1: %2008.9.27

2: %\documentclass[aps,axodraw,twocolumn,prl,nofootinbib,superscriptaddress]{revtex4}

3: %\documentclass[aps,axodraw,twocolumn,preprint]{revtex4}

4: %\documentclass[prd,showpacs,amsmath,showkeys,floatfix]{revtex4}

5: \documentclass[aps,preprint,amsmath,showpacs,amssymb,nofootinbib]{revtex4}

6: %\usepackage{fancyhdr}

7: %\usepackage{fancybox}

8: \bibliographystyle{unsrt}

9: \usepackage{epstopdf}

10: 

11: \usepackage{graphicx}

12: \usepackage{color}

13: %\usepackage{soul}

14: \usepackage{latexsym}

15: 

16: %\documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}

17: %\documentclass[preprint,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}

18: %\documentclass[a4]{article}

19: \usepackage{feynarts}

20: %\usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point

21: %\usepackage{bm}% bold math

22: 

23: %\nofiles

24: %--------------------------------------------------------------------

25: % new definitions, abreviations, etc

26: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

27: 

28: \newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}

29: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}

30: \newcommand{\beqa}{\begin{eqnarray}}

31: \newcommand{\eeqa}{\end{eqnarray}}

32: \newcommand{\ba}{\begin{array}}

33: \newcommand{\ea}{\end{array}}

34: \newcommand{\no}{\nonumber}

35: 

36: \def\delr            {\!\stackrel{\leftrightarrow}{\partial^\mu}\!}

37: \def\delrd            {\!\stackrel{\leftrightarrow}{\partial_\mu}\!}

38: % --- Journal references ---

39: 

40: \newcommand{\ZPC}[1]  {{\em Z. Phys.}    {\bf C#1}}

41: \newcommand{\PLB}[1]  {{\em Phys. Lett.} {\bf B#1}}

42: \newcommand{\NPB}[1]  {{\em Nucl. Phys.} {\bf B#1}}

43: \newcommand{\PRD}[1]  {{\em Phys. Rev.}  {\bf D#1}}

44: \newcommand{\PRep}[1] {{\em Phys. Rep.}  {\bf #1}}

45: \newcommand{\PRL}[1]  {{\em Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf #1}}

46: \newcommand{\PLett}[1]  {{\em Phys. Lett.} {\bf #1}}

47: %------------------------------------------------------------

48: \begin{document}

49: 

50: \title{ Lepton Flavor Violating  $l \to l' \gamma$ and $Z \to l \bar l'$ Decays Induced by Scalar Leptoquarks}

51: 

52: \author{Rachid Benbrik$^{1,2}$\footnote{Email:

53: rbenbrik@phys.cycu.edu.tw\\ Address after Aug. 2008: Department of

54: Physics, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan.}}

55: 

56: \author{Chun-Khiang Chua$^1$\footnote{Email:

57: ckchua@phys.cycu.edu.tw} }%

58: \affiliation{%

59: $^1$Department of Physics, Chung Yuan Christian University

60:   Chung-Li, Taiwan 320, Republic of China\\

61: $^2$LPHEA, D\'epartement de Physique,Facult\'e des Sciences-Semlalia B.P 2390 Marrakech, Morocco.

62: }%

63: 

64: %---------------

65: \begin{abstract}

66: Motivated by the recent muon $g-2$ data, we study the lepton

67: flavor violating $l \to l' \gamma$ and $Z \to l \bar l'$ ($l, l' =

68: e, \mu, \tau$) decays with $l \neq l'$ in a scalar leptoquark

69: model. Leptoquarks can produce sizable LFV $l\to l'\gamma$ decay

70: rates that can be easily reached by present or near future

71: experiments.

72: %

73: Leptoquark masses and couplings are constrained by the muon $g-2$

74: data and the current $l \to l' \gamma$ bounds. We predict $Br(Z

75: \to \tau^\mp e^\pm)$ reaching the present limit ($10^{-5}$) and

76: $Br(Z \to \mu^\mp \tau^\pm)$ reaching $2\times 10^{-8}$, which

77: will be accessible by future linear colliders, whereas, the

78: current bounds on LFV impose very strong constraints on the $Br(Z

79: \to \mu^\mp e^\pm)$ and the ratio is too low to be observed in the

80: near future.

81: \end{abstract}

82: 

83: \pacs{14.80.-j, 13.40.Em, 13.35.-r, 13.38.Dg}

84: 

85: 

86: \maketitle

87: 

88: 

89: 

90: 

91: 

92: 

93: %_______________________________________________________%

94: \section{Introduction}

95: \label{sec:introduction}

96: %==================================

97: 

98: 

99: 

100: The excess value of the anomalous magnetic moment of muon was

101: reported by the E821 collaboration at BNL~\cite{Bennet}

102: \begin{equation}

103: a^{{\rm exp}}_\mu = 116\, 592\, 080(63) \times 10^{-11}.

104: \end{equation}

105: The Standard Model prediction for $a^{SM}_\mu$ with QED, hadronic

106: and electroweak contributions is~\cite{Miller,Aoyama:2007mn}

107: %

108: \begin{equation}

109: a^{{\rm SM}}_\mu = 116\, 591\, 785 (61) \times 10^{-11}.

110: \end{equation}

111: %

112: with the experimental value of $(g-2)/2$, the comparison gives

113: \begin{equation}

114: \Delta a_\mu \equiv a^{{\rm exp}}_\mu -a^{{\rm SM}}_\mu = (295\pm

115: 87.7) \times 10^{-11},  \qquad (3.4 \sigma) \label{amue}

116: \end{equation}

117: The 3.4 standard deviation difference between the two, may be a

118: hint of new physics contribution.

119: 

120: 

121: It has been shown that contributions from leptoquark (LQ)

122: exchanges are capable to resolve the above

123: deviation~\cite{Bigi:1985jq, Mahanta:2001yc,Cheung:2001ip}. Leptoquarks are

124: vector or scalar particles carrying both lepton and baryon

125: numbers. LQs can be quite naturally introduced in the low-energy

126: theory as a relic of a more fundamental theory at some high-energy

127: scale, such as grand unified theories (GUT) \cite{ps,GUT}. In some

128: models, it is possible to have leptoquarks at TeV

129: scale~\cite{lowLQ}. The low-energy LQ phenomenology has received

130: considerable attention. Possible LQ manifestations in various

131: processes have been extensively investigated

132: \cite{lowLQ}-\cite{Benbrik:2008ik}. Various constraints on LQ

133: masses and couplings have been deduced from existing experimental

134: data and prospects for the forthcoming experiments have been

135: estimated. Direct searches of LQs as s-channel resonances in deep

136: inelastic ep-scattering and pair production in hadron colliders

137: placed lower limits on their mass $M_{LQ} \geq 73-298$GeV

138: \cite{pdg} depending on the LQ types and couplings. The interest

139: on leptoquarks has been renewed during the last few years since

140: ongoing collider experiments have good prospects for searching

141: these particles \cite{LHC}. For a recent review of leptoquarks,

142: one is referred to \cite{LQreview}.

143: 

144: 

145: 

146: 

147: 

148: 

149: 

150: 

151: 

152: 

153: Lepton Flavor Violation (LFV) are powerful tools to search for new

154: physics. The present experimental limits give~\cite{pdg}:

155: \beqa

156: \label{lfv1}

157: {\rm Br}(\mu \to e \gamma) &<& 1.2 \times 10^{-11}, \\

158: \label{lfv2}

159: {\rm Br}(\tau \to e \gamma) &<& 1.1 \times 10^{-7}, \\

160: \label{lfv3} {\rm Br}(\tau \to \mu \gamma) &<& 6.8 \times 10^{-8}.

161: \eeqa

162: %

163: Since effects of leptoquark interactions can manifest in $a_\mu$,

164: it is very likely that they can also give interesting

165: contributions to these $l\to l'\gamma$

166: processes~\cite{Mahanta:2001yc,Cheung:2001ip}. There are

167: considerable efforts on experiments that aim at pushing the

168: sensitivity of ${\rm Br}(\mu \to e \gamma)$ down by two order of

169: magnitudes~\cite{LQll'gamma}. B factories and the upgraded super B

170: factory can probe the $\tau\to e\gamma,\,\mu\gamma$ decays at

171: better sensitivities.

172: 

173: 

174: 

175: 

176: 

177: 

178: 

179: 

180: 

181: The $Z \to \ell \bar\ell'$ decays are among the LFV interactions

182: and the theoretical predictions of their branching ratios  in the

183: framework of the SM are extremely small \cite{Riemann, Ganapathi,

184: Illana}.

185: %

186: These results are far from the experimental limits obtained at

187: LEP1 \cite{pdg}:

188: %

189: \begin{eqnarray}

190: Br(Z\rightarrow e^{\pm} \mu^{\mp}) &<& 1.7\times 10^{-6} \,\,\,\,,

191: \\

192: Br(Z\rightarrow e^{\pm} \tau^{\mp}) &<& 9.8\times 10^{-6}\,\,\,\,,

193: \\

194: Br(Z\rightarrow \mu^{\pm} \tau^{\mp}) &<& 1.2\times 10^{-5} \,\,.

195: \label{Expr1}

196: \end{eqnarray}

197: %

198: Better sensitivities are expected from the Giga-Z modes at future

199: colliders, such as International Linear Collider (ILC), to have

200: \cite{AguilarSaavedra:2001rg,Heinemeyer:2007aw,Erler:2008ek}:

201: %

202: \begin{eqnarray}

203: Br(Z\rightarrow e^{\pm} \mu^{\mp}) &<& 2\times 10^{-9} \, , \\

204: Br(Z\rightarrow e^{\pm} \tau^{\mp}) &<& \kappa\times 6.5\times 10^{-8}

205: \, , \\

206: Br(Z\rightarrow \mu^{\pm} \tau^{\mp}) &<& \kappa\times 2.2\times

207: 10^{-8}, \label{Expr2}

208: \end{eqnarray}

209: with $\kappa\simeq0.2-1.0$.

210: %

211: It will be interesting to study the leptoquark contributions to

212: the $Z\to l\bar l'$ processes.

213: 

214: 

215: 

216: 

217: 

218: 

219: 

220: 

221: The aim of the present paper is to study the leptoquark effects in

222: various LFV processes including $l\to l'\gamma$ and $Z\to l\bar

223: l'$ decays, while considering leptoquark contribution to $a_\mu$

224: as a solution to the muon anomalous moment discrepancy.

225: %

226: The layout of the present paper is as follows: In Sec. II we

227: introduce the formalism.  We then use it in Sec. III to study the

228: leptoquark contributions to $a_\mu$ and LFV processes including

229: $l\to l'\gamma$ and $Z\to l\bar l'$ decays. Sec. IV contains our

230: conclusions. Some formulas and low energy constraints are given in

231: Appendices.

232: 

233: 

234: 

235: 

236: 

237: 

238: 

239: %--------------------------------------------

240: \section{Formalism}

241: \subsection{Scalar Leptoquark Interactions}

242: %-------------------------------------------

243: 

244: 

245: 

246: 

247: 

248: 

249: In this section we list the relevant parts of the scalar

250: leptoquark Lagrangian. We consider isosinglet scalar leptoquarks.

251: The effective Lagrangian describing the leptoquark interactions in

252: the mass basis is given by \cite{CHH1999,Lagr1}:

253: \begin{eqnarray}

254: % LQ

255:  {\mathcal{L}}_{LQ}

256:  &=&

257:  \label{lag}

258:  \overline{u^c_a} \bigg(h^{'}_{ai} \Gamma_{k,S_R} P_L+h_{ai}\Gamma_{k,S_L} P_R \bigg) e_i S^*_k

259:  +\overline{e_{j}} \bigg( h^{'*}_{aj} \Gamma^\dagger_{S_R,k} P_R+h^*_{aj} \Gamma^\dagger_{S_L,k} P_L

260:  \bigg) u^c_a S_k

261:  \\\no

262:  &-& e Q_{(u^c)} A_\mu \overline{u^c_a} \gamma^\mu u^c_a - ieQ_{S} A_\mu S^*_{k} \delr S_{k}

263:  + ieQ_{S} \tan\theta_W Z_\mu S^*_{k} \delr S_{k}

264:  \\\no

265:  &-& \frac{e }{s_W c_W} Z_\mu \overline{u^c_a}\gamma^\mu

266:  \bigg( (T_{3(u^c)} - Q_{(u^c)} s^2_W) P_R - Q_{(u^c)} s^2_W P_L \bigg)

267:  u^c_a,

268: \end{eqnarray}

269: %

270: where $k = 1,2$ are the indices of leptoquark, $T_3 = -1/2$,

271: $Q_{u^c} = -2/3$ are quark's isospin and electric charge, $Q_S =

272: -1/3 $ is the electric charge of scalar leptoquarks $S_k$, $a$ and

273: $i,j$ are quarks and leptons flavor indices and we use $c_{W} =

274: \cos\theta_W$ and $s_{W} = \sin\theta_W$.

275: %

276: The $\Gamma_{k, S_{L,R}}$ are elements of leptoquark mixing matrix

277: that brings $S_{L,K}$ to the mass basis $S_k$:

278: %---------

279: \begin{eqnarray}

280: S_L = \Gamma^{\dagger}_{S_L, k} S_k, \qquad S^*_R = \Gamma_{k,S_R}

281: S^*_k,

282: \end{eqnarray}

283: where the $S_{L(R)}$ is the field that associates with the

284: $\overline{e_{j}} P_{L(R)} u^c_a$ terms in

285: ${\mathcal{L}}_{LQ}$~\cite{CHH1999}. Note that in the no-mixing

286: case ($\Gamma=1$), $S_{1,2}$ reduce to $S_{L,R}$, which are called

287: chiral leptoquarks, as they only couple to quarks and leptons in

288: certain chirality structures.

289: %

290: Finally, the couplings $h$ and $h'$ are 3 by 3 matrices, which

291: give rise to various LFV processes and must be subject to

292: experimental constraints.

293: 

294: 

295: 

296: 

297: 

298: In this work we do not aim at a comprehensive study of the effects

299: of all possible leptoquark interactions. Instead, we try to

300: demonstrate that a simple scalar leptoquark model can provide rich

301: and interesting LFV phenomenons.

302: 

303: 

304: 

305: 

306: 

307: 

308: 

309: 

310: 

311: %========================================

312: \subsection{Muon anomalous magnetic moment $(g-2)_{\mu}$}

313: %========================================

314: 

315: 

316: 

317: 

318: 

319: 

320: %============================

321: \begin{widetext}

322: \begin{figure}

323: \begin{center}

324: \includegraphics[width=12cm]{fd1.eps}

325: \end{center}

326: %\vspace{-2cm}

327: \caption{Feynman diagrams contributing to $\ell \to \ell' \gamma$

328: and $Z \to \ell \bar \ell'$,

329:   ${S}_k$ are the scalar leptoquark $k=1,2$,

330:   $u^c_a$ are quark up  with  $a=1,2,3$. }

331: \label{penguin}

332: \end{figure}

333: \end{widetext}

334: %============================================

335: 

336: 

337: 

338: 

339: 

340: 

341: The LQ interaction is capable to generate muon anomalous magnetic

342: moment and resolve the discrepancy between theoretical and

343: experimental results. The one-loop diagrams are shown in

344: Fig.~\ref{penguin}(a)-(b) with $l=l'=\mu$. The extra contribution to

345: $a_\mu $ arises from the LQ model due to quark and scalar

346: leptoquark one-loop contribution is given by

347: %

348: \begin{widetext}

349: \begin{eqnarray}

350: a^{LQ}_{\mu} &=&\no - \frac{N_c m^2_\mu}{8 \pi^2} \sum_{q=1}^{3}

351: \sum_{k=1}^{2}

352:  \frac{1}{M^2_{S_k}} \bigg[ \big(|h_{q\mu} \Gamma_{k,S_L}|^2  + |h'_{q\mu} \Gamma_{k,S_R}|^2 \big)

353: \big( Q_{(u^c)} F_{2}(x)- Q_{S} F_{1}(x) \big) \\&& -

354:   \frac{m_{(u^c_a)}}{m_\mu}  {\rm Re} \big(h'_{q\mu} h^*_{q\mu} \Gamma^{+}_{S_R,k}\Gamma_{k,S_L} \big)

355: \big(Q_{(u^c)} F_{3}(x_{ka}) - Q_{S} F_{4}(x_{ka}) \big) \bigg],

356: \label{eq:a_LQ}

357: \end{eqnarray}

358: %

359: \end{widetext}

360: %

361: In the above expression, $N_c = 3$, $Q_{S} = -1/3$, $Q_{u^c} =

362: -2/3$. Our expression agrees with that in \cite{Djouadi:1989md,

363: Cheung:2001ip}. The kinematic loop functions $F_{i}$ $(i=1,...,4)$

364: depend on the variable $x = m^2_{(u^c_a)} / m^2_{S_k}$ are given in the appendix A.

365: 

366: 

367: 

368: 

369: Using leptoquark contribution to saturate the deviation given in

370: Eq.(\ref{amue}), the leptoquark masses $M_{S_{1,2}}$, mixing angle

371: $\theta_{LQ}$ and couplings $h^{(\prime)}_{q\mu}$, will be

372: constrained.

373: 

374: 

375: 

376: 

377: 

378: 

379: 

380: 

381: %-------------------------------------------

382: %======================================

383: \subsection{$\ell \to  \ell' \gamma$}

384: %=====================================

385: 

386: 

387: 

388: 

389: 

390: In this subsection we give the amplitude of $\ell\to \ell'\gamma$ from

391: leptoquark exchange. According to the gauge invariance, the

392: amplitude can be written as:

393: \begin{eqnarray}

394: i{\mathcal{M}}^{\gamma}&=&ie\bar{u}(p_2) \bigg(

395: F^{\gamma}_{2RL} P_{L} + F^{\gamma}_{2LR} P_R\bigg) (i\sigma_{\mu\nu}q^\nu)

396:  u(p_1)\varepsilon^{\mu *}_{\gamma},

397: \end{eqnarray}

398: where $\varepsilon_\gamma$ is the polarization vector and $q= p_1

399: - p_2$ is the momentum transfer. For the amplitude of leptoquark

400: exchange at one-loop level as depicted in Figure.~\ref{penguin},

401: we have

402: \begin{widetext}

403: \begin{eqnarray}

404: \label{lepq}

405: F^{\gamma}_{2LR} &=&\no \frac{N_c}{16 \pi^2}\sum_{q=1}^{3} \sum_{k=1}^{2}

406:   \frac{1}{M^2_{S_k}}\Bigg[

407: \big(m_l h'_{q\ell} h^{'*}_{q\ell'} \Gamma^{\dagger}_{S_R,k}

408: \Gamma_{k,S_R}    + m_{l'} h_{q\ell} h^{*}_{q\ell'}

409: \Gamma^{\dagger}_{S_L,k} \Gamma_{k,S_L}  \big)

410: %\\\no &&\times

411: \big(Q_{(u^c)}F_{2}(x)

412:   - Q_{S}F_{1}(x)\big)

413: \\ &&- m_{(u^c_a)}

414: \big(h_{q\ell} h^{'*}_{q\ell'} \Gamma^{\dagger}_{S_R,k}

415: \Gamma_{k,S_L}\big) \big(Q_{(u^c)}F_{3}(x) -  Q_{S}

416:   F_4 (x)\big)\Bigg],

417:   \\

418:  F^{\gamma}_{2RL} &=& F^{\gamma}_{2LR} ( h

419:   \leftrightarrow h', R \leftrightarrow L),

420: \end{eqnarray}

421: \end{widetext}

422: with $x = m^2_{(u^c_a)} / m^2_{S_k}$.

423: The branching ratio of $\ell

424: \to \ell' \gamma$ is:

425: %

426: \begin{eqnarray}

427: {\rm Br}(\ell \to \ell' \gamma) &=&\frac{\alpha_{em}}{4

428: \Gamma(\ell)} \frac{(m^2_\ell - m^2_{\ell'})^3}{ m^3_\ell } \bigg(

429: |F^{\gamma}_{2LR}|^2 + |F^{\gamma}_{2RL}|^2 \bigg),

430: \end{eqnarray}

431: %------------------------------------

432: In our numerical calculations we analyze the Brs of the decays

433: under consideration by using the total decay widths of the

434: decaying leptons $\Gamma(\ell)$.

435: 

436: 

437: 

438: 

439: 

440: 

441: %=============================================

442: %===

443: %===           Z decays

444: %===

445: %=============================================

446: 

447: 

448: 

449: 

450: 

451: 

452: %----------------------

453: \subsection{$Z \to \ell \bar\ell'$ }

454: %----------------------

455: 

456: 

457: The Feynman diagrams of LFV $Z$ decay process are shown in Fig. 1.

458: The total contribution of all diagrams (c) and (d) can be written

459: as \beqa \label{ampge} i{\mathcal{M}}^{Z}_{\mu}&=&ie

460: m^2_Z\bar{u}(p_2) \bigg[\bigg(F^Z_{1L} P_R + F^Z_{1R}P_L\bigg)

461: \bigg(-g_{\mu\nu} + \frac{q_\mu q_\nu}{m^2_Z} \bigg)\gamma^\nu

462: \\\no &&

463: + \frac{1}{m^2_Z}\bigg(F^Z_{2RL}P_{L} + F^Z_{2LR}P_R\bigg)

464: (i\sigma_{\mu\nu}q^\nu) \bigg]u(p_1)\varepsilon^{Z}_{\mu} (q)

465: \eeqa

466: %

467: where $q_\mu$ is the $Z$ four-momentum. The decay rates involve

468: both $F^Z_{1L(R)}$ and $F^Z_{2LR(RL)}$:

469: %

470: \beqa {\rm Br}(Z \to \ell \bar\ell') &=&

471: \frac{\alpha_{em}}{6} \frac{m_Z}{\Gamma_Z} \bigg[

472: \bigg(|F^Z_{1L}|^2 + |F^Z_{1R}|^2 \big) \\\no && + \frac{1}{2

473: m^2_Z} \bigg(|F_{2LR}(Z)|^2+|F_{2RL}(Z)|^2 \bigg)\bigg],

474: \eeqa

475: %

476: where the form factors $F^Z_{1L(R)}$ and $F^Z_{2LR(RL)}$ are given

477: by

478: %----------------

479: \begin{widetext}

480: \beqa

481: F^Z_{1L} &=& \frac{N_c}{16 \pi^2} \frac{1}{M^2_{S_k}} \bigg[

482: h^\prime_{q\ell} h^{\prime *}_{q\ell'} \Gamma^+_{S_R, k}\Gamma_{k, S_R}

483: \big( g_{S} G_1(x) + g_{R} G_{2}(x) \big)

484: \\\no &-&\frac{m_{u_a}}{m^2_{\ell} - m^2_{\ell'}}

485: \big(g_L- g_R \big) \big( h_{q\ell} h^{\prime *}_{q\ell'}

486: \Gamma^+_{S_R, k}\Gamma_{k, S_L} m_{\ell} - h^\prime_{q\ell}

487: h^*_{q\ell'} \Gamma^+_{S_L, k}\Gamma_{k, S_R} m_{\ell'}

488: \big)G_{3}(x)\bigg],

489:  \\

490: F^Z_{1R} &=& F^Z_{1L}(h \leftrightarrow h^\prime,  L

491: \leftrightarrow R ),

492:  \eeqa

493: and

494: %-------------

495: \beqa

496:  F^Z_{2LR} &=& \frac{N_c}{16 \pi^2}\frac{1}{M^2_{S_k}} \bigg[

497: h_{q\ell} h^{\prime *}_{q\ell'} \Gamma^{\dagger}_{S_R,

498: k}\Gamma_{k,S_L} m_{u_a}(g_R + g_L)G_3(x)

499:  \\\no

500: &+& \big( g_R

501:  h^\prime_{q\ell} h^{\prime *}_{q\ell'} \Gamma^{\dagger}_{S_R, k}\Gamma_{k,S_R}

502: m_{\ell} + g_L h_{q\ell} h^{ *}_{q\ell'} \Gamma^{\dagger}_{S_L,

503: k}\Gamma_{k,S_L} m_{\ell'} \big)G_4(x)

504:  \\\no

505:  &-& g_{S}\bigg( (

506: h^\prime_{q\ell} h^{\prime *}_{q\ell'} \Gamma^{\dagger}_{S_R,

507: k}\Gamma_{k,S_R} m_{\ell} + h_{q\ell} h^{ *}_{q\ell'}

508: \Gamma^{\dagger}_{S_L, k}\Gamma_{k,S_L} m_{\ell'}) G_5(x)

509: %\\\no &+&

510: + m_{u_a} h_{q\ell} h^{ \prime *}_{q\ell'} \Gamma^{\dagger}_{S_R,

511: k}\Gamma_{k,S_L} G_6(x)\bigg)\bigg],

512:  \\

513:  F^Z_{2RL} &=& F^Z_{2LR}(h \leftrightarrow h^\prime ,L

514:  \leftrightarrow R ),

515:  \eeqa

516: \end{widetext}

517: where we have $x = m^2_{u_a} / m^2_{S_k}$ and the couplings

518: $g_{R,L}$ and $g_S$ are given by

519: \begin{eqnarray}

520: g_R &=& -\frac{2}{\sin\theta_W \cos\theta_W} \big ( T_{3(u^c)} - Q_{(u^c)} \sin^2\theta_W \big), \\

521: g_L &=&  Q_{(u^c)} \tan\theta_W, \qquad g_S =  Q_{S} \tan\theta_W.

522: \end{eqnarray}

523: %

524: In the above expressions of $F^Z_{1L(R)}$, we keep only the leading term

525: in $m_Z^2/m_{S_k}^2$. The explicit expressions of one loop

526: functions $G_n$ $(n=1,..6)$ can be found in the appendix A.

527: 

528: 

529: 

530: 

531: 

532: 

533: 

534: %============================================

535: \section{Numerical results and discussion}

536: %============================================

537: 

538: 

539: 

540: 

541: 

542: 

543: We are now ready to give some numerical results. The quark mass

544: are evaluated  at the scale of the $\mu =

545: 300$~GeV~\cite{Gray:1990}, which is the typical leptoquark mass

546: used in this work,

547: \begin{eqnarray}

548: m_t = 161.4 \,{\rm GeV}, \quad m_c = 0.55\, {\rm GeV},\quad

549:  m_u  = 11.4 \times 10^{-3}\,{\rm GeV},

550: \end{eqnarray}

551: and for the following quantities we use~\cite{pdg}

552: \begin{eqnarray}

553: \alpha_{em} = 1/137.0359, \quad M_W = 80.45 \,{\rm GeV} , \quad M_Z = 91.1875 \,{\rm GeV}.

554: \end{eqnarray}

555: %

556: For simplicity, we assume that the couplings $h$ and $h'$ are real

557: and equal to each other, i.e.

558: \begin{eqnarray}

559: h = h^\prime = h^*.

560: \end{eqnarray}

561: %

562: We use leptoquark mass splitting $\Delta= 500$ GeV in our

563: analysis, where $\Delta$ is defined as $\sqrt{M^2_{S_2} -

564: M^2_{S_1}}$. Consequently, the remaining parameters in the

565: leptoquark model are the mass of the light scalar leptoquark

566: $M_{S_1}$, the mixing angle $\theta_{LQ}$, and the couplings

567: $h_{q\ell}$.

568: 

569: 

570: 

571: 

572: 

573: 

574: 

575: 

576: %============================================

577: \subsection{Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment $a_\mu$}

578: %============================================

579: 

580: 

581: 

582: 

583: 

584: %---------------------------------------------------

585: \begin{figure*}[ht]

586:   \begin{tabular}{cc}

587:     \resizebox{90mm}{!}{{\hspace{-3cm}}\includegraphics{fig2L.eps}}&{\hspace{-0.5cm}}

588:     \resizebox{90mm}{!}{{\hspace{-3cm}}\includegraphics{fig2R.eps}}

589: \end{tabular}

590: \caption{ Scatter plot in the plane ($M_{S_1}- |h_{q\mu}|^2$) in

591:  the left panel,($M_{S_1}- \sin2\theta_{LQ}$) in the right panel. These are

592:  allowed regions in the parameter space that give $a^{LQ}_\mu=\Delta

593:  a_\mu=(295\pm87.7)\times10^{-11}$.}

594:  \label{figure1}

595: \end{figure*}

596: %----------------------------------------

597: 

598: 

599: 

600: 

601: 

602: 

603: 

604: 

605: 

606: In this section we discuss a few phenomenological aspects of the

607: leptoquark contributions to $a_\mu$.

608: %

609: In the left panel of Fig.~\ref{figure1}, we present an scatter

610: plot in the $(M_{S_1}- |h_{q\mu}|^2)$ plane for top quark

611: contribution (red) and charm quark contribution (green), which are

612: allowed by $a^{LQ}_\mu=\Delta a_\mu=(295\pm87.7)\times10^{-11}$

613: [see Eq. (\ref{amue})] within the 1$\sigma$ range of data. We note

614: that it is not possible to use the up quark loop contribution

615: alone for the $a_\mu^{LQ}=\Delta a_\mu$, since the mixing angle

616: and couplings $h_{u\mu}$ are strongly constrained by the $\pi$

617: leptonic decays (see Appendix B).

618: 

619: 

620: 

621: 

622: 

623: 

624: 

625: In order to see the impact of the mixing angle, we present in the

626: right panel of Fig.\ref{figure1} the allowed regions

627: $a^{LQ}_{\mu}=\Delta a_\mu$ in the $(M_{S_1}- \sin2\theta_{LQ})$

628: plane. We use $\alpha_{em}\leq h^2_{q\mu}\leq1$. The contribution

629: dominates around $\sin2\theta_{LQ} \sim 0.7$ both for top and

630: charm quark contributions. We see that the constraint from

631: $a_{\mu}$ confines the allowed range of $M_{S_1}$ to $M_{S_1}

632: \lesssim 950 $ GeV for top quark contribution and to $M_{S_1}

633: \lesssim 350 $ GeV for charm quark contribution at the 1$\sigma$

634: level. These parameter space will be used for later study of LFV

635: processes. The light leptoquark mass should be below 1 TeV, if

636: leptoquarks with couplings of electromagnetic strength are

637: responsible to the deviation $\Delta a_\mu$. It is interesting

638: that LHC may have good chance to observe these

639: particles~\cite{LHC}.

640: 

641: 

642: 

643: 

644: 

645: 

646: 

647: 

648: 

649: 

650: 

651: %========================

652: \subsection{Lepton Flavor Violating $l\to l'\gamma$ and $Z\to l\bar l'$ Decays}

653: %=======================

654: In this section, we investigate the LFV decay processes generated

655: by the same leptoquark scalar interactions. We consider only

656: parameter space that corresponds to $a^{LQ}_\mu=\Delta a_\mu$ when

657: it is appropriate. We discuss $\mu \to e \gamma$ and $\tau \to e

658: \gamma,\,\mu\gamma$ decays first.

659: 

660: In Fig.~\ref{figure3} and Fig.~\ref{figure4} we show scatter plots

661: of the allowed parameters in $(M_{S_1},

662: h_{q\ell}h_{q\ell^\prime})$ planes from bounds of $\tau \to

663: \mu\gamma$, $\tau \to e \gamma$ and $\mu \to e \gamma$ rates. Note

664: that in the plots we use

665:  \beqa

666:  1.5\times 10^{-13}&\leq&{\rm Br}(\mu \to e \gamma) < 1.2 \times 10^{-11},

667:  \no\\

668:  1\times 10^{-9}&\leq&{\rm Br}(\tau \to e \gamma) < 1.1 \times 10^{-7},

669:  \no\\

670:  1\times 10^{-9}&\leq&{\rm Br}(\tau \to \mu \gamma) < 6.8 \times 10^{-8}.

671:  \label{eq:ll'g}

672:  \eeqa

673: where the upper bounds are from the current limits:

674: Eqs.~(\ref{lfv1})-(\ref{lfv3}), while the lower bound for ${\rm

675: Br}(\mu \to e \gamma)$ is from \cite{LQll'gamma} and the lower

676: bounds for $\tau\to l\gamma$ are for illustration. For the

677: $\tau\to \mu\gamma$ and $\mu\to e\gamma$ cases the $(g-2)_\mu$

678: constraint is taken into account.

679: 

680: 

681: For different quark contribution the couplings are bounded in the

682: following ranges: $10^{-4}\lesssim h_{q\tau}h_{q\mu}\lesssim

683: 10^{-2}$, $10^{-3}\lesssim h_{c\tau}h_{ce}\lesssim 1$,

684: $10^{-4}\lesssim h_{t\tau}h_{te}\lesssim 1$ and $10^{-7}\lesssim

685: h_{q\mu}h_{qe}\lesssim 10^{-6}$. For the $\tau\to\mu \gamma$ and

686: $\mu\to e\gamma$ cases, the allowed leptoquark masses are

687: $m_{S_1}\lesssim 250-300$ GeV and 1~TeV for $c$-quark and $t-$

688: quark loop contribution, respectively. These region are determined

689: from the bounds and the muon $g-2$ constraint (see also

690: Fig.~\ref{figure1}) at the same time. On the other hand the

691: couplings governing $\tau\to e\gamma$ decay and those generating

692: muon $g-2$ contribution are decoupled, the parameters

693: corresponding to the former bounds are free from the latter

694: constraint. The resulting allowed regions are larger in this

695: cases.

696: %

697: The parameters in these allowed regions will be used to predict

698: $Z\to l\bar l'$ decays. To have an idea of the size the allowed

699: couplings, we give that upper bound on $h_{q\ell} h_{q\ell'}$

700: obtained form the present $l\to l'\gamma$ limits in

701: Table~\ref{TBC2}. We see that the $\mu\to e\gamma$ constraint is

702: more effective in restricting the sizes of $h_{q\ell} h_{q\ell'}$.

703: 

704: 

705: 

706: 

707: 

708: 

709: 

710: 

711: 

712: 

713: %----------------------------------

714: \begin{table}[h]

715: \begin{center}

716: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|}

717: \hline\hline

718: Decay mode & $h_{c\ell}h_{c\ell'}$ & $h_{t\ell}h_{t\ell'}$ \\

719: \hline\hline

720: $ \tau \to \mu \gamma $  & $ < 5.29 \times 10^{-3}$ & $ < 9.11 \times 10^{-3}$ \\

721: $ \tau \to e \gamma $  & $ < 0.81 $ & $ < 0.82$ \\

722: $ \mu \to e \gamma $  & $< 1.45 \times 10^{-6}$ & $ < 1.92 \times 10^{-6}$  \\

723: \hline\hline

724: %----------

725: \end{tabular}

726: \caption{ Constraints on the parameters $h_{q\ell}h_{q\ell'}$

727: $(q=t,c)$ coming from radiative FCNC processes induced by the

728: scalar leptoquark using the present experimental bounds.}

729: \label{TBC2}

730: \end{center}

731: \end{table}

732: %----------------------------------

733: 

734: 

735: 

736: %----------------------------------------

737: \begin{center}

738: \begin{figure*}

739:   \begin{tabular}{cc}

740:     \resizebox{90mm}{!}{{\hspace{-3cm}}\includegraphics{fig3a_tmg.ps}} &{\hspace{-0.5cm}}

741:     \resizebox{90mm}{!}{{\hspace{-3cm}}\includegraphics{fig3b_teg.ps}}

742:   \end{tabular}

743: \caption{

744: Scatter plots of leptoquark parameters in

745:  $(M_{S_1}, h_{q\ell}h_{q\ell'})$ planes from $(\ell \to

746: \ell' \gamma)$ bounds given in Eq.~(\ref{eq:ll'g}). The left

747: (right) figure is for the

748:  $\tau \to \mu \gamma$ ($\tau \to e \gamma$) case with top and charm quark contributions.

749: } \label{figure3}

750: \end{figure*}

751: \end{center}

752: %-----------------------------------------------

753: 

754: 

755: 

756: 

757: 

758: %-----------------------------------------------

759: \begin{center}

760: \begin{figure*}

761: \includegraphics[width=11cm]{fig4_meg.eps}

762: \caption{Same as Fig.~\ref{figure3} except for the $\mu \to e

763: \gamma$ case.} \label{figure4}

764: \end{figure*}

765: \end{center}

766: %-----------------------------------------------

767: 

768: 

769: 

770: 

771: In Fig.~\ref{figure7} and \ref{figure8}, we give the predicted

772: $Z\to l\bar l'$ rates in correlation with Br$(l \to l' \gamma)$.

773: We see that $Br(Z \to \tau^\mp e^\pm)$ can reach $1.95 \times

774: 10^{-5}$, which is comparable with the present bound, and $Br(Z

775: \to \mu^\mp \tau^\pm)$ can reach $2.34 \times 10^{-8}$, which will

776: be accessible by future linear colliders. On the contrary, the

777: current bound on the $\mu\to e\gamma$ decay imposes very strong

778: constraints on the related couplings as shown in Table I. Hence

779: the predicted $Br(Z \to \mu^\mp e^\pm)$ is rather small and is too

780: low to be observed in the near future.

781: %

782: %

783: In Fig.~\ref{figure7}, we see that the $Z\to l\bar l'$ rates are

784: roughly positively correlating with the $l \to l' \gamma$ rates

785: and the top quark loop contributions are larger than the charm

786: quark's ones. To have observable $Z\to \tau^\mp\mu^\pm$ and $Z\to

787: \tau^\mp e^\pm$, the $\tau \to\mu\gamma,\,e\gamma$ rates are

788: predicted to be close to the present bounds.

789: 

790: 

791: 

792: %-----------------------------------------------

793: \begin{center}

794: \begin{figure*}

795:   \begin{tabular}{cc}

796:     \resizebox{90mm}{!}{{\hspace{-3cm}}\includegraphics{fig5a.eps}} &{\hspace{-1cm}}

797:     \resizebox{90mm}{!}{{\hspace{-3cm}}\includegraphics{fig5b_teg.eps}}

798:   \end{tabular}

799: \caption{ The correlation between Br$(\tau \to \ell' \gamma)$ and

800: Br$(Z \to \tau \ell')$ where $\tau = e , \mu$.} \label{figure7}

801: \end{figure*}

802: \end{center}

803: %-----------------------------------------------

804: 

805: %-----------------------------------------------

806: \begin{center}

807: \begin{figure*}

808: \includegraphics[width=11cm]{fig6.eps}

809: \caption{ The correlation between Br$(\mu \to e \gamma)$ and Br$(Z

810: \to \mu e)$.} \label{figure8}

811: \end{figure*}

812: \end{center}

813: %-----------------------------------------------

814: 

815: 

816: 

817: In this work the analysis has been performed for the scalar

818: leptoquark case. It is possible that vector leptoquarks may also

819: contribute to $(g-2)_\mu$ and LFV processes. As shown in

820: Ref.~\cite{Bigi:1985jq,DBC}, quite often $(g-2)_\mu$ and LFV

821: processes provide more stringent constraints on vector leptoquark

822: couplings and masses than on scalar leptoquark ones. For example,

823: using the measured $m_t$ and the formula given in

824: \cite{Bigi:1985jq}, the present $\Delta a_\mu$ leads to a very

825: large mass scale $\Lambda\simeq 500$~TeV in the vector leptoquark

826: case, where $\Lambda$ was defined from the relation:

827: $4\pi/\Lambda^2\equiv g^2_{LQ}/m^2_{LQ}$. The mass scale is much

828: larger than the corresponding mass scale exhibited in Fig.~2,

829: which is found to be $\Lambda\simeq$ few -- ${\mathcal

830: O}(10)$~TeV. Similarly, in $l\to l'\gamma$ processes, the

831: constraints on vector leptoquark parameters are usually more

832: severe~\cite{DBC}.

833: 

834: %In \cite{DBC} we see that the dependence on

835: %the leptoquark mass for LFV rates is also stronger in the vector

836: %leptoquark case.

837: %Note that there are two types of vector

838: %leptoquarks: gauge-like and non-gauge-like and the constraints

839: %depend on the types as well. One usually needs to bring in further

840: %assumptions for the non-gauge-like vector leptoquark case

841: %\cite{DBC}.

842: 

843: 

844: 

845: %========================

846: \section{Conclusion}

847: %=======================

848: 

849: Motivated by the reported discrepancy of the muon $g-2$ results,

850: we studied the lepton flavor violating $\ell \to \ell' \gamma$ and

851: $Z \to \ell \bar\ell'$ decays in the LQ model. We showed that the

852: $g-2$ anomaly favors LQ masses in rather low-energy regime, e.g.

853: $< 1$ TeV, which is within the reach of the forthcoming Large

854: Hadron Collider.

855: 

856: 

857: We found that leptoquarks can generate sizable LFV $l\to l'\gamma$

858: decays. The present experimental limits are used to confined the

859: leptoquark parameter space. On the other hand, it is interesting

860: to search for these LFV effects in experiments, such as MEG, B

861: factories and the super B factory.

862: 

863: 

864: We predict $Br(Z \to \tau^\mp e^\pm)$ reaching $10^{-5}$ and $Br(Z

865: \to \mu^\mp \tau^\pm)$ reaching $2\times 10^{-8}$, which can be

866: accessible by present experiments and future linear colliders,

867: such as ILC. On the contrary, the current bounds on LFV impose

868: very strong constraints on the $Br(Z \to \mu^\mp e^\pm)$ and the

869: ratio is too low to be observed in the near future. In this case,

870: it is much useful to search for the LFV effects in $\mu\to

871: e\gamma$ decay.

872: 

873: 

874: 

875: 

876: 

877: 

878: 

879: 

880: 

881: 

882: 

883: 

884: \section{Acknowledgment}

885: The authors would like to thank Dr. Stefan Ritt for useful

886: discussions. This work is supported in part by the National

887: Science Council of R.O.C under grant number: NSC96-2811-M-033-005

888: and NSC-95-2112-M-033-MY2.

889: 

890: 

891: 

892: 

893: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

894: 

895: 

896: 

897: 

898: \appendix

899: 

900: 

901: 

902: 

903: 

904: %================================

905: \section{One loop functions}

906: %--------------------------------------------

907: The loop functions $F_i$ and $G_i$ used in Sec. II are given by

908: \begin{eqnarray}

909: F_{1}(x) &=& \frac{\big[2 + 3x -6x^2+x^3+6x\log(x)\big]}{12(1-x)^4},\\

910: F_{2}(x) &=& \frac{\big[1 - 6x +3x^2+2x^3-6x^2\log(x)\big]}{12(1-x)^4},\\

911: F_{3}(x) &=& \frac{-1}{2(1-x)^3}\big[ 3 -4x + x^2 + 2 \log(x)\big],\\

912: F_{4}(x) &=& \frac{1}{2(1-x)^3}\big[ 1 - x^2 + 2 x \log(x)\big],

913: \end{eqnarray}

914: and

915: \begin{eqnarray}

916: G_1(x) &=& \frac{\big[ -2 + 9 x^2 -18 x^4 + 11 x^6 - 12 x^6 \log(x) \big]}{36(x^2-1)^4} ,\\

917: G_2(x) &=& \frac{1}{36(x^2-1)^4}\\ \no & \times &

918: \big[ 16 - 45 x^2 + 36 x^4 - 7 x^6 + 12 (-2+3 x^2) \log(x)\big]\\

919: G_3(x) &=& \frac{ 3 - 4 x^2 + x^4 + 4 \log(x) }{4(x^2-1)^3} ,\\

920: G_4(x) &=& \frac{ 2 + 9 x^2 -6 x^4 + x^6 + 12 x^2 \log(x) }{12(x^2-1)^4} ,\\

921: G_5(x) &=& \frac{1 - 6 x^2 + 3 x^4 + 2 x^6 - 12 x^4 \log(x) }{12(x^2-1)^4} ,\\

922: G_6(x) &=& \frac{1}{2(x^2-1)^3} \big[ -1 + x^4 - 4 x^2\log(x)

923: \big].

924: \end{eqnarray}

925: %-------------------------------------------

926: 

927: 

928: 

929: 

930: %=======================================================

931: \section{Constraint form $\pi \to e\nu_{e}$ and $\pi \to \mu \nu_{\mu}$ decays }

932: %==================================

933: 

934: We follow \cite{pi_decay,DBC} to constrain leptoquark parameters

935: using pion decay data. Form the interactions given in

936: Eq.~(\ref{lag}), we obtain the effective four-Fermi interaction

937: \begin{eqnarray}

938: {\mathcal{L}}_{eff} &=& \label{lag2}

939: -\frac{h'_{ai}h^{'*}_{bj}\Gamma^+_{R,k} \Gamma_{k,R}}{M^2_{S_k}}

940: (\bar{e}^c_iP_L u_a )(\bar{d}_b P_R \nu^c_j) \\\no &-&

941: \frac{h_{ai} h^{'*}_{bj}\Gamma^\dagger_{R,k}

942: \Gamma_{k,L}}{M^2_{S_k}} (\bar{e}^c_iP_R u_a )(\bar{d}_b P_R

943: \nu^c_j)

944: \end{eqnarray}

945: By using the Fierz transformation, we can rewite the Eq.(\ref{lag2}) as

946: \begin{eqnarray}

947: {\mathcal{L}}_{eff} &=&\no  -\frac{1}{2 M^2_{S_k}}

948: h'_{ai}h^{'*}_{bj} \Gamma^\dagger_{R,k} \Gamma_{k,R}(\bar{d}_{L,b}

949: \gamma_\mu u_{L,a})(\bar{\nu}_{L,j} \gamma^\mu e_{L,i})

950: \\ &+&\frac{1}{2M^2_{S_k} }h_{ai}h^{'*}_{bj}\Gamma^\dagger_{R,k}

951: \Gamma_{k,L} (\bar{d}_{L,b}  u_{R,a})(\bar{\nu}_{L,j} e_{R,i})

952: \end{eqnarray}

953: On the other hand, the conventional interation for the $\pi \to l\nu_{l}$ decay in the SM is given by

954: \begin{eqnarray*}

955: {\mathcal{L}}_{eff} &=& -\frac{G_F V_{ud}}{\sqrt{2}}[\bar{\nu}\gamma_\mu (1-\gamma_5)l]

956: [\bar{d}\gamma^\mu (1-\gamma_5)u] + {\rm h.c}

957: \end{eqnarray*}

958: here $|V_{ud}|$ is the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix elements between the constituent of the pion meson, $G_F$ is the Fermi couplings constant. The ratio $R_{th}$ of the electronic and muonic decay modes is \cite{Cirigliano:2007xi}

959: \begin{eqnarray}

960: R_{th} &=& \no \frac{\Gamma_{SM}(\pi^+ \to \bar{e}\nu_e)}{\Gamma_{SM}(\pi^+ \to \bar{\mu}\nu_\mu)}

961: \\\no

962: &=& \bigg(\frac{m^2_e}{m^2_\mu}\bigg)\bigg(\frac{m^2_\pi - m^2_e}{m^2_\pi - m^2_\mu}\bigg)^2\bigg(1 + \delta\bigg)

963: \\

964: &=& (1.2352 \pm 0.0001) \times 10^{-4}

965: \end{eqnarray}

966: where $\delta$ is the radiative corrections, Thus the ratio

967: $R_{th}$ is very sensitive to non standard model effects (such as

968: multi-Higges, non-chiral leptoquarks).

969: %

970: The experimental ratio is \cite{pdg}

971: \begin{eqnarray}

972: R_{exp} = (1.2302 \pm 0.004) \times 10^{-4}

973: \end{eqnarray}

974: The interference between the standard model and LQ model can be expressed by

975: %====

976: \begin{widetext}

977: \begin{eqnarray}

978: R_{SM-LQ} &=& R_{th} +R_{th}\,\frac{m^2_{\pi^+}}{m_u + m_d}

979: \bigg(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{{\rm Re} (h_{ue}h^{'*}_{ue})}{G_F

980: V_{ud}M^2_{S_k}} \frac{1}{m_{e}}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \frac{{\rm Re}

981: (h_{u\mu}h^{'*}_{u\mu})}{G_F

982: V_{ud}M^2_{S_k}}\frac{1}{m_{\mu}}\bigg)

983: \Gamma^\dagger_{R,k}\Gamma_{k,L}

984: \end{eqnarray}

985: %====

986: At 2$\sigma$ level, we get

987: \begin{eqnarray}

988:  R_{min} < \sum^{2}_{k=1}\bigg(\frac{m_{\pi}}{m_{e}} \frac{{\rm Re}

989:  (h_{ue}h^{'*}_{ue})}{M^2_{S_k}}-\frac{m_{\pi}}{m_{\mu}} \frac{{\rm Re} (h_{u\mu}h^{'*}_{u\mu})}{ M^2_{S_k}}\bigg)

990:  \Gamma^\dagger_{R,k}\Gamma_{k,L} < R_{max}

991: \end{eqnarray}

992: \end{widetext}

993: where,

994: \begin{eqnarray}

995: R_{min} &=& -1.06 \times 10^{-8} {\rm GeV}^{-2},\\  R_{max}  &=& 2.45 \times 10^{-9} {\rm GeV}^{-2}.

996: \end{eqnarray}

997: %Our expression is agrees with that in \cite{Dobrescu:2008sz}.

998: The total contribution to $R_{SM-LQ}$ must be smaller than the differences

999: between SM and experiment within the error limits allow.

1000: \newpage

1001: 

1002: 

1003: 

1004: %------------------------------------------------

1005: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

1006: 

1007: 

1008: \bibitem{Bennet}

1009: %\bibitem{Bennett:2002jb}

1010:   G.~W.~Bennett {\it et al.}  [Muon g-2 Collaboration],

1011:   %``Measurement of the positive muon anomalous magnetic moment to 0.7-ppm,''

1012:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 89}, 101804 (2002)

1013:   [Erratum-ibid.\  {\bf 89}, 129903 (2002)]

1014:   [arXiv:hep-ex/0208001];

1015:   %%CITATION = PRLTA,89,101804;%%

1016: %\bibitem{Bennett:2004pv}

1017: %  G.~W.~Bennett {\it et al.}  [Muon g-2 Collaboration],

1018:   %``Measurement of the negative muon anomalous magnetic moment to 0.7-ppm,''

1019:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 92}, 161802 (2004)

1020:   [arXiv:hep-ex/0401008].

1021:   %%CITATION = PRLTA,92,161802;%%

1022: 

1023: 

1024: 

1025: \bibitem{Miller}

1026:  %\cite{Miller:2007kk}

1027: %\bibitem{Miller:2007kk}

1028:   J.~P.~Miller, E.~de Rafael and B.~L.~Roberts,

1029:   %``Muon g-2: Review of Theory and Experiment,''

1030:   Rept.\ Prog.\ Phys.\  {\bf 70}, 795 (2007)

1031:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0703049].

1032:   %%CITATION = RPPHA,70,795;%%

1033: 

1034: 

1035: \bibitem{Aoyama:2007mn}

1036:   T.~Aoyama, M.~Hayakawa, T.~Kinoshita and M.~Nio,

1037:   %``Revised value of the eighth-order QED contribution to the anomalous

1038:   %magnetic moment of the electron,''

1039:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 77}, 053012 (2008); T.~Kinoshita and M. Nio, Phys.\ Rev. {\bf 73}, 013003 (2006);

1040:   T.~Kinoshita and M. Nio, Phys.\ Rev. {\bf 70}, 113003 (2004).

1041:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D77,053012;%%

1042: 

1043: 

1044: 

1045: \bibitem{Bigi:1985jq}

1046: I.~I.~Y.~Bigi, G.~Kopp and P.~M.~Zerwas,

1047:   %``Signatures For Interfamily Transitions Involving Heavy Quarks,''

1048:   Phys.\ Lett.\  B {\bf 166}, 238 (1986).

1049:   %%CITATION = PHLTA,B166,238;%%

1050: 

1051: 

1052: 

1053: 

1054: 

1055: %\cite{Mahanta:2001yc}

1056: \bibitem{Mahanta:2001yc}

1057:   U.~Mahanta,

1058:   %``Implications of BNL measurement of delta(a(mu)) on a class of scalar

1059:   %leptoquark interactions,''

1060:   Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\  C {\bf 21}, 171 (2001)

1061:   [Phys.\ Lett.\  B {\bf 515}, 111 (2001)]

1062:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0102176].

1063:   %%CITATION = PHLTA,B515,111;%%

1064: 

1065: %\cite{Cheung:2001ip}

1066: \bibitem{Cheung:2001ip}

1067:   K.~m.~Cheung,

1068:   %``Muon anomalous magnetic moment and leptoquark solutions,''

1069:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 64}, 033001 (2001)

1070:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0102238].

1071:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D64,033001;%%

1072: 

1073: 

1074: \bibitem{ps}

1075: %\bibitem{Pati:1974yy}

1076:   J.~C.~Pati and A.~Salam,

1077:   %``Lepton Number As The Fourth Color,''

1078:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 10}, 275 (1974)

1079:   [Erratum-ibid.\  D {\bf 11}, 703 (1975)].

1080:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D10,275;%%

1081: 

1082: 

1083: 

1084: 

1085: \bibitem{GUT}

1086: % P.H. Frampton, Mod.Phys. Lett. A{\bf 7} (1992) 559.

1087: %\bibitem{Georgi:1974sy}

1088:   H.~Georgi and S.~L.~Glashow,

1089:   %``Unity Of All Elementary Particle Forces,''

1090:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 32}, 438 (1974);

1091:   %%CITATION = PRLTA,32,438;%%

1092:   H. Georgi, AIP Conf. Proc. {\bf 23}, 575 (1975);

1093: %\bibitem{Fritzsch:1974nn}

1094:   H.~Fritzsch and P.~Minkowski,

1095:   %``Unified Interactions Of Leptons And Hadrons,''

1096:   Annals Phys.\  {\bf 93}, 193 (1975).

1097:   %%CITATION = APNYA,93,193;%%

1098: 

1099: 

1100: 

1101: 

1102: \bibitem{lowLQ}

1103: %\bibitem{Farhi:1980xs}

1104:   E.~Farhi and L.~Susskind,

1105:   %``Technicolor,''

1106:   Phys.\ Rept.\  {\bf 74}, 277 (1981);

1107:   %%CITATION = PRPLC,74,277;%%

1108: %\bibitem{Lane:1991qh}

1109:   K.~D.~Lane and M.~V.~Ramana,

1110:   %``Walking technicolor signatures at hadron colliders,''

1111:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 44}, 2678 (1991);

1112:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D44,2678;%%

1113: %\cite{Schrempp:1984nj}

1114: %\bibitem{Schrempp:1984nj}

1115:   B.~Schrempp and F.~Schrempp,

1116:   %``Light Leptoquarks,''

1117:   Phys.\ Lett.\  B {\bf 153}, 101 (1985).

1118:   %%CITATION = PHLTA,B153,101;%%

1119: 

1120: 

1121: \bibitem{Lagr1}

1122: % W. Buchm\"uller, R. R\"uckl and D. Wyler, Phys.Lett. B{\bf 191} (1987) 442.

1123: %\cite{Buchmuller:1986zs}

1124: %\bibitem{Buchmuller:1986zs}

1125:   W.~Buchmuller, R.~Ruckl and D.~Wyler,

1126:   %``Leptoquarks in lepton quark collisions,''

1127:   Phys.\ Lett.\  B {\bf 191}, 442 (1987)

1128:   [Erratum-ibid.\  B {\bf 448}, 320 (1999)].

1129:   %%CITATION = PHLTA,B191,442;%%

1130: 

1131: 

1132: \bibitem{pi_decay}

1133: % O. Shanker, Nucl.Phys. B{\bf 204} (1982) 375; Nucl.Phys. B{\bf 206} (1982) 253.

1134: %\bibitem{Shanker:1982nd}

1135:   O.~U.~Shanker,

1136:   %``Pi Lepton 2, K Lepton 3 And K0 - Anti-K0 Constraints On Leptoquarks And

1137:   %Supersymmetric Particles,''

1138:   Nucl.\ Phys.\  B {\bf 204}, 375 (1982).

1139:   %%CITATION = NUPHA,B204,375;%%

1140: 

1141: 

1142: \bibitem{pp}

1143:  %O.J.P. \'Eboli and A.V. Olinto, Phys.Rev. D{\bf 38} (1988) 3461;

1144: %\bibitem{Eboli:1987vb}

1145:   O.~J.~P.~Eboli and A.~V.~Olinto,

1146:   %``Composite Leptoquarks In Hadronic Colliders,''

1147:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 38}, 3461 (1988);

1148:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D38,3461;%%

1149: % J.L Hewett and S. Pakvasa, {\it ibid} D{\bf 37} (1988) 3165;

1150: %\bibitem{Hewett:1987yg}

1151:   J.~L.~Hewett and S.~Pakvasa,

1152:   %``LEPTOQUARK PRODUCTION IN HADRON COLLIDERS,''

1153:   {\it ibid.}  D {\bf 37}, 3165 (1988);

1154:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D37,3165;%%

1155: %\bibitem{Ohnemus:1994xf}

1156:   J.~Ohnemus, S.~Rudaz, T.~F.~Walsh and P.~M.~Zerwas,

1157:   %``Single leptoquark production at hadron colliders,''

1158:   Phys.\ Lett.\  B {\bf 334}, 203 (1994)

1159:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9406235].

1160:   %%CITATION = PHLTA,B334,203;%%

1161: %J. Ohnemus, S. Rudaz, T.F. Walsh and P. Zerwas, Phys.Lett. B{\bf 334} (1994) 203.

1162: 

1163: 

1164: 

1165: \bibitem{ep}

1166:  J. Wudka, Phys.Lett., B{\bf 167}, 337 (1986); M.A. Doncheski and

1167:  J.L. Hewett, Z.Phys. C{\bf 56}, 209 (1992).

1168: 

1169: \bibitem{e+e-}

1170:  J.L Hewett and T.G. Rizzo, Phys.Rev. D{\bf 36}, 3367 (1987);

1171:  J.L Hewett and S. Pakvasa, Phys.Lett. B{\bf 227}, 178 (1987);

1172:  J.E. Cieza and O.J.P. \'Eboli, Phys.Rev. D{\bf 47}, 837 (1993).

1173: 

1174: %\cite{Djouadi:1989md}

1175: \bibitem{Djouadi:1989md}

1176:   A.~Djouadi, T.~Kohler, M.~Spira and J.~Tutas,

1177:   %``(E B), (E T) Type Leptoquarks At E P Colliders,''

1178:   Z.\ Phys.\  C {\bf 46}, 679 (1990).

1179:   %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C46,679;%%

1180: 

1181: \bibitem{Lagr2}

1182:  J. Bl\"umlein and R. R\"uckl, Phys.Lett. B{\bf 304}, 337 (1993).

1183: 

1184: \bibitem{e-gamma}

1185:  O.J.P. \'Eboli et al., Phys.Lett. B{\bf 311}, 147 (1993);

1186:  H. Nadeau and D. London, Phys.Rev. D{\bf 47}, 3742 (1993).

1187: 

1188: \bibitem{pdg}

1189:  W. M. Yao et {\it al} Particle Data Group, { J. Phys. G}{\bf 30},

1190:  1 (2006) and 2007 partial update for the 2008 edition.

1191: 

1192: 

1193: \bibitem{gamma-gamma}

1194:  G. B\'elanger, D. London and H. Nadeau, Phys.Rev. D{\bf 49}, 3140 (1993).

1195: 

1196: \bibitem{DBC}

1197:  S. Davidson, D. Bailey and A. Campbell,

1198:  Z.Phys. C{\bf 61}, 613 (1994).

1199: 

1200: \bibitem{Leurer}

1201:  M. Leurer, Phys.Rev.Lett.{\bf 71} (1993) 1324;

1202:  Phys.Rev. D{\bf 49}, 333 (1994);

1203:  Phys.Rev. D{\bf 50}, 536 (1994).

1204: 

1205: \bibitem{bw86}

1206:  W. Buchm\"uller and D. Wyler, Phys.Lett. B{\bf 177}, 377 (1986).

1207: 

1208: \bibitem{CHH1998}

1209:   C.~K.~Chua and W.~Y.~Hwang,

1210:   %``The neutrino magnetic moment induced by leptoquarks,''

1211:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 60}, 073002 (1999)

1212:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9811232].

1213:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D60,073002;%%

1214: 

1215: \bibitem{CHH1999}

1216:  C.~K.~Chua, X.~G.~He and W.~Y.~Hwang,

1217:   %``Neutrino mass induced radiatively by supersymmetric leptoquarks,''

1218:   Phys.\ Lett.\  B {\bf 479}, 224 (2000)

1219:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9905340].

1220:   %%CITATION = PHLTA,B479,224;%%

1221: 

1222: %\cite{Benbrik:2008ik}

1223: \bibitem{Benbrik:2008ik}

1224:   R.~Benbrik and C.~H.~Chen,

1225:   %``Leptoquark on $P\to \ell^{+} \nu$, FCNC and LFV,''

1226:   arXiv:0807.2373 [hep-ph].

1227:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0807.2373;%%

1228: 

1229: \bibitem{Gray:1990}

1230: N.~Gray, D.~J.~Broadhurst, W.~Grafe and K.~Schilcher, Z.~Phys.

1231: C{\bf 48}(1990) 673;

1232: %

1233: K.~G.~Chetyrkin and M.~Steinhauser, Phys. Rev. Lett {\bf 83}

1234: (1999) 4001;

1235: %

1236: {\it ibid.} Nucl. Phys. B{\bf 573} (2000) 617; S.~G.~Gorishny,

1237: A.~L.~Kataev, S~.A~.Larin and L.~R.~Surguladze, Mod. Phys. Lett.

1238: A{\bf 5}(1990)2703,{\it ibid.} Phys. Rev. D{\bf 43} (1991) 1633.

1239: 

1240: 

1241: \bibitem{LHC}

1242:  V.~A.~Mitsou, N.~C.~Benekos, I.~Panagoulias and T.~D.~Papadopoulou,

1243:   %``Prospects for scalar leptoquark discovery at the LHC,''

1244:   Czech.\ J.\ Phys.\  {\bf 55}, B659 (2005)

1245:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0411189];

1246:   %%CITATION = CZYPA,55,B659;%%

1247:  S.~Abdullin and F.~Charles,

1248:   %``Study of leptoquark pair production at the LHC with the CMS detector,''

1249:   Phys.\ Lett.\  B {\bf 464}, 223 (1999)

1250:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9905396].

1251:   %%CITATION = PHLTA,B464,223;%%

1252: 

1253: \bibitem{LQreview}

1254:  S. Rolli and M. Tanabashi, in \cite{pdg}.

1255: 

1256: \bibitem{LQll'gamma}

1257:  S.~Ritt  [MEG Collaboration],

1258:   %``Status Of The Meg Expriment Mu $\to$ E Gamma,''

1259:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\  {\bf 162} (2006) 279;

1260:   %%CITATION = NUPHZ,162,279;%%

1261:  http://meg.web.psi.ch/.

1262: 

1263: 

1264: \bibitem{Riemann}

1265:  T. Riemann and G. Mann,

1266:  %``Nondiagonal {$Z$} decay: ${Z} \to e \mu$'',

1267:  in {\it Proc. of the Int. Conf. Neutrino'82, 14-19 June

1268:  1982, Balatonf{\"u}red, Hungary} (A. Frenkel and E. Jenik, eds.),

1269:  vol. II, pp. 58-, Budapest, 1982,

1270:  scanned copy at

1271:  http://www.ifh.de/$\sim$riemann, G. Mann and T. Riemann, {\it

1272:  Annalen Phys.} {\bf 40}, 334 (1984).

1273: 

1274: \bibitem{Ganapathi}

1275:  V. Ganapathi, T. Weiler, E. Laermann, I. Schmitt, and P. Zerwas, {\it Phys.  Rev.} {\bf D27} (1983) 579;

1276:  M. Clements, C. Footman, A. Kronfeld, S. Narasimhan, and D. Photiadis, {\it Phys.

1277:  Rev.} {\bf D27} (1983) 570;

1278:  M. A .Perez, G. T. Velasco, J. J. Toscano, {\it Int.J.Mod.Phys.} {\bf A19} (2004) 159;

1279:  A. Flores-Tlalpa, J.M. Hernandez, G. Tavares-Velasco, J.J. Toscano, {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf

1280:  D65}, 073010 (2002).

1281: 

1282: \bibitem{Illana}

1283:  J. I. Illana, M. Jack and T. Riemann, hep-ph/0001273, (2000);

1284:  J. I. Illana, and T. Riemann, {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D63 }, 053004 (2001).

1285: 

1286: 

1287: \bibitem{AguilarSaavedra:2001rg}

1288:   J.~A.~Aguilar-Saavedra {\it et al.}  [ECFA/DESY LC Physics Working Group],

1289:   %``TESLA Technical Design Report Part III: Physics at an e+e- Linear

1290:   %Collider,''

1291:   arXiv:hep-ph/0106315.

1292: 

1293: \bibitem{Heinemeyer:2007aw}

1294:   S.~Heinemeyer, W.~Hollik, A.~M.~Weber and G.~Weiglein,

1295:   arXiv:0711.0456 [hep-ph].

1296:   %``High-Precision Tests of the MSSM with GigaZ,''

1297: 

1298: \bibitem{Erler:2008ek}

1299:   J.~Erler and P.~Langacker,

1300:   %``Electroweak Physics,''

1301:   arXiv:0807.3023 [hep-ph].

1302: 

1303: \bibitem{Cirigliano:2007xi}

1304: V.~Cirigliano and I.~Rosell,

1305:   %``The Standard Model prediction for R_{e/mu}^{(pi,K)},''

1306:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 99}, 231801 (2007)

1307:   [arXiv:0707.3439 [hep-ph]].

1308:   %%CITATION = PRLTA,99,231801;%%

1309: 

1310: \end{thebibliography}

1311: %========================================

1312: \end{document}

1313: