1: \documentclass[12pt]{iopart}
2: %\documentclass[10pt]{iopart}
3: % Uncomment next line if AMS fonts required
4: \usepackage{iopams}
5: \usepackage{epsfig}
6: \usepackage{color}
7:
8:
9: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}
10: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}
11: \newcommand{\spaceint}[2]{\int_{#1} d^3 #2 \;}
12: \newcommand{\vect}[1]{\mathbf{#1}}
13: \newcommand{\vat}{V^{\rm att}}
14: \newcommand{\di}{\displaystyle}
15: \newcommand{\rp}{r_{||}}
16: \newcommand{\ep}{\varepsilon_\Pi}
17: \newcommand{\ef}{\varepsilon_F}
18: \newcommand{\emix}{\varepsilon_{\rm m}}
19: \newcommand{\ev}{\varepsilon_{\rm rep}}
20: \newcommand{\Ezp}{E_{z,0^+}}
21: \newcommand{\Ezm}{E_{z,0^-}}
22: \newcommand{\Ep}{E_{||,0}}
23: \newcommand{\ro}{r_{0,{\rm ref}}}
24: \newcommand{\agt}{\gtrsim}
25: \newcommand{\alt}{\lesssim}
26: \newcommand{\kbt}{k_{\rm B}T}
27: \newcommand{\mc}{\mathcal}
28: \newcommand{\tx}{\textcolor}
29: \begin{document}
30:
31: \title{Stability and interactions
32: of nanocolloids at fluid interfaces: effects of capillary waves and line tensions$\;$}
33:
34: \author{H.~Lehle\dag and M.~Oettel\ddag}
35:
36: \address{\dag\
37: Max--Planck--Institut f\"ur Metallforschung, Heisenbergstr. 3, D-70569 Stuttgart, \\
38: Institut f\"ur Theoretische und Angewandte Physik, Universit\"at Stuttgart,
39: Pfaffenwaldring 57, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany}
40: \address{\ddag\
41: Johannes--Gutenberg--Universit\"at Mainz, Institut f\"ur Physik (WA 331),
42: Staudinger Weg 7, D-55128 Mainz, Germany}
43:
44: \begin{abstract}
45: We analyze the effective potential for nanoparticles trapped at a
46: fluid interface within a simple model which incorporates surface and
47: line tensions as well as a {thermal} average over interface fluctuations
48: (capillary waves). For a single colloid, a reduced steepness of the potential
49: well hindering movements out of the interface plane compared
50: to rigid interface models is observed, and an instability of the
51: capillary wave
52: partition sum in case of negative line tensions is pointed out.
53: For two colloids, averaging over the capillary waves leads to an effective
54: Casimir--type interaction which is long--ranged, {power-like in the
55: inverse distance} but {whose power} sensitively depends
56: on possible restrictions of the {colloid degress of freedom}.
57: A nonzero line tension
58: leads to changes in the magnitude but not in the functional form
59: of the effective potential asymptotics.
60: \end{abstract}
61:
62: \pacs{24.60.Ky,68.03.Kn,82.70.Dd}
63:
64: \submitto{\JPCM}
65:
66: \section{Introduction}
67:
68: The effective forces between rigid objects immersed
69: in a fluctuating medium have attracted a steadily growing interest
70: because their understanding allows one to design and tune them by choosing
71: suitable media and boundary conditions and by varying the thermodynamic state
72: of the medium. Possible applications range from micromechanical systems to
73: colloidal suspensions and embedded biological macromolecules.
74: Accordingly, these fluctuations may be the
75: zero--temperature, long--ranged quantum fluctuations of the
76: electromagnetic fields giving rise to the
77: original Casimir effect \cite{Bor01} between flat or corrugated immersed
78: metallic bodies \cite{Jaf04, Bue04}.
79: Other examples for fluctuation induced long--ranged effective forces between
80: immersed objects involve media such as
81: bulk fluids near their critical point \cite{Kre94,Bec07},
82: membranes \cite{Kar99} or interfaces \cite{Kai05}.
83:
84: A quasi two--dimensional realization of a fluctuating system with
85: long--ranged correlations is given by
86: a liquid--liquid or liquid--vapor interface
87: {along with its capillary wave excitations}, for an experimental
88: study in real space see Ref.~\cite{Aar04}. Consequently rigid objects such
89: as colloids which are trapped at the interface are subject to an effective
90: force generated by the fluctuating capillary waves. Theoretical
91: investigations of this phenomenon have dealt with the effective
92: interaction between pointlike \cite{Kai05} or rodlike \cite{Gol96} objects.
93: If the particles are held fixed, and the interface is pinned at their
94: surfaces, the capillary wave mediated interaction between the particles is
95: a direct analogon of the original Casimir effect for a
96: two--dimensional Gaussian scalar field
97: with Dirichlet boundary conditions at the one--dimensional
98: boundaries, given by the three--phase contact lines
99: (for a general treatment on the Casimir effect in scalar fields, see
100: Ref.~\cite{Emi08}). However, the interface
101: and the colloids are embedded in three--dimensional space, and therefore
102: the colloids and the position of the three--phase contact lines
103: may fluctuate. It has been shown in Refs.~\cite{Gol00,Leh06,Leh07}
104: that this situation
105: corresponds theoretically to a Casimir problem with {\em fluctuating}
106: boundary conditions. Depending on the type of admitted boundary fluctuations,
107: the asymptotics of the resulting Casimir interaction varies considerably.
108: This is an effect absent in the case of objects immersed in
109: three--dimensional bulk systems.
110: Moreover, the fluctuations of the colloids in direction perpendicular to the
111: interface plane influence their stability, i.e. the activation energy to
112: desorb them from the interface. This aspect has received little attention
113: so far, as often rigid--interface models are employed to discuss the
114: energetics of trapped colloids at interfaces (see, e.g.,
115: Refs.~\cite{Pie80,Ave96}).
116:
117: {In this work, both questions, the stability of single colloids and their
118: Casimir--like interactions in the presence of fluctuating capillary waves, are analyzed
119: with particular attention to the effects of a nonzero line tension.}
120: The paper is structured as follows: In Sec.~\ref{sec:single} we discuss
121: a free energy model for the entrapment and stability
122: of a single colloid at a fluid
123: interface. In order to be self--contained, the predictions of the rigid
124: interface models incorporating surface and line tensions are summarized
125: in Subsecs.~\ref{sec:surface} and \ref{sec:line}, whereas the effect
126: of capillary waves is treated in Subsec.~\ref{sec:cw}.
127: In Sec.~\ref{sec:two} we discuss the fluctuation--induced interaction
128: between two trapped colloids, making use of the fluctuation Hamiltonians derived
129: for the single colloid problem. The importance of the type of admitted
130: boundary fluctuations on the effective interaction is highlighted
131: with the exemplary discussion
132: of two cases: (i) both colloids fluctuate freely and (ii) the colloids
133: are held fixed. For both cases, line tensions modify the magnitude of the
134: effective interaction but are shown not to lead to qualitatively new
135: behavior.
136:
137:
138:
139: \section{Free energy model for spherical colloids trapped at interfaces}
140: \label{sec:single}
141:
142: In this section, we consider the free energy of a single, spherical colloid
143: with radius $R$ trapped
144: at an interface between two phases I and II which is assumed to be flat in
145: equilibrium.
146: The height of the center of the colloid above the interface
147: is denoted by $z$, and we look for the free energy $F$ of the colloid with $z$
148: fixed, i.e. $F\equiv F(z)$ describes a constrained free energy and the equilibrium
149: free energy for the colloid follows upon minimization with respect to $z$.
150: This constrained free energy can be viewed as an effective potential, in which
151: the colloid fluctuates.
152: In Subsecs.~\ref{sec:surface} and \ref{sec:line} we introduce
153: the surface and line tension contributions to $F(z)$ under the assumption that
154: the interface stays rigidly flat. In Subsec.~\ref{sec:cw} the effect of
155: interface fluctuations on the constrained free energy $F(z)$ is calculated
156: in a perturbative manner, employing the capillary wave concept.
157:
158: \subsection{Surface tension}
159: \label{sec:surface}
160:
161: \begin{figure}
162: \begin{center}
163: \epsfig{file=onecolloidfinal.eps, width=10cm}
164: \end{center}
165: \caption{Side view of a single colloid with radius $R$ trapped at an
166: interface ($z=0$).
167: The full circle shows the colloid in equilibrium, with ist center located
168: at a height $z_{\rm eq}$ above the interface. The radius of the circular
169: three--phase contact line is given by $r_{0,{\rm eq}}$. The dashed circle
170: shows the colloid out of equilibrium at a center position $z$. The surface
171: tensions phase I/phase II, colloid/phase I, and colloid/phase II are denoted
172: by $\gamma$, $\gamma_{\rm I}$, and $\gamma_{\rm II}$, respectively.
173: The physical contact angle $\theta$ differs from Young's angle
174: $\cos\theta_0=(\gamma_{\rm I}-\gamma_{\rm II})/\gamma$ for a non--vanishing
175: line tension. }
176: \label{fig:rigid}
177: \end{figure}
178:
179:
180: Let $\gamma$ denote the surface tension of the fluid interface and
181: $\gamma_{\rm I[II]}$ denote the surface tension of the colloid surface (with area
182: $A_{\rm I[II]}$) exposed to phase I [II] (see Fig.~\ref{fig:rigid}).
183: The free energy $F(z)$, measured with respect to the configuration
184: where the colloid is completely immersed in phase I, is given by \cite{Pie80}
185: \bea
186: F(z) &=& \gamma_{\rm I}\,(A_{\rm I} -4\pi R^2) +
187: \gamma_{\rm II}\,A_{\rm II} - \gamma\, A \;.
188: \eea
189: Here, $A$ is the cross section area of the colloid with the interface.
190: Introducing the reduced quantities $\hat z = z/R$,
191: $\hat F(\hat z)= F(z)/(\pi\gamma R^2)$, and Young's angle $\theta_0$ via
192: $\cos\theta_0=(\gamma_{\rm I}-\gamma_{\rm II})/\gamma$, the free energy becomes
193: \bea
194: \label{eq:f_pie}
195: \hat F(\hat z) &=& (\hat z + \cos\theta_0)^2 -(1+\cos\theta_0)^2 \;.
196: \eea
197: According to this model, the free energy (or single colloid effective potential)
198: is harmonic with spring constant $k= F''(z_{\rm eq})= 2\pi\gamma$.
199: The equilibrium position is
200: given by $\hat z_{\rm eq}= - \cos\theta_0$ and the depth of the harmonic well
201: defines the activation energy $E_{\rm a} = \pi\gamma R^2 (1-|\cos\theta_0|)^2)$.
202: Thus we see that for interfaces of simple fluids ($\gamma \sim 10^{-2}$ N/m)
203: the activation energy becomes comparable to the thermal energy
204: $\beta^{-1}=\kbt$
205: only for nanoscopic colloids with radius $R \simeq 1$ nm.
206: At such small scales the application of the simple, thermodynamic concept
207: of surface tension seems doubtful.
208: Nonetheless, recent investigation using
209: computer simulations \cite{Bre99,Bre99a} have indicated that the behavior
210: of truly
211: nanoscale particles can be described within a wide range of conditions by such
212: a phenomenological
213: thermodynamic model upon introduction of particle size dependent surface tensions
214: and three--phase line tensions.
215:
216:
217: \subsection{Line tension}
218: \label{sec:line}
219:
220: The line tension was introduced by Gibbs~\cite{Gib61,Row02} to define the
221: excess free energy associated to the line where three phases meet. The accurate
222: experimental measurement of the line tension has been a considerable challenge.
223: In fact, the uncertainty in the order of magnitude of the line tension has generated
224: a considerable number of studies. The interested
225: reader is referred to a recent review devoted to the current status of the
226: three--phase line tension~\cite{Ami04}.
227: On theoretical grounds the line tension can be either positive or negative and
228: it is expected to be a small force~\cite{Row02}, $10^{-11}$~N. For simple
229: fluids away from criticality, dimensional analysis gives $\tau \sim \kbt/\sigma
230: $ where $\sigma \sim 0.1$ nm is a typical atomic length scale.
231: Line tensions inferred from experiments
232: span several orders of magnitude, $10^{-12}-10^{-6}$~N~\cite{Ami04,Dre96},
233: reflecting the variety of experimental
234: techniques (which are all indirect and where systematic errors can hardly be
235: estimated) and the variety of materials used.
236: More recent experimental efforts point towards line tensions with
237: magnitudes at the lower
238: end of the range given above (see, e.g., the discussion in Ref.~\cite{Schim07}
239: and references therein).
240: It is not clear
241: from the outset that the concept of line tension is unique, i.e. independent from
242: notional shifts of the interfaces
243: (which also shift the location of the contact line) that should be
244: permitted within the molecularly diffuse interface region.
245: This question is treated in detail in Ref.~\cite{Schim07} which lines out a
246: protocol how to define and relate line tensions obtained in different experimental
247: setups.
248:
249: \begin{figure}
250: \begin{center}
251: \epsfig{file=linetension.eps, width=8cm}
252: \end{center}
253: \caption{Plots of the reduced effective potential $\hat F(\hat z)$ for 4 different
254: values of the reduced line tension $\hat \tau$. With increasing $\hat \tau$,
255: the configuration crosses from the stable via the metastable to the unstable
256: regime. Young's angle is set to $\theta_0=120^o$ which corresponds to the
257: contact angle of $\mu$m--sized polystyrene colloids at an oil/water interface
258: \cite{Par07}. }
259: \label{fig:stability}
260: \end{figure}
261:
262: For our purposes, we may assume that a specific definition for the interface
263: locations has been adopted with regard to which surface tensions are defined
264: (see Fig.~\ref{fig:rigid}).
265: If we associate a line tension $\tau$ with the energy of the three--phase
266: contact line (which is a circle with radius $r_0=\sqrt{R^2-z^2}$), the free energy
267: of Eq.~(\ref{eq:f_pie}) must be amended as follows:
268: \bea
269: \label{eq:f_ave}
270: \hat F(\hat z) &=& (\hat z + \cos\theta_0)^2 -(1+\cos\theta_0)^2 +
271: 2\sqrt{1-\hat z^2}\,\hat \tau \;.
272: \eea
273: Here, the reduced line tension is given by $\hat \tau =\tau/(\gamma R)$.
274: The new equilibrium position of the colloid is determined by an equation
275: of fourth order in $\hat z$:
276: \bea
277: \label{eq:zeq}
278: \hat z_{\rm eq}\left( \frac{\hat \tau}{\sqrt{1-\hat z_{\rm eq}^2}} -1\right) &=&
279: \cos\theta_0 \;.
280: \eea
281: The spring constant $k= F''(z_{\rm eq})$ of the potential well near the
282: minimum is also modified and becomes
283: \bea
284: \label{eq:k1}
285: k= 2\pi\gamma (1 - \hat \tau /\hat r_{0,\rm eq}^3)
286: \eea
287: where $\hat r_{0,\rm eq} = \sqrt{1-\hat z_{\rm eq}^2}$.
288: Note that the effective potential
289: defined by Eq.~(\ref{eq:f_ave}) is not harmonic anymore. Positive values for
290: the line tension lead to a shallower well, inducing metastability for the trapped
291: colloid \cite{Ave96}. Large positive line tensions lead to the desorption of the
292: colloid from the interface (see Fig.~\ref{fig:stability} for the variation
293: of the effective potential $\hat F(\hat z)$ with $\hat \tau$ for $\theta_0=120^o$).
294: Thus, within this simple model, a first order transition between
295: colloids desorbed in one of the bulk phases and adsorption to the interface is
296: possible \cite{Ave96}.
297:
298:
299: \subsection{Capillary waves}
300: \label{sec:cw}
301:
302: In thermal equilibrium, the interface is not sharp but acquires a finite
303: thickness through density fluctuations.
304: In a coarse--grained picture, these density fluctuations correspond to
305: fluctuations of the mean interface position $u(\vect x)$ around the equilibrium
306: position $u=0$. Here, $\vect x = (x,y)$ is a vector in the equilibrium
307: interface plane $z=0$.
308: For wavelengths of these interface position
309: fluctuations which are larger than the correlation length
310: in the bulk phases, the free energy of an interface configuration $u(\vect x)$
311: is given by the surface energy of this configuration:
312: \bea
313: \label{eq:f_cw1}
314: F_{\rm men} = \gamma \int_{S_{\rm men}} d^2x \left[\sqrt{1+ (\nabla u)^2}
315: + \frac{u^2}{\lambda_c^2}\right]\;.
316: \eea
317: Here, $S_{\rm men}$ is the interface or meniscus area projected onto
318: the plane $z=0$ of the reference interface, i.e. it is the whole plane
319: $z=0$ with colloids which are possibly trapped at the interface ``cut out".
320: The free energy in Eq.~(\ref{eq:f_cw1}) contains an additional
321: term which accounts for the costs in gravitational energy
322: associated with the meniscus fluctuations. It involves the capillary length
323: $\lambda_c$ given by
324: $\lambda_c=[\gamma/(|\rho_{\rm II}-\rho_{\rm I}|g)]^{1/2}$,
325: where
326: $g$ is the gravitational constant and
327: $\rho_i$ the mass density in phase $i$.
328: Usually, in simple fluids $\lambda_c$ is in the range
329: of millimeters. Surface excitations whose free energy are described by
330: Eq.~(\ref{eq:f_cw1}) are termed {\em capillary waves}, and their
331: effect on static and dynamic properties of liquid interfaces
332: is a subject of lively interest
333: \cite{Mec99,Dai00,Mil02,Dai03,Tol04,Vin05,Tar07}.
334:
335: The effective potential $F(z)$ for the colloid whose center
336: is fixed at height $z$ above the equilibrium interface can be obtained
337: through the partition function of the capillary waves:
338: \bea
339: F(z) & = & - \kbt \ln \mc{Z} \;, \\
340: \label{eq:Zsingledef}
341: \mc{Z} &=& \mc{Z}_0^{-1} \int \mathcal{D}u \,\exp(-\beta\mc{H})
342: \qquad \qquad (\beta^{-1}=\kbt)\;.
343: \eea
344: Here, $\mc{Z}_0$ is a suitable normalization factor. The Hamiltonian $\mc{H}$
345: which enters the Boltzmann weight for a certain interface configuration
346: $u(\vect x)$ is the difference in free energy between the configuration
347: $\{u(\vect x),z\}$ (describing the interface and colloid position) and the
348: equilibrium configuration $\{u=0,z_{\rm eq}\}$ which we call the reference
349: configuration. The equilibrium position of the colloid is determined
350: through Eq.~(\ref{eq:zeq}). Therefore
351: \bea
352: \label{eq:hs}
353: \fl
354: \mc{H}[u(\vect x),z] &=&
355: (F_{\rm men}[\{u(\vect x),z\}] - F_{\rm men}[\{0,z_{\rm eq}\}])
356: +\gamma_{\rm I}\Delta A_{\rm I}
357: +\gamma_{\rm II}\Delta A_{\rm II} + \tau \Delta L
358: \eea
359: The difference in the interface areas colloid/phase I and colloid/phase II
360: between the configuration $\{u,z\}$ and the reference configuration is
361: given by $\Delta A_{\rm I}$ and $\Delta A_{\rm II}$, respectively, and the
362: difference of the three--phase contact line length between these
363: configurations is given by $\Delta L$. In general, $\mc{H}[u(\vect x),z] $
364: is a complicated functional of $u$ and $z$. In order to reduce it to a
365: tractable expression which allows the analytical determination of the
366: functional integral in Eq.~(\ref{eq:Zsingledef}), we perform a
367: Taylor expansion in $u$ and $z$ \cite{Oet05}.
368: To quadratic order, this implies that the Hamiltonian can be split into
369: a two--dimensional ``bulk" term $\mc{H}_{\rm cw}$ and a one--dimensional
370: ``boundary" term $\mc{H}_{\rm b}$:
371: \bea
372: \label{eq:hs_split}
373: \mc{H}[u(\vect x),z] &=& \left.\mc{H}_{\rm cw}[u(\vect x)]
374: \right|_{\vect x \in S_{\rm men,ref}} +
375: \left.\mc{H}_{\rm b}[u(\vect x),z]
376: \right|_{\vect x \in \partial S_{\rm men,ref}}\;.
377: \eea
378: The two--dimensional ``bulk" area $S_{\rm men,ref}$ is given by the
379: interface in the reference configuration (i.e. the plane $z=0$ with the
380: colloid cut out), and the boundary line $\partial S_{\rm men,ref}$ is
381: given by the three--phase contact line in the reference configuration.
382: With these definitions $\mc{H}_{\rm cw}$ corresponds to the usual
383: capillary wave Hamiltonian {\cite{Buf65}:}
384: \bea
385: \label{eq:hcw}
386: \mc{H}_{\rm cw}[u(\vect x)] &=& \frac{\gamma}{2} \int_{S_{\rm men,ref}} d^2x\,
387: \left[ (\nabla u)^2
388: +\frac{u^2}{\lambda_c^2}
389: \right] \;.
390: \eea
391: The boundary term $\mc{H}_{\rm b}$ only depends on the difference
392: $h=z-z_{\rm eq}$ and {the} vertical
393: position of the contact line $f$. The latter is expressed by its Fourier
394: transform:
395: \bea
396: \label{eq:conlin}
397: f(\varphi) =
398: u(\partial S_{\rm men,ref})=\sum_{m=-\infty}^\infty P_{m}\,e^{{\rm i}m\varphi}
399: \;.
400: \eea
401: In Eq.~(\ref{eq:conlin}), the polar angle $\varphi$ is defined on the reference
402: contact line circle $\partial S_{\rm men,ref}$.
403: The Fourier coefficients $P_{m}$ are referred to as
404: contact line multipoles below, and
405: since the contact line height $f(\varphi)$ is real,
406: $P_m=P^*_{-m}$ holds. With these definitions, the boundary term
407: acquires the form
408: \bea
409: \label{eq:hb}
410: \mc{H}_{\rm b}[u(\vect x),h] &=& \mc{H}_{\rm b,1} + \mc{H}_{\rm b,2}\,, \\
411: \label{eq:hb1}
412: \mc{H}_{\rm b,1} &=& \frac{\pi\gamma}{2}\left[ 2(P_{0}-h)^2+
413: 4\sum_{m=1}^{\infty} |P_{m}|^2\right]\;, \\
414: \label{eq:hb2}
415: \mc{H}_{\rm b,2} &=& \frac{\pi \gamma}{2} \frac{R^3}{r_{0,\rm eq}^3}\,
416: \hat \tau
417: \left[ -2 \, (P_{0}-h)^2
418: + 4 \sum_{m=1}^{\infty} \left( m^2-1 \right) \,|P_{m}|^2 \right] \;.
419: \eea
420: As before, $r_{0,\rm eq}=\sqrt{R^2-z_{\rm eq}^2}$ is the radius
421: of the circle enclosed by the reference contact line and
422: $\hat \tau =\tau/(\gamma R)$ is the reduced line tension.
423: The detailed derivation of the two terms contributing to $\mc{H}_{\rm b}$
424: can be found in \ref{app:boundary}. Note that $\mc{H}_{\rm b,1}$ which
425: describes the change in colloid surface energy upon shifting the contact line
426: is strictly positive definite, whereas $\mc{H}_{\rm b,2}$ is not
427: positive definite, regardless of the sign of $\tau$.
428:
429: The partition function $\mc{Z}$ (Eq.~(\ref{eq:Zsingledef})) can be written
430: such that the integral
431: over contact line fluctuations $\int\mc{D}f$ appears explicitly:
432: \bea
433: \label{eq:Z1single} \fl
434: \mathcal{Z}=\mathcal{Z}_0^{-1} \int \mathcal{D}u\,
435: \exp \left(-\beta\mathcal{H}_{\rm cw}[u,z] \right)\;
436: \int \mathcal{D}f \!\!\!
437: \prod_{{\bf x} \in \partial S_{\rm men,ref}}
438: \delta [u({\bf x})-f({\bf x})]
439: \exp \left(-\beta\mathcal{H}_{{\rm b}}[f,h] \right)
440: \;. \quad
441: \eea
442: The integration measure for the contact line fluctuations
443: is given by $\mc{D}f=dP_0\prod_{m>0} d{\rm Re}P_{m}d{\rm Im}P_{-m}$.
444: However, in this form the 2d-``bulk" fluctuations $u$ are not yet
445: separated from the ``boundary" fluctuations $f$. This can be achieved
446: by splitting the field $u$ of the local interface position into
447: a mean--field and a fluctuation part, $u=u_{\rm mf}+v$. The
448: mean--field part solves the Euler--Lagrange equation
449: $ (-\Delta+\lambda_c^{-2})\,u_{\rm mf}=0$ with the boundary condition
450: $u_{\rm mf}\,|_{ \partial S_{\rm men, ref}}=f $.
451: Consequently the fluctuation part
452: vanishes at the contact line:
453: $v\,|_{ \partial S_{\rm men, ref}}=0$.
454: Then the partition function
455: $\mathcal{Z}=\mathcal{Z}_{\rm fluc}\mathcal{Z}_{\rm mf}$
456: factorizes into a product of a fluctuation part
457: independent of
458: the boundary conditions
459: and a mean field part which depends on the fluctuating contact line
460: $f$:
461: \begin{eqnarray}\label{eq:Zsepsingle}
462: \mathcal{Z}_{\rm fluc} &=& \mathcal{Z}_0^{-1} \int \mathcal{D}v\,
463: \prod_{{\bf x} \in \partial S_{\rm men, ref}}\delta ( v({\bf x}))
464: \exp \left(-\beta\mathcal{H}_{\rm cw}[v] \right)\;, \\
465: \label{eq:Zmf_single}
466: \mathcal{Z}_{\rm mf} (h) &=&
467: \int \mathcal{D}f
468: \, \exp\left\{ -\frac{\beta\gamma }{2}
469: \oint_{\partial S_{\rm men, ref}} \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
470: d\ell\, f({\bf x})\,( \partial_n u_{\rm mf}({\bf x}))\right\}
471: \exp \left(-\beta\mathcal{H}_{{\rm b}}[f,h] \right)
472: \;. \nonumber
473: \end{eqnarray}
474: The first exponential in $\mathcal{Z}_{\rm mf}$ stems from applying Gauss' theorem
475: to the energy associated with $u_{\rm mf}$. In this term
476: $ \partial_n u_{\rm mf}$ denotes the normal derivative of the mean--field
477: solution towards the {interior} of the circle $\partial S_{\rm men, ref}$,
478: and $d\ell$ is
479: the infinitesimal line segment on $\partial S_{\rm men, ref}$.
480:
481: Since $\mathcal{Z}_{\rm fluc} $ does not depend on the colloid position
482: $h=z-z_{\rm eq}$, it only contributes an additive constant to the
483: effective potential. In $\mathcal{Z}_{\rm mf}$, only the monopole
484: fluctuations of the contact line $P_0$ are coupled to $h$
485: (see Eqs.~(\ref{eq:hb1}) and (\ref{eq:hb2})). The mean--field energy term
486: (the first exponential in $\mathcal{Z}_{\rm mf}$, Eq.~(\ref{eq:Zmf_single}))
487: is diagonal in the multipole moments $P_m$ (see \ref{app:umf}):
488: \bea
489: \label{eq:umf}
490: -\frac{\beta\gamma }{2}
491: \oint_{\partial S_{\rm men, ref}} \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
492: d\ell\, f({\bf x})\,( \partial_n u_{\rm mf}({\bf x}))
493: \stackrel{\lambda_c \gg R}{\simeq}
494: -\pi\beta\gamma \left( \frac{P_0^2}{\ln \hat \lambda_c} + 2
495: \sum_{m> 0} m|P_m|^2 \right)\;,
496: \eea
497: with the reduced capillary length given by
498: $\hat \lambda_c = 1.12\lambda_c/r_{0,{\rm eq}}$.
499: Therefore only the integral over the monopole fluctuation $P_0$
500: yields a dependence on $h$ in the partition function:
501: \bea
502: \fl
503: \mc{Z} &=& \mc{Z}'_0[v,P_{m\,(m\not =0)}] \,
504: \int dP_0
505: \exp\left\{ - \pi \beta\gamma \left[
506: \frac{P_0^2}{\ln\hat\lambda_c} + (P_0-h)^2\,
507: \left(1 - \frac{\hat \tau}{\hat r_{0,{\rm eq}}^3}\right)
508: \right] \right\} \\
509: \fl
510: &=& \mc{Z}'_0[v,P_{m\,(m\not =0)}]\,
511: \left[ \beta\gamma\left( \frac{1}{\ln\hat\lambda_c} +
512: 1 - \frac{\hat \tau}{\hat r_{0,{\rm eq}}^3}\right) \right]^{-1/2}\;
513: \times \\
514: \fl && \qquad \qquad
515: \exp\left\{ - \pi \beta\gamma\, h^2\,
516: \frac{ 1 - \frac{\di \hat \tau}{\di \hat r_{0,{\rm eq}}^3}}
517: {1+\ln\hat\lambda_c
518: \left(1-\frac{\di \hat \tau}{\di \hat r_{0,{\rm eq}}^3}\right)}
519: \right\}
520: \eea
521: The $h$--independent contributions have been put into the new normalization
522: factor $\mc{Z}'_0$.
523: Thus the effective potential for the colloid moving around its equilibrium
524: position is given by
525: \bea
526: F(z) & = & - \beta^{-1} \; \ln \mc{Z} \\
527: \label{eq:f_single_cw}
528: & = & {\rm const.} + \pi \gamma\, (z-z_{\rm eq})^2\,
529: \frac{ 1 - \frac{\di \hat \tau}{\di \hat r_{0,{\rm eq}}^3}}
530: {1+\ln\hat\lambda_c
531: \left(1-\frac{\di \hat \tau}{\di \hat r_{0,{\rm eq}}^3}\right)}
532: \;.
533: \eea
534: The spring constant $k=F''(z_{\rm eq})$ of the effective potential
535: can be compared to the one derived for the case of a rigid interface
536: (Eq.~(\ref{eq:k1}). It is seen that we recover the latter upon neglecting
537: the term involving the capillary length $\lambda_c$. However, for
538: a physical situation, the capillary length is not small and greatly
539: diminishes the steepness of the potential well (for
540: colloids with $R=10$ nm at an air--water interface, $\theta_0 \simeq
541: 90^o$ and negligible line tensions, $k$ is reduced by a factor of 14).
542: In accordance with the Goldstone boson character of capillary waves,
543: the spring constant vanishes for $\lambda_c \to \infty$ since the whole
544: interface can move with no energy cost upon shifting the colloid.
545:
546: In accordance with the rigid interface result
547: (Eq.~(\ref{eq:k1})), the effective potential becomes unstable
548: for $\hat \tau > \hat r_{0,{\rm eq}}^3$.
549: However, this perturbative calculation of the effective potential $F(z)$ allows
550: no conclusion on the height of the energy barrier, which exists
551: in the metastable regime of positive line tensions
552: (see Fig.~\ref{fig:stability}). One may speculate that the considerable
553: reduction of the potential well steepness by capillary waves goes along
554: with a reduction of the barrier height and would thus facilitate
555: particle desorption.\footnote{This effect might be expected quite
556: in similarity to the effective reduction of the barrier height in a
557: double-well potential
558: for a single quantum--mechanical particle \cite{Klei_book}.}
559:
560: For negative line tensions, the shape of the effective potential in
561: Eq.~(\ref{eq:f_single_cw}) is hardly affected since $\ln\hat\lambda_c \gg 1$.
562: However, an instability shows up in the partition function which is
563: contained in the factor $\mc{Z}_0'$. This factor contains
564: a contribution of the form
565: \bea
566: \label{eq:instability}
567: \mc{Z}_0' & \propto & \mc{D}'f
568: \exp\left\{ - 2\pi\beta\gamma \, \sum_{m>0} |P_m|^2
569: \left[ (m+1) + (m^2-1)\frac{\di \hat \tau}{\di \hat r_{0,{\rm eq}}^3}
570: \right] \right\}
571: \eea
572: where the measure for the contact line fluctuations does not contain the
573: monopoles, $\mc{D}'f = \int \prod_{m>0} d{\rm Re}P_{m}d{\rm Im}P_{-m}$.
574: Clearly, for arbitrarily small but negative $\tau$ there exists a
575: critical multipole order $m_c$ above which the exponent becomes
576: positive and thus the partition function becomes infinite. Taken at face
577: value, for negative line tensions the interface would become unstable
578: by forming ripples with small wavelengths near the colloid. In a physical
579: situation, there is however a lower cutoff in the wavelength of these
580: ripples set by the colloid surface roughness which presumably adds
581: a positive energy penalty to higher multipole fluctuations of the
582: contact line.
583:
584: As is well--known, the capillary length $\lambda_c$ serves effectively as
585: an infrared cutoff for the capillary wave spectrum. Although the capillary
586: wave model used in this work was derived assuming gravitational
587: damping of the capillary waves (see Eq.~(\ref{eq:f_cw1})), the dependence
588: of all resulting expressions on $\lambda_c$ is not specific to that
589: form of the capillary wave Hamiltonian \cite{Oet05}. Such an infrared cutoff
590: results equally well from a finite system size (e.g. a two--phase system
591: with trapped colloids in a container with extension $L$
592: or colloids trapped on a droplet with radius $R_{\rm d}$).
593: Thus for such systems, the effective potential (Eq.~(\ref{eq:f_single_cw}))
594: is obtained by just replacing $\lambda_c$ by $L$ or $R_{\rm d}$.
595: Since for smaller system sizes the influence of the line tension on $F(z)$
596: is more pronounced, it is conceivable to obtain a value
597: for $\tau$ from the fluctuations in the colloid position which sample
598: $F(z)$. As can be seen from Eq.~(\ref{eq:f_single_cw}), no knowledge
599: of the surface tension $\gamma_{\rm I}$ and $\gamma_{\rm II}$
600: (or Young's angle $\theta_0$) is required, but the modified
601: contact angle $|\sin\theta|=\hat r_{0,\rm eq}$ enters.
602: Certainly,
603: an experimental realization appears to be difficult
604: because of the difficulty in determining $\theta$,
605: and one could resort to simulations in a first step which determine the
606: colloid fluctuations with varying system size and in which $\theta$ can be
607: determined straightforwardly.
608:
609:
610: \section{Fluctuation induced forces between two colloids}
611: \label{sec:two}
612:
613: The previous considerations can be extended to the case of two colloids which
614: are trapped at the interface at distance $d$. Clearly, if both colloids are at
615: their equilibrium position (defined by Eq.~(\ref{eq:zeq})) and capillary waves
616: are neglected, the interface is flat and therefore no interface--mediated
617: interactions are present. If, by some external force, the colloids
618: are moved away from equilibrium, the interface will adapt to a
619: long--ranged deformation and induce a capillary interaction energy
620: $\propto \ln d$ between the colloids \cite{Kra00}, the
621: well--known {\em cheerios} effect \cite{Vel05}.
622: The occurence of such a long--ranged interaction
623: is tied to the occurence of a net force on the system ``colloids + interface"
624: \cite{For04,Oet05,Oet06}.
625:
626: \begin{figure}
627: \begin{center}
628: \epsfig{file=twocolloidsfinal.eps, width=10cm}
629: \end{center}
630: \caption{ (a) Side view of two colloids at distance $d$ trapped at an
631: interface, with $h_i$ $(i=1,2)$ denoting the relative center position
632: of the fluctuating colloid $i$ (dashed circles) with respect to
633: the colloid $i$ in equilibrium (full circles). (b)
634: Top view on the equilibrium interface, spanning the $x-y$--plane.
635: The colloids in equilibrium occupy the circular areas $S_i^0$, and
636: their boundaries $\partial S_i^0$ are the
637: equilibrium (or reference) three--phase contact lines.
638: }
639: \label{fig:twocolls}
640: \end{figure}
641:
642: Here, we are interested in the occurence of an interface--mediated interaction
643: potential $V(d)$
644: in the force--free situation which are brought about by the fluctuating capillary
645: waves. To that end, we can apply the partition function analysis developed
646: in the previous section, extended to the case of two spherical ``obstacles" trapped
647: within the interface. We will focus on two scenarios:
648: \begin{itemize}
649: \item[(A1)] No external force acts on the colloids, therefore the colloids
650: are free to fluctuate in the direction perpendicular
651: to the interface.
652: \item[(A2)] The colloids are fixed at their equilibrium position by external
653: means. On average, there is no external force acting vertically on the
654: colloids, although at a given instant of time some force is needed to
655: counteract the Brownian fluctuations of the colloids. In this case,
656: the effective potential $V(d)$ between the colloids is related to the
657: pair correlation function $g(z_{\rm eq}, z_{\rm eq}, d)$ between the colloids
658: through $\beta V(d) = - \ln g(z_{\rm eq}, z_{\rm eq}, d)$.
659: \end{itemize}
660: In both scenarios, the interface and in particular the three--phase contact line
661: are free to fluctuate, subject to the energy penalty of the capillary wave and
662: the boundary Hamiltonian lined out in the previous section.
663: In previous work \cite{Leh06,Leh07} (neglecting line tensions) we have
664: established that the long--range
665: behavior of the effective potential $V(d)$ depends sensitively on the
666: types of contact line fluctuations. For the case of a {\em pinned} contact line
667: on the colloid and the colloids fixed at their equilibrium position,
668: $V(d) \propto \ln\ln d$ whereas for the case (A1), $V(d) \propto d^{-8}$.
669: In the present work, we will show (i) that for case (A2), fixed colloids but
670: unpinned contact line, the effective potential is still long--ranged,
671: $V(d) \propto \ln(1+\ln d)$ and (ii) that line tensions do not change the
672: leading power in the long--range behavior of $V(d)$ but the instability for
673: negative line tensions in the partition sum for a single colloid also occurs
674: in the leading interaction term for case (A1).
675:
676: The effective potential $V(d)$ is obtained via the partition function of
677: the fluctuating capillary waves $\mc{Z}$ via
678: \bea
679: V(d) = -\kbt \ln \mc{Z}(d)\;.
680: \eea
681: The partition function $\mc Z \propto \int \mc{D}u\,\exp(-\beta\mc{H})$
682: contains a Hamiltonian which as before contains a 2d-``bulk" term
683: and a sum of boundary terms for each of the two colloids:
684: \bea
685: \mc{H}[u(\vect x),z] &=& \left.\mc{H}_{\rm cw}[u(\vect x)]
686: \right|_{\vect x \in S_{\rm men,ref}} +
687: \sum_{i=1}^2 \left.\mc{H}^i_{\rm b}[u(\vect x),z]
688: \right|_{\vect x \in \partial S^0_i}\;.
689: \eea
690: The functional form of $\mc{H}_{\rm cw}$ and the $\mc{H}^i_{\rm b}$ is given
691: by Eqs.~(\ref{eq:hcw}) and (\ref{eq:hb})--(\ref{eq:hb2}), respectively,
692: with due generalization of contact line multipoles for each colloid $i$,
693: $P_m\to P_{im}$, and of colloid height differences $h \to h_i=z_i-z_{\rm eq}$.
694: In the equilibrium (reference) configuration, colloid $i$
695: intersects the interface plane in the circular area $S^0_i$, thus
696: the three--phase contact lines in the reference configuration are given by
697: $\partial S^0_i$ ($i=1,2$). Thus the 2d-``bulk" area over which the capillary waves
698: fluctuate is given by
699: $S_{\rm men,ref}=\mathbb{R}^2\setminus\bigcup_{i=1}^2 S^0_i$
700: (see also Fig.~\ref{fig:twocolls} for the geometric definitions).
701: Via the integration domain $S_{\rm men,ref}$ of $\mc{H}_{\rm cw}$,
702: the total Hamiltonian and hence the partition function $\mc{Z}(d)$
703: of the system depends
704: on the distance $d$ of the colloid centers.
705:
706: As before, the fluctuations over the contact lines
707: $f_i=\sum_m \exp({\rm i}m\varphi_i)P_{im}$
708: are incorporated into the partition function
709: via $\delta$--function constraints:
710: %
711: \bea\label{eq:Z1}
712: \mathcal{Z}(d)&=&\mathcal{Z}_0^{-1} \int \mathcal{D}u\,
713: \exp \left(-\beta\mathcal{H}_{\rm cw}[u,d] \right)\; \times \\
714: \nonumber & &
715: \prod_{\rm i=1}^2 %\int dh_i
716: %\prod_m dP_{ im}dQ_{im}\,
717: \int \mathcal{D}f_i
718: \prod_{{\bf x}_i \in \partial S^0_{i}}
719: \delta [u({\bf x}_{ i})-f_{ i}({\bf x}_{ i})]
720: \exp \left(-\beta \mathcal{H}^i_{{\rm b}}[f_i,h_i]\right)
721: \;.
722: \eea
723: The normalisation factor $\mc{Z}_{0}$
724: is chosen such that $\mc{Z}(d\to\infty)\to 1$. The difference between cases
725: (A1) and (A2) defined above shows up in the definition of the measure for
726: the contact line fluctuations:
727: \bea
728: \mc{D} f_i &=& \left\{ \begin{array}{lr}
729: dh_i\,dP_{i0}\prod_{m>0} d{\rm Re}P_{im}d{\rm Im}P_{i-m} & \quad \mbox{(A1)} \\
730: \\
731: dP_{i0}\prod_{m>0} d{\rm Re}P_{im}d{\rm Im}P_{i-m} & \quad \mbox{(A2)}
732: \end{array} \right. \;.
733: \eea
734: As seen above, in the unconstrained case (A1) an additional integral over
735: the colloid height variables is performed.
736: Both cases can be discussed conveniently by splitting the field $u$ of the local interface position into
737: a mean--field and a fluctuation part, $u=u_{\rm mf}+v$. The
738: mean--field part solves the Euler--Lagrange equation
739: $ (-\Delta+\lambda_c^{-2})\,u_{\rm mf}=0$ with the boundary condition
740: $u_{\rm mf}\,|_{ \partial S^0_{i}}=f_{ i} $. Consequently the fluctuation part
741: vanishes at the contact line:
742: $v\,|_{ \partial S_{ i}^0}=0$.
743: Then the partition function $\mathcal{Z}=\mathcal{Z}_{\rm fluc}\mathcal{Z}_{\rm mf}$
744: factorises into a product of a fluctuation part
745: independent of
746: the boundary conditions
747: and a mean field part which depends on the fluctuating boundary conditions $f_i$
748: of the meniscus on the colloid surfaces:
749: %
750: \begin{eqnarray}\label{Zsep}
751: \fl
752: \mathcal{Z}_{\rm fluc} &=& \mathcal{Z}_0^{-1} \int \mathcal{D}v\,
753: \prod_{\rm i=1}^2 \prod_{{\bf x}_i \in \partial S^0_i}\delta ( v({\bf x}_i))
754: \exp \left(-\beta\mathcal{H}_{\rm cw}[v,d] \right)\;, \nonumber \\
755: \fl
756: \mathcal{Z}_{\rm mf} &=& \prod_{\rm i=1}^2
757: \int \mathcal{D}f_i
758: \, \exp\left\{ -\frac{\beta\gamma }{2} \sum_{i}
759: \oint_{\partial S^0_i}d\ell_i f_i({\bf x}_i)\,( \partial_n u_{\rm mf}({\bf x}_i;d))\right\}
760: \exp \left(-\beta\mathcal{H}^i_{{\rm b}}[f_i,h_i] \right)
761: \;.
762: \end{eqnarray}
763: %
764: The first exponential in $\mathcal{Z}_{\rm mf} $ stems from applying Gauss' theorem
765: to the energy associated with $u_{\rm mf}$. In this term
766: $ \partial_n u_{\rm mf}$ denotes the normal derivative of the mean--field
767: solution towards the interior of the circle $\partial S^0_i$, and $d\ell_i$ is
768: the infinitesimal line segment on $\partial S^0_i$ .
769:
770: \begin{figure}
771: \begin{center}
772: \epsfig{file=collflucsnewfinal.eps, width=10cm}
773: \end{center}
774: \caption{ Pictorial representation of the separability of the total
775: effective potential $V$ caused by the fluctuating capillary waves
776: and the possibly fluctuating colloid
777: into a fluctuation ($V_{\rm fluc}$) and a mean--field part ($V_{\rm men}$).
778: The fluctuation part (second picture) is obtained by summing over
779: all admissible capillary
780: waves which are pinned at the colloid surface ($u=0$) and with the colloids
781: themselves fixed. The mean--field part (third picture) is obtained
782: by summing over the colloid height fluctuations (long arrows) and the
783: contact line fluctuations (short arrows) equipped with a Boltzmann
784: factor incorporating the energy of the mean--field meniscus solution
785: whose boundary condition is set by the momentary position of the contact
786: line.
787: }
788: \label{fig:flucsep}
789: \end{figure}
790:
791: In this form, the partition function is amenable to analytical expansions for
792: small and large distances $d$ between the colloids. The multiplicative
793: separation of $\mc{Z}$ allows to define additive contributions
794: to the effective potential:
795: $V=V_{\rm fluc}+V_{\rm mf}$ with
796: $\beta V_{\rm fluc[mf]}=\ln\mc{Z}_{\rm fluc[mf]}$. The techniques to evaluate
797: the fluctuation and mean--field part to the effective potential have
798: been presented in detail in Ref.~\cite{Leh07}, and we {give a summary of} the main
799: results which are necessary to discuss the influence of the line tension terms on
800: $V(d)$.
801:
802: \subsection{Fluctuation part}
803: \label{sec:fluc}
804:
805: The fluctuation part contributes equally
806: for both
807: cases (A1) and (A2) introduced above.
808: The $\delta$-functions
809: in the fluctuation part of the partition function
810: can be removed by using their integral representation via
811: auxiliary fields $\psi_i ({\bf x}_i)$ defined on the
812: interface boundaries $\partial S^0_i$ ~\cite{Li91}. This enables us to integrate out
813: the field $u$ leading to
814: %
815: \begin{eqnarray}
816: \label{eq:zfluc}
817: \fl
818: \mathcal{Z}_{\rm fluc} =
819: \int \prod_{i=1}^2 \mc{D}\psi_i\,
820: \exp\left\{
821: -\frac{k_{\rm B}T}{2\gamma}\sum_{i,j=1}^2
822: \oint_{\partial S^0_i}d\ell_i \oint_{\partial S^0_j}d\ell_j\,
823: \psi_i ({\bf x}_i)\,G(|{\bf x}_i-{\bf x}_j|)\,\psi_j({\bf x}_j)\right\}\;.
824: \end{eqnarray}
825: %
826: We note in passing, that
827: the fluctuation part in the form of Eq.~(\ref{eq:zfluc})
828: resembles 2d screened electrostatics: it is the
829: partition function of a system
830: of fluctuating charge densities $\psi_i$ residing on the contact circles. For large
831: $d/r_0$ it can be calculated by utilizing the multipole expansion
832: \bea
833: \psi_i(\varphi_i) = \sum_{m=-\infty}^\infty \psi_{im} \exp({\rm i}m\varphi_i)\;,
834: \eea
835: introducing the auxiliary multipole moments $\psi_{im}$ of order $m$ pertaining
836: to colloid $i$. Using these it can be shown that in the limit
837: $\lambda_c \gg d \gg R$ the fluctuation part of the effective potential
838: $\beta V_{\rm fluc} = -\ln \mathcal{Z}_{\rm fluc}$ has the form
839: \bea
840: \label{eq:flucexp}
841: \beta V_{\rm fluc} (d) & = & {\rm const.} + a_0(d)
842: + \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{a_n}{d^{2n}}, \\
843: \label{eq:a0}
844: a_0(d) &=& \frac{1}{2} \ln \ln \frac{d}{r_{0,{\rm eq}}} \;,
845: \eea
846: where the $a_n$ for $n>0$ are numerical coefficients. Through the multipole analysis it is
847: found that interaction terms $\propto \psi_{1m}\psi_{2m'}$ contribute terms
848: to $V_{\rm fluc}$ which are proportional to $d^{-2(m+m')}$.
849: The combination $\propto \psi_{10}\psi_{20}$ (fluctuating auxiliary monopoles)
850: gives rise to the leading term $a_0$ in $V_{\rm fluc}$.
851:
852: %
853: \subsection{Mean--field part}
854: %
855: The calculation of $\mc{Z}_{\rm mf}$ (Eq.~(\ref{Zsep})) requires to determine
856: the solution of the differential equation
857: \bea
858: \label{eq:mf}
859: (-\Delta+\lambda_c^{-2})\,u_{\rm mf}=0
860: \eea
861: with the boundary conditions at the fluctuating contact line and at infinity,
862: respectively:
863: \bea
864: \label{eq:mfb}
865: \left.u_{\rm mf}({\bf x}_i)\right|_{{\bf x}_i \in \partial S^0_i}
866: &=&f_i(\varphi_i) \\
867: \left. u_{\rm mf}({\bf x})\right|_{|{\bf x}|\to \infty} &\to &0 \;.
868: \eea
869: We write the solution as a
870: superposition $u_{\rm mf} = u_1+u_2$
871: where $u_i= \sum_m K_m ( r_i/\lambda_{ c})
872: A_{im} e^{{\rm i} m\varphi_i} $ is
873: the general mean--field solution in $\mathbb{R}^2\setminus S^0_i$
874: {(see Fig.~\ref{fig:twocolls} for the geometric definitions)}.
875: The solution has to match to the boundary conditions
876: at both circles $\partial S^0_1$ and $\partial S^0_2$.
877: %
878: This can be achieved by a projection of $u_2$ onto
879: the complete set of functions on $\partial S^0_1$, $\{ e^{{\rm i}m\varphi_1} \}$,
880: and vice versa.
881: Equating this expansion with the
882: contact line multipole expansion
883: $f_i(\varphi_i)=\sum_i P_i\,\exp({\rm i}m\varphi_i)$
884: leads to a system of linear equations for the expansion coefficients
885: $\{A_{im}\}$.
886: %(which of course has to solved separately for real and imaginary
887: %part of the $A_{im}$. Since $f_i$ is real we, however, have $A_{im}=A_{i-m}^*$.).
888: This system can be solved analytically within a systematic $1/d$ expansion or
889: numerically,
890: observing rapid
891: convergence.
892: %allowing us to truncate the
893: %expansions at $m_{\rm max}\approx 20$.
894: Owing to the linearity of Eq.~(\ref{eq:mf}), the
895: mean field part of the partition function $\mc{Z}_{\rm mf}$
896: can be
897: written in a Gaussian form:
898: %
899: \begin{equation}
900: \label{eq:zmf1}
901: \fl
902: \mc{Z}_{\rm mf} = \int \mc{D} f_i\; \exp\left ( - \beta \mc{H}[u_{\rm mf},d]
903: \right)\;
904: \exp\left\{ -\pi \beta\gamma\left(1-\frac{\di \hat \tau}{\di \hat r_{0,{\rm eq}}^3}\right)\sum_i (P_{i0}-h_i)^2 \right\},
905: \end{equation}
906: %
907: where $\mc{H}[u_{\rm mf}]$ is a symmetric quadratic form in the vector of
908: the contact line
909: multipole moments ${\bf {\hat f}}_i=(\dots, P_{i-1},P_{i0},P_{i1},\dots )$:
910: \begin{eqnarray}\label{Hmean}
911: \mc{H}[u_{\rm mf},d]
912: &=&
913: \frac{\gamma}{2}
914: \left(
915: \begin{array}{c}
916: {\bf\hat{f}}_1\\
917: {\bf\hat{f}}_2
918: \end{array}
919: \right)
920: ^{\rm T}
921: \left(\begin{array}{cc}
922: {\bf E}_{\rm 1\,self} & {\bf E}_{\rm int}(d) \\
923: {\bf E}_{\rm int}(d) & {\bf E}_{\rm 2\, self}
924: \end{array}\right)
925: \left(
926: \begin{array}{c}
927: {\bf \hat{f}}_1\\
928: {\bf \hat{f}}_2
929: \end{array}
930: \right)\;.
931: \end{eqnarray}
932: Using this form, it can be shown that the mean--field part
933: $V_{\rm mf}$ of the effective potential has a similar expansion to
934: the one of the fluctuation part $V_{\rm fluc}$ (Eq.~(\ref{eq:flucexp}))
935: in the limit $\lambda_c \gg d \gg R$:
936: \bea
937: \beta V_{\rm mf} (d) &=& {\rm const.} + b_0(d) +
938: \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{b_n}{d^{2n}}\;.
939: \eea
940: Also similar to the analysis of $V_{\rm fluc}$, interaction terms
941: $\propto P_{1m}P_{2m'}$ contribute terms
942: to $V_{\rm mf}$ which are proportional to $d^{-2(m+m')}$.
943: The fluctuating contact line monopoles and the possibly (in case (A1))
944: fluctuating colloid heights $h_i$
945: gives rise to the leading term $b_0$ in $V_{\rm mf}$.
946: The form of $b_0(d)$ and the values of the numerical coefficients
947: $b_n$ depend on the cases (A1) and (A2) introduced above.
948: \begin{itemize}
949: \item[(A1)] Here, for the freely fluctuating colloid, the integration measure
950: was given by $\mc{D}f_i =dh_id{\bf {\hat f}}_i$. Upon change of variables
951: $h_i \to h_i-P_{i0}$, it is seen from Eq.~(\ref{eq:zmf1}) that the
952: $d$--dependent part of $\mc{Z}_{\rm mf}$ is given by $\det {\bf E}$.
953: For the case of vanishing line tension, the properties of $\det {\bf E}$
954: were discussed in detail in Ref.~\cite{Leh07}. In particular it turns out that
955: the four leading terms in the expansion of $V_{\rm mf}$ and $V_{\rm fluc}$
956: cancel each other ($b_m=-a_m$ for $m=0,1,2,3$) and the total effective potential
957: is given to leading order by
958: \bea
959: \beta V(d) &\approx & \frac{a_4+b_4}{d^8} \;.
960: \eea
961: This corresponds to a quadrupole--quadrupole interaction according to the
962: power counting in terms of the multipoles of either the fluctuating auxiliary
963: charge densities $\psi_{im}$ (for $V_{\rm fluc}$) or the fluctuating contact line
964: $P_{im}$ (for $V_{\rm mf}$). Hence, a nonvanishing line tension does not change
965: the leading power in $V(d)$ since the line tension contributions
966: (via $\mc{H}_{b,2}$, see Eq.~(\ref{eq:hb2})) to $\det {\bf E}$ are nonzero only for
967: contact line multipoles higher than dipoles.\footnote{The boundary Hamiltonian
968: contains also a line tension contribution for the monopole terms
969: $\propto (P_{i0}-h_i)^2$ (see Eq.~(\ref{eq:hb2})).
970: Upon integration over the colloid height $h_i$,
971: the line tension dependence here is absorbed in a $d$--independent
972: multiplicative factor in $\mc{Z}_{\rm mf}$, see Eq.~(\ref{eq:zmf1}).}
973: Therefore, including the line tension we find for the total effective potential
974: \bea
975: \label{eq:a1}
976: \beta V(d) & =& {\rm const.} -\frac{1-\frac{\di 3\, \hat \tau}
977: {\di \hat r_{0,{\rm eq}}^3}\,
978: \left(2-\frac{\di 3 \hat \tau}{\di \hat r_{0,{\rm eq}}^3} \right) }
979: {\left(1+\frac{\di \hat \tau}{\di \hat r_{0,{\rm eq}}^3}\right)^2}\;
980: \frac{1}{d^8}
981: \eea
982: The dependence of the effective potential on $\tau$ is depicted in
983: Fig.~\ref{fig:a1line}.
984: For positive line tensions, $\beta V(d)$ is always asymptotically attractive,
985: save for the value $\hat \tau/r_{0,{\rm eq}}^3 = 1/3$ where the coefficient
986: of the leading $d^{-8}$ term vanishes, and the effective potential becomes even
987: shorter ranged. For negative line tensions, we encounter a divergence of this
988: coefficient for $\hat \tau/r_{0,{\rm eq}}^3 \to -1$. This
989: divergence is related to the instability in the one--colloid partition function
990: at the interface already discussed following Eq.~(\ref{eq:instability}).
991: %
992: \begin{figure}
993: \begin{center}
994: \epsfig{file=fig5Coeff8final.eps, width=8cm}
995: \end{center}
996: \caption{For case (A1), the freely fluctuating colloid, the dependence of the
997: coefficient of the leading $d^{-8}$ term ($a_4+b_4$)
998: in the effective potential $V(d)$
999: on the line tension is shown. The dependence on $\tau$ enters through the
1000: reduced variable $x= \hat \tau/r_{0,{\rm eq}}^3$ where $\hat \tau = \tau/(\gamma R)$
1001: and $\hat r_{0,{\rm eq}}= r_{0,{\rm eq}}/R$. }
1002: \label{fig:a1line}
1003: \end{figure}
1004: %
1005: \item[(A2)] This case implies fixing the colloids at their equilibrium
1006: positions $z_{\rm eq}$. Thus in the integration measure for the contact
1007: line fluctuations the integration over the colloid height $h=z-z_{\rm eq}$ is
1008: absent, $\mc{D}f_i = d {\hat{\bf f}}_i$. According to Eq.~(\ref{eq:zmf1}),
1009: the quadratic form ${\hat{\bf f}}^T {\bf E}\; {\hat{\bf f}}$ in the
1010: Gaussian integral is slightly changed by the second exponential on the
1011: right hand side of Eq.~(\ref{eq:zmf1}). In particular, this leads to a changed
1012: leading coefficient $b_0$ in the mean--field free energy
1013: \bea
1014: b_0(d) = - \frac{1}{2}\, \ln \ln \frac{d}{r_{0,{\rm eq}}} +
1015: \frac{1}{2}\, \ln \left( 1 + \left[ 1-\frac{\di \hat \tau}
1016: {\di \hat r_{0,{\rm eq}}^3} \right] \ln \frac{d}{r_{0,{\rm eq}}} \right)\;.
1017: \eea
1018: Therefore, for case (A2) the leading term in the total effective potential contains
1019: a very long--ranged leading term of the form
1020: \bea
1021: \label{eq:a2}
1022: \beta V(d) &\approx & {\rm const.} +
1023: \frac{1}{2}\, \ln \left( 1 + \left[ 1-\frac{\di \hat \tau}
1024: {\di \hat r_{0,{\rm eq}}^3} \right] \ln \frac{d}{r_{0,{\rm eq}}} \right)\;,
1025: \eea
1026: which for $d \gg r_{0,{\rm eq}}$ slowly approaches the asymptotic
1027: form found for $V_{\rm fluc}$ (Eq.~(\ref{eq:a0})). Thus for fixed colloid position
1028: in the interface their pair correlation function
1029: $g(z_{\rm eq},z_{\rm eq},d)=-\exp(-\beta V(d))\propto - \ln(d/r_{0,{\rm eq}})$
1030: contains a long--ranged piece dominated by the fluctuating ``bulk" capillary waves
1031: only. This has also been found in a study treating the colloids as point
1032: particles \cite{Kai05} and in an analytical study of the pair correlation function
1033: in phase--separating 2d and 3d lattice models \cite{Mac07}, and the asymptotics
1034: of the colloid pair correlation function is the same as exhibited by the
1035: {\em fluid} pair correlation function in the interface region \cite{Wer76}.
1036: However, treating the finite size of the colloids correctly leads to sizeable
1037: corrections in the asymptotics of the effective pair potential (Eq.~(\ref{eq:a2})) and
1038: gives a nonzero $V(d)$ in the physically relevant case (A1) (it is zero in
1039: the limit of point colloids).
1040: %
1041: \end{itemize}
1042:
1043: \section{Conclusion}
1044:
1045: In this paper, we have studied the influence of capillary waves on the stability
1046: and interactions of colloids (with radius $R$) trapped at a fluid interface
1047: with surface tension $\gamma$, with particular
1048: attention to the effects of a line tension $\tau$.
1049: Quite often, the stability of colloids
1050: at a fluid interface with respect to vertical displacements $h$ from their
1051: equilibrium position is discussed using a rigid interface model.
1052: This gives for negligible line tensions and partially wetting colloids a steep
1053: potential well with spring constant $k=2\pi\gamma$.
1054: A finite line tension changes the spring constant by a term $\propto \tau/R$
1055: and may induce metastability for the trapped colloids for certain positive
1056: values of $\tau$. Within a perturbative model we have
1057: found that the potential well is considerably broadened by capillary waves
1058: (qualitatively, $k \to k/\ln(\lambda_c/R)$ where $\lambda_c$ is the capillary
1059: length in the interface system). This suggests also a reduction of the
1060: metastability barriers in case of positive line tensions, although
1061: calculations beyond our perturbative model (quadratic in the fluctuations)
1062: are needed for conclusive results.
1063:
1064: Capillary waves also induce effective interactions between two
1065: colloids which are of Casimir type. For freely fluctuating colloids a
1066: power-law dependence of the effective potential $V(d)$ in the intercolloidal distance
1067: $d$ is obtained, $V \propto d^{-8}$. A finite line tension does not change
1068: this power--law dependence, save for a specific positive value of $\tau$
1069: where the corresponding coefficient vanishes and $V(d)$ becomes even
1070: shorter--ranged, decaying at least $\propto d^{-10}$.
1071: Negative line tensions increase the amplitude
1072: of $V(d)$. For colloids fixed in the interface, the effective potential is
1073: equivalent to the potential of mean force between them and acquires a
1074: long--ranged component $V(d) \propto \ln(1+A\ln d)$ where $A$ is a line--tension
1075: dependent coefficient (see Eq.~(\ref{eq:a2})). For $d \gg R$,
1076: our results contain as a special case the long--ranged potential of mean force
1077: already discussed for pointlike colloids within an fluctuating interface.
1078:
1079: In previous work \cite{Leh06,Leh07} we have discussed the strong
1080: attractive component in the fluctuation force which occurs for
1081: small separations between the colloid. This strong attraction is independent of
1082: the surface properties and also of the line tension and can be understood
1083: from the capillary wave partition sum with stricht Dirichlet boundary conditions
1084: on the colloid surface (see Subsec.~\ref{sec:fluc}). Both short--ranged and
1085: long--ranged regimes of the effective fluctuation potential should be
1086: important for the
1087: aggregation of nanocolloids at interfaces and compete with
1088: other effective interactions such as of electrostatic origin
1089: \cite{Bre07,Oet08}.
1090:
1091: {\bf Acknowledgment:} M. O. thanks the organizers of CODEF II for their
1092: invitation and the German Science Foundation for
1093: financial support through the Collaborative Research Centre
1094: SFB-TR6 ``Colloids in External Fields”, project section D6-NWG.
1095:
1096: \begin{appendix}
1097:
1098: \section{Derivation of the boundary Hamiltonian}
1099: \label{app:boundary}
1100: %
1101: In this appendix we derive the boundary term
1102: $\mc{H}_{\rm b}$ which describes free energy changes upon shifting the
1103: contact line
1104: (cf. the result in Eqs.~(\ref{eq:hb})--(\ref{eq:hb2}) of Sec.~\ref{sec:cw}).
1105: According to Eqs.~(\ref{eq:hs})--(\ref{eq:hcw}) the boundary term is given by
1106: \bea
1107: \mc{H}_{\rm b}=
1108: \gamma_{\rm I}\Delta A_{\rm I}+\gamma_{\rm II}\Delta A_{\rm II}
1109: +\gamma\Delta A_{\rm proj}
1110: +\tau \Delta L
1111: \eea
1112: and contains contributions associated with the difference in the interface areas colloid/phase I and colloid/phase II
1113: between the configuration $\{u,z\}$ and the reference configuration
1114: $\{u=0,z_{\rm eq}\}$
1115: (given by $\Delta A_{\rm I}$ and $\Delta A_{\rm II}$, respectively) and the
1116: difference of the three--phase contact line length between these
1117: configurations (given by $\Delta L$). The term $\Delta A_{\rm proj}$
1118: describes the change in area (with respect to the reference configuration) of
1119: meniscus $u(\vect r)$ projected onto the plane $z=0$.
1120:
1121: If the three phase contact line is slowly varying without overhangs,
1122: the following geometric relation holds between its projection onto
1123: the plane $z=0$ (parametrized in polar coordinates by $r_0(\varphi)$) and the
1124: contact line $u_0=u(r_0(\varphi),\varphi)$ itself:
1125: %
1126: \bea\label{tpcph}
1127: r_0(\varphi)
1128: &=&
1129: \left[
1130: R^2-[u(r_0(\varphi),\varphi)-z]^2
1131: \right]^{1/2}
1132: %\nonumber
1133: \\
1134: &=&
1135: \left[
1136: r_{0,\rm eq}^2+2\,z_{\rm eq}\,\left[u(r_0(\varphi),\varphi)- h\right]
1137: -(u(r_0(\varphi),\varphi)-h)^2
1138: \right]^{1/2} \;.
1139: \nonumber
1140: \eea
1141: %
1142: In Eq.~(\ref{tpcph}), $r_{0,\rm eq}=\sqrt{R^2-z_{\rm eq}^2}$
1143: is the radius of the circular reference (or equilibrium) contact line,
1144: $h=z-z_{\rm eq}$ is the deviation of the
1145: colloid center from its equilibrium height
1146: and $u(r_0(\varphi),\varphi)$ is the actual height of the contact line
1147: parametrized in terms of the polar angle $\varphi$.
1148:
1149: Because of
1150: $A_{\rm II}=4\pi R^2-A_{\rm I}$,
1151: $\Delta A_{\rm I}=-\Delta A_{\rm II}$ holds
1152: for fluctuations of the colloid surface area in contact with fluid I and II, respectively.
1153: Then, the
1154: associated
1155: changes of the free energy
1156: can be written as
1157: %
1158: \bea\label{Hbapp1}
1159: \fl
1160: \gamma_{\rm I}\Delta A_{\rm I}
1161: +\gamma_{\rm II}\Delta A_{\rm II}
1162: &=&
1163: \gamma \cos\theta_0
1164: \int_{0}^{2\pi}d\varphi\int_{r_{0,\rm eq}}^{r_0(\varphi)}
1165: dr\,
1166: \frac{r}{\sqrt{1-r^2/R^2}}
1167: \nonumber \\
1168: \fl &=&
1169: -R\gamma \cos\theta_0
1170: \,\int_{0}^{2\pi}d\varphi\,\left[
1171: u(r_0(\varphi),\varphi)-h
1172: \right]
1173: \\
1174: \fl &\simeq&
1175: -\frac{\gamma R \cos\theta_0}{2z_{\rm eq}}\int_0^{2\pi}d\varphi\,
1176: \left[
1177: f- h
1178: \right]^2
1179: -\frac{\gamma R \cos\theta_0}{2z_{\rm eq}}\int_0^{2\pi}d\varphi\,
1180: \left[
1181: r_0^2(\varphi)-r_{0,{\rm ref}}^2
1182: \right]\;, \nonumber
1183: \eea
1184: %
1185: where we have applied Eq.~(\ref{tpcph}).
1186: Following Ref.~\cite{Oet05},
1187: in the last line we have
1188: approximated
1189: the actual height of the contact line by the meniscus height at the
1190: reference contact circle $\partial S_{\rm men,ref}$, i.e.
1191: $u(r_0(\varphi),\varphi)\approx u(r_{0,{\rm eq}},\varphi)\equiv f(\varphi)$.
1192: Correction terms to this approximation are at least of third order in
1193: $u$ and $f$~\cite{Oet05}.
1194:
1195: The free energy contribution associated with the change in projected meniscus area can be written as
1196: %
1197: \bea\label{Hbapp2}
1198: \gamma \Delta A_{\rm proj}
1199: &=&
1200: \gamma
1201: \int_0^{2\pi}d\varphi\int_{r_0(\varphi)}^{r_{0,\rm eq}}
1202: dr\,r
1203: %\nonumber\\
1204: =\frac{\gamma}{2}\int_0^{2\pi}d\varphi\,
1205: \left[
1206: r_{0,\rm eq }^2-r_0^2(\varphi)
1207: \right] \;.
1208: \eea
1209: %
1210: Combining Eqs.~(\ref{Hbapp1}) and~(\ref{Hbapp2}),
1211: applying again Eq.~(\ref{tpcph}) and using relation~(\ref{eq:zeq})
1212: for the equilibrium position of the colloid
1213: ($R\cos \theta_0 /z_{\rm eq}=\tau/(\gamma r_{0,\rm eq})-1$)
1214: we find
1215: %
1216: \bea\label{Hbapp3}
1217: \fl
1218: \gamma_{\rm I}\Delta A_{\rm I}
1219: +\gamma_{\rm II}\Delta A_{\rm II}
1220: +\gamma \Delta A_{\rm proj}
1221: %}\nonumber\\
1222: &=&
1223: \frac{\gamma}{2}\int_0^{2\pi}
1224: d\varphi\,
1225: [f-h]^2
1226: -
1227: \frac{\tau z_{\rm eq}}{r_{0,\rm eq}}\int_0^{2\pi}
1228: d\varphi\, [f-h]
1229: \;.
1230: \eea
1231: %
1232:
1233: The free energy contribution related to the
1234: length fluctuations of the contact line
1235: is written as
1236: %
1237: \bea\label{Hlin}
1238: \tau \Delta L
1239: &=&
1240: \tau\int_{0}^{2\pi} d\varphi\,
1241: \left[
1242: \sqrt{r_0(\varphi)^2
1243: +[\partial_\varphi r_0(\varphi)]^2
1244: +[\partial_\varphi u(r_0(\varphi),\varphi)]^2
1245: }
1246: -r_{0,\rm eq } \right]
1247: \nonumber\\
1248: &\simeq&
1249: \frac{\tau}{2r_{0,\rm eq}}
1250: \int_{0}^{2\pi}\!\!\!\! d\varphi\,
1251: \left[
1252: -\frac{R^2}{r_{0,\rm eq}^2}\,(f- h)^2
1253: +2 z_{\rm eq}
1254: \,(f- h)
1255: +\frac{R^2}{r_{0,\rm eq}^2}
1256: \,(\partial_\varphi f)^2
1257: \right]
1258: %\nonumber\\
1259: \eea
1260: %
1261: Comparing Eqs.~(\ref{Hbapp3})-(\ref{Hlin}), we find
1262: that the linear terms cancel out because the equilibrium
1263: position $z_{\rm eq}$ and $r_{0,\rm eq}$ are determined by
1264: Eq.~(\ref{eq:zeq}).
1265: Inserting the decomposition of $f(\varphi)$ from Eq.~(\ref{eq:conlin})
1266: and performing the integrals over $\varphi$
1267: finally leads to the form
1268: $\mc{H}_{\rm b} \simeq \mc{H}_{\rm b,1}+\mc{H}_{\rm b,2}$
1269: given in Eqs.~(\ref{eq:hb})--(\ref{eq:hb2}) for the
1270: the total boundary Hamiltonian,
1271: where the two contributions read
1272: %
1273: \bea\label{Hbapp4}
1274: \mc{H}_{\rm b,1}
1275: %&\simeq&
1276: %\frac{\gamma}{2}\int_0^{2\pi}d\varphi\,
1277: %\left[
1278: %f(\varphi)-h
1279: %\right]^2
1280: %\nonumber\\
1281: &=&\frac{\pi\gamma}{2}\left[
1282: 2(P_{0}-h)^2
1283: +4\sum_{m\ge 1}|P_{m}|^2
1284: \right]\;,
1285: \\
1286: \label{Hbapp5}
1287: \mc{H}_{\rm b,2}
1288: &=&
1289: \frac{\pi R^2\tau}{2r_{0,{\rm eq}}^3}
1290: \left[
1291: -2
1292: \,
1293: (P_{0}-h)^2
1294: +
1295: 4
1296: \sum_{m=1}^{\infty}
1297: \left(
1298: m^2-1
1299: \right)
1300: \,|P_{m}|^2
1301: \right] \;,
1302: \eea
1303: %
1304: and describe changes in colloid surface energy and in line energy, respectively,
1305: upon shifting the three phase contact line.
1306:
1307:
1308: \section{Derivation of the mean--field energy term in Eq.~(\ref{eq:umf})}
1309: \label{app:umf}
1310:
1311: Let $(r,\varphi)$ be polar coordinates in the equilibrium interface plane
1312: $z=0$ where $r=0$ is the center of the circle enclosed by the reference
1313: contact line.
1314: The solution to the mean--field equation
1315: $ (-\Delta+\lambda_c^{-2})\,u_{\rm mf}=0$
1316: with the boundary condition $u_{\rm mf}(r_{0,{\rm eq}},\varphi)=
1317: f(\varphi) = \sum_m P_m \exp({\rm i}m\varphi)$ is given by
1318: \bea
1319: u_{\rm mf}(r,\varphi) =\sum_{m=-\infty}^\infty P_m\, \exp({\rm i}m\varphi)\,
1320: \frac{K_{|m|}\left(\frac{\di r}{\di \lambda_c}\right)}
1321: {K_{|m|}\left(\frac{\di r_{0,{\rm eq}}}{\di \lambda_c}\right)}\;,
1322: \eea
1323: where $K_m$ is the modified Bessel function of the second kind and order
1324: $m$. For nanocolloids, $\lambda_c \gg R$, so that one can use the
1325: approximation
1326: \bea
1327: K_m(x) \approx \left\{
1328: \begin{array}{cr} -\ln(x/C) \qquad (C\simeq 1.12) & (m=0) \\
1329: (2m-2)!!\,x^{-m} & (m>0)
1330: \end{array} \right.
1331: \eea
1332: which is valid for $x \ll 1$. Thus we find
1333: (with $f' = df/dr$)
1334: \bea
1335: \fl
1336: \int_0^{2\pi} d\varphi \left(- u_{\rm mf}'(r_{0,{\rm eq}},\varphi)\,
1337: u_{\rm mf}(r_{0,{\rm eq}},\varphi)\right) \approx \frac{2\pi}{r_{0,{\rm eq}}}
1338: \left( \frac{P_0^2}{\ln (C\lambda_c/r_{0,{\rm eq}})} +
1339: 2\sum_{m= 1}^\infty m|P_m|^2 \right)
1340: \eea
1341: which immediately leads to Eq.~(\ref{eq:umf}).
1342:
1343: \end{appendix}
1344:
1345: \section*{References}
1346:
1347: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
1348:
1349: \bibitem{Bor01} Bordag M, Mohideen U and Mostepanenko V M 2001
1350: {\it Phys. Rep.} {\bf 353} 1
1351: \bibitem{Jaf04} Jaffe R L and Scardicchio A 2004 \PRL {\bf 92} 070402
1352: \bibitem{Bue04} B{\"u}scher R and Emig T 2004 \PR A {\bf 69} 062101
1353: \bibitem{Kre94} Krech M 1994 {\it The Casimir Effect in Critical Systems}
1354: (Singapore: World Scientific)
1355: \bibitem{Bec07} Hertlein C, Helden L, Gambassi A, Dietrich S and Bechinger C
1356: 2008 {\it Nature} {\bf 451} 172
1357: \bibitem{Kar99} Kardar M and Golestanian R 1999
1358: {\it Rev. Mod. Phys.} {\bf 71} 1233
1359: \bibitem{Kai05} Kaidi H, Bickel T and Benhamou M 2005 {\it EPL} {\bf 69} 15
1360: \bibitem{Aar04} Aarts D G A L , Schmidt M and Lekkerkerker H N W 2004
1361: {\it Science} {\bf 304} 847
1362: \bibitem{Gol96} Golestanian R, Goulian M and Kardar M 1996 \PR E {\bf 54} 6725
1363: \bibitem{Emi08} Emig T, Graham N, Jaffe R L and Kardar M 2008
1364: \PR D {\bf 77} 025005
1365: \bibitem{Gol00} Golestanian R 2000 \PR E {\bf 62} 5242
1366: \bibitem{Leh06} Lehle H, Oettel M and Dietrich S 2006 {\it EPL} {\bf 75} 174
1367: \bibitem{Leh07} Lehle H and Oettel M 2007 \PR E {\bf 75} 011602
1368: \bibitem{Pie80} Pieranski P 1980 \PRL {\bf 45} 569
1369: \bibitem{Ave96} Aveyard R and Clint J H 1996
1370: {\it J. Chem. Soc. Farad. Trans.} {\bf 92} 85
1371: \bibitem{Bre99} Bresme F and Quirke N 1999 \JCP {\bf 110} 3536
1372: \bibitem{Bre99a} Bresme F and Quirke N 1999
1373: {\it Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.} {\bf 1} 2149
1374: \bibitem{Gib61} Gibbs J W 1961
1375: {\it The Scientific Papers of J. Willard Gibbs}
1376: vol~1 (Ox Bow Press Connecticut) p 288
1377: \bibitem{Row02} Rowlinson J S and Widom B 2002
1378: {\it Molecular Theory of Capillarity} (New York: Dover)
1379: \bibitem{Ami04} Amirfazli A and Neumann A W 2004
1380: {\it Adv. Coll. Int. Sci.} {\bf 110} 121
1381: \bibitem{Dre96} Drelich J 1996 {\it Colloids Surf. A} {\bf 116} 43
1382: \bibitem{Schim07} Schimmele L, Napi\'orkowski M and Dietrich S 2007
1383: \JCP {\bf 127} 164715
1384: \bibitem{Par07}
1385: Park B J, Pantina J P, Furst E, Oettel M, Reynaert S and Vermant J
1386: 2007 {\it Langmuir} {\bf 24} 1686
1387: \bibitem{Mec99} Mecke K and Dietrich S 1999 \PR E {\bf 59} 6766
1388: \bibitem{Dai00} Fradin C, Braslau A, Luzet D, Smilgies D, Alba M, Boudet N,
1389: Mecke K and Daillant J 2000 {\it Nature} {\bf 403} 871
1390: \bibitem{Mil02} Milchev A and Binder K 2002 {\it EPL} {\bf 59} 81
1391: \bibitem{Dai03} Mora S, Daillant J, Mecke K, Luzet D, Braslau A, Alba M
1392: and Struth B 2003 \PRL {\bf 90} 216101
1393: \bibitem{Tol04} Madsen A, Seydel T, Sprung M, Gutt C, Tolan M and
1394: Gr\"ubel G 2004 \PRL {\bf 91} 096104
1395: \bibitem{Vin05} Vink R, Horbach J and Binder K 2005 \JCP {\bf 122} 134905
1396: \bibitem{Tar07} Tarazona P, Checa R and Chac\'on E 2007 \PRL {\bf 99} 196101
1397: \bibitem{Oet05} Oettel M, Dominguez A and Dietrich S 2005 \PR E {\bf 71} 051401
1398: \bibitem{Buf65} Buff F P, Lovett A and Stillinger F H 1965 \PRL {\bf 15} 621
1399: \bibitem{Klei_book} Kleinert H 1990 {\it Path integrals}
1400: (Singapore: World Scientific) chapter 5
1401: \bibitem{Kra00} Kralchevsky P A and Nagayama K 2000
1402: {\it Adv. Coll. Interface Sci.} {\bf 85} 145
1403: \bibitem{Vel05} Vella D and Mahadevan L 2005 {\it Am. J. Phys.} {\bf 73} 817
1404: \bibitem{For04} Foret L and W{\"u}rger A 2004 \PRL {\bf 92} 058302
1405: \bibitem{Oet06} Oettel M, Dominguez A and Dietrich S 2006
1406: {\it Langmuir} {\bf 22} 846
1407: \bibitem{Li91} Li H and Kardar M 1991 \PRL {\bf 67} 3275
1408: \bibitem{Mac07} Abraham D B, Essler F H and Maciolek A 2007 \PRL {\bf 98} 170602
1409: \bibitem{Wer76} Wertheim M S 1976 \JCP {\bf 65} 2377
1410: \bibitem{Bre07} Bresme F and Oettel M 2007 \JPCM {\bf 19} 413101
1411: \bibitem{Oet08} Oettel M and Dietrich S 2008 {\it Langmuir} {\bf 24} 1425
1412:
1413:
1414:
1415:
1416:
1417:
1418:
1419:
1420:
1421: \end{thebibliography}
1422:
1423: \end{document}
1424: