1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\documentclass[12pt, manuscript]{aastex}
3: \documentclass{emulateapj}
4:
5: % mspre - based on ms07.tex 25 Jun 08
6:
7: \newcommand{\iso}{{\em ISO}}
8: \newcommand{\iras}{{\em IRAS}}
9: \newcommand{\mum}{\ifmmode{\rm \mu m}\else{$\mu$m}\fi}
10:
11: %\submitted{Submitted to the Astrophysical Journal ... }
12: %\journalinfo{ }
13:
14: \begin{document}
15:
16: \title{The Magellanic zoo: Mid-infrared {\it Spitzer}
17: spectroscopy of evolved stars and circumstellar dust in
18: the Magellanic Clouds}
19:
20: \author{
21: G.~C.~Sloan\altaffilmark{1},
22: K.~E.~Kraemer\altaffilmark{2},
23: P.~R.~Wood\altaffilmark{3},
24: A.~A.~Zijlstra\altaffilmark{4},
25: J.~Bernard-Salas\altaffilmark{1},
26: D.~Devost\altaffilmark{1,5},
27: J.~R.~Houck\altaffilmark{1}
28: }
29: \altaffiltext{1}{Cornell University, Astronomy Department,
30: Ithaca, NY 14853-6801, sloan@isc.astro.cornell.edu,
31: jbs@isc.astro.cornell.edu, jrh13@cornell.edu}
32: \altaffiltext{2}{Air Force Research Laboratory, Space Vehicles
33: Directorate, 29 Randolph Road, Hanscom AFB, MA 01731}
34: \altaffiltext{3}{Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics,
35: Australian National University, Cotter Road, Weston Creek ACT 2611,
36: Australia, wood@mso.anu.edu.au}
37: \altaffiltext{4}{Univ. of Manchester, School of Physics \& Astronomy,
38: P.~O.~Box 88, Manchester M60 1QD, albert.zijlstra@manchester.ac.uk}
39: \altaffiltext{5}{Canada France Hawaii Telescope, 65-1238 Mamalahoa
40: Hwy, Kamuela, HI, 96743, devost@cfht.hawaii.edu}
41:
42: \begin{abstract}
43:
44: We observed a sample of evolved stars in the Large and Small
45: Magellanic Clouds (LMC and SMC) with the Infrared Spectrograph
46: on the {\it Spitzer Space Telescope}. Comparing samples from
47: the SMC, LMC, and the Galaxy reveals that the dust-production
48: rate depends on metallicity for oxygen-rich stars, but carbon
49: stars with similar pulsation properties produce similar
50: quantities of dust, regardless of their initial metallicity.
51: Other properties of the oxygen-rich stars also depend on
52: metallicity. As the metallicity decreases, the fraction of
53: naked (i.e.\ dust-free) stars increases, and among the naked
54: stars, the strength of the 8~\mum\ absorption band from SiO
55: decreases. Our sample includes several massive stars
56: in the LMC with long pulsation periods which produce
57: significant amounts of dust, probably because they are young
58: and relatively metal rich. Little alumina dust is seen in
59: circumstellar shells in the SMC and LMC, unlike in Galactic
60: samples. Three oxygen-rich sources also show emission from
61: magnesium-rich crystalline silicates. Many also show an
62: emission feature at 14~\mum. The one S star in our sample
63: shows a newly detected emission feature centered at
64: 13.5~\mum. At lower metallicity, carbon stars with similar
65: amounts of amorphous carbon in their shells have stronger
66: absorption from molecular acetylene (C$_2$H$_2$) and weaker
67: emission from SiC and MgS dust, as discovered in previous
68: studies.
69:
70: \end{abstract}
71:
72: \keywords{circumstellar matter --- infrared: stars }
73:
74:
75: \section{Introduction} % Sec. 1
76:
77: In the Galaxy, stars on the asymptotic giant branch (AGB)
78: may be responsible for nearly 90\% of the dust injected into
79: the interstellar medium (ISM), with supergiants accounting
80: for most of the remainder \citep{geh89}. How much these
81: relative contributions change in the early Universe is not
82: well understood. This question has grown even more
83: important, now that the Infrared Spectrograph
84: \citep[IRS][]{hou04} on the {\it Spitzer Space Telescope}
85: \citep{wer04a} has detected dust in galaxies at redshifts
86: of 2.6--2.7 \citep{tep07,lut07}, corresponding to look-back
87: times of $\sim$11 Gyr in a Universe 13.7 Gyr old. Supernovae
88: have been suggested as a possible source of dust in the early
89: Universe, \citep[e.g.][]{cmc67,ds80}, but the amount of
90: dust they contribute remains controversial
91: \citep[e.g.][]{sug06,mei07}. The most massive stars that can
92: evolve to the AGB will begin producing dust only $\sim$100 Myr
93: after the formation of the first stars in a galaxy.
94: This initial population will be metal poor.
95:
96: Nearby galaxies within the Local Group give us the
97: opportunity to study how the dust produced by individual
98: supergiants and AGB stars depends on metallicity.
99: The Large and Small Magellanic Clouds (LMC and SMC) lie at
100: distances of 50 and 61 kpc, respectively
101: \citep[e.g.][]{alv04,kw06}. Measurements of the metallicity
102: ([Fe/H]) of the LMC vary between $-0.3$ and $-0.4$, while the
103: range in the SMC is between $-0.6$ and $-0.8$ \citep[][and
104: references therein]{kw06}.
105:
106: The {\it Infrared Space Observatory} ({\it ISO}) obtained
107: the first mid-infrared spectra of evolved stars in the LMC.
108: \cite{tra99} published spectra of 23 targets using the
109: PHOT-S spectrometer, which covered the 2--5 and
110: 6--12~\mum\ wavelength ranges at a resolution $R\sim$90
111: ($R=\lambda/\Delta\lambda$), and the CAM-CVF
112: spectrometer, which observed the 7--14~\mum\ wavelength range
113: at a resolution of $\sim$40. The formation of CO molecules
114: in stellar outflows will exhaust either C or O from the material
115: available to form dust and divides the dust chemistry around
116: these objects into oxygen-rich or carbon-rich. The \iso\
117: sample includes spectra from both chemistries, and
118: \cite{tra99} showed that they could separate these two
119: groups photometrically with color-color diagrams.
120:
121: The spectrometers on \iso\ allowed observations of only the
122: brightest targets. The improved sensitivity of the IRS on
123: {\it Spitzer} has made possible more detailed studies of
124: mass-loss and dust injection in both the LMC and SMC. The
125: five major programs have observed a combined total of 176
126: sources in the LMC and 63 in the SMC, most of them evolved
127: stars. \cite{slo08a} reviewed these programs and the
128: different criteria used to select targets.
129:
130: Program 3426 (P.I.\ Kastner) focused on the brightest
131: sources in the LMC, using the classes defined from
132: observations of the {\it Mid-Course Space Experiment} ({\it
133: MSX}) by \cite{msx01} \citep{kas06,buc06}. Program 3591
134: (P.I.\ Kemper) targeted objects covering the stages of
135: evolution of oxygen-rich stars from the AGB to planetary
136: nebulae \citep{lei08,mk08}. Program 3277 (P.I.\ Egan)
137: selected targets in the SMC based on their infrared colors
138: \citep{kra05,kra06,slo06b}. Program 3505 (P.I.\ Wood)
139: spanned a range of mass-loss rates in the LMC and the SMC.
140: It included a young stellar object \citep[YSO;][]{vl05b},
141: but nearly all of the rest are carbon stars
142: \citep{zij06,mat06,gro07,lag07}.
143: The other three programs also observed more carbon stars than
144: initially planned, with sources classified photometrically as
145: OH/IR stars turning out to be carbon stars instead.
146:
147: This paper focuses on Program 200, (P.I.\ Sloan; hereafter
148: referred to as the MC\_DUST program). The next section
149: describes the sample and the ground-based support
150: observations. In \S 3, we describe the IRS observations,
151: the data reduction, and the classification of the spectra.
152: The MC\_DUST sample contains a rich variety of object types,
153: each of which requires a different method of analysis. We
154: examine each of these types in turn in the following
155: sections: \S 4---stars with no associated dust (naked stars),
156: \S 5---dusty oxygen-rich stars, \S 6---carbon stars,
157: \S 7---red sources with emission from polycyclic aromatic
158: hydrocarbons (PAHs). Several targets show characteristics
159: which place them in multiple categories, and as a consequence,
160: they will be analyzed in more than one of the following
161: sections. In each of these sections, we examine individual
162: sources and unusual spectral features, but we save a more
163: general comparison of the various populations for \S 8.
164: Finally, we draw conclusions in \S 9.
165:
166:
167: \section{The Sample} % Sec. 2
168:
169: \subsection{Sample Selection} % Sec. 2.1
170:
171: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrr} % Table 1
172: \tablenum{1}
173: \tablecolumns{5}
174: \tablewidth{0pt}
175: \tablecaption{The MC\_DUST program\label{Tbl2}}
176: \tablehead{
177: \colhead{Object} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{LMC} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{SMC} \\
178: \colhead{Class} & \colhead{Planned} & \colhead{Observed} &
179: \colhead{Planned} & \colhead{Observed}
180: }
181: \startdata
182: AGB/M & 7 & 7 & 4 & 4 \\
183: AGB/MS & 3 & 3 & 4 & 4 \\
184: AGB/S & 3 & 2 & 1 & 1 \\
185: AGB/C & 6 & 4 & 4 & 1 \\
186: OH/IR star & 3 & 3 & \nodata & \nodata \\
187: C/IR star & 3 & 2 & \nodata & \nodata \\
188: RSG & 3 & 4 & \nodata & 1 \\
189: YSO & \nodata & 1 & \nodata & \nodata \\
190: unknown & \nodata & 1 & \nodata & \nodata \\
191: total & 28 & 27 & 13 & 11 \\
192: \enddata
193: \end{deluxetable}
194:
195: \begin{deluxetable*}{lllrrrlrr} % Table 2
196: %\begin{deluxetable}{lllrrrlrr}
197: \tablenum{2}
198: \tablecolumns{9}
199: \tablewidth{0pt}
200: \small
201: \tablecaption{The MC\_Dust sample\label{Tbl3}}
202: \tablehead{
203: \colhead{ } & \colhead{RA} & \colhead{Dec.} &
204: \multicolumn{3}{c}{2MASS} &
205: \colhead{Source} & \colhead{Period} & \colhead{ } \\
206: \colhead{Target} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{J2000.0} & \colhead{J} &
207: \colhead{H} & \colhead{K$_s$} & \colhead{Type} & \colhead{(days)} &
208: \colhead{Ref.\tablenotemark{a}}
209: }
210: \startdata
211:
212: HV 11223 & 00 32 01.61 & $-$73 22 34.7 & 11.166 & 10.276 & 9.971 & AGB/MS & 407: & 1\\
213: HV 1366 & 00 42 49.87 & $-$72 55 11.4 & 12.232 & 11.431 & 11.154 & AGB/M & 305 & 5\\
214: BFM 1 & 00 47 19.24 & $-$72 40 04.5 & 12.661 & 11.647 & 11.027 & AGB/S & 398 & 5\\
215: CV 78 & 00 49 03.94 & $-$73 05 19.9 & 11.649 & 10.613 & 10.129 & AGB/C & 423 & 6\\
216: HV 11303 & 00 52 08.84 & $-$71 36 24.0 & 10.836 & 9.983 & 9.540 & AGB/MS & 534 & 1\\
217: HV 11329 & 00 53 39.40 & $-$72 52 39.2 & 10.911 & 9.987 & 9.647 & AGB/M & 377 & 5\\
218: HV 838 & 00 55 38.22 & $-$73 11 41.1 & 10.608 & 9.860 & 9.440 & AGB/M & 622 & 5\\
219: HV 11366 & 00 56 54.77 & $-$72 14 08.6 & 11.066 & 10.154 & 9.870 & AGB/MS & 366 & 1\\
220: HV 12149 & 00 58 50.17 & $-$72 18 35.6 & 9.963 & 9.022 & 8.609 & AGB/M & 745 & 5\\
221: HV 1963 & 01 04 26.63 & $-$72 34 40.3 & 10.638 & 9.677 & 9.409 & AGB/MS & 249 & 6\tablenotemark{b}\\
222: Massey SMC 59803 & 01 04 38.21 & $-$72 01 27.0 & 9.093 & 8.301 & 8.097 & RSG & \nodata & \nodata\\
223: \\
224: IRAS 04509$-$6922 & 04 50 40.47 & $-$69 17 31.9 & 9.874 & 8.670 & 7.928 & (AGB/M) & 1290 & 3\\
225: IRAS 04516$-$6902 & 04 51 29.00 & $-$68 57 50.1 & 9.927 & 8.619 & 7.914 & (AGB/M) & 1170 & 5\\
226: IRAS 04530$-$6916 & 04 52 45.67 & $-$69 11 49.5 & 13.942 & 11.859 & 9.959 & (RSG) & 1260: & 3\\
227: IRAS 04545$-$7000 & 04 54 10.06 & $-$69 55 58.3 & 16.510 & 12.815 & 10.402 & OH/IR & 1270 & 3\\
228: HV 888 & 05 04 14.14 & $-$67 16 14.4 & 8.010 & 7.188 & 6.781 & RSG & 850 & 1\\
229: HV 2310 & 05 06 27.68 & $-$68 12 03.7 & 10.455 & 9.635 & 9.111 & AGB/M & 600 & 5\\
230: IRAS 05128$-$6455 & 05 13 04.57 & $-$64 51 40.3 & 14.553 & 12.832 & 11.281 & (C/IR) & 708 & 4\\
231: MACHO 79.5505.26 & 05 14 29.83 & $-$68 54 33.8 & 12.302 & 11.363 & 10.923 & AGB/C & 97 & 5\tablenotemark{b}\\
232: HV 5810 & 05 24 07.02 & $-$69 23 36.9 & 10.813 & 9.947 & 9.642 & AGB/M & 374 & 5\\
233: WBP 17 & 05 26 19.88 & $-$69 41 37.3 & 12.342 & 11.315 & 10.796 & AGB/C & 304 & 5\\
234: WBP 29 & 05 26 40.95 & $-$69 23 11.4 & 12.270 & 11.382 & 10.915 & AGB/C & 247 & 5\tablenotemark{b}\\
235: WBP 42 & 05 27 04.73 & $-$69 38 16.3 & 13.800 & 12.192 & 11.009 & AGB/C & 404 & 5\\
236: WOH G 339 & 05 27 10.24 & $-$69 36 26.7 & 10.399 & 9.544 & 9.159 & AGB/M & 538 & 5\\
237: WBP 77 & 05 28 06.75 & $-$69 32 27.9 & 12.313 & 11.482 & 11.197 & AGB/S & 212 & 5\\
238: WBP 104 & 05 28 26.73 & $-$69 14 43.5 & 12.364 & 11.422 & 11.047 & AGB/S & 245 & 2\\
239: 2MASS J052832 & 05 28 32.10 & $-$69 29 08.5 & 11.429 & 10.571 & 10.326 & unknown & 110: & 5\\
240: HV 2572 & 05 28 36.71 & $-$69 20 04.1 & 9.795 & 8.836 & 8.447 & AGB/M & 591: & 6\\
241: HV 2575 & 05 29 59.98 & $-$67 45 01.4 & 11.482 & 10.556 & 10.066 & AGB/MS & 390 & 5\\
242: HV 2578 & 05 29 03.15 & $-$69 48 06.9 & 9.947 & 9.104 & 8.737 & AGB/M & 653 & 5\tablenotemark{b}\\
243: IRAS 05300$-$6651 & 05 30 03.89 & $-$66 49 24.2 & 16.895 & 14.800 & 12.247 & C/IR & \nodata & \nodata\\
244: HV 996 & 05 32 35.62 & $-$67 55 09.0 & 8.991 & 8.156 & 7.643 & RSG & 760 & 1\\
245: IRAS 05329$-$6708 & 05 32 51.33 & $-$67 06 52.0 & 17.285 & 13.638 & 11.233 & OH/IR & 1260 & 3\\
246: HV 12620 & 05 32 59.92 & $-$70 41 23.6 & 11.206 & 10.357 & 10.052 & AGB/MS & 326 & 5\\
247: IRAS 05348$-$7024 & 05 34 15.99 & $-$70 22 52.5 & 17.659 & 15.488 & 12.851 & C/IR & \nodata & \nodata\\
248: IRAS 05402$-$6956 & 05 39 44.89 & $-$69 55 18.1 & 14.344 & 11.740 & 9.789 & OH/IR & 1390 & 3\\
249: HV 12667 & 05 49 13.36 & $-$70 42 40.7 & 10.823 & 10.019 & 9.445 & AGB/M & 645 & 5\\
250: HV 12070 & 05 52 27.86 & $-$69 14 10.0 & 10.605 & 9.754 & 9.204 & AGB/MS & 599 & 5\\
251: %\\
252: %(NGC 371 LE 31) & 01 01 45.70 & $-$72 07 57.0 & 13.036 & 11.819 & 11.082 & AGB/C & (290) & \\
253: %(NGC 371 LE 8) & 01 05 57.30 & $-$72 00 48.0 & 12.732 & 11.672 & 11.097 & AGB/C & (330) & \\
254: %(WBP 219) & 05 26 40.40 & $-$69 23 11.0 & 12.563 & 11.452 & 10.676 & AGB/C & (294) & \\
255: \enddata
256: \tablenotetext{a}{References for periods: (1) \cite{wbf83}; (2) \cite{wbp85};
257: (3) \cite{woo92}; (4) \cite{whi03}; (5) from MACHO data \citep{macho};
258: (6) from OGLE data \citep{ogle97,ogle05}.}
259: \tablenotetext{b}{The period has changed significantly from previously
260: published values; see \S 2.3.}
261: \end{deluxetable*}
262: %\end{deluxetable}
263:
264: The MC\_DUST program was a small (17.2 hour) program
265: conducted as part of the IRS Guaranteed Time Observations
266: (GTO). It sampled sources in the LMC and SMC covering a
267: range of classifications determined in both the optical and
268: the infrared. The targets were divided into seven classes:
269: red supergiants (RSGs), four categories of optically
270: identified AGB sources (M giants, MS stars, S stars, and C
271: stars), and two categories of infrared sources: OH/IR stars
272: and infrared carbon-rich sources (C/IR stars). Table 1
273: breaks down the observing program by object class, as
274: planned and as actually executed. The plan included 28
275: sources in the LMC (20 oxygen-rich and eight carbon-rich),
276: and 13 in the SMC (nine oxygen-rich and four carbon-rich).
277: As with other programs in the Magellanic Clouds, the crowded
278: regions resulted in several peak-up failures. In our case,
279: we lost three objects in the LMC and three in the SMC, but
280: gained three serendipitious observations, two in the LMC and
281: one in the SMC.
282:
283: % Table 1 goes here.
284:
285: The other spectroscopic samples in the Magellanic Clouds
286: were selected primarily from near- and mid-infrared
287: photometry, but most of the sources in the MC\_DUST sample
288: were selected based on optical spectral classifications,
289: supplemented with longer wavelength data. While many of the
290: object types in other programs turned out to be different
291: than planned, our sources, for the most part, had the
292: photospheric chemistries we had expected. Another advantage
293: was that we were able to observe several sources below the
294: photometric limits of previous infrared surveys, allowing us
295: to probe fainter sources on the AGB.
296:
297: % Table 2 goes here.
298:
299: Table 2 lists the individual targets in the MC\_DUST sample.
300: The targets with Harvard Variable numbers and the carbon star
301: CV 78\footnote{CV = Cordoba Variable; \cite{wbf83} cite
302: \cite{des59}.} were selected from the study by \cite{wbf83}.
303: These targets account for most of the sources in the RSG,
304: AGB/M and AGB/MS classes. The AGB/S and AGB/C stars with
305: WBP numbers were selected from the observations of
306: \cite{wbp85}. \cite{wbf83} identified MACHO 79.5505.26 as
307: HV 5680, but HV 5680 is actually 16\arcsec\ to the northeast
308: and a magnitude fainter at K. The target we have named
309: BFM 1 was the first S star identified in the SMC \citep{bfm81}
310: and, as discussed below, is the only true S star in our
311: sample.\footnote{Table 2 corrects the erroneous coordinates
312: for BFM 1 given by \cite{bfm81}.} We also
313: selected six oxygen-rich infrared sources first studied by
314: \cite{woo92}. They identified three as OH/IR stars. The
315: other three include a suspected supergiant (IRAS 04530) and
316: two luminous and embedded evolved stars (IRAS 04509 and
317: IRAS 04516). Finally, we selected three sources believed
318: to be infrared carbon stars (C/IR) from a sample studied by
319: \cite{vl99}. The types in parentheses in Table 2 have
320: changed, as discussed in \S 3.3 and 3.4 below.
321:
322: Peak-up failures affected our sample of carbon stars most
323: significantly, reducing our LMC sample from eight to six
324: carbon stars and our SMC sample from four to one.
325: Fortunately, other programs produced a surplus of carbon
326: stars, which has resulted in a series of papers on carbon
327: stars in the SMC \citep{slo06b,lag07} and the LMC
328: \citep{zij06,lei08}. Three of the peak-up failures resulted
329: in serendipitious observations. Instead of observing NGC 371
330: LE 28 in the SMC, we observed Massey SMC 59803, a supergiant
331: with a spectral class of K2--3 I \citep{lev06}. In the LMC,
332: we observed the giant WOH G 339 instead of WBP 51, and
333: instead of WBP 116, we observed a source identified only in
334: the 2MASS catalog (2MASS J05283210-6929084, or J052832 for
335: short). Little is known about this last source; it may even
336: be a foreground object and not in the SMC.
337:
338: \subsection{Ground-based Spectroscopy} % Sec. 2.2
339:
340: \begin{figure*} % Fig. 1
341: \includegraphics[width=6.0in]{f01.eps}
342: \caption{Optical spectra of our sample of evolved stars in
343: the Magellanic Clouds. The panels for HV 5810, BFM 1, and
344: WBP 17 are larger than the rest to illustrate typical
345: molecular bands in M giants, S stars, and carbon stars,
346: respectively. Spectral classes in parentheses are
347: inconsistent with the observed spectra. We observed only
348: two of the nine IRAS sources due to the heavy optical
349: obscuration.}
350: \end{figure*}
351:
352: To verify the overall chemistry of our targets, we obtained
353: optical spectra using the Double Beam Spectrograph on the
354: 2.3 m telescope of the Australian National University at
355: Siding Spring Observatory (SSO) of all of our targets, except
356: for seven of the nine IRAS sources, due to their heavy optical
357: obscuration. These spectra covered the 0.45--1.05~\mum\
358: wavelength range with a resolution of 10\AA. They were
359: reduced using standard IRAF procedures with HR 718 as a flux
360: standard and the weak-lined giant HD 26169 to remove
361: telluric features. Figure 1 presents the optical spectra.
362: We have expanded the panels for HV 5810, BFM 1, and WBP 17 to
363: use them as prototypes for M giants, S stars, and carbon
364: stars, respectively, and make room for labels for the visible
365: molecular bands.
366:
367: % Figure 1 goes here.
368:
369: Cyanogen (CN) bands dominate the spectra of the carbon stars
370: and make them easy to distinguish, with its characteristic
371: corrugations. The bands which appear in this wavelength
372: range arise from the A $^2\Pi$ $-$ X $^2\Sigma^+$ electronic
373: transition \citep{hh79}. The band systems are labelled with
374: the change in vibrational state, and in each system the
375: vibrational states involved increase to the red. The
376: spectrum of CV 78 includes H$\alpha$ emission at 0.656~\mum.
377:
378: TiO band systems dominate the spectra of the M giants. The
379: identifications of the band systems presented in Figure 1 are
380: from \cite{hh79} and the models of M dwarfs by \cite{val98}.
381: The spectra in the sample show a wide range of band strengths.
382: The spectra which are most obscured by dust show only the
383: reddest bands. Some of the spectra show H$\alpha$ emission.
384:
385: Figure 1 shows that the spectrum of one of our planned C/IR
386: stars, IRAS 05128, is very similar to IRAS 04516 and clearly
387: oxygen-rich. \cite{tra99} classified it as a carbon star
388: based on its \iso/PHOT-S spectrum, but subsequently,
389: \cite{mat05} found strong H$_2$O absorption and possible weak
390: SiO absorption in its 2.9--4.1~\mum\ spectrum. Our optical
391: spectrum confirms their conclusion that IRAS 05128 is
392: oxygen-rich. \cite{vl08} classify IRAS 05128
393: as an M9 giant.
394:
395: \cite{bfm81} identified BFM 1 as an S star based on a strong
396: LaO band at 0.79~\mum. Our spectrum clearly shows both LaO
397: and ZrO bands, but these are superimposed on a CN spectrum
398: (compare BFM 1 to CV 78 just below it). The strong
399: absorption band at 0.93~\mum\ is due to ZrO \citep[][and
400: references therein]{sw69} and arises from the b' $^3\Pi$ $-$
401: a $^3\Delta$ electronic transition. It is close to the head
402: of the CN A$-$X $\Delta$v=1 band system, but displaced
403: $\sim$0.2~\mum\ to the red, making it easy to identify.
404: The head of the LaO A $^2\Pi_{3/2}$ $-$ X $^2\Sigma^+$
405: band system at 0.79~\mum\ \citep{wc78} coincides
406: with the head of the CN A$-$X $\Delta$v=2 band system, but
407: the LaO stands out in two ways. First, the LaO band makes
408: the head of the CN band too deep, and second, the A
409: $^2\Pi_{1/2}$ $-$ X $^2\Sigma^+$ band system appears at
410: 0.74~\mum. Similarly, the ZrO B $^1\Pi$ $-$ X
411: $^1\Sigma$ band system strengthens the apparent head of
412: the CN A$-$X $\Delta$v=3 band system at 0.69~\mum, but
413: the ZrO $\gamma$ band system from 0.61 to 0.66~\mum\
414: makes the identification unambiguous. The $\gamma$
415: system arises from the A $^3\Phi$ $-$ X $^3\Delta$
416: transition \citep{pd79}.
417:
418: BFM 1 is the sole true S star in our sample. WBP 77 shows
419: a hint of LaO absorption at 0.79~\mum\ but is otherwise
420: more consistent with an MS spectrum. Both it and WBP 104
421: show the 0.65 and 0.93~\mum\ ZrO bands seen in many MS
422: spectra. The spectrum of HV 12070, which is classified as an
423: MS star, looks more like the spectrum of an M giant. We have
424: noted the uncertainties in the classifications by putting
425: them in parentheses in Figure 1, but we have not changed them
426: for two reasons. First, these sources are variable stars
427: and the spectra may have different characteristics at
428: different phases. Second, we do not distinguish between M
429: and MS stars in our analysis below; we consider them as one
430: group of oxygen-rich sources in our analysis. However, the
431: fact that BFM 1 is our sole strong S star is significant.
432: It is the only source where C/O$\approx$1, which may
433: explain its unusual dust properties (see \S 5.6).
434:
435: \subsection{Optical Light Curves} % Sec. 2.3
436:
437: Many of the stars in our sample have light curves in the
438: databases from the MACHO Project \citep[Massive Compact Halo
439: Objects;][]{macho} and/or the Optical Gravitational Lensing
440: Experiment \citep[OGLE;][]{ogle97,ogle05}. Table 2 includes
441: the periods we have determined from these data. Most of these
442: stars pulsate regularly, or semi-regularly, with periods
443: covering a wide range, from $\sim$100 days to $\sim$1400.
444: The red and blue lightcurves sometimes give slightly
445: different periods. We have found that the blue light curves
446: generally produce more self-consistent periods.
447:
448: Some of the periods have changed significantly from
449: previously published results, primarily because some of the
450: older periods were based on data which did not sample the
451: light curves adequately. Several periods measured by
452: \cite{wbf83} have changed. HV 1963 had a period of 330:
453: days, but we measure a period of 249 days with the OGLE data.
454: The MACHO data for MACHO 79.5505.26 give a period of 97 days,
455: compared to 151. This source has a longer cycle of 1200
456: days, so the shorter period must be an overtone mode. The
457: period of HV 2578 has changed from 470 to 247 days, based on
458: the MACHO data. HV 2572 previously had a period of 201 days.
459: The OGLE data are poorly characterized, but a period of 591
460: days fits the data better than any other. \cite{wbp85}
461: measured the period of WBP 29 to be 360 days, but we find that
462: the MACHO data are more consistent with a 247-day period.
463: Several other periods have changed by amounts less than 10\%.
464:
465: \subsection{Near-infrared Photometry} % Sec. 2.4
466:
467: \begin{deluxetable*}{lrrrrr} % Table 3
468: %\begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrr}
469: \tablenum{3}
470: \tablecolumns{6}
471: \tablewidth{0pt}
472: \small
473: \tablecaption{Near-infrared SSO photometry\label{Tbl4}}
474: \tablehead{
475: \colhead{ } & \multicolumn{4}{c}{Magnitude} & \colhead{Julian} \\
476: \colhead{Target} & \colhead{J} & \colhead{H} & \colhead{K} &
477: \colhead{L} & \colhead{Date}
478: }
479: \startdata
480: HV 11223 & 11.197$\pm$0.017 & 10.266$\pm$0.023 & 10.077$\pm$0.013 & 9.673$\pm$0.081 & 2453526\\
481: HV 1366 & 12.258$\pm$0.019 & 11.534$\pm$0.012 & 11.305$\pm$0.008 & 10.451$\pm$0.196 & 2453334\\
482: BFM 1 & 12.377$\pm$0.034 & 11.489$\pm$0.018 & 11.082$\pm$0.019 & 10.103$\pm$0.164 & 2453524\\
483: BFM 1 & 12.088$\pm$0.013 & 11.268$\pm$0.014 & 10.830$\pm$0.014 & 10.186$\pm$0.157 & 2453942\\
484: CV 78 & 11.099$\pm$0.036 & 10.168$\pm$0.033 & 9.880$\pm$0.012 & 9.223$\pm$0.058 & 2453527\\
485: HV 11303 & 10.770$\pm$0.022 & 9.846$\pm$0.010 & 9.626$\pm$0.012 & 9.298$\pm$0.067 & 2453530\\
486: HV 11329 & 11.068$\pm$0.013 & 10.007$\pm$0.013 & 9.800$\pm$0.012 & 9.454$\pm$0.074 & 2453527\\
487: HV 11329 & 10.991$\pm$0.012 & 10.000$\pm$0.007 & 9.781$\pm$0.018 & 9.752$\pm$0.113 & 2453915\\
488: HV 838 & 9.824$\pm$0.006 & 9.008$\pm$0.003 & 8.824$\pm$0.004 & 8.607$\pm$0.045 & 2453227\\
489: HV 11366 & 11.135$\pm$0.016 & 10.115$\pm$0.015 & 9.941$\pm$0.012 & 9.673$\pm$0.085 & 2453530\\
490: HV 12149 & 10.701$\pm$0.015 & 9.758$\pm$0.009 & 9.353$\pm$0.014 & 8.643$\pm$0.045 & 2453530\\
491: HV 1963 & 10.606$\pm$0.006 & 9.630$\pm$0.005 & 9.388$\pm$0.003 & 9.233$\pm$0.011 & 2453227\\
492: HV 1963 & 10.711$\pm$0.011 & 9.735$\pm$0.007 & 9.509$\pm$0.017 & 9.368$\pm$0.079 & 2453915\\
493: Massey SMC 59803 & 9.056$\pm$0.015 & 8.254$\pm$0.011 & 8.141$\pm$0.012 & 7.952$\pm$0.018 & 2453530\\
494: %MSX SMC 018 & 12.955$\pm$0.029 & 11.375$\pm$0.010 & 10.318$\pm$0.018 & 8.943$\pm$0.057 & 2453918\\
495: \\
496: IRAS 04509$-$6922 & 9.959$\pm$0.006 & 8.724$\pm$0.011 & 8.098$\pm$0.015 & 7.071$\pm$0.015 & 2453517\\
497: IRAS 04516$-$6902 & 10.229$\pm$0.008 & 8.943$\pm$0.010 & 8.334$\pm$0.015 & 7.280$\pm$0.017 & 2453517\\
498: IRAS 04530$-$6916 & 13.869$\pm$0.020 & \nodata & 9.768$\pm$0.033 & 7.678$\pm$0.025 & 2453135\\
499: IRAS 04545$-$7000 & 15.900$\pm$0.320 & \nodata & 10.119$\pm$0.006 & 8.083$\pm$0.053 & 2453135\\
500: IRAS 04545$-$7000 & 14.472$\pm$0.026 & 11.422$\pm$0.007 & 9.397$\pm$0.005 & 7.221$\pm$0.016 & 2453918\\
501: HV 888 & 7.885$\pm$0.008 & 7.014$\pm$0.009 & 6.788$\pm$0.026 & 6.349$\pm$0.017 & 2453532\\
502: HV 2310 & 10.756$\pm$0.004 & \nodata & 9.533$\pm$0.005 & 8.969$\pm$0.080 & 2453135\\
503: IRAS 05128$-$6455 & 13.316$\pm$0.010 & 11.451$\pm$0.010 & 10.052$\pm$0.014 & 8.186$\pm$0.032 & 2453531\\
504: MACHO 79.5505.26 & 12.419$\pm$0.026 & \nodata & 10.994$\pm$0.009 & \nodata & 2453135\\
505: HV 5810 & 11.289$\pm$0.009 & 10.307$\pm$0.012 & 10.000$\pm$0.016 & 9.534$\pm$0.135 & 2453530\\
506: WBP 17 & 12.454$\pm$0.007 & 11.322$\pm$0.011 & 10.792$\pm$0.015 & 10.322$\pm$0.186 & 2453516\\
507: WBP 29 & 12.555$\pm$0.010 & 11.411$\pm$0.011 & 10.806$\pm$0.020 & \nodata & 2453516\\
508: WBP 42 & 12.797$\pm$0.026 & 11.283$\pm$0.012 & 10.311$\pm$0.015 & 9.168$\pm$0.062 & 2453517\\
509: WBP 77 & 12.562$\pm$0.031 & \nodata & 11.359$\pm$0.004 & \nodata & 2453135\\
510: WBP 104 & 12.387$\pm$0.015 & 11.398$\pm$0.013 & 11.115$\pm$0.015 & 10.641$\pm$0.189 & 2453532\\
511: HV 2572 & 10.079$\pm$0.008 & \nodata & 8.854$\pm$0.006 & 8.418$\pm$0.039 & 2453135\\
512: HV 2575 & 11.446$\pm$0.007 & 10.433$\pm$0.010 & 10.091$\pm$0.015 & 9.501$\pm$0.089 & 2453530\\
513: HV 2575 & 11.391$\pm$0.006 & 10.438$\pm$0.004 & 10.117$\pm$0.004 & 9.649$\pm$0.072 & 2453919\\
514: HV 2578 & 10.085$\pm$0.012 & 9.146$\pm$0.013 & 8.790$\pm$0.015 & 8.199$\pm$0.039 & 2453527\\
515: IRAS 05300$-$6651 & \nodata & 14.972$\pm$0.107 & 12.532$\pm$0.044 & 9.437$\pm$0.086 & 2453526\\
516: HV 996 & 8.799$\pm$0.007 & 7.910$\pm$0.016 & 7.468$\pm$0.014 & 6.665$\pm$0.014 & 2453526\\
517: IRAS 05329$-$6708 & 15.096$\pm$0.170 & \nodata & 9.794$\pm$0.008 & 7.445$\pm$0.034 & 2453135\\
518: IRAS 05329$-$6708 & 15.618$\pm$0.074 & 12.557$\pm$0.015 & 10.504$\pm$0.014 & 8.159$\pm$0.023 & 2453915\\
519: HV 12620 & 11.197$\pm$0.007 & 10.302$\pm$0.011 & 10.104$\pm$0.019 & 9.472$\pm$0.085 & 2453517\\
520: IRAS 05348$-$7024 & \nodata & \nodata & 13.579$\pm$0.200 & 9.226$\pm$0.080 & 2453135\\
521: IRAS 05402$-$6956 & 13.632$\pm$0.013 & 11.054$\pm$0.011 & 9.289$\pm$0.015 & 7.170$\pm$0.017 & 2453517\\
522: HV 12667 & 10.793$\pm$0.006 & 9.853$\pm$0.020 & 9.354$\pm$0.020 & 8.527$\pm$0.037 & 2453521\\
523: HV 12070 & 10.421$\pm$0.003 & \nodata & 9.157$\pm$0.004 & 8.596$\pm$0.041 & 2453135\\
524: \enddata
525: \end{deluxetable*}
526: %\end{deluxetable}
527:
528: We obtained ground-based near-infrared photometry for our
529: sources as close in time to the IRS observations as possible.
530: We used CASPIR \citep{caspir} on the 2.3-m telescope at SSO
531: to obtain images at J (effective wavelength 1.24~\mum), H
532: (1.68~\mum), K (2.22~\mum), and narrow-band L (3.59~\mum).
533: \cite{slo06b} describe the calibration methods. Table 3
534: presents the photometry. It includes two entries
535: for four sources because we observed them twice with the
536: IRS and twice from the ground. The photometric data for
537: WBP 17 are averaged from measurements made before and after
538: the IRS spectroscopy.
539:
540: % Table 3 goes here.
541:
542:
543: \section{IRS Spectroscopy} % Sec. 3
544:
545: \subsection{IRS Observations} % Sec. 3.1
546:
547: \begin{deluxetable*}{lrrrrlrll} % Table 4
548: %\begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrlrll}
549: \tablenum{4}
550: \tablecolumns{9}
551: \tablewidth{0pt}
552: \small
553: \tablecaption{Low-resolution observations\label{Tbl5}}
554: \tablehead{
555: \colhead{ } & \colhead{ } & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Time (s)} &
556: \colhead{IRS} & \colhead{Observed} & \colhead{Julian} & \colhead{Infrared} &
557: \colhead{ } \\
558: \colhead{Target} & \colhead{AOR key} & \colhead{SL} & \colhead{LL} &
559: \colhead{Camp.} & \colhead{(UT)} & \colhead{Date} & \colhead{Sp. Class} &
560: \colhead{M$_{bol}$\tablenotemark{a}}
561: }
562: \startdata
563:
564: HV 11223 & 6019584 & 112 & 480 & 21 & 2005 Jun 04 & 2453526 & 1.N & $-$6.13\\
565: HV 1366 & 6017024 & 240 & 480 & 14 & 2004 Oct 25 & 2453304 & 1.N & $-$4.97\\
566: BFM 1 & 6022912 & 240 & 480 & 21 & 2005 Jun 02 & 2453524 & 2.ST: & $-$5.03\\
567: BFM 1 (follow-up) & 17398784 & 1920 & 2880 & 33 & 2006 Jul 26 & 2453942 & 2.NO & $-$5.23\\
568: CV 78 & 6019072 & 112 & 480 & 21 & 2005 Jun 05 & 2453527 & 2.CE & $-$6.22\\
569: HV 11303 & 6017536 & 112 & 480 & 21 & 2005 Jun 08 & 2453530 & 1.N: & $-$6.05\\
570: HV 11329 & 6017280 & 112 & 480 & 21 & 2005 Jun 05 & 2453527 & 1.NO & $-$6.25\\
571: HV 11329 (follow-up) & 17399296 & 1440 & 2880 & 32 & 2006 Jun 28 & 2453915 & 1.NO & $-$6.27\\
572: HV 838 & 6017792 & 56 & 480 & 11 & 2004 Aug 11 & 2453228 & 1.N: & $-$7.37\tablenotemark{b}\\
573: HV 11366 & 6018304 & 112 & 480 & 21 & 2005 Jun 08 & 2453530 & 1.N:O:: & $-$6.22\\
574: HV 12149 & 6019328 & 56 & 480 & 21 & 2005 Jun 08 & 2453530 & 2.SE8 & $-$6.69\tablenotemark{c}\\
575: HV 1963 & 6018048 & 112 & 480 & 10 & 2004 Jul 18 & 2453205 & 1.N:O: & $-$6.66\\
576: HV 1963 (follow-up) & 17399040 & 960 & 1920 & 32 & 2006 Jun 28 & 2453915 & 1.N:O & $-$6.56\\
577: Massey SMC 59803 & 6019840 & 240 & 720 & 21 & 2005 Jun 08 & 2453530 & 2.SE4u & $-$8.11\\
578: \\
579: IRAS 04509$-$6922 & 6022400 & 56 & 120 & 21 & 2005 May 26 & 2453517 & 2.SE8f & $-$7.66\\
580: IRAS 04516$-$6902 & 6020096 & 56 & 120 & 21 & 2005 May 26 & 2453517 & 2.SE6f & $-$7.43\\
581: IRAS 04530$-$6916 & 6023936 & 56 & 56 & 6 & 2004 Apr 18 & 2453114 & 5.U/SA & $-$7.78\\
582: IRAS 04545$-$7000 & 6020352 & 56 & 120 & 6 & 2004 Apr 18 & 2453114 & 3.SAxf & $-$6.42\\
583: HV 888 & 6015488 & 56 & 120 & 22 & 2005 Jul 10 & 2453562 & 2.SE8tf & $-$9.01\\
584: HV 2310 & 6014976 & 112 & 480 & 6 & 2004 Apr 18 & 2453114 & 2.SE5xf & $-$6.13\\
585: IRAS 05128$-$6455 & 6024192 & 56 & 240 & 23 & 2005 Aug 09 & 2453592 & 2.SE5f & $-$5.99\\
586: MACHO 79.5505.26 & 6016768 & 240 & 480 & 6 & 2004 Apr 16 & 2453112 & 1.N & $-$4.50\\
587: HV 5810 & 6014464 & 112 & 480 & 21 & 2005 Jun 08 & 2453530 & 2.U: & $-$5.64\\
588: WBP 17 & 6023425 & 240 & 720 & 20 & 2005 Aug 14 & 2453597 & 1.NC & $-$4.63\\
589: WBP 29 & 6021632 & 240 & 720 & 20 & 2005 Apr 22 & 2453483 & 2.CE: & $-$4.54\\
590: WBP 42 & 6023680 & 112 & 480 & 21 & 2005 May 26 & 2453517 & 2.CE & $-$4.97\\
591: WOH G 339 & 6022144 & 112 & 480 & 21 & 2005 May 26 & 2453517 & 2.SE5 & $-$6.52\tablenotemark{d}\\
592: WBP 77 & 6021120 & 240 & 480 & 6 & 2004 Apr 16 & 2453112 & 2.SE1: & $-$4.26\\
593: WBP 104 & 6021376 & 240 & 720 & 22 & 2005 Jul 10 & 2453562 & 1.NO:: & $-$4.53\\
594: 2MASS J052832 & 6020864 & 240 & 720 & 22 & 2005 Jul 10 & 2453562 & 1.NO & $-$5.45\tablenotemark{d}\\
595: HV 2572 & 6014208 & 56 & 480 & 6 & 2004 Apr 18 & 2453114 & 2.SE7 tf: & $-$6.78\tablenotemark{e}\\
596: HV 2575 & 6016256 & 112 & 480 & 21 & 2005 Jun 08 & 2453530 & 1.N: & $-$5.51\\
597: HV 2575 (follow-up) & 17399552 & 1920 & 2880 & 32 & 2006 Jul 02 & 2453919 & 2.NO & $-$5.51\\
598: HV 2578 & 6014720 & 56 & 480 & 21 & 2005 Jun 05 & 2453527 & 2.SE7tf & $-$6.88\\
599: IRAS 05300$-$6651 & 6024704 & 56 & 240 & 21 & 2005 Jun 04 & 2453525 & 3.CR & $-$5.17\\
600: HV 996 & 6015744 & 56 & 120 & 21 & 2005 Jun 04 & 2453526 & 2.SE7 & $-$8.30\\
601: IRAS 05329$-$6708 & 6023168 & 56 & 120 & 6 & 2004 Apr 18 & 2453114 & 3.SAxf & $-$7.06\\
602: HV 12620 & 6016000 & 240 & 720 & 21 & 2005 May 26 & 2453517 & 1.N: & $-$5.66\\
603: IRAS 05348$-$7024 & 6024448 & 56 & 480 & 6 & 2004 Apr 16 & 2453112 & 3.CR & $-$5.62\\
604: IRAS 05402$-$6956 & 6020608 & 56 & 120 & 21 & 2005 May 26 & 2453517 & 3.SBxf & $-$7.20\\
605: HV 12667 & 6015232 & 56 & 480 & 21 & 2005 May 30 & 2453521 & 2.SE6 tf: & $-$6.26\\
606: HV 12070 & 6016512 & 56 & 120 & 6 & 2004 Apr 16 & 2453112 & 2.SE6 & $-$6.48\\
607: %\\
608: %(NGC 371 LE 31) & 6018560 & 240 & 720 & 21 & 2005 Jun 02 & 2453524 & \nodata & \nodata \\
609: %(NGC 371 LE 8) & 6018816 & 240 & 480 & 21 & 2005 Jun 02 & 2453524 & \nodata & \nodata \\
610: %(WBP 219) & 6021888 & 240 & 720 & 21 & 2005 May 26 & 2453517 & \nodata & \nodata \\
611: \enddata
612: \tablenotetext{a}{Based on {\it Spitzer} spectra and SSO photometry (in Table 3), except where noted.}
613: \tablenotetext{b}{Using 2MASS and S$^3$MC photometry gives M$_{bol}$ = $-$6.73.}
614: \tablenotetext{c}{Using 2MASS and S$^3$MC photometry gives M$_{bol}$ = $-$7.38.}
615: \tablenotetext{d}{Using 2MASS and SAGE photometry to replace absent CASPIR photometry.}
616: \tablenotetext{e}{Using 2MASS and SAGE photometry gives M$_{bol}$ = $-$7.16.}
617: \end{deluxetable*}
618: %\end{deluxetable}
619:
620: \begin{deluxetable*}{lrrrlr} % Table 5
621: %\begin{deluxetable}{lrrrlr}
622: \tablenum{5}
623: \tablecolumns{6}
624: \tablewidth{0pt}
625: \small
626: \tablecaption{Short-High observations\label{Tbl6}}
627: \tablehead{
628: \colhead{ } & \colhead{ } & \colhead{SH Int.} & \colhead{IRS} &
629: \colhead{Observed} & \colhead{Julian} \\
630: \colhead{Target} & \colhead{AOR key} & \colhead{Time (s)} & \colhead{Camp.} &
631: \colhead{(UT)} & \colhead{Date}
632: }
633: \startdata
634: IRAS 04545$-$7000 & 17399808 & 120 & 32 & 2006 Jul 01 & 2453918.4 \\
635: IRAS 05329$-$6708 & 17400320 & 60 & 32 & 2006 Jun 28 & 2453914.9 \\
636: %MSX SMC 018 & 17400832 & 120 & 32 & 2006 Jul 01 & 2453918.4 \\ % DROP
637: \enddata
638: \end{deluxetable*}
639: %\end{deluxetable}
640:
641: We observed all of the sources in our sample with the
642: low-resolution modules on the IRS. These observations were
643: carried out as part of the IRS GTO allocation, which was
644: spread over the first 2.5 years of the {\it Spitzer}
645: mission. As described below, we also followed
646: up some targets in Cycle 3. We observed four stars with
647: possible low-contrast excesses with longer integration
648: times (PID 30332), and we followed up two sources in the
649: MC\_DUST program with Short-High (SH) observations to verify
650: the existence of new dust features at 14~\mum\ (PID 30345).
651: Table 4 summarizes the low-resolution observations, and
652: Table 5 summarizes the SH observations.
653:
654: % Tables 4 and 5 go here.
655:
656: \subsection{Standard Reduction} % Sec. 3.2
657:
658: Our data reduction began with the S15 version of the data
659: pipeline released by the {\it Spitzer} Science Center (SSC).
660: Before extracting spectra from the flatfielded images, we
661: subtracted background images and corrected bad pixels.
662: For the Short-Low (SL) data, we used images with the source
663: in the other aperture as the background (aperture
664: differences). Thus, the Short-Low order 1 (SL1) images
665: served as background data for the SL order 2 (SL2) images,
666: and vice versa. For Long-Low, we obtained nod differences,
667: subtracting images with the source in one nod position from
668: images with the source in the same aperture, but in the
669: other nod position. The next step was to correct bad
670: pixels by interpolating from their neighbors, using the
671: {\rm imclean} IDL package\footnote{Available from the SSC
672: as {\rm irsclean}.}. Bad pixels are those flagged in the
673: bit-mask images provided with the data release and those
674: flagged as rogues in the rogue masks provided by the SSC.
675:
676: We extracted spectra from the corrected images using the
677: {\rm profile}, {\rm ridge}, and {\rm extract} routines
678: available in the SSC's {\it Spitzer} IRS Custom Extractor
679: (SPICE). The spectra were calibrated with spectral
680: corrections generated from observations of the K0 giant
681: HR 6348 for SL and for LL, HR 6348 along with the late
682: K giants HD 166780 and HD 173511 \citep[see][for further
683: details]{slo08c}. To eliminate pointing-induced
684: discontinuities between the orders, we normalized the
685: various segments to match at the wavelengths where they
686: overlapped. We normalized segments upwards to the
687: presumably best-centered segment. Finally, we trimmed
688: the segments to eliminate untrustworthy data at the ends.
689:
690: The SH observations required a different reduction method.
691: We used S14 images, substracted dedicated sky images, and
692: performed full-slit extractions. We calibrated using
693: observations of $\xi$ Dra (K2 III).
694:
695: \subsection{Bolometric Magnitudes} % Sec. 3.3
696:
697: Table 4 also includes the bolometric magnitudes of our
698: sources at the time of observation, which result from an
699: integration of the IRS spectra and the near-infrared SSO
700: photometry. We have assumed a Wien tail to the blue and a
701: Rayleigh-Jeans tail to the red, and a distance modulus of
702: 18.5 to the LMC and 18.9 to the SMC.
703:
704: Where possible, we have also computed bolometric magnitudes
705: by replacing the SSO data with the 2MASS photometry in Table 2
706: and 3.6 and 4.5~\mum\ {\it Spitzer} photometry from
707: the SAGE survey of the LMC \citep{mei06} and the S$^3$MC
708: survey of the SMC \citep{bol07}.\footnote{SAGE and S$^3$MC
709: stand, respectively, for Surveying the Agents of Galactic
710: Evolution and the {\it Spitzer} Survey of the SMC.} In
711: those cases where the data give a significantly different
712: result, Table 4 includes a note of explanation.
713:
714: The observational distinction between red supergiants and
715: oxygen-rich AGB stars is non-trivial. Sources in the
716: Magellanic Clouds have known distances, making luminosity
717: a logical discriminant (pulsation amplitude is another).
718: \cite{wbf83} estimate that the classic upper limit for AGB
719: sources lies at about M$_{bol}$=$-7.1$, but as \cite{woo92}
720: discussed, some AGB sources can occasionally stray above that
721: limit. The bolometric luminosities in Table 4 suffer from
722: the additional difficulty of variability. We have observed
723: the stars at only one phase, which blurs the $-7.1$-magnitude
724: limit somewhat.
725:
726: For the classifications in Tables 1 and 2, we assume all RSGs
727: exceed the classic limit and show no large-amplitude
728: pulsation, OH maser emission, or Li absorption at 0.67~\mum.
729: The Li absorption indicates that the source has experienced
730: hot-bottom burning, placing it at the high-mass end of the
731: AGB \citep{smi95}.
732:
733: Four of our targets meet all of these constraints. HV 888
734: and HV 996 are firmly identified supergiants in the LMC
735: \citep[e.g.][]{wbf83}, as is Massey SMC 59803 in the SMC
736: \citep{lev06}. The fourth source is IRAS 04530, but this
737: source is probably a young stellar object (YSO), as
738: explained in \S 7.3.
739:
740: Two more sources meet some, but not all, of the criteria for
741: a supergiant. IRAS 04509 and IRAS 04516 have bolometric
742: luminosities over the AGB limit by our measurements (with
743: both SSO and 2MASS photometry), but \cite{woo92} suggested
744: that they were AGB sources, having measured their bolometric
745: luminosities to be $-7.30$ and $-6.77$, and
746: their amplitudes at K to be 1.5 and 1.3 magnitudes,
747: respectively. They noted that very red AGB sources might
748: exceed the $-7.1$-magnitude limit slightly. However, they
749: found no evidence of OH maser activity in IRAS 04509, and
750: \cite{mar04} found none in IRAS 04516. Our bolometric
751: luminosities are well above the classic AGB limit, and
752: while both sources have no detected maser activity, their
753: K-band amplitudes are inconsistent with supergiant status.
754: These two sources are as luminous as AGB sources can be, and
755: we suspect that they are massive AGB sources.
756:
757: \cite{woo92} and \cite{whi03} detected masers in all three
758: targets identified as OH/IR sources in Table 1. IRAS 05329
759: and IRAS 05402 have bolometric luminosities in some
760: references over the AGB limit, but the presence of maser
761: emission clarifies their status. IRAS 04545 is under the AGB
762: limit in most references.
763:
764: Two sources show evidence of hot-bottom burning, HV 2572
765: \citep{smi95,wf00} and HV 12070 \citep{whi03}, making them
766: massive AGB stars. \cite{wbf83} suggested that HV 2572
767: might be a foreground object, but its radial velocity is
768: more consistent with membership in the LMC (P.\ Wood,
769: private communication).
770:
771: % woo92 whi03
772: % target <K> M$_{bol}$ my M$_{bol}$ M$_{bol}$
773: % IRAS 04545 10.64 -6.15 -6.31 -6.42 -6.56 P=1216d DelK=1.57 (I had P=1270)
774: % IRAS 05329 9.87 -6.86 -7.13 -7.06 -6.95 P=1262d DelK=1.50
775: % IRAS 05402 10.12 -6.50 -7.14 -7.20 -6.77 P=1393d DelK=1.80
776:
777: % IRAS 04509 8.35 -7.30 -7.75 -7.66 woo92 - DelK=1.5
778: % IRAS 04516 8.86 -6.77 -7.65 -7.43 woo92 - DelK=1.3
779: % IRAS 04530 9.79 -7.62 -6.44 -7.78 woo92 - DelK=0.2
780:
781: \subsection{Infrared Spectral Classification} % Sec. 3.4
782:
783: The first step in our analysis is to classify each source
784: into one of five broad categories based on the general
785: properties of its infrared spectrum. Each spectrum is then
786: analyzed in more detail, using a method appropriate to its
787: classification.
788:
789: We applied the classification method developed at
790: Hanscom Field and introduced by \cite{kra02}. This system
791: places a spectrum into one of five numbered groups based on
792: its overall color: 1 for blue spectra dominated by a stellar
793: continuum, 2 for dusty stars, 3 for spectra dominated by warm
794: dust, and 4 and 5 for spectra dominated by progressively
795: cooler dust.\footnote{These last two groups are distinguished
796: using data from 36 to 45~\mum, which are unavailable to the
797: IRS. We simply classify the one red spectrum as group 5.}
798: It then describes the dominant features in the spectra with
799: one- or two-letter abbreviations: N for naked stars, SE for
800: silicate emission, SB for self-absorbed silicate emission, SA
801: for silicate absorption, CE for carbon-rich dust emission, CR
802: for optically thick and cooler carbon dust shells, and U for
803: spectra showing the unidentified infrared (UIR) emission
804: features arising from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
805: and related material. We introduce a new classification,
806: 2.ST, in \S 5.6.
807:
808: Table 4 gives the infrared spectral classifications, which
809: include the basic classification plus additional subdivisions
810: and notes as described in the following sections. The
811: overall classification determines the method(s) applied to
812: analyze the spectra and in which sections they are
813: discussed. In \S 4, we discuss the naked stars (1.N and
814: 1.NO) and some of the nearly naked spectra showing other dust
815: features. In \S 5 we examine oxygen-rich dust spectra (2.SE,
816: 3.SE, 3.SB, and 3.SA), while \S 6 examines carbon-rich
817: spectra (1.NC, 2.CE and 3.CR). Finally, \S 7 looks at the
818: spectra with red continua and/or contributions from PAHS.
819:
820: Distinguishing the nature of the dust (oxygen-rich vs.
821: carbon-rich) is straightforward if there is plenty of dust,
822: but for sources with low-contrast excesses, not only can it
823: be difficult to determine what kind of dust is present, but
824: it can be a challenge just to decide if there is an excess
825: at all. To assist, we have measured the dust emission
826: contrast (DEC), which \cite{sp95} defined to be the
827: ratio of dust emission to stellar emission between 7.67 and
828: 14.03~\mum. They applied this method to the database of
829: Low-Resolution Spectra (LRS) from {\it IRAS}. \cite{sp98}
830: noted that all sources with DEC $>$ 0.08 had clear dust
831: excesses, while all sources with DEC$<$ 0.04 looked naked.
832: The sources between these two limits were more problematic
833: and could be described as ``fig-leaf'' sources, since they
834: are neither naked nor fully clothed by a dust shell.
835:
836: We follow their example, but with some changes. As done
837: previously, we assume the optically thin case, which implies
838: that the contributions to the spectrum from the star and dust
839: are additive. The better coverage to shorter wavelengths of
840: the IRS compared to the LRS allows us to shift the wavelength
841: range for fitting the stellar contribution to 6.8--7.4~\mum,
842: between an absorption band from water vapor at
843: $\sim$6.6~\mum\ and the fundamental SiO band, which begins at
844: 7.4~\mum. As discussed below (\S 4), the SiO band is much
845: weaker in the Magellanic Clouds than in the Galaxy, so
846: instead of using a model spectrum with an SiO band, we simply
847: fit and subtract a 3600 K Planck function to measure the DEC.
848: This also makes the method general enough to apply to carbon
849: stars.
850:
851: While \cite{sp98} set the minimum DEC for dusty stars to be
852: 0.08, we find that in the MC\_DUST sample, sources with a DEC
853: as high as 0.10 do not have a sufficient excess to identify
854: unambiguously. We classify sources with DEC$\le$0.04 as 1.N,
855: while the fig-leaf sources with 0.04$<$DEC$\le$0.10 are 1.N:.
856: Sources with higher dust emission contrasts are classified in
857: group 2, and in all cases but one, can be placed into the
858: appropriate sub-category (2.SE, 2.CE, etc.).
859:
860: Three sources (BFM 1, HV 5810, and WBP 77) have DECs
861: high enough to qualify as dusty, but we can see through the
862: dust and investigate their photospheres.
863: Consequently, we will examine their photospheric properties
864: in the section below on naked stars (\S 4) and their dust
865: content in the appropriate section as well.
866: % Similarly, the naked star WBP 17 is carbon-rich,
867: % so it is analyzed in both \S 4 and \S 6. NOW JUST \S 6
868:
869: Two of our sources are identified as C/IR stars in Table 2,
870: IRAS 05300 and IRAS 05348. \cite{vl06} list
871: IRAS 05348 as ``unknown type'', but our IRS data clearly show
872: a carbon star. As noted in \S 2.2, IRAS 05128 has previously
873: been identified as carbon-rich based on its {\it ISO}
874: spectrum, but both our optical and infrared spectra reveal an
875: oxygen-rich source.
876:
877: One source, MACHO 79.5505.26, has inconsistent optical and
878: infrared spectra. The optical spectrum is clearly
879: carbon-rich, but the infrared spectrum shows no dust or
880: absorption bands indicating its chemistry, which is unusual
881: for carbon stars. For this reason, we analyze it both in
882: \S 4 and 6. Similarly, the SMC supergiant Massey
883: SMC 59803 shows both silicate and PAH emission (analyzed
884: separately in \S 5 and 7).
885:
886:
887: \section{Naked Stars} % Sec. 4
888:
889: \begin{figure} % Fig. 2
890: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f02.eps}
891: \caption{IRS spectra of naked oxygen-rich stars in the SMC.
892: The spectra have been normalized and shifted for clarity.
893: The 8~\mum\ flux, determined by applying the bandpass of the
894: IRAC 8~\mum\ filter to the IRS data, is given after each
895: source name in parentheses.}
896: \end{figure}
897:
898: \begin{figure} % Fig. 3
899: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f03.eps}
900: \caption{IRS spectra of naked oxygen-rich stars in the LMC.
901: As in Fig.\ 2, the spectra have been normalized and shifted.}
902: \end{figure}
903:
904: Figures 2 and 3 present the spectra of the naked
905: sources in the SMC and LMC, respectively. These include seven
906: of the 11 SMC sources and five of the 27 LMC sources.
907:
908: % Figures 2-3 go here.
909:
910: Many of these spectra are faint, which exposes us to
911: background issues that would have little effect on brighter
912: sources. The Magellanic Clouds are crowded in the infrared,
913: with extended emission and a multitude of stray sources.
914: These have a greater impact on LL, with its 10\arcsec\ slit
915: and sensitivity to extended emission from cool dust. In some
916: of the spectra, the source is faint enough and blue enough
917: that we failed to detect it in LL. For this reason, our
918: analysis will concentrate on the SL data. Even though some
919: of the LL data are excellent, we did not detect any
920: significant spectral features beyond about 15~\mum.
921:
922: \subsection{Method} % Sec. 4.1.
923:
924: \begin{figure} % Fig. 4
925: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f04.eps}
926: \caption{IRS spectra of naked stars in the SMC, plotted in
927: Rayleigh-Jeans units ($\lambda^2 F_{\nu}$), so that the
928: Rayleigh-Jeans tail of a blackbody would be a horizontal
929: line. For each spectrum, the dotted lines give the fitted
930: continuum and the best fit absorption from an average
931: Galactic M giant. Table 6 gives the equivalent width of
932: the fitted SiO band.}
933: \end{figure}
934:
935: \begin{figure} % Fig. 5
936: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f05.eps}
937: \caption{IRS spectra of naked stars in the LMC, plotted in
938: Rayleigh-Jeans units with the fitted fitted continuum and
939: absorption spectra, as in Fig.\ 4.}
940: \end{figure}
941:
942: \begin{figure} % Fig. 6
943: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f06.eps}
944: \caption{IRS spectra of stars in the SMC and LMC with
945: indications of low-contrast dust emission (in Rayleigh-Jeans
946: units). The dotted lines are the fitted continua and
947: absorption spectra, as in Fig.\ 4. Spectra with full
948: wavelength coverage for these sources appear in later
949: figures: BFM 1 in Fig.\ 8, HV 5810 in Fig. 22, and WBP 77
950: in Fig.\ 9.}
951: \end{figure}
952:
953: \begin{deluxetable*}{lrrrl} % Table 6
954: %\begin{deluxetable}{lrrrl}
955: \tablenum{6}
956: \tablecolumns{5}
957: \tablewidth{0pt}
958: \tablecaption{Naked and nearly naked stars\label{Tbl7}}
959: \tablehead{
960: \colhead{ } & \colhead{Dust Em. } & \colhead{Fitted} &
961: \colhead{W$_{\lambda}$ SiO} & \colhead{Infrared} \\
962: \colhead{Target} & \colhead{Contrast} & \colhead{T (K)} &
963: \colhead{(\mum)} & \colhead{Sp. Class}
964: }
965: \startdata
966: HV 11223 & $-$0.02 $\pm$ 0.08 & 2290 $\pm$ 510 & $<$ 0.18 & 1.N \\
967: HV 1366 & 0.02 $\pm$ 0.06 & 2270 $\pm$ 560 & $<$ 0.20 & 1.N \\
968: BFM 1 & 0.24 $\pm$ 0.04 & 1460 $\pm$ 110 & $<$ 0.16 & 2.ST: \\
969: BFM 1 (follow-up) & 0.16 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1160 $\pm$ 10 & 0.15 $\pm$ 0.05 & 2.N:O \\
970: HV 11303 & 0.07 $\pm$ 0.03 & 2130 $\pm$ 240 & $<$ 0.03 & 1.N: \\
971: HV 11329 & 0.04 $\pm$ 0.05 & 1600 $\pm$ 80 & 0.28 $\pm$ 0.13 & 1.NO \\
972: HV 11329 (follow-up) & 0.00 $\pm$ 0.02 & 2380 $\pm$ 100 & 0.18 $\pm$ 0.03 & 1.NO \\
973: HV 838 & 0.10 $\pm$ 0.03 & 2320 $\pm$ 320 & $<$ 0.02 & 1.N: \\
974: HV 11366 & 0.06 $\pm$ 0.09 & 2230 $\pm$ 300 & 0.18 $\pm$ 0.19 & 1.N:O:: \\
975: HV 1963 & 0.07 $\pm$ 0.05 & 2160 $\pm$ 120 & 0.21 $\pm$ 0.13 & 1.N:O: \\
976: HV 1963 (follow-up) & 0.05 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1990 $\pm$ 50 & 0.13 $\pm$ 0.03 & 1.N:O \\
977: \\
978: MACHO 79.5505.26 & $-$0.06 $\pm$ 0.04 & 4120 $\pm$ 2170 & $<$ 0.11 & 1.N \\
979: HV 5810 & 0.19 $\pm$ 0.08 & 1210 $\pm$ 110 & 0.38 $\pm$ 0.17 & 2.U \\
980: %WBP 17 & $-$0.00 $\pm$ 0.04 & 10000 $\pm$ 2950 & \nodata & 1.NC \\
981: WBP 77 & 0.19 $\pm$ 0.07 & 1130 $\pm$ 120 & 0.33 $\pm$ 0.18 & 2.SE1: \\
982: WBP 104 & $-$0.11 $\pm$ 0.06 & 4080 $\pm$ 890 & 0.20 $\pm$ 0.19 & 1.NO:: \\
983: 2MASS J052832 & $-$0.21 $\pm$ 0.05 & 10000 $\pm$ \nodata & 0.34 $\pm$ 0.15 & 1.NO \\
984: HV 2575 & 0.07 $\pm$ 0.07 & 2170 $\pm$ 870 & 0.09 $\pm$ 0.17 & 1.N: \\
985: HV 2575 (follow-up) & 0.07 $\pm$ 0.02 & 2260 $\pm$ 180 & 0.24 $\pm$ 0.08 & 1.N:O \\
986: HV 12620 & 0.06 $\pm$ 0.03 & 1900 $\pm$ 10 & $<$ 0.04 & 1.N: \\
987: \enddata
988: \end{deluxetable*}
989: %\end{deluxetable}
990:
991: The Hanscom system includes two subclasses of naked stars,
992: oxygen-rich (1.NO), and carbon-rich (1.NC). The 1.NO spectra
993: can be distinguished by the presence of the SiO fundamental
994: band, with maximum absorption at 8.0~\mum. For 1.NC spectra,
995: the primary discriminant is the acetylene (C$_2$H$_2$)
996: absorption band at 7.5~\mum, and in some cases, a narrower
997: acetylene band at 13.7~\mum. Those sources which cannot be
998: identified as 1.NO or 1.NC are classified simply as 1.N.
999: We examine the one 1.NC spectrum, of WBP 17, in \S 6.
1000:
1001: The SiO fundamental has a bandhead at 7.4~\mum. While the
1002: wavelength of maximum absorption is nearby, at 8.0~\mum, the
1003: band extends out as far as $\sim$11.0~\mum\ in some cases.
1004: The band is broad enough, and the spectra are noisy enough,
1005: that our usual technique of fitting a line segment to the
1006: continuum on either side of the band to integrate the
1007: equivalent width is inadequate. First, the continuum is not
1008: linear over such a broad wavelength range, and second, our
1009: estimated equivalent width has proven too sensitive to the
1010: vagueries of the continuum fit. Instead, we have constructed
1011: a template transmission spectrum from Cycle 4 IRS GTO
1012: observations of 10 naked M giants \citep[PID 40112;][]{slo08d}
1013: and fitted it to the spectrum to estimate the equivalent
1014: width.\footnote{The sample currently includes 13 reduced
1015: spectra, but we did not use three with strong water vapor
1016: absorption at 6.6~\mum\ when generating the SiO template.}
1017: We estimate the continuum with a Planck function which
1018: reproduces the color measured over the wavelength intervals
1019: 6.10--6.45 and 11.5--13.0~\mum. We then scale the
1020: transmission spectrum until we find the minimum $\chi^2$
1021: difference, and measure the equivalent width of our fitted
1022: spectrum from 7.4 to 11.5~\mum. We estimate the uncertainty
1023: in the fitted temperature by varying the long-wavelength
1024: fitting interval, and we estimate the uncertainty in
1025: equivalent width by finding the SiO strengths which
1026: correspond to the minimum $\chi^2$ multiplied by the factor
1027: $(1 + N^{-1/2})$, where $N$ is the number of pixels in the
1028: measured wavelength range.
1029:
1030: Figures 4 and 5 illustrate the best fits to the naked stars,
1031: and Figure 6 shows the three sources with both possible
1032: low-contrast dust and photospheric absorption bands. The
1033: results of these fits appear in Table 6.
1034:
1035: % Figures 4-6 and Table 6 go here.
1036:
1037: \subsection{Results} % Sec. 4.2
1038:
1039: \begin{figure} % Fig. 7
1040: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f07.eps}
1041: \caption{The follow-up spectra with longer integration times
1042: of four of the MC\_DUST targets. The originally observed
1043: spectrum appears in light gray, while the new spectrum is in
1044: black. The dotted lines are the continuum fitted to the new
1045: spectrum and the best-fit absorption spectrum, as in Fig.\ 3.}
1046: \end{figure}
1047:
1048: For each naked spectrum, Table 6 lists the dust emission
1049: contrast, the temperature of the fitted Planck function, and
1050: the equivalent width of the best-fitting SiO band. One
1051: should not overinterpret the temperatures.
1052: Spectra from sources which were not properly centered in the
1053: slit will be subtly distorted, since the slit throughput is
1054: a complex function of both wavelength and position in the
1055: slit \citep{ks06}. As Table 6 shows, the uncertainty in the
1056: temperature can be substantial in the noisier spectra.
1057: However, the temperatures can be useful if treated carefully.
1058: Table 6 reveals a correlation between higher dust emission
1059: contrasts and lower temperatures, suggesting that sources
1060: with lower blackbody temperatures do show low-contrast excess
1061: emission from dust.
1062:
1063: The classifications of naked stars in Tables 3 and 6 require
1064: some clarification. If a colon follows the ``N", it indicates
1065: uncertainty about whether or not the source is naked (i.e.\ it
1066: is a ``fig-leaf'' source). If the colon follows the ``O'',
1067: then the SiO band is detected with a S/N between $\sim$1 and
1068: $\sim$2.
1069:
1070: Figure 6 presents the three sources with a DEC too high to
1071: be naked and too low to identify the nature of the dust
1072: excess. BFM 1, the S star in the SMC, has a DEC of
1073: $\sim$0.20, indicating the presence of some dust. The full
1074: spectrum of this source appears in \S 5, along with a
1075: discussion of the interesting feature at 13--14~\mum.
1076: HV 5810 shows an apparent SiO absorption feature, but it
1077: also shows apparent emission features at 11.3, 12.0, and
1078: 12.7~\mum, the positions of the out-of-plane C--H bending
1079: modes in PAHs \citep[e.g.][]{atb89}. The apparent SiO
1080: absorption is more likely just the trough between the
1081: 7--9~\mum\ and 11--13~\mum\ PAH complexes (despite a S/N
1082: ratio of $\sim$2). This interpretation is strengthened by
1083: the spectral structure at 8.5~\mum, which resembles the
1084: emission feature from the C--H in-plane bending mode in PAHs.
1085: We discuss this source further in \S 7.2 below.
1086:
1087: %could also mention lack of CO in HV 5810
1088:
1089: Figure 7 presents the follow-up observations with longer
1090: integrations of four of our targets. We have detected SiO
1091: bands in all four of the follow-up spectra at a S/N of
1092: $\sim$3 or better, which is an improvement over the original
1093: spectra, where the limited S/N allowed only two detections
1094: with a S/N ratio of just $\sim$2. The follow-up spectrum
1095: of BFM 1 has changed compared to the original. The apparent
1096: 13--14~\mum\ emission feature is absent, while the SiO band
1097: is now clearly present, though weak. The S/N ratio of the
1098: spectrum of HV 2575 is high enough to reveal weak absorption
1099: between 6.5 and 7.4~\mum\ from water vapor \citep{cam02}.
1100:
1101: % Figure 7 goes here.
1102:
1103: We will return to the naked stars in \S 8.1 and 8.3 below.
1104:
1105:
1106: \section{Oxygen-rich Dust Sources} % Sec. 5
1107:
1108: \begin{figure} % Fig. 8
1109: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f08.eps}
1110: \caption{Spectra of the three SMC sources showing
1111: silicate or possibly related dust emission features.}
1112: \end{figure}
1113:
1114: \begin{figure*} % Fig. 9
1115: \includegraphics[width=7.0in]{f09.eps}
1116: \caption{Spectra of the 12 LMC sources with silicate or
1117: related emission.}
1118: \end{figure*}
1119:
1120: \begin{figure} % Fig. 10
1121: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f10.eps}
1122: \caption{Spectra of the three LMC sources showing silicate
1123: absorption features or self-absorbed silicate features at
1124: 10~\mum. These spectra are analyzed in Fig.\ 12 and 13.}
1125: \end{figure}
1126:
1127: The MC\_DUST sample contains 18 spectra dominated by silicate
1128: dust and related oxygen-rich dust species, as Figures 8 through
1129: 10 show. The SMC sample has three oxygen-rich dust emission
1130: sources, and no sources with enough dust opacity to drive the
1131: 10~\mum\ feature into absorption. The LMC sample includes 12
1132: emission sources, one red source showing a self-absorbed
1133: 10~\mum\ silicate feature, and two even redder sources with
1134: silicate absorption at 10~\mum.
1135:
1136: % Figures 8-10 go here.
1137:
1138: \subsection{Classification} % Sec. 5.1
1139:
1140: \begin{figure} % Fig. 11
1141: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f11.eps}
1142: \caption{The silicate dust sequence. MC\_DUST sources are
1143: plotted with black filled circles. The smallar gray circles
1144: show the distribution of Galactic AGB sources
1145: \citep{sp95,sp98}, and the dotted curve is a power law:
1146: $F_{10}/F_{12} = 1.32 (F_{10}/F_{11})^{1.77}$.}
1147: \end{figure}
1148:
1149: \begin{deluxetable*}{lrrrrrl} % Table 7
1150: %\begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrrl}
1151: \tablenum{7}
1152: \tablecolumns{7}
1153: \tablewidth{0pt}
1154: \tablecaption{Silicate emission analysis\label{Tbl11}}
1155: \tablehead{
1156: \colhead{ } & \colhead{ } & \colhead{Dust Em.} & \colhead{ } &
1157: \colhead{ } & \colhead{Corrected} & \colhead{Infrared} \\
1158: \colhead{Target} & \colhead{[7]$-$[15]} & \colhead{Contrast} &
1159: \colhead{$F_{10}/F_{11}$} & \colhead{$F_{10}/F_{12}$} &
1160: \colhead{$F_{10}/F_{11}$} & \colhead{Sp. Class}
1161: }
1162: \startdata
1163: BFM 1 & 0.41$\pm$0.07 & 0.24$\pm$0.04 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 2.ST\\
1164: BFM 1 (follow-up) & 0.62$\pm$0.06 & 0.16$\pm$0.02 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 2.NO\\
1165: HV 12149 & 0.88$\pm$0.02 & 0.80$\pm$0.04 & 1.39$\pm$0.05 & 2.29$\pm$0.13 & 1.68$\pm$0.11 & SE8\\
1166: Massey SMC 59803 & 0.58$\pm$0.01 & 0.23$\pm$0.01 & 0.77$\pm$0.03 & 1.08$\pm$0.04 & 1.19$\pm$0.06 & SE4\\
1167: \\
1168: IRAS 04509 & 2.12$\pm$0.01 & 3.96$\pm$0.05 & 1.17$\pm$0.02 & 2.06$\pm$0.07 & 1.59$\pm$0.06 & SE8\\
1169: IRAS 04516 & 2.00$\pm$0.01 & 3.22$\pm$0.02 & 1.02$\pm$0.01 & 1.47$\pm$0.04 & 1.38$\pm$0.04 & SE6\\
1170: IRAS 04545 & 2.22$\pm$0.01 & 1.51$\pm$0.01 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 3.SA\\
1171: HV 888 & 1.60$\pm$0.01 & 1.90$\pm$0.01 & 1.27$\pm$0.02 & 2.00$\pm$0.05 & 1.58$\pm$0.05 & SE8\\
1172: HV 2310 & 0.88$\pm$0.03 & 0.63$\pm$0.02 & 1.00$\pm$0.04 & 1.26$\pm$0.02 & 1.30$\pm$0.05 & SE5\\
1173: IRAS 05128 & 1.93$\pm$0.00 & 2.42$\pm$0.02 & 0.95$\pm$0.01 & 1.25$\pm$0.02 & 1.29$\pm$0.03 & SE5\\
1174: HV 5810 & 1.02$\pm$0.02 & 0.19$\pm$0.08 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 2.U\\
1175: WOH G 339 & 0.92$\pm$0.02 & 0.46$\pm$0.02 & 1.11$\pm$0.04 & 1.14$\pm$0.06 & 1.27$\pm$0.08 & SE5\\
1176: WBP 77 & 1.01$\pm$0.10 & 0.19$\pm$0.07 & 0.72$\pm$0.14 & 0.43$\pm$0.10 & 0.88$\pm$0.26 & SE1:\\
1177: HV 2572 & 1.06$\pm$0.01 & 0.80$\pm$0.02 & 1.23$\pm$0.02 & 1.73$\pm$0.03 & 1.49$\pm$0.03 & SE7\\
1178: HV 2578 & 1.05$\pm$0.01 & 0.85$\pm$0.03 & 1.24$\pm$0.03 & 1.85$\pm$0.06 & 1.53$\pm$0.06 & SE7\\
1179: HV 996 & 1.63$\pm$0.01 & 1.88$\pm$0.01 & 1.19$\pm$0.01 & 1.65$\pm$0.04 & 1.46$\pm$0.04 & SE7\\
1180: IRAS 05329 & 1.94$\pm$0.00 & 1.14$\pm$0.03 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 3.SB\\
1181: IRAS 05402 & 2.24$\pm$0.00 & 2.29$\pm$0.04 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 3.SA\\
1182: HV 12667 & 0.92$\pm$0.01 & 0.57$\pm$0.03 & 1.17$\pm$0.02 & 1.54$\pm$0.06 & 1.42$\pm$0.06 & SE6\\
1183: HV 12070 & 0.60$\pm$0.02 & 0.29$\pm$0.02 & 1.16$\pm$0.01 & 1.50$\pm$0.02 & 1.41$\pm$0.03 & SE6\\
1184: \enddata
1185: \end{deluxetable*}
1186: %\end{deluxetable}
1187:
1188: The classification method introduced by \cite{sp95,sp98}
1189: quickly distinguishes the composition of the emitting
1190: oxygen-rich dust. We apply that method here, fitting an
1191: assumed photospheric spectrum to the blue end of the observed
1192: spectrum and subtracting it to isolate the dust contribution.
1193: Because the photospheric spectra in the Magellanic Clouds
1194: have weaker SiO absorption than in the Galactic sample (see
1195: \S 4), we depart from the previous method and simply assume a
1196: 3600 K Planck function for the star. We fit it to the
1197: spectrum in the interval 6.8--7.4~\mum\ and subtract it. The
1198: classification is based on the ratios of the flux from the
1199: dust spectrum in small wavelength intervals centered at 10,
1200: 11, and 12~\mum. Figure 11 shows that the flux ratios from
1201: oxygen-rich dust trace the {\it silicate dust sequence}. We
1202: classify the spectra based on their position up this
1203: sequence, starting with SE1 in the lower left and running to
1204: SE8 in the upper right. The silicate emission index =
1205: $10 (F_{11}/F_{12}) - 7.5$, where $F_{11}/F_{12}$ is the
1206: corrected ratio found by locating the point on the power law
1207: $F_{10}/F_{12} = 1.32 (F_{10}/F_{11})^{1.77}$ closest to the
1208: actual value for a given spectrum. Table 7 presents the
1209: results.
1210:
1211: We also measured the magnitude of the stars in two narrow
1212: filters (6.8--7.4 and 14.4--15.0~\mum) to produce a [7]$-$[15]
1213: color. Table 7 includes these colors; we will examine these
1214: colors more closely when comparing other samples in a future
1215: paper.
1216:
1217: % Figure 11 goes here.
1218:
1219: % Table 7 goes here.
1220:
1221: \subsection{Crystalline silicate structure beyond 20~\mum} % Sec. 5.2
1222:
1223: \begin{figure} % Fig. 12
1224: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f12.eps}
1225: \caption{The crystalline silicate emission features apparent
1226: in three LL spectra. The data plotted in gray are the
1227: original spectra, while the data plotted in black are the
1228: spectra which have been defringed by boxcar smoothing, as
1229: explained in the text. The thin black line is the spline
1230: fitted at wavelengths marked by diamonds. Fig.\ 13 presents
1231: the resulting crystalline silicate spectra.}
1232: \end{figure}
1233:
1234: \begin{figure} % Fig. 13
1235: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f13.eps}
1236: \caption{The spline-subtracted crystalline silicate emission
1237: features from the spectra in Fig.\ 12. In the top three
1238: panels, the smoothed data are in black and the unsmoothed
1239: data are in light gray. The vertical lines mark reference
1240: wavelengths at 23.25, 27.9, and 33.7~\mum. The bottom panel
1241: presents a model spectrum (black) composed of 50\% laboratory
1242: forsterite \citep[Mg$_2$SiO$_4$, dark gray;][]{fab01b} and 50\%
1243: laboratory enstatite \citep[MgSiO$_3$, light gray;][]{jag98},
1244: both at 80 K and assuming a CDE2 shape distribution (see
1245: text). The vertical dotted lines in the bottom panel
1246: illustrate how the observed peaks should shift from 80 K
1247: to 300 K, based on the laboratory work by \cite{sut06}.}
1248: \end{figure}
1249:
1250: Figure 10 shows the spectra of the three most embedded
1251: sources in the MC\_DUST sample, all in the LMC. Two of these
1252: sources show clear evidence of crystalline silicate emission
1253: features at 23, 28, and 34~\mum. The third, IRAS 05329,
1254: shows strong fringing in LL1 that obscures the crystalline
1255: feature at 23~\mum\ and partly hides the one at 28~\mum.
1256: These crystalline features are much broader than the
1257: instrumental resolution, so a boxcar smoothing algorithm
1258: applied to LL1 will mask the fringes without significantly
1259: degrading the emission features. For IRAS 04545 and
1260: IRAS 05402, we applied a 3-pixel boxcar to all wavelengths
1261: and then applied an additional 5-pixel boxcar to the LL1 data
1262: to the blue of 22.88~\mum. For IRAS 05329, with its stronger
1263: fringing pattern, we applied a 5-pixel boxcar at all
1264: wavelengths and a second 5-pixel boxcar to the blue of
1265: 30.5~\mum. We stitched and trimmed these defringed spectra
1266: in the same manner as described in \S 3.1. Figure 12
1267: presents the results. (Correcting the fringes changed the
1268: segment-to-segment normalization.)
1269:
1270: % Figure 12 goes here.
1271:
1272: We fitted a spline to the data at 20.0, 21.3, 24.5, 25.5,
1273: 31.6, and 36.5~\mum\ to produce the spectra in Figure 13.
1274: The bottom panel in Figure 13 plots a model constructed
1275: from laboratory spectra of forsterite \citep{fab01b} and
1276: enstatite \citep{jag98}, the magnesium-rich endmembers of the
1277: olivine (Mg$_2$SiO$_4$) and pyroxene (MgSiO$_3$) series,
1278: respectively. We have produced optical efficiencies from the
1279: published indices of refraction for a modified continuous
1280: distribution of ellipsoids which uses quadratic weighting to
1281: emphasize spherical grains (CDE2), following the methods
1282: described by \cite{fab01b}. We found that a grain temperature
1283: of 80 K reproduced the average relative strengths of the 23
1284: and 34~\mum\ features, which both arise from forsterite.
1285: In order to reproduce the strong emission feature at 28~\mum,
1286: our sample had to include equal parts enstatite and
1287: forsterite. Adding enstatite also improves the match to the
1288: wavelength of the observed feature at 28~\mum.
1289:
1290: % Figure 13 goes here.
1291:
1292: Spectra from the SWS on \iso\ of Galactic sources of
1293: crystalline silicates serve as a useful comparison.
1294: \cite{mol02} found important differences between spectra
1295: produced by objects with known disks and objects where the
1296: emitting dust was in stellar outflows, particularly at 28 and
1297: 34~\mum. Their Figures 3, 4, and 5 present mean spectra from
1298: disk and outflow objects for the 23, 28, and 34~\mum\
1299: features, respectively. For comparison, we concentrate on
1300: IRAS 04545 and IRAS 05402 due to the higher quality of their
1301: spectra compared to IRAS 05239. In both spectra, the
1302: 23~\mum\ feature shows a sharp peak at 23.25~\mum. This
1303: differs from both the Galactic disk sources, which show a
1304: peak at 23.6~\mum, and the Galactic outflow sources, which
1305: have a broader peak from 22.8 to 23.8~\mum. The 28 and
1306: 34~\mum\ features in the LMC sources both resemble the
1307: Galactic disk sources. In the LMC sources, the 28~\mum\
1308: feature peaks at 27.9~\mum\ and is as strong as the 23 and
1309: 34~\mum\ features. In the Galactic samples, the 28~\mum\
1310: feature is largely absent in the outflow sources, but
1311: strong in the disk sources.\footnote{The spectra produced
1312: by \cite{mol02} show additional structure at $\sim$29.5 and
1313: 30.5~\mum, but this spectral region is notoriously difficult
1314: in the SWS data, due to problems in spectral bands 3D and 3E,
1315: making this structure questionable \citep[][discuss this in
1316: more detail]{slo03}.} In the LMC sources, the 34~\mum\
1317: feature peaks at 33.7~\mum, as does the Galactic disk sample,
1318: while the Galactic outflow sample shows an additional peak at
1319: 32.9~\mum\ which appears as only a shoulder in the disk
1320: spectra. Thus, while the 23~\mum\ feature differs somewhat
1321: from the Galactic sample, both the 28 and 34~\mum\ features
1322: closely resemble spectra from Galactic sources of crystalline
1323: silicates, especially those found in circumstellar disks.
1324:
1325: Several effects can shift the wavelength of the observed
1326: features. \cite{sut06} recently investigated how the emission
1327: features from forsterite shift with temperature. Using their
1328: data, we could expect a shift to the red of 0.21~\mum\ in the
1329: 23.25~\mum\ feature, 0.25~\mum\ at 27.9~\mum, and 0.22~\mum\
1330: at 33.7~\mum\ if we were to heat the grains in our observed
1331: spectra from 80 K to 300 K, which is the temperature of the
1332: measured laboratory samples. The bottom panel of Figure 13
1333: includes vertical dotted lines illustrating these shifts.
1334:
1335: Another way to shift the features is to replace some of the
1336: Mg in the minerals with Fe. \cite{chi02} and \cite{koi03}
1337: studied this effect in pyroxenes and olivines, respectively.
1338: In pyroxenes, replacing 20\% of the Mg with Fe shifts the
1339: 28~\mum\ feature by 0.4~\mum, while a similar replacement in
1340: olivines shifts the 23~\mum\ feature 0.3~\mum\ and the
1341: 34~\mum\ feature 0.2~\mum.
1342:
1343: The shape of the grains also influences the wavelengths of
1344: the emission features, as \cite{min03} have thoroughly
1345: investigated. Generally, a shift from spherical to
1346: non-spherical shape distributions moves the features to
1347: longer wavelengths. Most examinations of this effect have
1348: assumed that no particular axis is favorably extended in a
1349: sample of grains. \cite{slo06a} examined the effect of
1350: preferential non-sphericity along different axes and found
1351: that some shapes could shift the features to the blue,
1352: instead of the red.
1353:
1354: The solid vertical lines in Figure 13 mark the average
1355: peaks of the features in IRAS 04545 and IRAS 05402. In
1356: the bottom panel, we should compare the peaks of the
1357: model spectrum to the {\it dotted} vertical lines, since
1358: these account for the difference in temperature between
1359: the laboratory and LMC data. The observed position of the
1360: 23~\mum\ forsterite feature shows no redshift compared to
1361: the laboratory data, indicating Mg-rich grains with a CDE2
1362: shape distribution are a good fit. The 28~\mum\ feature,
1363: which arises from a mixture of enstatite and forsterite, is
1364: $\sim$0.3~\mum\ to the red of the laboratory data, indicating
1365: Fe inclusions of no more than $\sim$15\% or a slightly
1366: different shape distribution. Less can be said about the
1367: relative positions of the 34~\mum\ feature in the observed
1368: and laboratory data because of the clear difference in
1369: profile. Overall, our observations of crystalline silicates
1370: in the LMC are fully consistent with Mg-dominated grains,
1371: much like those observed in the Galaxy.
1372:
1373: \subsection{Crystalline silicate structure at 10~\mum} % Sec. 5.3
1374:
1375: \begin{figure} % Fig. 14
1376: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f14.eps}
1377: \caption{Structured silicate emission at 10~\mum\ in HV 2310
1378: (top) and HV 12667 (bottom). The IRS data (circles and error
1379: bars) have been smoothed with a 3-pixel boxcar. The fitted
1380: model dust spectrum (solid black line) is a combination of
1381: amorphous silicates \citep[dashed gray curve;][]{ohm92} and
1382: forsterite \citep[Mg$_2$SiO$_4$; dashed black curve;][]{fab01b}.
1383: For HV 2310, 7\% of the grains are crystalline, with a shape
1384: distribution including spherical, prolate (along the $x$
1385: axis), and oblate (extended along the $x$ and $z$ axes). For
1386: HV 12667, 2.5\% of the dust is crystalline, and the shape
1387: distribution includes spherical grains and prolate grains
1388: ($x$ axis).}
1389: \end{figure}
1390:
1391: \cite{slo06a} published the spectrum of HV 2310, one of the
1392: first objects observed in the MC\_DUST program. This 600-day
1393: Mira shows an unusual silicate emission spectrum with
1394: structure in the 10--11~\mum\ region best fit with a mixture
1395: of 7\% crystalline forsterite and a blend of amorphous grains
1396: dominated by astronomical silicates \citep[as described
1397: by][]{ohm92}. They based their analysis on S11 pipeline
1398: output from the SSC, while the data here are S15. While the
1399: general shape is still indicative of crystalline silicates,
1400: the spectral details have changed enough to require a new
1401: analysis.
1402:
1403: The MC\_DUST sample has revealed one more object showing
1404: crystalline silicate structure at 10~\mum, HV 12667. This
1405: source is a 645-day Mira, so it has similar pulsation
1406: properties to HV 2310, and it also has a similar infrared
1407: brightness, 45 mJy at 8~\mum, compared to 36 mJy for HV 2310.
1408:
1409: Figure 14 plots the continuum-subtracted spectra of HV 2310
1410: and HV 12667. In both cases, we have fitted and subtracted
1411: a 3600 K Planck function at 5.3--5.8~\mum. We tested the
1412: dependency of our results on the assumed stellar continuum
1413: by also using a model M6 giant with SiO absorption at 8~\mum,
1414: and we found no significant impact. Figure 14 also includes
1415: a rough fit to the dust spectrum, using a combination of
1416: amorphous silicates \citep{ohm92} and forsterite
1417: \citep{jag98}. Following \cite{slo06a}, we have produced a
1418: modified shape distribution in an effort to reproduce the
1419: detailed structure of the 10~\mum\ silicate feature. In the
1420: case of HV 12667, we have used a distribution of spherical
1421: grains, and prolate grains extended along the $x$ axis. To
1422: fit the observed spectrum, this population of crystalline
1423: grains needs to account for 2.5\% of the dust; the rest is
1424: amorphous silicates. For HV 2310, the shape distribution
1425: includes prolate grains ($x$ axis) and oblate grains ($x$ and
1426: $z$ axes). The crystalline component of the dust population
1427: is 7\%, unchanged from before. \cite{slo06a} also included
1428: amorphous pyroxene and amorphous alumina to fit the blue and
1429: red wings of the silicate profile, respectively. We do not
1430: include these components because we wish to concentrate on
1431: the structure at the peak of the profile.
1432:
1433: % Figure 14 goes here.
1434:
1435: It is highly unlikely that these shape distributions fit the
1436: silicate profiles uniquely. In fact, the changes in the
1437: pipeline calibration have changed the spectrum of HV 2310
1438: enough that we have modified the shape distribution used by
1439: \cite{slo06a}. The prolate grains in their shape
1440: distribution were extended along the $z$ axis, vs.\ the $x$
1441: axis here. This difference illustrates that the data are not
1442: of sufficient fidelity to pin these details down. However,
1443: the fits to HV 2310 and HV 12667 demonstrate that the
1444: silicate profiles in both are consistent with forsterite and
1445: that is is not necessary to invoke enstatite or minerals with
1446: Fe components to fit the features.
1447:
1448: \subsection{The 13~\mum\ emission feature} % Sec. 5.4
1449:
1450: The 13~\mum\ emission feature, first detected by
1451: \cite{lmp86}, often appears in the spectra from Galactic
1452: oxygen-rich dust shells \citep{slo96}. In our Magellanic
1453: samples, it is largely absent. There may be a feature in
1454: the spectra of HV 2572 and HV 2578, but if so, it is weak,
1455: noisy, and difficult to measure. The spectra of IRAS 04509,
1456: IRAS 04516, and IRAS 05128 show features in this spectral
1457: region, but they are centered closer to 14~\mum, as discussed
1458: in the next section.
1459:
1460: Our sample of oxygen-rich dust spectra is small, it may
1461: contain some biases (e.g.\ for Mira variables, which are
1462: less likely to show a 13~\mum\ feature than semiregular
1463: variables), and some of the spectra are noisy, which can hide
1464: low-contrast emission features. Consequently, our conclusion
1465: that the prevalence and strength of the 13~\mum\ emission
1466: feature is reduced in the Magellanic Clouds is somewhat
1467: preliminary. A more thorough examination of oxygen-rich
1468: circumstellar dust observed in other Magellanic programs is
1469: in preparation.
1470:
1471: \subsection{The 14~\mum\ emission feature} % Sec. 5.5
1472:
1473: \begin{figure} % Fig. 15
1474: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f15.eps}
1475: \caption{The 14~\mum\ feature in IRAS 04545 (top) and
1476: IRAS 05239 (bottom), in low-resolution IRS data (light
1477: gray) and SH data. The SH spectra are plotted before and
1478: after smoothing with a 7-pixel boxcar.
1479: IRAS 04545 increased 30\% in brightness,
1480: producing a high-quality SH spectrum which confirms the
1481: presence of the 14~\mum\ feature. IRAS 05329, on the other
1482: hand, dimmed by 40\%, making confirmation more difficult.}
1483: \end{figure}
1484:
1485: \cite{slo06a} previously noted that the spectrum of HV 2310
1486: includes an emission feature at 14~\mum. They were somewhat
1487: cautious about the feature, since it appears at the boundary
1488: between SL and LL, raising the possibility that it is an
1489: artifact, even if no known effect in the IRS could produce
1490: such a feature. \cite{ec06} also detected a 14~\mum\
1491: emission feature in the IRS spectra of the Trojan asteroids
1492: 624 Hektor and 921 Agamemnon, but they were also cautious and
1493: did not suggest a possible carrier. Figures 9--10 reveal
1494: that several sources in the MC\_DUST sample besides HV 2310
1495: also have 14~\mum\ features.
1496:
1497: To test if the feature might be an artifact in the
1498: low-resolution IRS spectra, we observed two 14~\mum\ sources,
1499: IRAS 04545 and IRAS 05329, with the SH module, as shown in
1500: Figure 15. Both sources are variable stars, and IRAS 04545
1501: increased in brightness by 30\% between the two observations,
1502: resulting in an excellent SH spectrum which clearly confirms
1503: the detection in SL and LL. IRAS 05329 declined in
1504: brightness by nearly 40\%, and as a consequence, the SH
1505: spectrum is noisier. While the SH data are consistent with
1506: the low-resolution data, they do not show an obvious 14~\mum\
1507: feature.
1508: %It is interesting that a 13~\mum\ feature appears
1509: %in the SH data. If this feature were real, its sudden
1510: %appearance between the two epochs would imply that the
1511: %feature is more variable than the dominant silicate emission
1512: %and absorption.
1513:
1514: % Figure 15 goes here.
1515:
1516: %At this time, the 14~\mum\ feature remains unidentified.
1517: %We have examined various pyroxene samples, since some
1518: %produce features in the vicinity of 14~\mum, but none have
1519: %proven suitable.
1520:
1521: \subsection{BFM 1} % Sec. 5.6
1522:
1523: \begin{figure} % Fig. 16
1524: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f16.eps}
1525: \caption{The spectrum of BFM 1 from 9.5 to 16.5~\mum, as
1526: originally observed (in black), and when followed up with
1527: a longer integration time (in gray) 418 days later. The
1528: thin black curve is a spline fitted through the original
1529: spectrum to isolate the possible dust spectrum shown in the
1530: bottom panel. In the bottom panel, the spectrum has
1531: been smoothed, and the fitted Gaussian
1532: (dashed gray curve) is centered at 13.52~\mum\ and has a
1533: FWHM of 0.53~\mum.}
1534: \end{figure}
1535:
1536: As shown in Figures 6, 7, and 8, BFM 1 has some unusual
1537: spectral characteristics. First, while the spectrum shows no
1538: substantial structure out to 12.5~\mum, it has a significant
1539: dust emission contrast (0.24 when first observed, and 0.16
1540: when followed up), indicating the presence of a featureless
1541: excess component. Second, the original spectrum shows a
1542: previously unknown emission feature from 13 to 14~\mum.
1543: Third, the follow-up spectrum, taken 418 days later with a
1544: longer integration time, confirms the featureless dust
1545: excess, but shows nothing where the 13--14~\mum\ feature
1546: had previously been.
1547:
1548: BFM 1 is the only true S star in our sample, and it is a
1549: steady Mira variable with a 398-day period and an amplitude
1550: of about 4 magnitudes in the optical. In S stars, the
1551: C/O ratio is near unity, leaving little C or O for the
1552: production of dust once CO has formed, which could lead to
1553: unusual dust chemistry. Our spectra of BFM 1 certainly
1554: show unusual characteristics. The featureless excess is
1555: not consistent with amorphous alumina, as that would leave
1556: a recognizable low-contrast feature in the 11--12~\mum\
1557: region. Perhaps it is amorphous carbon, or some other
1558: dust component.
1559:
1560: The possible feature at 13--14~\mum\ is also enigmatic.
1561: The follow-up spectrum did not confirm its presence, so
1562: either it disappeared in the interval between the
1563: observations, or else it was an artifact to begin with.
1564: The two spectra were obtained 418 days apart, compared to
1565: the 398-day period of the star. Thus the spectra were
1566: at nearly the same phase, ruling out some phase-dependent
1567: phenomenon. Nonetheless, we suspect the feature is real.
1568: First, it appears in the spectra from both nod positions.
1569: Second, it covers over 25 pixels in SL and is not the
1570: product of any known artifact. Third, similar features
1571: appear in two of the 90 spectra in the sample of Galactic
1572: S stars observed by the IRS in Cycle 3 \citep[Program
1573: ID 30737, P.I.\ S.\ Hony]{slo08b}.
1574:
1575: Figure 16 focuses on the 13--14~\mum\ feature in BFM 1.
1576: Fitting a spline to remove the continuum isolates a feature
1577: which can be fit with a Gaussian centered at 13.52~\mum\
1578: with a full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 0.53~\mum.
1579: The unique spectrum of BFM 1 deserves a unique
1580: classification. We extend the Hanscom system with a
1581: new classification, 2.ST, where the ``T'' indicates a
1582: feature centered at 13.5~\mum.
1583:
1584: % Figure 16 goes here.
1585:
1586:
1587: \section{Carbon-rich Sources} % Sec. 6 NC-CE-CR
1588:
1589: \begin{figure} % Fig. 17
1590: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f17.eps}
1591: \caption{The six definite carbon stars in the MC\_DUST
1592: sample. CV 78, the top spectrum, is in the SMC; the rest
1593: are in the LMC. The spectra of WBP 17 and WBP 29 are
1594: truncated at longer wavelengths due to background issues.
1595: The spectrum of a seventh source, MACHO 79.5505.26, appears
1596: in Fig.\ 2 and 4 and has an uncertain chemistry.}
1597: \end{figure}
1598:
1599: The MC\_DUST sample includes one definite carbon star in the
1600: SMC and five in the LMC. Figure 17 presents the spectra of
1601: these sources. In addition, MACHO 79.5505.26 has a
1602: carbon-rich optical spectrum but an ambiguous infrared
1603: spectrum with no dust emission and only CO absorption at
1604: 5~\mum. Its spectrum appears in Figures 2 and 4, In the
1605: next section, we show that it has no carbon-rich absorption
1606: features. We exclude it from further analysis as a carbon
1607: star because the chemistry of the infrared component
1608: is uncertain.
1609:
1610: We have truncated the spectra of two sources in Figure 17
1611: to avoid some problems introduced by complex backgrounds.
1612: The LL1 data for WBP 17 are negative due to strong
1613: background gradients. A nearby bright carbon star
1614: contaminates the LL data for WBP 29.
1615:
1616: % Figure 17 goes here.
1617:
1618: \subsection{The Manchester Method} % Sec. 6.1
1619:
1620: \begin{deluxetable*}{lcccccccl} % Table 8
1621: %\begin{deluxetable}{lcccccccl}
1622: \tablenum{8}
1623: \tablecolumns{9}
1624: \tablewidth{0pt}
1625: \small
1626: %\rotate
1627: \tablecaption{Carbon star analysis\label{Tbl12}}
1628: \tablehead{
1629: \colhead{ } & \colhead{[6.4]$-$[9.3]} & \colhead{[16.5]$-$[21.5]} &
1630: \colhead{7.5~\mum\ EW} & \colhead{13.7~\mum\ EW} &
1631: \colhead{$\lambda_{SiC}$} & \colhead{ } & \colhead{ } &
1632: \colhead{Infrared} \\
1633: \colhead{Target} & \colhead{(mag)} & \colhead{(mag)} & \colhead{(\mum)} &
1634: \colhead{(\mum)} & \colhead{(\mum)} & \colhead{SiC/Cont.} &
1635: \colhead{MgS/Cont.} & \colhead{Sp. Class}
1636: }
1637: \startdata
1638: CV 78 & 0.204$\pm$0.048 & 0.178$\pm$0.061 & 0.030$\pm$0.030 & 0.024$\pm$0.034 & 11.12$\pm$0.15 & 0.197$\pm$0.019 & \nodata & 2.CE \\
1639: MACHO 79.5505.26 & 0.208$\pm$0.044 & $-$0.307$\pm$0.350 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 1.N \\
1640: WBP 17 & $-$0.113$\pm$0.047 & $-$1.027$\pm$0.770 & 0.304$\pm$0.014 & 0.157$\pm$0.032 & 11.43$\pm$0.39 & 0.092$\pm$0.031 & \nodata & 1.NC \\
1641: WBP 29 & 0.084$\pm$0.030 & \nodata & 0.395$\pm$0.011 & \nodata & 12.01$\pm$0.69 & 0.035$\pm$0.037 & \nodata & 2.CE \\
1642: WBP 42 & 0.358$\pm$0.017 & 0.140$\pm$0.094 & 0.310$\pm$0.019 & \nodata & 10.95$\pm$0.31 & 0.092$\pm$0.025 & \nodata & 2.CE: \\
1643: IRAS 05300 & 1.061$\pm$0.006 & 0.280$\pm$0.011 & 0.152$\pm$0.003 & 0.047$\pm$0.010 & 11.32$\pm$0.08 & 0.098$\pm$0.005 & 0.255$\pm$0.014 & 3.CR \\
1644: IRAS 05348 & 1.050$\pm$0.006 & 0.295$\pm$0.010 & 0.013$\pm$0.004 & 0.047$\pm$0.001 & 11.28$\pm$0.05 & 0.137$\pm$0.004 & 0.238$\pm$0.012 & 3.CR \\
1645: \enddata
1646: \end{deluxetable*}
1647: %\end{deluxetable}
1648:
1649: To analyze the carbon-rich spectra, we applied the Manchester
1650: method introduced by \cite{slo06b} and also applied by
1651: \cite{zij06} and \cite{lag07}. These papers examined a
1652: total of 28 carbon stars in the LMC and 33 in the SMC, while
1653: our sample adds five carbon stars in the LMC and one in the
1654: SMC. The Manchester method measures the spectral continuum
1655: at four narrow wavelength intervals relatively free of
1656: molecular band absorption or dust emission centered at 6.3,
1657: 9.4, 16.5, and 21.5~\mum. The first two wavelengths define
1658: the [6.4]$-$[9.3] color, which measures the contribution from
1659: warm dust relative to the stellar photosphere. The
1660: [16.5]$-$[21.5] color measures the temperature of any cool
1661: dust contribution to the spectrum. It also provides a
1662: means of estimating the contribution under the MgS dust
1663: emission feature, which peaks in the 26--30~\mum\ range.
1664:
1665: Gaseous acetylene (C$_2$H$_2$) produces two absorption
1666: bands visible in the IRS spectra: a broad band centered at
1667: 7.5~\mum\ and typically $\sim$1.0~\mum\ wide, and a narrow
1668: band at 13.7~\mum\ \citep{mat06}. This latter band is
1669: actually the Q branch of the fundamental $\nu_5$ mode and
1670: it is often centered in a broader band which includes the P
1671: and R branches, but the broad component can be difficult to
1672: recognize due to the presence of the SiC dust emission
1673: feature at 11.3~\mum.
1674:
1675: The Manchester method fits line segments to the continuum to
1676: measure the equivalent width of the acetylene bands and the
1677: integrated flux of the SiC emission feature. We express the
1678: flux of the SiC band as a ratio to the continuum underneath.
1679: To measure the strength of the MgS the Manchester method uses
1680: the [16.5]$-$[21.5] color to extrapolate a cool blackbody
1681: continuum beneath the feature, which peaks in the
1682: 26--30~\mum\ range. Table 8 presents the results.
1683:
1684: % Table 8 goes here
1685:
1686: \subsection{Results} % Sec. 6.2
1687:
1688: \begin{figure} % Fig. 18
1689: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f18.eps}
1690: \caption{The equivalent widths of the acetylene absorption
1691: bands at 7.5~\mum\ (top) and 13.7~\mum\ (bottom), plotted vs.
1692: [6.4]$-$[9.3] color, which measures the strength of the
1693: amorphous carbon component. Galactic data are plotted with
1694: light gray circles, LMC data in dark gray diamonds, and SMC
1695: data in black squares. The MC\_DUST sample are plotted
1696: with large symbols, while small symbols are from previously
1697: published samples.}
1698: \end{figure}
1699:
1700: \begin{figure} % Fig. 19
1701: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f19.eps}
1702: \caption{The integrated fluxes of the SiC (top) and MgS
1703: (bottom) dust features, divided by the underlying continuum
1704: and plotted as a function of [6.4]$-$[9.3] color. Symbols
1705: are as defined in Fig.\ 18.}
1706: \end{figure}
1707:
1708: Figures 18 and 19 plot the results for our sample (large
1709: symbols), along with the LMC sample of \cite{zij06}, the SMC
1710: samples of \cite{slo06b} and \cite{lag07}, and the Galactic
1711: sample observed by the SWS on \iso. The Galactic sample is
1712: defined by the carbon-rich classifications of \cite{kra02}
1713: and uses the data in the SWS Atlas \citep{slo03}. The small
1714: MC\_DUST sample follows the trends set by the larger samples
1715: of Magellanic carbon stars previously published. As
1716: metallicity decreases, stars with similar [6.3]$-$[9.4]
1717: colors show increasing absorption from acetylene and reduced
1718: emission from SiC and MgS dust.
1719:
1720: % Figures 18 and 19 go here.
1721:
1722: The strength of the 7.5~\mum\ acetylene band increases as the
1723: stars go from a [6.4]$-$[9.3] color of 0.0 to $\sim$0.3 and
1724: then decreases as the amorphous carbon component becomes more
1725: dominant, although the scatter at a given color is large.
1726: The data appear to follow two separate tracks, but the
1727: significance is not clear with these sample sizes. The
1728: strength of the 13.7~\mum\ band generally decreases steadily
1729: from 0.10~\mum\ to $\sim$0.05~\mum\ at a [6.4]$-$[9.3] color
1730: of 0.5 and remains roughly constant beyond. In both cases,
1731: the LMC and SMC sources usually have deeper bands compared to
1732: the Galactic sources of the same color, but no clear
1733: difference between the LMC and SMC is discernable.
1734:
1735: The strength of the SiC feature follows two distinct tracks
1736: with [6.4]$-$[9.3] color. The lower track starts with no SiC
1737: feature at a color of 0.0 and slowly increases to a
1738: $\sim$10\% strength at a color of 1.0. The upper track climbs
1739: to a $\sim$30\% strength at a color of $\sim$0.45, then drops
1740: to meet the lower track at redder colors. \cite{slo06b}
1741: noted that five of their carbon stars in the SMC had enhanced
1742: SiC strength compared to the rest: MSX SMC 054, 091, 105,
1743: 159, and 163. In Figure 19, these five clearly fall on the
1744: upper track, which includes nearly all of the Galactic
1745: sources. \cite{slo06b} were unable to find any other
1746: property that distinguished them from the rest of the SMC
1747: sample, except that they were more likely to show MgS
1748: emission. Additional SMC sources on the upper track
1749: include GM 780 from the sample of \cite{lag07} and CV 78
1750: from the MC\_DUST sample. \cite{lag07} noted that GM 780
1751: was peculiar, with no acetylene absorption and a relatively
1752: high luminosity. They argued that its C/O ratio was lower
1753: than most of the Magellanic sources and more like Galactic
1754: carbon stars, which might affect the fraction of SiC
1755: in its outflows.
1756:
1757: The MgS strength in the SMC and LMC samples are similar
1758: to each other. Few sources bluer than [6.4]$-$[9.3] $\sim$
1759: 0.7 having any measurable MgS dust, while most Galactic
1760: sources do. At redder colors, the three samples behave
1761: similarly, with MgS strengths typically $\sim$40\% of the
1762: continuum, but with considerable scatter, especially in the
1763: LMC sample.
1764:
1765: \subsection{Distance indicators} % Sec. 6.3
1766:
1767: \begin{figure} % Fig. 20
1768: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f20.eps}
1769: \caption{A near-infrared color-magnitude diagram for the
1770: carbon stars in the SMC samples of \cite{slo06b}
1771: and \cite{lag07}. The dashed line shows
1772: a line fit to the SMC data while the dotted lines show
1773: the standard deviation of the scatter about that line.}
1774: %NEED TO ADD LMC DATA AND EXPLAIN WHY THEY DON'T FIT.
1775: \end{figure}
1776:
1777: \begin{figure} % Fig. 21
1778: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f21.eps}
1779: \caption{A mid-infrared color-magnitude diagram for the
1780: Magellanic and Galactic carbon stars examined by
1781: \cite{slo06b}, \cite{zij06}, and \cite{lag07}. The
1782: solid line shows the running mean of the data as a function
1783: of [6.4]$-$[9.3] color. The dashed line is a quadratic fit
1784: to the data, with the dotted lines above and below showing
1785: the (smoothed) standard deviation.}
1786: \end{figure}
1787:
1788: Figure 20 plots the absolute magnitude at K vs.\ the J$-$K
1789: 2MASS colors for the carbon stars in the SMC samples of
1790: \cite{slo06b} and \cite{lag07}. We have
1791: assumed a distance modulus of 18.93 to the SMC \citep{kw06}.
1792: The data follow a linear relation with a standard deviation
1793: of 0.51 magnitudes:
1794:
1795: \begin{equation}
1796: M_K = -9.18 + 0.395 (J-K).
1797: \end{equation}
1798:
1799: % Figure 20 goes here.
1800:
1801: Applying the synthetic photometry to the spectra to generate
1802: magnitudes at 6.4 and 9.3~\mum\ reveals a second infrared
1803: color-magnitude relation. Figure 21 plots the absolute
1804: magnitude at 9.3~\mum\ as a function of [6.4]$-$[9.3] color
1805: for the samples of carbon stars in the Galaxy and both
1806: Magellanic Clouds of \cite{slo06b}, \cite{zij06}, and
1807: \cite{lag07}. The magnitudes at 9.3~\mum\ are based on a
1808: flux density at zero magnitudes of 45.7 Jy and distance
1809: moduli to the LMC and SMC of 18.54 and 18.93, respectively
1810: \citep{kw06}. The Galactic sample were observed with the
1811: SWS on \iso, as described by \cite{slo06b}. The distances
1812: were estimated by \cite{bc05}. Here, the relation is
1813: quadratic:
1814:
1815: \begin{equation}
1816: M_{9.3~\mu m} = \Sigma a_i ([6.4]-[9.3])^i,
1817: \end{equation}
1818:
1819: \noindent where $a_0 = -8.81$, $a_1 = -6.56$, and
1820: $a_2 = 2.74$. The standard deviation of the data about this
1821: relation is 0.45 magnitudes.
1822:
1823: % Figure 21 goes here.
1824:
1825:
1826: \section{PAH Emission Sources} % Sec. 7
1827:
1828: \begin{figure} % Fig. 22
1829: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f22.eps}
1830: \caption{Spectra of the two red sources in the MC\_DUST
1831: sample. Both show PAH emission features. A third
1832: spectrum with PAH features, of Massey SMC 59803, appears in
1833: Fig.\ 8.}
1834: \end{figure}
1835:
1836: \begin{figure} % Fig. 23
1837: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f23.eps}
1838: \caption{The 8 and 24~\mum\ fields of the three PAH sources
1839: shown in Fig.\ 8 and 22. The images of Massey SMC 59803 and
1840: IRAS 04530 are plotted on a logarithmic scale, while HV 5810
1841: is plotted on a linear scale. Massey SMC 59803 is an
1842: isolated supergiant, but the other two sources are associated
1843: with extended emission.}
1844: \end{figure}
1845:
1846: Figure 22 presents the spectra of the two red sources in the
1847: MC\_DUST sample, IRAS 04530 and HV 5810. Both of these
1848: spectra have PAH emission features. A third source, the
1849: supergiant Massey SMC 59803, also shows PAH emission
1850: superimposed on an oxygen-rich dust spectrum. Its spectrum
1851: appears in Figure 8.
1852:
1853: % Figure 22 goes here.
1854:
1855: Figure 23 includes 8 and 24~\mum\ images of the three PAH
1856: emission sources. The data for Massey SMC 59803 were
1857: obtained as part of the S$^3$MC survey by \cite{bol07}.
1858: Data for the other two sources are from the SAGE survey
1859: \citep{mei07}.
1860:
1861: % Figure 23 goes here.
1862:
1863: \subsection{Massey SMC 59803} % Sec. 7.1
1864:
1865: \begin{figure} % Fig. 24
1866: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f24.eps}
1867: \caption{The spectrum of Massey SMC 59803 with a fitted
1868: spline ({\it top}), and the residual PAH spectrum ({\it
1869: bottom}). The dashed vertical lines in the bottom panel
1870: are at wavelengths of 6.23, 7.70, 8.60, 11.26, an
1871: 12.70~\mum\, the centers of the PAH features in a typical
1872: class A PAH spectrum \citep[in the classification system
1873: introduced by][]{pee02}.}
1874: \end{figure}
1875:
1876: An examination of the 8 and 24~\mum\ images of Massey SMC
1877: 59803 reveals no associated extended emission. The IRS data
1878: are also consistent with a point source at all wavelengths.
1879: To separate the contribution of PAHs from the spectrum,
1880: we fit a spline through the ``continuum'' from the star and
1881: amorphous silicate grains which produce the 10~\mum\ feature,
1882: as illustrated in Figure 24 (top). \cite{kel08} applied this
1883: method to a sample of spectra from Herbig Ae/Be stars with
1884: both silicate and PAH emission and successfully disentangled
1885: the separate dust components in most cases.
1886:
1887: % Figure 24 goes here.
1888:
1889: Figure 24 (bottom) shows the resulting PAH spectrum. PAHs in
1890: the spectra of supergiants are unusual, but not unheard of.
1891: \cite{syl98} observed PAH emission at 8.6 and 11.3~\mum\ in
1892: three supergiants in the h and $\chi$ Persei association.
1893: The residual PAH spectrum from Massey SMC 59803 shows
1894: emission features centered at 6.21, 6.70, 8.13, 11.29, 12.86,
1895: and 13.56~\mum. The 6.7~\mum\ feature probably does not
1896: arise from PAHs and is presently unidentified. The remaining
1897: features are from PAHs. The strongest features are the C--C
1898: complex centered at 8~\mum\ and the out-of-plane C--H solo
1899: bending mode at 11.3~\mum.
1900:
1901: \cite{pee02} defined three classes of PAH spectra based
1902: primarily on the position of the 8~\mum\ PAH complex. Most
1903: spectra fell into class A (peak at 7.65~\mum) or class B
1904: (7.85~\mum), but two class C spectra showed a feature
1905: peaking at $\sim$8.2~\mum. The detailed position and shape
1906: of the 8~\mum\ complex depends critically on how the spline
1907: fits the continuum on the blue side of the silicate feature,
1908: so we should not overinterpret this feature. Nonetheless,
1909: there does appear to be an excess between $\sim$7.5 and
1910: 9~\mum, and it is more consistent with class C than with
1911: the other classes. The 11.3~\mum\ feature is also shifted
1912: from its nominal position in class A and B spectra of
1913: 11.26~\mum\ \citep{slo07} to 11.29~\mum.
1914:
1915: \cite{slo07} found that class C PAH spectra are associated
1916: with cooler radiation fields. Massey SMC 59803 has an
1917: estimated effective temperature of 4100 K \citep{lev06}, and
1918: its PAH spectrum, while noisy, is consistent with this
1919: temperature.
1920:
1921: \subsection{HV 5810} % Sec. 7.2
1922:
1923: As discussed in \S 4.2 and illustrated in Figure 6, the
1924: spectrum of HV 5810 shows emission from several C$-$H bending
1925: modes in PAHs. These include the in-plane bending mode at
1926: 8.55 and the out-of-plane bending modes at 11.27, 12.78, and
1927: 13.5~\mum\ in SL \citep[e.g.][]{atb89,hon01}. The emission
1928: at 12.78~\mum\ probably contains a contribution from [Ne II]
1929: emission as well. The LL portion of the spectrum in
1930: Figure 24 reveals an emission complex in LL with peaks at
1931: 16.5 and 17.35~\mum, which also arises from PAHs
1932: \citep{mou00,wer04b}.
1933:
1934: Examination of the spectral images reveals that the emission
1935: features at 11.3 and 12.8~\mum\ extend the length of the SL
1936: slit. The emission at 8.6~\mum\ is also extended. In the LL
1937: images, the 16--18~\mum\ PAH complex is extended over about
1938: $\sim$20$\arcsec$, while several forbidden emission lines are
1939: extended over much larger areas: [\ion{Ne}{3}] at 15.6~\mum,
1940: [\ion{S}{3}] at 18.7 and 33.5~\mum, and [\ion{Si}{2}] at
1941: 34.8~\mum. The forbidden lines are commonly seen in many
1942: images of other targets, but they usually subtract out when
1943: the background is removed. At longer wavelengths, the
1944: spatial structure of HV 5810 grows more complex and extended
1945: as well.
1946:
1947: Figure 23 shows that HV 5810 is embedded in a complex
1948: region of extended emission. We conclude that we have
1949: observed a naked star, HV 5810, superimposed on a complicated
1950: background. %It is possible that the 16--18~\mum\ PAH complex
1951: %might be more localized to the immediate vicinity of HV 5810.
1952:
1953: \subsection{IRAS 04530$-$6916} % Sec. 7.3
1954:
1955: \begin{figure} % Fig. 25
1956: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f25.eps}
1957: \caption{The SL spectrum of IRAS 04530, scaled to match the
1958: \iras\ photometry. In the top panel, the spline points are
1959: marked with diamonds, and the fitted spline with a smooth
1960: thin curve. The spline-subtracted spectrum appears in the
1961: bottom panel, showing both silicate absorption and PAH
1962: emission. The vertical dotted lines are at wavelengths of
1963: 6.23, 7.70, 8.60, 11.26, and 12.70~\mum.}
1964: \end{figure}
1965:
1966: The observations of IRAS 04530 were partially mispointed in
1967: both SL and LL, requiring some special attention to complete
1968: the processing. The source was mostly out of the slit in
1969: one of the SL nod positions, and in LL, we only observed
1970: a portion of the source, which is extended. To stitch the
1971: spectral segments together, we normalized them to the 12 and
1972: 25~\mum\ fluxes from the \iras\ Faint Source Catalog (2.01
1973: and 4.97 Jy, respectively). Because of the spectral tilts
1974: in mispointed spectra, this leaves a discontinuity at the
1975: SL/LL interface. The overall continuum properties of the
1976: resulting spectrum should be considered provisional.
1977: Despite the limitations of the spectrum, the presence of
1978: various spectral features and their wavelengths are reliable.
1979:
1980: The spectrum shows a combination of silicate absorption
1981: and emission from PAHs. Although the IRS does not cover the
1982: 35--45 \mum\ wavelength range that the Hanscom system used to
1983: distinguish the reddest sources, the \iras\ data show that
1984: the spectrum continues to rise between 25 and 60 \mum, making
1985: this spectrum class 5.U/SA \citep[this class was
1986: introduced by][]{ekp04}.
1987:
1988: The combination of both PAH emission and silicate absorption
1989: complicates the analysis of the PAH strengths, but it does
1990: not have a significant effect on their positions. To examine
1991: the PAH features more closely, we fit a spline through the
1992: most likely continuum, as Figure 25 illustrates. The
1993: resulting PAH spectrum has features peaking at 6.22, 7.65,
1994: 8.62, 11.27, and 12.78~\mum. With the exception of the last
1995: feature, which may be affected by [\ion{Ne}{2}] emission, the
1996: wavelengths for these features correspond to a class A PAH
1997: spectrum in the scheme of \cite{pee02}. This class of
1998: PAH spectrum is commonly seen in star formation regions.
1999:
2000: % Figure 25 goes here.
2001:
2002: IRAS 04530 has usually been treated as an evolved star.
2003: \cite{woo92} measured its bolometric magnitude to be $-$7.62
2004: and concluded that it was probably a supergiant due to its
2005: high luminosity, low pulsation amplitude, and lack of maser
2006: activity. \cite{vl01} seconded this opinion, and on the
2007: basis of these works it was included in this study.
2008: \cite{vl05a} recently suggested that it may instead be a YSO.
2009: Their optical spectrum shows strong hydrogen emission lines
2010: as well as the [\ion{S}{3}] doublet and [\ion{Ca}{2}] triplet.
2011: \cite{hod04} and \cite{ekp04} found that the U/SA
2012: classification in the \iso\ PHOT-S and CAM-CVF databases
2013: occurred almost exclusively in YSOs, star forming regions,
2014: and starburst galaxies (the single exception being C* 1662).
2015:
2016: The SAGE images at 8~\mum\ and 24~\mum\ in Figure 23
2017: reveal that IRAS 04530 lies at the edge of an extensive
2018: region of 8~\mum\ emission probably associated with the
2019: DEM L15 H II region. The IRAC and MIPS photometry of
2020: IRAS 04530 \citep[from the 2006 December release of the
2021: SAGE point source catalog][]{mei06} and the 2MASS photometry
2022: help clarify its evolutionary status. IRAS 04530
2023: does not lie near the AGB population in the color-color
2024: and color-magnitude diagrams published from Galactic and
2025: Magellanic Spitzer programs \citep{whi03a,whi03b,blu06,bol07}.
2026:
2027: In summary, evidence from the new {\em Spitzer} observations,
2028: both spectroscopic and photometric, support the suggestion of
2029: \cite{vl05a} that IRAS 04530 is a YSO, not an evolved star.
2030:
2031:
2032: \section{Dependencies on Metallicity} % Sec. 8
2033:
2034: The previous sections concentrated on the analysis
2035: applied to the different classes of spectra and the results
2036: for individual sources. This section concentrates on the
2037: samples as a whole, comparing the SMC and LMC samples to the
2038: Galactic samples published elsewhere. The dominant difference
2039: between these samples is metallicity.
2040:
2041: \subsection{Fraction of naked stars} % Sec. 8.1.
2042:
2043: \begin{deluxetable}{llll} % Table 9
2044: \tablenum{9}
2045: \tablecolumns{4}
2046: \tablewidth{0pt}
2047: \tablecaption{Fraction of naked oxygen-rich stars\label{Tbl8}}
2048: \tablehead{
2049: \colhead{ } & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Period (days)} \\
2050: \colhead{Sample} & \colhead{$\le$250} & \colhead{250--700} & \colhead{$>$ 700}
2051: }
2052: \startdata
2053: Galaxy & 2 of 106 & 5 of 269 & 0 of 11 \\
2054: LMC & 2 of 3 & 2 of 9 & 0 of 8 \\
2055: SMC & 1 of 1 & 6 of 7 & 0 of 1 \\
2056: \enddata
2057: \end{deluxetable}
2058:
2059: Our sources were selected using criteria similar to those for
2060: the Galactic samples of AGB stars examined by \cite{sp95} and
2061: supergiants studied by \cite{sp98}. The Galactic samples were
2062: chosen by searching for optically identified variables of
2063: classes associated with either the AGB or supergiants in the
2064: LRS Atlas \citep{lrs86}. \cite{sp95} found that 43\% of
2065: irregular (Lb) variables, 19\% of semi-regular (SRb)
2066: variables, and only 1\% of Mira variables (including SRa
2067: variables) were naked, while \cite{sp98} found that 13 of 65,
2068: or 20\%, of the supergiants were naked.
2069:
2070: The MC\_DUST sample includes five supergiants, all of which
2071: are associated with circumstellar dust, but the situation is
2072: different for the AGB. In the LMC, three of the 19 oxygen-rich
2073: sources, or 16\%, are naked (we are excluding the naked
2074: star J052832, about which little is known), while in the SMC,
2075: seven of nine oxygen-rich AGB sources, or 78\%, are naked.
2076:
2077: We know the pulsation periods of enough of the various
2078: samples to compare how the fraction of naked stars varies
2079: with period in the Galaxy, LMC, and SMC. Because the number
2080: of naked stars is small, we divide the periods into only
2081: three bins separated at 250 d, the approximate boundary
2082: between most of the short-period semi-regulars and Miras, and
2083: 700 d, the approximate period limit for Miras in the Galactic
2084: sample. For the Galactic sample, we use the catalog
2085: published by \cite{sp98}. Of the 611 oxygen-rich AGB stars
2086: and supergiants in that catalog, 386 have periods, and only
2087: seven of those are naked. Two of the naked stars have
2088: periods less than 250 days, and the other five fall in the
2089: 250--700-day bin, as Table 9 shows. If we limited the sample
2090: to just Miras, the results are similar, with only two naked
2091: Miras out of 229.
2092:
2093: % Table 9 goes here.
2094:
2095: Table 9 reveals that in the two lower-period bins, the
2096: percentage of naked stars increases as the metallicity of
2097: the sample decreases. None of the stars
2098: with periods greater than 700 days are naked. In the SMC,
2099: the only variable with a period less than 700 days and a
2100: dust excess is BFM 1, but even its dust shell is thin, and
2101: the dust spectrum is unusual.
2102:
2103: \subsection{Dust Emission Contrast} % Sec. 8.2
2104:
2105: \begin{figure} % Fig. 26
2106: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f26.eps}
2107: \caption{Dust emission contrast among oxygen-rich souces as a
2108: function of period, for all variables with known periods in
2109: the Galactic LRS sample \citep{sp95,sp98} and the MC\_DUST
2110: sample. Dust emission contrast is defined in \S 3.4. In the
2111: Galactic sample, Miras and the closely
2112: related SRa variables are plotted as filled circles, while
2113: the SRb and SRc variables are plotted as open circles. LMC
2114: sources appear as dark gray diamonds, and SMC sources as
2115: black squares. The four symbols outlined in black mark
2116: suspected massive stars. The two points with periods
2117: $\sim$800 days are supergiants. The two in the upper right
2118: are massive AGB sources (\S 3.3). The horizontal line at
2119: DEC = 0.10 separates naked and dusty sources in the
2120: Magellanic samples.}
2121: \end{figure}
2122:
2123: \begin{deluxetable}{llll} % Table 10
2124: \tablenum{10}
2125: \tablecolumns{4}
2126: \tablewidth{0pt}
2127: \tablecaption{Dust emission contrasts\label{Tbl9}}
2128: \tablehead{
2129: \colhead{ } & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Period (days)} \\
2130: \colhead{Sample} & \colhead{$\le$250} & \colhead{250--700} & \colhead{$>$ 700}
2131: }
2132: \startdata
2133: Galaxy & 0.38$\pm$0.27 & 0.61$\pm$0.41 & 1.24$\pm$0.61 \\
2134: LMC & 0.06$\pm$0.11 & 0.44$\pm$0.30 & 2.29$\pm$0.92 \\
2135: SMC & 0.06$\pm$\nodata & 0.07$\pm$0.07 & 0.80$\pm$\nodata \\
2136: \enddata
2137: \end{deluxetable}
2138:
2139: As part of the classification process in \S 5.1, we also
2140: measured the dust emission contrast for each oxygen-rich
2141: source, as defined for the naked stars in our sample.
2142: Figure 26 plots the dust emission contrast as a function of
2143: period in the Magellanic and Galactic samples for the naked
2144: and oxygen-rich sources. For periods between 250 and 700
2145: days, the range dominated by Mira variables, the Galactic
2146: sample shows a general trend of increasing dust emission
2147: contrast with increasing period, but with a substantial
2148: spread. For periods less than 700 days, the Magellanic
2149: sources show significantly less dust emission than their
2150: Galactic counterparts. This result is consistent with the
2151: low SiO molecular band strength detected in naked oxygen-rich
2152: stars in the Magellanic Clouds, since SiO is the basic
2153: building block of silicate dust.
2154:
2155: % Figure 26 goes here.
2156:
2157: Magellanic sources with periods greater than 700 days
2158: typically show large contributions from dust in their
2159: spectra. In particular, five sources lie on or appear to
2160: continue the trend of DEC vs.\ period established by the
2161: Galactic sample. Two of these sources, HV 888 and HV 996,
2162: are definite supergiants (at DEC$\sim$1.9 and P$\sim$800 d).
2163: Two more, IRAS 04509 and IRAS 04512, are probably very
2164: luminous AGB sources as discussed in \S 3.3.
2165: We believe these four sources are more massive than typical
2166: AGB sources and therefore younger. Since they formed more
2167: recently, they are probably more metal rich than typical
2168: Magellanic sources, and they would be expected to mimic the
2169: more metal-rich Galactic sample.
2170:
2171: Figure 26 includes three more LMC sources with very long
2172: pulsation periods to the lower right. From top to bottom,
2173: these are IRAS 05402 (DEC$\sim$2.3), IRAS 04545
2174: (DEC$\sim$1.5), and IRAS 05329 (DEC$\sim$1.1). All three
2175: of these sources show silicate absorption at 10~\mum, so
2176: our DEC measurement, which is a simple sum, underestimates
2177: the total silicate contribution. Correcting for this
2178: simplification would undoubtedly push these points upward in
2179: Figure 26. However, all three spectra show clear evidence for
2180: crystalline silicate emission at longer wavelengths, which
2181: as described in \S 5.2, resemble the spectra from dusty
2182: Galactic objects with disks. This semblance is far from
2183: direct evidence of a disk, but it might indicate that
2184: presence of a reservoir of dust in addition to the dust
2185: forming in the outflows from these stars at the current time.
2186:
2187: Table 10 presents the mean dust emission contrasts for the
2188: same period ranges used for Table 9. For the stars with
2189: periods $\le$700 days, the amount of dust drops from the
2190: Galaxy to the LMC and drops further in the SMC. For these
2191: stars, the amount of dust clearly depends on metallicity.
2192: As described above, the samples with periods $>$ 700 days
2193: probably include young massive stars which blur the
2194: dependence on metallicity seen at shorter periods.
2195:
2196: % Table 10 goes here.
2197:
2198: \subsection{SiO band strengths} % Sec. 8.3.
2199:
2200: \begin{deluxetable}{lr} % Table 11
2201: \tablenum{11}
2202: \tablecolumns{2}
2203: \tablewidth{0pt}
2204: \tablecaption{Comparative SiO band strengths\label{Tbl10}}
2205: \tablehead{
2206: \colhead{Sample} & \colhead{W (\mum)}
2207: }
2208: \startdata
2209: SWS M giants & 0.35$\pm$0.11 \\
2210: IRS M giants & 0.28$\pm$0.06 \\
2211: LMC & 0.26$\pm$0.11 \\
2212: SMC & 0.16$\pm$0.08 \\
2213: \enddata
2214: \end{deluxetable}
2215:
2216: \cite{mat05} obtained 3--4~\mum\ spectra of six oxygen-rich
2217: evolved stars in the LMC, and they detected possible weak SiO
2218: absorption in only one source, IRAS 05218, which had been
2219: thought to be a carbon star \citep{tra99}. They explained
2220: the absence of this band by noting that silicon is not
2221: produced in AGB stars, so its abundance in the photosphere
2222: reflects the initial abundance of the star, which will be low
2223: in a metal-poor system like the LMC. But at least four of
2224: their six targets have circumstellar dust shells, which make
2225: it possible that the dust partially masks the SiO bands.
2226:
2227: In the MC\_DUST sample, the SiO fundamental band is clearly
2228: present in the spectra of several of the less obscured
2229: sources. Table 11 compares the mean equivalent widths of the
2230: total LMC and SMC samples to two Galactic samples, one
2231: based on SWS observations and a second based on IRS data.
2232: For the SMC and LMC samples, we use only those equivalent
2233: widths in Table 6 with a S/N of $\sim$1 or better. For
2234: sources with only an upper limit, we use it in place of the
2235: measured width. For HV 2575 (first observation), we take the
2236: upper limit to be 0.26~\mum. The follow-up spectra are
2237: treated as separate data. MACHO 79.5505.26 is not included
2238: since it may be carbon rich.
2239:
2240: % Table 11 goes here.
2241:
2242: Using {\it ISO}/SWS data, \cite{her02} determined that the
2243: strength of the SiO fundamental band increases from an
2244: equivalent width of $\sim$0.05~\mum\ in K0 giants to
2245: $\sim$0.18~\mum\ at K5. No M giant had an equivalent width
2246: less than $\sim$0.15, while the maximum value increased past
2247: 0.25~\mum\ at M5. They measured the SiO equivalent width
2248: between 7.6 and 9.0~\mum, but the bandhead is at 7.4~\mum,
2249: and the band continues to 11.0~\mum\ in some cases. We have
2250: remeasured the SiO fundamental band in their sample of 23
2251: M giants using a similar method to that applied to the IRS
2252: data, except that we integrate the equivalent width directly
2253: instead of fitting a template absorption band. We shifted
2254: the long-wavelength range for fitting the Planck function
2255: from 11.5--13.0~\mum\ to 10.8--11.4~\mum\ to avoid hysteresis
2256: effects in the SWS data, which tend to drive the flux up
2257: slightly toward 12~\mum. For similar reasons, we shifted the
2258: long-wavelength boundary for integrating the equivalent width
2259: from 11.5 to 11.1~\mum. These shifts slightly reduce the
2260: equivalent widths, but the Galactic sample still has stronger
2261: SiO absorption than the Magellanic samples. The mean SiO
2262: equivalent width shows no strong dependency on optical
2263: spectral type.
2264:
2265: The second comparison sample of M giants comes from the
2266: ongoing IRS GTO Cycle 4 program used to generate the SiO
2267: template described in \S 4.1. At the time of this writing,
2268: spectra of 13 of the 20 planned M giants have been obtained
2269: and reduced. We extracted the SiO equivalent width using
2270: wavelengths identical to those used for the Magellanic
2271: samples, but as with the SWS data, we simply integrated the
2272: feature, instead of fitting a template. As with the SWS
2273: sample, the equivalent width does not depend strongly on
2274: spectral type. The difference between the two Galactic M
2275: giant samples may result from different selection criteria,
2276: but it is within the standard deviations.
2277:
2278: Table 11 shows a general trend toward decreasing SiO
2279: band strength with decreasing metallicity, although there
2280: is some overlap in the samples. The LMC sample overlaps
2281: the IRS M giants. The wide spread in the LMC sample may
2282: indicate a range of metallicities, but the sample is not
2283: large. The SMC clearly shows weaker SiO bands than the
2284: Galactic giants. These results confirm the
2285: metallicity-dependent trend first recognized by
2286: \cite{mat05} in the 3~\mum\ spectral region.
2287:
2288: \subsection{Oxygen-rich dust composition} % Sec. 8.4
2289:
2290: \begin{figure} % Fig. 27
2291: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f27.eps}
2292: \caption{The distribution of the MC\_DUST sample and
2293: Galactic comparison samples with silicate emission index. In
2294: the top panel, LMC sources are shaded with diagonal stripes,
2295: while the two SMC sources are cross-hatched (at SE4 and SE8).
2296: Alumina-rich dust produces the SE1--3 spectra and is largely
2297: absent from the Magellanic samples. The dust distribution in
2298: the Magellanic sample closely resembles the Galactic
2299: supergiants, even though only about three of the 14
2300: Magellanic sources plotted in the upper panel are actually
2301: supergiants.}
2302: \end{figure}
2303:
2304: \cite{es01} demonstrated with radiative transfer models that
2305: the amorphous alumina grains produce the broad, low-contrast
2306: features peaking $\sim$11--12~\mum, which correspond to lower
2307: SE indices (SE1--3), while amorphous silicate grains produce
2308: the classic 10~\mum\ silicate feature (and associated
2309: 18~\mum\ feature) which corresponds to higher SE indices
2310: (SE6--8). The middle portion of the sequence (SE4--6)
2311: generally shows structured emission features, with a peak at
2312: 10~\mum\ and a shoulder at 11~\mum. This structure could
2313: arise from multiple causes, including mixtures of amorphous
2314: alumina and silicates, self-absorbed silicates, or possibly,
2315: crystalline silicate grains. Given that alumina and
2316: silicates both contribute to the spectra, it might be more
2317: appropriate to refer to the sequence as the oxygen-rich dust
2318: sequence.
2319: %\cite{kra02} introduced a modified classification
2320: %scheme, grouping the broad, low-contrast alumina features
2321: %(SE1--3) as SEa, the structured silicate spectra (SE4--6) as
2322: %SEb, and the classic silicate features (SE6--8) as SEc.
2323:
2324: Figure 27 compares the distribution of silicate emission
2325: sources in the Magellanic Clouds to the Galactic samples
2326: examined by \cite{sp95,sp98}. The Magellanic sample differs
2327: markedly from the Galactic AGB sample by having only two
2328: sources from SE1 to SE4. In fact, it looks more like the
2329: Galactic supergiant sample than anything else, which is
2330: somewhat surpising given that the sample displayed in
2331: Figure 27 includes only three supergiants. We had
2332: intentionally observed ten stars classified as S or MS,
2333: which we had expected to resemble the Galactic S and MS
2334: stars, but most of these proved to be naked instead. Of
2335: the five S and MS stars in the LMC, three (WBP 104,
2336: HV 2575, and HV 12620) are naked, while HV 12070 is an
2337: SE6 and WBP 77 accounts for the lone SE1 source. Of the
2338: five in the SMC, only BFM 1 shows any sign of dust, but as
2339: discussed in \S 5.6., it is very unusual dust.
2340:
2341: The lack of emission from amorphous alumina dust in the
2342: Magellanic Clouds is consistent with how the abundance of Al
2343: depends on metallicity compared to other dust-producing
2344: elements like Mg and Si. The latter elements are both
2345: $\alpha$-capture products, and while their abundance is
2346: lower in metal-poor stars, Al is even less abundant
2347: \citep[see][and references therein]{whe89}.
2348:
2349: The apparent absence of a 13~\mum\ feature in our sample
2350: provides further evidence of the relative lack of Al in the
2351: Magellanic Clouds. The carrier of the 13~\mum\ feature has
2352: been the subject of some debate, with the focus on crystalline
2353: alumina \citep[corundum, Al$_2$O$_3$][]{gla94,slo96} or spinel
2354: \citep[MgAl$_2$O$_4$][]{po99,fab01a}. \cite{slo03} and
2355: \cite{dep06} have provided strong evidence against spinel
2356: as the carrier, but here, it is sufficient to note that in
2357: both proposed carriers, the Al--O bond is responsible for
2358: the 13~\mum\ feature. Consequently, the lack of Al
2359: in the Magellanic Clouds fully explains its absence.
2360:
2361: The presence of the 14~\mum\ feature in our Magellanic
2362: sample provides some clues about its carrier.
2363: \cite{pit06} recently noted that the 14~\mum\ feature in
2364: HV 2310 could be reproduced by AlN dust or possibly by
2365: non-spherical corundum grains. While the non-spherical
2366: grain models discussed by \cite{dep06} do shift the emission
2367: peak from 13~\mum\ to longer wavelengths, the features become
2368: quite broad compared to the observed 14~\mum\ features. In
2369: addition, the low abundance of Al in the Magellanic Clouds
2370: make any Al-bearing dust species an unlikely carrier.
2371: The presence of the 14~\mum\ feature appears to be limited to
2372: strong silicate emission sources, which suggests that its
2373: carrier is probably related to silicates in some way.
2374:
2375: % Figure 27 goes here.
2376:
2377: % Our sample selected against faint oxygen-rich sources,
2378: % since these were less likely to be identified as Harvard
2379: % Variables and less likely to have been included in the
2380: % near-infrared follow-up surveys which formed the basis
2381: % for our sample.
2382:
2383: \subsection{Carbon mass-loss rates} % Sec. 8.5
2384:
2385: \begin{figure} % Fig. 28
2386: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f28.eps}
2387: \caption{Dust mass-loss rate as a function of [6.4]$-$[9.3]
2388: color, including data from the samples of Magellanic carbon
2389: stars presented by \cite{slo06b,zij06} and \cite{lag07} and
2390: analyzed with radiative transfer models by \cite{gro07}. We
2391: have converted the total mass-loss rates to dust mass-loss
2392: rates by dividing by their assumed gas-to-dust ratio of 200.
2393: The solid line is a linear fit to the data.}
2394: \end{figure}
2395:
2396: \begin{figure} % Fig. 29
2397: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f29.eps}
2398: \caption{[6.4]$-$[9.3] color as a function of period.
2399: The data include the samples from Fig. 22 (small diamonds
2400: and squares), the MC\_DUST sample (large diamonds and
2401: squares), and the Galactic sample (small circles).
2402: The Galaxy, SMC, and LMC show no significant differences
2403: despite their different metallicities.}
2404: \end{figure}
2405:
2406: Grains composed primarily of carbon atoms, usually described
2407: as amorphous carbon, dominate the the dust produced by carbon
2408: stars \citep[e.g.][]{mr87,se95}, but amorphous carbon has no
2409: easily discernable spectral features, making a direct
2410: measurement of its contribution difficult. The Manchester
2411: method substitutes the [6.4]$-$[9.3] color, which will grow
2412: increasingly red as the contribution of amorphous carbon
2413: relative to the star increases. \cite{gro07} applied
2414: radiative transfer models to all of the Magellanic carbon
2415: stars in the previously cited papers, and they found a good
2416: correlation between total mass-loss rate and [6.4]$-$[9.3]
2417: color (see their Fig. 7). What the radiative transfer models
2418: actually probe, however, is the {\it dust} mass-loss rate.
2419: The total mass-loss rate is simply inferred from the
2420: gas-to-dust ratio, which \cite{gro07} assumed to be 200 in
2421: both the LMC and SMC. We convert their mass-loss rates
2422: to dust mass-loss rates (by dividing by 200) and repeat their
2423: comparison to [6.4]$-$[9.3] color in Figure 28. Both the LMC
2424: and SMC follow the same relation. Fitting a line to the data
2425: gives log (mass-loss rate) $= -9.8 + 1.6 $ ([6.4]$-$[9.3]).
2426: The scatter of the data about this line has a standard
2427: deviation of 16\%.
2428:
2429: % Figure 28 goes here.
2430:
2431: This and previous studies have compared objects in the
2432: Galaxy, SMC, and LMC at similar [6.4]$-$[9.3] color as though
2433: objects with similar amounts of amorphous carbon dust are
2434: truly alike. They might not be if the dust formation
2435: efficiency depended on metallicity. To examine this
2436: possibility, we examined the pulsation periods of the sources
2437: in the various samples, since those should be similar for
2438: physically similar stars. Figure 29 plots [6.4]$-$[9.3]
2439: color as a function of pulsation period, and it reveals no
2440: significant differences in the distribution of colors at a
2441: given period between the samples. In other words, carbon
2442: stars with similar pulsation properties are embedded in
2443: similar quantities of dust, regardless of their initial
2444: metallicity.
2445:
2446: % Figure 29 goes here.
2447:
2448:
2449: \section{Discussion and Conclusions} % Sec. 9
2450:
2451: The similar dust production rates among the samples in
2452: Figure 29 have important consequences. The production of
2453: amorphous carbon is limited by the amount of excess carbon
2454: compared to oxygen, but carbon is produced in the
2455: triple-$\alpha$ process in AGB stars. The production of
2456: silicates and other oxygen-rich grains, on the other hand,
2457: is limited by the abundances of heavy elements such as Si
2458: and Al, and these are not produced in significant quantities
2459: on the AGB. The ready explanation for the results
2460: presented in Figure 29 is that the carbon produced and
2461: dredged up by AGB stars dominates the carbon with which they
2462: formed. It should follow, then, that even Population III
2463: stars, if they are in the mass range to become carbon stars,
2464: will produce approximately the same amount of carbon-rich
2465: dust as their Population I counterparts.
2466:
2467: \cite{bbm78,bbm80} discovered that in the SMC, more AGB
2468: stars became carbon rich than in the LMC \citep[see
2469: also][]{ch03}. \cite{rv81} explained this phenomenon as a
2470: metallicity effect. Stars with solar abundances will become
2471: carbon stars if their initial mass $\ga$1.7~M$_{\sun}$, but
2472: at 1/5 solar metallicity, the mass limit has dropped to
2473: 1.2~M$_{\sun}$, primarily because of the lack of oxygen in
2474: the atmosphere of the metal-poor star to balance the dredged
2475: up carbon. Assuming a Salpeter initial mass function
2476: \citep{sal55} and integrating from these carbon limits to
2477: 8~M${_\sun}$, we find that in the SMC, 70\% more of the
2478: AGB should be carbon-rich compared to a sample with solar
2479: metallicity. Since we see no diminishment of carbon-rich
2480: dust production at decreasing metallicity, we conclude that
2481: the more metal-poor an initial population of stars, the more
2482: carbon-rich dust it will contribute to the ISM, simply
2483: because it produces more carbon stars.
2484:
2485: Many other properties of carbon stars do depend on
2486: metallicity. Our small sample reinforces results from
2487: previous studies of {\it Spitzer} spectroscopy in the
2488: Magellanic Clouds, which show that as the metallicity
2489: decreases, emission from SiC and MgS dust decrease,
2490: while absorption from acetylene gas increases. The
2491: increased acetylene absorption probably arises from
2492: higher C/O ratios in Magellanic carbon stars
2493: \citep{vl99,mat02,mat05}, which in turn arise from a
2494: combination of increased dredge-up efficiency \citep{woo81}
2495: and less initial oxygen in the atmosphere \citep{vw93}.
2496: The additional acetylene we observe may add even more to
2497: the amount of carbon injected into the ISM by metal-poor
2498: populations.
2499:
2500: The behavior of the oxygen-rich dust stands in stark contrast
2501: to the carbon-rich dust. While the quantity of carbon-rich
2502: dust shows no discernable dependence on metallicity,
2503: oxygen-rich dust shows many clear trends. As metallicity
2504: decreases, (1) the fraction of naked stars increases, (2)
2505: SiO absorption decreases, (3) the silicate dust emission also
2506: decreases, and (4) alumina-rich dust emission disappears
2507: almost entirely. The lower metallicity of the Magellanic
2508: Clouds provides a ready explanation for all of these effects.
2509: Si is not produced on the AGB, so its abundance scales with
2510: overall metallicity. As a result, we observe less SiO gas,
2511: which is the fundamental building block of silicate dust,
2512: and less silicate dust as well. The abundance of Al scales
2513: even more strongly with metallicity (\S 5.4.), so the
2514: lack of alumina dust should not be a surprise. Not only
2515: do we see few spectra in the SE1--3 range, but we see little
2516: or no emission from the 13~\mum\ feature, which arises from
2517: an Al--O bond.
2518:
2519: Standard condensation sequences propose the formation of
2520: alumina-rich grains before silicates
2521: \citep[e.g.][]{tie90,ste90}. The lack of alumina dust in
2522: our sample suggests the formation of alumina is not a
2523: prerequisite to the formation of silicates. In other words,
2524: silicates can form without pre-existing alumina grains to
2525: serve as seeds.
2526:
2527: The oxygen-rich sample contains a wealth of interesting dust
2528: features. Five sources show crystalline silicate features
2529: at 10~\mum\ or longer wavelengths, and these are all
2530: consistent with Mg-rich pyroxene and olivine. There is no
2531: evidence for Fe in the silicates, much like the Galactic
2532: sample. Several sources have an unidentified 14~\mum\
2533: emission feature, and one source, the only true S star in
2534: our sample, shows a previously unknown 13.5~\mum\ emission
2535: feature. These two features are newly discovered by the
2536: IRS, and their identification awaits further investigation.
2537:
2538: The Magellanic Clouds present us with a scenario of steady or
2539: increasing carbon-rich dust production as systems grow more
2540: metal-poor, compared to declining rates of oxygen-rich dust
2541: production. This result measures what goes into the ISM, but
2542: it contradicts observations of what is currently present in
2543: the ISM in metal-poor systems. Most lines of sight in the
2544: SMC have unusual extinction curves without the commonly
2545: observed 2175~\AA\ bump seen in the Galaxy, in common with
2546: starburst galaxies and quasars \citep[e.g.][and references
2547: therein]{gc98,pit00}. The 2175~\AA\ bump is commonly
2548: associated with graphitic carbonaceous material \citep[as
2549: first proposed by][]{sd65}. \cite{ds98} showed that certain
2550: PAHs and PAH clusters can reproduce the 2175~\AA\ bump and
2551: that these particles can result from interstellar processing
2552: of hydrogenated amorphous carbon. The recent study of
2553: unusual PAH-like spectra by \cite{slo07} demonstrates that
2554: hydrocarbons can exist with a range of aromatic-to-aliphatic
2555: ratios. Many of the sources of unusual PAH-like emission are
2556: carbon-rich post-AGB objects. All of these observations
2557: support an evolutionary relationship from amorphous carbon
2558: produced by carbon stars on the AGB and to interstellar PAHs
2559: to the more graphitic material responsible for the 2175~\AA\
2560: bump. The results in this paper demonstrate that carbon-rich
2561: dust production does not decrease in more metal-poor samples,
2562: and yet, metal-poor systems like the SMC are missing the
2563: 2175~\AA\ bump that should result.
2564:
2565: Either the missing carbon-rich dust did not form, or it has
2566: been destroyed. \cite{gc98} suggested that harsher radiation
2567: fields in metal-poor systems can destroy the carrier of the
2568: 2175~\AA\ bump. Stellar modelling shows that decreasing the
2569: metallicity of a star results in less UV line blanketing and
2570: an emitted spectrum with more UV emission \citep{giv02}, which
2571: readily explains the harsher interstellar radiation observed
2572: in metal-poor \ion{H}{2} regions \citep{mh02}. \cite{gal08}
2573: recently reached the opposite conclusion. They used galactic
2574: evolution models to investigate the absence of PAH emission
2575: in blue compact dwarf galaxies and other metal-poor galaxies
2576: \citep{eng05,wu06}, and concluded that these systems produce
2577: significantly less carbon-rich dust than the Galaxy. Our
2578: sample of Magellanic carbon stars provides no evidence for
2579: less carbon-rich dust formation in more primordial systems,
2580: which leads to the conclusion that the lack of carbon-bearing
2581: dust in these systems results not from reduced production,
2582: but from enhanced destruction.
2583:
2584: \acknowledgements
2585:
2586: The authors thank the anonymous referee for carefully reading
2587: the manuscript and helping us to improve it.
2588: These observations were made with the {\it Spitzer Space
2589: Telescope}, which is operated by JPL, California Institute of
2590: Technology under NASA contract 1407 and supported by NASA
2591: through JPL (contract number 1257184). This research has
2592: made use of the SIMBAD and VIZIER databases, operated at the
2593: Centre de Donn\'{e}es astronomiques de Strasbourg, and the
2594: Infrared Science Archive at the Infrared Processing and
2595: Analysis Center, which is operated by JPL.
2596:
2597: \begin{thebibliography}{}
2598:
2599: \bibitem[Alcock et al.(1996)]{macho} Alcock, C., et al.\ 1996, \apj,
2600: 461, 84
2601: \bibitem[Allamandola et al.(1989)]{atb89} Allamandola, L.~J., Tielens,
2602: A.~G.~G.~M., \& Barker, J.~R.\ 1989, \apjs, 71, 733
2603: %\bibitem[Alves et al.(2002)]{alv02} Alves, D.~R., Rejkuba, M., Minniti, D.,
2604: % \& Cook, K.~H., 2002, \apj, 573, L51
2605: \bibitem[Alves(2004)]{alv04} Alves, D.~R.\ 2004, New Astron.\ Rev.\ 2004,
2606: 48, 659
2607: \bibitem[Bergeat \& Chevallier(2005)]{bc05} Bergeat, J., \& Chevallier, L.\
2608: 2005, \aap, 429, 235
2609: \bibitem[Bernard-Salas et al.(2006)]{jbs06} Bernard-Salas, J., Peeters, E.,
2610: Sloan, G.~C., Cami, J., Guiles, S., \& Houck, J.~R.\ 2007, \apj, 652, L29
2611: \bibitem[Blanco et al.(1978)]{bbm78} Blanco, B.~M., Blanco, V.~M., \& McCarthy,
2612: M.~F.\ 1978, Nature, 271, 638
2613: \bibitem[Blanco et al.(1980)]{bbm80} Blanco, V.~M., Blanco, B.~M., \& McCarthy,
2614: M.~F.\ 1980, \apj, 242, 938
2615: \bibitem[Blanco et al.(1981)]{bfm81} Blanco, V.~M., Frogel, J.~A., \&
2616: McCarthy, M.~F.\ 1981, \pasp, 93, 532
2617: \bibitem[Blum et al.(2006)]{blu06} Blum, R.~D., et al.\ 2006, AJ, 132, 2034
2618: \bibitem[Bolatto et al.(2007)]{bol07} Bolatto, A.~D., et al.\ 2007, \apj, 655,
2619: 212
2620: \bibitem[Buchanan et al.(2006)]{buc06} Buchanan, C.~L., Kastner, J.~H.,
2621: Forrest, W.~J., Hrivnak, B.~J., Sahai, R., Egan, M., Frank, A., \& Barnbaum,
2622: C.\ 2006, \aj, 132, 1890
2623: \bibitem[Cami(2002)]{cam02} Cami, J.\ 2002, Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Amsterdam
2624: \bibitem[Cernuschi et al.(1967)]{cmc67} Cernuschi, F., Marsiano, F., \&
2625: Codina, S.\ 1967, Ann. d'Ap., 30, 1039
2626: \bibitem[Chihara et al.(2002)]{chi02} Chihara, H., Koike, C.,
2627: Tsuchiyama, A., Tachibana, S., \& Sakamoto, D.\ 2002, \aap, 391, 267
2628: \bibitem[Cioni \& Habing(2003)]{ch03} Cioni, M.-R.~L.\ \& Habing, H.~J.\
2629: 2003, \aap, 402, 133
2630: \bibitem[DePew et al.(2006)]{dep06} DePew, K., Speck, A., \& Dijkstra, C.\
2631: 2006, \apj, 640, 971
2632: \bibitem[Dessy(1959)]{des59} Dessy, J.~L.\ 1959, Bol.\ Inst.\ Mat.\ Astr.\
2633: Fis.\ Cordoba, Vol.\ 1, No.\ 2
2634: \bibitem[Duley \& Seahra(1998)]{ds98} Duley, W.~W.\ \& Seahra, S.\ 1998, \apj,
2635: 507, 874
2636: \bibitem[Dwek \& Scalo(1980)]{ds80} Dwek, E.\ \& Scalo, J.~M.\ 1980, \apj, 239,
2637: 193
2638: \bibitem[Egan et al.(2001)]{msx01} Egan, M.~P., van Dyk, S.~D., \&
2639: Price, S.~D.\ 2001, \aj, 122, 1844
2640: \bibitem[Egan et al.(2003)]{msx03} Egan, M. P., et al.\ 2003,
2641: ``The Midcourse Space Experiment Point Source Catalog, Version 2.3,
2642: Explanatory Guide,'' Air Force Research Laboratory Technical Report
2643: AFRL-VS-TR-2003-1589
2644: \bibitem[Egan \& Sloan(2001)]{es01} Egan, M.~P. \& Sloan, G.~C.\ 2001, \apj,
2645: 558, 165
2646: \bibitem[Emery et al.(2006)]{ec06} Emery, J.~P.,
2647: Cruikshank, D.~P., van Cleve, J.\ 2006, Icarus, 182, 496
2648: \bibitem[Engelbracht et al.(2005)]{eng05} Engelbracht, C.~W., Gordon, K.~D.,
2649: Rieke, G.~H., Werner, M.~W., Dale, D.~A., \& Latter, W.~B.\ 2005, \apj,
2650: 628, L29
2651: \bibitem[Engelke et al.(2004)]{ekp04} Engelke, C.~W., Kraemer, K.~E., \&
2652: Price, S.~D.\ 2004, \apjs, 150, 343
2653: \bibitem[Fabian et al.(2001a)]{fab01a} Fabian, D., Posch, Th., Mutschke, H.,
2654: Kerschbaum, F., \& Dorschner, J.\ 2001a, \aap, 373, 1125
2655: \bibitem[Fabian et al.(2001b)]{fab01b} Fabian, D., Henning, T., J\"{a}ger, C.,
2656: Mutschke, H., Dorschner, J., \& Wehrhan, O. 2001, \aap, 378, 228
2657: \bibitem[Galliano et al.(2008)]{gal08} Galliano, F., Madden, S.~C., Tielens,
2658: A.~G.~G.~M., Peeters, E., \& Jones, A.~P.\ 2008, \apj, 679, 310
2659: \bibitem[Gehrz(1989)]{geh89} Gehrz, R.\ 1989, in Interstellar Dust, Proc. IAU
2660: Symp. 135, ed. L.~J.\ Allamandola \& A.~G.~G.~M.\ Tielens (Dordrecht:
2661: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 445
2662: \bibitem[Gillett, et al.(1968)]{gil68} Gillett, F.~C., Low, F.~J.,
2663: \& Stein, W.~A.\ 1968, \apj, 154, 677
2664: \bibitem[Giveon et al.(2002)]{giv02} Giveon, U., Sternberg, A., Lutz, D.,
2665: Feuchtgruber, H., \& Pauldrach, A.~W.~A.\ 2002, \apj, 566, 880
2666: \bibitem[Glaccum(1994)]{gla94} Glaccum, W.\ 1994, in Proc.\ of the Airborne
2667: Astronomy Symp.\ on the Galactic Ecosystem: From Gas to Stars to Dust, ed.
2668: M.~R.\ Haas, J.~A.\ Davidson, \& E.~F.\ Erickson (San Francisco: ASP), 395
2669: \bibitem[Gordon \& Clayton(1998)]{gc98} Gordon, K.\ \& Clayton, G.~C.\
2670: 1998, \apj, 500, 816
2671: \bibitem[Groenewegen et al.(2007)]{gro07} Groenwegen, M.~A.~T., et al.\ 2007,
2672: \mnras, 376, 313
2673: \bibitem[Heras et al.(2002)]{her02} Heras, A.~M., Shipman, R.~F., Price, S.~D.,
2674: de Graauw, Th., Walker, H.~J., Jourdain de Muizon, M., Kessler, M.~F.,
2675: Prusti, T., Decin, L.; Vandenbussche, B., Waters, L.~B.~F.~M.\ 2002, \aap,
2676: 394, 539
2677: \bibitem[Hodge et al.(2004)]{hod04} Hodge, T.~M., Kraemer, K.~E., Price, S.~D.,
2678: \& Walker, H.~J.\ 2004, \apjs, 151, 299
2679: \bibitem[Hony et al.(2001)]{hon01} Hony, S., Van Kerckhoven, C., Peeters, E.,
2680: Tielens, A.~G.~G.~M., Hudgins, D.~M., \& Allamandola, L.~J.\ 2001, \aap, 370,
2681: 1030
2682: \bibitem[Houck et al.(2004)]{hou04} Houck, J.~R., et al.\ 2004, \apjs, 154, 18
2683: \bibitem[Huber \& Herzberg(1979)]{hh79} Huber, K.~P. \& Herzberg, G.\ 1979,
2684: Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure, Vol. IV. Constants of Diatomic
2685: Molecules (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.)
2686: \bibitem[IRAS Science Team(1986)]{lrs86} IRAS Science Team 1986, \aaps, 65, 607
2687: \bibitem[J\"{a}ger et al.(1998)]{jag98} J\"{a}ger, C., Molster, F.~J.,
2688: Dorschner, J., Henning, Th., Mutschke, H., Waters, L.~B.~F.~M.\ 1998,
2689: \aap, 339, 904
2690: \bibitem[Kastner et al.(2006)]{kas06} Kastner, J.~H., Buchanan, C.~L.,
2691: Sargent, B., \& Forrest, W.~J.\ 2006, \apj, 638, L29
2692: \bibitem[Keremedjiev \& Sloan(2006)]{ks06} Keremedjiev, M.~S. \& Sloan, G.~C.,
2693: 2006, IRS Technical Report 06001
2694: \bibitem[Keller et al.(2008)]{kel08} Keller, L.~D., Sloan, G.~C., Forrest,
2695: W.~J., Ayala, S., D'Alessio, P., Shah, S., Calvet, N., Hartmann, L.,
2696: Najita, J., Sargent, B., Li, A., Watson, D.~M., \& Chen, C.~H.\ 2008,
2697: \apj, submitted
2698: \bibitem[Keller \& Wood(2006)]{kw06} Keller, S.~C.\ \& Wood, P.~R.\ 2006,
2699: \apj, 642, 834
2700: \bibitem[Koike et al.(2003)]{koi03} Koike, C., Chihara, H., Tsuchiyama, A.,
2701: Suto, H., Sogawa, H., \& Okuda, H.\ 2003, \aap, 399, 110
2702: \bibitem[Kraemer et al.(2002)]{kra02} Kraemer, K.~E., Sloan, G.~C., Price,
2703: S.~D., \& Walker, H.~J.\ 2002, \apjs, 140, 389
2704: \bibitem[Kraemer et al.(2005)]{kra05} Kraemer, K.~E., Sloan, G.~C., Wood,
2705: P.~R., Price, S.~D., \& Egan, M.~P.\ 2005, \apj, 631, L147
2706: \bibitem[Kraemer et al.(2006)]{kra06} Kraemer, K.~E., Sloan, G.~C.,
2707: Bernard-Salas, J., Price, S.~D., Egan, M.~P., \& Wood, P.~R.\ 2006, \apj,
2708: 652, L25
2709: \bibitem[Lagadec et al.(2007)]{lag07} Lagadec, E., Zijlstra, A.~A., Sloan,
2710: G.~C., Matsuura, M., Wood, P.~R., van Loon, J.~Th., Harris, G.~J., Blommaert,
2711: J.~A.~D.~L., Hony, S., Groenewegen, M.~A.~T., Feast, M.~S., Whitelock, P.~A.,
2712: Menzies, J.~W., \& Cioni, M.-R.\ 2007, \mnras, 376, 1270
2713: \bibitem[Lambert \& Clegg(1980)]{lc80} Lambert, D.~L.\ \& Clegg, R.~E.~S.\
2714: 1980, \mnras, 191, 367
2715: \bibitem[Leisenring et al.(2008)]{lei08} Leisenring, J.~M., Markwick-Kemper,
2716: F., \& Sloan, G.C.\ 2008, \apj, in press
2717: \bibitem[Levesque et al.(2006)]{lev06} Levesque, E.~M., Massey, P., Olsen,
2718: K.~A.~G., Plez, B., Meynet, G., \& Maeder, A.\ 2006, \apj, 645, 1102
2719: \bibitem[Little-Marenin \& Price(1986)]{lmp86} Little-Marenin, I.~R., \&
2720: Price, S.~D.\ 1986, in Summer School on Interstellar Processes: Abstracts of
2721: Contributed Papers, ed.\ D.~J.\ Hollenbach \& H.~A.\ Thronson, NASA Tech.\
2722: Memorandum 88342 (NASA Ames Research Center: Moffett Field, CA), 137
2723: \bibitem[Lutz et al.(2007)]{lut07} Lutz, D., Sturm, E., Tacconi, L.~J.,
2724: Valiante, E., Schweitzer, M., Netzer, H., Maiolino, R., Andreani, P.,
2725: Shemmer, O., \& Veilleux, S.\ 2007, \apj, 661, L25
2726: \bibitem[Maeder(1992)]{mae92} Maeder, A.\ 1992,\aap, 264, 105
2727: \bibitem[Markwick-Kemper et al.(2008)]{mk08} Markwick-Kemper, et al.\ 2008, in
2728: preparation
2729: \bibitem[Marshall et al.(2004)]{mar04} Marshall, J.~R., van Loon, J.~Th.,
2730: Matsuura, M., Wood, P.~R., Zijlstra, A.~A., \& Whitelock, P.~A.\ 2004,
2731: \mnras, 355, 1348
2732: \bibitem[Martin \& Rogers(1987)]{mr87} Martin, P.~G. \& Rogers, C.\ 1987, \apj,
2733: 322, 374
2734: \bibitem[Mart\'{i}n-Hern\'{a}ndez et al.(2002)]{mh02} Mart\'{i}n-Hern\'{a}ndez,
2735: N.~L., Vermeij, R., Tielens, A.~G.~G.~M., van der Hulst, J.~M., \& Peeters,
2736: E.\ 2002, \aap, 389, 286
2737: \bibitem[Matsuura et al.(2002)]{mat02} Matsuura, M., Zijlstra, A.~A., van
2738: Loon, J.~Th., Yamamura, I., Markwick, A.~J., Woods, P.~M., \& Waters,
2739: L.~B.~F.~M. 2002, \apj, 580, L133
2740: \bibitem[Matsuura et al.(2005)]{mat05} Matsuura, M., Zijlstra, A.~A., van Loon,
2741: J.~Th., Yamamura, I., Markwick, A.~J., Whitelock, P.~A., Woods, P.~M.,
2742: Marshall, J.~R., Feast, M.~W., \& Waters, L.~B.~F.~M.\ 2005, \aap, 434, 691
2743: \bibitem[Matsuura et al.(2006)]{mat06} Matsuura, M., et al.\ 2006, \mnras, 371,
2744: 415
2745: \bibitem[McGregor et al.(1994)]{caspir} McGregor, P.~J., Hart, J.,
2746: Hoadley, D., \& Bloxham, G.\ 1994, in Infrared Astronomy with Arrays,
2747: ed. I.\ McLean (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 299
2748: \bibitem[Meikle et al.(2007)]{mei07} Meikle, W.~P.~S., Mattila, S., Pastorello,
2749: A., Gerardy, C.~L., Kotak, R., Sollerman, J., Van Dyk, S.~D., Farrah, D.,
2750: Filippenko, A.~V., H\"{o}flich, P., Lundqvist, P., Pozzo, M., \& Wheeler,
2751: J.~C.\ 2007, \apj, 665, 608
2752: \bibitem[Meixner et al.(2006)]{mei06} Meixner, M., et al.\ 2006, \aj, 132, 2268
2753: \bibitem[Min et al.(2003)]{min03} Min, M., Hovenier, J.~W., \& de Koter, A.\
2754: 2003, \aap, 404, 35
2755: \bibitem[Molster et al.(2002)]{mol02} Molster, F.~J., Waters, L.~B.~F.~M.,
2756: Tielens, A.~G.~G.~M.\ 2002, \aap, 382, 222
2757: \bibitem[Moutou et al.(2000)]{mou00} Moutou, C., Verstraete, L, L\'{e}ger, A.,
2758: Sellgren, K., \& Schmidt, W.\ 2000, \aap, 354, L17
2759: \bibitem[Ossenkopf et al.(1992)]{ohm92} Ossenkopf, V., Henning, T., \&
2760: Mathis, J.~S.\ 1992, \aap, 261, 567
2761: %\bibitem[Paczy\'{n}ski(1971)]{pac71} Paczy\'{n}ski, B. 1971, Acta Astr., 21, 4
2762: %\bibitem[Peeters et al.(2004)]{pee04} Peeters, E., Mattioda, A.~L., Hudgins,
2763: % D.~M., \& Allamandola, L.~J.\ 2004, \apj, 617, L65
2764: \bibitem[Peeters et al.(2002)]{pee02} Peeters, E., Hony, S., Van Kerckhoven,
2765: C., Tielens, A.~G.~G.~M., Allamandola, L.~J., Hudgins, D.~M., \&
2766: Buauschlicher, C.~W.\ 2002, \aap, 390, 1089
2767: \bibitem[Phillips \& Davis(1979)]{pd79} Phillips, J.~G.\ \& Davis, S.~P.\
2768: 1979, \apj, 229, 867
2769: \bibitem[Pitman et al.(2006)]{pit06} Pitman, K.~M., Speck, A.~K., \&
2770: Hofmeister, A.~M.\ 2006, \mnras, 371, 1744
2771: \bibitem[Pitman et al.(2000)]{pit00} Pitman, K.~M., Clayton, G.~C., \&
2772: Gordon, K.~D.\ 2000, \pasp, 112, 537\\
2773: \bibitem[Posch et al.(1999)]{po99} Posch, T., Kerschbaum, F., Mutschke, H.,
2774: Fabian, D., Dorschner, J., \& Hron, J. 1999, \aap, 352, 609
2775: \bibitem[Renzini \& Voli(1981)]{rv81} Renzini, A.\ \& Voli, M.\ 1981, \aap,
2776: 94, 175
2777: \bibitem[Salpeter(1955)]{sal55} Salpeter, E.~E.\ 1955, \apj, 121, 161
2778: \bibitem[Skrutskie et al.(2006)]{skr06} Skrutskie, M.~F., et al.\ 2006, \aj,
2779: 131, 1163
2780: \bibitem[Sloan et al.(2006a)]{slo06a} Sloan, G.~C., Devost, D., Bernard-Salas,
2781: J., Wood, P.~R., \& Houck, J.~R.\ 2006, \apj, 638, 472
2782: \bibitem[Sloan \& Egan(1995)]{se95} Sloan, G.~C. \& Egan, M.~P.\ 1995, \apj,
2783: 444, 452
2784: \bibitem[Sloan et al.(2007)]{slo07} Sloan, G.C., Jura, M., Duley, W.~W.,
2785: Kraemer, K.~E., Bernard-Salas, J., Forrest, W.~J., Sargent, B., Li, A.,
2786: Barry, D.~J., Bohac, C.~J., Watson, D.~M., \& Houck, J.~R.\ 2007, \apj,
2787: 664, 1144
2788: \bibitem[Sloan et al.(2006b)]{slo06b} Sloan, G.~C., Kraemer, K.~E., Matsuura,
2789: M., Wood, P.~R., Price, S.~D., \& Egan, M.~P.\ 2006, \apj, 645, 1118
2790: \bibitem[Sloan et al.(2003)]{slo03} Sloan, G.~C., Kraemer, K.~E., Price,
2791: S.~D., \& Shipman, R.~F.\ 2003, \apjs, 147, 379
2792: \bibitem[Sloan et al.(1996)]{slo96} Sloan, G. C., LeVan, P. D., \&
2793: Little-Marenin, I. R. 1996, \apj, 463, 310
2794: \bibitem[Sloan \& Price(1995)]{sp95} Sloan, G.~C. \& Price, S.D.\ 1995, \apj,
2795: 451, 758
2796: \bibitem[Sloan \& Price(1998)]{sp98} Sloan, G.~C. \& Price, S.D.\ 1998, \apjs,
2797: 119, 141
2798: \bibitem[Sloan et al.(2008a)]{slo08a} Sloan, G.~C., Zijlstra, A.~A., Kraemer,
2799: K.~E., Markwick-Kemper, F., \& Leisenring, J.~M.\ 2008, in The Biggest,
2800: Baddest, Coolest Stars, ed. R.~E.\ Stencel \& B.~J.\ Smith
2801: \bibitem[Sloan et al.(2008b)]{slo08b} Sloan, G.~C., et al.\ 2008, \mnras,
2802: in preparation % 08b - sgal - 13-14 um feature
2803: \bibitem[Sloan et al.(2008c)]{slo08c} Sloan, G.~C., et al.\ 2008, \aj,
2804: in preparation % 08c - speccal, A dwarfs and K giants
2805: \bibitem[Sloan et al.(2008d)]{slo08d} Sloan, G.~C., et al.\ 2008, \apj,
2806: in preparation % 08d - M giants
2807: \bibitem[Smith et al.(1995)]{smi95} Smith, V.~V., Plez, B., Lambert, D.~L.,
2808: Lubowich, D.~A.\ 1995, \apj, 441, 735
2809: \bibitem[Speck et al.(2006)]{spe06} Speck, A.~K., Cami, J., Markwick-Kemper,
2810: C., Leisenring, J., Szcerba, R., Dijkstra, C., Van Dyk, S., \& Meixner, M.\
2811: 2006, \apj, 650, 892
2812: \bibitem[Spinrad \& Wing(1969)]{sw69} Spinrad, H.\ \& Wing, R.~F.\ 1969,
2813: \araa, 7, 249
2814: \bibitem[Stecher \& Donn(1965)]{sd65} Stecher, T.~P.\ \& Donn, B.\ 1965, \apj,
2815: 142, 1681
2816: \bibitem[Stencel et al.(1990)]{ste90} Stencel, R.~E., Nuth, J.~A.,
2817: Little-Marenin, I.~R., \& Little, S.~J.\ 1990, \apj, 350, L45.
2818: \bibitem[Sugerman et al.(2006)]{sug06} Sugerman, B.~E.~K., et al.\ 2006,
2819: Science, 313, 196
2820: \bibitem[Suto et al.(2006)]{sut06} Suto, H., Sogawa, H., Tachibana, S., Koike,
2821: C., Karoji, H., Tsuchiyama, A., Chihara, H., Mizutani, K., Akedo, J., Ogiso,
2822: K., Fukui, T., \& Ohara, S.\ 2006, \mnras, 370, 1599
2823: \bibitem[Sylvester et al.(1998)]{syl98} Sylvester, R.~J., Skinner, C.~J., \&
2824: Barlow, M.~J. 1997, \mnras, 301 1083
2825: \bibitem[Szym\'{a}nski(2005)]{ogle05} Szyma\'{n}ski, M.~K.\ 2005, Acta Astron.,
2826: 55, 43
2827: %\bibitem[Teplitz et al.(2006)]{tep06} Teplitz, H.~I., Armus, L., Soifer, B.~T.,
2828: % Charmandaris, V., Marshall, J.~A., Spoon, H., Lawrence, C., Hao, L.,
2829: % Higdon, S., Wu, Y., Lacy, M., Eisenhardt, P.~R., Herter, T., \& Houck, J.~R.\
2830: % 2006, \apj, 638, L1
2831: \bibitem[Teplitz et al.(2007)]{tep07} Teplitz, H.~I., Desai, V., Armus, L.,
2832: Chary, R., Marshall, J.~A., Colbert, J.~W., Frayer, D.~T., Pope, A., Blain,
2833: A., Spoon, H.~W.~W., Charmandaris, V., \& Scott, D.\ 2007, \apj, 659, 941
2834: \bibitem[Tielens(1990)]{tie90} Tielens, A.~G.~G.~M.\ 1990, in From Miras
2835: to Planetary Nebulae: Which Path for Stellar Evolution?, ed. M.~O.\
2836: Mennessier \& A.\ Omont (Gif-sur-Evette: Editions Fronti\`{e}res), 186
2837: \bibitem[Trams et al.(1999)]{tra99} Trams, N.~R., van Loon, J.~Th., Waters,
2838: L.~B.~F.~M., Zijlstra, A.~A., Loup, C., Whitelock, P.~A., Groenewegen,
2839: M.~A.~T., Blommaert, J.~A.~D.~L., Siebenmorgen, R., Heske, A., \& Feast,
2840: M.~W.\ 1999, \aap, 346, 843
2841: \bibitem[Udalski et al.(1997)]{ogle97} Udalski, A., Kubiak, M., \&
2842: Szym\'{a}nski, M.\ 1997, Acta Astron., 47, 319
2843: \bibitem[Valenti et al.(1998)]{val98} Valenti, J.~A., Piskunov, N.,
2844: Johns-Krull, C.~M.\ 1998, \apj, 498, 851
2845: \bibitem[van Loon et al.(1999)]{vl99} van Loon, J.~Th., Groenewegen, M.~A.~T.,
2846: de Koter, A., Trams, N.~R., Waters, L.~B.~F.~M., Zijlstra, A.~A., Whitelock,
2847: P.~A., \& Loup, C.\ 1999, \aap, 559, 572
2848: \bibitem[van Loon et al.(2001)]{vl01} van Loon, J.~Th., Zijlstra, A.~A.,
2849: Bujarrabal, V., \& Nyman, L.-\AA.\ 2001, \aap, 368, 950
2850: \bibitem[van Loon et al.(2005a)]{vl05a} van Loon, J.~Th., Cioni, M.-R.~L.,
2851: Zijlstra, A.~A., \& Loup, C.\ 2005, \aap, 438, 273
2852: \bibitem[van Loon et al.(2005b)]{vl05b} van Loon, J.~Th., Oliveira, J.~M.,
2853: Wood, P.~R., Zijlstra, A.~A., Sloan, G.~C., Matsuura, M., Whitelock, P.~A.,
2854: Groenewegen, M.~A.~T., Blommaert, J.~A.~D.~L., Cioni, M.-R.~L., Hony, S.,
2855: Loup, C., \& Waters, L.~B.~F.~M.\ 2005, \mnras, 364, L71
2856: \bibitem[van Loon et al.(2006)]{vl06} van Loon, J.~Th., Marshall, J.~R.,
2857: Cohen, M., Matsuura, M., Wood, P.~R., Yamamura, I., \& Zijlstra, A.~A.\
2858: 2006, \aap, 447, 971
2859: \bibitem[van Loon et al.(2008)]{vl08} van Loon, J.~Th., Cohen, M., Oliveira,
2860: J.~M., Matsuura, M., McDonald, I., Sloan, G.~C., Wood, P.~R., \& Zijlstra,
2861: A.~A.\ 2008, \mnras, submitted
2862: \bibitem[Vassiliadis \& Wood(1993)]{vw93} Vassiliadis, E. \& Wood P.~R. 1993,
2863: \apj, 413, 641
2864: \bibitem[Werner et al.(2004a)]{wer04a} Werner, M.~W., et al.\ 2004a,
2865: \apjs, 154, 1
2866: \bibitem[Werner et al.(2004b)]{wer04b} Werner, M.~W., Uchida, K.~I., Sellgren,
2867: K., Marengo, M., Gordon, K.~D., Morris, P.~W., Houck, J.R., \& Stansberry,
2868: J.~A.\ 2004b, \apjs, 154, 309
2869: \bibitem[Wheeler et al.(1989)]{whe89} Wheeler, J.~C., Sneden, C., \& Truran,
2870: J.~W., Jr.\ 1989, \araa, 27, 279
2871: \bibitem[Whitelock \& Feast(2000)]{wf00} Whitelock, P. \& Feast, M. 2000,
2872: Mem.\ Soc.\ Astron.\ Ital.\ 71, 601
2873: \bibitem[Whitelock et al.(2003)]{whi03} Whitelock, P.~A., Feast, M.~W.,
2874: van Loon, J.~Th., \& Zijlstra, A.~A.\ 2003, \mnras, 342, 86
2875: \bibitem[Whitney et al.(2003a)]{whi03a} Whitney, B.~A., Wood, K., Bjorkman,
2876: J.~E., \& Wolff, M.~J.\ 2003a, \apj, 591, 1049
2877: \bibitem[Whitney et al.(2003b)]{whi03b} Whitney, B.~A., Wood, K., Bjorkman,
2878: J.~E., \& Cohen, M.\ 2003b, \apj, 598, 1079
2879: \bibitem[Woitke(2006)]{woi06} Woitke, P. 2006, \aap, 452, 537
2880: \bibitem[Wood(1981)]{woo81} Wood, P.~R. 1981, in Physical Processes in
2881: Red Giants, ed. I. Iben \& A. Renzini, (Dordrecht: Reidel), 135
2882: \bibitem[Wood et al.(1983)]{wbf83} Wood, P.~R., Bessell, M.~S., \& Fox, M.~W.\
2883: 1983, \apj, 272, 99
2884: \bibitem[Wood et al.(1985)]{wbp85} Wood, P.~R., Bessell, M.~S., \& Paltoglou,
2885: G.\ 1985, \apj, 290, 477
2886: \bibitem[Wood et al.(1992)]{woo92} Wood, P.~R., Whiteoak, J.~B., Hughes,
2887: S.~M.~G., Bessell, M.~S., Gardner, F.~F., \& Hyland, A.~R.\ 1992, \apj,
2888: 397, 552
2889: \bibitem[Wu et al.(2006)]{wu06} Wu, Y., Charmandaris, V., Hao, L., Brandl,
2890: B.~R., Bernard-Salas, J., Spoon, H.~W.~W.\ Houck, J.~R.\ 2006, \apj, 639, 157
2891: \bibitem[Wyckoff \& Clegg(1978)]{wc78} Wyckoff, S.\ \& Clegg, R.~E.~S.\
2892: 1979, \mnras, 184, 127
2893: \bibitem[Zijlstra et al.(2006)]{zij06} Zijlstra, A.~A., et al.\ 2006, \mnras,
2894: 370, 1961
2895:
2896: \end{thebibliography}
2897:
2898:
2899: \clearpage
2900:
2901: \clearpage
2902: \thispagestyle{empty}
2903: \setlength{\voffset}{15mm}
2904: \clearpage
2905: \setlength{\voffset}{0mm}
2906:
2907: \clearpage
2908:
2909: \clearpage
2910:
2911: \end{document}
2912: