1: \documentclass[aps,preprint]{revtex4}%
2: \usepackage{amsfonts}
3: \usepackage{amsmath}
4: \usepackage{amssymb}
5: \usepackage{graphicx}%
6: \setcounter{MaxMatrixCols}{30}
7: %TCIDATA{OutputFilter=latex2.dll}
8: %TCIDATA{Version=5.00.0.2606}
9: %TCIDATA{CSTFile=revtex4.cst}
10: %TCIDATA{Created=Friday, April 25, 2008 22:08:45}
11: %TCIDATA{LastRevised=Friday, August 01, 2008 14:55:59}
12: %TCIDATA{<META NAME="GraphicsSave" CONTENT="32">}
13: %TCIDATA{<META NAME="SaveForMode" CONTENT="1">}
14: %TCIDATA{BibliographyScheme=BibTeX}
15: %TCIDATA{<META NAME="DocumentShell" CONTENT="Articles\SW\REVTeX 4">}
16: %TCIDATA{Language=American English}
17: \newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}
18: \newtheorem{acknowledgement}[theorem]{Acknowledgement}
19: \newtheorem{algorithm}[theorem]{Algorithm}
20: \newtheorem{axiom}[theorem]{Axiom}
21: \newtheorem{claim}[theorem]{Claim}
22: \newtheorem{conclusion}[theorem]{Conclusion}
23: \newtheorem{condition}[theorem]{Condition}
24: \newtheorem{conjecture}[theorem]{Conjecture}
25: \newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}
26: \newtheorem{criterion}[theorem]{Criterion}
27: \newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}
28: \newtheorem{example}[theorem]{Example}
29: \newtheorem{exercise}[theorem]{Exercise}
30: \newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}
31: \newtheorem{notation}[theorem]{Notation}
32: \newtheorem{problem}[theorem]{Problem}
33: \newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}
34: \newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark}
35: \newtheorem{solution}[theorem]{Solution}
36: \newtheorem{summary}[theorem]{Summary}
37: \newenvironment{proof}[1][Proof]{\noindent\textbf{#1.} }{\ \rule{0.5em}{0.5em}}
38: \begin{document}
39: \title{Hawking radiation for higher dimensional Einstein-Yang-Mills linear dilaton
40: black holes }
41: \author{S. Habib Mazharimousavi$^{\ast}$}
42: \author{I. Sakalli$^{\ddag}$}
43: \author{M. Halilsoy$^{\dag}$}
44: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Eastern Mediterranean University,}
45: \affiliation{G. Magusa, north Cyprus, Mersin-10, Turkey}
46: \affiliation{$^{\ast}$habib.mazhari@emu.edu.tr}
47: \affiliation{$^{\dagger}$izzet.sakalli@emu.edu.tr}
48: \affiliation{$^{\ddag}$mustafa.halilsoy@emu.edu.tr}
49:
50: \begin{abstract}
51: Recently, Hawking radiation from a $4-$dimensional linear dilaton black hole
52: solution to Einstein-Maxwell-Dilaton (EMD) theory, via a method of computing
53: exactly the semi-classical radiation, has been derived by Cl\'{e}ment, et al.
54: Their results show that, whenever solution is available to the massless scalar
55: wave equation, an exact computation of the radiation spectrum leads to the
56: Hawking temperature $T_{H}$. We apply the same method to derive Hawking
57: radiation spectrum for higher dimensional linear dilaton black holes in the
58: Einstein-Yang-Mills-Dilaton (EYMD) and Einstein-Maxwell-Dilaton (EMD)
59: theories. Our results show that the radiation with high frequencies for these
60: massive black holes reveal some remarkable information about the $T_{H}$.
61:
62: \end{abstract}
63: \maketitle
64:
65:
66: \section{Introduction}
67:
68: Although today there are different methods to compute the Hawking radiation,
69: (see for instance \cite{R1,R2,R3,R4,R5,R6}), it still remains of interest to
70: consider alternative derivations. On the other hand, none of them is
71: completely conclusive. Nevertheless, the most direct is Hawking's original
72: study \cite{R1,R2}, which computes the Bogoliubov coefficients between in and
73: out states for a realistic collapsing black hole. The most significant remark
74: on this study is that a black hole can emit particles from its event horizon
75: with a temperature proportional to its surface gravity. Another elegant
76: contribution was made to the Hawking radiation by Unruh \cite{R7}. He showed
77: that it is possible to obtain the same Hawking temperature when the collapse
78: is replaced by appropriate boundary conditions on the horizon of an eternal
79: black hole. Instead of computing the Bogoliubov coefficients in order to
80: obtain the black hole radiation, one may alternatively compute the reflection
81: and transmission coefficients of an incident wave by the black hole. This
82: method works best if the wave equation can be solved, exactly. From now on, we
83: designate this method with "semi-classical radiation spectrum method" and
84: abbreviate it as \textit{SCRSM}.
85:
86: Recently, Cl\'{e}ment, et al \cite{R8} have studied the \textit{SCRSM} for a
87: class of non-asymptotically flat charged massive linear dilaton black holes.
88: The metric of the associated linear dilaton black holes is a solution to the
89: Einstein-Maxwell-Dilaton (EMD) theory in 4-dimensions. It is shown that in the
90: high frequency region, the \textit{SCRSM} for massive black holes yield the
91: same temperature with the surface gravity method. Their result for a massless
92: black hole is in agreement with the fact that a massless object can't radiate.
93:
94: In this Letter, we shall follow \cite{R8} as a guide and extend the
95: application of \textit{SCRSM} to $N$-dimensional linear dilaton black holes,
96: which are the solutions to Einstein-Yang-Mills-Dilaton (EYMD) theory
97: \cite{R9}. The spacetimes describing these linear dilaton black holes are
98: non-asymptotically flat. First, we consider the statistical Hawking
99: temperature of the massive linear dilaton black holes, computed by using the
100: surface gravity and discuss their evaporation process. According to the
101: Stefan's law, we show that only 4-dimensional black holes evaporate in an
102: infinite time, while the others $N\geqslant5$\ can evaporate in a finite time.
103: In both cases, during the evaporation process, the Hawking temperature remains
104: constant for a given dimension. Besides this, the constant value of the
105: Hawking temperature increases with the dimensionality number. We then apply
106: the \textit{SCRSM} to the massive linear dilaton black holes and show that
107: this computation exactly matches with the statistical Hawking temperature in
108: the high frequency region. We explain how the massless extreme black holes do
109: not radiate by making a connection between our work and \cite{R8}.
110:
111: In Sec. II we present and solve the EYMD equations and by using the massless
112: Klein-Gordon equation, radiation spectrum is derived. In Sec. III we repeat
113: similar analysis for the EMD theory, intending to compare with the EYMD
114: results. The Letter ends with Conclusion in Sec. IV.
115:
116: \section{Einstein-Yang-Mills-Dilaton (EYMD) black hole radiation spectrum}
117:
118: Recently, we obtained a static spherically symmetric higher dimensional linear
119: dilaton black hole solution in EYMD theory \cite{R9}. The metric ansatz is
120: given by
121: \begin{equation}
122: ds^{2}=-f\left( r\right) dt^{2}+\frac{dr^{2}}{f\left( r\right) }+h\left(
123: r\right) ^{2}d\Omega_{N-2}^{2}%
124: \end{equation}
125: where $f\left( r\right) $ and $h\left( r\right) $ are only functions of
126: $r$ and the spherical line element is
127: \begin{equation}
128: d\Omega_{N-2}^{2}=d\theta_{1}^{2}+\underset{i=2}{\overset{N-3}{%
129: %TCIMACRO{\tsum }%
130: %BeginExpansion
131: {\textstyle\sum}
132: %EndExpansion
133: }}\underset{j=1}{\overset{i-1}{%
134: %TCIMACRO{\tprod }%
135: %BeginExpansion
136: {\textstyle\prod}
137: %EndExpansion
138: }}\sin^{2}\theta_{j}\;d\theta_{i}^{2}%
139: \end{equation}
140: in which $0\leq\theta_{k}\leq\pi$ with $k=1..N-3$, and $0\leq\theta_{N-2}%
141: \leq2\pi.$ Our action is
142: \begin{align}
143: \mathbf{I} & =-\frac{1}{2}\int\nolimits_{\mathcal{M}}d^{N}x\sqrt{g}\left[
144: R-\left( \mathbf{\nabla}\Phi\right) ^{2}-e^{2\alpha\Phi}\mathbf{Tr}\left(
145: F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}\right) \right] ,\\
146: \mathbf{Tr}(.) & =\overset{\left( N-1\right) (N-2)/2}{\underset{a=1}{%
147: %TCIMACRO{\tsum }%
148: %BeginExpansion
149: {\textstyle\sum}
150: %EndExpansion
151: }\left( .\right) ,}\nonumber
152: \end{align}
153: in which $R$ is the curvature scalar, $\Phi$ is the dilaton field (with
154: parameter $\alpha)$ and $\mathbf{F}^{\left( a\right) }=F_{\mu\nu}^{\left(
155: a\right) }dx^{\mu}dx^{\nu}$ stands for the Yang-Mills (YM) field. In terms of
156: the gauge potentials $\mathbf{A}^{\left( a\right) }=A_{\mu}^{\left(
157: a\right) }dx^{\mu},$ the YM fields are given by%
158: \begin{equation}
159: \mathbf{F}^{\left( a\right) }=\mathbf{dA}^{\left( a\right) }+\frac
160: {1}{2\sigma}C_{\left( b\right) \left( c\right) }^{\left( a\right)
161: }\mathbf{A}^{\left( b\right) }\wedge\mathbf{A}^{\left( c\right) },
162: \end{equation}
163: in which $C_{\left( b\right) \left( c\right) }^{\left( a\right) }$
164: stands for the structure constants of $\frac{\left( N-1\right) (N-2)}{2}$
165: parameter Lie group $G$ and $\sigma$ is a coupling constant. The N-dimensional
166: YM ansatz is chosen from the Wu-Yang ansatz \cite{R13}%
167: \begin{align}
168: \mathbf{A}^{(a)} & =\frac{Q}{r^{2}}\left( x_{i}dx_{j}-x_{j}dx_{i}\right)
169: ,\text{ \ \ }Q=\text{charge, \ }r^{2}=\overset{N-1}{\underset{i=1}{\sum}}%
170: x_{i}^{2},\\
171: 2 & \leq j+1\leq i\leq N-1,\text{ \ and \ }1\leq a\leq\left( N-1\right)
172: (N-2)/2,\nonumber
173: \end{align}
174: where $Q$ is the non-zero YM charge. The YM equations
175: \begin{equation}
176: \mathbf{d}\left( e^{2\alpha\Phi\left( r\right) \star}\mathbf{F}^{\left(
177: a\right) }\right) +\frac{1}{\sigma}C_{\left( b\right) \left( c\right)
178: }^{\left( a\right) }e^{2\alpha\Phi\left( r\right) }\mathbf{A}^{\left(
179: b\right) }\wedge^{\star}\mathbf{F}^{\left( c\right) }=0,
180: \end{equation}
181: are satisfied by virtue of (5). The corresponding metric functions by setting
182: $\alpha=\frac{1}{\sqrt{N-2}},$ are found as
183: \begin{align}
184: f\left( r\right) & =\frac{\left( N-3\right) r}{\left( N-2\right)
185: Q^{2}}\left[ 1-\left( \frac{b}{r}\right) ^{\frac{N-2}{2}}\right]
186: \nonumber\\
187: h\left( r\right) & =Q\sqrt{2r}\nonumber\\
188: e^{2\alpha\Phi} & =r.
189: \end{align}
190: By following the mass definition for the non-asymptotically flat black holes,
191: the so-called quasilocal mass introduced by Brown and York \cite{R10}, one can
192: see that the horizon $b$ is related to the mass $M,$\ charge $Q$ and the
193: dimensions $N,$ through
194: \begin{equation}
195: b=\left[ \frac{2^{\frac{8-N}{2}}MQ^{4-N}}{N-3}\right] ^{\frac{2}{N-2}}%
196: \end{equation}
197:
198:
199: For $b>0$, the horizon at $r=b$\ hides the null singularity at $r=0$\ . On the
200: other hand, in the extreme case $b=0$ metric (1) still exhibits the features
201: of the black holes. Because the central singularity $r=0$ is null and
202: marginally trapped, it prevents outgoing signals to reach external observers.
203: Using the conventional definition of the statistical Hawking temperature
204: \cite{R11}, one finds%
205: \begin{equation}
206: T_{H}=\frac{1}{4\pi}f^{\prime}\left( r_{h}\right) =\frac{\left( N-3\right)
207: }{8\pi Q^{2}}.
208: \end{equation}
209:
210:
211: One can immediately observe that $T_{H}$ is constant for an arbitrary
212: dimensions $N$\ and linearly increases with the dimensionality of the
213: spacetime. As we learnt from black body radiation, radiating objects loose
214: mass in which the process is governed by Stefan's law \cite{R8}. Therefore
215: while a black hole radiates, it should also loose mass. According to Stefan's
216: law, we should calculate the surface area of the black hole (7). The horizon
217: area $A_{H}$ is found as%
218:
219: \begin{equation}
220: A_{H}=\frac{4\pi^{\frac{N-1}{2}}Qb}{\Gamma(\frac{N-1}{2})}%
221: \end{equation}
222: where $\Gamma(z)$ stands for the gamma function. After assuming that only
223: neutral quanta, in respect of the Yang Mills charge, are radiated, Stefan's
224: law admits the following time-dependent horizon solutions%
225:
226: \[
227: b(t)=\exp\left[ -\frac{\sigma}{\left( 2Q\right) ^{7}\pi^{3}}(t-t_{0}%
228: )\right] ,\text{ \ \ \ \ \ \ (}N=4\text{)}%
229: \]
230: %
231:
232: \begin{equation}
233: b(t)=\left[ -\mu(t-t_{0})\right] ^{\frac{2}{N-4}}\text{ ,\ \ \ \ \ \ (}%
234: N\geqslant5\text{)}%
235: \end{equation}
236: where%
237:
238: \begin{equation}
239: \mu=2^{-(\frac{12+N}{2})}Q^{-(N+3)}\sigma\frac{\left( N-4\right) \left(
240: N-3\right) ^{3}}{N-2}\frac{\pi^{(\frac{N-9}{2})}}{\Gamma(\frac{N-1}{2})},
241: \end{equation}
242: and $\sigma$\ is Stefan's constant. For $N=4$, the Hawking temperature is
243: constant with decreasing mass and the black hole reaches to an extreme black
244: hole state $b=0$ in an infinite time. However, for $N\geqslant5$, the Hawking
245: temperature has also a constant value for a chosen dimensions $N$, but the
246: black hole turns out to be the extreme black hole in a finite time according
247: to $b\sim(t_{0}-t)^{\frac{2}{N-4}}.$ It is observed that the exponential decay
248: law for $N=4$ dimensions, modifies into a power law decay for $N>4$. Following
249: the \textit{SCRSM}, we now derive a more precise expression for the
250: temperature of the black holes (7). To this end, we should first study the
251: wave scattering in such a spacetime. Contrary to the several black hole cases,
252: here the massless Klein-Gordon equation
253: \begin{equation}
254: \square\Psi=0
255: \end{equation}
256: admits an exact solution in the spacetimes (1). The Laplacian operator on the
257: $N$-dimensional metric (1) is given by%
258: \begin{equation}
259: \square=\frac{1}{\sqrt{-g}}\partial_{A}\left( \sqrt{-g}\partial^{A}\right)
260: \end{equation}
261: where $A$ runs from $1$\ to $N.$ One may consider a separable solution as%
262: \begin{equation}
263: \Psi=R\left( r\right) e^{-i\omega t}Y_{l,m_{1,}..,m_{N-3}}\left( \theta
264: _{1},..,\theta_{N-2}\right)
265: \end{equation}
266: in which $Y_{l,m_{1,}..,m_{N-3}}\left( \theta_{1},..,\theta_{N-2}\right) $
267: is the spherical harmonics in $N-1$ dimensional space. After substituting
268: harmonic eigenmodes (15) into the wave equation (13) and making a
269: straightforward calculation, one obtains the following radial equation:%
270: \begin{equation}
271: h(r)^{2-N}\partial_{r}\left[ h(r)^{N-2}f\left( r\right) \partial
272: _{r}\right] R\left( r\right) +\left[ \frac{\omega^{2}}{f\left( r\right)
273: }-\frac{l\left( l+1\right) }{h(r)^{2}}\right] R(r)=0.
274: \end{equation}
275: After changing the independent variable and the parameters as
276: \begin{align}
277: y & =1-\left( \frac{r}{b}\right) ^{\left( \frac{N-2}{2}\right) },\text{
278: \ \ \ }\tilde{\omega}=\frac{2Q^{2}}{N-3}\omega\\
279: \tilde{\lambda}^{2} & =\frac{2}{\left( N-2\right) \left( N-3\right)
280: }l\left( l+1\right) \nonumber
281: \end{align}
282: one transforms the radial equation (16) into
283: \begin{equation}
284: \partial_{y}\left( y\left( y-1\right) \partial_{y}\right) R\left(
285: y\right) +\left( \tilde{\omega}^{2}\frac{y-1}{y}-\tilde{\lambda}^{2}\right)
286: R\left( y\right) =0.
287: \end{equation}
288: Further, letting%
289:
290: \begin{equation}
291: \tilde{\Lambda}^{2}=\tilde{\omega}^{2}-(\tilde{\lambda}^{2}+\frac{1}{4})
292: \end{equation}
293: we can obtain the general solution of equation (18) in the form%
294:
295: \begin{align}
296: R\left( y\right) & =C_{1}y^{i\tilde{\omega}}F\left( \frac{1}{2}+i\left(
297: \tilde{\omega}+\tilde{\Lambda}\right) ,\frac{1}{2}+i\left( \tilde{\omega
298: }-\tilde{\Lambda}\right) ,1+2i\tilde{\omega};y\right) +\nonumber\\
299: & C_{2}y^{-i\tilde{\omega}}F\left( \frac{1}{2}-i\left( \tilde{\omega
300: }+\tilde{\Lambda}\right) ,\frac{1}{2}-i\left( \tilde{\omega}-\tilde{\Lambda
301: }\right) ,1-2i\tilde{\omega};y\right) .
302: \end{align}
303: Thus, solution (20) leads to the general solution of Eq. (18) as%
304: \begin{align}
305: R\left( \rho\right) & =C_{1}\left( \frac{\beta-\rho}{\beta}\right)
306: ^{i\tilde{\omega}}F\left( \frac{1}{2}+i\left( \tilde{\omega}+\tilde{\Lambda
307: }\right) ,\frac{1}{2}+i\left( \tilde{\omega}-\tilde{\Lambda}\right)
308: ,1+2i\tilde{\omega};\frac{\beta-\rho}{\beta}\right) +\nonumber\\
309: & C_{2}\left( \frac{\beta-\rho}{\beta}\right) ^{-i\tilde{\omega}}F\left(
310: \frac{1}{2}-i\left( \tilde{\omega}+\tilde{\Lambda}\right) ,\frac{1}%
311: {2}-i\left( \tilde{\omega}-\tilde{\Lambda}\right) ,1-2i\tilde{\omega}%
312: ;\frac{\beta-\rho}{\beta}\right)
313: \end{align}
314: in which
315: \begin{align}
316: \rho & =\left( r\right) ^{\left( \frac{N-2}{2}\right) }\nonumber\\
317: \beta & =\left( b\right) ^{\left( \frac{N-2}{2}\right) }%
318: \end{align}
319: One follows the result of the G. Cl\'{e}ment et al's work (see Eq. (19) in
320: \cite{R8}), to read the resulting radiation spectrum as
321: \begin{equation}
322: \left( e^{\frac{\omega}{T_{H}}}-1\right) ^{-1}=\frac{\cosh^{2}\pi\left(
323: \tilde{\omega}-\tilde{\Lambda}\right) }{\cosh^{2}\pi\left( \tilde{\omega
324: }+\tilde{\Lambda}\right) -\cosh^{2}\pi\left( \tilde{\omega}-\tilde{\Lambda
325: }\right) }%
326: \end{equation}
327: For high frequencies $\tilde{\Lambda}\simeq\tilde{\omega}=\frac{2Q^{2}}%
328: {N-3}\omega,$ and this leads to
329: \begin{equation}
330: e^{\frac{\omega}{T_{H}}}=\cosh^{2}2\pi\tilde{\omega}\rightarrow T_{H}%
331: =\underset{\omega\rightarrow\text{large value}}{\lim}\frac{\omega}{2\ln\left(
332: \cosh2\pi\tilde{\omega}\right) }=\frac{N-3}{8\pi Q^{2}}%
333: \end{equation}
334: which is nothing but the statistical Hawking temperature (9).
335:
336: On the other hand, for $b=0$ (i.e. the case of extreme massless black holes),
337: the above analysis for computing the Hawking radiation fails. In \cite{R8}, it
338: is successfully shown that the wave scattering problem in the extreme linear
339: dilaton black holes in EMD theory reduces to the propagation of eigenmodes of
340: a free Klein-Gordon field in two-dimensional Minkowski spacetime with an
341: effective mass. Conclusively, there is no reflection, so that the extreme
342: linear dilaton black holes can't radiate, although their surface gravities
343: remain finite. Since setting $b=0$ reduces metric (1) to a conformal product
344: $M_{2}\times S^{N-2}$ of a two dimensional Minkowski spacetime with the
345: $\left( N-2\right) -$sphere of constant radius, the same interpretation is
346: valid for the extreme linear dilaton black holes in EYMD theory. Namely, the
347: massless linear dilaton black holes in EYMD theory also can't radiate.
348:
349: \section{Einstein-Maxwell-Dilaton (EMD) black hole radiation spectrum}
350:
351: In order to make a comparison with the foregoing YM results in this section we
352: represent the similar analysis for the EMD case. The $N-$dimensional EMD
353: action is given by \cite{R12}%
354: \begin{equation}
355: S=\int d^{N}x\sqrt{-g}\left( R-\frac{4}{N-2}\left( \nabla\Phi\right)
356: ^{2}-e^{-\frac{4\alpha\Phi}{N-2}}F^{2}\right)
357: \end{equation}
358: where $\alpha$ is the dilaton parameter, and $F^{2}=F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}$
359: (this form of action was used by Chan et al\cite{R12}). The metric and field
360: ansaetze are%
361: \begin{align}
362: ds^{2} & =-f\left( r\right) dt^{2}+\frac{dr^{2}}{f\left( r\right)
363: }+h(r)^{2}d\Omega_{N-2}^{2}\\
364: F & =e^{\frac{4a\phi}{N-2}}\frac{q}{h^{N-2}}dt\wedge dr.
365: \end{align}
366: In Ref.\cite{R12} the general non-asymptotically flat solutions were reported
367: in which by setting $\alpha=N-3$ one gets the following explicit form%
368: \begin{align}
369: f\left( r\right) & =\frac{4}{\gamma^{2}}\left( \frac{N-3}{N-2}\right)
370: ^{2}r\left( 1-\left( \frac{b}{r}\right) ^{\frac{N-2}{2}}\right) ,\\
371: h\left( r\right) & =\gamma\sqrt{r},\text{ \ \ }\gamma=\text{constant,}%
372: \end{align}
373: where the radius of event horizon $r_{h}=b,$ is given by
374: \begin{equation}
375: b=\left( \frac{2\left( N-2\right) M_{QL}}{\left( N-3\right) ^{2}%
376: \gamma^{N-4}}\right) ^{\frac{2}{N-2}}%
377: \end{equation}
378: and $M_{QL}$ stands for the quasilocal mass of the black hole\cite{R10}. One
379: may use the usual definition of the Hawking temperature at the radius of event
380: horizon%
381: \begin{equation}
382: T_{H}=\frac{1}{4\pi}f^{\prime}\left( r_{h}\right) =\frac{\left( N-3\right)
383: ^{2}}{2\pi\gamma^{2}\left( N-2\right) }.
384: \end{equation}
385: Following the same procedure as in the previous section, one can show that,
386: the radiation spectrum of the EMD black holes are same as EYMD case which is
387: given by Eq. (23), provided the definitions of $\tilde{\omega}$ and
388: $\tilde{\lambda}^{2}$ are changed as%
389: \begin{equation}
390: \tilde{\lambda}^{2}=\frac{l\left( l+1\right) }{\left( N-3\right) ^{2}%
391: },\text{ and }\tilde{\omega}=\frac{\left( N-2\right) \omega\gamma^{2}%
392: }{2\left( N-3\right) ^{2}}.
393: \end{equation}
394: With these changes, the high frequency limit of radiation spectrum gives%
395: \begin{equation}
396: e^{\frac{\omega}{T_{H}}}=\cosh^{2}2\pi\tilde{\omega}\rightarrow T_{H}%
397: =\underset{\omega\rightarrow\text{large value}}{\lim}\frac{\omega}{2\ln\left(
398: \cosh2\pi\tilde{\omega}\right) }=\frac{\left( N-3\right) ^{2}}{2\pi
399: \gamma^{2}\left( N-2\right) }%
400: \end{equation}
401: which is matched with (31). In Fig. (1) we plot the high frequency limits of
402: the Hawking temperatures in terms of the dimensions of the space-time, for
403: both EMD and EYMd cases. Also, in Fig. (2) we plot the Hawking temperature in
404: terms of the spectrum low frequency $\omega$ for both EMD and EYMD black hole.
405:
406: \section{Conclusion}
407:
408: The semi-classical radiation spectrum method (SCRSM) properly works to compute
409: the Hawking radiation for massive higher-dimensional $(N\geq5)$ linear
410: dilatonic black holes in EYMD and EMD theories. In the high frequency region,
411: the results of SCRSM agree with the temperature $(T_{H})$ obtained from the
412: surface gravity. The dependence of $T_{H}$ on the dimensionality $N$ is
413: plotted for both the EYMD\ and EMD theories to see the differences. From the
414: Stefan's law it is shown that the $N=4$ dimensions dilatonic black holes
415: evaporate in an infinite time, while for $N\geq5$ it takes a finite time. We
416: verify also, once more that a massless object can't radiate. We do this by
417: studying a massless Klein-Gordon field in our extreme dilatonic black hole
418: background for which $T_{H}=0$, whereas the surface gravity is not zero.
419:
420: \begin{thebibliography}{99} %
421:
422:
423: \bibitem {R1}S. W. Hawking, Nature (London) \textbf{248} (1974) 30.
424:
425: \bibitem {R2}S. W. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys. \textbf{43} (1975) 199.
426:
427: \bibitem {R3}T. Damour and R. Ruffini, Phys. Rev. D \textbf{14} (1976) 332.
428:
429: \bibitem {R4}M.K. Parikh and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{85} (2000) 5042.
430:
431: \bibitem {R5}K. Srinivasan and T. Padmanabhan, Phys.Rev. D \textbf{60} (1999) 024007.
432:
433: \bibitem {R6}S. Hemming and E. Keski-Vakkuri, Phys. Rev. D \textbf{64} (2001) 044006.
434:
435: \bibitem {R7}W.G. Unruh, Phys. Rev. D 14 (1976) 870.
436:
437: \bibitem {R8}G. Cl\'{e}ment, J.C. Fabris, G.T. Marques, Phys. Lett. B
438: \textbf{651} (2007) 54.
439:
440: \bibitem {R9}S.H. Mazharimousavi and M. Halilsoy, arXiv: 0802.3990v2 [gr-qc] (2008).
441:
442: \bibitem {R10}J. D. Brown and J.W. York, Phys. Rev. D \textbf{47} (1993) 1407.
443:
444: \bibitem {R11}R.M. Wald, General Relativity, The University of Chicago Press,
445: Chicago and London, 1984.
446:
447: \bibitem {R12}K. C. K. Chan, J. H. Horne and R. B. Mann, Nucl. Phys. B
448: \textbf{447} (1995) 441.
449:
450: \bibitem {R13}S. H. Mazharimousavi, M. Halilsoy, Phys. Lett. B \textbf{659}
451: (2008) 471.
452: \end{thebibliography}
453:
454: \bigskip
455:
456: \section{Figure Captions}
457:
458: Figure 1: A plot of the high frequency limits of Hawking temperatures
459: $T_{H\text{ }}$ versus the dimensions of the space-time. The solid and crossed
460: curves represent the EMD and EYMD cases, respectively.
461:
462: Figure 2: $T_{H\text{ }}$versus small frequency plot in 5D. Up to a systematic
463: shift, the EMD and EYMD both exhibit similar behavior at small frequencies.
464:
465:
466: \end{document}