{2pc}
32: %\noindent{\it Keywords}: Article preparation, IOP journals
33: % Uncomment for Submitted to journal title message
34: \submitto{\JPG}
35: % Comment out if separate title page not required
36: %\maketitle
37:
38: \section{Introduction}
39:
40: The detailed investigation of the Higgs sector is anticipated as one of the central themes
41: of the accelerator particle physics program after the Higgs boson will have been observed,
42: most likely at the LHC. The study of the Higgs profile will have to determine whether the
43: observed particle is indeed responsible for generating the mass of gauge bosons, quarks and
44: charged leptons.
45: A significant {\it corpus} of studies, outlining strategies to test the Higgs mechanism for
46: gauge bosons and quarks with accuracies down to a few percent, has already been
47: assembled~\cite{Battaglia:2000jb, Barklow:2004th}
48: These rely on the combination of data from the LHC and an $e^+e^-$ linear collider
49: operating at centre-of-mass energies $\sqrt{s}$ = 0.25~TeV - 1.0~TeV.
50: In this paper we discuss the feasibility of a test of the Higgs mechanism in the lepton
51: sector, by verifying the scaling $\frac{g_{H \mu \mu}}{g_{H \tau \tau}}$, through a precise
52: determination of the $g_{H \mu \mu}$ coupling in the $H^0 \to \mu^+\mu^-$decay, in 3~TeV
53: $e^+e^-$ collisions.
54: At the LHC, the significance of an observation of the $H^0 \to \mu^+\mu^-$ decay is estimated
55: to be only $\simeq$~3~$\sigma$ for 115~GeV $< M_H <$ 130~GeV, even when combining the CMS and
56: ATLAS data on both the gluon and weak boson fusion production channels for 300~fb$^{-1}$ of
57: integrated luminosity~\cite{Han:2002gp}. It further decreases for larger values of $M_H$.
58: $e^+e^-$ collisions below 1.0~TeV should provide with determination of $g_{H \tau \tau}$ to a
59: relative statistical accuracy of $\simeq$~0.035 for a 120~GeV Higgs boson but, at best,
60: with only a signal and not with a precision measurement in the $g_{H\mu\mu}$ Yukawa
61: coupling~\cite{Battaglia:2001vf}. The $WW$ fusion process, $e^+e^- \to H^0 \nu_e \bar \nu_e$,
62: offers a large Higgs cross section, provided high enough $\sqrt{s}$ energies can be attained,
63: to make this measurement possible. In this paper the detection of the $H^0 \to \mu^+ \mu^-$
64: decay in high energy $e^+e^-$ collisions is studied using full {\tt Geant-4}-based simulation
65: and reconstruction. The paper is organised as follows.
66: In section~2 we discuss the simulation of the $e^+e^- \to H^0 \nu_e \bar \nu_e$,
67: $H^0 \to \mu^+ \mu^-$ process and of the relevant physics and machine-induced background.
68: Section~3 describes the detector simulation and section~4 has the results.
69:
70: \section{$e^+e^- \to H^0 \nu_e \bar \nu_e$, $H^0 \to \mu^+ \mu^-$ at $\sqrt{s}$ = 3 TeV}
71:
72: Higgs boson production in $e^+e^-$ collisions proceeds through two main processes: the
73: so-called Higgstrahlung, $e^+e^- \to H^0 Z^0$, and the $WW$ fusion,
74: $e^+e^- \to H^0 \nu_e \bar \nu_e$ reactions.
75: While the associated production of the Higgs boson with a $Z^0$ has a number of advantages,
76: including the possibility to tag the presence of the Higgs boson independent on its decay modes,
77: $WW$ fusion reaches the largest cross sections, due to its $\propto \log \frac{s}{M^2_H}$ rise,
78: if large enough centre-of-mass energies can be obtained. This makes the $WW$ fusion process of
79: special interest for the study of rare Higgs decays, such as $H^0 \to b \bar b$ at large
80: Higgs boson masses, and $H^0 \to \mu^+ \mu^-$. But as the energy increases, the $H^0$ production
81: cross section is more and more peaked along the beam axis. Above $\simeq$~3~TeV, the further
82: increase in production cross section is effectively lost, due to the limited detector acceptance
83: in the very forward region. The production cross section at 3~TeV and 5~TeV is respectively
84: 2.3 and 3.0 times larger compared to that at 1~TeV. However, restricting the acceptance to
85: Higgs bosons produced at $| \cos \theta | <$ 0.99 (0.92), the gains in cross section become
86: 2.1 (1.7) and 2.4 (1.9), respectively.
87: The possibility of achieving $e^+e^-$ collisions at multi-TeV energies, introduced by the
88: CLIC concept~\cite{Assmann:2000hg},
89: offers a real opportunity for observing this decay and measuring $g_{H\mu\mu}$ with
90: enough accuracy to perform a significant test of the scaling of the Yukawa couplings in the
91: lepton sector over a broad range of Higgs boson masses~\cite{Battaglia:2001vf}.
92: Multi-TeV $e^+e^-$ collisions become important not only for exploring the highest
93: energy frontier but also for precision studies of suppressed Higgs decays.
94:
95: \section{Data Analysis}
96:
97: Signal events $e^+ e^- \to H^0 \nu_e \bar \nu_e$, $H^0 \to \mu^+ \mu^-$ are generated
98: with {\tt Pythia 6.205}~\cite{Sjostrand:2000wi}, including beamsstrahlung effects,
99: at several Higgs boson mass values from 120~GeV up to 160~GeV.
100: Cross sections are computed using {\tt CompHep 4.4.0}~\cite{Boos:2004kh} and the Higgs
101: decay branching fractions with {\tt HDECAY}~\cite{Djouadi:1997yw}.
102: At $\sqrt{s}$ = 3~TeV, the effective $e^+e^- \to H^0 \nu_e \bar \nu_e$ production cross
103: section, accounting for initial state radiation, is 0.48~pb to 0.45~pb and the decay
104: branching fraction, BR($H^0 \to \mu^+ \mu^-$) = 2.56$\times$10$^{-4}$ to 6.47$\times$10$^{-5}$,
105: for $M_H$ in the range from 120~GeV to 150~GeV.
106: The irreducible $\mu^+ \mu^- \nu_{\ell} \bar \nu_{\ell}$ background is generated
107: with {\tt CompHep 4.4.0} interfaced with {\tt Pythia 6.205}.
108: The total cross section of events with an invariant mass of the $\mu^+ \mu^-$ system,
109: $M_{\mu\mu}$, in the range 100~GeV $< M_{\mu\mu} <$ 400~GeV is 5.31~fb.
110: We assume to operate CLIC at centre of mass energy of 3~TeV for a total integrated
111: luminosity of 5~ab$^{-1}$, which corresponds to $\simeq$~eight years (1 yr = 10$^7$~s)
112: of operation at its nominal luminosity of 6.5$\times$10$^{34}$~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$.
113: The CLIC anticipated parameters are given in~\cite{clic-params}, for this analysis we
114: use the luminosity spectrum as in~\cite{Battaglia:2004mw}.
115: This provides with $\simeq$~2.3$\times$10$^6$ $e^+e^- \to H^0 \nu_e \bar \nu_e$ events,
116: 620 to 150 of which are followed by the $H^0 \to \mu^+ \mu^-$ decay, depending on
117: the value of the Higgs bosons mass in the range from 120~GeV to 150~GeV. The machine
118: induced background, which affects this analysis most, is due to parasitic
119: $\gamma \gamma \to {\mathrm{hadrons}}$ events occurring within the same time-stamp as a
120: physics event. The anticipated average number of such events for the CLIC parameters is
121: 3.2~BX$^{-1}$, or 161 events within a 25~ns time-stamp. $\gamma \gamma$ collisions are
122: simulated using the {\tt GUINEAPIG} program~\cite{guineapig1, guineapig2} and the cross
123: sections parametrised according to~\cite{Schuler:1996en}.
124: The hadronic final states are simulated using {\tt Pythia} and overlayed to a
125: signal event. The average visible energy deposited in the detector by
126: $\gamma \gamma \to {\mathrm{hadrons}}$ events is $\simeq$~90~GeV/BX.
127:
128: Charged particles are reconstructed in a multi-layered main tracker, made of high
129: resolution silicon strip detectors, and a precision vertex tracker in a 5~T solenoidal
130: field. Discrete Si tracking, following the example of the CMS experiment at LHC, emerged
131: as an appealing solution for CLIC, where local hit occupancy and two-track separation may
132: limit the applicability of gaseous trackers~\cite{Frey:2000eb,Battaglia:2004mw}.
133: A large magnetic field is beneficial for ensuring an excellent momentum resolution for
134: high $p_t$ particle tracks, as well as for confining low momentum charged particles from
135: machine-induced backgrounds to small radii.
136: This analysis is based on an implementation of the SiD detector~\cite{sid}, developed as a
137: concept for the International Linear Collider (ILC) project, for the reconstruction of
138: 3~TeV $e^+e^-$ events.
139: The SiD concept has a five-layered Si main tracker which ensures a momentum resolution
140: $\delta p_t/p_t^2 <$ 5$\times$10$^{-5}$ and polar angle coverage down to 8.3$~{\circ}$.
141: The following assumptions on the detector response
142: are made: the detection efficiency is 0.98 per layer, the point resolution 7~$\mu$m, which
143: includes alignment effects, and the detector is capable of time-stamping hits with 25~ns
144: resolution, corresponding to 50 bunch crossings (BX).
145:
146: While the SiD is designed for the reconstruction of events at centre-of-mass energies
147: below 1~TeV, its geometry is well suited for the study of simple events, as
148: those of our signal, up to multi-TeV energies.
149: Full event simulation is performed using the SiD model implemented in the
150: {\tt Mokka 06-03} program~\cite{Musat:2004sp} based on {\tt Geant-4}~\cite{Agostinelli:2002hh}.
151: Simulation results are saved in the {\tt lcio} format~\cite{Gaede:2003ip} and used as
152: input to the event reconstruction. This is performed using a set of dedicated processors
153: implemented in the {\tt Marlin} reconstruction and analysis framework~\cite{Gaede:2006pj}.
154: The reconstruction starts from hits generated in the sensitive layers along the track.
155: The track pattern recognition is performed from the outermost main tracker hits and
156: extends inwards to the vertex tracker. After the first stage of pattern recognition
157: hit bundles are fitted using a simple helix. A second stage pattern recognition is
158: performed using hits left unassociated after the first stage. Reconstructed particle
159: tracks are requested to have more than 4 hits and associated hits on at least
160: 70~\% of the number of sensitive surfaces traversed, depending on their polar angle,
161: $\theta$, $\chi^2$ fit probability in excess of 0.01, $| \cos \theta| <$ 0.98, and
162: impact parameter significance below 3.5~times the extrapolation resolution, in both
163: coordinates. These cuts remove poorly measured particle tracks.
164: The momentum resolution of the reconstructed muon tracks is
165: $\delta p_t/p_t^2$ = (3.46 $\pm$ 0.10)$\times$10$^{-5}$, in agreement with the
166: SiD specifications. Events with two, oppositely charged muon candidate tracks with
167: momentum exceeding 10~GeV and below 750~GeV and event energy in charged particles
168: 100~GeV $< E_{\mathrm{charged}} <$ 1.5~TeV are selected.
169:
170: \section{Results}
171:
172: The invariant mass distribution of the selected di-muon pairs is shown in Figure~\ref{fig:mass}.
173: The distribution is fitted with a Gaussian curve to describe the signal and an exponential
174: background.
175: \begin{figure}[h!]
176: \begin{center}
177: \epsfig{file=hmm_mass.eps,width=11.0cm}
178: \end{center}
179: \caption{\label{fig:mass}Reconstructed invariant mass distribution
180: for signal and background $\mu^+ \mu^-$ + $E_{\mathrm{missing}}$
181: events with $M_H$ =130~GeV and 5~ab$^{-1}$ of integrated luminosity.}
182: \end{figure}
183: The mass resolution $\sigma_{M_H}/M_H$ for signal events is 0.0034, which corresponds
184: to 0.40~GeV for $M_H$=120~GeV. The signal region is defined by a $\pm$~2~$\sigma_{M_H}$ interval
185: around the fitted mass peak position and a binned $\chi^2$ fit is performed to extract the number
186: of signal and background events. Results are summarised in
187: Table~\ref{tab:results}.
188: \begin{table}
189: \caption{\label{tab:results}Number of selected signal and background events.}
190: \begin{indented}
191: \item[]\begin{tabular}{@{}lcccc}
192: \br
193: $M_H$ (GeV) & Nb.\ Signal Evts.\ & Nb.\ Bkg.\ Evts.\ & S/$\sqrt{\mathrm{B}}$ &
194: $\delta{\mathrm{BR}}/{\mathrm{BR}}$ \\
195: \mr
196: 120 & 229.6 & 161.1 & 18.1 & 0.086 \\
197: 130 & 153.1 & ~88.1 & 16.3 & 0.101 \\
198: 140 & 103.2 & ~64.3 & 12.9 & 0.125 \\
199: 150 & ~68.1 & ~58.1 & ~9.5 & 0.160 \\
200: 155 & ~68.1 & ~58.0 & ~5.2 & 0.253 \\
201: 160 & ~12.1 & ~33.0 & ~2.1 & \\
202: \br
203: \end{tabular}
204: \end{indented}
205: \end{table}
206: We obtain
207: $\frac{\delta {\mathrm{BR(}}H^0 \to \mu\mu {\mathrm{)}}}
208: {{\mathrm{BR(}}H^0 \to \mu\mu {\mathrm{)}}}$ = 0.086 and 0.160 for $M_H$ = 120~GeV and 150~GeV,
209: respectively. These results correspond to a determination of $g_{H \mu \mu}$ with a relative
210: accuracy of 0.04 to 0.08. A significant signal for the decay can be obtained up to $M_H$ = 155~GeV,
211: when its branching fraction is only 4$\times$10$^{-5}$, due to the rapid turn on of the $WW$
212: decay channel of the Higgs boson.
213: The analysis is repeated by overlaying the $\gamma \gamma \to {\mathrm{hadrons}}$ background
214: on signal events, for $M_H$ = 120~GeV/$c^2$. No degradation of the reconstruction efficiency
215: and resolution is observed for the amount of hadronic background corresponding to 50~BX
216: (see Figure~\ref{fig:comp}).
217: \begin{figure}[h!]
218: \begin{center}
219: \epsfig{file=hmm_mass_comp.eps,width=11.0cm}
220: \end{center}
221: \caption{\label{fig:comp}Reconstructed invariant mass distribution
222: for signal events with $M_H$ =120~GeV without (histogram) and with
223: (points with error bars) $\gamma \gamma \to {\mathrm{hadrons}}$ background
224: overlayed.}
225: \end{figure}
226:
227: \section{Conclusions}
228:
229: The determination of the muon Yukawa coupling $g_{H \mu \mu}$ in $e^+e^-$ collisions at
230: centre-of-mass energies of 3~TeV at CLIC has been studied through the
231: $e^+e^- \to H^0 \nu_e \bar \nu_e$, $H^0 \to \mu^+ \mu^-$ process using full simulation
232: and event reconstruction. The process is observable for Higgs mass values up to 155~GeV
233: and the $g_{H \mu \mu}$ Yukawa coupling can be determined with a relative statistical
234: accuracy of 0.04 to 0.08 for masses from 120~GeV to 150~GeV with an integrated
235: luminosity of 5~ab$^{-1}$. The superposition of machine-induced
236: $\gamma \gamma \to {\mathrm{hadrons}}$ background corresponding to 50 bunch crossings
237: overlayed on a single $\mu^+ \mu^- \nu \bar \nu$ event does not affect these results.
238:
239: \section*{References}
240: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
241:
242: \bibitem{Battaglia:2000jb}
243: M.~Battaglia and K.~Desch,
244: %``Precision studies of the Higgs boson profile at the e+ e- linear
245: %collider,''
246: in {\it Physics and Experiments with Future Linear $e^+e^-$ Colliders},
247: A.~Para and H.E.~Fisk (editors), AIP Conference Proceedings 578, 2001,
248: 163 [arXiv:hep-ph/0101165].
249: %%CITATION = HEP-PH/0101165;%%
250:
251: %\cite{Barklow:2004th}
252: \bibitem{Barklow:2004th}
253: T.~L.~Barklow,
254: %``Experimental aspects of Higgs physics at the ILC,''
255: in {\it Proc. of the International Conference On Linear Colliders}
256: H.~Videau and J.-C.~Brient (editors), Paris 2005, vol.\ 1, 127
257: [arXiv:hep-ph/0411221].
258: %%CITATION = HEP-PH/0411221;%%
259:
260: \bibitem{Han:2002gp}
261: T.~Han and B.~McElrath,
262: %``h --> mu+ mu- via gluon fusion at the LHC,''
263: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 528} (2002) 81
264: [arXiv:hep-ph/0201023].
265: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B528,81;%%
266:
267:
268: \bibitem{Assmann:2000hg}
269: R.~W.~Assmann {\it et al.}, CERN-2000-008.
270: %``A 3-TeV e+ e- linear collider based on CLIC technology,''
271: %%CITATION = SLAC-REPRINT-2000-096;%%
272:
273: \bibitem{Battaglia:2001vf}
274: M.~Battaglia and A.~De Roeck,
275: %``Determination of the muon Yukawa coupling at high energy e+ e- linear
276: %colliders,''
277: in {\it Proc. of the APS/DPF/DPB Summer Study on the Future of Particle Physics (Snowmass 2001) } ed. N.~Graf,
278: {\it In the Proceedings of APS / DPF / DPB Summer Study on the Future of Particle Physics (Snowmass 2001), Snowmass, Colorado, 30 Jun - 21 Jul
279: 2001, pp E3066}
280: [arXiv:hep-ph/0111307].
281: %%CITATION = ECONF,C010630,E3066;%%
282:
283: \bibitem{Sjostrand:2000wi}
284: T.~Sjostrand, P.~Eden, C.~Friberg, L.~Lonnblad, G.~Miu, S.~Mrenna and E.~Norrbin,
285: %``High-energy-physics event generation with PYTHIA 6.1,''
286: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\ {\bf 135} (2001) 238
287: [arXiv:hep-ph/0010017].
288: %%CITATION = CPHCB,135,238;%%
289:
290: \bibitem{Boos:2004kh}
291: E.~Boos {\it et al.} [CompHEP Collaboration],
292: %``CompHEP 4.4: Automatic computations from Lagrangians to events,''
293: Nucl.\ Instrum.\ Meth.\ A {\bf 534} (2004) 250
294: [arXiv:hep-ph/0403113].
295: %%CITATION = NUIMA,A534,250;%%
296:
297: \bibitem{Djouadi:1997yw}
298: A.~Djouadi, J.~Kalinowski and M.~Spira,
299: %``HDECAY: A program for Higgs boson decays in the standard model and its
300: %supersymmetric extension,''
301: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\ {\bf 108} (1998) 56
302: [arXiv:hep-ph/9704448].
303: %%CITATION = CPHCB,108,56;%%
304:
305: \bibitem{clic-params}
306: H.~Braun {\it et al.}, CLIC Note 627 (2006).
307:
308: \bibitem{Battaglia:2004mw}
309: M.~Battaglia, A.~De Roeck, J.~R.~Ellis and D.~Schulte (Editors),
310: CERN-2004-005, arXiv:hep-ph/0412251.
311: %``Physics at the CLIC multi-TeV linear collider: Report of the CLIC Physics
312: %Working Group,''
313: %%CITATION = CERN-2004-005;%%
314:
315: \bibitem{guineapig1}
316: D.~Schulte, Report TESLA 97-08 (1997)
317:
318: \bibitem{guineapig2}
319: D.~Schulte, Proceedings of the IEEE Particle Accelerator Conference (PAC99) and
320: CERN-PS-99-017.
321:
322: \bibitem{Schuler:1996en}
323: G.~A.~Schuler and T.~Sjostrand,
324: %``A scenario for high-energy gamma gamma interactions,''
325: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 73} (1997) 677
326: [arXiv:hep-ph/9605240].
327:
328: \bibitem{Frey:2000eb}
329: A.~Frey,
330: %``Central tracking detector concepts for the CLIC e+ e- collider,''
331: %\href{http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?irn=4787544}{SPIRES entry}
332: prepared for the {\it 5th Int. Linear Collider Workshop (LCWS 2000)},
333: Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, 24-28 Oct 2000.
334:
335: \bibitem{sid}
336: J.~E.~Brau, M.~Breidenbach and Y.~Fujii, SLAC-PUB-11413 (2003).
337:
338: \bibitem{sid-dod}
339: T.~Abe {\it et al}, SiD Detector Outline Document (2007).
340:
341: \bibitem{Musat:2004sp}
342: G.~Musat,
343: in the Proc.\ of Int.\ Conf.\ on Linear Colliders (LCWS 04), Paris, 2004,
344: vol. 1, 437.
345:
346: \bibitem{Agostinelli:2002hh}
347: S.~Agostinelli {\it et al.},
348: %``GEANT4: A simulation toolkit,''
349: Nucl.\ Instrum.\ Meth.\ A {\bf 506} (2003), 250.
350: %%CITATION = NUIMA,A506,250;%%
351:
352: \bibitem{Gaede:2003ip}
353: F.~Gaede, T.~Behnke, N.~Graf and T.~Johnson,
354: %``LCIO: A persistency framework for linear collider simulation studies,''
355: {\it In the Proceedings of 2003 Conference for Computing in High-Energy and
356: Nuclear Physics (CHEP 03), La Jolla, California, 24-28 Mar 2003, pp TUKT001}
357: [arXiv:physics/0306114].
358:
359: \bibitem{Gaede:2006pj}
360: F.~Gaede,
361: %``Marlin and LCCD: Software tools for the ILC,''
362: Nucl.\ Instrum.\ Meth.\ A {\bf 559} 177 (2006).
363: %%CITATION = NUIMA,A559,177;%%
364:
365:
366: \end{thebibliography}
367: \end{document}
368: