1: \def\ts {\thinspace}
2: \def\kms {\ifmmode{{\rm \ts km\ts s}^{-1}}\else{\ts km\ts s$^{-1}$}\fi}
3: \def\msol {\ifmmode{{\rm M}_{\odot} }\else{M$_{\odot}$}\fi}
4: \def\lsol {\ifmmode{L_{\odot}}\else{$L_{\odot}$}\fi}
5: \def\lfir {\ifmmode{L_{\rm FIR}}\else{$L_{\rm FIR}$}\fi}
6: \def\,{\thinspace}
7: \def \ppm{$\pm$}
8:
9: \documentclass[preprint]{aastex}
10: %\documentclass[aj_pt4]{aastex}
11: \usepackage{graphicx}
12: \usepackage{longtable}
13: %\usepackage{amsmath}
14:
15: \linespread{1.0} \received{} \accepted{} \paperid{}
16: \journalid{}{2007}
17:
18: \begin{document}
19:
20: \title{Molecular Gas and Star formation in ARP~302}
21: \author{Yiping Ao\altaffilmark{1,2},
22: Dinh-V-Trung\altaffilmark{3,4}, Jeremy Lim\altaffilmark{3}, Ji
23: Yang\altaffilmark{1} and Satoki Matsushita\altaffilmark{3}}
24:
25: \altaffiltext{1}{Purple Mountain Observatory,
26: Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China}
27:
28: \altaffiltext{2}{Visiting Scholar, Academia Sinica Institute of
29: Astronomy and Astrophysics}
30:
31: \altaffiltext{3}{Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and
32: Astrophysics, P.O. Box 23-141, Taipei 106, Taiwan}
33:
34: \altaffiltext{4}{on leave from Institute of Physics, Vietnamese Academy of Science
35: and Technology, ThuLe, BaDinh, Hanoi, Vietnam.}
36:
37: \begin{abstract}
38: We present the Submillimeter Array observation of the CO $J$=2$-$1
39: transition towards the northern galaxy, ARP~302N, of the early
40: merging system, ARP~302. Our high angular resolution observation
41: reveals the extended spatial distribution of the molecular gas in
42: ARP~302N. We find that the molecular gas has a very asymmetric
43: distribution with two strong concentrations on either side of the
44: center together with a weaker one offset by about 8 kpc to the
45: north. The molecular gas distribution is also found to be
46: consistent with that from the hot dust as traced by the 24 $\mu$m
47: continuum emission observed by the Spitzer. The line ratio of CO
48: $J$=2$-$1/1$-$0 is found to vary strongly from
49: about 0.7 near the galaxy center to 0.4 in the outer part of the
50: galaxy. Excitation analysis suggests that the gas density is low,
51: less than 10$^3$ cm$^{-3}$, over the entire galaxy.
52: By fitting the SED of ARP~302N in the far infrared we obtain a dust
53: temperature of $T\rm _d$=26--36 K and a dust mass of
54: M$\rm _{dust}$=2.0--3.6$\times$10$^8$ M$\rm _\odot$.
55: The spectral index of the radio continuum is around 0.9. The
56: spatial distribution and spectral index of the radio continuum
57: emission suggests that most of the radio continuum emission is
58: synchrotron emission from the star forming regions at the nucleus
59: and ARP302N-cm. The good spatial correspondance between the 3.6 cm radio continuum
60: emission, the Spitzer 8 \& 24 $\mu$m data and the high resolution
61: CO $J$=2$-$1 observation from the SMA shows that there is the
62: asymmetrical star forming activities in ARP~302N.
63:
64: \end{abstract}
65:
66: \keywords{galaxies:active -- glaxies:ISM -- galaxies:starburst --
67: infrared:galaxies -- galaxies:individual: ARP~302}
68:
69: \section{Introduction}
70:
71: Most luminous infrared (IR) galaxies (LIRGs; 10$^{11}$ L$\rm
72: _\odot$ $<$ L$\rm _{IR}$ $\leq$ 10$^{12}$ L$\rm _\odot$) are found
73: in interacting or merging systems with disturbed morphologies. In
74: the standard scenario proposed by Sanders et al. (1988a,b), the
75: formation of LIRGs, or ultra-luminous infrared galaxies (ULIRGs)
76: is due to the interaction and merging of two gas-rich galaxies.
77: Numerical simulations of interacting galaxies
78: \citep{barnes91,mihos96} indicate that a stable bar is formed
79: during the first encounter. Under the gravitational torque induced
80: by the bar, the molecular gas is channelled into the central
81: regions of the galaxies forming a huge reservoir to fuel intense
82: starbursts. Recent high angular resolution observations \citep{downes98} seem to support
83: this picture by revealing rotating disks of molecular gas that has
84: been driven into the centers of the mergers.
85:
86: A lot of (U)LIRGs have been studied at high angular resolution, for example
87: ARP~299 \citep{casoli99}, NGC5394/95 \citep{kaufman02}, ARP~220 \citep{wiedner02},
88: NGC4038/39 \citep{zhu03}, NGC5194/95 \citep{matsushita04}, NGC~6090 \citep{wang04},
89: NGC5218 \citep{olsson07}. A few samples of the sources along the merging sequence
90: are also been investigated. \citet{xilouris04} found evidence for an increase
91: in 100- to 850-$\mu$m flux density ratio along the merging sequence and
92: interpreted this trend as an increase of the mass fraction of the warm dust in
93: comparison to the cold dust, inferring the possible enhanced star formation
94: rate (SFR). \citet{bergvall03}, however, question the
95: ubiquitous connection between interactions and starburst activity.
96: \citet{gao99} find the enhanced star formation efficiency (SFE) for
97: the later merging systems, but the effect is cancelled by the decrease
98: in the amount of molecular gas. That might result in no change in the infrared luminosity, i.e.
99: the indicator of the starburst activity. Thus more sources in high
100: resolution are needed and multiple CO transtions are essential to
101: investigate the gas properties for the mergers at different
102: stages.
103:
104: Here we present another case study of an early merger system,
105: ARP~302. This galaxy is also named as VV 340 or UGC 9618, which consists of two galaxies
106: (ARP~302N and ARP~302S) with a separation of about 40$\arcsec$ between the two
107: nuclei, which is $\sim$27 kpc at the angular distance of 138 Mpc
108: (the luminosity distance is 147 Mpc), and has an infrared
109: luminosity of 4.5$\times$10$^{11}$ L$_\odot$. ARP~302 is the most
110: CO luminous system known in the local universe, and more luminous
111: in CO than those ultraluminous galaxies out to redshifts of 0.27
112: (Solomon et al. 1997). The detected molecular gas mass is
113: 9.1$\times$10$^{10}$ M$_\odot$ \citep{lo97} (corrected by the adopted
114: comsmology here). HI data gives a mass
115: of atomic hydrogen 2.7$\times$10$^{10}$ M$_\odot$ \citep{van01}.
116: In all observations it was found that
117: ARP~302N contributes most of the IR emission and molecular gas
118: mass.
119:
120: Previous high resolution CO $J$=1$-$0 observation on ARP~302 by
121: \cite{lo97} (the angular resolution is
122: 7$\arcsec$$\times$5$\arcsec$) reveals two extended CO disks ($>$
123: 10 kpc), and ARP~302N shows roughly an exponential disk with a
124: scale length of 7 kpc extending out to 23 kpc in diameter.
125: Based on the unusually extended distribution of the molecular gas,
126: \cite{lo97} concluded that the high IR luminosity in ARP~302
127: arises simply because an extremely large amount of molecular gas
128: is forming high-mass stars at a rate similar to the Galaxy, instead of the
129: starburst activities in the galactic nucleus.
130:
131: In this study, we report the high angular
132: resolution CO $J$=2$-$1 observation of ARP~302N and the analysis of archival
133: data in the radio and mid/far infrared to study the physical properties of the gas
134: as well as the star formation activities in this early merger. In \S\ref{observations},
135: we show the details of our observations together with the
136: information about the archive data used in this paper. In
137: \S\ref{spatial}, \S\ref{ratio} and \S\ref{kinematics}, we present
138: the results of spatial distribution and the kinematics of the
139: molecular gas of our observations. In \S\ref{vla} and
140: \S\ref{spitzer}, the results of the radio emission and the mid/far
141: infrared emission from the archive data are presented. Finally we
142: present the dust properties using a dust model in \S\ref{dust},
143: the excitation condition of the gas in \S\ref{excitation}, the
144: star formation activities in \S\ref{formation} and a comparison with
145: other mergers in \S\ref{compar}. A summary of this
146: study is given in \S\ref{conclusion}. In this paper, we use a
147: $\Lambda$ cosmology with $\rm H_{\rm0} =
148: 71$~km~s$^{-1}$~Mpc$^{-1}$, $\rm \Omega_\Lambda=0.73$ and $\rm
149: \Omega_{m}=0.27$ \citep{spergel03}.
150:
151: \section{Observations}\label{observations}
152:
153: \subsection{CO $J$=2$-$1 observation with the Submillimeter array}
154:
155: We carried out the observation of the CO $J$=2$-$1 line from
156: ARP~302N on 2005 March 26, using the Submillimeter array
157: (SMA\footnotemark[5])\footnotetext[5]{The Submillimeter Array is a
158: joint project between the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory
159: and the Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics,
160: and is funded by the Smithsonian Institution and the Academia
161: Sinica.} \citep{ho04} in its most compact configuration. At that
162: time the SMA consists of 7 antennas of 6 meter in diameter. The
163: weather condition during our observations is average, with
164: atmospheric opacity at zenith $\tau_{225}$ $\sim$ 0.35. The single
165: sideband system temperature is about 450 K. Because of the large
166: extent of ARP~302N, we cover the whole galaxy using a two-pointing
167: mosaic, with a separation of 20$\arcsec$ between the two pointings
168: located at 10$\arcsec$ north and south of the nucleus
169: ($\alpha$=14$^h$57$^m$00$^s$.67, $\delta$=+24$\rm
170: ^o$37$\arcmin$02$\arcsec$.8).
171:
172: The total on-source time was about 2 hours per one pointing. We
173: observed the CO $J$=2$-$1 line in the upper sideband of the double
174: sideband receiver. The SMA digital correlator was configured to
175: provide twenty-four independent spectral windows in each sideband.
176: Each window was divided into 128 channels, which provided 0.8 MHz
177: frequency resolution (i.e. $\sim$1.1~km~s$^{-1}$) at 223 GHz,
178: giving a total frequency coverage in each sideband of 1.97 GHz
179: (i.e. $\sim$2650~km~s$^{-1}$). We tuned the SMA receivers to the
180: redshifted CO $J$=2$-$1 line at the frequency of 222.967 GHz,
181: which corresponds to the systemic velocity of 10180
182: \kms. We observed Jupiter and Callisto for bandpass and flux
183: calibration respectively, and estimated the flux density scale to
184: be accurate to about 10\% at 1.3 mm band. The nearby quasar
185: 1357+193 was observed every 20 minutes to correct for
186: time-dependent gain variations due to atmospheric fluctuations.
187: The data were calibrated using the MIR-IDL package, which was
188: specially developed for the SMA. We then exported the data into
189: MIRIAD format for further processing. The mosaiced images made
190: from SMA data were deconvolved using the Steer-Dewdney-Ito clean
191: algorithm \citep{steer84}. The synthesized beam size is
192: 3.4$\arcsec$$\times$2.5$\arcsec$ for the CO $J$=2$-$1 observatrion
193: with the uniformed weighting and the resulting noise level is 60
194: mJy beam$^{-1}$ at a velocity resolution of 20 km~s$^{-1}$. The 230
195: GHz continuum image of ARP~302N was formed from the line-free
196: channels and the rms noise level is 5 mJy~beam$^{-1}$.
197: No 1.3 mm continuum emission was detected from our
198: observation at 3 $\sigma$ level of 15 mJy~beam$^{-1}$.
199:
200: \subsection{CO $J$=2$-$1 observation with the Submillimeter Telescope}
201: To estimate the amount of CO J=2--1 flux recovered in our SMA
202: observations, we also observed the CO $J$=2$-$1 line in ARP~302N
203: with a single dish telescope, the Submillimeter Telescope (SMT),
204: in Arizona on 2005 December 14 under excellent weather condition
205: ($\rm \tau_{225 GHz}$ $\sim$ 0.08). The observation was done in
206: beam switching mode, with a beam throw of 2 arcmins and a chopping
207: frequency of 1.25 Hz. The half-power beamwidth (HPBW) of the SMT
208: telescope at the frequency of CO J=2--1 line is 28$\arcsec$, which
209: is large enough to cover most of the CO emitting region of
210: ARP~302N. The acousto-optical spectrometer (AOS) was used as the
211: backend, with a usable bandwidth of 1 GHz and a velocity
212: resolution of 1.3~km~s$^{-1}$. A single pointing observation was
213: made toward the nucleus of ARP~302N. The on-source integration
214: time was 45 minutes. The data was reduced with the GILDAS software
215: package. All the spectra were then co-added to produce the final
216: CO J=2--1 spectrum of ARP~302N. The final spectra were smoothed to
217: the resolution of 14 km~s$^{-1}$. The
218: noise level on antenna temperature scale was 3 mK. We
219: converted the spectrum into main beam temperature scale using a
220: main beam efficiency of 0.66.
221:
222: \subsection{VLA archive data}
223: We searched the Very Large Array data archive, which is provided by the National Radio Astronomy
224: Observatory
225: (VLA\footnotemark[6]\footnotetext[6]{The National Radio Astronomy
226: Observatory is a facility of the National Science Foundation
227: operated under cooperative agreement by Associated Universities,
228: Inc.}), for data on ARP~302N. Previous observations were found for
229: X band (8.44 GHz, i.e. 3.6~cm), C band (4.86 GHz, i.e. 6.0~cm) and
230: L band (1.49 GHz, i.e. 20~cm). We used the NRAO data reduction
231: package to reduce the available data sets. Continuum images were
232: made using a natural weighting. For X-band data, which were obtained in
233: the extended configuration, we
234: applied tappering to the data in order to recover the more extended continuum emission.
235:
236: \subsection{Spitzer archive data}
237: To compare with our SMA data, we also searched for the archival
238: data on ARP~302N produced by the Spitzer telescope. We found that
239: ARP~302N was imaged with the Infrared Array Camera (IRAC; Fazio et
240: al. 2004) in all four channels (3.6, 4.5, 5.8, and 8.0 $\mu$m) on
241: 2005 July 16 and with Multiband Imaging Photometer for Spitzer
242: (MIPS; Rieke et al. 2004) in 24, 70 and 160 $\mu$m on 2005 January
243: 25. The images were reduced with the Spitzer Science Center (SSC)
244: IRAC reduction pipeline and combined with the SSC mosaicker. The
245: point spread functions are
246: 2.2$\arcsec$, 6$\arcsec$, 18$\arcsec$ and 40$\arcsec$ for 8, 24,
247: 70 and 160 $\mu$m wavelengths, respectively. We only use the 8.0 $\mu$m and
248: the MIPS data in this paper. The uncertainties on the final
249: absolute calibrations are estimated at 10\%, 10\%, 20\%, and 20\%
250: for the 8, 24, 70, and 160 $\mu$m data, respectively.
251:
252:
253: \section{Results}\label{results}
254:
255: \subsection{Spatial distribution of the molecular gas}\label{spatial}
256:
257: In Figure~\ref{channel_map} we show the channel maps of CO
258: $J$=2$-$1 emission for ARP~302N. There is a clear positional shift
259: of the emission centroid with the velocity along the north-south
260: direction, consistent with the rotation of the gas in the galactic
261: disk. In each velocity channel we find that the emission is just
262: barely resolved in the east-west direction, which is perpendicular
263: to the galactic plane. In the channels with the velocity within
264: \ppm 80 \kms, the emission is compact and only slightly resolved
265: by the SMA, showing a symmetric distribution. The emission in this
266: velocity range is centered at the nucleus and the emission of some
267: channels is weaker than the channels outside this range. In higher
268: redshifted and blueshifted velocity channels the emission is
269: slightly more extended in the north-south direction, especially
270: for the channels above \ppm 220 \kms. For the receding part of the
271: galaxy the CO J=2--1 emission is resolved into two distinct
272: components, which are separated by about 8$\arcsec$.
273:
274: Because the total extent of the CO emission is significant by
275: comparison with the primary beam of the SMA, part of the CO flux
276: could be resolved out in our SMA observations. In
277: Figure~\ref{spectra} we compare the spectrum of CO J=2--1 obtained
278: with the SMT at the resolution of 28$\arcsec$ and that obtained by
279: convolving our SMA channel maps to the same resolution. The CO
280: $J$=2$-$1 flux detected by the SMA within one SMT beam centered at
281: the nucleus is 356($\pm$8) Jy km~s$^{-1}$. It suggests that the SMA
282: recovers about 60\% of the CO $J$=2$-$1 flux from Arp 302 in
283: comparison with a total flux of 576 Jy \kms detected by the SMT. The
284: total CO $J$=2$-$1 flux detected by the SMA is 382 ($\pm$10) Jy
285: km~s$^{-1}$. The most significant difference between both spectrum
286: is the comparatively lower emission in the SMA spectrum from 220 to
287: 320 \kms, which could be due to extended emission that is partially
288: resolved out by the SMA in the outer northern region. The similarity
289: in the line shape between single dish and the SMA spectrum suggests
290: that the missing flux is more or less uniformly distributed across
291: the line.
292:
293: Figure~\ref{arp302_color}(b) shows the contours of integrated CO
294: $J$=2$-$1 intensity map at 3.4$\arcsec$$\times$2.5$\arcsec$
295: resolution by the SMA. The molecular gas almost covers the entire
296: optical disk of the galaxy seen almost edge on and distributes
297: over a region with the size of about 15 kpc. We find that the
298: molecular gas has a very asymmetric distribution with two strong
299: concentrations on either side of center together with a outmost
300: weaker concentration offset by about 8 kpc to the north. In the
301: figure, we show three crosses from bottom to top: one is at the
302: nucleus, the second is at the peak of 3.6 cm emission outside of
303: the nucleus (see \S\ref{vla}) and the third one is at the outmost
304: north for the weak CO J=2--1 emission concentration. To compare
305: with the BIMA data, we show the BIMA CO $J$=1$-$0 map in
306: Figure~\ref{arp302_color}(a). Our higher resolution map allows us
307: to investigate the molecular gas distribution with three
308: concentrations along the north-south direction, which the BIMA
309: data can not tell us. We also convolved the SMA beam to the BIMA's
310: and the map is shown in Figure~\ref{arp302_color}(d).
311: The BIMA map shows more extended distribution of the gas with large
312: radial distance comparison with the SMA result, which may be
313: due to the different exciation conditions for the gas at large
314: radial distance.
315:
316: \subsection{CO $J$=2$-$1/$J$=1$-$0 line ratio}\label{ratio}
317:
318: In Figure~\ref{arp302_color}(e), we present the map of the brightness temperature ratio of CO
319: $J$=2$-$1 emission from the SMA to CO $J$=1$-$0 emission from the
320: BIMA. To calculate the line ration, we first convolve our CO $J$=2$-$1 map to the same
321: angular resolution of 7$\arcsec$$\times$5$\arcsec$ of the BIMA
322: data as shown in Figure~\ref{arp302_color}(d) and form the line ratio map. We find that the line ratio varies from
323: 0.2 at the outer region to about 0.5 at the peaks. The ratio
324: should be the lower limit since the missing flux of the SMA is
325: about 36\% but there is no missing flux for the BIMA data -- the
326: flux of 304$\pm$45 Jy km~s$^{-1}$ from the BIMA CO $J$=1$-$0
327: observation \citep{lo97} is similar to the value of 290$\pm$35 Jy
328: km~s$^{-1}$ from NRAO 12m telescope (private communication from Y.
329: Gao; Gao \& Solomon 1999). The line ratio is a very important observational
330: constraint to estimate the physical conditions of the molecular gas in
331: Arp~302N as we will show in the next section.
332:
333: \subsection{Kinematics}\label{kinematics}
334:
335: We present in Figure~\ref{arp302_color}(c) the intensity-weighted velocity
336: field as contours. A velocity field typical of normal rotation is clearly
337: seen along the major axis within a radius of $\sim$4$\arcsec$, i.e. 2.7~kpc.
338: Along the minor axis, we can not detect any disturblance of the gas in the inner
339: region. In Figure~\ref{velplot} we shows the position-velocity (PV)
340: diagram of the CO J=2--1 emission along the major axis (position
341: angle of 1$^\circ$). We note that the molecular gas exhibits a
342: nearly constant velocity gradient (about 100 km~s$^{-1}$
343: kpc$^{-1}$) within the central 6$\arcsec$ or 4.0 kpc in linear scale.
344: In the velocity range
345: between 260 and 340 km~s$^{-1}$ there are clearly two components: one is associated
346: with the gas at ARP302N-cm and the other component located to the
347: northern part about 8$\arcsec$ to 15$\arcsec$ away from
348: the nucleus. The gas at 3.3$\arcsec$ (2.2 kpc) north of the
349: nucleus shows a slightly steeper velocity gradient (about 170
350: km~s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$) and the position of this feature is
351: consistent with ARP302N-cm (the secondary 3.6 cm radio emission
352: feature, see \S\ref{vla}). The molecular gas located at large
353: galactocentric distance toward the north shows clear deviation from
354: solid body rotation, as can be seen in Figure~\ref{velplot}.
355:
356: \cite{Sakamoto99} find that there is a steep rise in rotation
357: velocity, i.e. the velocity gradient $\sim$ 1000 km s$^{-1}$
358: kpc$^{-1}$, in the central regions with radii of typically
359: $\leq$ 0.5 kpc towards most nearby spiral galaxies.
360: It is therefore apparent that the presence of a shallow velocity
361: gradient over an extended region of 4.0 kpc in radius sets Arp~302N apart from
362: normal cases. However, solid body
363: rotation over kpc-scales is found in some special cases, such as NGC~4194 \citep{aalto00},
364: NGC~7479 \citep{laine99}, UGC~2866 \citep{huettem99} and NGC~891 \citep{garcia95}.
365: Usually the presence of a molecular ring
366: or the solid body rotation in bars are evoked to explain the observed linear velocity gradient.
367: \subsection{VLA results}\label{vla}
368: Low resolution of the images at C band (6~cm) and L band (20~cm),
369: as shown in Figure~\ref{arp302_vla}, indicate that
370: the radio emission is concentrated in the central region. There is
371: only one central peak and the details can not be well resolved
372: with the current poor resolutions, which are 13--14$\arcsec$ for
373: both observations. The integrated intensities are 30.2$\pm$0.4 mJy
374: and 89.0$\pm$3.6 mJy for 6~cm and 20~cm respectively, yielding a
375: spectral index, $\alpha$ (where S $\varpropto$ $\nu^{-\alpha}$),
376: of 0.9.
377:
378: High resolution of the X band (3.6~cm) images are shown in
379: Figure~\ref{arp302_vla}. 3.6 cm continuum emission is mainly
380: contributed from two components with similar total integrated
381: intensity. One component, associated with the galactic nucleus, is
382: compact and marginally resolved (right top panel of
383: Figure~\ref{arp302_vla}). A second component is located at
384: 3.3$\arcsec$ ($\sim$ 2.2 kpc) north of the nucleus (ARP302N-cm
385: hereafter) and extends from 2$\arcsec$ to 4$\arcsec$ away from the
386: nucleus (left top panel of Figure~\ref{arp302_vla}). All the results
387: are summarized in Table~\ref{xband}.
388:
389: \subsection{Spitzer results}\label{spitzer}
390:
391: In Figure~\ref{irac} we show the mid infrared continuum emision from
392: Arp~302 at 8.0 $\mu$m and 24 $\mu$m taken with IRAC and MIPS instruments
393: of Spitzer. Both 8.0 $\mu$m and 24 $\mu$m images exhibit similar
394: morphology to that seen in the CO J=2--1 emission.
395: Hot dust traced by the 8.0 $\mu$m and 24 $\mu$m share the
396: similar spatial distribution as the molecular gas traced by the CO
397: J=2--1 emission. With a resolution of $\sim$7$\arcsec$ at 24
398: $\mu$m, ARP~302 is very well resolved. From the MIPS image we estimate the flux densities
399: of 0.32$\pm0.03$ Jy and 0.08$\pm0.01$ Jy for ARP~302N and ARP~302S
400: respectively. The flux densities are 5.16$\pm1.03$ Jy at 70 $\mu$m
401: and 5.08$\pm1.02$ Jy at 160 $\mu$m for ARP~302N respectively.
402: Applying the same flux ratio based on 24~$\mu$m between ARP~302N
403: and ARP~302S to the total IRAS flux densities of ARP~302, we
404: estimate 5.32$\pm1.60$ Jy at 60 $\mu$m and 11.6$\pm3.5$ Jy at 100
405: $\mu$m for ARP~302N.
406:
407: \section{Discussion}\label{discussion}
408:
409: \subsection{Dust properties constrained by one component dust
410: model}\label{dust}
411:
412: The dust continuum allows us to investigate the properties of the
413: dust, such as the dust temperature and the dust mass. To model the
414: dust emission from ARP~302N, we use the IR continuum fluxes measured
415: by Spitzer MIPS at 70 $\mu$m (5.16$\pm1.03$ Jy) and 160 $\mu$m
416: (5.08$\pm1.02$ Jy), and also by IRAS at 60 $\mu$m (5.32$\pm1.60$ Jy)
417: and 100 $\mu$m (11.6$\pm3.5$ Jy) (see details in \S\ref{spitzer})
418: together with the flux density of 135$\pm24$ mJy at 850 $\mu$m
419: reported by \cite{dunne00}.
420:
421: Assuming that the dust emission is optically thin, the flux
422: density of the dust emission is related to the dust temperature
423: and the dust mass by the relation: $\rm
424: S_{\nu}=(1+z)[B_{\nu}(T_{dust})-B_{\nu}(T_{bg})]\kappa_d(\nu)
425: M_{dust}/D_L^2$, where $\rm S_{\nu}$ is the observed flux density,
426: $\rm T_{dust}$ and $\rm T_{bg}$ are the dust and background
427: temperature respectively, $\rm B_{\nu}$ is the Planck function,
428: $\rm D_L$ is the luminosity distance of the source, $\rm M_{dust}$
429: is the dust mass and $\rm \kappa_d$ is the dust absorption
430: coefficient. For the dust absorption coefficient, we adopt $\rm
431: \kappa_d(\nu) = 0.4~(\nu/250~GHz)^\beta$ cm$^2$ g$^{-1}$, where
432: $\beta$ is the emissivity index. We note that the emisivity index
433: $\beta$ depends on the dust properties and needs to be specified
434: beforehand. By fitting the observational measurements, we can
435: derive the dust mass and dust temperature for each specified value
436: of $\beta$. In Figure~\ref{sed}, we show three fitting results
437: with ($\beta$, $T\rm _{dust}$, M$\rm _{dust}$) combinations:
438: $\beta$=1.0, $T\rm _{dust}$=36 K and M$\rm
439: _{dust}$=2.2$\times$10$^8$ M$_\odot$ (the best fit), $\beta$=1.5,
440: $T\rm _{dust}$=29 K and M$\rm _{dust}$=2.0$\times$10$^8$ M$_\odot$
441: (moderate $\beta$ value), and $\beta$=2.0, $T\rm _{dust}$=26 K and
442: M$\rm _{dust}$=1.1$\times$10$^8$ M$_\odot$ (the simple modified
443: blackbody fit). The dust temperature ranges from 26 to 36~K for
444: the different models. Previous two models gives a dust mass of
445: 2.0-2.2$\times$10$^8$ M$_\odot$, which are twice of the value from
446: the simple modified blackbody model.
447:
448: The simple modified blackbody model underestimates
449: the 850~$\mu$m flux density by $\sim$60\%, which indicates that either
450: additional cold component or modifications to the emissivity index
451: are needed or that the optically thin assumption is inappropriate.
452: Actually, the gas is very extended in this galaxy and should result in
453: the similar distribution for the dust emission. The dust emission is
454: still optically thin at 70~$\mu$m even if the dust is distribuated
455: over a region with a small radius of 1~kpc, with a dust mass of
456: 2.0$\times$10$^8$ M$_\odot$,
457: thus the optically thin assumption should be correct in this galaxy.
458: In a large survey for local galaxies by \citet{dunne00}, the dust
459: emissivity indexes to the best fitting models are found to be
460: 1.3$\pm$0.2 and they argued that the galaxies may contain a
461: significant amount of cold dust. For ARP~302N, an additional cold gas component
462: with a dust mass of 1.6--2.5$\times$10$^8$ M$_\odot$ and a dust temperature
463: of 20-15~K can conpensate for the lower predicted flux at 850~$\mu$m.
464: This results in a total
465: dust mass of 2.7--3.6$\times$10$^8$ M$_\odot$ dependent on the
466: temperature of the cold dust component.
467:
468: The observed flux in CO $J$=1$-$0 \citep{lo97} is 304 Jy~\kms for ARP~302N,
469: and the corresponding CO line luminosities are 1.6$\times$10$^{10}$ K~\kms~pc$^2$.
470: This places ARP~302 to be the most CO luminous system known in the local
471: universe and possibly the most gas rich system. Usually, we can estimate
472: the gas mass using a standard conversion factor, 4.8~M$_\odot$ (K~\kms~pc$^2$)$^{-1}$
473: in our Galaxy, and it leads to a gas mass of 7.7$\times$10$^{10}$M$_\odot$.
474: We derived a dust mass of 2.0-3.6$\times$10$^8$ M$_\odot$ from our dust models as above.
475: Adopting the gas-to-dust mass ratio of 150 in our Galaxy, this yields
476: the value of 3.0-5.4$\times$10$^{10}$M$_\odot$ for the gas mass.
477: Therefore, the gas mass estimates from the dust and the CO luminosity
478: are comparable within their uncertainties and lead to a gas mass of
479: 5.4$\times$10$^{10}$M$_\odot$ (the mean value from two methods).
480:
481: The theoretical prediction of the flux density of the continuum
482: emission at 1.3mm is less than 42 mJy from the above dust models.
483: The sensitivity of the continuum observation is 5 mJy beam$^{-1}$,
484: thus it is reasonable that there is no positive detection from the
485: SMA observation if the emission is distributed over a region of
486: over 3 beams.
487:
488: \subsection{Excitation condition of the gas}\label{excitation}
489:
490: The excitation condition of molecular gas in ARP~302N can be
491: studied using the CO $J$=2$-$1/$J$=1$-$0 line ratio. As seen in
492: Figure~\ref{arp302_color} the line ratio peaks at either side of
493: the center. The ratio varies significantly across the galaxy, from
494: about 0.2 in the outer region to about 0.5 at the peaks. Assuming
495: that the missing flux of the SMA observation is uniformly
496: distributed, the line ratio will be 0.2 higher and the ratio will
497: vary from 0.4 in the outer region to about 0.7 at the peaks. The
498: overall line ratio from the single dish measurements is about 0.5.
499: From a survey of the CO $J$=1$-$0 and $J$=2$-$1 lines in the inner
500: kpc regions of a large sample of nearby spiral galaxies,
501: \cite{braine92} measured an average line ratio of 0.89, but
502: 7 out of 35 galaxies have CO $J$=2$-$1/$J$=1$-$0 line ratios
503: less than 0.6. Furthermore, the gas in the central regions tend to
504: have high excitation temperature, which will result in the higher
505: line ratio if the CO line emission is optically thick.
506: The disks of NGC1808 \citep{aalto94} and our Galaxy show values
507: of 0.7 and 0.6, which are comparable to the value in the central
508: region of ARP~302N.
509:
510: To be more quantitative, we use our molecular excitation model
511: to constrain the physical conditions of the molecular gas.
512: The transfer of radiation is calculated within the framework of
513: the large velocity gradient approximation. We take into account
514: all rotational levels of the CO molecule up J=10.
515: We use the collisional cross sections between CO and H$_2$ molecules
516: from \citet{flower85}. The statistical equillibrium equations
517: are solved using the Newton-Raphson method. In our molecular excitation model
518: three parameters are required: the gas density, the kinetic temperature and
519: the fractional abundance of the CO molecule per unit velocity gradient.
520: At the expected low density of the molecular gas, the kinetic temperature
521: is expected to decoupled from the dust temperature.
522: In this case, the kinetic temperature might be as low as half
523: of the dust temperature \citep{downes98}. In the previous section,
524: we estimate the dust temperature in the range of 26 to 36 K. For the
525: excitation calculation, we adopt two representative values of 20 and 30 K.
526: In Figure~\ref{lvg} (left panel) we present the dependence of CO
527: $J$=2$-$1/$J$=1$-$0 line ratio on the gas density $n({\rm H}_2)$
528: and the abundance per velocity gradient [CO]/$\rm{(dv/dr)}$ for
529: kinetic temperature of 20 and 30~K. The figure shows that for the line ratio
530: measured in ARP~302N the gas density is low, less than 10$^3$
531: cm$^{-3}$. At this low density, the transition $J$=2$-$1 is
532: sub-thermally excited. Lower line ratios correspond to lower
533: densities for a reasonable range of abundance per velocity
534: gradient. To provide further support for this conclusion we also
535: show the dependence of line ratio on the gas density and kinetic
536: temperature T$_{\rm kin}$ for a fixed abundance per velocity
537: gradient of [CO]/$\rm{(dv/dr)}$ = 1$\times$ 10$^{\rm -5}$ pc~($\rm
538: km s^{-1}$)$^{-1}$ (right panel of Figure~\ref{lvg}). The result
539: suggests only a weak dependence on kinetic temperature. Our
540: finding is very similar to the conclusion of \cite{sakamoto94} in
541: that the variation in line ratio mainly reflects the variation in
542: gas density. To set more stringent limits on the gas density and
543: temperature would require observations of higher transitions of CO
544: and/or its $^{13}$CO isotope.
545:
546: The relatively low gas density in ARP~302N is reflected
547: in its spatial distribution. For ULIRGs, which are in a more
548: advanced merger phase, \cite{downes98} show that the molecular gas
549: is more strongly concentrated in the nuclear region of the galaxy in
550: the form of a rotating disk with size of 1 kpc or less. The
551: estimated average gas density is higher, ranging from a few 10$^3$
552: to 10$^4$ cm$^{-3}$. In ARP~302N, there is a large amount of
553: molecular gas (5.4$\times$10$^{10}$ M$_{\odot}$, see in \S\ref{dust}), but this gas is
554: distributed over a very extended galactic disk with a size of 15
555: kpc, resulting in lower average density.
556: We note that the diffuse and very extended spatial distribution
557: of molecular gas in ARP~302N is unusual among local luminous and ultralumious
558: galaxies. However, in some cases such as in the interacting galaxy M51, the molecular
559: gas traced by CO emission also covers all the optical disk,
560: out to at least 12 kpc radius \citep{schuster07}.
561: The origin of this distribution is currently unknown.
562:
563: \subsection{Star forming activity}\label{formation}
564: The star formation activity can be estimated by SFE, the ratio of luminosity to molecular gas mass,
565: of the galaxies. For ARP~302N, we estimate an infrared luminosity
566: of 3.4$\times$10$^{11}$ L$_{\odot}$, separating the contamination
567: of ARP~302S in the manner described in \S\ref{spitzer}. We can
568: also estimate the infrared luminosity from the 24 $\mu$m data with
569: the empirical formula L$_{IR}$=10$\nu L_\nu(24 \mu m)$
570: \citep{bell05}, yielding a luminosity of 2.7 $\times$10$^{11}$
571: L$_{\odot}$, which is comparable with our estimated IRAS
572: luminosity. The molecular gas estimate is 5.4$\times$10$^{10}$ M$_{\odot}$
573: for ARP~302N. Its SFE of 6.3 L$_{\odot}$/M$_{\odot}$ is slightly
574: higher than that in our Galaxy but much
575: lower than starburst galaxies or (U)LIRGs. The high infrared
576: luminosity, the large amount of the gas mass and the low SFE make
577: this galaxy peculiar.
578:
579: The SFR for ARP~302N is about 40 $\rm
580: M_\odot~yr^{-1}$ assuming SFR = 1.17$\times$10$^{-10}$ ($\rm
581: L\rm_{FIR}/L_{\odot}$) $\rm M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$
582: \citep{kennicutt98}, and thus ARP~302N can retain such a
583: luminosity over a period of at most 2.0$\times 10^9$ yrs. The
584: system will likely evolve into advanced merger in a timescale of
585: several tens million yrs \citep{mihos96}, and may at that time
586: become a ULIRG with a luminosity of 1.6$\times$10$^{12}$
587: $L_{\odot}$ even if it will lose half of its gas mass by then
588: (given a SFE of 42 L$_{\odot}$/M$_{\odot}$ for the merging systems
589: with the separation less than 5 kpc from Gao \& Solomon 1999).
590:
591: \subsubsection{Constraint from the line ratio}
592: As discussed in previous section, our excitation analysis suggests
593: that the low line ratio in ARP~302N is due to the low volume density
594: of the molecular gas. The low gas density is entirely consistent
595: with the low SFE observed in ARP~302N, as star
596: formation is associated with dense gas rather than just total gas
597: mass \citep{gao04}.
598:
599: \subsubsection{Radio continuum}
600: The thermal radio emission from HII regions is identifiable by its
601: flat spectral index with a typical value of 0.1. A spectral index
602: of 0.9 as measured for ARP~302N implied that non-thermal emission
603: dominates. Synchrotron emission with a spectral index of 0.9 is
604: likely to be dominated by supernova remnants with small diameters,
605: referred to the star forming activity in ARP~302N. From the high
606: resolution images at 3.6~cm, the continuum emission mainly comes
607: from the nucleus and ARP302N-cm. Therefore, the nucleus and
608: ARP302N-cm are the regions with strong star forming activity.
609:
610: \subsubsection{Strong star forming activities at the nucleus and ARP302N-cm}
611:
612: The extended infrared emission from Spitzer 8 and 24 $\mu$m data
613: excludes the existence of a strong AGN in ARP~302N and favors the
614: star formation origin for the large infrared luminosity in
615: ARP~302N. Therefore it fully supports that the star formation
616: dominates the IR emission in the galgaxy. The 3.6 cm observation
617: shows that there is strong and extended radio continuum emission
618: at ARP302N-cm. The Spitzer 8 and 24 $\mu$m images peak at the same
619: region, indicating that there is strong emission from the PAH and
620: hot dust. The high resolution CO $J$=2$-$1 image from the SMA
621: reveals much molecular gas exists at ARP302N-cm. All of these
622: results support that there is the asymmetrical star forming
623: activities in the system and ARP302N-cm is the strongest active
624: star forming region in the galaxy.
625:
626: From 3.6~cm images with the different
627: resolutions at the nuclear region, it is clear that at least 36\%
628: of the emission is not associated with the unresolved structure in
629: the nuclear region and 64\% of the emission is originated from a
630: compact region (from the VLA 3.6~cm data, the deconvolved size is
631: 0.23$\arcsec$$\times$0.09$\arcsec$, i.e. 143 pc $\times$ 56 pc).
632: As a whole, the star formation is not active in ARP~302N, but there
633: is strong star forming regions at the nucleus and ARP302N-cm.
634:
635: From the previous optical spectroscopy observation
636: \citep{veilleux95}, the system was classified as LINER type galaxy.
637: \citet{alonso00} claim that LINER-like optical
638: spectra would be the consequence of the shock-heating by supernovae
639: of the surrounding gas after a burst of star formation, as observed
640: in NGC~5218 \citep{olsson07}. This scenario to explain the LINER
641: type spectrum is consistent with our radio observation which suggests
642: that there are many supernova explosions. Of course, we can not
643: exclude the possible existence of a weak AGN in the center.
644:
645: \subsection{Comparison with other mergers}\label{compar}
646: In Arp 302N the distribution and kinematics of molecular gas show no
647: discernable disturbance. That suggests the Arp 302 system is in the
648: early merging stage. Recently, many authors studied the molecular
649: gas in high angular resolution to investigate
650: the effects of the merging procedure and the star formation therein.
651: The molecular gas is often concentrated on the overlap region or at least have
652: another peak except for the centers of the systems with the well seperated nuclei,
653: such as ARP~299 \citep{casoli99}, NGC~6090 \citep{wang04} and VV~114 \citep{iono2004}.
654: In these cases, the starburst acitivites is prominent and the SFE is much higher
655: than that in our Galaxies. NGC~6670 is another widely seperated merger
656: and is well studied by \citet{wang01}. They also found that the stars
657: and the molecular gas do not show any clear sign of the
658: merging process. However, the atomic gas is found to concentrate in the region in between
659: the two galaxies, a very clear signature of the merging process.
660: The atomic gas will be helpful to determine the merging process in ARP~302.
661: Indeed, simulations show that the high SFRs and the SFEs arise only in the late
662: stages of the merger and the star formation does not deplete much gas
663: before it reaches the central regions in the mergering systems \citet{mihos94,mihos96}.
664: It is consistent with the observed enhanced SFE in the
665: late mergers by \citet{gao99}, which suggests that the fact before
666: its final merging stage is the reason why the SFE in this LIRG is just comparable to the
667: value in our Galaxy. The huge infrared luminosity in ARP~302N is just due to
668: its large amount of the gas mass instead of the starburst activity.
669:
670: \section{Conclusion}\label{conclusion}
671: In this paper we present the SMA observations of the CO $J$=2$-$1
672: transition towards the northern galaxy, ARP~302N, of the early
673: merging system, ARP~302, to study the physical properties of the gas.
674: To well understand the star formation activities,
675: the VLA data at 3.6~cm, 6.0~cm, 20~cm and the Spitzer (both IRAC
676: and MIPS data) archive data are also shown here. Our main results
677: are summarized as the following:
678:
679: \begin{enumerate}
680:
681: \item Our high angular resolution CO $J$=2$-$1 observation reveals
682: the extended spatial distribution of the molecular gas in
683: ARP~302N. We find that the molecular gas has a very asymmetric
684: distribution with two strong concentrations on either side of the
685: center together with a weaker one offset by about 8 kpc to the
686: north. This spatial distribution is very similar to the morphology seen
687: previously in the CO J=2--1 line.
688:
689: \item The distribution of the molecular gas is also found to be
690: consistent with that for the PAH and the hot dust as traced by the 8 $\mu$m
691: and 24 $\mu$m continuum emission observed by Spitzer.
692:
693: \item The line ratio CO J=2--1/1-0 shows that the line ratio
694: varies strongly from about 0.7 near the galaxy center to 0.4 in
695: the outer part of the galaxy. Excitation analysis suggests that
696: the gas density is low, less than 10$^3$ cm$^{-3}$, over the
697: entire galaxy.
698:
699: \item By fitting the far infrared part of the SED of ARP~302N, we obtain a dust
700: temperature $T\rm _d$ in the range 26--36 K and a dust mass of
701: M$\rm _{dust}$=2.0--3.6$\times$10$^8$ M$\rm _\odot$.
702:
703: \item We determine the spectral index of the radio continuum to be approximately 0.9. The
704: spatial distribution and spectral index of the radio continuum
705: emission suggests that most of the radio continuum emission is
706: synchrotron emission from the star forming regions at the nucleus
707: and ARP302N-cm. The good spatial correspondance between the 3.6 cm radio continuum
708: emission, the Spitzer 8 and 24 $\mu$m data and the high resolution
709: CO $J$=2$-$1 observation from the SMA shows that there is the
710: asymmetrical star forming activities in ARP~302N and ARP302N-cm is
711: the strongest active star forming region in the galaxy.
712:
713:
714: \end{enumerate}
715:
716: \acknowledgments
717:
718: We would like to acknowledge the anonymous referee for the valuable discussions and
comments. We also thank the SMA staff for maintaining the operation of the array.
719: The SMT is operated by the Arizona Radio Observatory (ARO), Steward
720: Observatory, University of Arizona. Y.-P. Ao thanks the ASIAA for
721: supporting his stay as a Visiting Scholar, when much of this work
722: was done. Y.-P. Ao also acknowledge the support of NSFC grant 10733030.
723:
724: \begin{thebibliography}{}
725: \bibitem[Aalto et al. (1994)]{aalto94}{Aalto, S., Booth, R. S., Black, J. H., Koribalski, B. \& Wielebinski, R., 1994, \aap, 286, 365}
726: \bibitem[Aalto \& H\"{u}ttemeister\, (2000)]{aalto00}{Aalto, S. \& H\"{u}ttemeister, S., 2000, A\&A, 362, 42}
727: \bibitem[Alonso-Herrero et al.\,(2000)]{alonso00}{Alonso-Herrero, A., Rieke, M. J., Rieke, G. H. \& Shields, J. C., 2000, ApJ, 530, 688}
728: \bibitem[Barnes \& Hernquist\,(1991)]{barnes91}{Barnes, J. E. \& Hernquist, L. E., 1991, \apj, 370, L65}
729: \bibitem[Bell et al.\,(2005)]{bell05}{Bell, E. F., et al. 2005, ApJ, 625, 23}
730: \bibitem[Bergvall et al. (2003)]{bergvall03}{Bergvall, N., Laurikainen, E. \& Aalto, S., 2003, \aap, 405, 31}
731: \bibitem[Braine \& Combes\,(1992)]{braine92}{Braine, J., \& Combes, F., 1992, A\&A 264, 433}
732: \bibitem[Casoli et al. (1999)]{casoli99}{Casoli, F., Willaime, M.-C., Viallefond, F. \& Gerin, M., 1999, \aap, 346, 663}
733: \bibitem[Downes \& Solomon\,(1998)]{downes98}{Downes, D. \& Solomon, P. M., 1998, \apj, 507, 615}
734: \bibitem[Dunne et al.\,(2000)]{dunne00}Dunne, L., Eales, S., Edmunds, M., Ivison, R., Alexander, P. \& Clements, D. L., 2000, \mnras, 315, 115
735: \bibitem[Fazio et al.\,(2004)]{fazio04}{Fazio, G. G., et al., 2004, ApJS, 154, 10}
736: \bibitem[Flower \& Launay\,(1985)]{flower85} Flower, D.R., Launay, J.M., 1985, MNRAS, 214, 271
737: \bibitem[Gao \& Solomon\,(1999)]{gao99}{Gao, Y. \& Solomon, M., 1999, \apj, 512, L99}
738: \bibitem[Gao \& Solomon\,(2004)]{gao04}{Gao, Y. \& Solomon, P. M., 2004, \apj, 606, 271}
739: \bibitem[Garc\'{i}a-Burillo \& Gu\'{e}lin\,(1995)]{garcia95}{Garc\'{i}a-Burillo, S. \& Gu\'{e}lin, M., 1995, A\&A, 299, 657}
740: \bibitem[Ho, Moran \& Lo\,(2004)]{ho04}{Ho, P. T. P., Moran, J. M. \& Lo, K. Y., 2004, \apj, 616, L1}
741: \bibitem[H\"{u}ttemeister et al.\,(1999)]{huettem99}{H\"{u}ttemeister, S., Aalto, S. \& Wall, W. F., 1999, A\&A, 346, 45}
742: %\bibitem[Hwang et al.\,(1999)]{hwang99}{Hwang, C. Y., Lo, K. Y., Gao, Y., Gruendl, R. A. \& Lu, N. Y. 1999, \apj, 511, L17}
743: \bibitem[Iono et al.\,(2004)]{iono2004}{Iono, D., Ho, P. T. P., Yun, M. S., Matsushita, S., Peck, A. B. \& Sakamoto, K., 2004, ApJ, 616, L63}
744: \bibitem[Kaufman et al. (2002)]{kaufman02}{Kaufman, M., Sheth, K., Struck, C. et al. 2002, AJ, 123, 702}
745: \bibitem[Kennicutt\,(1998)]{kennicutt98}{Kennicutt, R. C., 1998, ARA\&A, 36, 189}
746: \bibitem[Laine et al.\,(1999)]{laine99}{Laine, S., Kenney, J. D. P., Yun, M. S. \& Gottesman, S. T., 1999, ApJ, 511, L709}
747: \bibitem[Lo, Gao \& Gruendl\,(1997)]{lo97}Lo, K. Y., Gao, Y. \& Gruendl, R. A., 1997, \apj, 475, L103
748: \bibitem[Matsushita et al. (2004)]{matsushita04}{Matsushita, S., Sakamoto, K., Kuo, Cheng-Yu et al. 2004, ApJ, 616, L55}
749: \bibitem[Mihos \& Hernquist\,(1994)]{mihos94}{Mihos, J. C. \& Hernquist, L. E., 1994, ApJ, 425, L13}
750: \bibitem[Mihos \& Hernquist\,(1996)]{mihos96}{Mihos, J. C. \& Hernquist, L. E., 1996, \apj 464, 641}
751: \bibitem[Olsson et al.\,(2007)]{olsson07}{Olsson, E., Aalto, S., Thomasson, M., Beswick, R. \& Hüttemeister, S., 2007, A\&A, 473, 389}
752: \bibitem[Sakamoto et al.\,(1994)]{sakamoto94}{Sakamoto, S., Hayashi, M., Hasegawa, T., Handa, T., \& Oka, T., 1994, ApJ 425, 641}
753: \bibitem[Sakamoto et al.\,(1999)]{Sakamoto99}{Sakamoto, K., Okumura, S. K., Ishizuki, S. \& Scoville, N. Z., 1999, \apj, 525, 691}
754: \bibitem[Sanders et al.\,(1988a)]{Sanders88a}{Sanders, D. B., Soifer, B. T., Elias, J. H., Madore, B. F., Matthews, K., Neugebauer, G. \& Scoville, N. Z., 1988, \apj, 325, 74}
755: \bibitem[Sanders et al.\,(1988b)]{Sanders88b}{Sanders, D. B., Soifer, B. T., Elias, J. H., Neugebauer, G. \& Matthews K., 1988b, \apj, 328, L35}
756: \bibitem[Schuster et al. (2007)]{schuster07}{Schuster, K. F., Kramer, C., Hitschfeld, M., Garcia-Burillo, S. \& Mookerjea, B., 2007, \aap, 461, 143}
757: \bibitem[Solomon et al.\,(1997)]{Solomon97}{Solomon, P. M., Downes, D., Radford, S. J. E. \& Barrett, J. W., 1997, \apj, 478, 144}
758: \bibitem[Spergel et al.\,(2003)]{spergel03}{Spergel, D. N., Verde, L., Peiris, H., etal. 2003, ApJS, 148, 175}
759: \bibitem[Steer et al.\,(1984)]{steer84}{Steer, D. G., Dewdney, P. E. \& Ito, M. R., 1984, A\&A, 137, 159}
760: \bibitem[van Driel, Gao \& Monnier-Ragaigne\,(2001)]{van01}{van Driel, W., Gao, Y. \& Monnier-Ragaigne, D., 2001, \aap, 368, 64}
761: \bibitem[Veilleux et al.\,(1995)]{veilleux95}{Veilleux, S., Kim, D.-C., Sanders, D. B., Mazzarella, J. M. \& Soifer, B. T., 1995, \apjs, 98, 171}
762: \bibitem[Wang et al. (2004)]{wang04}{Wang, J., Zhang, Q., Wang, Z., Ho, P. T. P., Fazio, G. G. \& Wu, Y., 2004, ApJ, 616, L67}
763: \bibitem[Wang et al.\,(2001)]{wang01}{Wang, W., Lo, K. Y., Gao, Y. \& Gruendl, R. A., 2001, AJ, 122, 140}
764: \bibitem[Wiedner et al. (2002)]{wiedner02}{Wiedner, M.C., Wilson, C.D., Harrison, A., Hills, R. E., Lay, O. P. \& Carlstrom, J. E., 2002, ApJ, 581, 229}
765: \bibitem[Xilouris et al. (2004)]{xilouris04}{Xilouris, E. M., Georgakakis, A. E., Misiriotis, A. \& Charmandaris, V., 2004, MNRAS, 355, 57}
766: \bibitem[Zhu et al. (2003)]{zhu03}{Zhu, M., Seaquist, E. R. \& Kuno, N., 2003, ApJ, 588, 243}
767:
768:
769: \end{thebibliography}
770:
771:
772: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccc}
773: \tablewidth{0pc} \tablecaption{Basic parameters for the SMA and
774: VLA observations towards ARP~302N \label{xband}} \tablecolumns{6}
775: \tablehead{
776: \colhead{Data} & \colhead{Freq.} & \colhead{Line/cont.} & \colhead{beam size, P.A.}
777: & \colhead{Image rms} & \colhead{Intensity\tablenotemark{a}} \\
778: \colhead{} & \colhead{GHz} & \colhead{} & \colhead{arcsec,degree}
779: & \colhead{mJy~beam$^{-1}$} & \colhead{mJy\tablenotemark{b}} }
780: \startdata
781: SMA & 222.967 & CO $J$=2$-$1 & 3.4$\times$2.5, 154$\rm ^o$ & 60\tablenotemark{c} & 382$\pm$10 \\
782: VLA L & 1.49 & continuum & 14$\times$13, 140$\rm ^o$ & 1.6 & 89.0$\pm$3.6 \\
783: VLA C & 4.86 & continuum & 15$\times$13, 178$\rm ^o$& 0.21 & 30.2$\pm$0.4 \\
784: VLA X (taper 150 k$\lambda$) & 8.44 & continuum & 0.95$\times$0.90, 59$\rm ^o$ & 0.14 & 1.70$\pm$0.31;2.53$\pm$0.48 \\
785: VLA X (no taper) & 8.44 & continuum & 0.24$\times$0.23, 87$\rm ^o$ & 0.05 & 1.08$\pm$0.12;0.93$\pm$0.22 \\
786:
787: \enddata
788: \tablenotetext{a}{For VLA 3.6~cm data, the first column for the
789: nucleus and the second column for ARP~304N-cm.}
790: \tablenotetext{b}{For the SMA result, the integrated intensity is
791: in unit of Jy km~s$^{-1}$.} \tablenotetext{c}{Velocity
792: resolution of 20 km~s$^{-1}$.}
793:
794: \end{deluxetable}
795:
796: \begin{figure}
797: \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.75\textwidth]{fig1.eps}\\
798: \caption{Channel maps of CO $J$=2$-$1 line of ARP~302N. The contours are -3, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 $\times$ 60 mJy~beam$^{-1}$
799: (1 sigma level), with a synthesized beam of 3.4$\arcsec$$\times$2.5$\arcsec$.
800: Three cross symbols from bottom to top show the positions of nuclear
801: region, ARP302N-cm (see \S\ref{vla}) and outmost northern CO $J$=2$-$1 emission peak respectively.
802: The map is centered on the nucleus of ARP~302N ($\alpha(\rm J2000)$=14$\rm^h$57$\rm^m$00$\rm^s$.67,
803: $\delta(\rm J2000)$=+24$\rm ^o$37$\arcmin$02$\arcsec$.8).}\label{channel_map}
804: \end{figure}
805:
806:
807: \begin{figure}
808: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.5\textwidth]{fig2.eps}\\
809: \caption{ (a). At the position of the nucleus of ARP~302N,
810: spectrum of CO $J$=2$-$1 line obtained with the Sub-millimeter Telescope
811: at a resolution of 28$\arcsec$. The measurement is on the main beam
812: brightness temperature. (b). Spectrum of CO $J$=2$-$1 line at the
813: same position obtained from the SMA convolved to the same
814: angular resolution as the single dish observation.}\label{spectra}
815: \end{figure}
816:
817: \begin{figure}
818: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.95\textwidth]{fig3.eps}\\
819: \caption{(a). Integrated intensity map of CO $J$=1$-$0 line of ARP~302N.
820: CO data is from BIMA observation, obtained by Lo et al 1997. The contours shown are
821: 6, 9, 12, 15, 20, 30, 50, 70, 90, 110, 130, 150 and 170 $\times$ 0.6 Jy km~s$^{-1}$.
822: (b). Integrated intensity map of CO $J$=2$-$1 line of ARP~302N.
823: The contours shown are 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 20, 30, 50, 70, 90, 110 and 130 $\times$ 1 Jy km~s$^{-1}$.
824: (c). CO $J$=2$-$1 velocity field obtained by the SMA. Contour levels are from -250 to 320 \kms\,
825: by the step of 30 \kms\,. Dashed line is blueshifted velocity and solid line redshifted.
826: (d). CO $J$=2$-$1 integrated intensity map convolved to the BIMA resolution.
827: The contours shown are 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 20, 30, 50, 70 and 90 $\times$ 2 Jy km~s$^{-1}$.
828: (e). Ratio map of $T\rm_{CO J=2--1}$/$T\rm_{CO J=1--0}$ of ARP~302N.
829: The contour is from 0.2 to 0.45 by the step of 0.05.
830: The cross symbols are the same as in Figure~\ref{channel_map}.
831: }\label{arp302_color}
832: \end{figure}
833:
834: \begin{figure}
835: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.5\textwidth]{fig4.eps}\\
836: \caption{Position-velocity diagram of ARP~302N along major axis. The contour levels are
837: from 0.12 to 0.54 Jy~beam$^{-1}$ by a step of 0.06 Jy~beam$^{-1}$.}\label{velplot}
838: \end{figure}
839:
840: \begin{figure}
841: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.5\textwidth]{fig5.eps}\\
842: \caption{Radio images are shown towards ARP~302.
843: The images at 3.6~cm are shown at two top panels with the resolutions of 0.76$\times$0.54
844: (left top panel) and 0.23$\times$0.09 (right top panel).
845: The images at 20~cm and 6~cm are shown at bottom panels with resolutions of
846: 13.7$\arcsec$$\times$12.7$\arcsec$ (left bottom panel) and
847: 14.8$\arcsec$$\times$13.3$\arcsec$ (right bottom panel).
848: The noise values and contour levels are shown at the right
849: bottom of each panel.
850: The cross symbols are the same as in Figure~\ref{channel_map}.}\label{arp302_vla}
851: \end{figure}
852:
853: \begin{figure}
854: \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.5\textwidth]{fig6.eps}\\
855: \caption{The Spitzer 8 $\mu$m and 24 $\mu$m images are shown in contours and overlaid
856: on the SMA CO $J$=2$-$1 integrated intensity in grey scale.
857: The contour levels are from 5\% to 95\% by a step of 10\% of the peak values.
858: The cross symbols are the same as in Figure~\ref{channel_map}.}\label{irac}
859: \end{figure}
860:
861: \begin{figure}
862: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.5\textwidth]{fig7.eps}\\
863: \caption{Observed SED of ARP~302N fitted by different single component dust models.
864: The single component dust model are shown for ($\beta$, $\rm T_{dust}$, $\rm M_{dust}$)
865: combinations as follows: the best fit (solid line: 1.0, 36 K, 2.2$\times 10^8$ M$_\odot$);
866: moderate $\beta$ value (dashed line: 1.5, 29 K, 2.0$\times 10^8$ M$_\odot$); the simple
867: modified blackbody fit (dotted line: 2.0, 26 K,
868: 1.1$\times 10^8$ M$_\odot$). The vetical line shows the predicted value range at
869: 1.3 mm. Note that 24 $\mu$m data are not used for the fitting.}\label{sed}
870: \end{figure}
871:
872: \begin{figure}
873: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.9\textwidth]{fig8.eps}\\
874: \caption{The dependence of CO $J$=2$-$1/$J$=1$-$0 line ratio on the
875: gas density $n({\rm H}_2)$ and the abundance per velocity gradient
876: [CO]/$\rm{(dv/dr)}$ for the kinetic temperature of 20~K and 30~K (two left panels), and
877: the dependence of line ratio on the gas density and kinetic
878: temperature T$_{\rm kin}$ for a fixed abundance per velocity
879: gradient of [CO]/$\rm{(dv/dr)}$ = 1$\times$ 10$^{\rm -5}$ pc~($\rm
880: km s^{-1}$)$^{-1}$ (right panel). Te solid lines show various values of
881: the line ratio between 0.4 and 0.8 by step of 0.1.}\label{lvg}
882: \end{figure}
883: \end{document}
884:
885: