1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \begin{document}
4:
5: \title{A $^{12}$CO, $^{13}$CO, and C$^{18}$O Survey of Infrared Dark Clouds}
6:
7: \author{Fujun Du, Ji Yang}
8: \affil{Purple Mountain Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences}
9: \affil{2 West Beijing Road, Nanjing 210008}
10: \email{fjdu@pmo.ac.cn}
11: \email{jiyang@pmo.ac.cn}
12:
13: \begin{abstract}
14: InfraRed Dark Clouds (IRDCs) are extinction features against the Galactic infrared background, mainly in mid-infrared band.
15: Recently they were proposed to be potential sites of massive star formation.
16: In this work we have made $^{12}$CO, $^{13}$CO, and C$^{18}$O (J=1$\rightarrow$0)\ survey of 61 IRDCs,
17: 52 of which are in the first Galactic quadrant, selected from a catalog given by Simon et al. (2006),
18: while the others are in the outer Galaxy, selected by visually inspecting the MSX images.
19: Detection rates in the three CO lines are 90\%, 71\%, and 62\% respectively.
20: The distribution IRDCs in the first Galactic quadrant is consistent with the 5 kpc molecular ring picture,
21: while slight trace of spiral pattern can also be noticed, which needs to be further examined.
22: The IRDCs have typical excitation temperature of 10 K and typical column density of several $10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$.
23: Their typical physical size is estimated to be several $pc$s using angular sizes from the Simon catalog.
24: Typical volume density and typical LTE mass are $\sim$5000 cm$^{-3}$ and $\sim$5000 M$_\odot$ respectively.
25: The IRDCs are in or near virial equilibrium.
26: The properties of IRDCs are similar to those of star forming molecular clumps,
27: and they seem to be intermediate between giant molecular clouds and Bok globules,
28: thus they may represent early stages of massive star formation.
29: \end{abstract}
30:
31: \keywords{dust, extinction --- Galaxy: structure --- infrared: ISM --- radio lines: ISM --- stars: formation}
32:
33: \section{Introduction}
34: The infrared dark clouds (IRDCs), revealed by the Midcourse Space
35: Experiment (MSX), are dark extinction features against the Galactic
36: mid-infrared background \citep{Egan1998a},
37: usually with filamentary or compact shapes, mostly at 8.6 -- 10.6 ~$\mu$m.
38: High opacity suggests the IRDCs might have high gas column density.
39: \citet{Carey1998a, Carey2000a} showed that the IRDCs have column densities as high as $10^{23}$ cm$^{-2}$,
40: gas density $\sim$$10^5$ -- $10^6$ cm$^{-3}$,
41: with distances to the sun $\sim$1 -- 8 kpc, and diameters $\sim$0.4 -- 15 pc.
42: The masses of the clouds they observed are estimated to be from tens of to thousands of solar masses,
43: while the temperatures are typically 10 -- 25 K.
44: Based on millimeter-to-mid-IR continuum observation of an MSXDC,
45: \citet{Rathborne2005a} found very high luminosities, 9000 -- 32,000 L$_\odot$, of the cores,
46: and they concluded that it must be forming massive stars.
47: \citet{Ragan2006a} mapped 41 IRDCs in N$_2$H$^+$ 1$\rightarrow$0, CS 2$\rightarrow$1, and C$^{18}$O 1$\rightarrow$0.
48: They found that different species often show striking differences in morphologies,
49: which were attributed to differences in evolutionary state and/or the
50: presence of undetected, deeply embedded protostars.
51: Average mass of the clouds is estimated to be $\sim$2500 M$_\odot$ using N$_2$H$^+$ observations,
52: which is consistent with the previous studies of massive star-forming regions.
53: The typical line width of the clouds they observed is 2 -- 3 km s$^{-1}$.
54: \citet{Rathborne2006a} found that the mass spectrum of IRDC cores
55: derived from millimeter maps is consistent with the stellar IMF.
56: Assuming each core will form a single star, they concluded that the
57: majority of these cores will form OB stars.
58: The IRDC cores are similar to the hot cores associated with individual,
59: young high-mass stars, except that they are much colder, thus \citet{Rathborne2006a}
60: suggested that the IRDCs represent an earlier evolutionary phase in
61: massive star formation, and they may be cold precursors to star clusters.
62: A water maser survey of 140 IRDC compact cores of \citet{Wang2006a}
63: revealed that the detection rate of H$_2$O masers for higher mass
64: cores is significantly higher than that of lower mass cores.
65: They suggest that the most massive IRDC cores without H$_2$O maser may be
66: at an earlier stage than the protostellar phases.
67: A survey in\ $^{13}$CO by \citet{Simon2006b} established kinematic
68: distances to 313 IRDCs. They derived typical sizes of $\sim$5 pc, peak
69: column densities of $\sim$10$^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$, LTE masses of $\sim$5$\times10^3$
70: M$_\odot$, and volume-averaged H$_2$ densities of $\sim$2$\times10^3$ cm$^{-3}$.
71: \citet{Beuther2007a} discovered a protostar in an IRDC, which will probably become a massive star.
72: These previous studies suggest that IRDCs can be ideal candidates to study the
73: initial conditions and early stages of massive star formation.
74:
75: An IRDC catalog has been published by \citet{Simon2006a}.
76: Clouds in this catalog are in the first and fourth quadrant of the
77: Galaxy. The authors used the MSX A band data to construct a background model,
78: and then searched for regions with rapid decrease with respect to this background.
79: The IRDC candidates are defined by contiguous regions
80: bounded by closed contours of 2$\sigma$ decremental contrast threshold.
81: The catalog contains 10,931 IRDCs, and 12,774 cores, with reliability estimated to be 82\%.
82: The distribution of IRDCs is in good correspondence with the diffuse Galactic infrared background.
83: There are more IRDCs toward the star-forming regions, the spiral arm tangents, and the 5 kpc molecular ring.
84:
85: As part of our campaign to search for candidates of massive star forming
86: clouds, we selected a sample of 61 clouds mainly from the IRDC
87: catalog given by \citet{Simon2006a} and observed them in $J=1\rightarrow0$
88: lines of $\rm ^{12}CO$, $\rm ^{13}CO$, and $\rm C^{18}O$ in single
89: point mode. In this article we report the results of this survey.
90:
91: \section{Source Selection}
92: Our sources are mainly selected from the Simon catalog of IRDCs \citep{Simon2006a}.
93: We first found out those IRDCs with contrast greater than 0.4,
94: area larger than $1'\times1'$, and declination greater than about $-22^\circ$.
95: Here ``contrast'' is defined as $\rm (Background-Image)/Background$ \citep{Simon2006a}.
96: After this first round selection, there are 209 sources left.
97: Then we divided the sources into groups by a 2 degrees step in Galactic longitude,
98: and selected from each group one or more ``representatives''
99: with the most prominent extinction features and relatively well-defined boundaries by visually inspecting the MSX images.
100: After this step, there are 52 sources left, which comprise the major part of our survey.
101: Except for 9 sources, whose Galactic coordinates are taken to be the first or second peak positions,
102: the coordinates of the other objects are taken to be the cloud centroid position from the Simon catalog.
103:
104: Besides these, we also selected 9 supplementary IRDC candidates against the bright mid-infrared background
105: in the second and third Galatic quadrant by visual inspection of the MSX images.
106: Their coordinates are taken to be the estimated extinction peaks.
107: The identification of IRDC in the outer Galaxy is difficult,
108: as the background emission is weaker and the MSX image quality is lower in these regions than in the inner Galaxy.
109: We hope to get some hint on the existence and/or distribution of IRDCs in the outer Galaxy from the enrollment of these 9 targets.
110:
111: In Table \ref{tab:sname_coordinates} we list the source names, Galactic coordinates,
112: and Equatorial coordinates used during the observation.
113: Figure \ref{fig:Gala_distri} shows the Galactic distribution of our
114: sample; the sources out of the first quadrant are not plotted in this
115: figure. We notice that almost none of our sources fall in the range
116: between $l=50^\circ$ and $l=70^\circ$, which clearly inherits a feature of
117: the Simon catalog (cf. Figure 5 of \citet{Simon2006a}).
118: Figure \ref{fig:area_pc_distri} shows histograms of the area and peak contrast of our sample,
119: with data taken from \citet{Simon2006a}.
120:
121: \clearpage
122: \pagestyle{plaintop}
123: \setlength{\voffset}{0mm}
124: \input{tab1}
125: \clearpage
126:
127: \begin{figure}[htbp]
128: \plotone{f1.eps}
129: \figcaption{Distribution of our sample in Galactic coordinates, with histograms of Galactic longitudes and latitudes overplotted.\label{fig:Gala_distri}}
130: \end{figure}
131:
132: \begin{figure}[htbp]
133: \plottwo{f2a.eps}{f2b.eps}
134: \figcaption{Histogram of IRDC angular area and peak contrast of our sample.
135: Notice that the abscissa of the histogram of area is in log scale. \label{fig:area_pc_distri}}
136: \end{figure}
137: \clearpage
138:
139: \section{Observation}
140: Our observations were taken during the observation season between 2006 and 2007
141: with the 13.7 m radio telescope in Delingha, China, which is operated by Purple Mountain Observatory.
142:
143: The SIS receiver used during the observation works in a double sideband mode.
144: The three CO lines are received simultaneously, with $^{12}$CO in the upper sideband and
145: $^{13}$CO and C$^{18}$O in the lower sideband \citep{Zuo2004a}.
146: The total system temperature is typically about 200\ --\ 300 K for the CO observations.
147: The backend AOS spectrometers have a resolution of 0.142 MHz (corresponding to a velocity resolution of
148: 0.37 km s$^{-1}$) for $^{12}$CO, and 0.042 MHz (0.11 km s$^{-1}$) for $^{13}$CO\ and C$^{18}$O, with
149: bandwidth being 378 km s$^{-1}$, 116 km s$^{-1}$, and 118 km s$^{-1}$ respectively.
150: The observations were taken in position switch mode.
151: Data were calibrated using the standard chopper wheel method.
152:
153: The absolute pointing of the telescope has an RMS
154: accuracy of about $10''$ during the observations.
155: The main beam width is about $1^\prime$.
156: The stability of the receiver and the pointing were checked every two hours by observing stand sources.
157: The observed intensities were corrected for the main beam efficiency,
158: which was obtained from observations of standard sources and planets.
159: Taking into account of the uncertainty in the main beam efficiency,
160: and the fact that the coupling efficiency is different for each object,
161: the observed intensities of our sources can be treated as certain within a factor of 1.5.
162: Data are processed using the CLASS package of GILDAS software.
163:
164: \section{Results}
165: A sample of 61 IRDCs, most of whose coordinates are taken to be the cloud coordinates in the Simon catalog,
166: have been surveyed in $^{12}$CO, $^{13}$CO, and C$^{18}$O.
167: Due to different available observation time and varying weather
168: conditions for each target, the resulting RMS noises for each source as well as for
169: each line are different. Typical noises are in the range 0.1 K to 0.5 K for
170: these lines.
171: A 3-$\sigma$ criterion is used to determine whether a source is detected in a line
172: or not. But for a few sources, weaker criteria were used.
173: Detection rate for each line is calculated correspondingly.
174: Table \ref{tab:brief_sum} is a brief summary of our survey.
175: Apparently the $^{12}$CO lines usually have more velocity components detectable than $^{13}$CO and C$^{18}$O,
176: even if in the same bandwidth. The number of sources with just one component in $^{13}$CO is less than that
177: of $^{12}$CO and C$^{18}$O, because for weak sources $^{13}$CO may be undetectable on one hand,
178: and for strong sources $^{13}$CO might have more than one components on the other hand.
179:
180: \clearpage
181: \begin{table}
182: \caption{Summary of the survey.}
183: \label{tab:brief_sum}
184: \begin{tabular}{l c c c }
185: \hline\hline
186: $^\#$Components & $^{12}$CO & $^{13}$CO & C$^{18}$O \\
187: \hline
188: None & 6 (10\%) & 18 (30\%) & 23 (38\%) \\
189: One & 19 (31\%) & 16 (26\%) & 26 (42\%) \\
190: Two & 11 (18\%) & 16 (26\%) & 8 (13\%)\\
191: Three & 14 (23\%) & 8 (13\%) & 3 (5\%) \\
192: Four & 5 (8\%) & 3 (5\%) & 1 (2\%) \\
193: More & 6 (10\%) & 0 & 0 \\
194: \hline
195: Detected & 55 & 43 & 38 \\
196: Total & 61 & 61 & 61 \\
197: Detection Rate & 90\% & 71\% & 62\%\\
198: \hline
199: \end{tabular}
200: \end{table}
201: \clearpage
202:
203: For those sources with multiple velocity components,
204: it is more likely that the components that are detectable in the rarer isotope lines
205: or those with the largest optical depths are physically associated with the infrared extinction features,
206: although the ultimate way to determine the velocity corresponding to the extinction feature is to fully map the
207: region, which is rather time consuming and yet to be carried out.
208: In practice, we used the following criteria: if a source is detected in C$^{18}$O, then
209: the components of the three CO isotope lines corresponding to those detected in C$^{18}$O
210: are recorded (with precedence level assigned according to their optical depths);
211: if it is not detected in C$^{18}$O, then we use $^{13}$CO to determine which
212: components to use; if it is neither detected in $^{13}$CO, then all the components of
213: $^{12}$CO are recorded.
214:
215: In Table \ref{tab:results_61src_obs} we list the observational
216: results of our single point survey. The source names used during the observation are just simple
217: combinations of the Galactic coordinates, which are in accordance with the Simon catalog.
218: In this table, sources with multiple components have more than one records labeled
219: with number followed by letter a, b, c, \ldots, in descending order of C$^{18}$O optical depth if it is detected,
220: otherwise $^{13}$CO optical depth or $^{12}$CO intensity is used for ordering.
221: For each cloud, the LSR velocity is taken to be the Gaussian fit velocity of $^{13}$CO\ if
222: $^{13}$CO\ is detected, otherwise that of $^{12}$CO\ is
223: used. This is because $^{12}$CO lines tend to be saturated and the Gaussian fit
224: velocity may be inaccurate, while C$^{18}$O lines suffer from the low signal to noise ratio.
225: As 15 sources have already been mapped by \citet{Simon2006b} in $^{13}$CO,
226: we compared our results with theirs, and find that the velocities we adopted
227: are generally in agreement with theirs, with just one exception, viz., G050.39-00.41.
228: For this source, the velocity component at V$_{LSR}$=41 km s$^{-1}$ is evidently self-absorbed in $^{12}$CO,
229: therefore the optical depth of $^{13}$CO and C$^{18}$O of this component could be overestimated.
230: Thus for this source we take the velocity of its first component to be in accordance with \citet{Simon2006b}.
231: G028.51+03.60, G038.77+00.78, and G084.81-01.09 also have self-absorption features in $^{12}$CO,
232: but each of them have only one component in C$^{18}$O, so there's no confusion for these three sources.
233: This comparison might indicate a reliablity of 94\% of the LSR velocities allocated to each source.
234:
235: In Table \ref{tab:results_61src_phy} we list the physical properties of these sources.
236: Parameters derived from $^{13}$CO\ and C$^{18}$O\ are both listed here for comparison.
237: For sources with multiple components, the first components in Table \ref{tab:results_61src_obs}
238: are used to derive the physical parameters.
239: The excitation temperatures are derived from the peak $^{12}$CO\ temperature; for sources with apparent self-absorption,
240: the values derived this way may be unreliable.
241: Distance of each source is derived from the LSR velocity using a Galactic rotation curve model given by \citet{Fich1989a}.
242: The adopted distances are always the nearer one, as the IRDCs appear to be extinction features.
243: We also tried the rotation curve of \citet{Clemens1985a},
244: and found that the differences in the results of these two models are typically less than 0.2 kpc, with an upper limit of 0.5 kpc.
245: Following \citet{Simon2006b}, the source sizes are calculated using the
246: kinematic distances derived here and the major and minor axis lengths in the Simon catalog.
247: For sources in the outer galaxy, their angular sizes are estimated from the MSX images.
248:
249: The column densities of H$_2$ are derived assuming a simple LTE model,
250: with a moderate $^{13}$CO\ abundance of $1\times10^{-6}$,
251: and C$^{18}$O\ abundance of $1.4\times10^{-7}$ (\citet{Dickman1978a, Burgh2007a, Kramer1999a, Frerking1982a}).
252: The volume densities are derived by simply dividing the column densities by the sizes,
253: and the masses are just the products of column densities and areas.
254: Although the volume densities and masses derived here are not very reliable,
255: as the sizes of the extinction features calculated here may not reflect the actual molecular cloud sizes,
256: they should be qualitatively correct.
257: In comparison with the results of \citet{Simon2006b}, we find that our results are consistent with theirs within a factor of 2.
258:
259:
260: \clearpage
261: \pagestyle{empty}
262: \setlength{\voffset}{25mm}
263: \input{tab3}
264: \clearpage
265: \pagestyle{plaintop}
266: \setlength{\voffset}{0mm}
267: \input{tab4}
268: \clearpage
269:
270: \section{Analysis}
271:
272: \subsection{Detection rate}
273: Using a 3$\sigma$ criterion, the detection rate is 90\% for $^{12}$CO, 71\% for
274: $^{13}$CO, and 62\% for C$^{18}$O\ (Table \ref{tab:brief_sum}).
275: The detection rate is higher in the inner Galactic region than in the outer region.
276: If restricted to the first Galactic quadrant, then the detection rate becomes 94\%, 77\%, and 73\%, for the three lines, respectively;
277: while the detection rate for these three lines is 67\%, 33\%, and 0\% in the outer regions.
278: About 60\% of the sources in our sample have multiple components in $^{12}$CO,
279: but only 70\% of them are detectable in $^{13}$CO, and one third of them are detectable in C$^{18}$O.
280: If we treat each velocity component as individual sources,
281: then the total number of components in $^{12}$CO is 137, while 62\% of them are detectable in $^{13}$CO,
282: and 40\% of them are detectable in C$^{18}$O, at an RMS noise level of 0.1 K -- 0.4 K.
283: As the IRDCs are believed to be dense condensations of molecular gases,
284: emissions from dense gas tracers such as C$^{18}$O are expected, thus the components without detectable
285: counterparts in $^{13}$CO or C$^{18}$O may not be associated with the IRDCs.
286:
287: \subsection{Distribution in the Galaxy}
288: The Galactic distribution of our sample is shown in Figure \ref{fig:distri_Gala},
289: overlaid with four spiral arms with parameters from \citet{Taylor1993a} for comparison.
290: Besides the expected concentration of sources near the sun,
291: another obvious feature is that about 60\% of the detected objects are in a ring with Galactocentric distance from $\sim$4 kpc to $\sim$6 kpc,
292: which is consistent with the 5 kpc molecular ring picture of the Galaxy \citep{Simon2001a}.
293: Figure \ref{fig:distri_Gala} also shows a slight trace of spiral pattern,
294: in that the sources in the first quadrant are seemingly distributed in three segments with about 15 objects in each,
295: which looks like the Galactic spiral structure in this region, namely,
296: the local spur, the Sagittarius-Carina arm, and the Scuturn-Crux arm \citep{Vallee2005a} (see also \citet{Solomon1989a, Russeil2003a}),
297: while the Norma arm is missing due to the limited declination coverage of the telescope.
298: However, uncertainties in the kinematic distances and the small scale of our sample make this pattern insignificant.
299: Although the errors caused by uncertainties in LSR velocities are not significant, typically less than 0.1 kpc,
300: and different rotation curve models usually yield similar results with discrepancies less than 0.5 kpc,
301: however, random and/or streaming motions of individual clouds can affect distance determination significantly,
302: which can cause errors as high as several kpc.
303: Error bars calculated assuming a velocity uncertainty of 10 km s$^{-1}$ are overploted on Figure \ref{fig:distri_Gala} for sources farther than 2 kpc from the sun.
304: Although we can still see some spiral pattern with these error bars,
305: however, irregular velocity caused by streaming motions and shocks can sometimes be as large as 30 km s$^{-1}$ \citep{Brand1993a},
306: and errors of this scale can entirely damage any spiral pattern.
307: At this stage it is hard to tell whether the pattern is true or just coincident as our sample is not large and uniform enough.
308: Actually, if we treat all the velocity components detected in $^{12}$CO as individual sources,
309: and plot them on the Galactic plane with corresponding kinematic distances, then no sign of spiral pattern can be identified.
310: Thus we can conjecture that maybe only a subclass of molecular clouds (e.g., the densest and the most massive ones) are distributed in spirals, if there are any spirals at all.
311:
312: Some sources out of the first quadrant have anomalous LSR velocities, e.g.,
313: $\rm G173.38+02.57$ in the second quadrant has an LSR velocity of $-18$ km s$^{-1}$,
314: and the distance derived from the rotation curve is 19.5 kpc, which seems to be unreasonable.
315: This kind of peculiar velocity is usually attributed to streaming motions \citep{Russeil2007a}
316: which is believed to be caused by the spiral shocks in the density wave theory.
317: In Table \ref{tab:results_61src_obs} we notice that the sources in the second quadrant with detectable CO emission
318: all have rather negative velocities, while those in the third quadrant all have positive velocities,
319: which is in good agreement with the results of \citet{Russeil2007a} (see also \citet{Brand1993a}),
320: wherein it is stated that the Perseus arm exhibits minus V$_{LSR}$ departures in the
321: second quadrant and positive departures in the third quadrant,
322: suggesting that these outer sources are in the Perseus arm, rather than further in the Cygnus arm.
323: The sources not in the first quadrant with loose shapes and lacking detectable $^{13}$CO or C$^{18}$O lines
324: may be distinct in nature with the other typical IRDCs.
325: The enrollment of these sources into our sample is merely supplementary.
326: It is probable that the IRDCs identified in the outer Galaxy are false due to weak and noisy infrared background.
327:
328:
329: \clearpage
330: \begin{figure}[htbp]
331: \plotone{f3.eps}
332: \figcaption{A face-on view of our sample in the Galactic plane.
333: Sizes of the circles are roughly proportional to the IRDC sizes, and the grayscales filling the
334: circles represent the excitation temperatures (the darkest are with the highest T$_{ex}$).
335: The error bars for sources farther than 2 kpc from the sun represent distance uncertainties calculated using the rotation curve model
336: by adding or subtracting their individual V$_{LSR}$ by 10 km s$^{-1}$.
337: Spiral arms are drawn using cubic splines with fiducial points taken from \citet{Taylor1993a}.
338: Solar distance distribution is shown in the upper histogram.
339: The lower panel histogram shows the number distribution with Galactocentric radius,
340: weighted by the area of the corresponding face-on segment (following \citet{Simon2006b}).
341: The vertical scale of the histogram is arbitrary, and it is proportional to the surface density of IRDCs in the Galaxy plane.
342: \label{fig:distri_Gala}}
343: \end{figure}
344: \clearpage
345:
346: \subsection{Physical properties of the IRDCs}
347: The mean excitation temperature derived from $^{12}$CO spectrum is 10 K,
348: which confirms the assumption in \citet{Simon2006b}.
349: The mean T$_R^\ast$ are 6 K and 2 K for $^{13}$CO and C$^{18}$O respectively.
350: A histogram of excitation temperature and its variation with Galactocentric distance is shown in Figure \ref{fig:Tex}.
351: Excitation temperature is roughly twice higher in the inner Galaxy than in the outer regions.
352:
353: Histogram of optical depths of $^{13}$CO and C$^{18}$O is shown in Figure \ref{fig:htau};
354: also shown is their variation with Galactocentric distance.
355: The mean optical depth is 1.4 and 0.3 respectively.
356: For sources detected in $^{13}$CO, 30\% have optical depth greater than unity,
357: while almost all sources are thin in C$^{18}$O.
358: The optical depth ratio of C$^{18}$O to $^{13}$CO has a mean value of $0.16\simeq1/6$,
359: which is roughly consistent with the abundance ratio we assumed at the beginning.
360: Optical depths of the highly saturated lines derived here may be rather inaccurate.
361:
362: The $^{12}$CO spectrum of several clouds are evidently self-absorbed.
363: The most apparent ones are G028.51+03.60, G038.77+00.78, and G050.39$-$00.41.
364: Spectrum of some clouds have indications of wide line-wings, which may be due to outflow motions triggered by star forming activities.
365:
366: \clearpage
367: \begin{figure}[htbp]
368: \plottwo{f4a.eps}{f4b.eps}
369: \figcaption{Histogram of excitation temperature and its variation with Galactocentric distance.
370: The smooth thick gray curve shows the general trend of the variation,
371: with values averaged at each radius (the same for the other similar figures hereinafter, without further notice).
372: \label{fig:Tex}}
373: \end{figure}
374: \begin{figure}[htbp]
375: \plottwo{f5a.eps}{f5b.eps}
376: \figcaption{The left panel shows histograms of the optical depth of $^{13}$CO and C$^{18}$O.
377: Notice that different horizontal scales are used for $^{13}$CO and C$^{18}$O respectively.
378: The right panel shows the variation of the C$^{18}$O optical depth with Galactic radius.
379: \label{fig:htau}}
380: \end{figure}
381: \clearpage
382:
383:
384: We used the angular sizes in the Simon catalog as we cannot derive reasonable sizes merely from single point observations.
385: Linear sizes are calculated from angular sizes and kinematic distances just obtained.
386: Histogram of sizes, column densities, and masses are shown in Figures \ref{fig:hphysize} -- \ref{fig:hmass}.
387: The detection limit of column density is about $10^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$ for our survey.
388: The mean size of our sample is 4 pc.
389: The mean column density of H$_2$ derived from $^{13}$CO and C$^{18}$O are $2\times10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$
390: and $3\times10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$, while the mean LTE mass derived from $^{13}$CO and C$^{18}$O are 4500 and 7000 M$_\odot$,
391: and the mean volume density are 4400 and 6600 cm$^{-3}$ respectively,
392: which are consistent with the results of \citet{Simon2006b}.
393: The typical column density of our sample is not as high as that of some previous work, e.g., \citet{Carey1998a}.
394: This is understandable due to the limitation in the tracers we observed,
395: and the positions we targeted may not be the at the peaks of the clouds.
396: Column densities derived from $^{13}$CO tend to be underestimated due to saturation effect,
397: and masses derived from $^{13}$CO are usually smaller than that derived from C$^{18}$O, as the same sizes are used in calculating masses.
398:
399: The mean line width of $^{13}$CO is 4 km s$^{-1}$ (Figure \ref{fig:hdVel}), while that of C$^{18}$O is 3 km s$^{-1}$,
400: much broader than that of some visually opaque regions \citep{Myers1983a}.
401: As finite optical depth can broaden the line profile, we attempted to make correction to the line width.
402: Assuming Gaussian profile for the distribution of optical depth with respect to velocity,
403: then the observed line width is related to the ``true'' line width by
404: $$\rm \frac{\Delta V_{\it line}}{\Delta V_{\it true}}=\sqrt{\frac{\ln\left[\tau_0/\ln\left(2/\left(1+e^{-\tau_0}\right)\right)\right]}{\ln2}}$$
405: where $\tau_0$ is the peak optical depth.
406: After converting the line widths into ``true'' widths,
407: the ``true'' widths of $^{13}$CO and C$^{18}$O become closer, although those of $^{13}$CO are still about 1.2 -- 2 times broader.
408: There are two possibilities.
409: Maybe the intrinsic line width of $^{13}$CO and C$^{18}$O is the same if their abundance ratio is constant throughout the cloud;
410: the reason why those of $^{13}$CO are broader might be that
411: the $^{13}$CO lines are rather saturated and the optical depths derived here tend to be underestimated,
412: which makes the previous modification insufficient.
413: However, it is more likely that the C$^{18}$O line widths are intrinsically narrower.
414: As the C$^{18}$O lines tend to trace denser regions,
415: the kinematic structure of the cloud might cause this kind of discrepancy in velocity dispersion;
416: it is possibile that in the central region the kinematic energy is dissipated to give way to the further collapse or accretion motion.
417: As is speculated by \citet{Myers1983b}, turbulence in the macro-scale is primarily caused by collisions and drag,
418: while there is no such source in the micro-scale, and turbulence in this scale can continuously decay.
419: However, our current survey is insufficient to give any definite clue to this, and detailed map of central regions in dense gas tracers are needed.
420:
421: \clearpage
422:
423: \begin{figure}[htbp]
424: \plottwo{f6a.eps}{f6b.eps}
425: \figcaption{Histogram of size and its variation with Galactocentric distance. \label{fig:hphysize}}
426: \end{figure}
427:
428: \begin{figure}[htbp]
429: \plottwo{f7a.eps}{f7b.eps}
430: \figcaption{
431: Left: Histogram of H$_2$ column densities derived from $^{13}$CO and C$^{18}$O.
432: Right: Variation of column density derived from $^{13}$CO with Galactocentric distance.
433: \label{fig:distri_ncolden}}
434: \end{figure}
435:
436: \begin{figure}[htbp]
437: \plottwo{f8a.eps}{f8b.eps}
438: \figcaption{
439: Left: Histogram of cloud LTE mass derived from $^{13}$CO and C$^{18}$O.
440: Right: Variation of LTE mass derived from $^{13}$CO with Galactocentric distance.
441: \label{fig:hmass}}
442: \end{figure}
443:
444: \begin{figure}[htbp]
445: \plottwo{f9a.eps}{f9b.eps}
446: \figcaption{Histogram of line width and the variation of C$^{18}$O line width with Galactocentric distance.
447: \label{fig:hdVel}}
448: \end{figure}
449: \clearpage
450:
451: The line widths mainly originate from turbulent motions,
452: and we may compare the kinematic energy density with the gravitational energy density.
453: Assuming uniform spheres, the ratio of twice the kinematic energy density to gravitational energy density can be expressed as
454: $$\alpha=\frac{5\sigma^2R}{G M},$$
455: which is denominated virial parameter by some authors \citep{Bertoldi1992a, Krumholz2005a}.
456: Here R is the radius of the sphere, $\sigma$ is the average total one-dimensional velocity dispersion,
457: which is related to the Gaussian fit FWHM by $\sigma$$=$${\rm FWHM}$$/$$\sqrt{8\ln2}$.
458: Histogram of $\alpha$ for those clouds detected in C$^{18}$O is shown in Figure \ref{fig:hturb_grav}.
459: It has an average of 1.3 and median of 0.6, which means these clouds are near virial equilibrium.
460: However, uncertainties in our assumption of size, geometry and matter distribution
461: (together with observational uncertainties and fluctuations in individual targets)
462: limit the validity of our result.
463: As in this paper the sizes for the IRDCs are calculated using the kinematic distances we derived herein and the angular sizes in the Simon catalog,
464: it is probable that sizes of the molecular clouds associated with the IRDCs are underestimated,
465: and the virial parameters for the clouds may actually be smaller, which means collapse motions are inevitable in the overall scale.
466: In Figure \ref{fig:virial_size} we plot the sizes versus the line widths and masses,
467: overlaid with power law fittings which can be expressed as
468: $$\Delta V \propto R^{0.2\pm0.07},$$
469: $$M \propto R^{2.1\pm0.07}.$$
470: These correlations imply that $\alpha\propto R^{-0.7}$, $\alpha\propto M^{-0.3}$.
471: The fact that the mass being approximately proportional to R$^2$ is straightforward if
472: the column densities are not correlated with sizes, which is actually the case for our survey.
473: Being in virial equilibrium is a natural explanation for this.
474: Another possibility is that the usual LTE method in determining the optical depth and the column density can easily be affected by observational noises,
475: and this might obscure the correlation of column density with radius.
476: That the velocity widths only weakly correlate with the sizes and the index of the power law relation is smaller than the typical value 0.5 of
477: some previous studies \citep{Myers1983b, Dame1986a, Solomon1987a, Goodman1993a} is probably due to the fact that
478: sizes of the extinction features cannot all be very accurate as for many IRDCs the background emission is not smooth and
479: the Gassian fit procedure in deriving the sizes might be problematic \citep{Simon2006a}.
480: Besides this, the sizes of the extinction features may not necessarily correlate with the sizes of the molecular clouds.
481:
482: \clearpage
483: \begin{figure}[htbp]
484: \plottwo{f10a.eps}{f10b.eps}
485: \figcaption{Histogram of virial parameters and its variation with Galactocentric distance.
486: \label{fig:hturb_grav}}
487: \end{figure}
488:
489: \begin{figure}[htbp]
490: \plottwo{f11a.eps}{f11b.eps}
491: \figcaption{Plot of sizes versus line widths and masses. Power law fittings are overplotted. \label{fig:virial_size}}
492: \end{figure}
493: \clearpage
494:
495: \subsection{Correlation between the MSX data and the molecular line data}
496: As our sources are selected from the MSX data, it is natural to compare our observation with the MSX images.
497: Initially we expected that the column density should be positively correlated with the degree of extinction of the IRDCs,
498: which is properly described by the contrast parameter in the Simon catalog.
499: However, the correlation between the contrast and the column density turns out to be rather weak, although it is positive.
500: The MSX flux is also positively correlated with the column density.
501: These correlations can be described by the following formulae (Figure \ref{fig:MSXflux_ncold}):
502: $$\rm
503: \mbox{Contrast} = 0.45 + 0.012 \times \left(\frac{N_{H_2}({}^{13}CO)}{10^{22}\ \mbox{cm}^{-2}}\right)
504: $$ $$\rm
505: \mbox{Contrast} = 0.43 + 0.018 \times \left(\frac{N_{H_2}(C^{18}O)}{10^{22}\ \mbox{cm}^{-2}}\right)
506: $$ $$\rm
507: \left(\frac{\mbox{F(8.3 $\mu$m)}}{10^{-6}\ W/m^2/sr}\right) = 2.3 + 0.8 \times \left(\frac{N_{H_2}({}^{13}CO)}{10^{22}\ \mbox{cm}^{-2}}\right)
508: $$ $$\rm
509: \left(\frac{\mbox{F(8.3 $\mu$m)}}{10^{-6}\ W/m^2/sr}\right) = 2.2 + 0.6 \times \left(\frac{N_{H_2}(C^{18}O)}{10^{22}\ \mbox{cm}^{-2}}\right)
510: $$
511: Here the contrasts are the peak contrasts taken from the Simon catalog,
512: and the MSX fluxes are averaged over a $10''\times10''$ region near the IRDC peaks.
513:
514: The correlation between MSX brightness and the column density is plausible,
515: as brighter infrared background (or neighbor) implies more drastic activities,
516: which might trigger gravitational instability and lead to condensation of matter;
517: also bright infrared emission usually comes from inner part of the Galaxy,
518: where large amounts of molecular clouds reside.
519: As for the insignificant correlation between peak contrast and column density,
520: foreground contamination, weak and noisy background emission, variability of dust-to-gas ratio,
521: and/or inaccurate contrast in the Simon catalog resulting from complex environment of some IRDCs can be the reason.
522: Also the narrow contrast range of our sample might make the correlation look insignificant.
523: For high extinction, the contrast is not a good approximation of optical depth.
524: It is also possible that some IRDCs may be embedded in larger or giant molecular clouds,
525: and the CO lines may actually trace these environmental clouds, being insensitive to the denser IRDCs.
526: Furthermore, some IRDCs actually seem to be gaps in bright emission regions, rather than extinction features;
527: this kind of IRDCs are usually morphologically connected to the dark vacuum outer space above or below the Galactic disk.
528:
529: \clearpage
530: \begin{figure}[htbp]
531: \plotone{f12.eps}
532: \figcaption{Correlation between the MSX flux as well as the peak contrast and the H$_2$ column density derived from $^{13}$CO and C$^{18}$O. \label{fig:MSXflux_ncold}}
533: \end{figure}
534: \clearpage
535:
536:
537: \section{Conclusions}
538: We observed 61 MSX IRDCs in three CO isotope lines with coordinates mainly taken from the Simon catalog.
539: For most sources, excitation temperatures, distances, and column densities are derived.
540: The Galactic distribution of IRDCs is consistent with the 5 kpc molecular ring picture,
541: while showing some traces of spiral pattern,
542: but a larger and more uniform survey is needed to determine whether this feature is true,
543: and maybe independent method to determine the distances other than the rotation curve method needs to be implemented.
544: Sizes are estimated using angular sizes from the Simon catalog, and LTE masses are calculated subsequently.
545: Typical size of the IRDC is several $pc$s, typical column density is several $10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$,
546: typical density is about 5000 cm$^{-3}$, and typical mass is about 5000 M$_\odot$,
547: which are similar to that of star forming clumps.
548: Many sources are significantly saturated in $^{13}$CO.
549: The abundance ratio of $^{13}$CO to C$^{18}$O in IRDCs is similar to that of typical molecular clouds.
550: The column density of IRDCs only weakly correlate with their peak contrast,
551: which might indicate that the peak contrast of some IRDCs are inaccurate due to noisy background,
552: as well as bright foreground and complex neighbourhood.
553: As giant molecular clouds have typical size of tens of pc, typical mass of $10^5$ -- $10^6$ M$_\odot$,
554: and typical density of hundreds of cm$^{-3}$ \citep{Solomon1979, Sanders1985a},
555: while Bok globules have typical size of several 0.1 pc, typical mass of 2 -- 100 M$_\odot$,
556: and typical density of $10^4$ -- $10^5$ cm$^{-3}$ \citep{Launhardt1997a},
557: IRDC seems to be an intermediate class between these two species.
558:
559: Many questions can be raised.
560: Are all IRDCs in the same stage of evolution?
561: Or more basically, are all IRDCs intrinsically the same? Do they fall into several different species?
562: What's the relationship between the IRDCs and their neighbor bright regions?
563: Are they compressed by their neighbors?
564: What role do IRDCs play in the formation of massive stars?
565: Whether there are pre-stellar objects in the central parts of IRDCs already?
566: Furthermore, it is not clear whether the sequence of GMC, IRDC, and Bok globule is an evolution sequence,
567: and, if so, what's the underlying mechanism?
568: Detailed mapping of some of these sources in a variety of tracers is necessary to clarify these issues.
569:
570: \acknowledgments
571: This work made use of data products from the Midcourse Space Experiment.
572: We are grateful to the staff members of the Delingha radio telescope for their help during the observations.
573: We thank the anonymous referee for his/her valuable comments and suggestions to the draft of this paper.
574: We also thank R. Simon for valuable clarification of some issues regarding their paper.
575: This work was supported by NSFC through grant 10621303 and Ministry of Science and Technology of China through grant 2007CB815406.
576:
577:
578: \begin{thebibliography}{}
579: \bibitem[Bertoldi \& McKee(1992)]{Bertoldi1992a}Bertoldi, F., \& McKee, C. F. 1992, \apj, 395, 140
580: \bibitem[Beuther \& Steinacker(2007)]{Beuther2007a}Beuther, H., Steinacker, J. 2007, ApJL, 656, L85
581: \bibitem[Brand \& Blitz(1993)]{Brand1993a}Brand, J., \& Blitz, L. 1993, \aap, 275, 67
582: \bibitem[Burgh, France \& McCandliss(2007)]{Burgh2007a}Burgh, E. B., France, K., \& McCandliss, S. R. 2007, \apj, 658, 446
583: \bibitem[Carey et al.(1998)]{Carey1998a}Carey, S. J., Clark, F. O., Egan, M. P., Price, S. D., Shipman, R. F., \& Kuchar, T. A. 1998, \apj, 508, 721
584: \bibitem[Carey et al.(2000)]{Carey2000a}Carey, S. J., Feldman, P. A., Redman, R. O., Egan, M. P., MacLeod, J. M., \& Price, S. D. 2000, \apj, 543, L157
585: \bibitem[Clemens(1985)]{Clemens1985a}Clemens, D. P. 1985, \apj, 295, 422
586: \bibitem[Dame et al.(1986)]{Dame1986a}Dame, T. M., Elmegreen, B. G., Cohen, R. S., \& Thaddeus, P. 1986, \apj, 305, 892
587: \bibitem[Dickman(1978)]{Dickman1978a}Dickman, R. L. 1978, \apjs, 37, 407
588: \bibitem[Egan et al.(1998)]{Egan1998a}Egan, M. P., Shipman, R. F., Price, S. D., Carey, S. J., \& Clark, F. O. 1998, \apjl, 494, L99
589: \bibitem[Fich, Blitz, \& Stark(1989)]{Fich1989a}Fich, M., Blitz, L., Stark, A. 1989, \apj, 342, 272
590: \bibitem[Frerking, Langer, \& Wilson(1982)]{Frerking1982a}Frerking, M. A., Langer, W. D., \& Wilson, R. W. 1982, \apj, 262, 590
591: \bibitem[Goodman et al.(1993)]{Goodman1993a}Goodman, A. A., Benson, P. J., Fuller, G. A., \& Myers, P. C. 1993, \apj, 406, 528
592: \bibitem[Kramer et al.(1999)]{Kramer1999a}Kramer, C., Alves, J., Lada, C. J. et al. 1999, \aap, 342, 257
593: \bibitem[Krumholz, McKee, \& Klein(2005)]{Krumholz2005a}Krumholz, M. R., McKee, C. F., \& Klein, R. I. 2005, Nature, 438, 332
594: \bibitem[Launhardt \& Henning(1997)]{Launhardt1997a}Launhardt, R., \& Henning, Th. 1997, \aap, 326, 329
595: \bibitem[Myers, Linke, \& Benson(1983)]{Myers1983a}Myers, P. C., Linke, R. A., \& Benson, P. J. 1983, \apj, 264, 517
596: \bibitem[Myers(1983)]{Myers1983b}Myers, P. C. 1983, \apj, 270, 105
597: \bibitem[Ragan et al.(2006)]{Ragan2006a}Ragan, S. E., Bergin, E. A., Plume, R., Gibson, D. L., Wilner, D. J., O'Brien, S., and Hails, E. 2006, ApJS, 166, 567
598: \bibitem[Rathborne, Jackson, \& Chambers(2005)]{Rathborne2005a}Rathborne, J. M., Jackson, J. M., \& Chambers, E. T. 2005, \apj, 630, L181
599: \bibitem[Rathborne, Jackson, \& Simon(2006)]{Rathborne2006a}Rathborne, J. M., Jackson, J. M., \& Simon, R. 2006, \apj, 641, 389
600: \bibitem[Russeil(2003)]{Russeil2003a}Russeil, D. 2003, \aap, 397, 133
601: \bibitem[Russeil, Adami, \& Georgelin(2007)]{Russeil2007a}Russeil, D., Adami, C., \& Georgelin, Y. M. 2007, \aap, 470, 161
602: \bibitem[Sanders, Scoville, \& Solomon(1985)]{Sanders1985a}Sanders, D. B., Scoville, N. Z., \& Solomon, P. M. 1985, \apj, 289, 373
603: \bibitem[Simon et al.(2001)]{Simon2001a}Simon, R., Jackson, J. M., Clemens, D. P., \& Bania, T. M. 2001, \apj, 551, 747
604: \bibitem[Simon et al.(2006a)]{Simon2006a}Simon, R., Jackson, J. M., Rathborne, J. M., \& Chambers, E. T. 2006, \apj, 639, 227
605: \bibitem[Simon et al.(2006b)]{Simon2006b}Simon, R., Rathborne, J. M., Shah, R. Y., Jackson, J. M., \& Chambers, E. T. 2006, \apj, 653, 1325
606: \bibitem[Solomon, Sanders, \& Scoville(1979)]{Solomon1979}Solomon, P. M., Sanders D. B., \& Scoville, N., Z. 1979, IAUS, 84, 35S
607: \bibitem[Solomon et al.(1987)]{Solomon1987a}Solomon, P. M., Rivolo, A. R., Barrett, J. \& Yahil, A. 1987, \apj, 319, 730
608: \bibitem[Solomon \& Rivolo(1989)]{Solomon1989a}Solomon, P. M., \& Rivolo, A. R. 1989, \apj, 339, 919
609: \bibitem[Taylor \& Cordes(1993)]{Taylor1993a}Taylor, J. H., \& Cordes, J. M. 1993, \apj, 411, 674
610: \bibitem[Vall\'ee(2005)]{Vallee2005a}Vall\'ee, J. P. 2005, \apj, 130, 569
611: \bibitem[Wang et al.(2006)]{Wang2006a}Wang, Y., Zhang, Q. Z., Rathborne, J. M., Jackson, J., \& Wu, Y. F. 2006, \apj, 651, L000
612: \bibitem[Zuo et al.(2004)]{Zuo2004a}Zuo, Y. X., Yang, J., Shi, S. C., Chen, S. H., Pei, L. B., Yao, Q. J., Sun, J. J., \& Lin, Z. H. 2004, ChJAA, 4, 390Z
613:
614: \end{thebibliography}
615:
616: \end{document}
617: