1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \documentclass{emulateapj}
3: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
4:
5: %=====================================================================
6: % CUSTOM: PACKAGES, MACROS & SETTINGS
7: %=====================================================================
8:
9: % packages for figures
10: %\usepackage{graphicx}
11: % packages for symbols
12: %\usepackage{latexsym,amssymb}
13: % package for citations
14: \usepackage{natbib}
15:
16: %% units
17: \newcommand{\kms}{km\,s$^{-1}$}
18: \newcommand{\cms}{cm\,s$^{-1}$}
19: \newcommand{\kmskpc}{km\,s$^{-1}$\,kpc$^{-1}$}
20: \newcommand{\Msun}{M$_\odot$}
21: \newcommand{\Lsun}{L$_\odot$}
22: \newcommand{\MLsun}{M$_\odot$/L$_\odot$}
23: \newcommand{\Lsunpcc}{L$_\odot$\,pc$^{-3}$}
24: \newcommand{\Msunpcc}{M$_\odot$\,pc$^{-3}$}
25: \newcommand{\Msunyr}{M$_\odot$\,yr$^{-1}$}
26: %% abbrevations
27: %% ...satellite/star cluster
28: \newcommand{\rs}{r_s} % radius
29: \newcommand{\Ms}{M_s} % mass
30: %% ...disk/ring
31: \newcommand{\rd}{r_d} % radius
32: \newcommand{\hd}{h_d} % scale height
33: \newcommand{\rdz}{r_{d,0}} % radius at r_0
34: \newcommand{\rde}{r_{d,edge}} % radius at edge
35: \newcommand{\Md}{M_d} % mass
36: \newcommand{\rHd}{r_{H,d}} % Hill radius of the disk
37: %% ...torques
38: \newcommand{\TTdf}{T_\mathrm{df}} % dynamical friction
39: \newcommand{\TTd}{T_\mathrm{disk}} % disk waves
40: \newcommand{\TTi}{T_\mathrm{infl}} % gas inflow
41: \newcommand{\TTv}{T_\mathrm{visc}} % disk viscosity
42: %% ...enclosed mass
43: \newcommand{\Menc}{M_\mathrm{enc}} % enclosed mass
44: \newcommand{\Mencs}{M_\mathrm{enc,s}} % enclosed mass at r_s
45: \newcommand{\Mencz}{M_\mathrm{enc,0}} % enclosed mass at r_0
46: \newcommand{\OFs}{\Omega_s} % orbital frequency
47: \newcommand{\OFz}{\Omega_0} % orbital frequency
48: %% ...times scales
49: \newcommand{\tcr}{t_\mathrm{cross}} % crossing
50: \newcommand{\tdf}{t_\mathrm{df}} % dynamica friction
51: \newcommand{\tdfz}{t_\mathrm{df,0}} % dynamica friction at r_0
52: %\newcommand{\tdyn}{t_\mathrm{dyn}} % dynamical
53: \newcommand{\tsep}{t_\mathrm{sep}} % separtion cluster-ring
54: %% ...dimensionless parameters
55: \newcommand{\qs}{q_s} % cluster-to-enclosed mass
56: \newcommand{\qd}{q_d} % disk-to-enclosed mass
57: \newcommand{\qp}{q'} % cluster-to-disk mass
58: \newcommand{\alp}{\alpha'} % strength viscosity
59: \newcommand{\bp}{\beta'} % strength tidal torque
60: \newcommand{\gp}{\gamma'} % mass inflow scale
61: %% ...miscellaneous
62: \newcommand{\Dr}{\Delta r} % separation satellite and disk
63: \newcommand{\vorb}{v_\mathrm{orb}} % orbital speed
64: \newcommand{\Mc}{M_c} % mass gas cloud
65: \newcommand{\rion}{r_\mathrm{ion}} % Stromgen sphere
66: \newcommand{\Mstar}{M_\star} % mass
67: \newcommand{\du}{\mathrm{d}} % upright d in integrals
68: \newcommand{\HH}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{H}_2}}
69: \newcommand{\Ha}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{H}\alpha}}
70: \newcommand{\HII}{\textsc{H}\,\textsc{II}}
71: \newcommand{\NII}{\textsc{N}\,\textsc{II}}
72:
73: %=====================================================================
74: % FRONT MATTER
75: %=====================================================================
76:
77: \shorttitle{Migration of Star Clusters and Nuclear Rings}
78: \shortauthors{van de Ven \& Chang}
79:
80: %=====================================================================
81: % BEGIN DOCUMENT
82: %=====================================================================
83:
84: \begin{document}
85:
86: \title{Migration of Star Clusters and Nuclear Rings}
87:
88: %\author{Glenn van de Ven\altaffilmark{1}}
89: %
90: %\affil{Institute for Advanced Study, Einstein Drive, Princeton, NJ
91: % 08540, USA}
92: %
93: %\email{glenn@ias.edu}
94: %
95: %\and
96: %
97: %\author{Philip Chang\altaffilmark{2}}
98: %
99: %\affil{Astronomy Department and Theoretical Astrophysics Center, 601
100: % Campbell Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720}
101: %
102: %\email{pchang@astro.berkeley.edu}
103: %
104: %\altaffiltext{1}{Hubble Fellow}
105: %
106: %\altaffiltext{2}{Miller Institute for Basic Research}
107:
108: \author{Glenn van de Ven\altaffilmark{1,3}}
109: \author{Philip Chang\altaffilmark{2,4}}
110: \affil{$^1$Institute for Advanced Study, Einstein Drive, Princeton, NJ
111: 08540, USA; glenn@ias.edu}
112: \affil{$^2$Astronomy Department and Theoretical Astrophysics Center, 601
113: Campbell Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; pchang@astro.berkeley.edu}
114: \altaffiltext{3}{Hubble Fellow}
115: \altaffiltext{4}{Miller Institute for Basic Research}
116:
117: \begin{abstract}
118: Star clusters that form in nuclear rings appear to be at slightly
119: larger radii than the gas. We argue that the star clusters move out
120: from the gas in which they are formed because of satellite-disk
121: tidal interactions. In calculating the dynamics of this star cluster
122: and gas ring system, we include the effects of dynamical friction of
123: the background stars in the host galaxy on the star cluster, and
124: inflowing gas along the bar onto the nuclear ring at the two contact
125: points. We show that the final separation is of the order of the
126: Hill radius of the nuclear ring, which is typically $20-30\%$ of its
127: radius. Massive star clusters can reach half of this separation very
128: quickly and produce a factor of a few enhancement in the gas surface
129: density. If this leads to star formation in addition to the
130: (ongoing) formation of star clusters near the contact points, a
131: possible (initial) azimuthal age gradient may become diluted or even
132: disappear. Finally, if the star cluster are massive and/or numerous
133: enough, we expect the nuclear ring to migrate inward, away from the
134: (possibly) associated (inner) Lindblad resonance. We discuss how
135: these predictions may be tested observationally.
136: \end{abstract}
137:
138: \keywords{accretion, accretion disks --- stellar dynamics --- stars:
139: formation --- galaxies: bulges --- galaxies: star clusters ---
140: galaxies: nuclei}
141:
142: %=====================================================================
143: \section{Introduction}
144: \label{sec:intro}
145: %=====================================================================
146:
147: Nuclear rings in barred spiral galaxies are regions of large gas
148: surface densities and high star formation. Their existence is
149: intimately related to the stellar bars with which they are associated.
150: The stellar bar drives the interstellar medium (ISM) into the nuclear
151: ring. How the radius of the ring is determined is unclear. The radius
152: may be set by the location of the inner Lindblad resonance (ILR) of
153: the stellar bar \citep[see review by][and references
154: therein]{Buta1996}. The reasoning behind this idea is that the sign of
155: the torque changes on either side of the Lindblad resonance.
156: Alternatively, the radius may be at the location where the
157: non-axisymmetric bar weakens, which is typically at $\sim 10\%$ of the
158: size of the bar \citep{Shlosman1990}. Finally, it may also be
159: determined by where the transition from phase space domination of
160: $X_1$ orbits (parallel to the major axis of the large-scale bar) to
161: the phase space domination of $X_2$ orbits (perpendicular to the bar)
162: occurs \citep{Regan1997}.
163:
164: Regardless of how they are formed they are interesting as a class
165: because they are perhaps the largest population of nearby star
166: bursting regions. They form star clusters in prodigious amounts and
167: are the only environment where super star clusters (SSCs) might be
168: found in abundance in normal galaxies \citep{Maoz2001}. These SSCs
169: can have masses in excess of $10^6$\,\Msun\ and may be the progenitors
170: of globular clusters if they can survive for $10^{10}$ years.
171:
172: In some of these systems the location of these star clusters is
173: curious. They appear to be at larger radii than the gas ring from
174: which they are presumably formed. For instance, the morphology of
175: NGC\,1512 clearly show the star cluster(s) exterior (radially) to the gas
176: as opposed to being embedded in the gas \citep{Maoz2001}. Taking
177: another example, in NGC\,4314 the star clusters are at larger radii
178: than the gas in the nuclear ring \citep{Benedict2002}. Finally,
179: \cite{Martini2003a} find that in their sample of 123 galaxies, eight
180: have strong nuclear rings and in each of the eight, star formation
181: occurs outside of the dust ring. Two of their other galaxies have
182: dust lanes immediately interior to what appears to be an older
183: stellar ring.
184:
185: There are two possible explanations for why these star clusters are
186: external to the gas. First, while the gas can lose angular momentum
187: due to dissipation, the stars and star clusters are collisionless and
188: hence remain on larger orbits \citep{Regan2003}. Second, the star
189: clusters migrated outward after their formation. We explore the latter
190: possibility in this paper.
191:
192: We argue that tidal interactions between the star cluster and the
193: nuclear ring from which it was formed leads to their separation. We
194: apply the physics of ``gas shepherding'', which was studied by one of
195: us \citep[][hereafter C08]{Chang2008}, to this cluster-ring system. We
196: derive a natural length scale for this separation, which we call the
197: ``Hill radius'' of the ring. At the same time, we show that the outer
198: edge of the ring can experience a surface density enhancement of a
199: few, possibly leading to additional formation of stars and star
200: clusters along the edge of the ring. Finally, we find that if the
201: star clusters are massive and/or numerous enough the cluster-ring
202: systems as a whole is expected to migrate inward. We show that these
203: predictions can be tested observationally.
204:
205: We present our model in \S~\ref{sec:tidal}. After summarizing the
206: observed properties of nuclear rings in \S~\ref{sec:properties}, we
207: give the basic picture and introduce the Hill radius of the ring in
208: \S~\ref{sec:basic_picture}, followed by the basic equations of our
209: model in \S~\ref{sec:basic_equations}. The solutions for various
210: scenarios are outlined in \S~\ref{sec:results}. A few observationally
211: testable predictions that arises from our model are given and compared
212: to observations in \S~\ref{sec:comparison}. We discuss some aspects of
213: our model in \S~\ref{sec:discussion} and summarize our conclusions in
214: \S~\ref{sec:conclusions}.
215:
216: %=====================================================================
217: \section{Tidal Interactions Between Star Clusters and Nuclear Rings}
218: \label{sec:tidal}
219: %=====================================================================
220:
221: We first summarize the basic properties of observed nuclear rings,
222: which are used to place the model predictions in context. We then
223: present the basic picture of our model, followed by the basic set of
224: equations that govern our model.
225:
226: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
227: \subsection{Observed properties}
228: \label{sec:properties}
229: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
230:
231: For a sample of 22 nuclear rings, \cite{Mazzuca2008} find that the
232: rings are in the same plane as the disk of their host galaxy and that
233: they are intrinsically circular. Typically, the radius of the ring is
234: around $\sim 0.5$\,kpc, but it can be a factor three smaller or
235: larger. With a circular velocity at the ring radius of around $\sim
236: 150$\,\kms, the (spherically) enclosed mass is about $\Menc \sim 2.5
237: \times 10^9$\,\Msun.
238:
239: The gaseous mass in the ring may be estimated from high spatial
240: resolution CO measurements, using the 'standard' conversion to \HH\
241: mass and adding $36\%$ for He. In this way, we obtain for NGC\,5457,
242: NGC\,3351, NGC\,6951, NGC\,3504 \citep{Kenney1992,Kenney1993} and
243: NGC\,4314 \citep{Benedict1996} on average a mass inside the ring of
244: $\Md \sim 5 \times 10^7$\,\Msun. Although the ring mass may be as
245: much as a factor ten smaller or two larger, it correlates with the
246: ring radius, so that the ring-to-enclosed mass ratio $\qd \equiv
247: \Md/\Menc$ stays within a narrow range of $\qd = 0.01 - 0.03$.
248: %
249: While this is the molecular gas inside the ring, part of the gas is
250: being ionized, due to photons from newly formed massive stars
251: %(escaping the \HII\ regions)
252: or due to shocks from stellar winds or supernovae explosions, and at
253: the inner edge of the ring possibly even due to an active galactic
254: nucleus (AGN). However, the ionized gas mass estimated from the \Ha\
255: (plus [\NII]) emission is generally two orders of magnitude lower than
256: the molecular gas mass \citep[e.g.][]{Planesas1997}.
257:
258: The nuclear rings are easily observable due to the emission from the
259: massive stars inside the young star clusters in the ring (which in the
260: ultraviolet even dominates the emission from a possible AGN). The
261: combination of high-spatial resolution (HST) images and
262: multi-wavelength coverage, makes it possible to isolate the individual
263: clusters and after correction for (dust) extinction to estimate their
264: mass and (relative) age. Below we use such a study by
265: \cite{Benedict2002} to investigate in more detail the nuclear ring in
266: NGC\,4314. Overall, the cluster masses follow a power-law distribution
267: with index $-2$, similar to young star clusters in merging galaxies
268: such as the Antennae \citep{Zhang1999}, but typically extending to a
269: smaller upper limit in mass (few times $10^5$\,\Msun), i.e., fewer of
270: the so-called ``super star clusters'' \citep[but see][]{Maoz2001}.
271:
272: On the other hand, these young star clusters are most likely just the
273: latest star formation in an ongoing succession of bursts
274: \citep[e.g.][]{Allard2006}. Most of the lower-mass clusters dissolve,
275: either early-on ($\la 50$\,Myr) due to violent relaxation after
276: expelling the residual gas ('infant mortality') depending on the star
277: formation efficiency \citep[e.g.][]{Parmentier2008}, or later-on due
278: to internal relaxation ('evaporation') and external tidal effects
279: \citep[e.g.][]{McLaughlin2007}. The resulting evolution towards a
280: bell-shaped distribution implies a relative increase in more massive
281: star clusters over time. Unfortunately, once the most massive stars
282: have died, the luminosity of star clusters very rapidly fades, so that
283: it becomes more difficult to distinguish them from the old stellar
284: population of their host galaxy. Nevertheless, based on velocity
285: dispersion measurements from stellar absorption lines,
286: \cite{Hagele2007} estimate dynamical masses up to almost $\sim
287: 10^7$\,\Msun\ for individual star clusters in the nuclear ring of
288: NGC\,3351. Henceforth, the typical ratio of cluster-to-ring mass
289: ratios $\qp \equiv \Ms/\Md$ depends on the (average) age of the star
290: clusters. For the young, luminous star clusters we adopt the range
291: $\qp = 0.001 - 0.01$, whereas for the old(er), faint(er) star cluster
292: $\qp = 0.01 - 0.1$ is probably more appropriate. Below we investigate
293: the two cases $\qp = 0.1$ and $\qp = 0.01$, corresponding to $\Ms \sim
294: 5 \times 10^6$\,\Msun\ and $\Ms \sim 5 \times 10^5$\,\Msun\ in case of
295: the above average gas mass in nuclear rings of $\Md \sim 5 \times
296: 10^7$\,\Msun. The effect of a less massive star cluster with $\qp <
297: 0.01$ is similar to that of $\qp = 0.01$.
298:
299: The time for a star cluster to cross the nuclear ring is given by
300: $\tcr = 2\pi/\Omega$, where $\Omega = \sqrt{G\Menc/r^3}$ is the
301: orbital frequency and $G$ is Newton's constant of gravity. Given a
302: typical circular velocity of $\sim 150$\,\kms\ at the observed mean
303: nuclear ring radius of $0.5$\,kpc, the crossing time is around $\tcr
304: \sim 20$\,Myr. A star cluster is subject to dynamical friction with
305: the bulge stars on a (minimum) timescale\footnote{The dynamical
306: friction time is likely to be longer for a partially rotationally
307: supported bulge as opposed to a non-rotating bulge.} $\tdf = \Menc /
308: (\Omega\Ms\ln\Lambda)$, with $\ln\Lambda$ the Coulomb logarithm. Using
309: $\tcr = \tdf \, \qp \qd \, 2\pi \ln\Lambda$ and substituting $\qd
310: \simeq 0.02$ from above, we find that the dynamical friction time in
311: units of the crossing time is approximately given by $\tdf/\tcr \simeq
312: 1/\qp$. This means hundreds to tens of orbits for star clusters with
313: masses that are $1\%$ ($\qp=0.01$) to $10\%$ ($\qp=0.1$) of the
314: nuclear ring mass, or, with $\tcr = 20$\,Myr, a dynamical friction
315: time $\tdf$ from about $2$\,Gyr to $200$\,Myr for a non-rotating
316: bulge, which we will assume for the remainder of this work.
317:
318: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
319: \subsection{Basic Picture}
320: \label{sec:basic_picture}
321: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
322:
323: We illustrate our basic model in a cartoon in Figure
324: \ref{fig:cartoon}. Gas flowing in a bar potential along the $X_1$
325: orbits transitions to $X_2$ orbits making up the nuclear ring. The
326: $X_2$ orbits are approximately circular and so we will approximate
327: them as circles. From the gas in the nuclear ring stars are formed in
328: star clusters. We assume that the star clusters are formed
329: preferentially near the outer edge. These newly formed and forming
330: star clusters are subject to dynamical friction with the background
331: bulge stars\footnote{The background bulge stars may also be halo
332: stars, and the bulge/halo is assumed not to be supported by
333: rotation. For the purposes of this work, we will idealize the
334: bulge/halo as an isothermal background distribution, which we argue
335: in \S~\ref{sec:discussion_isothermal_profile} is a valid
336: approximation.} and tidal interactions with the ring. However, the
337: initial tidal interactions are strong compared to dynamical friction
338: and thus these star clusters will initially move {\it away} from the
339: ring.
340:
341: Indeed, in observations of nuclear rings young star clusters often
342: appear to be at larger radii than the gas ring from which they are
343: presumably formed. The color composite images of NGC\,1512
344: \citep{Maoz2001}, NGC\,4314 \citep{Benedict2002}, and NGC\,7742
345: (Hubble Heritage\footnote{http://heritage.stsci.edu/1998/28/}), show
346: young star cluster as bright spots on the outside of gas traced by the
347: dust. As pointed out by the referee, from these images it is also
348: clear that, even though the nuclear rings are as we assume
349: approximately circular with star clusters at the outer edge, the
350: observations can be quite difficult and complex.
351: %
352: First, when resolved in the optical the rings can look like tightly
353: wound spirals. This might be just appearance because the bar dust
354: lanes connecting with the ring are also partly obscuring the ring in
355: optical broad-band images, whereas in e.g.\ narrow-band imaging around
356: \Ha\ the ring of young star clusters seem to be complete \citep[see
357: also][]{Maoz2001}. Nevertheless, our basic picture described above for
358: a circular ring should still provide a fair description in case of a
359: tightly wound spiral.
360: %
361: Second, very obscured star clusters could remain hidden below the gas
362: ring even in the near infrared images taken, whereas even longer
363: wavelength observations (yet) lack the high spatial resolution
364: required to resolve the star clusters. Even so, the clearing of gas
365: and dust from the newly formed star cluster is very fast and
366: efficient, as even the youngest visible star clusters are only mildly
367: reddened \citep[e.g.][]{Maoz2001}.
368: %
369: Finally, some (sectors of) star clusters seem to appear more on the
370: inside of the nuclear ring, possibly along an inward extension of the
371: gas inspiraling onto the ring along the large-scale bar. As we
372: discuss briefly in \S~\ref{sec:discussion_star_formation}, star
373: clusters may form within the ring, in particular at the contact points
374: where the gas flows into the ring. Moreover, the interaction of
375: non-axisymmetric structures inside the ring (such as nuclear bars and
376: spirals) with the interstellar medium may also induce the formation of
377: star clusters.
378: %
379: However, even though such additional mechanism might be operating and
380: the observations should be interpret with care, they in general
381: support our basic picture of a circular nuclear ring with young stars
382: migrating outward.
383:
384: Since the basic physics mirror the "gas shepherding" scenario studied
385: by C08, we adopt the same notation. In this case the satellite is a
386: star cluster and the disk is a ring, but since only the (local)
387: geometry at the edge matters the physics remains the same. There are
388: however two important differences with respect to C08. First, the
389: perturbing star cluster's initial radial position begins very close to
390: the ring as opposed to a satellite reaching the disk from very far
391: away in C08. Due to ring tidal interactions, the star cluster and
392: ring will separate to establish an initial separation, $\Delta r$,
393: which we show below is of order the ``Hill radius'' of the ring. We
394: aim to study the manner by which this initial separation is achieved.
395: Second, gas continues to flow in from the $X_1$ orbits so that at the
396: transition between the $X_1$ to $X_2$ orbits, gas is continuously
397: being added to the system. Therefore, a source of mass exists in this
398: system, which changes the dynamics.
399:
400: \begin{figure*}
401: \plotone{f1.eps}
402: \caption{Cartoon of our model. Gas flows from larger radii
403: (along a $X_1$ orbit parallel to the major axis of the large-scale
404: bar) onto the nuclear ring, which is in an approximately circular
405: $X_2$ orbit. Part of this gas collapses to form star clusters near
406: the outer edge of the ring. These star clusters, being subject to
407: dynamical friction with the surrounding bulge stars in the host galaxy,
408: tidally interact with the gas in the nuclear ring and migrate
409: outward to a radius $\rs$. At the same time, the star clusters that
410: are sufficiently massive push the outer edge of the nuclear ring to
411: a smaller radius $\rd$. The net separation between the star clusters
412: and nuclear ring, $\Dr = \rs - \rd$, is of order the ``Hill radius''
413: of the nuclear ring, $\rHd$.}
414: \label{fig:cartoon}
415: \end{figure*}
416:
417: \placefigure{fig:cartoon}
418:
419: For now we ignore the source of mass to concentrate just on the tidal
420: interaction between the ring and star cluster and the dynamical
421: friction experienced by the star cluster. We begin by showing that
422: this combined action of dynamical friction and ring tides results in a
423: length scale in the problem, which we call the Hill radius of the
424: ring.
425: %
426: The torque due to dynamical friction on the star cluster is
427: \citep{Chandrasekhar1943, BT87}
428: %
429: \begin{equation}\label{eq:torque_estimate_df}
430: \TTdf \sim \frac{\Ms}{\tdf} \, \OFs \rs^2
431: \sim \frac{G \Ms^2}{\rs},
432: \end{equation}
433: %
434: where $\Ms$ is the mass of the star cluster, $\rs$ is its distance
435: from the center of the galaxy, $\OFs$ is its orbital frequency, and,
436: as before, $\tdf$ is the timescale for dynamical friction.
437: %
438: The torque due to the excitation of spiral density waves in a disk is
439: \citep{Goldreich1980, Lin1986, Ward1989, Artymowicz1993, Ward1997}
440: %
441: \begin{equation}\label{eq:torque_estimate_disk}
442: \TTd \sim \frac{G\Ms^2}{\rs} \frac{\Md}{\Mencs}
443: \left(\frac{\rs}{\Dr}\right)^3,
444: %\left(\frac{\rs}{\rs-\rd}\right)^3,
445: \end{equation}
446: %
447: where $\Md$ is the mass of the ring with radius $r_d$. The radial
448: separation between the star cluster and the ring $\Dr = \rs - \rd$ is
449: assumed to be small compared to the distance to the center, i.e., $\Dr
450: \ll \rd < \rs$.
451: %
452: While dynamical friction torques down the star cluster, the ring
453: torques up the star cluster. Balancing these two torques, i.e., $\TTdf
454: \sim \TTd$, gives
455: %
456: \begin{equation}\label{eq:hill_radius}
457: \Dr \sim \rs \left(\frac{\Md}{\Mencs}\right)^{1/3} \equiv \rHd,
458: \end{equation}
459: %
460: where the latter defines the Hill radius of the ring.
461:
462: Given the observed range in ring-to-enclosed mass of $\qd = 0.01 -
463: 0.03$ (\S~\ref{sec:properties}), the Hill radius is around $20 - 30\%$
464: of the radius $\rs$ of the star cluster. Since $\rs \sim \rd \gg
465: \rHd$, the observed range in nuclear ring radii of $\rd = 0.2 -
466: 1.7$\,kpc \citep[e.g.][]{Mazzuca2008} results in $\rHd = 50 -
467: 500$\,pc. We expect the radial separation between the star cluster and
468: nuclear ring to be of order of this Hill radius. However, the exact
469: amount and nature by which this separation will be achieved depends
470: strongly on the strength of the tidal torque between the cluster and
471: the ring, which we intend to quantify in this paper.
472:
473: The second process which we wish to study is the effect of an
474: additional source of mass on the dynamics of the cluster-ring system.
475: The gas merges onto the nuclear ring at the two contact points where
476: the $X_1$ orbits transition to $X_2$ orbits. We assume that the region
477: where the gas is added to the nuclear ring is radially narrow compared
478: to the radius of the nuclear ring. For a mass inflow rate of
479: $\dot{M}$, the amount of angular momentum added to a system per unit
480: time is
481: %
482: \begin{equation}\label{eq:dotL_inflow}
483: \dot{L} = \dot{M} \, \Omega r^2.
484: \end{equation}
485: %
486: However, not all of this angular momentum can be immediately applied
487: to affecting the qualitative dynamics of the system. By qualitative,
488: we mean that the mass inflow rate, which acts as a source of angular
489: momentum, changes the behavior of the cluster-ring system. For
490: instance, the source of angular momentum from mass inflow balances the
491: sink of angular momentum from dynamical friction on the star cluster.
492: To estimate what mass inflow rate would be needed to effect such a
493: change, we suppose this mass is added just inside of the satellite
494: radial position, i.e., $r \simeq \rs$. The mass will then be pushed
495: to the edge of the ring, $\rd$, due to tidal interactions. The change
496: in radial position will be of order the Hill radius of the disk,
497: $\rHd$. Hence, for such a parcel of gas of mass $M$, the change in
498: angular momentum moving from $\rs$ to $\rd$ is
499: %
500: \begin{equation}\label{eq:deltaL_estimate_inflow}
501: \Delta L \sim M \, \Omega r \, \Dr \sim M \, \OFs \rs \, \rHd.
502: \end{equation}
503: %
504: For a constant mass inflow rate $\dot{M}$, we expect the torque from
505: this inflow of gas, acting on the star cluster, to be
506: %
507: \begin{equation}\label{eq:torque_estimate_inflow}
508: \TTi = \frac{\du \Delta L}{\du t}
509: \sim \dot{M} \, \OFs \rs \, \rHd.
510: \end{equation}
511: %
512: Setting this inflow torque equal to the dynamical friction torque in
513: eq.~(\ref{eq:torque_estimate_df}), we find the scale for the mass
514: inflow rate to be
515: %
516: \begin{equation}\label{eq:mass_inflow_scale}
517: \dot{M} \sim \frac{\Ms}{\tdf} \left(\frac{\Mencs}{\Md}\right)^{1/3},
518: \end{equation}
519: %
520: where we have used the definition of the Hill radius of the ring given
521: in eq.~(\ref{eq:hill_radius}). Had we instead (naively) set
522: eq.~(\ref{eq:dotL_inflow}) to be equal to
523: eq.~(\ref{eq:torque_estimate_df}), we would have found $\dot{M} \sim
524: \Ms/\tdf$, which can be significantly smaller than the more physical
525: scale in eq.~(\ref{eq:mass_inflow_scale}).
526:
527: As shown in \S~\ref{sec:properties} above, $\tdf \simeq \tcr/\qp$, so
528: that $\dot{M} \sim (\Md/\tcr) \, \qp^2 / \qd^{1/3}$. Substituting the
529: average (gas) mass inside the ring of $\Md \sim 5 \times 10^7$\,\Msun,
530: the crossing time of $\tcr \sim 20$\,Myr, and the observed range in
531: ring-to-enclosed mass of $\qd = 0.01 - 0.03$, the typical scale for
532: the mass inflow rate becomes $\dot{M} \sim 10 \, \qp^2$\,\Msunyr. For
533: star clusters with masses that are $1\%$ ($\qp=0.01$) to $10\%$
534: ($\qp=0.1$) of the nuclear ring mass, this implies a scale $\dot{M}$
535: from about $0.001$ to $0.1$\,\Msunyr. To balance the \emph{combined}
536: dynamical friction from the many star clusters that are formed, the
537: \emph{total} mass inflow rate might easily have to be as high as $\sim
538: 1$\,\Msunyr, which is the typical star formation rate in nuclear rings
539: \citep[e.g.][]{Mazzuca2008}. For mass inflow rates significantly
540: below this scale, we expect the effect of this source of (gas) mass to
541: be insignificant. For mass inflow rates at or above this scale, the
542: effect of dynamical friction to push the cluster-ring system as a
543: whole to smaller radii is \emph{halted}.
544:
545: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
546: \subsection{Basic Equations}
547: \label{sec:basic_equations}
548: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
549:
550: We now present the governing equations for our model. We do not
551: present a detailed and complete derivation because these equations
552: have been already derived in much of the literature
553: \citep[e.g.][]{Lin1979a, Lin1979b, Lin1986, Hourigan1984, Ward1989,
554: Rafikov2002}, with two differences. First, we include the effect of
555: dynamical friction of the background bulge stars, which is extensively
556: discussed in C08 (to which we refer the interested reader). Second, we
557: will include a mass source term for, which models the inflow of gas
558: mass transitioning from the $X_1$ to $X_2$ orbits.
559:
560: The evolution of a \emph{viscous} gas ring under the influence of an
561: external torque is given by equations for continuity and angular
562: momentum. The equation of continuity is
563: %
564: \begin{equation}\label{eq:continuity}
565: \frac{\partial \Sigma}{\partial t}
566: + \frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial (r v_r \Sigma)}{\partial r} = S(r,t),
567: \end{equation}
568: %
569: where $r$ is the radial coordinate, $v_r$ is the radial component of
570: the velocity, $\Sigma$ is the surface mass density of the gas in the
571: ring, and $S(r,t)$ is a position and time dependent source term. The
572: angular momentum equation is \citep{Pringle1981, Rafikov2002}
573: %
574: \begin{equation}\label{eq:angular_momentum}
575: \frac{\partial (\Sigma \, \Omega r^2)}{\partial t}
576: + \frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial (r v_r \Sigma \, \Omega r^2)}{\partial r}
577: = - \frac{1}{2\pi r}
578: \left( \frac{\partial \TTv}{\partial r}
579: - \frac{\partial \TTd}{\partial r} \right)
580: + S(r,t) \, \Omega r^2
581: \end{equation}
582: %
583: where $\TTv = -2\pi r^3 \nu \Sigma \, \partial \Omega/\partial r$ is
584: the viscous torque with $\nu$ the viscosity. Taking into account that
585: $\Omega$ (through $\Menc$) is not an explicit function of time, we
586: combine eq.~(\ref{eq:continuity}) and eq.~(\ref{eq:angular_momentum})
587: to eliminate $v_r$, so that we are left with
588: %
589: \begin{equation}\label{eq:time_dependent_sigma}
590: \frac{\partial \Sigma}{\partial t} =
591: \frac{1}{2\pi r} \frac{\partial}{\partial r}
592: \left[ \frac{\partial (r^2\Omega)}{\partial r} \right]^{-1}
593: \left( \frac{\partial \TTv}{\partial r}
594: - \frac{\partial \TTd}{\partial r} \right)
595: + S(r,t).
596: \end{equation}
597: %
598: The radial motion of the star cluster is governed by the competing
599: torques of dynamical friction and ring tides. Henceforth, the change
600: of angular momentum of the star cluster with time is
601: %
602: \begin{equation}\label{eq:cluster_angular_momentum}
603: \Ms \frac{\partial (\OFs \rs^2)}{\partial t} = \TTdf - \TTd.
604: \end{equation}
605: %
606:
607: For the (bulge of the) spiral galaxy in which star cluster and nuclear
608: ring are embedded, we adopt a density profile $\rho \propto r^{-2}$
609: (see \S~\ref{sec:discussion_isothermal_profile} for a discussion on
610: the validity of such an isothermal profile). The corresponding mass
611: profile is given by $\Menc = \Mencz \, (r/r_0)$, with $\Mencz$ the
612: mass enclosed within radius $r_0$. Such a mass profile has the nice
613: property that the orbital velocity, $\vorb = \Omega r = \sqrt{G
614: \Mencz/r_0}$, is constant, and thus $\partial (\OFs \rs^2) /
615: \partial t = \vorb \partial \rs / \partial t$ in
616: eq.~(\ref{eq:cluster_angular_momentum}). With this mass profile, the
617: partial derivatives of the viscous and tidal torques reduce to (see
618: also C08)
619: %
620: \begin{eqnarray}
621: \label{eq:viscous torque}
622: \frac{\partial \TTv}{\partial r} & = &
623: 2\pi \vorb \frac{\partial (r \nu \Sigma)}{\partial r},
624: \\
625: \label{eq:external torque}
626: \frac{\partial \TTd}{\partial r} & \simeq &
627: \beta \frac{G \Ms^2 r_0}{\Mencz} \frac{r^3 \Sigma}{(\rs-r)^4}.
628: \end{eqnarray}
629: %
630: For the viscosity we follow C08, adopting $\nu = \nu_0
631: (\Sigma/\Sigma_0)^2$ as suggested by \cite{Lin1986} and $\nu_0 =
632: \alpha (Q_0 \qd)^2/2 \rdz \vorb$ using the standard \cite{Shakura1973}
633: $\alpha$-disk with \cite{Toomre1964} $Q_0$ parameter, and, as before,
634: $\qd = \Md/\Mencz$ the ratio of the nuclear ring (gas) mass to the
635: enclosed mass.
636:
637: Substituting these expressions and rescaling the surface mass density
638: and time respectively as $\sigma = \Sigma/\Sigma_0$ and $t' =
639: t/\tdfz$, with $\tdfz = \Mencz /(\Omega_0\Ms\ln\Lambda) $,
640: equations~(\ref{eq:time_dependent_sigma})
641: and~(\ref{eq:cluster_angular_momentum}) become
642: %
643: \begin{eqnarray}
644: \label{eq:master1}
645: \frac{\partial \sigma}{\partial t'} & = &
646: \frac{\alp}{\qp} \, \qd \frac{\rdz^2}{r}
647: \frac{\partial^2 (r\sigma^3)}{\partial r^2}
648: + \bp \qp \, \qd \frac{\rdz^3}{r}
649: \frac{\partial}{\partial r} \frac{r^3\sigma}{(\rs-r)^4}
650: + \gp \qp \, \frac{1}{\qd^{1/3}} f(r),
651: \\
652: \label{eq:master2}
653: \frac{\partial \rs}{\partial t'} & = &
654: \bp \, 2 \qd \rdz \int_{0}^{\rd} \frac{r^3\sigma}{(\rs-r)^4} \, \du r
655: - \frac{\rdz^2}{\rs}.
656: \end{eqnarray}
657: %
658: As before, $q' = \Ms/\Md$ is the ratio of the cluster mass to the
659: nuclear ring (gas) mass, $\alp \equiv \alpha Q_0^2/(2\ln\Lambda)$ and
660: $\bp \equiv \beta/(2\pi\ln\Lambda)$ set the strength of the ring
661: viscous and tidal torques relative to the dynamical friction torque,
662: and the constant $\gp$ controls the amount of inflow torque due to gas
663: coming in along $X_1$ orbits that transitions to $X_2$ orbits. The
664: dimensionless function $f(r)$ defines the radial extent where this gas
665: is deposited in the nuclear ring. We choose the form
666: %
667: \begin{equation}\label{eq:radial_extent_inflow}
668: f(r) =
669: \left\{
670: \begin{array}{ll}
671: \frac{1}{2\Dr} & \mathrm{if}\ \rdz - \Dr < r < \rdz \\
672: 0 & \mathrm{otherwise}
673: \end{array}
674: \right.,
675: \end{equation}
676: %
677: so that for $\gamma = 1$, the inflow torque and dynamical friction
678: torque approximately cancel, corresponding to the scale of the mass
679: inflow rate in eq.~(\ref{eq:mass_inflow_scale}).
680:
681: Equations~(\ref{eq:master1}) and~(\ref{eq:master2}) are the governing
682: equations governing our model. They are the same as respectively
683: equations~(23) and~(24) in C08, except for the extra source term at
684: the right-hand-side of eq.~(\ref{eq:master1}). In addition, our
685: initial conditions and timescales of interest are different from the
686: scenario studied in C08.
687:
688: %=====================================================================
689: \section{Results}
690: \label{sec:results}
691: %=====================================================================
692:
693: We first estimate the rate at which a star cluster moves out from the
694: nuclear ring. Next, we numerically solve the equations describing our
695: model, without any additional source of gas, and in case of a constant
696: mass inflow rate.
697:
698: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
699: \subsection{Estimate of the Rate of Cluster-Ring Separation}
700: \label{sec:estimate_separation}
701: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
702:
703: We give an order of magnitude estimate for the rate at which a newly
704: formed star cluster will separate itself form the nuclear ring. For
705: simplicity, we suppose that the gas in the nuclear ring does not react
706: significantly to the tidal torque, i.e., $\Sigma \simeq \Sigma_0$
707: ($\sigma \simeq 1$) and $\rd \simeq \rdz$ remain approximately
708: constant. In this case, eq.~(\ref{eq:master1}) can be neglected, and
709: ignoring the last term in eq.~(\ref{eq:master2}) due to dynamical
710: friction, it simplifies to
711: %
712: \begin{equation}\label{eq:master2_simplified}
713: \frac{\partial \rs}{\partial t'} \sim
714: 2 \bp \qd \rdz \int \frac{r^3}{(\rs-r)^4} \, \du r.
715: \end{equation}
716: %
717: Since $\rs-r \ll r$, the latter integral out to the edge of the ring
718: $\rdz$ can be approximated as $[\rdz/(\rs-\rdz)]^3/3$. This leads to
719: an ordinary differential equation in $x \equiv (\rs-\rdz)/\rdz$ of the
720: form $\du x/\du t' = (2\bp\qd/3) \, x^{-3}$. The resulting solution,
721: together with the Hill radius $\rHd$ defined in
722: eq.~(\ref{eq:hill_radius}) and $\rs \gtrsim \rdz \gg \rHd$, implies
723: that
724: %
725: \begin{equation}\label{eq:timescale_separation}
726: \left( \frac{\rs-\rdz}{\rHd} \right)^4 \sim
727: \frac{8\bp}{3} \frac{\rdz}{\rHd} \frac{t}{\tdfz}
728: \end{equation}
729: %
730: Since the left-hand-side as well as $8\bp/3$ are of order unity, the
731: timescale for a star cluster to separate itself from the nuclear ring
732: in which it was formed is of order $\tsep \sim (\rHd/\rdz) \tdfz$.
733: The observed range of $\qd = 0.01 - 0.03$ implies $\tsep/\tdfz \sim
734: 0.2 - 0.3$. Furthermore, in units of the crossing time $\tcr = \tdfz
735: \qp \qd 2\pi \ln \Lambda$, the separation time is about $\tsep/\tcr
736: \sim (\rHd/\rdz) /\qp$. This means a few to tens of orbits for
737: cluster-to-ring mass ratios from $\qp=0.01$ to $\qp=0.1$, or about
738: $500$\,Myr to $50$\,Myr for a typical crossing time of $\tcr =
739: 20$\,Myr.
740:
741: Since the time $t$ in eq.~(\ref{eq:timescale_separation}) goes as a
742: fourth power of the cluster-ring separation $\rs - \rdz$, the initial
743: separation is much faster than $\tsep$. This means that for a star
744: cluster to reach a significant fraction of the Hill radius of the
745: nuclear ring is very fast, i.e., typically of order less than $1\%$ of
746: the dynamical friction time. This implies a factor $20 - 30$ quicker
747: than $\tsep$, or, with $\tcr = 20$\,Myr, less than $20$\,Myr for
748: $\qp=0.01$ and less than $2$\,Myr for $\qp=0.1$. We come back to this
749: separation in the next section when we (numerically) investigate the
750: system in greater detail.
751:
752: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
753: \subsection{Separation and Density Enhancement}
754: \label{sec:separation_and_density_enhancement}
755: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
756:
757: We solve equations~(\ref{eq:master1}) and~(\ref{eq:master2}) using
758: standard explicit finite-difference methods
759: \citep{Press92..numrecipies}. For good spatial resolution, we use
760: 2000 grid points in $r/\rdz$ between zero and $1.50$, with the star
761: cluster initially at $\rs/\rdz = 1.01$. We set $\qd = \Md/\Menc =0.01$
762: similar to the observed ratios of (gas) mass in the ring to enclosed
763: mass within the ring radius derived in \S~\ref{sec:properties}.
764: Furthermore, for the dimensionless parameters $\alp$ and $\bp$,
765: representing the strength of the ring viscosity and tides relative to
766: the dynamical friction, we choose $\bp=1$ and $\alp=0.01$. We first
767: study the case without source term, i.e., $\gp=0$, while in the next
768: section \S~\ref{sec:constant_mass_inflow_rate}, we include the effect
769: of gas mass inflow.
770:
771: \begin{figure}
772: \plotone{f2.eps}
773: \caption{The top panel shows the evolution of the radial position of a
774: star cluster, $\rs$, relative to the initial outer radius of the
775: nuclear ring, $\rdz$, as function of the time, $t$, in units of the
776: initial dynamical friction time, $\tdfz$. The bottom panel shows
777: snapshots of the surface density profile at the edge of the nuclear
778: ring for various times, separated by $\Delta t/\tdfz = 0.06$, with
779: labels A-D as indicated in the top panel. The star cluster has mass
780: of $1\%$ ($\qp=0.01$) relative to the gas mass in the nuclear ring.
781: Furthermore, the dimensionless model parameters are set to
782: $\alp=0.01$, $\bp=1$, and $\gp=0$ (no mass inflow).}
783: \label{fig:md0.01}
784: \end{figure}
785:
786: \placefigure{fig:md0.01}
787:
788: In Figure~\ref{fig:md0.01}, we show the (numerical) solution of
789: equations~(\ref{eq:master1}) and~(\ref{eq:master2}) for a star cluster
790: with mass relative to the (gas) mass in the nuclear ring of $\qp =
791: 0.01$. The top panel shows the evolution of the radial position of the
792: star cluster, $\rs$, relative to the initial outer radius of the
793: nuclear ring, $\rdz$, as function of the time, $t$, in units of the
794: initial dynamical friction time, $\tdfz$. The bottom panel shows
795: snapshots of the surface density profile at the edge of the nuclear
796: ring for various times, separated by $\Delta t/\tdfz = 0.06$, with
797: labels A-D as indicated in the top panel. The initial built-up of
798: material at the edge of the ring is very fast and only after $t/\tdfz
799: = 10^{-4}$ (point A) an enhancement of about $30\%$ in the surface
800: mass density is achieved just inside $\rdz$. This rapid initial
801: enhancement is due to the fourth-power radial dependence of the tidal
802: torque in eq.~(\ref{eq:external torque}), and may not develop in a
803: realistic system. Nevertheless, the initial ring tidal torque will be
804: very strong and pushes the star cluster outward beyond the initial
805: edge of the ring. After a time $t/\tdfz = 0.06$ (point B), the star
806: cluster has moved out about $20\%$ from its initial position. The
807: surface mass density near the outer edge decreases now with respect to
808: its initial value due to viscous spreading. Points C and D continue
809: the trend of an outward moving star cluster and viscously spreading
810: ring, albeit at a decreasing pace.
811:
812: \begin{figure}
813: \plotone{f3.eps}
814: \caption{Same as Figure \ref{fig:md0.01}, but for at ten times more
815: massive star cluster with $\qp=0.1$. After an initial outward
816: migration the star clusters turns around and starts moving inwards.
817: At the same time, the surface mass density is pushed to smaller
818: radii and enhanced by a factor three to two.}
819: \label{fig:md0.1}
820: \end{figure}
821:
822: \placefigure{fig:md0.1}
823:
824: In contrast, for the case of $\qp=0.1$ (a ten times more massive star
825: cluster), the star cluster does not continuously move outward, but
826: rather stop and even moves inward as shown in Figure~\ref{fig:md0.1}.
827: As in the earlier case, an initial surface mass density enhancement is
828: built at point A, though it is a factor of ten larger than for the
829: case $\qp=0.01$, i.e., $300\%$ ($\qp=0.1$) as opposed to $30\%$
830: ($\qp=0.01$) of its initial value. However, the subsequent evolution
831: of this case differs from the earlier case. The star cluster still
832: moves outward, but it reaches only about $15\%$ of its initial
833: position. Its maximum in $\rs/\rdz$ is reached between point B and C,
834: after which the star cluster ``turns around'' and starts moving inward
835: with respect to the initial outer radius of the ring. The surface mass
836: density at the edge of the ring monotonically moves inward,
837: effectively being ``shepherd'' inward by the star cluster, similar to
838: the scenario in C08.
839:
840: \begin{figure}
841: \plotone{f4.eps}
842: \caption{The evolution of the radial separation $\rs-\rde$ between
843: the star cluster and the edge of the nuclear ring, normalized by the
844: Hill radius $\rHd$ of the nuclear ring. The top curve is for a ten
845: times more massive star cluster ($\qp=0.1$, see
846: Figure~\ref{fig:md0.1}) then bottom curve ($\qp=0.01$, see
847: Figure~\ref{fig:md0.01}). For both cases, the time to converge to
848: the final separation is about $20\%$ of the initial dynamical
849: friction time $\tdfz$, while the initial separation is very fast,
850: reaching half of the final separation in less than $1\%$ of
851: $\tdfz$.}
852: \label{fig:ring_t_vs_xp}
853: \end{figure}
854:
855: \placefigure{fig:ring_t_vs_xp}
856:
857: In both cases, the radial separation between the star cluster and the
858: (edge of the) nuclear ring approach a constant value, which we expect
859: from the order of magnitude estimate in \S~\ref{sec:basic_picture} to
860: be close to the Hill radius of the ring, $\rHd$, as defined in
861: eq.~(\ref{eq:hill_radius}). Substituting $\qd = 0.01$ and using that
862: $\rs \gtrsim \rdz \gg \rHd$, we estimate this Hill radius to be around
863: one-fifth of the initial radius of the ring, i.e., $\rHd/\rdz \sim
864: 0.2$. Combining the above shifts in the radial positions of the star
865: cluster and nuclear ring, we find that the separations for both cases
866: indeed converge to around one-fifth of $\rdz$, although for $\qp=0.01$
867: the separation stays slightly smaller, while for $\qp=0.1$ it is
868: somewhat larger.
869: %
870: This is further illustrated in Figure~\ref{fig:ring_t_vs_xp}, where we
871: show the evolution of the radial separation $\rs-\rde$ normalized by
872: the Hill radius $\rHd$. We use two definitions of the radius of the
873: disk edge, $\rde$. For $\qp = 0.01$, we define $\rde$ as largest $\rd$
874: for which $\Sigma/\Sigma_0>75\%$, while for $\qp = 0.1$, $\rde$ is
875: defined as the $\rd$ for which $\Sigma$ peaks. Despite these two
876: different definitions, Figure~\ref{fig:ring_t_vs_xp} shows two
877: important points. First, the separation between the disk and satellite
878: is of order $\rHd$, consistent with our expectations from
879: \S~\ref{sec:basic_picture}. Second, the final separation is reached
880: after about $20\%$ of the dynamical friction time, consistent with the
881: estimate of $\tsep/\tdfz \sim \rHd/\rdz \sim 0.2$ in
882: \S~\ref{sec:estimate_separation} for $\qd=0.01$. This figure also
883: confirms that the initial separation is very quick, indeed reaching
884: half of the final separation within a one percent of the dynamical
885: friction time, also consistent with our earlier expectations.
886:
887: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
888: \subsection{Constant Mass Inflow Rate}
889: \label{sec:constant_mass_inflow_rate}
890: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
891:
892: We now include the effect of a constant gas mass inflow on the
893: dynamics of the cluster-ring systems. Figure~\ref{fig:md0.1_mdot0.1}
894: shows the results of (numerically) solving the same system with
895: $\qp=0.1$ as in Figure~\ref{fig:md0.1}, except that the source term in
896: eq.~(\ref{eq:master1}) now contributes with $\gp=1$. We estimated in
897: \S~\ref{sec:estimate_separation} that the latter corresponds to an
898: mass inflow rate of $\dot{M} \sim 0.1$\,\Msunyr.
899: %
900: Comparing the top panels of the two figures, we find that the star
901: cluster moves (slightly) further out when $\gp = 1$ and remains
902: constant at the maximum radial position, as opposed to the shrinking
903: of $\rs$ after having moved out for an initial period when $\gp = 0$.
904: This is because in the case that $\gp = 1$, the inflow torque is
905: balancing the torque due to dynamical friction, as we estimated in
906: eq.~(\ref{eq:mass_inflow_scale}).
907: %
908: The bottom panels of the two figures are very similar, both showing an
909: enhancement as well as inward migration of the surface mass density.
910: The most significant difference is that in
911: Figure~\ref{fig:md0.1_mdot0.1} beyond the edge at $r/\rdz \sim 0.92$
912: there is a long tail out to $r/\rdz \sim 1$, due to mass inflow into
913: this region. Another difference is that for $\gp=1$ after the initial
914: inward push of the edge, it remains fixed at $r/\rdz \sim 0.92$,
915: whereas for $\gp=0$ it still moves inward, although at a decreasing
916: rate. This is consistent with the above difference in the change in
917: the radial position $\rs$ of the star cluster. As a consequence, also
918: in the case that $\gp=1$, the separation between the star cluster and
919: the (edge of the) nuclear ring converge to a constant value, which
920: is again of the order of the Hill radius of the ring.
921:
922: \begin{figure}
923: \plotone{f5.eps}
924: \caption{Same as Figure~\ref{fig:md0.1} with $\qp=0.1$, but now with
925: $\gp=1$. The torque due to the latter mass inflow rate approximately
926: cancels the dynamical friction torque or the star cluster,
927: preventing its radius $\rs$ to shrink. The long tail extending from
928: $r/\rdz \sim 0.92$ out to $r/\rdz \sim 1$ is due to mass inflow into
929: this region.}
930: \label{fig:md0.1_mdot0.1}
931: \end{figure}
932:
933: \placefigure{fig:md0.1_mdot0.1}
934:
935: In Figure~\ref{fig:ring_t_vs_xp_mdot}, we show the evolution of the
936: radial position of the star cluster relative to the initial outer edge
937: of the ring $\rs-\rdz$, in units of the latter Hill radius $\rHd$, for
938: four different constant mass inflow rates. From bottom to top the
939: curves correspond to $\gp = 0$, $0.3$, $1$ and $3$. This clearly shows
940: the transition around $\gp = 1$: after a similar initial outward
941: migration, the motion of the star cluster goes from in-falling for $\gp
942: \lesssim 1$ to outgoing for $\gp \gtrsim 1$. This is fully consistent
943: with our estimated scale for the mass inflow rate $\dot{M}$ in
944: eq.~(\ref{eq:mass_inflow_scale}), case of single star cluster with
945: $\qp=0.1$.
946:
947: \begin{figure}
948: \plotone{f6.eps}
949: \caption{
950: The evolution of the radial position of a star cluster with
951: $\qp=0.1$, relative to the initial outer edge of the ring,
952: $\rs-\rdz$, in units of the Hill radius of the ring, $\rHd$, for
953: four different constant mass inflow rates $\gp = 0$, $0.3$, $1$ and
954: $3$ from bottom to top. After a similar initial outward migration,
955: the motion of the star cluster goes from in-falling for $\gp \lesssim
956: 1$ to outgoing for $\gp \gtrsim 1$.}
957: \label{fig:ring_t_vs_xp_mdot}
958: \end{figure}
959:
960: \placefigure{fig:ring_t_vs_xp_mdot}
961:
962: %=====================================================================
963: \section{Comparison to Observations}
964: \label{sec:comparison}
965: %=====================================================================
966:
967: We describe the expected evolution of nuclear rings due to interaction
968: with star clusters based on our findings in the previous sections.
969: First, we focus on the evolution in radius, and discuss possible
970: azimuthal variations thereafter. Finally, we take a more detailed look
971: at the well-studied nuclear ring in NGC\,4314.
972:
973: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
974: \subsection{Radial Evolution of Nuclear Rings}
975: \label{sec:radial_evolution}
976: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
977:
978: From our analysis in \S~\ref{sec:tidal}, we expect that a newly formed
979: star cluster moves outward until it is about a Hill radius separated
980: from (the edge of) the nuclear ring. We derived in
981: \S~\ref{sec:basic_picture} a range in $\rHd$ from about $50$\,pc to
982: $500$\,pc, with $150$ pc as a typical value. For a host galaxy at
983: distance of $\sim 10$\,Mpc, this corresponds to about $1\arcsec$ to
984: $10\arcsec$, and typically $3\arcsec$, which should be readily
985: observable. However, while the position of the (young) star clusters
986: with respect to the center of their host galaxy is straightforward to
987: measure, the radial extent of the gas in the ring is often difficult
988: to determine. It requires high spatial resolution CO measurements to
989: trace the underlying molecular gas. Also, part of the gas (at the
990: edge) of the ring may be severely disturbed due to winds that clear
991: out the gas and dust from the newly formed star clusters and/or
992: ionized by the massive, bright stars in the young star cluster (but
993: see \S~\ref{sec:discussion_star_formation} and
994: \S~\ref{sec:discussion_stellar_feedback}). Still, the dust seems to be
995: well mixed into the gas \citep[e.g.][]{Brunner2008}, indicating that
996: dust provides a good tracer of the extent of the gas in the ring.
997: Apart from the contact points where the bar dust lanes connect with
998: the nuclear ring, the dust is indeed found on the inside of the
999: distribution of the star clusters (see also
1000: \S~\ref{sec:basic_picture}).
1001:
1002: Still, using the (peak in the) dust distribution as an estimate of the
1003: edge of the ring, the (unique) measurement of a separation is
1004: complicated by the spread in radius of the star clusters. Part of this
1005: spread is because of the dependence of the dynamical friction time on
1006: the mass of the star cluster: $\tdf/\tcr \simeq 1/\qp$. Even though we
1007: found that it takes less than $1\%$ of the dynamical friction time to
1008: reach about half of the Hill radius, with a typical crossing time of
1009: $\tcr = 20$\,Myr, this means only $2$\,Myr for the most massive star
1010: clusters ($\qp=0.1$), but as much as $200$\,Myr for the least massive
1011: clusters ($\qp=0.001$). Since $\tsep/\tdf \sim 0.2 - 0.3$, to reach
1012: the full separation takes a factor $20 - 30$ longer. This means that
1013: only the most massive clusters reach at least half of the Hill radius
1014: separation before all bright, massive stars die. The less massive
1015: clusters have already faded significantly, or even dissolved. So, we
1016: then might expect a smooth radial gradient with the most massive
1017: clusters on the outside, which in turn can be used to establish the
1018: Hill radius.
1019:
1020: Unfortunately, we found that the more massive cluster indeed rapidly
1021: reach a maximum separation, but after staying a while at this radius
1022: (depending on the mass inflow rate), they move inward again by pushing
1023: the ring inward (compare for example the top panels of
1024: Figures~\ref{fig:md0.01} and~\ref{fig:md0.1}). Hence, over time the
1025: less massive clusters, if they survive, may catch up with the more
1026: massive clusters. We conclude that only among the (very) young (few
1027: Myr) clusters we might expect a radial gradient with the more massive
1028: clusters to the outside, from which the Hill radius can be estimated.
1029: Later on, if a radial gradient is visible at all, it might even be
1030: opposite, with the more massive clusters on the inside. Since the
1031: more massive clusters have higher survival chance, the latter 'turn
1032: around' may result in at most a mild radial gradient in age (with the
1033: older clusters on the inside). \cite{Mazzuca2008} find only for 2 (out
1034: of 22) nuclear ring galaxies, a radial age gradient with indeed
1035: (slightly) older clusters on the inside.
1036:
1037: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
1038: \subsection{Azimuthal Age Gradient}
1039: \label{sec:aziumthal_age_gradient}
1040: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
1041:
1042: Unlike the radial age gradient, \cite{Mazzuca2008}, as in other
1043: detailed studies \citep[e.g.\ by][]{Boker2008}, do find signatures of
1044: an azimuthal age gradient in most of the nuclear rings, ranging from
1045: clean bipolar age gradients to a correlation between the youngest star
1046: clusters and the contact points of the bar dust arms with the nuclear
1047: ring. The natural explanation is that at (or very close to) these
1048: contact points the inflowing gas shocks and forms stars, after which
1049: the resulting star cluster travels in the ring away from the contact
1050: points. Indeed, for a typical bar pattern speed of $\sim 50$\,\kmskpc\
1051: \citep[e.g.][]{Gerssen2002} the corresponding time for the contacts
1052: points to rotate is $\sim 120$\,Myr, significantly shorter than the
1053: local crossing time $\tcr \sim 20$\,Myr. Alternatively, if the star
1054: formation occurs due to (local) gravitational instability of the gas
1055: in the ring, the star clusters are expected to form throughout the
1056: ring without an azimuthal age gradient. Instead of associating this
1057: instability with an inner Lindblad resonance \citep[ILR;
1058: e.g.][]{Elmegreen1994}, it is a natural consequence of shepherding:
1059: The gas in the ring loses angular momentum to the star cluster(s),
1060: which in turn lose angular momentum to the host galaxy through
1061: dynamical friction. This means that gas at the edge of the ring moves
1062: inward, resulting in an increase in the gas surface density at the
1063: edge (see also Figures~\ref{fig:md0.01}, \ref{fig:md0.1}
1064: and~\ref{fig:md0.1_mdot0.1}), until its becomes unstable against
1065: self-gravity.
1066:
1067: In the case of shepherding we do expect, as observed, a mixture in
1068: azimuthal age gradients. Initially, when the gas surface density in
1069: the ring is below the critical value for star formation, star
1070: clusters only form in episodes at the two contact points, they move
1071: together with the remaining gas along the ring, resulting in bipolar
1072: age gradient. The newly formed star clusters move outward, while at
1073: the same time 'pushing' the gas inward, causing an over-density
1074: built-up at the edge of the ring. When the gas surface density
1075: somewhere along the edge of the ring reaches the critical value, it
1076: becomes unstable and forms stars. The more massive the star cluster
1077: (or group of star clusters acting together), the higher the
1078: over-density and the sooner the critical value is reached. Generally,
1079: the most massive clusters and hence the star formation might be
1080: anywhere along the ring. However, depending on the mass inflow rate,
1081: there might be relatively more gas near the contact points to start
1082: with, so that first instability-driven star clusters still form near
1083: the contact points. Therefore, an azimuthal age gradient might still
1084: exist over part of the ring, but eventually the gradient is expected
1085: to flatten.
1086:
1087: We found in \S~\ref{sec:constant_mass_inflow_rate} that for a low
1088: enough mass inflow rate, the (most massive of the) existing star
1089: clusters move inward by dynamical friction, while 'pushing' and
1090: increasing the surface mass density of the gas in the outer part of
1091: the nuclear ring. As a result, the gas might reach the critical
1092: surface mass density and form new stars (in clusters) all along the
1093: edge of the ring. At the same time, near the contact points, which
1094: also move inward along with the nuclear ring, star formation from
1095: inflowing and shocking gas might be ongoing. We argue below in
1096: \S~\ref{sec:ngc4314} that the nuclear ring in NGC\,4314 is an example
1097: of this mechanism. Since even in the case of a high mass inflow rate,
1098: eventually enough (massive) star clusters are formed for their
1099: (combined) dynamical friction to 'push' to ring inward, the
1100: corresponding gas and bright star clusters migrate inward from larger
1101: to smaller $X_2$ orbits. In other words, nuclear rings will be located
1102: between the so-called outer and inner ILR, although strictly speaking
1103: resonances are only applicable to systems with a weak bar. Depending
1104: on the details of the mass inflow rate and star formation efficiency
1105: over time, we thus expect a variety in sizes of nuclear rings with
1106: respect to the resonance radii, as well as a significant diversity in
1107: their star cluster distribution. Hydrodynamic simulations indeed show
1108: the inward migration of nuclear rings
1109: \citep[e.g.][]{Regan2003,Fukuda2000}, and observations of nuclear
1110: rings confirm the diversity in their star cluster distribution
1111: \cite[e.g.][]{Mazzuca2008}
1112:
1113: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
1114: \subsection{Nuclear Ring in NGC\,4314}
1115: \label{sec:ngc4314}
1116: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
1117:
1118: NGC\,4314 is a nearby ($D \sim 10$\,Mpc, $1\arcsec \simeq 48.5$\,pc)
1119: galaxy with a large-scale bar out to a radius of $\simeq 65\arcsec$
1120: (3.15\,kpc). It host a prominent circumnuclear ring of star formation
1121: that peaks at a radius of $\simeq 7.0\arcsec$ (340\,pc), that is
1122: visible in \Ha, radio continuum as well as optical color maps. High
1123: spatial resolution CO observations by \cite{Benedict1996} clearly show
1124: that the molecular gas peaks at a smaller radius of $\simeq
1125: 5.5\arcsec$ (270\,pc).
1126:
1127: The circular velocity curve flattens at $\sim 7\arcsec$ to a value of
1128: $\sim 190$\,\kms\ \citep{Combes1992}, corresponding to a (spherically)
1129: enclosed mass $\Menc \sim 2.8 \times 10^9$\,\Msun. The total
1130: molecular gas mass within $7\arcsec$ is $\sim 15 \times 10^7$\,\Msun.
1131: However, this includes gas that is still flowing in along the dust
1132: lanes at the contact points, as well as a significant amount in the
1133: center where a strong peak in the CO coincides with a peak in
1134: $\Ha+[\NII]$ consistent with the LINER definition. Hence, we estimate
1135: the ring-to-enclosed mass to be $\qd \sim 0.03$ \citep[see
1136: also][]{Benedict1996}. The Hill radius of the ring is thus $r_H \sim
1137: 105$\,pc or $r_H \sim 2.2\arcsec$. The observed difference of $\simeq
1138: 1.5\arcsec$ between the peaks in star formation and CO flux is smaller
1139: than the predicted Hill radius, which is expected based on the
1140: discussion in \S~\ref{sec:radial_evolution}.
1141: %
1142: Although the peak in CO flux nicely corresponds with the peak in the
1143: dust distribution and thus likely traces the edge of the ring, the
1144: star clusters have not yet reached the Hill radius. Given a separation
1145: time of $\tsep/\tdf \sim \qd^{1/3} \sim 0.3$, a dynamical friction
1146: time of $\tdf/\tcr \simeq 1/q'$, a crossing time of $\tcr \sim
1147: 11$\,Myr, and an average age of the star clusters of $t \sim 15$\,Myr,
1148: we expect based on eq.~(\ref{eq:timescale_separation}), that the star
1149: clusters have reached a separation of about $\Dr \sim 1.5 \, \qp^{1/4}
1150: \, \rHd$. For star clusters with a (combined) mass relative to the gas
1151: mass in the ring from $\qp=0.01$ to $\qp=0.1$, this means a separation
1152: from about $1.0\arcsec$ to $1.8\arcsec$, bracketing the observed
1153: difference.
1154:
1155: There is no evidence for an azimuthal age gradient, but a slight
1156: tendency for a radial age gradient with the few clusters outside the
1157: ring begin all older than $15$\,Myr. This is consistent with the
1158: shepherding scenario in which the gas in the ring has been 'pushed'
1159: inward until a critical surface density is reached and all along the
1160: edge of the nuclear ring star clusters are formed, which then move
1161: outward. The (group of) star cluster(s) responsible for the inward
1162: migration of the ring likely have faded too much to be visible against
1163: the old underlying stellar population of the host galaxy. However,
1164: further support for the inward migration of the ring comes from two
1165: blue stellar spiral arms that seems to connect the outer-most $X_2$
1166: orbits (also referred to as the outer ILR) with the nuclear ring
1167: \citep{Wozniak1995, Benedict2002}. Subtracting a model of the red host
1168: galaxy, \cite{Benedict2002} find that the stars in the arm close to
1169: the nuclear ring are $\sim 20$\,Myr old, with an indication of an
1170: increase in age beyond $\sim 100$\,Myr going outward in the arms.
1171: Whereas during the inward migration the gas surface density along
1172: (the edge of) the ring was insufficient to form stars, shocks at the
1173: contact points might still have allowed the formation of stars. While
1174: the contact points moved inward together with the ring, these stars
1175: stayed behind and created the blue arms.
1176:
1177: \cite{Benedict1996} derive an outer ILR at $\sim 13\arcsec$ and inner
1178: ILR at $\sim 4\arcsec$ for an assumed bar pattern speed $\Omega_p \sim
1179: 72$\,\kmskpc\ of the large-scale bar. The latter is likely an upper
1180: limit because typically the co-rotation radius is beyond the $\sim
1181: 3$\,kpc radius of the bar, so that with a $190$\,\kms\ circular
1182: velocity, $\Omega_p \lesssim 60$\,\kmskpc. In turn this implies that
1183: the above outer and inner ILR are probably lower and upper limits
1184: respectively. This clearly shows that it is critical to obtain an
1185: independent measurement of the bar pattern speed, using for example
1186: the Tremaine-Weinberg (\citeyear{Tremaine1984}) method. Even so, the
1187: nuclear ring is in between the outer and inner ILR, in line with the
1188: shepherding scenario, in which the ring migrates inward until the
1189: increasing gas surface density at the edge reaches the critical value
1190: for star formation. While the newly formed star clusters move
1191: (slightly) outward peaking at $\sim 7.0\arcsec$, the gas in the ring
1192: is 'pushed' further inward peaking at $\sim 5.5\arcsec$. Note that
1193: \cite{Benedict1993} detected a nuclear bar within $\sim 4\arcsec$ that
1194: might provide a mechanism to transport part of the gas further inward
1195: towards the presumed black hole in the center \citep[see
1196: also][]{Benedict2002}.
1197:
1198: %=====================================================================
1199: \section{Discussion}
1200: \label{sec:discussion}
1201: %=====================================================================
1202:
1203: We discuss some of the assumptions of our model and we speculate about
1204: possible consequences the inward migration of the cluster-ring system
1205: has on transporting gas to the center of the galaxy.
1206:
1207: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
1208: \subsection{Isothermal Density Profile}
1209: \label{sec:discussion_isothermal_profile}
1210: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
1211:
1212: In deriving the equations for our model in
1213: \S~\ref{sec:basic_equations}, we have adopted a density profile $\rho
1214: \propto r^{-2}$ for the (bulge of the) spiral galaxy in which the star
1215: cluster and nuclear ring are embedded. At the radii where nuclear
1216: rings are present \citep[0.2--1.7\,kpc;][]{Mazzuca2008}, the density
1217: of galaxies indeed seem to be not too far from such an isothermal
1218: profile, as indicated, for example, by studies that combine stellar
1219: dynamics with strong gravitational lensing
1220: \citep[e.g.][]{Koopmans2006, vandeVen2008}. A more straightforward way
1221: is to consider that the surface brightness profiles of (bulges of)
1222: galaxies are well fitted by a \cite{Sersic1968} profile $I(R) \propto
1223: \exp[-(R/R_e)^{1/n}]$, with index $n$ and the effective radius $R_e$
1224: enclosing half of the total light. The (numerically) deprojection is
1225: well approximated by the density profile of \cite{Prugniel1997}, of
1226: which the (negative) slope is given by
1227: %
1228: \begin{equation}\label{eq:deprojected_Sersic_slope}
1229: \gamma = p_n + \frac{b_n}{n} \left(\frac{r}{R_e}\right)^{1/n},
1230: \end{equation}
1231: %
1232: with $p_n=1.0-0.6097/n+0.05463/n^2$ and $b_n = 2\,n - 1/3 + 4/405\,n +
1233: 46/25515\,n^2$ \citep{Ciotti1999}. For an average bulge of a spiral
1234: galaxy $n \sim 2$ and $R_e \sim 1$\,kpc \citep[e.g.][]{Hunt2004}, so
1235: that at the typical radius $r \sim 0.5$\,kpc of a nuclear ring, we
1236: indeed find that the slope of the density $\gamma \sim 2$ is close to
1237: isothermal.
1238:
1239: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
1240: \subsection{Gas Clumps and Clouds}
1241: \label{sec:discussion_gas}
1242: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
1243:
1244: The star cluster that is being formed in the nuclear ring is already
1245: subject to dynamical friction while it is still a gas clump, as long
1246: as the material that makes up the (proto) star cluster is bound enough
1247: relative to the background stellar population of the host galaxy.
1248: Since this gas clump contains (significant) more mass than the final
1249: cluster of only stars, the initial dynamical friction is (much)
1250: stronger. However, the clearing of gas (and dust) from the newly
1251: formed star cluster is very fast and efficient, since even the
1252: youngest visible star clusters are only mildly reddened
1253: \cite[e.g.][]{Maoz2001}.
1254:
1255: We assume that the gas in the nuclear ring is uniform, i.e., no gas
1256: clouds (or clumps) aside from those which turn into star clusters.
1257: Since such gas clouds would also be subject to dynamical friction from
1258: the background bulge stars and thus move inward, dynamical friction on
1259: the nuclear ring itself has also been proposed as an explanation of
1260: the inward migration of the nuclear ring in for example NGC\,4314
1261: \citep{Combes1992}.
1262:
1263: Suppose that the gas is made up of $N$ gas clouds of the same mass
1264: $\Mc = \Md/N$, then about $N = 1/\qp^2$ clouds are needed to have a
1265: combined dynamical friction torque of the same order as that of a
1266: single star cluster of mass $\Ms = \qp \Md$. Adopting as before the
1267: two cases of $\qp=0.01$ and $\qp=0.1$, this respectively means
1268: $N=10^4$ and $N=10^2$ gas clouds of mass $\Mc = 5 \times 10^3$\,\Msun\
1269: and $\Mc = 5 \times 10^5$\,\Msun\ for a typical nuclear ring mass of
1270: $\Md = 5 \times 10^7$\,\Msun.
1271: %
1272: From \S~\ref{sec:properties} we have that the dynamical friction time
1273: in units of the crossing time is approximately given by $\tdf/\tcr
1274: \simeq \Md/\Ms$, so that with $\Ms = \Mc = \Md/N$ for a gas cloud we
1275: obtain $\tdf \simeq N \tcr$. Given a typical crossing time of $\tcr
1276: \sim 20$\,Myr, the timescales of dynamical friction for the latter two
1277: cases are about $\tdf \sim 200$\,Gyr and $\tdf \sim 2$\,Gyr,
1278: respectively.
1279: %
1280: We thus conclude either nearly no inward migration ($\qp \sim 0.01$),
1281: or gas that is very clumpy with quite large gas clouds ($\qp \sim
1282: 0.1$).
1283:
1284: Moreover, since the gas clouds will span a range in mass with
1285: different corresponding dynamical friction timescales, they migrate
1286: inward at different rates, leading to a (radial) diffusion of the
1287: nuclear ring, especially with respect to the gas that is not in clouds
1288: and stays behind. Although in some galaxies, like M\,83, that are
1289: claimed to harbor a (partial) nuclear ring, the corresponding
1290: morphology is rather clumpy and chaotic, most of the nuclear rings are
1291: are quite smooth and well defined, including the nuclear ring in
1292: NGC\,4314. Collisionless star clusters are also less prone to
1293: destruction than collisional gas clouds, in particular in the presence
1294: of shear stresses from differential speeds. As a result, at least the
1295: most massive star clusters will sink faster inward than the gas
1296: clouds, and appear to be on the inside of the gas (clouds) in the
1297: nuclear ring, which typically is \emph{not} observed.
1298:
1299: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
1300: \subsection{Star Formation within the Nuclear Ring}
1301: \label{sec:discussion_star_formation}
1302: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
1303:
1304: We have assumed that the star cluster form just exterior of the
1305: nuclear ring. This assumption simplifies the physics and the numerical
1306: computation, though it is not absolutely necessary. If the star
1307: cluster forms \emph{near} the outer edge of the nuclear ring, we do
1308: not expect the resulting dynamics to be significantly different. By
1309: near, we demand that the separation between the star cluster and the
1310: outer edge is within one Hill radius of the nuclear ring. In this way,
1311: the amount of mass which participates in the tidal evolution of the
1312: cluster-ring system \emph{exterior} to the star cluster is less then
1313: \emph{interior} to the star cluster. As long as this condition is
1314: fulfilled, the evolution should proceed along the lines of our
1315: calculation.
1316:
1317: There are a few reasons to believe that the star clusters (preferably)
1318: form near the outer edge of the nuclear ring. The supply of gas from
1319: the bar merges with the ring at the outermost radius. It is unknown
1320: how the gas spreads radially over the rest of the ring, but if it is
1321: due to viscous processes, for instance the magneto radial instability
1322: \citep[MRI;][]{Balbus1991}, then the surface density is maximal at the
1323: outer edge. As a result, the gas in the ring is most likely to
1324: be(come) unstable near the outer edge and hence preferentially
1325: fragment there.
1326:
1327: While many clusters will form near the outer edge (and hence
1328: susceptible to shepherding) for the reasons given above, clusters are
1329: also likely to form inside of the outer edge. For instance, once
1330: massive star clusters are formed, their interaction with the gas ring
1331: may result in large and fairly symmetric enhancements in the gas
1332: surface mass density (see for example Figure~\ref{fig:md0.1}), so that
1333: new, but significant smaller, star clusters can be formed
1334: \emph{around} these enhancements. For the relatively small star
1335: clusters formed on the inside, we expect the inward migration to
1336: follow that of forming proto planets \citep[see e.g.][]{Ward1997}.
1337: %
1338: In addition, if the gas flowing along the bar is very clumpy, possess
1339: a different vertical scale height, or a different inclination than the
1340: gas ring, it may not (only) merge at the outermost radius. In this
1341: way, even rather large star clusters might form on the inner edge of
1342: the nuclear ring. They then migrate further inward (relatively faster
1343: than cluster formed on the outer edge as they encounter less of the
1344: gas ring), possibly along an inward extension of the inspiraling gas.
1345: %
1346: Whereas these are possible explanations for the observation that some
1347: star clusters appear more on the inside of the nuclear ring (see also
1348: \S~\ref{sec:basic_picture}), alternatively they might form already
1349: inside of the ring as the result of the local interaction of a
1350: non-axisymmetric structure such as a nuclear bar or spiral with the
1351: interstellar medium (see also \S~\ref{sec:discussion_feeding_nucleus}).
1352:
1353: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
1354: \subsection{Stellar Feedback}
1355: \label{sec:discussion_stellar_feedback}
1356: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
1357:
1358: Winds originating from (massive) stars and/or supernovae in the star
1359: clusters might not only clear out the remaining gas in the star
1360: cluster itself, but also push away part of the gas in the nuclear
1361: ring. This creates a separation between the cluster and the ring that
1362: might mimic the outward migration of the star cluster. However,
1363: since the density of the interstellar medium is far less than that of
1364: the gas in the ring, the winds will escape in the vertical direction
1365: like a fountain arising from the (equatorial) plane of the ring.
1366: Therefore, even if the cluster is embedded in the ring itself, the
1367: winds are expected to clear out at most a region that is equal to
1368: scale height of the disk, $\hd$, which is significantly smaller than
1369: the Hill radius of the ring, $\rHd$.
1370:
1371: To show this, we start from \cite{Toomre1964} $Q$ parameter for the
1372: gas in the ring: $Q = c_s \kappa/\pi G \Sigma$ \citep{BT87}. Here, the
1373: epicycle frequency $\kappa$ is defined as $\kappa^2 = (4 +
1374: \du\ln\Omega/\du\ln r) \Omega^2$, so that $\kappa = \sqrt{2} \Omega$
1375: for the assumed (isothermal) density profile $\rho \propto r^{-2}$.
1376: Adopting $c_s = \hd \Omega$, we obtain for the scale height of the
1377: ring $\hd/\rd \simeq (\Md/\Menc) \, Q/\sqrt{2}$. On the other hand,
1378: the Hill radius of the ring $\rHd/\rd \simeq (\Md/\Menc)^{1/3}$.
1379: Assuming $Q \simeq 1$ and substituting the mean observed
1380: ring-to-enclosed mass ratio $\Md/\Menc \simeq 0.02$, we find that
1381: $\hd/\rHd \simeq 0.05$. This indeed shows that winds might clear out a
1382: region that is at most a few per cent of the Hill radius of the
1383: nuclear ring.
1384:
1385: A second possible stellar feedback effect, is due the (ultraviolet)
1386: radiation coming from the massive, bright stars in the (young) star
1387: cluster, which might (photo)ionize the (molecular) gas in the nuclear
1388: ring. We can estimate the radial extent of this ionization from the
1389: radius $\rion$ of the Str\"omgren sphere.
1390: %
1391: We start from $\dot{N}_\mathrm{ion} \simeq \alpha \, n_g^2 \, 4\pi
1392: \rion^3/3$, with cross section $\alpha \simeq 3 \times
1393: 10^{-13}$\,\cms. We assume that bright stars radiate roughly at $10\%$
1394: of the Eddington luminosity in the ultraviolet (UV; $\ge 10$\,eV), to
1395: obtain an ionization rate of $\dot{N} < 10^{48} \,
1396: (\Mstar/\mathrm{M}_\odot)$ photons per second. With the above estimate
1397: of the scale height $\hd$, we find for the gas mass density $\rho_g
1398: \simeq \Menc\sqrt{2}/\pi \rd^3 Q$. Substituting $\Menc \sim 2.5
1399: \times 10^9$\,\Msun, $\rd \sim 0.5$\,kpc and $Q \simeq 1$, and
1400: dividing by the proton mass, we find for the number density of the gas
1401: $n_g \sim 4 \times 10^2$\,cm$^{-3}$. In this way, we estimate that a
1402: (UV) radiating star of mass $\Mstar$ is able to ionize gas out to a
1403: (maximum) radius of $\rion < 3 \,
1404: (\Mstar/\mathrm{M}_\odot)^{1/3}$\,pc.
1405:
1406: For a typical O star of $\Mstar \sim 40$\,\Msun, this means $\rion <
1407: 10$\,pc, which is significantly smaller than the typical Hill radius
1408: of $\rHd \sim 150$\,pc. The combined (and focused) ionizing radiation
1409: of thousands of massive young stars with a lifetime of only a few to
1410: ten Myr are needed to reach the latter radius. Even then, the dust,
1411: which is hardly effected by the radiation, will still provide a good
1412: tracer of the gas in the ring, and as such can be used to establish
1413: the separation between star clusters and the nuclear ring.
1414:
1415: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
1416: \subsection{Feeding the Nucleus?}
1417: \label{sec:discussion_feeding_nucleus}
1418: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
1419:
1420: For sufficiently massive star clusters and/or for a sufficiently large
1421: number of them, it is in principle possible for these star clusters to
1422: shepherd the nuclear ring to smaller radii. As in C08, we assumed the
1423: gas ring sits in a simple spherically symmetric potential. However,
1424: the gas ring arises as a result of the stellar bar, which is a
1425: non-axisymmetric feature in the potential, driving the gas inward
1426: towards the $X_1-X_2$ orbit transition. In addition, the gas ring is
1427: self-gravitating with Toomre's (\citeyear{Toomre1964}) $Q$ near unity.
1428: We now speculate on the effect of this non-axisymmetry and self-gravity
1429: on the gas shepherding scenario.
1430:
1431: First, as the gas ring is being shepherded inward, it moves from one
1432: $X_2$ orbit to a smaller one. Eventually, it may move inward of the
1433: smallest non-intersecting $X_2$ orbit in a barred potential
1434: \citep[e.g.][]{Regan2003}. The gas which is pushed beyond this point
1435: will find itself in intersecting orbits, losing angular momentum on
1436: each orbit as it shocks against gas on the same orbit or on
1437: neighboring orbits. The high(er) density regions resulting from the
1438: shocks, might give rise to the observed (chaotic) spurs of gas and
1439: dust in the centers of (late-type) galaxies
1440: \citep[e.g.][]{Elmegreen1998,Martini2003a}.
1441:
1442: Second, the effect of self-gravity in the shepherded gas ring is
1443: nontrivial. As we stated above in
1444: \S~\ref{sec:discussion_star_formation}, the effect of an enhanced
1445: surface density at the edge of the ring results in $Q \lesssim 1$, if
1446: the initial $Q \simeq 1$. In addition, this \textit{local} enhancement
1447: in the surface density may give rise to the gaseous analogy of stellar
1448: self-gravitating groove and edge modes \citep[see
1449: also][]{Lovelace1978, Sellwood1991, Papaloizou1991}. This may result
1450: in the formation of nuclear bars \citep[e.g.][]{Laine2002, Erwin2002,
1451: Englmaier2004} or nuclear spirals \citep[e.g.][]{Englmaier2000,
1452: Pogge2002}, providing a means for inward transport of gas from the
1453: nuclear ring region in analogy to the ``bars within bars'' scenario
1454: \citep{Shlosman1990}.
1455:
1456: %=====================================================================
1457: \section{Conclusions}
1458: \label{sec:conclusions}
1459: %=====================================================================
1460:
1461: We have studied the dynamics between a star cluster and the gas in the
1462: nuclear ring from which it was formed. The star cluster is subject to
1463: dynamical friction with the background bulge stars in the host galaxy. The
1464: resulting dynamical friction torque induces a tidal (and viscous)
1465: torque on the gas in the nuclear ring. In addition, we investigated a
1466: torque due to in-falling gas along the bar onto the nuclear ring at the
1467: contact points. We arrived at the following, observationally testable
1468: predictions based on our model.
1469:
1470: \begin{enumerate}
1471: \item[(i)] The star clusters which are formed near the outer edge of
1472: the ring migrate outward. The final separation is of the order of
1473: the Hill radius of the ring, which is $20-30\%$ of its radius if the
1474: ring's gas mass is the observed $1-3\%$ of the enclosed mass.
1475: Similarly, the time to reach this final separation is about
1476: $20-30\%$ of the dynamical friction time. The initial separation is
1477: very fast, reaching half the Hill radius within only $1\%$ of the
1478: dynamical friction time. The latter can be as short as a few million
1479: years for a massive enough ($\gtrsim 10^6$\,\Msun) star cluster.
1480: \item[(ii)] While such a massive cluster moves out the surface mass
1481: density of the gas at the edge of the nuclear ring is pushed inward
1482: and gets enhanced by a factor of a few. If this enhancement reaches
1483: the critical value for star formation, new star clusters are
1484: expected to form along the ring. This is in addition to the
1485: (ongoing) formation of star cluster from shocking gas near the
1486: contact points. The (initial) azimuthal age gradient that is
1487: expected from the latter gets diluted or even washed out by the
1488: former (secondary) star cluster formation.
1489: \item[(iii)] If the (formed) star cluster are massive and/or numerous
1490: enough, and the gas mass inflow rate low enough (or even shut down),
1491: we expect the inward migration of the cluster-ring system as a
1492: whole. This mean that, even though initially the nuclear ring could
1493: have formed as often suggested at an (inner) Lindblad resonance, it
1494: can migrate closer to the center of the host galaxy.
1495: \end{enumerate}
1496:
1497: The latter implies that the most massive star cluster, after an
1498: initial outward separation, turn around and migrate inward along with
1499: the nuclear ring. Consequently, any initial radial age gradient due to
1500: the dynamical friction time being inverse proportional to the mass of
1501: the star cluster, is diluted or even inverted. Even so, both a radial
1502: and azimuthal age gradient are observationally difficult to measure.
1503: When the most massive stars are still alive, the bright emission lines
1504: can be used for (relative) age dating \citep[e.g.][]{Boker2008}, but
1505: after a few tens of million years it becomes already very challenging
1506: to distinguish the fading star clusters from the background stellar
1507: population \citep[but see e.g.][]{Benedict2002}.
1508:
1509: The outward migration of a least the most massive star clusters is
1510: easier to establish, and using the dust to trace the gas, observations
1511: indeed show the young star clusters exterior to the nuclear ring. The
1512: measured separation should be of the order of the Hill radius of the
1513: nuclear ring, which indeed is the case in NGC\,4314. This well-studied
1514: nuclear ring also seems to have migrated inward, leaving a tail of
1515: older star clusters behind and being currently located between the
1516: inner and outer ILR. To firmly confirm such a ``shepherding of gas''
1517: towards smaller radii, the dynamics of the host galaxy, including the
1518: (bar) pattern speed, needs to be measured accurately.
1519:
1520: %=====================================================================
1521: % ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
1522: %=====================================================================
1523:
1524: \acknowledgements
1525:
1526: We thank Torsten B\"oker, Jes\'us Falc\'on--Barroso, Norm Murray,
1527: Eliot Quataert and Scott Tremaine for useful discussions. We thank
1528: Nathan Smith for pointing out the importance of stellar winds and
1529: stellar radiation on the properties of the nuclear gas ring. We thank
1530: the referee, Curt Struck, for insightful comments on this work. GvdV
1531: acknowledges support provided by NASA through Hubble Fellowship grant
1532: HST-HF-01202.01-A awarded by the Space Telescope Science Institute,
1533: which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in
1534: Astronomy, Inc., for NASA, under contract NAS 5-26555. PC gratefully
1535: acknowledges the support of the Miller Institute for Basic Research,
1536: and thanks the Institute for Advanced Study for their hospitality
1537: where a portion of this work was conducted.
1538:
1539: %=====================================================================
1540: % APPENDICES
1541: %=====================================================================
1542:
1543: %\appendix
1544:
1545: %\section{}\label{sec:}
1546:
1547: %=====================================================================
1548: % REFERENCES
1549: %=====================================================================
1550:
1551: \begin{thebibliography}{58}
1552: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
1553:
1554: \bibitem[{{Allard} {et~al.}(2006){Allard}, {Knapen}, {Peletier}, \&
1555: {Sarzi}}]{Allard2006}
1556: {Allard}, E.~L., {Knapen}, J.~H., {Peletier}, R.~F., \& {Sarzi}, M. 2006,
1557: \mnras, 371, 1087
1558:
1559: \bibitem[{{Artymowicz}(1993)}]{Artymowicz1993}
1560: {Artymowicz}, P. 1993, \apj, 419, 155
1561:
1562: \bibitem[{{Balbus} \& {Hawley}(1991)}]{Balbus1991}
1563: {Balbus}, S.~A. \& {Hawley}, J.~F. 1991, \apj, 376, 214
1564:
1565: \bibitem[{{Benedict} {et~al.}(1993){Benedict}, {Higdon}, {Jefferys},
1566: {Duncombe}, {Hemenway}, {Shelus}, {Whipple}, {Nelan}, {Story}, {McArthur},
1567: {McCartney}, {Franz}, {Fredrick}, \& {van Altena}}]{Benedict1993}
1568: {Benedict}, G.~F., {Higdon}, J.~L., {Jefferys}, W.~H., {Duncombe}, R.,
1569: {Hemenway}, P.~D., {Shelus}, P.~J., {Whipple}, A.~L., {Nelan}, E., {Story},
1570: D., {McArthur}, B., {McCartney}, J., {Franz}, O.~G., {Fredrick}, L.~W., \&
1571: {van Altena}, W.~F. 1993, \aj, 105, 1369
1572:
1573: \bibitem[{{Benedict} {et~al.}(2002){Benedict}, {Howell}, {J{\o}rgensen},
1574: {Kenney}, \& {Smith}}]{Benedict2002}
1575: {Benedict}, G.~F., {Howell}, D.~A., {J{\o}rgensen}, I., {Kenney}, J.~D.~P., \&
1576: {Smith}, B.~J. 2002, \aj, 123, 1411
1577:
1578: \bibitem[{{Benedict} {et~al.}(1996){Benedict}, {Smith}, \&
1579: {Kenney}}]{Benedict1996}
1580: {Benedict}, G.~F., {Smith}, B.~J., \& {Kenney}, J.~D.~P. 1996, \aj, 112, 1318
1581:
1582: \bibitem[{{Binney} \& {Tremaine}(1987)}]{BT87}
1583: {Binney}, J. \& {Tremaine}, S. 1987, {Galactic Dynamics} (Princeton, NJ,
1584: Princeton University Press)
1585:
1586: \bibitem[{{B{\"o}ker} {et~al.}(2008){B{\"o}ker}, {Falc{\'o}n-Barroso},
1587: {Schinnerer}, {Knapen}, \& {Ryder}}]{Boker2008}
1588: {B{\"o}ker}, T., {Falc{\'o}n-Barroso}, J., {Schinnerer}, E., {Knapen}, J.~H.,
1589: \& {Ryder}, S. 2008, \aj, 135, 479
1590:
1591: \bibitem[{{Brunner} {et~al.}(2008){Brunner}, {Sheth}, {Armus}, {Wolfire},
1592: {Vogel}, {Schinnerer}, {Helou}, {Dufour}, {Smith}, \& {Dale}}]{Brunner2008}
1593: {Brunner}, G., {Sheth}, K., {Armus}, L., {Wolfire}, M., {Vogel}, S.,
1594: {Schinnerer}, E., {Helou}, G., {Dufour}, R., {Smith}, J.-D., \& {Dale}, D.~A.
1595: 2008, \apj, 675, 316
1596:
1597: \bibitem[{{Buta} \& {Combes}(1996)}]{Buta1996}
1598: {Buta}, R. \& {Combes}, F. 1996, Fundamentals of Cosmic Physics, 17, 95
1599:
1600: \bibitem[{{Chandrasekhar}(1943)}]{Chandrasekhar1943}
1601: {Chandrasekhar}, S. 1943, \apj, 97, 255
1602:
1603: \bibitem[{{Chang}(2008)}]{Chang2008}
1604: {Chang}, P. 2008, \apj, 684, 236 [C08]
1605:
1606: \bibitem[{{Ciotti} \& {Bertin}(1999)}]{Ciotti1999}
1607: {Ciotti}, L. \& {Bertin}, G. 1999, \aap, 352, 447
1608:
1609: \bibitem[{{Combes} {et~al.}(1992){Combes}, {Gerin}, {Nakai}, {Kawabe}, \&
1610: {Shaw}}]{Combes1992}
1611: {Combes}, F., {Gerin}, M., {Nakai}, N., {Kawabe}, R., \& {Shaw}, M.~A. 1992,
1612: \aap, 259, L27
1613:
1614: \bibitem[{{Elmegreen}(1994)}]{Elmegreen1994}
1615: {Elmegreen}, B.~G. 1994, \apjl, 425, L73
1616:
1617: \bibitem[{{Elmegreen} {et~al.}(1998){Elmegreen}, {Elmegreen}, {Brinks}, {Yuan},
1618: {Kaufman}, {Klaric}, {Montenegro}, {Struck}, \& {Thomasson}}]{Elmegreen1998}
1619: {Elmegreen}, B.~G., {Elmegreen}, D.~M., {Brinks}, E., {Yuan}, C., {Kaufman},
1620: M., {Klaric}, M., {Montenegro}, L., {Struck}, C., \& {Thomasson}, M. 1998,
1621: \apjl, 503, L119
1622:
1623: \bibitem[{{Englmaier} \& {Shlosman}(2000)}]{Englmaier2000}
1624: {Englmaier}, P. \& {Shlosman}, I. 2000, \apj, 528, 677
1625:
1626: \bibitem[{{Englmaier} \& {Shlosman}(2004)}]{Englmaier2004}
1627: ---. 2004, \apjl, 617, L115
1628:
1629: \bibitem[{{Erwin} \& {Sparke}(2002)}]{Erwin2002}
1630: {Erwin}, P. \& {Sparke}, L.~S. 2002, \aj, 124, 65
1631:
1632: \bibitem[{{Fukuda} {et~al.}(2000){Fukuda}, {Habe}, \& {Wada}}]{Fukuda2000}
1633: {Fukuda}, H., {Habe}, A., \& {Wada}, K. 2000, \apj, 529, 109
1634:
1635: \bibitem[{{Gerssen}(2002)}]{Gerssen2002}
1636: {Gerssen}, J. 2002, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series,
1637: Vol. 275, Disks of Galaxies: Kinematics, Dynamics and Peturbations, ed.
1638: E.~{Athanassoula}, A.~{Bosma}, \& R.~{Mujica}, 197--200
1639:
1640: \bibitem[{{Goldreich} \& {Tremaine}(1980)}]{Goldreich1980}
1641: {Goldreich}, P. \& {Tremaine}, S. 1980, \apj, 241, 425
1642:
1643: \bibitem[{{H{\"a}gele} {et~al.}(2007){H{\"a}gele}, {D{\'{\i}}az}, {Cardaci},
1644: {Terlevich}, \& {Terlevich}}]{Hagele2007}
1645: {H{\"a}gele}, G.~F., {D{\'{\i}}az}, {\'A}.~I., {Cardaci}, M.~V., {Terlevich},
1646: E., \& {Terlevich}, R. 2007, \mnras, 378, 163
1647:
1648: \bibitem[{{Hourigan} \& {Ward}(1984)}]{Hourigan1984}
1649: {Hourigan}, K. \& {Ward}, W.~R. 1984, Icarus, 60, 29
1650:
1651: \bibitem[{{Hunt} {et~al.}(2004){Hunt}, {Pierini}, \& {Giovanardi}}]{Hunt2004}
1652: {Hunt}, L.~K., {Pierini}, D., \& {Giovanardi}, C. 2004, \aap, 414, 905
1653:
1654: \bibitem[{{Kenney} {et~al.}(1993){Kenney}, {Carlstrom}, \&
1655: {Young}}]{Kenney1993}
1656: {Kenney}, J.~D.~P., {Carlstrom}, J.~E., \& {Young}, J.~S. 1993, \apj, 418, 687
1657:
1658: \bibitem[{{Kenney} {et~al.}(1992){Kenney}, {Wilson}, {Scoville}, {Devereux}, \&
1659: {Young}}]{Kenney1992}
1660: {Kenney}, J.~D.~P., {Wilson}, C.~D., {Scoville}, N.~Z., {Devereux}, N.~A., \&
1661: {Young}, J.~S. 1992, \apjl, 395, L79
1662:
1663: \bibitem[{{Koopmans} {et~al.}(2006){Koopmans}, {Treu}, {Bolton}, {Burles}, \&
1664: {Moustakas}}]{Koopmans2006}
1665: {Koopmans}, L.~V.~E., {Treu}, T., {Bolton}, A.~S., {Burles}, S., \&
1666: {Moustakas}, L.~A. 2006, \apj, 649, 599
1667:
1668: \bibitem[{{Laine} {et~al.}(2002){Laine}, {Shlosman}, {Knapen}, \&
1669: {Peletier}}]{Laine2002}
1670: {Laine}, S., {Shlosman}, I., {Knapen}, J.~H., \& {Peletier}, R.~F. 2002, \apj,
1671: 567, 97
1672:
1673: \bibitem[{{Lin} \& {Papaloizou}(1979{\natexlab{a}})}]{Lin1979b}
1674: {Lin}, D.~N.~C. \& {Papaloizou}, J. 1979{\natexlab{a}}, \mnras, 188, 191
1675:
1676: \bibitem[{{Lin} \& {Papaloizou}(1979{\natexlab{b}})}]{Lin1979a}
1677: ---. 1979{\natexlab{b}}, \mnras, 186, 799
1678:
1679: \bibitem[{{Lin} \& {Papaloizou}(1986)}]{Lin1986}
1680: ---. 1986, \apj, 307, 395
1681:
1682: \bibitem[{{Lovelace} \& {Hohlfeld}(1978)}]{Lovelace1978}
1683: {Lovelace}, R.~V.~E. \& {Hohlfeld}, R.~G. 1978, \apj, 221, 51
1684:
1685: \bibitem[{{Maoz} {et~al.}(2001){Maoz}, {Barth}, {Ho}, {Sternberg}, \&
1686: {Filippenko}}]{Maoz2001}
1687: {Maoz}, D., {Barth}, A.~J., {Ho}, L.~C., {Sternberg}, A., \& {Filippenko},
1688: A.~V. 2001, \aj, 121, 3048
1689:
1690: \bibitem[{{Martini} {et~al.}(2003){Martini}, {Regan}, {Mulchaey}, \&
1691: {Pogge}}]{Martini2003a}
1692: {Martini}, P., {Regan}, M.~W., {Mulchaey}, J.~S., \& {Pogge}, R.~W. 2003,
1693: \apjs, 146, 353
1694:
1695: \bibitem[{{Mazzuca} {et~al.}(2008){Mazzuca}, {Knapen}, {Veilleux}, \&
1696: {Regan}}]{Mazzuca2008}
1697: {Mazzuca}, L.~M., {Knapen}, J.~H., {Veilleux}, S., \& {Regan}, M.~W. 2008,
1698: \apjs, 174, 337
1699:
1700: \bibitem[{{McLaughlin} \& {Fall}(2007)}]{McLaughlin2007}
1701: {McLaughlin}, D.~E. \& {Fall}, S.~M. 2007, ArXiv e-prints, 704
1702:
1703: \bibitem[{{Papaloizou} \& {Savonije}(1991)}]{Papaloizou1991}
1704: {Papaloizou}, J.~C. \& {Savonije}, G.~J. 1991, \mnras, 248, 353
1705:
1706: \bibitem[{{Parmentier} {et~al.}(2008){Parmentier}, {Goodwin}, {Kroupa}, \&
1707: {Baumgardt}}]{Parmentier2008}
1708: {Parmentier}, G., {Goodwin}, S.~P., {Kroupa}, P., \& {Baumgardt}, H. 2008,
1709: ArXiv e-prints, 802
1710:
1711: \bibitem[{{Planesas} {et~al.}(1997){Planesas}, {Colina}, \&
1712: {Perez-Olea}}]{Planesas1997}
1713: {Planesas}, P., {Colina}, L., \& {Perez-Olea}, D. 1997, \aap, 325, 81
1714:
1715: \bibitem[{{Pogge} \& {Martini}(2002)}]{Pogge2002}
1716: {Pogge}, R.~W. \& {Martini}, P. 2002, \apj, 569, 624
1717:
1718: \bibitem[{{Press} {et~al.}(1992){Press}, {Teukolsky}, {Vettering}, \&
1719: {Flannery}}]{Press92..numrecipies}
1720: {Press}, W.~H., {Teukolsky}, S.~A., {Vettering}, W.~T., \& {Flannery}, B.~P.
1721: 1992, {Numerical Recipes} (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge)
1722:
1723: \bibitem[{{Pringle}(1981)}]{Pringle1981}
1724: {Pringle}, J.~E. 1981, \araa, 19, 137
1725:
1726: \bibitem[{{Prugniel} \& {Simien}(1997)}]{Prugniel1997}
1727: {Prugniel}, P. \& {Simien}, F. 1997, \aap, 321, 111
1728:
1729: \bibitem[{{Rafikov}(2002)}]{Rafikov2002}
1730: {Rafikov}, R.~R. 2002, \apj, 572, 566
1731:
1732: \bibitem[{{Regan} \& {Teuben}(2003)}]{Regan2003}
1733: {Regan}, M.~W. \& {Teuben}, P. 2003, \apj, 582, 723
1734:
1735: \bibitem[{{Regan} {et~al.}(1997){Regan}, {Vogel}, \& {Teuben}}]{Regan1997}
1736: {Regan}, M.~W., {Vogel}, S.~N., \& {Teuben}, P.~J. 1997, \apjl, 482, L143
1737:
1738: \bibitem[{{Sellwood} \& {Kahn}(1991)}]{Sellwood1991}
1739: {Sellwood}, J.~A. \& {Kahn}, F.~D. 1991, \mnras, 250, 278
1740:
1741: \bibitem[{{S\'ersic}(1968)}]{Sersic1968}
1742: {S\'ersic}, J.~L. 1968, {Atlas de galaxias australes} (Cordoba, Argentina:
1743: Observatorio Astronomico, 1968)
1744:
1745: \bibitem[{{Shakura} \& {Syunyaev}(1973)}]{Shakura1973}
1746: {Shakura}, N.~I. \& {Syunyaev}, R.~A. 1973, \aap, 24, 337
1747:
1748: \bibitem[{{Shlosman} {et~al.}(1990){Shlosman}, {Begelman}, \&
1749: {Frank}}]{Shlosman1990}
1750: {Shlosman}, I., {Begelman}, M.~C., \& {Frank}, J. 1990, \nat, 345, 679
1751:
1752: \bibitem[{{Toomre}(1964)}]{Toomre1964}
1753: {Toomre}, A. 1964, \apj, 139, 1217
1754:
1755: \bibitem[{{Tremaine} \& {Weinberg}(1984)}]{Tremaine1984}
1756: {Tremaine}, S. \& {Weinberg}, M.~D. 1984, \apjl, 282, L5
1757:
1758: \bibitem[{{van de Ven} {et~al.}(2008){van de Ven}, {Falc{\'o}n-Barroso},
1759: {McDermid}, {Cappellari}, {Miller}, \& {de Zeeuw}}]{vandeVen2008}
1760: {van de Ven}, G., {Falc{\'o}n-Barroso}, J., {McDermid}, R.~M., {Cappellari},
1761: M., {Miller}, B.~W., \& {de Zeeuw}, P.~T. 2008, \mnras, submitted
1762:
1763: \bibitem[{{Ward}(1997)}]{Ward1997}
1764: {Ward}, W.~R. 1997, Icarus, 126, 261
1765:
1766: \bibitem[{{Ward} \& {Hourigan}(1989)}]{Ward1989}
1767: {Ward}, W.~R. \& {Hourigan}, K. 1989, \apj, 347, 490
1768:
1769: \bibitem[{{Wozniak} {et~al.}(1995){Wozniak}, {Friedli}, {Martinet}, {Martin},
1770: \& {Bratschi}}]{Wozniak1995}
1771: {Wozniak}, H., {Friedli}, D., {Martinet}, L., {Martin}, P., \& {Bratschi}, P.
1772: 1995, \aaps, 111, 115
1773:
1774: \bibitem[{{Zhang} \& {Fall}(1999)}]{Zhang1999}
1775: {Zhang}, Q. \& {Fall}, S.~M. 1999, \apjl, 527, L81
1776:
1777: \end{thebibliography}
1778:
1779: %=====================================================================
1780: % END DOCUMENT
1781: %=====================================================================
1782:
1783: \end{document}
1784: