1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

2: \documentclass{emulateapj}

3: \usepackage{apjfonts}

4: \usepackage[]{natbib}

5: \usepackage{graphics}

6:      

7: \newcommand{\etal}{et al.}  

8: \newcommand{\per}{\ensuremath{^{-1}}}

9: \newcommand{\persq}{\ensuremath{^{-2}}}

10: \newcommand{\percu}{\ensuremath{^{-3}}}

11: \newcommand{\percucm}{cm\ensuremath{^{-3}}}

12: \newcommand{\hal}{H\ensuremath{\alpha}}

13: \newcommand{\hbeta}{H\ensuremath{\beta}} 

14: \newcommand{\hst}{\emph{HST}}

15: \newcommand{\msun}{\ensuremath{M_{\odot}}}

16: \newcommand{\lsun}{\ensuremath{L_{\odot}}}

17: \newcommand{\kms}{km s\ensuremath{^{-1}}} 

18: \newcommand{\ebv}{\ensuremath{E(B-V)}}

19: \newcommand{\ncrit}{\ensuremath{n_{crit}}}

20: \newcommand{\lam}[1]{\ensuremath{\lambda}#1}

21: \newcommand{\mbh}{\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{BH}}}

22: \newcommand{\hn}{\hal+[\ion{N}{2}]}

23: \newcommand{\chisq}{\ensuremath{\chi^2}}

24: \newcommand{\sigmastar}{\ensuremath{\sigma_\star}}

25: \newcommand{\mbul}{\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{bulge}}}

26: \newcommand{\msigma}{\ensuremath{\mbh-\sigma}}

27: \newcommand{\rblr}{\ensuremath{r_{\mathrm{BLR}}}}

28: \newcommand{\vfwhm}{\ensuremath{v_{\mathrm{FWHM}}}}

29: \newcommand{\mgb}{Mg\ensuremath{b}}

30: \newcommand{\rosat}{\emph{ROSAT}}

31: \newcommand{\lbol}{\ensuremath{L_{\mathrm{bol}}}}

32: \newcommand{\lbul}{\ensuremath{L_{\mathrm{bul}}}}

33: \newcommand{\ledd}{\ensuremath{L_{\mathrm{Edd}}}}

34: \newcommand{\chandra}{\emph{Chandra}}

35: 

36: \slugcomment{to appear in The Astrophysical Journal Letters}

37: \shorttitle{OFFSET AGN IN NGC 3341} 

38: \shortauthors{BARTH ET AL.}

39: 

40: \begin{document} 

41: 

42: \title{An Offset Seyfert 2 Nucleus in the Minor Merger System NGC 3341}

43: 

44: \author{Aaron J. Barth\altaffilmark{1}, Misty

45:   C. Bentz\altaffilmark{1}, Jenny E. Greene\altaffilmark{2,3}, and Luis

46:   C. Ho\altaffilmark{4}}

47: 

48: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, 4129 Frederick

49:   Reines Hall, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-4575;

50:   barth@uci.edu}

51: 

52: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton

53:   University, Princeton, NJ 08544}

54: 

55: \altaffiltext{3}{Hubble Fellow and Princeton-Carnegie Fellow}

56: 

57: \altaffiltext{4}{The Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of

58:   Washington, 813 Santa Barbara Street, Pasadena, CA 91101}

59: 

60: 

61: \begin{abstract}

62: 

63: We present the discovery of a triplet of emission-line nuclei in the

64: disturbed disk galaxy NGC 3341, based on archival data from the Sloan

65: Digital Sky Survey and new observations from the Keck Observatory.

66: This galaxy contains two offset nuclei within or projected against its

67: disk, at projected distances of 5.1 and 8.4 kpc from its primary

68: nucleus and at radial velocity separation of less than 200 \kms\ from

69: the primary. These appear to be either dwarf ellipticals or the bulges

70: of low-mass spirals whose disks have already been stripped off while

71: merging into the primary galaxy.  The inner offset nucleus has a

72: Seyfert 2 spectrum and a stellar velocity dispersion of $70\pm7$ \kms.

73: The outer offset nucleus has very weak emission lines consistent with

74: a LINER classification, and the primary nucleus has an emission-line

75: spectrum close to the boundary between LINER/\ion{H}{2} composite

76: systems and \ion{H}{2} nuclei; both may contain accreting massive

77: black holes, but the optical classifications alone are ambiguous.  The

78: detection of an offset active nucleus in NGC 3341 provides a strong

79: suggestion that black hole accretion episodes during minor mergers can

80: be triggered in the nuclei of dwarf secondary galaxies as well as in

81: the primary.

82: 

83: 

84: 

85: \end{abstract}

86: 

87: \keywords{galaxies: active --- galaxies: individual (NGC 3341) ---

88:   galaxies: interactions --- galaxies: nuclei --- galaxies: Seyfert}

89: 

90: \section{Introduction}

91: 

92: In the standard hierarchical merger paradigm for galaxy formation and

93: evolution, a natural consequence of the merger of two galaxies

94: containing massive black holes is that the two black holes will sink

95: to the center of the host galaxy by dynamical friction, eventually

96: forming a binary and merging together (see Merritt \& Milosavljevi\'c

97: 2005 for a review).  As a result, there is a general expectation that

98: some merging and post-merger galaxies should have two massive black

99: holes.  However, definitive observational identification of galaxies

100: containing two (or more) massive black holes is limited to objects

101: showing evidence for accretion-powered activity from spatially

102: resolved active galactic nuclei (AGNs) \citep{kom03a}.  A galaxy with

103: two widely separated active nuclei is often referred to as a ``dual

104: AGN'' to distinguish it from the case of a ``binary AGN'' in which the

105: two black holes form a tight, gravitationally bound binary.  Several

106: examples of dual AGNs are now known

107: \citep[e.g.,][]{owe85,kom03b,bal04,gua05,ger07,bia08}, most of which

108: are found in major mergers of massive galaxies.  It is also expected

109: that minor mergers can trigger episodes of nuclear activity

110: \citep{hm95}, and dual AGNs could also be present in some minor

111: mergers with dwarf secondary galaxies if the secondary galaxies also

112: harbor central black holes.  However, the fraction of dwarf or

113: low-mass galaxies that contain black holes is unknown, and only weakly

114: constrained by AGN surveys \citep{gh07} and by stellar-dynamical

115: searches for black holes in dwarf galaxies \citep{val05}.

116: 

117: In this \emph{Letter}, we present the discovery of a triplet of

118: emission-line nuclei (at several kpc separation) in NGC 3341.  This

119: system appears to contain two dwarf galaxies merging with a massive

120: disk galaxy, and one of the offset nuclei has a Seyfert 2 spectrum.

121: NGC 3341 is therefore a rare example of a disk galaxy with an offset

122: AGN, and an excellent nearby case study for investigations of AGN

123: triggering during a minor merger.  The primary nucleus and the second

124: offset nucleus have optical spectra that indicate possible low-level

125: AGN activity as well, making this a candidate dual or even triple

126: AGN system.

127: 

128: \section{Archival SDSS Data}

129: 

130: In the course of searching the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS)

131: archives for dwarf galaxies with Seyfert-type spectra, we came across

132: the object SDSS J104232.05+050241.9.  Its SDSS spectrum is that of a

133: Seyfert 2 nucleus, with strong narrow emission lines superposed on a

134: starlight-dominated continuum.  Its $g$-band apparent magnitude is

135: 18.30 mag; at $z=0.0271$ (or $D_L\approx117$ Mpc for $H_0=71$ km

136: s\per\ Mpc\per, $\Omega_M = 0.27$, and $\Omega_\Lambda=0.73$), this

137: corresponds to only $M_g = -17$ mag.  In the online MPA/JHU

138: catalog\footnote{http://www.mpa-garching.mpg.de/SDSS} of AGNs in SDSS

139: Data Release 4 \citep{kau03}, it is listed as an AGN with a host

140: galaxy stellar mass of $1.6\times10^9$ \msun\ and an [\ion{O}{3}]

141: $\lambda5007$ luminosity of $2\times10^6$ \lsun.  This object

142: initially appeared to be an excellent example of an AGN in a dwarf

143: host galaxy, but when we examined the SDSS image of the object, we

144: found that it is not an individual dwarf galaxy.  Instead, it is an

145: off-nuclear knot within the disk of the larger galaxy NGC 3341.  The

146: SDSS catalog magnitude of $g=18.30$ mag corresponds only to the

147: brightness of this off-nuclear source, while NGC 3341 overall is a

148: giant disk galaxy with $B=14.9$ mag (or $M_B=-20.3$ mag).

149: 

150: Figure \ref{sdssimage} shows the SDSS image of NGC 3341.  It is a

151: disturbed disk galaxy (Hubble type $\sim$Sa-Sb, but listed in the UGC

152: catalog as ``peculiar'') undergoing a minor merger, with two dwarf

153: companions within (or projected against) the galaxy disk.  We label

154: these off-nuclear sources as NGC 3341B and NGC 3341C, with object B

155: corresponding to SDSS J104232.05+050241.9.  The SDSS only obtained a

156: spectrum of object B, and not of the galaxy's primary nucleus or of

157: object C.  The luminosities of the two off-nuclear sources ($M_g =

158: -17$ and $-16.6$ mag for objects B and C) are too high for these to be

159: super star clusters, but they could be dwarf ellipticals, or the

160: bulges of low-mass spirals whose disks have already been stripped off

161: during the merger.  Objects B and C are located at projected

162: separations of 9\farcs5 and 15\farcs6 (5.1 and 8.4 kpc) from the

163: primary nucleus, respectively, and the separation between B and C is

164: 11\farcs9 (6.4 kpc).

165: 

166: 

167: 

168: \begin{figure}

169: \plotone{f1.eps}

170: \caption{SDSS color-composite image of NGC 3341.  The field of view is

171:   $2\arcmin\times2\arcmin$.  North is up and east is to the left.

172: \label{sdssimage}}

173: \end{figure}

174: 

175: 

176: 

177: \section{Keck Observations}

178: 

179: 

180: We obtained spectra of all three nuclei at the Keck-II telescope using

181: the ESI spectrograph \citep{she02} on the night of 2008 March 2 UT.

182: Observing conditions were relatively poor for Mauna Kea, with some

183: cirrus overhead and seeing of $\sim1\farcs5$.  Despite the poor

184: seeing, a narrow slit of width 0\farcs75 was used in order to resolve

185: narrow absorption and emission lines in dwarf galaxies.  The spectra

186: cover 3800--10900 \AA\ over 10 echelle orders, at a uniform scale of

187: 11.5 km s\per\ pixel\per\ and instrumental dispersion of $\sigma_i=22$

188: \kms.  The spectra were obtained with the slit oriented at

189: PA=115\arcdeg, close to the parallactic angle for the midpoint of the

190: exposure sequence, at airmass 1.2--1.3.  Exposure times were 900 s

191: each for the primary nucleus and object C, and 1200 s for object B.

192: Spectra were extracted using a width of 2\arcsec\ and flux-calibrated

193: using observations of the standard star Feige 34.  The $S/N$ per pixel

194: in the continuum at 6600 \AA\ is $\sim20$, 15, and 10 for the nucleus

195: and objects B and C, respectively.  To obtain pure emission-line

196: spectra, we performed starlight subtraction using observations of

197: template stars observed with the same ESI configuration.  (See Barth

198: \etal\ 2008 for a detailed description of the reduction, calibration,

199: and starlight-subtraction procedures.)  The starlight-subtracted

200: spectra of the three nuclei are shown in Figure \ref{spectra}.  For

201: object C, the only detected emission lines are \hal\ and [\ion{N}{2}]

202: $\lambda6583$.

203: 

204: 

205: \begin{figure}

206: \plotone{f2.eps}

207: \caption{Portions of the starlight-subtracted Keck spectra of the

208: three nuclei.

209: \label{spectra}}

210: \end{figure}

211: 

212: 

213: \section{Results and Discussion}

214: 

215: 

216: The starlight subtraction procedure yields radial velocities of $cz =

217: 8325\pm9$, $8131\pm6$, and $8145\pm6$ \kms\ for the primary nucleus

218: and objects B and C, respectively.  This confirms the physical

219: association between the three objects and rules out a chance

220: projection of unrelated sources.  

221: 

222: Emission-line fluxes were measured by direct integration of the

223: starlight-subtracted spectra; the key diagnostic flux ratios are

224: listed in Table \ref{table1}.   Figure \ref{bpt} displays the

225: emission-line flux ratios of [\ion{O}{3}]/\hbeta\ and

226: [\ion{N}{2}]/\hal\ in a \citet{bpt81} diagnostic diagram, in

227: comparison with galaxies from the \citet{kau03} sample.  The Keck

228: spectrum of object B confirms its classification as a Seyfert 2, as it

229: falls within the Seyfert branch of the diagnostic diagram.  Its

230: [\ion{O}{3}] $\lambda5007$ emission line has FWHM = 116 \kms, similar

231: to the low [\ion{O}{3}] linewidths seen in other Seyfert 2 nuclei

232: having low-mass host galaxies \citep{bgh08}.

233: 

234: In the [\ion{O}{3}]/\hbeta\ vs.\ [\ion{N}{2}]/\hal\ diagram, the

235: primary nucleus falls in the region of LINER/\ion{H}{2} ``composite''

236: or ``transition'' objects, close to the boundary with \ion{H}{2}

237: nuclei, following the \citet{kew06} classification scheme.  However,

238: we note that the [\ion{O}{1}]/\hal\ and [\ion{S}{2}]/\hal\ ratios at

239: the nucleus are consistent with classification as an \ion{H}{2}

240: nucleus \citep{hfs97, kew06}.  Thus, the classification of the nucleus

241: is somewhat ambiguous.  The narrow-line profiles at the nucleus are

242: double-peaked, with a peak-to-peak velocity separation of 310 km

243: s\per.  This velocity splitting could arise from either radial motion

244: or rotation; similar double-peaked profiles due to the rotation of a

245: circumnuclear disk are seen, for example, in the transition-type

246: nucleus of NGC 3245 \citep{hfs95}.

247: 

248: For the weak emission lines in object C, we find [\ion{N}{2}]/\hal\

249: $=0.93 \pm 0.27$, indicated as a shaded band in Figure \ref{bpt}.  The

250: nearly-equal strengths of [\ion{N}{2}] and \hal\ are inconsistent with

251: an \ion{H}{2} region origin for the emission lines.  Given the

252: non-detection of [\ion{O}{3}] $\lambda5007$ emission, the most likely

253: classification for this object is a LINER or LINER/\ion{H}{2}

254: composite.  The \hal\ equivalent width is only $\sim1$ \AA.

255: 

256: 

257: 

258: 

259: While the optical data identify object B as an AGN with a high degree

260: of confidence, the source of ionizing photons in the nucleus and

261: object C is less certain.  In the absence of definitive AGN signatures

262: such as broad-line emission, very weak LINER-type emission lines such

263: as those seen in object C could in principle result from

264: photoionization of diffuse gas by sources unrelated to an AGN, such as

265: post-AGB stars \citep{bin94} or X-ray binaries.  Indeed, \chandra\

266: observations have revealed that some nearby ``Type 2'' LINERs do not

267: have a central AGN-like point source at all, but do have X-ray

268: emission dominated by a circumnuclear population of X-ray binaries

269: \citep{era02, flo06}.  As for the primary nucleus, the source of

270: ionization in LINER/\ion{H}{2} transition nuclei has been the subject

271: of much debate \citep[see][]{ho08}.  A likely interpretation is that

272: they are composite systems containing both a weak AGN and \ion{H}{2}

273: regions ionized by hot stars \citep[e.g.,][]{hfs93, vgv97, kew06}.

274: Shock heating could play some role in the narrow-line region

275: excitation as well \citep[e.g.,][]{ds95, cv01}.  Summarizing results

276: from X-ray surveys of nearby galaxies, \citet{ho08} concludes that the

277: majority of transition nuclei (perhaps $\sim75\%$) do contain AGNs.

278: Thus, the optical spectra of the nucleus and object C can be

279: interpreted as possibly containing low-luminosity accretion-powered

280: AGNs, but the optical data do not provide conclusive evidence for the

281: presence of AGNs in these objects.  A search for X-ray sources in NGC

282: 3341 would potentially provide the best constraints on the AGN content

283: in this galaxy.

284: 

285: 

286: 

287: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}

288: \tablewidth{3in} \tablecaption{Emission-Line Ratios}

289: \tablehead{ \colhead{Object} & \colhead{[\ion{O}{3}]/\hbeta} & 

290: \colhead{[\ion{O}{1}]/\hal} &

291: \colhead{[\ion{N}{2}]/\hal} & \colhead{[\ion{S}{2}]/\hal}  }

292: \startdata

293: Nucleus & $0.38\pm0.04$ & $0.05\pm0.01$ & $0.54\pm0.02$ & $0.31\pm0.01$ \\

294: B       & $6.6\pm0.2$   & $0.20\pm0.01$ & $0.85\pm0.02$ & $0.66\pm0.02$ \\

295: C       & \nodata       & $<0.25$       & $0.93\pm0.27$ & $<0.6$ 

296: \enddata

297: \tablecomments{Forbidden-line measurements refer to [\ion{O}{3}]

298: $\lambda5007$, [\ion{O}{1}] $\lambda6300$, [\ion{N}{2}] $\lambda6583$,

299: and [\ion{S}{2}] $\lambda\lambda6716,6731$. }

300: 

301: \label{table1}

302: \end{deluxetable}

303: 

304: 

305: NGC 3341 is not detected in the \rosat\ All-Sky Survey, and no source

306: corresponding to its position is listed in the \rosat\ Faint Source

307: Catalog \citep{vog00}.  We estimate an upper limit of 0.02 counts

308: s\per\ in the \rosat\ image, corresponding to an upper limit of

309: $L$(0.1--2 keV)$<5\times10^{41}$ ergs s\per\ for an unabsorbed source

310: with a photon index of $\Gamma = 1.8$.  Using typical ratios of X-ray

311: to optical emission-line flux for nearby low-luminosity AGNs

312: \citep{ho08}, the expected luminosity of each of the three nuclei

313: would be at least an order of magnitude below the \emph{ROSAT} upper

314: limit.  Thus, much deeper observations would be needed in order to

315: search for X-ray sources in this system.  The primary nucleus is a

316: radio source, detected in the FIRST survey (Becker \etal\ 1995) with a

317: flux density of 4.8 mJy and deconvolved major and minor axis sizes of

318: $5\farcs5\times5\farcs0$.

319: 

320: 

321: 

322: 

323: \begin{figure}

324: \plotone{f3.eps}

325: \caption{Diagnostic diagram showing the emission-line ratios of the

326:   three nuclei.  Black contours denote emission-line galaxies from the

327:   \citet{kau03} sample.  The dashed and dotted curves represent the

328:   classification criteria of \citet{kew06}, in which \ion{H}{2} nuclei

329:   fall below and to the left of the dashed curve, AGNs lie above and

330:   to the right of the dotted curve, and composite objects lie in the

331:   intermediate region.  The primary nucleus of NGC 3341 is shown as a

332:   blue circle, and object B as a red square.  For object B and for

333:   the [\ion{N}{2}]/\hal\ ratio at the primary nucleus, the error bars

334:   are smaller than the plot symbols.  The violet shaded band gives the

335:   $1\sigma$ uncertainty range for the [\ion{N}{2}]/\hal\ ratio of

336:   object C.

337: \label{bpt}}

338: \end{figure}

339: 

340: 

341: We measured the stellar velocity dispersions of the three nuclei

342: following the direct-fitting methods described by \citet{bhs02}, by

343: fitting the spectra over the restricted wavelength range 5020--5500

344: \AA\ containing the strong Mg$b$ and Fe5270 features.  We find

345: $\sigmastar=182\pm14$, $70\pm7$, and $44\pm6$ \kms\ for the nucleus

346: and objects B and C, respectively.  If these objects follow the

347: \msigma\ correlation for quiescent galaxies of \citet{tre02}, the

348: expected black hole masses would be $9\times10^7$, $2\times10^6$, and

349: $3\times10^5$ \msun\ in the three nuclei.  \citet{hec04} show that a

350: typical [\ion{O}{3}] bolometric correction for Seyfert galaxies is

351: $\lbol/L$([\ion{O}{3}])$\approx 3500$ (with a scatter of approximately

352: 0.38 dex).  With this bolometric correction, object B would have

353: $\lbol/\ledd \approx 0.1$.

354: 

355: From the 2MASS \citep{skr06} point source and extended source

356: catalogs, the $K_s$-band magnitudes of the primary galaxy and objects

357: B and C are 10.78, 14.26, and 15.07 mag, respectively.  To estimate

358: the stellar mass ratio of the merger, we use $K$-band mass-to-light

359: ratios from \citet{bell03}, computed using reddening-corrected optical

360: colors from SDSS.  Following the \citet{bell03} prescriptions, the

361: primary galaxy and objects B and C each have $M/L_K\approx0.85$.  This

362: yields a stellar mass of $\sim1\times10^{11}$ \msun\ for the primary

363: galaxy and a stellar mass ratio of 50:2:1 for the merging system

364: (primary:B:C).  We note, however, that this mass ratio does not

365: account for any stellar mass already stripped off of objects B and C

366: during the merger.  For a more detailed examination of the structure

367: of the merging system, higher-resolution imaging would be needed.

368: \emph{Hubble Space Telescope} data could clarify whether the offset

369: nuclei were originally spheroidal or elliptical galaxies, or the

370: bulges or pseudobulges of low-mass disk galaxies.

371: 

372: It is particularly interesting to find nuclear activity in at least

373: one of the secondary nuclei in this system, since the AGN fraction in

374: low-mass galaxies is known to be very small overall \citep{kau03,

375: gh07}.  Furthermore, the black hole occupation fraction in dwarf

376: galaxies is expected to be well below unity if the efficiency for

377: black hole seed formation is small in low-mass halos at high redshift

378: \citep{vol08}, or if gravity-wave kicks during binary black hole

379: coalescence can efficiently expel black holes from dwarf galaxies

380: \citep{mer04}.  There are examples of AGNs with host galaxy

381: luminosities similar to objects B and C, such as POX 52 \citep{bar04},

382: but they are predominantly isolated systems not involved in strong

383: interactions.  Simulations have shown that minor mergers can drive

384: radial inflows of gas to the center of the primary galaxy, potentially

385: triggering AGN accretion episodes \citep{hm95}, but there is little if

386: any statistical evidence for enhanced AGN activity in the secondary

387: galaxies of minor interaction systems.  In a study of close

388: (separation $<50h^{-1}$ kpc) galaxy pairs in SDSS, \citet{wg07} found

389: that in minor interactions with $\Delta m >2$ mag, there was a strong

390: increase in the AGN fraction for the primary galaxies (relative to a

391: matched field galaxy control sample) but there was no detectable

392: enhancement in the AGN fraction of the secondary galaxies in the pairs

393: relative to a matched control sample.  In view of the properties of

394: NGC 3341, we speculate that any enhancement in the AGN fueling rate in

395: the secondary might occur at very small separations ($\lesssim10$ kpc)

396: that are difficult to probe in statistical surveys.

397: 

398: This unusual AGN host galaxy was discovered because the SDSS

399: fortuitously selected object B as the one spectroscopic target in this

400: field.  If the primary nucleus had been targeted instead, the galaxy

401: would have appeared unremarkable, and follow-up observations of

402: objects B and C would have been unlikely.  What are the prospects for

403: detection of offset AGNs in other nearby galaxies?  \citet{kd05}

404: argued that some of the most extreme ultraluminous X-ray (ULX) sources

405: are likely to be the nuclei of captured satellite galaxies undergoing

406: AGN accretion episodes, rather than being X-ray binaries with

407: intermediate-mass black holes.  While no ULX sources are

408: currently known to have an origin in captured satellites, the

409: discovery of NGC 3341B in the SDSS suggests that optical selection can

410: be at least as efficient as X-ray selection for discovery of

411: off-nuclear, accreting black holes from satellite galaxies in minor

412: mergers.  However, optical selection depends crucially on the ability to

413: identify the nucleus of the secondary galaxy in imaging data.  As

414: discussed by \citet{wgb06}, there are severe observational biases that

415: make it very difficult to identify satellite galaxies involved in

416: minor interactions ($\Delta m > 2$ mag) at very close separations of

417: $\lesssim10$ kpc from the primary galaxy.  Furthermore, at separations

418: of a few kpc, satellite galaxies may be so severely disrupted that

419: they no longer have identifiable nuclei, and offset, low-luminosity

420: AGNs not embedded in stellar nuclei would likely be inconspicuous in

421: optical surveys.  Nevertheless, further searches for systems like NGC

422: 3341 containing low-mass companions at small separations could provide

423: new constraints on the demographics of dual AGNs and the efficiency of

424: AGN fueling in minor mergers.

425: 

426: 

427: \acknowledgments 

428: 

429: 

430: Research by A.J.B. and M.C.B. is supported by NSF grant AST-0548198.

431: Data presented herein were obtained at the W.M. Keck Observatory,

432: which is operated as a scientific partnership among Caltech, the

433: University of California, and NASA. The Observatory was made possible

434: by the generous financial support of the W.M. Keck Foundation.  The

435: authors wish to recognize and acknowledge the very significant

436: cultural role and reverence that the summit of Mauna Kea has always

437: had within the indigenous Hawaiian community.  Funding for the SDSS

438: and SDSS-II has been provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the

439: Participating Institutions, the National Science Foundation, the

440: U.S. Department of Energy, the National Aeronautics and Space

441: Administration, the Japanese Monbukagakusho, the Max Planck Society,

442: and the Higher Education Funding Council for England.  This

443: publication makes use of data products from the Two Micron All Sky

444: Survey, which is a joint project of the University of Massachusetts

445: and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center/California Institute

446: of Technology, funded by NASA and the NSF.

447: 

448: 

449: 

450: \begin{thebibliography}{}

451: 

452: \bibitem[Baldwin et al.(1981)]{bpt81} Baldwin, J.~A., Phillips, M.~M.,

453: \& Terlevich, R.\ 1981, \pasp, 93, 5

454: 

455: \bibitem[Ballo et al.(2004)]{bal04} Ballo, L., Braito, V., 

456: Della Ceca, R., Maraschi, L., Tavecchio, F., 

457: \& Dadina, M.\ 2004, \apj, 600, 634 

458: 

459: \bibitem[Barth et al.(2008)]{bgh08} Barth, A. J., Greene, J. E., \& Ho,

460:   L. C.  2008, \aj, in press

461: 

462: \bibitem[Barth \etal(2004)]{bar04} Barth, A.~J., Ho, L.~C., Rutledge,

463: R.~E., \& Sargent, W.~L.~W.\ 2004, \apj, 607, 90

464: 

465: \bibitem[Barth et al.(2002)]{bhs02} Barth, A.~J., Ho, L.~C., 

466: \& Sargent, W.~L.~W.\ 2002, \aj, 124, 2607 

467: 

468: \bibitem[Becker et al.(1995)]{bwh95} Becker, R.~H., White, 

469: R.~L., \& Helfand, D.~J.\ 1995, \apj, 450, 559 

470: 

471: \bibitem[Bell et al.(2003)]{bell03} Bell, E.~F., McIntosh, 

472: D.~H., Katz, N., \& Weinberg, M.~D.\ 2003, \apjs, 149, 289 

473: 

474: \bibitem[Bianchi et al.(2008)]{bia08} Bianchi, S., Chiaberge, 

475: M., Piconcelli, E., Guainazzi, M., \& Matt, G.\ 2008, \mnras, 369 

476: 

477: \bibitem[Binette et al.(1994)]{bin94} Binette, L., Magris, C.~G.,

478: Stasi{\'n}ska, G., \& Bruzual, A.~G.\ 1994, \aap, 292, 13

479: 

480: \bibitem[Contini \& Viegas(2001)]{cv01} Contini, M., \& Viegas, S.~M.\

481: 2001, \apjs, 132, 211

482: 

483: \bibitem[Dopita \& Sutherland(1995)]{ds95} Dopita, M.~A., \&

484: Sutherland, R.~S.\ 1995, \apj, 455, 468

485: 

486: \bibitem[Eracleous et al.(2002)]{era02} Eracleous, M., 

487: Shields, J.~C., Chartas, G., \& Moran, E.~C.\ 2002, \apj, 565, 108 

488: 

489: \bibitem[Flohic et al.(2006)]{flo06} Flohic, H.~M.~L.~G., 

490: Eracleous, M., Chartas, G., Shields, J.~C., 

491: \& Moran, E.~C.\ 2006, \apj, 647, 140 

492: 

493: \bibitem[Gerke et al.(2007)]{ger07} Gerke, B.~F., et al.\ 

494: 2007, \apjl, 660, L23 

495: 

496: \bibitem[Greene \& Ho(2007)]{gh07} Greene, J.~E., \& Ho, L.~C.\ 2007,

497: \apj, 667, 131

498: 

499: \bibitem[Guainazzi et al.(2005)]{gua05} Guainazzi, M.,

500: Piconcelli, E., Jim{\'e}nez-Bail{\'o}n, E., \& Matt, G.\ 2005, \aap,

501: 429, L9

502: 

503: \bibitem[Heckman et al.(2004)]{hec04} Heckman, T.~M., Kauffmann, G.,

504: Brinchmann, J., Charlot, S., Tremonti, C., \& White, S.~D.~M.\ 2004,

505: \apj, 613, 109

506: 

507: \bibitem[Hernquist \& Mihos(1995)]{hm95} Hernquist, L., \& Mihos,

508: J.~C.\ 1995, \apj, 448, 41

509: 

510: \bibitem[Ho(2008)]{ho08} Ho, L.~C.\ 2008, \araa, in press

511: (arXiv:0803.2268)

512: 

513: \bibitem[Ho et al.(1993)]{hfs93} Ho, L.~C., Filippenko, 

514: A.~V., \& Sargent, W.~L.~W.\ 1993, \apj, 417, 63 

515: 

516: \bibitem[Ho et al.(1995)]{hfs95} Ho, L.~C., Filippenko, A.~V., \&

517: Sargent, W.~L.W.\ 1995, \apjs, 98, 477

518: 

519: \bibitem[Ho et al.(1997)]{hfs97} Ho, L.~C., Filippenko, A.~V., \&

520: Sargent, W.~L.~W.\ 1997, \apjs, 112, 315

521: 

522: \bibitem[Kauffmann et al.(2003)]{kau03} Kauffmann, G., et 

523: al.\ 2003, \mnras, 346, 1055 

524: 

525: \bibitem[Kewley et al.(2006)]{kew06} Kewley, L.~J., Groves, 

526: B., Kauffmann, G., \& Heckman, T.\ 2006, \mnras, 372, 961 

527: 

528: \bibitem[King \& Dehnen(2005)]{kd05} King, A.~R., \& Dehnen, W.\ 2005,

529: \mnras, 357, 275

530: 

531: \bibitem[Komossa(2003a)]{kom03a} Komossa, S.\ 2003a, in The Astrophysics

532: of Gravitational Wave Sources (AIP Conference Proceeding), 686, 161

533: 

534: \bibitem[Komossa et al.(2003b)]{kom03b} Komossa, S., Burwitz, 

535: V., Hasinger, G., Predehl, P., Kaastra, J.~S., 

536: \& Ikebe, Y.\ 2003b, \apjl, 582, L15 

537: 

538: \bibitem[Merritt \& Milosavljevi{\'c}(2005)]{mm05} Merritt, D., \&

539: Milosavljevi{\'c}, M.\ 2005, Living Reviews in Relativity, 8, 8

540: 

541: \bibitem[Merritt et al.(2004)]{mer04} Merritt, D., Milosavljevi{\'c},

542: M., Favata, M., Hughes, S.~A., \& Holz, D.~E.\ 2004, \apjl, 607, L9

543: 

544: \bibitem[Owen et al.(1985)]{owe85} Owen, F.~N., O'Dea, C.~P., 

545: Inoue, M., \& Eilek, J.~A.\ 1985, \apjl, 294, L85 

546: 

547: \bibitem[Sheinis et al.(2002)]{she02} Sheinis, A.~I., Bolte, M., Epps,

548: H.~W., Kibrick, R.~I., Miller, J.~S., Radovan, M.~V., Bigelow, B.~C.,

549: \& Sutin, B.~M.\ 2002, \pasp, 114, 851

550: 

551: \bibitem[Skrutskie et al.(2006)]{skr06} Skrutskie, M.~F., et 

552: al.\ 2006, \aj, 131, 1163 

553: 

554: \bibitem[Tremaine et al.(2002)]{tre02} Tremaine, S., et al.\ 2002,

555: \apj, 574, 740

556: 

557: \bibitem[Valluri et al.(2005)]{val05} Valluri, M., Ferrarese, L.,

558: Merritt, D., \& Joseph, C.~L.\ 2005, \apj, 628, 137

559: 

560: \bibitem[V\'eron et al.(1997)]{vgv97} V\'eron, P., Gon\c{c}alves, A.~C., \&

561: V\'eron-Cetty, M.-P.\ 1997, \aap, 319, 52

562: 

563: \bibitem[Voges et al.(2000)]{vog00} Voges, W., et al.\ 2000, 

564: \iaucirc, 7432, 3 

565: 

566: \bibitem[Volonteri et al.(2008)]{vol08} Volonteri, M., Lodato, G., \&

567: Natarajan, P.\ 2008, \mnras, 383, 1079

568: 

569: %\bibitem[Wong et al.(2008)]{wcf08} Wong, D.~S., Chornock, R., 

570: %\& Filippenko, A.~V.\ 2008, \pasp, 120, 266 

571: 

572: \bibitem[Woods \& Geller(2007)]{wg07} Woods, D.~F., \& Geller,

573: M.~J.\ 2007, \aj, 134, 527

574: 

575: \bibitem[Woods et al.(2006)]{wgb06} Woods, D.~F., Geller, M.~J., \&

576: Barton, E.~J.\ 2006, \aj, 132, 197

577: 

578: \end{thebibliography}

579: 

580: 

581: 

582: \end{document}

583:  

584: