1: %% \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %% \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
3: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
4: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
5: \documentclass{emulateapj}
6:
7: \slugcomment{To appear in the {\em Astrophysical Journal}}
8: \shorttitle{Low-Mass Active Galactic Nucleus GH\,10}
9: \shortauthors{Wrobel et al.}
10: \begin{document}
11: \title{Steep-Spectrum Radio Emission from the Low-Mass
12: Active Galactic Nucleus GH\,10}
13: \author{J. M. Wrobel\altaffilmark{1},
14: J. E. Greene\altaffilmark{2},
15: L. C. Ho\altaffilmark{3},
16: and J. S. Ulvestad\altaffilmark{1}}
17:
18: \altaffiltext{1}{National Radio Astronomy Observatory, P.O. Box O,
19: Socorro, NM 87801; jwrobel@nrao.edu, julvesta@nrao.edu}
20: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton
21: University, Princeton, NJ 08544; jgreene@astro.princeton.edu}
22: \altaffiltext{3}{The Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of
23: Washington, 813 Santa Barbara Street, Pasadena, CA 91101;
24: lho@ociw.edu}
25:
26: \begin{abstract}
27: GH\,10 is a broad-lined active galactic nucleus (AGN) energized by a
28: black hole of mass 800,000~$M_\odot$. It was the only object detected
29: by Greene et al.\ in their Very Large Array (VLA) survey of 19
30: low-mass AGNs discovered by Greene \& Ho. New VLA imaging at 1.4,
31: 4.9, and 8.5~GHz reveals that GH\,10's emission has an extent of less
32: than 320~pc, has an optically-thin synchrotron spectrum with a
33: spectral index $\alpha = -0.76\pm0.05$ ($S_\nu \propto
34: \nu^{+\alpha}$), is less than 11\% linearly polarized, and is steady -
35: although poorly sampled - on timescales of weeks and years.
36: Circumnuclear star formation cannot dominate the radio emission,
37: because the high inferred star formation rate, 18~$M_\odot$~yr$^{-1}$,
38: is inconsistent with the rate of less than 2~$M_\odot$~yr$^{-1}$
39: derived from narrow H$\alpha$ and [O~II] $\lambda$3727 emission.
40: Instead, the radio emission must be mainly energized by the low-mass
41: black hole. GH\,10's radio properties match those of the
42: steep-spectrum cores of Palomar Seyfert galaxies, suggesting that,
43: like those Seyferts, the emission is outflow-driven. Because GH\,10
44: is radiating close to its Eddington limit, it may be a local analog of
45: the starting conditions, or seeds, for supermassive black holes.
46: Future imaging of GH\,10 at higher linear resolution thus offers an
47: opportunity to study the relative roles of radiative versus kinetic
48: feedback during black-hole growth.
49: \end{abstract}
50:
51: \keywords{galaxies: active ---
52: galaxies: individual (GH\,10) ---
53: galaxies: nuclei ---
54: galaxies: Seyfert ---
55: radio continuum: galaxies}
56:
57: \section{Motivation}
58:
59: Although little is known about the mass function of nuclear black
60: holes with mass below about $10^6~M_\odot$, this is an important
61: regime for several reasons. For example, the remarkable correlation
62: between host bulge velocity dispersion and black hole mass strongly
63: hints that black holes play an essential role in galaxy evolution
64: \citep{kor04}, yet there are few observational constraints on the
65: starting conditions, or so-called seeds, for the supermassive black
66: holes with masses above about $10^6~M_\odot$. Also, until the {\em
67: Laser Interferometer Space Antenna\/} launches, an understanding of
68: the low-mass end of the black-hole mass function may provide one of
69: the few constraints on these seed black holes \citep{hug02}.
70: Moreover, it remains to be established whether small galaxies can
71: commonly host nuclear black holes and, if so, whether the same mass
72: versus dispersion relation mentioned above is obeyed.
73:
74: Motivated by these and similar issues, \citet{gre04} conducted the
75: first systematic search for a population of black holes with mass
76: below about $10^6~M_\odot$. They used SDSS DR1 to select a sample of
77: broad-lined active galactic nuclei (AGNs) with virial mass estimates
78: $10^{5-6}~M_\odot$. This sample of 19 objects was the first uniformly
79: selected sample of low-mass AGNs. The sample is characterized by
80: Eddington ratios, $L_{\rm bol}/L_{\rm Edd}$, that are close to unity,
81: implying radiatively efficient accretion onto these black holes. With
82: its low-mass black holes and high Eddington ratios, this sample probes
83: a poorly explored region of parameter space, potentially providing new
84: insights into the physical drivers of radio properties in AGNs. For
85: this reason, \citet{gre06} observed the sample at 4.9 GHz with the
86: Very Large Array (VLA). A single object, \object{GH 10}, was detected
87: with a 4.9-GHz--to--optical flux ratio $R \sim 2.8$, formally
88: radio-quiet \citep{kel89}. A stacked image of the remaining 18
89: objects yielded an upper limit of $R \le 0.27$, emphasizing the
90: atypical traits of GH\,10.
91:
92: To help understand the physical origin of these atypical traits, new
93: multi-frequency VLA data were obtained on GH\,10 and are presented in
94: Section 2. As summarized in Section 3.1, the radio emssion from
95: GH\,10 is found to be compact, steep-spectrum, unpolarized, and steady
96: in time. A star-formation origin for this emission is considered, and
97: dismissed, in Section 3.2, while Section 3.3 explores the implications
98: of a black-hole origin for the radio emission. The paper ends, in
99: Section 4, with a summary of the key findings and suggestions for
100: future directions.
101:
102: The following cosmological parameters are assumed: $H_0 =
103: 71$~km~s$^{-1}$~Mpc$^{-1}$, $\Omega_m = 0.27$, and $\Omega_\Lambda =
104: 0.75$ \citep{spe03}, leading to a luminosity distance of 363~Mpc
105: \citep{gre04,gre06}. Also, the sign convention adopted for the
106: spectral index $\alpha$ near a frequency $\nu$ is the flux density
107: $S_\nu \propto \nu^{+\alpha}$.
108:
109: \section{VLA Imaging}
110:
111: The VLA was used in the A configuration \citep{tho80} to observe
112: GH\,10 under proposal code AG745 on UT 2007 Jun 18 and 2007 Jul 15.
113: Observations were phase-referenced to the calibrator J1224+0330 whose
114: positional accuracy was 0.01\arcsec. The switching angle was
115: 5\arcdeg, while the switching times were 560~s, 260~s, and 200~s for
116: observations at center frequencies of 1.4000, 4.8601, and 8.4601~GHz,
117: respectively. These frequencies will be abbreviated as 1.4, 4.9, and
118: 8.5~GHz hereafter. The {\em a priori\/} pointing position for GH\,10
119: was centered 3\arcsec\, south of the SDSS position \citep{gre04} to
120: avoid any phase-center artifacts. Observations were made assuming a
121: coordinate equinox of 2000. Data were acquired with a bandwidth of
122: 100~MHz for each circular polarization. Observations of 3C\,286 were
123: used to set the amplitude scale to an accuracy of about 3\%.
124:
125: On 2007 Jun 18, net exposure times were 1500~s, 7800~s, and 8300~s at
126: 1.4, 4.9, and 8.5~GHz, respectively. Twenty-five to 27 antennas
127: provided data of acceptable quality, with most of the data loss
128: attributable to EVLA retrofitting activities. The observations at
129: 1.4~GHz were made at a large hour angle and were followed by
130: alternating observations at 4.9 and 8.5~GHz to sample similar hour
131: angles. On 2007 Jul 15, 1.4-GHz observations were made at transit and
132: resulted in a net exposure time of 2800~s. Twenty-four antennas
133: provided data of acceptable quality, with most of the data loss
134: attributable to EVLA retrofitting activities and software failures.
135: The data were calibrated using the 2007 Dec 31 release of the NRAO
136: AIPS software. No self-calibrations were performed. No polarization
137: calibration was performed, as only upper limits to the linear
138: polarization percentages were sought. The AIPS task {\tt imagr} was
139: used to form and deconvolve images of the emission from GH\,10.
140:
141: Following \citet{wro00}, {\tt imagr} was used to form and deconvolve
142: Stokes $I\/$ images at 4.9 and 8.5~GHz at a matched resolution at FWHM
143: of 0.42\arcsec. This led to detections of a compact source at both
144: frequencies, with no evidence for adjacent emission on larger scales.
145: The 4.9~GHz image appears in Figure~1. Quadratic fits in the image
146: plane yielded the integrated flux densities and the two-point spectral
147: index given in Table~1. These flux densities from 2007 Jun 18 are
148: plotted in Figure~2. The image fits also yielded identical
149: deconvolved diameters of less than 0.21\arcsec, as well as almost
150: identical positions. The 4.9-GHz position is $\alpha(J2000) = 12^{h}
151: 40^{m} 35^{s}.825$ and $\delta(J2000) = -00^{\circ} 29' 19''.53$, with
152: a 1-D error of 0.1\arcsec, the quadratic sum of terms due to the
153: signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the detection (less than 0.01\arcsec),
154: the phase-calibrator position error (0.01\arcsec), and the
155: phase-referencing strategies (estimated to be 0.1\arcsec). This
156: 4.9-GHz position is consistent with the SDSS position \citep{gre04}
157: marked in Figure~1. {\tt imagr} was also used to form
158: matched-resolution images of Stokes $Q\/$ and $U\/$ at 4.9 and
159: 8.5~GHz. Those images led to no detections, with the most
160: constraining upper limit to the linear polarization percentage being
161: less than 11\% at 4.9~GHz.
162:
163: Following \citet{ho01b}, {\tt imagr} was used in a two-step approach
164: to form and deconvolve Stokes $I\/$ images at 1.4~GHz. First, a
165: search for confusing sources was done by using the inner array
166: baselines to image, at low resolution, the primary antenna beam to the
167: half-power point. Second, all array baselines were used to image
168: GH\,10 and its confusing sources, simultaneously and at a high
169: resolution of about 1.4\arcsec\, at FWHM. From the GH\,10 data
170: acquired at transit on 2007 Jul 15, this approach led to a
171: high-resolution image mildly affected by confusion, showing a compact
172: detection plus no evidence for adjacent emission on larger scales; a
173: quadratic fit in the image plane yielded the integrated flux density
174: in Table~1 and a deconvolved diameter of less than 0.72\arcsec. From
175: the GH\,10 data acquired at a large hour angle on 2007 Jun 18, the
176: high-resolution image was more degraded by confusion so only a
177: parabolic fit in the image plane was made. This yielded the peak flux
178: density in Table~1 that is plotted in Figure~2. That figure also
179: shows the spectral index $\alpha = -0.76\pm0.05$ derived from all the
180: photometry on 2007 Jun 18.
181:
182: Finally, the 4.9-GHz data were used to produce an image at the FWHM
183: resolution of the 1.4-GHz data on 2007 Jun 18. A parabolic fit to
184: that 4.9-GHz image gave the flux density listed in Table~1, leading in
185: turn to the tabulated spectral index between 1.4 and 4.9~GHz. Also,
186: that 4.9-GHz flux density is consistent with the value obtained at a
187: FWHM resolution of 0.42\arcsec\, implying no additional emission on
188: scales between 0.42\arcsec and about 1.4\arcsec.
189:
190: \section{Implications}
191:
192: \subsection{Radio Properties}
193:
194: The new VLA data imply that the emission from GH\,10 is compact, with
195: a diameter of less than 0.21\arcsec\, (320~pc) at 4.9~GHz (Fig.~1) and
196: 8.5~GHz, and less than 0.72\arcsec\, (1.1~kpc) at 1.4~GHz. These
197: upper limits are derived from data with SNRs of 15 or more. The new
198: 1.4-GHz images show only a compact component and do not confirm the
199: prior hint from low-SNR data of marginally resolved emission with a
200: FWHM diameter of 5\arcsec\, \citep[7.5~kpc;][]{whi97}. Similarly, the
201: new 4.9-GHz image does not confirm the prior suggestion from low
202: SNR-data of marginally-resolved emission with a FWHM diameter of
203: 0.3\arcsec\, \citep[530~pc;][]{gre06}.
204:
205: The emission from GH\,10 has a steep radio spectrum, with a
206: three-point spectral index of $\alpha = -0.76\pm0.05$ measured on 2007
207: Jun 18 and thus free from concerns about time variability (Fig.~2).
208: This spectral index agrees with the two-point, matched-resolution
209: spectral indices given in Table~1, as is expected for compact,
210: unresolved emission. The single-epoch radio spectrum shown for GH\,10
211: in Figure~2 - the first ever measured for any of the 19 low-mass AGNs
212: discovered by Greene and Ho \citep{gre04,gre06} - is consistent with
213: optically thin synchrotron emission. This emission is less than 11\%
214: linearly polarized at 4.9~GHz, well below the 73\% expected for
215: electrons with a power-law energy distribution, with index $p = 1 -
216: 2\alpha$, in a uniform magnetic field \citep[][page 197]{shu91}.
217: Faraday depth effects could also be at play.
218:
219: Variability timescales for AGNs are expected to scale with black-hole
220: mass \citep[e.g., ][]{ede99}, and have not yet been explored for any
221: of the 19 low-mass Greene and Ho objects. The new VLA photometry can
222: be used to assess GH\,10's time variabilty, for future comparison with
223: other GH\,10 timescales to search for physical linkages. Using only
224: A-configuration data, the ratio of the 4.9-GHz flux density on 2007
225: Jun 18 (0.75$\pm$0.05~mJy) to that on 2004 Oct 9
226: \citep[0.7$\pm$0.1~mJy;][]{gre06} is 7$\pm$16\%, consistent with
227: steady emission on timescales of years. The ratio of the 1.4-GHz flux
228: density on 2007 Jul 15 (1.88$\pm$0.13~mJy) to that on 2007 Jun 18
229: (1.80$\pm$0.09~mJy) is 4$\pm$9\%, also consistent with steady emission
230: on timescales of weeks. Also, folding in the B-configuration survey
231: of \citet{whi97}, the 1.4-GHz flux density of GH\,10 on 1998 Aug 11
232: was 1.16$\pm$0.16 mJy (peak) and 1.29$\pm$0.16 mJy (integrated). For
233: such a low-SNR and compact source, \citet{dev04} advocate using the
234: peak flux density and seeking variability at the 4 $\sigma$, or
235: greater, level. For GH\,10, the ratio of the flux density on 2007 Jul
236: 15 (1.88$\pm$0.13 mJy) to that earlier peak (1.16$\pm$0.16 mJy) is
237: 62$\pm$16\%, a change of less than 4 $\sigma$ on a timescale of almost
238: a decade.
239:
240: In summary, the radio emssion from GH\,10 is compact, steep-spectrum,
241: unpolarized, and steady - although sparsely sampled - on timescales of
242: weeks and years. The integrated 1.4-GHz flux density corresponds to a
243: power of $3.0 \times 10^{22}$~W~Hz$^{-1}$, while that at 4.9~GHz
244: corresponds to a power of $1.2 \times 10^{22}$~W~Hz$^{-1}$.
245:
246: \subsection{Radio Emission from Star Formation?}
247:
248: The radio emission from GH\,10 might be driven, in part, by
249: circumnuclear star formation. Applying {\tt scanpi} to {\em Infrared
250: Astronomical Satellite\/} data at 60~$\mu$m, GH\,10 is undetected with
251: a 3 $\sigma$ upper limit of 0.15~Jy. Equation (2) of \citet{yun01}
252: yields an upper limit to the 60-$\mu$m power. Inserting that limit
253: into the radio-infrared relation in equation (4) of \citet{yun01} sets
254: an upper limit of $< 1.9 \times 10^{22}$~W~Hz$^{-1}$ to the 1.4-GHz
255: power expected from any star formation. This limit is below the
256: observed power of $3.0 \times 10^{22}$~W~Hz$^{-1}$, but not by much.
257:
258: A more telling analysis follows from consideration of the host
259: galaxy's properties, especially as they relate to estimates for a
260: star-formation rate. Keck spectroscopy, with a 1\arcsec\, (1.5~kpc)
261: aperture, exhibit the Mg I{\it b} and Ca II infrared triplets
262: characteristic of an old stellar population \citep{bar05}. {\em
263: Hubble Space Telescope\/} $B$ and $I$ imaging, with a resolution at
264: FWHM of 0.12\arcsec\, (170~pc), reveals a smooth, spheroidal-looking
265: system with a steep Sersic index $n=4$ and a color $B-I=2$ that is
266: characteristic of Sa or spheroidal galaxies \citep{gre08}. SDSS
267: spectroscopy with a 3\arcsec\, (4.5~kpc) aperture shows narrow
268: H$\alpha$ and [O~II] $\lambda$3727 lines but, as a Balmer decrement
269: could not be robustly measured, an estimate of the internal reddening
270: is unavailable for GH\,10 \citep{gre04}. However, if the average
271: reddening advocated for the 19 Greene and Ho objects by \citet{gre08}
272: is adopted and the reddening curve of \citet{car89} is applied, then
273: the correction factors for narrow H$\alpha$ and [O~II] $\lambda$3727
274: are 1.3 and 1.7, respectively. Then using equations (2)-(3) of
275: \citet{ken98}, those corrected line luminosities for GH\,10 each imply
276: a star formation rate no higher than 2~$M_\odot$~yr$^{-1}$. These
277: rate estimates are, by construction, upper limits because they neglect
278: the portion of the line-emitting gas that is energized by the AGN
279: rather than by star formation. Moreover, in order for GH\,10 to be
280: within the 2 $\sigma$ range of the radio-infrared relation mentioned
281: above, the reddening at H$\alpha$ would need to be 2 mag, far more
282: than the average (0.3 mag) and largest (0.5 mag) reddening advocated
283: for the Greene and Ho objects \citep{gre08}. Fortunately, GH\,10 is
284: also detected in a {\em Spitzer\/} IRS spectrum, boding well for a
285: future estimate of a star formation rate that is less affected by
286: reddening concerns (C. E. Thornton et al., in preparation).
287:
288: For comparison, using equation (13) of \citet{yun01}, the observed
289: 1.4-GHz power of GH\,10 would correspond to a star-formation rate of
290: 18~$M_\odot$~yr$^{-1}$. Such a high rate is clearly inconsistent with
291: the line-based upper limit of 2~$M_\odot$~yr$^{-1}$ derived above.
292: Circumnuclear star formation cannot, therefore, dominate the radio
293: emission from GH\,10.
294:
295: \subsection{Radio Emission from the AGN}
296:
297: Based on the above analysis, it seems plausible that the radio
298: emission from GH\,10 is mainly energized by its low-mass black hole.
299: GH\,10 is radiating at about twice its Eddingtion luminosity, with
300: this estimate being uncertain by a factor of 3 \citep{gre04}. Thus
301: comparisons of GH\,10 with other broad-lined AGNs with near-unity
302: Eddington ratios are especially apt. The 4.9-GHz--to--optical flux
303: ratio for GH\,10 implies $R \sim 2.8$, so GH\,10 is radio-quiet
304: \citep{kel89}, a trait shared by most quasars at $z < 0.5$
305: \citep{ho01a,gre04,gre06}. There is also a faint, compact {\em
306: Chandra\/} detection within 1\arcsec\, (1.5~kpc) of the SDSS position
307: of GH\,10, and its spectral properties resemble those of high-mass
308: black holes \citep{gre07a}. The ratio of the 4.9-GHz luminosity, $5.9
309: \times 10^{38}$~ergs~s$^{-1}$, to the hard X-ray luminosity, $1.9
310: \times 10^{42}$~ergs~s$^{-1}$, implies $R_{\rm X} = 10^{-3.5}$
311: \citep{ter03}. Such a value is also consistent with the values shown
312: by most $z < 0.5$ quasars and by most luminous Seyfert 1 galaxies
313: \citep{ho08}. Unfortunately, such systems are too faint and too
314: distant to be resolved on sub-kiloparsec scales in VLA images, so no
315: structural comparisons can be made.
316:
317: GH\,10's values for $R\/$ and $R_{\rm X}$, plus its radio and hard
318: X-ray luminosities, also resemble those for the more luminous Palomar
319: Seyfert galaxies \citep{pan07}. VLA imaging at 1.4 and 4.9~GHz of the
320: Palomar Seyfert galaxies, with a resolution of about 1\arcsec\,
321: (100~pc at the median distance of 20~Mpc), shows a wide range of radio
322: powers ($10^{18}-10^{25}$~W~Hz$^{-1}$), spectral indices (+0.5 to -1),
323: and linear sizes (a few tens of parsecs to 15~kpc)
324: \citep{ho01b,ulv01}. Their structures mainly show a compact core,
325: either unresolved or slightly resolved, sometimes with adjacent
326: elongated, jetlike/outflow components. Linearly polarized emission,
327: while rarely detected, is preferentially associated with features
328: adjacent to the cores. Thus GH\,10's radio properties most resemble
329: those of the steep-spectrum cores of the Palomar Seyferts, for which
330: the emission is unmodified by the effects of internal and/or external
331: opacity. Like the Palomar Seyferts, the steep-spectrum emission from
332: GH\,10 could be outflow-driven. Moreover, the lower escape velocity
333: from GH\,10's dwarf host galaxy \citep{bar05} would make it easier for
334: any synchrotron-emitting plasma to leave the vicinity of the AGN,
335: thereby favoring a steep, rather than flat or inverted, radio
336: spectrum.
337:
338: This work has established that the radio emission from GH\,10 is
339: compact, steep-spectrum, unpolarized, and steady. Still, GH\,10 is
340: known to be atypical when compared to the other GH objects, which are
341: especially radio-quiet with $R \le 0.27$ from a stacking analysis
342: \citep{gre06}. Following those authors, by analogy with supermassive
343: and stellar-mass black holes, a near-unity Eddington ratio suggests
344: that the low-mass black hole GH\,10 is presently in the very high
345: state, with its entry into that state from the high/soft state
346: accompanied by an optically thin ejection event in the radio. Within
347: this framework, and barring opacity effects, the radio emission from
348: GH\,10 would be the slowly fading, steep-spectrum remnant from that
349: ejection event, whose power corresponds to the quenched radio levels
350: expected for the high/soft state \citep[e.g.,][]{mac03}. Also, a
351: radio detection of only one of the 19 GH objects suggests, at face
352: value, that such radio ejections from GH objects occur only about 5\%
353: of the time. Interestingly, a 5\% duty cyle resembles that
354: established observationally for radio flares from microquasars
355: \citep[e.g.,][]{nip05}.
356:
357: Because the low-mass black hole GH\,10 is radiating close to its
358: Eddington limit, it may be a local analog of the starting conditions,
359: or seeds, for supermassive black holes. From the present work, the
360: diameter of GH\,10's radio emission must be less than 0.21\arcsec\,
361: (320~pc). If GH\,10 is indeed driving some of this emission, then
362: 1.4-GHz imaging with Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI) at a
363: resolution of 0.005\arcsec\, (7.5~pc) will reveal the physical
364: connection between the black hole and the synchrotron-emitting plasma.
365: Although GH\,10 is a faint radio source (Table~1), VLBI imaging of
366: such sources is feasible \citep[e.g.,][]{wro06} and would offer a
367: means to study the relative roles of radiative versus kinetic feedback
368: during black-hole growth \citep[e.g.,][]{dim05,kuh05}.
369:
370: \section{Summary and Future Directions}
371:
372: GH\,10 was the only object detected by \citet{gre06} in their VLA
373: survey of the 19 low-mass AGNs discovered by \citet{gre04}. New VLA
374: imaging reveals that the emssion from GH\,10 has an extent of less
375: than 320~pc, with an optically thin synchrotron spectrum that is less
376: than 11\% linearly polarized. The radio emission is steady, although
377: poorly sampled, on timescales of weeks and years. Circumnuclear star
378: formation cannot dominate the radio emission, because the inferred
379: star formation rate, 18~$M_\odot$~yr$^{-1}$, is inconsistent with the
380: upper limit of 2~$M_\odot$~yr$^{-1}$ derived from the narrow optical
381: emission lines. Instead, the radio emission must be dominantly
382: energized by the low-mass black hole, which is thought to be radiating
383: near its Eddington limit.
384:
385: The radio properties of GH\,10 strongly resemble those of the
386: steep-spectrum cores of Palomar Seyfert galaxies, which feature
387: outflow-driven emission unmodified by the effects of internal and/or
388: external opacity. This suggest that, like those Palomar Seyferts, the
389: radio emission from GH\,10 is outflow-driven, a suggestion that can be
390: tested with future VLBI imaging. Such imaging could also offer an
391: opportunity to study the relative roles of radiative versus kinetic
392: feedback during black-hole growth, given that GH\,10 may be a local
393: analog of the starting conditions, or seeds, for supermassive black
394: holes. Finally, the compact, steep-spectrum, unpolarized, and steady
395: nature of the emission from GH\,10 will guide future observations of
396: the new 1.4-GHz detections of low-mass AGNs reported by
397: \citet{gre07b}.
398:
399: %% Included in this acknowledgments section are examples of the
400: %% AASTeX hypertext markup commands. Use \url without the optional [HREF]
401: %% argument when you want to print the url directly in the text. Otherwise,
402: %% use either \url or \anchor, with the HREF as the first argument and the
403: %% text to be printed in the second.
404:
405: \acknowledgments We acknowledge useful feedback from an anonymous referee.
406:
407: {\it Facilities:} \facility{VLA}
408:
409: \begin{thebibliography}{}
410:
411: \bibitem[Barth et al.(2005)]{bar05} Barth, A. J., Greene, J. E., \&
412: Ho, L. C. 2005, \apj, 619, L151
413: \bibitem[Cardelli et al.(1989)]{car89} Cardelli, J. A., Clayton,
414: G. C., \& Mathis, J. S. 1989, \apj, 345, 245
415: \bibitem[de Vries et al.(2004)]{dev04} de Vries, W. H., Becker, R. H.,
416: White, R. L., \& Helfand, D. J. 2004, \aj, 127, 2565
417: \bibitem[Di Matteo et al.(2005)]{dim05} Di Matteo, T., Springel, V.,
418: \& Hernquist, L. 2005, \nat, 433, 604
419: \bibitem[Edelson \& Nandra(1999)]{ede99} Edelson, R., \& Nandra, K.
420: 1999, \apj, 514, 682
421: \bibitem[Greene \& Ho(2004)]{gre04} Greene, J. E., \& Ho, L. C. 2004,
422: \apj, 610, 722
423: \bibitem[Greene \& Ho(2007a)]{gre07a} Greene, J. E., \& Ho, L. C.
424: 2007a, \apj, 656, 84
425: \bibitem[Greene \& Ho(2007b)]{gre07b} Greene, J. E., \& Ho, L. C.
426: 2007b, \apj, 670, 92
427: \bibitem[Greene et al.(2006)]{gre06} Greene, J. E., Ho, L. C., \&
428: Ulvestad, J. S. 2006, \apj, 636, 56
429: \bibitem[Greene et al.(2008)]{gre08} Greene, J. E., Ho, L. C., \&
430: Barth, A. J. 2008, \apj, submitted
431: \bibitem[Ho(2008)]{ho08} Ho, L. C. 2008, \araa, 46, in press
432: (astro-ph/0803.2268)
433: \bibitem[Ho \& Peng(2001)]{ho01a} Ho, L. C., \& Peng, C. Y. 2001,
434: \apj, 555, 650
435: \bibitem[Ho \& Ulvestad(2001)]{ho01b} Ho, L. C., \& Ulvestad, J. S.
436: 2001, \apjs, 133, 77
437: \bibitem[Hughes(2002)]{hug02} Hughes, S. A. 2002, \mnras, 331, 805
438: \bibitem[Kellermann et al.(1989)]{kel89} Kellermann, K. I., Sramek,
439: R. A., Schmidt, M., Shaffer, D. B., \& Green, R. F. 1989, \aj, 98,
440: 1195
441: \bibitem[Kennicutt(1998)]{ken98} Kennicutt, R. C., Jr. 1998, \araa,
442: 36, 189
443: \bibitem[Kormendy(2004)]{kor04} Kormendy, J. 2004, in Carnegie
444: Observatories Astrophysics Series, Vol. 1: Coevolution of Black Holes
445: and Galaxies, ed. L. C. Ho (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press), 1
446: \bibitem[Kuhlen \& Madau(2005)]{kuh05} Kuhlen, M., \& Madau, P. 2005,
447: \mnras, 363, 1069
448: \bibitem[Maccarone et al.(2003)]{mac03} Maccarone, T. J., Gallo, E.,
449: \& Fender, R. 2003, \mnras, 345, L19
450: \bibitem[Nipoti et al.(2005)]{nip05} Nipoti, C., Blundell, K. M., \&
451: Binney, J. 2005, \mnras, 361, 633
452: \bibitem[Panessa et al.(2007)]{pan07} Panessa, F., Barcons, X.,
453: Bassani, L., Cappi, M., Carrera, F. J., Ho, L. C., \& Pellegrini,
454: S. 2007, \aap, 467, 519
455: \bibitem[Shu(1991)]{shu91} Shu, F. H. 1991, The Physics of
456: Astrophysics, Volume 1. Radiation (Mill Valley: University Science
457: Books)
458: \bibitem[Spergel et al.(2003)]{spe03} Spergel, D. N., et al. 2003,
459: \apjs, 148, 175
460: \bibitem[Terashima \& Wilson(2003)]{ter03} Terashima, Y., \& Wilson,
461: A.S. 2003, \apj, 583, 145
462: \bibitem[Thompson et al.(1980)]{tho80} Thompson, A. R., Clark, B. G.,
463: Wade, C. M., Napier, P. J. 1980, \apjs, 44, 151
464: \bibitem[Ulvestad \& Ho(2001)]{ulv01} Ulvestad, J. S., \& Ho, L. C.
465: 2001, \apj, 558, 561
466: \bibitem[White et al.(1997)]{whi97} White, R. L., Becker, R. H.,
467: Helfand, D. J., \& Gregg, M. D. 1997, \apj, 475, 479
468: (http://sundog.stsci.edu/top.html)
469: \bibitem[Wrobel(2000)]{wro00} Wrobel, J. M. 2000, \apj, 531, 716
470: \bibitem[Wrobel \& Ho(2006)]{wro06} Wrobel, J. M., \& Ho, L. C. 2006,
471: \apj, 646, L95
472: \bibitem[Yun et al.(2001)]{yun01} Yun, M. S., Reddy, N. A., \& Condon,
473: J. J. 2001, \apj, 554, 803
474: \end{thebibliography}
475:
476: \clearpage
477:
478: \begin{deluxetable}{ccclc}
479: \tablecolumns{5}
480: \tablewidth{0pc}
481: \tablecaption{VLA Photometry of GH\,10}\label{tab1}
482: \tablehead{
483: \colhead{} & \colhead{Resolution} &
484: \colhead{$\nu$} & \colhead{$S_\nu$} & \colhead{} \\
485: \colhead{Date} & \colhead{(\arcsec,\arcsec,\arcdeg)} &
486: \colhead{(GHz)} & \colhead{(mJy)} & \colhead{Fig.~2} \\
487: \colhead{(1)} & \colhead{(2)} &
488: \colhead{(3)} & \colhead{(4)} & \colhead{(5)}}
489: \startdata
490: 2007 Jun 18& 0.42,0.42,0 & 4.9& 0.75$\pm$0.05\tablenotemark{a}& Yes \\
491: & 0.42,0.42,0 & 8.5& 0.44$\pm$0.03\tablenotemark{a}& Yes \\
492: & 1.96,1.44,-47& 1.4& 1.80$\pm$0.09\tablenotemark{b}& Yes \\
493: & 1.96,1.44,-47& 4.9& 0.72$\pm$0.04\tablenotemark{b}& No \\
494: 2007 Jul 15& 1.45,1.36,47 & 1.4& 1.88$\pm$0.13 & No \\
495: \enddata
496: \tablecomments{
497: Col.~(1): UT observation date.
498: Col.~(2): Elliptical Gaussian resolution at FWHM and its elongation
499: position angle.
500: Col.~(3): Center frequency.
501: Col.~(4): Flux density with error given by the quadratic sum of the
502: 3\% scale error and the 1 $\sigma$ rms of the fit.
503: Col.~(5): Plotted in Figure 2?}
504: \tablenotetext{a}{Two-point spectral index $\alpha = -0.97\pm0.17$.}
505: \tablenotetext{b}{Two-point spectral index $\alpha = -0.73\pm0.06$.}
506: \end{deluxetable}
507:
508: \clearpage
509:
510: \begin{figure}
511: \epsscale{1.0}
512: \plotone{f1.eps}
513: \caption{VLA image of Stokes $I\/$ emission from GH\,10 at a frequency
514: of 4.9~GHz and spanning 6\,arcsec\, (9~kpc). Coordinate labels are
515: relative to the pointing position, which was centered 3\arcsec\, south
516: of the SDSS position to avoid phase-center artifacts. SDSS position
517: is marked with a cross with a gap. Natural weighting was used, giving
518: an rms noise of 0.022~mJy~beam$^{-1}$ (1 $\sigma$) and Gaussian beam
519: dimensions at FWHM of 0.42\arcsec\, (hatched circle). Contours are at
520: $-$6, $-$4, $-$2, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 times 1 $\sigma$. Negative
521: contours are dashed and positive ones are solid. Linear color scale
522: spans $-$0.1~mJy~beam$^{-1}$ to 0.2~mJy~beam$^{-1}$.}\label{fig1}
523: \end{figure}
524: \clearpage
525:
526: \begin{figure}
527: \epsscale{1.0}
528: \plotone{f2.eps}
529: \caption{VLA spectrum of GH\,10 as measured at 1.4, 4.9, and 8.5~GHz
530: on 2007 Jun 18.}\label{fig2}
531: \end{figure}
532:
533: \end{document}
534: