1: % Normal article style for journal.
2: %\documentstyle[12pt,aasms4]{article}
3: % Preprint style.
4: %\documentstyle[12pt,aaspp4]{article}
5: %\documentstyle[emulateapj]{article}
6: % Two-Column Preprint style.
7: %\documentstyle[10pt,aas2pp4,tighten]{article}
8: \documentstyle[preprint]{aastex}
9: \bibliographystyle{apj}
10: \received{}
11: \revised{}
12: \accepted{}
13: \journalid{}{}
14: \articleid{}{}
15: \paperid{}
16: \cpright{}{}
17: \ccc{}
18:
19: \slugcomment{Submitted to the Astrophysical Journal}
20:
21: \lefthead{Wood, Whitney, Robitaille, \& Draine}
22: \righthead{Emission from PAHs \& VSGs in Monte Carlo Radiation Transfer Codes}
23: %\righthead{Carcinogens in Gomez's Hamburger}
24:
25: \begin{document}
26:
27: \title{Emission from Very Small Grains and PAH Molecules in
28: Monte Carlo Radiation Transfer Codes:\\
29: Application to the Edge-On Disk of Gomez's Hamburger}
30:
31: %\title{Carcinogens in Gomez's Hamburger}
32:
33: \author{Kenneth Wood\altaffilmark{1}, Barbara A. Whitney\altaffilmark{2}, Thomas Robitaille\altaffilmark{1},
34: \& Bruce T. Draine\altaffilmark{3} }
35:
36: \altaffiltext{1}{School of Physics \& Astronomy, University of St Andrews,
37: North Haugh, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9AD, Scotland; kw25@st-andrews.ac.uk}
38:
39: \altaffiltext{2}{Space Science Institute, 4750 Walnut St. Suite 205, Boulder, CO 80301;
40: bwhitney@spacescience.org}
41:
42: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Peyton Hall,
43: Princeton, NJ 08544}
44:
45: \authoremail{kw25@st-andrews.ac.uk}
46:
47:
48: \begin{abstract}
49:
50: We have modeled optical to far infrared images, photometry, and
51: spectroscopy of the object known as Gomez's Hamburger. We reproduce the
52: images and spectrum with an edge-on disk of mass $0.3M_\odot$ and radius
53: 1600~AU, surrounding an A0 III star at a distance of 280~pc. Our mass estimate is
54: in excellent agreement with recent CO observations. However, our distance
55: determination is more than an order of magnitude smaller than previous
56: analyses which inaccurately interpreted the optical spectrum. To
57: accurately model the infrared spectrum we have extended our Monte Carlo
58: radiation transfer codes to include emission from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) molecules
59: and very small grains (VSG). We do this using pre-computed PAH/VSG emissivity files for
60: a wide range of values of the mean intensity of the exciting radiation field.
61: When Monte Carlo energy packets are absorbed by PAHs/VSGs we reprocess them to
62: other wavelengths by sampling
63: from the emissivity files, thus simulating the absorption and re-emission process without
64: reproducing lengthy computations of statistical equilibrium, excitation and de-excitation
65: in the complex many level molecules.
66: Using emissivity lookup tables in our Monte Carlo codes gives the flexibility to use
67: the latest grain physics calculations of PAH/VSG emissivity and opacity that are being
68: continually updated in the light of higher resolution infrared spectra.
69: We find our approach gives a good representation of the
70: observed PAH spectrum from the disk of Gomez's Hamburger.
71: Our models also indicate the PAHs/VSGs in the disk have a larger
72: scaleheight than larger radiative equilibrium grains, providing evidence for dust coagulation and settling
73: to the midplane.
74:
75: \end{abstract}
76:
77:
78: \keywords{accretion, accretion disks --- radiative transfer --- stars: circumstellar matter ---
79: ISM: dust, extinction}
80:
81: \section{Introduction}
82:
83: The object known as Gomez's Hamburger \citep{Ruiz87} exhibits the spectral and imaging
84: characteristics of an edge-on circumstellar disk. High resolution HST imagery shows
85: a bipolar reflection nebula of size 5.5\arcsec by 2.5\arcsec bisected by an optically thick
86: dust lane, reminiscent of
87: models and images of disks surrounding low mass Classical T~Tauri stars
88: \citep[e.g.,][]{WH92, Burrows96, Grosso2003}. The HST data support the
89: circumstellar disk (or torus) interpretation first proposed by \citet{Ruiz87} based on lower
90: resolution optical imaging
91: polarimetry and the object's broad band spectral energy distribution (SED) which is
92: faint in the optical and bright at mid- to far-infrared wavelengths. Such SEDs
93: are characteristic of edge-on circumstellar disks \citep[e.g.,][]{Wood2002}. The disk hypothesis
94: for Gomez's Hamburger has been strengthened by recent CO observations \citep{Bujarr2008}
95: that are reproduced with a model of a Keplerian disk of mass $0.9 M_\odot (d/500{\rm pc})^2$,
96: where $d$ is the distance to the source.
97:
98: Optical spectroscopy of Gomez's Hamburger indicates the central source is an A0 III star.
99: Using parameters typical
100: to this spectral type and the integrated broad band spectrum, \citet{Ruiz87}
101: estimated the object to be at a distance of 2.9~kpc with a circumstellar disk of radius 8000~AU.
102: However, as we will show below the disk is smaller and closer than estimated by \citet{Ruiz87}.
103: This is because they did not take into consideration that the integrated spectrum
104: from an edge-on disk is strongly dependent on inclination \citep{Whitney2003a}.
105: At optical wavelengths
106: edge-on disks are only seen in scattered light and can be several orders of magnitude
107: fainter than systems where the central star is directly seen. In addition to the error in distance determination,
108: the spectral type of the central source may not be accurate because the optical spectrum is entirely
109: scattered light. Therefore, the combination of high resolution optical spectroscopy
110: and radiation transfer modeling of the scattered starlight from the disk is required for more accurate spectral
111: typing. However, in the absence of higher resolution optical spectroscopy, in our modeling below
112: we adopt the A0 III spectral type from \citet{Ruiz87}.
113:
114: More recent Spitzer IRS observations of Gomez's Hamburger show strong mid infrared
115: emission features typical of emission from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)
116: molecules and very small grains (VSGs). Such emission features are common in massive star
117: forming regions \citep[e.g.,][]{Churchwell2006} as the emission mechanism is sensitive to
118: the strength of the exciting UV
119: radiation from O and B stars. However, charged PAH molecules exhibit significant opacity at
120: optical and infrared wavelengths, so that the PAH excitation may arise from softer photons
121: \citep{LD2002}, thus enabling PAH emission to be observed from the circumstellar environment of lower
122: mass stars. Indeed, PAH emission has been detected from disks and envelopes around A stars
123: and classical T~Tauri stars \citep[e.g.,][]{Habart2004, Pontop2007, Geers2006}.
124:
125: In this paper we present models for the HST images, broad band spectral energy distribution,
126: and high resolution Spitzer IRS spectrum of Gomez's Hamburger. In doing so, in \S2 we introduce
127: extensions to our Monte Carlo radiation transfer codes that allow us to model
128: emission from PAHs and VSGs. \S3 presents the radiation transfer modeling of Gomez's
129: Hamburger, and in \S4 we summarize our findings and briefly discuss future applications of our new
130: code developments.
131:
132: \section{PAH/VSG Emission Processes}
133:
134: Emission from PAH molecules and
135: VSGs can dominate the mid-infrared spectrum
136: from dusty regions associated with massive star formation. New
137: mid-infrared images from the {\it Spitzer Space Telescope} GLIMPSE survey
138: \citep{Churchwell2004, Churchwell2006} dramatically show PAHs acting as a signpost for
139: massive star formation.
140: The characteristic infrared PAH emission spectrum has been studied in
141: detail in many star-forming regions in the Milky Way and other galaxies using a variety of
142: ground and space-based observatories
143: \citep[e.g.,][]{Peeters2004, DraineSINGS2007}.
144: A proper understanding of the
145: infrared emission from star-forming regions and galaxies therefore requires
146: the inclusion of PAHs and VSGs in radiation transfer codes.
147:
148: Unlike the radiative equilibrium temperatures attained by large dust grains,
149: the absorption and reprocessing of radiation by PAHs and VSGs does not
150: yield an equilibrium temperature. Absorption of a single photon can appreciably increase the energy
151: content of the molecule, and the ensuing radiative de-excitation
152: produces an infrared spectrum consisting of a continuum plus characteristic emission features.
153: Detailed modeling of the emission process therefore
154: requires solving statistical equilibrium in complex multi-level molecules.
155:
156: Approximations exist for determining the reprocessing of photons and emission from PAHs and
157: VSGs and have been incorporated into some radiation transfer codes
158: \citep[e.g.,][]{Misselt2001, Pontop2007, Dullemon2007, Manske1998}. In this
159: paper we introduce a new technique that is readily included into Monte Carlo
160: radiation transfer codes and utilizes the detailed PAH and VSG opacity and
161: emissivity calculations presented by \cite{DL2007}.
162:
163: \subsection{PAH/VSGs in Monte Carlo Radiation Transfer Codes}
164:
165: Our current Monte Carlo radiation transfer codes \citep[see details in][]{Whitney2003a}
166: treat multiple anisotropic scattering in three dimensions and calculate radiative
167: equilibrium dust temperatures and spectra using the \citet{BW2001} technique
168: or iteratively using methods described by \citet{Lucy1999}.
169: The \citet{BW2001} technique works well for two and three dimensional systems \citep[e.g.,][]{Remy2006},
170: but to determine higher signal-to-noise temperatures for the same number of Monte Carlo
171: energy packets, especially for three dimensional systems,
172: the techniques described by \citet{Lucy1999} are more efficient \citep{CW2008}.
173: The \citet{BW2001}
174: technique produces the same temperatures and spectra as Lucy's method, but requires more
175: energy packets (or Monte Carlo photons) and hence longer run times for three dimensional
176: simulations.
177:
178: \citet{Lucy1999} introduced efficient
179: ways for determining mean intensities and hence temperatures and ionization fractions
180: in Monte Carlo codes by summing the path lengths within grid cells of individual "energy
181: packets" as they take their random walks in the radiation transfer simulation. In particular,
182: the Monte Carlo estimator for the mean intensity in a cell is given by,
183: %
184: \begin{equation}
185: J_i = {\epsilon \over{4\pi\Delta t\Delta V_i}}\sum l
186: \end{equation}
187: %
188: where the $\epsilon = L \Delta t /N$ is the energy of each of the $N$ Monte Carlo energy packets,
189: $L$ is the system luminosity, and $\Delta t$ is the time interval of the Monte Carlo simulation.
190: The summation is over all pathlengths, $l$, of energy packets passing through
191: cell $i$ of volume $V_i$. We will make use of this Monte Carlo estimator below.
192:
193: We have extended our Monte Carlo codes to allow for multiple dust species within any given
194: cell in the simulation grid. When Monte Carlo energy packets interact with dust in a cell the
195: dust type they interact with is chosen from the relative opacity of each dust species present,
196: %
197: \begin{equation}
198: P_i = {{\rho_i\kappa_i}\over{\sum_j \rho_j\kappa_j}}
199: \end{equation}
200: %
201: Where $P_i$ is the probability of the energy packet interacting with dust type $i$ which has
202: density and opacity $\rho_i$ and $\kappa_i$.
203:
204: If a Monte Carlo energy packet is absorbed by a dust type that attains a radiative equilibrium
205: temperature, the energy packet is reprocessed and the incremental temperature
206: change of the cell is calculated using the Bjorkman \& Wood technique. Therefore at the end of
207: the simulation we have a temperature grid for each dust type that attains radiative equilibrium
208: temperatures.
209:
210: If however, a Monte Carlo energy packet is absorbed by PAH/VSG opacity, the packet is
211: reprocessed sampling a new frequency from the pre-computed emissivity files of \citet{DL2007}.
212: Since the PAH/VSG emissivity has been computed for a wide range of values of the
213: mean intensity of the exciting radiation field, we choose the relevant emissivity file based on
214: the value of the mean intensity in the cell where the Monte Carlo energy packet was absorbed.
215: This requires an iterative procedure whereby on the first iteration energy packets absorbed by
216: PAHs/VSGs are reprocessed using the emissivity file for $J=1$, where $J$ is
217: the mean intensity relative to the average value for the interstellar radiation field,
218: $J_{ISRF} = 2.17\times 10^{-2} {\rm erg}\, {\rm cm}^{-2}\, {\rm s}^{-1}$
219: \citep{MathisISRF}. On subsequent iterations energy packets are reprocessed
220: based on the mean intensity from the previous iteration, calculated using Eq.~1.
221: Due to the small PAH/VSG fractions in our simulations (typically less than $4\%$) photons
222: reprocessed by PAHs/VSGs do not contribute significantly to the mean intensity. Therefore
223: we find that this procedure requires at most three iterations for convergence.
224:
225: \subsection{Approximations for PAH/VSG Opacities and Emissivities}
226:
227: The extensions to our Monte Carlo codes of allowing for multiple dust types mean that
228: in principle we could employ opacity and emissivity files for grains of many different sizes.
229: However, in this first paper we have taken a simpler approach of introducing a cutoff in the
230: grain sizes at $a=200$~{\AA}, below which we assume grains are transiently heated and
231: energy packets absorbed by these small grains are reprocessed as described above. This
232: is a somewhat arbitrary cutoff, but it is a size above which grains generally attain radiative
233: equilibrium temperatures \citep{DL2007}.
234:
235: In addition to introducing a size cutoff between PAH/VSGs and grains in radiative equilibrium,
236: we make the assumption that the PAH/VSG emissivity is a function only of the mean intensity
237: of the radiation field and not the spectral shape of the exciting radiation field. The \citet{DL2007}
238: emissivities that we use were computed for an exciting radiation field with spectral shape of the model
239: interstellar radiation field of our Galaxy \citep{MathisISRF}. We make this
240: approximation in the absence of emissivity calculations for a wide range of exciting spectra. This is
241: an appropriate first approximation since the Monte Carlo code
242: accurately treats the transfer and absorption of photons at all wavelengths by the PAH/VSG opacity.
243: So in our technique the correct number of photons are reprocessed by PAHs/VSGs, and their
244: wavelengths are chosen from the pre-computed mean intensity dependent emissivities.
245:
246: We use the opacity and emissivity files for PAHs/VSGs with sizes $a < 200$~{\AA} taken
247: from the \citet{DL2007} silicate-graphite-PAH grain model. Their model assumes
248: a power law grain size distribution with the silicate and graphite abundances, PAH charging, and
249: PAH mass fraction adjusted to reproduce the opacity and infrared
250: spectrum of the Milky Way's diffuse interstellar medium. In particular they find a PAH mass fraction
251: of 4.5\% is required to reproduce the observed infrared spectra in the Milky Way and
252: other galaxies.
253:
254: Figures~1 and 2 show the wavelength dependent opacity and emissivities for PAHs/VSGs
255: with grain sizes $a < 200${\AA}. This is the grain size below which we use the
256: described approximation for computing the PAH/VSG reprocessing of absorbed energy
257: packets. Notice that the PAH/VSG opacity is not negligible at long wavelengths, so
258: even photons with just a few eV of energy can excite PAH emission, as described by \citet{LD2002}.
259: The shape of the continuum emission in the $20-35\mu$m region is sensitive to the intensity of the illuminating
260: radiation field, but the spectral shape and relative strengths
261: of the PAH emission features are relatively
262: insensitive to U for $U < 10^4$ \citep[see, e.g., Fig. 13 of][]{DL2007}, where $U$ is the energy density
263: of the radiation field relative to that of the interstellar radiation field of \citet{MathisISRF}.
264: Our reprocessing
265: technique accounts for the fact that single photons may excite PAHs/VSGs in environments where
266: the mean intensity is very low. Our technique also incorporates the effect of multiphoton excitation
267: because the \citet{DL2007} emissivity calculations include this effect which becomes
268: important in regions of high mean intensity.
269:
270:
271: \section{Gomez's Hamburger Models}
272:
273: Figures 3 and 4 show spectra and images of our model of Gomez's Hamburger that reproduces the
274: observed spectrum and {\it HST} images. The broadband optical and near-infrared photometry, as
275: well as the IRAS 60\,$\mu$m flux, were taken from \citet{Ruiz87}. The IRAC images and IRS spectrum
276: were extracted from the Spitzer Space Telescope data archive (PI: Marwick-Kemper, program P01094).
277: Aperture photometry was performed on the IRAC and MIPS 24\,$\mu$m data, with the appropriate point
278: source aperture corrections applied. The source is slightly extended at IRAC wavelengths, but SSC
279: recommends that for extended sources smaller than 8-9'' in size, the point source corrections should be
280: used. The HST WFPC2 images were extracted form the MAST archive (PI: Noll, HST proposal 9315).
281:
282: The model comprises a flared disk illuminated by a central star.
283: The central star was spectroscopically identified as being A0 III by \citet{Ruiz87}, so we adopt
284: $L_\star=160 L_\odot$ and $T_\star=10^4$~K. The input spectrum is a $10^4$~K NextGen model
285: atmosphere \citep{NextGen}.
286: As mentioned earlier, the {\it HST} images resemble those of edge-on protoplanetary disks,
287: therefore we adopt a flared disk geometry for the circumstellar density structure parameterized by
288: %
289: \begin{equation}
290: %\rho (r) = \rho_0
291: \rho (r) = \rho_0 \exp\left[{-\frac{1}{2}z^2/h(r)^2}\right]\left( {r\over{R_\star}}\right)^{-\alpha}
292: \end{equation}
293: %
294: for $r> R_{\rm min}$ where $r$ and $z$ are the cylindrical coordinates and $R_{\rm min}$ is the
295: inner radius of the disk. The disk scaleheight $h(r) = h_0 (r/R_\star)^\beta$
296: where $h_0$ and $\rho_0$ are the scaleheight and density at the stellar radius, $R_\star$. The surface
297: density therefore has the form $\Sigma (r) \sim r^{\beta-\alpha}$. Models of disks heated by a central
298: star typically yield surface densities $\Sigma \sim r^{-1}$ and flaring parameters in the range
299: $1.1\la \beta\la 1.3$ \citep[see review by][]{DullPPV}.
300:
301: For the radiative equilibrium circumstellar dust, we adopt the opacity and scattering properties of the
302: dust model described in \citet{Wood2002}. This dust model extends to larger sizes than ISM grains and
303: produces a shallower wavelength dependent opacity. Larger grains are expected from theories of
304: coagulation in disks and this dust model gives a good representation of
305: the SEDs of disks in Taurus \citep[e.g.,][]{Rice2003}. We use this dust model in the absence of mm observations
306: of Gomez's Hamburger which can help to determine the slope of the long wavelength dust opacity and
307: hence information on the dust size distribution.
308:
309: In addition to a radiative equilibrium dust component we introduce the PAH/VSG
310: opacity and emissivity as described above. The PAH/VSG component of the dust has the same
311: radial density structure but is allowed to have a larger scale height from the radiative equilibrium
312: grains. The scaleheights ($h_0$) of the PAH/VSG and thermal dust components are parameters which are
313: varied in a grid of models we ran to reproduce the observations (see below).
314: This approximates dust settling in disks \citep[see also][]{Scholz2006} where the smaller
315: grains (PAHs/VSGs in our model) have a larger scaleheight than the larger radiative equilibrium
316: grains. Therefore the density structures of the PAHs/VSGs and radiative equilibrium grains are
317: given by equation~3 with only the $\rho_0$ and $h_0$ terms differing to reflect the different
318: mass fractions and scaleheights of radiative equilibrium grains and PAHs/VSGs.
319: The mass fraction of PAHs/VSGs is one of the free parameters in our modeling.
320:
321: In our modeling procedure we ran a small grid of models to determine the distance
322: to Gomez's Hamburger in addition to the disk mass, inner hole size, scaleheights of the radiative
323: equilibrium dust and PAH/VSG components, and the PAH/VSG fraction required to reproduce the
324: features observed in the IRS spectrum. As the disk is observed to be close to edge-on we restricted
325: the inclination to be $i > 85^\circ$ because lower inclination disks produce a larger contrast
326: between the upper and lower parts of the scattered light disk.
327:
328: Assuming the illuminating source is an A0 III star and the circumstellar disk is viewed close to edge-on,
329: allows us to determine the distance, interstellar extinction, and disk radius by fitting the optical flux
330: levels and image size as shown in figures~3 and 4. From
331: this we determine $d = 280$~pc, $R_d = 1600$~AU, and $A_V = 1.8$.
332: The disk inclination, flaring parameter ($\beta$), scaleheight, and mass of the radiative equilibrium dust component are determined from comparing models with the $HST$
333: images. We varied these parameters in the range $85^\circ \le i \le 90^\circ$ and $1.1\le \beta\le 1.3$.
334:
335: The two SED models shown in figure~3 are our best fit models with and without PAHs/VSGs.
336: We calculated goodness of fit $\chi^2$ values for the two models using broadband fluxes only and
337: separately using only the IRS data. Assuming 15\% errors on each data point, we find that for the
338: broadband fluxes (thirteen data points) the model without
339: PAH/VSG effects has $\chi^2 = 381.2$, while the model including PAHs/VSGs has $\chi^2 = 50.8$. Using
340: only the IRS data (273 data points) gives $\chi^2 = 19350$ (model without PAHs/VSGs) and $\chi^2 = 376$
341: (model including PAHs/VSGs). For the model including PAH/VSG effects and considering all the data, we
342: find $\chi^2 = 1.49$ per data point, i.e., an average deviation of 1.22$\sigma$.
343:
344: Many degenerecies exist in modeling disk images and SEDs, notably in the disk flaring parameters
345: $h_0$ and $\beta$. Within the context of the smooth, axisymmetric power law disk structure model in
346: the parameter space we explored we found values that reproduce the infrared SED and images
347: (Figures 3 \& 4) are $i = 87\pm 1^\circ$, $\beta = 1.2$,
348: $M_{\rm dust} = 0.003 \pm 0.0005 M_\odot$
349: and $h_0 = 0.0077 \pm 0.0005$. The value of $\beta$ together with our assumption that the
350: surface density scales as $\Sigma \sim r^{-1}$ therefore gives $\alpha = 2.2$. Assuming a gas to dust ratio
351: of 100 results in a total disk mass of $0.3M_\odot$. This disk mass is in excellent agreement with that
352: determined from the CO observations of \citet{Bujarr2008}, who derived a disk mass of
353: $0.9 M_\odot (d/500{\rm pc})^2$.
354:
355: We allow the scaleheight of the
356: PAHs/VSGs to differ from that of the larger radiative equilibrium grains and find that a PAH/VSG mass fraction
357: of $1.5\pm 0.25$\% and scaleheight $h_0^{PAH} = 0.009\pm 0.001$ reproduces the {\it Spitzer} IRS spectrum as shown in
358: figure~3. The larger scaleheight for the PAH/VSG component is consistent with many other disk models that
359: predict the coagulation and settling of large grains to the midplane.
360: We also found that the IRS spectrum was best reproduced with an inner disk hole size of
361: $R_{\rm min} = 500 \pm 25 R_\star$ which is larger than the dust destruction radius of radiative
362: equilibrium grains of $40 R_\star$, assuming a typical dust sublimation temperature of 1600~K.
363:
364: Figures~3 and 4 show that compared to a model without PAHs/VSGs our circumstellar disk model together
365: with our new technique for incorporating PAH/VSG emission processes provides a very good match to
366: the observed spectral energy distribution
367: and high resolution optical images of Gomez's Hamburger. In particular the relative strengths of the
368: PAH features in the {\it Spitzer} IRS spectrum are well reproduced, whereas they are absent in the model
369: without PAHs/VSGs. We do not fit the IRAS 60$\mu$m data
370: point, but this is not a great concern due to potential contamination problems with the IRAS data. In fact the
371: IRAS 100$\mu$m data is not useable for this source.
372:
373: The PAH/VSG emissivities we use in
374: our code were developed by \citet{DL2007} specifically to model post-{\it Spitzer} data of the diffuse
375: interstellar medium in the Milky Way and other galaxies.
376: Further applications of our code to model mid-infrared spectra
377: of other disks will enable us to test whether the \citet{DL2007} model can fit PAH features in a broad range of
378: environments. Recent studies of PAH features in Herbig Ae stars \citep{Boersma2008}
379: suggest there are multiple components that differ from the ISM-like model we have adopted.
380:
381: In Figure~3 we also show our disk model SED {\it without} PAHs/VSGs which are seen to dominate in the
382: wavelength range $5\mu{\rm m}\la\lambda\la 20\mu{\rm m}$ and also with a strong feature around 3$\mu$m.
383: The excess emission from disks in this mid-infrared region is very sensitive to disk heating
384: by viscous accretion. Therefore care must be taken when analyzing mid-infrared observations of disks
385: because radiation transfer models
386: that do not include PAH/VSG emission could lead to overestimating the accretion rate in order to ``fill in''
387: the mid-infrared excess. High resolution mid-infrared spectra that can identify PAH features will greatly
388: assist in the analysis and interpretation of infrared spectra and accretion rates of protoplanetary disks.
389:
390: In summary we find that if the central object is an A0 III star, then Gomez's Hamburger lies at a distance of
391: 280~pc, much closer than the 2.9~kpc estimated by \citet{Ruiz87}. The nebulosity may be modeled with a
392: highly inclined disk of mass $0.3M_\odot$ and radius $1600$~AU.
393: We reproduce the PAH features present in the {\it Spitzer} IRS spectrum
394: using the PAH/VSG model and associated opacities and emissivities computed by \citet{DL2007} for
395: their model of the infrared spectrum of the diffuse ISM in our Galaxy.
396:
397: Our modeling of the circumstellar structure suggests Gomez's Hamburger is an edge-on protoplanetary disk
398: around an A0 star. However, if the spectral type of the source is inaccurate, we cannot rule out the possibility
399: that Gomez's Hamburger is much closer and the disk has a smaller radius (for a lower luminosity source). Conversely, a higher luminosity central source would yield a larger disk radius and distance.
400: As the optical spectrum is entirely scattered light, the combination of high resolution optical spectroscopy
401: and radiation transfer modeling of the scattered starlight from the disk is required for more accurate spectral
402: typing. The original suggestion from \citet{Ruiz87} is that Gomez's Hamburger is a protoplanetary nebula.
403: While our model does not explicitly address this scenario, our derived circumstellar disk structure is consistent
404: with dynamical models of planetary nebulae requiring a pre-existing circumstellar disk or torus which can
405: act to focus and shape the stellar material ejected during the planetary nebula phase \citep[e.g.,][]{BF2002}.
406:
407: \section{Summary}
408:
409: We have presented a straightforward method to include the absorption and re-emission from PAH molecules and
410: VSGs into Monte Carlo radiative equilibrium codes. Our technique utilizes pre-computed intensity-dependent
411: emissivities from which we sample the emission spectrum of Monte Carlo energy packets that have been
412: absorbed by PAHs/VSGs. Our codes are readily adaptable to include a range of sizes for the
413: PAHs/VSGs, but in this first paper we adopt a grain size cutoff of 200~{\AA}, above which we
414: assume the dust grains attain radiative equilibrium temperatures. For grain sizes smaller than 200~{\AA},
415: absorbed energy packets are reprocessed using the pre-computed emissivity files as described in \S2.
416: Incorporating the PAH/VSG emission in this manner allows us to compute model spectra and images
417: very quickly without repeating lengthy calculations of statistical equilibrium and transient heating and
418: cooling of the PAH/VSG component --- these calculations are in effect already incorporated in the
419: pre-computed PAH/VSG opacities and emissivities presented in figures~1 and 2.
420:
421: In a future paper we will extend our technique for sampling emissivities to be dependent not only on the
422: intensity of the exciting radiation field, but also on the spectrum of the absorbed energy in each grid cell of
423: our Monte Carlo simulation. Similar to the mean intensity calculation, determining the spectrum of the
424: absorbed energy throughout our grid is straightforward to implement in Monte Carlo radiation transfer
425: simulations. This more accurate treatment of the PAH/VSG reprocessing will be possible using planned
426: calculations of PAH/VSG emissivity files for a range of exciting spectra comprising model stellar atmosphere
427: spectra and black-bodies for a range of temperatures and reddening.
428:
429: As a first application of our new code we modeled the object known as Gomez's Hamburger. We find that
430: the broad band SED, high resolution images, and {Spitzer} IRS spectrum can be reproduced with an edge-on
431: circumstellar disk with a component of PAHs/VSGs comprising 1.5\% of the dust mass.
432: Our Monte Carlo radiation transfer using the adopted dust opacities ensures that very few high
433: energy photons penetrate into regions of large optical depth. Therefore there is little or no PAH/VSG
434: emission from such regions and the PAH/VSG emission is largely confined to a surface layer exposed
435: to the direct stellar radiation. This is what is observed in the limb brightened bubbles in the GLIMPSE
436: survey \citep{Churchwell2006}. In future papers we will use our code to model the bubbles observed in the
437: GLIMPSE survey to address the question of PAH/VSG survival around hot stars and in H~{\sc ii} regions
438: in addition to modeling the dust content within the H~{\sc ii} regions and the effects this may have on
439: determining the ionizing luminosity of the central sources. We will also investigate emission
440: from PAHs/VSGs in protostars, thus extending the radiative equilibrium dust modeling presented by
441: \citet{Whitney2003b}.
442:
443:
444: \begin{figure}
445: \plotone{f1.eps} \caption{Solid line shows the wavelength dependent opacity for the
446: PAH/VSG (dust plus gas) model of
447: \citet{DL2007} for grains with sizes $a < 200$~{\AA}. Dot-dashed line is for the radiative equilibrium
448: dust model of \citet{Wood2002}. For comparison the dashed line shows the opacity for an ISM dust
449: plus gas mixture.}
450: \end{figure}
451:
452: \begin{figure}
453: \plotone{f2.eps}
454: \caption{Emissivity for PAHs/VSGs with size $a < 200${\AA} for different values of
455: $U$, the energy density of the exciting radiation field relative to the average interstellar value. The
456: emissivities shown are in the range $1 \le U\le 10^7$. The solid line shows the emissivity
457: for $U=1$ and the long dashed line is for $U=10^7$.}
458: \end{figure}
459:
460: \begin{figure}
461: \plotone{f3.eps}
462: \caption{SED data (dots and red curve) and our best disk model (upper solid line) for
463: Gomez's Hamburger. The lower solid line at mid-IR wavelengths
464: shows the same disk model without the PAH/VSG components.}
465: \end{figure}
466:
467:
468: \begin{figure}
469: \plottwo{f4a.eps}{f4b.eps}
470: \caption{Three-color images at $B$ (blue), $V$ (green), and $R$ (red) bands showing HST data (left) and
471: model (right) images for Gomez's Hamburger}
472: \end{figure}
473:
474:
475: \acknowledgements
476:
477: TR is supported by a Scottish Universities Physics Alliance Studentship,
478: BAW is supported in part by the NASA Theory Program (NNG05GH35G),
479: BTD was supported in part by NSF grant AST-0406883.
480:
481: %\bibliography{reference}
482:
483: \bibliography{ms.bbl}
484:
485: \end{document}
486: