1: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
2: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3: \documentclass[11pt,preprint]{aastex}
4:
5: %\documentclass{emulateapj}
6: %\usepackage{apjfonts}
7:
8: \newcommand\mdot{\rm \dot{M}}
9: \newcommand\msun{\rm M_{\odot}}
10: \newcommand\rsun{\rm R_{\odot}}
11: \newcommand\lsun{\rm L_{\odot}}
12: \newcommand\msunyr{\rm M_{\odot}\,yr^{-1}}
13: \newcommand\be{\begin{equation}}
14: \newcommand\en{\end{equation}}
15: \newcommand\cm{\rm cm}
16: \newcommand\kms{\rm{\, km \, s^{-1}}}
17: \newcommand\K{\rm K}
18: \newcommand\etal{{\rm et al}.\ }
19: \shorttitle{Transition Disks in CrA}
20: \shortauthors{Sicilia-Aguilar et al.}
21:
22: \begin{document}
23:
24: \title{Very Low-Mass Objects in the Coronet Cluster: The Realm of the Transition Disks\altaffilmark{1}}
25:
26:
27: \author{Aurora Sicilia-Aguilar\altaffilmark{2}, Thomas Henning\altaffilmark{2}, Attila Juh\'{a}sz\altaffilmark{2},}
28: \author{Jeroen Bouwman\altaffilmark{2}, Gordon Garmire\altaffilmark{3}, Audrey Garmire\altaffilmark{3}}
29:
30: \altaffiltext{1}{Based on ESO program 079.C-0235}
31: \altaffiltext{2}{Max-Planck-Institut f\"{u}r Astronomie, K\"{o}nigstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany}
32: \altaffiltext{3}{The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802-6305, USA}
33:
34: \email{sicilia@mpia.de}
35:
36: \begin{abstract}
37:
38: We present optical and IR spectra of a set of low-mass stars and brown
39: dwarfs in the Coronet cluster (aged $\sim$1 Myr), obtained with the multifiber
40: spectrograph FLAMES on the VLT and with the IRS instrument on Spitzer.
41: Most of the objects had been selected via their X-ray emission in a deep
42: Chandra survey. The optical spectra reveal spectral types between
43: M1 and M7.5, confirm the youth of the objects (via Li 6708\,\AA\ absorption),
44: and show the presence of accretion (via H$\alpha$) and shocks (via forbidden
45: line emission). The IRS spectra, together with IR photometry from the IRAC/MIPS
46: instruments on Spitzer and 2MASS, confirm the presence of IR excesses
47: characteristic of disks around $\sim$70\% of the objects. Half of the disks do not
48: exhibit any silicate emission, or present flat features characteristic of large
49: grains ($>$6\,$\mu$m). The rest of the disks show silicate emission with
50: indications of amorphous and crystalline silicate grains a few microns in size.
51: About 50\% of the objects with disks do not show near-IR excess emission, corresponding
52: to the presence of ``transitional'' disks, according to their classical definition.
53: This is a very high fraction for such a young cluster. The large number of ``transitional''
54: disks suggests lifetimes comparable to the lifetimes of typical optically thick disks.
55: Therefore, these disks may not be in a \textit{short-lived} phase, intermediate between Class II
56: and Class III objects. The median spectral energy distribution of the disks in the Coronet
57: cluster is also closer to a flat disk than observed for the disks around solar-type stars
58: in regions with similar age. The differences in the disk morphology and evolution in the
59: Coronet cluster could be related to fact that these objects have very late
60: spectral types compared to the solar-type stars in other cluster studies. Finally, the
61: optical spectroscopy reveals that one of the X-ray sources is produced by a Herbig Haro
62: object in the cloud.
63:
64: \end{abstract}
65:
66: \keywords{stars: low-mass, brown dwarfs --- stars: pre-main sequence --- accretion disks --- planetary systems: protoplanetary disks }
67:
68: \section{Introduction \label{intro}}
69:
70: The formation of very low-mass stars and brown dwarfs (BD) has been a matter of
71: discussion for a long time (Luhman et al. 2006). The difficulties in fragmenting a cloud or
72: stopping the envelope mass accretion at or near the hydrogen burning limit suggested
73: that very low-mass objects may not form like solar-type stars, but require other
74: mechanisms like ejection in multiple systems (Bate et al. 2005; Umbreit et al. 2005)
75: or photoerosion by nearby high-mass stars that can remove part of the initial core
76: material (Withworth \& Zinnecker 2004). At the same time, multiple studies have focused
77: on the detection of accretion disks around very low-mass young stars and BD
78: (Fern\'{a}ndez \& Comer\'{o}n 2001; Natta \& Testi 2001; Jayawardhana et al. 2002, 2003;
79: Pascucci et al. 2003; Klein et al. 2003; Luhman et al. 2005; Mohanty 2004, 2005).
80: H$\alpha$ spectroscopy reveals
81: active accretion, and the excesses in the near- and mid-IR are consistent with
82: disks similar to the disks around classical T Tauri stars (CTTS; Muench et al. 2001;
83: Apai et al. 2002, 2005; Pascucci et al. 2003; Mohanty et al. 2004;
84: Jayawardhana et al. 2005; Scholz \& Jayawardhana 2008). IR spectroscopy finds further
85: similarities: dust evolution, grain growth/settling and disk flattening, formation of
86: crystalline silicates, and inner holes (Furlan et al. 2005; Apai et al. 2005;
87: Gizis et al. 2005; Sterzik et al. 2004; Sargent et al. 2006; Natta et al. 2007;
88: Morrow et al. 2008; Henning 2008), which are thought to be the first steps in the
89: formation of planetary systems, occur in these disks. Therefore, objects of all
90: masses may be formed by cloud fragmentation and subsequent disk formation and
91: accretion (Luhman et al. 2007).
92:
93: Nevertheless, our understanding of disk evolution and accretion mechanisms in very
94: low-mass stars and BD is still far from complete. The timescales for very low-mass
95: disk evolution, expected to be longer than those of solar-type T Tauri stars (TTS)
96: and Herbig Ae/Be stars (HAeBe; Sterzik et al. 2004; Dahm \& Hillenbrand 2007;
97: Bouy et al. 2007), are still very uncertain (Lada et al. 2006), due to the lack of
98: statistically significant samples of coeval very low-mass stars and BD. IR observations
99: of M-type stars reveal differences in innermost disk evolution (Kessler-Silacci et al. 2007;
100: Sicilia-Aguilar et al. 2007), which may be the result of differences in the disk
101: structure, presence of dead zones, and accretion mechanisms (Hartmann et al. 2006) and
102: could affect the formation of planetary systems in such disks.
103: As it happens with the solar-type TTS, deeper and more complete multiwavelength
104: observations suggest that there is an important fraction of harder-to-detect,
105: flattened and transitional disks with inner holes around the lower-mass
106: objects. For these very low-mass objects, with masses $<$0.2 M$_\odot$ down to
107: the BD regime, the morphology of the disks could be different (Morrow et al. 2008),
108: but the difficulties in observing faint objects and determining the low-mass
109: initial mass function in the regions translate into very small samples and
110: large uncertainties. If, like we observe in solar-type TTS, individual differences
111: in disk evolution are remarkable even for objects of similar ages and spectral types,
112: the knowledge of disks and accretion around very low-mass stars and BD and their
113: evolution is highly limited at the present time, and may be biased toward ``special''
114: systems (with large IR excess and strong accretion rates).
115:
116: The Coronet cluster (also known as CrA) is an obscured star-forming region,
117: located at a distance of $\sim$150 pc (d$\sim$ 130 pc according to Marraco \& Rydgren 1981
118: and De Zeeuw et al. 1999; d$\sim$ 170 pc according to Knude \& Hog 1998),
119: associated with the Herbig Ae star R CrA (Taylor \& Storey 1984) and a dense molecular
120: core (Loren 1979). The Coronet cluster is relatively isolated at the edge of the Gould Belt.
121: It is located out of the galactic plane, and it is probably part of the Sco OB2 Association
122: (De Zeeuw et al. 1999) and of the large Sco-Cen region (De Geus et al. 1992).
123: Cambr\'{e}sy (1999) estimated a total mass of 1600 M$_\odot$
124: for the whole cloud, using a distance of 170 pc. Casey et al. (1998) obtained an
125: age of 3 Myr for the TY CrA multiple system, considering a distance of 130 pc;
126: the cluster would be younger if the distance is larger. An age around 1 Myr is more
127: consistent with the presence of nebular material and Class 0 objects
128: (Chen et al. 1997). Nisini et al. (2005) estimated an age of 0.5-1 Myr
129: based on 4 embedded objects, being therefore one of the closest and youngest
130: clusters. Submillimeter, millimeter, IR, and optical surveys (Henning et al. 1994;
131: de Muizon et al. 1980; Wilking et al. 1985; Marraco \& Rydgren 1981) found a few HAeBe
132: and TTS, suggesting a modest stellar population. The most massive stars in the region are
133: the Herbig Ae star R CrA and the B9 star TY CrA. X-ray surveys using Einstein, XMM-Newton,
134: ROSAT, and Chandra (Walter 1986; Walter et al. 1997; Neuh\"{a}user et al. 1997, 2000;
135: Hamaguchi et al. 2005a,b) identified several low-mass members. Deeper X-ray
136: observations (Garmire \& Garmire 2003) found 118 potential (1$\sigma$) sources, many
137: of which were consistent with young stars, some of them deeply embedded, which
138: have not been described in detail yet.
139:
140: Here we present the results of optical and IR spectroscopy on
141: a collection of low- and very low-mass members of the Coronet
142: Cluster. The new and archive data, including the Chandra survey, optical
143: spectroscopy with FLAMES/VLT, IR spectroscopy with IRS/Spitzer, and IRAC
144: and MIPS/Spitzer photometry are introduced in Section \ref{data}, where we
145: also describe the selection methods of the sample of very low-mass objects.
146: The derived stellar and disk properties are presented in Section \ref{analysis},
147: and their implications for star formation and disk evolution are discussed in
148: Section \ref{discussion}. Finally, the results are summarized
149: in Section \ref{conclusions}.
150:
151: \section{Selection of the sample, observations, and data reduction \label{data}}
152:
153: Here we present the different observations (see Table \ref{obs-table} for
154: a summary). The sample was selected starting from a deep X-ray survey
155: (Section \ref{data-xray}) and using additional optical candidates.
156: The membership and spectral types were confirmed with the optical multifiber
157: spectrograph FLAMES/VLT (Section \ref{data-opt}). Finally, the IRS instrument
158: on Spitzer (Section \ref{data-irs}) was used to study the presence of disks and
159: their characteristics, and the survey is completed with data from 2MASS and
160: IRAC/MIPS archival data (Section \ref{data-archive}). The Chandra field, together
161: with the optical candidates in the region, are completely covered in at least
162: two of the IRAC channels (all the four channels in 95\% of the cases) and the
163: MIPS maps.
164:
165: \subsection{A very low-mass cluster in the CrA region: X-ray survey\label{data-xray}}
166:
167: The starting point of this work were the X-ray detections of potential
168: low-mass objects in the region. The X-ray data were obtained on 2000 October
169: 7 with the Chandra X-ray Observatory (CXO). The observation was made using the ACIS-I
170: (AXAF CCD Imaging Spectrometer) array of CCDs in the timed-exposure mode
171: (Garmire et al. 2003). This survey covered a 16.8'$\times$16.8' field centered on
172: 19:01:47.9 -36:58:22 J2000 with a 20 ks exposure. The data were aspect corrected
173: using 10 stars in the same field with an estimated astrometric uncertainty of 0.5"
174: for stars within 5 arc minutes of the aim-point. Source detection and location were
175: determined using the WAVDETECT software (Freeman et al. 2002). The energy range was
176: limited to the range 0.5 - 8.0 keV to maximize the S/N. The data were corrected
177: for Charge Transfer Inefficiency (CTI) caused by radiation damage of the CCDs during
178: the first weeks after launch, which improves the energy resolution and charge
179: loss due to changes in the pattern of charge generated by X-ray interaction
180: in the CCD pixels (Townsley et al. 2002). Flaring pixels were removed using the
181: status filter and by examining the arrival time of each event. A small subset of events
182: was found to occur in the next exposure for a given pixel and were missed by the status
183: filter. These events were removed from the data as flaring pixel events. The X-ray
184: properties of the confirmed members of the Coronet cluster are compiled in
185: Table \ref{xray-table}. A larger list of sources and more detailed analysis will be
186: reported in a future publication.
187:
188: All the sources in Table \ref{obs-table} (except G-100, G-133, and G-136) were
189: detected with more than 84\% confidence level. The limiting sensitivity for the
190: observations was 2.1$\times$10$^{-15}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ in the 0.5-8.0 keV band,
191: which corresponds to a luminosity of 6$\times$10$^{27}$ erg s$^{-1}$. The depth of
192: the survey ensures complete detection of all Class III and Class II objects
193: down to the BD regime within the Chandra field (considering the typical relations
194: between bolometric and X-ray luminosities; Flaccomio et al. 2006), and an
195: important number of Class I embedded sources. Some of the most extincted sources
196: (A$_V \geq$15 mag) may be not detected, but the high extinction region is
197: only a minimal part ($\sim$6\%) of the total Chandra field (Henning et al. 1994),
198: so most of the extincted sources are probably Class I/Class 0 objects with thick envelopes.
199: Due to the depth of the exposure and by comparison with other Chandra surveys,
200: a fraction of the sources could be extragalactic (Garmire \& Garmire 2003). In
201: addition, shocks and Herbig-Haro (HH) objects are known to produce X-ray emission
202: (Pravdo et al. 2001; Favata et al. 2002; Raga et al. 2002), and
203: several shocks have been identified in the optical
204: in the Coronet cluster (Graham 1993; Wang et al. 2004). Therefore, optical and IR
205: data are essential in order to determine the nature of these sources.
206:
207:
208:
209: \subsection{Optical spectroscopy \label{data-opt}}
210:
211: In order to confirm the cluster membership and to obtain accurate spectral types,
212: we targeted the Coronet cluster with the multi-object optical spectrograph
213: FLAMES on the UT2/VLT. Observations took place between April and June 2007
214: within our program 079.C-0235. FLAMES, combined with the multifiber
215: spectrograph GIRAFFE and the MEDUSA fibers, permits to obtain up to 130 spectra,
216: including objects and sky positions. We observed one field centered on
217: 19:01:40 -36:56:30 J2000 with three different gratings (L682.2, L773.4, L881.7),
218: providing intermediate resolution (R=5600-8600) spectra from 6440\,\AA\ to 9400\,\AA.
219: This spectral range includes the main accretion feature (H$\alpha$ emission at
220: 6563\,\AA), Lithium I absorption line (signature of youth, 6708\,\AA), [S II]
221: emission lines characteristic of shocks and Herbig Haro (HH) objects
222: ($\lambda\lambda$ 6716, 6731\,\AA) and a large number of photospheric features
223: required for spectral type classification of late-type stars.
224:
225: The spectrograph fibers were assigned to candidate cluster members as listed
226: in Table \ref{obs-table}. They include objects identified via their X-ray
227: emission (Garmire \& Garmire 2003; labeled G-number), completing the list
228: with optical very low-mass stars and BD candidates (L\'{o}pez-Mart\'{\i}
229: et al. 2005), and a large number of sky positions, required to
230: perform a proper background subtraction in the inhomogeneous CrA nebula.
231: Since the selection was done independently of the Spitzer colors,
232: it is not biased toward objects with disks, and the sample contains
233: Class I, Class II, and Class III objects. The fibers have an aperture of
234: 1.2 arcsec, so precise coordinates are necessary. All the X-ray detections
235: were matched to 2MASS objects, or had their coordinates
236: transformed into the 2MASS system, to avoid fiber mismatching. For the
237: sources that were not detected with 2MASS nor Spitzer, there could be
238: some mismatching in the fiber position, since the X-ray coordinates
239: have in some cases uncertainties of the order of the fiber diameter
240: (see Section \ref{data-xray}), but this would in any case affect only
241: very few cases, if any. A total of 56 fibers were assigned to objects,
242: and 70 fibers were positioned to measure the sky.
243:
244: The spectra were reduced using IRAF\footnote{IRAF
245: is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Observatories,
246: which are operated by the Association of Universities for Research
247: in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National
248: Science Foundation.} standard tasks within the packages
249: \textit{noao.imred.ccdred} and \textit{noao.imred.specred}.
250: A total of 3$\times$2700 s exposures were taken with the
251: gratings L682.2 and L773.4, and 2$\times$2700 s with the
252: grating L881.7, in order to minimize the effects of cosmic ray hits.
253: The spectra were bias corrected, combined, and then extracted and
254: flat fielded using the specific task for multifiber spectroscopy,
255: \textit{dofibers}. This task was also used to determine the wavelength
256: calibration, using the available ThAr lamp. Due to the variations
257: of the sky over the whole region, as well as some stray light
258: affecting part of the fibers on the CCD, the sky subtraction was
259: done individually for each object. The different sky spectra were
260: divided in groups according to their brightness and the location
261: on the CCD. Each group had a minimum of 20 individual sky spectra,
262: so the noise of the images was not substantially increased by
263: the sky subtraction. The sky emission lines were corrected
264: from each spectrum by subtracting the appropriate combined sky spectrum.
265: Due to the differences in transmission between fibers, and since it
266: is not required for the analysis we present here, no flux
267: calibration was performed. In order to match the spectra over the
268: entire wavelength range, we scaled the instrumental flux in the regions
269: where the spectra overlap ($\sim$80\,\AA\ between gratings L682.2 and
270: L773.4, and $\sim$140\,\AA\ between L773.4 and L881.7).
271:
272: Finally, the presence of emission and absorption lines (especially
273: H$\alpha$ and the youth indicator Li I at 6708\,\AA) were measured
274: with IRAF task \textit{splot}. Of all the 56 objects observed with
275: FLAMES, 17 were not detected at optical wavelengths, being most likely highly
276: extincted stars or protostars (Class I/Class 0 objects), or (mainly the
277: objects outside the high extinction cloud) extragalactic objects. Since none
278: of the non-detected objects is detected in the 2MASS survey, their optical
279: magnitudes are likely to be very faint, and
280: therefore, we believe they are rather non-detections than fiber mismatching.
281: One of the objects detected (G-115) is confirmed to be a quasar at z=0.62.
282: For the rest, the H$\alpha$ line could be identified, and for 11 of them,
283: the signal to noise ratio (S/N) was good enough to allow spectral typing
284: (typically, S/N$>$100), or approximate spectral typing for 3 more objects
285: (with S/N$\sim$30-100; see Section \ref{spectype}).
286:
287:
288: \subsection{IRS spectroscopy \label{data-irs}}
289:
290: A total of 14 IR spectra were obtained with the low-resolution modules
291: of the Infrared Spectrograph (IRS; Houck et al. 2004) on Spitzer, within
292: our GO-3 program 30536. The observations took place between August 2006
293: and October 2007. The objects were selected among the
294: X-ray members with IRAC and/or MIPS IR excesses, refining the
295: selection to ensure that the candidates were located in a zone
296: of moderate to low background. The observations were taken using
297: the high-precision optical pick-up, to ensure good centering of
298: the object on the slit in a region with multiple IR sources and
299: strong emission from the ambient gas. The exposure times for
300: each object were calculated considering the IRAC and
301: MIPS fluxes (see Section \ref{data-archive}), and ranged between
302: $\sim$200 s for the brightest sources to $\sim$105 min for the
303: faintest ones (see Table \ref{obs-table}). In addition, we include the
304: spectrum of CrA-465, belonging to the GO3 program number 30540.
305:
306: The spectra were reduced using the reduction schemes developed for the
307: analysis of the data from the legacy programs ``Formation and Evolution of
308: Planetary Systems" (FEPS) and ``Cores to Disks'' (c2d; Bouwman et al. 2006,
309: 2008 and references therein). This reduction package consist of automated
310: routines, based on SMART (Higdon et al. 2004) and other IDL programs,
311: to extract calibrated IRS spectra from the Spitzer pipeline basic
312: calibrated data (BCD). We use a custom-size extraction window, fitted to the
313: point spread function, which ensures better sensitivity than the default
314: extraction aperture provided by the pipeline. For sources with high
315: S/N, the position of the aperture was fitted in the reduction process, in
316: order to minimize flux loses and ensure a good order matching.
317: In case of high-background regions, we cancel the sky in an efficient
318: way by the subtraction of the opposite
319: nod beams and extraction and subtraction of the two resulting sources.
320: Bad pixel masks were created by examining the images, and included in the
321: reduction. These data reduction techniques have produced
322: high-quality IRS spectra for the FEPS program and for the $\eta$ Cha
323: very low-mass stars IRS program (Bouwman et al. 2006, 2008).
324:
325: In the cases where the background levels were higher
326: and/or the objects were very faint (G-65, CrA-205, CrA-466, CrA-4110,
327: CrA-4111) the background was examined at different locations
328: in the two nods (on both sides of the star and in the off positions),
329: selecting the best fitting one for the subtraction. In the case of
330: CrA-4110 and G-65, the presence of an extremely bright source and strong
331: diffuse emission at the LL (long-low, 14-25\,$\mu$m) wavelengths made it impossible
332: to extract the source, so only the SL (short-low, 5-14\,$\mu$m) range is presented.
333:
334: \subsection{IRAC, and MIPS complementary data\label{data-archive}}
335:
336: To complete the disk information, especially for the objects without
337: IRS spectra, we searched the 2MASS database as well as the Spitzer
338: Infrared Array Camera (IRAC; Fazio et al. 2004) and the Multiband
339: Imaging Photometer (MIPS; Rieke et al. 2004) data already being public in
340: the Spitzer archive for the Coronet region. The complementary 2MASS
341: and Spitzer data for all sources observed with FLAMES and/or IRS are presented
342: in Table \ref{archive-table}. Since we did not find a list of IRAC and MIPS
343: sources in the Coronet within the literature, the IRAC and MIPS data were
344: downloaded using \textit{Leopard}. The data covering our objects were obtained from
345: programs 6 (AORs 3650816 and 3664640), 30784 (AOR 17672960), and 248 (AOR 13469696).
346: These programs include two IRAC fields ($\sim$0.3$\times$0.3 deg) with small
347: overlap in the standard map mode (12s exposure for AOR 3650816, and 6$\times$12s
348: for 17672960), a small MIPS 24\,$\mu$m map ($\sim$7$\times$7 arcmin, 3$\times$10s
349: exposures), and large MIPS 24 and 70\,$\mu$m scan maps ($\sim$0.6$\times$1 deg,
350: exposure time 3.67s). The very large areas covered by IRAC and MIPS ensure
351: that all the X-ray and optical candidates are included in at least two
352: IRAC channels (95\% of the objects are covered by IRAC maps in all the four
353: channels) and in the large MIPS map.
354:
355: We constructed the mosaics using the software MOPEX, starting on the BCD data, and
356: using the standard parameters in the Spitzer Mosaicker Manual
357: \footnote{http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/postbcd/onlinedocs/intex.html}. A 10\% accuracy
358: in the photometry is sufficient for the aim of this work, and the main sources of error
359: in the region are the variable background and the photon counts for the faintest objects,
360: so we did not correct for array location dependence.
361:
362: We obtained aperture photometry using the IRAF task \textit{phot} in the package
363: \textit{noao.digiphot.apphot}. For the four IRAC channels, we used a 5 pixel aperture
364: with a background annulus 5-10 pixels, with the corresponding aperture corrections
365: listed in the IRAC Data Handbook (1.061, 1.064, 1.067, and 1.089 for the
366: 3.6, 4.5, 5.8 and 8.0\,$\mu$m channels, respectively). For the MIPS 24\,$\mu$m
367: photometry, we used a 5 pixel aperture with background annulus 15-19 pixels
368: and an aperture correction of 1.167 (MIPS Data
369: Handbook\footnote{http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/mips/dh}). These values
370: had been successfully applied to our Spitzer IRAC and MIPS photometry of Tr 37 and the
371: Tr 37 globule (Sicilia-Aguilar et al. 2006a). For the few sources detected
372: at 70\,$\mu$m, we used a 7.5 pixel aperture, background measured from 10-15 pixels, and
373: an aperture correction 1.295, following the MIPS Data Handbook. In
374: case a source was detected with equally good quality in two programs, we use
375: the average magnitude (note that differences between two measurements are
376: always small and fully consistent with the photometric errors in
377: Table \ref{archive-table}). The main limits of the IRAC and MIPS photometry are
378: the contamination of large parts of the maps by the saturated emission of
379: nearby bright sources (in particular, R CrA) and extended nebular emission.
380: For objects with moderate extinction (A$_V <$15 mag), the IRAC data is complete
381: down to photospheres of M7 type objects, and down to M4-M5 photospheres
382: at 24\,$\mu$m. The detection limits for MIPS are $\sim$1-2 mJy (magnitude $\sim$9.5-10)
383: at 24\,$\mu$m, and $\sim$80 mJy (magnitude $\sim$2.5) at 70\,$\mu$m. The IRAC and MIPS
384: data are also in very good agreement with the fluxes measured in the IRS spectra.
385:
386:
387: \section{Analysis \label{analysis}}
388:
389: \subsection{Spectral types and extinction \label {spectype}}
390:
391: The first step on the analysis of the FLAMES spectra was to derive spectral types
392: and extinction values for the observed objects. Given that all the spectra showed
393: the typical TiO and VO bands of M-type stars (see Figure \ref{spectra-fig}), we
394: used a combination of spectral typing indices for M stars, containing four PC
395: (pseudo-continuum) indices from Mart\'{\i}n et al. (1996), namely PC1, PC2, PC3
396: and PC4, and the R1, R2, R3, TiO 8465 indices in Riddick et al. (2007),
397: listed in Table \ref{index-table}. In case the spectral type was M5
398: or later, the results were refined by using the indices VO 2 and VO 7445
399: (Riddick et al. 2007). We avoided the indices that can be affected by atmospheric
400: absorption (O$_2$ and H$_2$O bands), and those falling near the extremes of the
401: FLAMES spectra. All the indices were obtained by measuring the ratio of average
402: fluxes in two or more places in the spectra (Table \ref{index-table}).
403: We use the calibrations derived from collections of standard stars and BD
404: listed in Mart\'{\i}n et al. (1996) and Riddick et al. (2007), except for
405: the PC1 and PC2 indices, for which we fitted a linear relation, including
406: all the objects listed in Mart\'{\i}n et al. (1996), in order to improve the
407: quality of the fit (see Table \ref{index-table}).
408:
409: The PC indices have the
410: disadvantage that they compare zones of the spectrum separated by $\sim$500-1500 \,\AA,
411: which makes them sensitive to extinction. The Riddick et al. indices compare
412: fluxes which are not more than 200 \,\AA\ apart, so the effect of extinction is
413: negligible. Gravity can lead to variations as well. The calibration in
414: Riddick et al. (2007) is constructed for pre-main sequence objects
415: with ages similar to the members of the Coronet cluster, so the errors due
416: to differences in gravity are expected to be minimal. We did not find significant
417: differences between the spectral types obtained from extinction- or gravity-sensitive
418: indices and others, so we believe the results are robust. Combining
419: several indices for each object, the typical errors in the spectral type
420: are around 0.5-1 subtypes. For stars M2 or earlier, for which the described indices
421: are not very precise, we made a visual comparison of the spectra with those of standard
422: stars in order to refine the classification. For the objects with poor S/N ($\sim$30-100),
423: for which the indices were not accurate, we obtained an approximate spectral type by visual
424: comparison to standard spectra, checking the 2MASS colors as well to reduce the
425: uncertainties. Our results are in good agreement with the spectral types or approximate
426: spectral types listed by L\'{o}pez-Mart\'{\i} et al. (2005) and Forbrich \& Preibisch (2007).
427:
428: For the objects with known spectral types, the extinction was estimated
429: using the J-H and J-K colors observed with 2MASS, and comparing to the
430: standard colors for stars (Bessell et al. 1998) and
431: for BD (Kirkpatrick et al. 1995). For each object, the
432: extinction A$_V$ was derived from E(J-H) and E(H-K).
433: Following Bessell \& Brett (1988), and assuming a typical galactic extinction
434: law, A$_V$=10.87 E(J-H) and A$_V$=5.95 E(J-K) mag. The final extinction was
435: obtained as the average, with errors given as the standard deviation.
436: The results are similar (within 5\%) to those using the relations
437: in Cardelli et al. (1989). Since many of the
438: studied objects have circumstellar material, part of the matter causing the
439: extinction could be processed to some degree, which may result in non-standard
440: extinction laws. Nevertheless, the agreement between the extinction obtained
441: from both J-H and J-K suggest that the deviations, if any, are small.
442: The location of the objects within the J-H vs. H-K diagram
443: (Figure \ref{jhk-fig}) is in good agreement with the spectral types (M stars
444: and a BD, CrA-465) as well as with the standard extinction law. The spectral
445: types and extinctions are listed in Table \ref{lines-table}.
446:
447: For the objects with no optical spectra, approximate spectral
448: types could be inferred only from the SED fitting. For those two classes,
449: we can estimate an approximate extinction using the JHK diagram
450: (Figure \ref{jhk-fig}), since their disks produce no significant excess
451: at those wavelengths. From this, we can conclude that G-1 is a late-K or
452: early-M star with A$_V \sim$3.5 mag (Forbrich \& Preibisch 2007 classify it
453: as a potential M-type star), and G-32 is a deeply embedded Class II object
454: whose uncertain 2MASS photometry does not allow any extinction
455: estimate. All the rest of objects are consistent with M stars and maybe a
456: massive BD (M6-M8, CrA-432), with extinction A$_V <$2 mag.
457:
458: \subsection{Dust mineralogy \label{disks}}
459:
460: Some of the disks observed show silicate emission features in the 8-13$\mu$ and
461: 20-30\,$\mu$m range in their IRS spectra. These features are produced by the small grains
462: ($\leq$6\,$\mu$m) in the warm ($\sim$150-450 K), optically thin, disk atmosphere.
463: In order to analyze the dust mineralogy in this layer, we
464: fitted the spectra using the Two-Layer Temperature Distribution (TLTD)
465: spectral decomposition routines developed by Juh\'{a}sz et al. (2008). This model
466: is an improvement of the single- and two-temperature fitting methods
467: (Bouwman et al. 2001; van Boekel et al. 2005). It reproduces the silicate
468: emission using the sum of a multicomponent continuum (star, inner rim,
469: disk midplane) assuming that the region where the observed radiation originates
470: (both optically thin and thick) has a distribution of temperatures instead of a single
471: one. The routine includes the dust species for which we
472: have evidence of optically thin emission in the IRS wavelength range.
473: These are five different dust species (amorphous silicates with olivine and pyroxene
474: stoichiometry, forsterite, enstatite, silica) with sizes 0.1, 1.5, and 6.0\,$\mu$m
475: (see Figure \ref{qval-fig}; Dorschner et al. 1995; Servoin \& Piriou 1973;
476: J\"{a}ger et al. 1998; Henning \& Mutschke 1997; Preibisch et al. 1993), except for
477: the enstatite grains, for which we only include 0.1 and
478: 1.5\,$\mu$m grains. This is due to the fact that there is no evidence of large
479: enstatite grains in disks (Bouwman et al. 2001; Sicilia-Aguilar et al. 2007), and
480: also because the inclusion of a large enstatite component adds a spurious source
481: of continuum that masks the more abundant amorphous grains, and extra features
482: in the 13-14\,$\mu$m region that are rather produced by gaseous components (C$_2$H$_2$
483: and HCN; Carr \& Najita 2008; the spectra of CrA-466, CrA-432, and G-87
484: show marginal detections of gas lines in this region). Amorphous carbon grains
485: with sizes 0.1, 1.5 and 6.0\,$\mu$m are also included as a featureless contribution
486: to the continuum. The mass absorption coefficients are derived from
487: the material optical constants using the theory of distribution of hollow
488: spheres for the crystalline dust (Min et al. 2005\footnote{Previous investigations
489: show that this scattering model provides a relatively good fit to the silicate
490: features (e.g., Bouwman et al. 2001). The application of more complicated dust
491: models (e.g. Henning \& Stognienko 1996; Voshchinnikov \& Henning 2008) is beyond
492: the scope of this paper.}), and the classical Mie
493: theory for spherical particles for the amorphous dust.
494:
495: The observed flux-density at a given frequency is given by
496:
497: \begin{eqnarray}
498: F_\nu = F_{\nu, {\rm cont}} & + & \sum_{i=1}^N\sum_{j=1}^MD_{i,j}\kappa_{i,j}
499: \int_{\rm{T_{\rm a, max}}}^{\rm{T_{\rm a, min}}}\frac{2\pi}{d^2}B_\nu(T){T}^{\frac{2-qa}{qa}}dT
500: \label{eq:1}
501: \end{eqnarray}
502:
503: where, $N$ and $M$ are the number of dust species and of grain sizes, respectively.
504: The mass absorption coefficient of the dust species $i$ and grain size $j$
505: is represented by $\kappa_{i,j}$. $B_\nu(T)$ is the Planck-function, $qa$ is the power
506: exponent of the temperature distribution and $d$ is the distance to the source. The
507: subscript $a$ in the integration boundaries refers to the disk atmosphere. The continuum
508: emission ($F_{\nu, {\rm cont}}$) is given by
509:
510: \begin{eqnarray}
511: F_{\nu, {\rm cont}} = D_0 \frac{\pi R_\star^2}{d^2} B_\nu(T_\star)&+& D1\int_{\rm{T_{\rm r,max}}}^{\rm{T_{\rm r, min}}}\frac{2\pi}{d^2}B_\nu(T){T}^{\frac{2-qr}{qr}}dT \\
512: &+& D2\int_{\rm{T_{\rm m,max}}}^{\rm{T_{\rm m, min}}}\frac{2\pi}{d^2}B_\nu(T){T}^{\frac{2-qm}{qm}}dT.
513: \label{eq:2}
514: \end{eqnarray}
515:
516: The first term on the right hand side describes the emission of the star the while the
517: second and third terms describe the radiation of the inner rim and the disk midplane respectively.
518: The meanings of the different parameters are summarized in Table \ref{silparam-table}.
519: The parameters include the distance d (150 pc; Marraco \& Rydgren 1981; Knude \& Hog 1998) and
520: the radius and effective temperature of the star $R_*$ and $T_*$ (estimated from the spectral
521: type and luminosity of the sources). The highest temperature of each component (disk atmosphere,
522: inner rim, midplane) is fitted, and the lowest temperature is calculated assuming that the
523: contribution of the annulus with the corresponding temperature to the total flux is
524: higher than 0.1\%. Small variations in the disk model parameters
525: (inner and outer disk temperatures, temperature exponents) do not produce significant
526: changes in the extracted mineralogy, as the bulk of the silicate emission comes from
527: a region with T$\sim$150-450 K, and no dust exists beyond the dust sublimation temperature
528: ($\sim$1200 K). The exponents of the temperatures (qa, qm, qr), and the coefficients
529: of each contribution ($D_0$, $D_1$, $D_2$, $D_{i,j}$) are fitted (see details
530: in Juh\'{a}sz et al. 2008 and more information in Table \ref{silparam-table}).
531: To account for the errors in the IRS spectra, the fit of each object was repeated
532: 100 times, adding random Gaussian noise to the original spectrum. The final
533: silicate composition is obtained as the average of the whole set, and the errors
534: are derived from the standard deviation, considering separately the positive and
535: negative directions (Van Boekel et al. 2005; Sicilia-Aguilar et al. 2007).
536: The estimated errors include therefore only the
537: component due to the S/N and measurement errors in the spectra. Other sources of error,
538: like those related to the presence of materials that are not included in our
539: set of optical constants, or different grain shapes or chemical composition
540: of the grains, could introduce systematic deviations that are harder to quantify and
541: will be studied in detail in the future (Juh\'{a}sz et al. in prep.).
542:
543: The silicate feature at 8-13\,$\mu$m is detected in 6 objects out of 13
544: (CrA-466, CrA-4107, G-1, G-14, G-85, and G-87; Figure \ref{silfit-fig}).
545: A zoom on the 10\,$\mu$m region for the objects without evidence of silicate
546: feature is shown in Figure \ref{nosil-fig}.
547: The S/N is in all cases good enough to determine the presence or absence of
548: silicate emission. The S/N is typically worse at longer wavelengths, so
549: the silicate features in the 20-30\,$\mu$m range could be identified only
550: in three of the spectra (CrA-466, CrA-4111, G-85; Figure \ref{longsilfit-fig}),
551: even though one of them (CrA-4111) shows no silicate emission in the 10\,$\mu$m
552: region. Since the silicate signatures at 8-13\,$\mu$m and 20-30\,$\mu$m are dominated
553: by material at different temperatures and thus, different radial distances from the
554: star, having probably different compositions and grain sizes, it is not
555: recommended to fit the whole spectrum with a single model. Therefore, we fitted the
556: 7-14\,$\mu$m wavelength range for the shorter wavelengths,
557: which offers the best compromise taking into account the optical constants and radial
558: changes (Juh\'{a}sz et al. 2008) and the quality of the spectra. Juh\'{a}sz et al. (2008)
559: suggest to use the 7-17\,$\mu$m region for fitting Herbig AeBe stars, but most of the spectra
560: here have low S/N, so small errors in the order matching at $\sim$14\,$\mu$m produce small
561: offsets in the final spectra and/or increased noise, which affects the final fit. Although
562: the routine used for fitting includes a re-centering of the aperture that substantially
563: improves order matching, the result is not perfect, specially for the weaker objects.
564: For the longer wavelength features, we fit the 17-35\,$\mu$m region. The results of the fitting
565: procedure are listed in Table \ref{sil-table}, and displayed in Figures \ref{silfit-fig}
566: (7-14\,$\mu$m region) and \ref{longsilfit-fig} (17-35\,$\mu$m region). The disks show
567: typically a mixture of crystalline and amorphous silicates with different grain sizes,
568: and a large variety of abundances, with no evident correlation between disk/stellar properties
569: and silicate emission (Table \ref{sil-table}). Evidence of potential
570: differences in chemical composition of the grains (for instance, the presence of a fraction
571: of Fe silicates instead of Mg silicates) could cause systematic offsets of the lines
572: similar to those seen in CrA-466 at long wavelengths (Figure \ref{longsilfit-fig}).
573: Differences in grain porosity could also lead to similar effects (Voshchinnikov \&
574: Henning 2008).
575:
576: Among the spectra with silicate emission in the 7-14\,$\mu$m region and low errors in the
577: fitted grain composition (CrA-466, G-1, G-14, G-85), we observe a large variety of
578: crystalline fraction, going from $\sim$3-5\% for G-14 and G-1, to $\sim$20-30\% for CrA-466
579: and G-87 (Table \ref{sizecryst-table}). The crystallinity fraction of CrA-466 and G-87 are
580: higher than observed for the solar-type stars in the 4 Myr-old cluster Tr 37
581: (Sicilia-Aguilar et al. 2007), suggesting strong grain processing. High crystallinity
582: fractions compared to those measured for disks around solar-type stars are typical in
583: the disks around low-mass stars and BD (Apai et al. 2005). Very large crystalline grains
584: are rare, probably because they form aggregates together with amorphous grains
585: (Bouwman et al. 2006), but large amorphous grains ($\sim$6\,$\mu$m) are found in many cases
586: (e.g., Sicilia-Aguilar et al. 2007). Therefore, strong grain growth may result in part
587: of the amorphous dust being too large to produce detectable features in the IRS spectra,
588: while the crystalline grains may still be visible and seem to be more abundant.
589: Inclination effects can also lead to variations in the silicate feature for
590: objects close to edge-on, but given that these disks are very flattened, strong
591: variations are expected to be rare.
592:
593: In the long-wavelength region, only the spectra CrA-466 and G-85 could be fitted
594: with an uncertainty $<$10\% (Figure \ref{longsilfit-fig}).
595: CrA-466 is characterized by mostly large amorphous grains with
596: pyroxene stoichiometry, and a small fraction of small forsterite and large silica grains.
597: The crystalline fraction is therefore smaller ($\sim$14\%) than in the 10\,$\mu$m region,
598: which could suggest the presence of larger quantities of small amorphous grains at large
599: radii. For G-85, there are no significant differences between the 7-14\,$\mu$m
600: and the 17-35\,$\mu$m region in crystallinity fraction, although the grain sizes tend to
601: be smaller in the longer wavelength range, and the amorphous silicates are dominated
602: by pyroxene-type components at shorter wavelengths, but olivine-type grains
603: in the long wavelength range. The presence of strongly processed crystalline grains at long
604: wavelengths suggests either some radial mixing at some stage in the evolution, or the importance
605: of shocks in thermal annealing. Nevertheless, observations of larger samples of objects
606: are required to draw statistically significant conclusions.
607:
608: As we mentioned, half of the disks have no warm (150-450 K) small ($<$6\,$\mu$m)
609: grains in the disk atmosphere. For the transition objects (TO) or disks with inner
610: holes, this may be in fact the effect of lack of dust in a physical clean hole
611: (0.1-1 AU, depending on the spectral type).
612: Nevertheless, 3 of the TO do show silicate emission (CrA-466, G-14, and G-87),
613: and 3 of the disks without near-IR inner holes lack the feature (CrA-432,
614: CrA-465, CrA-4110), so we probably require other physical conditions (strong grain
615: growth, flattened disks) to explain this behavior. The lack of silicate features in
616: flattened (but non-transitional) disks has been also observed in the 4 Myr-old
617: cluster Tr 37 (Sicilia-Aguilar et al. 2007). The S/N is typically lower
618: ($\sim$10-20) in the 20-30\,$\mu$m range, and considering that the features are
619: much weaker in this part of the spectrum, we cannot confirm nor rule out the
620: presence of small silicate grains in the colder parts of the disk for the rest of
621: the objects.
622:
623:
624: \section{Discussion \label{discussion}}
625:
626: \subsection{Disks around very low-mass objects: ``Transition'' disks?\label{lowmass}}
627:
628: Since this study targeted candidate young objects based
629: on X-ray or optical photometry, which are not biased towards systems with
630: IR excesses from circumstellar disks, it is possible to estimate the disk
631: fraction for low- and very-low mass objects in the cluster. As mentioned in
632: Section \ref{data-xray}, the X-ray survey is complete down to the spectral range
633: considered here ($\sim$M8) within the Chandra field, which is totally covered by
634: the IRAC and MIPS maps (Section \ref{data-archive}). The stars/BD
635: with SEDs consistent with young Class II and Class III sources and
636: TO, clearly identified via JHK and IRAC/MIPS photometry
637: (Figures \ref{irssed-fig} and \ref{sed-fig}) sum up to 20 objects. They
638: are all M0 stars or later, except maybe G-1, which could be a late-K or
639: early-M star. Therefore, this sample contains objects with later spectral
640: types than the Haisch et al. (2001), Sicilia-Aguilar et al. (2006a),
641: and Hern\'{a}ndez et al. (2007a) studies,
642: which were done for solar-type (G, K, early M) stars.
643:
644: The IRAC color-color diagram (Figure \ref{irac-fig}) shows colors consistent with
645: typical Class II disks in Taurus, together with some transitional disks and
646: Class III-like objects. From the shape of the SED and the wavelength at which the IR
647: excess starts, 7 are Class II objects (with IR excess starting before 6\,$\mu$m,
648: CrA-432, CrA-465, CrA-4107, CrA-4110, G-1, G-32, and G-85), 6 are Class III objects (no
649: IR excess, or only marginal 24\,$\mu$m excess detected, CrA-453, G-30, G-49, G-94,
650: G-95, and G-102), and 7 are TO (with no IR excess at wavelengths shorter than
651: 6\,$\mu$m, and sometimes, longer; CrA-205, CrA-466, CrA-4109, CrA-4111, G-14, G-65,
652: G-87). This results in a disk fraction $\sim$70\%, of which 50\% of
653: the disks are TO. Note that most of the Class II objects (all but CrA-432 and G-32)
654: have no excess at JHK nor at 3.6\,$\mu$m, so their disks are very different from
655: the typical Class II disks with JHK colors falling within the ``CTTS locus"
656: (Meyer et al. 1997). The disk fraction for the Coronet cluster is slightly lower
657: than expected for solar-type stars in a $\sim$1 Myr-old region with significant cloud
658: material and several embedded Class I and Class 0 objects (usually $\sim$80\% in JHKL
659: surveys; Haisch et al. 2001; Hern\'{a}ndez et al. 2007a).
660:
661: There is a controversy about the timescales for disk dissipation around very low-mass
662: stars and BD. Most studies suggest a longer lifetime or larger disk fractions for
663: the very low-mass objects compared to solar-type stars (Sterzik et al. 2004;
664: Bouy et al. 2007), but some other studies have claimed
665: similar timescales (Luhman et al. 2005; Damjanov et al. 2007) and even
666: shorter lifetimes for the M-type stars (Lada et al. 2006). An important problem
667: estimating disk fractions is the wavelength at which the excess is measured,
668: and the completeness of the observations at the given wavelength. In the Coronet
669: Cluster, only $\sim$1/3 of the disks show excess at JHKL wavelengths similar to
670: the excesses tracked by Haisch et al. (2001). This is a significantly lower fraction
671: than for solar-type stars with the same age, for which only 5-10\% of the disks
672: lack near-IR excesses (e.g., Taurus; Hartmann et al. 2005), and has been
673: pointed out already for BD (Luhman et al. 2007). Lada et al. (2006)
674: calculated their final disk fractions for ``optically thick'' disks only, which
675: excludes all the TO and the flattened (``anemic'') disks. The fact that a large
676: fraction of the disks around the very low-mass Coronet cluster members are transitional
677: or ``anemic'' disks, using the definitions in Lada et al. (2006), can explain the
678: controversies in disk fraction for very low-mass objects. In addition, the
679: morphology of the SEDs in the Coronet requires observations at wavelengths longer
680: than $\sim$3.6\,$\mu$m to detect the presence of circumstellar material accurately.
681: The lack of complete long-wavelength IR data can also contribute to the uncertainty in
682: disk fractions around very low-mass objects. Given the lower luminosities of M-stars
683: and BD, the SEDs can look flattened or transitional after a little evolution in
684: the innermost 0.1-1 AU region, even if the rest of the disk is flared
685: and optically thick.
686:
687: A comparison of the median disk SED of different well-known regions and the Coronet
688: Cluster (Figure \ref{mediansed-fig} left) is a good indicator of the differences
689: in disk morphology between M-type and solar-type stars. The median SED shows that
690: the typical disks in the Coronet cluster are very different from the disks around
691: solar-type stars in regions with similar ages (Taurus; Kenyon \& Hartmann 1995;
692: Hartmann et al. 2005) and more similar to older regions (Tr 37 and NGC 7160;
693: Sicilia-Aguilar et al. 2006a). Most of the Class II SEDs in the Coronet cluster have
694: slopes close to flat disks ($\lambda$F$_\lambda$ $\sim$ $\lambda^{-4/3}$, optically
695: thick but geometrically thin disk; Hartmann 1998), which is very different from
696: the SEDs of embedded clusters with similar age (e.g., the Tr 37 globule,
697: Sicilia-Aguilar et al. 2006a). Nevertheless, the median SEDs for the older clusters
698: in Figure \ref{mediansed-fig} (left) were calculated for solar-type stars, with spectral
699: types G to early M, very different from the M0-M8 spectral types in the
700: Coronet cluster. If the radial distance traced by the IR fluxes, and/or the
701: disk morphology, and/or their evolution vary with the
702: mass or spectral type of the star, comparing objects with different masses may
703: mask the real time evolution with age, or other effects such as influence of the
704: environment or initial conditions.
705:
706: To explore the SED morphology of other very low-mass stars and BD, we trace the
707: median disk SED for objects with M0-M8 spectral types in several regions for which accurate
708: spectral types, extinctions, and Spitzer data were available: Taurus (23 objects,
709: median spectral type M3, 1-2 Myr; Kenyon \& Hartmann 1995; Brice\~{n}o et al. 1998;
710: Hartmann et al. 2005), IC 348 (128 objects, median spectral type M4, 2-3 Myr;
711: Luhman et al. 2003; Lada et al. 2006); 25 Ori (4 objects, median spectral type M3,
712: 10 Myr; Brice\~{n}o et al. 2007; Hern\'{a}ndez et al. 2007b). The median SED was
713: computed after correcting for extinction for each object. For Taurus and 25 Ori, we
714: used the average A$_V$=1 mag and A$_V$=0.29 mag in the cases where the individual
715: extinction was not known. Since the typical extinctions are low in both regions,
716: individual variations are not significant at IR wavelengths. As in the case of the
717: Coronet cluster, we did not exclude TO disks, if their excesses at mid-IR were comparable
718: to normal, optically thick disks (flared or flat). The median SEDs are displayed in
719: Figure \ref{mediansed-fig} (right). All the regions, except Taurus, show a median SED
720: at $\lambda <$6\,$\mu$m consistent with an optically thick, geometrically thin disk
721: ($\lambda$ F$_\lambda \sim \lambda^{-4/3}$; Hartmann 1998). For 25 Ori, 3 of the disks
722: are TO with no excess at $\lambda <$8\,$\mu$m, which explains the photospheric fluxes
723: down to this wavelength. The comparison with the median SED for solar-type stars in
724: these (Lada et al. 2006) and the regions in Figure \ref{mediansed-fig} (left) confirms
725: the differences in SED morphology depending on the spectral type of the central
726: object.
727:
728: The main conclusion from the median SED analysis is that flattened and transitional
729: disks are far more common among the low-mass objects than among solar-type stars at
730: any given age and in most regions, extending the results of Megeath et al. (2005)
731: and McCabe et al. (2006). One reason for this behavior could be that
732: a given IR wavelength traces a zone much closer to the star in a mid- or late-M
733: star than in a solar-type star, so any signs of disk evolution (grain growth,
734: disk flattening, inner holes) affecting the innermost disk ($\sim$0.1-1 AU) will
735: produce larger changes in the near-IR flux for the low-mass objects than for
736: solar-type stars. On the other hand,
737: the fact that the median SED of the young Coronet cluster is very close to a flat disk
738: suggests that differences in the inner disk structure (maybe caused by lower disk masses
739: and the lack of dead zones; Hartmann et al. 2006) and/or differences in the initial
740: conditions at the time of formation (for instance, in the angular momentum of the
741: cores that form very low-mass stars; Dullemond et al. 2006) may shape the disks
742: already at a very early stage. In addition,
743: the environment (high-mass versus low-mass star forming regions; Luhman et al. 2008)
744: could affect both the formation and the evolution of the objects and their disks, so
745: future observations of low-mass objects in high-mass star forming regions
746: should be performed to compare their properties with those in relatively isolated,
747: low-mass star-forming regions.
748:
749: The large number of TO needs also to be considered. Typically, TO represent
750: only 5-10\% of the total number of disks around solar-type stars (Sicilia-Aguilar
751: et al. 2006a; Hartmann et al. 2005), which suggests that their lifetimes are less
752: than a tenth of the lifetime of the optically thick disks, of the order of
753: 10$^5$-10$^6$ years. The situation is similar in young (e.g., Taurus, 1-2 Myr;
754: Hartmann et al. 2005) and intermediate-age (e.g. Tr 37, 4 Myr; Sicilia-Aguilar et al. 2006a)
755: clusters, so disks with inner holes are thought to be on a rapid, transitional phase
756: between Class II and Class III objects, lasting less than 1 Myr. The rapid
757: transitional phase is usually interpreted as planetesimal or planet formation
758: (Quillen et al. 2004), and/or strong dust coagulation to pebble-sized grains (starting
759: in the inner disk and progressing rapidly to the rest of the disk), and/or
760: the effect of photoevaporation by the ultraviolet radiation of the central star
761: (Alexander et al. 2006a,b). Timescales in the inner disk are shorter, so the
762: evolution would occur faster in the innermost part (Hayashi et al. 1985),
763: and extend rapidly to the rest. In certain cases, the inner holes may be also produced
764: by close-in companions (e.g. CoKu Tau/4; Ireland \& Kraus 2008).
765:
766: The flux excesses over the photosphere of most TO (Table \ref{excess-table}) are
767: consistent with optically thick disks with inner holes rather than with debris disks
768: (Kenyon \& Bromley 2005), except for the small excesses around some of the
769: Class III sources. Therefore, they are most likely protoplanetary disks with inner
770: holes (``transition objects'') than evolved, reprocessed, debris disks, although most
771: debris disks studies have been done for intermediate-mass and solar-type stars.
772: The large fraction of TO (50\%) in the Coronet cluster points to a much
773: longer ``transitional'' phase, with lifetimes of the same order of magnitude
774: as the typical disk lifetimes. This is in contradiction with clearing up of inner
775: holes via photoevaporation, which would remove the remaining disk in 10$^5$-10$^6$
776: years after the innermost disk has been photoevaporated (Alexander et al. 2006a,b).
777: Observations of M-type stars and BD with disks have suggested that TO and
778: disks with inner holes are more frequent around them (Mohanty et al. 2004;
779: Allers et al. 2006; McCabe et al. 2006; Bouy et al. 2007), but so far the number of
780: objects considered was significantly smaller than in the Coronet cluster. As with
781: the median SED analysis, the youth of the Coronet cluster suggests that some of the
782: disks could be already formed as ``flattened'' disks or ``transition-like'' structures.
783: More observations in different regions are needed to explore whether the differences
784: in disk structure are related to evolution around a very low-mass object, and/or to
785: the formation of very low-mass objects with disks, and/or the environment
786: in a low-mass star-forming cluster.
787:
788: Finally, 5 objects are consistent with very embedded Class II or Class I sources
789: according to their IRAC and MIPS colors (G-36, G-43, G-45, G-112, and G-122; see
790: Figure \ref{sed-fig} and notes to Table \ref{obs-table}), and 20 more may be very
791: embedded cluster members (mostly Class I, maybe Class 0 objects), with incomplete
792: IRAC/MIPS data (due to low S/N or saturation by nearby extended sources). None of
793: the very embedded sources nor potential embedded sources is associated with the
794: millimeter clumps detected in the region (Henning et al. 1994; Chini et al. 2003),
795: probably because of the low mass of the objects, as the surveys were mostly sensitive
796: to masses typical of HAeBe and intermediate-mass TTS. In addition, the SEDs
797: of several sources (see Table \ref{obs-table}) and their positions within
798: the cloud suggest that they are probably contaminating extragalactic objects.
799: For one of them, G-115, the optical spectrum confirms that it is a quasar
800: at redshift 0.62. The rest of them were not detected at optical wavelengths.
801:
802:
803: \subsection{Accretion in the Coronet cluster\label{accretion}}
804:
805: The optical spectroscopy can be used to estimate the fraction of accreting disks
806: by measuring the H$\alpha$ equivalent width (EW, see Table \ref{lines-table},
807: Figure \ref{halpha-fig}). EW larger than 10\,\AA\ or 20\,\AA\ in emission indicates
808: active accretion for objects with spectral types K3-M2 and later than M2,
809: respectively (White \& Basri 2003; a more precise classification is given by
810: Barrado y Navascu\'{e}s \& Mart\'{\i}n 2003). The H$\alpha$ emission lines of
811: accreting stars are usually broadened by the accretion and winds, so the
812: line profiles and the velocity wings are an
813: additional criterion to detect accretion (Muzerolle et al. 1998a, 2005;
814: Natta et al. 2005), although the very low-mass objects tend to have narrower
815: H$\alpha$ profiles because of their smaller gravitational potential (Muzerolle
816: et al. 2005). The H$\alpha$ EW criterion is sometimes unable to detect
817: accretion in objects with very low accretion rates ($<$10$^{-9}$\,M$_\odot$/yr;
818: Sicilia-Aguilar et al. 2006b), but the intermediate resolution of FLAMES reveals
819: H$\alpha$ line broadening larger than $\sim$120 km/s. The Ca II IR triplet
820: ($\lambda \lambda$ 8498, 8542, 8662\,\AA) is a marker of strongly accreting objects,
821: and is included in the spectral range covered with FLAMES, but it is not detected
822: in any of the sources except for a marginal detection in G-85 ($\sim$3-4$\sigma$,
823: with EW -0.6, -1.3, and -0.8 for the lines $\lambda\lambda$ 8498, 8542, and 8662\,\AA,
824: respectively). This suggests that the accretion rates in the Coronet cluster
825: are low to moderate ($<$10$^{-8}$-10$^{-9}$\,M$_\odot$/yr), as is typically observed
826: for very low-mass stars and BD (Natta et al. 2004).
827:
828: H$\alpha$ emission is detected in 21 objects (Figure \ref{halpha-fig}), although
829: the detection is marginal in G-87 and G-133. The star G-95 is a rare case, as it
830: does not show any H$\alpha$ emission but a small absorption, which is very unusual
831: even for a M1-type Class III object, since young M stars have very active chromospheres.
832: Inclination and, to a lesser extent, rotation, may affect the line profiles and width
833: (Muzerolle et al. 1998b, 2001), but the presence of absorption instead of emission is not
834: easy to reproduce by just adjusting these parameters. Nevertheless, the status of G-95
835: as young star (and thus, cluster membership) can be inferred from the presence of Li I
836: absorption. The results are that 10 out of 14 stars are weak-lined T Tauri stars (WTTS)
837: class, with small H$\alpha$ EW and no signs of line broadening nor other accretion
838: indicators. This gives an accretion fraction of $\sim$30\%, which is lower than observed
839: even in more evolved regions (Sicilia-Aguilar et al. 2006b). Nevertheless, some of these
840: sources could be accreting at very low rates ($\sim$10$^{-10}$-10$^{-12}$\,M$_\odot$/yr),
841: which produce small EW and no significant line broadening for the resolution of FLAMES
842: (Muzerolle et al. 2005). Such low accretion rates are relatively normal for low-mass objects
843: (Natta et al. 2004; Luhman et al. 2007). Among the TO objects,
844: CrA-466 has strong EW indicative of accretion, and G-65 shows broad H$\alpha$, despite the
845: small EW, so it is likely to be accreting at a low rate. All the Class II sources with near-IR
846: excess are accreting, except for CrA-4110, which shows narrow H$\alpha$ with small EW (it
847: could be accreting at a low rate, $\sim$10$^{-10}$-10$^{-12}$\,M$_\odot$/yr). None of the
848: Class III objects shows any indications of accretion. If we extrapolate those results to
849: the total sample of Class III, Class II and TO, we obtain an accretion fraction $\sim$40\%,
850: which is lower than observed for solar-type stars in similarly young regions. This is
851: consistent with the observations in other regions (Muzerolle et al. 2003;
852: Mohanty et al. 2005; Bouy et al. 2007), which also revealed a low fraction of accreting
853: disks for the very low-mass members.
854:
855: We find the same relation between accretion rates and SED morphology than in
856: the older cluster Tr 37 (Sicilia-Aguilar et al. 2006b): Some of the TO have ongoing
857: accretion despite their lack of near-IR excess, while some normal-looking Class II
858: sources have very low accretion rates despite not having inner holes. Therefore, we once
859: more observe that the ``classical'' distinction between CTTS and WTTS based on the
860: H$\alpha$ EW does not always correspond to Class II and Class III objects according to
861: their IR excesses (Hillenbrand 2008). Not only some objects with low accretion rates
862: show ``weak" (but broad) H$\alpha$ emission (Sicilia-Aguilar et al. 2005, 2006b), but
863: we find accreting and non-accreting objects among the disks with inner holes, and disks
864: without holes but with very low accretion rates.
865:
866:
867: \subsection{X-ray properties of the very low-mass objects \label{xray}}
868:
869:
870: The temporal X-ray properties of each source were investigated by examining the arrival
871: times of the photons from a given source using the software tool Event
872: Browser\footnote{http://www.astro.psu.edu/xray/docs}. The mean arrival rate of photons
873: for each source was computed. If the arrival rate of events exceeded this expected rate
874: by more than 1.3$\sigma$ as determined by Poisson probability of such an excess (Gehrels 1986),
875: then the source was flagged as a flaring source and the length of the excess flux was
876: determined as well as the Poisson probability of the excess. Sources G-28, G-45, G-78
877: and G-108 are only visible as flare sources, there was no steady flux. These results are
878: shown in Table \ref{xray-table}. The complete census of X-ray sources and their properties
879: will be published in a separate work.
880:
881: The hardness ratio (HR) and its error were computed for each source. The HR is defined as
882: HR=(C(2-8)-C(0.5-2))/C(0.5-8), where C(x-y) is the background subtracted flux in the x to y
883: keV energy band and the error for low count sources was computed using the method of Lyons (1991).
884: The absorption column to the source, N$_H$, was either determined by a fit to the spectrum using the
885: XSPEC software (Arnaud 1996) for sources with more than 100 photons or by computing the average
886: energy of the lowest two photon energies (E$_{2ave}$) from the source for source with 3 - 100 photons.
887: The computation of N$_H$ was made using a power-law spectrum with a photon index of -2 and a series of
888: trial values of N$_H$. Other spectral forms such as bremsstrahlung and plasma models provide almost
889: identical curves, implying that this method is fairly insensitive to spectral shape. The two lowest energy
890: photons formed a fraction of the total flux which could be read off of the model curves. The E$_{2ave}$
891: in the source spectrum was then used to determined which N$_H$ best matched this energy. The
892: determination of N$_H$ upper and lower bounds was calibrated against photons selected at random
893: from bright sources where the N$_H$ was determined by spectral fitting in XSPEC. Distributions of
894: the lowest two energy counts were created for sources with 3, 6, 10, 20, and 40 photons to estimate
895: the errors using this method. The results were tabulated and a linear regression fit was made to
896: E$_{2ave}$ , and to the upper N$_H$ upper and lower bounds to the E$_{2ave}$ from the distributions as a
897: function of source intensity and E$_{2ave}$. A more complete description of this method is being
898: prepared for publication. The errors in Table \ref{xray-table} are the 95\% errors. The luminosities were based
899: on the unabsorbed flux either computed using the observed flux, absorption and an assumed spectrum
900: of a 2 keV plasma and the PIMM's Tool\footnote{http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/Tools/w3pimms.html},
901: or from XSPEC by freezing all the parameters and setting
902: the absorption to zero. The distance was taken as 130 pc for the estimates.
903:
904: The column density N$_H$ can be used to estimate the extinction independently from
905: the results derived from the colors and spectral types. Using the results of
906: Vuong et al. (2003), that N$_{H}$/A$_J$=5.6$\pm$0.4 10$^{21}$ cm$^{_2}$ mag$^{-1}$,
907: and the conversion A$_J$/A$_V$=0.282 in Cardelli et al. (1989), we obtain A$_V$
908: (see Table \ref{xray-table}). These values roughly agree with the values derived
909: previously, although the predicted extinctions are lower for some of the most extincted
910: objects. Since the standard relations between N$_H$ and A$_V$ are derived for the
911: interstellar medium, differences in dust and gas in the circumstellar environment
912: may be responsible for this effect, as well as the larger uncertainties in the derivation
913: of N$_H$ from X-ray data. In any case, we prefer the results derived from
914: spectral types and JHK photometry, which are in very good agreement with the fitted
915: SEDs.
916:
917: Most of the Class II and Class III sources show negative HRs corresponding to
918: moderate absorption and temperature around 2 - 10 keV. The TO and Class I sources on the other
919: hand show a mixture of both negative and positive HRs. There is a correlation between the X-ray
920: luminosity and HR and the IR colors (Figure \ref{xray-fig}). Sources with smaller IR excess
921: (Class III and TO) tend to show higher X-ray luminosity and specially, more negative HR.
922: This correlation is likely caused by extinction effects, and could also suggest
923: differences in the orientation of the disks (closer to edge-on if the X-ray absorption is
924: stronger). Part of the difference in X-ray luminosity may be caused by the presence of close-in
925: binaries, which have also a noticeable effect on disks (Bouwman et al. 2006). So far
926: there is no information about binarity among the Coronet cluster members, but the holes in
927: some of the TO could be produced by close-in binaries (Ireland \& Kraus 2008). The Class I sources
928: also display a large range of N$_H$, possibly because these sources are deeper in the cloud or
929: their disks/envelopes are adding some absorption. Many of the X-ray sources show
930: considerable variability over longer time intervals. Seven additional observations were made
931: of this region with some sources fading below detectability and others brightening.
932:
933:
934: \subsection{HH objects with X-ray emission in the Coronet cluster \label{environment}}
935:
936: The whole CrA region is characterized by an extended, cometary-like nebulosity, which
937: becomes very optically thick near the star R CrA (Graham 1992; Henning et al. 1994;
938: Cambr\'{e}sy 1999). There are numerous Class I and Class 0 objects within the cloud
939: (Henning et al. 1994; Chen et al. 1997), and a large number of shocks and HH objects,
940: mostly detected via their optical emission (Wang et al. 2004). Some HH objects are known
941: to produce X-ray emission (Pravdo et al. 2001; Favata et al. 2002; Raga et al. 2002), although
942: previous studies of X-ray emission in the Coronet cluster (Forbrich \& Preibisch 2007)
943: had not found any relation between the known HH objects and the X-ray sources.
944:
945: Using the optical spectra, we found that two of the X-ray detected
946: objects (G-64 and G-80) show the forbidden [S II] emission lines
947: at 6716 and 6731\,\AA, characteristic of shocked material, as well as [N II]
948: emission at 6548 and 6583\,\AA\ (Figure \ref{lines-fig}; Hamann 1994).
949: In the case of G-64, Spitzer data reveals a nearby faint source,
950: probably an embedded Class I source. G-64 is also located near a known
951: HH object, HH 96 (19:01:41.87 -37:00:57.3; Wang et al. 2004).
952: On the other hand, G-80 is not detected at any of the Spitzer wavelengths,
953: being probably a HH knot in the cloud. Its H$\alpha$ profile, as well
954: as the [N II] and [S II] profiles, show the red tails characteristics of
955: HH objects. G-80 is relatively far from the other known HH objects, and given
956: the large number of sources in its surroundings, it is not easy to identify
957: the object that produces it.
958:
959: The EW of the lines are listed in Table \ref{shock-table}.
960: The line ratios are thus 0.84 and 1.22 for G-64 and G-80, respectively.
961: The line ratios depend on the electron density and (weakly) on the temperature
962: (Osterbrock 1989). Assuming a shock temperature of 10,000 K, the ratios
963: observed in the G-64 and G-80 suggest electron densities of the order of
964: $\sim$4$\times$10$^2$ cm$^{-3}$ and $\sim$10$^{3}$ cm$^{-3}$, respectively.
965: These values are slightly lower than the typical electron densities observed
966: in shocks near TTS (Hamann 1994), which tend to be close to saturation
967: ($\sim$5$\times$10$^3$ cm$^{-3}$). Given the weak dependence of the
968: electron density on the temperature as T$^{-1/2}$, temperature variations cannot
969: account for this difference, so we may conclude that electron densities in
970: the CrA cloud are lower than the typical values.
971:
972: \section{Conclusions \label{conclusions}}
973:
974: The study of the disks around very low-mass objects in the Coronet cluster
975: reveals significant differences with other regions. The disk fraction is
976: smaller ($\sim$70\%) than in clusters with a similar age, and more striking,
977: about $\sim$50\% of the disks show ``transitional'' SEDs with inner holes (TO). The SEDs
978: of the disks without inner holes are significantly flatter than observed in
979: similarly young clusters and even in regions a few Myr older
980: (Sicilia-Aguilar et al. 2006a), and the median SED is close to that of a flat disk
981: ($\lambda$F$_\lambda$ $\sim$ $\lambda^{-4/3}$). The disks with no inner gaps
982: show typically evidence of accretion, while only some of the TO are actively
983: accreting. In any case, the H$\alpha$ EW and profiles suggest that accretion rates
984: are probably low to moderate ($<$10$^{-8}$-10$^{-9}$\,M$_\odot$/yr), as it is
985: common for very low-mass objects.
986:
987: Since the members of the Coronet cluster have later spectral types than
988: typical disks studies (M0-M7.5 instead of G-early M), our work suggests
989: that M-type stars and BD tend to have flatter disks and inner holes with a
990: significantly higher frequency than solar-type stars. Partial evidence
991: of this had been suggested in other studies, based on smaller samples
992: of stars (Megeath et al. 2005; McCabe et al. 2006; Lada et al. 2006;
993: Allers et al. 2006; Morrow et al. 2007).
994:
995: The fact that most disks around the very low-mass members of the Coronet
996: cluster have inner holes or are strongly flattened may be responsible
997: for the controversy about disk fractions for very low-mass stars and BD.
998: It also reveals that observations at mid-IR wavelengths are required in order
999: to determine accurately the disk fractions for M-type stars and BD.
1000:
1001: The large fraction of ``transitional'' disks suggest a lifetime comparable
1002: to the typical disk lifetimes, which is inconsistent with the rapid timescales
1003: due to disk photoevaporation (Alexander et al. 2006a,b), and with the relatively
1004: short lifetimes inferred for solar-type stars in other regions (Hartmann et al. 2005;
1005: Sicilia-Aguilar et al. 2006a). Therefore, at least some of the ``transitional''
1006: disks may not be in a short-lived, intermediate evolutive stage.
1007:
1008: The youth of the Coronet cluster members suggests that part of these disks
1009: could have been formed already as flattened or ``transition-like'' structures.
1010: Whether this effect is due to the formation conditions of these low-mass objects
1011: in a low-mass star-forming region like the Coronet cluster (angular momentum of
1012: the collapsing cores, presence of binary companions), or is a consequence of a
1013: different evolutive path of disks around the less massive sources, needs
1014: to be explored by targeting large samples of very low-mass objects in
1015: older regions and in massive star-formation environments.
1016:
1017: Finally, the optical spectroscopy confirms that one of the X-ray sources
1018: in the Coronet cluster corresponds to a newly detected HH object.
1019:
1020: \acknowledgements
1021: We want to thank A. Mart\'{\i}nez-Sansigre for his help identifying extragalactic
1022: sources, and the anonymous referee for his/her comments and the rapid response.
1023: A. \& G. Garmire acknowledge financial support from NASA grants SV4-74018, NAS8-01128, and
1024: NAS8-38252. This work is based on observations made with the Spitzer Space Telescope,
1025: which is operated
1026: by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology under a contract with
1027: NASA. It also makes use of data products from the Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is
1028: a joint project of the University of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis
1029: Center/California Institute of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space
1030: Administration and the National Science Foundation, and the NIST Atomic Spectra Database
1031: (http://physics.nist.gov/asd3).
1032:
1033: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1034:
1035: \bibitem[Alexander et al.(2006a)]{alexander06a} Alexander, R., Clarke, C., Pringle, J, 2006a MNRAS, 369, 216
1036:
1037: \bibitem[Alexander et al.(2006b)]{alexander06b}Alexander, R., Clarke, C., Pringle, J, 2006b MNRAS, 369, 229
1038:
1039: \bibitem[Allers et al.(2006)]{allers06} Allers, K. N.; Kessler-Silacci, J. E.; Cieza, L. A.; Jaffe, D. T., 2006, ApJ 644, 364
1040:
1041: \bibitem[Arnaud(1996)]{arnaud96} Arnaud, K.A., 1996, ASPC, 101, 17
1042:
1043: \bibitem[Apai et al.(2003)]{apai03} Apai, D., Pascucci, I., Henning, T. et al., 2002, ApJ 573, L115
1044:
1045: \bibitem[Apai et al.(2005)]{apai05} Apai, D.; Pascucci, I.; Bouwman, J.; Natta, A.; Henning, Th.; Dullemond, C. P., 2005, Sci, 310, 834
1046:
1047: \bibitem[Barrado y Navascu\'{e}s \& Mart\'{\i}n(2003)]{barrado03} Barrado y Navascu\'{e}s, D., \& Mart\'{\i}n, E., 2003, AJ 126, 2997
1048:
1049: \bibitem[Bate et al.(2005)]{bate05} Bate, M., et al. 2005, MNRAS, 356, 1201
1050:
1051: \bibitem[Bessell \& Brett(1988)]{bessell88} Bessell, M., \& Brett, J., 1988 PASP 100, 1134
1052:
1053: \bibitem[Bessell et al.(1998)]{bessell98} Bessell, M. S.; Castelli, F.; Plez, B., 1998, A\&A, 333, 231
1054:
1055: \bibitem[Bouwman et al.(2001)]{bouwman01} Bouwman, J., Meeus, G., de Koter, A., Hony, S., Dominik, C., Waters, L., 2001, AA, 375, 950
1056:
1057: \bibitem[Bouwman et al.(2006)]{bouwman06} Bouwman, J.; Lawson, W. A.; Dominik, C.; Feigelson, E. D.; Henning, Th.; Tielens, A. G. G. M.; Waters, L. B. F. M., 2006, ApJ, 653, 57
1058:
1059: \bibitem[Bouwman et al.(2008)]{bouwman08} Bouwman, J., Henning, Th., et al. 2008, ApJ in press
1060:
1061: \bibitem[Bouy et al.(2007)]{bouy07} Bouy, H., Hu\'{e}lamo, N., Mart\'{\i}n, E., Barrado y Navascu\'{e}s, D., Sterzik, M., \& Pantin, E., 2007, A\&A 463, 641
1062:
1063: \bibitem[Brice\~{n}o et al.(1998)]{briceno98} Brice\~{n}o, C., Hartmann, L., Stauffer, J., Mart\'{\i}n, E., 1998, AJ, 115, 2074
1064:
1065: \bibitem[Brice\~{n}o et al.(2007)]{briceno07} Brice\~{n}o, C., Hartmann, L., et al., 2007, ApJ, 661, 1119
1066:
1067: \bibitem[Cambr\'{e}sy(1999)]{cambresy99} Cambr\'{e}sy, L., 1999, A\&A, 345, 417
1068:
1069: \bibitem[Cardelli et al.(1989)]{cardelli89} Cardelli, J., Clayton, G., Mathis, J., 1989, ApJ, 345, 245
1070:
1071: \bibitem[Carr \& Najita(2008)]{carr08} Carr, J., Najita, J., 2008, Science, 319, 1504
1072:
1073: \bibitem[Casey(1998)]{casey98} Casey, B. W.; Mathieu, R. D.; Vaz, L. P. R.; Andersen, J.; Suntzeff, N. B., 1998, AJ, 115, 1617
1074:
1075: \bibitem[Chen et al.(1997)]{chen97} Chen, H.; Grenfell, T. G.; Myers, P. C.; Hughes, J. D., 1997, ApJ, 478, 295
1076:
1077: \bibitem[Chini et al.(2003)]{chini03}Chini, R. et al. 2003, A\&A, 409, 235
1078:
1079: \bibitem[Dahm \& Hillenbrand(2007)]{dahm07} Dahm, S., Hillenbrand, L., 2007, \aj, 133, 2072
1080:
1081: \bibitem[Damjanov et al.(2007)]{Damjanov07} Damjanov, I., Jayawardhana, R., et al. 2007, ApJ, 670, 1337
1082:
1083: \bibitem[De Geus(1992)]{degeus92} De Geus, E. J., 1992, A\&A, 262, 258
1084:
1085: \bibitem[De Muizon et al.(1980)]{demuizon80} De Muizon, M., Rouan, D., Lena, P., Nicollier, C., Wijnbergen, J., 1980, AA, 83, 140
1086:
1087: \bibitem[De Zeeuw et al.(1999)]{dezeeuw99} De Zeeuw, P., et al. 1999, AJ, 117, 354
1088:
1089: \bibitem[Dorschner et al.(1995)]{dorschner95} Dorschner, J, Begemann, B., Henning, T., J\"{a}ger, C., \& Mutschke, H., 1995, A\&A, 300, 503
1090:
1091: \bibitem[Dullemond et al.(2006)]{dullemond06} Dullemond, C., Natta, A., Testi, L., 2006, ApJL 645, 69
1092:
1093: \bibitem[Favata et al.(2002)]{favata02} Favata, F.; Fridlund, C. V. M.; Micela, G.; Sciortino, S.; Kaas, A. A., 2002, ASPC 277, 467
1094:
1095: \bibitem[Fazio et al.(2004)]{faz04} Fazio, G.G., Hora, J.L., Allen, L.E., \& 62 more coauthors, 2004, \apjs, 154, 10
1096:
1097: \bibitem[Flaccomio et al.(2006)]{flaccomio06} Flaccomio, E., Micela, G., Sciortino, S., A\&A, 455, 903
1098:
1099: \bibitem[Freeman et al.(2002)]{freeman02} Freeman, P. E., Kashyap, V., Rosner, R., Lamb, D. Q. 2002, ApJS, 138, 185
1100:
1101: \bibitem[Fern\'{a}ndez \& Comer\'{o}n(2001)]{fernandez01} Fern\'{a}ndez, M., Comer\'{o}n, F., 2001, A\&A 380, 264
1102:
1103: \bibitem[Forbrich \& Preibisch(2007)]{forbrich07} Forbrich, J.; Preibisch, T., 2007, A\&A 475, 959
1104:
1105: \bibitem[Furlan et al.(2005)]{furlan05} Furlan, E., Calvet, N., et al., 2005, ApJ, 621, L129
1106:
1107: \bibitem[Garmire \& Garmire(2003)]{garmire03} Garmire, G., \& Garmire, A., 2003, Astron. Nachr. 324, 153
1108:
1109: \bibitem[Garmire et al.(2003)]{garmireetal03} Garmire, G. P., Bautz, M. W., Ford, P. G., Nousek, J. A., \& Ricker, G. R., 2003 Proc. SPIE 4851,28.
1110:
1111: \bibitem[Gehrels(1986)]{gehrels86} Gehrels, N., 1986 ApJ 303, 336
1112:
1113: \bibitem[Gizis et al.(2005)]{gizis05} Gizis, J., Shipman,H, Harvin, J., 2005, ApJ 630, L89
1114:
1115: \bibitem[Graham (1992)]{graham92} Graham, J., 1992, ESO Scientific Report, p.185
1116:
1117: \bibitem[Graham (1993)]{graham93} Graham, J.A., 1993, PASP 105, 688
1118:
1119: \bibitem[Haisch et al.(2001)]{hais01} Haisch, K., Lada, E., \& Lada, C., 2001, \apj, 553, 153
1120:
1121: \bibitem[Hamaguchi et al.(2005a)]{hamaguchi05a} Hamaguchi, K., et al. 2005a, ApJ 618, 360
1122:
1123: \bibitem[Hamaguchi et al.(2005b)]{hamaguchi05b} Hamaguchi, K., et al., 2005b, ApJ 623, 291
1124:
1125: \bibitem[Hamann(1994)]{hamann94} Hamann, F. , 1994, ApJS, 93, 485
1126:
1127: \bibitem[Hartmann(1998)]{hart98} Hartmann, L.: Accretion Processes in Star Formation, Cambridge University Press, 1998.
1128:
1129: \bibitem[Hartmann et al.(2005)]{hart05} Hartmann, L., Megeath, S.T., Allen, L., Luhman, K., Calvet, N., D'Alessio, P., Franco-Hern\'{a}ndez, R., Fazio, G., 2005, \apj, 629, 881
1130:
1131: \bibitem[Hartmann et al.(2006)]{hartmann06} Hartmann, L., D'Alessio, P., Calvet, N., \& Muzerolle, J., 2006, ApJ, 648, 484
1132:
1133: \bibitem[Hayashi et al.(1985)]{hay85} Hayashi, C., Nakazawa, K., \& Nakagawa, Y.\ 1985, in Protostars and Planets II,
1134: eds. D. Black \& M. Matthews (Tucson: University of Arizona Press), 1100
1135:
1136: \bibitem[Henning et al.(1994)]{henning94} Henning, Th.; Launhardt, R.; Steinacker, J.; Thamm, E., 1994, A\&A, 338, 223
1137:
1138: \bibitem[Henning \& Stognienko(1996)]{henning96} Henning, Th.\& Stognienko, R., 1996, A\&A, 311, 291
1139:
1140: \bibitem[Henning \& Mutschke(1997)]{henning97} Henning, Th.\& Mutschke, H., 1997, A\&A, 327, 743
1141:
1142: \bibitem[Henning(2008)]{henning08} Henning, Th., 2008, Physica Scripta in press
1143:
1144: \bibitem[Hern\'{a}ndez et al.(2007a)]{hernandez07a} Hern\'{a}ndez, J., Hartmann, L., Megeath, S.T.,et al., 2007b, ApJ, 662, 1067
1145:
1146: \bibitem[Hern\'{a}ndez et al.(2007b)]{hernandez07b} Hern\'{a}ndez, J., Calvet, N., et al., 2007, ApJ, 671, 1784
1147:
1148: \bibitem[Higdon et al. (2004)]{higdon04} Higdon, S., et al., 2004, PASP, 116, 975
1149:
1150: \bibitem[Hillenbrand(2008)]{hillenbrand08} Hillenbrand, L. A., 2008, Physica Scripta in press
1151:
1152: \bibitem[Houck et al.(2004)]{houck04} Houck, J., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 18
1153:
1154: \bibitem[Ireland \& Kraus(2008)]{ireland08} Ireland, M., Kraus, A., 2008, ApJ, 678, 59
1155:
1156: \bibitem[J\"{a}ger et al.(1998)]{jaeger98} J\"{a}ger, C., Molster, F., Dorschner, J., et al., 1998, A\&A 339, 904
1157:
1158: \bibitem[J\"{a}ger et al.(2003)]{jaeger03} J\"{a}ger, C., Fabian, D., et al. 2003, A\&A, 401, 57
1159:
1160: \bibitem[Jayawardhana et al.(2002)]{jayawardhana02} Jayawardhana, R., Mohanty, S., Basri, G., 2002, ApJ 578, L141
1161:
1162: \bibitem[Jayawardhana et al.(2003)]{jayawardhana03} Jayawardhana, R., Mohanty, S., Basri, G., 2003, ApJ 592, 282
1163:
1164: \bibitem[Kenyon \& Hartmann(1995)]{kenyon95} Kenyon, S.J. \& Hartmann, L., 1995, ApJS , 101, 117
1165:
1166: \bibitem[Kenyon \& Bromley(2005)]{kenyon05} Kenyon, S.J., \& Bromley, B.C., 2005, AJ, 130, 1
1167:
1168: \bibitem[Kessler-Silacci et al.(2007)]{kessler07} Kessler-Silacci et al., 2007, ApJ,659,680
1169:
1170: \bibitem[Kirkpatrick et al.(1995)]{kirkpatrick95} Kirkpatrick, J. D.; Henry, T. J.; Simons, D. A. 1995, AJ, 109, 797
1171:
1172: \bibitem[Klein et al.(2003)]{klein03} Klein, R., Apai, D., Pascucci, I., Henning, Th., Waters, L., 2003, ApJ, 593, 57
1173:
1174: \bibitem[Knude \& Hog(1998)]{knude98} Knude, J.; Hog, E. 1998, A\&A 338, 897
1175:
1176: \bibitem[Lada et al.(2006)]{lada06} Lada, C., Muench, A., et al., 2006, AJ, 131, 1547
1177:
1178: \bibitem[L\'{o}pez-Mart\'{\i} et al.(2005)]{lopezmarti05} L\'{o}pez-Mart\'{\i}, B., Eisl\"{o}ffel, J., Mundt, R., 2005, AA, 444, 175
1179:
1180: \bibitem[Loren(1979)]{loren79} Loren, R. B., 1979, ApJ, 227, 832
1181:
1182: \bibitem[Luhman et al.(2003)]{luhman03} Luhman, K.;Stauffer, John R.; Muench, A. A.; Rieke, G. H.; Lada, E. A.; Bouvier, J.; Lada, C. J., 2003, ApJ, 593, 1093
1183:
1184: \bibitem[Luhman et al.(2005)]{luhman05} Luhman, K., Lada, C., Hartmann, L., et al., 2005, ApJ, 631, 69
1185:
1186: \bibitem[Luhman et al.(2007)]{luhman07} Luhman, K., Joergens, V., Lada, C., Muzerolle, J., Pascucci, I., White, R., 2007, Protostars
1187: and Planets V, B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, and K. Keil (eds.), Tucson: University of Arizona Press, p443-457
1188:
1189: \bibitem[Luhman et al.(2008)]{luhman08} Luhman, K., Allen, L., Allen, P., et al. 2008, ApJ, 675, 1375
1190:
1191: \bibitem[Lyons(1991)]{lyons91} Lyons, L., 1991, Data Analysis for Physical Science Students, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
1192:
1193: \bibitem[Mart\'{\i}n et al.(1996)]{martin96} Mart\'{\i}n, E., Rebolo, R., Zapatero-Osorio, M.R., 1996, ApJ, 469, 706
1194:
1195: \bibitem[Marraco \& Rydgren(1981)]{marraco81}Marraco \& Rydgren 1981, AJ, 86, 62
1196:
1197: \bibitem[McCabe et al.(2006)]{mccabe06} McCabe, C., Ghez, A., Prato, L, Duchene, G., Fisher, R., Telesco, C., 2006, ApJ 636, 932
1198:
1199: \bibitem[Megeath et al.(2005)]{megeath05} Megeath, S. T.; Hartmann, L.; Luhman, K. L.; Fazio, G. G., 2005, ApJ, 634, 113
1200:
1201: \bibitem[Meyer et al.(1997)]{mey97} Meyer, M.~R., Calvet, N., \& Hillenbrand, L.~A.\ 1997, AJ, 114, 288
1202:
1203: \bibitem[Min et al.(2005)]{min05} Min, M.; Hovenier, J. W.; de Koter, A., 2005, A\&A 432, 909
1204:
1205: \bibitem[Mohanty et al.(2004)]{mohanty04} Mohanty, S., Jayawardhana, R., Natta, A., Fujiyoshi, T., Tamura, M., Barrado y Navascu\'{e}s, D., 2004, ApJ 609, L33
1206:
1207: \bibitem[Mohanty et al.(2005)]{mohanty05} Mohanty, S., Jayawardhana, R., Basri, G., et 2005, ApJ, 626, 498
1208:
1209: \bibitem[Morrow et al.(2008)]{morrow08} Morrow, A. L.; Luhman, K. L.; Espaillat, C.; D'Alessio, P.; Adame, L.; Calvet, N.; Forrest, W. J.; Sargent, B.; Hartmann, L.; Watson, D. M.; Bohac, C. J., 2008, ApJ 676, 143
1210:
1211: \bibitem[Muench et al.(2001)]{muench01} Muench, A., Alves, J., Lada, Ch., Lada, E., 2001, \apj 558, 51
1212:
1213: \bibitem[Muzerolle et al.(1998a)]{muzerolle98profile} Muzerolle, J., Hartmann, L., Calvet, N., 1998, AJ 116, 455
1214:
1215: \bibitem[Muzerolle et al.(1998b)]{muzerolle98model} Muzerolle, J., Calvet, N. \& Hartmann, L., 1998, \apj, 492, 743
1216:
1217: \bibitem[Muzerolle et al.(2001)]{muzerolle01} Muzerolle, J., Calvet, N. \& Hartmann, L., 2001, ApJ, 550, 944
1218:
1219: \bibitem[Muzerolle et al.(2003)]{muzerolle03} Muzerolle, J., Hillenbrand, L., Calvet, N., Brice\~{n}o, C.; Hartmann, L., 2003, ApJ, 592, 266
1220:
1221: \bibitem[Muzerolle et al.(2005)]{muzerolle05} Muzerolle, J.; Luhman, K.; Brice\~{n}o, C.; Hartmann, L.; Calvet, N., 2005, ApJ 625, 906
1222:
1223: \bibitem[Natta \& Testi(2001)]{natta01}Natta, A., \& Testi, L., 2001, A\&A, 376, L22
1224:
1225: \bibitem[Natta et al.(2004)]{natta04} Natta, A., Testi, L., Neri, R., Schepherd, D., Wilner, D., 2004, A\&A, 416, 179
1226:
1227: \bibitem[Natta et al.(2005)]{natta05} Natta, A., Testi, L., Randich, S., Muzerolle, J., 2005, Mem. S.A.It., 76, 343
1228:
1229: \bibitem[Natta et al.(2007)]{natta07} Natta, A., Testi, L., Calvet, N., et al., 2007, Protostars
1230: and Planets V, B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, and K. Keil (eds.), Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 767
1231:
1232: \bibitem[Neuh\"{a}user et al.(1997)]{neuhauser97} Neuh\"{a}user, R., Preibisch, T., 1997, A\&A, 322, L37
1233:
1234: \bibitem[Neuh\"{a}user et al.(2000)]{neuhauser00} Neuh\"{a}user, R., et al., 2000, A\&A, 146, 323
1235:
1236: \bibitem[Nisini et al.(2005)]{nisini05} Nisini, B.; Antoniucci, S.; Giannini, T.; Lorenzetti, D., 2005, A\&A, 429, 543
1237:
1238: \bibitem[Osterbrock(1989)]{osterbrock89} Osterbrock, D. E., ``Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei", University Science Books, 1989
1239:
1240: \bibitem[Pascucci et al.(2003)]{pascucci03} Pascucci, I., Apai, D., Henning. T., Semenov, D., 2003, CoKon. 103, 99
1241:
1242: \bibitem[Pascucci et al.(2005)]{pascucci05} Pascucci, I., Apai, D., Henning. T., Sterzik, M., Dullemond, C., Bouwman, C., 2005, Mem.S.A.It., 76, 315
1243:
1244: \bibitem[Pasquini et al.(2002)]{pasquini02} Pasquini, L., et al., 2002, The Messenger, 110, 1 (ISSN 0722-6691)
1245:
1246: \bibitem[Pravdo et al.(2001)]{pravdo01} Pravdo, S. H.; Feigelson, E. D.; Garmire, G.; Maeda, Y.; Tsuboi, Y.; Bally, J., 2001, Nature 413, 708
1247:
1248: \bibitem[Preibisch et al.(1993)]{preibisch93} Preibisch, T., Ossenkopf, V., Yorke, H., \& Henning, T., 1993, A\&A, 279, 577
1249:
1250: \bibitem[Quillen et al.(2004)]{quillen04} Quillen, A., Blackman, E., Frank, A., Varniere, P., 2004, \apj, 612, L137
1251:
1252: \bibitem[Raga et al.(2002)]{raga02} Raga, A. C.; Noriega-Crespo, A.; Vel\'{a}zquez, P. F., 2002, \apj, 576, 149
1253:
1254: \bibitem[Riddick et al.(2007)]{riddick07} Riddick, F. C.; Roche, P. F.; Lucas, P. W., 2007, MNRAS, 381, 1077
1255:
1256: \bibitem[Rieke et al.(2004)]{rie04} Rieke, G., Young, E., Engelbracht, C., \& 40 more coauthors, 2004, \apjs, 154, 25
1257:
1258: \bibitem[Sargent et al.(2006)]{sargent06} Sargent, B., Forrest, W., D'Alessio, P., and 12 more coauthors, 2006, ApJ, 645, 395
1259:
1260: \bibitem[Scholz \& Jayawardhana(2008)]{scholz08} Scholz, A., \& Jayawardhana, R., 2008, \apj 672, 49
1261:
1262: \bibitem[Servoin \& Piriou(1973)]{servoin73} Servoin, J., \& Piriou, B., 1973, Phys. Stat. Sol., 55, 677
1263:
1264: \bibitem[Sicilia-Aguilar et al. (2005)]{sic05onc} Sicilia-Aguilar, A., Hartmann, L., Szentgyorgyi, A., et al., 2005, AJ, 129, 363
1265:
1266: \bibitem[Sicilia-Aguilar et al.(2006a))]{sicilia06ir} Sicilia-Aguilar, A., Hartmann, L., Calvet, N., Megeath, S.T., Muzerolle, J., Allen, L., D'Alessio, P., Mer\'{\i}n, B., Stauffer, J., Young, E., Lada, C., 2006a,ApJ 638, 897
1267:
1268: \bibitem[Sicilia-Aguilar et al.(2006b))]{sicilia06opt} Sicilia-Aguilar, A., Hartmann, L., F\"{u}r\'{e}sz, G., Henning, Th., Dullemond, C., Brandner, W., 2006b, AJ 132, 2135
1269:
1270: \bibitem[Sicilia-Aguilar et al.(2007))]{sicilia07} Sicilia-Aguilar, A., Hartmann, L., Watson, D., Bohac, C., Henning, Th., Bouwman, J., 2007, ApJ, 659, 1637
1271:
1272: \bibitem[Sterzik et al.(2004)]{sterzik04} Sterzik, M., Pascucci, I., Apai, D., van der Bliek, N., Dullemond, C., 2004, AA, 427, 245
1273:
1274: \bibitem[Taylor \& Storey(1984)]{taylor04} Taylor \& Storey, 1984, MNRAS, 209, 5
1275:
1276: \bibitem[Townsley et al.(2002)]{townsley02} Townsley, L.; Broos, P.; Feigelson, E.; Burrows, D.; Chu, Y.-H.; Garmire, G.; Griffiths, R.; Maeda, Y.; Pavlov, G.; Tsuboi, Y., 2002, APS, APRB17061T
1277:
1278: \bibitem[Umbreit et al.(2005)]{umbreit05} Umbreit, S., Burkert, A., Henning, Th., Mikkola, S., Spurzen, R., 2005, ApJ, 623, 940
1279:
1280: \bibitem[Van Boekel et al.(2003)]{boekel03} Van Boekel, R., Waters, L., Dominik, C., Bouwman, J., de Koter, A., Dullemond, C., Paresce, F., 2003, AA, 400, L21
1281:
1282: \bibitem[Van Boekel et al.(2005)]{boekel05} Van Boekel, R., Min, M., Waters, L., et al. 2005, A\&A 437, 189
1283:
1284: \bibitem[Voshchinnikov \& Henning(2008)]{voshchinnikov08} Voshchinnikov, N., Henning, Th., 2008, A\&AL, 483, 9
1285:
1286: \bibitem[Vuong et al.(2003)]{vuong03} Vuong, M, et al, 2003, A\&A, 408, 581
1287:
1288: \bibitem[Walter(1986)]{walter86} Walter, F., 1986, ApJ, 306, 573
1289:
1290: \bibitem[Walter et al.(1997)]{walter97} Walter, F., et al., 1997, AJ, 114, 1544.
1291:
1292: \bibitem[Wang et al. (2004)]{wang04} Wang, H., Mundt, R., Henning, Th., Apai, D., 2004, ApJ 617, 1191
1293:
1294: \bibitem[White \& Basri(2003)]{whi03} White, R., \& Basri, G., 2003, \apj, 582, 1109
1295:
1296: \bibitem[Whitworth \& Zinnecker(2004)]{withworth04} Whitworth, A., Zinnecker, H., 2004, A\&A 427, 299
1297:
1298: \bibitem[Wilking et al.(1997)]{wilking97}Wilking, B., et al., 1997, AJ, 114, 2029
1299:
1300:
1301: \end{thebibliography}
1302:
1303:
1304: \clearpage
1305:
1306: \input tab1.tex
1307:
1308: \input tab2.tex
1309:
1310: \clearpage
1311: \pagestyle{empty}
1312: \input tab3.tex
1313: \clearpage
1314: \pagestyle{plaintop}
1315:
1316: \clearpage
1317: \pagestyle{empty}
1318: \input tab4.tex
1319: \clearpage
1320: \pagestyle{plaintop}
1321:
1322: \input tab5.tex
1323:
1324: \input tab6.tex
1325:
1326: \input tab7.tex
1327:
1328: \input tab8.tex
1329:
1330: \input tab9.tex
1331:
1332: \input tab10.tex
1333:
1334: \clearpage
1335:
1336: \begin{figure}
1337: \plotone{f1.eps}
1338: \caption{FLAMES spectra of some of the Coronet cluster objects. The spectra
1339: have been scaled and shifted in order to display them together. \label{spectra-fig}}
1340: \end{figure}
1341:
1342: \clearpage
1343:
1344: \begin{figure}
1345: \plotone{f2.eps}
1346: \caption{J-H vs. H-K diagram for the very low-mass objects in the Coronet
1347: Cluster. The main sequences of dwarfs, giants, and BD are displayed as a dashed line
1348: for comparison (Bessell et al. 1998; Kirkpatrick et al. 1996), together with the CTTS
1349: locus stars (Meyer et al.1997, solid line), and a reddening vector for
1350: A$_V$=5 mag. The objects with known extinction has been corrected and are represented by
1351: filled symbols. The objects for which the extinction is not known are not corrected and
1352: are represented as open circles. All the objects with small photometric errors
1353: have colors consistent with M-type stars or BD with no or little near-IR excess.
1354: The objects that stand out of the M0-M6 track (either because of their extinction
1355: or because of having later spectral types) have been labeled. \label{jhk-fig}}
1356: \end{figure}
1357:
1358: \clearpage
1359:
1360: \begin{figure}
1361: \plotone{f3.eps}
1362: \caption{Mass absorption coefficients ($\kappa$) for the materials used in the
1363: five-particle model silicate fitting routine (Dorschner et al. 1995; Servoin \& Piriou 1973;
1364: J\"{a}ger et al. 1998; Henning \& Mutschke 1997; Preibisch et al. 1993).
1365: Two amorphous silicates (with olivine and forsterite stoichiometry), plus
1366: enstatite, forsterite, and silica, are used. For each material, we include three
1367: grain sizes: 0.1\,$\mu$m (dashed line), 1.5\,$\mu$m (dotted-dashed line), and 6.0\,$\mu$m
1368: (solid line), except for enstatite, for which we have only 0.1\,$\mu$m (dashed line) and
1369: 1.5\,$\mu$m (dotted-dashed line) sized-grains. \label{qval-fig}}
1370: \end{figure}
1371:
1372: \clearpage
1373:
1374:
1375: \begin{figure}
1376: \plotone{f4.eps}
1377: \caption{Silicate emission and fit of the objects with excess emission in the
1378: 10\,$\mu$m region. The spectra with noise in the fitted region (7-14\,$\mu$m) are
1379: displayed. The final fit is represented by a thick line, and the continuum level
1380: is marked as a dashed thin line.\label{silfit-fig}}
1381: \end{figure}
1382:
1383: \clearpage
1384:
1385: \begin{figure}
1386: \plotone{f5.eps}
1387: \caption{10\,$\mu$m region in the objects with no evident silicate emission.
1388: Note that CrA-432 and Cra-465 do not show any silicate emission,
1389: but just excess emission starting at $\sim$10\,$\mu$m. CrA-205 shows multiple
1390: lines that are gas lines from the nebula and bad pixels, and cannot be totally
1391: corrected due to the very low emission from the source.
1392: The large errors in G-65 are due to the very bright background near R CrA.
1393: \label{nosil-fig}}
1394: \end{figure}
1395:
1396: \clearpage
1397:
1398:
1399: \begin{figure}
1400: \plotone{f6.eps}
1401: \caption{Silicate emission and fit in the 17-35\,$\mu$m range.
1402: The small offsets between the features and the model in CrA-466 may
1403: suggest a difference in composition. The spectra with noise in the fitted region are
1404: displayed. The final fit is represented by a thick line, and the continuum level
1405: is marked as a dashed thin line.
1406: \label{longsilfit-fig}}
1407: \end{figure}
1408:
1409: \clearpage
1410:
1411:
1412:
1413:
1414: \begin{figure}
1415: \plotone{f7.eps}
1416: \caption{SEDs for the objects observed with IRS. A stellar photosphere of a similar spectral type
1417: is displayed for comparison. All the fluxes with known extinction have been dereddened,
1418: including G-1 (A$_V$ $\sim$ 3.5 mag derived from the JHK diagram). The data points
1419: include optical R and I photometry (L\'{o}pez-Mart\'{\i} et al. 2005),
1420: 2MASS, IRAC, and MIPS observations. \label{irssed-fig}}
1421: \end{figure}
1422:
1423: \clearpage
1424:
1425:
1426:
1427: \begin{figure}
1428: \plotone{f8.eps}
1429: \caption{SEDs for the objects not observed with IRS. In the case of Class III and
1430: Class II objects with low extinction, a stellar photosphere of a similar spectral type
1431: has been displayed for comparison. The data points include optical R and I photometry
1432: (L\'{o}pez-Mart\'{\i} et al. 2005), 2MASS, IRAC, and MIPS observations.
1433: \label{sed-fig}}
1434: \end{figure}
1435:
1436: \clearpage
1437:
1438:
1439: \begin{figure}
1440: \plotone{f9.eps}
1441: \caption{IRAC color-color diagram for the very low-mass objects in the Coronet cluster.
1442: CTTS-like objects with disks tend to appear within the box, which shows the
1443: location of typical Taurus CTTS (Hartmann et al. 2005). WTTS-like objects
1444: reside near the 0,0 point. Disks around these very low-mass objects tend to be flatter
1445: than their higher-mass counterparts in Taurus. The X marks the quasar G-115, which
1446: falls in the region for normal Class I sources or very flared Class II disks. \label{irac-fig}}
1447: \end{figure}
1448:
1449: \clearpage
1450:
1451: \begin{figure}
1452: \plottwo{f10a.eps}{f10b.eps}
1453: \caption{Left: Median SED of the disks in the Coronet cluster, compared to
1454: the median SED of solar-type stars in regions at different stages of evolution
1455: (Taurus, Tr 37 , NGC 7160) and the photospheric emission of a K7 star. All the
1456: $\lambda$F$_\lambda$ fluxes have been scaled to the distance of the Coronet cluster
1457: (d$\sim$ 150 pc). The disks
1458: around very low-mass objects in the CrA cloud have significantly less
1459: near-IR emission than young disks in Taurus, and even less than the disks
1460: in the very evolved NGC 7160. This suggest differences in disk structure for
1461: M-type objects compared to solar-type stars. The quartiles are
1462: shown for CrA and Taurus. For clarity, the quartiles of Tr 37 and NGC 7160
1463: (which are similar to those of CrA) are not displayed.
1464: Right: Median SED of the disks in the Coronet cluster, compared to the
1465: median SED of M0-M7 objects in regions with different ages (Taurus, IC 348, 25 Ori).
1466: All the fluxes have been scaled to the distance of the Coronet cluster(d$\sim$ 150 pc).
1467: The typical disk SED of M-type objects at short wavelengths is close to a flat
1468: disk at nearly all stages (25 Ori has only 4 disks, 3 of them TO). For clarity, the quartiles
1469: are displayed for CrA only, being similar in the other regions.
1470: \label{mediansed-fig}}
1471: \end{figure}
1472:
1473: \clearpage
1474:
1475:
1476:
1477: \begin{figure}
1478: \plotone{f11.eps}
1479: \caption{H$\alpha$ emission of the very low-mass objects in the Coronet cluster.
1480: The flux is normalized to the continuum level.
1481: Most of the objects display the narrow lines typical of non-accreting systems.
1482: The Class III object G-95 does not show any H$\alpha$ emission, but its youth
1483: and membership are confirmed by the Li I absorption.
1484: The detections of G-87 and G-133 are marginal. \label{halpha-fig}}
1485: \end{figure}
1486:
1487: \clearpage
1488:
1489: \begin{figure}
1490: \plotone{f12.eps}
1491: \caption{X-ray luminosity and hardness ratio (HR) versus IRAC colors [3.6]-[4.5]
1492: and [5.8]-[8.0] (not corrected for reddening). There is a trend of objects with redder disks
1493: to have lower X-ray luminosities, and more positive HR, which is directly related
1494: to the extinction (the two objects in the upper right corner are the Class I source
1495: G-122 and the very extincted TO G-87). \label{xray-fig}}
1496: \end{figure}
1497:
1498: \clearpage
1499:
1500:
1501: \begin{figure}
1502: \plotone{f13.eps}
1503: \caption{Shock [N II] and [S II] lines observed in the X-ray emitting HH objects G-64 and G-80.
1504: The H$\alpha$ line of G-80 shows the typical profile of shocks as well. \label{lines-fig}}
1505: \end{figure}
1506:
1507:
1508:
1509: \end{document}
1510: