1: \documentclass[apj]{emulateapj}
2: % \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
3: % \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
4: % \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
5: % \documentclass{aastex}
6: % \usepackage{lscape}
7: \usepackage{graphicx}
8: \newcommand{\myemail}{mgoto@mpia.de}
9: % 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 1234
10:
11: \shorttitle{Survey of H$_3^+$ toward the Galactic Center II.}
12: % (not more than 44 characters)
13: \shortauthors{Goto et al.}
14:
15: \begin{document}
16:
17: \title{Absorption Line Survey of H$_3^+$ toward the Galactic Center
18: Sources II. \\ Eight Infrared Sources within 30~pc of the Galactic
19: Center\altaffilmark{1}}
20:
21: \author{Miwa Goto,\altaffilmark{2}
22: Tomonori Usuda,\altaffilmark{3}
23: Tetsuya Nagata,\altaffilmark{4}
24: T. R. Geballe,\altaffilmark{5}
25: Benjamin J. McCall,\altaffilmark{6}
26: Nick Indriolo,\altaffilmark{6}
27: Hiroshi Suto,\altaffilmark{7}
28: Thomas Henning,\altaffilmark{2}
29: Christopher P. Morong,\altaffilmark{8}
30: \protect\and Takeshi Oka\altaffilmark{8}}
31:
32: \email{mgoto@mpia.de, t-oka@uchicago.edu}
33:
34: \altaffiltext{1}{Based on data collected at Subaru Telescope,
35: operated by the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan}
36:
37: % \altaffiltext{2}{Based on data collected in the course of CRIERS
38: % science verification observations (60.A-9057) at the
39: % VLT on Cerro Paranal (Chile), which is operated by
40: % the European Southern Observatory (ESO).}
41:
42: \altaffiltext{2}{Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Astronomie, K\"onigstuhl 17,
43: Heidelberg D-69117, Germany}
44:
45: \altaffiltext{3}{Subaru Telescope, 650 North A`ohoku Place, Hilo,
46: HI 96720}
47:
48: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Astronomy, Kyoto University, Kyoto,
49: 606-8502, Japan}
50:
51: \altaffiltext{5}{Gemini Observatory,
52: 670 North A`ohoku Place, Hilo, HI 96720.}
53:
54: \altaffiltext{6}{Department of Astronomy and Department of
55: Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,
56: Urbana, IL 61801-3792.}
57:
58: \altaffiltext{7}{National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Osawa,
59: Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan}
60:
61: \altaffiltext{8}{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics,
62: Department of Chemistry, and Enrico Fermi Institute,
63: University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637.}
64:
65: \begin{abstract}
66:
67: Infrared absorption lines of $\mathrm{H}_{3}^{+}$, including the
68: metastable $R$(3,3)$^l$ line, have been observed toward eight bright
69: infrared sources associated with hot and massive stars located in and
70: between the Galactic Center Cluster and the Quintuplet Cluster 30~pc
71: to the east. The absorption lines with high velocity dispersion arise
72: in the Galaxy's Central Molecular Zone (CMZ) as well as in foreground
73: spiral arms. The temperature and density of the gas in the CMZ, as
74: determined from the relative strengths of the $\mathrm{H}_{3}^{+}$
75: lines, are $T$=200~--~300~K and $n\leq$50~--~200~cm$^{-3}$. The
76: detection of high column densities of $\mathrm{H}_{3}^{+}$ toward all
77: eight stars implies that this warm and diffuse gaseous environment is
78: widespread in the CMZ. The products of the ionization rate and path
79: length for these sight lines are 1000 and 10 times higher than in
80: dense and diffuse clouds in the Galactic disk, respectively,
81: indicating that the ionization rate, $\zeta$, is not less than
82: 10$^{-15}$~s$^{-1}$ and that $L$ is at least on the order of 50~pc.
83: The warm and diffuse gas is an important component of the CMZ, in
84: addition to the three previously known gaseous environments: (1) cold
85: molecular clouds observed by radio emission of CO and other molecules,
86: (2) hot ($T~=$~10$^4$~--~10$^6$~K) and highly ionized diffuse gas
87: ($n_e~=$~10~--~100~cm$^{-3}$) seen in radio recombination lines, far
88: infrared atomic lines, and radio-wave scattering, and (3) ultra-hot
89: ($T~=$~10$^7$~--~10$^8$~K) X-ray emitting plasma. Its prevalence
90: significantly changes the understanding of the environment of the
91: CMZ. The sight line toward GC~IRS~3 is unique in showing an additional
92: $\mathrm{H}_{3}^{+}$ absorption component, which is interpreted as due
93: to either a cloud associated with circumnuclear disk or the
94: ``50~km~s$^{-1}$ cloud'' known from radio observations. An infrared
95: pumping scheme is examined as a mechanism to populate the (3,3)
96: metastable level in this cloud.
97:
98: \end{abstract}
99:
100: \keywords{Galaxy: center --- ISM: clouds --- ISM: lines and bands ---
101: ISM: molecules --- stars: individual (GC~IRS~1W, GC~IRS~21, GC~IRS~3,
102: NHS~21, NHS~22, NHS~42, NHS~25, GCS~3-2)}
103:
104: % http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/ApJ/information.html
105: % up to 6 headings
106:
107: \section{Introduction}
108:
109: \subsection{The Central Molecular Zone}
110:
111: The region of the Galaxy within 200~pc of the center, known as the
112: Central Molecular Zone (CMZ), contains 10\% of the Galactic
113: interstellar molecular mass \citep[and references
114: therein]{mor96,gen94,mez96}. The interstellar medium (ISM) in the
115: CMZ is exceptional in many other ways. It is highly turbulent,
116: pervaded by an intense magnetic field \citep[for a review;
117: ][]{mor06}, contains a multitude of massive stars
118: \citep[e.g.,][]{mon92,cot98,mun06} and super-massive clusters
119: \citep[e.g.,][for a short review]{nag90,nag95,fig04}, and also is
120: home to numerous highly energetic objects ranging from supernova remnants
121: to cataclysmic variables \citep[CVs, e.g.,][]{mun03}. The particle
122: densities in its dense molecular clouds are of order
123: 10$^4$~cm$^{-3}$ and higher. The volume filling factor,
124: \emph{f$_{\rm v}$}, of dense molecular clouds has previously been
125: estimated to be $\sim$ 10\% \citep{mor96}, but is more likely $\sim$
126: 1\% \citep{oka05} in view of the observed visual extinction of
127: $\mathit{A_V}$~=~25~--~40~mag \citep{cot00}.
128:
129: If dense molecular clouds only occupy 1\% of the CMZ, what
130: interstellar environments make up the remaining 99\%? There have
131: been some reports of lower density ``diffuse'' molecular gas in
132: the intercloud region. Detailed analysis of the $\mathit{J}$ = 1
133: $\rightarrow$ 0 emission lines of CO and C$^{18}$O by
134: \citet{dah98}, and the $\mathit{J}$~=~2~$\rightarrow$~1 and
135: $\mathit{J}$ = 1 $\rightarrow$ 0 emission lines of CO by
136: \citet{oka98a} have demonstrated the presence of gas with
137: densities of $\sim$ 10$^{2.5}$ cm$^{-3}$. Indeed \citet{oka98a}
138: conclude that CO emission from the Galactic center (GC) is
139: dominated by emission from gas of that density. The volume
140: filling factor of \emph{f$_{\rm v}$} $\sim$ 0.1 claimed by
141: \citet{mor96} may include such gas. In this paper we present
142: evidence for an even lower density molecular environment in
143: which H$_2$ must still be plentiful but where CO is not
144: abundant. In hindsight, the radio absorption lines with high
145: velocity dispersion of OH \citep[e. g.][]{bol64}, H$_2$CO
146: \citep[e. g.][]{pal69}, HCO$^+$ \citep{lin81}, and CO
147: \citep{oka98b} may originate in this newly reported environment.
148:
149: A second candidate to fill the intercloud medium is the ultra-hot
150: plasma ($T$ $\sim 10^7$ -- 10$^8$~K) observed by its diffuse X-ray
151: emission at energies of 0.5 -- 10~keV. The radiation from the plasma
152: is observed in all sightlines to the CMZ
153: \citep[e.g.,][]{koy89,yam93,koy96}. \citet{laz98} suggested that the
154: highly ionized regions with \emph{n$_e$} $\sim 10$ cm$^{-3}$ and $T$
155: $\sim 10^6$~K that are required to explain the $\lambda^2$ dependent
156: radio-wave scattering toward the GC are located at the
157: photon-dominated interfaces between the molecular clouds and this
158: ultra-hot X-ray emitting plasma. They proposed that high density
159: molecular clouds with a volume filling factor of perhaps \emph{f$_{\rm
160: v}$} $\sim$ 0.1 are surrounded by the scattering electron gas and the
161: rest of the space is filled with this plasma (see their Fig. 9).
162:
163: For an environment such as that described above, which is so dominated
164: by ionized gas, ``Central Plasma Zone" rather than CMZ would be a more
165: appropriate term for the region. For a variety of reasons the
166: ultra-hot and hot plasma cannot occupy the same regions where
167: molecules abound. How those different categories of gas are
168: distributed and how they coexist in the CMZ is yet to be
169: understood. Observations of a new astrophysical probe of the CMZ, the
170: infrared absorption spectrum of H$_3^+$ \citep{geb96}, are beginning
171: to shed fresh light on these questions \citep{bol06}. Earlier
172: measurements of this molecular ion in the Galactic center by
173: \citet{geb99}, \citet{got02}, and \citet{oka05} were made along only a
174: very few sight lines. In this paper we report and analyze observations
175: of seven transitions of H$_3^+$ along eight sight lines, which provide
176: a more comprehensive diagnostic of the extent and nature of the
177: H$_3^+$ - containing gas in the CMZ.
178:
179:
180: %==========================================================================================================================================================================================================================
181: % \input{tb1.tex}
182: % xo\clearpage
183: \begin{table*}[bht]
184: \begin{center}
185: \tablewidth{\textwidth}
186: \scriptsize
187: % \tiny
188: \caption{Target list.}\label{tb1}
189: \begin{tabular}{lcccccll}
190: \hline \hline
191: Source & R.A. & Dec. & $l$ & $b$ &$L$/$L'$& Other Names & Reference \\
192: & (J2000)& (J2000) & [\arcdeg]& [\arcdeg]& [mag] & in SIMBAD & 1, 2, 3. \\
193: \hline
194:
195: GC~IRS~21 \dots& 17:45:40.2 & $-$29:00:31 &$-$0.0561 &$-$0.0468 & &NAME SGR~A~IRS~21, GCIRS~21 & 1, 2, 3. \\
196: GC~IRS~3 \dots & 17:45:39.8 & $-$29:00:24 & $-$0.0552&$-$0.0448 & 5.3 &BHA~11, GCIRS~3 & 1, 2, 3. \\
197: GC~IRS~1W \dots& 17:45:40.4 & $-$29:00:27 &$-$0.0549 &$-$0.0471 & 5.5 &NAME SGR~A~IRS~1W, GCIRS~1W & 1, 2, 3. \\
198: NHS~21 \dots& 17:42:53.8 & $-$28:51:41 & +0.0992 &$-$0.0553 & 4.62 &qF~577, [NHS93]~21 & 4, 5, 6. \\
199: NHS~22 \dots& 17:46:05.6 & $-$28:51:41 & +0.1199 &$-$0.0482 & 6.0 & [NHS93]~22 & 4, 5, 6. \\
200: NHS~42 \dots& 17:46:08.3 & $-$28:49:55 & +0.1481 &$-$0.0426 & 6.05 & qF~578, [NHS93]~42 & 4, 5, 6. \\
201: NHS~25 \dots& 17:46:15.3 & $-$28:50:04 & +0.1592 &$-$0.0657 & 6.2 &NAME PISTOL STAR, [NHS93]~25& 4, 5, 6. \\
202: GCS~3-2 \dots & 17:46:14.7 & $-$28:49:41 & +0.1636 &$-$0.0606 & 2.5 & GCS~3-2, [NHS93]~24 & 4, 5, 6. \\
203: \hline
204: \end{tabular}
205:
206: \tablecomments{Reference: 1. \citet{kra95}, 2. \citet{ott99}, 3.
207: \citet{tan06}, 4. \citet{nag90}, 5. \citet{nag93}, 6. \citet{fig99}.
208: }
209:
210: \end{center}
211: \end{table*}
212: % \end{landscape}
213: %==========================================================================================================================================================================================================================
214:
215: \subsection{H$_3^+$ as an Astrophysical Probe}
216:
217: The crucial information obtained from the observations of
218: H$_3^+$ reported here is the product of the ionization rate of
219: molecular hydrogen \emph{$\zeta$}, and the aggregate length of
220: the line of sight through the H$_3^+$ - containing clouds,
221: $L$. The simple chemistry of H$_3^+$ allows us to obtain this
222: product from the observed total H$_3^+$ column densities
223: \citep{oka05,oka06b}, as described below, under the assumptions
224: that (1) there is a steady-state balance between creation and
225: destruction of H$_3^+$ and (2) the dominant supplier of
226: electrons is carbon, all of which is singly ionized.
227:
228: Creation of H$_3^+$ begins with ionization of H$_2$. Because in
229: interstellar regions where H$_2$ is plentiful the ion-neutral
230: reaction H$_2$ + H$_2^+$ $\rightarrow$ H$_3^+$ + H is rapid, the
231: limit to the formation of H$_3^+$ is the much slower ionization
232: rate of molecular hydrogen,
233:
234: \[
235: {\rm H_2} + {\rm R} \rightarrow {\rm H_2^+} + e + {\rm R}^{\prime}.
236: \]
237:
238: \noindent The ionizing rays, R, are dominated by cosmic rays in the
239: Galactic disk \citep[][and references therein]{ind07}, but in the
240: CMZ the ionization by X-rays and EUV radiation may be significant.
241: The production rate per unit volume of H$_3^+$ is thus given by
242: \emph{$\zeta$}$n$(H$_2$), where \emph{$\zeta$} is the effective
243: ionization rate of H$_2$ including all the aforementioned
244: contributors. In steady state, production of H$_3^+$ balances its
245: destruction, which is dominated by dissociative recombination with
246: electrons,
247:
248: \[
249: {\rm H_3^+} + {\rm e} \rightarrow {\rm 3H~~or~~H_2} + {\rm H},
250: \]
251:
252: \noindent
253: and one obtains \citep{geb99}
254:
255: \[
256: \zeta n({\rm H_2}) = k_{\rm e}n({\rm H_3^+})n({\rm e}),
257: \]
258:
259: \noindent
260: where $k_e$ is the electron recombination rate constant,
261: whose temperature dependent value is $\sim$ 10$^{-7}$ cm$^3$
262: s$^{-1}$ \citep{mcc04}. Replacing the electron density with the
263: atomic carbon density after depletion gives
264:
265: \[
266: {n({\rm e})}/{n({\rm H_2})} = ({2}/{f}) \left[{n_{\rm C}}/{n_{\rm
267: H}}\right]_{\rm SV} R_X,
268: \]
269:
270: \noindent where $R_X$ = 3 -- 10 is the factor increase in relative
271: carbon abundance at the Galactic center over the solar vicinity,
272: $[n_{\rm C}/n_{\rm H}]_{\rm SV}$ \citep{sod95}, and $f = 2n({\rm
273: H_2}) /n_{\rm H}$ is the fractional density of molecular hydrogen
274: relative to the total number of hydrogen atoms, $n_{\rm H} = 2n({\rm
275: H_2}) + n({\rm H})$. Using $N$(H$_3^+$)~=~$L$$n$(H$_3^+$) because of
276: the constancy of $n$(H$_3^+$) \citep[e.g.,][]{oka06b}, we obtain the
277: equation central to the analysis in this paper relating the product
278: \emph{$\zeta$L} to the total H$_3^+$ column density and other
279: measurables,
280:
281: \begin{equation}
282: \zeta L = 2 k_{\rm e} \left[{n_{\rm C}}/{n_{\rm H}}\right]_{\rm
283: SV} R_X N({\rm H_3^+})_{total}/f.
284: \end{equation}
285:
286: As discussed by \citet{oka05}, in the Galactic center the spectrum of
287: H$_3^+$ provides direct information about the temperature and density
288: of the gas. There the relative population of H$_3^+$ in the ($J$, $K$)
289: = (3,3) metastable level, which is 361 K above the lowest (1,1) level
290: (note that $J$ =~0 does not exist in the ground vibrational state), is
291: measurable and is a useful thermometer for temperatures of $\sim$ 100
292: -- 1000~K. Observations of the fractional population in the (2,2)
293: unstable level, from which H$_3^+$ decays to the (1,1) level by
294: spontaneous emission in 27 days \citep{pan86,nea96}, provides a good
295: measure of cloud densities less than several hundred per cm$^{3}$. The
296: lifetime of H$_3^+$ in diffuse clouds is $1/(k_{\rm e} n_{\rm e})
297: \approx 10^9$~s, which is two orders of magnitude longer than the
298: collisional timescale with molecular hydrogen. The rotational
299: temperature of H$_3^+$ is therefore maintained via collisions with the
300: ambient H$_2$. The thermalization of H$_3^+$ in interstellar clouds
301: has been modeled by \citet{oka04}, who provide H$_3^+$ population
302: ratios $n$(3,3)/$n$(1,1) and $n$(3,3)/$n$(2,2) plotted as functions of
303: temperature and density (see their Figs.~2-4).
304: % Those figures are inverted in this paper so that the
305: % observed population ratios are directly plotted in the figure.
306:
307: \section{Observations}
308:
309: Bright infrared sources corresponding to dust shells surrounding
310: luminous stars or to hot and bright stars with a dearth of
311: photospheric absorption features were selected from the Sgr~A$^\ast$
312: cluster \citep{bec78,kra95,tan06}, the Quintuplet cluster
313: \citep{oku90,nag90}, and candidates in their vicinity \citep{nag93} to
314: use as probes of foreground H$_3^+$ (Table~\ref{tb1}). Spectroscopic
315: observations were carried out at the Subaru Telescope over several
316: nights between 2004 July 7 UT and 2004 Sep 26 UT, using the Infrared
317: Camera and Spectrograph (IRCS) \citep{tok98,kob00}. The data obtained
318: on 2001 Jun 16 UT, originally published in \citet{got02}, were
319: combined with the newer data. A summary of the observations is given
320: in Table~\ref{tb2}.
321:
322: A curvature sensing adaptive optics (AO) system \citep{tak04} was used
323: whenever a wavefront reference star was available. Use of the AO
324: system significantly increased the throughput of starlight through the
325: narrow (0\farcs15) slit, which was necessary to attain high spectral
326: resolution ($\lambda / \Delta \lambda$ = 20,000; $\Delta v =$
327: 15~km~s$^{-1}$). In order to subtract sky and telescope emission,
328: either the telescope itself or the tip-tilt mirror in the AO system
329: was nodded by about 3\arcsec~ along the slit so that the stellar
330: spectrum fell on two different parts of the camera. The slit position
331: was set along the east-west axis in all cases except when nearby faint
332: sources fell onto the slit, which would have hampered a clean
333: sky-subtraction.
334:
335: The angle of cross-dispersing grating in IRCS was adjusted so that as
336: many H$_3^+$ lines as possible were observed in the time
337: available. The major absorption lines essential for the gas
338: diagnostics (the $R$(1,0), $R$(1,1)$^u$, $R$(1,1)$^l$, $Q$(1,0), and
339: $Q$(1,1) lines from the lowest (1,1) and (1,0) levels, and the
340: $R$(3,3)$^l$ and $R$(2,2)$^l$ lines from the higher (3,3) and (2,2)
341: levels) were covered in two grating settings. The $Q$(1,0) transition
342: at 3.9530~$\mu$m was covered by both of the grating settings. Details
343: of the spectral setup are found in \citet{got02}.
344:
345: Standard stars with early spectral types were observed on the same
346: nights through similar airmasses as the Galactic center stars in order
347: to remove the telluric absorption features. Spectroscopic flat-fields
348: were obtained from a halogen lamp installed at the Cassegrain port in
349: front of the instrument's entrance window. The sky conditions were
350: fair with the seeing between 0\farcs45 and 0\farcs75 at $R$ band.
351:
352: %==========================================================================================================================================================================================================================
353: \begin{table*}
354: \tablewidth{\textwidth}
355: \begin{center}
356: \scriptsize
357: % \tiny
358: \caption{Summary of observations.}\label{tb2}
359: \begin{tabular}{lrrrllll}
360: \hline \hline
361: Source & Exposure &\multicolumn{2}{c}{Grating$^a$}&Line Coverage &\multicolumn{2}{c}{Atmospheric Standard} & UT Date \\
362: & [s] & ECH & XDP & & Name & Spe. & \\
363: \hline
364:
365: GC~IRS~21 \dots& 1800 & 11050 &2800 &$R$(2,2)$^l$, $R$(1,1)$^u$, $R$(1,0), $Q$(1,1), $Q$(1,0) & HR~7528 & B9.5~IV & 2004 Jul 28 \\
366: & 2400 & 5050 &3500 &$R$(3,3)$^l$, $R$(1,1)$^l$, $Q$(1,0) & HR~6378 & A2~V & 2004 Sep 02 \\
367: & & & & & & & \\
368:
369:
370: GC~IRS~3 \dots & 360 & 8350 &6100 &$R$(1,1)$^u$, $R$(1,0), $R$(1,1)$^l$,$Q$(1,1),$Q$(1,0) & HR~7924 ($\alpha$ Cyg) & A2~Iae & 2001 Jun 16 \\
371: & 1440 & 4400 &5200 &$R$(3,3)$^l$, $R$(1,1)$^l$ & HR~7924 ($\alpha$ Cyg) & A2~Iae & 2001 Jun 16 \\
372:
373: & 3120 & 11050 &2800 &$R$(2,2)$^l$, $R$(1,1)$^u$, $R$(1,0), $Q$(1,1), $Q$(1,0) & HR~7001 ($\alpha$ Lyr) & A0~V & 2004 Jul 07 \\
374: & 2400 & 5050 &3500 &$R$(3,3)$^l$, $R$(1,1)$^l$, $Q$(1,0) & HR~7001 ($\alpha$ Lyr) & A0~V & 2004 Jul 08 \\
375:
376: & 3000 & 11050 &2800 &$R$(2,2)$^l$, $R$(1,1)$^u$, $R$(1,0), $Q$(1,1), $Q$(1,0) & HR~7121 & B2.5~V & 2004 Sep 25 \\
377: & 1280 & 11050 &2800 &$R$(2,2)$^l$, $R$(1,1)$^u$, $R$(1,0), $Q$(1,1), $Q$(1,0) & HR~7121 & B2.5~V & 2004 Sep 26 \\
378: & & & & & & & \\
379:
380: GC~IRS~1W \dots& 2560 & 5050 &3500 &$R$(3,3)$^l$, $R$(1,1)$^l$, $Q$(1,0) & HR~7001 ($\alpha$ Lyr) & A0~V & 2004 Jul 27 \\
381: & 2560 & 11050 &2800 &$R$(2,2)$^l$, $R$(1,1)$^u$, $R$(1,0), $Q$(1,1), $Q$(1,0) & HR~7528 & B9.5~IV & 2004 Jul 27 \\
382: & & & & & & & \\
383:
384: NHS~21 \dots& 3600 & 11050 &2800 &$R$(2,2)$^l$, $R$(1,1)$^u$, $R$(1,0), $Q$(1,1), $Q$(1,0) & HR~7001 ($\alpha$ Lyg) & A0~V & 2004 Jul 08 \\
385: & 3600 & 5050 &3500 &$R$(3,3)$^l$, $R$(1,1)$^l$, $Q$(1,0) & HR~6378 & A2~V & 2004 Jul 08 \\
386: & & & & & & & \\
387:
388: NHS~22 \dots& 1200 & 11050 &2800 &$R$(2,2)$^l$, $R$(1,1)$^u$, $R$(1,0), $Q$(1,1), $Q$(1,0) & HR~7121, ATRAN & B2.5~V & 2004 Sep 04 \\
389: & 1200 & 5050 &3500 &$R$(3,3)$^l$, $R$(1,1)$^l$, $Q$(1,0) & HR~7121, ATRAN & B2.5~V & 2004 Sep 04 \\
390: & & & & & & & \\
391:
392: NHS~42 \dots& 1920 & 11050 &2800 &$R$(2,2)$^l$, $R$(1,1)$^u$, $R$(1,0), $Q$(1,1), $Q$(1,0) & HR~7924 ($\alpha$ Cyg) & A2~Iae & 2004 Jul 27 \\
393: & 1920 & 5050 &3500 &$R$(3,3)$^l$, $R$(1,1)$^l$, $Q$(1,0) & & & 2004 Jul 27 \\
394: & & & & & & & \\
395:
396: NHS~25 \dots& 1200 & 5050 &3500 &$R$(3,3)$^l$, $R$(1,1)$^l$, $Q$(1,0) & HR~7121 & B2.5~V & 2004 Sep 04 \\
397: & 1200 & 11050 &2800 &$R$(2,2)$^l$, $R$(1,1)$^u$, $R$(1,0), $Q$(1,1), $Q$(1,0) & HR~7121 & B2.5~V & 2004 Sep 04 \\
398: & & & & & & & \\
399:
400: GCS~3-2 \dots & 120 & 8350 &6100 &$R$(1,1)$^u$, $R$(1,0), $R$(1,1)$^l$, $Q$(1,1),$Q$(1,0) & HR~7528 & B9.5~IV & 2001 Jun 16 \\
401: & 240 & 4400 &5200 &$R$(3,3)$^l$, $R$(1,1)$^l$, $Q$(1,0) & HR~7528 & B9.5~IV & 2001 Jun 16 \\
402:
403: & 1344 & 11050 &2800 &$R$(2,2)$^l$, $R$(1,1)$^u$, $R$(1,0), $Q$(1,1), $Q$(1,0) & HR~7001 ($\alpha$ Lyr) & A0~V & 2004 Jul 07 \\
404: & 1344 & 5050 &3500 &$R$(3,3)$^l$, $R$(1,1)$^l$, $Q$(1,0) & HR~7001 ($\alpha$ Lyr) & A0~V & 2004 Jul 07 \\
405:
406: \hline
407: \end{tabular}
408:
409: \tablenotetext{a}{ECH and XDP denote the angles of echelle and
410: cross-dispersing gratings in the instrumental coding unit.}
411: % \tablecomments{Reference: 1. \citet{ott99}, 2. \citet{kra95}, 3. \citet{nag93}, 4. \citet{fig99}, 5. \citet{lan05}.}
412:
413: \end{center}
414: \end{table*}
415: %==========================================================================================================================================================================================================================
416:
417:
418: \section{Data Reduction}
419:
420: The data were reduced using IRAF\footnote{IRAF is distributed by the
421: National Optical Astronomy Observatories, which are operated by the
422: Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under
423: cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation.} and
424: custom-written IDL codes. The two dimensional spectrograms were
425: pair-subtracted and then averaged and the pixel responses were
426: normalized by the dark-subtracted flat-field images. Noisy pixels were
427: filtered out based on the pixel statistics, and interpolated prior to
428: spectral extraction. The one-dimensional spectra were obtained using
429: the IRAF aperture extraction package.
430:
431: The removal of the telluric lines by dividing the data by the spectra
432: of the standard stars was handled by IDL codes that take into account
433: possible observational flaws, including slight shifts in the
434: wavelengths, differences in airmasses (and therefore depths of
435: telluric absorption lines), slightly different spectral resolutions,
436: fringing of the continua, and saw-toothed features due to the
437: different readout channels. In cases where the flaws were too extreme
438: to be easily corrected, a transmission spectrum calculated by ATRAN
439: \citep{lor92} was used as a substitute to remove the telluric
440: features. The signal-to-noise ratios of the spectra were calculated
441: from the noises on the continua near the H$_3^+$ absorption lines.
442:
443:
444: Wavelength calibration was achieved by matching the observed spectra
445: to the model transmission spectrum. The accuracy of the calibration is
446: normally better than one tenth of one pixel ($\delta v$ =
447: 0.75~km~s$^{-1}$) when the signal-to-noise ratio of the observed
448: spectrum is sufficiently high.
449: % Spectra extracted from the two dithered
450: % positions were not added together but reduced separately, and overlaid
451: % in the final spectra to increase the spectral sampling.
452: The radial velocities of the absorption lines observed in the multiple
453: runs were corrected for the orbital motion of the Earth, converted to
454: $v_{\rm LSR}$ using the radial velocity package of IRAF, and added
455: together with appropriate weights according to the signal-to-noise
456: ratios of the spectra. The signal-to-noise ratios after adding up all
457: available data range 60 to 300.
458:
459: \begin{figure*}
460: \begin{center}
461: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=.9\textwidth]{f1.eps}
462: \caption{Spectra of H$_3^+$ toward eight sources in the Central
463: Molecular Zone. The $R$(1,1)$^u$ and $R$(1,0) absorptions in the
464: bottom trace are separated by 35~km~s$^{-1}$ and the profiles
465: overlap. The wavelength interval near $Q$(1,1) is heavily interfered
466: by the telluric absorption of N$_2$O, causing the low
467: signal-to-noise ratios. The gap in the spectrum of NHS 25 in the
468: $Q$(1,0) line corresponds to a strong atomic emission line, probably
469: of Si II. \label{f1}}
470: \end{center}
471: \end{figure*}
472:
473: The seven most relevant lines for this study are shown in
474: Fig.~\ref{f1}. For the Pistol Star, NHS 25 and possibly more weakly
475: for NHS 22, the $Q$(1,0) line at 3.9530 $\mu$m is overlapped at low
476: wavelength with an atomic emission line. This wavelength region is
477: omitted for NHS 25 in Fig.~1. The atomic emission matches the Si II
478: lines at 3.9477~--~3.9499~$\mu$m compiled in the NIST table
479: \citep{ral07}.
480:
481:
482: \section{Results}
483:
484: \subsection{Overview}
485:
486: All five of the absorption lines ($R$(1,0), $R$(1,1)$^u$,
487: $R$(1,1)$^l$, $Q$(1,0), and $Q$(1,1)) that originate from the lowest
488: para and ortho rotational levels, ($J$, $K$) = (1,1) and (1,0), were
489: detected in all sight lines. In each sight line the line profiles of
490: these transitions are basically the same (Fig.~\ref{f1}), showing a
491: broad trough of absorption primarily at negative radial velocities,
492: and several sharp absorption minima, which we attribute to intervening
493: clouds in the foreground spiral arms, as did \citet{oka05} for
494: GCS~3-2.
495:
496: The 3.5337~$\mu$m $R(3,3)^l$ line from the (3,3) metastable level was
497: detected in all targets. In nearly every case it occurs largely at
498: negative radial velocities. Its profile is broad and rather smooth,
499: with a width approaching 150~km~s$^{-1}$, and with no sharp features.
500: H$_3^+$ lines of such width have never been seen in the Galactic
501: disk. Moreover, searches for the $R(3,3)^l$ line in the disk along
502: sight lines where the H$_3^+$ lines from the lowest two levels have
503: clearly been observed \citep{geb96,mcc98,geb99,mcc02,ind07} have been
504: unsuccessful \citep{oka05}. For these reasons and following
505: \citet{oka05}, we attribute the entire $R$(3,3)$^l$ absorption to the
506: gas in the CMZ. The $R(3,3)^l$ line profile mimics the broad trough in
507: the $J$~=~1 $\mathrm{H}_{3}^{+}$ absorption line profiles. We use this
508: resemblance to differentiate between the absorptions in the CMZ and
509: those in the spiral arms.
510:
511: The $R(2,2)^l$ line at 3.6205~$\mu$m was detected in one sight line
512: only, that toward GC~IRS~3, and only at velocities near
513: $+$50~km~s$^{-1}$. Because this is the first time that this line has
514: been detected and because absorption by it is only 1 -- 2~\%, we have
515: carefully examined its reality. Two telluric CH$_{4}$ lines line at
516: 2762.48~cm$ ^{-1}$ (3.61994~$\mu$m) and 2761.36~cm$^{-1}$
517: (3.62141~$\mu$m) with peak absorption strengths of 20 -- 30~\%\
518: overlap the $R$(2,2)$^l$ line; incomplete cancellation of them could
519: cause absorption features near the observed feature. However, the
520: wavelength match is not precise and moreover, the width of the
521: $R$(2,2)$^l$ line (40 -- 60~km~s$^{-1}$) is twice that of each of the
522: telluric lines, which are nearly unresolved. As a further check we
523: obtained independent observations of GC~IRS~3 from the United Kingdom
524: Infrared Telescope (UKIRT) in September 2004 and July 2005, using the
525: echelle in the facility spectrograph CGS4. Although somewhat different
526: in detail, the UKIRT observations consistently show a 1 -- 2~\%
527: absorption dip at the same wavelength as the Subaru data. Thus the
528: detection of this line toward GC~IRS~3 is genuine. All observed
529: spectra of the $R$(2,2)$^l$ line in GC~IRS~3 are shown in
530: Fig. \ref{f2} together with the $R$(3,3)$^l$ and $R$(1,1)$^l$
531: absorption lines.
532:
533: In contrast to the Galactic disk where the detectable presence of
534: H$_3^+$ is limited to relatively few sight lines and their narrow
535: angular proximity, every sight line observed toward the CMZ has
536: abundant H$_3^+$. Although the targets presented here are within 30~pc
537: of Sgr~A$^\ast$ in projected distance, the lengths of all of the
538: absorbing columns of H$_3^+$ are very large (significantly larger than
539: this separation) as discussed below (see also \citet{oka05}) and the
540: observed velocity dispersion is very large, with absorption occurring
541: from $-$150~km~s$^{-1}$ to $+$20~km~s$^{-1}$. This range
542: approximately matches the entire span of the radial velocity of the
543: gas in the CMZ on the front-side of the center \citep{saw04}. These
544: characteristics suggest that the gas containing the observed H$_3^+$
545: is not located in well-separated entities, but is continuous with a
546: large volume filling factor. The large column densities of H$_3^+$ in
547: all sight lines are most obvious in the bottom traces of Fig.~\ref{f1}
548: where two of the strong H$_3^+$ spectral lines from the (1,1) and
549: (1,0) levels overlap and yield a blended feature of large equivalent
550: width.
551:
552:
553: \subsection{$\mathrm{H}_{3}^{+}$ equivalent widths and column densities}
554:
555: H$_3^+$ lines from the $J$ = 1 levels are composites of absorption in
556: the CMZ and in foreground spiral arms. \citet{oka05} separated the two
557: components of the $R$(1,1)$^l$ absorption profile in GCS~3-2 by using
558: the 2.3~$\mu$m \mbox{v~=~2~--~0} $R$(1) line of CO which is composed
559: of sharp absorption features at the radial velocities
560: ($-$50~km~s$^{-1}$, $-$30~km~s$^{-1}$ and 0~km~s$^{-1}$) of foreground
561: spiral arms with little or no CMZ component. The sharp features in the
562: H$_3^+$ absorption profile, which mimic the CO spectrum, were
563: subtracted from the $R$(1,1)$^l$ line and the remainder was ascribed
564: to H$_3^+$ in the CMZ \citep[see Fig.~4 of ][]{oka05}.
565:
566: We found that this method was not effectively applicable for the
567: spectra in Fig.~\ref{f1} because of the lower resolution of the IRCS
568: (by a factor of 3) compared to the Phoenix Spectrometer of the Gemini
569: South Observatory, and the low signal-to-noise ratios of spectra
570: toward targets fainter than GCS~3-2. We used an alternative method for
571: separation, in which we assume for each star that the velocity profile
572: of the trough in the $J$~=~1 lines is a scaled version of the
573: $R$(3,3)$^l$ profile. The method is depicted in Fig.~\ref{f3}. It
574: crudely assumes uniform physical conditions in the absorbing clouds
575: along the line of sight. We used it to separate the CMZ and spiral arm
576: components of the $Q$(1,0) line as well as the $R$(1,1)$^l$ line. We
577: ignore the detailed velocity profiles of the observed spectra, and
578: list integrated absorptions of the $R$(1,1)$^l$ line and their ratios
579: in the CMZ to the total (CMZ plus spiral arms). This ratio is also the
580: ratio of column densities. We tested the method for GCS~3-2 for which
581: \citet{oka05} used the high resolution spectrum obtained by Phoenix at
582: the Gemini South Observatory and reported the ratio ($N(1,1)_{\rm
583: GC}/N(1,1)_{\rm Total} = 0.68$) by a different method of analysis
584: using CO spectrum; the agreement is satisfactory. The interference of
585: the $Q$(1,0) line by the atomic emission for NHS~25 mentioned in
586: Section~3 does not seriously hamper the measurement since the scaling
587: of the $R$(3,3)$^l$ line to the $Q$(1,0) line is not much affected.
588: The ratio of the equivalent width of the CMZ component to the total
589: ranges from 0.5 to 0.9 for the eight sight lines.
590:
591: \begin{figure}
592: \begin{center}
593: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=.32\textwidth]{f2.eps}
594: \caption{Spectra of the $R$(2,2)$^l$ line at 3.6205~$\mu$m toward
595: GC~IRS~3 obtained at Subaru and UKIRT. The $R$(3,3)$^l$ and
596: $R$(1,1)$^l$ lines observed at Subaru are also shown. \label{f2}}
597: \end{center}
598: \end{figure}
599:
600:
601: The sight line toward GC~IRS~3 is exceptional in that it passes
602: through two different categories of gas. In addition to the gas with
603: mostly negative velocity common to all eight targets, it shows
604: absorption at $+$50~km~s$^{-1}$. This absorption is unique in two
605: other ways: (1) it is the only gas in which the $R$(2,2)$^l$ line is
606: observable (indicating that the gas producing this velocity feature is
607: higher density than the gas seen at other velocities) and (2) it is
608: the only gas for which the column density of the (3,3) metastable
609: level is definitely higher than in the (1,1) ground level. Therefore
610: we consider the $+$50~km~s$^{-1}$ absorption separately. Measured
611: equivalent widths of all spectral lines are listed in
612: Table~\ref{tb3}. For those transitions starting from the (1,1) level,
613: both total equivalent widths and equivalent widths for the part of the
614: absorption originating in the CMZ are provided.
615:
616: \begin{figure*}[bth]
617: \begin{center}
618: \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=.9\textwidth]{f3.eps}
619: \caption{Scaling the $R$(3,3)$^l$ absorption (top trace in each
620: panel) to match the absorption trough of the $R$(1,1)$^l$ absorption
621: (middle trace in black). The scaled $R$(3,3)$^l$ is overlaid in red
622: with $R$(1,1)$^l$, and the difference spectrum is shown in the
623: bottom trace. Vertical lines indicate the range of velocities where
624: the profiles were scaled. For GC~IRS~3, the scaling is done
625: separately in the two velocity ranges, $-200$--20~km~s$^{-1}$ (red)
626: and 20--80~km~s$^{-1}$ (blue). \label{f3}}
627: \end{center}
628: \end{figure*}
629:
630:
631: %----
632: The H$_3^+$ column densities in the (1,0), (1,1), (3,3), and (2,2)
633: levels were calculated from the equivalent widths of the $Q$(1,0)
634: $R$(1,1)$^l$, $R$(3,3)$^l$, and $R$(2,2)$^l$ lines, respectively, as
635: in \citet{geb99}, from the equation $ W_\lambda = (8
636: \pi^3/3h\nu)N_{\rm level} |{\boldmath \mu}|^2$, using the theoretical
637: line strengths $|{\boldmath \mu}|^2$ provided by J. K. G. Watson
638: \citep[also calculable from the list of][]{nea96}. The results are
639: given in Table~\ref{tb4}. The column density corresponding to the 50
640: km~s$^{-1}$ absorption toward GC~IRS~3 is listed separately at the
641: bottom of the table. The total column densities $N$(H$_3^+$)$_{\rm
642: total}$ are simply the sum of column densities of the (1,1), (1,0),
643: (3,3), and (2,2) levels since modeling of the thermalization
644: \citep{oka04} shows that they are the only levels significantly
645: populated at the temperatures and densities of the region.
646:
647:
648: %----
649: For broad spectral lines such as those treated in this paper,
650: uncertainties in the equivalent widths result mainly from the
651: uncertainties in defining the continuum level rather than the standard
652: deviations of individual data point. The listed uncertainties were
653: estimated by multiplying the standard deviation of the continuum level
654: by the width of the relevant velocity range.
655:
656: % For NHS~25, and possibly much more weakly for NHS~22, the $Q$(1,0) line
657: % at 3.9530~$\mu$m overlaps at low velocity an atomic emission
658: % line \citep[\ion{Si}{2} at 3.9477--3.9499~$\mu$m; NIST Atomic Spectra
659: % Database, ][]{ral07}. The equivalent widths for the $Q$(1,0) line
660: % given in Table~\ref{tb3} are not affected by the contamination, as they
661: % are measured by scaling $R$(3,3)$^l$ to the profile of $Q$(1,0).
662:
663:
664: \subsection{Temperature and Density}
665:
666: The column densities given in Table~\ref{tb4} were used to determine
667: the temperatures, $T$, and densities, $n$, of the gas based on the
668: steady state calculation by \citet{oka04}. Their diagram, in which the
669: values of the population ratios $n$(3,3)/$n$(1,1) and
670: $n$(3,3)/$n$(2,2) are plotted as functions of $T$ and $n$ (their
671: Fig.~4), is inverted in our Fig.~\ref{f4} so that the observed
672: population ratios can be used directly to determine $T$ and $n$. The
673: population ratios toward GCS~3-2 from the velocity resolved data by
674: \citet{oka05} are included in the figure for comparison. Most of the
675: clouds in the Galactic center fall in the narrow parameter region of
676: the $T-n$ diagram, 200~K$<T<$~300~K and $n$ $\leq$ 50--200~cm$^{-3}$,
677: with the sole exception being the $+$50~km~s$^{-1}$ component toward
678: GC~IRS~3 for which a higher temperature of $\sim$ 400~K and a density
679: of 200~cm$^{-3}$ were found.
680:
681: The upper limits to the number densities in Table~\ref{tb4}
682: are based on the upper
683: limits to the $R$(2,2)$^l$ line equivalent widths. Lower
684: limits may be roughly estimated from the total extinction of $A_V$
685: $\sim$ 30~mag reported by \citet{cot00} toward the Quintuplet and
686: Central Clusters and the estimate by \citet{whi97} that the visual
687: extinction of the diffuse interstellar medium toward the GC is
688: $\sim$ 20 mag, that is, $E$($B - V$) $\sim$ 6.5. Ascribing all of
689: the latter to the CMZ and using the standard conversion factor from
690: $E(B - V)$ to $N$(H) \citep{boh78} gives
691: $N$(H$_2$)~$\sim$~2~$\times$~10$^{22}$~cm$^{-2}$. Assuming $L$ = 100
692: pc yields $n$(H$_2$) $\sim$~60~cm$^{-3}$. This shows that the gas
693: density is not much lower than the upper limit. Indeed the very
694: existence of observable $\mathrm{H}_{3}^{+}$ also argues against
695: much lower densities, in which conditions it would be difficult for
696: the H$_2$, which is needed to produce H$_3^+$, to exist.
697:
698: %==========================================================================================================================================================================================================================
699: \begin{table*}
700: \begin{center}
701: \tablewidth{\textwidth}
702: % \scriptsize
703: % \small
704: \tiny
705: \caption{Equivalent widths of absorption lines.\label{tb3}}
706:
707: \begin{tabular}{l cc c cc cccc c}
708: \hline \hline
709: &\multicolumn{2}{c}{Velocity Range\tablenotemark{a}}& $W_\lambda$ Total\tablenotemark{b} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Scaling Factor \tablenotemark{c}}
710: & \multicolumn{4}{c}{$W_{\lambda}$ in Galactic Center\tablenotemark{d}} & \\
711: &\multicolumn{2}{c}{---------------------------}
712: & % R(1,1)l
713: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{--------------------------------}
714: & \multicolumn{4}{c}{--------------------------------------------------------------} & \\
715: %---
716: Source & $v_1$ & $v_2$
717: & $R$(1,1)$^l$
718: & $R$(3,3)$^l$ & $R$(3,3)$^l$
719: & $R$(1,1)$^l$ & $Q$(1,0) & $R$(3,3)$^l$ & $R$(2,2)$^l$
720: & $N(1,1)_{\rm GC}/N(1,1)_{\rm Total}$\tablenotemark{e} \\
721:
722: %---
723: &[km~s$^{-1}$] &[km~s$^{-1}$]
724: &[10$^{-5}\mu$m]
725: & $\rightarrow R$(1,1)$^l$ & $\rightarrow Q$(1,0)
726: &[10$^{-5}\mu$m]&[10$^{-5}\mu$m]&[10$^{-5}\mu$m]&[10$^{-5}\mu$m]
727: & \\
728:
729: \hline
730: % 1: observable
731: % | | total | scaling | GC | percentile |
732: % ID | v1 v2 | w11 | y1 y2 | w11 w10 w33 W22 | |
733: % | v1 | v2 | w11 | y1 | y2 | w11_(warm) | w10_war | w3 | w2 | n1(gc/all) \\
734:
735:
736: GC~IRS~21\dots & $-$250 & 70 & 6.7$\pm$ 2.7 & 0.90 & 0.55 & 6.1$\pm$ 2.4 & 3.7$\pm$ 1.0 & 6.8$\pm$ 3.4 & $<$ 2.2 & 0.91$\pm$0.40 \\
737: GC~IRS~3 \dots & $-$200 & 20 & 4.0$\pm$ 0.5 & 1.00 & 0.60 & 2.4$\pm$ 0.5 & 1.4$\pm$ 0.3 & 2.4$\pm$ 0.5 & $<$ 0.4 & 0.59$\pm$0.12 \\
738: GC~IRS~1W\dots & $-$240 & 90 & 4.5$\pm$ 0.8 & 1.20 & 1.00 & 3.9$\pm$ 1.0 & 3.3$\pm$ 1.0 & 3.3$\pm$ 0.8 & $<$ 0.9 & 0.88$\pm$0.18 \\
739: NHS~21 \dots & $-$140 & 30 & 3.6$\pm$ 0.5 & 1.25 & 1.00 & 2.0$\pm$ 0.6 & 1.6$\pm$ 0.6 & 1.6$\pm$ 0.4 & $<$ 0.6 & 0.54$\pm$0.13 \\
740: NHS~22 \dots & $-$200 & 30 & 5.9$\pm$ 1.2 & 1.35 & 1.20 & 3.7$\pm$ 1.7 & 3.3$\pm$ 1.8 & 2.7$\pm$ 0.7 & $<$ 1.0 & 0.63$\pm$0.21 \\
741: NHS~42 \dots & $-$210 & 20 & 6.4$\pm$ 1.1 & 1.60 & 1.45 & 3.9$\pm$ 1.8 & 3.5$\pm$ 2.5 & 2.4$\pm$ 1.1 & $<$ 1.1 & 0.61$\pm$0.17 \\
742: NHS~25 \dots & $-$170 & 40 & 4.2$\pm$ 1.3 & 1.20 & 0.80 & 2.5$\pm$ 1.5 & 1.7$\pm$ 1.3 & 2.1$\pm$ 1.5 & $<$ 1.0 & 0.60$\pm$0.31 \\
743: GCS~3-2 \dots & $-$170 & 30 & 5.5$\pm$ 0.4 & 1.35 & 0.70 & 3.7$\pm$ 0.5 & 1.9$\pm$ 0.2 & 2.7$\pm$ 0.5 & $<$ 0.8 & 0.68$\pm$0.07 \\
744:
745: \hline
746: GC~IRS~3~(50~km~s$^{-1}$)\tablenotemark{f}\dots & 20 & 80 & 0.7$\pm$ 0.1 & 0.50 & 0.65 & 0.7$\pm$ 0.1 & 0.9$\pm$ 0.1 & 1.4$\pm$ 0.1 & 0.5 $\pm$ 0.2 & 0.93$\pm$0.15 \\
747: & & & & & & & & & & \\
748: \hline
749: \end{tabular}
750:
751: \tablenotetext{a}{Equivalent widths are measured by integrating
752: absorption intensity in the range between $v_1$ and $v_2$. }
753:
754: \tablenotetext{b}{The total equivalent width of the $R$(1,1)$^l$
755: line.}
756:
757: \tablenotetext{c}{Scaling factor to match the $R$(3,3)$^l$
758: absorption lines to the troughs of the $R$(1,1)$^l$ lines(see
759: Fig.~\ref{f3}). }
760:
761: \tablenotetext{d}{Equivalent widths of H$_3^+$ absorption troughs
762: due to H$_3^+$ in the CMZ.}
763:
764: \tablenotetext{e}{Ratio of equivalent width in the CMZ to the total
765: equivalent width.}
766:
767: \tablenotetext{f}{Equivalent width of GC~IRS~3 in the
768: 20-80~km~s$^{-1}$ range where the $R$(2,2)$^l$ absorption is
769: detected.}
770:
771: % \tablecomments{1. \citet{ott99}, 2. \citet{kra95}, 3. \citet{nag93}, 4. \citet{fig99}, 5. \citet{lan05}.}
772:
773: \normalsize
774: \end{center}
775: \end{table*}
776:
777: %==========================================================================================================================================================================================================================
778:
779:
780: \section{Discussion} % perhaps monolithic discussion
781:
782: \subsection{The Ionization Rate}
783:
784: An estimate of the ionization rate, $\zeta$, in the Galactic center
785: is the most important result of these $\mathrm{H}_{3}^{+}$
786: observations. To avoid confusion, we use $\zeta$(H) and
787: $\zeta$(H$_2$) for the ionization rates of H and H$_2$,
788: respectively, in the Galactic disk where ionization is mainly due to
789: cosmic-rays. We use $\zeta$ for the rate in the CMZ where the effect
790: of X-rays and FUV radiation may be significant. $\zeta$(H) and
791: $\zeta$(H$_2$) are related approximately as $\zeta$(H$_2$) =
792: 2$\zeta$(H) \citep{dal06}.
793:
794: Early studies of the cosmic ray ionization rate were made in order
795: to understand the physical state of the interstellar medium and its
796: heating mechanisms \citep{hay61,spi68,fie69}. \citet{spi68} reported
797: a minimum value of
798: \emph{$\zeta_f$}~=~6.8~$\times$~10$^{-18}$~s$^{-1}$ from an
799: extrapolation of the cosmic ray spectrum observed at Earth, and an
800: upper limit of 1.2 $\times$ 10$^{-15}$ s$^{-1}$ calculated from an
801: assumed supernova frequency. Their \emph{$\zeta_f$} is the total
802: ionization rate for atomic hydrogen including the effect of
803: secondary electrons, written here as \emph{$\zeta$}(H). The most
804: recent measurement of \emph{$\zeta$}(H), reported by \citet{web98}
805: using data from the \emph{Voyager} and \emph{Pioneer} spacecraft at
806: distances up to 60 AU from the Sun, is
807: \emph{$\zeta$}(H)~$\geq$~(3--4)~$\times~10^{-17}$~s$^{-1}$, which
808: should replace the lower limit used by \citet{spi68}.
809:
810: With the advent of the {\it Copernicus} satellite and its
811: far-ultraviolet spectrometer, which allowed FUV studies of chemical
812: abundances in the diffuse ISM \citep[for a review; ][]{spi75},
813: column densities of molecules and radicals such as HD and OH could
814: be measured. The reaction sequences leading to the creation of
815: these two molecules start from H$^+$ and are thus useful for
816: estimating \emph{$\zeta$}(H). Values of \emph{$\zeta$}(H) determined
817: in this way \citep{odo74,bla77,har78} are mostly a few times
818: 10$^{-17}$ s$^{-1}$, comparable to the lower limit given above. The
819: comprehensive model of the diffuse interstellar medium by
820: \citet{dis86} suggested a somewhat higher value of
821: \emph{$\zeta$}(H)~$\approx$~7~$\times$~10$^{-17}$~s$^{-1}$. However
822: they used an H$_3^+$ dissociative recombination rate constant one
823: thousand times lower than the current value which was popular in
824: some circles at the time. They noted that if the thousand times
825: higher constant were to be used, the value of \emph{$\zeta$}(H)
826: would need to be increased by a factor of $\sim$ 10.
827:
828: %Precision studies of the cosmic ray ionization rate especially for
829: %dense clouds %has been rejuvenated recently in relation to the
830: %chemical evolution of %molecular clouds and circumstellar disks
831: %%\citep[e.g.][]{tak00,dot02,dot04,mat05}, as well as their dynamical
832: %%evolution %where the ionized fraction of the medium controls the
833: %%coupling of the gas and %the magnetic field
834: %%\citep[e.g.][]{wil98,ber99,mck07}. See \citet{dal06} for %more
835: %%details.
836:
837: The formation and destruction mechanisms for H$_3^+$ are the simplest
838: among all astrophysical probes of the ionization rate, and this makes
839: H$_3^+$, when detectable, a powerful tool for measuring the ionization
840: rate. While the H$_3^+$ column densities observed in dense clouds,
841: \mbox{(0.4~--~2.3)~$\times$~10$^{14}$~cm$^{-2}$}, are consistent with
842: \emph{$\zeta$}(H$_2$) on the order of 3~$\times$~10$^{-17}$~s$^{-1}$
843: \citep{geb96, mcc99}, the surprisingly high $N$(H$_3^+$) observed in
844: diffuse clouds, comparable to those in dense clouds in spite of their
845: 10 times smaller visual extinction \citep{mcc98, geb99, mcc02},
846: require an order of magnitude higher \emph{$\zeta$}(H$_2$). Crucial to
847: this conclusion are the laboratory measurements of the dissociative
848: recombination rate constant $k_e$ in Eq.~(1)
849: \citep{ama88,lar93,lar00,mcc03,mcc04}.
850:
851: Together, \citet{mcc02} and \citet{ind07} have carried out a survey
852: of H$_3^+$ in the diffuse interstellar medium toward 29 nearby
853: stars. H$_3^+$ was detected in 14 of these sight lines with column
854: densities of (0.6~--~6.5)~$\times$~10$^{14}$~cm$^{-2}$. For these
855: diffuse clouds the product $\zeta$$L$ is in the range
856: (0.5~--~4.4)~$\times$~10$^4$~cm~s$^{-1}$. Separating $\zeta$ and $L$
857: is not straightforward. Based on various methods of estimating $L$,
858: which gave values of 2.2~-~31 pc for different clouds, the cosmic
859: ray ionization rates were found to be in the range
860: \emph{$\zeta$}(H$_2$)~=~(1.2~--~7.4)~$\times$~10$^{-16}$~s$^{-1}$
861: with an average of 5 $\times $10$^{-16}$~s$^{-1}$. Note that the
862: primary ionization rate of H, $\zeta$$_p$, used by \citet{ind07} is
863: related to $\zeta$(H$_2$) by 2.3$\zeta$$_p$ = $\zeta$(H$_2$)
864: \citep{gla74}. This has established that the cosmic ray ionization
865: rate in diffuse clouds is an order of magnitude higher than in dense
866: clouds. This result might be understandable in view of attenuation
867: of soft components of cosmic rays in dense clouds \citep{cra78}, if
868: a large flux of low energy cosmic rays is ubiquitous in the Galaxy
869: \citep{mcc03}, or if higher energy cosmic rays are trapped by
870: Alfv\'{e}n waves in diffuse clouds \citep{pad05}. The discrepancy
871: between the high \emph{$\zeta$}(H$_2$) and previous low
872: \emph{$\zeta$}(H) values determined from HD and OH has been
873: explained by \citet{lis03} as due to neutralization of H$^+$ by
874: charge exchange with small grains which had not been considered in
875: the previous studies, in which the neutralization of H$^+$ was
876: assumed to be due to much slower radiative recombination with
877: electrons.
878:
879: As seen in Table~\ref{tb3}, the total column density of H$_3^+$ in
880: the CMZ toward the eight observed stars ranges over (1.8 -- 6.1)
881: $\times$ 10$^{15}$ cm$^{-2}$, more than an order of magnitude higher
882: than the column densities in diffuse clouds in the Galactic disk,
883: suggesting even higher values of $\zeta$ and $L$. Since we are
884: interested in setting the minimum value of both $\zeta$ and $L$, we
885: use the maximum value of $f$~=~1 and the minimum value of $R_X$ = 3
886: \citep{sod95, ari96} in Eq.~(1) and obtain the numerical expression,
887:
888: \begin{equation}
889: (\zeta L)_{\rm min} = 7.4 \times 10^{-11} {\rm cm}^3 {\rm s}^{-1}
890: N({\rm H}_3^+)_{\rm total}.
891: \end{equation}
892:
893: \noindent To obtain Eq.~(2), we have used
894: $k_e$~=~7.7~$\times$~10$^{-8}$~cm$^3$~s$^{-1}$ calculated for $T$ =
895: 250 K from the temperature dependence reported by \citet{mcc04}
896: assuming the same electron temperature as the gas temperature, which
897: may be justified in view of the fast thermalization of electrons
898: with molecules and atoms. We used the C to H ratio in the solar
899: vicinity of 1.6 $\times$ 10$^{-4}$ given by \cite{sof04}, which is
900: close to the value of 1.4 $\times$ $10^{-4}$, determined directly
901: from infrared spectra of CO and H$_2$ toward an embedded young star
902: NGC~2024~IRS~2 \citep{lac94}, and $1.3 \times 10^{-4}$, found by
903: \citet{usu08} with the same technique but toward NGC~7538~IRS~1 in
904: the outer Galaxy. The observed $N$(H$_3^+$)$_{\rm total}$ yield
905: lower limits for $\zeta$$L$, ($\zeta$$L$)$_{\rm min}$ = (1.3 -- 4.5)
906: $\times$ 10$^5$ cm s$^{-1}$. Although lower limits,
907: the values of ($\zeta$$L$)$_{\rm min}$ are
908: 1000 times higher than values of
909: $\zeta$$L$ determined for dense clouds \citep{mcc99} and 10 times
910: higher than values for diffuse clouds in the Galactic disk
911: \citep{ind07}. We cannot cleanly separate $\zeta$ and $L$ based on
912: current understanding of the CMZ, but discuss two extreme cases in the
913: following sections.
914:
915:
916: %==========================================================================================================================================================================================================================
917: \begin{table*}
918: \begin{center}
919: \tablewidth{\textwidth}
920: \tiny
921: % \scriptsize
922:
923: \caption{Column densities of H$_3^+$ in the Galactic center.\label{tb4}}
924:
925: \begin{tabular}{l cccc cc cc c cc}
926: \hline \hline
927: &\multicolumn{4}{c}{$N({\rm H_3^+})_{\rm Level}$\tablenotemark{a}}
928: &\multicolumn{2}{c}{Relative Population\tablenotemark{a}}
929: &
930: &
931: & & \\
932:
933: &\multicolumn{4}{c}{-----------------------------------------------------------------------}
934: &\multicolumn{2}{c}{--------------------------------------------}
935: & &
936: &
937: & & \\
938: %---
939: & $N(1,1)$ &$N(1,0)$ &$N(3,3)$ &$N(2,2)$
940: & $N(3,3)/N(1,1)$ &$N(3,3)/N(2,2)$ % ratio
941: & $n(\rm{H_2})$ & $T(\rm{H_2})$
942: & $N({\rm H_3^+})_{\rm Total}$
943: & $(\zeta L)_{\rm min}$ & $L$ \tablenotemark{b}\\
944: %---
945: Source &[10$^{14}$cm$^{-2}$]&[10$^{14}$cm$^{-2}$]&[10$^{14}$cm$^{-2}$]&[10$^{14}$cm$^{-2}$]
946: & &
947: & [cm$^{-3}$] & [K]
948: & [10$^{14}$cm$^{-2}$]
949: & [$10^3$cm~s$^{-1}$] & [pc]\\
950:
951: \hline
952: % ID | GC warm | | | n_total | |
953: % | n11a n10a n33 n22 | n3/n1 n3/n2 | n T | nn | zeta L | L
954:
955: % | N11a | N10a | N3 | N2 | N3/N1 |N3/N2 | n | T | N_total | zeta L | L \\
956:
957: GC~IRS~21\dots & 28.1$\pm$12.3 & 9.0$\pm$ 4.4 & 24.2$\pm$12.1 & $<$ 8.3 & 0.86$\pm$0.57 & $>$2.93 & $<$ 125 & 150--450 & 61.3$\pm$ 17.8 & 451$\pm$ 131 & 146$\pm$ 43\\
958: GC~IRS~3 \dots & 10.8$\pm$ 2.1 & 3.4$\pm$ 1.3 & 8.4$\pm$ 1.9 & $<$ 1.6 & 0.78$\pm$0.23 & $>$5.36 & $<$ 50 & 225--400 & 22.5$\pm$ 3.2 & 166$\pm$ 23 & 54$\pm$ 8\\
959: GC~IRS~1W\dots & 18.1$\pm$ 3.8 & 7.9$\pm$ 2.4 & 11.7$\pm$ 3.0 & $<$ 3.3 & 0.65$\pm$0.21 & $>$3.53 & $<$ 75 & 200--300 & 37.6$\pm$ 5.4 & 277$\pm$ 40 & 90$\pm$ 13\\
960: NHS~21 \dots & 8.9$\pm$ 2.2 & 3.7$\pm$ 1.5 & 5.6$\pm$ 1.4 & $<$ 2.3 & 0.62$\pm$0.22 & $>$2.44 & $<$ 125 & 175--275 & 18.2$\pm$ 3.1 & 134$\pm$ 22 & 44$\pm$ 7\\
961: NHS~22 \dots & 16.9$\pm$ 5.6 & 7.9$\pm$ 3.5 & 9.7$\pm$ 2.7 & $<$ 3.6 & 0.57$\pm$0.25 & $>$2.73 & $<$ 100 & 150--275 & 34.5$\pm$ 7.2 & 254$\pm$ 53 & 82$\pm$ 17\\
962: NHS~42 \dots & 17.7$\pm$ 5.1 & 8.4$\pm$ 4.1 & 8.6$\pm$ 4.1 & $<$ 4.0 & 0.49$\pm$0.27 & $>$2.13 & $<$ 100 & 125--250 & 34.6$\pm$ 7.7 & 255$\pm$ 57 & 83$\pm$ 18\\
963: NHS~25 \dots & 11.4$\pm$ 5.9 & 4.0$\pm$ 3.8 & 7.4$\pm$ 5.3 & $<$ 3.9 & 0.65$\pm$0.57 & $>$1.89 & $<$ 175 & 100--300 & 22.8$\pm$ 8.8 & 168$\pm$ 64 & 54$\pm$ 21\\
964: GCS~3-2 \dots & 17.0$\pm$ 1.7 & 4.6$\pm$ 0.8 & 9.8$\pm$ 1.6 & $<$ 3.0 & 0.57$\pm$0.11 & $>$3.21 & $<$ 80 & 200--250 & 31.4$\pm$ 2.5 & 231$\pm$ 18 & 75$\pm$ 6\\
965:
966: \hline
967:
968: GC~IRS~3~(50~km~s$^{-1}$)\dots & 3.2$\pm$ 0.5 & 2.1$\pm$ 0.4 & 4.9$\pm$ 0.5 & 1.9$\pm$ 0.6 & 1.55$\pm$0.29& 2.61$\pm$0.50& 150--350 & 350--500 & 10.2$\pm$ 0.8 & 75$\pm$ 6 & 24$\pm$ 2\\
969:
970:
971: \hline
972: \end{tabular}
973:
974: \tablenotetext{a}{All column densities are for the CMZ only.}
975: \tablenotetext{b}{Using $\zeta$ = 1 $\times$ 10$^{-15}$~s$^{-1}$.}
976: % $\zeta$ = 4.6 $\times$ 10$^{-16}$~s$^{-1}$ from \citet{ind07} is
977: % assumed.
978:
979: \normalsize
980: \end{center}
981: \end{table*}
982: %\end{landscape}
983:
984: %============================================================================================================================================================================
985:
986: \subsection{The Case of Large $L$ in the CMZ}
987:
988: \indent \citet{oka05} favored a large $L$ and hence a high volume
989: filling factor for the newly found warm and diffuse molecular gas.
990: This was not only because the $R$(3,3)$^l$ metastable lines with
991: Large velocity widths and similar velocity profiles had been detected
992: along all eight lines of sight toward sources scattered over 30~pc in
993: projected distance from Sgr~A$^\ast$, but also because
994: the deduced $T$ and $n$ of the gas were similar in all cases. The
995: latter suggests that the absorbing diffuse material is continuous
996: rather than contained in several separate entities. Further support for
997: this interpretation is that the range of H$_3^+$ absorption velocities
998: in each sight line spans the entire range velocities observed at
999: radio and millimeter wavelengths with large apertures and
1000: interpreted as coming from the front side of the CMZ.
1001: Extending spectroscopy of H$_3^+$ over more widely spaced
1002: sight lines in the CMZ will constitute a more definitive test of the
1003: filling factor. A long path length may also be favored over high
1004: ionization, in that there are limits to the value of $\zeta$ for
1005: efficient production of H$_3^+$ as discussed in the next subsection.
1006:
1007: $L$ is unlikely to be significantly larger than the radius of the
1008: CMZ, which for the region of interest is $\sim$ 130 pc, as estimated
1009: using Fig.~11b of \citet{saw04}. Setting $L$~=~100 pc, close to this
1010: maximum permissible value, the aforementioned range of values of
1011: ($\zeta$$L$)$_{\rm min}$ yields the lower limits $\zeta$$_{min}$ =
1012: (0.4 -- 1.5)~$\times$~10$^{-15}$~s$^{-1}$ for the various sight
1013: lines. For lower values of $f$ and higher values of $R_X$,
1014: $\zeta$$_{min}$ will be higher.
1015:
1016:
1017: The large extent of the warm and diffuse molecular gas postulated
1018: above conflicts with the previous concept of the gas in the CMZ,
1019: represented, for example, in Fig.~9 of \citet{laz98} where the
1020: ultra-hot X-ray emitting plasma fills the CMZ. The warm and diffuse
1021: gas revealed in this paper cannot coexist with the ultra-hot plasma
1022: because the plasma electrons will be immediately cooled and
1023: molecules will be destroyed. Thus in the above model the volume
1024: filling factor of the ultra-hot gas would be reduced by a large
1025: factor.
1026:
1027: The large extent of the ultra-hot plasma gas in the CMZ was proposed
1028: because of observations of extensive X-ray emission near the GC
1029: \citep[e.g.,][]{koy89,yam93,koy96}. \citet{sun93} and \citet{mar93}
1030: observed similar X-ray emission, but interpreted it differently in
1031: view of the difficulty of confining such a hot gas by the
1032: gravitational potential of the Galactic center, and the
1033: extraordinarily large energy input required to maintain the high
1034: temperature. With the advent of the \emph{Chandra} X-ray satellite,
1035: a great many X-ray point sources have been resolved in the GC. These
1036: have been interpreted as explaining all \citep{wan02}, or a
1037: significant fraction \citep{mun03}, of the observed intense X-rays
1038: as being due to stellar sources such as cataclysmic variables and
1039: young stellar objects. Additional observational reports also argue
1040: against the ultra-hot plasma based on the close correlation between
1041: the stellar distribution and the observed intensities of the X-rays
1042: in the GC \citep [e.g.,][]{war06} and in the Galactic ridge \citep
1043: [e.g.,][]{rev06}. However, interpretation of the X-ray emission
1044: remains controversial \citep[e.g.,][]{mun04,moN06,koy07}.
1045:
1046: Yet another category of high temperature gas observed in the CMZ is
1047: the hot gas observed in recombination lines and other phenomena.
1048: \citet{laz98} studied the $\lambda^2$-dependent hyper-strong
1049: radio-wave scattering and free-free radio emissions and absorptions
1050: and interpreted the data as evidence for \emph{T$_e$} $\sim 10^6$ K
1051: and \emph{n$_e$} $\sim 10$ cm$^{-3}$ gas with nearly 100\% surface
1052: filling factor toward the CMZ \citep[see][for a different
1053: interpretation]{gol06}. \citet{rod05} have observed fine structure and
1054: recombination lines toward a sample of 18 sources and reported even
1055: higher electron densities of 30 -- 100~cm$^{-3}$. \citet{laz98}
1056: inferred that these regions were at interfaces between molecular
1057: clouds and the X-ray plasma and proposed (see their Fig.~9) that the
1058: high density molecular clouds with a volume filling factor of
1059: perhaps \emph{f$_{\rm v}$} $\sim$ 0.1 are surrounded by the scattering
1060: electron gas, and the rest of the space is filled with X-ray emitting
1061: plasma. Our observations and analysis \citep[see also][]{oka05}
1062: %clearly
1063: contradict such a picture \citep{bol06}.
1064:
1065:
1066:
1067: \begin{figure*}
1068: \begin{center}
1069: % \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=.5\textwidth]{f4.eps}
1070: \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=.8\textwidth]{f4.eps}
1071: % \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=.45\textwidth]{f4a.eps}
1072: %\includegraphics*[angle=-90,width=.5\textwidth,bb=0 0 476 360]{f4.jpg}
1073: \caption{Temperature and density plotted in filled circles as
1074: functions of population ratios $n$(3,3)/$n$(1,1) and
1075: $n$(3,3)/$n$(2,2) obtained by inverting the diagram of
1076: \citet{oka04}. Temperature is indicated by thick white lines and
1077: density by thin lines. The estimated uncertainties in
1078: $n$(3,3)/$n$(1,1) are shown in error bars. Velocity resolved data of
1079: GCS~3-2 from \citet{oka05} is shown in filled squares for
1080: comparison.
1081: % Observed ratios are plotted
1082: % with error bars of +/- 1$\sigma$; the density arrows extend
1083: % 0.5$\sigma$.
1084: \label{f4}}
1085: \end{center}
1086: \end{figure*}
1087:
1088:
1089: \subsection{The Case of High $\zeta$ in the CMZ}
1090:
1091: It is usually assumed that the density of high energy ($E > 100$~MeV)
1092: cosmic rays is approximately uniform over the Galaxy because of their
1093: long mean free paths. The uniform distribution on the sky of diffuse
1094: $\gamma$ ray emission appears to lend support to this
1095: \citep[e.g.][]{die01}. Recent detailed calculations by \citet{bue05}
1096: typically give a 20~\% variation depending on location and
1097: time. However, the situation is very different for low-energy cosmic
1098: rays, which are the most important for ionization of the gas; their
1099: energy densities can vary greatly depending on proximity to local
1100: cosmic sources \citep{kul71,spi75,ces75} because of their short mean
1101: free paths. For example, a proton of 2~MeV, which effectively ionizes
1102: hydrogen, travels only 3~pc before losing its energy in a medium with
1103: $n_H$ = 100~cm$^{-3}$ \citep{cra78}. The ionization rate by
1104: low-energy cosmic rays could be proportional to the number density of
1105: the accelerating sources \citep[SNRs; e.g.][]{koy95} and therefore
1106: have strong local variations. If the energy density of cosmic-rays
1107: follows the surface density of OB stars, the cosmic ray ionization
1108: rate would be an order of magnitude higher in the Galactic center
1109: than in the solar neighborhood \citep{wol03}. \citet{yus02} and
1110: \citet{yus07} called for an even higher local enhancement of
1111: low-energy cosmic rays in the Galactic center ($\zeta =
1112: 2~\times~10^{-14}$ s$^{-1}$ to $5~\times~10^{-13}$s$^{-1}$!) to
1113: account for the iron fluorescence line at 6.4~keV. Such values are
1114: much larger than those derived in the previous section using
1115: H$_3^+$. X-rays and far ultraviolet radiation from stars may also
1116: increase $\zeta$. A factor of 10 or higher increase of $\zeta$ due to
1117: X-ray emission has even been reported in the circumstellar disk of a
1118: low mass star \citep{dot04}. The enhancements could be large for the
1119: CMZ, where there are abundant intense emitters of X-rays and EUV
1120: radiation.
1121:
1122: For the above high values of $\zeta$, $L$ would be quite short
1123: if Eq.~(2) is applied. However, there are two arguments against
1124: adopting such high values of $\zeta$. First, as argued earlier,
1125: the observed high velocity dispersion of H$_3^+$ indicates that
1126: the gas is quite extensive rather than confined in many small
1127: clumps. This indicates that there are non-local sources of
1128: ionization covering an extensive region.
1129:
1130: Second, the results of Eqs.~(1) and (2) are based on a simple linear
1131: formalism, which is a good approximation for low $\zeta$. For much
1132: higher $\zeta$ this should be replaced by higher order non-linear
1133: formalism in which $N$(H$_3^+$) no longer increases proportionally to
1134: $\zeta$, but tends to saturate. One source of such nonlinearity,
1135: revealed by \citet{lis06,lis07}, is the dissociative recombination
1136: of H$_2^+$, H$_2^+$ + e$^-$ $\rightarrow$ H + H, which competes with
1137: the H$_3^+$ production reaction H$_2^+$ + H$_2$ $\rightarrow$ H$_3^+$
1138: + H. The former reaction, in addition to the dissociative
1139: recombination of H$_3^+$, reduces the H$_3^+$ concentration twice. It
1140: also increases $n$(H) and decreases $f$, hence the
1141: non-linearity. In an example given in the lower figure of Fig.~3 of
1142: \citet{lis06}, a ten times increase of $\zeta$ from 10$^{-16}$
1143: s$^{-1}$ to 10$^{-15}$ s$^{-1}$ leads to only a fourfold increase of
1144: H$_3^+$ (the saturation is more severe for the upper figure). The
1145: importance of saturation depends sensitively on the value of
1146: $f$, the fractional abundance of H$_2$. Another source of
1147: non-linear behavior is the production of H through dissociation of
1148: H$_2$ by cosmic rays, X-rays, and EUV radiation. The rates of these
1149: processes are comparable to the rate of ionization
1150: \citep{gla73,gla74}. Since the reproduction of H$_2$ on dust grains is
1151: slow, H accumulates in the gas and the charge exchange reaction,
1152: H$_2^+$ + H $\rightarrow$ H$_2$ + H$^+$, which has a high rate
1153: constant of 6.4~$\times$~10$^{-10}$~cm$^3$~s$^{-1}$, will compete with
1154: the H$_3^+$ producing reaction introducing additional
1155: non-linearity. The increase of $n$(H) and resulting reduction of
1156: $f$ affect the gas in several other ways, all of which make the
1157: increase of $\zeta$ ineffective in increasing
1158: $\mathrm{H}_{3}^{+}$. While more detailed treatments of these
1159: nonlinearities have yet to be worked out, it seems unlikely to us that
1160: $\zeta$ can be larger than $\sim$ 3 $\times$ 10$^{-15}$ s$^{-1}$ over
1161: extensive portions of the CMZ. Small volumes with higher $\zeta$ may
1162: well exist in the CMZ, but they would not necessarily produce a large
1163: fraction of the observed H$_{3}^{+}$.
1164:
1165: % \citet{pad05} proposed that the cosmic ray ionization rate toward
1166: % $\zeta$~Per \citep{mcc03} nearly two orders of magnitude larger in a
1167: % dense cloud is naturally explained by the spatial variation of the
1168: % energy density of cosmic rays proportional to the total gas density.
1169:
1170: %\citet{gre01} argued that the high ionization rate inferred to Cyg
1171: %OB2 No.12 \citep{geb99} is consistent with its x-ray induced
1172: %chemistry, and the high-mass star cluster Cyg~OB2 is indeed known to
1173: %be a powerful x-ray source. The interpretation of H$_3^+$ spectra
1174: %into the cosmic ray ionization rate is straightfoward, relatively
1175: %free from observational biases. However, the high dispersion
1176: %spectrosscopy calls for luminous sources in the background. The most
1177: %of the targets observed so far in the absorption line survey of
1178: %H$_3^+$ are luminous x-ray sources by themselves
1179: %\citep[e.g.][]{roc05}. Observation with less acitive stars in the
1180: %background should be in order.
1181:
1182: \subsection{The $+$50~km~s$^{-1}$ absorption toward GC~IRS~3}
1183:
1184: The sight line toward GC~IRS~3 is special in that at
1185: $+$50~km~s$^{-1}$ LSR it has a detectable population of H$_3^+$ in
1186: the unstable (2,2)~level in addition to the large populations in the
1187: (1,1) and (3,3) levels. Also this is the only case for which the
1188: population in the (3,3) metastable level is definitely higher than
1189: in the (1,1) ground level (see $N$(3,3)/$N$(1,1) in Table 4). The
1190: observable population in the (2,2) level indicates a high density
1191: and the larger population in the (3,3) level than in the (1,1) level
1192: indicates high temperature environment. Our analysis yields
1193: $n$~=~175~--~300 cm$^{-3}$ and $T$~=~350~--~500~K. As seen from
1194: Fig.~4, this environment is clearly distinct from those elsewhere.
1195: We speculate below on two possible locations for this gas: (1) the
1196: Circumnuclear Disk (CND) and, (2) the ``50~km~s$^{-1}$ cloud''
1197: behind the GC.
1198:
1199: \subsubsection{Circumnuclear disk}
1200:
1201: GC~IRS~3 is only 5\arcsec~(0.2~pc) from Sgr~A$^\ast$, which is well within
1202: the projected span of the Central Cluster \citep[the maximum
1203: transverse separation of bright stars in the cluster is $\sim$0.65~pc;
1204: ][]{vie05}. The central 3~pc of the GC contains hot, high density gas
1205: which shows intricate mini-spiral structures \citep{eke83,lo83} termed
1206: the Western Arc, the Northern Arm, the Eastern Arm, and the Bar
1207: \citep{gue87}. The extension of the Western Arc has been associated
1208: with a nearly completely
1209: circular, Keplerian circumnuclear disk by analysis of HCN radio emission
1210: \citep{gue87,gen87,jac93,chr05} and by other methods; recent direct
1211: observations of the disk via its far infrared dust emission by
1212: \citet{lat99} are particularly noteworthy.
1213: % \citet{geb89} suggested that the absorbing CO is associated with the CND.
1214: There also have been attempts to interpret other three mini-spirals
1215: as CNDs which are not necessarily elliptical \citep[][e.
1216: g.]{lis85,qui85,lac91,jac93,lis03}. GC~IRS~3 is located in the
1217: cavity between the Northern Arm and the Bar, a region of low gas
1218: density. H. S. Liszt (private communication) has suggested that the
1219: \ion{H}{1} absorption at $+$50~km~s$^{-1}$ in Fig.~5 of
1220: \citet{lis85} may be due to the same cloud producing the H$_3^+$
1221: absorption in the sightline toward GC~IRS~3. Not only does the velocity
1222: match, but also the high velocity gradient of 100~km~s$^{-1}$
1223: arcmin$^{-1}$ found by \citet{lis85} is consistent with the width of the
1224: H$_3^+$ 50~km~s$^{-1}$ absorption feature.
1225:
1226: % The interpretation
1227: % , while the sight line toward GC~IRS~1 crosses the Northern Arm
1228: % \citep[see Fig.~3 of ][]{lat99}.
1229:
1230: However, there are two possible problems with this interpretation.
1231: First, it calls for an uncomfortably high cosmic ionization rate in
1232: order to account for the observed H$_3^+$ column density in the
1233: short path length within the CND. Assuming a path length on the
1234: order of 0.5 pc, the observed ($\zeta$$L$)$_{\rm min}$ of 7.5
1235: $\times$ 10$^4$~cm~s$^{-1}$ in Table~\ref{tb4} gives
1236: $\zeta$~$\sim$~2~$\times$~10$^{-14}$~s$^{-1}$, an extremely
1237: high value. Such a value is possible \citep{yus07} in view
1238: of the high density of stars and radiation field in the region, but
1239: in such conditions the higher order chemistry \citep{lis06,lis07}
1240: discussed in Section 5.3. surely plays a role. Although the
1241: detection of H$_3^+$ in the unstable (2,2) level indicates higher
1242: density compared with other sight lines, the population of the (3,3)
1243: level is still much higher and the distribution is highly
1244: non-thermal. The density is definitely much lower than that reported
1245: for the CND (10$^4$~--~10$^6$~cm$^{-3}$). This could be due to the
1246: fact that GC~IRS~3 is in the northern cavity and is only behind the
1247: edge of the CND rather than its densest regions.
1248:
1249: The second problem is the absence of the $R$(2,2)$^l$ line in the
1250: spectrum of GC~IRS~1W. It is remarkable that the $R$(2,2)$^l$ line
1251: is detected toward GC~IRS~3, but not toward GC~IRS~1W which is just
1252: 8\farcs4 apart, or 0.31~pc for a common distance of 7.6~kpc
1253: \citep{eis05,nis06}. If both stars belong to the Central Cluster
1254: \citep{bec78,vie05}, it is not likely that they are much more than
1255: 0.5~pc apart. Although the source might well be located in the
1256: foreground, GC~IRS~1W overlaps with the high density part of the
1257: Northern Arm, while GC~IRS~3 is located in the cavity. It is difficult
1258: To understand why only GC~IRS~3 shows $R$(2,2)$^l$ absorption, if the
1259: absorption occurs within the CND.
1260:
1261:
1262: % , and the ``$+$50~km~s$^{-1}$ cloud'' origin of R(2,2)l is
1263: % immediately
1264: % overlaped with Northern Arm, admittedly in the foreground.
1265: %-------------------------------------------------------------------
1266:
1267: \subsubsection{The``50~km~s$^{-1}$ cloud''}
1268:
1269: The observed velocity of $+$50~km~s$^{-1}$ toward GC~IRS3 immediately
1270: suggests that the
1271: absorption might arise in the well known ``50~km~s$^{-1}$ cloud'',
1272: one of the giant molecular clouds ($> 10^6 M_\odot$) located near
1273: the Galactic center. The ``50~km~s$^{-1}$ cloud'' is sometimes
1274: referred to as M$-$0.02$-$0.07, or was called the ``40~km~s$^{-1}$
1275: cloud'' by \citet{oor77}, and has been discussed in detail by
1276: \citet{bro84}.
1277: % The radial location of the ``50~km~s$^{-1}$ cloud'' is still highly
1278: % controversial.
1279: Many atomic and molecular studies have established that it is located
1280: \emph{behind} the Galactic nucleus, in between the non-thermal radio
1281: source Sgr~A East (SNR) and the \ion{H}{2} region Sgr~A West, which
1282: enshrouds the central star cluster
1283: \citep{whi74,gue83,pau96}. \citet{yus96} argued that the several
1284: masers they discovered in the southeast of Sgr~A$^\ast$ are excited in
1285: the shock-heated interface between Sgr~A~East and M$-$0.02$-$0.07,
1286: where the expanding supernova remnant hits the giant molecular
1287: cloud. \citet{tsu06} also found clues for an interaction between
1288: Sgr~A~East and the ``50~km~s$^{-1}$ cloud'' in the high velocity wings
1289: of CS $J=1-0$, although it may not be the case that the
1290: ``50~km~s$^{-1}$ cloud'' is the sole cloud that falls in the radial
1291: velocity $+$50~km~s$^{-1}$ in the line of sight toward the Galactic
1292: center \citep{zyl92}.
1293:
1294: \citet{geb89} found that GC~IRS~3 and IRS~7 show deep absorption lines
1295: of the CO fundamental band at 4.7~$\mu$m at the radial velocity
1296: $+$50~km~s$^{-1}$, while GC~IRS~1 and IRS~2 do not. They attributed
1297: the $+$50~km~s$^{-1}$ absorption to the CND but also mentioned the
1298: possibility that GC~IRS~3 is not a member of the central cluster, but
1299: behind the $+$50~km~s$^{-1}$ cloud and thus not in the Central
1300: Cluster. The nature of GC~IRS~3 is
1301: controversial \citep{pot08}; it is among the brightest sources
1302: in the Central Cluster region only less lumnous than GC~IRS~1
1303: and GC~IRS~10, and much redder than them in the mid-infrared
1304: even though it is (apparently) in the
1305: cavity. Because of its location and featureless infrared continuum
1306: \citep[e.g. ][]{kra95}, GC~IRS~3 has widely been believed to be a hot
1307: massive star heavily obscured by its own dust (similar to the
1308: bright Quintuplet sources), in addition to
1309: foreground dust. However, new interferometric observation that
1310: resolve the circumstellar dust shell have been interpreted by
1311: \citet{pot08} as evidence that the central object is a late-type
1312: carbon star, the photospheric spectral features of which are completely
1313: obscured. This interpretation is consistent with the apparent lack
1314: of ionization of the circumstellar shell, which one might expect
1315: if the object lies within the Central Cluster, and indeed the lack of
1316: ionized gas near GC~IRS~3 \citep{roc85}. Although somewhat unlikely
1317: due to its proximity on the plane of the sky to the Central Cluster,
1318: the placement of GC~IRS~3 well behind the cluster and the
1319: ``$+$50~km~s$^{-1}$ cloud'' is otherwise a straightforward assignment
1320: and avoids the difficulties associated with the CND hypothesis
1321: mentioned in the previous section.
1322:
1323: % First, it naturally explains why GC~IRS~1W
1324: % does not show that absorption feature regardless of the apparent
1325: % closeness to GC~IRS~3. Second, the length of the absorbing path is
1326: % mitigated upto 10~pc, instead of 0.5~pc in the CND. It relaxes
1327: % requirement of an ultra high $\zeta$ by an order of magnitude.
1328:
1329: % These arguments suggest that the velocity agreement is
1330: % coincidental. \citet{geb89} also rejected the ``50~km~s$^{-1}$ cloud"
1331: % as the absorption site.
1332: % This suggests that the 50 km s$^{-1}$ gas ``clump'' is sandwiched
1333: % between IRS~3 and IRS~1W, with the latter in front of the clump and
1334: % thus closer to the observer. It also suggests that the path length
1335: % through this clump is much shorter than inferred for the other H$_3^+$
1336: % columns in the CMZ.
1337:
1338: \subsection{Infrared pumping}
1339:
1340: During the 2005 Royal Society Discussion Meeting on H$_3^+$
1341: \citep{oka06a}, J. H. Black proposed an infrared pumping mechanism
1342: which can produce a non-thermal rotational level distribution of
1343: H$_3^+$ if the infrared flux is sufficiently high. The mechanism is
1344: illustrated in Fig.~\ref{f5}. Infrared radiation pumps H$_3^+$ from
1345: the fully populated lowest ortho-level, (1,0), to the (2,0) level in
1346: the first excited vibrational state via the $R$(1,0) transition. The
1347: molecule decays to the (3,0) level in the ground state by spontaneous
1348: emission with a lifetime of 25.3~ms. The molecule further decays to
1349: the (3,3) metastable level through the forbidden rotational transition
1350: (3,0) $\rightarrow$ (3,3) emitting a far-infrared photon at 49.62
1351: $\mu$m in 3.75 hours \citep{pan86,nea96}. Thus, H$_3^+$ molecules are
1352: pumped from the (1,0) level to the metastable (3,3) level.
1353:
1354:
1355: \begin{figure}
1356: \begin{center}
1357: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=.4\textwidth]{f5.eps}
1358: \caption{Schematic of the infrared pumping mechanism proposed by J.
1359: H. Black. H$_3^+$ in the lowest ortho-level (1,0) is excited to the
1360: (2,0) level in the first excited vibrational state via the $R$(1,0)
1361: transition (red line) by ambient photons. The excited H$_3^+$
1362: spontaneously decays to the (3,0) ground level through the P(3,0)
1363: transition (orange line) and then to the metastable (3,3) level
1364: (shown in blue). See text for more details. Other transitions used
1365: in this paper are also shown. \label{f5}}
1366: \end{center}
1367: \end{figure}
1368:
1369: % Spontaneous emission directly from v=1 (2,0) to v=0 (3,3) is also
1370: % possible.
1371:
1372: %is relatively slow due to the low density of the gas, The warm and
1373: %diffuse H$_3^+$ clouds of $\sim$100~pc in linear scale share the
1374: %same problem with the x-ray emission: a lack of obvious heating
1375: %mechanism. We will briefly discuss below on the relative importance
1376: %of the collisional heating and the radiative pumping of H$_3^+$. The
1377: %collisional heating by the ambient molecular hydrogen is usually the
1378: %dominant process in normal clouds in the Galactic disk, however, the
1379: %infrared radiation in the Galactic center is orders magnitude
1380: %higher, it has to be more quantitatively addressed. We follow the
1381: %disucssion in \citet{dis82} on the vibrational-rotational transition
1382: %of the interstellar C$_2$.
1383:
1384: Since the spontaneous emissions are all very fast, the rate
1385: determining process for Black's mechanism is the rate of infrared
1386: pumping of the (1,0) level of H$_3^+$. We rewrite the excitation
1387: rate given in Eq.~(15) of \citet{dis82} as
1388: \[
1389: W_{R(1,0)} = \lambda^2A\phi_\nu/8\pi = 1.51 \times
1390: 10^{-7} \phi_\nu {\rm s}^{-1},
1391: \]
1392:
1393: \noindent where $\phi_\nu$ is the photon flux of the ambient radiation
1394: at the wavelength of the transition in the units of photon cm$^{-2}$
1395: s$^{-1}$ Hz$^{-1}$, and the values of $\lambda$ = 3.6685~$\mu$m, the
1396: Einstein coefficient $A$ = 98.5~s$^{-1}$, and the dilution factor of
1397: 0.286 are used. The dilution factor takes into account the spontaneous
1398: emission (2,0) $\rightarrow$ (1,0) back to the ground level (1,1) with
1399: $A$ = 35.5 s$^{-1}$, resulting in a reduction of the pumping
1400: efficiency. In order for pumping to be significant, the value of $
1401: W_{R(1,0)}$ has to be comparable to the collision rate,
1402: \[
1403: R = n\sigma v = n k_L \sim 2 \times 10^{-7}
1404: {\rm s}^{-1},
1405: \]
1406: \noindent where we used a number density of $n$ = 100 cm$^{-3}$ and
1407: the temperature independent Langevin rate constant,
1408: 2~$\times$~10$^{-9}$~cm$^3$~s$^{-1}$ for the H$_3^+$ + H$_2$
1409: collision.
1410:
1411: The energy density of the interstellar radiation field in the solar
1412: neighborhood at 4~$\mu$m has been estimated by \citet{por06} to be
1413: $\lambda u_\lambda$ = 0.055 $\mu$m~eV~cm$^{-3}$~$\mu$m$^{-1}$ which
1414: translates to $\phi_\nu$~=~6~$\times$10$^{-5}$
1415: photons~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~Hz$^{-1}$. This is consistent with the
1416: value reported by \citet{mat83} within a factor of 1.5. The
1417: corresponding pumping rate is $W_{R(1,0)}$~=~1~$\times$~10$^{-11}$
1418: s$^{-1}$, about 2$\times$10$^{4}$ times lower than the collision rate.
1419: \citet{por06} have estimated an average energy density about 20 times
1420: higher in the GC. \citet{lau02} have reported an energy density in
1421: the central
1422: 120~pc (their Fig.~10) which is another factor of 10 higher. The
1423: corresponding pumping rate is still 100 times lower than the collision
1424: rate and the infrared pumping is perhaps not very effective for
1425: majority of the gas reported in this paper.
1426:
1427: In the central parsec of the Galaxy, however, the stellar density is
1428: $\sim$ $10^6$~$M_\odot$~pc$^{-3}$ \citep{sch07}, including a large
1429: number of luminous red giants and at least 80 hot and massive stars
1430: \citep{pau06}. In this environment infrared pumping likely would
1431: overwhelm the collisional relaxation of any H$_3^+$ that is present.
1432: The effect, however, must be local to the very central region of the
1433: CMZ and probably does not seriously alter the population of the
1434: (3,3) level beyond a few tens of parsecs from the center, i.e., in
1435: the bulk of the CMZ. However, it may well be the best explanation
1436: for the strong $R$(3,3)$^l$ absorption line toward GC~IRS~3 at
1437: 50~km~s$^{-1}$ discussed in the previous subsection.
1438:
1439: \section{Summary Points}
1440:
1441: %The present observation has confirmed the large absorption of H$_3^+$
1442: %toward the Galactic center. The $R$(3,3)$^l$ transition, the signpost
1443: %of the warm gas of the temperature $\sim$250~K, was detected in all
1444: %line of sights toward 8 sources scattered from the Sgr~A$^\ast$ to the
1445: %Quintuplet cluster. The physical conditions of the absorbing clouds
1446: %were estimated under the steady state approximation using the relative
1447: %population of H$_3^+$ in ($J$,$K$)=(1,1), (2,2) and (3,3). The
1448: %temperature and the density were all similar in the line of sights
1449: %observed, lending support to the finding of \citet{oka05} that there
1450: %is a warm and diffuse gas [$n$(H$_2$)$<$ 100~cm$^{-3}$] in the
1451: %Galactic center of the size of 100~pc. The cosmic ionization rate must
1452: %be yet at least one order of magnitude larger ($\zeta_p > 2 \times
1453: %10^{-15}$~s$^{-1}$) to keep the cloud inside the CMZ than the one
1454: %derived from the H$_3^+$ observation in the local diffuse clouds near
1455: %the Sun \citep[$\zeta_p > 2 \times 10^{-16}$~s$^{-1}$;][]{ind07},
1456: %which is already 5 to 7 times larger than the most prefered value
1457: %$\zeta_p$ = (3--4)$\times 10^{-17}$~s$^{-1}$ by the experiments of the
1458: %particle counters onboard the spacecrafts {\it Voyager} and {\it
1459: %Pioneer}. The $R$(2,2)$^l$ transition at 3.621~$\mu$m was found for
1460: %the first time in the ISM toward GC~IRS~3. The radial velocity of the
1461: %absorption line $+$20--80~km~s$^{-1}$ coinsides with the interval
1462: %where the $R$(3,3)$^l$ is deeper than $R$(1,1)$^l$, which does requre
1463: %the presence of $R$(2,2)$^l$ to be phyically realistic. The absorbing
1464: %cloud is warm [$T$(H$_2$)$\approx$450~K] and moderately dense
1465: %[$n$(H$_2$)$\approx$200~K], most likely attributed to the CND rather
1466: %than the ``$+$50~km~s$^{-1}$ cloud'', taking into account the radial
1467: %location the gas relative to the Sgr~A$\ast$ cluster where GC~IRS~3
1468: %belongs to. The possible excitation of H$_3^+$ to the metastable (3,3)
1469: %level via the infrared pumping was discussed, and found two orders of
1470: %magnitude less efficient than the collisional heating.
1471:
1472: (1) Seven infrared spectral lines of $\mathrm{H}_{3}^{+}$, $Q$(1,0),
1473: $Q$(1,1), $R$(1,1)$^l$, $R$(1,0), $R$(1,1)$^u$, $R$(2,2)$^l$, and
1474: $R$(3,3)$^l$, have been observed toward eight bright and hot stars
1475: distributed from the Quintuplet Cluster $\sim$ 30 pc east of the
1476: Galactic Center, to the Central Cluster close to Sgr~A$^\ast$, using
1477: the IRCS spectrograph of the Subaru Telescope.
1478:
1479: (2) All sight lines showed strong $R$(3,3)$^l$ absorptions with high
1480: velocity dispersions, indicating a high population of the (3,3)
1481: metastable rotational level. Those absorptions are ascribed to
1482: $\mathrm{H}_{3}^{+}$ in the CMZ and indicate a large surface filling
1483: factor.
1484:
1485: (3) The five absorption lines starting from the lowest levels, (1,1)
1486: and (1,0), are composed of sharp spectral lines due to
1487: $\mathrm{H}_{3}^{+}$ in the foreground spiral arms and a broad
1488: trough due to $\mathrm{H}_{3}^{+}$ in the CMZ. These two
1489: absorption components have been separated by assuming that the
1490: profile of the trough
1491: is proportional to the $R$(3,3)$^l$ absorption profile.
1492:
1493: (4) The observed high $\mathrm{H}_{3}^{+}$ column densities indicate
1494: lower limits of $\zeta$$L$, ($\zeta$$L$)$_{\rm min}$ = (1.3 -- 4.5)
1495: $\times$ 10$^5$ cm s$^{-1}$, which are 1000 and 10 times higher than
1496: for dense and diffuse clouds in the Galactic disk, respectively,
1497: indicating high values of $\zeta$ and $L$ in the CMZ.
1498:
1499: (5) Various arguments suggest $\zeta$ is on the order of 10$^{-15}$
1500: s$^{-1}$ and $L$ on the order of 50 pc in the CMZ, indicating a high
1501: ionization rate in the region and a high volume filling factor of
1502: the gas.
1503:
1504: (6) Analysis based on the thermalization model calculation
1505: \citep{oka04} has given $T$ = 200 -- 300 K and
1506: $n$~$\leq$~50~--~200~cm$^{-3}$ (Fig.~\ref{f4}). A lower limit
1507: on the order of 50 cm$^{-3}$ is set for $n$ from the observed visual
1508: extinction, $A_V$, and the existence of detectable
1509: $\mathrm{H}_{3}^{+}$.
1510:
1511: (7) Taken as a whole the observations reveal a previously
1512: unidentified gaseous environment in the CMZ having a high volume
1513: filling factor. This is radically different than the previous picture
1514: of the gas in the CMZ, and suggests in particular that the filling
1515: factor of ultra-hot X-ray emitting plasma may be nowhere close to
1516: unity.
1517: % considerably less
1518: % than unity.
1519: % previously thought.
1520:
1521: 8)~ The sight line toward GC~IRS~3, close to Sgr~A~$^\ast$, is
1522: unique in having a detectable population in the H$_3^+$ (2,2)
1523: unstable level near $+$50~km~s$^{-1}$, indicating a higher density
1524: for the gas producing this absorption. We speculate that the
1525: cloud responsible for
1526: this absorption feature is either a compact cloud near the
1527: circumnuclear disk or the well known ``50~km~s$^{-1}$ cloud''. For
1528: the former a high value of $\zeta = 2 \times 10^{-14}$ s$^{-1}$ is
1529: needed, while for the latter GC~IRS~3 is located behind the
1530: ``50~km~s$^{-1}$ cloud'' and thus outside of the Central Cluster.
1531:
1532: (9) An infrared pumping mechanism to populate the (3,3) metastable
1533: level proposed by J. H. Black has been examined. The infrared
1534: radiation in the extended CMZ is not intense enough to significantly
1535: pump this level, and the high temperatures detected there are likely
1536: thermal. However in the CND pumping probably dominates and
1537: temperatures determined for gas in that region based on the
1538: relative populations in this level and the $J$~=~1 levels would
1539: not be kinetic temperatures.
1540:
1541: %(10) The unique characteristics of H$_3^+$ as a dosimeter (to
1542: %measure $\zeta$), a depth meter ($L$), a thermometer (T), and a
1543: %densitometer (n) have been discussed and used.
1544:
1545: \vspace{0.15in}
1546:
1547: We thank all the staff of the Subaru Telescope and NAOJ for their
1548: invaluable assistance in obtaining these data and for their continuous
1549: support during IRCS and Subaru AO construction. We are grateful to the
1550: staff of UKIRT, which is operated by the Joint Astronomy Centre on
1551: behalf of the U. K. Science and Facilities Research Council, for
1552: assistance in obtaining the corroborating spectra of GC~IRS~3. Special
1553: thanks go to John H. Black, Katsuji Koyama, Harvey S. Liszt, Kazuo
1554: Makishima, Tomoharu Oka, Takeshi Tsuru, and Farhad Yusef-Zadeh for
1555: their enlightening discussions and to Joseph Lazio and H. S. Liszt for
1556: critical reading of this paper. This research has made use of the
1557: SIMBAD database, operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France. T. R. G.'s
1558: research is supported by the Gemini Observatory, which is operated by
1559: the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., on
1560: behalf of the international Gemini partnership of Argentina,
1561: Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, the United Kingdom and the United
1562: States of America. M. G. was supported by a Japan Society for the
1563: Promotion of Science fellowship. B. J. M. and N. I. have been
1564: supported by NSF Grant PHY 05-55486. T.O. acknowledges NSF Grant PHY
1565: 03-54200. We wish to express our appreciation for the hospitality of
1566: Hawaiian people and the use of their sacred mountain.
1567:
1568: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1569:
1570: %\bibitem[Allen, Hyland, Hiller(1990)]{all90}
1571: % Allen, D. A., Hyland, A. R., \& Hillier, D. J., 1990, \mnras, 244,
1572: % 706
1573:
1574: \bibitem[Amano (1988)]{ama88}
1575: Amano, T. 1988, \apj, 329, L121
1576:
1577: %\bibitem[Anantharamaiah et al.(1991)]{ana91}
1578: % Anantharamaiah, K. R., Pedlar, A., Ekers, R. D., \& Goss, W. M.
1579: % 1991, \mnras, 249, 262
1580:
1581: \bibitem[Arimoto, Sofue, \& Tsujimoto (1996)]{ari96}
1582: Arimoto, N., Sofue, Y., \& Tsujimoto, T. 1996, \pasj, 48, 275
1583:
1584: %\bibitem[Audouze et al.(1976)]{aud76}
1585: % Audouze, J., Lequeux, J., Reeves, H., \& Vigroux, L. 1976, \apjl,
1586: % 208, L51
1587:
1588: % \bibitem[Bania(1977)]{ban77}
1589: % Bania, T. M. 1977, \apj, 216, 381
1590:
1591: \bibitem[Becklin et al.(1978)]{bec78} % Sgr A cluster
1592: Becklin, E. E., Matthews, K., Neugebauer, G., \& Willner,
1593: S. P. 1978, \apj, 219, 121
1594:
1595: %\bibitem[Becklin \& Neugebauer(1975)]{bec75}
1596: % Becklin, E. E., \& Neugebauer, G. 1975, \apj, 200, L71
1597:
1598: %\bibitem[Becklin \& Neugebauer(1968)]{bec68}
1599: % Becklin, E. E., \& Neugebauer, G. 1968, \apj, 151, 145
1600:
1601: %\bibitem[Bergin et al.(1999)]{ber99}
1602: % Bergin, E. A., Plume, R., Williams, J. P., \& Myers, P. C. 1999,
1603: % \apj, 512, 724
1604:
1605: %\bibitem[Bieging(1976)]{bie76} % OH 1667 absorption
1606: % Bieging, J. H. 1976, \aap, 51, 289
1607:
1608: %\bibitem[Blum, Sellgren, \& DePoy(1996)]{blu96}
1609: % Blum, R. D., Sellgren, K., \& DePoy, D. L. 1996, \apj, 470, 864
1610:
1611: %\bibitem[Black \& Dalgarno(1973)]{bla73}
1612: % Black, J. H., \& Dalgarno, A. 1973, \apjl, 184, L101
1613:
1614: \bibitem[Black \& Dalgarno(1977)]{bla77}
1615: Black, J. H., \& Dalgarno, A. 1977, \apjs, 34, 405
1616:
1617: \bibitem[Bohlin, Savage, \& Drake (1978)]{boh78}
1618: Bohlin, R. C., Savage, B. D., \& Drake, J. F. 1978, \apj, 224,
1619: 132
1620:
1621: \bibitem[Boldyrev \& Yusef-Zadeh(2006)]{bol06}
1622: Boldyrev, S., \& Yusef-Zadeh, F. 2006, \apj, 637, L101
1623:
1624: \bibitem[Bolton et al.(1964)]{bol64}
1625: Bolton, J. G., Gardner, F. F., McGee, R. X., \& Robinson, B. J. 1964, Nature, 204,
1626: 30
1627:
1628: %\bibitem[Bradford et al.(2005)]{bra05} %CO7-6
1629: % Bradford, C. M.., Stacey, G. J., Nikola, T., Bolatto, A. D.,
1630: % Jackson, J. M., Savage, M. L., \& Davidson, J. A. 2005, \apj, 623,
1631: % 866
1632:
1633: \bibitem[Brown \& Liszt(1984)]{bro84}
1634: Brown, R. L., \& Liszt, H. S. 1984, \araa
1635:
1636: \bibitem[B\"{u}sching et al.(2005)]{bue05}
1637: B\"{u}sching, I., Kopp, A., Pohl, M., Schlickeiser, R., Perrot, C.,
1638: \& Grenier, I. 2005, \apj, 619, 314
1639:
1640: %\bibitem[Burton \& Liszt(1983)]{bur83}
1641: % Burton, W. B., \& Liszt, H. S. 1983, \aap~Suppl. 2983, 52, 63
1642:
1643: %\bibitem[Ceccarelli et al.(2002)]{cec02}
1644: % Ceccarelli, C., Baluteau, J.-P., Walmsley, M., Swinyard, B. M.,
1645: % Caux, E., Sidher, S. D., Cox, P., Gry, C., Kessler, M., \&
1646: % Prusti, T. 2002, \aap, 383, 603
1647:
1648: %\bibitem[Cernicharo et al.(2006)]{cer06}
1649: % Cernicharo, J., Goicoechea, J. R., Pardo, J. R., \& Asensio-Ramos, A. 2006,
1650: % \apj, 642, 940
1651:
1652: \bibitem[Cesarsky(1975)]{ces75}
1653: Cesarsky, C. J. 1975, ICRC, 2, 634
1654:
1655: %\bibitem[Cesarsky, Cass\'e, \& Paul(1977)]{ces77}
1656: % Cesarsky, C. J., Cass\'e, M., \& Paul, J. A. 1977, \aap, 60, 139
1657:
1658: %\bibitem[Cheung et al.(1969)]{che69}
1659: % Cheung, A. C., Rank, D. M., Townes, C. H., Knowles, S. H., \&
1660: % Sullivan, W. T., III 1969, \apj, 157, L13
1661:
1662: % \bibitem[Chiar et al.(1995)]{chi95}
1663: % Chiar, J. E., Adamson, A. J., Kerr, T., H., \& Whittet,
1664: % D. C. B. 1995, \apj, 455, 234
1665:
1666: %\bibitem[Chiar et al.(2002)]{chi02}
1667: % Chiar, J. E., Adamson, A. J., Pendleton, Y. J., Whittet, D. C. B.,
1668: % Caldwell, D. A., \& Gibb, E. L. 2002, \apj, 570, 198
1669:
1670: \bibitem[Christopher et al.(2005)]{chr05}
1671: Christopher, M. H., Scoville, N. Z., Stolovy, S. R., \& Yun,
1672: M. S. 2005, \apj, 622, 346
1673:
1674: %\bibitem[Coil, Ho(2000)]{coi00} % good schematic drawing
1675: % Coil, A. L., \& Ho, P. T. P. 2000, \apj, 533, 245
1676:
1677: %\bibitem[Coil, \& Ho(1999)]{coi99} % NH3
1678: % Coil, A. L., \& Ho, P. T. P. 1999, \apj, 513, 752
1679:
1680: %\bibitem[Cordonnier et al.(2000)]{cor00}
1681: % Cordonnier, M., Uy, D., Dickson, R. M., Kerr, K. E., Zhang, Y., \&
1682: % Oka, T. 2000, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 3181
1683:
1684: \bibitem[Cotera et al.(1998)]{cot98}
1685: Cotera, A. S., Simpson, J. P., Erickson, E. F., \& Colgan,
1686: S. W. J. 1998, \apj, 510, 747
1687:
1688: \bibitem[Cotera et al.(2000)]{cot00}
1689: Cotera, A. S., Simpson, J. P., Erickson, E. F., Colgan, S. W. J.,
1690: Burton, M. G., \& Allen, D. A. 2000, \apjs, 129, 123
1691:
1692: \bibitem[Cravens \& Dalgarno(1978)]{cra78}
1693: Cravens, T. E., \& Dalgarno, A. 1978, \apj, 219, 750
1694:
1695: %\bibitem[Dalgarno \& McCray(1972)]{dal72}
1696: % Dalgarno, A. \& McCray, R. A. 1972, \araa
1697:
1698: \bibitem[Dalgarno(2006)]{dal06}
1699: Dalgarno, A. 2006, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 12269
1700:
1701: \bibitem[Dahmen et al.(1998)]{dah98}
1702: Dahmen, G., H\"uttemeister, S., Wilson, T. L., \& Mauersberger,
1703: R. 1998, \aap, 331, 959
1704:
1705: \bibitem[Digel et al.(2001)]{die01}
1706: Digel, S. W., Grenier, I. A., Hunter, S. D., Dame, T. M., \&
1707: Thaddeus, P. 2001, \apj, 555, 12
1708:
1709: %\bibitem[Donovan, Herrnstein, \& Ho(2006)]{don06}
1710: % Donovan, J. L., Herrnstein, R. M., \& Ho, P. T. P. 2006, \apj, 647, 1159
1711:
1712: %\bibitem[Doty et al.(2002)]{dot02}
1713: % Doty, S. D., van Dischoeck, E. F., van der Tak, F. F. S., \&
1714: % Boonman, A. M. S. 2002, \aap, 389, 446
1715:
1716: \bibitem[Doty et al.(2004)]{dot04}
1717: Doty, S. D., Sch\"{o}ier, F. L., \& van Dishoeck, E. F. 2004, \aap, 418,
1718: 1021
1719:
1720: %\bibitem[Downes et al.(1979)]{dow79}
1721: % Downes, D., Goss, W. M., Schwarz, U. J., \& Wouterloot,
1722: % J. G. A. 1979 \aap~Suppl., 35, 1
1723:
1724: % \bibitem[Eisenhauer et al.(2003)]{eis03}
1725: % Eisenhauer, S., Sch\"{o}del, R., Genzel, R., Ott, T., Tecza, M.,
1726: % Abuter, R., Eckart, A., \& Alexander, T. 2003, \apj, 597, L121
1727:
1728: \bibitem[Eisenhauer et al.(2005)]{eis05}
1729: Eisenhauer, F., Genzel, R., Alexander, T., Abuter, R., Paumard, T.,
1730: Ott, T., Gilbert, A., Gillessen, S., Horrobin, M., Trippe, S.,
1731: Bonnet, H., Dumas, C., Hubin, N., Kaufer, A., Kissler-Patig, M.,
1732: Monnet, G., Str\"obele, S., Szeifert, T., Eckart, A., Sch\"odel,
1733: R., \& Zucker, S., 2005, \apj, 628, 246
1734:
1735: %\bibitem[Ekers et al.(1975)]{eke75}
1736: % Ekers, R. D., Goss, W. M., Schwarz, U. J., Downes, D., \& Rogstad,
1737: % D. H. 1975, \aap, 43, 159
1738:
1739: \bibitem[Ekers et al.(1983)]{eke83}
1740: Ekers, R. D., van Gorkom, J. H., Schwarz, U. J., \& Goss,
1741: W. M. 1983, \aap, 122, 143
1742:
1743:
1744: \bibitem[Field, Goldsmith, \& Habing(1969)]{fie69}
1745: Field, G. B., Goldsmith, D. W., \& Habing, H. J. 1969, \apj, 155,
1746: L149
1747:
1748: \bibitem[Figer, McLean, \& Morris(1999)]{fig99}
1749: Figer, D. F., McLean, I. S., \& Morris, M. 1999, \apj, 512, 202
1750:
1751: \bibitem[Figer(2004)]{fig04}
1752: Figer, D. F. 2004, in ASP Conf. Ser. 322: The Formation and
1753: Evolution of Massive Young Star Clusters
1754: (ed. H. J. G. L. M. Lamers, L. J. Smith, A. Nota), p. 49
1755:
1756: % \bibitem[Gaessler et al.(2002)]{gae02}
1757: % Gaessler, W., et al. 2002, Proc. SPIE, 4494, 30
1758:
1759: %\bibitem[Gatley et al.(1977)]{gat77}
1760: % Gatley, I., Becklin, E. E., Wynn-Williams, C. G., \& Werner,
1761: % M. W. 1977, \apj, 216, 277
1762:
1763: %\bibitem[Gatley et al.(1984)]{gat84}
1764: % Gatley, I., Beattie, D. H., Lee, T., Jones, T. J., \& Hyland, A. R.
1765: % 1984, \mnras, 210, 565
1766:
1767: %\bibitem[Gatley et al.(1986)]{gat86}
1768: % Gatley, I., Jones, T. J., Hyland, A. R., Wade, R., Geballe, T. R.,
1769: % \& Krisciunas, K. 1986, \mnras, 222, 299
1770:
1771: %\bibitem[Garwood, Dickey(1989)]{gar89} % search with ``Garwood''
1772: % Garwood, R. W., \& Dickey, J. M. 1989, \apj, 338, 841
1773:
1774: % \bibitem[Geballe(2000)]{geb00}
1775: % Geballe, T. R. 2000, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A, 358, 2503
1776:
1777: \bibitem[Geballe, Baas, \& Wade(1989)]{geb89}
1778: Geballe, T. R., Baas, F., \& Wade, R. 1989, \aap, 208, 255
1779:
1780: \bibitem[Geballe et al.(1999)]{geb99}
1781: Geballe, T. R., McCall, B. J., Hinkle, K. H., \& Oka, T.\ 1999,
1782: \apj, 510, 251
1783:
1784: \bibitem[Geballe \& Oka(1996)]{geb96}
1785: Geballe, T. R., \& Oka, T. 1996, \nat, 384, 334
1786:
1787: %\bibitem[Genzel et al.(1985)]{gen85}
1788: % Genzel, R., Crawford, M. K., Townes, C. H., \& Watson, D. M. 1985,
1789: % \apj, 297, 766
1790:
1791: \bibitem[Genzel, Hollenbach \& Townes~(1994)]{gen94}
1792: Genzel, R., Hollenbach, D., \& Townes, C. H. 1994,
1793: Rep. Prog. Phys., 57, 417
1794:
1795: \bibitem[Genzel \& Townes(1987)]{gen87}
1796: Genzel, R., \& Townes, C. H. 1987, \araa, 25, 377
1797:
1798: %\bibitem[Genzel et al.(1984)]{gen84}
1799: % Genzel, R, Watson, D. M., Townes, C. H., Dinerstein, H. L.,
1800: % Hollenbach, D., Lester, D. F., Werner, M, \& Storey, J. W. V.
1801: % 1984, \apj, 276, 551
1802:
1803: \bibitem[Glassgold \& Langer(1973)]{gla73}
1804: Glassgold, A. E., \& Langer, W. D. 1973, \apj, 186, 859
1805:
1806: \bibitem[Glassgold \& Langer(1974)]{gla74}
1807: Glassgold, A. E., \& Langer, W. D. 1974, \apj, 193, 73
1808:
1809: \bibitem[Goldreich \& Sridhar(2006)]{gol06}
1810: Goldreich, P., \& Sridhar, S. 2006, \apj, 640, L159
1811:
1812: \bibitem[Goto et al.(2002)]{got02}
1813: Goto, M., McCall, B. J., Geballe, T. R., Usuda, T., Kobayashi, N.,
1814: Terada, H., \& Oka, T. 2002, \pasj, 54, 951
1815:
1816: %\bibitem[Gredel, Black, \& Yan(2001)]{gre01} % Cyg OB2 #12, xray
1817: % Gredel, R., Black, J. H., \& Yan, M. 2001, \aap, 375, 553
1818:
1819: \bibitem[Groenewegen et al.(2008)]{gro08} % distance to GC
1820: Groenewegen, M. A. T., Udalski, A., \& Bono, G., 2008,
1821: arXiv:0801.2652v1
1822:
1823: %\bibitem[G\"usten \& Downes(1980)]{gue80}
1824: % G\"usten, R., \& Downes, D. 1980, \aap, 87, 6
1825:
1826: %\bibitem[G\"usten and Downes(1981)]{gue81}
1827: % G\"usten, R., \& Downes, D. 1981, \aap, 99, 27
1828:
1829: \bibitem[G\"usten et al.(1987)]{gue87}
1830: G\"usten, R., Genzel, R., Wright, M. C. H., Jaffe, D. T., Stutzki,
1831: J., \& Harris, A. I. 1987, \apj, 318, 124
1832:
1833: \bibitem[G\"usten \& Henkel(1983)]{gue83}
1834: G\"usten, R., \& Henkel, C. 1983, \aap, 125, 136
1835:
1836: %\bibitem[G\"usten et al.(1985)]{gue85}
1837: % G\"usten, R., Walmsley, C. M., Ungerechts, H., \& Churchwell, E.
1838: %1985,
1839: % \aap, 142, 381
1840:
1841: %\bibitem[Harris et al.(1985)]{har85}
1842: % Harris, A. I., Jaffe, D. T., Silver, M., \& Genzel, R. 1985, \apj, 294,
1843: % L93
1844:
1845: \bibitem[Hartquist, Doyle, \& Dalgarno(1978)]{har78} % HD
1846: Hartquist, T. W., Doyle, H. T., \& Dalgarno, A. 1978, \aap, 1978,
1847: 68, 65
1848:
1849: %\bibitem[Harvey, Campbell, \& Hoffman(1976)]{har76}
1850: % Harvey, P. M., Campbell, M. F., \& Hoffmann, W. F, 1976, \apj, 205, L69
1851:
1852: \bibitem[Hayakawa, Nishimura, \& Takayanagi(1961)]{hay61}
1853: Hayakawa, S., Nishimura, S., \& Takayanagi, K. 1961, \pasj, 13, 184
1854:
1855: %\bibitem[Herbst and Klemperer(1973)]{her73}
1856: % Herbst, E., \& Klemperer, W. 1973, \apj, 185, 505
1857:
1858: %\bibitem[Herrnstein \& Ho(2002)]{her02}
1859: % Herrnstein, R. M., \& Ho, P. T. P. 2002, \apjl, 579, L83
1860:
1861: %\bibitem[Herrnstein \& Ho(2005)]{her05} %NH3
1862: % Herrnstein, R. M., \& Ho, P. T. P. 2005, \apj, 620, 287
1863:
1864: %\bibitem[Herrnstein \& Ho(2007)]{her07}
1865: % Herrnstein, R. M., \& Ho, P. T. P. 2007, arXiv:astro-ph/0209586v1
1866:
1867: %\bibitem[Ho et al.(1991)]{ho91} % SgrA E interaction NH3
1868: % Ho, P. T. P, Ho, L. C., Szczepanski, J. C., Jackson, J. M.,
1869: % Armstrong, J. T>, \& Barrett, A. H.
1870:
1871: %\bibitem[Hoffmann, Frederick, \&Emery(1971)]{hof71}
1872: % Hoffmann, W. F., Frederick, C. L., \& Emery, R. J. 1971, \apj, 164,
1873: % L23
1874:
1875: %\bibitem[H\"uttemeister et al.(1993)]{hue93}
1876: % H\"uttemeister, S., Wilson, T. L., Bania, T. M., \& Mart\'in-Pintado,
1877: % J. 1993, \aap, 280, 255
1878:
1879: %\bibitem[H\"uttemeister et al.(1995)]{hue95}
1880: % H\"uttemeister, S., Wilson, T. L., Mauersberger, R., Lemme, C.,
1881: % Dahmen, G., \& Henkel, C. 1995, \aap, 294, 667
1882:
1883: \bibitem[Indriolo et al.(2007)]{ind07}
1884: Indriolo N., Geballe, T. R., Oka, T., \& McCall, B. J. 2007, \apj,
1885: 671, 1736
1886:
1887: \bibitem[Jackson et al.(1993)]{jac93}
1888: Jackson, J. M., Geis, N., Genzel, R., Harris, A. I., Madden, S.,
1889: Poglitsch, A., Stacey, G. J., \& Townes, C. H. 1993, \apj, 402, 173
1890:
1891: % \bibitem[Jensen et al.(2001)]{jen01} Kreckel, H.
1892: % Jensen, M. J., Pedersen, H. B., Safvan, C. P., Seiersen, K., Urbain,
1893: % X., \& Andersen, L. H. 2001, Phys. Rev. A, 63, 052701-1
1894:
1895: %\bibitem[Kaifu et al.(1972)]{kai72}
1896: % Kaifu, N., Kato, T., \& Iguchi, I. 1972, \nat~ Phys. Sci., 238, 105
1897:
1898: %\bibitem[Kim et al.(2002)]{kim02}
1899: % Kim, S., Martin, C. L., Stark, A. A., \& Lane, A. P. 2002 \apj, 580,
1900: % 896
1901:
1902: \bibitem[Kobayashi et al.(2000)]{kob00}
1903: Kobayashi, N., Tokunaga, A. T., Terada, H., Goto, M., Weber, M.,
1904: Potter, R., Onaka, P. M., Ching, G. R., Young, T. T., Fletcher, K.,
1905: Neil, D., Robertson, L., Cook, D., Imanishi, M., \& Warren,
1906: D. W. 2000, Proc. SPIE, 4008, 1056
1907:
1908: \bibitem[Koyama et al.(1989)]{koy89}
1909: Koyama, K., Awaki, H., Kunieda, H., Takano, S., Tawara, Y.,
1910: Yamauchi, S., Hatsukade, I., \& Nagase, F. 1989, \nat, 339, 603
1911:
1912: \bibitem[Koyama et al.(2007)]{koy07}
1913: Koyama, K., Hyodo, Y., Inui, T., Nakajima, H., Matsumoto, H.,
1914: Tsuru, T. G., Takahashi, T., Maeda, Y., Yamazaki, N. Y., Murakami,
1915: H., Yamauchi, S., Tsuboi, Y., Senda, A., Kataoka, J., Takahashi,
1916: H., Holt, S. S., \& Brown, G. V. 2007, \pasj, 59, S245
1917:
1918: \bibitem[Koyama et al.(1996)]{koy96}
1919: Koyama, K., Maeda, Y., Sonobe, T., Takeshima, T., Tanaka, Y., \&
1920: Yamauchi, S. 1996, \pasj, 48, 249
1921:
1922: \bibitem[Koyama et al. (1995)]{koy95} % sn1006
1923: Koyama, K., Petre, R., Gotthelf, E. V., Hwang, U., Matsuura, M.,
1924: Ozaki, M., \& Holt, S. S. 1995, \nat, 378, 255
1925:
1926: \bibitem[Krabbe et al.(1995)]{kra95}
1927: Krabbe, A., Genzel, R., Eckart, A., Najarro, F., Lutz, D., Cameron,
1928: M., Kroker, H., Tacconi-Garman, L. E., Thatte, N., Weitzel, L,
1929: Drapatz, S., Geballe, T., Sternberg, A., \& Kudritzki, R. 1995,
1930: \apjl, 447, L95
1931:
1932: %\bibitem[Kreckel et al.(2005)]{kre05}
1933: % Kreckel, H., Motsch, M., Mikosch, J., Glos\'ik, J., Pla$\check{\rm
1934: % s}$il, R., Altevogt, S., Andrianarijaona, V., Buhr, H., Hoffmann,
1935: % J., Lammich, L., Lestinsky, M., Nevo, I., Novotny, S., Orlov,
1936: % D. A., Pedersen, H. B., Sprenger, F., Terekhov, A. S., Toker, J.,
1937: % Wester, R., Gerlich, D., Schwalm, D., Wolf, A., \& Zajfman,
1938: % D. 2005, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 263201
1939:
1940: %\bibitem[Kuijken \& Gilmore(1989)]{kui89}
1941: % Kuijken, K., \& Gilmore, G. 1989, \mnras, 239, 651
1942:
1943: \bibitem[Kulsrud \& Cesarsky(1971)]{kul71} % low-energy CR is short range
1944: Kulsrud, R. M., \& Cesarsky, C. J. 1971, ApL,
1945: 8, 189
1946:
1947: \bibitem[Lacy et al.(1991)]{lac91}
1948: Lacy, J. H., Achtermann, J. M., \& Serabyn, E.
1949: 1991, \apj, 380, L71
1950:
1951: \bibitem[Lacy et al.(1994)]{lac94}
1952: Lacy, J. H., Knacke, R., Geballe, R., \& Tokunaga, A. T. 1994,
1953: \apjl, 428, L69
1954:
1955: %\bibitem[Lacy et al.(1980)]{lac80}
1956: % Lacy, J. H., Townes, C. H., Geballe, T. R., \& Hollenbach,
1957: % D. J. 1980, \apj, 241, 132
1958:
1959: \bibitem[Larsson(2000)]{lar00}
1960: Larsson, M. 2000, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A., 358, 2433
1961:
1962: \bibitem[Larsson et al. (1993)]{lar93}
1963: Larsson, M., Danared, H., Mowat, J. R., Sigray, P., Sundstrom,
1964: G., Brostrom, L., Filevich, A., Kallberg, A., Mannervik, S., \&
1965: Rensfelt, K. G. 1993, \prl, 70, 430
1966:
1967: \bibitem[Latvakoski, et al.(1999)]{lat99}
1968: Latvakoski, H. M., Stacey, G. J., Gull, G. E., \& Hayward,
1969: T. L. 1999, \apj, 511, 761
1970:
1971: \bibitem[Launhardt, Zylka, \& Mezger (2002)]{lau02}
1972: Launhardt, R., Zylka, R., \& Mezger, P. G. 2002 \aap, 384, 112
1973:
1974: \bibitem[Lazio \& Cordes(1998)]{laz98}
1975: Lazio, T. J. W., \& Cordes, J. M. 1998 \apj, 505, 715
1976:
1977: %\bibitem[Lee et al.(2003)]{lee03} % H2
1978: % Lee, S., Pak, S., Davis, C. J., Herrnstein, R. M., Geballe, T. R.,
1979: % Ho, P. T., \& Wheeler, J. C. 2003, \mnras, 341, 509
1980:
1981: % \bibitem[Le Petit, Roueff, Herbst(2004)]{lp04}
1982: % Le Petit, F., Roueff, E., \& Herbst, E. 2004, \aap, 417, 993
1983:
1984: %\bibitem[Lester et al.(1981)]{les81}
1985: % Lester, D. F., Werner, M. W., Storey, J. W. V., Watson, D. M. \&
1986: % Townes, C. H. 1981, \apjl, 248, L109
1987:
1988: % nidzinas, J. 2001, \apj, 561, 823
1989:
1990: \bibitem[Linke, Stark, \& Frerking(1981)]{lin81}
1991: Linke, R. A., Stark, A. A., \& Frerking, M. A. 1981, \apj, 243,
1992: 147
1993:
1994: \bibitem[Liszt(2003)]{lis03} %H91a SgrA
1995: Liszt, H. S., 2003, \aap, 408, 1009
1996:
1997: \bibitem[Liszt(2006)]{lis06}
1998: Liszt, H. S. 2006, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 364, 3049
1999:
2000: \bibitem[Liszt(2007)]{lis07}
2001: Liszt, H. S. 2007, \aap, 461, 205
2002:
2003: %\bibitem[Liszt and Burton(1993)]{lis93}
2004: % Liszt, H. S. \& Burton, W. B. 1993, \apj, 407, L25
2005:
2006: \bibitem[Liszt, Burton, van der Hulst (1985)]{lis85} % interaction HI 12CO
2007: Liszt, H. S., Burton, W. B., \& van der Hulst, J. M. 1985, \aap,
2008: 142, 237
2009:
2010: %\bibitem[Liszt et al.(1983)]{lis83} % HI 21cm
2011: % Liszt, H. S., van der Hulst, J. M., Burton, W. B., \& Ondrechen,
2012: % M. P. 1983, \aap, 126, 341
2013:
2014: \bibitem[Lo \& Claussen(1983)]{lo83}
2015: Lo, K. Y., \& Claussen, M. J. 1983, \nat, 306, 647
2016:
2017: \bibitem[Lord(1992)]{lor92}
2018: Lord, S. D. 1992, A New Software Tool for Computing Earth's
2019: Atmosphere Transmissions of Near- and Far-Infrared Radiation, NASA
2020: Technical Memoir 103957 (Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research
2021: Center)
2022:
2023: %\bibitem[Lugten et al.(1986)]{lug86} % [CII] 158 um
2024: % Lugten, J. B., Genzel, R., Crawford, M. K., \& Townes, C. H. 1986,
2025: % \apj, 306, 691
2026:
2027: \bibitem[Markevitch, Sunyaev, \& Pavlinsky (1993)]{mar93}
2028: Markevitch, M., Sunyaev, R. A., \& Pavlinsky, M. 1993, \nat, 364,
2029: 40
2030:
2031: %\bibitem[Marshall, Lasenby, and Harris(1995)]{mar95} % nice picture HCN
2032: % Marshall, J., Lasenby, A. N., \& Harris, A. I. 1995, \mnras, 277,
2033: % 594
2034:
2035: %\bibitem[Martin et al.(1961)]{mar61}
2036: % Martin, D. W., McDaniel, E. W., \& Meeks, M. L. 1961, \apj, 134,
2037: % 1012
2038:
2039: \bibitem[Mathis, Mezger, \& Panagia(1983)]{mat83}
2040: Mathis, J. S., Mezger, P. G., \& Panagia, N. 1983, \aap, 128, 212
2041:
2042: %\bibitem[Matsuyama \& Pudritz(2005)]{mat05}
2043: % Matsuyama, S., \& Pudritz, R. E., 2005, \apj, 618, L137
2044:
2045: %\bibitem[Mauersberger et al.(1986)]{mau86}
2046: % Mauersbergr, R., Henkel, C., Wilson, T. L., \& Walmsley, C. M. 1986, \aap,
2047: % 192
2048:
2049: %\bibitem[McCall(2001)]{mcc01} %phd thesis
2050: % McCall, B. J., 2001, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Chicago
2051:
2052: \bibitem[McCall et al.(1998)]{mcc98} % Cyg OB12
2053: McCall, B. J., Geballe, T. R., Hinkle, K. H., \& Oka, T. 1998,
2054: Science, 279, 1910
2055:
2056: \bibitem[McCall et al.(1999)]{mcc99} %dense
2057: McCall, B. J., Geballe, T. R., Hinkle, K. H., \& Oka, T. 1999,
2058: \apj, 522, 338
2059:
2060: \bibitem[McCall et al.(2002)]{mcc02} %diffuse
2061: McCall, B. J., Hinkle, K. H., Geballe, T. R., Moriarty-Schieven,
2062: G. H., Evans, N. J., II, Kawaguchi, K., Takano, S., Smith, V. V.,
2063: \& Oka, T. 2002, \apj, 567, 391
2064:
2065: \bibitem[McCall et al.(2003)]{mcc03}
2066: McCall, B. J., Hunneycutt, A. J., Saykally, R. J., Geballe, T. R.,
2067: Djuric, N., Dunn, G. H., Semaniak, J., Novotny, O., Al-Khalili, A.,
2068: Ehlerding, A., Hellberg, F., Kalhori, S., Neau, A., Thomas, R.,
2069: \"Osterdahl, F., \& Larsson, M. 2003, \nat, 422, 500
2070:
2071: %\bibitem[McCall et al.(1998b)]{mcc98b}
2072: % McCall, B. J., Hinkle, K. H., Geballe, T. R., \& Oka, T. 1998b,
2073: % Faraday Discuss., 109, 267
2074:
2075: \bibitem[McCall et al.(2004)]{mcc04} %diffuse
2076: McCall, B. J., Huneycutt, A. J., Saykally, R. J., Djuric, N., Dunn,
2077: G. H., Semaniak, J., Novotny, O., Al-Khalili, A., Ehlerding, A.,
2078: Hellberg, F., Kalhori, S., Neau, A., Thomas, R. D., Paal, A.,
2079: \"Osterdahl, F., \& Larsson, M. 2004, \pra, 70, 052716
2080:
2081: %\bibitem[McGary, Coil, \& Ho(2001)]{mcg01}
2082: % McGary, R. S., Coil, A. L., \& Ho, P. T. P. 2001, \apj, 559, 326
2083:
2084: %\bibitem[McKee, \& Ostriker(2007)]{mck07}
2085: % McKee, C. F., \& Ostriker, E. C. 2007, \araa, 45, 565
2086:
2087: %\bibitem[McKee, \& Ostriker(1977)]{mck77}
2088: % McKee, C. F., \& Ostriker, J. P. 1977, \apj, 218, 148
2089:
2090: %\bibitem[McKellar and Watson(1998)]{mck98}
2091: % McKellar, A. R. W., \& Watson, J. K. G. 1998, J. Mol.
2092: % Spectrosc., 191,215
2093:
2094: %\bibitem[Mezger et al.(1986)]{mez86}
2095: % Mezger, P. G., Chini, R., Kreysa, E., \& Gem\"und, H.-P 1986, \aap,
2096: % 160, 324
2097:
2098: \bibitem[Mezger, Duschl, \& Zylka(1996)]{mez96}
2099: Mezger, P. G., Duschl, W. J., \& Zylka, R. 1996, \aapr, 7, 289
2100:
2101: \bibitem[Moneti et al.(1992)]{mon92}
2102: Moneti, A., Glass, I., \& Moorwood, A. 1992, \mnras, 258, 705
2103:
2104: %\bibitem[Morris et al.(1983)]{mor83}
2105: % Morris, M., Polish, N., Zuckerman, B., \& Kaifu, N. 1983, \aj,
2106: %88, 1228
2107:
2108: \bibitem[Morris \& Serabyn(1996)]{mor96}
2109: Morris, M., \& Serabyn, E. 1996, \araa, 34, 645
2110:
2111: \bibitem[Morris(2006)]{mor06}
2112: Morris, M. 2006, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 54, 1
2113:
2114: \bibitem[Morris \& Nayakshin (2006)]{moN06}
2115: Morris, M., \& Nayakshin, S. 2006 J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 54, 461
2116:
2117: \bibitem[Muno et al.(2003)]{mun03}
2118: Muno, M. P., Baganoff, F. K., Bautz, M. W., Brandt, W. N., Broos,
2119: P. S., Feigelson, E. D., Garmire, G. P., Morris, M. R., Ricker,
2120: G. R., \& Townsley, L. K. 2003, \apj, 589, 225
2121:
2122: \bibitem[Muno et al.(2004)]{mun04}
2123: Muno, M. P., Baganoff, F. K., Bautz, M. W., Feigelson, E. D.,
2124: Garmire, G. P., Morris, M. R., Park, S., Ricker, G. R., \&
2125: Townsley, L. K. 2004, \apj, 613, 326
2126:
2127: \bibitem[Muno et al.(2006)]{mun06}
2128: Muno, M. P, Bower, G. C., Burgasser, A. J., Baganoff, F. K.,
2129: Morris, M. R., \& Brandt, W. N. 2006, \apj, 638, 183
2130:
2131: \bibitem[Nagata et al.(1993)]{nag93}
2132: Nagata, T., Hyland, A. R., Straw, S. M., Sato, S., \& Kawara,
2133: K. 1993, \apj, 406, 501
2134:
2135: \bibitem[Nagata et al.(1995)]{nag95} % arches
2136: Nagata, T., Woodward, C. E., Shure, M., \& Kobayashi, N. 1995, \aj,
2137: 109, 1676
2138:
2139: \bibitem[Nagata et al.(1990)]{nag90} % quintuplet
2140: Nagata, T., Woodward, C. E., Shure, M., Pipher, J. L., \& Okuda,
2141: H. 1990, \apj, 351, 83
2142:
2143: % \bibitem[Nagayama et al.(2007)]{nag07}
2144: % Nagayama, T., Omodaka, T., Handa, T., Iahak, H. B. H., Sawada, T.,
2145: % Miyaji, T., \& Koyama, Y. 2007, astro-ph/0707.0911
2146:
2147: \bibitem[Neale, Miller, \& Tennyson (1996)]{nea96}
2148: Neale, L, Miller, S., \& Tennyson, J. 1996, \apj, 464, 516
2149:
2150: \bibitem[Nishiyama et al.(2006)]{nis06}
2151: Nishiyama, S., Nagata, T., Sato, S., Kato, D., Nagayama, T.,
2152: Kusakabe, N., Matsunaga, N., Naoi, T., Sugitani, K., \& Tamura, M.
2153: 2006, \apj, 647, 1093
2154:
2155: % \bibitem[Ojha et al.(2001)]{ojh01} % [CI] 492 GHz AST/RO
2156: % Ojha, R., Stark, A.n, Hsieh, H. H., Lane, A. P., Chamberlin, R.,
2157: % Bania, T. M., Bolatto, A. D., Jackson, J. M., \& Wright, G. 2001,
2158: % \apj, 548, 253
2159:
2160: %\bibitem[Odenwald \& Fazio(1984)]{ode84}
2161: % Odenwald, S. F., \& Fazio, G. G. 1984, \apj, 283, 6010
2162:
2163: \bibitem[O'Donnell \& Watson(1974)]{odo74} % xray
2164: O'Donnell, E. J., \& Watson, W. D. 1974, \apj, 191, 89
2165:
2166: %\bibitem[Oka (1980)]{oka80}
2167: % Oka, T. 1980, \prl, 45, 531
2168:
2169: \bibitem[Oka (2006a)]{oka06a}
2170: Oka, T. 2006a, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 364, 2847
2171:
2172: \bibitem[Oka (2006b)]{oka06b}
2173: Oka, T. 2006b, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 12235
2174:
2175: %\bibitem[Oka (2003)]{oka03} Oka, T. 2003, {\it Dissociative
2176: % Recombination of Molecular Ions with Electrons} (ed. Guberman,
2177: % S. L.), Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York, p. 209
2178:
2179: %\bibitem[Oka et al.(1971)]{oka71}
2180: % Oka, T., Shimizu, F. O., Shimizu, T., \& Watson, J. K. G. 1971,
2181: % \apj, 165, L15
2182:
2183: \bibitem[Oka \& Epp(2004)]{oka04}
2184: Oka, T., \& Epp, E. 2004, \apj, 613, 349
2185:
2186: \bibitem[Oka et al.(2005)]{oka05}
2187: Oka, T., Geballe, T. R., Goto, M., Usuda, T., \& McCall,
2188: B. J. 2005, \apj, 632, 882
2189:
2190: \bibitem[Oka et al.(1998a)]{oka98a}
2191: Oka, T., Hasegawa, T., Hayashi, M., Handa, T., \& Sakamoto,
2192: S. 1998a, \apj, 493, 730
2193:
2194: \bibitem[Oka et al.(1998b)]{oka98b}
2195: Oka, T., Hasegawa, T., Sato, F., Tsuboi, M., \& Miyazaki,
2196: A. 1998b, \apjs, 118, 455
2197:
2198: \bibitem[Okuda et al.(1990)]{oku90} % quintuplet
2199: Okuda, H., Shibai, H., Nakagawa, T., Matsuhara, H., Kobayashi, Y.,
2200: Kaifu, N., Nagata, T., Gatley, I., \& Geballe, T. R. 1990, \apj,
2201: 351, 89
2202:
2203: \bibitem[Oort(1977)]{oor77}
2204: Oort, J. H. 1977, \araa, 15, 295
2205:
2206: \bibitem[Ott, Eckart, \& Genzel(1999)]{ott99}
2207: Ott, T., Eckart, A., \& Genzel, R. 1999, \apj, 523, 248
2208:
2209: \bibitem[Padoan \& Scalo(2005)]{pad05}
2210: Padoan, P., \& Scalo, J. 2005, \apjl, 624, L97
2211:
2212: \bibitem[Palmer et al.(1969)]{pal69}
2213: Palmer, P., Zuckerman, B., Buhl, D., \& Snyder L. E. 1969, \apj, 156,
2214: L147
2215:
2216: \bibitem[Pan \& Oka(1986)]{pan86}
2217: Pan, F.-S., \& Oka, T. 1986, \apj, 305, 518
2218:
2219: %\bibitem[Park et al. (2004)]{par04}
2220: %Park, S., Muno, M. P., Baganoff, F. K., Maeda, Y., Morris, M.,
2221: %Howard, C., Bautz, M. W., Garmire, G. P. 2004 \apj, 603, 548
2222:
2223: \bibitem[Pauls, Johnston, \& Wilson(1996)]{pau96} % H2CO
2224: Pauls, T., Johnston, K. J., \& Wilson, T. L. 1996, \apj, 461, 223
2225:
2226: \bibitem[Paumard et al.(2006)]{pau06}
2227: Paumard, T., Genzel, R., Martins, F., Nayakshin, S.,
2228: Beloborodov, A. M., Levin, Y., Trippe, S., Eisenhauer, F.,
2229: Ott, T., Gillessen, S., Abuter, R., Cuadra, J., Alexander, T., \&
2230: Sternberg, A. 2006, \apj, 643, 1011
2231:
2232: %\bibitem[Pedlar et al.(1989)]{ped89}
2233: % Pedlar, A., Anantharamaiah, K. R., Ekers, R. D., Goss, W. M., van
2234: % Gorkom, J. H., Schwarz, U. J., \& Zhao, J.-H. 1989, \apj, 342, 769
2235:
2236: % \bibitem[Pendleton et al.(1994)]{pen94}
2237: % Pendleton, Y. J., Sandford, S. A., Allamandola, L. J., Tielens,
2238: % A. G. G. M, \& Sellgren, K. 1994, \apj, 437, 683
2239:
2240: %\bibitem[Pierce-Price et al.(2000)]{pie00}
2241: % Pierce-Price, D., Richer, J. S., Greaves, J. S., et al. 2000, \apj,
2242: % 545, L121
2243:
2244: \bibitem[Pott et al.(2008)]{pot08}
2245: Pott, J.-U., Eckart, A., Glindemann, A., Sch\"odel, R., Viehmann,
2246: T., \& Robberto, M. 2008, \aap, 480, 115
2247:
2248: \bibitem[Porter, Moskalenko, \& Strong(2006)]{por06}
2249: Porter, T. A., Moskalenko, I. V., \& Strong, A. W. 2006, \apjl, 648, L29
2250:
2251: \bibitem[Quinn \& Sussman (1985)]{qui85}
2252: Quinn, P. J., \& Sussman, G. J. 1985, \apj, 288, 377
2253:
2254: \bibitem[Ralchenko et al(2007)]{ral07}
2255: Ralchenko, Yu., Jou, F.-C., Kelleher, D.E., Kramida, A.E.,
2256: Musgrove, A., Reader, J., Wiese, W.L., and Olsen, K. (2007). NIST
2257: Atomic Spectra Database (version 3.1.3), and avaialble online at
2258: http://physics.nist.gov/asd3.
2259:
2260: \bibitem[Revnivtsev et al.(2006)]{rev06}
2261: Revnivtsev, M., Sazonov, S., Gilfanov, M., Churazov, E., \&
2262: Sunyaev, R. 2006, \aap, 452, 169
2263:
2264: %\bibitem[Rieke, Telesco, \& Harper(1978)]{rie78}
2265: % Rieke, G. H., Telesco, C. M., \& Harper, D. A. 1978, \apj, 220,
2266: %556
2267:
2268:
2269: %\bibitem[Roberts et al. (1991)]{rob91}
2270: % Roberts, D. A., Goss, W. M., van Gorkom, J. H., \& Leahy,
2271: % J. P. 1991, \apjl, 366, L15
2272:
2273: %\bibitem[Roberts \& Goss(1993)]{rob93}
2274: % Roberts, D. A., \& Goss, W. M. 1993, \apjs, 86, 133
2275:
2276: %\bibitem[Roberts et al.(1996)]{rob96}
2277: % Roberts, D. A., Yusef-Zadeh, F., \& Goss, W. M. 1996, \apj, 459, 627
2278:
2279: %\bibitem[Rockefeller et al.(2005)]{roc05}
2280: % Rockefeller, G., Fryer, C. L., Melia, Fl, \& Wang, Q. D. 2005, \apj,
2281: % 623, 171
2282:
2283: %\bibitem[Rodr\'iguez-Fern\'andez et al.(2001)]{rod01a}
2284: %Rodr\'iguez-Fern\'andez, N. J., Mart\'in-Pintado, J., Fuente, A., de
2285: %Vicente, P., Wilson, T. L., \& H\"uttemeister, S. 2001, \aap, 365,
2286: %174
2287:
2288: %\bibitem[Rodr\'iguez-Fern\'andez et al.(2004)]{rod04}
2289: %Rodr\'iguez-Fern\'andez, N. J., \& Mart\'in-Pintado, J., Fuente, A.,
2290: %\& Wilson, T. L. 2004, \aap, 427, 217
2291:
2292: \bibitem[Roche \& Aitken(1985)]{roc85}
2293:
2294: Roche, P. F., \& Aitken, D. K. 1985, \mnras, 215, 425
2295:
2296: \bibitem[Rodr\'iguez-Fern\'andez, \& Mart\'in-Pintado(2005)]{rod05}
2297: Rodr\'iguez-Fern\'andez, N. J., \& Mart\'in-Pintado, J. 2005, \aap,
2298: 429, 923
2299:
2300: % \bibitem[Rougoor \& Oort(1959)]{rou59}
2301: % Rougoor, G. W., \& Oort, J. H. 1959, IAU Symp. No. 9, p.416
2302:
2303: % \bibitem[Rougoor \& Oort(1960)]{rou60}
2304: % Rougoor, G. W., \& Oort, J. H. 1960, Proc. Nat. Sci.
2305:
2306: %\bibitem[Sanders \& Wrixon(1973)]{san73}
2307: % Sanders, R. H., \& Wrixon, G. T. 1973, \aap, 26, 365
2308:
2309: % \bibitem[Sundstr{\"o}m et al.(1995)]{sun95}
2310: % Sundstr{\"o}m, G., Mowat, J. R., Danared, H., Datz, S.,
2311: % Brost{\"o}m, Filevish, A., K\"{a}llberg, Mannervik, S., Rensfelt,
2312: % K. G., Sigray, P., af Ugglas, M., \& Larsson, M. 1994, Science,
2313: % 263, 785
2314:
2315: \bibitem[Sawada et al.(2004)]{saw04}
2316: Sawada, T., Hasegawa, T., Handa, T., \& Cohen, R. J. 2004, \mnras, 349,
2317: 1167
2318:
2319: %\bibitem[Sawada et al.(2001)]{saw01}
2320: % Sawada, T., Hasegawa, T., Handa, T., Morino, J.-I., Oka,
2321: % T., Booth, R., Bronfman, L., Hayashi, M., Castellanos, A. L.,
2322: % Nyman, L.-\AA., Sakamoto, S., Seta, M., Shaver, P., Sorai, K.,
2323: % \& Usuda, K. S. 2001, \apjs, 136, 189
2324:
2325: %\bibitem[Schwarz, Shaver, \& Ekers(1977)]{sch77}
2326: % Schwarz, U. J., Shaver, P. A., \& Ekers, R. D. 1977, \aap, 54, 863
2327:
2328: %\bibitem[Schwarz, Bregman, \& van Gorkom(1989)]{sch89}
2329: % Schwarz, U. J., Bregman, J. D., \& van Gorkom, J. H. 1989, \aap,
2330: % 215, 33
2331:
2332: %\bibitem[Scoville et al.(2003)]{sco03}
2333: % Scoville, N. Z., Stolovy, S. R., Rieke, M., Christopher, M., \&
2334: % Yusef-Zadeh, F. 2003, \apj, 594, 294
2335:
2336: \bibitem[Sch\"odel et al.(2007)]{sch07}
2337: Sch\"odel, R., Eckart, A., Alexander, T., Merritt, D., Genzel, R.,
2338: Sternberg, A., Meyer, L., Kul, F., Moultaka, J., Ott, T., \&
2339: Straubmeier, C. 2007, \aap, 469, 125
2340:
2341: %\bibitem[Scoville(1972)]{sco72}
2342: % Scoville, N. Z. 1972, \apj, 175, L127
2343:
2344: %\bibitem[Serabyn, \& Lacy(1985)]{ser85} % NeII
2345: % Serabyn, E., \& Lacy, J. H. 1985, \apj, 293, 445
2346:
2347: %\bibitem[Serabyn, \& Lacy(1988)]{ser88} % NeII
2348: % Serabyn, E., Lacy, J. H., Townes, C. H., \& Bharat, R. 1988, \apj,
2349: % 326, 171
2350:
2351: %\bibitem[Serabyn, Lacy, \& Achtermann(1992)]{ser92} %CS7-6,5-4 [NeII] [ArII] [SIV]
2352: % Serabyn, E., Lacy, J. H., \& Achtermann, J. M. 1992, \apj, 395, 166
2353:
2354: %\bibitem[Serabyn et al.(1994)]{ser94} % CI609um
2355: % Serabyn, E., Keen, J., Lis, D. C., \& Phillips, T. G.
2356: % 1994, \apjl, 424, L95
2357: %\bibitem[Snyder et al.(1969)]{sny69}
2358: % Snyder, L. E., Buhl, D., Zuckerman, B., \& Palmer, P. 1969, Phys. Rev.
2359: % Lett., 22, 679
2360:
2361: %\bibitem[Shaw et al.(2007)]{sha07}
2362: % Shaw, G., Ferland, G. J., Srianand, R., Abel, N. P., van Hoof,
2363: % P. A. M. \& Stancil, P. C. 2007, arXiv0711.0335
2364:
2365: %\bibitem[Shukla, Yun, \& Scoville(2004)]{shu04}
2366: % Shukla, H., Yun, M. S., \& Scoville, N. Z. 2004, \apj, 616, 231
2367:
2368: %\bibitem[Silk \& Werner(1969)]{sil69} % xray atomic
2369: % Silk, J., \& Werner, M. W. 1969, \apj, 158, 185
2370:
2371: \bibitem[Sodroski et al.(1995)]{sod95} % Rx = 3-10
2372: Sodroski, T. J., Odegard, N., Dwek, E., Hauser, M. G., Franz, B. A.,
2373: Freedman, I., Kelsall, T., Wall, W. F., Berriman, G. B., Odenwald,
2374: S. F., Bennett, C., \& Reach, W. T. 1995, \apj, 452, 262
2375:
2376: \bibitem[Sofia et al.(2004)]{sof04} % C/H = 1.6e-4
2377: Sofia, U. J., Lauresch, J. T., Myers, D. M., \& Cartledge, S. I.
2378: B.
2379: 2004, \apj, 605, 272
2380:
2381: %\bibitem[Spiter(1968)]{spi68a}
2382: % Spitzer, L. Jr. {\it Diffuse Mattter in Space} (New York: Interscience)
2383:
2384: \bibitem[Spitzer \& Tomasko(1968)]{spi68}
2385: Spitzer, L., Jr., \& Tomasko, M. G. 1968, \apj, 152, 971
2386:
2387: \bibitem[Spitzer \& Jenkins(1975)]{spi75}
2388: Spitzer, L., Jr., \& Jenkins, E. B. 1975 \araa, 13, 133
2389:
2390: \bibitem[Sunyaev, Markevitch \& Pavlinsky(1993)]{sun93}
2391: Sunyaev, R. A., Markevitch, M. \& Pavlinsky, M. 1993, \apj, 407,
2392: 606
2393:
2394: %\bibitem[Sutton et al.(1990)]{sut90} %CO 3-2
2395: % Sutton, E. C., Danchi, W. C., Jaminet, P. A., \& Masson,
2396: % C. R. 1990, \apj, 348, 503
2397:
2398: \bibitem[Takami et al.(2004)]{tak04}
2399: Takami, Hl, Takato, N., Hayano, Y., Iye, M., Oya, S., Kamata, Y.,
2400: Kanzawa, T., Minowa, Y., Otsubo, M., Nakashima, K., Gaessler, W.,
2401: Saint-Jacques, D. 2004, \pasj, 56, 225
2402:
2403: \bibitem[Tanner et al.(2006)]{tan06} Tanner, A., Figer, D. F.,
2404: Najarro, F., Kudritzki, R. P., Gilmore, D., Morris, M., Becklin,
2405: E. E., McLean, I. S., Gilbert, A. M., Graham, J. R., Larkin, J. E.,
2406: Levenson, N. A., \& Teplitz, H. I. 2006, \apj, 641, 891
2407:
2408: \bibitem[Tokunaga et al.(1998)]{tok98}
2409: Tokunaga, A. T., Kobayashi, N., Bell, J., Ching, G., K., Hodapp,
2410: K-.W., Hora, J. L., Neill, D., Onaka, P. M., Rayner, J. T.,
2411: Robertson, L., Warren, D. W., Weber, M., \& Young, T. T. 1998,
2412: \procspie, 3354, 512
2413:
2414: %\bibitem[Tsuboi, Handa, \& Ukita(1998)]{tsu98}
2415: % Tsuboi, M., Handa, T., \& Ukita, N. 1998, \apjs, 120, 1
2416:
2417: \bibitem[Tsuboi et al.(2006)]{tsu06}
2418: Tsuboi, M., Okumura, S. K., \& Miyazaki, A. 2006,
2419: J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 54, 16
2420:
2421: %\bibitem[Uy, Cordonnier, \& Oka(1997)]{uy97}
2422: % Uy, D., Cordonnier, M., \& Oka, T. 1997, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3844
2423:
2424: \bibitem[Usuda et al.(2008)]{usu08}
2425: Usuda, T., et al. unpublished.
2426:
2427: %\bibitem[Valinia et al.(2000)]{val00}
2428: % Valinia, A., Tatischeff, V., Arnaud, K., Ebisawa, K., \& Ramaty, R.
2429: % 2000, \apj, 543, 733
2430:
2431: %\bibitem[van der Tak \& van Dishoeck(2000)]{tak00}
2432: % van der Tak, F. F. S., \& van Dishoeck, E. F. 2000, \aap, 358, L79
2433:
2434: \bibitem[van Dishoeck \& Black(1982)]{dis82}
2435: van Dishoeck, E. F., \& Black, J. H. 1982, \apj, 258, 533
2436:
2437: \bibitem[van Dishoeck \& Black(1986)]{dis86}
2438: van Dishoeck, E. F., \& Black, J. H. 1986, \apj, 62, 109
2439:
2440: \bibitem[Viehmann et al.(2005)]{vie05}
2441: Viehmann, T., Eckart, A., Sch\"{o}del, R., Moultaka, J.,
2442: Straubmeier, C., \& Pott, J. -U. 2005, \aap, 433, 117
2443:
2444: \bibitem[Wang, Gotthelf, \& Lang (2002)]{wan02}
2445: Wang, Q. D., Gotthelf, E. V., \& Lang, C. C. 2002, \nat, 415, 148
2446:
2447: \bibitem[Warwick, Sakano, \& Decourchelle (2006)]{war06}
2448: Warwick, R., Sakano, M., \& Decourchelle, A. 2006,
2449: J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 54, 103
2450:
2451: %\bibitem[Watson(1973)]{wat73}
2452: % Watson, W. D. 1973, \apj, 182, L73
2453:
2454: \bibitem[Webber(1998)]{web98} %voyager pioneer
2455: Webber, W. R. 1998, \apj, 506, 329
2456:
2457: \bibitem[Whiteoak, Rogstad, \& Lockhart(1974)]{whi74} % H2Co
2458: Whiteoak, J. B., Rogstad, D. H., \& Lockhart, I. A. 1974, \aap, 36,
2459: 245
2460:
2461: %\bibitem[Whiteoak \& Gardner(1978)]{whi78}
2462: % Whiteoak, J. B., \& Gardner, F. F. 1978,
2463: % Proc. Astron. Soc. Australia. 3, 266
2464:
2465: %\bibitem[Whiteoak \& Gardner(1979)]{whi79}
2466: % Whiteoak, J. B., \& Gardner, F. F. 1979, \mnras, 188, 445
2467:
2468: \bibitem[Whittet et al.(1997)]{whi97}
2469: Whittet, D. C. B., Boogert, A. C. A., Gerakines, P. A., Schutte,
2470: W., Tielens, A. G. G. M., de Graauw, Th., Prusti, T., van Dishoeck,
2471: E. F., Wesselius, P. R., \& Wright, C. M. 1997, \apj, 490, 729
2472:
2473: %\bibitem[Williams et al.(1998)]{wil98}
2474: % Williams, J. P., Bergin, E. A., Caselli, P., Myers, P. C., \&
2475: % Plume, R. 1998, \apj, 503, 689
2476:
2477: %\bibitem[Wilson et al.(1982)]{wil82}
2478: % Wilson, T. L., Rug, K., Walmsley, C. M., Martin, R. N., Pauls,
2479: % T. A., \& Bartrla, W. 1982, \aap, 115, 185
2480:
2481: %\bibitem[Wilson et al.(2006)]{wil06}
2482: % Wilson, T. L., Henkel, C., \& H\"uttemeister, S. 2006, \aap, 460,
2483: % 533
2484:
2485: \bibitem[Wolfire et al.(2003)]{wol03}
2486: Wolfire, M. G., McKee, C. F., Hollenbach, D., \& Tielens,
2487: A. G. G. M. 2003, \apj, 587, 278
2488:
2489: % \bibitem[Wooten, Snell, \& Evans(1980)]{woo80}
2490: % Wooten, A., Snell, R., \& Evans, N. J., II 1980, \apj, 240, 532
2491:
2492: %\bibitem[Wright et al.(2001)]{wri01}
2493: % Wright, M. C. H., Coil, A. L., McGary, R. S., Ho, P. T. P, \&
2494: % Harris, A. I. 2001, \apj, 551, 254
2495:
2496: \bibitem[Yamauchi \& Koyama(1993)]{yam93}
2497: Yamauchi, S., \& Koyama, K. 1993, \apj, 404, 620
2498:
2499: % \bibitem[Yusef-Zadeh, Lasenby, and Marshall(1993)]{yus93}
2500: % Yusef-Zadeh, F., Lasenby, A., \& Marshall, J. 1993, \apj, 410, L27
2501:
2502: %\bibitem[Yusef-Zadeh, Morris, Chance(1984)]{yus84}
2503: % Yusef-Zadeh, F., Morris, M., \& Chance, D. \nat, 310, 557
2504:
2505: \bibitem[Yusef-Zadeh et al.(1996)]{yus96} % OH maser interaction
2506: Yusef-Zadeh, F., Roberts, D. A., Goss, W. M., Frail, D. A., \&
2507: Green, A. J. 1996, \apjl, 466, L25
2508:
2509: \bibitem[Yusef-Zadeh \& Melia(1992)]{yus92}
2510: Yusef-Zadeh, F., \& Melia, F. 1992, \apjl, 385, L41
2511:
2512: %\bibitem[Yusef-Zadeh et al.(2001)]{yus01}
2513: % Yusef-Zadeh, F., Stolovy, S. R., Burton, M., Wardle, M., \& Ashley,
2514: % M. C. B. 2001, \apj, 560, 749
2515:
2516: \bibitem[Yusef-Zadeh, Law, \& Wardle (2002)]{yus02}
2517: Yusef-Zadeh, F., Law, C., \& Wardle, M. 2002, \apjl, 2002, 568, L121
2518:
2519: \bibitem[Yusef-Zadeh et al.(2007)]{yus07}
2520: Yusef-Zadeh, F., Muno, M., Wardle, M., \& Lis, D. C. 2007, \apj,
2521: 656, 847
2522:
2523: % \bibitem[Yusef-Zadeh, Wardel, \& Roy(2007)]{yus07b}
2524: % Yusef-Zadeh, F., Wardel, M., \& Roy, S. 2007, \apjl, 665, L123
2525:
2526: \bibitem[Zylka, Mezger, \&Lesch(1992)]{zyl92}
2527: Zylka, R., Mezger, P. G., \& Lesch, H. 1992, \aap, 261, 119
2528:
2529: %% reference for oka-san
2530:
2531: %\bibitem[Muno et al.(2005)]{mun05}
2532: %Muno, M. P., Pfahl, E., Baganoff, F. K., Brandt, W. N., Ghez, A.,
2533: %Lu, J., \& Morris, M. R. 2005, \apjl, 622, L113
2534:
2535: %\bibitem[Muno(2003)]{mun03}
2536: %Muno, Michael, P. 2003, GCNEWS - Galactic Center Newsletter, 16, 4
2537: %(eds. A. Cotera, S. Markoff, \& L. O. Sjouwerman)
2538:
2539:
2540: %\bibitem[Muno et al.(2007]{mun07}
2541: %Muno, M. P., Baganoff, F. K., Brandt, W. N., Park, S., \& Morris,
2542: %M. R. 2007, \apjl, 656, L69
2543:
2544: % \bibitem[Muno et al.(2004)]{mun04}
2545: % Muno, M. P., Arabadjis, J. S., Baganoff, F. K., Bautz, M. W., Brandt,
2546: % W. N., Broos, P. S., Feigelson, E. D., Garmire, G. P., Morris, M. R.,
2547: % \& Ricker, G. R. 2004, \apj, 613, 1179
2548:
2549: %\bibitem[Yusef-Zadeh, Law, \& Wardle(2002)]{yus02}
2550: %Yusef-Zadeh, F., Law, C., \& Wardle, M. 2002, \apjl, 568, L121
2551:
2552: %\bibitem[Law \& Yusef-Zadeh(2004)]{law04}
2553: %Law, C., \& Yusef-Zadeh, F. 2004, \apj, 611, 858
2554:
2555: %\bibitem[Wang, Dong, \& Lang(2006)]{wan06}
2556: %Wang, Q. D., Dong, H., \& Lang, C. 2006, \mnras, 371, 38
2557:
2558: %\bibitem[Ezoe et al.(2006)]{ezo06}
2559: %Ezoe, Y., Kokubun, M., Makishima, K., Sekimoto, Y., \& Matsuzaki,
2560: %K. 2006, \apjl, 649, L123
2561:
2562: %\bibitem[Rodriguez-Fernandez et al.(2006)]{rod06}
2563: %Rodriguez-Fernandez, N. J., Combes, F., Martin-Pintado, J., Wilson,
2564: %T. L., \& Apponi, A. 2006, \aap, 455, 963
2565:
2566: %\bibitem[Rodr\'iguez-Fern\'andez, Mart\'in-Pintado, de Vicente(2001)]{rod01b}
2567: %Rodr\'iguez-Fern\'andez, N. J., Mart\'in-Pintado, J., \& de Vicente,
2568: %P. 2001, \aap, 377, 631
2569:
2570: %\bibitem[Lazio(2005)]{laz05}
2571: %Lazio, T. J. W. 2005, in ASP Conf. Ser. 340: Future Directions in High
2572: %Resolution Astronomy: The 10th Anniversary of the VLBA,
2573: %(ed. J. D. Romney, M. J. Reid), p. 419
2574:
2575: %\bibitem[Ferri\`ere, Gillard, \& Jean(2007)]{fer07}
2576: %Ferri\`ere, K., Gillard, W., \& Jean, P. 2007, astro-ph/0702532
2577:
2578: %\bibitem[Ferri\`ere(1995)]{fer95}
2579: %Ferri\`ere, K. 1995, \apj, 441, 281
2580:
2581: %\bibitem[Ferri\`ere(1998)]{fer98}
2582: %Ferri\`ere, K. 1998, \apj, 503, 700
2583:
2584:
2585: %\bibitem[Revnivtsev \& Sazonov(2007)]{rev07}
2586: %Revnivtsev, M., \& Sazonov, S. 2007, \aap, astro-ph/0702640
2587:
2588: %\bibitem[Sazonov et al.(2006)]{saz06}
2589: %Sazonov, S., Revnivtsev, M., Gilfanov, M., Churazov, E., \& Sunyaev,
2590: %R. 2006, \aap, 450, 117
2591:
2592: %\bibitem[Balmont \& Tagger(2006)]{bal06}
2593: %Balmont, R., \& Tagger, M. 2006, \aap, 452, 15
2594:
2595: %\bibitem[Maloney, Hollenbach, \& Tielens(1996)]{mal96}
2596: %Maloney, P. R., Hollenbach, D. J., \& Tielens, A. G. G. M. 1996, \apj,
2597: %466, 561
2598:
2599: \end{thebibliography}
2600:
2601: % \clearpage
2602:
2603:
2604: % \begin{figure}
2605: % \includegraphics[angle=0,width=\textwidth]{vla5.ps}
2606: % \caption{A map.\label{f4}}
2607: % \end{figure}
2608:
2609: \end{document}