1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: %%\input{psfig.sty}
4:
5: % add a few handy definitions
6: \def\av {$A_{\rm V}$}
7: \def\arcsec {$^{\prime \prime}$}
8: \def\arcmin {$^{\prime}$}
9: \def\chb {c($H\beta$)}
10: \def\cmmb {~cm$^{-2}$}
11: \def\cmmc {~cm$^{-3}$}
12: \def\degr {$^{\circ}$}
13: \def\etal {{et~al.\/}}
14: \def\HI {H~{\rm I}}
15: \def\HII {H~{\rm {II}}}
16: \def\kms {~km~s$^{-1}$}
17: \def\mo {{$M_{\odot}$}}
18: \def\lo {{$L_{\odot}$}}
19: \def\moy {{$M_{\odot}$~yr$^{-1}$}}
20: \def\Rtoo {$R_{23}$}
21: \def\tableref#1{Table~\ref{#1}}
22: \def\figureref#1{Figure~\ref{#1}}
23: \def\figurerefs#1{Figures~\ref{#1}}
24: \def\I {\sc I}
25: \def\II {\sc II}
26: \def\III {\sc III}
27:
28:
29:
30:
31: %%\usepackage{epsfig,ref,natbib}
32: \bibliographystyle{apj}
33: \citestyle{aa}
34: \bibpunct[]{(}{)}{,}{a}{}{,}
35:
36: \begin{document}
37:
38: \shorttitle{GLIMPSE Mid-IR Excesses}
39: \shortauthors{Uzpen, B. \etal}
40: %\en%\end{quote}
41:
42: \title{A GLIMPSE into the Nature of Galactic Mid-IR Excesses}
43:
44: \author{B. Uzpen \altaffilmark{1}, H.~A. Kobulnicky \altaffilmark{1},
45: D.~R. Semler \altaffilmark{2}, T. Bensby \altaffilmark{3} \altaffilmark{4},
46: \and C. Thom \altaffilmark{5} }
47:
48: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
49: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
50: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
51: %% affiliation.
52:
53: \altaffiltext{1}{University of Wyoming, Dept. of Physics \&
54: Astronomy, Dept. 3905, Laramie, WY 82071}
55:
56: \altaffiltext{2}{Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory, Columbia University, 550 West 120th Street, New York, NY 10027}
57:
58: \altaffiltext{3}{University of Michigan, Department of Astronomy
59: 500 Church St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1042}
60:
61: \altaffiltext{4}{European Southern Observatory, Alonso de Cordova 3107,
62: Vitacura, Casilla 19001, Santiago Chile}
63:
64: \altaffiltext{5}{The University of Chicago, Department of Astronomy \& Astrophysics
65: 5640 S. Ellis Ave, Chicago, IL 60637}
66:
67: \begin{abstract}
68: We investigate the nature of the mid-IR excess for 31
69: intermediate-mass stars that exhibit an 8 $\mu$m excess in either the
70: Galactic Legacy Infrared Mid-Plane Survey Extraordinaire or the
71: Mid-Course Space Experiment using high resolution optical spectra to
72: identify stars surrounded by warm circumstellar dust. From these data
73: we determine projected stellar rotational velocities and estimate
74: stellar effective temperatures for the sample. We estimate stellar
75: ages from these temperatures, parallactic distances, and evolutionary
76: models. Using MIPS [24] measurements and stellar parameters we
77: determine the nature of the infrared excess for 19 GLIMPSE stars. We
78: find that 15 stars exhibit H$\alpha$ emission and four exhibit
79: H$\alpha$ absorption. Assuming that the mid-IR excesses arise in
80: circumstellar disks, we use the H$\alpha$ fluxes to model and estimate
81: the relative contributions of dust and free-free emission. Six stars
82: exhibit H$\alpha$ fluxes that imply free-free emission can plausibly
83: explain the infrared excess at [24]. These stars are candidate
84: classical Be stars. Nine stars exhibit H$\alpha$ emission, but their
85: H$\alpha$ fluxes are insufficient to explain the infrared excesses at
86: [24], suggesting the presence of a circumstellar dust component.
87: After the removal of the free-free component in these sources, we
88: determine probable disk dust temperatures of
89: T$_{disk}\simeq$300--800~K and fractional infrared luminosities of
90: $L_{IR}/L_{*}$ $\simeq$10$^{-3}$. These nine stars may be
91: pre-main-sequence stars with transitional disks undergoing disk
92: clearing. Three of the four sources showing H$\alpha$ absorption
93: exhibit circumstellar disk temperatures $\simeq$300--400~K,
94: $L_{IR}/L_{*}$ $\simeq$10$^{-3}$, IR colors $K$-[24]$<$ 3.3, and are
95: warm debris disk candidates. One of the four H$\alpha$ absorption
96: sources has $K$-[24]$>$ 3.3 implying an optically thick outer disk and
97: is a transition disk candidate.
98: \end{abstract}
99:
100: \keywords{Line: profiles --- Stars: Fundamental Parameters, Emission-line, Be,
101: Rotation, Circumstellar matter --- Techniques: spectroscopic}
102:
103:
104: \section{Introduction}
105:
106: With its launch in 1983, the \textit{Infrared Astronomical Satellite}
107: ($IRAS$) opened up a new wavelength window and enabled identification
108: of many classes of stellar sources with circumstellar material,
109: providing new insights into star formation and evolution. In one of
110: the most exciting discoveries enabled by $IRAS$, \citet{Aumann:1984}
111: reported the first detection of an infrared excess owing to dust in
112: the Vega system, and this excess was later explained as a debris
113: disk. To date, many debris disks have been found with \textit{IRAS},
114: the \textit{Infrared Space Observatory} \textit{(ISO)}, and the
115: \textit{Spitzer Space Telescope} (\textit{Spitzer})
116: (\citealt{Backman:1993}; \citealt{Spangler:2001};
117: \citealt{Meyer:2004}). Most known debris disks show evidence of cool
118: dust at wavelengths $>$ 20 $\mu$m, and the majority of these surround
119: intermediate-mass stars (\citealt{Backman:1993}; \citealt{Chen:2006};
120: \citealt{Hillenbrand:2008}). Only two $IRAS$ Point Source Catalog
121: debris disk sources, the intermediate-mass A-type stars $\beta$
122: Pictoris and $\zeta$ Leporis, exhibited a mid-IR ($\leq$ 12 $\mu$m)
123: excess detectable by $IRAS$ \citep{Aumann:1991}. $Spitzer$
124: observations of $IRAS$-discovered debris disks indicate that most are
125: devoid of warm dust and small particles (sizes $<$ 10 $\mu$m)
126: \citep{Chen:2006}. The rarity of mid-IR excess sources may imply that
127: dust particles emitting at terrestrial temperatures are uncommon
128: around main-sequence stars.
129:
130: Advances in infrared technologies coupled with large-aperture
131: ground-based telescopes and $Spitzer's$ mid-IR sensitivity with IRAC
132: enable new searches for warm/hot circumstellar dust that $IRAS$ did
133: not detect. Even with such improvements in sensitivity over $IRAS$,
134: only five known intermediate-mass stars (HD 3003, HD 38678, HD 75416,
135: HD 105234, and HD 181296) are surrounded by debris disks with
136: temperatures analogous to our asteroid belt ($>$ 200 K)
137: (\citealt{Chen:2001}; \citealt{Rhee:2007} and references therein).
138: $Spitzer$ observations have also revealed a number of mid-IR excess
139: objects that are primordial disks undergoing disk clearing processes
140: similar to the solar-mass star TW Hya (\citealt{Calvet:2005};
141: \citealt{Furlan:2007}). ``Transition disks'' may be evolved
142: protoplanetary disks with inner holes caused by clearing of the
143: initial gas-dominated disks from the inside out
144: \citep{Strom:1989}. These disks would be optically thin at near- and
145: mid-IR wavelengths and optically thick in the far-IR. These sources
146: would show weak to no accretion signatures
147: \citep{Sicilia-Aguilar:2006b}. Intermediate-mass candidate transition
148: disks have only recently been discovered (\citealt{Hernandez:2006};
149: \citealt{Sicilia-Aguilar:2006a}; \citealt{Hernandez:2007}). Such
150: transition disks are especially interesting as possible evolutionary
151: links between the optically thick Herbig AeBe disk systems and the
152: older optically thin debris disk systems.
153:
154: In \citet{Uzpen:2005,Uzpen:2007} we exploited this new mid-IR
155: capability and used $Spitzer$ to identify stars with 8 $\mu$m infrared
156: excesses. In \citet{Uzpen:2007}, we identified 230 stars that
157: exhibited 8 $\mu$m mid-IR excesses out of 4,015 stars investigated in
158: the \textit{Spitzer} Galactic Legacy Infrared MidPlane Survey
159: Extraordinaire (GLIMPSE; \citealt{Benjamin:2003}) and MidCourse Space
160: Experiment (\textit{MSX}; \citealt{Egan:2003}) catalogs. Out of the
161: 230 stars with 8 $\mu$m excesses, 183 are of spectral types O or early
162: B. The excess for these stars is plausibly explained by free-free
163: emission. Out of the 47 remaining stars of spectral types B8 or later,
164: five stars were shown to be false excess sources, and three sources
165: were not yet confirmed at 24 $\mu$m \citep{Uzpen:2007}. In systems
166: with mid-IR excesses we modeled the 8 and 24 $\mu$m excesses as simple
167: blackbodies to characterize the color temperature and fractional
168: infrared luminosity of the circumstellar disk. The results were
169: consistent with massive debris disks and/or transitional disks with
170: disk temperatures ranging between $\approx$200--800~K and fractional
171: infrared luminosities ($L_{IR}/L_{*}$)
172: $\approx$10$^{-4}$--10$^{-2}$. However, infrared photometry alone is
173: not sufficient to unambiguously determine the nature of the
174: extraphotospheric emission in these sources. Because of their
175: scarcity, identifying new transition disks and warm debris disks is an
176: important step toward understanding the evolutionary path of
177: circumstellar disks.
178:
179: The nature of the mid-IR excesses emanating from circumstellar disks
180: around intermediate-mass stars (2--8\ \mo) varies greatly and
181: partially depends on age \citep{Zuckerman:2001}. Young stars form
182: circumstellar disks through the collapse of the initial molecular
183: cloud as a method to conserve angular momentum
184: \citep{Shu:1987}. Intermediate-mass pre-main-sequence Herbig AeBe
185: stars accrete gaseous material via their circumstellar disks as they
186: evolve towards main-sequence stars (\citealt{Herbig:1960};
187: \citealt{Waters:1998}). Circumstellar dust disks, presumably due to
188: planetesimal collisions, surround some main-sequence stars
189: (\citealt{Backman:1993}; \citealt{Lagrange:2000}). Circumstellar
190: gaseous disks that emit excesses owing to free-free emission surround
191: other main-sequence stars during late main-sequence or
192: post-main-sequence evolution and are known as classical Be stars
193: (\citealt{Struve:1931}; \citealt{Porter:2003};
194: \citealt{McSwain:2005}). Circumstellar disks can surround evolved
195: giants as well (e.g., \citealt{Jura:1999}; \citealt{Verhoelst:2007};
196: \citealt{Deroo:2007}). By understanding the nature of the
197: circumstellar disks, we can better understand how these disks evolve.
198:
199: The two most common stellar contaminants in surveys for stars with
200: debris disks are Herbig AeBe stars and classical Be stars. Herbig
201: AeBe stars are young stars accreting circumstellar material via their
202: disks (\citealt{Strom:1972}; \citealt{Hillenbrand:1992};
203: \citealt{Hartmann:1993}). Emission lines and near-infrared excesses
204: evidence this accretion \citep{Hillenbrand:1992}. \citet{Waters:1998}
205: suggest the following as criteria for Herbig AeBe stars: (1) an
206: emission-line A or B star, (2) an infrared excess owing to
207: circumstellar dust, either hot or cool, and (3) luminosity class
208: III--V. As the primordial disk dissipates the emission lines weaken
209: and the infrared excess decreases, appearing only at longer
210: wavelengths \citep[e.g.,][]{The:1994}. Classical Be stars are
211: typically rapidly rotating B stars with H$\alpha$ emission and an IR
212: excess from free-free emission (\citealt{Gehrz:1974};
213: \citealt{Balona:2000}). These stars are variable in both emission-line
214: strength and luminosity \citep{Dachs:1988}. The circumstellar disks
215: for classical Be stars are thought to be mechanisms for mass loss,
216: unlike Herbig AeBe circumstellar disks which facilitate accretion
217: \citep{Balona:2000}. Classical Be stars are similar to Herbig AeBe
218: stars in that they both exhibit emission lines due to circumstellar
219: gas (\citealt{Struve:1931}; \citealt{Herbig:1960}). The greatest
220: distinction between Herbig AeBe stars and classical Be stars is the
221: nature of the infrared excess---dust in the former and thermal
222: bremsstrahlung in the latter.
223:
224: In this paper we present results of optical spectroscopic analysis for
225: 30 mid-IR excess sources identified in the \textit{Spitzer} GLIMPSE
226: and $MSX$ catalogs to determine the nature of infrared excess
227: \citep{Uzpen:2007}. By investigating the nature of the infrared excess
228: through optical spectral features, we can distinguish between various
229: types of circumstellar disks that persist around intermediate-mass
230: stars. Our goal is to remove classical Be and Herbig AeBe stars from
231: our sample to identify transition and warm debris disk candidates. In
232: \S 2 we describe how we obtained new optical echelle spectroscopy. We
233: discuss the results of our rotational velocity analysis in \S 3. In
234: \S 4 we present our methods for determining effective temperatures. In
235: \S 5 we discuss the spectra including the H$\alpha$, \ion{Fe}{2}
236: $\lambda$ 5317 \AA, Paschen, \ion{O}{1}, and \ion{Ca}{2} IR triplet
237: line profiles and any implications on the nature of the disk from the
238: lines. We describe how we estimate stellar ages through main-sequence
239: fitting utilizing our determined fundamental parameters in \S 6. In \S
240: 7 we discuss how all of the derived parameters provide insight into
241: the nature of the infrared excess, how we use these parameters to
242: estimate the contribution of free-free emission associated with our
243: sources, and how we draw conclusions regarding the evolutionary state
244: of the circumstellar disk. In \S 8 we describe the individual sources
245: and classify the infrared excesses. Finally we use spectral classification
246: schemes for stars with infrared excesses, such as classical
247: Be stars, with our stars to determine if the classifications
248: are consistent in \S 9. We also apply our classification schemes
249: to well-known stellar samples to determine their classification
250: in \S 9.
251:
252: \section{Target Selection and Observations}
253:
254: We observed 30 of 42 stellar sources that exhibited an 8 $\mu$m mid-IR
255: excess in \citet{Uzpen:2007}, 25 of which have an excess at 8 and 20+
256: $\mu$m. The purpose of these observations was to identify
257: circumstellar disk characteristics (e.g., Balmer emission, metallic
258: emission, forbidden-line emission), and stellar classification
259: features (e.g, \ion{He}{1}, and \ion{Mg}{2} absorption) based on
260: optical spectral features to determine stellar and circumstellar
261: properties. We chose stars with both known and unknown circumstellar
262: evolutionary state.
263:
264: We conducted high-resolution, high-signal-to-noise ratio spectroscopic
265: observations at the Magellan Telescope with the Magellan Inamori
266: Kyocera Echelle (MIKE; \citealt{Bernstein:2003}) double echelle
267: spectrograph on the nights of 26--28 September 2006 and 7--8 April
268: 2007. The spectral coverage was $\simeq$3400--9500 \AA \ with a
269: resolving power of R=37,000 at 4000 \AA \ and R=29,000 at 6500 \AA \,
270: measured from arc spectra. The typical S/N was $\simeq$100:1 in the
271: stellar continuum. We conducted standard data reductions in IRAF
272: including flat fielding with a continuum lamp and wavelength
273: calibration using a ThAr arc lamp, but no flux calibration was
274: applied.
275:
276: We also observed 13 stars to use as rotational velocity standards
277: listed below the solid horizontal line in Table~\ref{trot}. These
278: stars were used to validate our technique and compare our determined
279: values to those in the literature. Seven of these stars had projected
280: rotational velocities determined in \citet{Royer:2002a}. Ten of these
281: stars had projected rotational velocities determined in
282: \citet{Slettebak:1975}. Four stars had their rotational velocities
283: determined in both papers and provide a direct comparison between the
284: two techniques. We will discuss these stars further in \S 3.
285:
286: \section{Rotational Velocities}
287:
288: The most common methods for measuring the projected rotational
289: velocities are through the computation of the first zero of a Fourier
290: Transform of a given line profile (\citealt{Carroll:1933};
291: \citealt{Gray:1992}; \citealt{Royer:2005}) or through the measurement
292: of a line full width half maximum (FWHM) \citep{Slettebak:1975}. The
293: FWHM of \ion{He}{1} $\lambda$ 4471 \AA, \ion{Mg}{2} $\lambda$ 4481
294: \AA, and \ion{Fe}{1} $\lambda$ 4476 \AA \ are shown to correlate with
295: \textit{v} sin \textit{i} in \citet{Slettebak:1975} and is the method
296: we adopt to measure projected rotational velocity. However, this
297: method is less reliable at lower rotational velocities because of the
298: non-linearity of the FWHM/projected rotational velocity relationship,
299: and the calibration of \citet{Slettebak:1975} has been shown to be
300: 10--12$\%$ lower than measurements made using the Fourier Transform
301: \citep{Royer:2002a}. In order to improve upon existing linear
302: relations between \ion{He}{1} $\lambda$ 4471 \AA, \ion{Mg}{2}
303: $\lambda$ 4481 \AA, and \ion{Fe}{1} $\lambda$ 4476 \AA \ we measure
304: the FWHM of the rotationally broadened stellar models of
305: \citet{Munari:2005} of solar metallicity at a resolving power of
306: R=20,000 from 21,000--7,500~K.
307:
308: Figure~\ref{FWHM} shows the relationships between projected rotational
309: velocity and the FWHM measured over a range of stellar temperatures by
310: the author B.U. of \ion{He}{1} $\lambda$ 4471 \AA \ (upper left),
311: \ion{Mg}{2} $\lambda$ 4481 \AA \ (upper right), and \ion{Fe}{1}
312: $\lambda$ 4476 \AA \ (lower left). The \ion{He}{1} $\lambda$ 4471 \AA
313: \ line profile includes a Stark broadening component. Since Stark
314: broadening has a non-linear dependence on temperature this component
315: degraded the repeatability of consistent measurements that caused a
316: greater dispersion in the FWHM measurement. We derived the following
317: equations for a linear least squares fit between the measured stellar
318: absorption line FWHM and the projected rotational velocity:
319: \begin{equation}
320: \textit{v} \ sin \ \textit{i}\ (km\ s^{-1})=54.25 \times He(FWHM)-46.58\ (km\ s^{-1}),
321: \end{equation}
322: \begin{equation}
323: \textit{v} \ sin \ \textit{i}\ (km\ s^{-1})=47.64 \times Mg(FWHM)+2.01\ (km\ s^{-1}),
324: \end{equation}
325: \begin{equation}
326: \textit{v} \ sin \ \textit{i}\ (km\ s^{-1})=57.04 \times Fe(FWHM)-8.73\ (km\ s^{-1}).
327: \end{equation}
328:
329: \noindent
330: The Mg FWHM relation is not linear below $\simeq$40 km s$^{-1}$ due to
331: resolution of the line multiplets or above 300 km s$^{-1}$ due to
332: blends with the \ion{He}{1} $\lambda$ 4471 \AA \ line, while the Fe
333: FWHM relation is linear at velocities $\geq$10 km s$^{-1}$.
334:
335: Table~\ref{trot} lists the \textit{v} sin \textit{i} measurements of
336: our target stars and rotational velocity standards and compares them
337: with values listed in the literature, when
338: available. Figure~\ref{FWHM}(lower right) shows a comparison between
339: our measurements and literature rotational values from
340: \citet{Slettebak:1975} and \citet{Royer:2002a,Royer:2002b}. Our
341: values are consistent with those derived from
342: \citet{Royer:2002a,Royer:2002b} and are 10--15\% higher than those of
343: \citet{Slettebak:1975}. This offset compared to
344: \citet{Slettebak:1975} is consistent with results from other projected
345: rotational velocity studies. We estimate our uncertainties in
346: projected rotational velocity at 10$\%$, given in Table~\ref{trot},
347: using the FWHM method based on both the dispersion of the models from
348: the best-fit line and measurement uncertainties in the FWHM. When two
349: rotational velocity indicators are present, the reported rotational
350: velocity is the weighted mean of both measurements, and the
351: uncertainty is the uncertainty of the mean.
352:
353: \section{Surface Temperatures}
354:
355: We determined effective temperatures by comparing model equivalent
356: width (EW) measurements of \ion{He}{1} $\lambda$ 4009 \AA, \ion{He}{1}
357: $\lambda$ 4471 \AA, \ion{Mg}{2} $\lambda$ 4481 \AA, \ion{Fe}{2}
358: $\lambda$ 4233 \AA, and \ion{Ca}{1} $\lambda$ 4227 \AA \ of
359: \citet{Munari:2005} R=20,000 solar metallicity models to our spectral
360: measurements. For our spectra we used the models in the range 7,000~K
361: $\leq$ T$_{eff}$ $\leq$ 21,000~K, with log \textit{g}=4.5 for
362: T$_{eff}$ $<$ 10,000~K, and log \textit{g}=4.0 for T$_{eff}$ $\geq$
363: 10,000~K. We used models with rotational broadening between 0 km
364: s$^{-1}$ and 400 km s$^{-1}$. The effective temperature step size
365: varies from $\Delta$T$_{eff}$=1000~K for 12,000~K $<$ T$_{eff}$ $\leq$
366: 21,000~K, $\Delta$T$_{eff}$=500~K for 10,000~K $\leq$ T$_{eff}$ $<$
367: 12,000~K and $\Delta$T$_{eff}$=250~K for 7,000~K $\leq$ T$_{eff}$ $<$
368: 10,000~K.
369:
370: The equivalent width ratios of \ion{Mg}{2} $\lambda$ 4481
371: \AA/\ion{He}{1} $\lambda$ 4009 \AA, \ion{Mg}{2} $\lambda$ 4481
372: \AA/\ion{He}{1} $\lambda$ 4471 \AA, \ion{Mg}{2} $\lambda$ 4481
373: \AA/\ion{Fe}{2} $\lambda$ 4233 \AA, and \ion{Mg}{2} $\lambda$ 4481
374: \AA/\ion{Ca}{1} $\lambda$ 4227 \AA \ form monotonic relations
375: dependent on both rotational velocity and temperature spanning
376: T=21,000--7,000~K, as shown in Figure~\ref{temp}. The solid curves in
377: Figure~\ref{temp} are polynomials representing the best-fit relation
378: between the EW ratio and stellar effective temperature for the models
379: with projected rotational velocity of 150 km s$^{-1}$. The multiple
380: data points at each abscissa/ordinate are due to multiple measurements
381: of the same model and show the magnitude of the random uncertainties
382: associated with measuring the EW. The dotted curve in
383: Figure~\ref{temp} (lower left panel) represents the best fit
384: polynomial between the EW ratio of \ion{Mg}{2} $\lambda$ 4481
385: \AA/\ion{Fe}{2} $\lambda$ 4233 \AA\ for models with rotational
386: velocity of 250 km s$^{-1}$ (triangles). We chose Mg and He because
387: these lines are prominent in B and early A stars, and He strength
388: decreases rapidly in late B stars. Fe lines start to appear in early A
389: stars and increase in strength toward later spectral types. Ca lines
390: increase in strength and number starting at late A stars and
391: continuing through F stars. At rotational velocities $>$ 150 km
392: s$^{-1}$ the \ion{Mg}{2} $\lambda$ 4481 \AA/\ion{He}{1} $\lambda$ 4009
393: \AA\ and \ion{Mg}{2} $\lambda$ 4481 \AA/\ion{He}{1} $\lambda$ 4471
394: \AA\ ratios are independent of rotational velocity and thus provide
395: the best estimates of T$_{eff}$. At rotational velocities $<$ 150 km
396: s$^{-1}$ the \ion{Mg}{2} $\lambda$ 4481 \AA/\ion{Ca}{1} $\lambda$ 4227
397: \AA\ ratios are independent of rotational velocity and provide the
398: best estimates of T$_{eff}$. The \ion{Mg}{2} $\lambda$ 4481
399: \AA/\ion{Fe}{2} $\lambda$ 4233 \AA\ relationship depends upon
400: rotational velocity over all velocity ranges, unlike the other EW
401: ratios. Therefore, this ratio is not generally as sensitive to
402: effective temperature, but we use it over a limited temperature range,
403: 10,000--12,000~K, where other lines ratios are not useful.
404:
405: We determined the effective temperature utilizing one or more
406: equivalent width ratios in Figure~\ref{temp} for our target stars and
407: present them in Table~\ref{ttemp}, along with spectral types from the
408: literature. The uncertainties on effective temperatures were
409: determined by adding in quadrature the uncertainty derived from
410: equivalent width fitting with one-half the model step size. The former
411: uncertainty component approximately accounts for the random
412: uncertainty in measuring the equivalent width, which is dominated by
413: the uncertainty in the definition of the stellar continuum. In
414: general, most derived effective temperature measurements are
415: consistent with the stellar spectral classification, within
416: uncertainties.
417:
418: We found several late B stars to have effective temperatures hotter
419: than their spectral classifications would indicate. Such an effect
420: might result if, for example, some stars were deficient in heavy
421: metals, resulting in smaller metal-to-helium EW ratios in
422: Figure~\ref{temp} and systematically higher indicated effective
423: temperatures. In order validate the derived temperatures and test
424: whether this approach is sensitive to our assumption of solar
425: metallicity, we compare in Figures~\ref{he1} and \ref{he2} our
426: spectra with the \citet{Munari:2005} stellar models, degraded to
427: similar signal-to-noise ratios, in the region near \ion{He}{1}
428: $\lambda$ 5876 \AA. Figures~\ref{he1} and \ref{he2} show the
429: spectral region near \ion{He}{1} $\lambda$ 5876 \AA\ (denoted by the
430: dashed vertical line) with the best fitting stellar model over-plotted
431: in either red or blue. The narrow strong lines to the right of
432: \ion{He}{1} $\lambda$ 5876 \AA\ are the \ion{Na}{1} $\lambda$ 5890/5896
433: \AA\ doublet, generally of interstellar origin except in the later
434: type stars which have an atmospheric component. Red curves (24
435: out of 30 stars) show the best fit stellar model and indicate that the
436: temperature measured from EW ratios fell within one model temperature
437: step size from the best fit model. Blue curves (6 out of 30
438: stars) show the best fit stellar temperature model and indicate that
439: the model deviated by more than one model temperature step size from
440: the temperature determined from EW ratios. For G014.4239-00.7657 the
441: best fit stellar model was T$_{eff}$=18,000~K as it is for
442: G299.1677-00.3922 and G007.2369+01.4894. G014.4239-00.7657 and
443: G299.1677-00.3922 have the hottest measured T$_{eff}$ and our
444: relationship for \ion{Mg}{2} $\lambda$ 4481 \AA/\ion{He}{1} $\lambda$
445: 4471 \AA\ is not very sensitive in this temperature regime. For both
446: stars the \ion{Mg}{2} $\lambda$ 4481 \AA/\ion{He}{1} $\lambda$ 4471
447: \AA\ derived temperature is $\sim$600 K lower than \ion{Mg}{2}
448: $\lambda$ 4481 \AA/\ion{He}{1} $\lambda$ 4009 \AA\ ratio pushing the
449: weighted mean to a lower temperature. If we ignore the \ion{Mg}{2}
450: $\lambda$ 4481 \AA/\ion{He}{1} $\lambda$ 4471 \AA\ temperature, the
451: \ion{Mg}{2} $\lambda$ 4481 \AA/\ion{He}{1} $\lambda$ 4009 \AA\
452: temperature, with uncertainties, falls between the 17,000 and 18,000~K
453: models, as is found from the best fit models. For the remainder of
454: this paper we will use T$_{eff}$=16,900$\pm$800 K for
455: G014.4239-00.7657 and T$_{eff}$=16,450$\pm$1030 K for
456: G299.1677-00.0392. G007.2369+01.4894 is a known Herbig AeBe star, see
457: \S 8 for more details. The \ion{Na}{1} D lines in emission and strong
458: broad \ion{He}{1} $\lambda$ 5876 \AA\ absorption are indicators of
459: circumstellar gas. This star exhibits line profile variations
460: consistent with circumstellar activity (\citealt{Catala:1989};
461: \citealt{Pogodin:1994}). The variable lines and circumstellar gas
462: explain the discrepancy between temperatures measured from the
463: \ion{He}{1} $\lambda$ 5876 \AA\ line fitting and EW ratios.
464: G229.4514+01.0145 exhibits stronger \ion{He}{1} $\lambda$ 5876 \AA\
465: absorption than the \ion{Mg}{2} $\lambda$ 4481 \AA/\ion{He}{1}
466: $\lambda$ 4471 \AA\ ratio temperature of T$_{eff}$=10,220$\pm$390~K
467: implies. This is a suspected Herbig AeBe star, see \S 8, and, like
468: G007.2369+01.4894, it is better fit with a hotter model,
469: T$_{eff}$=12,000~K. G265.5536-03.9951-A and B are binaries and their
470: interactions may effect their spectra. For G265.5536-03.9951-A we
471: found a better fit with a cooler model of 6,500~K rather than the
472: measured T$_{eff}$ of 7,040$\pm$170~K, while G265.5536-03.9951-B is
473: better fit with a hotter model of 8,250~K rather than the measured
474: T$_{eff}$ of 7,660$\pm$140~K. G307.9784-00.7148 was also better fit
475: with a cooler stellar model, T$_{eff}$=12,000~K rather than the EW
476: ratio measured T$_{eff}$=13,220$\pm$520~K. With the exception of the
477: probable pre-main-sequence stars, the best fit models all lie within
478: two stellar models of the measured temperatures based on EW
479: ratios. The sources with discrepant model fit temperatures and EW
480: ratio measured temperatures may show indication of circumstellar gas,
481: see \S 5. In summary, the six stars that show small discrepancies
482: between temperatures derived from He $\lambda$ 5876 \AA\ fits and EW
483: ratios are explainable in most cases by circumstellar material and
484: activity rather than metallicity enhancements or deficiencies.
485:
486: The discrepancy between literature spectral types and derived
487: temperature for some objects in Table~\ref{ttemp} may be in part due
488: to differences between observational parameters and theoretical
489: stellar models. For example, under the MK system, the definition of a
490: B8 main-sequence star requires the \ion{He}{1} $\lambda$ 4471 \AA\ EW
491: to be equal to the \ion{Mg}{2} $\lambda$ 4481 \AA\ EW. Using this MK
492: system definition of a B8 main-sequence star and \citet{Munari:2005}
493: models we derive a temperature of $\simeq$12,600~K through
494: interpolation of the model grids. However, the observational
495: effective temperature for a B8 main-sequence star is 11,400~K
496: \citep{Cox:2000}. We do not present revised spectral types for the
497: late B stars in Table~\ref{ttemp} due to the small systematic
498: temperature difference between optical classification criteria and
499: theoretical models.
500:
501: \section{Spectral Features}
502:
503: Metallic and hydrogen emission lines in the spectra of both classical
504: Be and Herbig AeBe stars have been well studied (e.g.,
505: \citealt{Finkenzeller:1984}; \citealt{Andrillat:1990}). For example,
506: the lines of \ion{He}{1} $\lambda$ 5876 \AA\ , \ion{Na}{1} D,
507: H$\alpha$, \ion{Fe}{2}, \ion{O}{1}, and \ion{Ca}{2} IR triplet have
508: been studied as indicators of circumstellar material around Herbig
509: AeBe stars (\citealt{Finkenzeller:1984}; \citealt{Hamann:1992};
510: \citealt{Bohm:1995}; \citealt{Hernandez:2004}). The spectra of
511: classical Be stars exhibit, in addition to hydrogen emission,
512: \ion{Ca}{2} IR triplet, \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$ 8446 and \ion{O}{1}
513: $\lambda$ 7772 \AA, and \ion{Fe}{2} in emission
514: (\citealt{Andrillat:1990}; \citealt{Jaschek:1993};
515: \citealt{Hanuschik:1996}). By comparing line strengths with stellar
516: models it is possible to identify emission and absorption lines
517: arising in circumstellar material and identify the type of
518: circumstellar disk.
519:
520: \subsection{Hydrogen Lines}
521:
522: \subsubsection{Balmer Lines}
523:
524: The nature of an infrared excess can, in part, be determined through
525: H$\alpha$ spectroscopy. By definition, classical Be stars and Herbig
526: AeBe stars exhibit Balmer emission lines owing to their circumstellar
527: gaseous disk. In contrast, debris disks do not exhibit any Balmer
528: emission lines and are devoid of significant amounts of circumstellar
529: gas \citep{Lagrange:2000}. We measured the H$\alpha$ equivalent width
530: for our targets and noted the five H$\alpha$ profile types in
531: Table~\ref{tha}. These profile types include single-peaked emission
532: profiles (S), double-peaked emission profiles (D), absorption profiles
533: (A), P-Cygni emission profiles (P), and inverse P-Cygni emission
534: profiles (IP). For complex profiles, double-peaked emission, or
535: P-Cygni features, we fit multiple Gaussian profiles to the H$\alpha$
536: feature and report the sum of the EWs in Table~\ref{tha}. We
537: performed the fitting process manually five times, and we adopt the
538: rms dispersion of the summed EWs as our estimate of the 1$\sigma$
539: uncertainty on EW(H$\alpha$). We then utilized \citet{Munari:2005}
540: stellar model H$\alpha$ absorption measurements to correct the
541: H$\alpha$ equivalent width for underlying absorption in order to
542: estimate the true EW of the emission. This measure,
543: EW(H$\alpha$$_{corr}$), is then used for the remainder of this paper.
544: Normalized H$\alpha$ spectra are shown in Figures~\ref{ha1} \&
545: \ref{ha2}. One-third of the sample, ten stars, exhibit H$\alpha$
546: absorption profiles. Of the remaining twenty stars that exhibit
547: H$\alpha$ emission, only one star exhibits single-peaked emission, one
548: star exhibits inverse P-Cygni, and one star exhibits P-Cygni profiles.
549: The majority of the stars that exhibit Balmer emission show a
550: double-peaked emission profile (17 stars). This result is not
551: surprising given that the majority of both classical Be and Herbig
552: AeBe stars exhibit double-peaked H$\alpha$ profiles
553: (\citealt{Porter:2003}; \citealt{Finkenzeller:1984}).
554:
555: \subsubsection{Paschen Lines}
556:
557: Both early- and late-type classical Be stars exhibit Paschen lines in
558: emission with the later type only exhibiting weak emission not
559: reaching the continuum \citep{Andrillat:1990}. Herbig AeBe stars have
560: been found to exhibit Paschen emission, although the Paschen lines are
561: significantly weaker than the metallic Fe and Ca emission lines in the
562: red spectral region \citep{Catala:1986}. Figures~\ref{pa1} and
563: \ref{pa2} shows spectral regions 8400--8600 \AA\ and Paschen lines
564: Pa15--19. Lower order Paschen lines either lie off our spectral
565: coverage or fall in regions of poor atmospheric transparency. Very few
566: stars exhibit Paschen emission: G027.0268+00.7224, G299.1677-00.3992,
567: G321.7686+00.4102, and G340.0517+00.6687. Table~\ref{tspec} lists the
568: spectral features used for confirmation of circumstellar gas and
569: determination of the nature of the circumstellar disk. Paschen
570: emission is listed as column 3 in Table~\ref{tspec}. For classical Be
571: stars, emission from metallic lines of \ion{Fe}{2}, \ion{O}{1}
572: $\lambda$ 8446, \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$ 7772 \AA\, and \ion{Ca}{2} is
573: found only when the Paschen lines are in emission
574: (\citealt{Andrillat:1990}; \citealt{Jaschek:1993}). Herbig AeBe stars
575: may exhibit \ion{O}{1}, \ion{Fe}{2}, and \ion{Ca}{2} emission with or
576: without Paschen emission \citep{Catala:1986}.
577:
578:
579: \subsection{Metallic Lines}
580:
581: \subsubsection{\ion{Ca}{2} IR Triplet}
582:
583: For classical Be stars, \citet{Andrillat:1990} found that \ion{Ca}{2}
584: is only seen in emission if Paschen lines were seen in
585: emission. \citet{Andrillat:1988} found that \ion{Ca}{2} emission was
586: observed in those stars that exhibited a large $IRAS$ excess, $>$0.6
587: magnitudes at 12 $\mu$m. For Herbig AeBe stars, the \ion{Ca}{2} IR
588: triplet is shown to correlate with the H$\alpha$ emission strength
589: \citep{Catala:1986}. Only three of our sources exhibited \ion{Ca}{2}
590: IR triplet emission, G007.2369+01.4894, G027.0268+00.7224, and
591: G229.4514+01.0145, and their spectra are shown in Figure~\ref{ca2}.
592: The best fitting EW ratio determined stellar model is shown beneath
593: the stellar spectrum. G007.2368+01.4894 was also shown to exhibit
594: \ion{Ca}{2} emission in \citet{Hamann:1992}, and their profile appears
595: similar to our spectrum. G229.4514+01.0145 and G027.0268+00.7224 show
596: double peaked \ion{Ca}{2} emission. These two stars also exhibit
597: double peaked H$\alpha$ emission. We also find that \ion{Ca}{2}
598: emission strength is correlated with H$\alpha$ emission strength, but
599: our sample is not large, containing only three sources. Therefore, we
600: do not further investigate this correlation.
601:
602: \subsubsection{\ion{O}{1} $\lambda$ 8446 \AA\ Emission and \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$ 7772 \AA\ Absorption}
603:
604: \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$ 8446 \AA\ emission is seen in both
605: Herbig AeBe stars and classical Be stars. The \ion{O}{1} excitation is
606: due to \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$ 1025 \AA\ fluorescence with Lyman $\beta$
607: that subsequently excites the related \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$ 8446 \AA\
608: \citep{Bowen:1947}. \citet{Andrillat:1990} found that classical Be
609: stars only exhibit \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$ 8446 \AA\ emission if Paschen
610: emission is also present. \citet{Jaschek:1993} found a correlation
611: between \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$ 8446 \AA\ emission and \ion{O}{1}
612: $\lambda$ 7772 \AA\ emission with the former about four times stronger
613: than the later. \citet{Jaschek:1993} also found that Be stars which
614: exhibit both \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$ 7772 \AA\ in emission also exhibit
615: \ion{Fe}{2} $\lambda$ 7712 \AA\ in emission. \citet{Hamann:1992} found
616: that some Herbig AeBe stars exhibit anomalously large \ion{O}{1}
617: $\lambda$ 7772 \AA\ absorption and attribute it to a large
618: circumstellar envelope. \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$ 7772 \AA\ has also been
619: seen in emission for some Herbig AeBe stars (e.g.,
620: \citealt{Hamann:1992}). Column five of Table~\ref{tspec} lists
621: whether \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$ 8446~\AA\ is found in emission. Column
622: six of Table~\ref{tspec} indicates whether \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$ 7772
623: \AA\ is found in absorption stronger than stellar models predict (s)
624: or in emission (e).
625:
626: \subsubsection{\ion{Fe}{2} Emission}
627:
628: Classical Be stars exhibit metallic lines in emission, especially
629: \ion{Fe}{2} (\citealt{Jaschek:1980}; \citealt{Hanuschik:1996}).
630: Presence or absence of \ion{Fe}{2} is one criterion for classification
631: of classical Be stars into subgroups \citep{Jaschek:1980}. We show
632: continuum-normalized spectra near \ion{Fe}{2} $\lambda$ 5317 \AA\ in
633: Figures~\ref{fe1} and \ref{fe2}. Only four sources exhibit \ion{Fe}{2}
634: in emission: G027.0268+00.7224 (A0V), G229.4514+01.0145 (B9V),
635: G321.7868+00.4102 (B8VN), and G340.0517+00.6682 (B8).
636: \citet{Jaschek:1980} Group I sources, stars with \ion{Fe}{2} emission,
637: are of spectral type B0--B6. These four stars may be an extension to
638: later spectral types for Group I classical Be stars. Herbig AeBe stars
639: have also been shown to exhibit \ion{Fe}{1} and \ion{Fe}{2} emission,
640: but the EW of H$\alpha$ for such sources show strong emission,
641: EW(H$\alpha$) $<$ -25 \AA\ \citep{Hernandez:2004}. G340.0517+00.6682
642: and G321.7868+00.4102 are the only two of the four sources to exhibit
643: strong H$\alpha$ emission, EW(H$\alpha_{corr}$)=-39.38 and -26.81 \AA\
644: and \ion{Fe}{2} emission.
645:
646: \subsubsection{Broad Absorption}
647:
648: Herbig AeBe stars have been shown to exhibit absorption lines such as
649: \ion{He}{1} $\lambda$ 5876 \AA\ and \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$ 7772 \AA\
650: that are stronger and broader than expected from the stellar
651: photosphere \citep{Catala:1986}. G007.2369+01.4894 exhibits strong
652: \ion{He}{1} $\lambda$ 5876 \AA\ as noted in \S 3 and seen in the top
653: left panel of Figure~\ref{he1}. G229.4514+01.0145 may also exhibit
654: strong \ion{He}{1} $\lambda$ 5876 \AA\ circumstellar absorption as
655: indicated by the higher temperature stellar model needed to fit the
656: line than measured by \ion{He}{1} and \ion{Mg}{2} EW ratios (see \S
657: 3). Several stars exhibit strong broad absorption features at
658: $\lambda$ $\sim$4400, $\sim$4418, and $\sim$4455 \AA. These lines do
659: not appear to correspond with known diffuse interstellar bands (DIBs)
660: or expected photospheric atomic absorption transitions
661: \citep{Jenniskens:1994}. The stars that exhibit broad non-stellar
662: absorption lines at these wavelengths are G007.2369+01.4894,
663: G025.6122+01.3020, G051.6491-00.1182, and G229.4514+01.0145. These
664: absorption lines may imply that G025.6122+01.3020 and
665: G051.6491-00.1182 are surrounded by circumstellar gaseous material
666: similar to the material surrounding Herbig AeBe stars. We will discuss
667: the implications of the stellar absorption/emission lines in context
668: of the nature of the infrared excess in \S 8.
669:
670: \section{Age Determination}
671:
672: When stars are not members of known stellar clusters with
673: well-determined ages, stellar ages are generally estimated by fitting
674: theoretical isochrones to effective temperatures and bolometric
675: luminosities, provided that some distance estimate is available
676: \citep{Song:2001}. Using our derived T$_{eff}$ and trigonometric
677: parallaxes from $Hipparcos$/Tycho, we estimated stellar ages by
678: fitting stellar parameters to \citet{Siess:2000} evolutionary model
679: tracks. $Hipparcos$ parallaxes were the preferred distance measures
680: and used when available (11 stars). In only one instance we used a Tycho
681: parallax. If neither parallax was available, we adopted absolute
682: visual magnitudes derived in the literature (4 stars) using methods
683: such as H$\beta$ luminosity and intrinsic Stromgren colors of
684: luminosity classes (see \citealt{Seidensticker:1989};
685: \citealt{Westin:1985}; \citealt{Kozok:1985}). We list parallactic
686: distances in Table~\ref{tage} except in the cases where noted. We
687: then interpolated a bolometric correction using our derived effective
688: temperatures in conjunction with \citet{Cox:2000} effective
689: temperatures and bolometric corrections. We applied these bolometric
690: corrections to the Tycho-2 visual magnitudes and correct for distance
691: and extinction to derive the absolute bolometric magnitudes.
692:
693: Figure~\ref{ages} shows our derived absolute bolometric magnitudes and
694: effective temperatures (i.e., the HR diagram) with isochrones derived
695: from \citet{Siess:2000} Z=0.02 stellar evolutionary models
696: over-plotted. Figure~\ref{ages} shows the range of stellar
697: temperatures consistent with $\sim$2--5\ \mo\ stars. Stars with
698: absolute bolometric magnitudes determined from $Hipparcos$ parallaxes
699: are denoted by the diamonds, those with bolometric magnitudes
700: determined from Tycho parallaxes are shown by triangles, and those for
701: which literature absolute magnitudes were used are shown by
702: asterisks. The zero-age main-sequence is shown by the solid
703: line. Isochrones for 1, 10, and 100 Myr are shown by the dotted,
704: dashed, and dash-dot relations. The majority of our stars are
705: consistent with 3--5\ \mo \ stellar models. Most of our stars lie
706: above the main-sequence indicating either a late pre-main-sequence
707: (few Myr) or late main-sequence stellar age ($\simeq$ 100 Myr). We
708: estimate a range of possible stellar ages by taking the full range of
709: \citet{Siess:2000} model ages consistent with the derived temperatures
710: and luminosities, taking into account the measurement uncertainties.
711: Table~\ref{tage} lists the possible age ranges for the stars with
712: sufficient measurements and compares them to other results in the
713: literature. The age ranges we determined for the three stars having
714: published age estimates were consistent with those measurements. We
715: were able to determine the age ranges of two stars identified in
716: literature as pre-main-sequence stars and found that the ages were
717: consistent with such a state. Most published measurements of stellar
718: ages have uncertainties of order a few $\%$ of the stellar lifetime
719: because they are either nearby (small uncertainties in luminosity) or
720: derived from main-sequence cluster fitting. Our age measurements
721: typically have errors of 10$\%$ or greater, so the derived values
722: should be regarded as general age ranges.
723:
724: \section{Implication of Fundamental Parameters on the Nature of the
725: Mid-IR Excesses}
726:
727: Stellar parameters, such as rapid rotation and H$\alpha$ emission can
728: provide insight into the nature of the infrared excess. On average,
729: classical Be stars rotate more rapidly than Herbig AeBe stars.
730: H$\alpha$ emission can be used to determine the amount of free-free
731: emission expected from the circumstellar disk. H$\alpha$ emission is
732: also found to decrease as pre-main-sequence stars evolve toward the
733: main-sequence \citep{Manoj:2006}. Broadband infrared colors are
734: commonly used to discriminate between various circumstellar disks
735: (i.e., \citealt{Hartmann:2005}). We use the fundamental parameters
736: derived above to determine the nature of the circumstellar
737: excess in the following subsections.
738:
739: \subsection{Large Rotational Velocities}
740:
741: Intermediate-mass stars rotate at a wide variety of velocities
742: depending on how they formed and their evolutionary
743: state. \citet{Finkenzeller:1985} found that Herbig AeBe stars rotate
744: at values of 100 $<$ \textit{v} sin \textit{i} $<$ 225 km
745: s$^{-1}$. \citet{Bohm:1995} predict that higher mass Herbig AeBe stars
746: ($>$ 4\ \mo) should gain angular momentum as they approach the
747: zero-age main-sequence. \citet{Bohm:1995} also predict that zero-age
748: main-sequence stars in the mass range 2.6\ \mo\ $<$ M$_{*}$ $<$ 4.0 \
749: \mo\ should rotate at 205$\pm$55 km s$^{-1}$ and stars with M$_{*}$
750: $>$ 4.0\ \mo\ should rotate at 180$\pm$90 km s$^{-1}$ based on
751: pre-main-sequence projected rotational velocities. Classical Be stars
752: are typically rapid rotators having \textit{v} sin \textit{i} $>$
753: 200 km $^{-1}$. In Figure~\ref{comp} we compare the rotational
754: velocities for our sample of 20 GLIMPSE late-B and early A stars
755: (dashed histogram), to B8--B9.5 stars from \citet{Abt:2002} (solid
756: histogram) and classical Be stars from \citet{Hanuschik:1996}
757: (dash-dot histogram). Our 20 GLIMPSE stars rotate between 25 km
758: s$^{-1}$ $<$ \textit{v} sin \textit{i} $<$ 310 km s$^{-1}$ with a mean
759: and dispersion of 209$\pm$76 km s$^{-1}$. \citet{Abt:2002} found that
760: the rotational velocity distribution for B8--9.5 stars is bimodal with
761: peaks at both 50 km s$^{-1}$ and 250 km s$^{-1}$. The mean projected
762: rotational velocity and dispersion of the \citet{Abt:2002} late B star
763: sample is 148$\pm$84 km s$^{-1}$. The mean projected rotational
764: velocity and dispersion of \citet{Hanuschik:1996} classical Be stars
765: is 217$\pm$17 km s$^{-1}$. Thus, our sample has comparatively high
766: rotational velocities, more consistent with the HAeBe stars and Be
767: stars than the field B stars of \citet{Abt:2002}.
768:
769: We compared our sample rotational velocities to both the classical Be
770: sample and the B8--B9.5 sample using a K-S test to determine if our
771: sample could be drawn from either of these other distributions. There
772: is no large sample of Herbig AeBe stars with projected rotational
773: velocity measurements as they approach the zero-age main-sequence, so
774: we cannot make a comparison to these objects. The probability that
775: our sample could be derived from the \citet{Abt:2002} sample is $<$
776: 0.1\%. The probability that our sample may be derived from the
777: \citet{Hanuschik:1996} sample is 8\%. Although the mean projected
778: rotational velocity of our GLIMPSE stars is consistent with those
779: of the \citet{Hanuschik:1996} classical Be stars, it is unlikely that
780: our sample consists of solely Be stars. This result may imply that
781: our sample is a mixed group of sources including both normal B stars,
782: classical Be stars, and even Herbig AeBe stars.
783:
784: \subsection{Infrared Colors as a Discriminant for Terrestrial
785: Temperature Dust}
786:
787: Using the working definition of \citet{Waters:1998} for Herbig AeBe
788: stars, the only differing criterion between classical Be and Herbig
789: AeBe stars is the nature of the infrared excess. While Herbig AeBe
790: stars have an infrared excess due to circumstellar dust and gas,
791: classical Be stars owe their infrared excess to free-free emission
792: in ionized gas.
793:
794: Color-color plots are often used to distinguish various types of
795: infrared sources (e.g., \citealt{Walker:1989};
796: \citealt{Zhang:2004}). Using a color-color plot in both the near- and
797: mid-infrared we can distinguish between sources that have an excess
798: owing to free-free emission (and free-bound emission) and sources that
799: have dust emission. In order to model the expected contribution of
800: free-free emission to the infrared continuum we utilize the following
801: equation from \citet{Tucker:1975} to estimate the free-free flux.
802: The free-free emissivity at a given frequency, $\nu$, is
803:
804: \begin{equation}
805: j_{ff}(\nu)=5.44\times10^{-39}
806: \frac{g_{ff}Z^{2}_{i}N_{e}N_{p}}{\sqrt{T}}e^{-h\nu/kT}
807: (erg\ cm^{-3}\ s^{-1}\ sr^{-1}\ Hz^{-1})
808: \end{equation}
809:
810: \noindent where N$_{e}$ and N$_{p}$ are the electron and proton
811: densities, T is the electron temperature, and g$_{ff}$ is the Gaunt
812: factor. We assumed an electron temperature of 10,000~K, a pure
813: hydrogen gas, Z=1, and N$_{e}$=N$_{p}$=3$\times$10$^{11}$
814: cm$^{-3}$. The values of electron densities for classical Be stars
815: vary and we use the mean value from \citet{Gehrz:1974}
816: ($n_e=3\times10^{11}$ cm$^{-3}$). Even though classical Be stars exhibit
817: such large electron densities within their circumstellar disks, it has
818: been shown that such disks are still optically thin at optical wavelengths
819: \citep{McDavid:2001}. We used Gaunt factors from Figure~5 of
820: \citet{Karzas:1961} by fitting a polynomial to parametrize the Gaunt
821: factors as a function of wavelength for T$\simeq$10,000~K. Equation~5
822: gives an expression for the Gaunt factor for 10,000~K where $\lambda$
823: is in $\mu$m
824:
825: \begin{equation}
826: g_{ff}=33.513-4.041 \times Log(\lambda)+0.106 \times Log(\lambda)^{2}+0.001 \times Log(\lambda)^{3}.
827: \end{equation}
828:
829: In the near-infrared, the contribution of free-bound emission is not
830: negligible. \citet{Ashok:1984} found the contributions from free-free
831: and free-bound to the total nebular emission at 2.2 $\mu$m are 63\%
832: and 37\%, respectively, for the physical conditions of \citet{Gehrz:1974}.
833: We therefore include free-bound emission in our
834: calculation of nebular emission. The free-bound emissivity
835: as a function of frequency is
836:
837: \begin{equation}
838: j_{\lambda,n}^{fb}=1.4\times10^{-33}n^{-3}N_{e}N_{p}T^{-3/2}Z^{4}e^{(\chi_{n}-h\nu)/kT}
839: (erg\ cm^{-3}\ s^{-1}\ sr^{-1}\ Hz^{-1}),
840: \end{equation}
841:
842: \noindent where $n$ is the excitation level of hydrogen
843: \citep{Tucker:1975}. We adopted the same values for $N_e$, $N_p$, and
844: $T$ as for the free-free emissivity above.
845:
846: We used the above equations for free-free and free-bound emission to
847: model the infrared colors of a two-component spectral energy
848: distribution consisting of a stellar atmosphere and a thermal
849: bremsstrahlung excess. We simulated the free-free contribution to the
850: overall SED by adding increasing amounts of free-free (and free-bound)
851: emission (normalized at 8 $\mu$m) to a B8V stellar model from
852: \citet{Kurucz:1993}. We varied the free-free contribution from 0.01\%
853: of the stellar blackbody at 8 $\mu$m to 100 times the stellar
854: blackbody at 8 $\mu$m. Varying the electron temperature of the
855: circumstellar component between 5,000~K and 15,000~K has a negligible
856: effect on the broadband IR colors. We also modeled the colors
857: expected for a two-component spectral energy distribution consisting
858: of a stellar blackbody and a cooler blackbody representative of
859: circumstellar dust at temperatures 100--1100~K. We then used these
860: colors to determine if we can distinguish between free-free emission
861: and dust emission in color space.
862:
863: Figure~\ref{color} shows a plot of 8-24 $\mu$m vs. $K$-8 $\mu$m colors
864: for the 19 GLIMPSE stars with [24] excesses. Open circles represent
865: GLIMPSE sources having H$\alpha$ in emission and open stars represent
866: GLIMPSE sources having H$\alpha$ in absorption. Classical Be stars
867: ($asterisks$) are those from \citet{Zhang:2004}. We utilized $MSX$ A
868: band and $IRAS$ 25 $\mu$m as 8 $\mu$m and 24 $\mu$m measurements for
869: the sources from \citet{Zhang:2004,Zhang:2005}
870: respectively. Thirty-five of the \citet{Zhang:2004,Zhang:2005} stars
871: have $MSX$ A band and $IRAS$ 25 $\mu$m measurements. Both Be catalogs,
872: \citet{Zhang:2004,Zhang:2005}, draw on Be stars from
873: \citet{Jaschek:1982}, however at least 7 of the 35
874: \citet{Jaschek:1982} sources have some indication in the literature
875: that they may be Herbig Be stars rather than classical Be stars. The
876: arrow shows the reddening vector for A$_{V}$=5.0. The solid curve
877: denotes a B8V main-sequence star with A$_{V}$=1.0 and increasing
878: contribution from a free-free component at 8 $\mu$m. The solid symbols
879: denote where the circumstellar contribution at 8 $\mu$m constitutes
880: 5\% ($diamond$), 33\% ($hexagon$) and 50\% ($square$) of the total 8
881: $\mu$m flux. The dashed curves denote a B8V main-sequence star with
882: A$_{V}$=1.0 and an 800~K or 300~K blackbody circumstellar
883: component. We added the blackbody contribution in a similar manner as
884: the free-free contribution, and the solid symbols denote 5\%, 33\%,
885: and 50\% fractional circumstellar contributions.
886:
887: Figure~\ref{color} shows that this color-space can distinguish between
888: free-free and cool dust origins of the IR excesses. Points to the left
889: of the solid curve may be explained by either hot dust or free-free
890: emission. Thus, hot dust is indistinguishable from free-free emission
891: in this color space. Points to the right of the solid curve can only
892: be explained by a cool (terrestrial or cooler) dust component. The
893: majority (13 of 15) of sources with H$\alpha$ emission ({\it open
894: circles}) lie to the left of the solid line, consistent with them
895: being classical Be stars or stars with hot circumstellar dust. The
896: majority of the sources with H$\alpha$ absorption ({\it open stars})
897: lie to the right of the solid line, consistent with a cool
898: circumstellar dust component. The majority of the classical Be stars
899: ({\it asterisks}) lie to the left of the solid line, as expected for
900: free-free excesses and consistent with their classification. There
901: are, however, 14 \citet{Jaschek:1982} sources that fall to the right
902: of the solid curve. They are HD 6343, HD 37318, HD 251726, HD 52721,
903: HD 53367, HD 90177, HD 141926, BD-11 4667, HD 174571, HD 204722, HD
904: 240010, HD 37967, HD 259431, and HD 50083. This sub-sample of 14 stars
905: contains five of the seven possible Herbig Be stars within the 35 star
906: \cite{Jaschek:1982} sample. The two remaining possible Herbig Be stars
907: are HD 50138 and HD 101412. These two sources show the greatest $K$-8
908: color and fall off the top of the plotted region and to the left of
909: the solid curve. HD 50138 is also listed as a possible B[e] star
910: \citep[e.g.,][]{Bjorkman:1998}. Therefore, it is possible that some of
911: the stars classified as classical Be stars may actually be Herbig Be
912: stars. The two H$\alpha$ emission GLIMPSE sources that fall to the
913: right of the solid curve are G036.8722+00.6199 and G311.6185+00.2469.
914: H$\alpha$ absorption sources that fall to the right of the solid curve
915: are G014.4239-00.7657, G311.0099+00.4156, and G339.7415-00.1904.
916: These five sources are candidates for objects with terrestrial
917: temperature circumstellar dust and are discussed in detail below.
918:
919: \subsection{Individual Free-free Contributions}
920:
921: A quantitative analysis of the H$\alpha$ and mid-IR excess fluxes can
922: help distinguish between circumstellar dust and ionized gas
923: better than IR colors alone. Specifically, we want to determine if the
924: free-free excess in the mid-IR predicted by the H$\alpha$ flux can
925: account for the observed IR excess or if a dust component is
926: required. We use the H$\alpha$ flux of each star to predict the
927: gaseous circumstellar contribution to the 8 $\mu$m and 24 $\mu$m
928: continuum, under the assumption that the H$\alpha$, free-free, and
929: free-bound emitting volumes are coincident. Using this method one can
930: then verify that the color-color plot in Figure~\ref{color}
931: discriminates between infrared excesses with free-free emission and
932: those with an excess due to cool dust. We adopt the emissivity at
933: H$\beta$ from \citet{Brocklehurst:1971} for 10,000~K,
934:
935: \begin{equation}
936: 4 \pi j_{H\beta} = 1.24 \times 10^{-25} N_{e} N_{p}\
937: (ergs\ cm^{-3} \ s^{-1}),
938: \end{equation}
939:
940: \noindent where N$_{e}$ and N$_{p}$ are the number densities of
941: electrons and protons in cm$^{-3}$, respectively. We used the
942: ratio of H$\alpha$ to H$\beta$ emission coefficients from
943: \citet{Brocklehurst:1971} for Case B,
944:
945: \begin{equation}
946: \frac{j_{H\alpha}}{j_{H\beta}}=2.87.
947: \end{equation}
948:
949: \noindent Finally the flux due to free-free emission can be derived utilizing
950: the flux at H$\alpha$ and the emissivity at H$\alpha$,
951:
952: \begin{equation}
953: F_{ff}(\nu)=F_{H\alpha}\frac{j_{ff}({\nu})}{j_{H\alpha}},
954: \end{equation}
955:
956: \noindent where \textit{j}$_{ff}{(\nu)}$ is the thermal bremsstrahlung
957: emissivity at a given frequency, and \textit{j}$_{H\alpha}$ is the
958: emissivity of H$\alpha$. We used an electron temperature of 10,000~K
959: but the exact choice of N$_{e}$, N$_{p}$, and $T$ is not critical
960: to the ratio of $j$$_{ff}$/$j$$_{H\alpha}$. The ratio is independent
961: of gas density and only slowly varies with $T$.
962:
963: We calculate the H$\alpha$ flux by multiplying the
964: absorption-corrected equivalent width of the H$\alpha$ line,
965: EW(H$\alpha_{corr}$), by the reddening-corrected flux at R
966: band. Dereddened R fluxes are listed in Table~\ref{tha} computed from
967: R-band magnitudes of \citet{Monet:1998} \& \citet{Monet:2003}. We
968: adopt extinction estimates from \citet{Uzpen:2007}, which may include
969: circumstellar absorption and may be larger than true interstellar
970: extinction. The resultant H$\alpha$ flux thus predicts a maximum
971: possible free-free flux, ignoring possible variability and optical
972: depth effects.
973:
974: As a means of verifying our calculations, we used the observed
975: H$\alpha$ fluxes of \ion{H}{2} regions from \citet{Viallefond:1983},
976: \citet{Viallefond:1986a}, and \citet{Viallefond:1986b} to predict the
977: free-free radio fluxes. We compared our predicted radio fluxes to the
978: measured values and found that the predicted 6 or 21 cm fluxes are a
979: factor of $\simeq$2 deficient relative to measured
980: values. \citet{Israel:1980} found typical extinctions of 1--2
981: magnitudes at visual wavelengths for \ion{H}{2} regions. The H$\alpha$
982: fluxes from \citet{Viallefond:1986a} do not take into account
983: extinction, and this may be part of the reason for the deficit.
984: Non-thermal processes in the radio may also contribute to the radio
985: flux.
986:
987: Figure~\ref{G36} shows a comparison of the data and models for one star,
988: G036.8722-00.4112. The modeled free-free component plus stellar
989: blackbody (dash-dot-dot-dot curve) is not sufficient to explain the
990: measured excess at 24 $\mu$m for this source. A stellar blackbody
991: with additional blackbody due to dust (thin solid curve) fits all the
992: measured data and is the likely explanation for the excess.
993:
994: We applied our free-free model to all stars with H$\alpha$ emission
995: and measured [24] flux. Table~\ref{tff} gives the measured [24] flux
996: (from \citealt{Uzpen:2007}) for all 20 GLIMPSE stars and derived flux
997: contribution at [24] from free-free emission for the 15 stars with
998: emission and [24] excess. The excesses from six sources are
999: attributable to circumstellar gas since the removal of the free-free
1000: component results in $<$ 3 $\sigma$ excesses. We designate such
1001: objects as Type I sources. The remaining nine stars with emission and
1002: [24] measurements have excesses $>$ 3 $\sigma$ after the free-free
1003: components were removed. We designate these as Type II sources. We
1004: note that in none of our sources does the removal of the free-free
1005: component reduce the 8 $\mu$m or 24 $\mu$m flux below photospheric
1006: levels. In all cases, the correction for circumstellar free-free
1007: contributions either reduces the 8 and 24 $\mu$m measurements to the
1008: photospheric levels or leaves a significant excess at these bands.
1009:
1010: \subsection{Variability}
1011:
1012: Both classical Be and Herbig AeBe stars exhibit variability at
1013: H$\alpha$ (\citealt{Dachs:1988}; \citealt{Waters:1998}). Our sources
1014: may also be variable at H$\alpha$, and that may explain some of the
1015: Type II sources that exhibit an excess $>$ 3.0 $\sigma$ at [8.0]
1016: and/or [24] when the free-free component is removed. In order to
1017: assess H$\alpha$ variability among this sample, we investigated
1018: H$\alpha$ profile variations for a sub-sample of four northern Type I
1019: or II stars and a Balmer absorption star, G011.2691+00.4208,
1020: G036.8722-00.4112 and G047.3677+00.6199, G047.4523+00.5132, and
1021: G051.6491-00.1182. Ideally all Type II sources would be investigated
1022: for variability but five of the Type II stars are in the southern
1023: hemisphere and not observable from the Wyoming Infrared Observatory
1024: (WIRO) (G300.0992-00.0627, G305.4232-00.8229, G307.9784-00.7148,
1025: G314.3136-00.6977, and G340.0517+00.6687).
1026:
1027: We obtained optical spectroscopy of all stars with the WIRO-Spec
1028: instrument on WIRO on the nights of 2005 August 14 and 15 using the
1029: 1435 $l$ mm$^{-1}$ volume-phase holographic grating in first
1030: order. This instrument is an integral field unit spectrograph
1031: consisting of 293 densely packed fibers in a 19 $\times$ 20
1032: configuration with each fiber projecting to 1\arcsec \ on the sky.
1033: This grating provides a dispersion of 0.7 \AA\ pixel$^{-1}$, a spectral
1034: resolution of 1.4 \AA,\ and wavelength coverage of $\simeq$$1400$ \AA
1035: \ from $\simeq$5750--7150 \AA. Standard reduction techniques were
1036: implemented, including flat fielding using a continuum lamp and
1037: wavelength calibration using a CuAr arc lamp, but no flux calibration
1038: was performed. We achieved a typical signal-to-noise ratio of 100:1.
1039:
1040: We also obtained optical spectroscopy using the WIRO-Longslit
1041: spectrograph on the nights of 2006 September 13 and 14. The
1042: WIRO-Longslit is a low-resolution spectrograph with a dispersion of
1043: $1.1$ \AA\ pixel$^{-1}$, a resolution of $2.6$ \AA \ using a 2\arcsec \
1044: slit width, and covers $\simeq$$4400-6700$ \AA\ when using the 600
1045: $l$ mm$^{-1}$ grating in second order. We used a GG455 blocking
1046: filter to remove third order contamination. We performed the same
1047: reduction procedures for the longslit data as WIRO-Spec data, and the
1048: signal-to-noise ratios were similar.
1049:
1050: G011.2691+00.4208, G036.8722-00.4112, G051.6491-00.1182 displayed a
1051: double-peaked emission profile all three nights. G047.4523+00.5132
1052: exhibited absorption all three nights. G047.3677+00.6199 displayed a
1053: double-peaked emission profile on the nights of 2005 August 15 and
1054: 2006 September 27. However, on the night of 2006 September 13 the
1055: star exhibited a single-peaked emission profile. The
1056: EW(H$\alpha_{corr}$) changed $\simeq$25$\%$ and may be due to
1057: H$\alpha$ variability. A variation in H$\alpha$ may result in a
1058: lower-than-expected calculation of the free-free emission. We
1059: estimated at what level the H$\alpha$ EW must vary to account for the
1060: excess at [24]. We find that the EW(H$\alpha_{corr}$) must double for
1061: the free-free emission to explain the excess at [24]. It is
1062: interesting to note that even if the EW(H$\alpha_{corr}$) were a
1063: factor of two larger, the excess is still significant at [8.0] even
1064: after removal of the free-free component.
1065:
1066: For the six Type II stars in the southern hemisphere, we are unable
1067: to verify any H$\alpha$ variability because we have only one
1068: observation of these stars. The H$\alpha$ variability
1069: combined with the non-contemporaneous nature of the H$\alpha$ and IR
1070: data, may lead us to over- or underestimate the circumstellar
1071: free-free contribution to the [8.0] and [24] bands. If the
1072: circumstellar free-free contribution is underestimated, we expect to
1073: see a residual IR excess. The nine Type II sources may be examples of
1074: this effect. However, we find no instances of the converse, i.e.,
1075: sources where the H$\alpha$ flux over predicts of the circumstellar
1076: free-free contribution, thereby creating a deficit at [8.0] or
1077: [24]. We find that the six southern Type II sources need to exhibit
1078: H$\alpha$ equivalent width variation at two or three times the
1079: measured levels to explain the excesses as free-free emission. Thus,
1080: it is unlikely that the Type II sources are to be explained
1081: as objects owing their excess to free-free emission.
1082:
1083: Optical depth effects at H$\alpha$ may also lead to underestimates of
1084: the free-free emission. The H$\alpha$ optical depth would have to
1085: exceed $\tau$$\approx$1 in order to explain the excesses of Type II
1086: sources by free-free emission. As mentioned above,
1087: \citet{McDavid:2001} shows that a Be stellar disk with an electron
1088: density of order 10$^{12}$ cm$^{-3}$ is optically thin, with the
1089: maximum $\tau$ $<$ 1, at optical wavelengths.
1090:
1091: \subsection{Physical Nature of IR Excess Sources}
1092:
1093: Table~\ref{tsum} lists the derived circumstellar parameters for the
1094: nine Type II stars with the free-free emission component
1095: removed. Circumstellar disk temperature and fractional infrared
1096: luminosity were determined in the same manner as
1097: \citet{Uzpen:2007}. Briefly, we fit the SED as a single temperature
1098: blackbody to model the IR excess. Table~\ref{tsum} also lists the
1099: derived circumstellar parameters for the four non-emission line stars,
1100: hereafter referred to as Type III. We list the circumstellar disk
1101: parameters from \citet{Uzpen:2007} for the five $MSX$ stars with
1102: $\lambda$ $>$ 20 $\mu$m observations.
1103:
1104: We searched for correlations between derived circumstellar parameters
1105: with stellar parameters to provide insight into the nature of the
1106: excess. Figure~\ref{diskt} shows circumstellar disk temperature (upper
1107: panel) and stellar effective temperature (lower panel) versus
1108: EW(H$\alpha_{corr}$). We found a significant inverse-correlation
1109: between EW(H$\alpha_{corr}$) and circumstellar disk temperature for
1110: Type II stars. The correlation coefficient of -0.81 for the nine Type
1111: II sources means there is a $<$ 1 $\%$ probability of obtaining such a
1112: high degree of correlation by chance. Such a correlation is expected
1113: if the H$\alpha$ emission is arising within a gaseous and dusty
1114: circumstellar disk undergoing a clearing of the inner disk. That is,
1115: the strength of H$\alpha$ decreases and the dust temperature drops as
1116: the inner disk becomes anemic. If the excess were due to free-free
1117: emission, we would expect the strength of H$\alpha$ equivalent width
1118: to be correlated with stellar effective temperature. The hotter stars
1119: generate more ionizing photons when compared to cooler stars and
1120: exhibit a larger excess \citep{Gehrz:1974}. We find no such
1121: correlation between stellar temperature and H$\alpha$ equivalent width
1122: for Type I, Type II or Type III stars, see Figure~\ref{diskt}.
1123:
1124: Using our age estimates we investigated whether there is a correlation
1125: between EW(H$\alpha_{corr}$), age, and $L_{IR}/L_{*}$ in
1126: Figure~\ref{3in1}. Omitting the four pre-main-sequence stars from
1127: $MSX$, we used the nine Type II stars, but only six of the nine
1128: have age estimates. We plotted the younger age for Type II stars, when
1129: available. Using the six Type II sources and the one Type III source
1130: with an age, we find that age is strongly correlated with H$\alpha$
1131: equivalent width with a correlation coefficient of 0.97 indicating $<$
1132: 1\% probability of obtaining such a high probability by chance. Using
1133: the older age when available, there is no correlation between
1134: EW(H$\alpha_{corr}$) and age. \citet{Manoj:2006} found that
1135: H$\alpha$ line strength decreases as Herbig AeBe stars age. If those
1136: stars are part of the evolved tail to Herbig AeBe stars we would
1137: expect to see such a correlation between EW(H$\alpha_{corr}$) and age.
1138:
1139: Using the above fundamental parameters, above correlations, and
1140: spectral features we can determine the circumstellar disk
1141: classification for our entire sample of 30 mid-IR excess sources. We
1142: indicate our circumstellar disk classification in
1143: Table~\ref{tsum}. Pre-main-sequence Herbig AeBe stars and T-Tauri
1144: stars are indicated by H and TT respectively. Debris disks are
1145: denoted by D in Table~\ref{tsum}. Stars with an excess owing to
1146: free-free emission are classical Be stars and listed as B. Finally,
1147: stars with a transitional disk system are labeled with T. Five of the
1148: $MSX$ stars do not have a confirmed excess at $\lambda$ $>$ 20 $\mu$m
1149: and thus, we do not classify their possible circumstellar disk. We
1150: find that utilizing Figure~\ref{color} as a first order discriminate
1151: is useful but may not be the only parameter necessary to determine the
1152: nature of the excess. Each object is discussed in the following
1153: section.
1154:
1155: \section{Individual Objects}
1156:
1157: In the subsections below, we discuss individual sources. When
1158: available, we list the HD catalog number, the GLIMPSE or $MSX$ ID
1159: number, and the literature spectral type. In some cases, the spectral
1160: type found in the literature is discrepant from our results.
1161: Figure~\ref{flow} is a flowchart illustrating the criteria we use to
1162: assign an evolutionary state to each source. In summary, we require
1163: that our candidate debris disks not exhibit any emission lines and
1164: exhibit $K$-[24] colors $<$ 3.3 magnitudes (e.g.,
1165: \citealt{Hernandez:2007}). Transition disk systems may not exhibit
1166: Paschen emission lines, may exhibit \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$ 8446 \AA\
1167: emission, may exhibit \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$ 7772 \AA\ in emission or
1168: absorption, may not exhibit \ion{Fe}{2} emission, and must have an
1169: excess not entirely explainable by free-free emission. Classical Be
1170: stars must have Balmer emission, may exhibit Paschen emission, may
1171: exhibit \ion{Fe}{2} emission, may exhibit \ion{O}{1} emission, and
1172: must have an excess explainable entirely by free-free emission.
1173: Herbig AeBe stars may have essentially the same optical spectral
1174: characteristics as classical Be stars, and are therefore difficult to
1175: distinguish based on optical spectra alone. The infrared excess in
1176: HAeBe stars is dominated by dust rather than free-free emission,
1177: therefore knowledge of the SED at wavelengths longer than $\sim$10
1178: microns is essential for unambiguous classification. However, for our
1179: sample, HAeBe stars either exhibit \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$ 7772 \AA\
1180: absorption and \ion{Ca}{2} IR emission or exhibit \ion{O}{1} emission,
1181: Paschen emission, and an excess not entirely explainable by free-free
1182: emission.
1183:
1184: \subsection{Candidate Debris Disk Systems}
1185:
1186: \textbf{HD 231033 (G047.4523+00.5132)-A0V}- As one of the few stars in
1187: our sample that lacks H$\alpha$ emission, the derived disk temperature
1188: (355$\pm$8~K) and $L_{IR}/L_{*}$ (1.2$\times$10$^{-3}$) make
1189: this one of the best candidates for being a warm debris disk system.
1190: This source falls just to the left of the solid line in
1191: Figure~\ref{color}, in the region where excesses due to either
1192: free-free emission or hot dust are permissible. The disk temperature
1193: and fractional infrared luminosity are similar to, but slightly higher
1194: than, typical debris disks. Since this star does not exhibit any
1195: optical emission lines, we classify the circumstellar disk as a
1196: massive debris disk. This star exhibits stronger \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$
1197: 7772 \AA\ absorption than the stellar temperature would imply. This
1198: may indicate the presence of a small amount of circumstellar gas. This
1199: star was observed multiple times at H$\alpha$ with both WIRO and
1200: Magellan and was not observed to exhibit H$\alpha$ variability. The
1201: age derived for this star (log age(yr)=6.11--6.37 or 7.58--8.19) is
1202: consistent with a main-sequence or late-stage main-sequence star,
1203: which agrees with its circumstellar disk classification. The large
1204: uncertainty in age is due to the large uncertainties associated with
1205: the Tycho parallactic measurement (d=909$^{+91}_{-755}$~pc).
1206:
1207: \textbf{HD 121808 (G311.0099+00.4156)-A3IV}- This star lacks optical
1208: emission lines of any kind, making it another strong debris disk
1209: candidate. Like G047.4523+00.5132, it exhibits stronger \ion{O}{1}
1210: $\lambda$ 7772 \AA\ absorption than the stellar temperature would
1211: indicate, suggesting that it may also be surrounded by a small amount
1212: of circumstellar gas. Circumstellar disk parameters
1213: (T$_{disk}$=315$^{+4}_{-3}$~K and
1214: $L_{IR}/L_{*}$=2.7$\times$10$^{-4}$) are consistent with a
1215: warm, massive debris disk. There is insufficient data in the
1216: literature to make a distance estimate, and therefore, an age
1217: estimate, for this star.
1218:
1219: \textbf{HD 151017 (G339.7415-00.1904)-A0}- This star does not show any
1220: spectral features indicative of the presence of circumstellar
1221: gas. Derived circumstellar disk parameters (T$_{disk}$=311$\pm$6~K and
1222: $L_{IR}/L_{*}$=1.0$\times$10$^{-4}$) are consistent with a
1223: warm, massive debris disk. There is insufficient data in the
1224: literature to make a distance estimate, and therefore, an age
1225: estimate, for this star.
1226:
1227: \subsection{Candidate Transition Disk Systems}
1228:
1229: Since transition disks around intermediate-mass stars have only
1230: recently been identified, we discuss some general properties of our
1231: eight candidate transition disk systems as a whole. The four
1232: transition disk sources with determined disk temperatures above 500~K
1233: exhibit H$\alpha$ emission and \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$ 8446 \AA\
1234: emission. Two of these four sources exhibit \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$ 7772
1235: \AA\ in emission and two exhibit \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$ 7772 \AA\
1236: absorption consistent with stellar temperatures. Three of the four
1237: transition disk candidates with disk temperatures below 500~K exhibit
1238: H$\alpha$ emission. Two of these four exhibit \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$
1239: 7772 \AA\ absorption stronger than the best-matched stellar model, and
1240: two exhibit \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$ 7772 \AA\ absorption consistent with
1241: stellar temperatures. Three of the four stars with disk temperatures
1242: below 500~K are also in the region of color-color space in
1243: Figure~\ref{color} not explainable by free-free emission. The change
1244: in the \ion{O}{1} lines from emission in systems with hot
1245: circumstellar disks to absorption in systems with cooler circumstellar
1246: disks may be an evolutionary effect as the disk clears. Hotter
1247: circumstellar dust would be located nearer the star, and the lack of
1248: gaseous emission as the inner disk radius becomes larger may be direct
1249: evidence of disk clearing. More transitional disk systems need to be
1250: identified and studied to provide statistical significance to this
1251: trend.
1252:
1253: \textbf{HD 168246 (G014.4239-00.7657)-B8}- This star does not exhibit
1254: H$\alpha$ emission and has an intermediate value of projected
1255: rotational velocity, 165$\pm$ 10 km s$^{-1}$. $L_{IR}/L_{*}$
1256: for this star, 1.3$\times$10$^{-2}$, is higher than typical for debris
1257: disks. The derived disk temperature of T$_{disk}$=191~K is the
1258: coolest in our sample and suggests that the circumstellar material is
1259: located at a relatively large radius of $\sim$75 AU. We find that this
1260: star exhibits anomalously strong \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$ 7772 \AA\
1261: absorption compared to the adopted stellar model, suggesting the
1262: presence of circumstellar gas. Given the lower temperature derived for
1263: this disk and the large $K$-[24] color (5.15 mag), this disk may be
1264: optically thick at [24]. This system may contain a transitional disk
1265: at the end of its clearing phase. We also find that this star lies
1266: near a strong 70 $\mu$m extended source, raising the possibility that
1267: the infrared emission at [24] is unrelated to the star. We find that
1268: the difference between the position of the strong [24] point source
1269: and the [8.0] point source is 1.1\arcsec, i.e., small compared to the
1270: 6 \arcsec\ resolution at [24]. In order to determine the chance of
1271: a random coincidence between the two sources we used the [24] source
1272: density in this field, 54 stars over an area of 0.01 deg$^{2}$
1273: (0.1$\times$0.1 deg. region), to determine that there are
1274: 4.2$\times$10$^{-4}$ sources per arcsecond$^{2}$. The probability of
1275: a [24] source randomly falling within 1.1\arcsec\ of any given [8.0]
1276: source is 0.2\%. Thus, these two sources are probably
1277: related. Although unlikely, there is a chance that the excess for this
1278: source may be due to background cirrus.
1279:
1280: \textbf{(G036.8722-00.4112)-B8V}- This star exhibits double-peaked
1281: H$\alpha$ emission but no other optical emission lines. Disk
1282: temperature (T$_{disk}$=427~K) and $L_{IR}/L_{*}$
1283: (7.2$\times$10$^{-4}$) are similar to, but slightly higher than,
1284: debris disks. Given that this star falls in the region of 8-24 $\mu$m
1285: vs. $K$-8 $\mu$m color space not explainable by free-free emission, we
1286: classify this star as having a transitional disk. The possible ages
1287: for this star are widely variant, similar to either a late-stage
1288: pre-main-sequence star or late-stage main-sequence star. Given the
1289: nature of the excess and the large difference between the possible
1290: ages, we adopt the younger age range of log age(yr)=6.11--6.32.
1291:
1292: \textbf{HD 180398 (G047.3677+00.6199)-B8Ve}- This star has been
1293: studied as a classical Be star \citep{Jaschek:1992}. Our Magellan
1294: H$\alpha$ profile shows the same shape recorded by
1295: \citet{Jaschek:1992}, but we also observe profile variability
1296: consistent with the report of \citet{Hamdy:1991}. This star exhibits
1297: \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$ 8446 \AA\ emission but not Paschen emission. We
1298: classify this source as a transition disk. The derived disk
1299: temperature of 784$^{+19}_{-24}$~K is one of the highest in our
1300: sample, as is its H$\alpha$ equivalent width
1301: (EW(H$\alpha$$_{corr}$)=-22.47). The determined $L_{IR}/L_{*}$
1302: of 2.8$\times$10$^{-3}$ is consistent with a massive debris disk or
1303: transition disk. The age of this star is somewhere between a
1304: late-stage pre-main-sequence star and an early-stage main-sequence
1305: star (log age(yr)=6.87--7.72), consistent with a transitional
1306: disk. This star lies in a region of color-color space explainable
1307: either by free-free emission or a hot dust excess.
1308:
1309: \textbf{(G300.0992-00.0627)-A1}- This star was tentatively associated
1310: with an X-ray source detected by the \textit{Uhuru} Satellite
1311: \citep{Gursky:1972}. However, the \textit{Rosat} Faint Source Catalog
1312: position for the X-ray source is 580$\pm$31 \arcsec\ from the GLIMPSE
1313: IR position, effectively ruling out an association with the IR excess
1314: source \citep{Voges:2000}. This star exhibits strong double-peaked
1315: H$\alpha$ emission, \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$ 8446 and 7772 \AA\ emission,
1316: without \ion{Fe}{2} or Paschen emission. We characterize the infrared
1317: excess as due to a transition disk. Circumstellar disk parameters of
1318: T$_{disk}$=526$^{+41}_{-32}$~K and
1319: $L_{IR}/L_{*}$=2.1$\times$10$^{-3}$ indicate a disk between
1320: those of Herbig AeBe stars and those of debris disks. This may be an
1321: early form of transitional disk.
1322:
1323: \textbf{HD 114757 (G305.4232-00.8209)-B6/8V(E)}-
1324: \citet{Seidensticker:1989} derived M$_{V}$= -1.89$\pm$0.44,
1325: A$_{V}$=1.11$\pm$0.13 mag, and distance modulus of
1326: 10.03$\pm$0.46 mag. H$\alpha$ exhibits a double-peaked emission-line
1327: profile. This star exhibits a warm circumstellar disk temperature
1328: (T$_{disk}$=675~K) and moderate $L_{IR}/L_{*}$
1329: (3.8$\times$10$^{-3}$). Stellar age estimates indicate either an early
1330: pre-main-sequence star or a middle/late-stage main-sequence
1331: star. This source falls in a region of color-color space that may be
1332: explained by free-free emission or a hot dust component.
1333: Free-free emission is not sufficient to explain the large excess
1334: at [24], suggesting the presence of circumstellar dust.
1335: This star exhibits both \ion{O}{1}
1336: $\lambda$ 8446 and $\lambda$ 7772 \AA\ in emission without \ion{Fe}{2} or
1337: Paschen lines in emission. We classify this source as a transition
1338: disk and adopt the younger stellar age of log age (yr)=5.88.
1339:
1340: \textbf{HD 118094 (G307.9784-00.7148)-B8V(N)}- \citet{Levenhagen:2004}
1341: derived the fundamental parameters for this star, which they list as a
1342: Be star. They found \textit{v} sin \textit{i}=239$\pm$30 km s$^{-1}$,
1343: T$_{eff}$=13,500$\pm$550~K, log \textit{g}=3.90$\pm$0.15, log
1344: age(yr)=8.03$\pm$0.04, log\ \lo=2.59$\pm$0.08, and \
1345: \mo=4.2$\pm$0.2. Our derived values of projected rotational velocity,
1346: 240$\pm$20 km s$^{-1}$, and temperature, 13,220$\pm$520~K, are in
1347: agreement with their derived values. We determine this star to be
1348: either a young pre-main-sequence object or a late-stage main-sequence
1349: star, log age(yr)=6.00--6.23 or 7.66--8.03. Even using their derived
1350: parameters and the \citet{Siess:2000} models we can not rule out the
1351: possibility of a $\simeq$1 Myr star. The H$\alpha$ emission profile is
1352: highly asymmetric and double-peaked. This star exhibits \ion{O}{1}
1353: $\lambda$ 7772 \AA\ in emission without \ion{Fe}{2} or Paschen lines
1354: in emission. Based on our stellar parameters, spectral features,
1355: T$_{disk}$=557~K, $L_{IR}/L_{*}$=9.0$\times$10$^{-4}$, and the
1356: possibility of a few Myr age, which we adopt, we classify this excess
1357: owing to a transitional disk.
1358:
1359: \textbf{HD 122620 (G311.6185+00.2469)-B8/9IV/V}- \citet{Westin:1985}
1360: derived M$_{V}$=-0.613, distance=965 pc, T$_{eff}$=11,190~K, and log
1361: age(yr)=8.275. Our derived effective temperature of 10,540$\pm$255 K
1362: is lower. Our age estimates are log age(yr)=6.08--6.18 and
1363: 8.16--8.18. The older age is consistent with the literature but
1364: inconsistent with the nature of the excess. The free-free component of
1365: the [24] excess is one of the smallest of the sample. The
1366: circumstellar disk parameters (T$_{disk}$=306~K and
1367: $L_{IR}/L_{*}$=1.2$\times$10$^{-3}$) are consistent with a
1368: warm massive debris disk. The weak double-peaked H$\alpha$ emission
1369: profile is inconsistent with a debris disk nature for this source. We
1370: classify this source as a transitional circumstellar disk and adopt
1371: the younger stellar age range.
1372:
1373: \textbf{HD 126578 (G314.3136-00.6977)-A1IV}- This star exhibits the
1374: weakest H$\alpha$ emission profile. The circumstellar parameters
1375: (T$_{disk}$=328~K and $L_{IR}/L_{*}$=9.6$\times$10$^{-4}$)
1376: indicate a debris disk, but the weak H$\alpha$ emission precludes such
1377: classification. \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$ 7772 \AA\ is seen in absorption
1378: with an EW greater than the best-fit stellar model would indicate.
1379: This star falls in a region of color-color space where
1380: excesses due to free-free emission or hot dust are permissible.
1381: This star may be at the end of its transitional disk phase.
1382:
1383: \subsection{Probable Be stars (Type I Sources)}
1384:
1385: \textbf{HD 165854 (G011.2691+00.4208)-B9V}- We find that the excess
1386: for this star can be explained by free-free emission which supports
1387: the standing classification of this star as a classical Be star. The only
1388: emission we find is a weak double-peaked H$\alpha$
1389: profile. \citet{Halbedel:1996} found the rotational velocity to be
1390: 250$\pm$10 km s$^{-1}$, and \citet{Yudin:2001} found it to be
1391: 242$\pm$10 km s$^{-1}$. These values are slightly greater than our
1392: derived value of 220$\pm$15 km s$^{-1}$.
1393:
1394: \textbf{HD 172030 (G027.0268+00.7224)-A0V}- This star exhibits a
1395: double-peaked H$\alpha$ emission profile and \ion{Fe}{2} emission. The
1396: spectrum for this star also shows the \ion{Ca}{2} IR triplet,
1397: \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$ 8446 \AA, \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$ 7772 \AA\ , and
1398: the Paschen lines in emission. The excess for this source can be fully
1399: explained by free-free emission. It is interesting to note that this
1400: star has a low projected rotational velocity, 25$\pm$5 km s$^{-1}$,
1401: which is not typical for classical Be stars.
1402:
1403: \textbf{HD 183035 (G051.6491-00.1182)-A0V}- The core of the marginally
1404: double-peaked H$\alpha$ profile is nearly filled in, and no other
1405: emission lines are present. This star does exhibit broad absorption
1406: features, i.e., $\lambda$ $\sim$4455 \AA\ inconsistent with the
1407: measured stellar temperature. This absorption may be an indication of
1408: circumstellar gas. However, this star falls in a region of color-color
1409: space explainable by free-free emission and has an excess consistent
1410: with such an origin. We conclude that this is a classical Be star.
1411:
1412: \textbf{(G299.1677-00.3922)-B8}- This star exhibits
1413: double-peaked H$\alpha$ emission, Paschen emission, and
1414: \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$ 8446 \AA\ emission. This type of
1415: spectrum is typical for classical Be stars \citep{Andrillat:1990}.
1416:
1417: \textbf{HD 107609 (G299.7090-00.9704)-B8/9IV}-
1418: This star exhibits a large fraction of the excess at [24] as free-free
1419: emission. However, this source does not exhibit any
1420: lines other than H$\alpha$ in emission.
1421: Nevertheless, it is likely that this is a classical Be star.
1422:
1423: \textbf{HD 121195 (G310.5420+00.4120)-B8IV(N)}- \citet{Westin:1985}
1424: derived M$_{V}$=-2.953, distance=1,945 pc, and T$_{eff}$=12,940~K for
1425: this star. Their temperature is in agreement with our derived
1426: effective temperature of 12,430$\pm$510~K. We determined log
1427: age(yr)=$\simeq$5.30 utilizing the \citet{Westin:1985} absolute visual
1428: magnitude. This extreme youth is probably not realistic given that,
1429: at such an age, this star would be embedded and undergo substantial
1430: extinction, which is not observed. The H$\alpha$ emission profile is
1431: weak and double-peaked, while \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$ 7772 \AA\ is found
1432: in absorption. Since the excess can be explained fully by free-free
1433: emission we classify this source as a Be star, but the optical
1434: spectrum is similar to some transition disks.
1435:
1436: \subsection{Other Circumstellar Disks and Infrared Excesses}
1437:
1438: \textbf{HD 163296 (G007.2369+01.4894)-A1V}- This $MSX$ star has been
1439: studied numerous times for both stellar parameters and circumstellar
1440: disk evolution. This Herbig Ae (HAe) star is only 122$^{+17}_{-13}$ pc
1441: distant. Rotational velocities for this source are consistent in the
1442: literature, \citet{Finkenzeller:1985} derived a rotational velocity of
1443: 120$^{+20}_{-30}$ km s$^{-1}$, \citet{Halbedel:1996} derived a
1444: rotational velocity of 120 km s$^{-1}$, \citet{Mora:2001} derived a
1445: velocity of 130$\pm$6 km s$^{-1}$, all consistent with our calculated
1446: value of 145$\pm$15 km s$^{-1}$. Stellar fundamental parameters were
1447: calculated to be T$_{eff}$=9,200$\pm$270~K, M$_{Bol}$=0.48$\pm$0.10
1448: from \citet{Cidale:2001}, and T$_{eff}$=9,475K, M$_{*}$=2.4\ \mo, and
1449: 5 Myr old from \citet{Mannings:1997}. The age of this star varies in
1450: the literature but is 4--6 Myr with H$\alpha$ equivalent width varying
1451: between -12 -- -17 \AA \ \citep{Kessler-Silacci:2006}.
1452: \citet{Pogodin:1994} found this star to exhibit rapid H$\alpha$
1453: variability. Our derived T$_{eff}$ of 10,350$\pm$230~K is hotter than
1454: literature values. We find that the H$\alpha$ emission line is
1455: stronger than the values reported in the literature
1456: (EW(H$\alpha$)=-26.15$\pm$0.15 \AA). The \ion{Mg}{2} $\lambda$ 4481
1457: \AA\ line is known to vary, and this may explain the difference
1458: between our measured effective temperature and those in literature
1459: \citep{Catala:1989}. Spectral types for this star vary between A0--A7,
1460: confirming a range of stellar temperatures for this star
1461: (\citealt{Finkenzeller:1985}; \citealt{Kessler-Silacci:2006}). Our
1462: measured parameters are consistent with the pre-main-sequence nature
1463: of this star.
1464:
1465: \textbf{HD 167905 (G008.3752-03.6697)-F3V}- We classify this $MSX$
1466: star as a T-Tauri object based on large $L_{IR}/L_{*}$
1467: (2$\times$10$^{-1}$), weak H$\alpha$ emission with a P-Cygni profile,
1468: low effective stellar temperature (T$_{eff}$=7260~K), and low
1469: rotational velocity.
1470:
1471: \textbf{HD 161643 (G009.4973+05.2441)-A7V}- We do not have enough data
1472: to propose an evolutionary status for this $MSX$ star. This star is a
1473: binary, and this may explain its slightly asymmetric H$\alpha$
1474: absorption profile \citep{Fabricius:2000}. The secondary star is $\simeq$3
1475: magnitudes fainter at $V$ in the $Hipparcos$ catalog. Longer
1476: wavelength confirmation of the excess is needed. Confirmation of an
1477: excess having small $L_{IR}/L_{*}$ would indicate a debris disk.
1478: This star does not exhibit any emission lines.
1479:
1480: \textbf{HD 171149 (G025.6122+01.3020)-B9V}- \citet{Abt:1995} derived a
1481: rotational velocity for this $MSX$ star of 280 km s$^{-1}$, while
1482: \citet{Royer:2002b} found the rotational velocity to be $>$301 km
1483: s$^{-1}$. Our derived value of 290$\pm$20 km s$^{-1}$ is consistent
1484: with both prior measurements. We find H$\alpha$ in absorption. We also
1485: find this source to exhibit broad absorption at $\sim$4455 \AA\ that
1486: may be due to circumstellar material. Additional longer wavelength
1487: observations are needed to classify this star. The H$\alpha$ profile
1488: needs to be studied for variability and emission. Longer wavelength
1489: infrared/radio measurements are needed to confirm the excess. With
1490: additional optical and infrared/radio measurements it will be possible
1491: to distinguish between an excess due to a classical Be star, debris
1492: disk, or false excess.
1493:
1494: \textbf{HD 182293 (G054.5163+02.4470)-K1IV}- Although listed
1495: as a K1IV in \citet{Wright:2003}, our spectrum (not shown) indicates
1496: a spectral type of II-III. We omit further
1497: analysis of this source due to its evolved nature.
1498:
1499: \textbf{HD 58647 (G229.4514+01.0143)-B9V}- There is a disparity
1500: between measured projected rotational velocities for this star.
1501: \citet{Grady:1996} and \citet{Manoj:2002} found it to be 280 km
1502: s$^{-1}$, however, \citet{Mora:2001} found the projected rotational
1503: velocity to be 118$\pm$4 km s$^{-1}$. Historically this star has been
1504: classified as a Herbig AeBe star, but in \citet{Manoj:2002} they
1505: conclude that this star is a classical Be star based on the low
1506: fractional infrared luminosity. \citet{Monnier:2005} studied the
1507: near-IR and disk properties of this source. They measured a stellar
1508: luminosity of 295$\pm$50 \ \lo, and found a very low fractional
1509: infrared luminosity when compared to other Herbig AeBe
1510: stars. \citet{Vink:2002} found that H$\alpha$ line polarization for
1511: this star does not agree with that of classical Be stars but exhibits
1512: similar properties to Herbig AeBe stars in the (Q,U) plane. They also
1513: measured the H$\alpha$ equivalent width to be -8.6\ \AA \ which is
1514: consistent with our measurement of -7.82$\pm$0.45\ \AA \ assuming they
1515: have similar uncertainties. We find this source to exhibit the
1516: \ion{Ca}{2} IR triplet, \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$ 8446 \AA\, and
1517: \ion{Fe}{2} in emission. This source also shows strong \ion{O}{1}
1518: $\lambda$ 7772 \AA\ , and $\sim$4455 \AA\ absorption. Based upon
1519: the spectral properties of this source we conclude that HD 58647 is a
1520: Herbig AeBe star. Given the low fractional infrared luminosity, this
1521: star may be a more evolved form of Herbig AeBe star.
1522:
1523: \textbf{HD 72106 (G257.6236+00.2459)-A0IV}- This is a visual double
1524: star with a separation of 0.8 arcseconds \citep{Viera:2003}. We have a
1525: spectrum of only the primary star, and no emission lines are
1526: found. \citet{Viera:2003} conclude that the secondary of this system
1527: exhibits the infrared excess, the H$\alpha$ emission, and is an evolved
1528: HAeBe star. The mid-IR spectrum of this source exhibits similar
1529: features of solar system comets also indicating the evolved nature of
1530: a Herbig AeBe star \citep{Schutz:2005}. \citet{Wade:2005} measured the
1531: magnetic field of both the primary and secondary of this system and
1532: found the primary to exhibit a strong magnetic field. They argue that
1533: the primary may be a progenitor to the Ap/Bp stars.
1534:
1535: \textbf{HD 73461 (G265.5536-03.9951)-A5V\&A6/8V}- This is a known wide
1536: visual binary \citep{Brosche:1989}. We have spectra of both the
1537: primary and secondary. Neither source exhibits any emission lines. The
1538: primary exhibits stronger \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$ 7772 \AA\ absorption
1539: that may indicate circumstellar gas. Longer wavelength confirmation
1540: of the excess is necessary to determine the nature of the
1541: circumstellar disk. Assuming the binary system is
1542: coeval, the stellar parameters constrain the primary to 2.2$\pm$0.2\
1543: \mo\ and secondary to 2.0$\pm$0.2\ \mo\ with an age of 6.81--6.83 Log
1544: yr.
1545:
1546: \textbf{HD 74534 (G269.5873-05.8882)-G0V}- \citet{Cutispoto:2002} detect
1547: \ion{Ca}{2} $\lambda$ K emission. We do not detect this in our spectrum.
1548: \citet{Cutispoto:2003} derived a mass of 2\ \mo, an age of $<$ 2 Gyr,
1549: and a projected rotational velocity of 17 km s$^{-1}$. They find this
1550: star to be an evolved giant. We also find this star to be an evolved
1551: giant based on our spectrum. Our derived projected rotational velocity
1552: of 10$\pm$5 km s$^{-1}$ is the lowest determined for our sample.
1553: We do not derive additional
1554: parameters for this source due to its evolved nature.
1555:
1556: \textbf{HD 135354 (G321.7868+00.4102)-B8VN}- \citet{Kozok:1985}
1557: derived distances, absolute visual magnitudes, and reddenings for Be
1558: stars, including this star. The absolute visual magnitude is -1.18 at
1559: a distance of 1.01 kpc. Utilizing these parameters, we determined a
1560: stellar age range of log age(yr)=5.83--6.12 and 8.01--8.13. This star
1561: exhibits H$\alpha$, \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$ 8446 \AA, \ion{O}{1}
1562: $\lambda$ 7772 \AA, Paschen, and \ion{Fe}{2} emission.
1563: \citet{Andrillat:1990} found that classical Be stars exhibiting
1564: \ion{O}{1} emission also show Paschen emission. \citet{Jaschek:1993}
1565: found that classical Be stars exhibit both \ion{O}{1} and \ion{Fe}{2}
1566: emission. This star exhibits both of these characteristics. The
1567: fractional infrared luminosity and disk temperature
1568: ($L_{IR}/L_{*}$=2.1$\times$10$^{-3}$ and T$_{disk}$=556~K) are
1569: consistent with transition disks but the measured H$\alpha$ EW is the
1570: second strongest of the sample. Given that the H$\alpha$ flux is
1571: insufficient to explain the excess at [24] and the EW of H$\alpha$ is
1572: consistent with Herbig AeBe stars we classify this star as a Herbig
1573: AeBe star.
1574:
1575: \textbf{HD 151228 (G339.4392-00.7791)-A0/1 IV/V}- The excess
1576: at [8.0] is not confirmed for this star at [24], making it
1577: a false mid-IR excess.
1578:
1579: \textbf{HD 150625 (G340.0517+00.6687)-B8}- \citet{Kozok:1985} derived
1580: an absolute visual magnitude of -1.87 and a distance of 0.83 kpc.
1581: Using these parameters we constrain stellar ages to log
1582: age(yr)=5.62--5.85 and 7.81--7.90. This star exhibits a strong
1583: H$\alpha$ emission profile, \ion{Fe}{2}, Paschen, and \ion{O}{1}
1584: $\lambda$ 8446 and 7772 \AA\ emission lines. The measured H$\alpha$
1585: flux is insufficient to explain the excess at [24]. This is the other
1586: Type II source that we classify as a Herbig AeBe star based on the
1587: emission line spectrum. The fractional infrared luminosity and disk
1588: temperature ($L_{IR}/L_{*}$=1.5$\times$10$^{-2}$ and
1589: T$_{disk}$=823~K) for this star is the largest in the GLIMPSE sample
1590: and falls between Herbig AeBe stars and debris disks. This may be an
1591: evolved Herbig AeBe star.
1592:
1593: \textbf{HD 152404 (G347.3777+04.2010)-F5V}- This star is a
1594: spectroscopic binary in the Upper Centarus-Lupus with an orbital
1595: period of 13.6 days \citep{Manset:2005}. This star is $\simeq$ 17 Myr
1596: old and classified as F5V \citep{Chen:2005}. This star has a strong
1597: excess ratio given its age and may be a long lived primordial disk
1598: \citep{Siegler:2007}. Our projected rotational velocity for the two
1599: stars is 15$\pm$5 km s$^{-1}$ consistent with 18.5$\pm$1.0 km s$^{-1}$
1600: from \citep{Alencar:2003}. Due to the nature of this binary source we
1601: do not derive effective temperature since our method of deriving
1602: temperature does not extend to spectroscopic binaries of similar
1603: mass. The H$\alpha$ profile indicates an unusual double peaked inverse
1604: P-Cygni profile. This may indicate circumstellar accretion.
1605:
1606: \section{Sample Comparisons}
1607:
1608: Given the similarity of the H$\alpha$ profiles for both stars
1609: classified as candidate transition disks systems and classical Be
1610: stars, we make a comparison of the spectral features for our sample
1611: with a group of well-studied classical Be stars from
1612: \citet{Andrillat:1990} and \citet{Jaschek:1993}. We use the following
1613: conclusions from \citet{Andrillat:1990} for classical Be stars: 1)
1614: \ion{Ca}{2} emission is infrequent for spectral types later than B6
1615: and nearly all stars that exhibit \ion{Ca}{2} in emission exhibit
1616: Paschen emission, 2) Paschen lines are in emission when \ion{O}{1} is
1617: in emission, 3) When $IRAS$ 12 $\mu$m is in excess greater than 0.55
1618: magnitudes of the predicted measurement then \ion{Ca}{2} is in
1619: emission. In order to make the comparison with the last criterion we
1620: used the [8.0] measurement in excess greater than 0.55 magnitudes.
1621: Table~\ref{comp} lists the 10 stars we are able to classify as either
1622: consistent or inconsistent with a classical Be star classification
1623: based on the three criteria we mentioned above. In all 10 instances
1624: the classifications we derive using the criteria of
1625: \citet{Andrillat:1990} are consistent with our classifications.
1626:
1627: In order to validate our classification scheme we also applied the
1628: classifications in Figure~\ref{flow} to the classical Be stars in
1629: \citet{Andrillat:1990}. In order to make the comparison over all
1630: spectral features classified, we supplemented the spectra from
1631: \citet{Andrillat:1990} with spectra from \citet{Jaschek:1993} to gain
1632: the \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$ 7772 \AA\ feature. There were only 19 stars
1633: in both \citet{Andrillat:1990} and \citet{Jaschek:1993}. Using our
1634: classification criteria we were able to classify only one of the 19
1635: stars as a classical Be star based on spectra alone. The remaining 18
1636: stars required some knowledge of the SED. We fit Kurucz stellar models
1637: to 2MASS photometry for these 18 stars in a manner similar to our
1638: GLIMPSE stars in order to estimate the amount of extraphotospheric
1639: flux emanating from these sources. Since these 18 stars are all bright
1640: ($\sim$V$\leq$ 5) and 2MASS photometry for such stars have large
1641: uncertainties, we chose not to determine the free-free emission from
1642: H$\alpha$ flux because of the larger normalization uncertainties
1643: associated with the $K$ band. In order to determine the nature of the
1644: excess emission we determined the slope of the excess component,
1645: $\beta$, where F$_{\nu}$ $\propto$ $\nu^{\beta}$ after an estimate of
1646: the stellar flux was removed. The slope of free-free emission in the
1647: infrared varies from $\beta$ $\sim$ -0.1--2.0 depending on the optical
1648: depth of the gas \citep{Wright:1974}. By contrast, sources with dust
1649: components would have slopes $\beta$ $<$ -0.1. In order to determine
1650: the slope of the infrared excess, we used flux measurements at 8.7
1651: $\mu$m from \citet{Gehrz:1974} and the $IRAS$ Point Source Catalog at
1652: 25 $\mu$m measurements. Only 10 of the 18 stars had photometry at both
1653: 8.7 and 25 $\mu$m. We found that eight out of the 10 stars exhibit
1654: positive slopes consistent with optically thick free-free
1655: emission. $\eta$ Tau and 48 Per exhibited negative slopes. Only 48
1656: Per exhibits a slope less than -0.1 at the 3$\sigma$ level. Given the
1657: length of time between the two infrared measurements ($>$ 10 years)
1658: the large negative slope may be a consequence of the star's known
1659: variability (e.g., \citealt{Koen:2002}). Assuming that slopes
1660: consistent with free-free emission would cause the stars to be
1661: classified as Type I sources (Be stars), 10 of 11 known classical Be
1662: stars would be classified as Be stars using our classification
1663: methods. By comparison, all three of our candidate debris disk systems
1664: exhibit slopes less than -0.1 at a 3$\sigma$ or greater level. None of
1665: the six classical Be stars within our sample exhibit slopes less than
1666: -0.1 at a 3$\sigma$ level, meaning that their excesses are consistent with
1667: optically thin or thick free-free emission. Neither of the two
1668: candidate Herbig AeBe stars exhibit a slope less than -0.1 at the
1669: 3$\sigma$ level. Four of the eight candidate transition disk
1670: systems exhibit a slope less than -0.1 at greater than a 3$\sigma$,
1671: level indicative of dust. These four stars are G014.4239-00.7657,
1672: G036.8722-00.4112, G311.6185+00.2469, and G314.3136-00.6977. The
1673: explanation for the four remaining candidate transition disk systems
1674: not exhibiting a $\beta$ $<$ -0.1 at a 3$\sigma$ level may be
1675: variability. An additional scenario for the shallower slopes
1676: is a narrow ring of single temperature hot dust, something analogous
1677: to $\zeta$ Leporis \citep{Chen:2001}. Another possible
1678: explanation for the excess for these four stars may be optically thick
1679: free-free emission. In order to be conservative, we added a possible
1680: Be classification to the remaining four candidate transition disk
1681: systems, G047.3677+00.6199, G300.0992-00.0627, G305.4232-00.8229, and
1682: G307.9784-00.7148 in Table~\ref{tsum}.
1683:
1684: \section{Conclusion}
1685:
1686: In an effort to identify the nature of the infrared excesses, we
1687: obtained high-resolution optical spectroscopy for 31 luminosity class
1688: V or IV stars of spectral type B8 or later exhibiting 8 $\mu$m mid-IR
1689: excesses in the GLIMPSE and $MSX$ catalogs. We measured stellar
1690: effective temperatures for 28 stars and projected rotational
1691: velocities and H$\alpha$ equivalent widths for 30 stars. The projected
1692: rotational velocities of the 20 GLIMPSE stars lie between 25 and 310
1693: km s$^{-1}$ with a mean and dispersion of 209$\pm$76 km s$^{-1}$
1694: consistent with the mixed nature of the sample. We used derived
1695: stellar parameters and distances to estimate stellar ages ranging from
1696: $\simeq$1 Myr to 100 Myr for 16 stars (9 of the 20 GLIMPSE
1697: stars). Twenty of the 31 stars (16 of the 20 GLIMPSE stars) exhibit
1698: H$\alpha$ emission, consistent with characteristics of
1699: pre-main-sequence stars (i.e., Herbig AeBe stars) or classical Be
1700: stars. H$\alpha$ equivalent widths range between -39.38 \AA\
1701: (characteristic of classical Be stars or Herbig AeBe stars) and 9.41
1702: \AA\ (main-sequence B and A stars), suggesting a variety of origins in
1703: a sample of objects spanning a range of stellar evolutionary states.
1704:
1705: For 16 of the 20 GLIMPSE stars showing H$\alpha$ emission, we use the
1706: H$\alpha$ flux to estimate the expected contribution of (free-free and
1707: free-bound) emission to the mid-IR excesses. In six out of the 16
1708: cases, the expected IR excess can fully account for the observed
1709: infrared excess (Type I sources). We did not confirm the infrared
1710: excess at 24 $\mu$m in one case. In the remaining nine cases (Type II
1711: sources) the expected contribution from free-free emission cannot
1712: account for all of the observed IR excess, implying that either 1) the
1713: circumstellar excess is time-variable and the non-contemporaneous
1714: nature of H$\alpha$ and mid-IR data render this estimate invalid, or
1715: 2) there is a dust component to the IR excess. The lack of evidence
1716: for H$\alpha$ variability for the majority of our sources, combined
1717: with the fact that in no instance does the H$\alpha$ \textit{over
1718: predict} the IR excess component, makes the first scenario
1719: unlikely. We conclude that the second scenario, the presence of a
1720: circumstellar dust component, is most probable. Combining correlations
1721: of spectral features for sources with known characteristics we find
1722: that the nine Type II sources with IR excesses require a dust
1723: component and are likely to be young main-sequence or near
1724: main-sequence objects harboring warm (300--800 K) circumstellar dust.
1725: The nominal fractional infrared luminosities for these nine sources
1726: after removal of the free-free component is
1727: $\simeq$10$^{-2}$--10$^{-3}$. For the six of these nine sources with
1728: age estimates, there is a correlation between estimated age and
1729: H$\alpha$ EW consistent with a progression of disk clearing with
1730: time. Such characteristics make these stars candidates for being
1731: ``transition disk'' or ``evolved-HAeBe'' systems containing rare
1732: dissipating primordial gas and dust disks. One of the four systems
1733: lacking H$\alpha$ emission has a very large $K$-[24] color, $>$ 4
1734: magnitudes. Such a large color difference implies that the excess is
1735: optically thick at [24]. We conclude that this source is also a
1736: transition disk. The remaining three systems lacking H$\alpha$
1737: emission have disk temperatures of 300--400 K and fractional infrared
1738: luminosities of 10$^{-3}$. These characteristics make them candidates
1739: for dusty debris disk systems.
1740:
1741: We show that $K$-8, 8-24 color-color diagrams are a useful tool to
1742: distinguish cool (T$_{d}$ $<$ 300~K) dusty mid-IR excess objects from
1743: hot (T$_{d}$ $>$ 500~K) dusty or free-free mid-IR excesses. Such
1744: diagrams reveal that additional information beyond near/mid-IR colors
1745: is necessary to distinguish hot dust from free-free excesses. This
1746: diagram also reinforces the idea that some stars cataloged as
1747: classical Be stars may in fact be late-stage pre-main-sequence stars
1748: containing circumstellar dust.
1749:
1750: \acknowledgments
1751:
1752: We would like to thank Mary Putnam and Sally Oey for their assistance
1753: in obtaining the Magellan observations. We would like to thank Karen
1754: Kinemuchi for her helpful discussions. We kindly thank M.R. Meade,
1755: B.L. Babler, R. Indebetouw, B. A. Whitney, C. Watson, and
1756: E. Churchwell for their use of the GLIMPSE data reduction
1757: pipeline. B.U. acknowledges support from a NASA Graduate Student
1758: Researchers Program fellowship, grant NNX06AI28H. This research has
1759: made use of the SIMBAD database, operated at CDS, Strasbourg,
1760: France. This publication makes use of data products from the Two
1761: Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint project of the University of
1762: Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis
1763: Center/California Institute of Technology, funded by the National
1764: Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Science
1765: Foundation.
1766:
1767:
1768: %\bibliographystyle{apj}% your bst file here
1769: %\bibliography{apj-jour,paper3} %your bib file here
1770:
1771: \begin{thebibliography}{113}
1772: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
1773:
1774: \bibitem[{{Abt} {et~al.}(2002){Abt}, {Levato}, \& {Grosso}}]{Abt:2002}
1775: {Abt}, H.~A., {Levato}, H., \& {Grosso}, M. 2002, \apj, 573, 359
1776:
1777: \bibitem[{{Abt} \& {Morrell}(1995)}]{Abt:1995}
1778: {Abt}, H.~A., \& {Morrell}, N.~I. 1995, \apjs, 99, 135
1779:
1780: \bibitem[{{Alencar} {et~al.}(2003){Alencar}, {Melo}, {Dullemond}, {Andersen},
1781: {Batalha}, {Vaz}, \& {Mathieu}}]{Alencar:2003}
1782: {Alencar}, S.~H.~P., {Melo}, C.~H.~F., {Dullemond}, C.~P., {Andersen}, J.,
1783: {Batalha}, C., {Vaz}, L.~P.~R., \& {Mathieu}, R.~D. 2003, \aap, 409, 1037
1784:
1785: \bibitem[{{Andrillat} {et~al.}(1990){Andrillat}, {Jaschek}, \&
1786: {Jaschek}}]{Andrillat:1990}
1787: {Andrillat}, A., {Jaschek}, M., \& {Jaschek}, C. 1990, \aaps, 84, 11
1788:
1789: \bibitem[{{Ashok} {et~al.}(1984){Ashok}, {Bhatt}, {Kulkarni}, \&
1790: {Joshi}}]{Ashok:1984}
1791: {Ashok}, N.~M., {Bhatt}, H.~C., {Kulkarni}, P.~V., \& {Joshi}, S.~C. 1984,
1792: \mnras, 211, 471
1793:
1794: \bibitem[{{Aumann} {et~al.}(1984){Aumann}, {Beichman}, {Gillett}, {de Jong},
1795: {Houck}, {Low}, {Neugebauer}, {Walker}, \& {Wesselius}}]{Aumann:1984}
1796: {Aumann}, H.~H., {Beichman}, C.~A., {Gillett}, F.~C., {de Jong}, T., {Houck},
1797: J.~R., {Low}, F.~J., {Neugebauer}, G., {Walker}, R.~G., \& {Wesselius}, P.~R.
1798: 1984, \apjl, 278, L23
1799:
1800: \bibitem[{{Aumann} \& {Probst}(1991)}]{Aumann:1991}
1801: {Aumann}, H.~H., \& {Probst}, R.~G. 1991, \apj, 368, 264
1802:
1803: \bibitem[{{Backman} \& {Paresce}(1993)}]{Backman:1993}
1804: {Backman}, D.~E., \& {Paresce}, F. 1993, in Protostars and Planets III, ed.
1805: E.~H. {Levy} \& J.~I. {Lunine}, 1253--1304
1806:
1807: \bibitem[{{Balona}(2000)}]{Balona:2000}
1808: {Balona}, L.~A. 2000, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series,
1809: Vol. 214, IAU Colloq. 175: The Be Phenomenon in Early-Type Stars, ed. M.~A.
1810: {Smith}, H.~F. {Henrichs}, \& J.~{Fabregat}, 1--58381
1811:
1812: \bibitem[{{Benjamin} {et~al.}(2003){Benjamin}, {Churchwell}, {Babler}, {Bania},
1813: {Clemens}, {Cohen}, {Dickey}, {Indebetouw}, {Jackson}, {Kobulnicky},
1814: {Lazarian}, {Marston}, {Mathis}, {Meade}, {Seager}, {Stolovy}, {Watson},
1815: {Whitney}, {Wolff}, \& {Wolfire}}]{Benjamin:2003}
1816: {Benjamin}, R.~A., {Churchwell}, E., {Babler}, B.~L., {Bania}, T.~M.,
1817: {Clemens}, D.~P., {Cohen}, M., {Dickey}, J.~M., {Indebetouw}, R., {Jackson},
1818: J.~M., {Kobulnicky}, H.~A., {Lazarian}, A., {Marston}, A.~P., {Mathis},
1819: J.~S., {Meade}, M.~R., {Seager}, S., {Stolovy}, S.~R., {Watson}, C.,
1820: {Whitney}, B.~A., {Wolff}, M.~J., \& {Wolfire}, M.~G. 2003, \pasp, 115, 953
1821:
1822: \bibitem[{{Bernstein} {et~al.}(2003){Bernstein}, {Shectman}, {Gunnels},
1823: {Mochnacki}, \& {Athey}}]{Bernstein:2003}
1824: {Bernstein}, R., {Shectman}, S.~A., {Gunnels}, S.~M., {Mochnacki}, S., \&
1825: {Athey}, A.~E. 2003, in Presented at the Society of Photo-Optical
1826: Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference, Vol. 4841, Instrument Design and
1827: Performance for Optical/Infrared Ground-based Telescopes. Edited by Iye,
1828: Masanori; Moorwood, Alan F. M. Proceedings of the SPIE, Volume 4841, pp.
1829: 1694-1704 (2003)., ed. M.~{Iye} \& A.~F.~M. {Moorwood}, 1694--1704
1830:
1831: \bibitem[{{Bjorkman} {et~al.}(1998){Bjorkman}, {Miroshnichenko}, {Bjorkman},
1832: {Meade}, {Babler}, {Code}, {Anderson}, {Fox}, {Johnson}, {Weitenbeck},
1833: {Zellner}, \& {Lupie}}]{Bjorkman:1998}
1834: {Bjorkman}, K.~S., {Miroshnichenko}, A.~S., {Bjorkman}, J.~E., {Meade}, M.~R.,
1835: {Babler}, B.~L., {Code}, A.~D., {Anderson}, C.~M., {Fox}, G.~K., {Johnson},
1836: J.~J., {Weitenbeck}, A.~J., {Zellner}, N.~E.~B., \& {Lupie}, O.~L. 1998,
1837: \apj, 509, 904
1838:
1839: \bibitem[{{Boehm} \& {Catala}(1995)}]{Bohm:1995}
1840: {Boehm}, T., \& {Catala}, C. 1995, \aap, 301, 155
1841:
1842: \bibitem[{{Bowen}(1947)}]{Bowen:1947}
1843: {Bowen}, I.~S. 1947, \pasp, 59, 196
1844:
1845: \bibitem[{{Brocklehurst}(1971)}]{Brocklehurst:1971}
1846: {Brocklehurst}, M. 1971, \mnras, 153, 471
1847:
1848: \bibitem[{{Brosche} \& {Sinachopoulos}(1989)}]{Brosche:1989}
1849: {Brosche}, P., \& {Sinachopoulos}, D. 1989, Bulletin d'Information du Centre de
1850: Donnees Stellaires, 37, 109
1851:
1852: \bibitem[{{Calvet} {et~al.}(2005){Calvet}, {D'Alessio}, {Watson},
1853: {Franco-Hern{\'a}ndez}, {Furlan}, {Green}, {Sutter}, {Forrest}, {Hartmann},
1854: {Uchida}, {Keller}, {Sargent}, {Najita}, {Herter}, {Barry}, \&
1855: {Hall}}]{Calvet:2005}
1856: {Calvet}, N., {D'Alessio}, P., {Watson}, D.~M., {Franco-Hern{\'a}ndez}, R.,
1857: {Furlan}, E., {Green}, J., {Sutter}, P.~M., {Forrest}, W.~J., {Hartmann}, L.,
1858: {Uchida}, K.~I., {Keller}, L.~D., {Sargent}, B., {Najita}, J., {Herter},
1859: T.~L., {Barry}, D.~J., \& {Hall}, P. 2005, \apjl, 630, L185
1860:
1861: \bibitem[{{Carroll}(1933)}]{Carroll:1933}
1862: {Carroll}, J.~A. 1933, \mnras, 93, 478
1863:
1864: \bibitem[{{Catala} {et~al.}(1986){Catala}, {Czarny}, {Felenbok}, \&
1865: {Praderie}}]{Catala:1986}
1866: {Catala}, C., {Czarny}, J., {Felenbok}, P., \& {Praderie}, F. 1986, \aap, 154,
1867: 103
1868:
1869: \bibitem[{{Catala} {et~al.}(1989){Catala}, {Simon}, {Praderie}, {Talavera},
1870: {The}, \& {Tjin A Djie}}]{Catala:1989}
1871: {Catala}, C., {Simon}, T., {Praderie}, F., {Talavera}, A., {The}, P.~S., \&
1872: {Tjin A Djie}, H.~R.~E. 1989, \aap, 221, 273
1873:
1874: \bibitem[{{Chen} \& {Jura}(2001)}]{Chen:2001}
1875: {Chen}, C.~H., \& {Jura}, M. 2001, \apjl, 560, L171
1876:
1877: \bibitem[{{Chen} {et~al.}(2005){Chen}, {Jura}, {Gordon}, \&
1878: {Blaylock}}]{Chen:2005}
1879: {Chen}, C.~H., {Jura}, M., {Gordon}, K.~D., \& {Blaylock}, M. 2005, \apj, 623,
1880: 493
1881:
1882: \bibitem[{{Chen} {et~al.}(2006){Chen}, {Sargent}, {Bohac}, {Kim},
1883: {Leibensperger}, {Jura}, {Najita}, {Forrest}, {Watson}, {Sloan}, \&
1884: {Keller}}]{Chen:2006}
1885: {Chen}, C.~H., {Sargent}, B.~A., {Bohac}, C., {Kim}, K.~H., {Leibensperger},
1886: E., {Jura}, M., {Najita}, J., {Forrest}, W.~J., {Watson}, D.~M., {Sloan},
1887: G.~C., \& {Keller}, L.~D. 2006, \apjs, 166, 351
1888:
1889: \bibitem[{{Cidale} {et~al.}(2001){Cidale}, {Zorec}, \&
1890: {Tringaniello}}]{Cidale:2001}
1891: {Cidale}, L., {Zorec}, J., \& {Tringaniello}, L. 2001, \aap, 368, 160
1892:
1893: \bibitem[{{Cox}(2000)}]{Cox:2000}
1894: {Cox}, A.~N. 2000, {Allen's astrophysical quantities} (Allen's astrophysical
1895: quantities, 4th ed.~Publisher: New York: AIP Press; Springer, 2000.~Editedy
1896: by Arthur N.~Cox.~ ISBN: 0387987460)
1897:
1898: \bibitem[{{Cutispoto} {et~al.}(2002){Cutispoto}, {Pastori}, {Pasquini}, {de
1899: Medeiros}, {Tagliaferri}, \& {Andersen}}]{Cutispoto:2002}
1900: {Cutispoto}, G., {Pastori}, L., {Pasquini}, L., {de Medeiros}, J.~R.,
1901: {Tagliaferri}, G., \& {Andersen}, J. 2002, \aap, 384, 491
1902:
1903: \bibitem[{{Cutispoto} {et~al.}(2003){Cutispoto}, {Tagliaferri}, {de Medeiros},
1904: {Pastori}, {Pasquini}, \& {Andersen}}]{Cutispoto:2003}
1905: {Cutispoto}, G., {Tagliaferri}, G., {de Medeiros}, J.~R., {Pastori}, L.,
1906: {Pasquini}, L., \& {Andersen}, J. 2003, \aap, 397, 987
1907:
1908: \bibitem[{{Dachs} {et~al.}(1988){Dachs}, {Kiehling}, \& {Engels}}]{Dachs:1988}
1909: {Dachs}, J., {Kiehling}, R., \& {Engels}, D. 1988, \aap, 194, 167
1910:
1911: \bibitem[{{Deroo} {et~al.}(2007){Deroo}, {Acke}, {Verhoelst}, {Dominik},
1912: {Tatulli}, \& {van Winckel}}]{Deroo:2007}
1913: {Deroo}, P., {Acke}, B., {Verhoelst}, T., {Dominik}, C., {Tatulli}, E., \&
1914: {van Winckel}, H. 2007, \aap, 474, 45
1915:
1916: \bibitem[{{Egan} {et~al.}(2003){Egan}, {Price}, {Kraemer}, {Mizuno}, {Carey},
1917: {Wright}, {Engelke}, {Cohen}, \& {Gugliotti}}]{Egan:2003}
1918: {Egan}, M.~P., {Price}, S.~D., {Kraemer}, K.~E., {Mizuno}, D.~R., {Carey},
1919: S.~J., {Wright}, C.~O., {Engelke}, C.~W., {Cohen}, M., \& {Gugliotti}, M.~G.
1920: 2003, VizieR Online Data Catalog, 5114, 0
1921:
1922: \bibitem[{{Fabricius} \& {Makarov}(2000)}]{Fabricius:2000}
1923: {Fabricius}, C., \& {Makarov}, V.~V. 2000, VizieR Online Data Catalog, 335,
1924: 60141
1925:
1926: \bibitem[{{Finkenzeller}(1985)}]{Finkenzeller:1985}
1927: {Finkenzeller}, U. 1985, \aap, 151, 340
1928:
1929: \bibitem[{{Finkenzeller} \& {Mundt}(1984)}]{Finkenzeller:1984}
1930: {Finkenzeller}, U., \& {Mundt}, R. 1984, \aaps, 55, 109
1931:
1932: \bibitem[{{Furlan} {et~al.}(2007){Furlan}, {Sargent}, {Calvet}, {Forrest},
1933: {D'Alessio}, {Hartmann}, {Watson}, {Green}, {Najita}, \&
1934: {Chen}}]{Furlan:2007}
1935: {Furlan}, E., {Sargent}, B., {Calvet}, N., {Forrest}, W.~J., {D'Alessio}, P.,
1936: {Hartmann}, L., {Watson}, D.~M., {Green}, J.~D., {Najita}, J., \& {Chen},
1937: C.~H. 2007, \apj, 664, 1176
1938:
1939: \bibitem[{{Gehrz} {et~al.}(1974){Gehrz}, {Hackwell}, \& {Jones}}]{Gehrz:1974}
1940: {Gehrz}, R.~D., {Hackwell}, J.~A., \& {Jones}, T.~W. 1974, \apj, 191, 675
1941:
1942: \bibitem[{{Grady} {et~al.}(1996){Grady}, {Perez}, {Talavera}, {Bjorkman}, {de
1943: Winter}, {The}, {Molster}, {van den Ancker}, {Sitko}, {Morrison}, {Beaver},
1944: {McCollum}, \& {Castelaz}}]{Grady:1996}
1945: {Grady}, C.~A., {Perez}, M.~R., {Talavera}, A., {Bjorkman}, K.~S., {de Winter},
1946: D., {The}, P.-S., {Molster}, F.~J., {van den Ancker}, M.~E., {Sitko}, M.~L.,
1947: {Morrison}, N.~D., {Beaver}, M.~L., {McCollum}, B., \& {Castelaz}, M.~W.
1948: 1996, \aaps, 120, 157
1949:
1950: \bibitem[{{Gray}(1992)}]{Gray:1992}
1951: {Gray}, D.~F. 1992, {The Observation and Analysis of Stellar Photospheres} (The
1952: Observation and Analysis of Stellar Photospheres, by David F.~Gray,
1953: pp.~470.~ISBN 0521408687.~Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, June
1954: 1992.)
1955:
1956: \bibitem[{{Gursky}(1972)}]{Gursky:1972}
1957: {Gursky}, H. 1972, \apjl, 175, L141
1958:
1959: \bibitem[{{Halbedel}(1996)}]{Halbedel:1996}
1960: {Halbedel}, E.~M. 1996, \pasp, 108, 833
1961:
1962: \bibitem[{{Hamann} \& {Persson}(1992)}]{Hamann:1992}
1963: {Hamann}, F., \& {Persson}, S.~E. 1992, \apjs, 82, 285
1964:
1965: \bibitem[{{Hamdy} {et~al.}(1991){Hamdy}, {Elazm}, \& {Saad}}]{Hamdy:1991}
1966: {Hamdy}, M.~A., {Elazm}, M.~S.~A., \& {Saad}, S.~M. 1991, \apss, 186, 161
1967:
1968: \bibitem[{{Hanuschik} {et~al.}(1996){Hanuschik}, {Hummel}, {Sutorius},
1969: {Dietle}, \& {Thimm}}]{Hanuschik:1996}
1970: {Hanuschik}, R.~W., {Hummel}, W., {Sutorius}, E., {Dietle}, O., \& {Thimm}, G.
1971: 1996, \aaps, 116, 309
1972:
1973: \bibitem[{{Hartmann} {et~al.}(1993){Hartmann}, {Kenyon}, \&
1974: {Calvet}}]{Hartmann:1993}
1975: {Hartmann}, L., {Kenyon}, S.~J., \& {Calvet}, N. 1993, \apj, 407, 219
1976:
1977: \bibitem[{{Hartmann} {et~al.}(2005){Hartmann}, {Megeath}, {Allen}, {Luhman},
1978: {Calvet}, {D'Alessio}, {Franco-Hernandez}, \& {Fazio}}]{Hartmann:2005}
1979: {Hartmann}, L., {Megeath}, S.~T., {Allen}, L., {Luhman}, K., {Calvet}, N.,
1980: {D'Alessio}, P., {Franco-Hernandez}, R., \& {Fazio}, G. 2005, \apj, 629, 881
1981:
1982: \bibitem[{{Herbig}(1960)}]{Herbig:1960}
1983: {Herbig}, G.~H. 1960, \apjs, 4, 337
1984:
1985: \bibitem[{{Hern{\'a}ndez} {et~al.}(2006){Hern{\'a}ndez}, {Brice{\~n}o},
1986: {Calvet}, {Hartmann}, {Muzerolle}, \& {Quintero}}]{Hernandez:2006}
1987: {Hern{\'a}ndez}, J., {Brice{\~n}o}, C., {Calvet}, N., {Hartmann}, L.,
1988: {Muzerolle}, J., \& {Quintero}, A. 2006, \apj, 652, 472
1989:
1990: \bibitem[{{Hern{\'a}ndez} {et~al.}(2004){Hern{\'a}ndez}, {Calvet},
1991: {Brice{\~n}o}, {Hartmann}, \& {Berlind}}]{Hernandez:2004}
1992: {Hern{\'a}ndez}, J., {Calvet}, N., {Brice{\~n}o}, C., {Hartmann}, L., \&
1993: {Berlind}, P. 2004, \aj, 127, 1682
1994:
1995: \bibitem[{{Hernandez} {et~al.}(2007){Hernandez}, {Hartmann}, {Megeath},
1996: {Gutermuth}, {Muzerolle}, {Calvet}, {Vivas}, {Briceno}, {Allen}, {Stauffer},
1997: {Young}, \& {Fazio}}]{Hernandez:2007}
1998: {Hernandez}, J., {Hartmann}, L., {Megeath}, T., {Gutermuth}, R., {Muzerolle},
1999: J., {Calvet}, N., {Vivas}, A.~K., {Briceno}, C., {Allen}, L., {Stauffer}, J.,
2000: {Young}, E., \& {Fazio}, G. 2007, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints
2001:
2002: \bibitem[{{Hillenbrand} {et~al.}(2008){Hillenbrand}, {Carpenter}, {Kim},
2003: {Meyer}, {Backman}, {Moro-Martin}, {Hollenbach}, {Hines}, {Pascucci}, \&
2004: {Bouwman}}]{Hillenbrand:2008}
2005: {Hillenbrand}, L.~A., {Carpenter}, J.~M., {Kim}, J.~S., {Meyer}, M.~R.,
2006: {Backman}, D.~E., {Moro-Martin}, A., {Hollenbach}, D.~J., {Hines}, D.~C.,
2007: {Pascucci}, I., \& {Bouwman}, J. 2008, ArXiv e-prints, 801
2008:
2009: \bibitem[{{Hillenbrand} {et~al.}(1992){Hillenbrand}, {Strom}, {Vrba}, \&
2010: {Keene}}]{Hillenbrand:1992}
2011: {Hillenbrand}, L.~A., {Strom}, S.~E., {Vrba}, F.~J., \& {Keene}, J. 1992, \apj,
2012: 397, 613
2013:
2014: \bibitem[{{Israel} \& {Kennicutt}(1980)}]{Israel:1980}
2015: {Israel}, F.~P., \& {Kennicutt}, R.~C. 1980, \aplett, 21, 1
2016:
2017: \bibitem[{{Jaschek} \& {Jaschek}(1992)}]{Jaschek:1992}
2018: {Jaschek}, C., \& {Jaschek}, M. 1992, \aaps, 95, 535
2019:
2020: \bibitem[{{Jaschek} {et~al.}(1988){Jaschek}, {Jaschek}, {Egret}, \&
2021: {Andrillat}}]{Andrillat:1988}
2022: {Jaschek}, C., {Jaschek}, M., {Egret}, D., \& {Andrillat}, Y. 1988, \aap, 192,
2023: 285
2024:
2025: \bibitem[{{Jaschek} \& {Egret}(1982)}]{Jaschek:1982}
2026: {Jaschek}, M., \& {Egret}, D. 1982, in IAU Symposium, Vol.~98, Be Stars, ed.
2027: M.~{Jaschek} \& H.-G. {Groth}, 261
2028:
2029: \bibitem[{{Jaschek} {et~al.}(1993){Jaschek}, {Jaschek}, \&
2030: {Andrillat}}]{Jaschek:1993}
2031: {Jaschek}, M., {Jaschek}, C., \& {Andrillat}, Y. 1993, \aaps, 97, 781
2032:
2033: \bibitem[{{Jaschek} {et~al.}(1980){Jaschek}, {Jaschek}, {Hubert-Delplace}, \&
2034: {Hubert}}]{Jaschek:1980}
2035: {Jaschek}, M., {Jaschek}, C., {Hubert-Delplace}, A.-M., \& {Hubert}, H. 1980,
2036: \aaps, 42, 103
2037:
2038: \bibitem[{{Jenniskens} \& {Desert}(1994)}]{Jenniskens:1994}
2039: {Jenniskens}, P., \& {Desert}, F.-X. 1994, \aaps, 106, 39
2040:
2041: \bibitem[{{Jura}(1999)}]{Jura:1999}
2042: {Jura}, M. 1999, \apj, 515, 706
2043:
2044: \bibitem[{{Karzas} \& {Latter}(1961)}]{Karzas:1961}
2045: {Karzas}, W.~J., \& {Latter}, R. 1961, \apjs, 6, 167
2046:
2047: \bibitem[{{Kessler-Silacci} {et~al.}(2006){Kessler-Silacci}, {Augereau},
2048: {Dullemond}, {Geers}, {Lahuis}, {Evans}, {van Dishoeck}, {Blake}, {Boogert},
2049: {Brown}, {J{\o}rgensen}, {Knez}, \& {Pontoppidan}}]{Kessler-Silacci:2006}
2050: {Kessler-Silacci}, J., {Augereau}, J.-C., {Dullemond}, C.~P., {Geers}, V.,
2051: {Lahuis}, F., {Evans}, II, N.~J., {van Dishoeck}, E.~F., {Blake}, G.~A.,
2052: {Boogert}, A.~C.~A., {Brown}, J., {J{\o}rgensen}, J.~K., {Knez}, C., \&
2053: {Pontoppidan}, K.~M. 2006, \apj, 639, 275
2054:
2055: \bibitem[{{Koen} \& {Eyer}(2002)}]{Koen:2002}
2056: {Koen}, C., \& {Eyer}, L. 2002, \mnras, 331, 45
2057:
2058: \bibitem[{{Kozok}(1985)}]{Kozok:1985}
2059: {Kozok}, J.~R. 1985, \aaps, 62, 7
2060:
2061: \bibitem[{{Kurucz}(1993)}]{Kurucz:1993}
2062: {Kurucz}, R.~L. 1993, {SYNTHE spectrum synthesis programs and line data}
2063: (Kurucz CD-ROM, Cambridge, MA: Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, |c1993,
2064: December 4, 1993)
2065:
2066: \bibitem[{{Lagrange} {et~al.}(2000){Lagrange}, {Backman}, \&
2067: {Artymowicz}}]{Lagrange:2000}
2068: {Lagrange}, A.-M., {Backman}, D.~E., \& {Artymowicz}, P. 2000, Protostars and
2069: Planets IV, 639
2070:
2071: \bibitem[{{Levenhagen} \& {Leister}(2004)}]{Levenhagen:2004}
2072: {Levenhagen}, R.~S., \& {Leister}, N.~V. 2004, \aj, 127, 1176
2073:
2074: \bibitem[{{Mannings} \& {Sargent}(1997)}]{Mannings:1997}
2075: {Mannings}, V., \& {Sargent}, A.~I. 1997, \apj, 490, 792
2076:
2077: \bibitem[{{Manoj} {et~al.}(2006){Manoj}, {Bhatt}, {Maheswar}, \&
2078: {Muneer}}]{Manoj:2006}
2079: {Manoj}, P., {Bhatt}, H.~C., {Maheswar}, G., \& {Muneer}, S. 2006, \apj, 653,
2080: 657
2081:
2082: \bibitem[{{Manoj} {et~al.}(2002){Manoj}, {Maheswar}, \& {Bhatt}}]{Manoj:2002}
2083: {Manoj}, P., {Maheswar}, G., \& {Bhatt}, H.~C. 2002, \mnras, 334, 419
2084:
2085: \bibitem[{{Manset} {et~al.}(2005){Manset}, {Bastien}, \&
2086: {Bertout}}]{Manset:2005}
2087: {Manset}, N., {Bastien}, P., \& {Bertout}, C. 2005, \aj, 129, 480
2088:
2089: \bibitem[{{McDavid}(2001)}]{McDavid:2001}
2090: {McDavid}, D. 2001, \apj, 553, 1027
2091:
2092: \bibitem[{{McSwain} \& {Gies}(2005)}]{McSwain:2005}
2093: {McSwain}, M.~V., \& {Gies}, D.~R. 2005, \apjs, 161, 118
2094:
2095: \bibitem[{{Meyer} {et~al.}(2004){Meyer}, {Hillenbrand}, {Backman}, {Beckwith},
2096: {Bouwman}, {Brooke}, {Carpenter}, {Cohen}, {Gorti}, {Henning}, {Hines},
2097: {Hollenbach}, {Kim}, {Lunine}, {Malhotra}, {Mamajek}, {Metchev},
2098: {Moro-Martin}, {Morris}, {Najita}, {Padgett}, {Rodmann}, {Silverstone},
2099: {Soderblom}, {Stauffer}, {Stobie}, {Strom}, {Watson}, {Weidenschilling},
2100: {Wolf}, {Young}, {Engelbracht}, {Gordon}, {Misselt}, {Morrison}, {Muzerolle},
2101: \& {Su}}]{Meyer:2004}
2102: {Meyer}, M.~R., {Hillenbrand}, L.~A., {Backman}, D.~E., {Beckwith}, S.~V.~W.,
2103: {Bouwman}, J., {Brooke}, T.~Y., {Carpenter}, J.~M., {Cohen}, M., {Gorti}, U.,
2104: {Henning}, T., {Hines}, D.~C., {Hollenbach}, D., {Kim}, J.~S., {Lunine}, J.,
2105: {Malhotra}, R., {Mamajek}, E.~E., {Metchev}, S., {Moro-Martin}, A., {Morris},
2106: P., {Najita}, J., {Padgett}, D.~L., {Rodmann}, J., {Silverstone}, M.~D.,
2107: {Soderblom}, D.~R., {Stauffer}, J.~R., {Stobie}, E.~B., {Strom}, S.~E.,
2108: {Watson}, D.~M., {Weidenschilling}, S.~J., {Wolf}, S., {Young}, E.,
2109: {Engelbracht}, C.~W., {Gordon}, K.~D., {Misselt}, K., {Morrison}, J.,
2110: {Muzerolle}, J., \& {Su}, K. 2004, \apjs, 154, 422
2111:
2112: \bibitem[{{Monet}(1998)}]{Monet:1998}
2113: {Monet}, D.~G. 1998, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol.~30,
2114: Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 1427--+
2115:
2116: \bibitem[{{Monet} {et~al.}(2003){Monet}, {Levine}, {Canzian}, {Ables}, {Bird},
2117: {Dahn}, {Guetter}, {Harris}, {Henden}, {Leggett}, {Levison}, {Luginbuhl},
2118: {Martini}, {Monet}, {Munn}, {Pier}, {Rhodes}, {Riepe}, {Sell}, {Stone},
2119: {Vrba}, {Walker}, {Westerhout}, {Brucato}, {Reid}, {Schoening}, {Hartley},
2120: {Read}, \& {Tritton}}]{Monet:2003}
2121: {Monet}, D.~G., {Levine}, S.~E., {Canzian}, B., {Ables}, H.~D., {Bird}, A.~R.,
2122: {Dahn}, C.~C., {Guetter}, H.~H., {Harris}, H.~C., {Henden}, A.~A., {Leggett},
2123: S.~K., {Levison}, H.~F., {Luginbuhl}, C.~B., {Martini}, J., {Monet},
2124: A.~K.~B., {Munn}, J.~A., {Pier}, J.~R., {Rhodes}, A.~R., {Riepe}, B., {Sell},
2125: S., {Stone}, R.~C., {Vrba}, F.~J., {Walker}, R.~L., {Westerhout}, G.,
2126: {Brucato}, R.~J., {Reid}, I.~N., {Schoening}, W., {Hartley}, M., {Read},
2127: M.~A., \& {Tritton}, S.~B. 2003, \aj, 125, 984
2128:
2129: \bibitem[{{Monnier} {et~al.}(2005){Monnier}, {Millan-Gabet}, {Billmeier},
2130: {Akeson}, {Wallace}, {Berger}, {Calvet}, {D'Alessio}, {Danchi}, {Hartmann},
2131: {Hillenbrand}, {Kuchner}, {Rajagopal}, {Traub}, {Tuthill}, {Boden}, {Booth},
2132: {Colavita}, {Gathright}, {Hrynevych}, {Le Mignant}, {Ligon}, {Neyman},
2133: {Swain}, {Thompson}, {Vasisht}, {Wizinowich}, {Beichman}, {Beletic},
2134: {Creech-Eakman}, {Koresko}, {Sargent}, {Shao}, \& {van Belle}}]{Monnier:2005}
2135: {Monnier}, J.~D., {Millan-Gabet}, R., {Billmeier}, R., {Akeson}, R.~L.,
2136: {Wallace}, D., {Berger}, J.-P., {Calvet}, N., {D'Alessio}, P., {Danchi},
2137: W.~C., {Hartmann}, L., {Hillenbrand}, L.~A., {Kuchner}, M., {Rajagopal}, J.,
2138: {Traub}, W.~A., {Tuthill}, P.~G., {Boden}, A., {Booth}, A., {Colavita}, M.,
2139: {Gathright}, J., {Hrynevych}, M., {Le Mignant}, D., {Ligon}, R., {Neyman},
2140: C., {Swain}, M., {Thompson}, R., {Vasisht}, G., {Wizinowich}, P., {Beichman},
2141: C., {Beletic}, J., {Creech-Eakman}, M., {Koresko}, C., {Sargent}, A., {Shao},
2142: M., \& {van Belle}, G. 2005, \apj, 624, 832
2143:
2144: \bibitem[{{Mora} {et~al.}(2001){Mora}, {Mer{\'{\i}}n}, {Solano}, {Montesinos},
2145: {de Winter}, {Eiroa}, {Ferlet}, {Grady}, {Davies}, {Miranda}, {Oudmaijer},
2146: {Palacios}, {Quirrenbach}, {Harris}, {Rauer}, {Cameron}, {Deeg},
2147: {Garz{\'o}n}, {Penny}, {Schneider}, {Tsapras}, \& {Wesselius}}]{Mora:2001}
2148: {Mora}, A., {Mer{\'{\i}}n}, B., {Solano}, E., {Montesinos}, B., {de Winter},
2149: D., {Eiroa}, C., {Ferlet}, R., {Grady}, C.~A., {Davies}, J.~K., {Miranda},
2150: L.~F., {Oudmaijer}, R.~D., {Palacios}, J., {Quirrenbach}, A., {Harris},
2151: A.~W., {Rauer}, H., {Cameron}, A., {Deeg}, H.~J., {Garz{\'o}n}, F., {Penny},
2152: A., {Schneider}, J., {Tsapras}, Y., \& {Wesselius}, P.~R. 2001, \aap, 378,
2153: 116
2154:
2155: \bibitem[{{Munari} {et~al.}(2005){Munari}, {Sordo}, {Castelli}, \&
2156: {Zwitter}}]{Munari:2005}
2157: {Munari}, U., {Sordo}, R., {Castelli}, F., \& {Zwitter}, T. 2005, \aap, 442,
2158: 1127
2159:
2160: \bibitem[{{Pogodin}(1994)}]{Pogodin:1994}
2161: {Pogodin}, M.~A. 1994, \aap, 282, 141
2162:
2163: \bibitem[{{Porter} \& {Rivinius}(2003)}]{Porter:2003}
2164: {Porter}, J.~M., \& {Rivinius}, T. 2003, \pasp, 115, 1153
2165:
2166: \bibitem[{{Rhee} {et~al.}(2007){Rhee}, {Song}, \& {Zuckerman}}]{Rhee:2007}
2167: {Rhee}, J.~H., {Song}, I., \& {Zuckerman}, B. 2007, \apj, 671, 616
2168:
2169: \bibitem[{{Royer}(2005)}]{Royer:2005}
2170: {Royer}, F. 2005, Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana Supplement, 8, 124
2171:
2172: \bibitem[{{Royer} {et~al.}(2002{\natexlab{a}}){Royer}, {Gerbaldi},
2173: {Faraggiana}, \& {G{\'o}mez}}]{Royer:2002a}
2174: {Royer}, F., {Gerbaldi}, M., {Faraggiana}, R., \& {G{\'o}mez}, A.~E.
2175: 2002{\natexlab{a}}, \aap, 381, 105
2176:
2177: \bibitem[{{Royer} {et~al.}(2002{\natexlab{b}}){Royer}, {Grenier}, {Baylac},
2178: {G{\'o}mez}, \& {Zorec}}]{Royer:2002b}
2179: {Royer}, F., {Grenier}, S., {Baylac}, M.-O., {G{\'o}mez}, A.~E., \& {Zorec}, J.
2180: 2002{\natexlab{b}}, \aap, 393, 897
2181:
2182: \bibitem[{{Sch{\"u}tz} {et~al.}(2005){Sch{\"u}tz}, {Meeus}, \&
2183: {Sterzik}}]{Schutz:2005}
2184: {Sch{\"u}tz}, O., {Meeus}, G., \& {Sterzik}, M.~F. 2005, \aap, 431, 165
2185:
2186: \bibitem[{{Seidensticker}(1989)}]{Seidensticker:1989}
2187: {Seidensticker}, K.~J. 1989, \aaps, 79, 61
2188:
2189: \bibitem[{{Shu} {et~al.}(1987){Shu}, {Adams}, \& {Lizano}}]{Shu:1987}
2190: {Shu}, F.~H., {Adams}, F.~C., \& {Lizano}, S. 1987, \araa, 25, 23
2191:
2192: \bibitem[{{Sicilia-Aguilar} {et~al.}(2006{\natexlab{a}}){Sicilia-Aguilar},
2193: {Hartmann}, {Calvet}, {Megeath}, {Muzerolle}, {Allen}, {D'Alessio},
2194: {Mer{\'{\i}}n}, {Stauffer}, {Young}, \& {Lada}}]{Sicilia-Aguilar:2006a}
2195: {Sicilia-Aguilar}, A., {Hartmann}, L., {Calvet}, N., {Megeath}, S.~T.,
2196: {Muzerolle}, J., {Allen}, L., {D'Alessio}, P., {Mer{\'{\i}}n}, B.,
2197: {Stauffer}, J., {Young}, E., \& {Lada}, C. 2006{\natexlab{a}}, \apj, 638, 897
2198:
2199: \bibitem[{{Sicilia-Aguilar} {et~al.}(2006{\natexlab{b}}){Sicilia-Aguilar},
2200: {Hartmann}, {F{\"u}r{\'e}sz}, {Henning}, {Dullemond}, \&
2201: {Brandner}}]{Sicilia-Aguilar:2006b}
2202: {Sicilia-Aguilar}, A., {Hartmann}, L.~W., {F{\"u}r{\'e}sz}, G., {Henning}, T.,
2203: {Dullemond}, C., \& {Brandner}, W. 2006{\natexlab{b}}, \aj, 132, 2135
2204:
2205: \bibitem[{{Siegler} {et~al.}(2007){Siegler}, {Muzerolle}, {Young}, {Rieke},
2206: {Mamajek}, {Trilling}, {Gorlova}, \& {Su}}]{Siegler:2007}
2207: {Siegler}, N., {Muzerolle}, J., {Young}, E.~T., {Rieke}, G.~H., {Mamajek},
2208: E.~E., {Trilling}, D.~E., {Gorlova}, N., \& {Su}, K.~Y.~L. 2007, \apj, 654,
2209: 580
2210:
2211: \bibitem[{{Siess} {et~al.}(2000){Siess}, {Dufour}, \& {Forestini}}]{Siess:2000}
2212: {Siess}, L., {Dufour}, E., \& {Forestini}, M. 2000, \aap, 358, 593
2213:
2214: \bibitem[{{Slettebak} {et~al.}(1975){Slettebak}, {Collins}, {Parkinson},
2215: {Boyce}, \& {White}}]{Slettebak:1975}
2216: {Slettebak}, A., {Collins}, II, G.~W., {Parkinson}, T.~D., {Boyce}, P.~B., \&
2217: {White}, N.~M. 1975, \apjs, 29, 137
2218:
2219: \bibitem[{{Song} {et~al.}(2001){Song}, {Caillault}, {Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s},
2220: \& {Stauffer}}]{Song:2001}
2221: {Song}, I., {Caillault}, J.-P., {Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s}, D., \& {Stauffer},
2222: J.~R. 2001, \apj, 546, 352
2223:
2224: \bibitem[{{Spangler} {et~al.}(2001){Spangler}, {Sargent}, {Silverstone},
2225: {Becklin}, \& {Zuckerman}}]{Spangler:2001}
2226: {Spangler}, C., {Sargent}, A.~I., {Silverstone}, M.~D., {Becklin}, E.~E., \&
2227: {Zuckerman}, B. 2001, \apj, 555, 932
2228:
2229: \bibitem[{{Strom} {et~al.}(1989){Strom}, {Strom}, {Edwards}, {Cabrit}, \&
2230: {Skrutskie}}]{Strom:1989}
2231: {Strom}, K.~M., {Strom}, S.~E., {Edwards}, S., {Cabrit}, S., \& {Skrutskie},
2232: M.~F. 1989, \aj, 97, 1451
2233:
2234: \bibitem[{{Strom}(1972)}]{Strom:1972}
2235: {Strom}, S.~E. 1972, \pasp, 84, 745
2236:
2237: \bibitem[{{Struve}(1931)}]{Struve:1931}
2238: {Struve}, O. 1931, \apj, 73, 94
2239:
2240: \bibitem[{{The} {et~al.}(1994){The}, {de Winter}, \& {Perez}}]{The:1994}
2241: {The}, P.~S., {de Winter}, D., \& {Perez}, M.~R. 1994, \aaps, 104, 315
2242:
2243: \bibitem[{{Tucker}(1975)}]{Tucker:1975}
2244: {Tucker}, W. 1975, {Radiation processes in astrophysics} (Cambridge, Mass., MIT
2245: Press, 1975.~320 p.)
2246:
2247: \bibitem[{{Uzpen} {et~al.}(2007){Uzpen}, {Kobulnicky}, {Monson}, {Pierce},
2248: {Clemens}, {Backman}, {Meade}, {Babler}, {Indebetouw}, {Whitney}, {Watson},
2249: {Wolfire}, {Benjamin}, {Bracker}, {Bania}, {Cohen}, {Cyganowski}, {Devine},
2250: {Heitsch}, {Jackson}, {Mathis}, {Mercer}, {Povich}, {Rho}, {Robitaille},
2251: {Sewilo}, {Stolovy}, {Watson}, {Wolff}, \& {Churchwell}}]{Uzpen:2007}
2252: {Uzpen}, B., {Kobulnicky}, H.~A., {Monson}, A.~J., {Pierce}, M.~J., {Clemens},
2253: D.~P., {Backman}, D.~E., {Meade}, M.~R., {Babler}, B.~L., {Indebetouw}, R.,
2254: {Whitney}, B.~A., {Watson}, C., {Wolfire}, M.~G., {Benjamin}, R.~A.,
2255: {Bracker}, S., {Bania}, T.~M., {Cohen}, M., {Cyganowski}, C.~J., {Devine},
2256: K.~E., {Heitsch}, F., {Jackson}, J.~M., {Mathis}, J.~S., {Mercer}, E.~P.,
2257: {Povich}, M.~S., {Rho}, J., {Robitaille}, T.~P., {Sewilo}, M., {Stolovy},
2258: S.~R., {Watson}, D.~F., {Wolff}, M.~J., \& {Churchwell}, E. 2007, \apj, 658,
2259: 1264
2260:
2261: \bibitem[{{Uzpen} {et~al.}(2005){Uzpen}, {Kobulnicky}, {Olsen}, {Clemens},
2262: {Laurance}, {Meade}, {Babler}, {Indebetouw}, {Whitney}, {Watson}, {Wolfire},
2263: {Wolff}, {Benjamin}, {Bania}, {Cohen}, {Devine}, {Dickey}, {Heitsch},
2264: {Jackson}, {Marston}, {Mathis}, {Mercer}, {Stauffer}, {Stolovy}, {Backman},
2265: \& {Churchwell}}]{Uzpen:2005}
2266: {Uzpen}, B., {Kobulnicky}, H.~A., {Olsen}, K.~A.~G., {Clemens}, D.~P.,
2267: {Laurance}, T.~L., {Meade}, M.~R., {Babler}, B.~L., {Indebetouw}, R.,
2268: {Whitney}, B.~A., {Watson}, C., {Wolfire}, M.~G., {Wolff}, M.~J., {Benjamin},
2269: R.~A., {Bania}, T.~M., {Cohen}, M., {Devine}, K.~E., {Dickey}, J.~M.,
2270: {Heitsch}, F., {Jackson}, J.~M., {Marston}, A.~P., {Mathis}, J.~S., {Mercer},
2271: E.~P., {Stauffer}, J.~R., {Stolovy}, S.~R., {Backman}, D.~E., \&
2272: {Churchwell}, E. 2005, \apj, 629, 512
2273:
2274: \bibitem[{{Verhoelst} {et~al.}(2007){Verhoelst}, {van Aarle}, \&
2275: {Acke}}]{Verhoelst:2007}
2276: {Verhoelst}, T., {van Aarle}, E., \& {Acke}, B. 2007, \aap, 470, 21
2277:
2278: \bibitem[{{Viallefond} {et~al.}(1983){Viallefond}, {Donas}, \&
2279: {Goss}}]{Viallefond:1983}
2280: {Viallefond}, F., {Donas}, J., \& {Goss}, W.~M. 1983, \aap, 119, 185
2281:
2282: \bibitem[{{Viallefond} \& {Goss}(1986)}]{Viallefond:1986a}
2283: {Viallefond}, F., \& {Goss}, W.~M. 1986, \aap, 154, 357
2284:
2285: \bibitem[{{Viallefond} {et~al.}(1986){Viallefond}, {Goss}, {van der Hulst}, \&
2286: {Crane}}]{Viallefond:1986b}
2287: {Viallefond}, F., {Goss}, W.~M., {van der Hulst}, J.~M., \& {Crane}, P.~C.
2288: 1986, \aaps, 64, 237
2289:
2290: \bibitem[{{Vieira} {et~al.}(2003){Vieira}, {Corradi}, {Alencar}, {Mendes},
2291: {Torres}, {Quast}, {Guimar{\~a}es}, \& {da Silva}}]{Viera:2003}
2292: {Vieira}, S.~L.~A., {Corradi}, W.~J.~B., {Alencar}, S.~H.~P., {Mendes},
2293: L.~T.~S., {Torres}, C.~A.~O., {Quast}, G.~R., {Guimar{\~a}es}, M.~M., \& {da
2294: Silva}, L. 2003, \aj, 126, 2971
2295:
2296: \bibitem[{{Vink} {et~al.}(2002){Vink}, {Drew}, {Harries}, \&
2297: {Oudmaijer}}]{Vink:2002}
2298: {Vink}, J.~S., {Drew}, J.~E., {Harries}, T.~J., \& {Oudmaijer}, R.~D. 2002,
2299: \mnras, 337, 356
2300:
2301: \bibitem[{{Voges} {et~al.}(2000){Voges}, {Aschenbach}, {Boller}, {Brauninger},
2302: {Briel}, {Burkert}, {Dennerl}, {Englhauser}, {Gruber}, {Haberl}, {Hartner},
2303: {Hasinger}, {Pfeffermann}, {Pietsch}, {Predehl}, {Schmitt}, {Trumper}, \&
2304: {Zimmermann}}]{Voges:2000}
2305: {Voges}, W., {Aschenbach}, B., {Boller}, T., {Brauninger}, H., {Briel}, U.,
2306: {Burkert}, W., {Dennerl}, K., {Englhauser}, J., {Gruber}, R., {Haberl}, F.,
2307: {Hartner}, G., {Hasinger}, G., {Pfeffermann}, E., {Pietsch}, W., {Predehl},
2308: P., {Schmitt}, J., {Trumper}, J., \& {Zimmermann}, U. 2000, VizieR Online
2309: Data Catalog, 9029, 0
2310:
2311: \bibitem[{{Wade} {et~al.}(2005){Wade}, {Drouin}, {Bagnulo}, {Landstreet},
2312: {Mason}, {Silvester}, {Alecian}, {B{\"o}hm}, {Bouret}, {Catala}, \&
2313: {Donati}}]{Wade:2005}
2314: {Wade}, G.~A., {Drouin}, D., {Bagnulo}, S., {Landstreet}, J.~D., {Mason}, E.,
2315: {Silvester}, J., {Alecian}, E., {B{\"o}hm}, T., {Bouret}, J.-C., {Catala},
2316: C., \& {Donati}, J.-F. 2005, \aap, 442, L31
2317:
2318: \bibitem[{{Walker} {et~al.}(1989){Walker}, {Volk}, {Wainscoat}, {Schwartz}, \&
2319: {Cohen}}]{Walker:1989}
2320: {Walker}, H.~J., {Volk}, K., {Wainscoat}, R.~J., {Schwartz}, D.~E., \& {Cohen},
2321: M. 1989, \aj, 98, 2163
2322:
2323: \bibitem[{{Waters} \& {Waelkens}(1998)}]{Waters:1998}
2324: {Waters}, L.~B.~F.~M., \& {Waelkens}, C. 1998, \araa, 36, 233
2325:
2326: \bibitem[{{Westin}(1985)}]{Westin:1985}
2327: {Westin}, T.~N.~G. 1985, \aaps, 60, 99
2328:
2329: \bibitem[{{Wright} {et~al.}(2003){Wright}, {Egan}, {Kraemer}, \&
2330: {Price}}]{Wright:2003}
2331: {Wright}, C.~O., {Egan}, M.~P., {Kraemer}, K.~E., \& {Price}, S.~D. 2003, \aj,
2332: 125, 359
2333:
2334: \bibitem[{{Wright} \& {Barlow}(1974)}]{Wright:1974}
2335: {Wright}, A.~E., \& {Barlow}, M.~F. 1974, \mnras, 170, 41
2336:
2337: \bibitem[{{Yudin}(2001)}]{Yudin:2001}
2338: {Yudin}, R.~V. 2001, \aap, 368, 912
2339:
2340: \bibitem[{{Zhang} {et~al.}(2004){Zhang}, {Chen}, \& {He}}]{Zhang:2004}
2341: {Zhang}, P., {Chen}, P.~S., \& {He}, J.~H. 2004, New Astronomy, 9, 509
2342:
2343: \bibitem[{{Zhang} {et~al.}(2005){Zhang}, {Chen}, \& {Yang}}]{Zhang:2005}
2344: {Zhang}, P., {Chen}, P.~S., \& {Yang}, H.~T. 2005, New Astronomy, 10, 325
2345:
2346: \bibitem[{{Zuckerman}(2001)}]{Zuckerman:2001}
2347: {Zuckerman}, B. 2001, \araa, 39, 549
2348:
2349: \end{thebibliography}
2350:
2351:
2352: \clearpage
2353:
2354: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}
2355: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
2356: \setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.01in}
2357: \tablewidth{0pc}
2358: \tablecaption{Projected Rotational Velocities}
2359: \tablehead{
2360: \colhead{Target} &
2361: \colhead{HD} &
2362: \colhead{Spec.} &
2363: \colhead{\textit{v} sin \textit{i}} &
2364: \colhead{Lines Used} &
2365: \colhead{\textit{v} sin \textit{i} (Literature)} &
2366: \colhead{References} \\
2367: \colhead{} &
2368: \colhead{} &
2369: \colhead{} &
2370: \colhead({km s$^{-1}$)} &
2371: \colhead{} &
2372: \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} &
2373: \colhead{} }
2374: \startdata
2375: G007.2369+01.4894 & 163296 & A1V & 145$\pm$15 & M & & \\
2376: G008.3752-03.6697 & 167905 & F3V & 35$\pm$5 & F & & \\
2377: G009.4973+05.2441 & 161643 & A7V & 140$\pm$15 & M & & \\
2378: G011.2691+00.4208 & 165854 & B9V & 220$\pm$15 & H,M & 250$\pm$10, 242$\pm$10 & (1), (2) \\
2379: G014.4239--00.7657 & 165854 & B8 & 165$\pm$10 & H,M & & \\
2380: G025.6122+01.3020 & 171149 & B9V & 290$\pm$20 & H,M & 280, 301 & (3), (4) \\
2381: G027.0268+00.7224 & 172030 & A0V & 25$\pm$5 & M & & \\
2382: G036.8722--00.4112 & ... & B8V & 295$\pm$20 & H,M & & \\
2383: G047.3677+00.6199 & 180398 & B8Ve & 310$\pm$25 & H,M & & \\
2384: G047.4523+00.5132 & 231033 & A0V & 150$\pm$10 & H,M & & \\
2385: G051.6491--00.1182 & 183035 & A0V & 270$\pm$20 & H,M & & \\
2386: G229.4514+01.0145 & 58647 & B9V & 295$\pm$20 & H,M & 118, 280 & (5), (6) \\
2387: G257.6236+00.2459 & 72106 & A0IV & 240$\pm$25 & M & & \\
2388: G265.5536-03.9951-north(A) & 73461 & A5V & 40$\pm$5 & F & & \\
2389: G265.5536-03.9951-south(B) & ... & A6/8V & 25$\pm$5 & F & & \\
2390: G269.5873-05.8882 & 74534 & G0V & 10$\pm$5 & F & 17 & (7) \\
2391: G299.1677-00.3922 & ... & B8 & 130$\pm$10 & H,M & & \\
2392: G299.7090-00.9704 & 107609 & B8/9IV & 175$\pm$15 & H,M & & \\
2393: G300.0992-00.0627 & ... & A1 & 255$\pm$20 & H,M & & \\
2394: G305.4232-00.8229 & 114757 & B6/8V(E) & 230$\pm$20 & H,M & & \\
2395: G307.9784-00.7148 & 118094 & B8V(N) & 240$\pm$20 & H,M & & \\
2396: G310.5420+00.4120 & 121195 & B8IV(N) & 270$\pm$20 & H,M & & \\
2397: G311.0099+00.4156 & 121808 & A3IV & 235$\pm$25 & M & & \\
2398: G311.6185+00.2469 & 122620 & B8/9 IV/V & 265$\pm$20 & H,M & & \\
2399: G314.3136-00.6977 & 126578 & A1IV & 205$\pm$20 & M & & \\
2400: G321.7868+00.4102 & 135354 & B8VN & 230$\pm$20 & H,M & & \\
2401: G339.4392--00.7791 & 151228 & A0/1 IV/V & 40$\pm$5 & M & & \\
2402: G339.7415--00.1904 & 151017 & A0 & 240$\pm$15 & H,M & & \\
2403: G340.0517+00.6687 & 150625 & B8 & 230$\pm$15 & H,M & & \\
2404: G347.3777+04.2010 & 152404 & F5V & 15$\pm$5 & F & & \\
2405: \hline
2406: & 22252 & B8V & 255$\pm$20 & M & 249 & (8) \\
2407: & 48757 & A0V & 30$\pm$5 & M & 27 & (8) \\
2408: & 50853 & A0V & 205$\pm$20 & M & 195 & (8) \\
2409: & 181454 & B8V & 80$\pm$10 & H,M & 75 & (9) \\
2410: & 100673 & B9Ve & 150$\pm$15 & M & 160,125 & (8), (9) \\
2411: & 97277 & A2IV & 55$\pm$5 & M & 45 & (9) \\
2412: & 83953 & B6V & 285$\pm$20 & H,M & 260 & (9) \\
2413: & 95370 & A3IV & 95$\pm$10 & M & 86, 90 & (8), (9) \\
2414: & 83754 & B5V & 190$\pm$20 & H,M & 150 & (9) \\
2415: & 98718 & B5Vn & 325$\pm$35 & H & 280 & (9) \\
2416: & 90994 & B6V & 105$\pm$10 & H,M & 80 & (9) \\
2417: & 78045 & A3V & 50$\pm$ 5 & M & 34, 25 & (8), (9) \\
2418: & 83446 & A5V & 135$\pm$15 & M & 133, 125 & (8), (9) \\
2419: \enddata
2420: \tablecomments{ See \citet{Uzpen:2007} for further information about
2421: GLIMPSE or MSX Catalog ID. Line profiles used to derive projected
2422: rotational velocities are M for Mg \textsc{II} $\lambda$ 4481, H for H
2423: \textsc{I} $\lambda$ 4471 $\lambda$ and F for Fe \textsc{I} $\lambda$
2424: 4476. (1) \citet{Halbedel:1996}; (2) \citet{Yudin:2001}; (3)
2425: \citet{Abt:1995}; (4) \citet{Royer:2002b}; (5) \citet{Mora:2001}; (6)
2426: \citet{Grady:1996}; (7) \citet{Cutispoto:2003}; (8)
2427: \citet{Royer:2002a}; (9) \citet{Slettebak:1975}}
2428: \label{trot}
2429: \end{deluxetable}
2430:
2431: \clearpage
2432:
2433: \begin{deluxetable}{lcc}
2434: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
2435: \setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.01in}
2436: \tablewidth{0pc}
2437: \tablecaption{Effective Temperatures}
2438: \tablehead{
2439: \colhead{ID} &
2440: \colhead{Spec.} &
2441: \colhead{T$_{eff}$} \\
2442: \colhead{} &
2443: \colhead{} &
2444: \colhead{(K)} \\
2445: \colhead{(1)} &
2446: \colhead{(2)} &
2447: \colhead{(3)} }
2448: \startdata
2449: G007.2369+01.4894 & A1V & 10350$\pm$230 \\
2450: G008.3752-03.6697 & F3V & 7260$\pm$160 \\
2451: G009.4973+05.2441 & A7V & 8320$\pm$130 \\
2452: G011.2691+00.4208 & B9V & 12350$\pm$520 \\
2453: G014.4239--00.7657 & B8 & 16460$\pm$640 \\
2454: G025.6122+01.3020 & B9V & 12520$\pm$510 \\
2455: G027.0268+00.7224 & A0V & 10510$\pm$300 \\
2456: G036.8722--00.4112 & B8V & 11740$\pm$260 \\
2457: G047.3677+00.6199 & B8Ve & 15700$\pm$600 \\
2458: G047.4523+00.5132 & A0V & 12260$\pm$510 \\
2459: G051.6491--00.1182 & A0V & 13100$\pm$530 \\
2460: G229.4514+01.0145 & B9V & 10220$\pm$390 \\
2461: G257.6236+00.2459 & A0IV & 11530$\pm$300 \\
2462: G265.5536-03.9951-A & A5V & 7040$\pm$170 \\
2463: G265.5536-03.9951-B & A6/8V & 7660$\pm$140 \\
2464: G269.5873-05.8882$^{a}$ & G0III & ... \\
2465: G299.1677-00.3922 & B8 & 16170$\pm$730 \\
2466: G299.7090-00.9704 & B8/9IV & 12520$\pm$505 \\
2467: G300.0992-00.0627 & A1 & 13510$\pm$510 \\
2468: G305.4232-00.8229 & B6/8V(E) & 13520$\pm$510 \\
2469: G307.9784-00.7148 & B8V (N) & 13220$\pm$520 \\
2470: G310.5420+00.4120 & B8IV(N) & 12430$\pm$510 \\
2471: G311.0099+00.4156 & A3IV & 9800$\pm$130 \\
2472: G311.6185+00.2469 & B8/9 IV/V & 10540$\pm$255 \\
2473: G314.3136-00.6977 & A1IV & 9870$\pm$130 \\
2474: G321.7868+00.4102 & B8V N & 12340$\pm$505 \\
2475: G339.4392--00.7791 & A0/1 IV/V & 8800$\pm$150 \\
2476: G339.7415--00.1904 & A0 & 12220$\pm$510 \\
2477: G340.0517+00.6687 & B8 & 14080$\pm$520 \\
2478: G347.3777+04.2010$^{b}$ & F5V & ... \\
2479: \enddata
2480: \tablecomments{ (a) This
2481: star is a giant. See \S 8 for further details.
2482: (b) This star is a spectroscopic binary. Equivalent
2483: width measurements vary too greatly to determine
2484: temperature. See \S 8 for further details.}
2485: \label{ttemp}
2486: \end{deluxetable}
2487:
2488: \clearpage
2489:
2490: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccccc}
2491: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
2492: \rotate
2493: \tablewidth{0pc}
2494: \tablecaption{H$\alpha$ Equivalent Width Measurements}
2495: \tablehead{
2496: \colhead{ID} &
2497: \colhead{Spec. Type} &
2498: \colhead{Date} &
2499: \colhead{EW(H$\alpha$)} &
2500: \colhead{EW(H$\alpha_{abs}$)} &
2501: \colhead{EW(H$\alpha_{corr}$)} &
2502: \colhead{R$_{0}$ Flux} &
2503: \colhead{H$\alpha$ Flux} &
2504: \colhead{H$\alpha$ Profile} \\
2505: \colhead{} &
2506: \colhead{} &
2507: \colhead{} &
2508: \colhead{(\AA)} &
2509: \colhead{(\AA)} &
2510: \colhead{(\AA)} &
2511: \colhead{(erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ \AA$^{-1}$)} &
2512: \colhead{(erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$) } &
2513: \colhead{} \\
2514: \colhead{(1)} &
2515: \colhead{(2)} &
2516: \colhead{(3)} &
2517: \colhead{(4)} &
2518: \colhead{(5)} &
2519: \colhead{(6)} &
2520: \colhead{(7)} &
2521: \colhead{(8)} &
2522: \colhead{(9)} }
2523: \startdata
2524: G007.2369+01.4894 & A1V & 20060928 & -26.15$\pm$0.15 & ... & ... & 1.42$\times$10$^{-11}$ & ... & S \\
2525: G008.3752-03.6697 & F3V & 20060928 & -0.17$\pm$0.08 & ... & ... & 2.12$\times$10$^{-12}$ & ... & P \\
2526: G009.4973+05.2441 & A7V & 20060928 & 5.11$\pm$0.02 & ... & ... & 2.52$\times$10$^{-14}$ & ... & A \\
2527: G011.2691+00.4208 & B9V & 20060927 & -4.24$\pm$0.16 & 9.62 & -13.86$\pm$0.16 & 1.30$\times$10$^{-12}$ & 1.80$\times$10$^{-11}$ & D \\
2528: G014.4239-00.7657 & B8 & 20060927 & 4.45$\pm$0.03 & ... & 0.00 & 1.40$\times$10$^{-13}$ & ... & A \\
2529: G025.6122+03.3020 & B9V & 20060928 & 6.42$\pm$0.09 & ... & ... & 5.99$\times$10$^{-12}$ & ... & A \\
2530: G027.0268+00.7224 & A0V & 20070407 & -1.97$\pm$0.43 & 11.89 & -13.86$\pm$0.43 & 1.74$\times$10$^{-12}$ & 2.41$\times$10$^{-11}$ & D \\
2531: G036.8722-00.4112 & B8V & 20060927 & -2.39$\pm$0.15 & 12.68 & -15.07$\pm$0.15 & 1.68$\times$10$^{-12}$ & 2.53$\times$10$^{-11}$ & D \\
2532: G047.3677+00.6199 & B9Ve & 20060927 &-14.08$\pm$0.24 & 8.39 & -22.47$\pm$0.24 & 1.79$\times$10$^{-12}$ & 4.02$\times$10$^{-11}$ & D \\
2533: G047.4523+00.5132 & A0V & 20060927 & 6.49$\pm$0.02 & ... & 0.00 & 5.12$\times$10$^{-13}$ & ... & A \\
2534: G051.6491-00.1182 & A0V & 20060928 & 5.76$\pm$0.15 & 8.65 & -2.89$\pm$0.15 & 1.30$\times$10$^{-12}$ & 3.76$\times$10$^{-12}$ & D \\
2535: G229.4514+01.0145 & B9V & 20060926 & -7.82$\pm$0.45 & ... & ... & 8.66$\times$10$^{-12}$ & ... & D \\
2536: G257.6236+00.2459 & A0IV & 20060926 & 9.41$\pm$0.06 & ... & ... & 1.03$\times$10$^{-12}$ & ... & A \\
2537: G265.5536-03.9951-A & A5V & 20060927 & 3.77$\pm$0.06 & ... & ... & 2.36$\times$10$^{-12}$ & ... & A \\
2538: G265.5536-03.9951-B & A6/8V & 20060927 & 4.93$\pm$0.11 & ...& ... & 7.01$\times$10$^{-13}$ & ... & A \\
2539: G269.5873-05.8882 & G0III & 20060926 & 2.12$\pm$0.03 & ... & ... & 1.04$\times$10$^{-12}$ & ... & A \\
2540: G299.1677-00.3922 & B8 & 20070407 & -4.37$\pm$0.12 & 9.62 & -13.99$\pm$0.12 & 5.51$\times$10$^{-13}$ & 7.71$\times$10$^{-12}$ & D \\
2541: G299.7090-00.9704 & B8/9IV & 20070407 & -1.99$\pm$0.16 & 8.13 & -10.12$\pm$0.16 & 5.36$\times$10$^{-13}$ & 5.42$\times$10$^{-12}$ & D \\
2542: G300.0992-00.0627 & A1 & 20070407 & -13.89$\pm$0.32 & 7.76 & -21.65$\pm$0.32 & 2.41$\times$10$^{-13}$ & 5.22$\times$10$^{-12}$ & D \\
2543: G305.4232-00.8229 & B6/8V(E) & 20070407 & -14.22$\pm$0.42 & 7.76 & -21.98$\pm$0.42 & 7.34$\times$10$^{-13}$ & 1.61$\times$10$^{-11}$ & D \\
2544: G307.9784-00.7148 & B8V(N) & 20070407 & -4.63$\pm$0.69 & 8.64 & -13.27$\pm$0.69 & 1.62$\times$10$^{-12}$ & 2.15$\times$10$^{-11}$ & D \\
2545: G310.5420+00.4120 & B8IV(N) & 20070407 & -0.09$\pm$0.09 & 9.88 & -9.97$\pm$0.09 & 6.88$\times$10$^{-13}$ & 6.86$\times$10$^{-12}$ & D \\
2546: G311.0099+00.4156 & A3IV & 20070407 & 5.21$\pm$0.03 & ... & 0.00 & 1.67$\times$10$^{-12}$ & ... & A \\
2547: G311.6185+00.2469 & B8/9IV/V & 20070407 & 1.96$\pm$0.23 & 12.86 & -10.90$\pm$0.23 & 3.12$\times$10$^{-13}$ & 3.40$\times$10$^{-12}$ & D \\
2548: G314.3136-00.6977 & A1IV & 20070407 & 4.20$\pm$0.29 & 16.83 & -12.63$\pm$0.29 & 9.41$\times$10$^{-13}$ & 1.19$\times$10$^{-11}$ & D \\
2549: G321.7686+00.4102 & B8V N & 20070407 & -16.93$\pm$0.53 & 9.88 & -26.81$\pm$0.53 & 5.88$\times$10$^{-13}$ & 1.58$\times$10$^{-11}$ & D \\
2550: G339.4392-00.7791 & A0/1IV/V & 20060927 & 3.28$\pm$0.76 & 14.48 & -11.20$\pm$0.76 & 8.58$\times$10$^{-13}$ & 9.61$\times$10$^{-12}$ & D \\
2551: G339.7415-00.1904 & A0 & 20060927 & 5.50$\pm$0.03 & ... & 0.00 & 4.15$\times$10$^{-13}$ & ... & A \\
2552: G340.0517+00.6687 & B8 & 20060927 & -31.62$\pm$0.08 & 7.76 & -39.38$\pm$0.03 & 1.17$\times$10$^{-12}$ & 4.61$\times$10$^{-11}$ & D \\
2553: G347.3777+04.2010 & B8 & 20060927 & -0.02$\pm$0.10 & ... & ... & 2.08$\times$10$^{-12}$ & ... & IP \\
2554: \enddata
2555: \tablecomments{(5) H$\alpha$ equivalent width of the nearest stellar
2556: model. This equivalent width was then used to determine
2557: EW(H$\alpha_{corr}$) and subsequently calculate the H$\alpha$
2558: flux. (7) The reddening corrected R flux. (8) H$\alpha$ flux was determined only for GLIMPSE mid-IR excess
2559: stars with 24 $\mu$m measurements and H$\alpha$ emission. (9) D:
2560: double-peaked profile, A: absorption only profile, S: single emission
2561: only profile, P: P-Cygni profile, IP: inverse P-Cygni profile. }
2562: \label{tha}
2563: \end{deluxetable}
2564:
2565: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}
2566: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
2567: \setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.01in}
2568: \tablewidth{0pc}
2569: \tablecaption{Spectral Features}
2570: \tablehead{
2571: \colhead{ID} &
2572: \colhead{H$\alpha$ Emission} &
2573: \colhead{Paschen Emission} &
2574: \colhead{Ca \textsc{II} Emission} &
2575: \colhead{O \textsc{I} 8446 Emission} &
2576: \colhead{O \textsc{I} 7772 Absorption} &
2577: \colhead{Fe \textsc{II} Emission} \\
2578: \colhead{} &
2579: \colhead{} &
2580: \colhead{} &
2581: \colhead{} &
2582: \colhead{} &
2583: \colhead{} &
2584: \colhead{} \\
2585: \colhead{(1)} &
2586: \colhead{(2)} &
2587: \colhead{(3)} &
2588: \colhead{(4)} &
2589: \colhead{(5)} &
2590: \colhead{(6)} &
2591: \colhead{(7)} }
2592: \startdata
2593: G007.2369+01.4894 & y & n & y & y & s & n \\
2594: G008.3752-03.6697 & y & n & n & n & s & n \\
2595: G009.4973+05.2441 & n & n & n & n & n & n \\
2596: G011.2691+00.4208 & y & n & n & n & n & n \\
2597: G014.4239-00.7657 & n & n & n & n & s & n \\
2598: G025.6122+01.3020 & n & n & n & n & n & n \\
2599: G027.0268+00.7224 & y & y & y & y & e & y \\
2600: G036.8722-00.4112 & y & n & n & n & n & n \\
2601: G047.3677+00.6199 & y & n & n & y & n & n \\
2602: G047.4523+00.5132 & n & n & n & n & s & n \\
2603: G051.6491-00.1182 & y & n & n & n & n & n \\
2604: G229.4514+01.0145 & y & n & y & y & s & y \\
2605: G257.6236+00.2459 & n & n & n & n & n & n \\
2606: G265.5536-03.9951-A & n & n & n & n & s & n \\
2607: G265.5536-03.9951-B & n & n & n & n & n & n \\
2608: G269.5873-05.8882$^{a}$ & n & n & n & n & N/A & n \\
2609: G299.1677-00.3922 & y & y & n & y & e$?$ & n \\
2610: G299.7090-00.9704 & y & n & n & n & n & n \\
2611: G300.0992-00.0627 & y & n & n & y & e & n \\
2612: G305.4232-00.8229 & y & n & n & y & e & n \\
2613: G307.9784-00.7148 & y & n & n & y & n & n \\
2614: G310.5420+00.4120 & y & n & n & n & s & n \\
2615: G311.0099+00.4156 & n & n & n & n & s & n \\
2616: G311.6185+00.2469 & y & n & n & n & n & n \\
2617: G314.3136-00.6977 & y & n & n & n & s & n \\
2618: G321.7868+00.4102 & y & y & n & y & e & y \\
2619: G339.4392-00.7791 & y & n & n & n & n & n \\
2620: G339.7415-00.1904 & n & n & n & n & n & n \\
2621: G340.0517+00.6687 & y & y & n & y & e & y \\
2622: G347.3777+04.2010$^{b}$ & y & n & n & n & N/A & n \\
2623: \enddata
2624: \tablecomments{(2) Stars that exhibit H$\alpha$ in emission are
2625: denoted by (y). (3) Stars with Paschen lines in emission are denoted
2626: by (y). (4) Stars that exhibit Ca \textsc{II} IR triplet emission are
2627: denoted by (y). (5) Stars that exhibit O \textsc{I} $\lambda$ 8446
2628: \AA\ in emission are noted by (y) (6) Stars that are shown to have O
2629: \textsc{I} $\lambda$ 7772 \AA\ in absorption stronger than stellar
2630: models predict are denoted by (s), those that exhibit it in emission
2631: (e), and those that exhibit absorption are denoted by
2632: (n). G269.5873-05.8882 and G347.3777+04.2010 are listed as N/A because
2633: we do not determine their stellar temperature and cannot make a
2634: comparison to stellar models. (7) Stars that exhibit Fe \textsc{II}
2635: emission are denoted by (y). (a) Spectral features indicate that this
2636: star is a giant. See \S 8 for further details. (b) This star is a
2637: spectroscopic binary. See \S 8 for further details.}
2638: \label{tspec}
2639: \end{deluxetable}
2640:
2641: \clearpage
2642:
2643: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}
2644: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
2645: \setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.01in}
2646: \tablewidth{0pc}
2647: \tablecaption{Estimated Stellar Ages}
2648: \tablehead{
2649: \colhead{ID} &
2650: \colhead{Distance} &
2651: \colhead{Adopted M$_{Bol}$} &
2652: \colhead{Age Derived} &
2653: \colhead{Age in Literature} \\
2654: \colhead{} &
2655: \colhead{(pc)} &
2656: \colhead{[mag]} &
2657: \colhead{(log yr)} &
2658: \colhead{(log yr)} \\
2659: \colhead{(1)} &
2660: \colhead{(2)} &
2661: \colhead{(3)} &
2662: \colhead{(4)} &
2663: \colhead{(5)} }
2664: \startdata
2665: G007.2369+01.4894 & 122$^{+17}_{-13}$ & -1.15$^{+1.34}_{-0.34}$ & 6.13-6.63, 8.04-8.27 & 6.70$^{a}$ \\
2666: G009.4973+05.2441 & 137$^{+32}_{-22}$ & 1.27$^{+0.40}_{-0.45}$ & 6.65-6.95, 8.42-8.74 & ... \\
2667: G025.6122+01.3020 & 114$^{+12}_{-9}$ & -0.10$^{+0.34}_{-0.36}$ & 7.09-8.09 & ... \\
2668: G036.8722--00.4112 & 424$^{+423}_{-142}$ & -1.53$^{+3.40}_{-1.68}$ & 6.11-6.32, 8.10-8.20 & ... \\
2669: G047.3677+00.6199 & 353$^{+171}_{-86}$ & -2.05$^{+0.78}_{-1.06}$ & 6.87-7.72 & ... \\
2670: G047.4523+00.5132 & 909$^{+91}_{-755}$ & -2.00$^{+4.01}_{-0.37}$ & 6.11-6.37, 7.58-8.19 & ... \\
2671: G051.6491--00.1182 & 345$^{+173}_{-87}$ & -0.98$^{+0.79}_{-1.03}$ & 6.13-8.05 & ... \\
2672: G229.4514+01.0145 & 277$^{+79}_{-50}$ & -2.25$^{+0.59}_{-0.50}$ & 6.09-6.43, 8.37-8.43 & \\
2673: G257.6236+00.2459 & 288$^{+202}_{-84}$ & -0.13$^{+0.84}_{-1.26}$ & 6.26-6.55, 7.33-8.24 & \\
2674: G265.5536--03.9951-A$^{b}$ & 139$^{+39}_{-22}$ & 0.70$^{+0.42}_{-0.49}$ & 6.81-6.83 & ... \\
2675: G265.5536--03.9951-B$^{b}$ & 139$^{+39}_{-22}$ & 1.85$^{+0.42}_{-0.50}$ & 6.81-6.83 & ... \\
2676: G305.4232--00.8229$^{c}$ & 1009$^{+244}_{-188}$ & -3.05$\pm$0.45 & 5.88, 7.87-7.95 & \\
2677: G307.9784--00.7148 & 758$^{+2272}_{-326}$ & -3.04$^{+1.38}_{-2.10}$ & 6.00-6.23, 7.66-8.03 & 8.03$\pm$0.04$^{d}$ \\
2678: G311.6185+00.2469$^{e}$ & 965 & -1.13 $\pm$0.50 & 6.08-6.18, 8.16-8.18 & 8.275$^{f}$ \\
2679: G321.7868+00.4102$^{g}$ & 1010 & -2.09$\pm$0.51 & 5.83-6.12, 8.01-8.13 & ... \\
2680: G340.0517+00.6687$^{g}$ & 830 & -3.14$\pm$0.14 & 5.62-5.85, 7.81-7.90 & ... \\
2681: G347.3777+04.2010 & ... & ... & ... & 7.23$^{h}$ \\
2682: \enddata
2683: \tablecomments{ (a) \citep{Mannings:1997}; (b) Assuming both stars
2684: to be coeval only a 2.2 and 2.0\ \mo \ binary is possible
2685: given temperature measurements. (c) Utilizing
2686: \citet{Seidensticker:1989} extinction and absolute visual magnitude
2687: measurements (d) \citep{Levenhagen:2004} (e) Utilizing
2688: \citet{Westin:1985} absolute visual magnitude. (f)
2689: \citet{Westin:1985}; (g) Utilizing \citet{Kozok:1985}; (h)
2690: \citet{Chen:2005} }
2691: \label{tage}
2692: \end{deluxetable}
2693: \clearpage
2694:
2695: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccccc}
2696: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
2697: \setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.01in}
2698: \tablewidth{0pc}
2699: \tablecaption{Free-Free Contribution to the 24 $\mu$m Excess}
2700: \tablehead{
2701: \colhead{ID} &
2702: \colhead{[24] Flux} &
2703: \colhead{[24] error$^{a}$} &
2704: \colhead{Excess flux at [24]} &
2705: \colhead{Free-free component} &
2706: \colhead{$\%$ free-free } &
2707: \colhead{$\sigma$ excess} &
2708: \colhead{Excess Type} \\
2709: \colhead{} &
2710: \colhead{(mJy)} &
2711: \colhead{(mJy)} &
2712: \colhead{(mJy)} &
2713: \colhead{(mJy)} &
2714: \colhead{} &
2715: \colhead{} &
2716: \colhead{} \\
2717: \colhead{(1)} &
2718: \colhead{(2)} &
2719: \colhead{(3)} &
2720: \colhead{(4)} &
2721: \colhead{(5)} &
2722: \colhead{(6)} &
2723: \colhead{(7)} &
2724: \colhead{(8)} }
2725: \startdata
2726: G011.2691+00.4208 & 18.4 & 2.7 & 13.1 & 6.0 & 46$\pm$21$\%$ & 2.6 & I \\
2727: G014.4239--00.7657 & 71.9 & 13.7 & 71.2 & ... & ... & 5.2 & III \\
2728: G027.0268+00.7224 & 17.7 & 2.1 & 8.7 & 8.5 & 98$\pm$24$\%$ & 0 & I \\
2729: G036.8722--00.4112 & 21.7 & 2.2 & 16.3 & 7.4 & 45$\pm$13$\%$ & 4.0 & II \\
2730: G047.3677+00.6199 & 44.6 & 4.5 & 38.9 & 12.1 & 31$\pm$12$\%$ & 6.0 & II \\
2731: G047.4523+00.5132 & 8.5 & 1.1 & 6.3 & ... & ... & 5.5 & III \\
2732: G051.6491--00.1182 & 17.8 & 2.8 & 12.7 & 6.1 & 48$\pm$22$\%$ & 2.4 & I \\
2733: G299.1677--00.3922 & 7.0 & 0.8 & 5.4 & 5.6 & 104$\pm$15$\%$ & 0 & I \\
2734: G299.7090--00.9704 & 5.1 & 0.5 & 3.1 & 1.9 & 61$\pm$16$\%$ & 2.4 & I \\
2735: G300.0992--00.0627 & 7.3 & 0.8 & 6.1 & 1.7 & 28$\pm$13$\%$ & 5.5 & II \\
2736: G305.4232--00.8229 & 16.7 & 1.8 & 14.2 & 5.1 & 36$\pm$13$\%$ & 5.1 & II \\
2737: G307.9784--00.7148 & 21.5 & 2.2 & 16.1 & 7.0 & 43$\pm$14$\%$ & 4.1 & II \\
2738: G310.5420+00.4120 & 5.6 & 0.7 & 3.3 & 2.3 & 70$\pm$21$\%$ & 1.4 & I \\
2739: G311.0099+00.4156 & 149.4 & 17.9 & 140.9 & ... & ... & 7.9 & III \\
2740: G311.6185+00.2469 & 8.6 & 1.5 & 7.4 & 1.2 & 16$\pm$20$\%$ & 4.1 & II \\
2741: G314.3136--00.6977 & 22.8 & 2.3 & 17.8 & 4.0 & 22$\pm$13$\%$ & 6.0 & II \\
2742: G321.7868+00.4102 & 12.6 & 1.3 & 10.7 & 5.0 & 47$\pm$12$\%$ & 4.4 & II \\
2743: G339.4392--00.7791$^{b,c}$ & 7.7 & 1.5 & ... & ... & ... & ... & ... \\
2744: G339.7415--00.1904$^{b}$ & 5.4 & 0.8 & 4.4 & ... & ... & 5.5 & III \\
2745: G340.0517+00.6687$^{b}$ & 31.6 & 3.4 & 26.9 & 14.4 & 54$\pm$14$\%$ & 3.7 & II \\
2746: \enddata
2747: \tablecomments{(7) Determined by removing the free-free component from
2748: the [24] excess and dividing by the [24] error with 10$\%$ calibration
2749: uncertainty error added in quadrature with measured error. (a) [24]
2750: flux measurement error with 10$\%$ calibration uncertainty error added
2751: in quadrature with measured error. (b) found to have no real excess
2752: at [24]. (c) New measurement, not in \citep{Uzpen:2007}.}
2753: \label{tff}
2754: \end{deluxetable}
2755:
2756: \clearpage
2757:
2758: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccccc}
2759: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
2760: \setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.01in}
2761: \tablewidth{0pc}
2762: \tablecaption{Stellar and Circumstellar Disk Parameters}
2763: \tablehead{
2764: \colhead{ID} &
2765: \colhead{$K$-8} &
2766: \colhead{8-24} &
2767: \colhead{Disk Temperature} &
2768: \colhead{$\frac{L_{IR}}{L_{*}}$} &
2769: \colhead{EW(H$\alpha_{corr}$)} &
2770: \colhead{T$_{eff}$} &
2771: \colhead{\textit{v} sin \textit{i}} &
2772: \colhead{Evolutionary Status} \\
2773: \colhead{} &
2774: \colhead{[mag]} &
2775: \colhead{[mag]} &
2776: \colhead{(K)} &
2777: \colhead{} &
2778: \colhead{(\AA)} &
2779: \colhead{(K)} &
2780: \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} &
2781: \colhead{} \\
2782: \colhead{(1)} &
2783: \colhead{(2)} &
2784: \colhead{(3)} &
2785: \colhead{(4)} &
2786: \colhead{(5)} &
2787: \colhead{(6)} &
2788: \colhead{(7)} &
2789: \colhead{(8)} &
2790: \colhead{(9)} }
2791: \startdata
2792: G007.2369+01.4894 & ... & ... & 493$^{+4}_{-5}$ & 0.14$^{+0.002}_{-0.002}$ & -26.15$\pm$0.15$^{a}$ & 10350$\pm$230 & 145$\pm$15 & H \\
2793: G008.3752--03.6697 & ... & ... & 566$^{+7}_{-8}$ & 0.20$^{+0.004}_{-0.004}$ & -0.17$\pm$0.08$^{a}$ & 7260$\pm$160 & 35$\pm$5 & TT \\
2794: G009.4973+05.2441 & ... & ... & ... & ... & 5.11$\pm$0.02$^{a}$ & 8320$\pm$130 & 140$\pm$15 & $?$ \\
2795: G011.2691+00.4208 & 0.34 & 1.01 & ... & ... & -13.86$\pm$0.16 & 12350$\pm$520 & 220$\pm$15 & Be \\
2796: G014.4239--00.7657 & 0.47 & 4.78 & 191$^{+5}_{-4}$ & 0.013$^{+0.001}_{-0.001}$ & 4.45$\pm$0.03 & 16900$\pm$800 & 165$\pm$10 & T \\
2797: G025.6122+01.3020 & ... & ... & ... & ... & 6.42$\pm$0.09 & 12520$\pm$510 & 290$\pm$20 & $?$ \\
2798: G027.0268+00.7224 & 0.34 & 0.56 & ... & ... & -13.89$\pm$0.43 & 10510$\pm$300 & 25$\pm$5 & Be \\
2799: G036.8722--00.4112 & 0.27 & 1.26 & 427$^{+16}_{-17}$ & 0.00072$^{+0.00007}_{-0.00006}$ & -15.07$\pm$0.15 & 11740$\pm$260 & 295$\pm$20 & T \\
2800: G047.3677+00.6199 & 0.93 & 1.24 & 783$^{+19}_{-24}$ & 0.0028$^{+0.0001}_{-0.0001}$ & -22.47$\pm$0.24 & 15700$\pm$600 & 310$\pm$25 & T/Be \\
2801: G047.4523+00.5132 & 0.29 & 1.25 & 355$^{+8}_{-8}$ & 0.0012$^{+0.0001}_{-0.0001}$ & 6.49$\pm$0.02 & 12260$\pm$510 & 150$\pm$10 & D \\
2802: G051.6491--00.1182 & 0.19 & 1.12 & ... & ... & -2.89$\pm$0.15 & 13100$\pm$530 & 270$\pm$20 & Be \\
2803: G229.4514+01.0145 & ... & ... & 579$^{+4}_{-5}$ & 0.058$^{+0.001}_{-0.001}$ & -7.82$\pm$0.45$^{a}$ & 10220$\pm$390 & 295$\pm$20 & H \\
2804: G257.6236+00.2459 & ... & ... & 404$^{+9}_{-10}$ & 0.12$^{+0.002}_{-0.002}$ & 9.41$\pm$0.06$^{a}$ & 11530$\pm$300 & 240$\pm$25 & H \\
2805: G265.5536--03.9951-A & ... & ... & ... & ... & 4.93$\pm$0.11$^{a}$ & 7660$\pm$140 & 25$\pm$5 & $?$ \\
2806: G265.5536--03.9951-B & ... & ... & ... & ... & 3.77$\pm$0.06$^{a}$ & 7040$\pm$170 & 40$\pm$5 & $?$ \\
2807: G269.5873--05.8882 & ... & ... & ... & ... & 2.12$\pm$0.03$^{a}$ & ... & 10$\pm$5 & $?$ \\
2808: G299.1677--00.3922 & 0.35 & 1.18 & ... & ... & -13.99$\pm$0.12 & 16450$\pm$1030 & 130$\pm$10 & Be \\
2809: G299.7090--00.9704 & 0.18 & 0.81 & ... & ... & -10.12$\pm$0.16 & 12520$\pm$505 & 175$\pm$15 & Be \\
2810: G300.0992--00.0627 & 0.56 & 1.36 & 526$^{+41}_{-32}$ & 0.0021$^{+0.0002}_{-0.0002}$ & -21.65$\pm$0.32 & 13510$\pm$510 & 255$\pm$20 & T/Be \\
2811: G305.4232--00.8229 & 0.79 & 1.27 & 675$^{+37}_{-33}$ & 0.0038$^{+0.0003}_{-0.0002}$ & -21.98$\pm$0.42 & 13520$\pm$510 & 230$\pm$20 & T/Be\\
2812: G307.9784--00.7148 & 0.40 & 1.06 & 557$^{+22}_{-16}$ & 0.00090$^{+0.00007}_{-0.00008}$ & -13.27$\pm$0.69 & 13220$\pm$520 & 240$\pm$20 & T/Be \\
2813: G310.5420+00.4120 & 0.25 & 0.70 & ... & ... & -9.97$\pm$0.09 & 12430$\pm$510 & 270$\pm$20 & Be \\
2814: G311.0099+00.4156 & 0.37 & 2.79 & 315$^{+4}_{-3}$ & 0.0027$^{+0.0001}_{-0.0003}$ & 5.21$\pm$0.03 & 9800$\pm$130 & 235$\pm$25 & D \\
2815: G311.6185+00.2469 & 0.28 & 1.82 & 306$^{+13}_{-6}$ & 0.0012$^{+0.0001}_{-0.0001}$ & -10.90$\pm$0.23 & 10540$\pm$255 & 265$\pm$20 & T \\
2816: G314.3136--00.6977 & 0.22 & 1.45 & 328$^{+11}_{-9}$ & 0.00096$^{+0.00007}_{-0.00008}$ & -12.63$\pm$0.29 & 9870$\pm$130 & 205$\pm$20 & T \\
2817: G321.7868+00.4102 & 0.77 & 1.25 & 556$^{+18}_{-12}$ & 0.0021$^{+0.0002}_{-0.0001}$ & -26.81$\pm$0.53 & 12340$\pm$505 & 230$\pm$20 & H \\
2818: G339.4392--00.7791$^{b}$ & ... & ... & ... & ... & -11.20$\pm$0.76 & 8800$\pm$150 & 40$\pm$5 & ... \\
2819: G339.7415--00.1904 & 0.27 & 1.93 & 311$^{+6}_{-6}$ & 0.0010$^{+0.0001}_{-0.0001}$ & 5.50$\pm$0.03 & 12220$\pm$510 & 240$\pm$15 & D \\
2820: G340.0517+00.6687 & 1.11 & 1.04 & 823$^{+20}_{-20}$ & 0.015$^{+0.001}_{-0.001}$ & -39.38$\pm$0.08 & 14080$\pm$520 & 230$\pm$15 & H \\
2821: G347.3777+04.2010 & ... & ... & 487$^{+9}_{-11}$ & 0.13$^{+0.02}_{-0.03}$ & -0.02$\pm$0.10$^{a}$ & ... & 15$\pm$5 & TT/T \\
2822: \enddata
2823: \tablecomments{ (9) H: Herbig AeBe star, TT: T-Tauri
2824: star, T: Transitional disk, D: Debris disk, Be: Excess due to
2825: free-free emission and therefore a classical Be-type star, $?$:
2826: additional measurements are needed to classify the nature of the IR
2827: excess. (a) This value is EW(H$\alpha$), uncorrected for underlying
2828: stellar absorption. (b) The [8.0] excess from \citet{Uzpen:2007} is
2829: not confirmed at [24].}
2830: \label{tsum}
2831: \end{deluxetable}
2832:
2833: \clearpage
2834:
2835: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}
2836: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
2837: \setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.01in}
2838: \tablewidth{0pc}
2839: \tablecaption{Classification Based on \citet{Andrillat:1990} Spectral Features}
2840: \tablehead{
2841: \colhead{ID} &
2842: \colhead{Criterion 1} &
2843: \colhead{Criterion 2} &
2844: \colhead{Criterion 3} &
2845: \colhead{Classical Be} \\
2846: \colhead{(1)} &
2847: \colhead{(2)} &
2848: \colhead{(3)} &
2849: \colhead{(4)} &
2850: \colhead{(5)} }
2851: \startdata
2852: G007.2369+01.4894 & n & n & y & n \\
2853: G027.0268+00.7224 & y & y & N/A & y \\
2854: G047.3677+00.6199 & N/A & N/A & n & n \\
2855: G229.4514+01.0145 & n & n & y & n \\
2856: G299.1677-00.3922 & N/A & y & N/A & y \\
2857: G300.0992-00.0627 & N/A & n & n & n \\
2858: G305.4232-00.8229 & N/A & n & n & n \\
2859: G307.9784-00.7148 & N/A & n & n & n \\
2860: G321.7868+00.4102 & n & y & n & n \\
2861: G340.0517+00.6687 & n & y & n & n \\
2862: \enddata
2863: \tablecomments{(2) Criterion 1: Stars with Ca \textsc{II} in emission
2864: and Paschen in emission are denoted by y. Stars with Ca \textsc{II}
2865: in emission without Paschen emission are denoted by n. Stars without
2866: Ca \textsc{II} emission are denoted by N/A. (3) Criterion 2: Stars
2867: with O \textsc{I} in emission and Paschen in emission are denoted by
2868: y. Stars with O \textsc{I} in emission and Paschen in absorption are
2869: denoted by n. Stars without O \textsc{I} in emission are denoted by
2870: N/A. (4) Criterion 3: Stars with [8.0] excess $>$ 0.55 magnitudes
2871: with Ca \textsc{II} in emission are denoted by y. Stars with [8.0]
2872: excess $>$ 0.55 magnitudes without Ca \textsc{II} are denoted by
2873: n. Stars without [8.0] excess $>$ 0.55 magnitudes are denoted by
2874: N/A. (5) Stars with criterion 1, 2, and/or 3 with y only are
2875: consistent with classical Be stars.}
2876: \label{comp}
2877: \end{deluxetable}
2878:
2879: \clearpage
2880:
2881: \begin{figure}
2882: \hbox{
2883: \includegraphics[width=2.0in,angle=90]{f1a.eps}
2884: \includegraphics[width=2.0in,angle=90]{f1b.eps}
2885: }
2886: \hbox{
2887: \includegraphics[width=2.0in,angle=90]{f1c.eps}
2888: \includegraphics[width=2.0in,angle=90]{f1d.eps}
2889: }
2890: \caption{(upper left) The relation between projected rotational
2891: velocity and \ion{He}{1} $\lambda$ 4471 \AA\ FWHM of \citet{Munari:2005}
2892: stellar models, where the multiple points at each velocity reflect
2893: measurements over a range of effective temperatures. The \ion{He}{1}
2894: $\lambda$ 4471 \AA\ line contains Stark broadening that results in a
2895: greater dispersion in the FWHM measurement. The solid line shows the
2896: linear least squares fit. (upper right) The relation
2897: between projected rotational velocity and \ion{Mg}{2} $\lambda$ 4481
2898: \AA\ FWHM. (lower left) The relation between projected rotational
2899: velocity and \ion{Fe}{1} $\lambda$ 4476 \AA\ FWHM. (lower right) A
2900: comparison of projected rotational velocities of \citet{Royer:2002a}
2901: and \citet{Slettebak:1975} versus our rotational velocities. The solid
2902: line shows the 1:1 relationship in this panel. Our measurements are
2903: consistent with those of \citet{Royer:2002a} but $\simeq$10$\%$
2904: larger than those of \citet{Slettebak:1975}, as explained in the
2905: text.}
2906: \label{FWHM}
2907: \end{figure}
2908:
2909: \begin{figure}
2910: \hbox{
2911: \includegraphics[width=2.0in,angle=90]{f2a.eps}
2912: \includegraphics[width=2.0in,angle=90]{f2b.eps}
2913: }
2914: \hbox{
2915: \includegraphics[width=2.0in,angle=90]{f2c.eps}
2916: \includegraphics[width=2.0in,angle=90]{f2d.eps}
2917: }
2918: \caption{(upper left) The relation between model ratios of EW
2919: \ion{Mg}{2} $\lambda$ 4481 \AA/EW \ion{He}{1} $\lambda$ 4009 \AA\ and
2920: effective temperature. The multiple data points at each
2921: abscissa/ordinate are due to multiple measurements of the same model
2922: and shows the systematic errors associated with this
2923: relationship. The solid curve shows the best fit relation of EW ratio
2924: to effective temperature for the models with 150 km s$^{-1}$
2925: projected rotational velocity. (upper right) The relation between EW
2926: \ion{Mg}{2} $\lambda$ 4481 \AA/EW \ion{He}{1} $\lambda$ 4471 \AA\ and
2927: effective temperature. (lower left) The relation between EW
2928: \ion{Mg}{2} $\lambda$ 4481 \AA/EW \ion{Fe}{1} $\lambda$ 4233 \AA\ and
2929: effective temperature. This relationship depends upon rotational
2930: velocity, and the dotted curve shows the best fit relation of EW
2931: ratio to effective temperature at 250 km s$^{-1}$. (lower right) The
2932: relation between EW \ion{Mg}{2} $\lambda$ 4481 \AA/EW \ion{Ca}{1}
2933: $\lambda$ 4227 \AA\ and effective temperature.}
2934: \label{temp}
2935: \end{figure}
2936:
2937: \begin{figure}
2938: \includegraphics[width=4.0in,angle=90]{f3.eps}
2939: \caption{\ion{He}{1} $\lambda$ 5876 \AA\ profiles (denoted by the
2940: dashed vertical line) of mid-infrared excess stars overplotted with
2941: best fit \citet{Munari:2005} stellar models. Red curves show the
2942: stellar models for stars in which the measured stellar temperature
2943: falls in between the two nearest stellar models. Blue curves show the
2944: stellar models for stars in which the measured temperature does not
2945: fall in between the nearest stellar models. G014.4239-00.7657,
2946: G229.4514+01.0145, G265.5536-03.9951-A and B are overplotted by blue
2947: curves indicating the discrepancy between the \ion{He}{1} line
2948: and measured temperature.}
2949: \label{he1}
2950: \end{figure}
2951:
2952: \clearpage
2953:
2954: \begin{figure}
2955: \includegraphics[width=4.0in,angle=90]{f4.eps}
2956: \caption{\ion{He}{1} 5876 \AA\ profiles of mid-infrared excess
2957: stars overplotted with best fit \citet{Munari:2005} stellar
2958: models using the same symbolism as
2959: Figure~\ref{he1}. G299.1677-00.3922 and G307.9784-00.7148 are
2960: overplotted by blue curves indicating the discrepancy
2961: between the \ion{He}{1} line and measured temperature.}
2962: \label{he2}
2963: \end{figure}
2964:
2965: \clearpage
2966:
2967: \begin{figure}
2968: \includegraphics[width=4.0in,angle=90]{f5.eps}
2969: \caption{H$\alpha$ profiles of mid-infrared excess stars. The
2970: majority of our sources exhibit a double-peaked emission profile.}
2971: \label{ha1}
2972: \end{figure}
2973:
2974: \clearpage
2975:
2976: \begin{figure}
2977: \includegraphics[width=4.0in,angle=90]{f6.eps}
2978: \caption{H$\alpha$ profiles of mid-infrared excess stars. The
2979: majority of our sources exhibit a double-peaked emission profile.}
2980: \label{ha2}
2981: \end{figure}
2982:
2983: \clearpage
2984:
2985: \begin{figure}
2986: \includegraphics[width=4.0in,angle=90]{f7.eps}
2987: \caption{The spectral region 8400--8600 \AA\ showing several
2988: Paschen lines, Pa15-19, \ion{Ca}{2} $\lambda$ 8498 and 8542 \AA\,
2989: and \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$ 8446 \AA.}
2990: \label{pa1}
2991: \end{figure}
2992:
2993: \clearpage
2994:
2995: \begin{figure}
2996: \includegraphics[width=4.0in,angle=90]{f8.eps}
2997: \caption{The spectral region 8400--8600 \AA\ showing several
2998: Paschen lines, Pa15-19, \ion{Ca}{2} $\lambda$ 8498 and 8542 \AA\,
2999: and \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$ 8446 \AA.}
3000: \label{pa2}
3001: \end{figure}
3002:
3003: \clearpage
3004:
3005: \begin{figure}
3006: \includegraphics[width=4.0in,angle=90]{f9.eps}
3007: \caption{The spectral region 8400--8700 \AA\ showing
3008: the three stars within our sample that exhibit \ion{Ca}{2}
3009: emission. \citet{Munari:2005} stellar models of nearest
3010: measured temperature are shown below. All three
3011: sources also exhibit \ion{O}{1} emission, and G027.0268+00.7224
3012: exhibits Paschen emission.}
3013: \label{ca2}
3014: \end{figure}
3015:
3016: \clearpage
3017:
3018: \begin{figure}
3019: \includegraphics[width=4.0in,angle=90]{f10.eps}
3020: \caption{\ion{Fe}{2} $\lambda$ 5317 \AA\ profiles of mid-infrared
3021: excess stars. \ion{Fe}{2} is indicated by the dashed vertical
3022: line. \ion{Fe}{2} emission is not very common among our sources.}
3023: \label{fe1}
3024: \end{figure}
3025:
3026: \clearpage
3027:
3028: \begin{figure}
3029: \includegraphics[width=4.0in,angle=90]{f11.eps}
3030: \caption{\ion{Fe}{2} $\lambda$ 5317 \AA\ profiles of mid-infrared
3031: excess stars. \ion{Fe}{2} is indicated by the dashed vertical
3032: line. \ion{Fe}{2} emission is not very common among our sources.}
3033: \label{fe2}
3034: \end{figure}
3035:
3036: \clearpage
3037:
3038: \begin{figure}
3039: \includegraphics[width=4.0in,angle=90]{f12.eps}
3040: \caption{HR diagram for sixteen of our target stars overlaid with
3041: \citet{Siess:2000} stellar evolutionary models for 7,000 $<$ T$_{eff}$
3042: $<$ 17,000~K. The symbols show the various methods used to determine
3043: the absolute magnitude, diamonds for $Hipparcos$ parallax, triangle
3044: for Tycho parallax, and asterisks for stars with absolute magnitudes
3045: taken from the literature. The zero-age main-sequence is shown by the
3046: solid line. Isochrones are shown by the dotted, dashed, and dash-dot
3047: relations. The majority of our stars lie above the main-sequence and
3048: are consistent with 3--5\ \mo\ stars. The three coolest stars are
3049: above the main-sequence and consistent with pre-main-sequence objects.}
3050: \label{ages}
3051: \end{figure}
3052:
3053:
3054: \begin{figure}
3055: \includegraphics[width=4.0in,angle=90]{f13.eps}
3056: \caption{A comparison of projected rotational velocities of
3057: B8--9.5 V stars from \citet{Abt:2002}, classical Be stars from
3058: \citet{Hanuschik:1996}, and our GLIMPSE sample. Utilizing a KS test we
3059: find that there is no significant probability, $<$ 1\% for the
3060: \citet{Abt:2002} sample and 8\% for the \citet{Hanuschik:1996} sample,
3061: that this sample may be derived from either population.}
3062: \label{comp}
3063: \end{figure}
3064:
3065: \clearpage
3066:
3067: \begin{figure}
3068: \includegraphics[width=5.0in]{f14.eps}
3069: \caption{A $K$-8 $\mu$m vs. 8-24 $\mu$m color-color plot of our
3070: objects ($open$ $symbols$) and classical Be stars ($asterisks$)
3071: from \citet{Jaschek:1982} with $MSX$ A band and IRAS 25 $\mu$m
3072: (from \citealt{Zhang:2004,Zhang:2005}) were utilized as 8 $\mu$m
3073: and 24 $\mu$m measurements respectively. The arrow shows the
3074: reddening vector for A$_{V}$=5.0. The solid curve denotes a B8V
3075: main-sequence with A$_{V}$=1.0 and increasing contribution of
3076: free-free flux at 8 $\mu$m. The solid symbols denote 5\%, 33\%,
3077: and 50\% circumstellar contributions to the total flux at 8
3078: $\mu$m. The dashed curves denote B8V main-sequence stars with
3079: A$_{V}$=1.0 and increasing contributions from 800~K and 300~K
3080: blackbody circumstellar components, respectively. This plot shows
3081: that excess emission owing to free-free processes can be
3082: distinguished from cool dust ($<$ 300~K). Systems containing the
3083: former lie to the left of the solid line while the systems with
3084: the latter lie to the right. In this color-color space, free-free
3085: and hot dust excesses are indistinguishable.}
3086: \label{color}
3087: \end{figure}
3088:
3089: \clearpage
3090:
3091: \begin{figure}
3092: \includegraphics[width=5.0in]{f15.eps}
3093: \caption{Spectral energy distribution of one of our target stars,
3094: G036.8722-00.4112. The thick solid line is the distance-normalized
3095: stellar model. The thin solid line is the stellar model with
3096: extinction and circumstellar blackbody component from
3097: \citet{Uzpen:2007}. The dash-dot curve is the modeled free-free
3098: component normalized using the H$\alpha$ flux. The
3099: dashed-dot-dot-dot curve is the sum of the stellar model and the
3100: free-free component. The free-free component is not sufficient to
3101: explain the measured excess at 24 $\mu$m. The residuals are for the
3102: stellar model with circumstellar blackbody component.}
3103: \label{G36}
3104: \end{figure}
3105:
3106: \clearpage
3107:
3108: \begin{figure}
3109: \hbox{
3110: \includegraphics[width=4.0in]{f16a.eps}
3111: }
3112: \hbox{
3113: \includegraphics[width=4.0in]{f16b.eps}
3114: }
3115: \caption{(a) EW(H$\alpha$$_{corr}$) vs. disk temperature. There
3116: is a strong anti-correlation between these two parameters. (b) H$\alpha$
3117: equivalent width vs. stellar effective temperature. There is no
3118: correlation between these two parameters for Type I, Type II, or Type III
3119: sources.}
3120: \label{diskt}
3121: \end{figure}
3122:
3123: \clearpage
3124:
3125: \begin{figure}
3126: \plotone{f17.eps}
3127: \caption{An inter-comparison of $\frac{L_{IR}}{L_{*}}$, age, and
3128: H$\alpha$ equivalent width. Using the younger age, when available,
3129: age is correlated with H$\alpha$ equivalent width with a
3130: correlation coefficient of 0.97 indicating $>$ 99\% probability that
3131: the two parameters are correlated for these seven stars. Using the
3132: older age when available, there is no correlation between age and
3133: $\frac{L_{IR}}{L_{*}}$ or between H$\alpha$ equivalent width and
3134: $\frac{L_{IR}}{L_{*}}$. }
3135: \label{3in1}
3136: \end{figure}
3137:
3138: \clearpage
3139:
3140: \begin{figure}
3141: \includegraphics[width=5.0in]{f18.eps}
3142: \caption{A flow chart showing how we determined the type of
3143: circumstellar disk system using echelle spectra and an estimate of
3144: the contribution from free-free emission for 19 GLIMPSE stars. Two
3145: MSX stars are characterized: G007.2369+01.4894, where extensive
3146: data exists in the literature, and G229.4514+01.0145, which
3147: exhibits spectral features similar to G007.2369+01.4894.}
3148: \label{flow}
3149: \end{figure}
3150:
3151: \end{document}
3152: