1: % version 1; submitted to ApJ; Feb 12, 2008

2: % version 2; submitted to ApJ; Mar 24, 2008

3: % version 3; submitted to ApJ; Jul 09, 2008 

4: 

5: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

6: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}

7: \documentclass{emulateapj}

8: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}

9: %\documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}

10: 

11: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}

12: %\usepackage{emulateapj5}

13: \usepackage{apjfonts}

14: %\usepackage{deluxetable}

15: %\usepackage{epsfig}

16: 

17: \newcommand{\ang}{\AA}

18: \newcommand{\aox}{$\alpha_{\rm OX}$}

19: \newcommand{\chalf}{$c(\case{1}{2})$}

20: \newcommand{\civ}{{\sc C iv}}

21: \newcommand{\dsv}{$\delta_{\rm sim}^V$}

22: \newcommand{\dsw}{$\delta_{\rm sim}^{\rm FWHM}$}

23: \newcommand{\er}{$L_{\rm bol}/L_{\rm Edd}$}

24: \newcommand{\ewfe}{${\rm EW_{Fe}}$}

25: \newcommand{\feii}{Fe {\sc ii}}

26: \newcommand{\fwhmhb}{${\rm FWHM(H\beta)}$}

27: \newcommand{\fwhmhbb}{${\rm FWHM(H\beta_{\rm BC})}$}

28: \newcommand{\fwhmfe}{${\rm FWHM}_{\rm Fe}$}

29: \newcommand{\fwhmmg}{FWHM(Mg {\sc ii})}

30: \newcommand{\ergs}{${\rm ergs~s^{-1}}$}

31: \newcommand{\ergsa}{${\rm ergs~s^{-1}~\AA^{-1}}$}

32: \newcommand{\ergsh}{${\rm ergs~s^{-1}~Hz^{-1}}$}

33: \newcommand{\hb}{H$\beta$}

34: \newcommand{\hbb}{${\rm H}\beta_{\rm BC}$}

35: \newcommand{\hbn}{${\rm H}\beta_{\rm NC}$}

36: \newcommand{\kms}{$\rm km~s^{-1}$}

37: \newcommand{\ks}{$\chi^2$}

38: \newcommand{\lbol}{$L_{\rm bol}$}

39: \newcommand{\mbh}{$M_{\rm BH}$}

40: \newcommand{\mgii}{Mg {\sc ii}}

41: \newcommand{\msun}{$M_{\odot}$}

42: \newcommand{\myemail}{chenhu@bao.ac.cn}

43: \newcommand{\oiii}{{\sc [O iii]}}

44: \newcommand{\oii}{{\sc [O ii]}}

45: \newcommand{\rfe}{$R_{\rm Fe}$}

46: \newcommand{\ssv}{$\sigma_{\rm sim}^V$}

47: \newcommand{\sfv}{$\sigma_{\rm fit}^V$}

48: \newcommand{\ssw}{$\sigma_{\rm sim}^{\rm FWHM}$}

49: \newcommand{\sfw}{$\sigma_{\rm fit}^{\rm FWHM}$}

50: \newcommand{\vhbb}{$v({\rm H}\beta_{\rm BC})$}

51: \newcommand{\vhbn}{$v({\rm H}\beta_{\rm NC})$}

52: \newcommand{\vvhbb}{$V({\rm H}\beta_{\rm BC})$}

53: \newcommand{\vfe}{$v_{\rm Fe}$}

54: \newcommand{\vvfe}{$V_{\rm Fe}$}

55: 

56: \slugcomment{Accepted for publication in ApJ.}

57: 

58: \shorttitle{\feii\ Emission in Quasars}

59: \shortauthors{Hu et al.}

60: 

61: \begin{document}

62: 

63: \title{A Systematic Analysis of \feii\ Emission in Quasars:

64: Evidence for Inflow to the Central Black Hole}

65: 

66: \author{Chen Hu\altaffilmark{1,2,3}, Jian-Min Wang\altaffilmark{2},

67:         Luis C. Ho\altaffilmark{4},

68:         Yan-Mei Chen\altaffilmark{2,3}, Hao-Tong Zhang\altaffilmark{1}, 

69: 	Wei-Hao Bian\altaffilmark{2,5} and Sui-Jian Xue\altaffilmark{1}}

70: 

71: \altaffiltext{1}{National Astronomical Observatories of China,

72: Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100012, China; \myemail}

73: 

74: \altaffiltext{2}{Key Laboratory for Particle Astrophysics,

75: Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences,

76: Beijing 100039, China.}

77: 

78: \altaffiltext{3}{Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences,

79: Beijing 100049, China.}

80: 

81: \altaffiltext{4}{The Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington,

82: 813 Santa Barbara Street, Pasadena, CA 91101, USA.}

83: 

84: \altaffiltext{5}{Department of Physics and Institute of Theoretical Physics,

85: Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097, China.}

86: 

87: \begin{abstract}

88: Broad \feii\ emission is a prominent feature of the optical and ultraviolet 

89: spectra of quasars.  We report on a systematical investigation of optical \feii\ 

90: emission in a large sample of 4037 $z<0.8$ quasars selected from the Sloan 

91: Digital Sky Survey.  We have developed and tested a detailed line-fitting 

92: technique, taking into account the complex continuum and narrow and broad 

93: emission-line spectrum.  Our primary goal is to quantify the velocity 

94: broadening and velocity shift of the \feii\ spectrum in order to constrain the 

95: location of the \feii-emitting region and its relation to the broad-line 

96: region.  We find that the majority of quasars show \feii\ emission that is 

97: redshifted, typically by $\sim 400$~ \kms\ but up to 2000~\kms, with respect to 

98: the systemic velocity of the narrow-line region or of the conventional 

99: broad-line region as traced by the \hb\ line.  Moreover, the line width of 

100: \feii\ is significantly narrower than that of the broad component of \hb.  We 

101: show that the magnitude of the \feii\ redshift correlates inversely with the 

102: Eddington ratio, and that there is a tendency for sources with redshifted \feii\ 

103: emission to show red asymmetry in the \hb\ line.  These characteristics 

104: strongly suggest that \feii\ originates from a location different from, and 

105: most likely exterior to, the region that produces most of \hb.  The \feii-emitting 

106: zone traces a portion of the broad-line region of intermediate velocities 

107: whose dynamics may be dominated by infall.

108: \end{abstract}

109: 

110: \keywords{galaxies: nuclei --- (galaxies:) quasars: emission lines ---

111: (galaxies:) quasars: general --- galaxies: Seyfert --- 

112: line: profiles}

113: 

114: \section{Introduction}

115: Fe emission contributes significantly to the optical and ultraviolet (UV) 

116: spectra of most active galactic nuclei (AGNs), both in terms of wavelength 

117: coverage and flux.  The properties of the \feii-emitting clouds may provide 

118: important clues to the underlying physics in the broad-line region (BLR).  

119: First, \feii\ emission can be used to constrain the covering factor of BLR 

120: clouds from energy budget considerations.  Second, the ratio of the equivalent 

121: width (EW) of \feii\ to that of \hbb\ strongly varies with statistical 

122: measures of AGN correlations, such as the so-called Eigenvector 1 derived 

123: from principal component analysis, which is believed to be driven by some 

124: fundamental property such as mass accretion rate 

125: \citep[e.g.,][]{bg92,sul00a,sul00b,marzi01,marzi03a}.  Third, Fe abundance 

126: derived from \feii\ emission can be used to study the cosmological evolution 

127: of AGNs and possibly chemical enrichment of their hosts and environment 

128: \citep[e.g.,][]{wil85,wheel89,die02,die03,maio03}.  Careful measurement of the 

129: properties of \feii\ emission in a large sample of AGNs will clearly have a 

130: considerable impact on our understanding of these systems.

131: 

132: The origin of the optical/UV Fe emission has been hotly debated for

133: more than two decades. Thousands of Fe emission lines blend together to form a 

134: pseudo-continuum, which, when combined with Balmer continuum emission, results 

135: in the ``small blue bump'' around 3000 \ang\ \citep{grandi82,wil85}. Previously,

136: theoretical calculations of photoionized clouds in the BLR encountered

137: difficulties reproducing the observed strength of strong \feii\ emission,

138: prompting many authors to propose additional physical mechanisms

139: \citep{netzer83,wil85,joly87,joly91,collin88,sigut98}.  Recently, a more

140: sophisticated calculation by \citet{bal04} revealed that the predicted shape

141: and EW of the 2200--2800\AA\ \feii\ UV bump can only be made consistent with

142: observed values if either microturbulence of hundreds of \kms\

143: or another collisionally excited component is included in the model. 

144: 

145: Despite its significance, current observations of \feii\ emission provide poor 

146: constraints on its origin.  Some studies suggest that \feii\ emission

147: originates from the same region as the other broad emission lines.  For example,

148: \citet{phil77}, \citet{bg92}, \citet{laor97b}, and \citet{veron04} observed 

149: similar line widths and profiles for \feii\ and \hbb, and \citet{maoz93} found 

150: that both \feii\ emission and the Balmer continuum have comparable variation 

151: amplitudes. But there is a growing debate on this issue. \citet{marzi03b} 

152: found that \hbb\ is systematically broader than \feii\ for sources with 

153: \fwhmhbb\ $>$ 4000 \kms.  Recent studies of \feii\ emission variability have 

154: shown that \feii\ emission responds to variations in continuum flux but that 

155: the variability amplitude of \feii\ is not the same as that of \hb\ 

156: (\citealt{mv05} and references therein; \citealt{wang05}; \citealt{kuehn08}). 

157: In fact, the upper limit on the time lag between \feii\ emission and the 

158: continuum exceeds the lag of any other observed emission lines obtained 

159: \citep{mv05}.  This implies that \feii\ may be emitted from further out in the 

160: BLR than any other broad emission line. \citet{kuehn08} suggested that

161: \feii\ may be produced from a region between the BLR and the dust

162: sublimation radius. The study of \citet{matsuoka07}, 

163: based on measurements of the O {\sc i} and Ca {\sc ii} emission lines,  

164: supports the notion that \feii\ emerges from the outer portion of the BLR.

165: In a recent three-dimensional spectroscopic study of Mrk 493, 

166: \citet{popovic07} found that the \feii\ emission region is extensive and that 

167: the line width of \feii\ is only 1/3 of that of \hbb, leading them to suggest 

168: that \feii\ emission originates in an intermediate-line region.  If these 

169: findings can be confirmed, \feii\ emission can be a probe of the 

170: intermediate-line region, which may be the transition from the torus to 

171: the BLR and accretion disk.

172: 

173: Quasar emission lines often exhibit considerable velocity shifts with respect 

174: to each other.  However, the relative velocity of \feii\ emission with respect 

175: to other lines has not been well studied, especially in systematically for a 

176: large sample of objects (only a few measurements of individual sources have 

177: been published; e.g., \citealt{veron04}).  In fact, almost all broad quasar 

178: emission lines show blueward velocity shifts \citep{gastell82,carswell91}, 

179: with the exception of \mgii\ (no shift; \citealt{junk89}) and \hb\ (redward 

180: shift in some studies; e.g., \citealt{mcin99}).  Most previous studies simply 

181: {\it assumed}\ that \feii\ has no shift with respective to \oiii\ 

182: \citep[e.g.,][]{bg92,marzi96,mclure02,die03,greene05b,kim06,woo06} and that 

183: it has the same line width as the broad component of \hb\ 

184: \citep[e.g.,][]{netzer07,salv07}.  The goal of this study is to test this 

185: assumption.

186: 

187: The present paper presents the first detailed investigation of the velocity

188: shift and width of optical \feii\ emission\footnote{Unless otherwise noted, 

189: the \feii\ emission in this paper refers to the optical band.} 

190: in a large sample of quasars selected from 

191: the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS; \citealt{york00}).  Our primary motivation

192: is to determine the physical location and origin of the \feii-emitting region. 

193: We describe selection of the sample in \S \ref{sample} and

194: spectral analysis in \S \ref{fitting}.  We test the reliability of the 

195: measurements and the errors using Monte Carlo simulations (\S \ref{mcsim}),

196: and then check how significantly our method improves the spectral fit and how 

197: our method affects the measurements of other emission-line parameters (\S

198: \ref{compare}). Section \ref{result} discusses the results we obtained,

199: including the distribution of \feii\ emission shifts and widths,

200: correlations with other parameters, and also an analysis of the composite

201: spectra. The implications of our results are discussed in \S \ref{discuss},

202: with conclusing remarks given in \S \ref{summary}.  

203: 

204: Throughout this work, we adopt the following cosmological parameters: 

205: $H_0=70~{\rm km~s^{-1}}$ Mpc$^{-1}$, $\Omega_{m}=0.3$, and $\Omega_\Lambda=0.7$ 

206: \citep{spergel06}.

207: 

208: \section{Sample Selection} 

209: \label{sample} 

210: Our sample is selected from the SDSS Fifth Data Release (DR5;

211: \citealt{adelman07}) quasar catalog \citep{schneider07}.  We choose objects 

212: with redshift $z<0.8$ to ensure that the \oiii\ emission line lies within 

213: the SDSS spectral coverage.  Since the SDSS quasar sample is flux-limited and 

214: selected by broad-band colors \citep{richards02a}, care must be exercised in 

215: using it to study the quasar luminosity function \citep{vb05,richards06} or 

216: its cosmological evolution. However, this sample is adequate for the 

217: scientific goals of this work. 

218: 

219: We impose a series of selection criteria to ensure reliable measurements 

220: of \feii\ emission.  (1) We require a signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) $>$10 in the 

221: wavelength range 4430--5550 \ang, covering \hb, \oiii, and the most prominent 

222: features of optical \feii\ emission.  (2) We remove sources that have reduced 

223: \ks\ $>$ 4 in the continuum decomposition (\S \ref{contifit}). These 

224: sources cannot be fitted well by the present continuum model (Eq. 

225: (\ref{equ-conti}) in \S \ref{contidecomp}).  (3) We remove sources that have 

226: \ewfe\ $<$ 25 \ang;

227: this EW cut is determined by the simulations described in \S \ref{mcsim}.

228: (4) We also remove sources with \hbb\ FWHM errors $>$10\% and \oiii\

229: $\lambda$5007 peak velocity shift errors $>$100 \kms.  In total, the final 

230: sample contains 4037 sources, which is roughly 30\% of all quasars in DR5 with 

231: redshift $z<0.8$.

232: 

233: \section{Spectral Fitting}

234: \label{fitting}

235: The spectra of quasars from UV to optical wavelengths are remarkably similar to

236: each other.  The quasar composite spectrum \citep[e.g.,][]{vb01} is 

237: characterized by a featureless continuum and a plethora of broad and narrow 

238: emission lines. In the luminosity range of interest to us here, very little, 

239: if any, starlight is observed, so we can ignore the host galaxy contribution 

240: to the spectrum.  The validity of this simplification can be tested from our 

241: spectral fitting---nearly all of the sources in the sample can be well fitted 

242: without a host galaxy component.

243: 

244: The procedure of our spectral fitting algorithm is as follows.  We begin by

245: deredshifting the spectrum after correcting for Galactic extinction. Then, the

246: continuum is decomposed into three components: (1) a single power law, (2)

247: Balmer continuum emission (supplemented with high-order Balmer emission

248: lines), and (3) a pseudo-continuum due to blended Fe emission. We subtract this

249: continuum model to obtain a pure emission-line spectrum, which is then fitted

250: to derive parameters for the emission lines.  The measurement of Fe emission 

251: is strongly affected by the uncertainty in the determination of the continuum 

252: level. Since there are almost no ``pure'' continuum windows, a simultaneous fit

253: should be performed to decouple the Fe emission from the featureless 

254: continuum, rather than fitting the two independently.  [Tsuzuki et al. (2006) 

255: adopt an alternative approach in which they use a theoretical model to 

256: estimate the flux fraction of the emission lines in the continuum windows.]

257: The following subsections will describe each step in detail.

258: 

259: \subsection{Continuum Decomposition}

260: \label{contidecomp}

261: We use the $R_V$-dependent Galactic extinction law given by \citet{ccm89} and 

262: assume $R_V=3.1$. Eqs. (2a) and (2b) in \citet{ccm89} are used for the 

263: infrared band, but Eqs. (3a) and (3b) are replaced by those in 

264: \citet{odonnell94} for the optical band. We adopt the Galactic extinction in 

265: the $u$ band listed in the SDSS quasar catalog \citep{schneider07} and change 

266: it to the $V$ band using the relation $A_V=A_u/1.579$ \citep{schlegel98}. Then,

267: we deredshift the extinction-corrected spectrum using the redshift provided by 

268: the SDSS pipeline. This value of redshift is later refined using the line 

269: centroid of \oiii\ $\lambda$5007 measured after continuum decomposition 

270: (see \S \ref{redshift}).  

271: 

272: We model the continuum of the spectrum after Galactic extinction and redshift 

273: correction (hereinafter the corrected spectrum) using three components:

274: %

275: \begin{eqnarray}

276:   \label{equ-conti}

277:   F_\lambda & = & F_\lambda^{\rm PL}(F_{5100},\alpha)

278:   +F_\lambda^{\rm BaC}(F_{\rm BE},\tau_{\rm BE}) \nonumber\\

279:   & & +F_\lambda^{\rm Fe}(F_{\rm Fe}, {\rm FWHM_{\rm Fe}}, V_{\rm Fe}).

280: \end{eqnarray}

281: %

282: In total there are seven free parameters.  The first term is the featureless 

283: power law

284: %

285: \begin{equation}

286:   F_\lambda^{\rm PL}=F_{5100}

287:   \left( \frac{\lambda}{5100~{\rm \AA}}\right) ^{\alpha},

288: \end{equation}

289: %

290: where $F_{5100}$ is the flux density at 5100 \AA\ and $\alpha$ is the spectral 

291: index.    The second and third terms denote the Balmer continuum and Fe 

292: emission, respectively, which are described below.  For the Fe emission term,

293: $F_{\rm Fe}$ is the flux and $V_{\rm Fe}$ is the shift velocity of \feii.

294: 

295: \subsubsection{Balmer Continuum and High-order Balmer Lines}

296: \label{balconti}

297: Following \citet{grandi82} and \citet{die02}, the Balmer continuum produced by

298: a partially optically thick cloud with a uniform temperature can be expressed

299: by

300: %

301: \begin{equation}

302:   F_\lambda^{\rm BaC}=F_{\rm BE}B_\lambda(T_e)(1-e^{-\tau_\lambda})

303: \end{equation}

304: %

305: for wavelengths shortward of the Balmer edge ($\lambda_{\rm BE} = 3646$ \AA).  

306: $B_\lambda(T_e)$ is the Planck function at an electron temperature $T_e$, 

307: $F_{\rm BE}$ is a normalization coefficient for the flux at $\lambda_{\rm BE}$, 

308: and $\tau_\lambda$ is the optical depth at $\lambda$ expressed by

309: %

310: \begin{equation}

311:   \tau_\lambda=\tau_{\rm BE}\left( \frac{\lambda}{\lambda_{\rm BE}}\right),

312: \end{equation}

313: %

314: where $\tau_{\rm BE}$ is the optical depth at the Balmer edge.  There are two

315: free parameters, $F_{\rm BE}$ and $\tau_{\rm BE}$. Following \citet{die02}, 

316: we assume $T_e$ = 15,000 K.

317: 

318: At wavelengths $\lambda>\lambda_{\rm BE}$, blended higher-order Balmer lines 

319: give a smooth rise in the spectrum from $\sim$4000 \ang\ to the Balmer

320: edge \citep{wil85}. We treat the higher-order Balmer lines in a manner similar 

321: to that in \citet{die03}, with some modifications. To determine the relative 

322: strengths of the transitions with $7\le n\le50$, we use the line emissivities

323: given by \citet{storey95} for Case B, $T_e$ = 15,000 K, and $n_e=10^8~{\rm

324: cm^{-3}}$.  We normalize the flux of the higher-order Balmer lines to the

325: flux of the Balmer continuum at the edge using the results in \citet{wil85}.

326: (This implies that the higher-order Balmer lines also depend on $F_{\rm BE}$ 

327: and $\tau_{\rm BE}$.) In order to smooth the rise to the Balmer edge, we 

328: assume that each line has a Gaussian profile with FWHM = 8000 \kms.  In 

329: practice, none of the assumptions concerning the higher-order Balmer lines

330: actually impact our results because our fitting windows do not include this

331: region (see \S \ref{contifit}).

332: 

333: \subsubsection{Fe Emission}

334: \label{fefitting}

335: \citet{phil77} first introduced the template-fitting method to treat Fe 

336: emission in AGNs, using the Fe spectrum of the narrow-line Seyfert 1 (NLS1) 

337: galaxy I~Zw~1 ($z = 0.061$) to construct an \feii\ template.  In most 

338: applications of this method, the amount of velocity broadening applied 

339: to the template during spectral fitting is either solved as a free parameter

340: or is fixed (usually to the FWHM of broad \hb).  But the Fe template itself 

341: is not allowed to shift in velocity.  We follow essentially the same 

342: template-fitting, but we explicitly allow the width and shift of \feii\ to 

343: be free parameters.  We now describe the details of our algorithm.

344: 

345: Considering the redshift range of our sample, we need both the UV and optical 

346: Fe template for I~Zw~1. In the UV band, we adopt the Fe template of 

347: \citet{mv01}. Note that their template is set to zero around the \mgii\ line,

348: which is unphysical. However, the \mgii\ line is not the main focus of the

349: present work, and for the purposes of this work we do not concern ourselves 

350: with this complication.

351: In the optical, apart from the widely 

352: used template constructed by \citet{bg92}, some others are also available.

353: For example, a template of any width can be constructed from the list of Fe 

354: lines for I~Zw~1 given by \citet{veron04}.  We compared these two different 

355: templates and in the end chose the one from \citet{bg92} (kindly provided by 

356: T. A. Boroson) because it gives smaller reduced \ks.  However, we have 

357: verified that the shift of Fe emission, one of the main goals of this work, is 

358: actually not sensitive to the choice of template.  The velocity shifts 

359: measured using either of the two template are consistent with each other.

360: 

361: We combine the UV and optical templates to form a single template (with a gap 

362: from 3100 \ang\ to 3700 \ang, which has no data) and convolve it with a 

363: Gaussian function:

364: %

365: \begin{equation}

366:   \label{equ-fe}

367:   F_\lambda^{\rm Fe}=F_\lambda^{\rm I Zw 1}\ast G(F_{\rm conv}, {\rm

368:   FWHM_{conv}}, V_{\rm conv}),

369: \end{equation}

370: %

371: where $F_\lambda^{\rm I Zw 1}$ is the I Zw 1 Fe template, $G$ is a Gaussian 

372: function with flux $F_{\rm conv}$, width ${\rm FWHM_{conv}}$, and peak velocity

373: shift $V_{\rm conv}$. The convolution is done in logarithmic wavelength

374: space because $d({\rm ln}\lambda)=d\lambda/\lambda=dv/c$. The parameters in

375: Eq. (\ref{equ-conti}) can be calculated as follows.  The flux of the Fe

376: emission, $F_{\rm Fe}$, is equal to $F_{\rm conv}$ multiplied by the flux of the

377: template.  The shift of the Fe spectrum, \vvfe, is simply $V_{\rm conv}$. 

378: Finally, the FWHM of the Fe lines can be expressed as

379: %

380: \begin{equation}

381:   {\rm FWHM_{\rm Fe}}=\sqrt{{\rm FWHM_{I Zw 1}^2+FWHM_{conv}^2}}~~~.

382: \end{equation}

383: %

384: 

385: In the above algorithm, we assume that the Fe emission in the UV and optical 

386: have the same width and velocity shift, and that the ratio of UV Fe flux

387: to optical Fe flux is fixed to that of I~Zw~1. These assumptions help to 

388: reduce the number of free parameters, and seem appropriate given the S/N of 

389: the present sample.  If we split the UV/optical template following

390: \citet{verner04} to three major wavelength bands---UV (2000--3000 \ang), small

391: blue bump (3000--3500 \ang), and optical (4000--6000 \ang)---the final results

392: will be determined mainly by the optical Fe emission. The reasons are as 

393: follows. First, the small blue bump Fe emission is outside of our fitting 

394: windows (see \S\ref{contifit}). Second, the spectra of most of the quasars in 

395: the sample either do not cover or only cover a very narrow segment of the UV

396: Fe emission wavelength range. Third, the S/N of the UV band is lower than

397: the optical band. Thus, our measurements mainly trace the optical Fe

398: emission and are not very sensitive to UV Fe emission. 

399: We consider each of the three assumptions in turn.

400: 

401: The ratio of UV to optical Fe flux has been investigated by many authors

402: \citep[e.g.,][and references therein]{sigut04,verner04,bal04}. This ratio

403: depends on the physical parameters of the clouds, such as the hydrogen density

404: $n_{\rm H}$, the hydrogen-ionizing flux $\Phi_{\rm H}$, the velocity of

405: turbulence, and so forth. However, for physical conditions typical of quasars 

406: \citep[$n_{\rm H}\approx 10^{11}~{\rm cm^{-3}}$, $\Phi_{\rm H}\approx

407: 3\times 10^{20}~{\rm cm^{-2}~s^{-1}}$;][]{ferland92}, models of Fe emission 

408: indicate that there are large regions of parameter space where the ratio 

409: is roughly constant \citep[Figs. 3 and 4. in][]{verner04}.  This suggests that 

410: adopting a single ratio of UV to optical Fe flux (fixed to that of I~Zw~1)

411: should be a reasonably good approximation.

412: 

413: The width of the UV Fe lines is also not necessarily equal to that of the 

414: optical Fe lines. Many authors fix the width of the optical Fe lines to the 

415: width of broad \hbb, while in the UV the width is fixed to that of \mgii\

416: \citep[e.g.,][]{salv07}.  This procedure implicitly assumes that the optical 

417: Fe lines and \hbb\ originate from the same region, and similarly that the 

418: UV Fe lines follow \mgii.  Empirically, however, the width of \hbb\ is 

419: consistent with that of \mgii\ \citep{mclure02}; the difference is only 0.05 

420: dex on average \citep{salv07}. Our results in \S \ref{resultwidth} also show 

421: this. Thus, for the present purposes, it is safe to assume one single value for

422: the width of the optical and UV Fe lines. We leave the width as a free 

423: parameter, as has been done in many previous studies 

424: \citep[e.g.,][]{mclure02,die03,kim06}.

425: 

426: The velocity shift of the UV Fe lines\footnote{In fact, the velocity shift of

427: each individual UV Fe line may be different. \citet{mv01} measured the

428: velocity of each UV Fe line and showed that their shifts can vary by as much

429: as $\sim$ 100 \kms.  But considering the resolution of our spectra, assuming 

430: a single velocity shift is safe, both for the UV and optical.} could be 

431: different from that of the optical lines if they arise from different 

432: regions. We use only the optical Fe template and fit the continuum only in

433: the optical band for testing. The resulting Fe shifts change

434: little, demonstrating that our measurements are mainly determined by the

435: optical Fe lines. Thus, for our goal of studying the optical Fe lines,

436: assuming one single shift for the UV and optical Fe lines is an adequate

437: approximation.

438: 

439: It should be noted here that because of the two reasons mentioned above (low

440: S/N around UV Fe lines and incomplete wavelength near), the present paper

441: cannot conclude whether the UV and optical \feii\ have a common origin.

442: 

443: \subsubsection{Multicomponent Fit}

444: \label{contifit}

445: 

446: The continuum model described by Eq. (\ref{equ-conti}) is fitted by 

447: minimizing the quantity

448: %

449: \begin{equation}

450:   \chi^2=\sum_i\left(\frac{y_i-y_{\rm model}}{\sigma_i}\right)^2,

451: \end{equation}

452: %

453: where $\sigma_i$ is the error of the data set $(x_i,y_i)$.  We adopt the 

454: Levenberg-Marquardt method \citep[chap.  15.5]{press92} to solve 

455: Eq. (\ref{equ-conti}), 

456: which is  nonlinear. We also use it in fitting the emission lines (\S

457: \ref{linefit}).  The fitting is performed in the following windows:

458: 2470--2625, 2675--2755, 2855--3010, 3625--3645, 4170--4260, 4430--4770,

459: 5080--5550, 6050--6200, and 6890--7010 \ang. These windows are devoid of strong

460: emission lines \citep{mv01,kim06}. The window 3625-3645 \ang\ is used to

461: constrain the Balmer continuum emission, because in this region there is no

462: strong Fe emission \citep{wil85}. The reduced \ks\ distribution has a median value of 

463: \ks\ $=$ 1.365. 

464: 

465: Two examples of continuum decomposition are shown in Figures \ref{fig-conti1}

466: and \ref{fig-conti2}.

467: The top panel shows the corrected spectrum.  The spectrum in the fitting

468: window is plotted in green. Each component is plotted in blue and the summed

469: continuum in red.  The middle panel shows the residual spectrum, which is

470: the pure emission-line spectrum for the next step (\S \ref{linefit}). The

471: model fits the spectrum very well except in the region $\sim$ 3100--3700

472: \ang, where no Fe template is available.  In fact, the total flux of the

473: residual spectrum in this region strongly correlates with the Fe flux $F_{\rm

474: Fe}$.  This is consistent with the ``small blue bump'' being produced by Fe 

475: lines and the Balmer continuum \citep{wil85}. We subtract the power law and the

476: Balmer continuum from the corrected spectrum and show the enlarged resultant

477: spectrum (Fe-only spectrum) in the wavelength range 4100--5600 \ang\ in the

478: bottom panel. The Fe model is plotted in red.  

479: 

480: \begin{figure*}

481:   \centering

482:   \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f1.eps}

483:   \caption{

484:   Example of continuum decomposition for SDSS J115507.61+520129.6, which has 

485:   narrow Fe lines. Its \vfe\ is 

486:   459$\pm$16 \kms. Note that our Fe model fits the two strong \feii\ lines at 

487:   4924 and 5018 \ang\ very well, even though these two lines are not in 

488:   the fitting window.  The top panel gives the spectrum after Galactic 

489:   extinction and redshift correction. The spectrum in the fitting window is 

490:   plotted in green; each component is plotted in blue; and the summed 

491:   continuum is plotted in red. The middle panel shows the residual, 

492:   pure emission-line spectrum. Two blue dashed lines mark the positions of 

493:   \hb\ $\lambda$4861 and \oiii\ $\lambda$5007.

494:   The bottom panel shows the spectrum after subtracting the power law and the

495:   Balmer continuum in the wavelength range 4100--5600 \ang.  The red spectrum

496:   is our Fe model. The blue dashed line in the bottom panel is the

497:   position of the peak of \feii\ $\lambda$4924 with zero velocity

498:   shift.  

499:   }

500:   \label{fig-conti1}

501: \end{figure*}

502: 

503: \begin{figure*}

504:   \centering

505:   \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f2.eps}

506:   \caption{ Same as Fig. \ref{fig-conti1}, but for 

507:   SDSS J112611.63+425246.4, which has broad Fe lines.

508:   Note the large departure of the modeled \feii\ $\lambda$4924 line from its

509:   rest-frame wavelength (blue dashed line in the bottom panel). \vfe\ is

510:   1691$\pm$119 \kms.}

511:   \label{fig-conti2}

512: \end{figure*}

513: 

514: From the first example on SDSS J115507.61+520129.6, which has 

515: narrow Fe lines, the Fe model not only agrees with the Fe-only spectrum in our 

516: fitting windows (in green), but it also fits the two strong \feii\ lines at 

517: 4924 and 5018 \ang\ very well, even though these two lines are not in the

518: fitting windows. Two blue dashed lines in the middle panel mark the positions

519: of \hb\ $\lambda$4861 and \oiii\ $\lambda$5007. The blue dashed line in the 

520: bottom panel marks the position of \feii\ $\lambda$4924 line with zero 

521: velocity shift. The shift of Fe emission in this source can be seen clearly 

522: from the position of the \feii\ $\lambda$4924 line; the velocity shift, as 

523: measured from the model and with respect to \oiii,  is 459$\pm$16 \kms.  For 

524: the second source, SDSS J112611.63+425246.4, \feii\ $\lambda$4924 cannot be 

525: distinguished from \oiii\ $\lambda$4959 but the shift can be seen from the 

526: \feii\ model. In this case, it is 1691$\pm$119 \kms.

527: 

528: \subsection{Emission-line Fitting}

529: \label{linefit}

530: 

531: After subtracting the continuum, we measure the \hb\ and \oiii\

532: emission lines from the pure emission-line spectrum. We use multiple

533: components to fit the emission lines over the wavelength range 4770--5080 \ang.

534: The narrow \hb\ component, \oiii\ $\lambda$4959, and \oiii\ $\lambda$5007 are

535: modeled using three Gaussian. The \oiii\

536: $\lambda\lambda$4959, 5007 lines are forced to have the same FWHM and no 

537: relative wavelength shift, and their intensity ratio fixed to the theoretical 

538: value of 3.0. The narrow \hb\ component (\hbn) is forced to have the same FWHM 

539: as \oiii\ $\lambda$5007, a shift of up to 600 \kms\ relative to \oiii\ 

540: $\lambda$5007, and an intensity constrained to lie between 1/20 and 1/3 of that

541: of \oiii\ $\lambda$5007 \citep[e.g.][]{veilleux87,mcgill08}.  If 

542: necessary, we add another two Gaussian components for 

543: \oiii\ $\lambda\lambda$4959, 5007  to match their wings, and a

544: corresponding Gaussian is added to \hbn\ to ensure that \hbn\ and \oiii\

545: have the same profile. Following \citet{salv07} and \citet{mcgill08}, the broad \hb\

546: component is modeled using a Gauss-Hermite function \citep{vandermarel93},

547: whose best fit yields the FWHM, peak velocity shift, and the square root of

548: the second moment ($\sigma_{{\rm H}\beta}$). As illustration, Figure 

549: \ref{fig-hbo3} shows the emission-line fitting for the two sources in Figures

550: \ref{fig-conti1} and \ref{fig-conti2}.

551: The top panel shows the pure emission-line spectrum. The multiple  

552: components are in blue and the sum of them is in red; the bottom panel is the 

553: residuals.  

554: 

555: \begin{figure*}

556:   \centering

557:   \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.45\textwidth]{f3a.eps}

558:   \hspace{0.4cm}\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.45\textwidth]{f3b.eps}

559:   \caption{ Fitting of the emission lines for the two quasars in 

560:   Figs. \ref{fig-conti1} and \ref{fig-conti2}. The top panel shows the pure 

561:   emission-line spectrum. Each component is in blue, 

562:   and the sum of them is in red. The bottom panel shows the residuals.}

563:   \label{fig-hbo3}

564: \end{figure*}

565: 

566: We also measure the \oii\ and \mgii\ emission lines when they are available.

567: Since the continuum around \oii\ is not well determined (we make two

568: assumptions in the model for the higher-order Balmer lines; see the last 

569: paragraph in \S \ref{balconti}), we simply fit \oii\ above a locally defined

570: continuum with a single Gaussian \citep{greene05a}. As many sources have weak

571: \oii\ emission, we adopt as detection criterion that the line must have an

572: amplitude larger than 3 times the standard deviation of the local continuum.

573: The \mgii\ $\lambda\lambda$2796, 2803 doublet is fitted using two

574: Gauss-Hermite functions; they have the same parameters except that the

575: intensity ratio between them is fixed to 2 \citep{bal96}. The FWHMs and

576: velocity shifts of \mgii\ are calculated from a single Gauss-Hermite function.

577: 

578: \subsection{Tests of the Continuum Decomposition}

579: \label{mcsim}

580: The template-fitting method for measuring Fe emission and the 

581: Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm for nonlinear fitting are widely used as almost 

582: ``standard'' approaches. We add a new parameter \vvfe\ and set \fwhmfe\ free 

583: in our fitting. Since the S/N of the majority of the sources in our sample are 

584: low (about 50\% have S/N $<$ 15), it is necessary to test the reliability of

585: the Fe emission measurement.  We perform a suite of simulations similar to those

586: done in \citet{greene06b}.  Using a Monte Carlo method to generate artificial 

587: spectra, we measure the Fe emission of these spectra using the same method as

588: that used for the observed spectra.  Differences between input and output 

589: parameters can then be compared to evaluate potential systematic errors and 

590: biases.

591: 

592: We build the simulated continuum spectrum as a linear combination of a

593: single power law and Fe emission expressed by Eq. (\ref{equ-fe}). 

594: We generate a realistic noise pattern for the spectra using a real error 

595: array taken from SDSS observations, scaling it by a multiplicative factor 

596: to match the desired S/N of the simulation.  For each pixel of the

597: simulated spectrum, a Gaussian random deviation is added. Bad pixels have

598: large deviates statistically.  We use a mask array from an actual FITS file 

599: to locate the masked pixels; some of the pixels that have large errors are 

600: masked by the SDSS pipeline, but not all.  This procedure ensures that the 

601: simulated spectra have a realistic noise level and noise pattern. 

602: 

603: There are three main factors that can affect the measurements of \vvfe\ and

604: \fwhmfe: (1) the S/N of the spectrum; (2) the strength (EW) of the iron 

605: emission; and (3) the width (FWHM) of the iron lines.  Our simulations

606: demonstrate that the input value of \vvfe\ in the simulated spectrum 

607: has a very minimal effect on the systematic bias of the measured output 

608: values of \vvfe\ or \fwhmfe, and so we neglect it from further consideration.  

609: We calculate 

610: ${\rm EW_{Fe}}=F({\rm Fe}~\textsc{ii}~\lambda4570)/F_{5100}$ where, in the 

611: present paper, $F({\rm Fe}~\textsc{ii}~\lambda4570)$ is the flux of the \feii\ 

612: emission between 4434 and 4684 \AA.  Most of the quasars in the sample have a 

613: \ewfe\ between 15 and 75 \ang\ and \fwhmfe\ between 1000 and 5000 \kms. 

614: Accordingly, we test four values of \ewfe\ (15, 25, 50, 75 \ang) and vary 

615: \fwhmfe\ from 1000 to 5000 \kms, in steps of 500 \kms. We set S/N = 10, which 

616: is the lower limit of the S/N in the sample.  \vvfe\ is fixed at zero so that 

617: we can examine whether the measured shifts are real or spurious.

618: 

619: For each pair of values for \ewfe\ and \fwhmfe, we generate 100 spectra. We 

620: fit the continuum and then calculate the quantity

621: \begin{equation}

622:   \delta_{\rm sim}^V=\frac{V_{\rm in}-V_{\rm out}}{{\rm FWHM}_{\rm in}},

623: \end{equation}

624: where $V_{\rm in}$ and $V_{\rm out}$ are input and output values of $V_{\rm

625: Fe}$, respectively, and ${\rm FWHM_{in}}$ is the input \fwhmfe. 

626: Figure \ref{fig-mc}{\it a}\ shows \dsv\ as a function of \fwhmfe.  

627: The results are plotted using different colors and line styles for different 

628: values of \ewfe. For each \ewfe, there are three lines: the middle line 

629: represents the mean \dsv, and the other two lines above and below are one 

630: standard deviations (\ssv)

631: above and below the mean. From the diagram, we can see that the average value

632: of \dsv\ is always close to 0.   This demonstrates that 

633: the measured value of \vvfe\ shows no systematic redshift or blueshift with

634: increasing \fwhmfe\ and \ewfe. 

635: Obviously, \ssv\ increases with decreasing \ewfe; measuring \feii\ emission 

636: is very uncertain when \ewfe\ is small.  Based on the results of these 

637: tests, we decided to exclude from the sample sources with \ewfe\ $<$ 25 \ang.

638: It should be noted that the S/N in this particular simulation is

639: set at the lower limit of our sample, so the uncertainties shown in Figure

640: \ref{fig-mc} should be considered upper limits.  Figure \ref{fig-mc}{\it b}\ 

641: shows the difference between the error given by our code and that given by the 

642: simulation. \sfv\ is the average value of the

643: errors given by the code in the 100 trials divided by ${\rm FWHM_{in}}$. 

644: 

645: \begin{figure*}

646:   \centering

647:   \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.45\textwidth]{f4a.eps}%

648:   \hspace{0.4cm}\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.45\textwidth]{f4b.eps}

649:   

650:   \vspace{0.5cm}

651:   \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.45\textwidth]{f4c.eps}%

652:   \hspace{0.4cm}\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.45\textwidth]{f4d.eps}

653:   \caption{ ({\it a}) Input-output simulations of \vfe\

654:   measurements. We define \dsv\ $=(V_{\rm in}-V_{\rm out})/{\rm FWHM_{in}}$. 

655:   For each \ewfe, the middle line represents the mean \dsv, and the other two 

656:   lines above and below are one standard deviation above and below the mean. The

657:   S/N in the simulation is 10, which is the lower limit of our sample, so the

658:   uncertainties shown here should be considered upper limits.  ({\it b}) Test 

659:   of the error bars given by the code.  \sfv\ is the average value of the 

660:   errors given by the code in 100 trials, divided by ${\rm FWHM_{in}}$, and 

661:   \ssv\ is the standard deviation of \dsv.  ({\it c}) Input-output simulations 

662:   of \fwhmfe\ measurements. We define \dsw\ 

663:   $={\rm (FWHM_{out}-FWHM_{in})/FWHM_{in}}$. ({\it d}) Test of the error bars 

664:   by the code. \sfw\ is the average value of the relative errors of \fwhmfe\ 

665:   given by the code in 100 trials, and \ssw\ is the standard deviation of 

666:   \dsw. See text for details of the simulation.}

667:   \label{fig-mc}

668: \end{figure*}

669: 

670: Figures \ref{fig-mc}{\it c}\ and \ref{fig-mc}{\it d}\ show the systematic error

671: in the measurement of \fwhmfe. We define

672: %

673: \begin{equation}

674: \delta_{\rm sim}^{\rm FWHM}={\rm \frac{FWHM_{out}}{FWHM_{in}}-1}.

675: \end{equation}

676: %

677: The standard deviation of \dsw\ is denoted by \ssw, and \sfw\ is the average 

678: value of the relative errors of \fwhmfe\ (defined as the error of the \fwhmfe\ 

679: divided by ${\rm FWHM_{in}}$) given by the code.

680: 

681: From these simulations, we conclude: (1) the mean values of \dsv\ and \dsw\ 

682: cluster around 0 and exhibit no trend as a function of \fwhmfe\ or \ewfe; (2) 

683: the error given by our code is consistent with that given by the simulations 

684: (except perhaps for the \ewfe\ $=$ 15 \ang\ bin). 

685: These results show that our measurements are reliable and robust.

686: 

687: \subsection{Comparison with Conventional Fe Template-fitting Methods}

688: \label{compare}

689: There are two conventional methods for Fe fitting.  Both have been widely 

690: used and effective.   The first (model 1) assumes that the Fe lines have no 

691: velocity shift but that their width can be different with that of \hbb\ 

692: \citep[e.g.,][]{bg92,marzi96,mclure02,die03,greene05b,kim06,woo06}.

693: Alternatively (model 2), one assumes that the Fe lines have no shift and that 

694: they have the same width as \hbb\ \citep[e.g.,][]{netzer07,salv07}.  Two 

695: obvious questions arise.  Does our continuum model (Eq. (\ref{equ-conti})) 

696: significantly improve the fit? And second, how does our continuum 

697: decomposition affect the emission-line measurements (e.g., \hb\ and \oiii) and 

698: the physical parameters subsequently derived from them (e.g., central BH mass 

699: and the Eddington ratio)?

700: 

701: We compare the results derived from our approach with the two standard 

702: methods described above.  Following \citet[Chapter 12.1]{lupton93}, we use the

703: F-test\footnote{Strictly speaking, this test is valid only for models that 

704: use linear fitting. But it has been empirically used for nonlinear models and 

705: seems to be effective (e.g., see \citealt{hao05}).} to calculate how 

706: significantly our model improves the fit for each source. Comparing with model 

707: 1, 71\% of the sources are better fit by our model at a significance of 

708: $>$95.45\%, and 58\% of the sources are better fit at a significance level of 

709: $>$99.73\%.  With respect to model 2, the corresponding improvement can be 

710: seen in 89\% of the sources at a significance of $>$95.45\% and in 80\% of the 

711: sources at a significance of $>$99.73\%.  On average, our model decreases the 

712: reduced \ks\ by 0.039 and 0.094 compared  with models 1 and 2, respectively. 

713: We conclude that our approach of allowing \vvfe\ and \fwhmfe\ to be free 

714: parameters significantly improves the fit in most objects.

715: 

716: Next, we evaluate the actual impact that the different methods have on measured 

717: and derived physical quantities.  We measure the \hbb\ and \oiii\ emission 

718: lines, derive \mbh\ and \er\ (see \S \ref{resulter}) for each model, and then 

719: calculate the relative differences of the parameters between our model and the

720: two fiducial standard models.  As summarized in Table \ref{tab-diff}, the 

721: differences in line luminosities and line widths for \hbb\ and \oiii, \mbh,

722: and \er\ are all less than 5\%, while changes in velocity shifts are also no 

723: more than 50 \kms.  The only exception is for sources with very weak \oiii\ 

724: lines.  In this regime, the measurement of \oiii\ can be strongly affected by 

725: \feii\ $\lambda$4924 and \feii\ $\lambda$5018, and the effect on 

726: $L_{\textsc{[O iii]}}$ and FWHM$_{\textsc{[O iii]}}$ in Table \ref{tab-diff} is 

727: large (a few tens of percent).  This exercise demonstrates that, for most 

728: applications, the choice of method for Fe template fitting is in practice 

729: unimportant---unless the main scientific objective is to actually study the 

730: \feii\ emission itself. 

731: 

732: \begin{deluxetable*}{ccccccccc}

733:   %\rotate

734:   %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

735:   \tablewidth{0pt}

736:   \tablecolumns{9}

737:   \tablecaption{Effect of Fe Template-fitting Method on Other Parameters

738:   \label{tab-diff}}

739:   \tablehead{

740:   \colhead{Model} & \colhead{$L({\rm H}\beta_{\rm BC})$} &

741:   \colhead{\fwhmhbb} & \colhead{\vvhbb} & \colhead{$L_{\textsc{[O iii]}}$} &

742:   \colhead{FWHM$_{\textsc{[O iii]}}$} & \colhead{$V_{\textsc{[O iii]}}$} & 

743:   \colhead{\mbh} & \colhead{\er} \\

744:   \colhead{(1)} & \colhead{(2)} & \colhead{(3)} & \colhead{(4)} &

745:   \colhead{(5)} & \colhead{(6)} & \colhead{(7)} & \colhead{(8)} &

746:   \colhead{(9)}

747:   }

748:   \startdata

749:   \scriptsize

750:   fix \vvfe, free \fwhmfe\     & $-$1.75\%(2.99\%) & $-$1.74\%(3.54\%) & 

751:   $-$27.2(49.2) & $-$2.15\%(5.01\%) & $-$1.02\%(9.51\%) & 2.76(35.6) &

752:   $-$0.07\%(0.49\%) & 2.23\%(11.2\%) \\

753:   \scriptsize

754:   fix both \vvfe\ and \fwhmfe\ & $-$1.46\%(3.14\%) & $-$0.39\%(4.10\%) &

755:   $-$23.2(47.9) & $-$0.48\%(5.58\%) & $-$0.31\%(10.22\%) & 2.95(32.0) &

756:   $-$0.01\%(0.46\%) & 0.63\%(10.5\%) 

757:   \enddata

758: 

759:   \tablecomments{Changes in emission-line parameters and derived physical

760:   parameters due to using different Fe template-fitting models. Col. (2):

761:   luminosity of \hbb. Col. (3): FWHM of \hbb. Col. (4): \hbb\ velocity shift.

762:   Col. (5): luminosity of \oiii. Col. (6): FWHM of \oiii. Col. (7): \oiii\

763:   velocity shift. Col. (8): mass of the central BH. Col. (9): Eddington ratio 

764:   of the central BH (see \S \ref{resulter} for details of how

765:   to derive \mbh\ and \er). Each column shows the relative changes in

766:   percentage, except for Col. (4) and (7), which show the difference in 

767:   absolute velocity shift in \kms. The number in parenthesis is the standard 

768:   deviation.}

769: \end{deluxetable*}

770: 

771: \subsection{Redshifts}

772: \label{redshift}

773: The narrow emission lines are commonly used to obtain the systemic redshift. 

774: The \oiii\ $\lambda$5007 line is the strongest narrow line for most quasars, 

775: so it is most often used. However, \citet{boroson05} showed that 

776: \oiii\ can be blueshifted with respect to the low-ionization forbidden lines, 

777: which provide a better rest-frame. In our sample, 2265 sources ($\sim 50$\%) 

778: have detectable \oii\ $\lambda$3727 emission.  Figure \ref{fig-o2shift} shows 

779: the distribution of velocity shifts between \oiii\ and \oii; positive velocity 

780: indicates a redward shift. Consistent with the results of 

781: \citet{boroson05}, the majority of the sources have blueshifted \oiii; the 

782: median blueshift is $-47$ \kms.  Because the \oiii\ blueshifts are much 

783: smaller than the velocity shifts seen in \feii\ and in other broad lines (see 

784: \S \ref{resultshift}) and only half of our sample is detected in \oii, we 

785: still use \oiii\ to define the rest-frame.  Thus, we define the \feii\ 

786: velocity shift by \vfe=\vvfe$-V_{\textsc{[O iii]}}$, where $V_{\textsc{[O iii]}}$ is the 

787: velocity shift of the core component of the \oiii\ $\lambda5007$ line measured 

788: in \S \ref{linefit}.  

789: 

790: \begin{figure}

791:   \centering

792:   \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.45\textwidth]{f5.eps}

793:   \caption{ Distribution of \oiii\ velocity shifts with respect to

794:   \oii. Positive velocity indicates a redshift. The dotted line marks the

795:   position of zero velocity shift, while the dashed line marks the median of the

796:   distribution.}

797:   \label{fig-o2shift}

798: \end{figure}

799: 

800: \subsection{Errors}

801: \label{error}

802: 

803: We calculate the error of \vfe\ from the fitting of the continuum and

804: the fitting of the \oiii\ line. Figure \ref{fig-err}{\em a} shows the

805: distribution of the \vfe\ errors. Most velocity shifts have an error $< 200$ 

806: \kms, and the median of the distribution is 116 \kms. We also plot the

807: relative error on \fwhmfe\ in Figure \ref{fig-err}{\em b}.  The typical value 

808: is about 10\% to 20\%, and the median is 12.0\%. 

809: 

810: \begin{figure*}

811:   \centering

812:   \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f6.eps}

813:   \caption{ Distribution of ({\em a}) error in the \feii\

814:   velocity shift and ({\em b}) relative error in \feii\ FWHM. The dashed

815:   line marks the median of the distribution.}

816:   \label{fig-err}

817: \end{figure*}

818: 

819: \section{Results}

820: \label{result}

821: 

822: The full catalog of the measurements used in the analysis below is available

823: electronically. Table \ref{tab-format} describes the contents and the

824: formats of each column. All the emission line velocity shifts are with

825: respect to \oiii\ $\lambda$5007 and a positive value indicates a redward

826: shift. $-9999$ in the columns of \mgii\ (Col. 21---26) and \oii\

827: (Col. 35---40) measurements indicates the line lies out of the SDSS spectral

828: coverage or too weak to be detected (see \S \ref{linefit} for details). The

829: details of how to deriving the radio and X-ray properties (Col. 19 \& 20),

830: and the \mbh\ and Eddington ratio \er\ (Col. 42 \& 43), are described in \S

831: \ref{resultother} and \S \ref{resulter} respectively.

832: 

833: \begin{deluxetable*}{lcccl}

834:   %\tabletypesize{\tiny}

835:   \tablewidth{0pt}

836:   \tablecolumns{3}

837:   \tablecaption{Spectrophotometric Measurements Table Format

838:   \label{tab-format}}

839:   \tablehead{

840:   \colhead{Column} & \colhead{Format} & \colhead{Units} & \colhead{Label}

841:   &\colhead{Description} 

842:   }

843:   \startdata

844:   1  & a18   & \nodata & SDSS Name & SDSS DR5 Object Designation hhmmss.ss$+$ddmmss.s (J2000.0) \\

845:   2  & f8.4  & \nodata & $z$       & Redshift determined using the peak of the \oiii\ $\lambda$5007 \\

846:   3  & e12.4 & \ergs   & $L({\rm Fe} \textsc{ ii } \lambda4570)$  & Luminosity of the \feii\ emission between 4434 and 4686 \ang \\

847:   4  & e12.4 &         &           & Error in $L({\rm Fe} \textsc{ ii } \lambda4570)$ \\

848:   5  & f8.1  & \kms    & \fwhmfe   & \feii\ FWHM \\

849:   6  & f8.1  &         &           & Error in \fwhmfe \\

850:   7  & f8.1  & \kms    & \vfe      & \feii\ velocity shift; all the emission line velocity shifts are \\

851:                              & & & & ~~~~with respect to \oiii\ $\lambda$5007, and a positive value indicates a redward shift.\\

852:   8  & f8.1  &         &           & Error in \vfe \\

853:   9  & e12.4 & \ergs   & $L({\rm H}\beta_{\rm BC})$ & \hbb\ luminosity \\

854:   10 & e12.4 &         &           & Error in $L({\rm H}\beta_{\rm BC})$ \\

855:   11 & f8.1  & \kms    & \fwhmhbb  & \hbb\ FWHM \\

856:   12 & f8.1  &         &           & Error in \fwhmhbb \\

857:   13 & f8.1  & \kms    & \vhbb     & \hbb\ velocity shift \\

858:   14 & f8.1  &         &           & Error in \vhbb \\

859:   15 & e12.4 & \ergsa  & $L_{5100}$ & Specific continuum luminosity at 5100 \ang \\

860:   16 & e12.4 &         &           & Error in $L_{5100}$ \\

861:   17 & f7.3  & \nodata & $\alpha$  & Power law spectral index of the continuum \\

862:   18 & f7.3  & \nodata &           & Error in $\alpha$ \\

863:   19 & a2e10.3 & \ergsh & $L_{\rm 6 cm}$ & Specific luminosity at 6 cm derived from the Peak flux density measured in FIRST, \\

864:                              & & & & ~~~~assuming a radio spectral index = $-$0.5; the upper limits are derived from \\

865:                              & & & & ~~~~the FIRST flux limits; $-$1.000 indicates not in FIRST survey area. \\ 

866:   20 & e11.3 & \ergsh  & $L_{\rm 2 keV}$ & Specific luminosity at 2 kev derived from {\it ROSAT}\ PSPC count rate;\\

867:                              & & & & ~~~~0.000 means no detection. \\

868:   21 & e12.4 & \ergs   & $L_{{\rm Mg} \textsc{ ii}}$ & \mgii\ luminosity; $-$9999 means no detection. \\

869:   22 & e12.4 &         &           & Error in $L_{{\rm Mg} \textsc{ ii}}$ \\

870:   23 & f8.1  & \kms    & ${\rm FWHM}_{{\rm Mg} \textsc{ ii}}$ & \mgii\ FWHM \\

871:   24 & f8.1  &         &           & Error in ${\rm FWHM}_{{\rm Mg} \textsc{ ii}}$ \\

872:   25 & f8.1  & \kms    & $v_{{\rm Mg} \textsc{ ii}}$  & \mgii\ velocity shift \\

873:   26 & f8.1  &         &           & Error in $v_{{\rm Mg} \textsc{ ii}}$ \\

874:   27 & e12.4 & \ergs   & $L_{\textsc{[O iii]}}$ & \oiii\ $\lambda$5007 luminosity \\

875:   28 & e12.4 &         &           & Error in $L_{\textsc{[O iii]}}$ \\

876:   29 & f8.1  & \kms    & ${\rm FWHM}_{\textsc{[O iii]}}$ & \oiii\ $\lambda$5007 FWHM \\

877:   30 & f8.1  &         &           & Error in ${\rm FWHM}_{\textsc{[O iii]}}$ \\

878:   31 & e12.4 & \nodata & $L({\rm H}\beta_{\rm NC})/L_{\textsc{[O iii]}}$ & Ratio of \hbn\ to \oiii\ $\lambda$5007 \\

879:   32 & e12.4 & \nodata &           & Error in $L({\rm H}\beta_{\rm NC})/L_{\textsc{[O iii]}}$ \\

880:   33 & f8.1  & \kms    & \vhbn     & \hbn\ velocity shift \\

881:   34 & f8.1  &         &           & Error in \vhbn \\

882:   35 & e12.4 & \ergs   & $L_{\textsc{[O ii]}}$ & \oii\ luminosity; $-$9999 means no detection. \\

883:   36 & e12.4 &         &           & Error in $L_{\textsc{[O ii]}}$ \\

884:   37 & f8.1  & \kms    & ${\rm FWHM}_{\textsc{[O ii]}}$  & \oii\ FWHM \\

885:   38 & f8.1  &         &           & Error in ${\rm FWHM}_{\textsc{[O ii]}}$ \\

886:   39 & f8.1  & \kms    & $v_{\textsc{[O ii]}}$ & \oii\ velocity shift \\

887:   40 & f8.1  &         &           & Error in $v_{\textsc{[O ii]}}$ \\

888:   41 & f8.1  & \kms    & $\sigma_{{\rm H}\beta}$ & Square root of the second moment of \hbb \\

889:   42 & e11.3 & $M_\odot$ & \mbh    & Mass of the central Black Hole \\

890:   43 & e11.3 & \nodata & \er       & Ratio of bolometric luminosity to Eddtington luminosity \\

891:   44 & e12.4 & \nodata & \rfe      & Ratio of \feii\ to \hbb\ \\

892:   \enddata

893: \end{deluxetable*}

894: 

895: \subsection{Fe Emission Shifts}

896: \label{resultshift}

897: From the distribution of \vfe\ (Fig. \ref{fig-shift}{\it a}), we can clearly 

898: see that most quasars exhibit \feii\ emission that is {\it redshifted}\ 

899: with respect to the systemic velocity of the narrow-line region (defined 

900: by \oiii).  Only 481 out of 4037 quasars have blueshifts.  The median shift is

901: \vfe\ = $+$407 \kms\ (the vertical dashed line in the figure), with a maximum 

902: value of \vfe\ $\approx$ 2000 \kms. Considering that the typical error on 

903: \vfe\ is only $<$200 \kms\ (\S \ref{error}), the vast majority of the values

904: in the redshifted tail of the \vfe\ distribution must be real.  For comparison,

905: we also calculate the distribution of \feii\ velocity shift with respect to 

906: \oii\ (Fig. \ref{fig-shift}{\it b}).  The results obtained by using \oii\ 

907: as reference instead of \oiii\ are very similar and lead to the same 

908: conclusion.

909: 

910: \begin{figure*}

911:   \centering

912:   \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f7.eps}

913:   \caption{ ({\it a}) Distribution of \feii\ velocity shifts with

914:   respect to \oiii.  ({\it b}) \feii\ velocity shifts with respect to \oii.  

915:   Panel ({\it c}) shows the distributions of \vfe\ in the subsample that has 

916:   stricter criteria S/N $>$ 15 and \ks\ $<$ 1.2.  ({\it d}) \hbb\ velocity 

917:   shifts with respect to \oiii.  ({\it e}) \mgii\ velocity shifts with respect 

918:   to \oiii.  ({\it f}) Distribution of \feii\ velocity shifts with respect to 

919:   \hbb.  Positive velocity indicates a redshift.  The number in each panel is 

920:   the median value of the respective distribution, which is also marked by 

921:   the dashed line.  The dotted line marks the position of zero velocity shift.

922: }

923:   \label{fig-shift}

924: \end{figure*}

925: 

926: To rule out the possibility that the excess \feii\ redshifts arise from 

927: artifacts due to poor data quality or fitting errors, we examined a subset of 

928: data using the much stricter selection criteria that S/N $>$ 15 and \ks $<$ 

929: 1.2.  These 309 quasars have the best data quality and the most reliable

930: continuum fitting.  The shape of the distribution of \vfe\ this 

931: subsample (Fig. \ref{fig-shift}{\it c}) is quite similar to that of our whole 

932: sample.  The median velocity shift is 414 \kms.   We conclude on the basis of 

933: this test, as well as the Monte Carlo simulations described in \S \ref{mcsim},

934: that the \feii\ redshifts are robust and reliable.

935: 

936: Finally, we illustrate that the velocity shifts found for \feii\ really do 

937: imply radial motions of the \feii-emitting region, and not others.  Figures  

938: \ref{fig-shift}{\it d}\ and \ref{fig-shift}{\it e}\ show the velocity shifts 

939: for \hbb\ [\vhbb] and \mgii.  The distribution of \vhbb\ is almost symmetrical 

940: around 0, with a median value of only 65 \kms\ and a maximum value of about 

941: $\pm$1000 \kms. This result is consistent with previous studies (e.g., Fig. 3 

942: of \citealt{sul00a}; Fig. 2 of \citealt{baskin05}; Fig. 6 of 

943: \citealt{shang07}). 

944: Most recently, \citet{bonning07} also studied the velocity shift 

945: of \hbb\ using SDSS quasars, and our result is very similar to theirs; they 

946: fit their distribution of velocity shifts (their Fig. 1) using a Gaussian 

947: profile with a peak velocity of 100 \kms.  Our distribution of \mgii\ shifts is 

948: indistinguishable from that of \hbb.  It is symmetrical around 0, has a median 

949: value of 113 \kms\ and a maximum value of about $\pm$1000 \kms, and it is 

950: consistent with those given in, for example, \citet{richards02b} and 

951: \citet{shang07}. 

952: 

953: In order to compare \feii\ directly with \hbb, we also plot the distribution 

954: of the \feii\ velocity shift with respect to \hbb, as shown in Figure

955: \ref{fig-shift}{\it f}.  Again, most objects have redward shifts in \feii. 

956: 

957: \subsection{Fe Emission Widths}

958: \label{resultwidth}

959: 

960: Figures \ref{fig-width}{\it a}\ and \ref{fig-width}{\it b}\ show the 

961: distribution of \fwhmfe\ and \fwhmhbb, respectively. \fwhmfe\ has an artifical 

962: lower limit of 900 \kms, which is bounded by the I~Zw~1 \feii\ template.  The 

963: median value of \fwhmfe, 2533 \kms, is $\sim 0.74$ of that of \fwhmhbb\ (3445 

964: \kms).  Almost all the sources have \feii\ lines narrower than \hbb, and the 

965: majority have \fwhmfe\ $\approx$ 3/4 \fwhmhbb\ (Fig. \ref{fig-width}{\it c}). 

966: This result is contrary to the prevailing notion that \feii\ and \hbb\

967: have similar profiles and are emitted from the same region 

968: \citep[e.g.,][]{bg92}, but is consistent with some more recent studies of a 

969: few objects \citep[e.g.,][]{popovic07,matsuoka07}. 

970: 

971: \begin{figure*}

972:   \centering

973:   \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f8.eps}

974:   \caption{ Distribution of ({\it a}) \feii\ FWHM and ({\it b})

975:   \hbb\ FWHM. The number in the panel is the median FWHM, which is also marked 

976:   by the dashed line. \fwhmfe\ has a lower limit of 900 \kms\ (dotted line); 

977:   this is artificial because the I Zw 1 Fe template we used has a width of 900 

978:   \kms.  ({\it c}) Correlation between \fwhmfe\ and \fwhmhbb.  The dashed 

979:   diagonal line shows \fwhmfe\ = \fwhmhbb, and the solid line is \fwhmfe\ = 

980:   3/4 \fwhmhbb. ({\it d}) Correlation between \fwhmfe\ and \fwhmmg.  The 

981:   dashed diagonal denotes \fwhmhbb\ = \fwhmmg.}

982:   \label{fig-width}

983: \end{figure*}

984: 

985: We find that \fwhmhb\ and \fwhmmg\ are well correlated and roughly equal 

986: (Fig. \ref{fig-width}{\it d}), consistent with \citet{mclure02,salv07}. 

987: \citet{salv07} find that \fwhmhb\ tends to be larger than \fwhmmg\ for 

988: \fwhmhb\ $>$ 4000 \kms, an effect they attribute to an extensive red wing on 

989: \hb. This tendency can also be seen in our plot, and our composite spectra 

990: (Fig. \ref{fig-comhb}) do show that \hb\ tends to have a red asymmetry when 

991: broad.

992: 

993: \subsection{Correlations with Other Emission-line Parameters}

994: \label{resulte1}

995: 

996: \citet{bg92} used principal components analysis to study the correlations 

997: among various observed properties of nearby quasars, and found that most of

998: the variance in the optical spectra of quasars is connected with the inverse

999: correlation between \feii\ and \oiii\ strength. The soft X-ray photon index

1000: ($\Gamma_{\rm soft}$), the ratio of \feii\ to \hbb\ (\rfe), and the line width 

1001: of \hbb\ [\fwhmhbb] correlate with each other \citep{boller96,wang96,laor97a}.

1002: \citet{sul00a,sul00b,sul07} identified that \fwhmhbb, \rfe, $\Gamma_{\rm

1003: soft}$, and the velocity shift at half maximum of the broad \civ\ line profile 

1004: [\chalf] provide discrimination between different AGN types. So, for simplicity,

1005: instead of using a formal principal components analysis to study the 

1006: correlations between \feii\ and other parameters, we just study the 

1007: correlations with \fwhmhbb\ and \rfe.

1008: 

1009: The left panel of Figure \ref{fig-e1shift} shows the dependence of \vfe\ on

1010: \fwhmhbb\ for our sample. The crosses in the figure present the median

1011: values of the errors in both coordinates. Dividing the sample by a vertical

1012: line of \fwhmhbb\ = 3000 \kms\ 

1013: and a horizontal line of \vfe\ = 800 \kms, we find that almost

1014: all sources with \fwhmhbb\ $<$ 3000 \kms\ have \vfe\ $<$ 800 \kms, and most 

1015: sources with \vfe\ $>$ 800 \kms\ have \fwhmhbb\ $>$ 3000 \kms.  Sources with 

1016: large \vfe\ and low \fwhmhbb\ are rare. There is also a large spread in \vfe\ 

1017: for sources with \fwhmhbb\ $>$ 3000 \kms. Note that narrow-line Seyfert 1 

1018: galaxies (NLS1s), defined by \fwhmhbb $<$ 2000 \kms\ \citep{oster85}, 

1019: almost all have low \vfe\ in our sample.

1020: 

1021: \begin{figure*}

1022:   \centering

1023:   \includegraphics[angle=-90,totalheight=0.48\textwidth]{f9a.eps}

1024:   \hspace{0.3cm}\includegraphics[angle=-90,totalheight=0.48\textwidth]{f9b.eps}

1025:   \caption{ Correlation diagram for ({\it left}) \vfe\ vs.

1026:   \fwhmhbb\ and for ({\it right}) \vfe\ vs. \rfe. The crosses in the figure

1027:   present the median values of the errors in both coordinates. See text for

1028:   description of the vertical and horizontal lines.}

1029:   \label{fig-e1shift}

1030: \end{figure*}

1031: 

1032: Following \citet{netzer07}, we define \rfe\ as the line luminosity ratio of

1033: \feii\ and \hbb,

1034: %

1035: \begin{equation}

1036:   R_{\rm Fe}= \frac{L({\rm Fe} \textsc{ ii } \lambda 4570)}

1037:   {L({\rm H}\beta_{\rm BC})},

1038: \end{equation}

1039: %

1040: where $L({\rm Fe} \textsc{ ii } \lambda4570)$ is the luminosity of \feii\

1041: emission between $\lambda$4434 and $\lambda$4684.  The right panel of

1042: Figure \ref{fig-e1shift} shows the correlation diagram for \vfe\ versus \rfe. 

1043: The vertical line is \rfe\ = 1. Most sources with \rfe\ $>$ 1 have small

1044: \vfe. Sources with large \rfe\ and large \vfe\ are rare.

1045: This correlation agrees with the correlation between \rfe\ and \er\ shown in

1046: Figure 5 of \citet{netzer07}, considering the strong inverse correlation between

1047: \vfe\ and \er\ as we find in \S \ref{resulter}, below.

1048: 

1049: The statistical connection between \vfe\ and \fwhmhbb\ or \rfe\ is similar to

1050: those shown in Figures 2 and 9 of \citet{bg92}. This suggests that \vfe\ can

1051: also provide useful empirical discrimination between different types of AGNs 

1052: from optical spectra.

1053: 

1054: \subsection{The Physical Driver of \vfe}

1055: \label{resulter}

1056: The Eddington ratio \er\ is often suggested to be the main physical driver of 

1057: the spectral diversity in quasars

1058: \citep{sul00a,sul00b,marzi01,boroson02,marzi03a}, and \mbh\ is argued to be an

1059: important determinant of radio-loudness

1060: (\citealt{laor00,boroson02,mclure04}, but see \citealt{ho02}). This section 

1061: investigates attempts to determine which physical variable is the main driver 

1062: of variations in \vfe.

1063: 

1064: Central black hole masses can be estimated from empirical relations 

1065: derived from reverberation mapping. We derived the BH mass and \er\ using

1066: the relation calibrated by \citet{mcgill08},

1067: %

1068: \begin{eqnarray} 

1069:   {\rm log} \left(\frac{M_{\rm BH}}{M_\odot}\right) & = & 7.383 + 2~

1070:   {\rm log} \left(\frac{\sigma_{{\rm H}\beta}}{1000~{\rm km~s^{-1}}}\right)

1071:   \nonumber\\

1072:   & & + 0.69~

1073:   {\rm log} \left(\frac{\lambda L_{5100}}{10^{44}~{\rm ergs~s^{-1}}}\right)

1074:   \label{equ-m}

1075: \end{eqnarray}

1076: %

1077: (their Table 3; we use the factors for $L_{5100,t}$ and

1078: $\sigma_{H\beta}$).

1079: We estimate the bolometric luminosity using 

1080: $L_{\rm bol}=9\lambda L_{5100}$ \citep{kaspi00}.

1081: 

1082: Figure \ref{fig-eddshift}{\it a}\ shows \vfe\ as a function of \er\ for our sample.

1083: The vertical dot-dashed line is log(\er) = $-0.8$, and the horizontal dot-dashed

1084: line is \vfe\ = 800 \kms.  We find that almost all sources with 

1085: log(\er) $>$ $-0.8$  have \vfe\ $<$ 800 \kms, and most sources with \vfe\ 

1086: $>$ 800 \kms\ have log(\er) $<$ $-0.8$.  There are very few sources with large 

1087: \vfe\ and large \er. The error in \er\ is roughly 0.3 dex, which is

1088: dominated by the systematical error in estimating the BH mass using

1089: empirical relations \citep{mcgill08}.

1090: 

1091: \begin{figure*}

1092:   \centering

1093:   \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.45\textwidth]{f10a.eps}

1094:   \hspace{0.4cm}\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.45\textwidth]{f10b.eps}

1095:   \caption{ Correlation of \feii\ velocity shift vs. Eddington 

1096:   ratio, with the \feii\ velocity shift plotted ({\it a}) linearly and 

1097:   ({\it b}) logarithmically.  See text explanation of the dot-dashed lines. 

1098:   The solid lines is the fit to data in Eq. (\ref{equ-cor}).  The 

1099:   green squares represent the mean log(\er) in bins of 

1100:   $\Delta v_{\rm Fe}=200~{\rm km~s^{-1}}$, and the error bars represent the 

1101:   standard deviations.  The green dashed line shows the fit to the binned data. 

1102:   }

1103:   \label{fig-eddshift}

1104: \end{figure*}

1105: 

1106: The logarithmic form of this diagram is plotted in Figure 

1107: \ref{fig-eddshift}{\it b}, excluding the 481 sources with negative \vfe. We 

1108: find a strong inverse correlation between \vfe\ and \er.  The fit taken into

1109: account the uncertainties in both quantities yields the solid line:

1110: %

1111: \begin{equation}

1112:   \log v_{\rm Fe}=(1.00\pm0.05)

1113:   -(1.83\pm0.05)~{\rm log}(L_{\rm bol}/L_{\rm Edd}). 

1114:   \label{equ-cor}

1115: \end{equation}

1116: %

1117: Pearson's correlation coefficient $r_{\rm P}$ is $-0.53$, and the probability 

1118: $P$ of a chance correlation $< 1\times10^{-5}$.  

1119: Note that below an \vfe\ of about 150 \kms, the scatter to the fitted line

1120: increases. As mentioned in \S \ref{mcsim}, the input value of \vvfe\ affects

1121: the measurements little; this means that the errors of \vfe\ will not decrease

1122: with \vfe. Thus, for sources with small \vfe, the fractional error on \vfe\

1123: will be large.  This causes the scatter described before.  The squares show

1124: the mean values of log(\er) in bins of $\Delta v_{\rm Fe}=200~{\rm

1125: km~s^{-1}}$; the error bars in panel ({\it a}) show the standard deviations.

1126: The dashed line shows the fit to the binned values of log(\er): 

1127: %

1128: \begin{equation}

1129:   \log v_{\rm Fe}=(0.60\pm1.40)

1130:   -(2.22\pm0.99)~{\rm log}(L_{\rm bol}/L_{\rm Edd})~,

1131:   \label{equ-cor2}

1132: \end{equation}

1133: %

1134: In this case, $r_{\rm P}=-0.98$ and $P < 1\times10^{-5}$. The above analysis

1135: indicates that \vfe\ depends strongly on \er; $v_{\rm Fe}~\propto~(L_{\rm

1136: bol}/L_{\rm Edd})^\gamma$, with $\gamma\approx -2$: the larger the Eddington 

1137: ratio, the lower the velocity shift \vfe.  Plotting \vfe\ as an function of 

1138: \mbh\ and \lbol\ (not shown) reveals that neither of these two variables is as 

1139: important as \er.  The Eddington ratio is the main physical driver for \vfe.

1140: This result provides a strong constraint on theoretical models of the \feii\ 

1141: emission region.

1142: 

1143: \subsection{Correlations with Radio and X-ray Properties}

1144: \label{resultother}

1145: 

1146: In an effort to understand the physical origin of the \feii\ velocity shift, we 

1147: examine whether \vfe\ correlates with radio and X-ray emission. 

1148: \citet{richards02b} conducted a similar investigation in their analysis of 

1149: velocity shifts for the \civ\ line.  Figure \ref{fig-frac} (upper panel) 

1150: plots the fraction of radio-loud quasars in bins of different \vfe.  We define 

1151: the radio-loudness parameter as $R={\rm log}(L_{\rm 6 cm}/L_B)$, where 

1152: $L_{\rm 6 cm}$ and $L_B$ are the observed luminosities at 6 cm and 4400 \ang.

1153: We use the FIRST \citep{becker95} peak flux densities at 20 cm in Table 2 of 

1154: \citet{schneider07} to calculate the radio luminosity, assuming a radio 

1155: spectral index $\alpha_{\rm r} = -0.5$.  The optical luminosities are 

1156: calculated from the power-law continuum we fitted. We classify the sources 

1157: with $R > 1$ as radio-loud.  There are a total of 165 radio-loud quasars

1158: out of 3750 sources in the present sample within the FIRST survey area. Note 

1159: that the percentage of radio-loud quasars in our sample is $165 / 3750 = 

1160: 4.4\%$, slightly lower than the 6.7\% found by \citet{mclure04}.  The

1161: reason is probably that our sample is biased toward quasars with high \er\

1162: (by our \feii\ EW cut), since $R$ decreases with increasing

1163: \er\ \citep{ho02,greene06a}. 

1164: The rightmost bin

1165: have the largest radio-loud fraction, in which there are 7 radio-loud

1166: quasars out of 85, a fraction $\sim$2 times higher than average. The 

1167: cumulative Poisson probability ($P$) of getting 7 or more objects 

1168: out of 85 is 

1169: $8.54\times10^{-2}$ \citep{gehrels86} when the average is 3.74 ($165 / 3750

1170: \times 85$), no more than a $3\,\sigma$ significance ($1-P$ $<$ 99.73\%). 

1171: Thus there is no clear trend of radio-loud fraction with \vfe. 

1172: 

1173: \begin{figure}

1174:   \centering

1175:   \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.45\textwidth]{f11.eps}

1176:   \caption{ ({\it Top}) The fraction of radio-loud quasars in

1177:   bins of different \vfe.  

1178:   ({\it Middle}) The fraction of X-ray-detected quasars.

1179:   ({\it Bottom}) \aox\ in bins of different \vfe. }

1180:   \label{fig-frac}

1181: \end{figure}

1182: 

1183: Next, we evaluate the fraction of X-ray-detected quasars as a function of 

1184: \vfe\ (middle panel of Fig. \ref{fig-frac}). We use the data from

1185: \citet{schneider07}, who provide the X-ray full-band count rate from the {\it

1186: ROSAT}\ All-Sky Survey Bright \citep{voges99} and Faint \citep{voges00} 

1187: sources catalogs.  No obvious trend is apparent.  Finally, we test for 

1188: possible dependence of \vfe\ on the optical-to-X-ray spectral index 

1189: $\alpha_{\rm OX} \equiv -0.3838~{\rm log} (L_{\rm 2500}/L_{\rm 2~keV})$, where 

1190: $L_{\rm 2500}$ is the specific luminosity at 2500 \ang\

1191: calculated using the power-law continuum we measured and $L_{\rm 2~keV}$ is the

1192: specific luminosity at 2 keV derived from the {\it ROSAT}\

1193: count rate using {\tt PIMMS} \citep{mukai93} assuming a power-law model with

1194: photon index of 2. We see no obvious trend between \aox\ and \vfe\ either

1195: (bottom panel of Fig. \ref{fig-frac}).

1196: 

1197: \subsection{Composite Spectra}

1198: \label{composite}

1199: In order to get a visual impression of the correlations between \vfe\ and

1200: other emission-line properties, we create a set of five composite spectra by

1201: combining quasars in bins of different \vfe. We divide our sources into five 

1202: subsamples, covering the following velocity ranges: $-$250 to 250 \kms\ (A, 

1203: 1350 objects), 250 to 750 \kms\ (B, 1362 objects), 750 to 1250 \kms\ (C, 590 

1204: objects), 1250 to 1750 \kms\ (D, 332 objects), and 1750 to 2250 \kms\ (E, 180 

1205: objects).  The composite spectra are generated following the procedure of

1206: \citet{vb01}. The spectra of quasars in each subsample are deredshifted using 

1207: the redshifts determined from \oiii\ and then normalized to unity average flux 

1208: density over the rest wavelength interval 5090--5110 \ang. We generate the 

1209: composites using the geometric mean, which is appropriate for quasars 

1210: with power-law spectra because the geometric mean will result in a power law 

1211: with the mean spectral index \citep{vb01}. 

1212: 

1213: Figure \ref{fig-com} shows the composite spectra of the five subsamples

1214: described above. We plot the spectra in different colors and shifted them

1215: slightly vertically for clarity.  The spectra are arranged so that, from top

1216: to bottom, the velocity shifts of the \feii\ emission increase.  We find that 

1217: \fwhmhbb\ increases while the \feii\ flux decreases, consistent with the

1218: correlations seen in \S \ref{resulte1}. Inspecting the continuum slope,

1219: composite A shows a redder continuum than the rest (this can be seen most 

1220: easily

1221: when comparing composites A with B). This suggests that sources with low \vfe,

1222: which from our analysis are often accompanied by high \er\ and strong 

1223: \feii\ emission, tend to have redder UV-optical continua. This pattern is 

1224: reminiscent of that seen by \citet{constantin03}, who found that the

1225: UV-optical continuum of NLS1s, which have high \er\ and strong \feii, is redder

1226: than that of regular AGNs. This is unexpected from standard accretion disk 

1227: models, since a higher \er\ generally produces a hotter disk and thus a bluer

1228: continuum \citep[e.g.,][and references therein]{hubeny00}.

1229: 

1230: \begin{figure*}

1231:   \centering

1232:   \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f12.eps}

1233:   \caption{ Composite spectra of quasars in bins of different

1234:   \vfe. See text for details on generating the composite spectra. We shifted 

1235:   the spectra vertically for clarity.  Major emission lines are

1236:   indicated; see \citet{vb01} for a complete identification of the emission

1237:   lines.}

1238:   \label{fig-com}

1239: \end{figure*}

1240: 

1241: Note that it is difficult to see the shifts of the \feii\ emission clearly in 

1242: the composite spectra.  For example, the peaks between $\sim 5150$ and $5250$ 

1243: \AA\ appear to remain unshifted. The reason is as follows.  On the one hand, 

1244: since both the shifts and widths of the \feii\ emission have a large scatter 

1245: in each subsample, stacking the spectra effectively smooths the \feii\ 

1246: emission. On the other hand, there are many narrow emission lines (e.g., line

1247: system N3 in \citealt{veron04}) that are weak in a single spectrum and have

1248: nearly no shift.  Stacking the spectra enhances these narrow features.  

1249: 

1250: Another interesting phenomenon is that the wings of the \hb\ profile become 

1251: progressively more (red) asymmetric when \vfe\ increases (Fig. \ref{fig-comhb}).

1252: The inserted plot shows the difference spectra between composites B through 

1253: E, using composite A as reference, to emphasize the profile changes.

1254: Note the systematic migration of the red excess as \vfe\ increases.

1255: We do find some individual sources, similar to OQ 208 \citep{marzi93},

1256: whose redshifted \hb\ component seems to be associated with \feii\ emission 

1257: (\S \ref{shifthb}).  The asymmetry in \hb\ has been studied by many authors.

1258: \citet{bg92} found that there are \hb\ red asymmetries at small \rfe.

1259: \citet{marzi96} found that radio-loud AGNs show predominantly redshifted and

1260: red asymmetric \hb\ profiles: the larger the shift, the broader the line.

1261: Recently, \citet{netzer07} investigated the fractional luminosity of the red

1262: part of the \hb\ line and found that it has a tendency to increase with

1263: decreasing \feii/\hb\ (see their Table 3). Considering that \vfe\

1264: inversely correlates with \rfe, as shown in the right panel of

1265: Figure \ref{fig-e1shift}, the finding here is consistent with theirs.  One

1266: possible interpretation, discussed in \S \ref{feorig}, is that the \hb\ excess 

1267: emerges from the same region that produces \feii.  A systematic

1268: study of this issue will be carried out in a future paper.

1269: 

1270: \begin{figure}

1271:   \centering

1272:   \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.45\textwidth]{f13.eps}

1273:   \caption{ \hb\ and \oiii\ region of the composite

1274:   spectra. The inserted plot shows the difference spectra.

1275:   The vertical dashed line is drawn at 4861 \ang. 

1276:   Note the excess on the red wing of \hb.

1277:   }

1278:   \label{fig-comhb}

1279: \end{figure}

1280: 

1281: \section{Discussion}

1282: \label{discuss}

1283: 

1284: \subsection{Redshifted \hb\ Component: OQ 208-like Quasars}

1285: \label{shifthb}

1286: In our sample, we find a class of sources whose \hb\ profile can be fitted 

1287: well including an additional, substantially redshifted Gaussian 

1288: component. Usually this additional component has a velocity width intermediate

1289: between that of the broad and narrow components. We call this the intermediate

1290: component.  An interesting and possibly highly significant fact is that the 

1291: width and velocity shift of this additional \hb\ component is consistent with 

1292: those of the \feii\ emission. A prototype of this kind of sources is OQ 208 

1293: (Mrk 668), which was first studied in detail by \citet{marzi93}. They pointed 

1294: out that in OQ 208 the \feii\ lines at 4924 and 5018 \ang\ have the same peak 

1295: displacement as the red peak of \hb. 

1296: 

1297: \begin{figure*}

1298:   \centering

1299:   \noindent\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f14.eps}

1300:   \caption{ Spectrum of SDSS J094603.94+013923.6, an example of a 

1301:   OQ 208-like source. ({\it a}) Continuum decomposition. ({\it b})

1302:   Fe model and the observed spectrum after subtracting the power law and Balmer

1303:   continuum.  The spectra and the marks plotted in panel ({\it a}) and ({\it

1304:   b}) are as the same as those in the top and bottom panels of Fig.

1305:   \ref{fig-conti1}.  ({\it c}) Fitting of \hb\ and \oiii\ emission lines. The 

1306:   multiple Gaussian components are in blue, and the sum of them is in red. The 

1307:   two blue dashed lines mark the rest-frame wavelength of \hb\ and \oiii\ 

1308:   $\lambda$5007. ({\it d}) Fitting of \oii\ emission line.  The blue dashed 

1309:   line marks the rest-frame wavelength of \oii\ $\lambda$3727.  Note that the 

1310:   redshifts and widths of \oii, \oiii, and \hbn\ are almost the same.  Note 

1311:   also that we added an additional redshifted Gaussian line to fit \hb. The

1312:   width and velocity shift of this redshifted \hb\ component are consistent

1313:   with those of \feii\ emission. See text and Table \ref{tab-redhb} for more

1314:   details.} 

1315:   \label{fig-redhb}

1316: \end{figure*}

1317: 

1318: Figure \ref{fig-redhb} shows the spectrum of SDSS J094603.94+013923.6, an 

1319: example of a OQ 208-like source.  Panel ({\it a}) shows the continuum 

1320: decomposition, following the same convention as used in the top panel of 

1321: Figure \ref{fig-conti1}. Panel ({\it b}) shows the emission-line spectrum after 

1322: continuum subtraction.  The red solid line is our \feii\ model.  The blue 

1323: dashed line marks the position of the peak of \feii\ $\lambda$4924 at zero 

1324: velocity shift. The shift of the \feii\ spectrum is obvious.  Panel ({\it c})

1325: illustrates the detailed fitting of the \hb\ and \oiii\ emission lines.  The 

1326: profile of \hbn\ is fixed to that of \oiii.  The two blue dashed lines mark 

1327: the rest-frame wavelength of \hb\ and \oiii\ $\lambda$5007; both \hbn\ and 

1328: \oiii\ share the same velocity.  A prominent, intermediate-width redshifted 

1329: component is clearly required to fit \hb.  Panel ({\it d}) shows the fit for 

1330: \oii\ $\lambda$3727, which also has the same redshift as \oiii.  This 

1331: means that this source is not an \oiii\ ``blue outlier'' \citep{boroson05}.

1332: Table \ref{tab-redhb} lists the FWHMs and velocity shifts of \feii, \oiii,

1333: \oii, and each component of \hb. The velocity shifts are all with respect to 

1334: \oiii. The width and velocity shift of the redshifted \hb\ component are 

1335: consistent with those of \feii\ emission.  The emission-line spectrum of 

1336: SDSS J094603.94+013923.6 can be divided into three systems: (1) \hb, \oiii, 

1337: and \oii\ emission lines with narrow (FWHM $\approx 500$ \kms) widths and no 

1338: velocity shift; (2) a normal ``broad'' \hb\ component with FWHM $\approx 5700$ 

1339: \kms, approximately at rest with respect to the narrow lines; and (3) \feii\ 

1340: emission and \hb\ of intermediate width (FWHM $\approx 1500$ \kms) 

1341: redshifted by $\sim 1500-1700$ \kms.

1342: 

1343: \begin{deluxetable*}{ccccccc}

1344:   %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

1345:   \tablewidth{0pt}

1346:   \tablecolumns{7}

1347:   \tablecaption{Emission-line Properties of SDSS J094603.94+013923.6

1348:   \label{tab-redhb}}

1349:   \tablehead{

1350:   \colhead{} & \colhead{Fe} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{\hb} &

1351:   \colhead{\oiii\tablenotemark{a}}

1352:   & \colhead{\oii} \\

1353:   \cline{3-5} 

1354:   \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{Redshifted} & \colhead{Broad} &

1355:   \colhead{Narrow} & \colhead{} & \colhead{}

1356:   }

1357:   \startdata

1358:   FWHM (\kms)  & 1543(55) & 1428(18) & 5730(58) & \nodata\tablenotemark{b} &

1359:   505(6) & 568(18) \\

1360:   Velocity shift (\kms) & 1533(24) & 1756(7)  &

1361:   373(25)  & 49(10) & \nodata\tablenotemark{c} & $-$22(8) 

1362:   \enddata

1363:   \tablecomments{The number in parenthesis is the error.}

1364:   \tablenotetext{a}{Refers to the line core component used to derive

1365:   the redshift.}

1366:   \tablenotetext{b}{The width of the \hbn\ is fixed to the width of \oiii.}

1367:   \tablenotetext{c}{The redshift of \oiii\ is used as the systemic redshift.}

1368: \end{deluxetable*}

1369: 

1370: OQ 208-like sources can offer an unique view to understand the origin of

1371: \feii\ emission and the structure of the BLR.  A detailed study of this class 

1372: of objects is beyond the scope of this paper.  We will analyze a sample of 

1373: such sources discovered in our work in a forthcoming publication.  

1374: For the purposes of the present discussion, we simply note: \feii\ emission 

1375: is not associated with the conventional broad component of \hb\ but instead

1376: originates from the same region emitting the intermediate component of \hb. 

1377: This 

1378: is consistent with our findings in \S \ref{resultshift} that the width of 

1379: \feii\ is systematically narrower than that of \hbb.

1380: 

1381: \subsection{Where is the \feii\ Emission Region?}

1382: \label{feorig}

1383: 

1384: This paper has demonstrated that \feii\ emission most likely does not 

1385: originate from the same location that produces the broad component of \hb.

1386: The evidence comes from the systematic redshifts and narrower line widths 

1387: of \feii\ compared to \hbb.  As discussed below, the simplest interpretation 

1388: is that \feii\ emission originates from an inflow that is located at the outer 

1389: parts of the BLR.  The \hbb\ emission line itself shows no systematic velocity 

1390: shift, and any velocity shift itself is also small. This suggests that \hbb\ 

1391: emission region is well virialized and that the width of \hbb\ is dominated by 

1392: gravity, making this line suitable for estimating BH masses.  

1393: 

1394: Our finding that \fwhmfe\ $\approx 3/4$ \fwhmhbb\ suggests that the \feii\

1395: emission region is farther from the central BH than the \hbb\ emission region.

1396: If the \feii\ emission region is also virialized, so that $R\propto v^{-2}$, 

1397: then it is about 2 times farther from the center than the \hbb\ region.  On 

1398: the other hand, the systematic redshift of \feii\ indicates that the 

1399: assumption of virialization may be incorrect.

1400: 

1401: The redward shift of \feii\ and the inverse correlation between \vfe\ and \er\

1402: favor a scenario in which \feii\ emission emerges from an inflow. To explain 

1403: the systematic redshift, the inflow on the back side of the accretion disk must

1404: be obscured by the accretion disk and the torus, so that we can only observe 

1405: the redshifted part on the nearer side.  To explain the inverse correlation 

1406: between \vfe\ and \er, we speculate that the inflow is driven by gravity 

1407: toward the center and decelerated by the radiation pressure.  An increase in 

1408: \er\ would enhance the radiation pressure and lead to a decrease of the

1409: inward velocity of the inflow. 

1410: 

1411: Previous studies of the \civ\ line have shown that it tends to be 

1412: systematically blueshifted 

1413: \citep[e.g.,][]{gastell82,wilkes84,marzi96,sul00a,richards02b}.  

1414: This finding has led to suggestions

1415: that high-ionization lines and low-ionization lines

1416: originate from distinct regions \citep[see also the result of reverberation

1417: mapping][]{peterson99}. High-ionization lines such as \civ\ may be emitted 

1418: from some kind of outflowing disk wind 

1419: \citep[e.g.,][and references therein]{leighly04a,leighly04b,baskin05,shang07}, 

1420: whereas low-ionization lines such as \hb\ are anchored to a more 

1421: disk-like configuration.  This paper adds an additional element to this 

1422: picture.  We suggest that in addition to a disk and a wind, the BLR has yet 

1423: another component, one associated with inflowing material that produces 

1424: the \feii\ emission.  Interestingly, \citet{welsh07} recently reanalyzed the 

1425: spectral variability of the well-studied Seyfert 1 galaxy NGC 5548 and 

1426: suggested, based on the differential lag between the red and blue wings of the 

1427: \hb\ profile, that the BLR in this object contains an inflowing component.

1428: Such an inflow is likely to develop from the inner edge of the dusty torus,

1429: which may connect with the accretion disk. If this picture is correct, the 

1430: redshifted \feii\ emission can be used as a probe of the transition region

1431: from the dusty torus to the BLR or accretion disk.  

1432: More detailed theoretical modelling and observations of the \feii\ emission 

1433: region are clearly required to test this picture.

1434: 

1435: \section{Summary}

1436: \label{summary}

1437: 

1438: Using a large sample of quasars selected from SDSS, we have studied the 

1439: properties of their optical \feii\ emission, especially their velocity profile

1440: and velocity shift, with the goal of understanding the origin of the nature 

1441: of the \feii-emitting region.  This was accomplished using an improved iron 

1442: template-fitting method, whose reliability has been tested using extensive 

1443: simulations. 

1444: 

1445: Our findings can be summarized as follows:

1446: 

1447: 1. The majority of quasars show redshifted \feii\ emission with respect to the 

1448: systemic velocity of narrow-line region (as traced by \oiii\ $\lambda$5007) 

1449: or of the conventional broad-line region (as traced by \hb).  The shift is

1450: typically $\sim 400$~\kms\ and can be as large as $\sim 2000$ \kms. By 

1451: contrast, neither the broad \hb\ nor \mgii\ lines show a systematic velocity

1452: shift.

1453: 

1454: 2. The velocity width of \feii\ is systematically narrower than that of the 

1455: broad component of \hb.  On average, \fwhmfe\ $\approx$ 3/4 \fwhmhbb.

1456: 

1457: 3. The velocity shift of \feii\ increases with decreasing Eddington ratio, 

1458: decreasing Fe strength, and increasing \hb\ line width.  No clear trends 

1459: with radio or X-ray properties can be discerned.

1460: 

1461: 4. Composite spectra reveal that objects with large \feii\ velocity shifts 

1462: have a tendency to exhibit asymmetric \hb\ profiles with an excess red

1463: wing.  This phenomenon is particularly notable in a subclass of objects 

1464: that resembles the prototype OQ 208.  The \hb\ profile of OQ 208-like sources 

1465: show a redshifted component of intermediate width that closely resembles 

1466: the \feii\ emission.

1467: 

1468: 5. Our results strongly indicate that \feii\ emission does not originate from 

1469: the same region of the BLR that produces the ``traditional'' broad 

1470: component of \hb.  Instead, we suggest that \feii\ is associated with the 

1471: intermediate-width \hb\ component, both tracing an inflowing component of 

1472: the BLR.

1473: 

1474: \acknowledgments

1475: We thank the referee, Kirk Korista, for his careful, detailed comments and

1476: suggestions that helped to improve the paper.

1477: J.M.W. is very grateful to A. Laor for useful comments.  We thank T. A.

1478: Boroson and M. Vestergaard for the I Zw 1 Fe templates and their 

1479: suggestions on the spectral fitting.  We appreciate extensive discussions

1480: among the members of IHEP AGN group. The research is supported by NSFC and CAS

1481: via NSFC-10325313, 10733010 and 10521001, and KJCX2-YW-T03, respectively.

1482: This paper has used data from SDSS, FIRST, and {\it ROSAT}.  We are grateful

1483: to the SDSS, FIRST, and {\it ROSAT}\ collaborations for their effort

1484: devoted to conducting the surveys and providing the data to the public.

1485: The FIRST survey is supported in part under the auspices of the Department of

1486: Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract W-7405-ENG-48

1487: and the Institute for Geophysics and Planetary Physics.

1488: The ROSAT Project is supported by the Bundesministerium f\"ur Bildung und

1489: Forschung (BMBF/DLR) and the Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (MPG).

1490: Funding for SDSS and SDSS-II has been provided

1491: by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the Participating Institutions, the

1492: National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Energy, the National

1493: Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Japanese Monbukagakusho, and the Max

1494: Planck Society, and the Higher Education Funding Council for England.  The

1495: SDSS Web site is http://www.sdss.org/. The SDSS is managed by the Astrophysical

1496: Research Consortium (ARC) for the Participating Institutions.  The

1497: Participating Institutions are the American Museum of Natural History,

1498: Astrophysical Institute Potsdam, University of Basel, University of Cambridge,

1499: Case Western Reserve University, The University of Chicago, Drexel University,

1500: Fermilab, the Institute for Advanced Study, the Japan Participation Group, The

1501: Johns Hopkins University, the Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics, the

1502: Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, the Korean Scientist

1503: Group, the Chinese Academy of Sciences (LAMOST), Los Alamos National

1504: Laboratory, the Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy (MPIA), the

1505: Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics (MPA), New Mexico State University, Ohio

1506: State University, University of Pittsburgh, University of Portsmouth,

1507: Princeton University, the United States Naval Observatory, and the University

1508: of Washington.

1509: 

1510: \begin{thebibliography}{}

1511: \bibitem[Adelman-McCarthy et al.(2007)]{adelman07}Adelman-McCarthy, J., et al. 2007, \apjs, 172, 634

1512: \bibitem[Baldwin et al.(1996)]{bal96}Baldwin, J. A., et al. 1996, \apj, 461, 664

1513: \bibitem[Baldwin et al.(2004)]{bal04}Baldwin, J. A., Ferland, G. J., Korista, K. T., Hamann, F., \& LaCluyz\'e, A. 2004, \apj, 615, 610

1514: \bibitem[Baskin \& Laor(2005)]{baskin05}Baskin, A., \& Laor, A. 2005, \mnras, 356, 1029

1515: \bibitem[Becker et al.(1995)]{becker95}Becker, R. H., White, R. L., \& Helfand, D. J. 1995, \apj, 450, 559

1516: \bibitem[Boller et al.(1996)]{boller96}Boller, Th., Brandt, W. N., \& Fink, H. 1996, \aap, 305, 53

1517: \bibitem[Bonning et al.(2007)]{bonning07}Bonning, E. W., Shields, G. A., \& Salviander, S. 2007, \apj, 666, L13

1518: \bibitem[Boroson(2002)]{boroson02}Boroson, T. A. 2002, \apj, 565, 78

1519: \bibitem[Boroson(2005)]{boroson05}------. 2005, \apj, 130, 381

1520: \bibitem[Boroson \& Green(1992)]{bg92}Boroson, T. A., \& Green, R. F. 1992, \apjs, 80, 109

1521: \bibitem[Bottorff et al.(1997)]{bottorff97}Bottorff, M., Korista, K. T., Shlosman, I., \& Blandford, R. D. 1997, \apj, 479, 200

1522: \bibitem[Cardelli et al.(1989)]{ccm89}Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., \& Mathis, J. S. 1989, \apj, 345, 245

1523: \bibitem[Carswell et al.(1991)]{carswell91}Carswell, R. F., et al. 1991, \apj, 381, L5

1524: \bibitem[Collin-Souffrin et al.(1988)]{collin88}Collin-Souffrin, S., Hameury, J.-M., \& Joly, M. 1988, \aap, 205, 19

1525: \bibitem[Constantin \& Shields(2003)]{constantin03}Constantin, A., \& Shields, J. C. 2003, \pasp, 115, 592

1526: \bibitem[Dietrich et al.(2002)]{die02}Dietrich, M., Appenzeller, I., Vestergaard, M., \& Wagner, S. J. 2002, \apj, 564, 581

1527: \bibitem[Dietrich et al.(2003)]{die03}Dietrich, M., Hamann, F., Appenzeller, I., \& Vestergaard, M. 2003, \apj, 596, 817

1528: \bibitem[Ferland et al.(1992)]{ferland92}Ferland, G. J., Peterson, B. M., Horne, K., Welsh, W. F., \& Nahar, S. N. 1992, \apj, 387, 95

1529: \bibitem[Gaskell(1982)]{gastell82}Gaskell, C. M. 1982, \apj, 263, 79

1530: \bibitem[Gehrels(1986)]{gehrels86}Gehrels, N. 1986, \apj, 303, 336

1531: \bibitem[Grandi(1982)]{grandi82} Grandi, S. A. 1982, \apj, 255, 25

1532: \bibitem[Greene \& Ho(2005a)]{greene05a}Greene, J. E., \& Ho, L. C. 2005a, \apj, 627, 721

1533: \bibitem[Greene \& Ho(2005b)]{greene05b}------. 2005b, \apj, 630, 122

1534: \bibitem[Greene \& Ho(2006)]{greene06b}------. 2006, \apj, 641, 117

1535: \bibitem[Greene et al.(2006)]{greene06a}Greene, J. E., Ho, L. C., \& Ulvestad,

1536:   J. S. 2006, \apj, 636, 56

1537: \bibitem[Hao et al.(2005)]{hao05}Hao, L., et al. 2005, \aj, 129, 1783

1538: \bibitem[Hubeny et al.(2000)]{hubeny00}Hubeny, I., Agol, E., Blaes, O., \& Krolik, J. H., 2000, \apj, 533, 710

1539: \bibitem[Ho(2002)]{ho02}Ho, L.~C. 2002, \apj, 564, 120

1540: \bibitem[Isobe et al.(1990)]{isobe90}Isobe, T., Feigelson, E. D., Akritas, M. G., \& Babu, G. J. 1990, \apj, 364, 104

1541: \bibitem[Joly(1987)]{joly87}Joly, M. 1987, \aap, 184, 33

1542: \bibitem[Joly(1991)]{joly91}------. 1991, \aap, 242, 49

1543: \bibitem[Junkkarinen(1989)]{junk89}Junkkarinen, V. 1989, in IAU. Symp. 134, Active Galactic Nuclei, ed. D. E. Osterbrock \& J. S. Miller (Kluwer: Dordrecht), 122 

1544: \bibitem[Kaspi et al.(2000)]{kaspi00}Kaspi, S., Smith, P. S., Netzer, H., Maoz, D., Jannuzi, B. T., \& Giveon, U. 2000, \apj, 533, 631

1545: \bibitem[Kim et al.(2006)]{kim06}Kim, M., Ho, L. C., \& Im, M. 2006, \apj, 642, 702

1546: \bibitem[Kuehn et al.(2008)]{kuehn08}Kuehn, C. A., Baldwin, J. A., Peterson, B. M., \& Korista, K. T. 2008, \apj, 673, 69 

1547: \bibitem[Laor(2000)]{laor00}Laor, A. 2000, \apj, 543, L111

1548: \bibitem[Laor et al.(1997a)]{laor97a}Laor, A., Fiore, F., Elvis, M., Wilkes, B. J., \& McDowell, J. C. 1997a, \apj, 477, 93

1549: \bibitem[Laor et al.(1997b)]{laor97b}Laor, A., Jannuzi, B. T., Green, R. F., \& Boroson, T. A. 1997b, \apj, 489, 656

1550: \bibitem[Leighly(2004)]{leighly04b}Leighly, K. M. 2004, \apj, 611, 125

1551: \bibitem[Leighly \& Moore(2004)]{leighly04a}Leighly, K. M., \& Moore, J. R.  2004, \apj, 611, 107

1552: \bibitem[Lupton(1993)]{lupton93}Lupton, R. H. 1993, Statistics in Theory and Practice (Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press)

1553: \bibitem[McGill et al.(2008)]{mcgill08}McGill, K. L., Woo, J.-H., Treu, T., \& Malkan, M. A. 2008, \apj, 673, 703

1554: \bibitem[Maiolino et al.(2003)]{maio03}Maiolino, R., Juarez, Y., Mujica, R., Nagar, N. M., \& Oliva, E. 2003, \apj, 596, L155

1555: \bibitem[Maoz et al.(1993)]{maoz93}Maoz, D., et al. 1993, \apj, 404, 576

1556: \bibitem[Marziani et al.(1993)]{marzi93}Marziani, P., Sulentic, J. W., Calvani, M., Perez, E., Moles, M., \& Penston, M. V. 1993, \apj, 410, 56

1557: \bibitem[Marziani et al.(1996)]{marzi96}Marziani, P., Sulentic, J. W., Dultzin-Hacyan, D., Calvani, M., \&  Moles, M. 1996, \apjs, 104, 37

1558: \bibitem[Marziani et al.(2003b)]{marzi03b}Marziani, P., Sulentic, J. W., Zamanov, R., Calvani, M., Dultzin-Hacyan, D., Bachev, R., \& Zwitter, T.  2003b, \apjs, 145, 199

1559: \bibitem[Marziani et al.(2001)]{marzi01}Marziani, P., Sulentic, J. W., Zwitter, T., Dultzin-Hacyan, D., \& Calvani, M. 2001, \apj, 558, 553

1560: \bibitem[Marziani et al.(2003a)]{marzi03a}Marziani, P., Zamanov, R. K., Sulentic, J. W., \& Calvani, M. 2003a, \mnras, 345, 1133

1561: \bibitem[Matsuoka et al.(2008)]{matsuoka07}Matsuoka, Y., Oyabu, S., Tsuzuki, Y., \& Kawara, K. 2008, \apj, 673, 62

1562: \bibitem[McIntosh et al.(1999)]{mcin99}McIntosh, D. H., Rix, H.-W., Rieke, M. J., \& Foltz, C. B. 1999, \apj, 517, L73

1563: \bibitem[McLure \&  Jarvis(2002)]{mclure02}McLure, R. J., \& Jarvis, M. J.  2002, \mnras, 337, 109

1564: \bibitem[McLure \&  Jarvis(2004)]{mclure04}------. 2004, \mnras, 353, L45

1565: \bibitem[Mukai(1993)]{mukai93}Mukai, K. 1993, Legacy, 3, 21

1566: \bibitem[Netzer \& Trakhtenbrot(2007)]{netzer07}Netzer, H., \& Trakhtenbrot, B. 2007, \apj, 654, 754

1567: \bibitem[Netzer \& Wills(1983)]{netzer83}Netzer, H., \& Wills, B. J. 1983, \apj, 275, 445

1568: \bibitem[O'Donnell(1994)]{odonnell94}O'Donnell, J. E. 1994, \apj, 422, 158

1569: \bibitem[Osterbrock \& Pogge(1985)]{oster85}Osterbrock, D. E., \& Pogge, R. W.  1985, \apj, 297, 166

1570: \bibitem[Peterson \& Wandel(1999)]{peterson99}Peterson, B. M., \& Wandel, A.  1999, \apj, 521, L95

1571: \bibitem[Phillips(1977)]{phil77}Phillips, M. M. 1977, \apj, 215, 746

1572: \bibitem[Popovi\'c et al.(2007)]{popovic07}Popovi\'c, L. \v{C}., Smirnova, A., Ili\'c, D., Moiseev, A., Kova\v{c}evi\'c, J., \& Afanasiev, V. 2007, in The Central Engine of Active Galactic Nuclei, ed. L. C. Ho \& J.-M.  Wang (San Francisco: ASP), 552

1573: \bibitem[Press et al.(1992)]{press92}Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., \& Flannery, B. P. 1992, Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN (2nd ed.; Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press)

1574: \bibitem[Richards et al.(2002a)]{richards02a}Richards, G. T., et al. 2002a, \aj, 123, 2945

1575: \bibitem[Richards et al.(2002b)]{richards02b}------. 2002b, \aj, 124, 1

1576: \bibitem[Richards et al.(2006)]{richards06}------. 2006, \aj, 131, 2766

1577: \bibitem[Salviander et al.(2007)]{salv07}Salviander, S., Shields, G. A., Gebhardt, K., \& Bonning, E. W. 2007, \apj, 662, 131

1578: \bibitem[Schlegel et al.(1998)]{schlegel98}Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., \& Davis, M. 1998, \apj, 500, 525

1579: \bibitem[Schneider et al.(2007)]{schneider07}Schneider, D. P., et al. 2007, \aj, 134, 102

1580: \bibitem[Shang et al.(2007)]{shang07}Shang, Z., Wills, B. J., Wills, D., \& Brotherton, M. S. \aj, 2007, 134, 294

1581: \bibitem[Sigut \& Pradhan(1998)]{sigut98}Sigut, T. A. A., \& Pradhan, A. K.  1998, \apj, 499, L139

1582: \bibitem[Sigut et al.(2004)]{sigut04}Sigut, T. A. A., Pradhan, A. K., \& Nahar, S. N. 2004, \apj, 611, 81

1583: \bibitem[Spergel et al.(2007)]{spergel06}Spergel, D. N., et al. 2007, \apjs, 170, 377

1584: \bibitem[Storey \& Hummer(1995)]{storey95}Storey, P. J., \& Hummer, D. G.  1995, \mnras, 272, 41

1585: \bibitem[Sulentic et al.(2007)]{sul07}Sulentic, J. W., Bachev, R., Marziani, P., Negrete, C. A., \& Dultzin, D. 2007, \apj, 666, 757

1586: \bibitem[Sulentic et al.(2000a)]{sul00a}Sulentic, J. W., Marziani, P., \& Dultzin-Hacyan, D. 2000a, \araa, 38, 521

1587: \bibitem[Sulentic et al.(2000b)]{sul00b}Sulentic, J. W., Zwitter, T., Marziani, P., \& Dultzin-Hacyan, D. 2000b, \apj, 536, L5

1588: \bibitem[Tsuzuki et al.(2006)]{tsuzuki06}Tsuzuki, Y., Kawara, K., Yoshii, Y., Oyabu, S., Tanab\'e, T., \& Matsuoka, Y., 2006, \apj, 650, 57

1589: \bibitem[Vanden Berk et al.(2001)]{vb01}Vanden Berk, D. E., et al. 2001, \aj, 122, 549

1590: \bibitem[Vanden Berk et al.(2005)]{vb05}------. 2005, \aj, 129, 2047

1591: \bibitem[van der Marel \& Franx(1993)]{vandermarel93}van der Marel, R. P. \& Franx, M. 1993, ApJ, 407, 525

1592: \bibitem[Veilleux \& Osterbrock(1987)]{veilleux87}Veilleux, S., \& Osterbrock, D. E. 1987, \apjs, 63, 295

1593: \bibitem[Verner et al.(2004)]{verner04}Verner, E., Bruhweiler, F., Verner, D., Johansson, S., Kallman, T., \& Gull, T. 2004, \apj, 611, 780

1594: \bibitem[V\'eron-Cetty et al.(2004)]{veron04}V\'eron-Cetty, M.-P., Joly, M., \& V\'eron, P. 2004, \aap, 417, 515

1595: \bibitem[Vestergaard \& Peterson(2005)]{mv05}Vestergaard, M., \& Peterson, B. M.  2005, \apj, 625, 688

1596: \bibitem[Vestergaard \& Wilkes(2001)]{mv01}Vestergaard, M., \&  Wilkes, B. J.  2001, \apjs, 134, 1

1597: \bibitem[Voges et al.(1999)]{voges99}Voges, W., et al. 1999, \aap, 349, 389

1598: \bibitem[Voges et al.(2000)]{voges00}------. 2000, \iaucirc, 7432, 1

1599: \bibitem[Wang et al.(2005)]{wang05}Wang, J., Wei, J. Y., \& He, X. T. 2005, \aap, 436, 417

1600: \bibitem[Wang et al.(1996)]{wang96}Wang, T., Brinkmann, W., \& Bergeron, J.  1996, \aap, 309, 81

1601: \bibitem[Welsh et al.(2007)]{welsh07}Welsh, W. F., Martino, D. L., Kawaguchi, G., \& Kollatschny, W. 2007, in The Central Engine of Active Galactic Nuclei, ed. L. C. Ho \& J.-M.  Wang (San Francisco: ASP), 29

1602: \bibitem[Wheeler et al.(1989)]{wheel89}Wheeler, J. C., Sneden, C., \& Truran, J. W. 1989, \araa, 27, 279

1603: \bibitem[Wilkes(1984)]{wilkes84}Wilkes, B. J. 1984, \mnras, 207, 73

1604: \bibitem[Wills et al.(1985)]{wil85}Wills, B. J., Netzer, H., \& Wills, D. 1985, \apj, 288, 94

1605: \bibitem[Woo et al.(2006)]{woo06}Woo, J.-H., Treu, T., Malkan, M. A., \& Blandford, R. D. 2006, \apj, 645, 900

1606: \bibitem[York et al.(2000)]{york00}York, D. G., et al. 2000, \aj, 120, 1579

1607: \end{thebibliography}

1608: 

1609: \end{document}

1610: