1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2005 December 5
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18:
19: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
20:
21: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
22:
23: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
24:
25: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
26:
27: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
28:
29: \documentclass[apjl]{emulateapj}
30:
31: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
32: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
33: %% use the longabstract style option.
34:
35: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
36:
37: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
38: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
39: %% the \begin{document} command.
40: %%
41: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
42: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
43: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
44: %% for information.
45:
46: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
47: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
48: \def\ltsim{~\rlap{\lower -0.5ex\hbox{$<$}}{\lower 0.5ex\hbox{$\sim\,$}}}
49:
50: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
51:
52: \slugcomment{Published in The Astrophysical Journal, 683, L103-L106, 2008 August 20}
53:
54: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
55: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
56: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
57: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
58: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
59: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
60:
61: \shorttitle{OUTER-DISK PROPERTIES OUTSIDE BREAK RADIUS}
62: \shortauthors{BAKOS, TRUJILLO, \& POHLEN}
63:
64: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
65: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
66:
67: \begin{document}
68:
69: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
70: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
71: %% you desire.
72:
73: \title{COLOR PROFILES OF SPIRAL GALAXIES: CLUES ON OUTER-DISK FORMATION SCENARIOS}
74:
75: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
76: %% author and affiliation information.
77: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
78: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
79: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
80: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
81:
82: \author{Judit Bakos}
83: \author{Ignacio Trujillo\altaffilmark{1}}
84: \affil{Instituto de Astrof\'isica de Canarias, E-38205, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain; jbakos@iac.es, trujillo@iac.es}
85: \and
86: \author{Michael Pohlen}
87: \affil{Cardiff University, School of Physics \& Astronomy, Cardiff, CF24 3AA, Wales, UK; Michael.Pohlen@astro.cf.ac.uk}
88: %\email{jbakos@iac.es, trujillo@iac.es, Michael.Pohlen@astro.cf.ac.uk}
89:
90: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
91: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
92: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
93: %% affiliation.
94:
95: \altaffiltext{1}{Ram\'on y Cajal Fellow}
96:
97: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
98: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
99: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
100: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
101: %% editorial office after submission.
102:
103: \begin{abstract}
104:
105: We have explored radial color and stellar surface mass density profiles for a
106: sample of 85 late-type spiral galaxies with deep (down to $\sim$27
107: mag arcsec$^{-2}$) SDSS $g'$ and $r'$ band surface brightness profiles. About $90\%$
108: of the light profiles have been classified as broken exponentials, exhibiting either truncations (Type~II galaxies) or antitruncations (Type~III galaxies). The color profiles of Type~II galaxies show a ``U shape'' with a minimum of $(g' - r') = 0.47\ \pm\ 0.02$ mag at the break radius. Around the break
109: radius, Type~III galaxies have a plateau region with a color of $(g' - r') =
110: 0.57\ \pm\ 0.02$. Using the color to calculate the stellar surface mass density
111: profiles reveals a surprising result. The breaks, well established in the light
112: profiles of the truncated galaxies, are almost gone, and the mass profiles now
113: resemble those of the pure exponential (Type~I) galaxies. This result
114: suggests that the origin of the break in Type~II galaxies is more likely due to
115: a radial change in stellar population than being associated with an actual drop
116: in the distribution of mass. Type~III galaxies, however, seem to preserve their
117: shape in the stellar mass density profiles. We find that the stellar surface
118: mass density at the break for truncated galaxies is $13.6 \pm 1.6 \ {M}_{\sun}$pc$^{-2}$ and for the antitruncated ones is $ 9.9 \pm 1.3 \ {M}_{\sun}$pc$^{-2}$ for
119: the antitruncated ones. We estimate that the fraction of stellar mass outside
120: the break radius is $\sim$15$\%$ for truncated galaxies and $ \sim$9$\%$ for
121: antitruncated galaxies.
122:
123: \end{abstract}
124: %%
125: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
126: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
127: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
128: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
129:
130: \keywords{galaxies: evolution - galaxies: formation - galaxies: photometry - galaxies: spiral - galaxies: structure}
131:
132: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
133: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
134: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
135: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
136: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
137: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
138: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
139: %% each reference.
140:
141:
142: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
143: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so by tagging
144: %% their objects with \objectname{} or \object{}. Each macro takes the
145: %% object name as its required argument. The optional, square-bracket
146: %% argument should be used in cases where the data center identification
147: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper. The text appearing
148: %% in curly braces is what will appear in print in the published paper.
149: %% If the object name is recognized by the data centers, it will be linked
150: %% in the electronic edition to the object data available at the data centers
151: %%
152: %% Note that for sources with brackets in their names, e.g. [WEG2004] 14h-090,
153: %% the brackets must be escaped with backslashes when used in the first
154: %% square-bracket argument, for instance, \object[\[WEG2004\] 14h-090]{90}).
155: %% Otherwise, LaTeX will issue an error.
156:
157: \section{Introduction}
158: \label{intro}
159: %
160:
161: Our picture regarding the diversity of the radial surface brightness profiles
162: of spiral galaxies has changed greatly since the early work of Patterson (1940)
163: and de Vaucouleurs (1958), who showed that the disks of spiral galaxies
164: generally follow an exponential decrease in their radial surface brightness
165: profile. Nowadays, this view has become clearly insufficient, as not all the disk galaxies (indeed, only the minority for late-types) are well described
166: with a single exponential fitting function as shown in several recent studies
167: (Erwin et al.~2005; Pohlen \& Trujillo 2006, hereafter PT06; Florido et al. 2006, 2007; Erwin et al. 2008), where they have identified three basic classes of surface
168: brightness profiles depending on an apparent break feature or lack of one: (1)
169: the pure exponential profiles (Type I) with no breaks, (2) Type II with a
170: ``downbending break'' (revising and extending a previous classification
171: introduced by Freeman [1970] to include the so-called truncations of the
172: stellar populations at the edge of the disk discovered by van der Kruit
173: [1979]) and (3) a completely new class (Type III), also described by a broken
174: exponential but with an upbending profile. The latter, discovered by Erwin et
175: al. (2005), is also termed antitruncated.
176:
177: PT06 explored a sample of nearby late-type galaxies using
178: the Sloan Digital Sky Survey to create a statistically representative set of
179: radial surface brightness profiles. They found that about 60$\%$ of the
180: spirals are truncated (Type~II), 30$\%$ are antitruncated (Type~III), and only
181: 10$\%$ have no detectable breaks (Type~I).
182:
183: Still, little is known about the nature of the breaks or about the presence of
184: stars beyond that feature. In such low-density ($\le$ 10 $ {M}_{\sun}$pc$^{-2}$) environments at the galaxy peripheries, current star formation
185: theories forbid efficient star formation (Kennicutt 1989; Elmegreen \&
186: Parravano 1994; Schaye 2004). However, UV observations (Gil de Paz et
187: al. 2005; Thilker et al. 2005) have shown ongoing star formation in these
188: outer regions. In addition, it is clear that there are large number of stars
189: in the outskirts of galaxies (see, e.g., PT06).
190:
191: Several theories have investigated the formation of breaks in case of the
192: Type~II morphology. Proposed models to explain the existence of truncations in
193: stellar disks can be grouped into two branches depending on the
194: relevant mechanism that causes the break: (a) models related to angular
195: momentum conservation in the protogalactic cloud (van der Kruit 1987) or
196: angular momentum cutoff in cooling gas (van den Bosch 2001), and (b) models
197: that attribute the existence of breaks to star formation thresholds
198: (Kennicutt 1989; Elmegreen \& Parravano 1994; Schaye 2004). In agreement with
199: this last scenario, Elmegreen \& Hunter (2006) suggested a multicomponent star
200: formation that would result in a double exponential surface brightness
201: profile as observed for Type~II galaxies. Recent developments, some of them
202: combining pieces of the aforementioned scenarios, conclude that secular
203: evolution driven by bars or spiral arms or even clump disruptions can result
204: in truncated exponential profiles (Debattista et al. 2006; Bournaud al. 2007;
205: Ro\v skar et al. 2007; Foyle et al. 2008). Magnetic fields have also been considered to explain the existence of truncations (Battaner et al. 2002). On the other hand, the Type~III
206: morphology is proposed to be explained by a tidal stripping within a minor
207: merger (Pe\~narrubia et al. 2006; Younger et al. 2007), by a bombardment of
208: the disk with dark matter subhalos (Kazantzidis et al. 2007) or by a high
209: eccentricity flyby of a satellite galaxy (Younger et al. 2008).
210:
211: In this Letter we show for the first time color and stellar surface mass
212: profiles of a large sample of galaxies (the PT06 sample) to quantify the
213: stellar mass density at the break position and the fraction of stellar mass
214: beyond the break. These values become important while comparing observations
215: to the results of numerical simulations for the outer-disk formation. In order
216: to fully understand the galaxy formation and evolution process, it is necessary to
217: perform a detailed study of the stellar population properties at the galaxies'
218: outskirts. This kind of study gives insight into how the star formation progresses in the
219: different parts of the disks, providing clues on the stellar mass
220: buildup process.
221:
222: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
223: \section{The Data and Analysis Techniques}\label{data}
224:
225: Our data are the 85 SDSS $g'$ and $r'$ band surface brightness profiles
226: published in PT06. The galaxies were selected to be a representative, volume
227: limited ($R \ltsim 46$ Mpc) sample of face-on to intermediate-inclined
228: late-type disk galaxies brighter than ${M}_B = -18.4 $ mag. In that
229: sense, they range from fainter to brighter surface brightness, from
230: lower to higher mass, and also from smaller to larger size.
231: %
232: The surface brightness profiles are classified as 9 Type~I, 39 Type~II
233: and 21 Type~III, i.e., exponential, truncated and antitruncated profiles,
234: respectively (see PT06 and Erwin et al. 2008 for more details).
235: %
236:
237: The surface brightness limits on our individual surface brightness profiles
238: (27.0 and 27.5 mag arcsec$^{-2}$ for $r'$- and $g'$- bands, respectively) were estimated by computing when either over- or undersubstracting the sky by $\pm$1$\sigma$ has an effect of more than 0.2 mag
239: on the surface brightness distribution. These limits were established using two
240: different methods for determining the sky. In addition, by comparing our
241: profiles with deeper data (when available), we did not detect any systematic
242: error in the sky determination. It is worth noting that, for the work presented
243: here where we combine several profiles to explore the mean properties of the
244: surface brightness profiles, the uncertainties in the mean properties due to sky
245: substraction uncertainties are reduced to $\lesssim$0.03--0.04 mag in the outermost
246: regions of the galaxies.
247:
248: %
249: We have removed 16 galaxies from our original dataset due to peculiarities of
250: the classification, for example, all of the Type~II-AB galaxies where the
251: apparent break is to some extent artificial (see detailed discussion in PT06). We also
252: excluded IC 1067, which has a very uncertain classification, being either
253: Type~II or a possible Type~I. For galaxies with mixed classifications (see
254: PT06) we only used the first type.
255: %
256: To statistically compare the surface brightness profiles of all galaxies in
257: our sample, we normalized the sizes of the different galaxies according to
258: their respective $r'$-band break radii (see Fig.~\ref{colorgrads}).
259: %
260: For the Type~I galaxies, lacking a break radius, we applied 2.5 times the
261: measured scale length as a normalizing factor, which is the typical radius of
262: the break for the Type~II galaxies (PT06).
263: %
264: The Type~II and Type~III galaxies have their $r'$-band 27 mag arcsec$^-2$ isophote at around 1.8 times the break radius, which constrains how far we can accurately trace out the behavior of the light profiles into the outskirts of the disks.
265:
266: In order to calculate a robust mean color that characterizes our sample, we
267: removed the color of each individual galaxy at a given radii where the $g'$- or
268: the $r'$-band surface brightness is below the above critical limits at that
269: radii. We have obtained a robust mean value of the color for all galaxies by
270: removing the $3\sigma$ outliers. We have explicitly checked that using a cut in
271: the surface brightness does not result in a bias towards any absolute magnitude
272: range.
273:
274: The results of this mean are the profiles shown in the middle row of
275: Figure \ref{colorgrads}. It is straightforward to link the stellar mass density
276: ($\Sigma$) profile with the surface brightness profile at a given wavelength
277: ($\mu_{\lambda}$) if we know the mass-to-light ($M/L$) ratio, using the expression below.
278: \begin{equation}
279: log_{10} \Sigma = log_{10} (M/L)_{\lambda} - 0.4(\mu_{\lambda} - m_{abs,\sun,\lambda}) + 8.629,
280: \label{sigma}
281: \end{equation}
282: where $m_{abs,\sun,\lambda}$ is the absolute magnitude of the Sun at wavelength $\lambda$, and $\Sigma$ is measured in ${M}_{\sun}$pc$^{-2}$.
283: %
284: To evaluate the above expression, we need to obtain the $M/L$ ratio
285: at each radius. Following the prescription of Bell et al. (2003), we have
286: calculated the $M/L$ ratio as a function of color.
287:
288: In this work we assume a Kroupa IMF (Kroupa 2001), which according to Bell et al. (2003) implies a deduction of 0.15 dex from the $M/L$ using the following expression:\\
289: \begin{equation}
290: log_{10} (M/L)_{\lambda} = \left(a_{\lambda}\ +\ b_{\lambda}\ \times\ color \right)- 0.15,
291: \end{equation}
292: where for $(g' - r')$ color, $a_{\lambda} = -0.306$ and $b_{\lambda} = 1.097$
293: is applied to determine the $r'$-band $M/L$. The resulting stellar mass density profiles are shown in the bottom row of Figure \ref{colorgrads}.
294:
295: The Galactic extinction has been taken into account as described in PT06 using
296: the Schlegel et al. (1998) values:
297: \begin{equation}
298: \mu_{corrected,\lambda} = \mu_{measured,\lambda} - A_{\lambda},
299: \end{equation}
300: where $A_{\lambda}$ is the extinction coefficient in each band.
301:
302: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
303: \section{Results}
304:
305: \subsection{Averaged Radial Surface Brightness}
306:
307: The upper row of Figure \ref{colorgrads} shows the averaged radial surface
308: brightness profiles for the Type~I, Type~II and Type~III galaxies. The
309: increase towards the center over the inwards extrapolated (inner) disk
310: starting typically at around 0.2$R/R_b$ is due to the presence of bulges.
311: In the outer regions the characteristic break features, truncations and
312: antitruncations, are clearly seen in the mean profiles of Type~II and III
313: galaxies, respectively.
314:
315: \subsection{Color Gradients}
316:
317: The middle row of Figure \ref{colorgrads} shows the $(g' - r')$ radial color
318: profiles. It is interesting to note that each galaxy type has its own
319: characteristic color gradient. As found in previous works (e.g., de Jong
320: 1996), the disks exhibit a general bluing as a function of their radius. This
321: is seen for all the galaxy types.
322:
323: The color of Type~I galaxies, after reaching an asymptotic value of $(g' - r')
324: \sim 0.46$ mag in the outer regions ($\sim2R_h$), stays within the
325: error bars unchanged beyond. Type~II galaxies show a minimum [at $(g' - r') =
326: 0.47 \pm 0.02$ mag] in their color profile at the break radius with the
327: profile getting redder beyond. After the initial bluing, the color of Type~III
328: galaxies gets redder towards the break radius to a mean value of $(g' - r') =
329: 0.57 \pm 0.02$ mag. It is important to note that we can recover the
330: above color behavior of the mean profile basically for every individual galaxy
331: of each subsample, so consequently this is not an artifact of our profile
332: combination. In the outermost region of the profile, the uncertainty in the sky
333: determination can slightly increase the error bar on the color determination.
334: We have estimated this to be a factor of $\sim\sqrt{2}$ larger.
335:
336: All galaxy types have a feature in common (see Fig.~\ref{colorgrads}): a large
337: scatter of the surface brightness and color profiles. To understand the origin
338: of this scatter, we have explored how the color at the break position
339: correlates with different properties of the galaxies. We find that the scatter
340: is best correlated with the total absolute magnitude of the individual
341: galaxies (see Fig.~\ref{hists}, left column).
342: %
343: To quantify the strength of these correlations, we have performed Spearman
344: correlation analysis. For all the three types we find that the brighter the
345: galaxy, the redder the color at the break. This correlation is weaker for
346: Type~I galaxies, because the sample is too small to provide reliable
347: statistics, but becomes particularly clear for Type~II profiles where our
348: $r'$-band absolute magnitude range is the largest. Figure \ref{hists} shows that
349: at a fixed absolute magnitude, the range of the $(g' - r')$ color at the break
350: is only $\sim$ 0.15 mag. This is a factor of 2 smaller than the
351: overall range in Figure \ref{colorgrads}.
352:
353: \subsection{Surface Mass Density Profiles}
354:
355: As explained in \S \ \ref{data}, we have obtained $M/L$ ratio
356: profiles from the $(g' - r')$ colors. These profiles were then converted into
357: stellar surface mass density profiles, which we will discuss here. The most
358: striking result is that both Type~I and Type~II galaxy profiles look very
359: similar, even without any quantitative measurement of the steepness. The
360: break for the Type~II galaxies that is so apparent in the light profiles has almost (for some individual galaxies completely) disappeared. In case of Type~III galaxies, the shape of the profile has not changed dramatically: a change of the slope around the break is still evident;
361: however, the slope becomes less well described by two individual exponentials.
362:
363: \subsection{Break Surface Mass Density and Stellar Mass Fraction beyond the Break Radius}
364:
365: Since the stellar surface mass density is an important tracer of star
366: formation and disk stability (Kennicutt 1989), we provide here numbers
367: corresponding to the break position.
368: %
369: The middle column of Figure \ref{hists} shows the histograms of stellar surface
370: mass density at the break radius or, for Type~I galaxies, at $R\!=\!2.5R_{h}$. The values of $\Sigma_{br}$ are $22.5\ \pm\ 5.3\ {M}_{\sun}$pc$^{-2}$ (Type~I), $13.6\ \pm\ 1.6\ {M}_{\sun}$pc$^{-2}$ (Type~II), and $ 9.9\ \pm\ 1.3\ {M}_{\sun}$pc$^{-2}$ (Type~III). Note that we do not detect any brek on the stellar mass density profile of Type I galaxies down to $\sim3 \ {M}_{\sun}$pc$^{-2}$
371:
372: Another quantity we have calculated is the amount of stellar mass beyond the
373: break radii, which can be very useful for constraining the theoretical model. In
374: the right column of Figure \ref{hists}, the stellar mass fractions in the outer disk are
375: shown. Type~I galaxies contain about $22.3\ \pm \ 2 \%$ of their total stellar
376: mass beyond a radius of 2.5 times their scale-length. Type~II and Type~III
377: galaxies have much less stellar mass in the outer regions. For Type~III
378: galaxies ($9.2\ \pm\ 1.4 \% $) the amount of stellar mass is the lowest,
379: with Type~II in between ($14.7\ \pm\ 1.2 \%$).
380:
381: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
382: \section{Discussion}
383:
384: How can the results found in this work be used to constrain the current models for the
385: formation of breaks in the surface brightness profiles of disk galaxies?
386:
387: In the case of Type~II galaxies, the traditional pictures of
388: break formation (see \S \ \ref{intro}) grouped into two families: angular
389: momentum versus thresholds of star formation. Neither of these two ideas taken at
390: face value can explain why we find so many stars beyond the break radius, so
391: we will not go into more detail on these individual models. However, it is
392: important to stress that the new rendition of models has been able to
393: naturally explain the existence of stars beyond the break radius, and even
394: more, the exponential nature of the shape of the surface brightness beyond
395: this feature.
396: %
397: In particular, in the case of the Ro\v skar et al. (2008) model in which the
398: breaks are the result of the interplay between a radial star formation cutoff
399: and a redistribution of stellar mass by secular processes, a natural prediction
400: is the existence of a minimum in the age of the stellar population at the
401: break position, and a further aging (and consequently, a likely reddening) of
402: these stars as we move farther and farther away from the break radius. This is
403: in qualitative agreement with what we see in our color profiles for this
404: kind of galaxy. However, what these models have not been able to reproduce is
405: the absence of a clear break in the stellar mass density profile.
406:
407: The near absence of a break in the stellar surface mass density profile for our galaxies gives a strong indication that the behavior of the surface brightness profile outside the break is basically due to a change in the ingredients of the stellar population. If the shape of the color we see is not caused by a change in metallicity, this behavior could be explained as a natural consequence of stochastic migration of young stars from the inner parts of the disk to the outskirts (Ro\v skar et al. 2008). This will result in an age gradient where the oldest stars are the dominant component in the outskirts of the disks.
408:
409: Unfortunately, other models (like Bournaud et al. 2007 and Foyle et al. 2008)
410: that are capable of creating stellar mass density profiles that resemble the
411: Type~II one we have found here (i.e., without a clear break) do not provide
412: any prediction on the color (age) distribution the stars should have along
413: the radial range.
414:
415: Nevertheless, the fact that the stellar mass density of the break for this
416: type of galaxy with $\sim$13 ${M}_{\sun}$pc$^{-2}$ is so close to the
417: gas density threshold prediction of $\sim$10 ${M}_{\sun}$pc$^{-2}$
418: makes the case for a stellar population origin for the surface brightness
419: break even stronger (with a 100\% efficiency of transforming gas to stars).
420:
421: Evidence for the same color phenomenology for Type~II galaxies also at high
422: redshift is presented by Azzollini et al. (2008). They have shown that a
423: similar minimum in the color profile can be found, at least, up to z $\sim$ 1
424: and that the main source of the scatter of the color profiles is caused by
425: the different stellar mass (in our case, absolute magnitude) of the galaxies in
426: their sample. Following these findings, we can conclude that once the absolute
427: magnitude of a galaxy is fixed, the color profiles within a given Type~(I, II or
428: III) of galaxy are strikingly similar. A more massive galaxy has a redder global color but the same shape of the color gradient.
429:
430: Combining the results found in Azzollini et al. (2008) with what we find here,
431: one is tempted to claim that both the existence of the break in Type~II
432: galaxies and the shape of their color profiles are long-lived
433: features in the galaxy evolution, because it would be hard to imagine
434: how the above features could be continuously destroyed and recreated
435: maintaining the same properties over the last $\sim$8 Gyr.
436:
437: In the case of Type~III galaxies, the situation is less clear. On the one hand,
438: our sample is smaller than in the case of Type~II galaxies and consequently our results
439: less robust. And on the other hand, the theoretical models are less elaborated
440: than for truncated galaxies, and no clear predictions have been made in
441: particular for the color profiles. Taking into account that the shape of the
442: stellar mass density profile does not differ too much from what we see in the
443: surface brightness profiles, we are inclined to think that our data do not
444: favor a sole origin in stellar population changes for this type of galaxy
445: but an authentic change in the amount of stars from the exponential
446: continuation of their inner region. It is interesting to note that in most of
447: the proposed ideas summarized in \S \ \ref{intro} to explain this kind
448: of galaxy, the origin of the stars in the periphery are linked to a dynamical
449: (in some case external) origin. So what we are seeing for these galaxies is
450: maybe a combination of star formation combined with an infall of new stars
451: from a external (satellite) source.
452:
453: To corroborate our results, we plan to increase the number of galaxies as
454: well as the number of observed filters in our next study.
455:
456: \acknowledgments
457: This research was supported by the Instituto Astrof\'isica de Canarias.
458: We thank Alexande Vazdekis and Ruym\'an Azzollini for their valuable comments and the anonymous referee
459: for his or her careful reading.
460:
461: %\newpage
462:
463: \begin{thebibliography}{}
464:
465: \bibitem[a]{a} Azzollini, R., Trujillo, I, Beckman, J., 2008, \apjl, 679, L69
466: \bibitem[ab]{ab} Battaner, E., Florido, E., \& Jim\'enez-Vicente, J. 2002, A\&A, 388, 213
467: \bibitem[b]{b} Bell, E.F., McIntosh, D.H., Katz, N., Weinberg, M.D., 2003, \apjs, 149, 289
468: \bibitem[c]{c} Bournaud, F., Elmegreen, B. G., \& Elmegreen, D. M., 2007, \apj, 670, 237
469: \bibitem[d]{d} Debattista, V. P., Mayer, L., Carollo, C. M., Moore, B., Wadsley, J., \& Quinn, T., 2006, \apj, 645, 209
470: \bibitem[e]{e} de Jong, R. S. 1996, A\&A, 313, 45
471: \bibitem[f]{f} de Vaucouleurs, G. 1958, ApJ, 128, 465
472: \bibitem[g]{g} Elmegreen, B. G. \& Hunter, D. A., 2006, \apj, 363, 712
473: \bibitem[h]{h} Elmegreen, B. G. \& Parravano, A., 1994, \apj, 435, L121
474: \bibitem[i]{i} Erwin, P., Beckman, J. E., \& Pohlen, M., 2005, \apj, 626, L81
475: \bibitem[j]{j} Erwin, P., Pohlen, M., \& Beckman, J. E., 2008, AJ, 135, 20
476: \bibitem[aj]{aj} Florido, E., Battaner, E., Guijarro, A., Garz\'on, F., \& Castolli-Morales, A. 2006, A\&A, 455, 467
477: \bibitem[bj]{bj} Florido, E., Battaner, E., Zurita, A., \& Guijarro, A. 2007, A\&A, 472, L39
478: \bibitem[k]{k} Foyle, K., Courteau, S., Thacker, R. J., 2008, \mnras, 386, 1821
479: \bibitem[ak]{ak} Freeman, K. C. 1970, \apj, 160, 811
480: \bibitem[l]{l} Gil de Paz, A., et al. 2005, \apj, 627, L29
481: \bibitem[m]{m} Kazantzidis, S., Bullock, J. S., Zentner A. R., Kravtsov, A. V., \& Moustakas, L. A., 2007, \apj, submitted (arXiv: 0708.1949)
482: \bibitem[n]{n} Kennicutt, R. C., 1989, \apj, 344, 685
483: \bibitem[o]{o} Kroupa, P., 2001, \mnras, 322, 231
484: \bibitem[p]{p} Patterson, F. S., 1940, Harvard Coll. Obs. Bull., 914, 9
485: \bibitem[q]{q} Pe\~narrubia, J., McConnachie, A., \& Babul, A., 2006, \apj, 650, L33
486: \bibitem[r]{r} Pohlen, M., \& Trujillo, I., 2006, A\&A, 454, 759 (PT06)
487: \bibitem[s]{s} Ro\v skar, R., Debattista, V. P., Stinson, G. S., Quinn, T. R., Kaufmann, T., Wadsley J., 2008, \apj, 675, L65
488: \bibitem[t]{t} Schaye, J., 2004, \apj, 609, 667
489: \bibitem[u]{u} Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., Davis, M., 1998, \apj, 500, 525
490: \bibitem[v]{v} Thilker D. A., et al., 2005, \apj, 619, L79
491: \bibitem[y]{y} van den Bosch, F. C., 2001, \mnras, 327, 1334
492: \bibitem[z]{z} van der Kruit, P. C., 1979, A\&AS, 38, 15
493: \bibitem[aa]{aa} van der Kruit, P. C., 1987, A\&A, 173, 59
494: \bibitem[cc]{cc} Younger, J. D., Besla, G., Cox, T. J., Hernquist, L., Robertson, B., \& Willman, B., 2008, \apj, 676, L21
495: \bibitem[bb]{bb} Younger, J. D., Cox, T. J., Seth A. C., \& Hernquist, L., 2007, \apj, 670, 269
496:
497:
498:
499: \end{thebibliography}
500:
501: \clearpage
502:
503: \begin{figure}[t]
504: \centering
505: \includegraphics[scale=1.0]{f1.eps}
506:
507: \caption{\textit{Top row}: Averaged, scaled radial surface brightness
508: profiles of 9 Type~I, 39 Type~II and 21 Type~III galaxies. The filled circles
509: correspond to the $r'$-band mean surface brightness, the open circles to the
510: mean $g'$-band data. The small dots are the individual galaxy profiles in both
511: bands. The surface brightness is corrected for Galactic extinction.
512: \textit{Middle row}: $(g' - r')$ color gradients. The averaged profile of
513: Type~I reaches an asymptotic color value of $\sim$0.46 mag being
514: rather constant outward. Type~II profiles have a minimum color of $0.47 \pm
515: 0.02$ mag at the break position. The Type~III mean color profile has a redder value of about $0.57 \pm 0.02$ mag at the break. \textit{Bottom row}: $r'$-band surface mass density profiles obtained using the color-to-M/L conversion of Bell et al. (2003). Note how the significance of
516: the break almost disappears for the Type~II case. The error bars are given as
517: $\sim\sigma/\sqrt{N}$, where $\sigma$ is the scatter and $N$ is the number
518: of galaxies taken into account for estimating the mean averaged value in each
519: bin. These error bars do not account for uncertainties in the sky
520: determination.}
521:
522: \label{colorgrads}
523: \end{figure}
524:
525:
526:
527: \begin{figure}
528: \centering
529: \includegraphics[scale=1.0]{f2.eps}
530: \caption{\textit{Left column}: Absolute $r'$ magnitude and break color
531: (or at 2.5 scale lengths in the case of Type~I galaxies) correlations; $\rho$ is
532: the Spearman's correlation coefficient. Type~II galaxies show a strong
533: correlation between the break color and the absolute magnitude, which means
534: that the scatter in break color at a given luminosity is significantly
535: smaller than the overall scatter. \textit{Middle and right columns}: Stellar surface
536: mass density and stellar mass fraction histograms with their median values
537: in the upper right corner of each panel.}
538: \label{hists}
539: \end{figure}
540:
541:
542: \end{document}
543:
544: