1: %%

2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'

3: %%

4: %% Modified 2005 June 21

5: %%

6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the

7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.

8: 

9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document

10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore

11: %% any data that comes before this command.

12: 

13: %% The command below calls the preprint style

14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.

15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use

16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.

17: %%

18: 

19: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:

21: 

22: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}

23: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:

24: 

25: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}

26: 

27: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the

28: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,

29: %% use the longabstract style option.

30: 

31: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}

32: 

33: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so

34: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before

35: %% the \begin{document} command.

36: %%

37: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts

38: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing

39: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide

40: %% for information.

41: 

42: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}

43: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}

44: 

45: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.

46: 

47: \slugcomment{Accepted to ApJ}

48: %\slugcomment{Draft April 3, 2008; for submission to ApJ}

49: 

50: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although

51: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.

52: %% The left head contains a list of authors,

53: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.).  The right

54: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.

55: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.

56: 

57: \shorttitle{Molecular outflow survey in the OMC-2/3 region}

58: \shortauthors{Takahashi et al.}

59: 

60: %% This is the end of the preamble.  Indicate the beginning of the

61: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.

62: 

63: \begin{document}

64: 

65: \title{Millimeter- and Submillimeter-Wave Observations\\

66: of the OMC-2/3 Region. III. An Extensive Survey for Molecular Outflows}

67: 

68: \author{SATOKO TAKAHASHI}

69: \affil{Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, P.O. Box 23-141, Taipei 106, Taiwan; $satoko{\_}t@asiaa.sinica.edu.tw$ \\

70: Department of Astronomical Science, The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, 

71: National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Osawa 2-21-1, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan}

72: 

73: \author{MASAO SAITO}

74: \affil{ALMA Project Office, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Osawa 2-21-1, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan}

75: 

76: \author{NAGAYOSHI OHASHI}

77: \affil{Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, P.O. Box 23-141, Taipei 106, Taiwan}

78: 

79: \author{NOBUHIKO KUSAKABE}

80: \affil{Department of Astronomical Science, The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, 

81: National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Osawa 2-21-1, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan}

82: 

83: \author{SHIGEHISA TAKAKUWA}

84: \affil{Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, P.O. Box 23-141, Taipei 106, Taiwan}

85: 

86: \author{YOSHITO SHIMAJIRI}

87: \affil{Department of Astronomy, School of Science, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan}

88: 

89: \author{MOTOHIDE TAMURA}

90: \affil{National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Osawa 2-21-1, Mitaka, 

91: Tokyo 181-8588, Japan}

92: 

93: \author{and \\

94: RYOHEI KAWABE}

95: \affil{Nobeyama Radio Observatory, Nobeyama, Minamimaki,Minamisaku, Nagano,

96: 384-1305, Japan}

97: 

98: \newpage

99: 

100: \begin{abstract}

101: Using the ASTE 10 m submillimeter telescope and the 1.4 m Infrared Survey Facility (IRSF), 

102: we performed an extensive outflow survey in the Orion Molecular Cloud -2 and -3 region. 

103: Our survey, which includes 41 potential star-forming sites, 

104: has been newly compiled using multi-wavelength data based on millimeter- and submillimeter-continuum observations 

105: as well as radio continuum observations. 

106: From the CO (3--2) observations performed with the ASTE 10 m telescope, 

107: we detected 14 CO molecular outflows, seven of which were newly identified. 

108: This higher detection rate, as compared to previous CO (1--0) results in the same region, 

109: suggests that CO (3--2) may be a better outflow tracer.  

110: Physical properties of these outflows and their possible driving sources were derived. 

111: Derived parameters were compared with those of CO outflows in low- and high-mass star-forming regions. 

112: We show that the CO outflow momentum correlates with the bolometric luminosity of the driving source 

113: and with the envelope mass, regardless of the mass of the driving sources. 

114: In addition to these CO outflows, seven sources having NIR features suggestive of outflows were also identified.  

115: \end{abstract}

116: 

117: \keywords{ISM: clouds --- ISM: individual (OMC-2/3) ---stars: formation --- ISM: outflows ---

118: ISM: molecules --- radio lines: ISM}

119: 

120: \section{INTRODUCTION}

121: 	

122: 	CO molecular outflows are ubiquitous phenomena in low- to high-mass star-forming regions 

123: 	(e.g. Bachiller \& Tafalla 1999 for reviews, Zhang et al. 2001, Arce et al.  2007 for reviews). 

124: 	This phenomenon is considered to be directly associated with the main accretion phase in protostars, 

125: 	and is frequently used to identify protostars in dense cores. 

126: 	Hence the CO outflows provide the primary information concerning the mass accretion 

127: 	and ejection processes during the protostellar evolution. 

128: 	Previous single-dish surveys revealed the physical nature of CO outflows toward hundreds of low- to high-mass young stellar objects  

129: 	(e.g., Cabrit \& Bertout 1992, Shepherd \& Churchwell 1996, Bontemps et al. 1996, Beuther et al. 2002, Zhang et al. 2001, 2005). 

130: 	An extensive outflow survey of low-mass objects by Bontemps et al. (1996) found that the momentum flux of the CO 

131: 	outflows is positively correlated with the bolometric luminosity and also positively correlated with the mass of the associated parent cores. 

132: 	Recent high-mass studies also show the above correlations continuing to the high-mass 

133: 	region over several orders of magnitude in mass and bolometric luminosity (e.g., Curchwell 1997, Beuther et al. 2002, Zhang et al. 2005). 

134: 	On the other hand, the systematic studies focused on outflows associated with intermediate-mass 

135: 	protostars ($2~{\leq}~M_{\ast}~{\leq}~8~M_{\odot}$) are still limited, 

136: 	although several candidates have been investigated in detail to date 

137: 	(e.g., Fuente et al. 2005, Takahashi et al. 2006, Beltran et al. 2006, 2007). 

138: 	Studies of the intermediate-mass outflows are important for revealing the evolution of intermediate-mass stars.

139: 	But more importantly, such studies address the question of wether the same basic accretion and outflow processes operate continuously 

140: 	from low- to high- mass stars.

141: 	

142: 	In this paper, we present the results of our extensive outflow survey toward one of the nearest 

143: 	intermediate-mass star-forming regions: The Orion Molecular Cloud -2/3 (OMC-2/3; $d$=450 pc; Genzel \& Stutzki 1989). 

144: 	The goals of this project are to (i)search for outflows in OMC-2/3 with high sensitivity and high spatial resolution, 

145: 	(ii) combine the detected outflow results and the centimeter- to mid-infrared continuum information to identify a driving source of the outflows, 

146: 	and (iii) reveal the structures and the physical properties of each outflow.

147: 	In the OMC-2/3 region, 38 millimeter- and submillimeter dust continuum sources were detected 

148: 	(Chini et al. 1997, Lis et al. 1998, Nielbock et al. 2003). 

149: 	Free-free jets were also detected at 3.6 cm toward 11 of the embedded sources, and eight of 11 sources 

150: 	are associated with the dust continuum sources (Reipurth et al. 1999). 

151: 	Shock-excited H$_2$ knots, which probably trace shock fronts within each flow, 

152: 	are associated with these embedded sources (Yu et al. 1997, 2000, and Stanke et al. 2002). 

153: 	Aso et al. (2000) and Williams et al. (2003) made mapping observations in the CO (1--0) emission and identified nine CO outflows. 

154: 	They found that the outflows in OMC-2/3 are mostly spatially compact 

155: 	(i.e., possess short dynamical time scales of a few $\times~10^4$ yr), and energetic 

156: 	(${\sim}$ several ${\times}~10^{-4}$ M$_{\odot} $km s$^{-1}$). 

157: 	However, previous outflow identifications have ambiguities, 

158: 	because the CO (1--0) emission is often significantly affected by the contamination from the ambient molecular cloud. 

159: 	This made it difficult to identify small and faint outflows and differentiate them from the ambient molecular gas. 

160: 	Furthermore, pre- and proto-stellar candidates in OMC-2/3 are lying along the filament within a few $\times$ 0.1 pc. 

161: 	The crowded core distributions also made it difficult to identify which is the driving source of each outflow. 	

162: 	

163: 	We report results of our high-sensitivity molecular outflow survey in the submillimeter CO (3--2) emission 

164: 	with the ASTE telescope. The ASTE (Atacama Submillimeter Telescope Experiment) telescope equipped 

165: 	with a 345 GHz receiver is one of the most powerful facilities with which to seek molecular outflows over a wide field of views. 

166: 	The ASTE telescope in the ``On-The-Fly'' mapping mode enabled us to observe the entire region of OMC-2/3 with 

167: 	a high sensitivity limit (i.e., corresponding mass of the sensitivity limit is $\sim$10$^{-4}~M_{\odot}$).

168: 	The CO (3--2) emission exclusively traces higher temperature gas ($\geq$ 33 K). 

169: 	Our CO (3--2) results are compared with previous CO (1--0) results.   

170: 	We also show deep $JHK_s$ images taken by the Simultaneous Three-Color InfrarRed Imager for Unbiased Survey camera 

171: 	(SIRIUS) on Infrared Survey Facility (IRSF), which provide us with the distributions of faint reflection nebulae, chains of knots, and jet-like features. 

172: 	Furthermore, we also used the archived 24 $\mu$m data obtained by the infrared camera MIPS (Multiband Imaging Photometer) 

173: 	on the infrared space telescope Spitzer, which are sensitive to hot dusty components with a temperature of 

174: 	${\sim}$ 150 K, and probably trace 100 AU scale innermost envelopes/circumstellar 

175: 	disks associated with the central heating sources.

176: 	

177: 	The details of the observations of the submillimeter CO (3--2) emission 

178: 	and the near infrared $JHKs$-bands are presented in Section 2. 

179: 	In Section 3, we show the results of the outflow survey. 

180: 	Data analysis of the CO (3--2) outflows is shown in Section 4 and properties of the outflow driving sources are described 

181: 	in Section 5. In Section 6, we discuss the physical properties of the CO outflows in OMC-2/3 and compare them with 

182: 	outflows associated with low- to high-mass YSOs in previous studies. 

183: 	Finally, Section 7 summarizes the paper.

184: 

185: 	

186: \section{OBSERVATIONS AND DATA REDUCTION}

187: 	\subsection{CO (3--2) observations}

188: 	The CO ($J$ = 3--2; 345.795990 GHz) data have been taken with the ASTE 10 m telescope 

189: 	(Ezawa et al. 2004; Kohno et al. 2004) located

190: 	at the Pampa la Bola (altitude = 4800 m), Chile. 

191: 	Observations were remotely made from the ASTE operation room at San Pedoro de Atacama, 

192: 	using the network observation system N-COSMOS3 developed by NAOJ (Kamazaki et al. 2005) 

193: 	during the period of September 2nd to 4th, 2005.

194: 	The half-power beam-width of the ASTE telescope is 22$''$. 

195: 	We used the 345 GHz SIS heterodyne receiver, which had the typical system noise temperature of 175 - 350 K 

196: 	in DSB mode at the observed elevation. 

197: 	The typical atmospheric opacity at 220 GHz was 0.05 toward the zenith during our observations. 

198: 	The temperature scale was determined by the chopper-wheel method, 

199: 	which provides us with the antenna temperature corrected for the atmospheric attenuation. 

200: 	As a backend, we used four sets of 1024 channel auto-correlators, providing us with 

201: 	a frequency resolution of 31.12 KHz that corresponds to 0.27 km s$^{-1}$ at the CO (3--2) frequency.

202: 	The On-The-Fly (OTF) mapping technique (Sawada et al. 2008) was employed

203: 	to cover the whole OMC-2/3 region, $23'.0{\times}13'.3$ (corresponding to 3.1 $\times$ 1.8 pc at 450 pc).  

204: 	The pointing of the telescope was checked every two hours by 5-points scans of the point-like 

205: 	CO (3--2) emission from O Cet. [R.A. (J2000) = 02$^h$ 19$^m$ 20.8$^s$, decl. (J2000) = -02$^{\circ}$ 58$'$ 40.7$''$].

206: 	The pointing errors measured during the observations range from 1$''$.5 to 4$''$.0.

207: 	To convert the antenna temperature to brightness temperature, 

208: 	we adopted the main beam efficiency of 0.55 which was measured by Sawada et al. (2008) 

209: 	during the same observational semester.

210: 	After subtracting linear baselines, the data were convolved 

211: 	by a Gaussian-tapered Bessel function (Magnum, Emerson, \& Greisen 2007) 

212: 	whose FWHM was 14$''$ and resampled onto a 7$''$ grid.

213: 	Since the telescope beam is a Gaussian with a FWHM of 22$''$, 

214: 	the effective FWHM resolution is 26$''$ (corresponding to 0.06 pc). 

215: 	The ``scanning effect'' was minimized by combining scans along R.A. and decl., 

216: 	using the PLAIT algorithm developed by Emerson, D. T. \& Graeve, R. (1988).

217: 	The typical rms noise level was 0.47 K in brightness temperature ($T_b$) with a velocity resolution 

218: 	of 1.08 km s$^{-1}$ after smoothing over four channels. 

219: 	

220: 	\subsection{NIR observations}

221: 	NIR images in the OMC-2/3 region were obtained in November 2004 with the

222: 	near-infrared camera SIRIUS (Simultaneous Three-Color InfrarRed Imager for Unbiased Survey)  

223: 	mounted on the 1.4 m Infrared Survey Facility (IRSF) telescope at the South African Astronomical Observatory, in Sutherland. 

224: 	The camera is equipped with three 1024 $\times$ 1024 pixel HgCdTe (HAWAII) arrays. 

225: 	Two dichroic mirrors enable us to make simultaneous observations at the

226: 	$J~({\lambda}_{c}=1.25~{\mu}\rm{m})$, $H$ (1.63 $\mu$m), and $K_{s}$ (2.14 $\mu$m) bands.

227: 	Details of the camera are provided by Nagashima et al. (1999) and Nagayama et al. (2003).

228: 	The image scale of the array is 0$''$.45 pixel$^{-1}$, providing a field of view of $7'.7{\times}7'.7$ 

229: 	(corresponding to 1.0 $\times$ 1.0 pc).

230: 	Three different field centers, [1]: R.A. = 5$^h$ 35$^m$ 22$^s$, decl. = -5$^{\circ}$ 00$'$ 14.8$''$,

231: 	[2]: R.A. = 5$^h$ 35$^m$ 22$^s$, decl. = -5$^{\circ}$ 6$'$ 44.9$''$, 

232: 	and [3] R.A. = 5$^h$ 35$^m$ 22$^s$, decl = -5$^{\circ}$ 13$'

233: 	$14.8$''$, were set to cover the entire OMC-2/3 region.

234: 	We obtained a total exposure time of 900 seconds in each field. 

235: 	Seeing conditions were $\sim 1''.0~(FWHM)$ in the $J$ band.

236: 	The limiting magnitudes at $J$, $H$ and $K_s$ -band were 19.2, 18.6 and 17.3 mag., respectively. 

237: 	We used the NOAO IRAF software package to reduce the data.

238: 	We applied the standard procedures for near-infrared array image reduction, 

239: 	including dark-current subtraction, sky subtraction, and flat-fielding 

240: 	(see Nakajima et al. 2005 for details of the SIRIUS image processing).

241:  

242: \section{RESULTS} 

243: 	\subsection{Potential Star-Forming Regions in OMC-2/3}

244: 	As the first step of the outflow identification described in the next section, 

245: 	we identified individual star-forming sites in the OMC-2/3 region. 

246: 	For this purpose, we compiled 1.3 mm (Chini et al. 1997, Nielbock et al. 2003) 

247: 	and 350 $\mu$m (Lis et al. 1998) dust continuum sources detected 

248: 	in the OMC 2/3 region, finding 38 sites having dust continuum sources 

249: 	detected at either 1.3 mm, 350 $\mu$m, or both. 

250: 	In addition, we also compiled 3.6 cm radio continuum sources observed with the VLA in 

251: 	the OMC 2/3 region (Reipurth et al. 1999), finding 11 radio continuum sources. 

252: 	Note that eight of the 11 radio continuum sources are associated with the dust continuum sources we compiled, 

253: 	In total, 41 sites listed in Table 1 and shown in Figure 1$a$ are identified 

254: 	as potential star-forming sites located in the OMC-2/3 region. 

255: 

256: 	Because some of the sites that we identified may be still in the starless or pre-stellar phase, 

257: 	we checked whether 24 $\mu$m sources observed with Spitzer/MIPS are associated 

258: 	with these potential star-forming sites. 

259: 	The mid-infrared 24 $\mu$m emission, presumably tracing hot dust ($T_{\rm{dust}}{\sim}$150 K) around protostars, 

260: 	is a good indicator of ongoing star-formation. Eighteen sites in Table 1 are 

261: 	associated with 24 $\mu$m emission suggestive of ongoing star-forming activities. 

262: 	

263: 	\subsection{Outflow Identification}

264: 	The search for outflows was done based on the CO (3--2) data of the OMC-2/3 region that we obtained. 

265: 	The actual search, however, was limited to the vicinity of the potential star-forming sites listed in Table 1. 

266: 	This is because the purpose of our search is to identify outflows associated with potential star-forming sites 

267: 	and to compare characteristics of outflows in the following sections. 

268: 

269: 	In order to identify outflows, we carefully inspected velocity channel maps of the CO (3--2) emission to see 

270: 	whether there is localized blue-shifted or red-shifted emission in the vicinity (within a radius of ${\sim}1'$) of each site in Table 1. 

271: 	We also used our $JHKs$ images to see whether there were any reflection nebulae, 

272: 	jet-like futures, or a chains of knots, which are suggestive of the existence of outflows, 

273: 	in the vicinity of each site in Table 1. 

274: 

275: 	With these search procedures, we identified 21 outflow candidates, 

276: 	which were then classified into three categories, ``CLEAR'', ``POSSIBLE'', and ``MARGINAL'' as follows; 

277: 

278: 	\begin{description}

279: 	\item[CLEAR:]

280: 	outflows in this category have both localized blue- and red-shifted lobes 

281: 	with clear bipolarity in the CO (3--2) channel maps.

282: 

283: 	\item[PROBABLE:]

284: 	outflows in this category have either a localized blue- or red-shifted lobe in the CO (3--2) channel maps. 

285: 

286: 	\item[MARGINAL:]

287: 	outflows in this category have neither a localized blue- nor a red-shifted lobes 

288: 	in the CO (3--2) channel maps, but are associated with extended CO (3--2) high-velocity emission 

289: 	and/or NIR features suggestive of an outflow in the $JHKs$ images.

290: 	\end{description}

291: 

292: 	With this classification, 10 outflow candidates were classified as CLEAR, 

293: 	four were classified as PROBABLE, and six were classified as MARGINAL. 

294: 	Table 2 shows the summary of the outflow search for each of the potential star-forming sites. 

295: 	Figures 1$b$ and 1$c$ show an overall distribution of the 14 outflows candidates 

296: 	categorized as either CLEAR or PROBABLE. Among these 14 outflow candidates, 

297: 	seven were also previously found in CO (1--0) (Aso et al. 2000, Williams et al. 2003). 

298: 	The other seven outflow candidates were newly identified in our observations. 

299: 	We also detected Spitzer 24 $\mu$m sources toward 12 out of the 14 outflows as the likely outflow-driving candidate.  

300: 	Eight sources having near-infrared features suggestive of outflows were identified.

301: 	In the next section, we describe the results of individual outflow candidates in detail. 

302: 

303: 	\subsection{\bf Individual Outflows}

304: 	In this section, we present individual outflows identified in this paper.

305: 	We also present possible outflow candidates which are not associated with any of the 41 potential star-forming sites 

306: 	in Section 3.4. In the outflow identification, we adopt the source name based on the 1.3 mm sources by Chini et al. (1997) 

307: 	and Nielbock et al. (2003). If driving sources have no 1.3 mm sources, we adopt the 350 $\mu$m and/or VLA-3.6 cm 

308: 	source name which were identified by Lis et al. (1998) and Reipurth et al. (1999), respectively. 

309: 	

310: 	\subsubsection{\bf OMC-3 SIMBA Region}

311: 	Five of the 41 potential star-forming sites are located in the northeastern OMC-3 region, 

312: 	called the ``SIMBA'' region (Nielbock et al. 2003). 

313: 	In this region, we newly identified two outflow candidates in CO (3--2); 

314: 	one, categorized as CLEAR, is associated with SIMBA $a$ as shown in Figure 2, and the other, 

315: 	categorized as PROBABLE, is associated with SIMBA $c$ as shown in Figure 3. 

316: 	The later one associated with SIMBA $c$ has only a blue-shifted lobe, 

317: 	in which a faint NIR nebula denoted by [1] in Figure 3$a$ is found. 

318: 	Note that both the blue-shifted lobe and the NIR nebula show elongation in the same direction (northeast--southwest). 

319: 	The elongated CO and NIR structures would support the presence of the outflow associated with SIMBA $c$.

320: 	Although there is red-shifted CO (3--2) emission to the west of SIMBA $c$, 

321: 	which could be a counterpart of the blue-shifted lobe, 

322: 	it is difficult to conclude that this red-shifted emission is a part of the outflow associated with SIMBA $c$,  

323: 	because the orientation of the red-shifted emission (east--west) is very different from that of the blue-shifted lobe, 

324: 	and also because the red-shifted emission is not clearly isolated from the ambient cloud. 

325: 	Both SIMBA $a$ and SIMBA $c$ are associated with Spitzer 24 $\mu$m sources 

326: 	(SP 053530-045848 and 053528-045838, respectively) as shown in Figure 2$b$, 

327: 	and they could be the driving sources of these outflows.

328: 

329: 	\subsubsection{\bf OMC-3 Region}

330: 	Figures \ref{f4}, \ref{f5}, and \ref{f6} show results of our outflow survey in the the OMC-3 region 

331: 	(except the SIMBA region). 14 of 41 potential star-forming sites are located in this region, 

332: 	and at least six 1.3 mm sources have a class 0-type SEDs with a small ratio of $L_{bol}/L_{smm}< 200$ (Chini et al. 1997).

333: 	We identified four CO (3--2) outflows categorized as CLEAR in this region. 

334: 	

335: 	$MMS~2; (CLEAR)$-- 	We detected a CO (3--2) outflow along the east-west direction toward MMS 2 as 

336: 	shown in Figure \ref{f4}$b$. The blue- and red-shifted components overlap, 

337: 	suggesting that the axis of this flow is close to the plane of the sky.

338: 	This east-west outflow has also been identified in the CO (1--0) emission (Williams et al. 2003, Aso et al. 2000). 

339: 	However, the previous CO (1--0) studies had difficulty identifying which sites of MMS 1-4 the CO outflow is associated with. 

340: 	Because only MMS 2 is associated with a significant 24 $\mu$m Spitzer source (SP 053518-050045), 

341: 	this CO (3--2) outflow, presumably driven by the 24 $\mu$m Spitzer source, 

342: 	is most probably associated with MMS 2 rather than MMS1, MMS 3 or MMS 4. 

343: 	In the NIR image shown in Figure 4$a$, there is a jet-like feature and a knot to the west of the Spitzer source 

344: 	(denoted by [3] and [4], respectively). 

345: 	These two features were also detected in NIR H$_2$ emission (Yu et al. 1997, Stanke et al. 2002, Tsujimoto et al. 2004). 

346: 	Both of them are elongated in the same direction and in particular the reflection nebula denoted by [3] is spatially coincident with the blue-shifted lobe.

347: 	An extended NIR feature was also detected in the eastern part of the MMS 2 along the outflow axis (denoted by [2]).  

348: 	Our $JHK_s$ image suggests that the NIR feature is a reflection nebula from the isolated star-forming site 

349: 	rather than knots from MMS 2 (Section 3.4), although previous NIR H$_2$ observations suggested that 

350: 	the origin of the NIR feature is the outflow from MMS 2. 

351: 

352: 	$MMS~5; (CLEAR)$-- 

353: 	There is a compact east-west outflow with a clear bipolarity centered on MMS 5, as shown in Figure \ref{f4}$b$. 

354: 	This east-west outflow has also been identified in the CO (1--0) emission (Williams et al. 2003, Aso et al. 2000). 

355: 	A 24 $\mu$m source (SP053522-050115), associated with MMS 5, is located between the blue- and red-shifted lobes, 

356: 	suggesting that this 24 $\mu$m source is most probably the driving source of the outflow. 

357: 	The infrared image in Figure \ref{f4}$a$ shows that several knots, denoted by [5], 

358: 	are associated with the blue-shifted lobe. These knots were also detected in infrared H$_2$ emission 

359: 	(Yu et al. 1997 and Stanke et al. 2002).

360: 	

361: 	$MMS~6; (MARGINAL)$-- 

362: 	MMS 6 is the brightest 1.3 mm continuum source in the OMC-2/3 region (Chini et al. 1997). 

363: 	We did not find any clear signature of CO (3--2) outflows (see Figure \ref{f4}$b$), 

364: 	as also indicated by previous CO (1--0) observations (Williams et al. 2003, Matthews et al. 2005), 

365: 	although there is extended high-velocity red-shifted emission to the southeast of MMS 6. 

366: 	Careful inspection of the near-infrared image in Figure \ref{f4}$c$, however, 

367: 	shows that there are two faint $Ks$ emissions north and south of MMS 6. 

368: 	These two northern and southern sources are also detected at 24 $\mu$m 

369: 	(SP 053524-050130 and SP 053524-050140, respectively). 

370: 	More importantly, the near-infrared image shows a faint jet-like feature denoted by [6] 

371: 	to the east of the northern infrared source. 

372: 	In addition, a 3.6 cm free-free emission (i.e., VLA 3) is also associated with the northern infrared source. 

373: 	These results suggest that there may be an east-west outflow associated with the northern infrared source. 

374: 	We note that previous studies (Yu et al. 1997, Stanke et al. 2002) considered 

375: 	the two infrared sources north and south of MMS 6 to be knots due to a jet, 

376: 	although we consider them to be protostars because they are more point-like and are detected even at 24 $\mu$m.

377:  

378: 	$MMS~7; (CLEAR)$-- Figure \ref{f5} shows a molecular outflow associated with MMS 7, which

379: 	is elongated in the east-west direction. 

380: 	While the outflow shows a clear bipolarity, the red-shifted lobe is much more elongated than the blue-shifted lobe.

381: 	The connected trajectory of the CO red-shifted emission peaks, denoted as a black solid curve in Figure \ref{f5}$b$, shows a

382: 	wiggled structure over one pc to the west of MMS 7, possibly suggesting a precessing motion.

383: 	This east-west outflow has also been identified in the CO (1--0) observations 

384: 	by Aso et al. (2000), Williams et al. (2003), and Takahashi et al. (2006). 

385: 	The projected maximum velocity of this outflow is relatively small, 

386: 	and the NIR reflection nebula (Haro-5a/6a; Haro 1953) associated with the outflow extends to both east and west. 

387: 	These suggest that the outflow is almost on the plane of the sky.

388: 	In addition, there is a one-sided optical jet on the western side (Reipurth, Bally, \& Devine 1997; HH 294) 

389: 	and a compact 3.6 cm free-free jet associated with the central star (Reipurth et al. 1999, 2004), 

390: 	both of which have roughly the same position angle as that of the CO (3--2) flow.

391: 	We also detected faint knots along the western part of the CO outflow as denoted by [7] in Figure \ref{f5}$a$. 

392: 	We note that the CO outflow associated with MMS 7 has a very large collimation factor, 15.4, for blue-shifted component, 

393: 	which is significantly larger than the others, 0.9--4.7

394: 	\footnote{The axis ratio ($R_{\rm{maj}}/R_{\rm{min}}$) was adopted the maximum size of major- and minor- axes measured by eyes.}. 

395: 	We do not understand how to make such a large collimation factor of CO outflows, 

396: 	but this kind of CO outflow might be related to optical jets on a parsec scale (Reipurth et al. 1997).  

397: 

398: 	In the northeast of the MMS 7, there is an embedded protostellar candidate, 

399: 	MMS 7-NE, which has been identified by Takahashi et al. (2006), 

400: 	although the source is not included in the 41 potential star-forming sites.  

401: 	A possible compact bipolar outflow associated with MMS 7-NE was detected 

402: 	in the interferometric CO (1--0) observations with a 0.05 pc scale (Takahashi et al. 2006).  

403: 	The CO (3--2) bipolar outflow associated with the MMS 7-NE was 

404: 	not detected probably due to the insufficient spatial resolution and potential contamination 

405: 	of the MMS 7 outflow emission. 

406: 	

407: 	$MMS~9; (CLEAR)$ -- 

408: 	A prominent CO (3--2) outflow elongated from east to west was detected as shown in Figure \ref{f6}$b$. 

409: 	This outflow has also been identified by CO (1--0) observations (Aso et al. 2000, Williams et al. 2003). 

410: 	The outflow shows clear bipolarity centered on MMS 9. The blue- and red-shifted lobes are east and west of MMS 9. 

411: 	An additional red-shifted lobe was also detected overlapping part of the blue-shifted lobe. 

412: 	The maximum size of the outflow was measured at up to one pc in channel maps. 

413: 	A 24 $\mu$m emission (SP 053526-050546) is associated with MMS 9, 

414: 	and is presumably the driving source of the outflow, 

415: 	although there is another 24 $\mu$m source (SP 053526-050558) located at 10$''$ south of MMS 9. 

416: 	In the $JHKs$ image (see Figure \ref{f6}$a$), we detected a near-infrared feature denoted by [9]  

417: 	located to the east of the 24 $\mu$m source (SP 053526-050546). 

418: 	In addition, there appear bow-shock-like futures as denoted by [10] and [11] in Figure \ref{f6}$a$, 

419: 	which seem to be associated with the termination of the blue-shifted (or red-shifted) CO knots 

420: 	presented in Figure \ref{f6}$b$ [i]. 

421: 	It is interesting to note that the velocity width of the blue-shifted emission abruptly increases 

422: 	at the position of the bow-shock-like futures as shown in the position-velocity diagram (see Figure \ref{f9}). 

423: 		

424: 	Figure \ref{f6}$b$ shows that there are two other outflow candidates in this region. 

425: 	One is the blue-shifted lobe elongated to the northeast denoted by [ii]

426: 	from the position of the 24 $\mu$m sources (SP 053526-050546 and SP 053526-050558). 

427: 	At the northeast end of the blue-shifted lobe, there is a faint bow-shock-like feature 

428: 	detected in the $JHKs$ image shown in Figure \ref{f6}$a$ (denoted by [8]). 

429: 	It is not clear whether this blue-shifted lobe is a part of the outflow described above, 

430: 	or another outflow having no clear red-shifted lobe. 

431: 	In the following discussion, we consider that this blue-shifted lobe is a part of the outflow associated with MMS 9.

432: 	The other outflow candidate is the extended reflection nebula, located at $\sim$15$''$ west 

433: 	of MMS 10 (denoted as [12] in Figure \ref{f6}$a$). There is an infrared point source identified as J05353153-0505473 in the the 2MASS catalog 

434: 	to the east of the reflection nebula. 

435: 	Even though the source sits inside the red-shifted outflow from MMS 9, it is probably not related to the high-velocity emission. 

436: 	This is because the source already appears in the $J$-band as a point source, 

437: 	suggesting that it  is more evolved than other potential star-forming sites 

438: 	

439: 	\subsubsection{\bf OMC-2 Region}

440: 	The OMC-2 region contains embedded clusters with approximately 100 stellar components (Lada \& Lada 2003). 

441: 	There are also mid-infrared sources with a number density of 200 pc$^{-2}$ in the most complex regions: 

442: 	FIR 3--5 (Nielbock et al. 2003). Several bright reflection nebulae and NIR features in this region indicate an extreme complexity.

443: 	Twenty one of the 41 potential star-forming sites are included in this region.	

444: 	

445: 	$VLA~9; (PROBABLE)$-- 

446: 	A blue-shifted outflow is detected to the northeast of VLA 9, 

447: 	which is associated with a 24 $\mu$m source, SP 053526-050758, as shown by the dotted-line [iii] in Figure \ref{f6}$b$. 

448: 	We consider that this blue-shifted outflow is probably driven by the 24 $\mu$m source associated with VLA 9, 

449: 	although previous studies have reported that the blue-shifted outflow is 

450: 	associated with MMS 10 (Williams et al. 2003, Aso et al. 2000). 

451: 	This is because (i) MMS 10 is more likely a starless core rather than a protostellar core 

452: 	since there is no 24 $\mu$m source associated with MMS 10, 

453: 	and (ii) the morphology of the blue-shifted lobe seems to become more collimated 

454: 	toward the position of the 24 $\mu$m source, but not toward MMS 10. 

455: 	A NIR reflection nebula elongated in the same direction as the blue-shifted outflow is detected 

456: 	to the northeast of the 24 $\mu$m source, as denoted by [13] in Figure \ref{f6}$a$, 

457: 	which supports the idea that the blue-shifted outflow is driven by the 24 $\mu$m source. 

458: 	Note that the red-shifted emission southwest of the 24 $\mu$m source could partially 

459: 	be a counterpart of the blue-shifted outflow. 

460: 	It is, however, difficult for us to conclude this, because of the contamination by another nearby outflow 

461: 	associated with FIR 2 (see below). 

462: 	

463: 	$FIR~1b; (PROBABLE) $-- 

464: 	A red-shifted CO (3--2) outflow is located southeast of FIR 1$b$ [iv] as shown in Figure \ref{f6}$b$, 

465: 	whereas weak extended blue-shifted emission is northwest of FIR 1$b$. 

466: 	This extended blue-shifted component may be the counterpart of the red-shifted lobe, 

467: 	forming a bipolar outflow, as suggested by the previous CO (1--0) observations (Aso et al. 2000, Williams et al. 2003). 

468: 	This is, however, difficult to conclude because the blue-shifted emission is 

469: 	less localized and also is connected to the prominent outflow associated with MMS 9. 

470: 	The red-shifted outflow is probably associated with FIR 1$b$ 

471: 	although we cannot rule out its possible association with FIR 1$a$. 

472: 	Note that neither FIR 1$b$ nor FIR1$a$ is associated with any 24 $\mu$m emission, 

473: 	preventing us from identifying the driving source of the outflow. 

474: 	There is no apparent outflow associated with FIR 1$c$.

475: 

476: 	$FIR~2; (CLEAR)$--  There is a clear bipolar CO outflow associated with FIR 2,

477: 	centered on the 24 $\mu$m source of SP 053524-050830, as shown in Figure \ref{f6}$b$ or \ref{f7}$b$. 

478: 	This outflow has also been identified in CO (1--0) (Aso et al. 2000, Williams et al. 2003).

479: 	The blue-shifted emission is located to the southwest and the red-shifted emission to the northeast of 

480: 	24 $\mu$m source.

481: 	

482: 	$FIR~3; (CLEAR)$ --  

483: 	Red- and blue-shifted CO (3--2) emissions elongated along the northeast to the southwest direction is 

484: 	seen in Figure \ref{f7}$b$. Each of the emissions overlapping with the other has two peaks, 

485: 	and a prominent 24 $\mu$m source, SP 053528-050935 associated with FIR 3, 

486: 	is located between the two peaks. 

487: 	This suggests that the outflow is driven by this 24 $\mu$m source. 

488: 	This outflow was also identified in CO (1--0) and CO (2--1) (Aso et al. 2000, Williams et al. 2003, Wu et al. 2005).  

489: 	Because the blue- and red-shifted lobes overlap, 

490: 	the axis of the outflow is considered to be almost on the plane of the sky. 

491: 	This geometrical configuration is also suggested by the position-velocity diagram cutting 

492: 	along the outflow axis showing ``butterfly'' like velocity structure. 

493: 	Our $JHK_s$ image presented in Figure \ref{f7}$a$ [14] shows bright knots and shell-like features to the northeast of FIR 3 

494: 	and a reflection nebula to the southwest of FIR 3. 

495: 	These NIR features, which are associated with the CO (3--2) outflow, also support 

496: 	the idea that the outflow is driven by  the 24 $\mu$m source associated with FIR 3.

497: 

498: 	In the vicinity of the peak position of FIR 3, there is another 24 $\mu$m source, 

499: 	SP 053527-050923 (also identified as MIR 20 by Nielbock et al. 2003), located at 15$''$ northwest of FIR 3. 

500: 	Our $JHK_s$ image presented in Figure \ref{f7}$a$ [15] shows a jet-like feature elongated to the west of this 24 $\mu$m source. 

501: 	Interestingly, we also detected slightly extended blue-shifted CO (3--2) emission coincident 

502: 	with the NIR jet-like feature (see Figure \ref{f7}$b$), 

503: 	even though it is difficult for us to clearly distinguish this blue-shifted emission from the prominent 

504: 	blue-shifted outflow driven by SP 053528-050935.

505: 	

506: 	$FIR~4; (MARGINAL)$--  

507: 	The strong millimeter source FIR 4 associated with a free-free jet , VLA 12, 

508: 	is in the near neighborhood of a 24 $\mu$m source, SP 053527-051002. 

509: 	Although the CO (3--2) line profile toward FIR 4 shows a broad wing, 

510: 	no clear CO outflow associated with FIR 4 was identified in our CO (3--2) map (see Figure \ref{f7}$b$). 

511: 	Millimeter interferometric observations also showed no clear outflow associated with FIR 4 (Shimajiri et al. 2008). 

512: 	This may be because there is strong contamination of the prominent outflow associated with FIR 3. 

513: 	In fact, we detected a faint NIR nebula in the vicinity of FIR 4, as denoted by [16] in Figure \ref{f7}$a$ and \ref{f7}$c$, 

514: 	which could be a hint of a potential outflow associated with FIR 4.

515: 	

516: 	$FIR~5; (NO)$-- A 24 $\mu$m source, SP 053527-051017 (corresponding to MIR 27 from Nielbock et al. 2003), 

517: 	is located at 10$''$ NE of FIR 5. There is no clear bipolar CO lobe around this site. 

518: 

519: 	$VLA~13; (CLEAR)$--

520: 	We detected a bipolar CO (3--2) outflow along the north-south direction centered on VLA 13, 

521: 	which coincides with a bright 24 $\mu$m source, SP 053525-051031 (see Figure \ref{f7}$b$). 

522: 	Our $JHKs$ image shows that there is a bright cone-shaped $K_s$ reflection nebula 

523: 	([17] in Figure \ref{f7}$a$) coincident with this outflow.  

524: 

525: 	$FIR~6a-d$;   

526: 	A bipolar CO (3--2) outflow categorized as ``CLEAR'' lies northeast to southwest centered on FIR 6$b$ (see Figure \ref{f8}$b$), 

527: 	which is associated with a 24 $\mu$m source, SP 053523-051205 shown in Figure \ref{f8}$a$. 

528: 	We also detected another bipolar CO (3--2) outflow running close to the north-south centered on FIR 6$c$. 

529: 	This outflow was also categorized as ``CLEAR'' although its red-shifted lobe might be 

530: 	partially the molecular ridge surrounding M 43. No 24 $\mu$m source is associated with FIR 6$c$. 

531: 	This might be because of a very high background level due to the emission from M 43. 

532: 	Although FIR 6$d$ is not associated with any clear CO (3--2) high velocity lobe, 

533: 	a possible outflow we categorized as ``MARGINAL'' was found at the position of FIR 6$d$ as 

534: 	an NIR reflection nebula denoted by [18] in Figure \ref{f8}$a$. 

535: 	There is neither clear CO lobe nor NIR feature around FIR 6$a$. 

536: 

537: 	$CSO~32;(MARGINAL)$--

538: 	Although red-shifted emission is associated with CSO 32, 

539: 	this red-shifted emission appears to be a part of the molecular ridge surrounding M 43. 

540: 

541: 	$CSO~33;(PROBABLE)$--

542: 	A blue-shifted CO (3--2) emission associated with CSO 33 was detected as shown in Figure \ref{f8}$b$. 

543: 	Our $JHK_s$ image shows that a reflection nebula coincident with the blue-shifted outflow was also detected. 

544: 	The reflection nebula extends to the east of CSO 33, which seems to be consistent with the elongation of 

545: 	the blue-shifted emission. We cannot identify a driving source for this blue-shifted outflow since there is 

546: 	no 24 $\mu$m source associated with CSO 33. This may be because of the high background level due to M43. 

547: 	There is a red-shifted emission located at 15$''$ east of CSO 33, 

548: 	and could be the counterpart of the blue-shifted outflow. 

549: 	However, the direction of the red-shifted emission is not consistent with the extension of the reflection nebula. 

550: 	In addition, the location of CSO 33 is not favorable for the interpretation of the red-shifted emission 

551: 	as the counterpart of the blue-shifted outflow. 

552: 	The red-shifted emission may be a part of the molecular ridge surrounding and probably interacting with M43.

553: 	

554: 

555: 	\subsection{\bf Notable NIR sources}

556: 			

557: 	We have found three notable NIR sources in the OMC-2/3 region through the observations with SIRIUS/IRSF. 

558: 	Although these NIR sources are not associated with the 41 potential star-forming sites, 

559: 	the $JHKs$ images we obtained show probable star-forming activities. 

560: 

561: 	The first source is a faint reflection nebula located at $\sim$100$''$ east of MMS 2 (denoted as [2] in Figure \ref{f4}$a$). 

562: 	This source was catalogued as 2MASS J05352454-0500214. Previous observations of H$_2$ emission at 2.2 $\mu$m 

563: 	suggested that this reflection nebula might be a knot related to the outflow from MMS 2 (Stanke et al. 2002). 

564: 	Our $JHK_s$ image shows extended emission with a bright point source at the center of the emission (see Figure \ref{f10}$a$).

565: 	The extended NIR emission appears as a cone-shaped structure due to an outflow with an axis nearly pole-on. 

566: 	These results suggest that the NIR feature probably traces an independent star-forming activity rather than a knot due to the outflow from MMS 2. 

567: 	Strong blue-shifted and faint red-shifted CO (3--2) emissions were detected around this source (see Figure \ref{f4}$b$), 

568: 	but their relationship with the NIR feature is not clear.

569: 

570: 	The second source is a reddened point-like source surrounded by an extended emission elongated from northeast to southwest 

571: 	(denoted as [a] in Figure \ref{f8}$a$). The source was catalogued as 2MASS J05352748-0511497. 

572: 	The size of the extended emission is $\sim$8$''$ (corresponding to 3600 AU) along the major axis, while $\sim$4$''$ 

573: 	(corresponding to 1800 AU) along the minor axis. 

574: 	Although there is no clear CO high velocity emission associated with this source, 

575: 	the origin of the elongated feature might be an outflow cavity.

576: 		

577: 	The last source is located at 80$''$ northwest of FIR 6$b$ (denoted as [b] in Figure \ref{f8}$a$). 

578: 	The source, catalogued as 2MASS J05352307-0511490, has a cavity-like reflection nebula from nearly north to south, 

579: 	with a silhouette disk at its middle. Although there is no clear CO (3--2) high velocity emission associated with the source, 

580: 	the cavity-like reflection nebula is suggestive of an outflow activity. 

581: 	

582: 	The possible origins of these NIR sources are low-mass protostars associated with low mass molecular outflows with masses less 

583: 	than the detection limit of our survey. 

584: 		

585: \section{DATA ANALYSIS OF THE CO (3--2) EMISSION}

586: 	Table 3 summarizes parameters toward 14 outflows categorized as CLEAR or PROBABLE. 	

587: 	Regarding the inclination angle of the outflows of MMS 2, MMS 7, and FIR 3, we assumed 

588: 	an inclination of 70 $^{\circ}$, since the outflow axes of these outflows  

589: 	are nearly on the plane of the sky as seen in the outflow morphology (i.e., blue- and red-shifted lobes overlapping morphology) in the CO emission. 

590: 	The inclination angle of the other outflows were assumed to be 45 $^{\circ}$. 

591: 	The projected maximum size of each CO (3--2) outflow was measured at the 3$\sigma$ contour in its channel maps. 

592: 	The velocity range of each outflow was determined using channel maps: isolated components from high velocity CO 

593: 	emission are clearly identifiable at more than 3 $\sigma$ level within the velocity range, without significant contamination of 

594: 	emission from the ambient component. The velocity ranges of the outflows were presented in the Table 3. 

595: 	The maximum velocity (${\Delta}V_{\rm{max}}$) of each outflow presented in Table 3 was calculated as $|V_{\rm{sys}}-V_{\rm{max}}|$, 

596: 	where $V_{\rm{max}}$ is either the most blue-shifted or the most red-shifted velocity of each outflow within its velocity range.

597: 	

598: 	Under the assumption of the Local Thermodynamical Equilibrium (LTE) condition and optically thin CO (3--2) emission, 

599: 	we estimated the outflow mass ($M_{\rm{CO}}$) as 

600: 	

601: 	\begin{equation}

602: 		M_{\rm{CO}}~[M_{\odot}]~=~ \bar{\mu}~ m_{\rm{H}}~ X[{\rm{CO}}]~\Omega_{\rm{S}}~ D^2 N_{\rm{CO}},  

603: 	\end{equation}

604: 

605: 	where

606: 

607:     \begin{equation}

608: 		N_{\rm{CO}}~{\rm{[cm^{-2}]}}~=~ \frac{8 \pi {\nu}^3}{c^3} \times \frac{1}{(2J_{l}+3)A} 

609: 		\times \frac{Z(T_{\rm{ex}})}{\exp(-E_{l}/kT_{\rm{ex}})[1-\exp(h{\nu}/kT_{\rm{ex}})]}

610: 		\times \frac{{\int}T_B dV}{J(T_{\rm{ex}})-J(T_{\rm{bg}})}, 

611: 	\end{equation}

612: 	

613: 	and 

614: 

615: 	\begin{equation}

616: 		J(T)~=~\frac{h{\nu}/k}{\exp(h{\nu}/kT)-1}.

617: 	\end{equation}

618: 	

619: 	In the above expressions, $\bar{\mu}$ is the mean molecular weight of 2.33, $m_{\rm{H}}$ is the atomic hydrogen mass, 

620: 	$h$ is Planck's constant, $k$ is Boltzmann's constant, 

621: 	$c$ is the speed of light, $\nu$  is the line frequency, $T_{\rm{ex}}$ is the excitation temperature of the CO  transitions, 

622: 	$\Omega$ is a solid angle of each source, $D$ is the distance to the objects, $N_{\rm{CO}}$ is the CO column density, 

623: 	$T_{\rm{bg}}$ is the background radiation temperature, 

624: 	$A$ is the Einstein $A$-coefficient of the transition, $Z$ is the partition function, and $E_{l}$ 

625: 	is the rotational energy level of the lower energy state,  

626: 	$J_{l}$ is the rotational quantum number of the lower energy state, and ${\int}T_{B}dV$ is the integrated intensity of 

627: 	the blue- and red-shifted CO (3--2) emissions in the unit of K km s$^{-1}$. 

628:     Each outflow emission was integrated using the velocity range of the CO (3--2) emission presented in Table 3.

629: 	Here, we adopted $T_{\rm{ex}}$ of 30 K which is typical peak CO (3--2) brightness temperature in the OMC-2/3 filament 

630: 	(see CO line profiles in Figure \ref{f13}), and $X$[CO] of 10$^{-4}$ (e.g., Frerking, Langer \& Wilson 1982).	

631: 	The detection limit of the mass corresponds to as small as 10$^{-4}~M_{\odot}$ within a single beam 

632: 	\footnote{We derived the detection limit of the outflow mass assuming that the 3 $\sigma$ emission level and $\delta$V=1.08 km s$^{-1}$}.

633: 	The size and velocity of the outflow after the correction for the projection with the 

634: 	inclination angle, $i$, are estimated to be $R~=~R_{\rm{max}}/\sin i$, and $V~=~{\Delta}V_{\rm{max}}/\cos i$, respectively.

635: 	Here, a pole-on outflow was defined as an inclination angle of 0$^{\circ}$.

636: 	We obtained the outflow dynamical time, $t_d~ = ~R/V$, 

637: 	mass outflow rate, $\dot{M}_{\rm{CO}}~=~M_{\rm{CO}}/t_d$, 

638: 	momentum, $P_{\rm{CO}}~=~M_{\rm{CO}}{\times}V_{\rm{\rm{max}}}$, 

639: 	and momentum flux, $F_{\rm{CO}}~=~P_{\rm{CO}}/t_d$. 

640: 

641: \section{PROPERTIES OF THE PROTOSTELLAR CORES IN OMC-2/3}

642: 	In Table 4, we list the derived physical properties of the individual protostellar cores having CO outflows categorized as CLEAR. 

643: 	These individual sites have compact infrared sources (IRAS sources and/or Spitzer sources), which are considered to be 

644: 	the driving sources of the associated CO outflows. The bolometric luminosity of each driving source was estimated from the total 

645: 	flux density integrated from 8 $\mu$m to 1.3 mm continuum data. Since the IRAS sources in these regions have only upper limits at 

646: 	100 $\mu$m, upper and lower limits of the bolometric luminosity for each driving source were derived with and without the flux density 

647: 	at 100 $\mu$m, respectively. The mass of the envelope surrounding each of the driving sources was estimated from the 1.3 mm 

648: 	flux density observed by Chini et al. (1997) and Nielbock et al. (2003). On the assumption that the 1.3 mm continuum is optically thin, 

649: 	the mass is derived using the following formula;

650: 		

651: 		\begin{equation}

652: 			M_{\rm{dust}} = \frac{S_{\lambda}d^2}{{\kappa}_{\lambda}B_{\lambda}(T_{\rm{dust}})}

653: 		\end{equation}

654: 	where, $\kappa_{\lambda}$ is the mass-absorption coefficient of the dust grains, 

655: 	$B_{\lambda}$ is the Planck function, $d$ is the distance to the OMC-2/3 region (450 pc;Genzel \& Stutzki 1989), 

656: 	and $S_{\lambda}$ is the total flux density of the continuum emission within the 11$''$ radius 

657: 	(corresponding to 5000 AU) as repeated by Chini et al. 1997. 

658: 	We adopted a dust opacity of $\kappa_{\nu}=0.037$ cm$^{-2}$ g$^{-1} 

659: 	(400~{\mu}m/\lambda)^{\beta}$ (Ohashi et al. 1996), $\beta$=2, and $T_{\rm{dust}}$=20 K (i.e., typical temperature of these 

660: 	cores from Cesaroni et al. 1994, Chini et al. 1997).  

661: 	The estimated envelope masses are found to be $\leq$1.0 to 7.7 $M_{\odot}$. 	

662: 	

663: 	What is the evolutionary status of these sources? The spectral slope between near- and mid-infrared is often used to identify 

664: 	the evolutionary status of young stellar objects (e.g., Adams et al. 1988). We used the 2 $\mu$m and 10 $\mu$m data 

665: 	taken by Nielbock et al. (2003) to derive spectral slopes of our 10 cores: 6 sources (MMS 2, MMS 7, FIR 2, FIR 3, VLA 13, and FIR 6$b$) 

666: 	were found to show positive slopes (e.g., rising spectrum toward 10 $\mu$m), suggesting that these sources are Class I type of 

667: 	objects. Four out  of the 10 sources (SIMBA $a$, MMS 5, MMS 9, and FIR 6$c$), on the other hand, 

668: 	were not detected at 10 $\mu$m  and shorter wavelengths with the ground-based telescopes. 

669: 	Since these 4 sources are as luminous as the 6 detected sources mentioned above (see Table 4), 

670: 	they should not be too faint to be detected at 10 $\mu$m and shorter wavelengths. 

671: 	A possible reason for this non-detection at near-infrared is that they are even more deeply embedded than the 

672: 	6 detected sources. If this is the case, these 4 non-detected sources would be even younger than the 6 detected sources, 

673: 	i.e., Class 0 type of objects. Hence, these 4 sources are categorized as Class 0 type of objects in our paper. 

674: 	We note that the ratio of submillimeter luminosity  ($L_{\rm{sbmm}}$) to bolometric luminosity ($L_{\rm{bol}}$ ) 

675: 	is often used to distinguish Class 0 sources from Class I sources (Andre et al. 1993). 

676: 	It is, however, not easy for us to take this approach for our sample sources because of the large uncertainty 

677: 	of the bolometric luminosities we estimated, as described above.

678: 

679: 

680: \section{DISCUSSION}

681: \subsection{Comparison with previous CO (1--0) observations}

682: 	In addition to our CO (3--2) observations, outflow observations in the OMC-2/3 region were also conducted by Aso et al. (2000) 

683: 	with the Nobeyama 45 m telescope, and Williams et al. (2003) with the FCRAO 14 m telescope and the BIMA array. 

684: 	These previous observations were done in CO (1--0). In this section, we compare our results with those obtained 

685: 	in the previous observations.

686: 

687: 	Out of 14 outflows (10 are categorized as CLEAR and 4 are categorized as PROBABLE) we identified, 

688: 	the one associated with CSO 33 located in the most southern part of the OMC-2/3 region was not included in the previous outflow observations. 

689: 	Out of the rest, eight outflows associated with MMS 2, MMS 5, MMS 7, MMS 9, VLA 9, FIR 1$b$, FIR 2 and FIR 3 were also detected in 

690: 	both of the previous observations although one of them, associated with VLA 9, was considered to be associated with MMS 10 

691: 	in the previous observations (see section 3.3.3; see also below). The physical parameters of these eight outflows derived from 

692: 	our CO (3--2) data (see Table 4) are roughly in agreement with those derived from the previous CO (1--0) data. 

693: 	On the other hand, five outflows associated with SIMBA $a$, SIMBA $c$, VLA 13, FIR 6$b$, and FIR 6$c$ have been detected only in our CO (3--2) observations.

694: 

695: 	Why were these five outflows not detected in the previous CO (1--0) observations? 

696: 	One reason is the complexity of the region; some parts of the OMC-2 region form young stars as groups, 

697: 	and as a result, it is difficult for us to identify each outflow. 

698: 	For example, even though previous observations detected 

699: 	high velocity red-shifted CO (1--0) emission near VLA 13, it was not identified as an outflow associated with VLA 13. 

700: 	In this study, it was identified as an outflow associated with VLA 13 because of the near- and mid-IR data as well as the CO (3--2) data. 

701: 	A similar case is the outflow associated with VLA 9; previous studies misidentified this outflow as that associated with MMS 10 

702: 	because of the lack of near- and mid-infrared data.

703: 

704: 	Another possibility is that high velocity emission is weaker in the CO (1--0). 

705: 	In the case of outflows associated with SIMBA $a$ and SIMBA $c$, no high velocity emission was clearly detected 

706: 	in CO (1--0) in the previous observations. These outflows are weak even in the CO (3--2) emission. 

707: 	Similarly, outflows associated with FIR6 $b$ and FIR6 $c$ are significantly 

708: 	weak in CO (1--0) even though they are quite strong in CO (3--2). 

709: 

710: 	Are outflow emissions systematically weaker in CO (1--0) as compared with CO (3--2)? 

711: 	In order to examine this, we compared the intensity of CO (1--0) and (3--2) emissions toward the outflow lobes. 

712: 	For this comparison, we used new CO (1--0) outflow maps of the OMC-2/3 region, recently taken using 

713: 	the Nobeyama 45 m telescope with the OTF mode (Kawabe et al.) in addition to our CO (3--2) maps taken by ASTE. 

714: 	Since the CO (1--0) maps have a higher angular resolution (22$''$) than the CO (3--2) maps (26$''$), 

715: 	the CO (1--0) maps were convolved with a beam of 26$''$.  

716: 	For the outflows significantly detected in both CO (1--0) and (3--2), CO (3--2)/CO (1--0) intensity ratios were estimated to be 1-3, 

717: 	suggesting that CO (3--2) emission is at least comparable to, or brighter than CO (1--0) for the outflows in the OMC-2/3 region. 

718: 

719: 	It is interesting to consider what kind of physical conditions could make the CO (3--2) emission a few times stronger than the CO (1--0) emission. 

720: 	With the Large Velocity Gradient (LVG) calculations, the CO (3--2)/CO(1--0) ratio would be more than unity when 

721: 	H$_2$ density range of 1.5$\times$10$^3$ to 2$\times$10$^4$ cm$^{-3}$ and the kinematic temperature of 40 K. 

722: 	The gas kinetic temperature at some of outflow lobes actually estimated to be more than 40 K from CO (3-2) line profiles. 

723: 	Hence, these molecular outflows we observed in the OMC-2/3 region probably have high density gas of $\sim$10$^4$ cm$^{-3}$. 

724: 	Such high density and high temperature gas were found in the molecular outflow associated with L1157, 

725: 	one of the best-studied molecular outflows (Hirano \& Taniguchi 2001). 

726: 	

727: 

728: \subsection{Outflow Properties: OMC-2/3 Region versus Other Regions}

729: 

730: 	In the following section, we compare the physical nature of the outflows in the OMC-2/3 region with 

731: 	those found through previous systematic outflow searches in other star-forming regions. 

732: 	In order for us to minimize the ambiguity of the outflow identification, 

733: 	we limited our outflow sample in the OMC-2/3 region to those categorized as CLEAR or PROBABLE 

734: 	in the sections 6.2.1 and those categorized as CLEAR in the section 6.2.2.

735: 	

736: 	\subsubsection{Detection Rate of the outflows}

737: 	Among the 41 potential star-forming sites listed in Table 1, 

738: 	14 sites were found to be associated with CO outflows categorized as CLEAR or PROBABLE. 

739: 	When we simply calculate the CO outflow detection rate using this result, the rate is 34 \%. 

740: 	On the other hand, previous outflow searches in low-mass star-forming regions (e.g., Bontemps et al. 1996, Hogerheijde et al. 1998) 

741: 	and in high-mass star-forming regions (e.g., Shepherd \& Churchwell 1996, Zhang et al. 2001) showed that the detection rate is more than 80 \%. 

742: 	This might suggest that the CO outflow detection rate in the OMC-2/3 region is significantly lower than in the other star-forming regions. 

743: 	We should note, however, that 23 of the 41 potential star-forming sites (49 \%) do not have Spitzer 24 $\mu$m source; 

744: 	these sites are the so-called prestellar cores, where no infrared embedded sources have been found. 

745: 	In contrast, the previous outflow searches mentioned above were biased toward IRAS sources. 

746: 	When we limit our regions to those with 24 $\mu$m sources, then the CO outflow detection rate becomes 67 \%. 

747: 	This is comparable to, but not as high as those of the previous searches. 

748: 	This is probably because; (i) a part of the ambient molecular cloud in the OMC-2/3 region shows CO emissions with higher velocities, 

749: 	which are difficult to distinguish from molecular outflows; (ii) some of the 24 $\mu$m sources seem to be more evolved with less surrounding material. 	

750: 	

751: 	

752: 	\subsubsection{Relation between outflow parameters and driving source properties}

753: 	Previous studies have discussed the driving mechanisms and the physical properties of CO outflows 

754: 	(e.g., Lada 1985, Cabrit et al. 1992, Bontemps et al. 1996). 

755: 	Their main conclusions are as follows: (i) CO molecular outflows driven by a highly collimated flow (i.e., primary jet) are observed as entrained surrounding 

756: 	molecular gas, (ii) Energy of each CO outflow is mainly determined by the luminosity of the central driving source, which is probably related to the 

757: 	processes of mass accretion onto the central stars. 

758: 	In this subsection, we investigate the relationship between the physical parameters of the molecular outflows and of their driving sources.

759: 

760: 	In Figure \ref{f11}, we plot the momentum flux of the outflow ($F_{\rm{CO}}$) as a function of the bolometric luminosity of 

761: 	the outflow driving source ($L_{\rm{bol}}$) for 10 sources from our sample. 

762: 	For comparison, Figure \ref{f11} also shows the data of 101 CO outflows associated with young stellar objects (YSOs) in low- and  

763: 	high-mass star-forming regions, which were previously observed in CO with single-dish telescopes (Bontemps et al. 1996 and Hogerheijde et al. 

764: 	1998 for low-mass star-forming regions, Beuther et al. 2002, Zhang et al. 2005 for high-mass star-forming regions). 

765: 	

766: 	Figure \ref{f11} clearly shows a positive correlation between $F_{\rm{CO}}$ and $L_{\rm{bol}}$. 

767: 	The correlation is valid in a wide range of $L_{\rm{bol}}$ (0.1 ${\leq}L_{\rm{bol}}{\leq}~10^5{L_{\odot}}$) and 

768: 	$F_{\rm{CO}}$ ($10^{-6}{\leq}{F_{\rm{CO}}}{\leq}0.1~M_{\odot}$ km s$^{-1}$ yr$^{-1}$). 

769: 	Sources in low-mass star-forming regions have lower $F_{\rm{CO}}$ and $L_{\rm{bol}}$, 

770: 	while those in high-mass star-forming regions have higher $F_{\rm{CO}}$ and $L_{\rm{bol}}$. 

771: 	This conclusion has already been reported by Beuther et al. (2002). 

772: 	The sources in the OMC 2/3 region are located in this plot between the sources in low- and high-mass star-forming 

773: 	regions, and bridge a gap between them. The sources in the OMC-2/3 region have intermediate 

774: 	$F_{\rm{CO}}$ and $L_{\rm{bol}}$ in Figure \ref{f11}, which naturally suggests that they are most probably intermediate-mass YSOs. 

775: 		

776: 	It is interesting to consider why both $L_{\rm{bol}}$ and $F_{\rm{CO}}$ can be good indicators of the mass of the YSOs. 

777: 	For low- and intermediate-mass YSOs, their bolometric luminosities are most probably dominated by the accretion luminosity 

778: 	($L_{\rm{acc}}{\equiv}GM_{\ast}{\dot{M}_{\rm{acc}}}/R_{\ast}$). 

779: 	If we assume that the stellar radius ($R_{\ast}$) does not significantly change during protostellar evolution, 

780: 	the relation suggests that a higher $L_{\rm{bol}}$ indicates either 

781: 	a higher mass accretion rate or a higher central stellar mass, or both. 

782: 	Since a higher mass accretion rate results in a higher stellar mass as long as the mass accretion time scale is similar 

783: 	among low- and intermediate- mass protostars, it is fair to assume that $L_{\rm{bol}}$ is an 

784: 	indicator for the mass of YSO for low- and intermediate-mass YSOs. For high-mass YSOs, on the other hand, it is not always true that $L_{\rm{bol}}$ 

785: 	is dominated by the accretion luminosity since some of them reach the main sequence when they are still embedded in molecular clouds. 

786: 	If this is the case, $L_{\rm{bol}}$ is basically the same as the stellar luminosity, indicating that $L_{\rm{bol}}$ is an indicator of the stellar mass. 

787: 

788: 	How about $F_{\rm{CO}}$? It is not very clear how $F_{\rm{CO}}$ can be an indicator of the mass of YSOs. Bontemps et al. (1996) suggested that 

789: 	$F_{\rm{CO}}$ has a linear relationship with the rate of mass accretion onto the central star for low-mass YSOs. 

790: 	This is because the most plausible energy source for a jet/wind, which is considered to drive a CO outflow, 

791: 	is the gravitational energy released by infall and/or accretion onto  

792: 	the central protostar. If this is valid for low- to high-mass YSOs, 

793: 	$F_{\rm{CO}}$ is indirectly related to the central stellar mass which is more or less determined by the mass accretion rate.

794: 	

795: 	In Figure \ref{f12}, we plot $F_{\rm{co}}$ as a function of the envelope mass ($M_{\rm{env}}$). 

796: 	In the same way as in Figure \ref{f11}, we plot sources in the low- and high-mass star-forming regions (Bontemps et al. 1996, 

797: 	Hogerheijde et al. 1998, and Beuther et al. 2002) as well as those in the OMC-2/3 region. 

798: 	Figure \ref{f12} clearly shows a good correlation between $F_{\rm{co}}$ and $M_{\rm{env}}$. 

799: 	Note that Bontemps et al. (1996) also showed the same correlation 

800: 	for low-mass YSOs, whereas Figure \ref{f12} includes not only low-mass Class 0 and Class I sources, but also intermediate- and high-mass YSOs. 

801: 	Figure \ref{f12} shows that more massive YSOs are associated with higher envelope masses, suggesting that 

802: 	$M_{\rm{env}}$ is a good indicator of the YSO mass. 

803: 	This is probably not surprising because the core mass function often shows a relation similar to the initial mass 

804: 	function in various star-forming regions (e.g., Testi \& Sargent, 1998, Motte et al. 1998, Nutter \& Ward-Thompson 2007). 

805: 

806: 	As discussed above, our sample sources are considered to be intermediate-mass YSOs. 

807: 	In the OMC2/3 region, however, low-mass YSOs should form as well (see Section 3.4). 

808: 	Why are no low-mass YSOs included in our sample sources? One probable reason is that our sample sources are 

809: 	selected based on 1.3 mm, 350 $\mu$m, and 3.6 cm observations, as described in Section 3.1. 

810: 	The mass sensitivity (3 $\sigma$) of the dusty envelope detected in the 1.3 mm observations is roughly 1 $M_{\odot}$. 

811: 	For comparison, a typical value of  the envelope mass associated with low-mass protostars are 0.01 to 1 $M_{\odot}$ 

812: 	(e.g., Bontemps et al. 1996, Hogerheijde et al. 1998; see Figure 12). 

813: 	Therefore, most low-mass candidates may have been missed in our sample sources. 

814: 	In other words, our observations were biased toward the intermediate-mass proto-stellar cores.

815: 	

816: 	In addition to the discussion whether the outflow momentum flux depends on the central protostellar mass, 

817: 	it is also important to consider the evolutional effect on the outflow momentum flux. Bontemps et al. (1996) 

818: 	found a decline in the CO momentum flux from the Class 0 to Class I phase, suggesting that the outflow power declines with age. 

819: 	This result would be related to the decline of the mass accretion rate during the protostellar evolution. 

820: 	Our observational results were also examined from this point of view. In Figures 11 and 12, Class I sources in our sample 

821: 	were plotted as open diamonds while Class 0-like sources in our sample were plotted as filled diamonds. 

822: 	Figures 11 and 12 show no clear difference in the distribution of the momentum flux between Class 0 and Class I source in our samples. 

823: 	Why was no evolutionary trend seen in our samples? One possible reason is that the number of our sample sources may be 

824: 	too small to see such an evolutionary trend. 

825: 

826: 	We should, however, note that there might be one example that shows a possible evolutionary trend.  

827: 	The source is SIMBA $a$, one of the Class 0-like sources in our sample. 

828: 	This source has particularly small momentum flux in comparison with the other sources in our sample, and seems not to follow 

829: 	the $M_{\rm{env}}-F_{\rm{CO}}$ correlation in Figure 12. Even though $M_{\rm{env}}$ of SIMBA $a$ is as massive as those of 

830: 	our other samples, its $F_{\rm{CO}}, 3.6 {\times}10^{-6}~M_{\odot}~km~s^{-1}~{yr^{-1}}$, is 1-2 orders of magnitude smaller than others. 

831: 	This source might be in the earliest stage of the protostellar evolution, in which the mass of the envelope is large 

832: 	whereas the accretion/outflow activity is still less. 

833: 		

834: 		

835: \section{SUMMARY}

836: 

837: We have carried out an extensive outflow survey in the submillimeter CO (3--2) emission and at $JHK_s$ -bands 

838: toward the Orion Molecular Cloud-2 and -3 region which includes 41 potential star-forming sites. 

839: Main results are summarized as follows: 

840: 

841: \begin{itemize}

842: 

843: 	\item	From CO (3--2) and $JHK_s$ observations in addition to the multiwavelength continuum data, 

844: 	we detected 14 secure outflows, a half of which are newly identified in the OMC-2/3 region. 

845: 	We also found Spitzer 24 $\mu$m sources toward 12 out of the 14 outflows as their 

846: 	driving source.  In addition to these CO outflows, seven sources having NIR features suggestive of outflows were identified.  

847: 	This high fraction of newly identified CO outflows suggests that CO (3--2) emission may be a better outflow tracer than CO (1--0).

848: 	

849: 	\item	The outflow detection rate in OMC-2/3 is 34 \% which is significantly lower than those in previous low- and 

850: 	high-mass studies (i.e., $\gtrsim$ 80\%). This is because the 41 potential star-forming sites probably include 

851: 	23 potential prestellar cores. When we limit our sample to those with 24 $\mu$m sources,

852: 	the CO outflow detection rate becomes 67\% which is comparable to the previous low- and high- mass outflow studies.

853: 	

854: 	\item	Physical properties of these outflows and their possible driving sources were derived. 

855: 	Our results bridge a gap between previous low- and high-mass outflows, and the derived parameters 

856: 	show $L_{\rm{bol}}-F_{\rm{CO}}$ and $M_{\rm{env}}-F_{\rm{CO}}$ tight correlations regardless 

857: 	of the mass of the driving source. These results naturally suggest that the detected outflows 

858: 	in the OMC-2/3 region most probably are driven by intermediate-mass protostars. 

859: 	

860: \end{itemize}

861: \vspace{2.0cm}

862:  

863: \acknowledgments

864: The authors are grateful to T. Sawada, and K. Nakanishi for their support during the ASTE observations.

865: We acknowledge A. Ishihara and SIRIUS /IRSF team for supporting the SIRIUS/ IRSF observations. 

866: We also acknowledge P.T.P. Ho, Hsieh P., Y-N. Su, K. Saigo, J. Karr, and M. Puravankara for fruitful comments. 

867: This publication used archival data from the Spitzer Space Telescope.

868: We thank D. Johnstone and D. Lis for providing us the submillimeter continuum data taken by JCMT and CSO, respectively.

869: We also thank the referee for the constructive comments that have helped to improve this manuscript.

870: A part of this study was financially supported by the MEXT Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas No. 15071202 and No. 16077204.

871: S. Takahashi was financially supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) for Young Scientists.

872: 

873: 

874: \begin{thebibliography}{}

875: \bibitem[Adams et al (1988)]{ada88} Adams, F. C., Lada, C. J., \& Shu, F. H., 1988, \apj, 326,865 

876: \bibitem[Andre et al (1993)]{and93} Andre, P., Ward-thompson, D., \& Barsony, M., 1993, \apj, 406, 122 

877: \bibitem[Allen, L. (2007)]{all07} Allen, L., Megeath, S. T., Gutermuth, R., Myers, P. C., Wolk, S., Adams, F. C., Muzerolle, J., Young, E., \& Pipher, J. L., 

878: Protostars and Planets V, B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, and K. Keil (eds.), University of Arizona Press, Tucson, 951pp., 2007., p. 361-376

879: \bibitem[Arce et al (2006)]{arc06} Arce, H. G., \& Sargent, A. I., 2006, \apj, 646,1070 

880: \bibitem[Arce et al (2007)]{arc07} Arce, H. G.,  Shepherd, D., Gueth, F., Lee C.-F., Bachiller, R., Rosen, A., \& Beuther, H., 2007, 

881: Protostars and Planets V (Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press)

882: \bibitem[Aso. et. al. (2000)]{aso00} Aso, Y., Tatematsu, K., Sekimoto, Y., Nakano, T., Umemoto, T., Koyama, K., \& Yamamoto S., 2000, \apj,	131,	465

883: \bibitem[Bachiller \& Tafalla (1999)]{bac99} Bachiller, R. \& Tafalla, M., 1999, 

884: The Origin of Stars and Planetary Systems. Edited by Charles J. Lada and Nikolaos D. Kylafis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999, p.227

885: \bibitem[Beltran et al. (2006)]{bel06} Beltran, M. T., Girart, J. M., \& Estalella, R., 2006, A\&A, 457, 865

886: \bibitem[Beltran et al. (2007)]{bel07} Beltran, M. T., Estalella, R., Girart, J. M., Ho, P.T. P., \& Anglada, G., 2007arXiv0712.1757B

887: \bibitem[Beuther et al. (1992)]{beu92} Beuther, H., Schilke, P., Sridharan, T. K., Menten, K. M., Walmsley, C. M., \& Wyrowski, F.,  2002, A\&A 383,892 

888: \bibitem[Bontemps et al. (1996)]{bon96} Bontemps, S., Andre, P., Terebey, S., \& Cabrit, S., 1996, A\&A 294, 835

889: \bibitem[Cabrit et al. (1992)]{cab92} Cabrit, S., \& Bertout, C., 1992, A\&A 261, 274

890: \bibitem[Cesaroni et al. (1994)]{ces94} Cesaroni, R., \& Wilson, T. L., 1994, A\&A,	281, 209

891: \bibitem[Chini et al. (1997)]{chi97} Chini, R,.	Ward-Thompson, D,.	Bally, J,.	Nyman,	L.-\AA., Sievers,	A,.	\&	Billawala, Y.,  1997, \apj,	474, L135

892: \bibitem[Churchwell. (1997)]{chu97} E. Churchwell, 1997, \apj, 479, L59

893: \bibitem[Emerson \& Graeve (1988)]{eme88} Emerson \& Graeve, 1988, A\&Am 190m 353

894: \bibitem[Ezawa et al. (2004)]{eza05} Ezawa, H., Kawabe, R., Kohno, K., \& Yamamoto, S., 2004, 

895: Ground-based Telescopes. Edited by Oschmann, Jacobus M., Jr. Proceedings of the SPIE, Volume 5489, pp. 763

896: \bibitem[Frerking et al. (1982)]{fre82} Frerking, M., Langer, W. D., \& Wilson, R. W., 1982, \apj, 262, 590 

897: \bibitem[Fuente et al. (2005)]{fue05} Fuente, A., Neri, R., \& Caselli, P., 2005, A\&A, 448, 481 

898: \bibitem[Genzel \& Stutzki (1989)]{gen89} Genzel, R. \& Stutzki, J., 1989, ARA\&A, 27, 41

899: \bibitem[Goldreich \& Kwan (1974)]{gol74} Goldreich, P., \& Kwan, J., 1974, \apj, 189 441

900: \bibitem[Haro (1953)]{har53} Haro, G. 1953, \apj,	117,	73

901: \bibitem[Hatchell et al. (2007)]{hat07} Hatchell, J., Fuller, G. A., \& Richer, J. S., 2007, A\&A, 472, 187

902: \bibitem[Hirano \& Taniguchi (2001)]{hir01} Hirano, N., \& Taniguchi, Y., 2001, \apj, 550, L219 

903: \bibitem[Hogerheijde et al. (1998)]{hog98} Hogerheijde, M. R., vanDishoeck, E. F., Blake, G. A., \& vanLangevelde, H., J., 1998, \apj, 502, 315

904: \bibitem[Johnstone et al. (1999)]{joh99} Johnstone, D., \& Bally, J., 1999, \apj, 510, L49

905: \bibitem[Kamazaki (2005)]{kam05} Kamazaki, T., Ezawa, H., Tatematsu, K., Yamaguchi, N., et al. 2005, 

906: Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XIV ASP Conference Series, Vol. 347, 

907: Proceedings of the Conference held 24-27 October, 2004 in pasadena, Calfornia, USA. 

908: Edited by P. Shopbell, M. Britton, and R. Ebert. San Francisco: Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 2005., p.533

909: \bibitem[Kohno et al. (2004)]{eza05} Kohno, K., Yamamoto, S., Kawabe, R., Ezawa, H., Sakamoto, S., et al. 2004, 

910: Springer proceedings in physics, Vol. 91, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2004, p.349 

911: Edited by S. Pfalzner, C. Kramer, C. Staubmeier, \& A. Heithausen. 

912: \bibitem[Lada (1985)]{lad85} Lada, C. J., 1985, ARA\&A, 23, 264

913: \bibitem[Lada \& Lada (2003)]{lad03} Lada, C. J., \& Lada, E. A., 2003, ARA\&A, 41, 57

914: \bibitem[Lis et al. (1998)]{lis98} Lis, D.C., Serabyn, E., Keene, J., Dowell, C.D., Benford, D. J., Phillips, T. G., Hunter, T. R., \& Wang, N., 1998, \apj, 509, 299

915: \bibitem[Mangum et al (2007)]{man07} Mangum, J., Emerson, D., Greisen, E., 2007, A\&A, 474,679 

916: \bibitem[Matthews et al. (2005)]{mat05} Matthews, B. C., Lai, S. -P., \& Willson, C., 2005, \apj, 626, 959

917: \bibitem[Motte et al. (1998)]{mot98} Motte, T., Andre, P., \& Neri, R., 1998, A\&A 336, 150 

918: \bibitem[Nagashima et al. (1999)]{nag99} Nagashima, C., et al. in Star Formation 1999, ed. T. Nakamoto 

919: (Nobeyama; Nobeyama Radio obs.), 397

920: \bibitem[Nagayama et al. (2003)]{nag03} Nagayama, T., et al. 2003, Proc. SPIE, 4841, 459

921: \bibitem[Nakajima et al. (2005)]{nak05} Nakajima, Y., et al. 2005, \aj 129, 776

922: \bibitem[Nielbock et al. (2003)]{nie03} Nielbock, M., Chini, R., Muller S. A. H., 2003, A\&A, 408, 245

923: \bibitem[Mutter et al. (2007)]{nu07} Nutter, D., \& Ward-Thompson, 2007, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 374, 1413

924: \bibitem[Ohashi et al. (1996)]{oha96}	Ohashi, N,.	Hayashi, M,. Ho, P. T. P., Momose, M., \& Hirano, N., 1996	\apj, 466, 957 

925: \bibitem[Reipurth et al. (1997)]{rei97} Reipurth, B., Bally, J., \& Devine, D., 1997, \apj,  114, 2708

926: \bibitem[Reipurth et al. (1999)]{rei99} Reipurth, B., Rodriguea, L. F., \& Chini R., 1999, \apj,  118, 983

927: \bibitem[Reipurth et al. (2004)]{rei04} Reipurth, B., Rodriguea, L. F., Anglada, G., \& Bally, J., 2004, \apj,  127, 1736

928: \bibitem[Sawada et al. (2008)]{saw08} Sawada, T et al. (2008) in preparation

929: \bibitem[Sawada et al. (2008)]{saw08} Sawada, T., Ikeda, N., Sunada, K., \& Kuno, N., et al. 2007arXiv0712.1283s

930: \bibitem[Shepherd et al. (1996)]{tak96} Shepherd, D. S., \& Churchwell, E., 1996, \apj, 472, 225

931: \bibitem[Shimajiri et al. (2008)]{shi08} Shimajiri, Y., Takahashi, S., Takakuwa, S., Saito M., \& Kawabe, R., 2008 accepted to \apj.

932: \bibitem[Shu et al. (1988)]{shu88} Shu, F.H., Lizano, S., Suden S.P., \& Najita J. 1988 \apj 328 L19 

933: \bibitem[Stanke et al. (2002)]{sta02} Stanke, T., McCaughrean, M. J., Zinnecker H., 2002,  A\&A, 392, 239

934: \bibitem[Takahashi et al. (2006)]{tak06} Takahashi, S., Saito, M., Takakuwa S., \& Kawabe, R., 2006, \apj, 651, 933

935: \bibitem[Testi et al. (1998)]{tes98} Testi, L., \& Sargent, A. I., 1998, \apj 508, L91

936: \bibitem[Tsujimoto et al. (2004)]{tsu04} Tsujimoto, T., Koyama, K., Kobayashi, N., Saito, M., Tsuboi, Y., \& Chandler, C. J. PASJ, 56, 341

937: \bibitem[Yu et al. (1997)]{yu97} Yu, K. C., Bally, J., \& Devine, D., 1997, \apj, 485, L48

938: \bibitem[Yu et al. (2000)]{yu00} Yu, K. C., Billawala, Y., Smith, M. D., Bally, J., \& Butner, H. M., 2000, \aj, 120, 1974

939: \bibitem[Williams et al. (2003)]{wil03} Williams, J. P., Plambeck, R. L., \& Heyer, M. H., 2003, \apj,  591, 1025

940: \bibitem[Wu et al. (2005)]{wu05} Wu, Y., Zhang, Q., Chen, H., Yang, C., Wei, Y., \& Ho, P.T.P., 2005, \aj, 330, 347

941: \bibitem[Zhang et al. (2001)]{zha01} Zhang, Q., Hunter, T. R., Brenda, J., Sridharan, T. K., Molinari, S., Kramer, M. A. \& Cesaroni, R., 2001, \apj, 552, L170

942: \bibitem[Zhang et al. (2005)]{zha05} Zhang, Q., Hunter, T. R., Brenda, J., Sridharan, Cesaroni, R., T. K., Molinari, S., Wang, J., \& Kramer, M. A. \&2005, \apj, 625, 864

943: \end{thebibliography}

944: 

945: \clearpage

946: 

947: \begin{figure}

948: %\rotate

949: \epsscale{0.70}

950: \plotone{f1.eps}

951: \caption{\scriptsize $(a)$ 850 $\mu$m dust continuum map of the OMC-2/3 region from Johnstone et al. (1999).  

952: $(b)$ Averaged intensity map of the CO(3--2) emission taken with the ASTE with a velocity range of 

953: blue and red contours are $V_{\rm{LSR}}$ = -6.2 to 7.8 km s$^{-1}$ and $V_{\rm{LSR}}$ = 14.3 to 27.3 km s$^{-1}$, respectively. 

954: Contour intervals are 0.45 K km s$^{-1}$ starting at 0.45 K km s$^{-1}$. 

955: Solid and dashed lines show outflow axes categorized as CLEAR (SIMBA $a$, MMS 2, MMS 5, MMS 7, MMS 9, FIR 2, FIR 3, VLA 13, FIR 6$b$, and FIR 6$c$) 

956: and PROBABLE (SIMBA $c$,VLA 9, FIR1$b$, and CSO 33), respectively.

957: $(c)$ The $JHK_s$ composite image taken by the IRSF/SIRIUS. Pseudo colors of blue, green, and red show the data 

958: of $J$-, $H$-, and $K_s$- bands, respectively. Dashed squares in the Figure $c$ show the focusing areas in the Figure \ref{f2} to \ref{f8}.  

959: Numbers in the squares correspond to the figure numbers.

960: Crosses, dots, and squares indicate positions of 1.3 mm, 350 $\mu$m, and 3.6 cm sources, respectively

961: (from Chini et al. 1997, Lis et al. 1998, and Nielbock et al. 2003)

962: \label{f1}}

963: \end{figure}

964: 

965: \begin{figure}

966: \epsscale{1.00}

967: \plotone{f2.eps}

968: \caption{

969:   Images of SIMBA $a$; 

970:   (a) $JHK_s$ image taken by the IRSF/SIRIUS (color) superposed on 

971:   the CO (3--2) emission taken with the ASTE telescope (contours). 

972:   (b) 24 $\mu$m image taken with Spitzer/MIPS  (grey scale) superposed 

973:   on the CO (3--2) emission taken with the ASTE telescope (contours).

974:   The blue (white in panel $a$) and red contours show the blue- and red-shifted components in the velocity range of 

975:   7.8 km s$^{-1}~{\leq}~V_{\rm{LSR}}~{\leq}$  8.9 km s$^{-1}$ and 15.4 km s$^{-1}~{\leq}~V_{\rm{LSR}}~{\leq}~$  16.5 km s$^{-1}$, respectively. 

976:   Contour intervals are  1.13 K km s$^{-1}$ starting at  2.25 K km s$^{-1}$.

977:   A solid line in panel $b$ in Figure $a$ indicates the outflow axis categorized as CLEAR. 

978:   Crosses and open circles indicate positions of 1.3 mm and 350 $\mu$m sources, respectively (from Nielbock et al. 2003, Lis et al. 1998). 

979:   \label{f2}}

980: \end{figure}

981: 

982: \begin{figure}

983: \epsscale{1.00}

984: \plotone{f3.eps}

985: \caption{

986:   Images  of SIMBA $c$; 

987:   (a) $JHK_s$ image taken by the IRSF/SIRIUS. 

988:   (b) 24 $\mu$m image taken with Spitzer/MIPS (grey-scale) superposed 

989:   on the CO (3--2) emission taken with the ASTE telescope (contours).

990:   The blue and red contours in panel $b$

991:   show the blue- and red-shifted components in the velocity range of 

992:   8.9 km s$^{-1}~{\leq}~V_{\rm{LSR}}~{\leq}~$  10.1 km s$^{-1}$ 

993:   and 13.5 km s$^{-1}~{\leq}~V_{\rm{LSR}}~{\leq}~$  14.2 km s$^{-1}$, respectively. 

994:   Contour intervals are  1.50 K km s$^{-1}$ starting at  10.0 K km s$^{-1}$.

995:   A dashed line in panel $b$ indicates direction of the outflow categorized as PROBABLE.

996:   Crosses and open circles indicate positions of 1.3 mm and 350 $\mu$m sources, respectively (from Nielbock et al. 2003, Lis et al. 1998). 

997:   Dashed ellipse shows the position of NIR feature presented in Table 2.

998:   \label{f3}}

999: \end{figure}

1000: 

1001: \begin{figure}

1002: \epsscale{1.00}

1003: \plotone{f4.eps}

1004: \caption{\scriptsize 

1005:    Images in the northern part of the OMC-3 region.  

1006:   (a) $JHK_s$ image taken by the IRSF/SIRIUS. 

1007:   (b) 24 $\mu$m image taken with the Spitzer/MIPS (grey-scale) superposed on 

1008:   the CO (3--2) high-velocity emission taken with the ASTE telescope (contours).

1009:   The blue and red contours show the blue- and red-shifted components in the velocity range of 

1010:   1.3 km s$^{-1} \leq V_{\rm{LSR}}~ \leq$  6.7 km$^{-1}$ and 14.3 km s$^{-1}~\leq~V_{\rm{LSR}}~\leq $  15.4 km$^{-1}$, respectively. 

1011:   Contour intervals are 2.4 K km s$^{-1}$ starting at  3.6 K km s$^{-1}$ and 1.46 K km s$^{-1}$ starting at  2.19 K km s$^{-1}$ , respectively.

1012:   (c) Zoom up view of the $JHK_s$ image toward MMS 6. 

1013:   A solid line in panel $b$ indicates the outflows categorized as CLEAR associated with MMS 2 and MMS 5.

1014:   Crosses, open circles, and open squares indicate positions of 1.3 mm, 350 $\mu$m and 3.6 cm sources, respectively 

1015:   (from Chini et al. 1977, Lis et al. 1998, Reipurth et al. 1999). 

1016:   Dashed ellipses show the positions of NIR feature presented in Table 2.

1017:   \label{f4}}

1018: \end{figure}

1019: 

1020: \begin{figure}

1021: \epsscale{0.5}

1022: \plotone{f5.eps}

1023: \caption{

1024:   Images of MMS 7. 

1025:   (a) $JHK_s$ image taken by the IRSF/SIRIUS. 

1026:   (b) 24 $\mu$m image taken with Spitzer/MIPS (grey-scale) superposed on 

1027:   the CO (3--2) emission taken with the ASTE telescope (contours).

1028:   The blue and red contours in panel $b$ show the blue- and red-shifted components in the velocity range of 

1029:   6.7 km s$^{-1} \leq V_{\rm{LSR}}~ \leq$  7.8 km$^{-1}$ and 14.3 km s$^{-1}~\leq~V_{\rm{LSR}}~\leq $  16.5 km$^{-1}$, respectively. 

1030:   Contour intervals are 1.26 K km s$^{-1}$ starting at 

1031:   1.89 K km s$^{-1}$ and 1.74 K km s$^{-1}$ starting at  2.61 K km s$^{-1}$, respectively.

1032:   A solid line in panel $b$ traces the local peaks of the CO outflow associated with MMS 7 which are categorized as CLEAR.

1033:   Crosses, open circles, and open squares indicate positions of 1.3 mm, 350 $\mu$m and 3.6 cm sources, respectively 

1034:   (from Chini et al. 1977, Lis et al. 1998, Reipurth et al. 1999). 

1035:     Dashed ellipse shows the position of NIR feature presented in Table 2.

1036:   ``Grey zone '' in the bottom part of Figure $b$ show the bipolar outflow from the source,MMS 9, located south of MMS 7.

1037:   \label{f5}}

1038: \end{figure}

1039: \newpage

1040: 

1041: \begin{figure}

1042: \epsscale{1.00}

1043: \plotone{f6.eps}

1044: \caption{

1045:    Images in the MMS 8 to FIR 1 region. 

1046:   (a) $JHK_s$ image taken by the IRSF/SIRIUS. 

1047:   (b) 24 $\mu$m image taken with the Spitzer/MIPS (grey-scale) superposed on 

1048:   the CO (3-2) emission taken with the ASTE telescope (contours).

1049:   The blue and red contours show the blue- and red-shifted components in the velocity range of 

1050:   -1.9 km s$^{-1} \leq V_{\rm{LSR}}~ \leq$  6.7 km$^{-1}$ and 14.3 km s$^{-1}~\leq~V_{\rm{LSR}}~\leq $  21.9 km$^{-1}$, respectively. 

1051:   Contour intervals are 6.90 K km s$^{-1}$ starting at  4.14 K km s$^{-1}$ and 4.62 K km s$^{-1}$ starting at  7.70 K km s$^{-1}$, respectively. 

1052:   Solid-, dashed- and dash-dotted- lines in panel $b$ show the outflows categorized as CLEAR (EW outflow associated with MMS 9),

1053:   PROBABLE (associated with VLA 9 and FIR 1$b$), MARGINAL (NE-SW outflow associated with MMS 9), respectively. 

1054:   Crosses, open circles, and open squares indicate positions of 1.3 mm, 350 $\mu$m and 3.6 cm sources, respectively 

1055:   (from Chini et al. 1977, Lis et al. 1998, Reipurth et al. 1999). 

1056:   Hatched areas are outflow contamination from southern part, FIR3 (see Figure \ref{f7}).

1057:   Dashed ellipses show the positions of NIR feature presented in Table 2.

1058: \label{f6}}

1059: \end{figure}

1060: 

1061: \begin{figure}

1062: \epsscale{1.00}

1063: \plotone{f7.eps}

1064: \caption{

1065:   Images in the FIR 3--5 region. 

1066:   (a) $JHK_s$ image taken by the IRSF/SIRIUS. 

1067:   (b) 24 $\mu$m image taken with Spitzer/MIPS (grey-scale) superposed on 

1068:   the CO (3--2) emission taken with the ASTE telescope (contours).

1069:   The blue and red contours show the blue- and red-shifted components in the velocity range of 

1070:   -4.1 km s$^{-1} \leq V_{\rm{LSR}}~ \leq$  6.7 km$^{-1}$ 

1071:   and 14.3 km s$^{-1}~\leq~V_{\rm{LSR}}~\leq $  21.9 km$^{-1}$, respectively. 

1072:   Blue- and red-contour intervals are 8.40 K km s$^{-1}$ 

1073:   starting at  5.04 K km s$^{-1}$ and 4.62 K km s$^{-1}$ starting at  7.70 K km s$^{-1}$, respectively. 

1074:   (c) Zoom up view of the $JHK_s$ image toward FIR 4.

1075:   (d) The 24 $\mu$m image taken with Spitzer/MIPS (grey-scale) superposed on the source positions.

1076:   Solid- and dashed- lines in panel $b$ show the direction of the outflows categorized as 

1077:   CLEAR (associated with FIR2, FIR 3, and VLA13) and 

1078:   PROBABLE (associated with MIR 20), respectively. 

1079:   Crosses, open circles, and open squares indicate positions of 1.3 mm, 350 $\mu$m and 3.6 cm sources, respectively 

1080:   (from Chini et al. 1977, Lis et al. 1998, Reipurth et al. 1999). 

1081:   Dashed ellipses show the positions of NIR feature presented in Table 2.

1082:   \label{f7}}

1083: \end{figure}

1084: 

1085: \begin{figure}

1086: \epsscale{1.00}

1087: \plotone{f8.eps}

1088: \caption{

1089:   Images of the southern part of the OMC-2 region. 

1090:   (a) $JHK_s$ image taken by the IRSF/SIRIUS. 

1091:   (b) 24 $\mu$m image taken with SPITZER/MIPS (grey-scale) superposed on 

1092:   the CO (3--2) emission taken with the ASTE telescope (contours).

1093:   The blue and red contours show the blue- and red-shifted components in the velocity range of 

1094:   -3.9 km s$^{-1} \leq V_{\rm{LSR}}~ \leq$  6.7 km$^{-1}$ 

1095:   and 14.3 km s$^{-1}~\leq~V_{\rm{LSR}}~\leq $  21.9 km$^{-1}$, respectively. 

1096:   Contour intervals are 4.65 K km s$^{-1}$ starting at 

1097:   4.65 K km s$^{-1}$ and 4.62 K km s$^{-1}$ starting at  4.62 K km s$^{-1}$, respectively.

1098:   Solid- and dashed- lines in panel $b$ show the outflows categorized as CLEAR (associated with FIR 6$b$) and PROBABLE 

1099:   (associated with FIR 6$c$ and CSO 33), respectively. 

1100:   Crosses, open circles, and open squares indicate positions of 1.3 mm, 350 $\mu$m and 3.6 cm sources, respectively 

1101:   (from Chini et al. 1977, Lis et al. 1998, Reipurth et al. 1999).

1102:   Bright part at bottom left of the figure $a$ is M 43.

1103:   Dashed ellipse shows the position of NIR feature presented in Table 2.

1104:   \label{f8}}

1105: \end{figure}

1106: 

1107: \begin{figure}

1108: \epsscale{0.80}

1109: \plotone{f9.eps}

1110: \caption{Position-velocity diagrams in the CO (3--2) emission along the major axis toward detected outflows in OMC-2/3. 

1111:   The contour starting level and increment are 10\% and 5\% level of the peak intensity, respectively. 

1112:   The reference position of each figure set on the positions of 1.3 mm peak. \label{f9}}

1113: \end{figure}

1114: 

1115: \begin{figure}

1116: \epsscale{1.00}

1117: \plotone{f10.eps}

1118: \caption{$JHK_s$ images of the extended NIR features taken by SIRIUS/IRSF. 

1119: Pseudo colors of blue, green, and red show the data a $J$-, $H$-, and $K$- bands, respectively.\label{f10}}

1120: \end{figure}

1121: 

1122: \begin{figure}

1123: \epsscale{0.80}

1124: \plotone{f11.eps}

1125: \caption{CO outflow momentum flux plotted as a function of the bolometric luminosity.

1126: Open and filled diamonds show Class I and Class 0-like protostars in the OMC-2/3 region (this work).

1127: Triangles, open squares, filled circles, and open circles show previous low- to high-mass survey results 

1128: from Hogerheijde (1998), Bontemps et al. (1996), Beuther et al. (2002), and Zhang et al. (2005), respectively.   

1129: \label{f11}}

1130: \end{figure}

1131: 

1132: \begin{figure}

1133: \epsscale{0.8}

1134: \plotone{f12.eps}

1135: \caption{CO outflow momentum flux plotted as a function of the envelope mass. 

1136: Open and filled diamonds show Class I and Class 0-like protostars in the OMC-2/3 region (this work). 

1137: Triangles, open squares, and filled circles show previous low- to high-mass survey results 

1138: from Hogerheijde (1998), Bontemps et al. (1996), and Beuther et al. (2002), respectively. 

1139: \label{f12}}

1140: \end{figure}

1141: 

1142: \clearpage

1143: 

1144: \begin{deluxetable}{lllccccl}

1145: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

1146: \rotate

1147: \tablecaption{Centimeter- and millimeter-/submillimeter- continuum sources in the OMC-2/3 region\label{tbl1}}

1148: \tablewidth{0pt}

1149: \tablehead{

1150: \colhead{ID} & \colhead{R.A. (J2000)} & \colhead{Dec. (J2000)} & \colhead{1.3 mm\tablenotemark{a}} &

1151: \colhead{350 $\mu$m\tablenotemark{b}} & \colhead{3.6 cm\tablenotemark{c}} & \colhead{24 $\mu$m\tablenotemark{d}} &

1152: \colhead{Comments }  \\

1153: }

1154: \startdata

1155: 1	& 05 35 30.2	&	-04 58 48.0  	&	SIMBA $a$	&	CSO 1	 &  ---  &	053530-045848 &		 \\

1156: 2	&	05 35 29.7 & -04 58 06.0   &	SIMBA $b$ &  	---			   &  ---    & ---	& 	   \\

1157: 3	&	05 35 28.2 & -04 58 40.0   &	SIMBA $c$ & 	---			   &  ---     & 053528-045838  &	  \\

1158: 4	&	05 35 28.6 & -04 57 48.0   &	SIMBA $d$	& 	---			   & ---	  &  --- 		    &	    \\

1159: 5	&	05 35 30.6 & -04 59 49.0   &	SIMBA $e$ & 	---			   &  ---     &  --- 		   &  \\

1160: 6	&	05 35 35.1 & -04 59 24.5   &    ---	           &	CSO 2	 & ---		&  ---		  &	 	   \\

1161: 7	&	05 35 15.8 & -04 59 58.7   &	---	           &    CSO 3 	 &	---      & 053516-050003 \& 053515-050009	& Binary  		 \\

1162: 8	&	05 35 17.1 & -05 00 02.8   &	---	           &    CSO 4	 & ---	 	&  ---		   &	  	\\

1163: 9	&	05 35 18.0	& -05 00 19.8	&	MMS 1	 &	   CSO 5	& ---	  &	 ---		  &	        \\

1164: 10	&	05 35 18.3	&	-05 00 34.8 &	MMS 2	 &     CSO 6 	&  VLA 1      & 053518-050034		   & Binary (from Nielbock et al. 2003)	 \\

1165: 11	&	05 35 19.2 	&	-05 00 51.2	&	MMS 3	 &     CSO 7	&	---           & 053519-050051	 	 	&		\\

1166: 12	&	05 35 20.5	&	-05 00 53.0	& 	MMS 4    &     CSO 8	 & ---								    &	 ---		&  \\

1167: 13	&	05 35 22.4	&	-05 01 14.1	& 	MMS 5    &	   CSO 9     &	---	          & 053522-050115  	 		&  \\

1168: 14	&	05 35 23.5 	&	-05 01 32.2	&	MMS 6    &	   CSO 10	& VLA 3     & 053524-050130  \& 053524-050140				& Multiple system ?  \\

1169: 15	&	05 35 27.2  &   -05 03 38.5 &                   &     CSO 11   & ---          						 &  ---             & \\          

1170: 16	&	05 35 26.4	&	-05 03 53.4	&	MMS 7    &	   CSO 12	& VLA 4        & 053527-050355				& Bright reflection nebula, Haro- 5a/6a (from Haro 1953). \\

1171: 17	&	05 35 26.5	&	-05 05 17.4	&	MMS 8    &	   CSO 13   & --- 								   &  ---			& \\

1172: 18	&	05 35 26.0 	&	-05 05 42.4	&	MMS 9    &	   CSO 14	&  VLA 5        &  053526-050546    	 & Extended 24 $\mu$m source. \\

1173: 19	&	05 35 32.3 	&	-05 05 41.8	&	MMS 10	&	  ---            & ---								  	&  &  \\

1174: 20	&	05 35 25.6	&	-05 07 57.4	&	---			   &	 ---      	    &  VLA 9       & 053526-050758      	&  Located at the edge of the OMC-2 dust filament. \\

1175: 21	&	05 35 22.9  &   -05 06 41.2 & 	---			   & CSO 15       &  ---                                  & ---                   & \\ 

1176: 22	&	05 35 23.7 	&	-05 07 10.2	&	FIR 1$c$	   &  CSO 16      &  VLA 7           &	---              	                   	&	Extended 24 $\mu$m and cm source.	 \\

1177: 23	&	05 35 23.4	&	-05 07 32.2	&   FIR 1$b$	   &  CSO 17	  &	---	                                   &  ---	&		 \\

1178: 24	&	05 35 24.6	&	-05 07 53.3	&	FIR 1$a$	   &  CSO 18	  &  VLA 8          & 053524-050753       	& Faint 24 $\mu$m source.	 \\

1179: 25	&	05 35 24.7 	&	-05 12 33.3	&	---  	      &  CSO 19	      & ---        & ---	&		 \\

1180: 26	&	05 35 24.3 	&	-05 08 33.3	&	FIR 2	    &  CSO 20	    & ---        & 053524-050831        	&		 \\

1181: 27	&	05 35 26.5 	&	-05 08 25.4	&	---     	  &  CSO 21	       & ---                                    & ---	&		 \\

1182: 28	&	05 35 27.5 	&	-05 09 32.5	&	FIR 3	    &  CSO 22	    & VLA 11     & 053528-050935		    	 & A 24 $\mu$m source (SP 053527-050923) is located \\

1183: 		&						&						&					&						&										&	&	at ${\sim}10''$ NW from FIR 3.\\

1184: 29	&	05 35 26.7 	&	-05 10 00.4	&	FIR 4	    &  CSO 23	    & VLA 12     & 053527-051002		       & Mm/sub-mm and 24 $\mu$m sources do not \\

1185: 		&						&						&					&					&											& 	& coincide with the cm source.	\\

1186: 30	&	05 35 24.8 	&	-05 10 29.5	&	---           &  ---				 & VLA 13   & 053525-051031			&  Bright cone-like NIR feature.		 \\

1187: 31	&	05 35 26.4 	&	-05 10 23.4	&	FIR 5	   &    CSO 24 	    & ---             & ---	 	   				   &   \\

1188: 32	&	05 35 26.3  &   -05 12 23.4  &  ---           &   CSO 26      & ---                                     & ---                 &  \\

1189: 33	&	05 35 24.7  &   -05 12 33.3  & ---            &   CSO 27      & ---                                     & ---                 &  \\

1190: 34	&	05 35 23.4 	&	-05 12 36.2	&	FIR 6$a$	  &	   CSO 28	  &	--- 									& ---				  &		\\

1191: 35	&	05 35 21.7  &   -05 12 13.1 &	---			  &	   ---					  & VLA 14 &	--- 										   &		\\

1192: 36	&	05 35 23.4 	&	-05 12 03.2	&	FIR 6$b$	  &	   CSO 25	  &  ---   &	053523-051205         	 			& 	 	\\

1193: 37	&	05 35 21.5 	&	-05 13 15.1	&	FIR 6$c$	  &    CSO 29	  &	---                                      &	---					&		\\

1194: 38	&	05 35 20.0 	&	-05 13 14.9	&	FIR 6$d$	  &	   CSO 30	  &   ---   &	053520-051314         					&	 \\

1195: 39	&	05 35 21.5 	&	-05 14 30.1	&	No obs.	 &	 CSO 31	     & --- 									    &	---					&	 \\

1196: 40	&	05 35 21.3 	&	-05 14 54.0	&	No obs.	  &	 CSO 32	     & ---  									&	---					&	 \\

1197: 41	&	05 35 19.5 	&	-05 15 34.9	&	No obs.	  &   CSO 33	 &	---	   & 053520-051533	    				& Extended 24 $\mu$m source ?\\

1198: \enddata

1199: \tablenotetext{a}{1.3 mm continuum source names are from Chini et al. (1997) and Nielbock et al. (2003).}

1200: \tablenotetext{b}{350 $\mu$m continuum source names are from Lis et al. (1998).}

1201: \tablenotetext{c}{3.6 cm continuum source names are from Reipurth et al. (1999).}

1202: \tablenotetext{d}{We identified 24 $\mu$m sources obtained from the archive data taken by Spitzer/MIPS using the IRAF apphot package . }

1203: \end{deluxetable}

1204: 

1205: \clearpage

1206: 

1207: \begin{deluxetable}{llcccll}

1208: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

1209: \rotate

1210: \tablecaption{ IDENTIFICATION OF THE CO (3-2) OUTFLOWS\label{tbl2}}

1211: \tablewidth{0pt}

1212: \tablehead{

1213: \colhead{ID} & \colhead{Object name\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{Identification\tablenotemark{b}} & \colhead{Map\tablenotemark{c}} 

1214: & \colhead{NIR features\tablenotemark{d}} & \colhead{Reference\tablenotemark{e}} & \colhead{Comments} \\

1215: }

1216: \startdata

1217: 1	   &	SIMBA $a$	&		C	  &	  BR	    &                         & This work                        & \\

1218: 3	   &	SIMBA $c$	&		P	  &   BR?	   &		[1] 	       & This work                        &  Faint reflection nebula are associated with blue-shifted CO emission, 

1219: monopolar flow? \\

1220: 6	  &	CSO 2	  &		 M	     &   BR	   &		 		                     &  $a$ \& This work               & No Gaussian line profile, \\

1221: 	   &				 &				&			 &					                    &                                         & may trace a part of motion of large scale cloud gas \\

1222: 10	&	MMS 2	 &  	C	  &   BR	  &	      	  [2], [3], [4]      & $a$, $b$, \& This work  &  Corresponding to ``flow B''\tablenotemark{h}, nearly plane of the sky \\

1223: 13	&	MMS 5	 &	    C      &   BR		 &	    	   [5]               & $a$, $b$, \& This work  & Corresponding to ``flow C''\tablenotemark{h}, H$_2$ chain of knots \\

1224: 14	&	MMS 6	 & M  &	BR		   &	    [6]                               & This work  & Faint jet-like feature in the NIR image associated with SP 053524-050130 \\

1225: 16	&	MMS 7	 &	 	C      &   BR		 &	    	  [7]                &  $a$, $b$, $d$ \& This work & Corresponding to ``flow F''\tablenotemark{h}, nearly plane of the sky\\

1226: 18	&	MMS 9	 &		C		&   BR		 &	    	  [9], [10], [11]      & $a$, $b$, \& This work & Corresponding to ``flow H''\tablenotemark{h}\\

1227: 20	&	VLA 9	  &		P         &   B		   &	  	[13]                           & This work & Monopolar flow, edge of the dust filament \\

1228: 23	&	FIR 1$b$		&	  P         &   BR			 &	                            & $a$, $b$, \& This work  & \\

1229: 26	&	FIR 2		 &		C        &   BR		 &	                                       & $b$ \& This work  & \\

1230: 28	&	FIR 3		 &		C        &   BR		 &	    [14]                           & $b$, $c$, \& This work & ``Butterfly-like'' velocity structure\\

1231: ---\tablenotemark{g}	&	MIR 20     &      M          &  B      &      [15]   & This work   & There is a 24 $\mu$m source, SP 053527-050923 and Bright NIR jet \\

1232: 29	&	FIR 4		 &		M       &  BR?		 &	    [16]                           & This work & Faint reflection nebula ?\\

1233: 30	&	VLA 13	 &		C          &  BR		  &			[17]                    & This work & Bright NIR feature \\

1234: 36	&	FIR 6$b$		&		C        &  BR		&	                               & This work & \\

1235: 37	&	FIR 6$c$		&		C         & BR		&	                               & This work  & \\

1236: 40	&	CSO 32	  &		 M       &  BR		   &	                                    & This work & Another possibility might be due to gas associated \\ 

1237: 		&					&				&				&			                           & This work	&with shocked gas produced by HII region \\

1238: 41	&	CSO 33	  &		 P        &  BR		   &	 [19]                            & This work & Another possibility might be due to gas associated \\

1239: 		&					&				&				&				&                                         & with shocked gas produced by HII region \\

1240: \enddata

1241: \tablenotetext{a}{Object names from Chini et al. (1997), Nielbock et al. (2003), Lis et al. (1998) and Reipurth et al. (1999)}

1242: \tablenotetext{b}{Outflow identification results based on the CO (3--2) emission and $JHK_s$ image.

1243: C, P, and M indicate outflows identified as CLEAR, PROBABLE, and MARGINAL, respectively.}

1244: \tablenotetext{c}{Bipolarity of the CO (3--2) emission based on channel maps. B and R denote the blue-shifted and red-shifted CO(3--2) emission, respectively.}

1245: \tablenotetext{d}{Notation of near infrared features (see Figure \ref{f2}--\ref{f8})}

1246: \tablenotetext{e}{REFERENCE.---  ($a$)Aso et al. (2000); ($b$)Williams et al. (2003); ($c$)Willams et al. (2005); ($d$)Takahashi et al. (2006).}

1247: \tablenotetext{f}{This outflow corresponds to the [ii] in Figure 6$b$.}

1248: \tablenotetext{g}{CO(3--2) emission and NIR jet-like feature were detected at this source.}

1249: \tablenotetext{h}{Flows were identified in the 2.12 $\mu$m $v$ = 1--0 $s$(1) H$_2$ line emission (Yu et al. 1997)}

1250: \end{deluxetable}

1251: 

1252: \clearpage

1253: 

1254: \begin{deluxetable}{llcccccccccc}

1255: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

1256: \rotate

1257: \tablecaption{ CO (3-2) OUTFLOW PARAMETERS\label{}}

1258: \tablewidth{0pt}

1259: \tablehead{

1260: \colhead{ID} & \colhead{Object name\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{Criteria\tablenotemark{b}} & \colhead{Inclination\tablenotemark{c}} & \colhead{P.A.}  

1261: & \colhead{Velocity Range} &  \colhead{{${\Delta}V_{\rm{max}}$}\tablenotemark{d}} & \colhead{{$R_{\rm{max}}$}\tablenotemark{d}}  &  \colhead{{$M_{\rm{CO}}$}\tablenotemark{e}} 

1262: &  \colhead{{$t_{d}$}\tablenotemark{f}}  &  \colhead{{$\dot{M}_{\rm{CO}}$}\tablenotemark{f}}  &  \colhead{$F_{\rm{CO}}$\tablenotemark{f}} \\ 

1263: 

1264: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{(deg)} & \colhead{(deg)} & \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{(pc)} 

1265: & \colhead{($M_{\odot}$)} & \colhead{(yr)} & \colhead{($M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$)} & 

1266: \colhead{($M_{\odot}$ km s$^{-1}$ yr$^{-1}$)}  \\}

1267: 

1268: \startdata

1269: \multicolumn{11}{c}{Blue lobe}  \\

1270: \hline

1271: 1	&	SIMBA $a$	&	C 	&	45	&	50		& 7.8 -- 8.9 &	4.7	 &	1.2E-01	 &	1.3E-03  & 2.5E+04	& 5.1E-08   & 3.4E-07	 \\

1272: 3	&	SIMBA $c$	&	P	&	45	   &	--	   & 8.9 -- 10.0	 &	 3.6  &	1.0E-01 &	1.1E-02  & 2.7E+04	& 4.0E-07	& 2.0E-06  	\\

1273: 10	&	MMS 2		  &	  C	  &  45	  &	  90  	  & 3.5 -- 8.9 &	  7.7  &   1.7E-01 &  6.9E-02  & 7.8E+03  & 8.8E-06	  & 2.0E-04	   \\

1274: 13	&	MMS 5		  &	  C   &  45	  &	  -90	  & 1.3 -- 8.9 &	  9.7  &   8.4E-02 &  4.0E-02  & 8.5E+03  & 4.7E-06	  & 6.4E-05    \\   

1275: 16	&	MMS 7 	 	  &   C	  &	 70	  &	    90     & 4.6 -- 8.9 &  6.0	& 	1.5E-01 &  1.8E-02	& 8.9E+03  & 2.0E-06  & 3.5E-05    \\

1276: 18	&	MMS 9         &   C   &	 45	  &		-100  & -4.1 -- 8.9 &	 15.6 &   5.1E-01 &	4.7E-01  & 3.2E+04	 & 1.5E-05	& 3.2E-04   \\

1277: 20	&	VLA 9		  &    P   &  45	&	   40	 & 2.4 -- 8.9  &	 9.4	&	3.7E-01	& 1.3E-01 & 3.8E+04   & 3.5E-06	 & 4.6E-05  \\

1278: 23	&	FIR 1$b$	&    P   &	45	  &	 	---	   	 &  --- &	 ---	&  ---  & --- & ---   & ---  & --- \\

1279: 26	&	FIR 2			&   C	&	45	 &	 	-150  & -4.1 -- 8.9  & 15.4	&  1.0E-01  & 3.2E-02 & 6.3E+03	  & 5.1E-06	 & 1.1E-04 \\	

1280: 28	& 	FIR 3 (north)	& C &	70  &	  30	 & -9.5 -- 8.9 &	  20.7	& 1.9E-01  & 1.3E-01 & 3.3E+03	 & 3.9E-05	& 2.3E-03  \\

1281: 28	& 	FIR 3 (south)  &  C &   70  &	  30	 & -4.1 -- 8.9 &	  15.3	& 1.0E-01  & 4.8E-02 & 2.3E+03	 & 2.1E-05	& 9.2E-04  \\

1282: 30	&	VLA 13	 		 &	C  &   45  &	  0   	 & 2.4 -- 8.9  &	 8.8   & 8.4E-02 &	5.4E-02 & 9.3E+03	& 5.8E-06  & 7.2E-05 \\

1283: 36	&	FIR 6$b$		 &	C  &  45   &	   -115 & 1.3 -- 8.9 &	 9.0	& 1.7E-01 &	7.8E-02  & 1.8E+04	 & 4.3E-06	& 5.4E-05 \\

1284: 37	&	FIR 6c 			    &  C  &	 45   &	 30		& 0.3 -- 8.9 &	10.0	&  1.2E-01& 2.0E-02	& 1.2E+04	& 1.7E-06  & 2.4E-05  	  \\	 

1285: 41	&	CSO 33		   	  &	  P  &  45   &	 	--	  & 3.5 -- 8.9 	 &	 7.2	  &  8.4E-02 & 7.4E-02 & 1.1E+04  & 6.5E-06	& 6.6E-05   \\

1286: \hline

1287: \hline

1288: \multicolumn{11}{c}{Red lobe}  \\

1289: \hline

1290: 1	 &   SIMBA $a$		&	C	 & 45		  &	   50	   	  & 13.2 -- 16.5 &	   4.0	    &	1.4E-01	  & 2.0E-02	 & 3.4E+04	& 5.8E-07   & 3.3E-06 	\\

1291: 3	 &	 SIMBA $c$		&	P	 & 	45		 	&	 ---	   	 & --- &	   ---	    & 	--- 		   &	---	        & ---	          & ---	           & ---            \\

1292: 10	&	MMS 2			  &	  C	   & 45		    &	 90		    & 13.2 -- 16.5  &	 5.3      &	  1.5E-01 & 3.2E-02  & 7.6E+04	 & 4.2E-07	 & 2.4E-06	\\

1293: 13	&	MMS 5 	 		  &	  C	   & 45		    &    -90	    & 13.2 --21.9 &   10.9    &	 1.0E-01   & 1.4E-02  & 9.0E+03	 & 1.5E-06	 & 2.3E-05  \\

1294: 16	&	MMS 7 	 		  &	  C	   & 70		    &	 90	        & 13.2 -- 18.6 &	8.0		  &    9.8E-01	 & 1.4E-01	& 3.3E+05  & 4.4E-07   & 3.7E-06  \\

1295: 18	&	MMS 9 (west) &	 C	  &	45	       &	-100	  & 13.2 -- 26.2 &	  14.7     &   7.1E-01    &	2.8E-01  & 4.7E+04	& 6.0E-06   & 1.2E-04 \\

1296: 18	&	MMS 9 (east)  &	  C	   & 45	        &	-100	   & 13.2 -- 17.5 &   6.0 		&	3.5E-01     & 4.9E-02 	& 5.7E+04 & 8.6E-07	  & 7.3E-06 \\

1297: 20	&	VLA 9			   &	P    & 45		   &	   40	  & ---  &	 ---	   &	---	  			&	   ---	      & ---			   & ---	       & ---            \\

1298: 23	&	FIR 1$b$		  &	   P    & 45		  &	 	--	   	   & 13.2 -- 17.5 &	 6.2	  &  8.4E-02	 &	2.7E-02   & 1.3E+04	& 2.1E-06  & 1.8E-05 \\

1299: 26	&	FIR 2				  &	   C    & 45		 &	 -150      & 13.2 -- 20.8 &	 9.5	  &	 6.8E-02      &	1.8E-02   & 7.0E+03 & 2.6E-06  & 3.4E-05 \\

1300: 28	&	FIR 3 (north)    &	  C    & 70		  &	 30	            & 13.2 -- 25.1 &	13.9	& 1.9E-01       &  9.7E-02	& 3.7E+04 & 2.7E-06  & 3.9E-05  \\

1301: 28	&	FIR 3 (south)    &	  C    & 70		  &	 30	           & 13.2 -- 22.9 &	11.7	& 1.0E-01       & 6.3E-02	& 2.3E+04 & 2.8E-06  & 3.4E-05  \\

1302: 30	&	VLA 13	 		   & 	C    & 45		  &	   0           & 13.2 -- 17.5 &	  6.3	   & 6.8E-02	  & 1.4E-02	   & 1.1E+04 & 1.3E-06 & 1.2E-05 \\

1303: 36	&	FIR 6$b$		   &	C	 &	45	     &	 -115	    & 13.2 -- 21.9 &	   11.6    & 2.2E-01  &	4.9E-02   & 1.9E+04	 & 2.7E-06 & 4.4E-05    \\

1304: 37	&	FIR 6c 			      &	   C	&	45		&	 30	         & 13.2 -- 19.7 &	   9.4	     & 1.8E-01	   &  4.7E-02	& 1.9E+04  & 2.5E-06 & 3.4E-05 \\

1305: 41	&	COS 33	   	        &	P	  &	 45		  &	 	---	   	     & --- &	   ---		 & ---	   & ---	& ---  & --- & --- \\

1306: \enddata

1307: \tablenotetext{a}{Object names in the column are from Chini et al. (1997), Lis et al. (1998), Nielbock et al. (2003) and Reipurth et al. (1999).}

1308: \tablenotetext{b}{C and P indicate outflows identified as CLEAR and PROBABLE, respectively.}

1309: \tablenotetext{c}{Inclinations angles of MMS 2, MMS 7, and FIR 3 outflows were assumed nearly plane of the sky 

1310: (i.e., 70$^{\circ}$). Inclination of the other outflows were assumed 45$^{\circ}$. }

1311: \tablenotetext{d}{Not corrected for inclination.}

1312: \tablenotetext{e}{H$_2$ mass of the CO outflow were derived by the LTE assumption. Here, the typical excitation temperature of CO (3--2) 

1313: and the abundance were assumed  $T_{\rm{ex}}=30$ (see Figure \ref{f13}) and $X$[CO]=$10^{-4}$ (Frerking, Langer \& Wilson 1982), 

1314: respectively.}

1315: \tablenotetext{f}{Each parameter assumed inclination angle.}

1316: \end{deluxetable}

1317: 

1318: \newpage

1319: 

1320: \begin{table}

1321:   \caption{Physical Properties of the Possible Outflow Driving Sources}\label{t4}

1322:   \begin{center}

1323:     \begin{tabular}{llcccccc}

1324:       \hline

1325: 	  ID	& Object name          & $L_{\rm{bol.(min.)}}$ \tablenotemark{a,b}	&	$L_{\rm{bol.(max.)}}$ \tablenotemark{a,c} &	

1326: 	  $M_{\rm{env}}$\tablenotemark{d} & Spitzer 24 $\mu$m  & IRAS & Classification\tablenotemark{e}\\

1327: 	  		 &									& [$L_{\odot}$]	&	[$L_{\odot}$] &	[$M_{\odot}$]  & & & \\

1328: 	  \hline\hline

1329: 	  1		&	SIMBA $a$\tablenotemark{f}	          &		5.6	&		---		&	  6.5	   & 053530--045848 &   & 0 \\

1330: 	  10		&	MMS 2			  &		14	&		150	        &   	2.8	  & 053518--050034 &  & I \\

1331: 	  13		&	MMS 5			  &		9.0	&		---	        &	 4.5	 & 053522--050115 &  & 0 \\

1332: 	  16		&	MMS 7			  &		71	&		99		&	   4.1	  & 053527--050355 &  05329--0505 & I \\

1333: 	  18		&	MMS 9			  &		60	&		155		&   4.7		 & 053526--050546 & & 0 \\

1334: 	  26		&	FIR 2			  &	  59		&		217	        &   3.9	 & 053524--050831 &	 & I  \\

1335: 	  28		&	FIR 3			  &	  30		&		300	        &	7.7	  & 053528--050935 & & I \\

1336: 	  30		&	VLA 13			  &	  24		&		286	        &	$\leq$ 1.0  & 053525--051031 & & I \\

1337: 	  36		&	FIR 6$b$		  &    6.0		&		251	        &	 3.4	& 053523--051205 &  & I \\

1338: 	  37		&	FIR 6 $c$		  &    ---\tablenotemark{g}		&		---\tablenotemark{g} 	        &        5.1   & & & 0?     \\

1339: 	\hline

1340: 	\tablenotetext{a}{The bolometric luminosity of each object is estimated from the total flux integrated  by 8 $\mu$m to 1.3 mm 

1341: 	from Chini et al. 1997, Nielbock et al. 2003, and Spitzer archive data.}

1342: 	\tablenotetext{b}{Lower limit of the bolometric luminosity. (The data do not include IRAS 100 $\mu$m upper limit fluxes)}

1343: 	\tablenotetext{c}{Upper limit of the bolometric luminosity. (The data include IRAS 100 $\mu$m upper limit fluxes)}

1344: 	\tablenotetext{d}{Envelope mass were estimated by the flux within the diameter of 5000 AU (11$''$) by Chini et al. (1997).}

1345: 	\tablenotetext{e}{Evolutionary status of protostars were classified as Class 0 and Class I based on 2 $\mu$m and 10 $\mu$m results by Nielbock et al. (2003).}

1346: 	\tablenotetext{f}{The envelope mass of SIMBA $a$ were estimated by the flux within the diameter of 10800AU (24$''$) by Nielbock et al. (2003)}

1347: 	\tablenotetext{g}{The bolometric luminosity was not estimated due to negative detection of the near- to mid-infrared source.}

1348:     \end{tabular}

1349:   \end{center}

1350: \end{table}

1351: 

1352: \clearpage

1353: 

1354: \appendix

1355: \begin{figure}

1356: \epsscale{0.80}

1357: \plotone{f13.eps}

1358: \caption{CO(3--2) spectra for CLEAR and PROBABLE outflows in our sample at the positions of outflow driving sources 

1359: (i.e., positions of 1.3 mm continuum sources or VLA 3.6 cm sources). \label{f13}}

1360: \end{figure}

1361: 

1362: \end{document}

1363: