1: %\documentclass[,aps]{revtex4}
2: \documentclass[prd,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
3: %\documentclass[12pt]{article}
4: %\usepackage{amssymb}
5:
6: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
7: %\usepackage{showkeys}
8: \usepackage{graphics}
9: %\usepackage{CJK}
10: %\usepackage{epsfig,showkeys}
11: \usepackage{epsfig}
12: \usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
13: \usepackage{bm}% bold math
14:
15: %\textheight=24.cm \textwidth=160mm \topmargin=-1.5cm
16: %\oddsidemargin=0.25cm \evensidemargin=0.25cm
17:
18: \begin{document}
19: %\begin{CJK}{GBK}{song}
20: \title{$X(3872)$ and Other Possible Heavy Molecular States}
21: \author{Xiang Liu$^{1,2}$}\email{liuxiang@teor.fis.uc.pt}
22: \author{Zhi-Gang Luo$^1$}
23: \author{Yan-Rui Liu $^3$}
24: \author{Shi-Lin Zhu$^1$}
25: \email{zhusl@phy.pku.edu.cn}
26:
27:
28: %\author{Xiang Liu(ÁõÏè)$^{1,2}$}\email{liuxiang@teor.fis.uc.pt}
29: %\author{Zhi-Gang Luo(ÂÞÖ¾¸Õ)$^1$}
30: %\author{Yan-Rui Liu(ÁõÑÔÈñ)$^3$}
31: %\author{Shi-Lin Zhu(ÖìÊÀÁÕ)$^1$}
32: %\email{zhusl@phy.pku.edu.cn}
33:
34:
35:
36: \affiliation{$^1$Department of Physics, Peking University, Beijing
37: 100871, China \\
38: $^2$Centro de F\'{i}sica Computacional, Departamento de
39: F\'{i}sica, Universidade de Coimbra,
40: P-3004-516, Coimbra, Portugal\\
41: $^3$Institute of High Energy Physics, P.O. Box 918-4, Beijing
42: 100049, China}
43:
44:
45: \date{\today}% It is always \today, today,
46: % but any date may be explicitly specified
47:
48: \begin{abstract}
49:
50: We perform a systematic study of the possible molecular states
51: composed of a pair of heavy mesons such as $D\bar D$, $D^\ast\bar
52: D$, $D^\ast \bar D^\ast$ in the framework of the meson exchange
53: model. The exchanged mesons include the pseudoscalar, scalar and
54: vector mesons. Through our investigation, we find that (1) the
55: structure $X(3764)$ is not a molecular state; (2) There exists
56: strong attraction in the range $r < 1$ fm for the $D^*\bar D^*$
57: system with $J=0, 1$. If future experiments confirm $Z^+(4051)$ as
58: a loosely bound molecular state, its quantum number is probably
59: $J^{P}=0^+$. Its partner state $\Phi^{**0}$ may be searched for in
60: the $\pi^0\chi_{c1}$ channel; (3) The vector meson exchange
61: provides strong attraction in the $D^\ast \bar D$ channel together
62: with the pion exchange. A bound state solution exists with a
63: reasonable cutoff parameter $\Lambda\sim 1.4$ GeV. $X(3872)$ may
64: be accommodated as a molecular state dynamically although drawing
65: a very definite conclusion needs further investigation; (4) The
66: $B^\ast \bar B$ molecular state exists.
67:
68: \end{abstract}
69:
70: \pacs{12.39.Pn, 12.40.Yx, 13.75.Lb}
71:
72: \maketitle
73:
74:
75: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
76: \section{Introduction}\label{sec1}
77: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
78:
79: Since the observation of $Z^{+}(4430)$ \cite{Belle-4430}, the
80: Belle Collaboration reported two new resonance-like structures
81: $Z^+(4051)$ and $Z^+(4248)$ in the $\pi^+\chi_{c1}$ mass
82: distribution in the exclusive $\bar B^0\to K^-\pi^+\chi_{c1}$
83: decay. Their masses and widths are
84: $m_{Z^+(4051)}=(4051\pm14^{+20}_{-41})\, \mathrm{MeV}$,
85: $\Gamma_{Z^+(4051)}=(82^{+21+47}_{-17-22})\, \mathrm{MeV}$ and
86: $m_{Z^+(4248)}=(4248\pm14^{+44+180}_{-29-35})\,\mathrm{MeV}$,
87: $\Gamma_{Z^+(4248)}=(177^{+54+316}_{-39-61})\, \mathrm{MeV}$
88: \cite{Belle-new-two}. These charged hidden charm signals are good
89: candidates of either tetraquark states or heavy molecular states
90: if they are confirmed by future experiments.
91:
92: Recently the BES Collaboration reported an anomalous line-shape
93: observed in the range of $3.650$ GeV to $3.872$ GeV by analyzing
94: the cross section of $e^+e^-\to \mathrm{hadrons}$. The anomalous
95: line-shape is composed of two possible enhancement structures
96: around 3.764 GeV and 3.779 GeV respectively \cite{BES}. The later
97: one is consistent with the well-established $\psi(3770)$ while the
98: mechanism of the first structure is not clear now, which is
99: denoted as $X(3764)$ in this work.
100:
101: In the past five years, a series of observations of the
102: charmonium-like $X,\,Y,\,Z$ states, especially those states near
103: the threshold of two charmed mesons have stimulated the interest
104: in the possible existence of heavy molecular states greatly. The
105: presence of the heavy quarks lowers the kinetic energy while the
106: interaction between two light quarks could still provide strong
107: enough attraction.
108:
109: In fact, Voloshin and Okun studied the interaction between a pair
110: of charmed mesons and proposed the possibilities of the molecular
111: states involving charmed quarks more than thirty years ago
112: \cite{Okun}. De Rujula, Geogi and Glashow speculated $\psi(4040)$
113: as a $D^*\bar{D}^*$ molecular state \cite{RGG}. T\"{o}rnqvist
114: studied the possible deuteron-like two-meson bound states such as
115: $D\bar{D}^*$ and $D^*\bar{D}^*$ using the quark-pion interaction
116: model \cite{Tornqvist}. Dubynskiy and Voloshin suggested the
117: possibility of the existence of a new resonance at the
118: $D^*\bar{D}^*$ threshold \cite{voloshin-1,voloshin}. Zhang,
119: Chiang, Shen and Zou studied the possible S-wave bound states of
120: two pseudoscalar mesons with the vector meson exchange in Ref.
121: \cite{zou}. The experimental observation of $X(3872)$ and
122: $Z^+(4430)$ motivated the extensive discussion of $X(3872)$ as a
123: $D\bar D^*$ molecular state
124: \cite{3872-Mole-1,3872-Mole-2,3872-Mole-3,3872-Mole-4,3872-Mole-5,
125: liu-3872,liu-4430-3872,YR-3872,Close-3872} and $Z^+(4430)$ as a
126: $D_1'D^*(D_1D^*)$ molecular state
127: \cite{rosner,Meng,liu-4430,liu-4430-1}.
128:
129: It's interesting to note that the $Z^+(4051)$ enhancement
130: announced by the Belle collaboration and the $X(3764)$ signal
131: reported by the BES collaboration are near the thresholds of
132: $D^*\bar D^*$ and $D\bar D$ respectively. One may wonder whether
133: they could also be candidates of heavy molecular states. In this
134: work we perform a systematic study of three types of possible
135: heavy molecular states: the $D\bar D/B\bar B$ system (P-P), the
136: $D^\ast\bar D^\ast/B^\ast\bar B^\ast$ system (V-V), and the
137: $D^\ast\bar D/B^\ast\bar B$ system (P-V) using the formalism
138: developed in Ref. \cite{liu-3872,liu-4430,liu-4430-1}.
139:
140: This paper is organized as follows. After the introduction, we
141: introduce some notations and present the flavor wave functions of
142: the S-wave P-P, V-V and P-V systems constructed by two heavy
143: flavor mesons. In Sec. \ref{sec3}, we collect the effective
144: Lagrangians in the derivation of the effective potential. Sections
145: \ref{secpp}-\ref{secpv} are for the P-P, V-V, P-V cases
146: respectively. The last section is the discussion and conclusion.
147:
148:
149:
150: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
151: \section{Flavor wave functions of heavy molecular states}\label{sec2}
152: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
153:
154: We study the possible molecular states composed of two
155: pseudoscalar (P-P) heavy mesons, two vector (V-V) heavy mesons,
156: one pseudoscalar and one vector (P-V) heavy mesons. The masses of
157: the $J^{P}=0^-,1^-$ heavy mesons are taken from PDG \cite{PDG} and
158: collected in Table \ref{mass}.
159: \begin{widetext}
160: \begin{center}
161: %\begin{ruledtabular}
162: \begin{table}[htb]
163: \begin{tabular}{c||cccc|cccccc }\hline\hline
164: &\multicolumn{4}{c}{charmed-up(down) meson }&&&&\multicolumn{2}{c}{charmed-strange meson }&\\
165: \cline{2-10}
166:
167: \raisebox{1.0ex}{$J^{P}$}&charged&mass (MeV)&neutral&mass (MeV)&
168: &&&charged&mass (MeV)\\\cline{1-10}
169:
170: $0^-$&$D^{\pm}$&1869.3& $D^{0}$&1864.5&&&&$D_s^{\pm}$&1968.2
171: \\
172: $1^-$&$D^{*\pm}$&2010.0&$D^{*0}$&2006.7&&&&$D_s^{*\pm}$&2112.0
173: \\\hline\hline
174: &\multicolumn{4}{c}{bottom-up(down) meson }&&&&\multicolumn{2}{c}{bottom-strange meson }&\\
175: \cline{2-10}
176:
177: \raisebox{1.0ex}{$J^{P}$}&charged&mass (MeV)&neutral&mass (MeV)&
178: &&&neutral&mass (MeV)\\\cline{1-10}
179:
180: $0^-$&$B^{\pm}$&5279.1& $B^{0}$&5279.5&&&&$B_s^{0}$&5365.1
181: \\
182: $1^-$&$B^{*\pm}$&5325.1&$B^{*0}$&5325.1&&&&$B_s^{*0}$&5412.0
183: \\\hline\hline
184: \end{tabular}
185: \caption{The masses of heavy mesons in the H doublet \cite{PDG}.
186: \label{mass}}
187: \end{table}
188: %\end{ruledtabular}
189: \end{center}
190: \end{widetext}
191: The P-P type is categorized as two systems, i.e. $\mathcal{D-\bar
192: D}$, $\mathcal{\bar B-B}$. Here $\mathcal{D}$, $\mathcal{\bar D}$,
193: $\mathcal{B}$ and $\mathcal{\bar B}$ denote $(D^0,D^{+},D_s^+)$,
194: $(\bar D^0,D^{-},D_s^-)$, $(B^{+},B^0,B_s^0)$ and $(B^{-},\bar
195: B^0,\bar B_s^0)$ triplets respectively. In the following, we
196: illustrate their flavor wave functions with the $\mathcal{D-\bar
197: D}$ type as an example. Since charmed mesons belong to the
198: fundamental representation of flavor $SU(3)$, the $\mathcal{D-\bar
199: D}$ system form an octet and a singlet: $3\otimes \bar
200: 3=8\oplus1$. The corresponding flavor wave functions are
201: $\Phi_{s}^{+}=\bar{D}^0 D_{s}^+$, $ \Phi^{+}=\bar{D}^0 D^+$,
202: $\Phi_{s}^{0}=D^-D_s^+$, $ \Phi^{0}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\bar{D}^0
203: D^0-D^-D^+)$, $\bar{\Phi}_s^{0}={D}_s^- D^+$,
204: $\Phi_{8}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}(\bar{D}^0D^0+D^-D^+ -2 D_s^- D_s^+)$,
205: $ \Phi^{-}={D}^- D^0$, $\Phi_{s}^{-}={D}_s^- D^0$, $
206: \Phi_1=\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}(\bar{D}^0 D^0+D^-D^+ +D_{s}^- D_s^+)$.
207: Through ideal mixing, we have
208: $\Phi_8^0=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\bar{D}^0D^0+D^-D^+)$ and $
209: \Phi_{s1}^0=D_s^-D_s^+$, where $\Phi_{8}^0$ is an isoscalar while
210: $\Phi^0$ is an isovector. The above states are shown in Fig.
211: \ref{state} and collected in Table \ref{table} together with the
212: $\mathcal{\bar B-B}$ type states. The flavor wave functions of the
213: $D^\ast\bar D^\ast$ and $B^\ast\bar B^\ast$ systems are
214: constructed similarly, which are denoted as $\Phi^{**}$ and
215: $\Omega^{**}$ respectively.
216: \begin{center}
217: \begin{figure}[htb]
218: \begin{tabular}{c}
219: \scalebox{0.5}{ \includegraphics{states.eps}}
220: \end{tabular} \caption{The molecular multiplets composed of charmed and anit-charmed mesons. \label{state}}
221: \end{figure}
222: \end{center}
223:
224: \begin{widetext}
225: \begin{center}
226: \begin{ruledtabular}
227: \begin{table}[htb]
228: \begin{tabular}{c|c||c|cccccccc}
229: \multicolumn{2}{c}{ $\mathcal{D-\bar D}$}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{
230: $\mathcal{\bar B- B}$}
231: \\\hline State& wave function&State& wave function\\\hline
232: $\Phi_s^+$&$\bar{D}^0 D_s^+$&$\Omega_s^+$&$B^+\bar{B}_{s}^0$\\
233: $\Phi^+$&$\bar{D}^0D^+$&
234: $\Omega^+$&$B^+\bar B^0$\\
235: $\Phi_s^0$&$D^-D_s^+$&$\Omega_s^0$&${B}^0 \bar B_s^0$\\
236: $\Phi^0$&$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\bar{D}^0D^0-D^-D^+)$&$\Omega^0$&$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(B^+B^--B^0\bar B^0)$\\
237: $\bar\Phi^0_s$&$D_s^-D^+$&$\bar\Omega_s^0$&${B}_s^0 \bar B^0$\\
238: $\Phi^-$&$D^-D^0$&$\Omega^-$&${B}^0 B^-$\\
239: $\Phi_s^-$&$D_s^- D^0$&$\Omega_s^-$&${B}_s^0 B^-$\\
240: $\Phi_8^0$&$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\bar{D}^0D^0+D^-D^+)$&$\Omega_8^0$&$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(B^+B^-+B^0\bar B^0)$\\
241: $\Phi_{s1}^0$&$D_s^-D_s^+$&$\Omega_{s1}^0$&$B_s^0 \bar
242: B_s^0$\\
243: \end{tabular}
244: \caption{The flavor wave functions of the $\mathcal{D-\bar D}$ and
245: $\mathcal{B-\bar B}$ systems. \label{table}}
246: \end{table}
247: \end{ruledtabular}
248: \end{center}
249: \end{widetext}
250:
251: We label the $\mathcal{D-\bar D^*}$ and $\mathcal{B-\bar B^*}$
252: systems as $\Phi^{*}$ and $\Omega^{*}$ respectively and list their
253: flavor wave function in Table \ref{table-flavor}. Here we need
254: distinguish the $C$ parity for $\Phi^{*0}$, $\Phi_{8}^{*0}$ and
255: $\Phi_{s1}^{*0}$ in the $\mathcal{D-\bar D^*}$ system and
256: $\Omega^{*0}$, $\Omega_{8}^{*0}$ and $\Omega_{s1}^{*0}$ in the
257: $\mathcal{B-\bar B^*}$ system. The parameter $c=\mp1$ corresponds
258: to $C=\pm1$ respectively as pointed out in Ref.
259: \cite{liu-3872,liu-4430}. In this work we label those states with
260: the negative charge parity with a hat such as $\hat{\Phi}^{*0}$,
261: $\hat{\Phi}_{8}^{*0}$, $\hat{\Phi}_{s1}^{*0}$,
262: $\hat{\Omega}^{*0}$, $\hat{\Omega}_{8}^{*0}$ and
263: $\hat{\Omega}_{s1}^{*0}$. The charge parity of X(3872) is
264: positive.
265:
266: \begin{widetext}
267: \begin{center}
268: \begin{ruledtabular}
269: \begin{table}[htb]
270: \begin{tabular}{c|c||c|cccccccc}
271: \multicolumn{2}{c}{ $\mathcal{D-\bar D^*}$}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{
272: $\mathcal{ B- \bar B^*}$}
273: \\\hline State& wave function&State& wave function\\\hline
274: $\Phi_s^{*+}/\hat \Phi_s^{*+}$&$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\bar{D}^{*0}
275: D_s^+ +c\,\bar{D}^0 D_{s}^{*+})$&$\Omega_s^{*+}/\hat
276: \Omega_s^{*+}$
277: &$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(B^{*+}\bar{B}_{s}^0+c\,B^{+}\bar{B}_{s}^{*0})$\\
278:
279: $\Phi^{*+}/\hat \Phi^{*+}$&$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\bar{D}^{*0} D^+
280: +c\,\bar{D}^0 D^{*+})$&
281: $\Omega^{*+}/\hat \Omega^{*+}$&$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(B^{*+}\bar{B}^0+c\,B^{+}\bar{B}^{*0})$\\
282:
283: $\Phi_s^{*0}/\hat \Phi_s^{*0} $&$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}( {D}^{*-}
284: D_s^+ +c\,{D}^-
285: D_{s}^{*+})$&$\Omega_s^{*0}/\hat \Omega_s^{*0}$&$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(B^{*0}\bar{B}_{s}^0+c\,B^{0}\bar{B}_{s}^{*0})$\\
286:
287: $\Phi^{*0}/\hat{\Phi}^{*0}$&$\frac{1}{2}[(\bar{D}^{*0}D^0-D^{*-}D^+)+c\,(\bar{D}^0D^{*0}-D^-D^{*+})]$
288: &$\Omega^{*0}/\hat{\Omega}^{*0}$&$\frac{1}{2}[(B^{*+}B^--B^{*0}\bar B^0)+c\,(B^+B^{*-}-B^0\bar B^{*0})]$\\
289:
290:
291: $\bar\Phi^{*0}_s/\hat{\bar{\Phi}}^{*0}_s
292: $&$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(D_s^{*-}D^++c\,D_s^{-}D^{*+})$
293: &$\bar\Omega_s^{*0}/\hat{\bar{\Omega}}_{s}^{*0}$&$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}({B}_s^{*0} \bar B^0 +c\,{B}_s^{0} \bar B^{*0})$\\
294:
295: $\Phi^{*-}/\hat
296: \Phi^{*-}$&$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(D^{*-}D^0+c\,D^-D^{*0})$
297: &$\Omega^{*-}/\hat \Omega^{*-}$&$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}({B}^{*0} B^-+c\,{B}^0 B^{*-})$\\
298:
299:
300: $\Phi_s^{*-}/\hat \Phi_s^{*-}$&$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(D_s^{*-}
301: D^0+c\,D_s^- D^{*0})$
302: &$\Omega_s^{*-}/\hat \Omega_s^{*-}$&$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}({B}_s^{*0} B^-+c\,{B}_s^0 B^{*-})$\\
303:
304: $\Phi_8^{*0}/\hat{\Phi}_8^{*0}$&$\frac{1}{2}[(\bar{D}^{*0}D^0+D^{*-}D^+)+c\,(\bar{D}^0D^{*0}+D^-D^{*+})]$
305: &$\Omega_8^{*0}/\hat{\Omega}_8^{*0}$&$\frac{1}{2}[(B^{*+}B^-+B^{*0}\bar B^0)+c\,(B^+B^{*-}+B^0\bar B^{*0})]$\\
306:
307: $\Phi_{s1}^{*0}/\hat{\Phi}_{s1}^{*0}$&$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(D_s^{*-}D_s^++c\,D_s^-D_s^{*+})$
308: &$\Omega_{s1}^{*0}/\hat{\Omega}_{s1}^{*0}$&$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(B_s^0
309: \bar B_s^0+c\,B_s^0 \bar
310: B_s^{*0})$\\
311: \end{tabular}
312: \caption{The flavor wave functions of the $\mathcal{D-\bar D^*}$
313: and $\mathcal{B-\bar B^*}$ systems. \label{table-flavor}}
314: \end{table}
315: \end{ruledtabular}
316: \end{center}
317: \end{widetext}
318:
319:
320:
321: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
322: \section{The Effective Lagrangian in the
323: derivation of the potential}\label{sec3}
324: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
325:
326: In the derivation of the potential, we need the the effective
327: Lagrangians, which are constructed based on the chiral symmetry
328: and heavy quark symmetry: \cite{lagrangian-hl,Casalbuoni,Falk}
329: \begin{eqnarray}
330: \mathcal{L}&=&igTr[H_b\gamma_\mu \gamma_5 \mathcal{A}_{ba}^\mu
331: \bar{H}_a]+i\beta Tr[H_b v^\mu
332: (\mathcal{V}_\mu-\rho_\mu)_{ba}\bar{H}_a]\nonumber\\&&+i\lambda
333: Tr[H_b\sigma^{\mu\nu}F_{\mu\nu}(\rho)\bar{H}_a]+g_\sigma
334: Tr[H_a\sigma \bar {H}_a],\label{all-lagrangian}
335: \end{eqnarray}
336: where the field $H$ is defined in terms of the $(0^-, 1^-)$
337: doublet
338: \begin{eqnarray}
339: H_b&=&\frac{1+\not v}{2 }[P_{b}^{*\mu}\gamma_\mu+iP_b \gamma_5].
340: \end{eqnarray}
341: $A_{ab}^{\mu}$ is the axial vector field with definition
342: \begin{eqnarray}
343: A_{ab}^{\mu}=\frac{1}{2}(\xi^{\dag}\partial^{\mu}\xi-\xi\partial^{\mu}\xi^{\dag})_{ab}=
344: \frac{i}{f_{\pi}}\partial^{\mu}\mathbb{P}_{ab}+\cdots
345: \end{eqnarray}
346: with $\xi=\exp(i\mathbb{P}/f_{\pi})$ and $f_\pi=132$ MeV. The
347: octet pseudoscalar and nonet vector meson matrices are
348: \begin{eqnarray}
349: \mathbb{P}&=&\left(\begin{array}{ccc}
350: \frac{\pi^{0}}{\sqrt{2}}+\frac{\eta}{\sqrt{6}}&\pi^{+}&K^{+}\\
351: \pi^{-}&-\frac{\pi^{0}}{\sqrt{2}}+\frac{\eta}{\sqrt{6}}&
352: K^{0}\\
353: K^- &\bar{K}^{0}&-\frac{2\eta}{\sqrt{6}}
354: \end{array}\right),
355: \end{eqnarray}
356: \begin{eqnarray}
357: \mathbb{V}&=&\left(\begin{array}{ccc}
358: \frac{\rho^{0}}{\sqrt{2}}+\frac{\omega}{\sqrt{2}}&\rho^{+}&K^{*+}\\
359: \rho^{-}&-\frac{\rho^{0}}{\sqrt{2}}+\frac{\omega}{\sqrt{2}}&
360: K^{*0}\\
361: K^{*-} &\bar{K}^{*0}&\phi
362: \end{array}\right).\label{vector}
363: \end{eqnarray}
364: The effective interaction Lagrangians at the tree level from Eq.
365: (\ref{all-lagrangian}) are
366: \begin{eqnarray} \nonumber
367: \mathcal{L}_{\mathcal{DD}\mathbb{V}}&=&-ig_{\mathcal{DD}\mathbb{V}}\left(\mathcal{D}_{a}^{\dag}\partial_\mu
368: \mathcal{D}_{b}-\mathcal{D}_{b}\partial_\mu
369: D_{a}^{\dag}\right)(\mathbb{V}^\mu)_{ab},\label{la-1} \\ \nonumber
370: \mathcal{L}_{\mathcal{DD}\sigma }&=&-2\,m_{\mathcal{D}}\,g_\sigma
371: \mathcal{D}_{a}\mathcal{D}_{a}^{\dag}\sigma,\label{la-2}\\
372: \nonumber
373: \mathcal{L}_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}\mathbb{P}}&=&\frac{1}{2}g_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}\mathbb{P}}
374: \varepsilon_{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}\left(D_{a}^{*\mu}\partial^\alpha
375: \mathcal{D}_{b}^{*\beta\dag}
376: -\mathcal{D}_{b}^{*\beta\dag}\partial^\alpha
377: \mathcal{D}_{a}^{*\mu}\right)\partial^\nu \mathbb{P}_{ab},
378: \label{la-3}\\ \nonumber \mathcal{L}_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}\mathbb{V}
379: }&=&ig_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}\mathbb{V}}\left(\mathcal{D}_{a}^{*\nu\dag}\partial^\mu
380: \mathcal{D}_{\nu,b}^{*}-\mathcal{D}_{\nu b}^{*}\partial^\mu
381: \mathcal{D}_{a}^{*\nu\dag}\right)(\mathbb{V}_\mu)_{ab}
382: +4if_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}\mathbb{V}}D_{\mu a}^{*\dag} D_{\nu
383: b}^{*}(\partial^\mu \mathbb{V}^\nu -\partial^\nu
384: \mathbb{V}^\mu)_{ab}, \label{la-4}\\ \nonumber
385: \mathcal{L}_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}\sigma
386: }&=&2\,m_{\mathcal{D}^*}\,g_\sigma \mathcal{D}_{a}^{*\alpha}
387: \mathcal{D}_{\alpha a}^{*\dag}\sigma,\label{la-5}\\ \nonumber
388: \mathcal{L}_{\mathcal{D^*D}\mathbb{P}}&=&-ig_{\mathcal{D^*D}\mathbb{P}}\left(
389: \mathcal{D}_{a}\mathcal{D}_{\mu b}^{*\dagger}-\mathcal{D}_{\mu
390: a}^{*}\mathcal{D}^{\dagger}_b
391: \right)\partial^{\mu}\mathbb{P}_{ab},\label{la-6}\\ \nonumber
392: \mathcal{L}_{\mathcal{D^*D}\mathbb{V}}&=&-2f_{{\mathcal{D}^{*}\mathcal{D}\mathbb{V}}}
393: \varepsilon_{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}\left(\partial^{\mu}\mathbb{V}^{\nu}\right)_{ab}\left[\left(\mathcal{D}_{a}^{\dagger}
394: {\partial}^{\alpha}\mathcal{D}^{*\beta}_{b}-{\partial}^{\alpha}\mathcal{D}_{a}^{\dagger}
395: \mathcal{D}^{*\beta}_{b}\right)-\left(\mathcal{D}_{a}^{*\beta\dagger}
396: {\partial}^{\alpha}\mathcal{D}_{b}-{\partial}^{\alpha}\mathcal{D}_{a}^{*\beta\dagger}
397: \mathcal{D}_{b}\right)\right],\label{la-7}
398: \end{eqnarray}
399: where $\mathcal{D^{(*)}}$=(($\bar{D}^{0})^{(*)}$, $(D^{-})^{(*)}$,
400: $(D_{s}^{-})^{(*)}$). The relevant coupling constants are
401: \begin{eqnarray}
402: g_{{\mathcal{D}^{*}\mathcal{D}^{*}\mathbb{P}}}&=&\frac{g_{\mathcal{D}^*\mathcal{D}\mathbb{P}}}{\sqrt{m_{\mathcal{D}}m_{\mathcal{D}^*}}}=\frac{2g}{f_{\pi}},
403: \;\;\;g_{{\mathcal{DD}\mathbb
404: V}}=g_{{\mathcal{D}^{*}\mathcal{D}^{*}\mathbb V}}=\frac{\beta
405: g_{{V}}}{\sqrt{2}},\nonumber\\
406: f_{{\mathcal{D}^{*}\mathcal{D}\mathbb{V}}}&=&\frac{f_{{\mathcal{D}^{*}\mathcal{D}^{*}\mathbb{V}}}}{m_{{\mathcal{D}^*}}}=\frac{\lambda
407: g_{{V}}}{\sqrt{2}},\;\;\;
408: g_{{V}}=\frac{m_{_{\rho}}}{f_{\pi}},\;\;\;g_{\sigma}=\frac{g_{\pi}}{2\sqrt{6}},\label{para}
409: \end{eqnarray}
410: where $g_{_{V}},\;\beta$ and $\lambda$ are parameters in the
411: effective chiral Lagrangian that describe the interaction of heavy
412: mesons with light vector mesons \cite{Casalbuoni}. Following Ref.
413: \cite{Isola}, we take $g=0.59$, $\beta=0.9$ and $\lambda=0.56$
414: $\mathrm{GeV}^{-1}$. $g_{\pi}=3.73$ \cite{Falk}.
415:
416: In this work, we adopt the same formalism developed in Refs.
417: \cite{liu-3872,liu-4430,liu-4430-1} to derive the effective
418: potential. We compute the amplitudes of the elastic scattering of
419: two heavy mesons using the above effective Lagrangians. In order
420: to account for the structure effect of every interaction vertex,
421: we introduce the monopole type form factor (FF)
422: \cite{Tornqvist,FF}
423: \begin{eqnarray}
424: F(q)=\frac{\Lambda^2-m^2}{\Lambda^2-q^2}\; .\label{FFF}
425: \end{eqnarray}
426: Here $\Lambda$ is the phenomenological parameter around 1 GeV, and
427: $q$ denotes the four-momentum of the exchanged meson. The FF also
428: plays the role of regularizing the potential by imposing a
429: short-distance cutoff to cure the singularity of the effective
430: potential. Then we impose the constraint that the initial states
431: and final states should have the same angular momentum. After
432: averaging the potentials obtained with the Breit approximation in
433: the momentum space, we finally perform Fourier transformation to
434: derive the potentials in the coordinate space. In the following
435: sections, we illustrate the effective potentials in detail for the
436: P-P, V-V and P-V systems.
437:
438:
439:
440:
441: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
442: \section{The $\mathcal{D}-\bar{\mathcal{D}}$ case}\label{secpp}
443: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
444:
445: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
446: \subsection{The potential of the P-P system}
447: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
448:
449: The quantum number of the S-wave $\mathcal{D-\bar D}$ system is
450: $J^P=0^+$ and the C parity of the neutral states is positive. In
451: this work we consider the possible molecular states bound by the
452: force from the light pseudoscalar meson, vector meson and scalar
453: exchange. Parity and angular momentum conservation forbid the
454: exchange of a pseudoscalar meson between the $\mathcal{D-\bar D}$
455: pair. No suitable meson exchange is allowed for the $\Phi_s^{\pm}$
456: and $\Phi_s^0(\bar\Phi_s^0)$ cases. For the other states, the
457: effective potentials in the momentum space from the vector meson
458: and $\sigma$ meson exchange are
459: \begin{eqnarray}
460: \mathcal{V}_{_{\mathbb{V}}}(\textbf{q})\left[I_1^{\mathbb{V}\mathcal{D}_1\mathcal{D}_1}
461: ,I_2^{\mathbb{V}\mathcal{ D}_2 \mathcal{
462: D}_2},m_{\mathcal{D}_1},m_{\mathcal{ D}_2},m_\mathbb{V}\right]
463: &=&-g_{\mathcal{DD}\mathbb{V}}^2\,\,I_1^{\mathbb{V}\mathcal{D}_1\mathcal{D}_1}
464: I_2^{\mathbb{V}\mathcal{ D}_2\mathcal{ D}_2}\left
465: (\frac{1}{\textbf{q}^2+m_\mathbb{V}^2}+\frac{\textbf{q}^2}{4m_{\mathcal{D}_1}
466: m_{\mathcal{ D}_2} m_\mathbb{V}^2}\right
467: ),\label{pp1}\\
468: \mathcal{V}_\sigma(\textbf{q})&=&- {g_\sigma^2}
469: \frac{1}{\textbf{q}^2+m_\sigma^2},\label{pp2}
470: \end{eqnarray}
471: where $m_{\mathcal{D}}$ and $m_{\mathbb{V}}$ denote the masses of
472: charmed meson and exchanged vector meson respectively.
473: $I_1^{\mathbb{V}\mathcal{D}_1\mathcal{D}_1}$ and
474: $I_2^{\mathbb{V}\mathcal{ D}_2\mathcal{ D}_2}$ arise from the
475: coefficients related to the exchanged meson, which can be read
476: from the nonet vector meson matrix in Eq. (\ref{vector}). After
477: making the Fourier transformation, the three independent
478: structures in Eqs. (\ref{pp1})-(\ref{pp2}) read as
479: \begin{eqnarray}
480: &&\quad\,\,\mathbf{q}^2\quad\,\,\longrightarrow X(\Lambda,m,r),\\
481: &&\frac{1}{\mathbf{q}^2+m^2}\longrightarrow Y(\Lambda,m,r),\\
482: &&\frac{\mathbf{q}^2}{\mathbf{q}^2+m^2}\longrightarrow
483: Z(\Lambda,m,r)\; ,
484: \end{eqnarray}
485: where
486: \begin{eqnarray}
487: Y[\Lambda,m,r]&=&\frac{1}{4\pi r}\left(e^{-mr}-e^{-\Lambda
488: r}\right)-\frac{\xi^2}{8\pi \Lambda}e^{-\Lambda r},\\
489: Z[\Lambda,m,r]&=&-\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}\left(r^2\frac{\partial}{\partial r}\right)Y[\Lambda,m,r],\\
490: X[\Lambda,m,r]&=&\left[-\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial}{\partial
491: r}\left(r^2\frac{\partial}{\partial
492: r}\right)+m^2\right]Z[\Lambda,m,r]
493: \end{eqnarray}
494: with $\xi=\sqrt{\Lambda^2-m^2}$. We have adopted the monopole FF
495: in Eq. (\ref{FFF}) to regularize the potential in Eqs.
496: (\ref{pp1})-(\ref{pp2}). Now the effective potentials in the
497: coordinate space read
498: \begin{eqnarray}
499: \mathcal{V}_{_{\mathbb{V}}}(r)\left[I_1^{\mathbb{V}\mathcal{D}_1\mathcal{D}_1}
500: ,I_2^{\mathbb{V}\mathcal{ D}_2\mathcal{
501: D}_2},m_{\mathcal{D}_1},m_{\mathcal{ D}_2},m_\mathbb{V}\right]
502: &=&-g_{\mathcal{DD}\mathbb{V}}^2I_1^{\mathbb{V}\mathcal{D}_1\mathcal{D}_1}
503: I_2^{\mathbb{V}\mathcal{ D}_2\mathcal{ D}_2}\left
504: (Y[\Lambda,m_{\mathbb{V}},r]+\frac{X[\Lambda,m_{\mathbb{V}},r]}{4m_{\mathcal{D}_1}
505: m_{\mathcal{ D}_2} m_\mathbb{V}^2}\right
506: ),\label{ppr1}\\
507: \mathcal{V}_\sigma(r)&=&- {g_\sigma^2}
508: Y[\Lambda,m_{\sigma},r].\label{ppr2}
509: \end{eqnarray}
510: The exchange potential for $\Phi^\pm$ in coordinate space is
511: \begin{eqnarray}
512: \mathcal{V}(r)_{Total}^{\Phi^\pm}&=&\mathcal{V}_{\mathbb{V}}(r)
513: \left[\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},m_{D^0},m_{D^{+}},m_{\rho^0}\right]+\mathcal{V}_{\mathbb{V}}(r)
514: \left[\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},m_{D^0},m_{D^{+}},m_{\omega}\right]+\mathcal{V}_{\sigma}(r)\nonumber
515: \\&\approx&-g_{\mathcal{DD}\mathbb{V}}^2\left[\frac{Y[\Lambda,m_{\omega},r]}{2}-\frac{Y[\Lambda,m_{\rho},r]}{2}
516: -\frac{X[\Lambda,m_{\rho},r]}{8m_{D}^2m_{\rho}^2}+\frac{X[\Lambda,m_{\omega},r]}{8m_{D}^2m_{\omega}^2}\right]
517: - {g_\sigma^2} Y[\Lambda,m_{\sigma},r].\label{ppr-1}
518: \end{eqnarray}
519: The symbol "$\approx$" means the $SU(2)$ symmetry is assumed. For
520: the $\Phi^0$ and $\Phi_8^0$ states, the exchange potentials are
521: \begin{eqnarray}
522: \mathcal{V}(r)^{\Phi^0(\Phi_8^0)}_{Total}&=& \frac{1}{2}\Bigg\{
523: \mathcal{V}_{\mathbb{V}}(r)
524: \left[\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},m_{D^0},m_{D^{0}},m_{\rho^0}\right]
525: \mp2\mathcal{V}_{\mathbb{V}}(r)
526: \left[1,1,{m_{D^0}},m_{D^+},m_{\rho^\pm}\right]
527: \nonumber\\&&+\mathcal{V}_{\mathbb{V}}(r)
528: \left[-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},m_{D^+},m_{D^{-}},m_{\rho^0}\right]+
529: \mathcal{V}_{\mathbb{V}}(r)
530: \left[\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},m_{D^0},m_{D^{0}},m_{\omega}\right]\nonumber\\&&
531: + \mathcal{V}_{\mathbb{V}}(r)
532: \left[\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},m_{D^+},m_{D^{-}},m_{\omega}\right]
533: + 2\mathcal{V}_{\sigma}(r)\Bigg\}\nonumber\\&\approx&-
534: \frac{g_{\mathcal{DD}\mathbb{V}}^2}{2}(1\mp2)\left
535: (Y[\Lambda,m_{\rho},r]+\frac{X[\Lambda,m_{\rho},r]}{4m_{{D}}^2
536: m_{\rho}^2}\right )-\frac{g_{\mathcal{DD}\mathbb{V}}^2}{2}\left
537: (Y[\Lambda,m_{\omega},r]+\frac{X[\Lambda,m_{\omega},r]}{4m_{{D}}^2
538: m_{\omega}^2}\right )\nonumber\\&&-{g_\sigma^2}
539: Y[\Lambda,m_{\sigma},r] .\label{ppr-3}
540: \end{eqnarray}
541: Clearly the potential of $\Phi_{0}$ is the same as that of
542: $\Phi^{\pm}$ due to the SU(2) symmetry. The effective potential of
543: $\Phi_{s1}^0$ is
544: \begin{eqnarray}
545: \mathcal{V}(r)_{Total}^{\Phi_{s1}^0}&=&\mathcal{V}_{\mathbb{V}}(r)
546: \left[1,1,m_{D_s},m_{D_s},m_{\phi}\right]\nonumber\\&=&
547: -g_{\mathcal{DD}\mathbb{V}}^2\left
548: (Y[\Lambda,m_{\phi},r]+\frac{X[\Lambda,m_{\phi},r]}{4m_{{D}_s}^2
549: m_{\phi}^2}\right ),\label{ppr-2}
550: \end{eqnarray}
551: where only the $\phi$ meson exchange is allowed.
552:
553:
554:
555:
556: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
557: \subsection{Numerical results for the P-P system}\label{result-pp}
558: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
559:
560: The input parameters include the coupling constants in Eq.
561: (\ref{para}), the masses of heavy mesons listed in Table
562: \ref{mass}, and the exchanged meson masses $m_{\pi}=139.5$ MeV,
563: $m_{\rho}=775.5$ MeV, $m_{\sigma}=600$ MeV, $m_{\eta}=547.5$ MeV,
564: $m_{\omega}=782.7$ MeV and $m_{\phi}=1019.5$ MeV.
565:
566: We first plot the variation of the effective potentials of the
567: $\mathcal{D-\bar D}$ system with the cutoff $\Lambda=1$ GeV in
568: Fig. \ref{PP-potential}. For the $\Phi^{\pm}(\Phi^0)$ state, there
569: exist the $\rho$, $\omega$ and $\sigma$ meson exchanges. The
570: $\rho$ exchange force is repulsive while both the $\omega$ and
571: $\sigma$ meson exchange forces are attractive. The $\rho$ and
572: $\omega$ exchange forces cancel each other almost exactly. Thus
573: the total potential is attractive. For the state $\Phi_{s1}^0$,
574: the $\phi$ meson exchange potential is attractive. The exchange
575: potentials of $\rho$, $\omega$ and $\sigma$ mesons all are
576: attractive for $\Phi_8^0$. Thus its total effective potential is
577: attractive.
578:
579:
580: \begin{center}
581: \begin{figure}[htb]
582: \begin{tabular}{ccc}
583: \scalebox{0.56}{\includegraphics{PP-phi-pm.eps}}&
584: \scalebox{0.56}{\includegraphics{PP-s.eps}}&
585: \scalebox{0.56}{\includegraphics{PP-phi-80.eps}}\\(a)&(b)&(c)\\
586: \end{tabular}
587: \caption{Diagrams (a), (b) and (c) give respectively the variation
588: of potentials of $\Phi^{\pm}(\Phi)^{0}$, $\Phi_{s1}^0$ and
589: $\Phi_8^0$ states on $r$. \label{PP-potential}}
590: \end{figure}
591: \end{center}
592:
593:
594:
595:
596:
597:
598:
599:
600: We adopt the MATSLISE package to solve the Schr\"{o}dinger
601: equation with the effective potentials of $\Phi^{\pm}(\Phi^0)$,
602: $\Phi_{s1}^0$ and $\Phi_8^0$ states. MATSLISE is a graphical
603: Matlab software package for the numerical study of regular
604: Sturm-Liouville problems, one-dimensional Schr\"{o}dinger
605: equations and radial Schr\"{o}dinger equations with a distorted
606: coulomb potential. It allows the fast and accurate computation of
607: the eigenvalues and the visualization of the corresponding
608: eigenfunctions \cite{matslise}.
609:
610: The binding energies with typical values of $\Lambda$ for
611: $\Phi^{\pm}(\Phi^0)$, $\Phi_{s1}^0$ and $\Phi_8^0$ are presented
612: in Table \ref{DD}, if there exists the solution by solving
613: Schr\"{o}dinger equation. $r_{\mathrm{rms}}$ denotes the
614: root-mean-square radius with the unit of fm. For
615: $\Phi^{\pm}(\Phi^0)$, we can not find bound state solutions in the
616: range of $\Lambda<10$ GeV, which indicates $\Phi^{\pm}(\Phi^0)$
617: does not exist. For both $\Phi_{s1}^0$ and $\Phi_8^0$, there exist
618: bound state solutions with $\Lambda$ around $0.5$ GeV. When the
619: binding energy $E$ becomes smaller, the $r_{\mathrm rms}$ becomes
620: larger. Similar observations hold for the $B-\bar B$ system. Now
621: the reduced masses of $\Omega_{s1}^0$ and $\Omega_8^0$ are
622: heavier. Hence the kinetic term is smaller. $\Omega_{s1}^0$ and
623: $\Omega_8^0$ states appear with a larger $\Lambda$ around 1.1 GeV.
624: As an example, we show the dependence of the binding energy of
625: $\Phi_{s1}^0$ on $\Lambda$ in Fig. \ref{PP-Phi_s1}. Moreover, we
626: increase and reduce both the vector coupling constant and scalar
627: coupling constant by a factor of two to see the variation of the
628: binding energy and the cutoff parameter. The numerical results are
629: collected in Tables \ref{DD-2-times} and \ref{DD-half-times}.
630:
631:
632:
633: \begin{center}
634: \begin{ruledtabular}
635: \begin{table}[htb]
636: \begin{tabular}{c||ccccccccc}
637: &\multicolumn{3}{c}{$\mathcal{D-\bar D}$} \\\hline State&$\Lambda$
638: (GeV)&$E$ (MeV)& $r_{\mathrm{rms}}$ (fm)\\\hline
639: $\Phi^{\pm}(\Phi^0)$&-&-&-\\\hline
640: {$\Phi^0_{s1}$}&0.58&-10.14&1.84\\ % a=0.00001 b=50 tol= 1e-8
641: &0.60&-3.46&2.80\\\hline % a=0.00001 b=50 tol= 1e-10
642: {$\Phi_8^0$}&0.50&-23.42&1.44\\ % a=0.00001 b=100 tol= 1e-10
643: &0.53&-4.93&2.52\\ % a=0.00001 b=100 tol= 1e-10
644: \hline
645: &\multicolumn{3}{c}{$\mathcal{B-\bar B}$} \\\hline State&$\Lambda$
646: (GeV)&$E$ (MeV)& $r_{\mathrm{rms}}$ (fm)\\\hline
647: $\Omega^{\pm}(\Omega^0)$&-&-&-\\\hline {$\Omega^0_{s1}$}
648: &0.70&-9.24&1.84\\ % a=0.00001 b=50 tol= 1e-8
649: &0.72&-1.78&2.86\\ \hline % a=0.00001 b=50 tol= 1e-8
650: {$\Omega_8^0$}&1.10&-7.13&1.95\\ % a=0.00001 b=50 tol= 1e-10
651: &1.15&-23.34&1.23\\ % a=0.00001 b=50 tol= 1e-10
652: \end{tabular}
653: \caption{The bound state solutions for $\Phi^{\pm}(\Phi^0)$,
654: $\Phi_{s1}^0$ and $\Phi_8^0$ and $\Omega^{\pm}(\Omega^0)$,
655: $\Omega_{s1}^0$ and $\Omega_8^0$.\label{DD}}
656: \end{table}
657: \end{ruledtabular}
658: \end{center}
659:
660: \begin{center}
661: \begin{figure}[htb]
662: \begin{tabular}{c}
663: \scalebox{0.6}{ \includegraphics{E-Lambda-PP-Phi_s1.eps}}
664: \end{tabular} \caption{The dependence of $E$ on $\Lambda$ for $\Phi_{s1}^0$. \label{PP-Phi_s1}}
665: \end{figure}
666: \end{center}
667:
668:
669: \begin{center}
670: \begin{ruledtabular}
671: \begin{table}[htb]
672: \begin{tabular}{c||ccccccccc}
673: &\multicolumn{3}{c}{$\mathcal{D-\bar D}$} \\\hline State&$\Lambda$
674: (GeV)&$E$ (MeV)& $r_{\mathrm{rms}}$ (fm)\\\hline
675: $\Phi^{\pm}(\Phi^0)$&-&-&-\\\hline
676: {$\Phi^0_{s1}$}&0.72&-23.00&1.30\\ % a=0.00001 b=50 tol= 1e-8
677: &0.74&-8.16&1.90\\\hline % a=0.00001 b=50 tol= 1e-10
678: {$\Phi_8^0$}&0.60&-37.20&1.17\\ % a=0.00001 b=100 tol= 1e-10
679: &0.62&-11.39&1.77\\ % a=0.00001 b=100 tol= 1e-10
680: \hline
681: &\multicolumn{3}{c}{$\mathcal{B-\bar B}$} \\\hline State&$\Lambda$
682: (GeV)&$E$ (MeV)& $r_{\mathrm{rms}}$ (fm)\\\hline
683: $\Omega^{\pm}(\Omega^0)$&-&-&-\\\hline {$\Omega^0_{s1}$}
684: &0.82&-16.70&1.44\\ % a=0.00001 b=50 tol= 1e-8
685: &0.83&-7.69&1.92\\ \hline % a=0.00001 b=50 tol= 1e-8
686: {$\Omega_8^0$}&0.91&-11.84&1.66\\ % a=0.00001 b=50 tol= 1e-10
687: &0.92&-21.27&1.32\\ % a=0.00001 b=50 tol= 1e-10
688: \end{tabular}
689: \caption{The bound state solutions for $\Phi^{\pm}(\Phi^0)$,
690: $\Phi_{s1}^0$ and $\Phi_8^0$ and $\Omega^{\pm}(\Omega^0)$,
691: $\Omega_{s1}^0$ and $\Omega_8^0$ if we increase the coupling
692: constants by a factor of two.\label{DD-2-times}}
693: \end{table}
694: \end{ruledtabular}
695: \end{center}
696:
697: \begin{center}
698: \begin{ruledtabular}
699: \begin{table}[htb]
700: \begin{tabular}{c||ccccccccc}
701: &\multicolumn{3}{c}{$\mathcal{D-\bar D}$} \\\hline State&$\Lambda$
702: (GeV)&$E$ (MeV)& $r_{\mathrm{rms}}$ (fm)\\\hline
703: $\Phi^{\pm}(\Phi^0)$&-&-&-\\\hline
704: {$\Phi^0_{s1}$}&0.38&-24.49&1.50\\ % a=0.00001 b=50 tol= 1e-8
705: &0.39&-18.89&1.63\\\hline % a=0.00001 b=50 tol= 1e-10
706: {$\Phi_8^0$}&0.38&-15.38&1.78\\ % a=0.00001 b=100 tol= 1e-10
707: &0.39&-10.61&2.02\\ % a=0.00001 b=100 tol= 1e-10
708: \hline
709: &\multicolumn{3}{c}{$\mathcal{B-\bar B}$} \\\hline State&$\Lambda$
710: (GeV)&$E$ (MeV)& $r_{\mathrm{rms}}$ (fm)\\\hline
711: $\Omega^{\pm}(\Omega^0)$&-&-&-\\\hline {$\Omega^0_{s1}$}
712: &0.50&-30.69&1.29\\ % a=0.00001 b=50 tol= 1e-8
713: &0.52&-17.64&1.55\\ \hline % a=0.00001 b=50 tol= 1e-8
714: {$\Omega_8^0$}&0.46&-29.24&1.37\\ % a=0.00001 b=50 tol= 1e-10
715: &0.48&-14.15&1.73\\ % a=0.00001 b=50 tol= 1e-10
716: \end{tabular}
717: \caption{The bound state solutions for $\Phi^{\pm}(\Phi^0)$,
718: $\Phi_{s1}^0$ and $\Phi_8^0$ and $\Omega^{\pm}(\Omega^0)$,
719: $\Omega_{s1}^0$ and $\Omega_8^0$ if we reduce the coupling
720: constants by a factor of two.\label{DD-half-times}}
721: \end{table}
722: \end{ruledtabular}
723: \end{center}
724:
725:
726:
727: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
728: \section{The $\mathcal{D}^\ast-\bar{\mathcal{D}}^\ast$ case}\label{secvv}
729: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
730:
731: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
732: \subsection{The potential of the V-V system}
733: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
734:
735: The possible quantum numbers of the S-wave V-V system are
736: $J^{P}=1^+, 1^+, 2^+$. The $C$ parity is $+$ for the neutral
737: states. The exchanged mesons include the pseudoscalar, vector and
738: $\sigma$ mesons. The exchange potential reads
739: \begin{eqnarray}
740: \mathcal{V}_\mathbb{P}^{[J]}(\textbf{q})\left[I_1^{\mathbb{P}\mathcal{D}^*_1\mathcal{D}^*_1}
741: ,I_2^{\mathbb{P}\mathcal{ D}^*_2 \mathcal{
742: D}^*_2},m_{\mathcal{D}^*_1},m_{\mathcal{
743: D}^*_2},m_\mathbb{P}\right]&=&\frac{1}{4}\,g_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}\mathbb{P}}^2
744: \,\,I_1^{\mathbb{P}\mathcal{{D}}_1^*\mathcal{{D}}_1^*}\,I_2^{\mathbb{P}\mathcal{{D}}_2^*\mathcal{{D}}_2^*}
745: \,\mathcal{A}[J]\,\frac{\textbf{q}^2}{\textbf{q}^2+m_\mathbb{P}^2}\label{vvp1}
746: \end{eqnarray}
747: for the pseudoscalar meson exchange and
748: \begin{eqnarray}
749: &&\mathcal{V}^{[J]}_\mathbb{V}(\textbf{q})\left[I_1^{\mathbb{V}\mathcal{D}^*_1\mathcal{D}^*_1}
750: ,I_2^{\mathbb{V}\mathcal{ D}^*_2 \mathcal{
751: D}^*_2},m_{\mathcal{D}^*_1},m_{\mathcal{
752: D}^*_2},m_\mathbb{V}\right]\nonumber\\&&\quad\quad=-I_1^{\mathbb{V}\mathcal{{D}}_1^*\mathcal{{D}}_1^*}
753: \,I_2^{\mathbb{V}\mathcal{{D}}_2^*\mathcal{{D}}_2^*}
754: \Bigg[\frac{g_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}\mathbb{V}}^2}{4m_{\mathcal{D}_1^*}m_{\mathcal{
755: D}_2^*}}
756: \,\mathcal{C}[J]\,\frac{\textbf{q}^2}{m_\mathbb{V}^2}+g_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}
757: \mathbb{V}}^2\,\mathcal{C}[J]\,\frac{1}{\mathbf{q}^2+m_{\mathbb
758: V}^2}+\frac{4f_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}\mathbb{V}}^2}{m_{\mathcal{D}_1^*}m_{\mathcal{
759: D}_2^*}}\,\mathcal{B}[J]\,\frac{\textbf{q}^2}
760: {\textbf{q}^2+m_\mathbb{V}^2}\Bigg]\label{vvp-2}
761: \end{eqnarray}
762: for the vector meson exchange. For the $\sigma$ exchange,
763: \begin{eqnarray}
764: \mathcal{V}^{[J]}_\sigma(\textbf{q}) &=&- {g_\sigma^2}
765: \,\mathcal{C}[J]\,\frac{1}{\textbf{q}^2+m_\sigma^2}\label{vvp-3}
766: \end{eqnarray}
767: with
768: \begin{eqnarray}
769: \mathcal{A}[J]&\equiv&\sum_{\lambda_1\lambda_2\lambda_3\lambda_4}\langle
770: 1\lambda_1;1\lambda_2|J,m\rangle\langle1\lambda_3;1\lambda_4|J,m\rangle\frac{1}{\textbf{q}^2}
771: \left[\epsilon_1^{\lambda_{1}}\cdot
772: (\textbf{q}\times\epsilon_3^{*\lambda_{3}})\,\epsilon_2^{\lambda_{2}}\cdot(\textbf{q}\times\epsilon_4^{*\lambda_{4}})\right],\\
773: \mathcal{B}[J]&\equiv&\sum_{\lambda_1\lambda_2\lambda_3\lambda_4}\langle
774: 1\lambda_1;1\lambda_2|J,m\rangle\langle1\lambda_3;1\lambda_4|J,m\rangle\frac{1}{\textbf{q}^2}[(\epsilon_1\cdot\textbf{q})
775: (\epsilon_2\cdot\textbf{q})(\epsilon^*_3\cdot\epsilon^*_4)+(c.t.s)],\\
776: \mathcal{C}[J]&\equiv&\sum_{\lambda_1\lambda_2\lambda_3\lambda_4}\langle
777: 1\lambda_1;1\lambda_2|J,m\rangle\langle1\lambda_3;1
778: \lambda_4|J,m\rangle\left(\epsilon_1^{\lambda_1}
779: \cdot\epsilon_3^{*\lambda_3}\right)\left(\epsilon_2^{\lambda_2}\cdot\epsilon_4^{*\lambda_4}\right),
780: \end{eqnarray}
781: where $\epsilon_i$ is the polarization vector, and $c.t.s$ denotes
782: the cross-terms, i.e. $-(\epsilon_1\cdot\textbf{q})
783: (\epsilon_4^*\cdot\textbf{q})(\epsilon_2\cdot\epsilon_3^*)$,
784: $(\epsilon_3^*\cdot\textbf{q})
785: (\epsilon_4^*\cdot\textbf{q})(\epsilon_1\cdot\epsilon_2)$ and
786: $-(\epsilon_3^*\cdot\textbf{q})
787: (\epsilon_2\cdot\textbf{q})(\epsilon_1\cdot\epsilon_4^*)$. When
788: considering the different systems with $J^{P}=0^+, 1^+, 2^+$, we
789: impose the constraint on the scattering amplitudes that the
790: initial states and final states should have the same angular
791: momentum. Then we average the potential in the momentum space,
792: i.e., making the substitutions ${q_{x,y,z}^2\to {q^2}/{3}}$. The
793: coefficients of $\mathcal{A}(J)$, $\mathcal{B}(J)$ and
794: $\mathcal{C}(J)$ are listed into Table \ref{coeff}.
795: \begin{center}
796: \begin{ruledtabular}
797: \begin{table}[htb]
798: \begin{tabular}{c||ccc}
799: $J$&$\mathcal{A}(J)$&$\mathcal{B}(J)$&$\mathcal{C}(J)$\\\hline
800: 0&2/3&4/3&1\\
801: 1&1/3&2/3&1\\
802: 2&-1/3&-2/3&1\\
803: \end{tabular}
804: \caption{The values of $\mathcal{A}(J)$, $\mathcal{B}(J)$ and
805: $\mathcal{C}(J)$ for the cases of $J^{P}=0^+, 1^+, 2^+$
806: systems.\label{coeff}}
807: \end{table}
808: \end{ruledtabular}
809: \end{center}
810: After Fourier transformation, we get the potentials in the
811: coordinate space
812: \begin{eqnarray}
813: \mathcal{V}_\mathbb{P}^{[J]}(r)\left[I_1^{\mathbb{P}\mathcal{D}^*_1\mathcal{D}^*_1}
814: ,I_2^{\mathbb{P}\mathcal{D}^*_2 \mathcal{
815: D}^*_2},m_{\mathcal{D}^*_1},m_{\mathcal{
816: D}^*_2},m_\mathbb{P}\right]&=&\frac{1}{4}g_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}\mathbb{P}}^2
817: \,\,I_1^{\mathbb{P}\mathcal{{D}}_1^*\mathcal{{D}}_1^*}\,I_2^{\mathbb{P}\mathcal{{D}}_2^*\mathcal{{D}}_2^*}
818: \,\mathcal{A}[J]\,Z[\Lambda,m_\mathbb{P},r],
819: \end{eqnarray}
820: \begin{eqnarray}
821: &&\mathcal{V}^{[J]}_\mathbb{V}(r)\left[I_1^{\mathbb{V}\mathcal{D}^*_1\mathcal{D}^*_1}
822: ,I_2^{\mathbb{V}\mathcal{ D}^*_2 \mathcal{
823: D}^*_2},m_{\mathcal{D}^*_1},m_{\mathcal{
824: D}^*_2},m_\mathbb{V}\right]\nonumber\\&&\quad\quad=-I_1^{\mathbb{V}\mathcal{{D}}_1^*\mathcal{{D}}_1^*}
825: \,I_2^{\mathbb{V}\mathcal{{D}}_2^*\mathcal{{D}}_2^*}
826: \Bigg[\frac{g_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}\mathbb{V}}^2}{4m_{\mathcal{D}_1^*}m_{\mathcal{
827: D}_2^*}}
828: \,\mathcal{C}[J]\,\frac{1}{m_\mathbb{V}^2}X[\Lambda,m_\mathbb{V},r]+g_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}
829: \mathbb{V}}^2\,\mathcal{C}[J]\,Y[\Lambda,m_\mathbb{V},r]
830: \nonumber\\&&\quad\quad\quad+\frac{4f_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}\mathbb{V}}^2}{m_{\mathcal{D}_1^*}m_{\mathcal{
831: D}_2^*}}\,\mathcal{B}[J]\,Z[\Lambda,m_\mathbb{V},r]\Bigg],
832: \end{eqnarray}
833: \begin{eqnarray}
834: \mathcal{V}_\sigma(r)^{[J]} &=&- {g_\sigma^2}
835: \,\mathcal{C}[J]\,Y[\Lambda,m_\sigma,r].
836: \end{eqnarray}
837: The total effective potentials for the $\Phi_s^{**\pm}$ and
838: $\Phi_s^0(\bar\Phi_s^0)$ states are
839: \begin{eqnarray}
840: \mathcal{V}(r)_{Total}^{\Phi_s^\pm
841: [J]}&=&\mathcal{V}^{[J]}_{\mathbb{P}}(r)
842: \left[\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}},-\frac{2}{\sqrt{6}},m_{D^{*0}},m_{D_s^*},m_{\eta}\right],
843: \end{eqnarray}
844: \begin{eqnarray}
845: \mathcal{V}(r)_{Total}^{\Phi_s^0(\bar\Phi_s^0)[J]}&=&\mathcal{V}^{[J]}_{\mathbb{P}}(r)
846: \left[\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}},-\frac{2}{\sqrt{6}},m_{D^{*+}},m_{D_s^*},m_{\eta}\right],
847: \end{eqnarray}
848: where only the $\eta$ meson exchange is allowed. Considering the
849: SU(2) symmetry, one further gets
850: \begin{eqnarray}
851: \mathcal{V}(r)_{Total}^{\Phi_s^\pm
852: [J]}&\approx&\mathcal{V}(r)_{Total}^{\Phi_s^0(\bar\Phi_s^0)[J]}=
853: -\frac{1}{12}\,g_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}\mathbb{P}}^2
854: \,\,\mathcal{A}[J]\,Z[\Lambda,m_\eta,r].\label{vv-1}
855: \end{eqnarray}
856: For the $\Phi_{s1}^{**0}$ state, the potential is
857: \begin{eqnarray}
858: \mathcal{V}(r)_{Total}^{\Phi_{s1}^{**0}[J]}&=&\mathcal{V}^{[J]}_{\mathbb{P}}(r)
859: \left[-\frac{2}{\sqrt{6}},-\frac{2}{\sqrt{6}},m_{D_s^{*}},m_{D_s^*},m_{\eta}\right]+
860: \mathcal{V}^{[J]}_{\mathbb{V}}(r)
861: \left[1,1,m_{D^{*}_s},m_{D^{*}_s},m_{\phi}\right]\nonumber\\
862: &=&\frac{1}{6}g_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}\mathbb{P}}^2\,\mathcal{A}[J]Z[\Lambda,m_{\eta},r]
863: -
864: \Bigg[\frac{g_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}\mathbb{V}}^2}{4m_{\mathcal{D}_s^*}^2m_\phi^2}
865: \,\mathcal{C}[J]\,X[\Lambda,m_\phi,r]+g_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}
866: \mathbb{V}}^2\,\mathcal{C}[J]\,Y[\Lambda,m_\phi,r]
867: \nonumber\\&&+\frac{4f_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}\mathbb{V}}^2}{m_{\mathcal{D}_s^*}^2}\,\mathcal{B}[J]\,
868: Z[\Lambda,m_\phi,r]\Bigg].\label{vv-4}
869: \end{eqnarray}
870: For $\Phi^{**\pm}$, the exchange potential reads
871: \begin{eqnarray}
872: \mathcal{V}(r)_{Total}^{\Phi^{**\pm}[J]}&=&\mathcal{V}^{[J]}_{\mathbb{P}}(r)
873: \left[\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},m_{D^{*0}},m_{D^{*+}},m_{\pi}\right]+\mathcal{V}^{[J]}_{\mathbb{P}}(r)
874: \left[\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}},\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}},m_{D^{*0}},m_{D^{*+}},m_{\eta}\right]\nonumber\\&&+
875: \mathcal{V}^{[J]}_{\mathbb{V}}(r)
876: \left[\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},m_{D^{*0}},m_{D^{*+}},m_{\rho}\right]+\mathcal{V}^{[J]}_{\mathbb{V}}(r)
877: \left[\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},m_{D^{*0}},m_{D^{*+}},m_{\omega}\right]\nonumber\\&&+
878: \mathcal{V}_\sigma(r)^{[J]}\nonumber\\&\approx&
879: -g_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}\mathbb{P}}^2\,\mathcal{A}[J]\,\left[\frac{Z[\Lambda,m_{\pi},r]}{8}
880: -\frac{Z[\Lambda,m_{\eta},r]}{24}\right]-{g_\sigma^2}
881: \,\mathcal{C}[J]\,Y[\Lambda,m_\sigma,r]\nonumber\\&&+ \frac{1}{2}
882: \Bigg[\frac{g_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}\mathbb{V}}^2}{4m_{\mathcal{D}^*}^2m_\rho^2}
883: \,\mathcal{C}[J]\,X[\Lambda,m_\rho,r]+g_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}
884: \mathbb{V}}^2\,\mathcal{C}[J]\,Y[\Lambda,m_\rho,r]
885: +\frac{4f_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}\mathbb{V}}^2}{m_{\mathcal{D}^*}^2}\,\mathcal{B}[J]\,Z[\Lambda,m_\rho,r]\Bigg]\nonumber\\&&
886: - \frac{1}{2}
887: \Bigg[\frac{g_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}\mathbb{V}}^2}{4m_{\mathcal{D}^*}^2m_\omega^2}
888: \,\mathcal{C}[J]\,X[\Lambda,m_\omega,r]+g_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}
889: \mathbb{V}}^2\,\mathcal{C}[J]\,Y[\Lambda,m_\omega,r]
890: +\frac{4f_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}\mathbb{V}}^2}{m_{\mathcal{D}^*}^2}\,\mathcal{B}[J]\,Z[\Lambda,m_\omega,r]\Bigg].\nonumber\\&&
891: \label{vv-2}
892: \end{eqnarray}
893: The potential for the $\Phi^{**0}(\Phi_8^{**0})$ state is
894: \begin{eqnarray}
895: \mathcal{V}(r)^{\Phi^{**0}(\Phi_8^{**0})[J]}_{Total}&=&
896: \frac{1}{2}\Bigg\{\mathcal{V}_{\mathbb{P}}^{[J]}(r)
897: \left[\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},m_{D^{*0}},m_{D^{*0}},m_{\pi^0}\right]
898: \mp2\mathcal{V}_{\mathbb{P}}^{[J]}(r)
899: \left[1,1,{m_{D^{*0}}},m_{D^{*+}},m_{\pi^\pm}\right]
900: \nonumber\\&&+\mathcal{V}_{\mathbb{P}}^{[J]}(r)
901: \left[-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},m_{D^{*+}},m_{D^{*-}},m_{\pi^0}\right]+
902: \mathcal{V}_{\mathbb{P}}^{[J]}(r)
903: \left[\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}},\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}},m_{D^{*0}},m_{D^{*0}},m_{\eta}\right]\nonumber\\&&
904: + \mathcal{V}_{\mathbb{P}}^{[J]}(r)
905: \left[\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}},\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}},m_{D^{*+}},m_{D^{*-}},m_{\eta}\right]
906: \nonumber\\&&+ \mathcal{V}_{\mathbb{V}}^{[J]}(r)
907: \left[\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},m_{D^{*0}},m_{D^{*0}},m_{\rho^0}\right]
908: \mp2\mathcal{V}_{\mathbb{V}}^{[J]}(r)
909: \left[1,1,{m_{D^{*0}}},m_{D^{*+}},m_{\rho^\pm}\right]
910: \nonumber\\&&+\mathcal{V}_{\mathbb{V}}^{[J]}(r)
911: \left[-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},m_{D^{*+}},m_{D^{*-}},m_{\rho^0}\right]+
912: \mathcal{V}_{\mathbb{V}}^{[J]}(r)
913: \left[\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},m_{D^{*0}},m_{D^{*0}},m_{\omega}\right]\nonumber\\&&
914: + \mathcal{V}_{\mathbb{V}}^{[J]}(r)
915: \left[\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},m_{D^{*+}},m_{D^{*-}},m_{\omega}\right]
916: + 2\mathcal{V}_{\sigma}^{[J]}(r)
917: \Bigg\}\nonumber\\&\approx&
918: g_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}\mathbb{P}}^2\,\mathcal{A}[J]\,\left[\frac{(1\mp2)}{8}Z[\Lambda,m_{\pi},r]
919: +\frac{Z[\Lambda,m_{\eta},r]}{24}\right]-{g_\sigma^2}
920: \,\mathcal{C}[J]\,Y[\Lambda,m_\sigma,r]\nonumber\\&&-
921: \frac{(1\mp2)}{2}
922: \Bigg[\frac{g_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}\mathbb{V}}^2}{4m_{\mathcal{D}^*}^2m_\rho^2}
923: \,\mathcal{C}[J]\,X[\Lambda,m_\rho,r]+g_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}
924: \mathbb{V}}^2\,\mathcal{C}[J]\,Y[\Lambda,m_\rho,r]
925: +\frac{4f_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}\mathbb{V}}^2}{m_{\mathcal{D}^*}^2}\,\mathcal{B}[J]\,Z[\Lambda,m_\rho,r]\Bigg]\nonumber\\&&
926: - \frac{1}{2}
927: \Bigg[\frac{g_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}\mathbb{V}}^2}{4m_{\mathcal{D}^*}^2m_\omega^2}
928: \,\mathcal{C}[J]\,X[\Lambda,m_\omega,r]+g_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}
929: \mathbb{V}}^2\,\mathcal{C}[J]\,Y[\Lambda,m_\omega,r]
930: +\frac{4f_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}\mathbb{V}}^2}{m_{\mathcal{D}^*}^2}\,\mathcal{B}[J]\,Z[\Lambda,m_\omega,r]\Bigg],\nonumber\\\label{vv-3}
931: \end{eqnarray}
932: where $\mp$ corresponds to $\Phi^{**0}(\Phi_8^{**0})$
933: respectively. As a cross-check, the potential for $\Phi^{**0}$ is
934: the same as that for $\Phi^{**\pm}$ from the SU(2) symmetry. For
935: the V-V systems, we need only consider four independent types of
936: potentials corresponding to
937: $[\Phi_{s}^{**\pm},\Phi_s^{**0},\bar\Phi_{s}^{**0}]$,
938: $[\Phi^{**\pm},\Phi^{**0}]$, $\Phi_{8}^{**0}$ and
939: $\Phi_{s1}^{**0}$ listed in Eqs. (\ref{vv-1}), (\ref{vv-2}),
940: (\ref{vv-3}), (\ref{vv-4}) respectively when we consider the SU(2)
941: symmetry. For states with different quantum numbers, we simply
942: change the values of $\mathcal{A}[J]$, $\mathcal{B}[J]$ and
943: $\mathcal{C}[J]$ in Table \ref{coeff}.
944:
945: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
946: \subsection{Numerical results for the V-V system}\label{result-vv}
947: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
948:
949: The quantum numbers of the S-wave V-V system are $J^P=0^+, 1^+,
950: 2^+$. The variation of the oscillating effective potential of
951: $\Phi_{s}^{**\pm}(\Phi_{s}^{**0},\bar{\Phi}_{s}^{**0})$ with $r$
952: is shown in Fig. \ref{VV-potential-1}, where only the $\eta$ meson
953: exchange is allowed. The effective potentials of
954: $\Phi^{*\pm}(\Phi^{*0})$ and $\Phi_8^{**0}$ with $J^P=0^+, 1^+,
955: 2^+$ are presented in Fig.
956: \ref{VV-potential-2}-\ref{VV-potential-3}, where the exchanged
957: mesons include $\pi$, $\eta$, $\rho$, $\omega$ and $\sigma$. For
958: $\Phi_{s1}^{**0}$, its effective potential is shown in Fig.
959: \ref{VV-potential-4}, where both the $\eta$ and $\phi$ meson
960: exchange is allowed.
961:
962: \begin{figure}[htb]\begin{center}
963: \begin{tabular}{ccc}
964: \scalebox{0.8}{\includegraphics{VV-phis-spm.eps}}\\
965: \end{tabular}
966: \caption{The effective potential of
967: $\Phi_s^{**\pm}(\Phi_{s}^{**0},\bar{\Phi}_{s}^{**0})$.
968: \label{VV-potential-1}}\end{center}
969: \end{figure}
970:
971: \begin{center}
972: \begin{figure}[htb]
973: \begin{tabular}{ccc}
974: \scalebox{0.55}{\includegraphics{VV-phis-pm-J0.eps}}&
975: \scalebox{0.55}{\includegraphics{VV-phis-pm-J1.eps}}&
976: \scalebox{0.55}{\includegraphics{VV-phis-pm-J2.eps}}\\(a)&(b)&(c)\\
977: \end{tabular}
978: \caption{The effective potentials of $\Phi^{**\pm}(\Phi^{**0})$
979: with different quantum numbers. The thick solid line is the total
980: effective potential. \label{VV-potential-2}}
981: \end{figure}\end{center}
982: \begin{figure}[htb]\begin{center}
983: \begin{tabular}{ccc}
984: \scalebox{0.55}{\includegraphics{VV-phis-80-J0.eps}}&
985: \scalebox{0.55}{\includegraphics{VV-phis-80-J1.eps}}&
986: \scalebox{0.55}{\includegraphics{VV-phis-80-J2.eps}}\\(a)&(b)&(c)\\
987: \end{tabular}
988: \caption{The shape of the exchange potential of $\Phi_8^{**0}$.
989: The thick solid line is the total effective potential.
990: \label{VV-potential-3}}\end{center}
991: \end{figure}
992: \begin{figure}[htb]\begin{center}
993: \begin{tabular}{ccc}
994: \scalebox{0.55}{\includegraphics{VV-phis-s1-J0.eps}}&
995: \scalebox{0.55}{\includegraphics{VV-phis-s1-J1.eps}}&
996: \scalebox{0.55}{\includegraphics{VV-phis-s1-J2.eps}}\\(a)&(b)&(c)\\
997: \end{tabular}
998: \caption{The variation of the effective potential of
999: $\Phi_{s1}^{**0}$ with $r$. The thick solid line is the total
1000: effective potential. \label{VV-potential-4}}\end{center}
1001: \end{figure}
1002:
1003: With the above effective potentials, we solve the Schr\"{o}dinger
1004: equation to find the bound state solutions for the V-V system.
1005: Numerical results are collected in Table \ref{DsDs}. For the
1006: $\mathcal{D^*-D^*}$ states with $J^{P}=0^+, 1^+$, a bound state
1007: exists only for $\Lambda$ much larger than $1$ GeV. Especially for
1008: $\Phi_s^{**\pm}(\Phi_s^{**0},\bar\Phi_{s}^{**0})$ and
1009: $\Phi^{**\pm}(\Phi^{**0})$ with $J^P=1^+$, the existence of a
1010: bound state requires the values of $\Lambda$ be larger than 8 GeV.
1011: For $\Phi_s^{**\pm}(\Phi_s^{**0},\bar\Phi_{s}^{**0})$ and
1012: $\Phi^{**\pm}(\Phi^{**0})$ with $J^P=2^+$, no bound states exists
1013: for $\Lambda< 10$ GeV. The cutoff parameter $\Lambda$ is a typical
1014: hadronic scale, which is generally expected to be around $1\sim 2$
1015: GeV. If $\Lambda$ is much larger than 2 GeV or much smaller than 1
1016: GeV in order to form a bound state, we tend to conclude that there
1017: does not exist a heavy molecular state for these systems. We find
1018: bound state solutions for $\Phi_{8}^{**0}$ and $\Phi_{s1}^{**0}$
1019: with $J^P=0^+,1^+,2^+$.
1020:
1021: In Table \ref{DsDs}, we also give the numerical results for the
1022: $\mathcal{B^*-\bar B^*}$ system. There do not exist molecular
1023: states $\Omega_s^{**\pm}(\Omega_s^{**0},\bar\Omega_{s}^{**0})$ and
1024: $\Omega^{**\pm}(\Omega^{**0})$ with $J^P=2^+$ since we can not
1025: find bound state solutions for $\Lambda=0\sim 10$ GeV. Different
1026: from the $\mathcal{D^*-\bar D^*}$ system, there exist possible
1027: molecular states
1028: $\Omega_{s}^{**\pm}(\Omega_{s}^{**0},\bar{\Omega}_{s}^{**0})$ with
1029: $J^{P}=0^+, 1^+$ with more reasonable $\Lambda$ close to $1$ GeV.
1030: We also find the bound state solutions for $\Omega_{8}^{**0}$ and
1031: $\Omega_{s1}^{**0}$. The reason is simple. The larger the reduced
1032: mass for $\mathcal{B^*-\bar B^*}$, the lower the kinetic energy,
1033: the easier to form a molecular state. With $\Phi_{s}^{**}$ as an
1034: example, we illustrate the dependence of $E$ on $\Lambda$ in Fig.
1035: \ref{VV-Phi_s}. When all coupling constants are enlarged by a
1036: factor of two, the numerical results are collected in Table
1037: \ref{DsDs-2times}. When all coupling constants are reduced by a
1038: factor of two, the results are collected in Table \ref{DsDs-half}.
1039:
1040: \begin{center}
1041: \begin{figure}[htb]
1042: \begin{tabular}{c}
1043: \scalebox{0.6}{ \includegraphics{E-Lambda-VV-Phi_s.eps}}
1044: \end{tabular} \caption{The dependence of binding energy $E$ on $\Lambda$ for $\Phi_{s}^{**}$. \label{VV-Phi_s}}
1045: \end{figure}
1046: \end{center}
1047:
1048: \begin{center}
1049: \begin{ruledtabular}
1050: \begin{table}[htb]
1051: \begin{tabular}{c||ccc|ccc|ccccc}
1052: &\multicolumn{8}{c}{$\mathcal{D^*-\bar D^*}$} \\\hline
1053:
1054: &\multicolumn{3}{c}{$J^P=0^+$}&\multicolumn{3}{c}{$J^P=1^+$}&\multicolumn{3}{c}{$J^P=2^+$}\\\hline
1055:
1056: State&$\Lambda$
1057: (GeV)&$E$ (MeV)& $r_{\mathrm{rms}}$ (fm)&$\Lambda$ (GeV)&$E$
1058: (MeV)& $r_{\mathrm{rms}}$ (fm)&$\Lambda$ (GeV)&$E$ (MeV)&
1059: $r_{\mathrm{\mathrm{rms}}}$ (fm)\\\hline
1060:
1061:
1062:
1063: $\Phi_s^{**\pm}(\Phi_s^{**0},\bar\Phi_{s}^{**0})$&4.80&-5.26&1.92&8.70&-1.60&2.56&-&-&-\\
1064: &5.00&-39.42&0.72&8.90&-21.21&0.96&-&-&-\\\hline
1065:
1066: $\Phi^{**\pm}(\Phi^{**0})$&4.00&-5.21&1.99&9.80&-8.40&1.61&-&-&-\\
1067: &4.20&-19.02&1.08&10.00&-16.53&1.19&-&-&-\\\hline
1068:
1069: $\Phi_8^{**0}$&0.52&-18.32&1.48&0.50&-37.61&1.18&0.52&-11.71&1.85\\
1070: &0.53&-8.61&1.95&0.52&-15.03&1.63&0.50&-24.01&1.47\\\hline
1071:
1072: $\Phi_{s1}^{**0}$ &0.63 &-12.91&1.55 &0.60&-17.27&1.45&0.54&-23.64&1.46\\
1073: &0.64&-7.13&1.93&0.62&-6.56&2.11&0.56&-13.01&1.77\\\hline
1074:
1075: &\multicolumn{8}{c}{$\mathcal{B^*-\bar B^*}$} \\\hline
1076:
1077: &\multicolumn{3}{c}{$J^P=0^+$}&\multicolumn{3}{c}{$J^P=1^+$}&\multicolumn{3}{c}{$J^P=2^+$}\\\hline
1078:
1079: State&$\Lambda$
1080: (GeV)&$E$ (MeV)& $r_{\mathrm{rms}}$ (fm)&$\Lambda$ (GeV)&$E$
1081: (MeV)& $r_{\mathrm{rms}}$ (fm)&$\Lambda$ (GeV)&$E$ (MeV)&
1082: $r_{\mathrm{rms}}$ (fm)\\\hline
1083:
1084:
1085:
1086: $\Omega_s^{**\pm}(\Omega_s^{**0},\bar\Omega_{s}^{**0})$&2.30&-0.57&4.76&3.80&-3.98&2.21&-&-&-\\
1087: &2.40&-14.90&1.17&3.90&-17.91&1.06&-&-&-\\\hline
1088:
1089: $\Omega^{**\pm}(\Omega^{**0})$&1.50&-10.17&1.53&2.70&-3.60&2.41&-&-&-\\
1090: &1.60&-21.75&1.10&2.90&-15.55&1.22&-&-&-\\\hline
1091:
1092: $\Omega_8^{**0}$&0.57&-23.16&1.36&0.57&-32.70&1.23&0.61&-18.07&1.49\\
1093: &0.58&-6.42&2.28&0.59&-5.65&2.39&0.63&-8.39&1.93\\\hline
1094:
1095: $\Omega_{s1}^{**0}$ & 0.74&-12.12&1.56 &0.70&-33.5&1.09&0.64&-35.37&1.25\\
1096: &0.75&-4.48&2.37&0.72&-12.68&1.58&0.65&-27.12&1.35\\
1097:
1098:
1099: \end{tabular}
1100: \caption{The numerical results for the $\mathcal{D^*-\bar D^*}$
1101: and $\mathcal{B^*-\bar B^*}$ systems.\label{DsDs}}
1102: \end{table}
1103: \end{ruledtabular}
1104: \end{center}
1105:
1106:
1107: \begin{center}
1108: \begin{ruledtabular}
1109: \begin{table}[htb]
1110: \begin{tabular}{c||ccc|ccc|ccccc}
1111: &\multicolumn{8}{c}{$\mathcal{D^*-\bar D^*}$} \\\hline
1112:
1113: &\multicolumn{3}{c}{$J^P=0^+$}&\multicolumn{3}{c}{$J^P=1^+$}&\multicolumn{3}{c}{$J^P=2^+$}\\\hline
1114:
1115: State&$\Lambda$
1116: (GeV)&$E$ (MeV)& $r_{\mathrm{rms}}$ (fm)&$\Lambda$ (GeV)&$E$
1117: (MeV)& $r_{\mathrm{rms}}$ (fm)&$\Lambda$ (GeV)&$E$ (MeV)&
1118: $r_{\mathrm{\mathrm{rms}}}$ (fm)\\\hline
1119:
1120:
1121:
1122: $\Phi_s^{**\pm}(\Phi_s^{**0},\bar\Phi_{s}^{**0})$&1.90&-16.07&1.14&2.90&-14.48&1.18&-&-&-\\
1123: &1.85&-4.7&2.05&2.80&-1.14&3.74&-&-&-\\\hline
1124:
1125: $\Phi^{**\pm}(\Phi^{**0})$&1.00&-5.42&2.06&1.80&-6.28&1.89&-&-&-\\
1126: &1.20&-36.75&0.92&2.00&-24.25&1.04&-&-&-\\\hline
1127:
1128: $\Phi_8^{**0}$&0.58&-45.86&1.05&0.60&-15.53&1.62&0.65&-32.94&1.15\\
1129: &0.59&-13.02&1.73&0.61&-3.64&2.64&0.66&-27.10&1.21\\\hline
1130:
1131: $\Phi_{s1}^{**0}$ &0.76 &-39.20&0.97 &0.74&-38.98&1.01&0.70&-23.96&1.38\\
1132: &0.78&-7.90&1.82&0.76&-12.73&1.55&0.72&-11.31&1.78\\\hline
1133:
1134: &\multicolumn{8}{c}{$\mathcal{B^*-\bar B^*}$} \\\hline
1135:
1136: &\multicolumn{3}{c}{$J^P=0^+$}&\multicolumn{3}{c}{$J^P=1^+$}&\multicolumn{3}{c}{$J^P=2^+$}\\\hline
1137:
1138: State&$\Lambda$
1139: (GeV)&$E$ (MeV)& $r_{\mathrm{rms}}$ (fm)&$\Lambda$ (GeV)&$E$
1140: (MeV)& $r_{\mathrm{rms}}$ (fm)&$\Lambda$ (GeV)&$E$ (MeV)&
1141: $r_{\mathrm{rms}}$ (fm)\\\hline
1142:
1143:
1144: $\Omega_s^{**\pm}(\Omega_s^{**0},\bar\Omega_{s}^{**0})$&1.20&-9.26&1.50&1.60&-6.27&1.79&-&-&-\\
1145: &1.30&-79.29&0.60&1.70&-44.38&0.73&-&-&-\\\hline
1146:
1147: $\Omega^{**\pm}(\Omega^{**0})$&0.50&-17.96&1.41&0.80&-7.74&1.80&-&-&-\\
1148: &0.48&-16.36&1.48&0.90&-25.86&1.11&-&-&-\\\hline
1149:
1150: $\Omega_8^{**0}$&0.60&-81.06&0.89&0.62&-46.66&1.15&0.70&-245.16&0.50\\
1151: &0.61&-10.73&2.15&0.63&-11.49&1.98&0.71&-352.21&0.49\\\hline
1152:
1153: $\Omega_{s1}^{**0}$ & 0.83&-25.32&1.17 &0.82&-34.93&1.06&0.80&-26.93&1.27\\
1154: &0.84&-5.08&2.18&0.83&-15.01&1.47&0.82&-11.66&1.69\\
1155:
1156: \end{tabular}
1157: \caption{The numerical results for the $\mathcal{D^*-\bar D^*}$
1158: and $\mathcal{B^*-\bar B^*}$ systems after increasing the coupling
1159: constants by a factor of two.\label{DsDs-2times}}
1160: \end{table}
1161: \end{ruledtabular}
1162: \end{center}
1163:
1164:
1165: \begin{center}
1166: \begin{ruledtabular}
1167: \begin{table}[htb]
1168: \begin{tabular}{c||ccc|ccc|ccccc}
1169: &\multicolumn{8}{c}{$\mathcal{D^*-\bar D^*}$} \\\hline
1170:
1171: &\multicolumn{3}{c}{$J^P=0^+$}&\multicolumn{3}{c}{$J^P=1^+$}&\multicolumn{3}{c}{$J^P=2^+$}\\\hline
1172:
1173: State&$\Lambda$
1174: (GeV)&$E$ (MeV)& $r_{\mathrm{rms}}$ (fm)&$\Lambda$ (GeV)&$E$
1175: (MeV)& $r_{\mathrm{rms}}$ (fm)&$\Lambda$ (GeV)&$E$ (MeV)&
1176: $r_{\mathrm{\mathrm{rms}}}$ (fm)\\\hline
1177:
1178:
1179:
1180: $\Phi_s^{**\pm}(\Phi_s^{**0},\bar\Phi_{s}^{**0})$&-&-&-&-&-&-&-&-&-\\\hline
1181:
1182: $\Phi^{**\pm}(\Phi^{**0})$&-&-&-&-&-&-&-&-&-\\\hline
1183:
1184: $\Phi_8^{**0}$&0.40&-18.40&1.57&0.40&-13.09&1.82&0.39&-10.14&2.10\\
1185: &0.41&-12.23&1.81&0.41&-8.43&2.12&0.40&-6.67&2.42\\\hline
1186:
1187: $\Phi_{s1}^{**0}$ &0.46 &-6.43&2.21 &0.40&-27.87&1.37&0.40&-12.05&1.95\\
1188: &0.47&-3.70&2.76&0.42&-16.15&1.63&0.41&-8.61&2.18\\\hline
1189:
1190: &\multicolumn{8}{c}{$\mathcal{B^*-\bar B^*}$} \\\hline
1191:
1192: &\multicolumn{3}{c}{$J^P=0^+$}&\multicolumn{3}{c}{$J^P=1^+$}&\multicolumn{3}{c}{$J^P=2^+$}\\\hline
1193:
1194: State&$\Lambda$
1195: (GeV)&$E$ (MeV)& $r_{\mathrm{rms}}$ (fm)&$\Lambda$ (GeV)&$E$
1196: (MeV)& $r_{\mathrm{rms}}$ (fm)&$\Lambda$ (GeV)&$E$ (MeV)&
1197: $r_{\mathrm{rms}}$ (fm)\\\hline
1198:
1199:
1200: $\Omega_s^{**\pm}(\Omega_s^{**0},\bar\Omega_{s}^{**0})$&6.80&-9.33&1.43&-&-&-&-&-&-\\
1201: &6.90&-23.17&0.93&-&-&-&-&-&-\\\hline
1202:
1203: $\Omega^{**\pm}(\Omega^{**0})$&6.10&-7.37&1.64&-&-&-&-&-&-\\
1204: &6.20&-14.64&1.20&-&-&-&-&-&-\\\hline
1205:
1206: $\Omega_8^{**0}$&0.48&-26.88&1.31&0.48&-19.59&1.51&0.48&-11.34&1.92\\
1207: &0.50&-8.85&1.97&0.50&-6.57&2.25&0.50&-4.18&2.75\\\hline
1208:
1209: $\Omega_{s1}^{**0}$ & 0.58&-11.18&1.68 &0.53&-29.28&1.23&0.50&-18.73&1.60\\
1210: &0.60&-3.11&2.85&0.55&-15.49&1.54&0.52&-9.95&1.97\\
1211:
1212: \end{tabular}
1213: \caption{The numerical results for the $\mathcal{D^*-\bar D^*}$
1214: and $\mathcal{B^*-\bar B^*}$ systems after reducing the coupling
1215: constants by a factor of two.\label{DsDs-half}}
1216: \end{table}
1217: \end{ruledtabular}
1218: \end{center}
1219:
1220:
1221: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1222: \section{The $\mathcal{D}^\ast-\bar{\mathcal{D}}$ case}\label{secpv}
1223: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1224:
1225: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1226: \subsection{The potential of the P-V system}
1227: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1228:
1229: Fig. \ref{PV} shows the the general scattering channels in the
1230: derivation of the exchange potential. Different from the P-P and
1231: V-V systems, we need consider two additional crossed scattering
1232: diagrams for the P-V system, i.e. Fig. \ref{PV} (b) and (c).
1233: \begin{center}
1234: \begin{figure}[htb]
1235: \begin{tabular}{ccc}
1236: \scalebox{0.8}{\includegraphics{diagram-scattering.eps}}
1237: \end{tabular}
1238: \caption{The diagrams in the derivation of the effective potential
1239: of the P-V system. \label{PV}}
1240: \end{figure}
1241: \end{center}
1242:
1243: In terms of the effective Lagrangian in Sec. \ref{sec3}, the
1244: $\sigma$ meson exchange potential in the momentum space is
1245: \footnote{We missed a minus sign in the sigma meson exchange
1246: potential in Ref. \cite{liu-3872}.}
1247: \begin{eqnarray}
1248: \mathcal{V}_{\sigma}(\mathbf{q})&=&-\frac{g_{\sigma}^2}{\mathbf{q}^2+m_{\sigma}^2}\;
1249: .
1250: \end{eqnarray}
1251: The pseudoscalar meson exchange potential reads \cite{liu-3872}
1252: \begin{eqnarray}
1253: \mathcal{V}_{\mathbb{P}}(\mathbf{q})\left[I_1^{\mathbb{P}\mathcal{D}_{1}\mathcal{D}_{2}^*},
1254: I_2^{\mathbb{P}\mathcal{ D}^*_{2}\mathcal{
1255: D}_{1}},m_{\mathcal{D}_1},m_{\mathcal{D}_2^*},m_{\mathbb{P}}\right]
1256: &=&-\frac{1}{12m_{\mathcal{D}_1}m_{\mathcal{D}^*_2}}g^2_{\mathcal{D^*D}\mathbb{P}}\,
1257: I_1^{\mathbb{P}\mathcal{D}_{1}\mathcal{D}_{2}^*}\,
1258: I_2^{\mathbb{P}\mathcal{ D}^*_{2}\mathcal{ D}_{1}}\,\left\{
1259: {\begin{array}{ccc}\frac{\mathbf{q}^2}{\mu^2-\mathbf{q}^2}\quad& \mathrm{for}\,\pi \\
1260: -\frac{\mathbf{q}^2}{\mathbf{q}^2+\mu^{\prime 2}}\quad&\quad\, \mathrm{for}\,\eta \end{array}}\right.
1261: ,
1262: \end{eqnarray}
1263: where $\mu=\sqrt{q_{0}^2-m_{\pi}^2}$,
1264: $\mu'=\sqrt{m_{\eta(K)}^2-q_{0}^2}$ and $q_0=m_{D_2^*}-m_{D_1}$.
1265: For the vector meson exchange, there exist two types of potentials
1266: from the direct and crossed scattering channels:
1267: \begin{eqnarray}
1268: \mathcal{V}_{\mathbb{V}}^{Direct}(\mathbf{q})\left[I_1^{\mathbb{V}\mathcal{D}_{1}\mathcal{D}_{1}},
1269: I_2^{\mathbb{V}\mathcal{ D}^*_{2}\mathcal{
1270: D}^{*}_{2}},m_{\mathcal{D}_1},m_{\mathcal{D}_2^*},m_{\mathbb{V}}\right]
1271: &=&-g_{\mathcal{DD}\mathbb{V}}\,g_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}\mathbb{V}}\,
1272: I_1^{\mathbb{V}\mathcal{D}_{1}\mathcal{D}_{1}}\,
1273: I_2^{\mathbb{V}\mathcal{ D}^*_{2}\mathcal{
1274: D}^{*}_{2}}\,\left(\frac{\mathbf{q}^2}{4m_{D_1}m_{D_{2}^*}m_{\mathbb{V}}^2}
1275: +\frac{1}{\mathbf{q}^2+m_{\mathbb{V}}^2}\right),
1276: \end{eqnarray}
1277: \begin{eqnarray}
1278: \mathcal{V}_{\mathbb{V}}^{Cross}(\mathbf{q})\left[I_1^{\mathbb{V}\mathcal{D}_{1}\mathcal{
1279: D}^*_{2}}, I_2^{\mathbb{V}\mathcal{
1280: D}^{*}_{2}\mathcal{D}_{1}},m_{\mathcal{D}_1},m_{\mathcal{D}_2^*},m_{\mathbb{V}}\right]
1281: &=&-\frac{8}{3}f_{\mathcal{D^*D}\mathbb{V}}^2\,I_1^{\mathbb{V}\mathcal{D}_{1}\mathcal{
1282: D}^*_{2}}\, I_2^{\mathbb{V}\mathcal{
1283: D}^{*}_{2}\mathcal{D}_{1}}\,\frac{\mathbf{q}^2}{\mathbf{q}^2+\zeta^2},
1284: \end{eqnarray}
1285: where $\zeta_{\mathcal{V}}=\sqrt{m_{\mathcal{V}}^2-q_0^2}$. One
1286: notes that $m_{\mathcal{V}}$ is larger than $q_0$ for the P-V
1287: case. After Fourier transformation, we obtain the effective
1288: potentials in the coordinate space
1289: \begin{eqnarray}
1290: \mathcal{V}_{\sigma}(r)&=&-{g_{\sigma}^2}Y[\Lambda,m_{\sigma},r],
1291: \end{eqnarray}
1292: \begin{eqnarray}
1293: \mathcal{V}_{\mathbb{P}}(r)\left[I_1^{\mathbb{P}\mathcal{D}_{1}\mathcal{D}_{2}^*},
1294: I_2^{\mathbb{P}\mathcal{ D}^*_{2}\mathcal{
1295: D}_{1}},m_{\mathcal{D}_1},m_{\mathcal{D}_2^*},m_{\mathbb{P}}\right]
1296: &=&-\frac{1}{12m_{\mathcal{D}_1}m_{\mathcal{D}^*_2}}g^2_{\mathcal{D^*D}\mathbb{P}}\,
1297: I_1^{\mathbb{P}\mathcal{D}_{1}\mathcal{D}_{2}^*}\,
1298: I_2^{\mathbb{P}\mathcal{ D}^*_{2}\mathcal{ D}_{1}}\,\left\{
1299: {\begin{array}{ccc}U(r)\quad& \mathrm{for}\,\pi \\
1300: -Z[\Lambda,\mu',r]\quad&\quad\, \mathrm{for}\,\eta \end{array}}\right.
1301: ,
1302: \end{eqnarray}
1303: \begin{eqnarray}
1304: \mathcal{V}_{\mathbb{V}}^{Direct}(r)\left[I_1^{\mathbb{V}\mathcal{D}_{1}\mathcal{D}_{1}},
1305: I_2^{\mathbb{V}\mathcal{ D}^*_{2}\mathcal{
1306: D}^{*}_{2}},m_{\mathcal{D}_1},m_{\mathcal{D}_2^*},m_{\mathbb{V}}\right]
1307: &=&-g_{\mathcal{DD}\mathbb{V}}\,g_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}\mathbb{V}}\,
1308: I_1^{\mathbb{V}\mathcal{D}_{1}\mathcal{D}_{1}}\,
1309: I_2^{\mathbb{V}\mathcal{ D}^*_{2}\mathcal{
1310: D}^{*}_{2}}\,\left(\frac{X[\Lambda,m_{\mathbb{V}},r]}{{4m_{D_1}m_{D_{2}^*}m_{\mathbb{V}}^2}}
1311: +Y[\Lambda,m_{\mathbb{V}},r]\right),\nonumber\\
1312: \end{eqnarray}
1313: \begin{eqnarray}
1314: \mathcal{V}_{\mathbb{V}}^{Cross}(r)\left[I_1^{\mathbb{V}\mathcal{D}_{1}\mathcal{
1315: D}^*_{2}}, I_2^{\mathbb{V}\mathcal{
1316: D}^{*}_{2}\mathcal{D}_{1}},m_{\mathcal{D}_1},m_{\mathcal{D}_2^*},m_{\mathbb{V}}\right]
1317: &=&-\frac{8}{3}f_{\mathcal{D^*D}\mathbb{V}}^2\,I_1^{\mathbb{V}\mathcal{D}_{1}\mathcal{
1318: D}^*_{2}}\, I_2^{\mathbb{V}\mathcal{
1319: D}^{*}_{2}\mathcal{D}_{1}}\,Z[\Lambda,\zeta_{\mathcal{V}},r].
1320: \end{eqnarray}
1321: Here $$U(r)=-\frac{\mu^2}{4\pi r}\left[\cos(\mu r)-e^{-\alpha
1322: r}\right]-\frac{\beta^2\alpha}{8\pi}e^{-\alpha r}$$ with
1323: $\beta=\sqrt{\Lambda^2-m_{\pi}^2}$ and
1324: $\alpha=\sqrt{\Lambda^2-q_0^2}$. The total effective potentials of
1325: $\Phi_{s}^{*\pm}/\hat \Phi_{s}^{*\pm},\Phi_s^{*0}/\hat
1326: \Phi_s^{*0},\bar\Phi_{s}^{*0}/\hat{\bar{\Phi}}_{s}^{*0}$
1327: \begin{eqnarray}
1328: \mathcal{V}(r)_{Total}^{\Phi_s^{*\pm}/\hat
1329: \Phi_s^{*\pm}}&=&c\,\frac{g_{\mathcal{D^*D}\mathbb{P}}^2}
1330: {36\sqrt{m_{D}m_{D_s}m_{D^*}m_{D_s^*}}}Z[\Lambda,\mu',r].
1331: \end{eqnarray}
1332: For $\Phi^{*\pm}/\hat\Phi^{*\pm}$, the total effective potential
1333: reads
1334: \begin{eqnarray}
1335: \mathcal{V}(r)_{Total}^{\Phi^{*\pm}/\hat
1336: \Phi^{*\pm}}&=&\frac{1}{2}g_{\mathcal{DD}\mathbb{V}}g_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}\mathbb{V}}
1337: \left[\frac{X[\Lambda,m_{\rho},r]}{4m_{D}m_{D^*}m_{\rho}^2}+Y[\Lambda,m_{\rho},r]\right]
1338: -\frac{1}{2}g_{\mathcal{DD}\mathbb{V}}g_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}\mathbb{V}}
1339: \left[\frac{X[\Lambda,m_{\omega},r]}{4m_{D}m_{D^*}m_{\omega}^2}+Y[\Lambda,m_{\omega},r]\right]\nonumber\\&&
1340: -c\,\left\{-\frac{g^2_{\mathcal{D^*D}\mathbb{P}}}{24m_{D}m_{D^*}}\,U(r)\,
1341: -\frac{g^2_{\mathcal{D^*D}\mathbb{P}}}{72m_{D}m_{D^*}}Z[\Lambda,\mu',r]-\frac{4}{3}f^2_{\mathcal{D^*D}\mathbb{V}}
1342: Z[\Lambda,\zeta_{\rho},r]+\frac{4}{3}f^2_{\mathcal{D^*D}\mathbb{V}}
1343: Z[\Lambda,\zeta_{\omega},r]
1344: \right\}\nonumber\\&&-{g_{\sigma}^2}Y[\Lambda,m_{\sigma},r].
1345: \end{eqnarray}
1346: For $\Phi^{*0}/\hat{\Phi}^{*0}$,
1347: $\Phi_{s1}^{*0}/\hat{\Phi}_{s1}^{*0}$ and
1348: $\Phi_{8}^{*0}/\hat{\Phi}_8^{*0}$, we have
1349: \begin{eqnarray}
1350: \mathcal{V}(r)_{Total}^{\Phi^{*0}/\hat{\Phi}^{*0}}&=&\frac{1}{2}g_{\mathcal{DD}\mathbb{V}}g_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}\mathbb{V}}
1351: \left[\frac{X[\Lambda,m_{\rho},r]}{4m_{D}m_{D^*}m_{\rho}^2}+Y[\Lambda,m_{\rho},r]\right]
1352: -\frac{1}{2}g_{\mathcal{DD}\mathbb{V}}g_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}\mathbb{V}}
1353: \left[\frac{X[\Lambda,m_{\omega},r]}{4m_{D}m_{D^*}m_{\omega}^2}+Y[\Lambda,m_{\omega},r]\right]\nonumber\\&&
1354: -c\,\left\{-\frac{g^2_{\mathcal{D^*D}\mathbb{P}}}{24m_{D}m_{D^*}}\,U(r)\,
1355: -\frac{g^2_{\mathcal{D^*D}\mathbb{P}}}{72m_{D}m_{D^*}}Z[\Lambda,\mu',r]-\frac{4}{3}f^2_{\mathcal{D^*D}\mathbb{V}}
1356: Z[\Lambda,\zeta_{\rho},r]+\frac{4}{3}f^2_{\mathcal{D^*D}\mathbb{V}}
1357: Z[\Lambda,\zeta_{\omega},r]
1358: \right\}\nonumber\\&&-{g_{\sigma}^2}Y[\Lambda,m_{\sigma},r],
1359: \end{eqnarray}
1360: \begin{eqnarray}
1361: \mathcal{V}(r)_{Total}^{\Phi_{s1}^{*0}/\hat{\Phi}_{s1}^{*0}}&=&-g_{\mathcal{DD}\mathbb{V}}g_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}\mathbb{V}}
1362: \left[\frac{X[\Lambda,m_{\phi},r]}{4m_{D_s}m_{D_{s}^*}m_{\phi}^2}+Y[\Lambda,m_{\phi},r]\right]
1363: -c\,\frac{8}{3}f_{D^*D\mathcal{V}}^2Z[\Lambda,\zeta_{\phi},r]+c\,\frac{g_{\mathcal{D^*D}\mathbb{P}}^2}
1364: {18{m_{D_s}m_{D_s^*}}}Z[\Lambda,\mu',r],\nonumber\\
1365: \end{eqnarray}
1366: \begin{eqnarray}
1367: \mathcal{V}(r)_{Total}^{\Phi_8^{*0}/\hat{\Phi}_8^{*0}}&=&-\frac{3}{2}g_{\mathcal{DD}\mathbb{V}}g_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}\mathbb{V}}
1368: \left[\frac{X[\Lambda,m_{\rho},r]}{4m_{D}m_{D^*}m_{\rho}^2}+Y[\Lambda,m_{\rho},r]\right]
1369: -\frac{1}{2}g_{\mathcal{DD}\mathbb{V}}g_{\mathcal{D^*D^*}\mathbb{V}}
1370: \left[\frac{X[\Lambda,m_{\omega},r]}{4m_{D}m_{D^*}m_{\omega}^2}+Y[\Lambda,m_{\omega},r]\right]\nonumber\\&&
1371: -\,c\,\left\{\frac{g^2_{\mathcal{D^*D}\mathbb{P}}}{8m_{D}m_{D^*}}\,U(r)\,
1372: -\frac{g^2_{\mathcal{D^*D}\mathbb{P}}}{72m_{D}m_{D^*}}Z[\Lambda,\mu',r]+4f^2_{\mathcal{D^*D}\mathbb{V}}
1373: Z[\Lambda,\zeta_{\rho},r]+\frac{4}{3}f^2_{\mathcal{D^*D}\mathbb{V}}
1374: Z[\Lambda,\zeta_{\omega},r]
1375: \right\}\nonumber\\&&-{g_{\sigma}^2}Y[\Lambda,m_{\sigma},r]
1376: \end{eqnarray}
1377: The parameter $c$ is $\mp1$ for the P-V systems with the positive
1378: and negative charge parity respectively. As expected, the
1379: potential of $\Phi^{*0}$ and $\hat{\Phi}^{*\pm}$ are the same as
1380: that of $\Phi^{*\pm}$ and $\hat{\Phi}^{*0}$ respectively.
1381:
1382: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1383: \subsection{Numerical results for the P-V system} \label{result-pv}
1384: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1385:
1386: We show the variation of the potential with $r$ in Fig.
1387: \ref{PV-TYPE}. The total effective potential for
1388: $\hat\Phi^{*\pm}(\hat\Phi^{*0})$ and $\Phi_{8}^{*0}$ is attractive
1389: while the potential of $\Phi^{*\pm}({\Phi}^{*0})$ and
1390: $\hat{\Phi}_8^{*0}$ is repulsive with $\Lambda=1$ GeV. Especially
1391: the neutral states with positive charge parity are very
1392: interesting. The only candidate of $X(3872)$ with the attractive
1393: potential is $\Phi_{8}^{*0}$. We collect the numerical results in
1394: Table \ref{DDstar}. There do not exist molecular states
1395: $\Phi^{\*\pm}(\Phi^{*0})$, $\Omega^{\*\pm}(\Omega^{*0})$ and
1396: ${\hat \Omega}_8^{*0}$ because of the strong repulsive potential.
1397: Bound state solutions exist for
1398: $\Phi_{s}^{*\pm}(\Phi_{s}^{*0},\bar{\Phi}_{s}^{*0})$ and
1399: $\Omega_{s}^{*\pm}(\Omega_{s}^{*0},\bar\Omega_{s}^{*0})$,
1400: $\hat\Omega^{*\pm}(\hat\Omega^{*0})$ only with a very large
1401: $\Lambda$. We show the dependence of the binding energy of
1402: $\Phi_{s1}^0$ on $\Lambda$ in Fig. \ref{PV-Phi_s1}. Moreover we
1403: collect the numerical results in Table \ref{DDstar-2times} when
1404: all coupling constants are increased by a factor of two. When all
1405: the coupling constants are reduced by a factor of two, the results
1406: are shown in Table \ref{DDstar-half}.
1407:
1408:
1409: \begin{figure}[htb]
1410: \begin{center}
1411: \begin{tabular}{ccc}
1412: \scalebox{0.55}{\includegraphics{PV-phi-spm.eps}}&
1413: \scalebox{0.55}{\includegraphics{PV-phi-pm.eps}}&
1414: \scalebox{0.55}{\includegraphics{PV-phi-0.eps}}\\(a)&(b)&(c)\\
1415: \scalebox{0.55}{\includegraphics{PV-phi-s1.eps}}&
1416: \scalebox{0.55}{\includegraphics{PV-phi-s1-tilde.eps}}&
1417: \scalebox{0.55}{\includegraphics{PV-phi-8.eps}}\\(d)&(e)&(f)\\
1418: \scalebox{0.55}{\includegraphics{PV-phi-8-tilde.eps}}&&\\(g)&&\\
1419: \end{tabular}
1420: \caption{The exchange potential of the P-V system with the typical
1421: value $\Lambda=1$ GeV. The thick solid line is the total effective
1422: potential. \label{PV-TYPE}}
1423: \end{center}
1424: \end{figure}
1425:
1426: \begin{center}
1427: \begin{ruledtabular}
1428: \begin{table}[htb]
1429: \begin{tabular}{c||ccccccccc}
1430: &\multicolumn{3}{c}{$\mathcal{D-\bar D^*}$} \\\hline
1431: State&$\Lambda$ (GeV)&$E$ (MeV)& $r_{\mathrm{rms}}$ (fm)\\\hline
1432:
1433: $\hat\Phi_s^{*\pm},\hat\Phi_{s}^{*0},\hat\bar{\Phi}_{s}^{*0}$&-&-&-\\\hline
1434:
1435: $\Phi_s^{*\pm},\Phi_{s}^{*0},\bar{\Phi}_{s}^{*0}$&8.90&-11.74&1.29\\
1436: &9.00&-25.38&0.88\\ \hline
1437:
1438: $\hat\Phi^{*\pm},\hat\Phi^{*0}$&10.5&-12.86&1.35\\\hline
1439:
1440: ${\Phi}^{*\pm}, {\Phi}^{*0} $&-&-&-\\\hline
1441:
1442: $\Phi_{s1}^{*0}$&0.55&-19.51&1.55\\
1443: &0.57&-10.11&1.93\\\hline
1444:
1445: $\hat\Phi_{s1}^{*0}$&0.60&-17.96&1.43\\
1446: &0.62&-6.94&2.01\\\hline
1447:
1448: $\Phi_{8}^{*0}$&0.52&-13.02&1.79\\
1449: &0.54&-5.25&2.38\\\hline
1450:
1451: $\hat\Phi_{8}^{*0}$&0.50&-28.61&1.30\\
1452: &0.52&-9.42&1.91\\\hline
1453:
1454: &\multicolumn{3}{c}{$\mathcal{B-\bar B}^*$} \\\hline
1455: State&$\Lambda$ (GeV)&$E$ (MeV)& $r_{\mathrm{rms}}$ (fm)\\\hline
1456: $\hat\Omega_{s}^{*\pm},\hat\Omega_{s}^{*0},\hat{\bar\Omega}_{s}^{*0}$&-&-&-\\\hline
1457:
1458: $\Omega_{s}^{*\pm},\Omega_{s}^{*0},\bar\Omega_{s}^{*0}$&3.80&-3.07&2.20\\
1459: &3.90&-20.23&1.00\\\hline
1460:
1461: $\hat\Omega^{*\pm},\hat\Omega^{*0}$&2.80&-4.20&1.41\\
1462: &3.00&-21.13&0.96\\\hline
1463:
1464: $\Omega^{*\pm},\Omega^{*0}$&-&-&-\\\hline
1465:
1466: $\Omega_{s1}^{*0}$& 2.10&-5.94&1.99\\
1467: &2.20 &-9.79&1.65\\\hline
1468:
1469: $\hat\Omega_{s1}^{*0}$&0.72&-12.40&1.59\\
1470: &0.73&-5.95&2.08\\\hline
1471:
1472: $\Omega_{8}^{*0}$&0.92&-10.19&1.13\\
1473: &0.94&-18.67&1.03\\\hline
1474:
1475: $\hat\Omega_{8}^{*0}$&-&-&-\\
1476:
1477: \end{tabular}
1478: \caption{The possible bound state solutions for the P-V system.
1479: \label{DDstar}}
1480: \end{table}
1481: \end{ruledtabular}
1482: \end{center}
1483: \begin{center}
1484: \begin{figure}[htb]
1485: \begin{tabular}{c}
1486: \scalebox{0.6}{ \includegraphics{E-Lambda-PV-Phi_s1.eps}}
1487: \end{tabular} \caption{The dependence of $E$ on $\Lambda$ for $\Phi_{s1}^{*0}$. \label{PV-Phi_s1}}
1488: \end{figure}
1489: \end{center}
1490:
1491:
1492:
1493: \begin{center}
1494: \begin{ruledtabular}
1495: \begin{table}[htb]
1496: \begin{tabular}{c||ccccccccc}
1497: &\multicolumn{3}{c}{$\mathcal{D-\bar D^*}$} \\\hline
1498: State&$\Lambda$ (GeV)&$E$ (MeV)& $r_{\mathrm{rms}}$ (fm)\\\hline
1499:
1500: $\hat\Phi_s^{*\pm},\hat\Phi_{s}^{*0},\hat{\bar{\Phi}}_{s}^{*0}$&-&-&-\\\hline
1501:
1502: $\Phi_s^{*\pm},\Phi_{s}^{*0},\bar{\Phi}_{s}^{*0}$&2.80&-1.58&2.57\\
1503: &2.90&-15.38&1.15\\ \hline
1504:
1505: $\hat\Phi^{*\pm},\hat\Phi^{*0}$&1.90&-16.33&1.27\\
1506: &2.00&--26.25&1.03\\\hline
1507:
1508: ${\Phi}^{*\pm}, {\Phi}^{*0} $&-&-&-\\\hline
1509:
1510: $\Phi_{s1}^{*0}$&0.72&-13.66&1.65\\
1511: &0.73&-8.65&1.93\\\hline
1512:
1513: $\hat\Phi_{s1}^{*0}$&0.75&-22.85&1.24\\
1514: &0.77&-4.66&2.24\\\hline
1515:
1516: $\Phi_{8}^{*0}$&0.75&-28.48&1.15\\
1517: &0.78&-35.20&1.05\\\hline
1518:
1519: $\hat\Phi_{8}^{*0}$&1.21&-4.47&2.29\\
1520: &1.23&-19.31&1.26\\\hline
1521:
1522: &\multicolumn{3}{c}{$\mathcal{B-\bar B}^*$} \\\hline
1523: State&$\Lambda$ (GeV)&$E$ (MeV)& $r_{\mathrm{rms}}$ (fm)\\\hline
1524:
1525: $\hat\Omega_s^{*\pm},\hat\Omega_{s}^{*0},\hat{\bar{\Omega}}_{s}^{*0}$&-&-&-\\\hline
1526:
1527: $\Omega_{s}^{*\pm},\Omega_{s}^{*0},\bar\Omega_{s}^{*0}$&1.60&-6.24&1.74\\
1528: &1.70&-44.08&0.74\\\hline
1529:
1530: $\hat\Omega^{*\pm},\hat\Omega^{*0}$&0.87&-5.65&1.12\\
1531: &0.90&-12.67&1.03\\\hline
1532:
1533: $\Omega^{*\pm},\Omega^{*0}$&-&-&-\\\hline
1534:
1535: $\Omega_{s1}^{*0}$& 1.15&-5.70&1.88\\
1536: &1.20&-30.52&0.96\\\hline
1537:
1538: $\hat\Omega_{s1}^{*0}$&0.82&-34.13&1.07\\
1539: &0.84&-3.57&2.43\\\hline
1540:
1541:
1542:
1543: $\hat\Omega_{8}^{*0}$&-&-&-\\
1544:
1545: \end{tabular}
1546: \caption{The possible bound state solutions for the P-V system
1547: after increasing all the coupling constants by a factor of two.
1548: \label{DDstar-2times}}
1549: \end{table}
1550: \end{ruledtabular}
1551: \end{center}
1552:
1553: \begin{center}
1554: \begin{ruledtabular}
1555: \begin{table}[htb]
1556: \begin{tabular}{c||ccccccccc}
1557: &\multicolumn{3}{c}{$\mathcal{D-\bar D^*}$} \\\hline
1558: State&$\Lambda$ (GeV)&$E$ (MeV)& $r_{\mathrm{rms}}$ (fm)\\\hline
1559:
1560: $\hat\Phi_s^{*\pm},\hat\Phi_{s}^{*0},\hat{\bar{\Phi}}_{s}^{*0}$&-&-&-\\\hline
1561:
1562: $\Phi_s^{*\pm},\Phi_{s}^{*0},\bar{\Phi}_{s}^{*0}$&-&-&-\\ \hline
1563:
1564: $\hat\Phi^{*\pm},\hat\Phi^{*0}$&-&-&-\\ \hline
1565:
1566: ${\Phi}^{*\pm},
1567: {\Phi}^{*0} $&0.36&-11.10&2.07\\
1568: &0.37&-7.30&2.38 \\\hline
1569:
1570: $\Phi_{s1}^{*0}$&0.39&-17.22&1.74\\
1571: &0.41&-9.31&2.11\\\hline
1572:
1573: $\hat\Phi_{s1}^{*0}$&0.43&-12.33&1.78\\
1574: &0.45&-5.42&2.32\\\hline
1575:
1576: $\Phi_{8}^{*0}$&0.44&-18.01&1.68\\
1577: &0.46&-8.66&2.11\\\hline
1578:
1579: $\hat\Phi_{8}^{*0}$&0.38&-13.56&1.90\\
1580: &0.40&-6.17&2.41\\ \hline
1581:
1582: &\multicolumn{3}{c}{$\mathcal{B-\bar B}^*$} \\\hline
1583: State&$\Lambda$ (GeV)&$E$ (MeV)& $r_{\mathrm{rms}}$ (fm)\\\hline
1584:
1585: $\hat\Omega_s^{*\pm},\hat\Omega_{s}^{*0},\hat{\bar{\Omega}}_{s}^{*0}$&-&-&-\\\hline
1586:
1587: $\Omega_{s}^{*\pm},\Omega_{s}^{*0},\bar\Omega_{s}^{*0}$&-&-&\\\hline
1588:
1589: $\hat\Omega^{*\pm},\hat\Omega^{*0}$&-&-&\\\hline
1590:
1591: $\Omega^{*\pm},\Omega^{*0}$&-&-&-\\\hline
1592:
1593: $\Omega_{s1}^{*0}$& -&-&\\\hline
1594:
1595: $\hat\Omega_{s1}^{*0}$&3.30&-1.39&2.71\\
1596: &3.40&-11.03&1.41\\\hline
1597:
1598: $\Omega_{8}^{*0}$&0.46&-19.73&1.50\\
1599: &0.48&-8.10&1.78\\\hline
1600:
1601: $\hat\Omega_{8}^{*0}$&-&-&-\\
1602:
1603: \end{tabular}
1604: \caption{The possible bound state solutions for the P-V system
1605: after reducing all the coupling constants by a factor of two.
1606: \label{DDstar-half}}
1607: \end{table}
1608: \end{ruledtabular}
1609: \end{center}
1610:
1611:
1612: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1613: \section{Discussion and conclusion}\label{sec5}
1614: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1615:
1616: We have systematically studied the P-P, V-V and P-V systems, which
1617: is composed of a pair of heavy meson and anti-meson. We summarize
1618: our numerical results from Secs. \ref{secpp}-\ref{secpv} in Tables
1619: \ref{remark-PP}, \ref{remark-VV} and \ref{remark-PV}. We use the
1620: symbols '$\bigcirc$' and '$\bigotimes$' to indicate whether a
1621: molecular state exists or not with the coupling constants in
1622: Section \ref{sec3}. In the following two cases, we tend to label
1623: the system with the symbol '$\bigotimes$': (1) there does not
1624: exist a bound state at all because of the repulsive potential; (2)
1625: a bound state solution exists only with either $\Lambda >3$ GeV or
1626: $\Lambda <0.5$ GeV. If a bound state exists when $0.5< \Lambda
1627: <0.9$ GeV or $2.0< \Lambda <3.0$ GeV, we mark this state with '?'.
1628: In this case the result is so sensitive to the cutoff parameter
1629: that we can not draw a definite conclusion. Only when a loosely
1630: molecular state exists with $0.9< \Lambda <2.0$ GeV, we tend to
1631: label the state with the symbol '$\bigcirc$'. We want to emphasize
1632: the above criteria may be biased due to the authors' personal
1633: judgement. The readers are encouraged to consult the numerical
1634: results in Sections \ref{secpp}-\ref{secpv} and draw their own
1635: conclusions.
1636:
1637: \begin{center}
1638: %\begin{ruledtabular}
1639: \begin{table}[htb]
1640: \begin{tabular}{c|c||c|cccccc}\hline\hline
1641: \multicolumn{2}{c}{$\mathcal{D-\bar D}$}
1642: &\multicolumn{2}{c}{$\mathcal{B-\bar B}$} \\\hline
1643:
1644: state& remark & state & remark \\\hline
1645:
1646: $\Phi_{s}^{\pm}, \Phi_{s}^{0}, \bar \Phi_{s}^0$& $\bigotimes$
1647: &$\Omega_{s}^{\pm}, \Omega_{s}^{0}, \bar \Omega_{s}^0$&
1648: $\bigotimes$\\
1649:
1650: $\Phi^{\pm}, \Phi^{0}$& $\bigotimes$ &$\Omega^{\pm}, \Omega^{0}$&
1651: $\bigotimes$\\
1652:
1653: $\Phi_8^{0}$& $?$ &$\Omega_8^{0}$&
1654: $\bigcirc$\\
1655:
1656: $\Phi_{s1}^{0}$& $?$ &$\Omega_{s1}^{0}$& $?$\\\hline\hline
1657:
1658: \end{tabular}
1659: \caption{Summary of the $\mathcal{D-\bar D}$ and $\mathcal{B-\bar
1660: B}$ systems. The symbols $\bigotimes$ and $\bigcirc$ denote
1661: "forbidden" and "allowed" respectively. \label{remark-PP}}
1662: \end{table}
1663: %\end{ruledtabular}
1664: \end{center}
1665:
1666:
1667: \begin{center}
1668: %\begin{ruledtabular}
1669: \begin{table}[htb]
1670: \begin{tabular}{c|ccc||c|ccccc}\hline\hline
1671: \multicolumn{4}{c}{$\mathcal{D^*-\bar D^*}$}
1672: &\multicolumn{4}{c}{$\mathcal{B^*-\bar B^*}$} \\\hline
1673:
1674: state& \multicolumn{3}{c}{remark} & state &
1675: \multicolumn{3}{c}{remark} \\\hline
1676:
1677: &$J^{P}=0^+$&$J^{P}=1^+$&$J^{P}=2^+$&&$J^{P}=0^+$&$J^{P}=1^+$&$J^{P}=2^+$\\\hline
1678:
1679: $\Phi_{s}^{**\pm}, \Phi_{s}^{**0}, \bar \Phi_{s}^{**0}$&
1680: $\bigotimes$& $\bigotimes$&$\bigotimes$&$\Omega_{s}^{**\pm},
1681: \Omega_{s}^{**0}, \bar
1682: \Omega_{s}^{**0}$& $?$&$\bigotimes$&$\bigotimes$\\
1683:
1684: $\Phi^{**\pm}, \Phi^{**0}$& $\bigotimes$&
1685: $\bigotimes$&$\bigotimes$&$\Omega^{**\pm}, \Omega^{**0}$& $\bigcirc$&$?$&$\bigotimes$\\
1686:
1687: $\Phi_8^{**0}$& $?$&
1688: $?$&$?$&$\Omega_8^{**0}$& $?$&$?$&$?$\\
1689:
1690: $\Phi_{s1}^{**0}$& $?$& $?$&$?$&$\Omega_{s1}^{**0}$&
1691: $?$&$?$&$?$\\\hline\hline
1692: \end{tabular}
1693: \caption{Summary of the $\mathcal{D^*-\bar D^*}$ and
1694: $\mathcal{B^*-\bar B^*}$ systems. \label{remark-VV}}
1695: \end{table}
1696: %\end{ruledtabular}
1697: \end{center}
1698:
1699: \begin{center}
1700: %\begin{ruledtabular}
1701: \begin{table}[htb]
1702: \begin{tabular}{c|c||c|cccccc}\hline\hline
1703: \multicolumn{2}{c}{$\mathcal{D-\bar D^*}$}
1704: &\multicolumn{2}{c}{$\mathcal{B-\bar B^*}$} \\\hline
1705:
1706: state& remark & state & remark \\\hline
1707:
1708: $\Phi_{s}^{*\pm}, \Phi_{s}^{*0}, \bar \Phi_{s}^{*0}$& $\bigotimes$
1709: &$\Omega_{s}^{*\pm}, \Omega_{s}^{*0}, \bar \Omega_{s}^{*0}$&
1710: $\bigotimes$\\
1711:
1712: $\hat\Phi_s^{*\pm},\hat\Phi_{s}^{*0},\hat{\bar{\Phi}}_{s}^{*0}$&
1713: $\bigotimes$
1714: &$\hat\Omega_s^{*\pm},\hat\Omega_{s}^{*0},\hat{\bar{\Omega}}_{s}^{*0}$&$\bigotimes$\\
1715:
1716: $\Phi^{*\pm}, \Phi^{*0}$& $\bigotimes$ &$\Omega^{*\pm},
1717: \Omega^{*0}$&
1718: $\bigotimes$\\
1719:
1720: $\hat\Phi^{*\pm},\hat\Phi^{*0}$&$\bigotimes$&$\hat\Omega^{*\pm},
1721: \hat\Omega^{*0}$&$\bigotimes$\\
1722:
1723: $\Phi_{s1}^{*0}$&$?$&$\Omega_{s1}^{*0}$&$?$\\
1724:
1725: $\hat\Phi_{s1}^{*0}$&$?$&$\hat\Omega_{s1}^{*0}$&$?$\\
1726:
1727: $\Phi_8^{*0}$& $?$ &$\Omega_8^{*0}$&
1728: $\bigcirc$\\
1729:
1730: $\hat\Phi_{8}^{*0}$& $?$ &$\hat\Omega_{8}^{*0}$&
1731: $\bigotimes$\\\hline\hline
1732:
1733: \end{tabular}
1734: \caption{Summary of the $\mathcal{D-\bar D^*}$ and
1735: $\mathcal{B-\bar B^*}$ systems. \label{remark-PV}}
1736: \end{table}
1737: %\end{ruledtabular}
1738: \end{center}
1739:
1740: It's interesting to compare our results with those near-threshold
1741: structures observed recently.
1742: \begin{enumerate}
1743:
1744: \item{$Z^+(4051)$\\
1745:
1746: The charged broad structure $Z^+(4051)$ was observed by Belle in
1747: the $\pi^+\chi_{c1}$. Its central mass value is slightly above the
1748: $D^*\bar D^*$ threshold. First we want to emphasize that there
1749: exists strong attraction in the range $r<1$ fm for the $D^*\bar
1750: D^*$ system with $J=0, 1$ as can be seen clearly from the shape of
1751: the total effective potential in Fig. \ref{VV-potential-2}
1752: (a)-(b).
1753:
1754: If this enhancement is a molecular state, the potential candidate
1755: of $Z^+(4051)$ is the $\Phi^{**+}$ state with isospin $I=1$. Our
1756: numerical results indicate that there exists a bound state
1757: solution (1) for $\Phi^{**+}$ with $J^{P}=0^+$ and $\Lambda\sim 4$
1758: GeV; (2) for $\Phi^{**+}$ with $J^{P}=1^+$ and $\Lambda\sim 10$
1759: GeV. Unfortunately such a cutoff seems too large according to our
1760: criteria.
1761:
1762: If future experiments confirm $Z^+(4051)$ as a loosely bound
1763: molecular state, its quantum number is very probably $J^{P}=0^+$,
1764: which can be measured experimentally through the angular momentum
1765: distribution of $\pi^+\chi_{c1}$. Since $\Phi^{**+}$ belongs to an
1766: isospin triplet, its neutral partner state $\Phi^{**0}$ may be
1767: searched in the $\pi^0\chi_{c1}$ channel.}
1768:
1769: \item{$X(3872)$\\
1770:
1771: In our previous work \cite{liu-3872}, we explored the $D^0 \bar
1772: D^{*0}$ molecular state by considering the $\pi$ and $\sigma$
1773: meson exchange potentials only. Our numerical results showed that
1774: it is impossible to form a $D^0 \bar D^{*0}$ molecular state with
1775: the coupling constants determined by experiment and a reasonable
1776: cutoff around 1 GeV \cite{liu-3872}. Unfortunately we missed a
1777: minus sign in the sigma meson exchange potential, although its
1778: contribution is not large. Moreover we didn't take into account
1779: the charged modes.
1780:
1781: In this work, we consider both the neutral and charged modes and
1782: include the exchange force from the $\pi$, $\eta$, $\sigma$,
1783: $\rho$ and $\omega$ mesons. The resulting total effective
1784: potential is attractive as shown in Fig. \ref{PV-TYPE} (f). The
1785: vector meson exchange especially the rho meson exchange provides
1786: the additional strong attraction. The $\Phi_{8}^{*0}$ state
1787: corresponds the $X(3872)$.
1788:
1789: \begin{center}
1790: \begin{table}[htb]
1791: \begin{tabular}{c|cccc}\hline\hline
1792: $\Lambda$& $E$ (MeV)&$r_{rms}$ (fm)\\\hline
1793:
1794: 1.6&-12.86&1.47\\
1795: 1.5&-6.07&1.98\\
1796: 1.42&-2.41&3.09\\
1797: 1.41&-2.07&3.30\\
1798: 1.40&-1.75&3.53\\\hline\hline
1799:
1800: \end{tabular}
1801: \caption{The bound state solutions for the $D^\ast-\bar D$ system
1802: if we fix the pionic and scalar coupling constants and reduce only
1803: the vector coupling constant in Section \ref{sec3} by a factor of
1804: two. \label{3872-detail}}
1805: \end{table}
1806: \end{center}
1807:
1808:
1809: Recall that the sigma meson exchange force is weak and the pion
1810: meson exchange alone does not bind the $D^{\ast}\bar D$ into a
1811: molecular state with a physical pionic coupling constant and a
1812: reasonable cutoff \cite{liu-3872}. In fact a bound state appears
1813: only with $\Lambda \sim 6$ GeV there. With the additional strong
1814: attraction from the vector meson exchange, our present numerical
1815: analysis shows that a molecular state exists with $\Lambda\sim
1816: 0.55$ GeV. If we arbitrarily increase all the coupling constants
1817: by a factor of two, there exists a molecular state with a slightly
1818: more reasonable $\Lambda\sim 0.75$ GeV. If we reduce all the
1819: coupling constants by a factor two, there appears a bound state
1820: with $\Lambda\sim 0.45$ GeV. Such a cutoff value is below 1 GeV
1821: and smaller than the exchanged vector meson mass.
1822:
1823: The pionic coupling constant of the $D^\ast\bar D$ system was
1824: extracted from the decay width of the $D^\ast$ meson
1825: experimentally. Its value is known quite reliably. In contrast,
1826: the vector coupling constant was estimated using the vector
1827: dominance model in Ref. \cite{Isola}, which may be overestimated
1828: according to a recent light cone QCD sum rule analysis \cite{lzh}.
1829: If we fix the pionic and scalar coupling constants but reduce the
1830: vector coupling by a factor of two only, there exists a very
1831: reasonable bound state solution with $E=-1.75$ GeV and
1832: $\Lambda=1.4 $GeV as shown in Table \ref{3872-detail}. Now the
1833: value of its root-mean-square radius reaches 3.53 fm! In other
1834: words, such a molecular state is bound very loosely.
1835:
1836: In short summary, $X(3872)$ may be accommodated as a molecular
1837: state dynamically, although drawing a very definite conclusion is
1838: very difficult especially when other available experimental
1839: information is taken into account. In our calculation, we assumed
1840: the SU(2) symmetry and ignored the mass difference between the
1841: charged and neutral mesons. Moreover we ignored the possible S-D
1842: mixing effect completely since we impose the S-wave condition in
1843: the derivation of the potential. These approximations together
1844: with the sensitivity of the numerical results to the cutoff
1845: parameter should be considered in the future investigation.
1846:
1847: \item{$X(3764)$\\
1848:
1849: The broad structure $X(3764)$ is close to the $D\bar D$ threshold
1850: and was observed in $e^+e^-\to \mathrm{hadrons}$ process. Its
1851: quantum number is $J^{P}=1^{--}$. In the present case, we need
1852: consider the P-wave $\Phi_{8}^0$ by adding the centrifugal
1853: potential $\ell(1+\ell)/{(2\mu r^2)}$ with $\ell=1$ into the
1854: potential in Eq. (\ref{ppr-3}). Here $\mu$ is the reduced mass of
1855: the system. In Fig. \ref{pwave}, we show the variation of
1856: $V(r)_{Total}^{\phi_8^0}+3/(2\mu r^2)$ with several typical values
1857: of $\Lambda$. Our numerical analysis indicates that there does not
1858: exist a P-wave $\Phi_{8}^0$ from such a potential. In other words,
1859: the structure $X(3764)$ is not a $D\bar D$ molecular state.
1860:
1861: \begin{figure}[htb]\begin{center}
1862: \begin{tabular}{ccc}
1863: \scalebox{0.8}{\includegraphics{PP-phi-80-pwave.eps}}\\
1864: \end{tabular}
1865: \caption{The dependence of the potential
1866: $V(r)_{Total}^{\phi_8^0}+3/(2\mu r^2)$ on $\Lambda$. The solid,
1867: dotted and dashed lines correspond to $\Lambda=1, 3, 4$ GeV
1868: respectively. \label{pwave}}\end{center}
1869: \end{figure}
1870:
1871: }
1872:
1873: }
1874:
1875: \end{enumerate}
1876:
1877:
1878:
1879: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1880: \section*{Acknowledgments}
1881: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1882:
1883: The authors thank Professors K.T. Chao and Z.Y. Zhang for helpful
1884: discussions. This project was supported by National Natural
1885: Science Foundation of China under Grants 10625521, 10675008,
1886: 10705001, 10775146, 10721063 and China Postdoctoral Science
1887: foundation (20070420526). One of authors (X.L.) thanks the support
1888: by the \emph{Funda\c{c}\~{a}o para a Ci\^{e}ncia e a Tecnologia of
1889: the Minist\'{e}rio da Ci\^{e}ncia, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior}
1890: of Portugal (SFRH/BPD/34819/2007).
1891:
1892:
1893: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
1894:
1895: \bibitem{Belle-4430}Belle Collaboration, K. Abe et al.,
1896: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 100}, 142001 (2008).
1897:
1898: \bibitem{Belle-new-two}Belle Collaboration, R. Mizuk et al.,
1899: arXiv:0806.4098 [hep-ex].
1900:
1901: \bibitem{BES}BES Collaboration, M. Ablikim et al., arXiv:0807.0494
1902: [hep-ex].
1903:
1904:
1905: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% review of molecular %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1906:
1907: \bibitem{Okun}M.B. Voloshin and L.B. Okun, JETP Lett. {\bf 23}, 333 (1976).
1908:
1909: \bibitem{RGG}A.D. Rujula, H. Georgi and S.L. Glashow, Phys. Rev.
1910: Lett. {\bf 38}, 317 (1977).
1911: \bibitem{Tornqvist} N.A. T\"{o}rnqvist, Nuovo Cim. {\bf A 107}, 2471-2476
1912: (1994); Z.Phys. {\bf C 61}, 525-537 (1994).
1913: \bibitem{voloshin-1}M.B. Voloshin, arXiv:hep-ph/0602233.
1914:
1915: \bibitem{voloshin}S. Dubynskiy and M.B. Voloshin, Mod. Phys. Lett.
1916: {\bf A 21}, 2779 (2006).
1917:
1918: \bibitem{zou}Y.J. Zhang, H.C. Chiang, P.N. Shen and B.S. Zou,
1919: Phys. Rev. {\bf D 74}, 014013 (2006).
1920:
1921: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% X(3872) theory %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1922:
1923: \bibitem{3872-Mole-1}F.E. Close, P.R. Page, Phys. Lett. {\bf B 578}, 119
1924: (2004).
1925: \bibitem{3872-Mole-2} M.B. Voloshin, Phys. Lett. {\bf B 579}, 316 (2004).
1926: \bibitem{3872-Mole-3} C.Y.
1927: Wong, Phys. Rev. {\bf C 69}, 055202 (2004).
1928: \bibitem{3872-Mole-4} E.S. Swanson, Phys.
1929: Lett. {\bf B 588}, 189 (2004); ibid B 598, 197 (2004).
1930: \bibitem{3872-Mole-5} N.A. T\"{o}rnqvist, Phys. Lett. {\bf B 590}, 209 (2004).
1931:
1932: \bibitem{liu-3872}Y.R. Liu, X. Liu, W.Z. Deng and S.L. Zhu,
1933: arXiv:0801.3540 [hep-ph], Euro. Phys. J. C 56, 63 (2008).
1934: \bibitem{liu-4430-3872}X. Liu, Y.R. Liu, W.Z. Deng,
1935: arXiv:0802.3157.
1936: \bibitem{YR-3872}Y.R. Liu and Z.Y. Zhang, arXiv:0805.1616 [hep-ph].
1937: \bibitem{Close-3872}C.E. Thomas and F.E. Close, arXiv:0805.3653 [hep-ph].
1938:
1939:
1940: \bibitem{rosner}J.L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. {\bf D 76}, 114002 (2007).
1941: \bibitem{Meng}C. Meng and K.T. Chao, arXiv:0708.4222 [hep-ph].
1942:
1943:
1944: \bibitem{liu-4430}X. Liu, Y.R. Liu, W.Z. Deng and S.L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. {\bf D 77}, 034003
1945: (2008); arXiv:0711.0494 [hep-ph].
1946:
1947: \bibitem{liu-4430-1}X. Liu, Y.R. Liu, W.Z. Deng and S.L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. {\bf D 77},
1948: 094015 (2008); arXiv:0803.1295 [hep-ph].
1949:
1950: \bibitem{PDG}W.M. Yao et al., Particle Data Group, J. Phys. G {\bf 33}, 1
1951: (2006).
1952:
1953: \bibitem{FF}M.P. Locher, Y. Lu, and B. S. Zou, Z. Phys. {\bf A 347}, 281 (1994)
1954: ; X.Q. Li, D.V. Bugg, and B.S. Zou, Phys. Rev. {\bf D 55}, 1421
1955: (1997); X.G. He, X.Q. Li, X. Liu and X.Q. Zeng, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf
1956: C 51}, 883-889 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0606015; X. Liu, X.Q. Zeng and
1957: X.Q. Li, Phys. Rev. {\bf D 74}, 074003 (2006), arXiv:
1958: hep-ph/0606191.
1959:
1960: \bibitem{lagrangian-hl}H.Y. Cheng, C.Y. Cheung, G.L. Lin, Y.C. Lin,
1961: T.M. Yan and H.L. Yu, Phys. Rev. {\bf D47}, 1030 (1993); T.M. Yan,
1962: H.Y. Cheng, C.Y. Cheung, G.L. Lin, Y.C. Lin and H.L. Yu, Phys.
1963: Rev. {\bf D46}, 1148 (1992). M. B. Wise, Phys. Rev. {\bf D45},
1964: R2188 (1992); G. Burdman and J. Donoghue, Phys. Lett. {\bf B 280},
1965: 287 (1992).
1966:
1967: \bibitem{Casalbuoni}R. Casalbuoni, A. Deandrea, N. Di Bartolomeo,
1968: R. Gatto, F. Feruglio and G. Nardulli, Phys. Rep. {\bf 281}, 145
1969: (1997).
1970: \bibitem{Falk}A.F. Falk and M. Luke, Phys. Lett. {\bf B 292}, 119
1971: (1992).
1972:
1973: \bibitem{Isola}C. Isola, M. Ladisa, G. Nardulli and P. Santorelli,
1974: Phys. Rev. {\bf D 68}, 114001 (2003).
1975:
1976: \bibitem{matslise}V. LEDOUX, M.V. DAELE and G.V. BERGHE, Comp. Phys. Commun. {\bf 162}, 151
1977: (2004); V. LEDOUX, M.V. DAELE and G.V. BERGHE, ACM Transactions on
1978: Mathematical Software {\bf 31}, 532-554 (2005);
1979: http://users.ugent.be/~vledoux/MATSLISE/.
1980:
1981: \bibitem{lzh}Z. H. Li, W. Liu, H. Y. Liu, Phys. Lett. B 659, 598
1982: (2008).
1983:
1984: \end{thebibliography}
1985:
1986:
1987: %\end{CJK}
1988:
1989: \end{document}
1990: