1: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
2: %
3: % Title: Strange filamentary structures (``fireballs'') around a merger galaxy
4: % in the Coma cluster of galaxies
5: %
6: %
7: % Short title: Fireballs around a Coma merger
8: %
9: % Corresponding author: Michitoshi Yoshida
10: % Affiliation: Okayama Astrophysical Observatory
11: % Kamogata-cho, Asakuchi-gun
12: % Okayama 719-0232, Japan
13: % E-mail: yoshida@oao.nao.ac.jp
14: % Tel: +81-865-44-2155; Fax: +81-865-44-2360
15: %
16: % Contents: main text --> this file (including three tables)
17: % figures --> f1.eps to f14.eps
18: % response to the referee --> response
19: %
20: % color figures
21: % color in both printed and HTML --> f1.eps, f5.eps, f8.eps
22: % color in the HTML only --> f7.eps, f9.eps
23: % gray-scale versions --> f7-bw.eps, f9-bw.eps
24: %
25: % gray-scale figures --> f2.eps, f3.eps, f4.eps, f6.eps, f10.eps,
26: % f11.eps, f12.eps, f13.eps, and f14.eps
27: %
28: % 2008
29: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
30: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
31: \documentclass{emulateapj}
32: \begin{document}
33:
34: \shorttitle{FIREBALLS IN A COMA GALAXY}
35: \shortauthors{YOSHIDA ET AL.}
36:
37: \title{Strange filamentary structures (``fireballs'') around a merger galaxy in
38: the Coma cluster of galaxies\altaffilmark{1}}
39: \author{
40: Michitoshi Yoshida\altaffilmark{2},
41: Masafumi Yagi\altaffilmark{3},
42: Yutaka Komiyama\altaffilmark{3,4},
43: Hisanori Furusawa\altaffilmark{4},
44: Nobunari Kashikawa\altaffilmark{3},
45: Yusei Koyama\altaffilmark{5},
46: Hitomi Yamanoi\altaffilmark{3,6},
47: Takashi Hattori\altaffilmark{4}
48: and
49: Sadanori Okamura\altaffilmark{5,7}
50: }
51:
52:
53: \altaffiltext{1}{Based on data collected at the Subaru Telescope, operated by the
54: National Astronomical Observatory of Japan.}
55:
56: \altaffiltext{2}{Okayama Astrophysical Observatory, National Astronomical
57: Observatory,
58: Kamogata, Okayama 719-0232, Japan; yoshida@oao.nao.ac.jp.}
59:
60: \altaffiltext{3}{Optical and Infrared Astronomy Division, National
61: Astronomical Observatory,
62: Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan.}
63:
64: \altaffiltext{4}{Subaru Telescope, National Astronomical Observatory of
65: Japan, 650 North
66: A'Ohoku Place, Hilo, HI 96720, USA.}
67:
68: \altaffiltext{5}{Department of Astronomy, University of Tokyo,
69: Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.}
70:
71: \altaffiltext{6}{Department of Astronomical Science, School of Physical Sciences,
72: The Graduate University for Advanced Studies (Sokendai),
73: National Astronomical Observatory of Japan,
74: Tokyo 181-8588, Japan.}
75:
76: \altaffiltext{7}{Research Center for the Early Universe, University of
77: Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.}
78:
79:
80: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
81:
82: \begin{abstract}
83:
84: We found an unusual complex of narrow blue filaments, bright blue knots, and H$\alpha$-emitting
85: filaments and clouds, which morphologically resembled a complex of ``fireballs,'' extending up to
86: 80 kpc south from an E+A galaxy RB199 in the Coma cluster. The galaxy has a highly disturbed
87: morphology indicative of a galaxy--galaxy merger remnant. The narrow blue filaments extend in
88: straight shapes toward the south from the galaxy, and several bright blue knots are located at the
89: southern ends of the filaments. The $R_{\rm C}$ band absolute magnitudes, half light radii and
90: estimated masses of the bright knots are $\sim -12 - -13$ mag, $\sim 200-300$ pc and
91: $\sim 10^{6-7}$ M$_{\odot}$, respectively.
92: Long, narrow H$\alpha$-emitting filaments are connected at the south edge of the knots. The
93: average color of the fireballs is $B - R_{\rm C}\approx 0.5$, which is bluer than RB199 ($B - R =
94: 0.99$), suggesting that most of the stars in the fireballs were formed within several times $10^8$ yr.
95: The narrow blue filaments exhibit almost no H$\alpha$ emission. Strong H$\alpha$ and UV emission
96: appear in the bright knots. These characteristics indicate that star formation recently ceased in the
97: blue filaments and now continues in the bright knots. The gas stripped by some mechanism from
98: the disk of RB199 may be traveling in the intergalactic space, forming stars left along its trajectory.
99: The most plausible fireball formation mechanism is ram pressure stripping by high-speed collision
100: between the galaxy and the hot intra-cluster medium. The fireballs may be a snapshot of diffuse
101: intra-cluster population formation, or halo star population formation in a cluster galaxy.
102: \end{abstract}
103:
104: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
105:
106: \keywords{
107: galaxies: clusters: general --- galaxies: evolution ---
108: galaxies: galaxies: dwarf --- galaxies: kinematics and dynamics ---
109: intergalactic medium
110: }
111:
112: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
113:
114: \section{Introduction}
115:
116: Clusters of galaxies are ideal experimental laboratories for studying environmental effects on
117: galaxy evolution (e.g. Bosselli \& Gavazzi 2006). Cluster galaxy density varies widely from
118: edge to core, the
119: intergalactic space is often filled with X-ray emitting hot gas, and the cluster's large mass forms a
120: very deep gravitational potential around its center. These properties give us observational means to
121: investigate how galaxy density, ambient gas--galaxy interaction, and strong gravitational drag force
122: affect galaxy evolution.
123:
124: Several lines of observational evidence suggest that drastic galaxy evolution occurred in clusters of
125: galaxies from the redshift $z \sim 1$ to the present. Early type galaxies form a dominant population
126: in the inner region of local rich clusters, and in particular, S0 galaxies are preferentially found in
127: and around the cluster core region
128: \citep{Dressler1980,Dressler1994,Dressler1997,Postman1984,Goto2003,VanDerWel2007}. This
129: relationship---the morphology--density relationship---is also observed at high redshift ($z \sim 1$).
130: However, this enhancement of the fraction of S0 galaxies around a cluster core is less remarkable
131: in high redshift clusters than in local clusters \citep{Smith2005,Postman2005}. In addition, a
132: higher blue galaxy fraction has been established for high-redshift clusters
133: \citep{Butcher1978,Butcher1984}. Furthermore, a rapid rise in the luminosity function (LF) of
134: member galaxies toward the faint end has been reported in several local rich clusters
135: \citep{Popesso2005,Trentham2005,Popesso2006,Milne2007,Adami2007,Yamanoi2007}. However,
136: the LFs of some rich clusters at $z \approx 0.3$ may exhibit no such rapid increase at those faint
137: ends \citep{Harsono2007}. These observational facts suggest that in terms of morphology, color,
138: and population, rapid evolution of galaxies occurred in clusters from $z \sim 1$ to the present.
139:
140: Several environmental effects that explain the evolution of cluster galaxies have been proposed,
141: including galaxy--galaxy interaction \citep{Farouki1981,Icke1985}, galaxy harassment
142: \citep{Moore1996}, tidal interaction with cluster potential \citep{Henriksen1996}, ram pressure
143: stripping \citep{Gunn1972,Vollmer2001,Kron2008}, turbulent viscous stripping
144: \citep{Nulsen1982}, and galaxy starvation \citep{Larson1980,Bekki2002}. In addition, many
145: observational studies have been made to identify the dominant environmental processes in clusters
146: (cf., Bosselli \& Gavazzi 2006 and references therein). However, the kinds of physical processes
147: that are dominant in rapid galaxy evolution in clusters are still unclear.
148:
149: Recently, \citet{Cortese2007} (C07) found two peculiar galaxies near the central regions of rich
150: clusters Abell 1689 and Abell 2667 at $z\approx 0.2$. These galaxies have disturbed
151: morphology and are associated with many small blue blobs extending toward one side of the
152: galaxies. These blobs have absolute magnitudes of $M_B \approx -11 - -12$, corresponding to
153: masses of $10^{6-8}$ M$_{\odot}$. C07 detected [OII] emission from some of the blobs and
154: between the blobs and the host galaxies. The brightness and the size of the blobs are similar to
155: those of dwarf elliptical galaxies or ultracompact dwarf galaxies \citep{Drinkwater2004}. C07
156: suggested that the phenomena they found may be snapshots of the transformation of spiral galaxies
157: to S0 galaxies, and may give insight into the origin of cluster faint-end populations.
158:
159: Here we report the discovery of a strange complex of narrow blue filaments and knots extending
160: toward one side of a disturbed E+A galaxy, RB199, in the Coma cluster. New deep optical
161: broadband and narrowband (H$\alpha$) imaging observations of the central region of the Coma
162: cluster revealed this structure. The morphology of the structure is very similar to that of the
163: phenomena reported in C07, and the sizes and the luminosities of the knots in the structure are
164: comparable to C07's blobs. This structure may be a nearby counterpart of C07's phenomena.
165:
166: We assumed the cosmological parameters ($h_0$, $\Omega_m$, $\Omega_\lambda$) = (0.73, 0.24,
167: 0.72) and the distance modulus of the Coma cluster to be 35.05 \citep{Yagi2007}. The linear scale
168: at the Coma cluster is 474 pc arcsec$^{-1}$ under this assumption.
169:
170:
171: \section{Observation and Data Reduction}
172:
173: We observed a 34$\times$27 arcmin region near the Coma cluster center ($\alpha,\delta$)(J2000.)
174: = (12$^h$59$^m$26$^s$, +27$^{\circ}$44\arcmin 16\arcsec) with Suprime-Cam
175: \citep{Miyazaki2002} attached to the Subaru Telescope on April 28 and May 3, 2006 and May 13--
176: 15, 2007 (Table 1). The main purpose of these observations was to study the faint-end population
177: and star formation in the Coma cluster. We used two broadband filters, $B$, $R_{\rm C}$ and a
178: narrowband filter (N-A-L671, hereafter H$\alpha$ NB). The H$\alpha$ NB filter is designed for
179: observing H$\alpha$-emitting objects in the Coma cluster at $z = 0.0225$, and has a bell-shaped
180: transmission with a central wavelength of 6712 \AA\ and a FWHM of 120 \AA.
181:
182: We reduced the imaging data in the standard manner. Since some data have low S/N because of bad
183: weather, we chose better S/N images to make combined images. Photometric calibration was
184: performed using photometric standard stars observed on May 3, 2006 \citep{Yagi2007}. We
185: corrected Galactic extinction using the extinction calculator provided on the NASA/IPAC
186: Extragalactic Database (NED) Web site. The basic extinction data were obtained from
187: \citet{Schlegel1998}.
188: The limiting surface brightness of each band image was estimated from 1-$\sigma$ fluctuation
189: of sky background within a 2 arcsec diameter circular aperture. The limiting
190: surface brightness and the PSF sizes of the final images are summarized in Table 1. We subtracted
191: the $R_C$ image from the H$\alpha$ NB image to produce a continuum subtracted
192: H$\alpha$ image (``pure (net) H$\alpha$ image''). We rescaled the $R_{\rm C}$ image before the
193: subtraction using several field stars to equalize the mean flux of the stars in the $R_{\rm C}$ image
194: to that of the H$\alpha$ image. The resultant limiting surface brightness (1-$\sigma$ fluctuation in
195: a 2\arcsec\ circular aperture) of the pure H$\alpha$ image is $2.4\times 10^{-18}$ erg s$^{-1}$
196: cm$^{-2}$ arcsec$^{-2}$, if photon noise of object is negligible.
197:
198: The lengths and distances given in the following sections are all projected. Since the inclination
199: angles with respect to the sky plane of the features that we found are not known, we do not apply
200: any projection correction. The magnitudes are expressed in the Vega system unless otherwise
201: specified.
202:
203:
204: \section{Results}
205:
206: A false color image made with the $B$ (blue), the $R_{\rm C}$ (green), and the H$\alpha$ NB
207: (red) images around an amorphous galaxy RB199 (J2000.0, 12$^h$58$^m$43$^s$,
208: +27$^{\circ}$45\arcmin 43\arcsec) is shown in Figure \ref{fig1}. The centering error of the three
209: color images is less than 0.1 pixels, corresponding to 0\arcsec .02. The continuum light is not
210: subtracted from the H$\alpha$ NB image in Figure \ref{fig1}. Contour maps of the $B$ image and
211: the $R_{\rm C}$ image are shown in Figures \ref{fig2} and \ref{fig3}. Figure \ref{fig4} shows a
212: grayscale image of the pure H$\alpha$ image. A remarkable complex of blue filaments and blobs
213: and H$\alpha$-emitting clouds extends toward the south from RB199 (Figures \ref{fig1} -
214: \ref{fig4}). The overall morphology of the complex resembles a group of fireballs (large meteors)
215: shooting from the galaxy toward the south (see Figure \ref{fig1}). The complex is thus referred to
216: as the ``fireballs.'' Figure \ref{fig5} is a $B - R_{\rm C}$ color map of RB199 and the bright part
217: of the fireballs. We describe the morphological and color characteristics of RB199 and this strange
218: newly observed feature in the following subsections.
219:
220: \subsection{RB199}
221:
222: RB199 is an E+A galaxy whose projected distance from the center of the Coma cluster is about
223: 18\arcmin\, corresponding to 0.5 Mpc at the cluster \citep{Poggianti2004}. RB199's amorphous
224: morphology is clearly seen in Figure \ref{fig6}. The stellar system of RB199 is highly disturbed,
225: indicating that this galaxy is a galaxy--galaxy merger remnant. A past merger event probably
226: induced a starburst in the galaxy and now the star formation activity is in its decay phase, i.e., post-
227: starburst phase. E+A characteristics of the spectrum of the galaxy \citep{Poggianti2004} suggest
228: that massive OB stars have already died, whereas A-type stars are still alive. The
229: H$\alpha$ absorption dominant post-starburst region is distributed around the nucleus of RB199 as
230: shown in the pure H$\alpha$ image (see Figure \ref{fig4}).
231:
232: The main structure of RB199 can be divided into two parts: a central disturbed bright ``ellipse'' and
233: a smooth ``disk'' extending west of the ellipse (Figure \ref{fig6}). The position angles of the ellipse
234: and the disk are 70$^\circ$ and $-70^\circ$, respectively.
235:
236: The $B - R$ color of RB199 within a 163\arcsec\ aperture diameter is $B - R =
237: 0.99$ \citep{Poggianti2004}. Our $B - R_{\rm C}$ color map (Figure \ref{fig5}) reveals a
238: complex inner structure of color distribution in the galaxy. The central ellipse is bluer than the disk.
239: The central blue region in the central ellipse has a thick V-shaped structure and a $B - R_{\rm
240: C}$ color of $\approx 0.8-0.9$. The blue V-shaped structure is surrounded by slightly redder
241: components whose $B - R_{\rm C}$ color and position angle are $\approx 1.0$ and $\approx
242: 70^{\circ}$, respectively. The disk has a $B - R_{\rm C}$ color of $\approx 1.2$. Color
243: distribution of the disk is smooth and no clear color gradient appears.
244:
245: These characteristics suggest that a past merger concentrated the gas and stars of the progenitor
246: galaxies into the bottom of the gravitational potential of the system and induced a starburst. Some
247: of the newly formed stars from the merging process might have mixed with the preexisting disk
248: stars and formed the disk of RB199.
249:
250:
251:
252: \subsection{The fireballs}
253:
254: \subsubsection{Morphology}
255:
256: The most striking feature around RB199 is a complex of strange faint blue knots and filaments and
257: H$\alpha$-emitting ionized gas clouds extending toward the south from the galaxy (the ``fireballs'':
258: Figures \ref{fig1} - \ref{fig4}). The whole structure of the fireballs is schematically drawn in
259: Figure \ref{fig7}. We labeled several characteristic features in the fireballs, such as bright knots,
260: remarkable filaments, and extended faint clouds, as ``knot 1,'' ``filament 1,'' ``cloud 1,'' and so forth
261: (Figure \ref{fig7}). The enlarged false-color images of knots 1 to 5 are shown in Figure \ref{fig8}.
262:
263: The bright knots are located at the end of the bright blue filaments; for example, knot 1 is located at
264: the southern end of filament 1. Strong H$\alpha$ emission appears at the south sides of the bright
265: knots. Figures \ref{fig8} and \ref{fig9} clearly show this configuration. The intensity peaks of the
266: H$\alpha$ emission are slightly displaced to the south of the $B$ band intensity peaks of the bright
267: knots (see Figures \ref{fig8} and \ref{fig9}).
268:
269: The blue filaments (filament 1--filament 5) consist of several filaments with narrow, long, straight,
270: or slightly curved shapes, and lengths of $\sim 10 - 30$ kpc. The roots of the filaments appear to
271: be connected to the central ellipse of RB199 (Figure \ref{fig1}, see also Figure \ref{fig7}). The
272: most prominent filament is filament 1. It extends linearly toward knot 1, which is the brightest knot
273: in the blue filaments, and connects to filament 2 at the west side of knot 1. Filament 3 contains two
274: straight parallel filaments extending outward from the central ellipse. Filament 4 ends at knot 3 and
275: knot 4. Knot 4 is bright in H$\alpha$ emission and is smoothly connected to the most remarkable
276: H$\alpha$ feature, H$\alpha$ filament 1. H$\alpha$ filament 1 has a linear, slightly wiggled
277: morphology with a length of $\approx 15$ kpc and a width of $\approx 2$ kpc.
278:
279: The bright knots are spatially resolved. Their sizes, measured at $B$ band surface brightness of
280: 28 mag arcsec$^{-2}$, are $\sim 1 - 2$ kpc (Table 2). To estimate the half light radii (the effective
281: radii, $r_{\rm e}$) of the knots, we fitted Gaussian profiles blurred by the point spread function
282: (PSF) to the light profiles of the knots. Then we derived $r_{\rm e}$ using the relation $r_{\rm e}
283: \approx 1.18\; \sigma$. The $r_{\rm e}$ of the knots are $\approx 200-300$ pc. Although the light
284: distributions of the knots are unlikely to exhibit Gaussian profiles, the light profiles of the knots, in
285: particular knots 1, 2, and 5, are well represented with Gaussians. Thus, the $r_{\rm e}$ are good
286: approximations of the knot sizes.
287:
288: About 50 kpc from RB199 (Figure \ref{fig1}) is a faint, diffuse filament. This filament, filament 5,
289: is slightly displaced to the east from the line connecting filaments 3, 4, and H$\alpha$ filament 1
290: (see also Figure \ref{fig7}). Filament 5 is marginally detected in $R_{\rm C}$ band, indicating that
291: it is very blue. In addition, at the east and west of an elliptical galaxy G5 (located about 80 kpc
292: from RB199) are faint, diffuse H$\alpha$ clouds (Figure \ref{fig1}). They are very faint, but are
293: marginally seen in the pure H$\alpha$ image (Figure \ref{fig4}). They are also observed as faint
294: red diffuse clouds in Figure \ref{fig1}.
295:
296:
297: \subsubsection{Optical photometry}
298:
299: The results of the photometry of the fireballs are summarized in Table 2. The bright continuum
300: knots have absolute magnitudes of $M_B\sim -12$ and $M_R\sim -12- -13$. The typical $r_{\rm
301: e}$ is $\approx 200-300$ pc (see section 3.2.1). These values are similar to those of faint dwarf
302: ellipticals in the Virgo cluster (e.g., Ichikawa et al. 1990) or the faint ends of local dwarf galaxies
303: \citep{Belokurov2007}. Assuming a mass to luminosity ratio $M$/$L_R$ $ = $ 1 for these knots,
304: their masses are $\sim 10^{6-7}$ M$_\odot$. The mean color of the blue filaments are $B -
305: R_{\rm C} \approx 0.5$, corresponding to early F stars in the main sequence. The
306: H$\alpha$ luminosities of the bright knots are on the order of $10^{38}$ erg~s$^{-1}$. We did not
307: apply flux correction of possible contamination of [NII]$\lambda\lambda$6548/6583 emission for
308: the H$\alpha$ photometry. Thus, the H$\alpha$ fluxes and luminosities in Table 2 are upper limits,
309: possibly decreased by a few tens \%\ due to [NII] contamination. This uncertainty, however, does
310: not affect the following discussion. Assuming that all the H$\alpha$ emission comes from star-
311: forming regions, and using the $L_{\rm H\alpha}$ to star formation rate (SFR) conversion
312: relationship by \citet{Kennicutt1998}, we found that the corresponding SFRs of the knots are on
313: the order of $10^{-3}$ M$_\odot$~yr$^{-1}$ (Table 2). The internal reddening correction was not
314: applied in this calculation.
315:
316: The fireballs are much bluer than any region of RB199 (Figure \ref{fig5}). This suggests that the
317: stellar population or the dust contents of the fireballs is different from those of the galaxy disk.
318: Figure \ref{fig10} shows the color distribution in the fireballs. The filaments clearly grow bluer
319: with distance from the nucleus of RB199. This means either that the stellar population becomes
320: younger farther out from the galaxy, or that the filaments become dustier at shorter distances.
321:
322:
323: \subsubsection{Ultraviolet data}
324:
325: To investigate star formation activity in the fireballs, we downloaded UV images around RB199
326: from the Web site of the second data release of Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX) Nearby
327: Galaxy Survey\footnote{http://galex.stsci.edu/GR2/} \citep{Martin2005}. The FUV
328: ($\lambda\lambda 1344 - 1786$\AA) and NUV ($\lambda\lambda 1771 - 2831$\AA) contour maps
329: are superposed on the grayscale $B$ band image in Figures \ref{fig11} and \ref{fig12}.
330:
331: Note that most of the bright knots in the fireballs are bright in both the FUV and NUV bands. Knots
332: 1--5 are clearly visible both in the FUV and NUV images. In contrast, knot 6 can be seen only in
333: the FUV image. Filaments 1 and 3 are also visible in the NUV image. In addition, very faint
334: features are marginally detected in both FUV and NUV images at the position of filament 5
335: (Figures \ref{fig11} and \ref{fig12}).
336:
337: The UV magnitudes listed on the GALEX Web site and the ${\rm FUV} - B$ colors in the AB
338: system for the bright knots are summarized in Table 3. All the bright knots are detected in the FUV
339: band. Although knot 5 is visible in the NUV image (Figure \ref{fig12}), the NUV magnitude is not
340: listed on the Web site. We thus measured the NUV magnitude of knot 5 directly from the NUV
341: image, calibrating using the magnitude of knot 1. We also obtained the NUV magnitudes of
342: filaments 1 and 3 in the NUV image (Table 3).
343:
344: Knot 1 and 2 have FUV magnitudes of $\approx 21.5$ and the ${\rm FUV} - {\rm NUV}$ colors
345: of these knots are almost flat. Knot $3 + 4$ is about one magnitude fainter than knots 1 and 2 in the
346: NUV, and slightly redder. Knot 5 and 6 are almost two magnitudes fainter than knots 1 and 2 in the
347: FUV band. Using the conversion formula from FUV and NUV magnitudes to SFR by
348: \citet{Iglesias2006}, we derived the SFRs of knots 1--3 as $\sim 2-5 \times 10^{-
349: 3}$ M$_\odot$~yr$^{-1}$ from the FUV magnitudes and $\sim 6-10 \times 10^{-
350: 3}$ M$_\odot$~yr$^{-1}$ from the NUV magnitudes. These values are somewhat larger than, but
351: still consistent with, the SFRs derived from H$\alpha$ luminosities (see Table 2).
352:
353: Note that the ${\rm FUV} - B$ colors of the bright knots are all very blue, $-0.5- -0.9$, indicating
354: that active star formation occurs in the knots. These blue colors and the strong H$\alpha$ emission
355: seen at the southern sides of the bright knots strongly support the argument that the knots are
356: current star-forming sites. Comparison of the optical-UV colors of the fireballs with color
357: evolution models of star-forming galaxies is made in the next section.
358:
359:
360: \subsubsection{Comparison of the colors with star-formation models}
361:
362: To estimate the age of the filaments, we compared their colors with model calculations of color
363: evolution of star-forming stellar systems using PEGASE Ver.2 \citep{Fioc1997}. We assumed that
364: the initial mass function (IMF) follows the Salpeter IMF from 0.1 M$_\odot$ to 120 M$_\odot$.
365: Initial metallicity is 0.2 Z$_\odot$ in this calculation. Dust extinction was not included in our
366: calculations. We derived color evolutions for four cases: constant star formation (``CS'' model),
367: exponentially decaying star formation with a decay timescale of 100 Myr (``E100'' model), 200
368: Myr (``E200'' model), and 300 Myr (``E300'' model).
369:
370: Figures \ref{fig13} and \ref{fig14} show a color--color diagram of the $B - R_{\rm C}$ to ${\rm
371: FUV} - B$, $B - R_{\rm C}$ to ${\rm FUV} - B$, respectively. All the colors of the bright knots
372: are consistent with the E200 model or the E300 model with an age of several times $10^8$ yr to 1
373: Gyr (Figures \ref{fig13} and \ref{fig14}). Figure \ref{fig14} also shows that the colors of the blue
374: filaments close to the galaxy (filaments 1 and 3) are somewhat older than the bright knots, and are
375: consistent with the E300 model with an age older than 1 Gyr, or the E200 model with an age of 1
376: Gyr. Dust extinction trends are shown as arrows at the right-bottom corners of Figures \ref{fig13}
377: and Figure \ref{fig14}.
378: We derived the extinction trends using the reddening curve of star-forming galaxies proposed
379: by \citet{Calzetti2000}.
380: In both figures, the extinction trends almost follow the model loci along the
381: age sequence. If dust extinction is present in the knots, their predicted ages are much younger; in
382: other words, the ages estimated with Figures \ref{fig13} and \ref{fig14} are the maximum values
383: for the knots. We thus conclude that the average maximum age of the bright knots is several times
384: $10^8$ yr, and the maximum ages of the blue filaments that are located closer than the knots to the
385: galaxy are around 1 Gyr.
386:
387: Although we have no UV data for the other filaments of the fireballs, we roughly estimate their
388: ages using optical $B - R_{\rm C}$ color only. Using the E300 model, the ages of $\sim 700$ Myr,
389: $\sim 1.2$ Gyr, and $\sim 500$ Myr are estimated for filament 2, filament 4, and
390: H$\alpha$ filament 1, respectively, in the case of no dust extinction. The most distant blue filament,
391: filament 5, is very blue, and its age is estimated to be much younger than 500 Myr. In conclusion,
392: the maximum age of the filaments within 20 kpc from the galaxy is $\sim 1$ Gyr, that of the knots
393: at 20--40 kpc from the galaxy is $\sim 500-1000$ Myr, and that of the farthest filaments is $\leq
394: 500$ Myr.
395:
396: This age gradient indicates that the stellar components of the fireballs would be formed after the
397: stripping event. In other words, the gas stripped by some mechanism from the disk of RB199
398: travels in the intergalactic space, forming stars and leaving the formed stars along its trajectory.
399: This hypothesis is supported by the spatial distribution of the H$\alpha$ emission and the bright
400: knots. The bright H$\alpha$ clouds are located at the southern edges of the bright knots and
401: almost no H$\alpha$ emission is observed in the blue filaments. This
402: indicates that active star formation is now ongoing at the far end of the blue filaments. The
403: hypothesis may also be supported by the fact that the ages of the filaments and knots are roughly
404: consistent with the travel time from the galaxy to the edge of the fireballs ($\sim 60-80$ kpc),
405: assuming that the outflow velocity of the stripped material is on the order of $10^2$ km~s$^{-1}$.
406: Although the velocities of the filaments and the knots are not known, outflow velocities of an order
407: of $10^2$ km~s$^{-1}$ were observed in similar stripping phenomena
408: (e.g. Yoshida et al. 2004; Cortese et al. 2006; Yagi et al. 2007).
409:
410: The color gradient in the blue filaments could also be interpreted as due to dust absorption. If this is
411: the case, the above discussion of age gradient loses its meaning. However, the stellar population of
412: the fireballs is certainly very young because dust absorption correction makes the true colors of the
413: fireballs bluer than the observed ones (see Figures \ref{fig13} and \ref{fig14}), which strengthens
414: the premise that the stars were formed very recently.
415:
416:
417: \section{Formation Mechanism of the Fireballs}
418:
419: The newly found strange feature, the ``fireballs,'' around RB199 is extended in one direction from
420: the galaxy as a group of narrow blue filaments and bright knots with which H$\alpha$ and UV
421: emission are associated. Here we discuss possible fireball formation mechanisms.
422:
423: C07 found many small blobs extending to one side of galaxies near the cores of two $z \approx
424: 0.2$ rich clusters in the course of a cluster survey with $Hubble$ $Space$ $Telescope$ Advanced
425: Camera for Survey. \citet{Sun2007} also reported many star-forming blobs distributed around a
426: very long X-ray/H$\alpha$ tail of a galaxy in the nearby rich cluster Abell~3627. The blobs
427: found by C07 are distributed in faint optical filaments (C07). They detected [OII] emission around
428: some of the blobs, which indicates that star formation is under way in and around the blobs. The
429: morphology and colors of the blobs and the filaments found by C07 are very similar to the fireballs
430: of RB199. They argued that tidal stripping by interaction between deep cluster gravitational
431: potential and/or ram pressure stripping by high-speed collision between the galaxies and the
432: intra-cluster medium (ICM) are responsible for forming the strange blobs they found. Following C07, we
433: examine the above two processes for validity as the formation mechanism of the fireballs.
434:
435: \subsection{Tidal stripping}
436:
437: Tidal forces induced by galaxy--galaxy interaction disrupt the stellar disks and often throw stars far
438: from the galaxies. Since RB199 appears to be a merger, it is natural to interpret the fireballs as tidal
439: tails formed by tidal force induced by the merging process. The morphology of the fireballs is,
440: however, very strange compared to other merger tidal tails such as NGC~4038/39
441: \citep{Schweizer1978}, NGC~7252 \citep{Hibbard1996}, Arp299 \citep{Hibbard1999}, and
442: IRAS~19254--7245 \citep{Mirabel1991}. In many cases, tidal tails of merging galaxies have long
443: smooth morphologies extending in one or two directions from the merger main body
444: \citep{Hibbard1996}. The disrupted, multiple filamentary, ``splash''-like morphology of the
445: fireballs of RB199 is very rare and peculiar. Thus, from a morphological point of view, it is
446: unlikely that a past merging event is responsible for forming the fireballs, although we can not rule
447: out some special situation or conditions during the merger that produced such peculiar tidal features.
448:
449: Tidal forces induced by interactions between RB199 and its nearby galaxies may strip the disk gas
450: and stars of RB199 and may form the fireballs. In fact, several galaxies appear in the vicinity of
451: RB199 (G1--G4 in Figure \ref{fig2}). Among these galaxies, G1 has a radial velocity of 6665
452: km~s$^{-1}$ \citep{Colless1996}, indicating that this galaxy is a Coma member. However, no
453: tidal features---bridges, tails, ripples, and so on---appear around G1. Those features are also not
454: found around G2--G4. Another candidate galaxy that can strip the disk gas of RB199 is the galaxy
455: about 80 kpc south of RB199 (G5 in Figure \ref{fig2}). This galaxy is located in the extension line
456: of the fireballs, but the morphology of this galaxy exhibits no sign of strong tidal disturbances. To
457: strip the outer disk of a galaxy through tidal forces in close encounters with other galaxies, without
458: disturbing the perturbing galaxies, the perturbers must be more massive than the mass of the
459: perturbed galaxy. All of the above mentioned galaxies are, however, much fainter than RB199,
460: meaning that these galaxies are less massive than RB199. Furthermore, the colors of G2, G3, and
461: G4 are significantly redder than the average color of Coma ellipticals, indicating that these are
462: background galaxies. In fact, the photometric redshifts of these galaxies determined by the SDSS
463: project are $\sim 0.3-0.4$. Therefore, it is not plausible that these galaxies significantly perturbed
464: RB199 in the past.
465:
466: The deep gravitational potential of a rich cluster of galaxies exerts strong tidal forces on galaxies
467: crossing its core region. When a galaxy crosses a cluster core region, if the radial acceleration by
468: the cluster gravity exceeds the centrifugal acceleration of the crossing galaxy, the outer part of the
469: galaxy is stripped by the tidal force of the cluster (C07). The radial acceleration $a_{\rm c}$ by a
470: cluster core whose mass within $r$ is $M_{\rm c}$ is written as
471: \begin{equation}
472: a_{\rm c} =
473: {\rm G} M_{\rm c} \; \left[ \frac{1}{r^2} - \frac{1}{(r + R)^2} \right],
474: \end{equation}
475: where $R$ is the radius of the crossing galaxy and $r$ is the distance between the galaxy and the
476: cluster center.
477: The centrifugal acceleration of the galaxy is written as
478: \begin{equation}
479: a_{\rm gal} = {\rm G} \frac{M_{\rm gal}}{R^2},
480: \end{equation}
481: where $M_{\rm gal}$ is the mass of the galaxy. The projected distance from the center of the
482: Coma cluster and RB199 is $\approx 0.5$ Mpc. The total (stars + gas + dark matter) mass of the
483: Coma cluster within the radius of 0.5 Mpc was estimated as $\approx 3 \times
484: 10^{14}$ M$_\odot$ \citep{Lokas2003}. The $R$ band luminosity of RB199 is $1.4 \times
485: 10^9$ L$_\odot$ \citep{Mob2001}. Thus, assuming $M$/$L_R \sim 2 - 3$, which is a typical
486: value of disk $M/L$ ratios for nearby spiral galaxies
487: \citep{Forbes1992,Palunas2000,Yoshino2008}, the mass of the disk of RB199 is calculated as $3-
488: 4 \times 10^9$ M$_\odot$. The roots of the blue filaments are all connected to the central ellipse of
489: RB199; thus, the effective radius of the disturbed region of the galaxy is that of the ellipse, i.e., $R
490: \sim 5$ kpc. With these values, one can surmise that $a_{\rm gal}$ is one order of magnitude
491: larger than $a_{\rm c}$. This means that the cluster potential can hardly strip the outer disk
492: component of RB199. Even if the $M$/$L_R$ of the galaxy is almost unity, $a_{\rm gal}$ is still
493: larger than $a_{\rm c}$. Therefore, tidal stripping by cluster--galaxy interaction is not a possible
494: candidate for a formation mechanism of the fireballs around RB199.
495:
496:
497: \subsection{Ram pressure stripping}
498:
499: When a gas-rich disk galaxy collides with the hot ICM at high speed ($v\sim 10^3$ km s$^{-1}$),
500: ram pressure from the ICM strips massive amounts of gas from the galaxy. This process, ram
501: pressure stripping, has been discussed in many studies as an efficient gas removing mechanism for
502: galaxies in clusters
503: \citep{Gunn1972,Abadi1999,Fujita1999,Vollmer2001,Schulz2001,Bekki2003,Roediger2007}.
504: From an observational point of view, \citet{Cayatte1990,Cayatte1994} found that HI gas is
505: significantly deficient for spiral galaxies in the core region of the Virgo cluster.
506: \citet{Bravo2000,Bravo2001} found strong HI deficiency for bright spiral galaxies inside a radius
507: of 0.6 Mpc from the center of the Coma cluster. In addition, detailed case studies have been carried
508: out for many objects through optical and radio observations (NGC~4388: Yoshida et al. 2002,
509: 2004; Vollmer \& Huchtmeier 2003; Oosterloo \& van Gorkom 2005; NGC~4402: Crowl et al.
510: 2005; NGC~4438: Chemin et al. 2005; NGC~4522: Kenny \& Koopmann 1999; Vollmer et al.
511: 2004).
512:
513: The position and the velocity of RB199 suggest that the galaxy suffers strong ram pressure from the
514: ICM through high-speed collision with it. RB199 is located at the edge of the dense ICM associated
515: with the main body of the Coma cluster \citep{Poggianti2004}. In addition, the radial velocity of
516: RB199 ($v \approx 8700$ km~s$^{-1}$; Mobasher et al. 2001) is quite large with respect to the
517: mean radial velocity of the Coma cluster ($v \approx 6500$ km~s$^{-1}$). To determine whether
518: the disk gas of RB199 can be stripped, we try to estimate the ram pressure stripping radius $R_{\rm
519: strip}$ for the RB199 case. When the distribution of stars and gas of the galaxy disk is a double
520: exponential, $R_{\rm strip}$ is estimated as
521: \begin{equation}
522: R_{\rm strip} = 0.5 R_{\rm 0} \times ln \left[ \frac{{\rm G} M_{\rm star} M_{\rm gas}}{v^2\;
523: \rho_{\rm ICM}\; 2 \pi R_{\rm 0}^4} \right],
524: \end{equation}
525: where $M_{\rm star}$ and $M_{\rm gas}$ are the mass of the stars and the gas in the galaxy disk,
526: respectively, $v$ is the galaxy velocity relative to the ICM, $\rho_{\rm ICM}$ is the density of the
527: ICM, and $R_{\rm 0}$ is the radial scale length of the disk \citep{Domainko2006}. Substituting
528: $4.2 \times 10^9$ M$_\odot$, $\sim 10^8$ M$_\odot$, $\sim 10^{-4}$ cm$^{-3}$ and $\sim
529: 2000$ km~s$^{-1}$ for $M_{\rm star}$, $M_{\rm gas}$, $\rho_{\rm ICM}$ and $v$,
530: respectively, we obtain
531: \begin{equation}
532: R_{\rm strip} = 0.5 \left( \frac{R_{\rm 0}}{{\rm kpc}} \right) \times ln \left[ 25.4 \times
533: \left( \frac{R_{\rm 0}}{{\rm kpc}} \right)^{-4} \right].
534: \end{equation}
535: We fitted an exponential disk function to the light profile of the central ellipse of RB199 along
536: PA$ = $70$^{\circ}$ and found that $R_{\rm 0} \approx 1.5$ kpc. Note that RB199 has an
537: irregular shape and does not have a clear exponential disk. Hence the $R_{\rm 0}$ we derived
538: above is not a correct ``effective radius.'' This $R_{\rm 0}$ is, however, an indicator of the surface
539: density distribution of the galaxy, and thus is useful for determining whether the disk gas of RB199
540: can be stripped by the ram pressure of the ICM. With this value, we derived $R_{\rm strip} \approx
541: 1.2$ kpc. This means that almost all the gas in the disk of RB199 would be stripped by the
542: ram pressure of the ICM.
543:
544: The morphology of the fireballs also supports the ram pressure stripping hypothesis. The fireballs
545: extend from one side of RB199, and ram pressure stripping forms a filamentary structure extending
546: on one side from the colliding galaxy
547: (Abadi et al. 1999; Quilis, Moor \& Bower 2000; Roediger \& Hensler 2005;
548: Kronberger et al. 2008). In
549: addition, the configuration in which the ionized gas is far more extended than the stars (the blue
550: filaments and the bright knots) is naturally explained by ram pressure. The gas clouds undergo the
551: ram pressure of the ICM and are accelerated by it continuously after the stripping, whereas the stars
552: are not affected by the ram pressure and suffer the gravitational force of the galaxy. Hence the gas
553: clouds stretch far away from the galaxy while the stars remain relatively nearby. Therefore, we
554: propose that ram pressure stripping is the primary formation mechanism of the fireballs.
555:
556: A major argument against the ram pressure stripping hypothesis is the fact that the blue filaments
557: and the bright knots of the fireballs consist mainly of stars. Ram pressure stripping can remove only
558: gas from a galaxy and cannot greatly affect the stellar system of the galaxy. Stars are too massive,
559: and their collisional cross sections are too small, to respond to drag force from the ram pressure of
560: the ICM flow. However, note that the stellar population of the fireballs is very young and must
561: largely have been formed after stripping from the host galaxy. In other words, only the gas in the
562: disk was stripped in the initial phase, and the stars were then formed in the stripped gas.
563:
564: Sun et al. (2007) also argued that the blue blobs they found may have been formed in the stripped
565: gas by the ram pressure. Recently, \citet{Kron2008} performed numerical simulations focusing on
566: star formation due to ram pressure stripping and found that strong star formation is triggered in the
567: central region of their model galaxy as well as in the stripped gas filaments behind the galaxy. The
568: star formation blobs, whose sizes and masses are of an order of 1 kpc and 10$^7$ M$_\odot$,
569: respectively, extended up to 100 kpc from the galaxy \citep{Kron2008}. In their simulations, the
570: stripped gas filaments have narrow and slightly wiggled straight shapes, whereas the newly formed
571: stars form somewhat diffuse wide filaments. Note that the mass and size of the blobs and the
572: morphology of the complex of the blobs and the filaments derived in the simulations of
573: \citet{Kron2008} strongly resemble those of the fireballs we found around RB199. Accordingly,
574: Kronberger et al.'s results strongly support the hypothesis that the fireballs are formed by ram
575: pressure stripping.
576:
577: In the case that ram pressure stripping is the primary fireball formation driver, the stripped neutral
578: hydrogen (HI) gas would be observed around RB199. Bravo-Alfaro et al. (2000, 2001) made deep
579: HI observations of the Coma cluster using the VLA. RB199 and its surrounding area were within
580: the observation areas of fields 7 and 10 in their study \citep{Bravo2000}. They observed no sign of
581: HI gas around RB199. The primary cause for this is that the recession velocity of RB199 ($\approx
582: 8700$ km s$^{-1}$) is far outside the frequency bands (6.25 MHz) of their observations, which
583: were centered at radial velocities of 5500 km s$^{-1}$ (``field 7'') and 7300 km s$^{-1}$ (``field
584: 10'') \citep{Bravo2000}.
585:
586: \subsection{Ram pressure stripping with galaxy--galaxy merger}
587:
588: The morphology of RB199 indicates that this galaxy is a merger remnant. We are thus led to the
589: idea that a galaxy--galaxy merger in addition to ram pressure of the ICM may have played an
590: important role in efficiently stripping the gas from RB199. A galaxy--galaxy merger perturbs the
591: interstellar gas in the galaxy disk significantly, and some portion of the gas would flare up above
592: the disk. A combination of this effect and the ram pressure may make gas stripping from the galaxy
593: very efficient. \citet{Struck2004} performed numerical simulations of ram pressure stripping for
594: merging galaxies infalling to a cluster. Their results support that the above simple picture is correct
595: in principle. They found that strongly interacting galaxy pairs tend to be stripped of much more gas
596: than isolated galaxies by the ram pressure of the ICM \citep{Struck2004}. This process may be
597: very efficient in stripping the interstellar medium from a galaxy disk, and may strip heavy elements
598: other than HI gas, such as metals, molecules, or dust that make star formation in the stripped gas
599: possible.
600:
601: One of the most striking features formed by a combination of galaxy--galaxy interaction and ram
602: pressure stripping ever found is the Blue Infalling Group (BIG) in Abell 1367
603: \citep{Sakai2002,Gavazze2003,Cortese2006}. Very extended ionized gas filaments and blue tails
604: are observed in BIG \citep{Cortese2006}. In addition, many star-forming dwarf galaxies are
605: distributed in BIG \citep{Sakai2002}. \citet{Cortese2006} concluded that the combined action of
606: tidal forces among the galaxies and ram pressure by the ICM produced that peculiar structure.
607: Although BIG is much larger and more luminous than the fireballs around RB199, the phenomena
608: appear similar. In addition, the host galaxies of the blobs of C07 and Sun et al. (2007) have
609: disturbed morphologies, suggesting a past merger. These observational results support the idea that
610: a galaxy--galaxy interaction/merger in addition to ram pressure stripping may make a significant
611: contribution to the formation of fireballs and similar objects.
612:
613: In conclusion, ram pressure stripping is the key driver in fireball formation. A galaxy--galaxy
614: merger in addition to the ram pressure may make a considerable contribution to their formation.
615: Tidal interactions between RB199 and the gravitational potential of the Coma cluster would not be
616: strong enough to play a major role in formation of the fireballs.
617:
618:
619:
620: \section{Summary}
621:
622: We found a strange complex (the ``fireballs'') of blue filaments and H$\alpha$ clouds that extends
623: up to 80 kpc toward the south from the merging galaxy RB199 in the Coma cluster. The narrow
624: blue filaments are extended in straight shapes and several bright blue knots are located at the south
625: end of the blue filaments. Strong H$\alpha$ emission is associated with the knots. In addition, faint,
626: narrow H$\alpha$-emitting filaments extend farther from the southern edge of the knots.
627:
628: The total $B$ and $R_{\rm C}$ magnitudes of the fireballs are 19.87 and 19.33, respectively. The
629: luminosities of the H$\alpha$ emission associated with the bright knots are $ 1-6 \times
630: 10^{38}$ erg s$^{-1}$, which correspond to a star-formation rate of $\sim 10^{-
631: 3}$ M$_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$, assuming all the H$\alpha$ comes from star-forming activity. The
632: average color of the fireballs is $B - R_{\rm C}\approx 0.5$, which is bluer than RB199 ($B -
633: R_{\rm C} = 0.99$), and the blue filaments and the bright knots grow bluer with distance from the
634: nucleus of the galaxy. These observational facts suggest that the stars of which the fireballs are
635: composed were formed within several times $10^8$ yr and that the stellar population grows
636: younger farther from the galaxy.
637:
638: Almost no H$\alpha$ emission is observed in the blue filaments but strong H$\alpha$ and UV emissions
639: are associated with the bright knots. These characteristics indicate that star formation has already
640: ceased in the blue filaments and is now in progress in the bright knots. The gas stripped by some
641: mechanism from the disk of RB199 may be traveling in the intergalactic space, forming stars and
642: leaving the formed stars along its trajectories. The $R_{\rm C}$-band absolute magnitudes, the half
643: light radii, and the estimated masses of bright knots in the fireballs are $\sim -12 - -13$ mag, $\sim
644: 200-300$ pc and $\sim 10^{6-7}$ M$_{\odot}$, respectively. These values are similar to those of
645: faint dwarf spheroidals in the Virgo cluster or the faint end of local dwarf galaxies. This suggests
646: that the bright knots are gravitationally self-bound systems.
647:
648: The most plausible formation mechanism of the fireballs is ram pressure stripping by the hot ICM.
649: Tidal stripping by galaxy--galaxy interaction or galaxy--cluster interaction would not be a primary
650: mechanism for the formation of the fireballs. A galaxy--galaxy merger, however, is probably
651: important to make subsequent ram pressure stripping of the ICM more effective in forming this
652: strange structure.
653:
654: Although whether the stars in the fireballs are all gravitationally bound to RB199 is not known,
655: some structures close to the galaxy may fall back to the galaxy in the future, oscillating between the
656: two sides of the galaxy disk and eventually forming the halo star population of RB199.
657: %\citet{Kron2008} discuss that most of the stars formed in the stripped gas in
658: %their simulations are gravitationally bound to the host galaxy and will
659: %fall back to the galaxy within 1 Gyr.
660: Some part of the fireballs may be stripped from RB199 in the future by tidal interaction with
661: nearby galaxies or the cluster gravitational potential, even if they are currently bound to the galaxy.
662: If this is the case, the stripped stars may form a diffuse intra-cluster population
663: \citep{Gregg1998,Okamura2002,Murante2004,Krick2006,Gerhard2007}.
664:
665:
666: The fireballs we found in the Coma cluster resemble the compact young blobs found by C07 and
667: Sun et al. (2007) around some cluster galaxies. C07 argued that formation of these compact blobs is
668: rather rare in clusters at $z \approx 0.2$. They found only two examples out of 130 cluster spiral
669: galaxies at $z \approx 0.2$. They also predicted that these features would be more remarkable at $z
670: \geq 0.2$ because the galaxy infalling rate and the gas content of each galaxy are higher in high-
671: $z$ clusters than in local clusters. However, our findings show that formation of compact stellar
672: systems like C07's blobs around cluster galaxies is still ongoing in the local universe. The Coma
673: cluster has a large substructure of the ICM and a group of galaxies associated with this substructure,
674: indicating that this cluster itself is a merging system \citep{Colless1996}. RB199 is located near
675: the border between the main body and the substructure of the ICM \citep{Poggianti2004}. The
676: special conditions of the Coma cluster and RB199 may produce a special environment around
677: RB199,namely, high-ensity ambient gas, high-peed infall, and/or frequent galaxy--galaxy
678: interactions
679:
680:
681: \acknowledgments
682:
683: We thank the staff of the Subaru telescope for their kind help with the observations.
684: This work was carried out in part using data obtained by a collaborative study on the Coma cluster.
685: We thank our collaborators in this study, David Carter, Alister Graham, Shardha Jogee, Neal Miller,
686: and Bahram Mobasher, for their encouragement and helpful comments. We also thank Ikuru Iwata
687: for his help in calculating the color evolution model of a star-forming galaxy.
688: We are grateful to the anonymous referee for constructive suggestions that helped to greatly
689: improve the manuscript. This study was in part carried out using the facilities at the Astronomy
690: Data Center (ADC), National Astronomical Observatory of Japan. This research made
691: use of NASA's Astrophysics Data System Abstract Service, NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database,
692: and GALEX Release 2 database. We thank the National Institute of Information and
693: Communications Technology for their support on the high-speed network connection for data
694: transfer and analysis. This work was financially supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific
695: Research (B) No.18340055 from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
696: (JSPS).
697:
698: %----------------------------------------------------------------------------
699: \begin{thebibliography}{}
700:
701: \bibitem[Abadi, Moore \& Bower(1999)]{Abadi1999}
702: Abadi, M. G., Moore, B., \& Bower, R. G. 1999, \mnras, 308, 947
703:
704: \bibitem[Adami et al.(2007)]{Adami2007}
705: Adami, C., et al. 2007, \aap, 472, 749
706:
707: \bibitem[Bekki \& Couch(2003)]{Bekki2003}
708: Bekki, K., \& Couch, W. J. 2003, \apjl, 596, L13
709:
710: \bibitem[Bekki, Couch \& Shioya(2002)]{Bekki2002}
711: Bekki, K., Couch, W. J., \& Shioya, Y. 2002, \apj, 577, 651
712:
713: \bibitem[Belokurov et al.(2007)]{Belokurov2007}
714: Belokurov, V., et al. 2007, \apj, 654, 897
715:
716: \bibitem[Boselli \& Gavazzi(2006)]{Boselli2006}
717: Boselli, A., \& Gavazzi, G. 2006, \pasp, 118, 517
718:
719: \bibitem[Bravo-Alfaro et al.(2000)]{Bravo2000}
720: Bravo-Alfaro, H., Cayatte, V., van Gorkom, J. H., \& Balkowski, C. 2000, \aj, 119, 580
721:
722: \bibitem[Bravo-Alfaro et al.(2001)]{Bravo2001}
723: Bravo-Alfaro, H., Cayatte, V., van Gorkom, J. H., \& Balkowski, C. 2001, \aap, 379, 347
724:
725: \bibitem[Butcher \& Oemler(1978)]{Butcher1978}
726: Butcher, H., \& Oemler, A. 1978, \apj, 219, 18
727:
728: \bibitem[Butcher \& Oemler(1984)]{Butcher1984}
729: Butcher, H., \& Oemler, A. 1984, \apj, 285, 426
730:
731: \bibitem[Calzetti et al.(2000)]{Calzetti2000}
732: Calzetti, D. et al. 2000, \apj, 533, 682
733:
734: \bibitem[Cayatte et al.(1990)]{Cayatte1990}
735: Cayatte, V., van Gorkom, J. H., Balkowski, C., \& Kotanyi, C. 1990, \aj, 100, 604
736:
737: \bibitem[Cayatte et al.(1994)]{Cayatte1994}
738: Cayatte, V., Kotanyi, C., Balkowski, C., \& van Gorkom, J. H. 1994, \aj, 107, 1003
739:
740: \bibitem[Chemin et al.(2005)]{Chemin2005}
741: Chemin, L., et al. 2005, \aap, 436, 469
742:
743: \bibitem[Colless \& Dunn(1996)]{Colless1996}
744: Colless, M., \& Dunn, A. M. 1996, \apj, 458, 435
745:
746: \bibitem[Conselice \& Gallagher(1998)]{Conselice1998}
747: Conselice, C. J., \& Gallagher, J. S. 1998, \mnras, 297, L34
748:
749: \bibitem[Cortese et al.(2006)]{Cortese2006}
750: Cortese, L., et al. 2006, \aap, 453, 847
751:
752: \bibitem[Cortese et al.(2007)]{Cortese2007}
753: Cortese, L., et al. 2007, \mnras, 376, 157 (C07)
754:
755: \bibitem[Crowl et al.(2005)]{Crowl2005}
756: Crowl, H. H., Kenney, J. D. P., van Gorkom, J. H., \& Vollmer, B. 2005, \apj, 130, 65
757:
758: \bibitem[Domainko et al.(2006)]{Domainko2006}
759: Domainko, W., et al. 2006, \aap, 452, 795
760:
761: \bibitem[Dressler(1980)]{Dressler1980}
762: Dressler, A. 1980, \apj, 236, 351
763:
764: \bibitem[Dressler(1994)]{Dressler1994}
765: Dressler, A. 1994, \apj, 430, 107
766:
767: \bibitem[Dressler et al.(1997)]{Dressler1997}
768: Dressler, A., et al. 1997, \apj, 490, 577
769:
770: \bibitem[Drinkwater et al.(2004)]{Drinkwater2004}
771: Drinkwater, M. J., et al. 2004, PASA, 21, 375
772:
773: \bibitem[Evstigneeva et al.(2007)]{Evs2007}
774: Evstigneeva, E. A., Gregg, M. D., Drinkwater, M. J., \& Hilker, M. 2007, \aj, 133, 1722
775:
776: \bibitem[Farouki \& Shapiro(1981)]{Farouki1981}
777: Farouki, R., \& Shapiro, S. L. 1981, \apj, 243, 32
778:
779: \bibitem[Fioc \& Rocca-Volmerange(1997)]{Fioc1997}
780: Fioc, M., \& Rocca-Volmerange, B. 1997, \aap, 326, 950
781:
782: \bibitem[Forbes(1992)]{Forbes1992}
783: Forbes, D. A. 1992, \aaps, 92, 583
784:
785: \bibitem[Fujita \& Nagashima(1999)]{Fujita1999}
786: Fujita, Y., \& Nagashima, M. 1999, \apj, 516, 619.
787:
788: \bibitem[Gavazzi et al.(2003)]{Gavazze2003}
789: Gavazzi, G., et al. 2003, \apj, 597, 210
790:
791: \bibitem[Gerhard et al.(2007)]{Gerhard2007}
792: Gerhard, O., et al. 2007, \aap, 468, 815-822
793:
794: \bibitem[Goto et al.(2003)]{Goto2003}
795: Goto, T., et al. 2003, \mnras, 346, 601
796:
797: \bibitem[Gregg \& West(1998)]{Gregg1998}
798: Gregg, M. D., \& West, M. J. 1998, \nat, 396, 549
799:
800: \bibitem[Gunn \& Gott(1972)]{Gunn1972}
801: Gunn, J. E., \& Gott, J. R. 1972, \apj, 176, 1
802:
803: \bibitem[Harsono \& De Propris(2007)]{Harsono2007}
804: Harsono, D., \& De Propris, R. 2007, \mnras, 380, 1036
805:
806: \bibitem[Henriksen \& Byrd(1996)]{Henriksen1996}
807: Henriksen, M., \& Byrd, G. 1996, \apj, 459, 82
808:
809: \bibitem[Hibbard \& van Gorkom(1996)]{Hibbard1996}
810: Hibbard, J. E., \& van Gorkom, J. H. 1996, \aj, 111, 655
811:
812: \bibitem[Hibbard \& Yun(1999)]{Hibbard1999}
813: Hibbard, J. E., \& Yun, M. S. 1999, \aj, 118, 162
814:
815: \bibitem[Hilker et al.(2007)]{Hilker2007}
816: Hilker, M., et al. 2007, \aap, 463, 119
817:
818: \bibitem[Icke(1985)]{Icke1985}
819: Icke, V. 1985, \aap, 144, 115
820:
821: \bibitem[Iglesias-Paramo et al.(2006)]{Iglesias2006}
822: Iglesias-Paramo, J., et al. 2006, \apjs, 164, 38
823:
824: \bibitem[J$\acute{\rm a}$chym et al.(2007)]{Jac2007}
825: J$\acute{\rm a}$chym, P, et al. 2007, \aap, 472, 5
826:
827: \bibitem[Kennicutt(1998)]{Kennicutt1998}
828: Kennicutt, R. C. 1998, \apj, 498, 541
829:
830: \bibitem[Kenny \& Koopmann(1999)]{Kenny1999}
831: Kenny, J. D. P., \& Koopmann, R. A. 1999, \aj, 117, 181
832:
833: \bibitem[Krick, Bernstein \& Pimbblet(2006)]{Krick2006}
834: Krick, J. E., Bernstein, R. A., \& Pimbblet, K. A. 2006, \aj, 131, 168
835:
836: \bibitem[Kronberger et al.(2008)]{Kron2008}
837: Kronberger, T., Kapferer, W., Ferrari, C., Unterguggenberger, S., \& Schindler, S. 2008, \aap, 481,
838: 337
839:
840: \bibitem[Larson, Tinsley \& Caldwell(1980)]{Larson1980}
841: Larson, R. B., Tinsley, B. M., \& Caldwell, C. N. 1980, \apj, 237, 692
842:
843: \bibitem[Lokas \& Mamon(2003)]{Lokas2003}
844: Lokas, E. L., \& Mamon, G. A. 2003, \mnras, 343, 401
845:
846: \bibitem[Martin et al.(2005)]{Martin2005}
847: Martin, D. C., et al. 2005, \apj, 619, L1
848:
849: \bibitem[Milne et al.(2007)]{Milne2007}
850: Milne, M. L., et al. 2007, \aj, 133, 177
851:
852: \bibitem[Mirabel, Lutz \& Maza(1991)]{Mirabel1991}
853: Mirabel, I. F., Lutz, D., \& Maza, J. 1991, \aap, 243, 367
854:
855: \bibitem[Miyazaki et al.(2002)]{Miyazaki2002}
856: Miyazaki, S., et al. 2002, \pasj, 54, 833
857:
858: \bibitem[Mobasher et al.(2001)]{Mob2001}
859: Mobasher, B., et al. 2001, \apjs, 137, 279
860:
861: \bibitem[Moore et al.(1996)]{Moore1996}
862: Moore, B., Katz, N., Lake, G., Dressler, A., \& Oemler, A. 1996, \nat, 379, 613
863:
864: \bibitem[Murante et al.(2004)]{Murante2004}
865: Murante, G., et al. 2004, \apjl, 607, L83
866:
867: \bibitem[Nulsen(1982)]{Nulsen1982}
868: Nulsen, P. E. J. 1982, \mnras, 198, 1007
869:
870: \bibitem[Okamura et al.(2002)]{Okamura2002}
871: Okamura, S., et al. 2002, \pasj, 54, 883
872:
873: \bibitem[Oosterloo \& van Gorkom(2005)]{Oosterloo2005}
874: Oosterloo, T., \& van Gorkom, J., 2005, \aap, 437, L19
875:
876: \bibitem[Palunas \& Williams(2000)]{Palunas2000}
877: Palunas, P., \& Williams, T. B., \aj, 120, 2884
878:
879: \bibitem[Poggianti et al.(1999)]{Poggianti1999}
880: Poggianti, B. M., et al. 1999, \apj, 518, 576
881:
882: \bibitem[Possianti et al.(2001)]{Possiganti2001}
883: Poggianti, B. M., et al. 2001, \apj, 562, 689
884:
885: \bibitem[Poggianti et al.(2004)]{Poggianti2004}
886: Poggianti, B. M., et al. 2004, \apj, 601, 197
887:
888: \bibitem[Popesso et al.(2005)]{Popesso2005}
889: Popesso, P., Bohringer, H., Romaniello, M., \& Vogas, W. 2005, \aap, 433, 415
890:
891: \bibitem[Popesso et al.(2006)]{Popesso2006}
892: Popesso, P., Biviano, A., Bohringer, H., \& Romaniello, M. 2006, \aap, 445, 29
893:
894: \bibitem[Postman \& Geller(1984)]{Postman1984}
895: Postman, M., \& Geller, M. J. 1984, \apj, 281, 95
896:
897: \bibitem[Postman et al.(2005)]{Postman2005}
898: Postman, M., et al. 2005, \apj, 623, 721
899:
900: \bibitem[Quilis, Moore \& Bower(2000)]{Quilis2000}
901: Quilis, V., Moore, B., \& Bower, R. 2000, Science, 288, 1617
902:
903: \bibitem[Roediger \& Hensler(2005)]{Roediger2005}
904: Roediger, E., \& Hensler, G. 2005, \aap, 433, 875
905:
906: \bibitem[Roediger \& Br$\ddot{\rm u}$ggen(2007)]{Roediger2007}
907: Roediger, E., \& Br$\ddot{\rm u}$ggen, M. 2007, \mnras, 380, 1399
908:
909: \bibitem[Sakai et al.(2002)]{Sakai2002}
910: Sakai, S., et al. 2002, \apj, 578, 842
911:
912: \bibitem[Schlegel, Finkbeiner \& Davis(1998)]{Schlegel1998}
913: Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., \& Davis, M. 1998, \apj, 500, 525
914:
915: \bibitem[Schweizer(1978)]{Schweizer1978}
916: Schweizer, F. 1978, in Structure and Properties of Nearby Galaxies, p. 279
917:
918: \bibitem[Schulz \& Struck(2001)]{Schulz2001}
919: Schulz, S., \& Struck, C. 2001, \mnras, 328, 185
920:
921: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2005)]{Smith2005}
922: Smith, G. P., Treu, T., Ellis, R. S., Moran, S. M., \& Dressler, A. 2005, \apj, 620, 78
923:
924: \bibitem[Struck \& Brown(2004)]{Struck2004}
925: Struck, C., \& Brown, J. R. 2004, in Duc, P.-A., Braine, J. \& Brinks, E., eds., Recycling
926: Intergalactic and Interstellar Matter, IAU Symposium No. 217, p. 466
927:
928: \bibitem[Sun, Donahue \& Voit(2007)]{Sun2007}
929: Sun, M., Donahue, M., \& Voit, M. 2007, \apj, 671, 170
930:
931: \bibitem[Tran et al.(2003)]{Tran2003}
932: Tran, H. D., et al. 2003, \apj, 585, 750
933:
934: \bibitem[Trentham, Sampson \& Banerji(2005)]{Trentham2005}
935: Trentham, N., Sampson, L., \& Banerji, M. 2005, \mnras, 357, 783
936:
937: \bibitem[van der Wel et al.(2007)]{VanDerWel2007}
938: van der Wel, A., et al. 2007, \apj, 670, 206
939:
940: \bibitem[Vollmer \& Huchtmeier(2003)]{Vollmer2003}
941: Vollmer, B., \& Huchtmeier, W. 2003, \aap, 406, 427
942:
943: \bibitem[Vollmer et al.(2001)]{Vollmer2001}
944: Vollmer, B., Cayatte, V., Balkowski, C., \& Duschl, W. J. 2001, \apj, 561, 708
945:
946: \bibitem[Vollmer et al.(2004)]{Vollmer2004}
947: Vollmer, B., Beck, R., Kenney, J. D. P., \& van Gorkom, J. H. 2004, \aj, 127, 3375
948:
949: \bibitem[Yagi et al.(2007)]{Yagi2007}
950: Yagi, M., et al. 2007, \apj, 660, 1209
951:
952: \bibitem[Yamanoi et al.(2007)]{Yamanoi2007}
953: Yamanoi, H., et al. 2007, \aj, 134, 56
954:
955: \bibitem[Yoshida et al.(2002)]{Yoshida2002}
956: Yoshida, M., et al. 2002, \apj, 567, 118
957:
958: \bibitem[Yoshida et al.(2004)]{Yoshida2004}
959: Yoshida, M., et al. 2004, \aj, 127, 90
960:
961: \bibitem[Yoshino \& Ichikawa.(2008)]{Yoshino2008}
962: Yoshino, A., \& Ichikawa, T. 2008, \pasj, 60, 493
963:
964: \end{thebibliography}
965:
966: %----------------------------------------------------------------------------
967: %\clearpage
968:
969: \begin{figure}
970: \epsscale{0.8}
971: \plotone{f1.ps}
972: \caption{
973: \label{fig1} False color ($B$ band: blue, $R_{\rm C}$ band: green, H$\alpha$ NB: red) image of area
974: around RB199. North is right and east is top. RB199 is located at the right side of the image.
975: }
976: \end{figure}
977:
978: \begin{figure}
979: \epsscale{0.6}
980: \plotone{f2.ps}
981: \caption{
982: \label{fig2} $B$ contour map around RB199. The orientation is the same as Figure 1. To improve
983: the signal-to-noise ratio of the faint features, the original images were smoothed by $4 \times
984: 4$ pixels running mean to produce the contour maps in Figure \ref{fig2} and Figure \ref{fig3}. The
985: lowest contour level of this image is 28.5 (AB)mag arcsec$^{-2}$ and the contour interval is 1 mag.
986: ``G1''--``G5'' are galaxies near RB199. The object lying to the east of the galaxy G4 is a foreground
987: star.
988: }
989: \end{figure}
990:
991: \begin{figure}
992: \epsscale{0.6}
993: \plotone{f3.ps}
994: \caption{
995: \label{fig3} $R_{\rm C}$ contour map around RB199. The lowest contour level is 27.8 (AB)mag
996: arcsec$^{-2}$ and the contour interval is 1 mag.
997: }
998: \end{figure}
999:
1000: \begin{figure}
1001: \epsscale{0.6}
1002: \plotone{f4.ps}
1003: \caption{
1004: \label{fig4} Continuum subtracted H$\alpha$ image around RB199. Stronger H$\alpha$ is coded
1005: whiter.
1006: }
1007: \end{figure}
1008:
1009:
1010: \begin{figure}
1011: \epsscale{0.6}
1012: \plotone{f5.ps}
1013: \caption{
1014: \label{fig5} $B - R_{\rm C}$ color map of the RB199 field. This map shows the $B - R_{\rm
1015: C}$ color from 0.0 (violet) to 1.8 (red) (see the color bar at the bottom of the figure).
1016: }
1017: \end{figure}
1018:
1019: \begin{figure}
1020: \epsscale{.50}
1021: \plotone{f6.ps}
1022: \caption{
1023: \label{fig6} $B$ band image of RB199 (contour map overlaid on the grayscale image). The lowest
1024: contour level and the contour interval are 26.5 (AB)mag arcsec$^{-2}$ and 0.5 mag, respectively.
1025: }
1026: \end{figure}
1027:
1028: \begin{figure}
1029: \epsscale{.60}
1030: \plotone{f7.ps}
1031: \caption{
1032: \label{fig7} Schematic view of the ``fireballs'' of RB199.
1033: }
1034: \end{figure}
1035:
1036: \begin{figure}
1037: \epsscale{.5}
1038: \plotone{f8.ps}
1039: \caption{
1040: \label{fig8} Close-up views of the bright knots. Enlarged false-color images of the knot 1 (upper
1041: left), the knot 2 (upper right), the knot3 and knot 4 (lower left), and the knot 5 (lower right) are
1042: shown. The attribute of the color is the same as in Figure \ref{fig1}.
1043: }
1044: \end{figure}
1045:
1046: \begin{figure}
1047: \epsscale{.50}
1048: \plotone{f9.ps}
1049: \caption{
1050: \label{fig9} Contour map of the pure H$\alpha$ image (red lines) is overlaid on a contour map of
1051: the $B$ image (blue lines). Lowest contour levels of the pure H$\alpha$ and the $B$ maps are
1052: $2.4\times 10^{-18}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ arcsec$^{-2}$ and 28 (AB)mag arcsec$^{-2}$,
1053: respectively. Contour interval is 1 mag for both maps.
1054: }
1055: \end{figure}
1056:
1057: \begin{figure}
1058: \epsscale{0.5}
1059: \plotone{f10.ps}
1060: \caption{
1061: \label{fig10} $B - R_{\rm C}$ colors of the knots and filaments of the fireballs are shown with
1062: respect to the distance from the nucleus of RB199. The horizontal error bars indicate the length of
1063: the features.
1064: }
1065: \end{figure}
1066:
1067: \begin{figure}
1068: \epsscale{.50}
1069: \plotone{f11.ps}
1070: \caption{
1071: \label{fig11} GALEX FUV contour map overlaid on the $B$ band image of RB199.
1072: }
1073: \end{figure}
1074:
1075: \begin{figure}
1076: \epsscale{.50}
1077: \plotone{f12.ps}
1078: \caption{
1079: \label{fig12} GALEX NUV contours map overlaid on the $B$ band image of RB199.
1080: }
1081: \end{figure}
1082:
1083: \begin{figure}
1084: \epsscale{.50}
1085: \plotone{f13.ps}
1086: \caption{
1087: \label{fig13} Color--color diagram of $B - R_{\rm C}$ versus ${\rm FUV} - B$ for the bright
1088: knots and the blue filaments of the fireballs. The black squares represent the knot colors. The solid
1089: lines are the model prediction for the constant star-formation case. The dot-dashed lines, the dashed
1090: lines, and the dotted lines are the predictions of exponential decaying star formation models with
1091: decay timescales of 100 Myr (E100 model), 200 Myr (E200 model), and 300 Myr (E300 model),
1092: respectively. The arrows show the effect of internal dust extinction on the observed colors.
1093: }
1094: \end{figure}
1095:
1096: \begin{figure}
1097: \epsscale{.50}
1098: \plotone{f14.ps}
1099: \caption{
1100: \label{fig14} Color--color diagram of $B - R_{\rm C}$ versus ${\rm NUV} - B$ for the fireballs.
1101: The white squares represent the colors of filaments 1 and 3. The other symbols and lines are the
1102: same as in Figure \ref{fig13}.
1103: }
1104: \end{figure}
1105:
1106:
1107: \clearpage
1108:
1109: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}
1110: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
1111: \tablewidth{0pt}
1112: \footnotesize
1113: \tablecaption{Observation Log}
1114: \tablehead{
1115: \colhead{filter} &
1116: \colhead{PSF size} &
1117: \colhead{SB$_{\rm lim}$(ABmag arcsec$^{-2}$)\tablenotemark{a}} &
1118: \colhead{date (UT)}&
1119: \colhead{exposure}
1120: }
1121: \startdata
1122: $B$ & 1\arcsec.06 & 28.8 & 2006-04-28 & 2 $\times$ 450sec \\
1123: & & & 2006-05-03 & 3 $\times$ 450sec \\
1124: & & & 2007-05-13 & 5 $\times$ 600sec \\
1125: $R_{\rm C}$ & 0\arcsec.81 & 28.0 & 2006-04-28 & 11 $\times$ 300 sec \\
1126: & & & 2007-05-14 & 5 $\times$ 360 sec \\
1127: & & & 2007-05-15 & 1 $\times$ 300 sec \\
1128: NB & 0\arcsec.82 & 27.8 & 2006-04-28 & 5 $\times$ 1800 sec \\
1129: & & & 2007-05-15 & 8 $\times$ 1800 sec \\
1130: \enddata
1131:
1132: \tablenotetext{a}{
1133: SB$_{\rm lim}$ represent 1-$\sigma$ fluctuation of
1134: a circular aperture of 2 arcsec diameter. The
1135: $R_{\rm C}$ and NB are calibrated by short exposures taken on
1136: 2006-05-03, but the mosaic
1137: image does not include them.}
1138: \end{deluxetable}
1139:
1140: %\clearpage
1141:
1142: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccccc}
1143: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
1144: \tablewidth{0pt}
1145: \footnotesize
1146: \tablecaption{Photometry of the Fireballs around RB199}
1147: \tablehead{
1148: \colhead{ID} &
1149: \colhead{distance\tablenotemark{a}} &
1150: \colhead{size\tablenotemark{b}} &
1151: \colhead{$m_{B}$} &
1152: \colhead{$m_{R_{\rm C}}$} &
1153: \colhead{$B - R_{\rm C}$} &
1154: \colhead{$M_{\rm L}$\tablenotemark{c}} &
1155: \colhead{$L_{\rm H\alpha}$ \tablenotemark{d}} &
1156: \colhead{SFR \tablenotemark{e}}
1157: }
1158:
1159: \startdata
1160: knot 1 & 23 & 2.6$\times$0.9 & 22.52$\pm 0.03$ & 22.04$\pm 0.03$ & 0.47$\pm
1161: 0.04$ & 8.8 & 34 & 27 \\
1162: knot 2 & 24 & 1.8$\times$1.0 & 22.18$\pm 0.02$ & 21.53$\pm 0.02$ & 0.65$\pm
1163: 0.03$ & 14 & 59 & 47 \\
1164: knot 3 & 32 & 1.9$\times$0.6 & 23.19$\pm 0.03$ & 22.68$\pm 0.03$ & 0.51$\pm
1165: 0.04$ & 4.8 & 9.9 & 7.8 \\
1166: knot 4 & 34 & 0.7$\times$0.7 & 25.13$\pm 0.12$ & 24.88$\pm 0.13$ & 0.25$\pm
1167: 0.18$ & 0.76 & 2.1 & 1.7 \\
1168: knot 5 & 35 & 0.7$\times$0.7 & 24.06$\pm 0.04$ & 23.66$\pm 0.04$ & 0.40$\pm
1169: 0.06$ & 2.3 & 30 & 23 \\
1170: knot 6 & 28 & 0.6$\times$1.6 & 24.23$\pm 0.06$ & 23.66$\pm 0.05$ & 0.57$\pm
1171: 0.08$ & 2.0 & 3.2 & 2.5 \\
1172: filament 1 & 14 & 14 & 22.03$\pm 0.03$ & 21.36$\pm 0.03$ & 0.67$\pm 0.04$ & 16 &
1173: - & - \\
1174: filament 2 & 24 & 9 & 22.53$\pm 0.04$ & 22.28$\pm 0.03$ & 0.25$\pm 0.04$ & 6.7 &
1175: 0.9 & 0.7 \\
1176: filament 3 & 11 & 10 & 22.10$\pm 0.02$ & 21.32$\pm 0.05$ & 0.78$\pm 0.06$ & 16 &
1177: - & - \\
1178: filament 4 & 26 & 5 & 22.83$\pm 0.04$ & 22.39$\pm 0.03$ & 0.44$\pm 0.05$ & 6.4 &
1179: 5.9 & 4.7 \\
1180: filament 5 & 59 & 8 & 23.22$\pm 0.15$ & 23.36$\pm 0.11$ & -0.14$\pm 0.16$ & 2.5 &
1181: 3.8 & 3.0 \\
1182: H$\alpha$ filament 1 & 44 & 14 & 25.39$\pm 0.48$ & 25.39$\pm 0.32$ & 0.00$\pm 0.48$ &
1183: 0.68 & 28 & 23 \\
1184: H$\alpha$ filament 2 & 40 & 4 & 24.86$\pm 0.12$ & 25.07$\pm 0.23$ & -0.21$\pm 0.26$ &
1185: 0.52 & 12 & 9.2 \\
1186: H$\alpha$ cloud 1 & 80 & - & 26.04$\pm 0.25$ & - & - & 0.62\tablenotemark{f} & 9.0 &
1187: 7.2 \\
1188: H$\alpha$ cloud 2 & 79 & - & 26.29$\pm 0.62$ & - & - & 0.50\tablenotemark{f} & 11 &
1189: 8.6 \\
1190: \hline
1191: \\
1192: Total & 83\tablenotemark{g} & & 19.87 & 19.33 & 0.54 & 110 & 225 & 179 \\
1193: \enddata
1194:
1195: \tablenotetext{a}{distance from the nucleus of RB199 in units of kpc.}
1196: \tablenotetext{b}{sizes of the knots, filaments, and cloud in units of kpc. The sizes are measured
1197: at the $B$ band surface brightness of 28 mag~arcsec$^{-2}$.}
1198: \tablenotetext{c}{mass derived from $R_{\rm C}$ band magnitude in units of
1199: $10^6$ M$_\odot$ assuming that $M/L_R = 1$.}
1200: \tablenotetext{d}{H$\alpha$ luminosity in unit of $10^{37}$ ergs s$^{-1}$.
1201: Contamination of [NII]$\lambda\lambda 6548/6583$ emission and internal dust extinction
1202: is not corrected.}
1203: \tablenotetext{e}{star-formation rate calculated from $L_{\rm H\alpha}$ in units of $10^{-
1204: 4}$ M$_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$ assuming that all the H$\alpha$ emission is produced by star-formation
1205: activity.}
1206: \tablenotetext{f}{derived from $B$ band magnitude assuming that $M/L_B = 1$.}
1207: \tablenotetext{g}{distance between the edge of the H$\alpha$ cloud 1 and the nucleus of
1208: RB199.}
1209:
1210: \end{deluxetable}
1211:
1212: %\clearpage
1213:
1214: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccc}
1215: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
1216: \tablewidth{0pt}
1217: \footnotesize
1218: \tablecaption{Ultraviolet Magnitudes and Optical-UV Colors of the Fireballs}
1219: \tablehead{
1220: \colhead{ID} &
1221: \colhead{GALEX ID} &
1222: \colhead{GALEX FUV\tablenotemark{a}} &
1223: \colhead{GALEX NUV\tablenotemark{a}} &
1224: \colhead{${\rm FUV} - B$} &
1225: \colhead{${\rm NUV} - B$}\\
1226: \colhead{} &
1227: \colhead{} &
1228: \colhead{(AB mag)} &
1229: \colhead{(AB mag)} &
1230: \colhead{(AB mag)} &
1231: \colhead{(AB mag)}
1232: }
1233: \startdata
1234: knot 1 & J125841.9 + 274451 & 21.44$\pm 0.16$ & 21.46$\pm 0.09$ & -0.94$\pm 0.16$ & -
1235: 0.92$\pm 0.10$ \\
1236: knot 2 & J125843.8 + 274450 & 21.51$\pm 0.14$ & 21.19$\pm 0.08$ & -0.53$\pm 0.14$ & -
1237: 0.85$\pm 0.09$ \\
1238: knot 3 + 4 & J125842.9 + 274427 & 22.36$\pm 0.30$ & 21.76$\pm 0.17$ & -0.69$\pm 0.30$ &
1239: -1.29$\pm 0.21$ \\
1240: knot 5 & J125841.0 + 274429 & 23.12$\pm 0.34$ & 22.43$\pm 0.33$\tablenotemark{b} & -
1241: 0.80$\pm 0.34$ & -1.49$\pm 0.33$ \\
1242: knot 6 & J125843.4 + 274439 & 23.53$\pm 0.45$ & - & -0.56$\pm 0.46$ & - \\
1243: filament 1 & - & - & 21.84$\pm 0.40$\tablenotemark{b} & - & -
1244: 0.19$\pm 0.40$ \\
1245: filament 3 & - & - & 21.91$\pm 0.43$\tablenotemark{b} & - & -
1246: 0.19$\pm 0.43$ \\
1247: \enddata
1248:
1249: \tablenotetext{a}{Taken from the Web site of GALEX data release 2 (DR2), except for the NUV
1250: magnitudes of knot 5, filament 1, and filament 3.}
1251: \tablenotetext{b}{Directly measured in the NUV image calibrated by the GALEX DR2 NUV
1252: magnitude of knot 1.}
1253:
1254: \end{deluxetable}
1255:
1256: \end{document}
1257: