1: %%\documentclass{jpsj2}
2: %%\documentclass[twocolumn]{jpsj2}
3: %%\documentclass[letter]{jpsj2} %% for letters
4: %%\documentclass[twocolumn,letter]{jpsj2} %% two-column for letters
5: %%\documentclass[shortnote]{jpsj2} %% for short notes
6: \documentclass[twocolumn,shortnote]{jpsj2} %% for short notes
7: %%\documentclass[comment]{jpsj2} %% for comments
8: %%\documentclass[addenda]{jpsj2} %% for addenda
9: %%\documentclass[errata]{jpsj2} %% for errata
10: %%\documentclass[seceq]{jpsj2} %% It makes equation numbers included within the section number (for regular paper only).
11: %%% The following is the list of packages loaded automatically into this class file.
12: %% amsmath.sty
13: %% amssymb.sty
14: %% graphicx.sty
15: %% overcite.sty
16: % 2002/12/16
17: %\usepackage[mtbold]{mathtime}
18:
19: \def\runtitle{Pressure effect on BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$}
20: \def\runauthor{H. Fukazawa {\it et al.}}
21:
22: \title{%
23: Suppression of Magnetic Order\\
24: by Pressure in BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$
25: }
26:
27: \author{%
28: Hideto~Fukazawa\thanks{E-mail address: hideto@nmr.s.chiba-u.ac.jp},
29: Nao~Takeshita$^{1}$,
30: Takehiro~Yamazaki,
31: Kenji~Kondo,
32: Kenji~Hirayama,
33: Yoh~Kohori,
34: Kiichi~Miyazawa$^{1,2}$,
35: Hijiri~Kito$^{1}$,
36: Hiroshi~Eisaki$^{1}$,
37: and Akira~Iyo$^{1}$
38: }
39:
40: \inst{%
41: Department of Physics, Chiba University, Chiba 263-8522\\
42: $^{1}$Nanoelectronics Research Institute, National Institute of
43: Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba 305-8562\\
44: $^{2}$Department of Applied Electronics, Tokyo University of Science, Noda 278-8510
45: }
46:
47: \recdate{\today}
48:
49: %\abst{%
50: %We report the $^{75}$As nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurement of the ternary iron arsenide BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$.
51: %$^{75}$As-NMR spectra clearly revealed that magnetic transition occurs at around 131~K in our samples,
52: %which corresponds to the emergence of spin density wave.
53: %The temperature dependence of the internal magnetic field
54: %suggests that the transition is likely of the first order.
55: %The critical slowing-down phenomenon in the spin-lattice relaxation rate $1/T_{1}$ is not pronounced in this material.
56: %, which is contrast to the obvious critical-slowing-down phenomenon observed in $1/T_{1}$ of $^{139}$La in LaFeAsO~\cite{Nak1}.
57: %}
58:
59: \kword{%
60: BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$, magnetic transition, superconductivity, high pressure, nuclear magnetic resonance
61: }
62:
63: \begin{document}
64: \maketitle
65:
66:
67:
68:
69:
70: %\section{\label{sec:level1} Introduction}
71:
72:
73: The discovery of superconductivity in F-doped LaFeAsO~\cite{Kam1}
74: has accelerated further investigations of the related superconductors~\cite{Kit1,Take1,Ren2}.
75: The common feature of these compounds is the possession of a FeAs layer which is analogous to the CuO$_{2}$ plane
76: in high-superconducting-transition-temperature (high-$T_{\rm c}$) cuprates.
77: Soon after the intensive investigations of the oxypnictides,
78: the oxygen-free iron pnictide BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$~\cite{Rot1}
79: was proposed as the next candidate parent material of superconductor with high $T_{\rm c}$.
80: The crystal structure of this pnictide is the ThCr$_{2}$Si$_{2}$-type structure and
81: possesses a similar FeAs layer to that realized in LaFeAsO.
82: Moreover, this material exhibits spin density wave (SDW) anomaly at $T_{\rm SDW} =$~140~K (BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$)~\cite{Rot1,Hua1}.
83: It is important to note that the compound exhibits structural phase transition
84: from tetragonal ($I4/mmm$) to orthorhombic ($Fmmm$) as well as SDW anomaly~\cite{Rot1,Hua1}.
85: The most striking feature of this compound is that the SDW anomaly disappears and the superconductivity indeed sets in
86: by hole doping, for example, K substitution for Ba~\cite{Rot2}.
87: In addition, the pressure $P$ induced superconductivity in BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$ was recently
88: reported by the magnetic susceptibility measurements under pressure up to about 6~GPa~\cite{Ali1}.
89: Although it should be revealed by additional experimental approaches whether this superconductivity is intrinsic or not,
90: it is clear that the investigation of this compound under pressure is quite important.
91: In order to understand the relation between the SDW instability and expected superconductivity in BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$,
92: we performed resistivity $\rho$ measurements and zero-external-field (ZF)
93: $^{75}$As nuclear-magnetic-resonance (NMR) measurements of BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$ under high pressure.
94:
95: In our previous letter, we reported the $^{75}$As-NMR spectra of BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$ at various temperatures
96: and the temperature $T$ dependence of the spin-lattice relaxation rate $1/T_{1}$ of $^{75}$As under ambient pressure~\cite{Fuk2}.
97: $^{75}$As-NMR spectra clearly revealed that magnetic transition occurs at around 131~K in our samples,
98: which corresponds to the emergence of spin density wave.
99: The $T$ dependence of the internal magnetic field $H_{\rm int}$ suggested that the transition is likely of the first order.
100: We also deduced from the difference of the linewidth of the highly oriented powder and partially oriented powder
101: that the $H_{\rm int}$ at the As site is parallel to $c$-axis.
102: %The critical slowing-down phenomenon in $1/T_{1}$ was not pronounced in this material,
103: %which was in contrast to that in the case of LaFeAsO,
104: %in which the phenomenon was more clearly observed in the $1/T_{1}$ of $^{139}$La~\cite{Nak1}.
105: The steep decrease in $1/T_{1}$ below $T_{\rm SDW}$ was observed and was due to the gap formation of the SDW at part of the Fermi surface.
106: $1/T_{1}$ below about 100~K was nearly proportional to $T$ which indicates
107: the relaxation due to the remaining conduction electron at the Fermi level even below $T_{\rm SDW}$.
108: In our previous paper, we also reported a ZF $^{75}$As-NMR spectrum at 1.5~K~\cite{Fuk2,Fuk3}.
109: The ZF $^{75}$As-NMR spectrum clearly revealed that the magnetically ordered state of this compound is commensurate.
110: Furthermore, the center line of the ZF $^{75}$As-NMR spectrum is a good measure of the $H_{\rm int}$ at the As site.
111:
112:
113:
114:
115:
116:
117: %\section{\label{sec:level2}Experimental}
118:
119: The polycrystalline BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$ was synthesized by a high-temperature and high-pressure method.
120: The samples were confirmed to be nearly single phase by X-ray diffraction analysis.
121: The electrical resistivity was measured by means of ordinary dc four probe method.
122: Cubic anvil apparatus for low temperature measurement~\cite{Mor1} was used for the resistivity measurements under $P$ up to 13~GPa.
123: Detailed condition for the use of this apparatus is given elsewhere~\cite{Take1}.
124: %For the samples of the NMR measurements, the resistivity measurement revealed
125: %the rapid decrease in resistivity below 131~K, which corresponds to SDW anomaly~\cite{Tom1}.
126: The NMR experiment on the $^{75}$As nucleus ($I=3/2$, $\gamma = 7.292$~MHz/T) was carried out
127: using a phase-coherent pulsed NMR spectrometer.
128: The samples were crushed into powder for use in the experiment.
129: The CuBe-NiCrAl hybrid piston-cylinder cell was used for the NMR measurements under $P$ up to about 2.5~GPa.
130: Daphne 7373 was used for the pressure transmitting medium, which was confirmed to be
131: suited for the measurements under $P$ with the use of the piston cylinder cell~\cite{Fuk4}.
132: The pressure and its homogeneity was determined
133: from the nuclear quadrupole resonance frequency and full width at half maximum of $^{63}$Cu of Cu$_{2}$O at 4.2~K, respectively~\cite{Rey1}.
134:
135:
136:
137:
138:
139:
140: %\section{\label{sec:level3}Results and Discussions}
141:
142: \begin{figure}
143: \centering
144: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{Fig1_BaFe2As2_rhoT_P.eps}
145: \caption{
146: (Color online) Temperature $T$ dependence of the dc resistivity $\rho$ of BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$ under various pressures.
147: The inset shows the $T$ dependence of $d\rho /dT$ of BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$ at 2.0~GPa.
148: }
149: \end{figure}
150:
151: In Fig.~1, we show the $T$ dependence of $\rho$ of BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$ under various pressures.
152: $\rho$ exhibits metallic behavior in almost all the $T$ range at all the pressures.
153: At ambient pressure, $\rho$ rapidly decreases below about 131~K (= $T_{\rm SDW}$)~\cite{Tom1}.
154: This is due to SDW anomaly as well as the structural phase transition.
155: The $T_{\rm SDW}$ of our samples is slightly lower than those
156: reported by Rotter {\it et al.}~\cite{Rot1} and Huang {\it et al.}~\cite{Hua1}
157: This anomaly apparently becomes broader above 1~GPa: it becomes difficult to determine the SDW and/or structural transition temperature.
158: In the inset of Fig.~1, we show the $T$ dependence of $d\rho /dT$ of BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$ at 2.0~GPa.
159: The large peak can be seen at around 114~K.
160: Because the $\rho$ decreases more steeply below this temperature,
161: which can be interpreted as the suppression of the magnetic scattering,
162: this anomaly is attributable to SDW transition.
163: Hence, we express the characteristic temperature of this anomaly under pressure with $T_{\rm SDW}$ as well as the ambient $T_{\rm SDW}$.
164: Gradual decrease of $\rho$ at the temperatures above $T_{\rm SDW}$ might be due to the preceding behavior of SDW anomaly.
165:
166: \begin{figure}
167: \centering
168: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{Fig2_BaFe2As2_75As_NMR_HintP_TstP_TSDWP_TSCP.eps}
169: \caption{
170: (Color online) The $T$-$P$ phase diagram of BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$ determined from resistivity anomalies.
171: Squares ($T_{\rm anom}$), up triangles ($T_{\rm SDW}$), and circles ($T_{\rm *}$)
172: denote structural-like, SDW, and SC-like transition, respectively.
173: Down triangles denote the internal magnetic fields $H_{\rm int}$ at the As site evaluated from the ZF $^{75}$As-NMR measurements at 1.5~K.
174: The inset shows the ZF $^{75}$As-NMR spectra at various pressures.
175: }
176: \end{figure}
177:
178: More clear change in $\rho$ is steep decrease below about 20-30~K under $P$ above 3.0~GPa.
179: This anomaly corresponds to superconducting phase transition
180: which was reported by the magnetic susceptibility measurements under $P$ up to about 6~GPa~\cite{Ali1}.
181: However, we should note that we obtained no zero-resistivity at every pressure.
182: We confirmed its reproducibility with different batches of samples.
183: Simultaneously, we obtained current dependence of the $\rho$ below these temperatures.
184: Therefore, this anomaly is related with superconductivity,
185: but we could not conclude that this anomaly is an intrinsic property of BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$ under pressure.
186: Then, we express the characteristic temperature of this anomaly with $T_{\rm *}$.
187:
188:
189: %The other anomaly can be found as a quite small peak in the $\rho$ at higher temperature:
190: %the anomaly is denoted by right-side arrow at a pressure in Fig.~1.
191: %Since its change is systematic, we might speculate that this anomaly is ascribable to structural phase transition.
192: %However, we could not exclude the possibility that the structural phase transition occurs
193: %simultaneously with SDW magnetic transition even under pressure.
194: %Therefore, we express the characteristic temperature of this anomaly with $T_{\rm anom}$.
195:
196:
197:
198:
199:
200: In Fig.~2, we show the $T$-$P$ phase diagram of BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$ determined from resistivity anomalies.
201: We also show the $P$ dependence of the $H_{\rm int}$ up to about 2.5~GPa.
202: The $H_{\rm int}$ at the As site was evaluated from the $P$-dependent center line
203: of the ZF $^{75}$As-NMR spectrum as shown in the inset of Fig.~2.
204: Detailed analysis of the spectra to evaluate the $H_{\rm int}$ is written elsewhere~\cite{Fuk3}.
205: We also show higher satellite line at 2.49~GPa in the inset of Fig.~2
206: in order to show that the peak at around 8.7~MHz is indeed a center line of the ZF NMR spectrum.
207: The $P$ dependence of the $H_{\rm int}$ is nearly proportional to that of $T_{\rm SDW}$.
208: This supports that our estimation of the $T_{\rm SDW}$ from $\rho$ is adequate.
209: The phase diagram clearly shows that the SDW anomaly is suppressed by applied $P$, but is simultaneously quite robust against $P$.
210: Furthermore, if $T_{*}$ is an intrinsic $T_{c}$ of BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$,
211: this phase diagram suggests the possibility of coexistence of SDW ordered phase and superconducting phase.
212: The similar behavior is reported by the phase diagram of the isomorph SrFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$ under $P$~\cite{Kum1}
213: and the K-doped BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$~\cite{HCh1}.
214: However, we again emphasize that, at the present stage, we cannot conclude that the anomaly below about 20-30~K is
215: an intrinsic property of BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$ under $P$.
216: We note that there is no clear change in spin-lattice relaxation time $T_{1}$ at 1.5~K between 0 and 2.49~GPa.
217: If superconductivity sets in even at 2.49~GPa, we can expect the sufficient increase of $T_{1}$ due to the gap formation of superconductivity.
218: This might indicate that the apparent superconductivity above 3~GPa is not a bulk superconductivity.
219: The imperfection of the crystal possibly suppresses the superconductivity or
220: the anomaly arises from a small amount of impurity phase consisting of Fe and As, which cannot be detected by NMR measurement.
221: Therefore, we should continue the NMR measurements under $P$ beyond 3~GPa
222: in order to determine the magnetic phase diagram and ground state of BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$ under $P$
223: with Bridgman anvil cell~\cite{Fuk1} and mini cubic anvil apparatus~\cite{Hir1}, which are now in progress.
224:
225:
226:
227:
228: %\section{Summary}
229:
230:
231: %In summary, we performed the dc resistivity and the ZF $^{75}$As-NMR measurement of BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$ under high pressure.
232: %The $T$-$P$ phase diagram of BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$ determined from resistivity anomalies and
233: %the ZF $^{75}$As-NMR clearly revealed that the SDW anomaly is quite robust against $P$.
234: %The NMR measurements under $P$ beyond 3~GPa is needed in order to determine the ground state of BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$ under $P$.
235: %and the measurements with a Bridgman anvil cell~\cite{Fuk1} and mini cubic anvil apparatus~\cite{Hir1} are now in progress.
236:
237:
238:
239:
240: %\section*{Acknowledgment}
241:
242: This work is supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the MEXT.
243:
244:
245:
246:
247:
248:
249:
250:
251: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
252:
253:
254: \bibitem{Kam1} Y. Kamihara {\it et al.}: J. Am. Chem. Soc. {\bf 130} (2008) 3296.
255:
256: \bibitem{Kit1} H. Kito {\it et al.}: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 77} (2008) 063707.
257:
258: \bibitem{Take1} N. Takeshita {\it et al.}: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 77} (2008) 075003.
259:
260: \bibitem{Ren2} Z. A. Ren {\it et al.}: Euro. Phys. Lett. {\bf 82} (2008) 57002.
261:
262: \bibitem{Rot1} M. Rotter {\it et al.}: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 78} (2008) 020503(R).
263:
264: \bibitem{Hua1} Q. Huang {\it et al.}: arXiv:0806.2776v1.
265:
266: \bibitem{Rot2} M. Rotter {\it et al.}: arXiv:0805.4630v1.
267:
268: \bibitem{Ali1} P. L. Alireza {\it et al.}: arXiv: 0807.1896v1.
269:
270: \bibitem{Fuk2} H. Fukazawa {\it et al.}: to be published in J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. No.9 (2008); arXiv:0806.4514v3.
271:
272: \bibitem{Fuk3} H. Fukazawa {\it et al.}: submitted to the Proceedings of the International Symposium on Fe-Oxipnictide Superconductors.
273:
274: \bibitem{Mor1} N. M$\hat{\rm{o}}$ri {\it et al.}: High Pressure Research {\bf 24} (2004) 225.
275:
276: \bibitem{Tom1} Y. Tomioka: private communications.
277:
278: \bibitem{Fuk4} H. Fukazawa {\it et al.}: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 76} (2007) 125001.
279:
280: \bibitem{Rey1} A.P. Reyes {\it et al.}: Rev. Sci. Instrum. {\bf 63} (1992) 3120.
281:
282: \bibitem{Kum1} M. Kumar {\it et al.}: arXiv: 0807.4283v1.
283:
284: \bibitem{HCh1} H. Chen {\it et al.}: arXiv: 0807.3950v1.
285:
286: \bibitem{Fuk1} H. Fukazawa {\it et al.}: Rev. Sci. Instrum. {\bf 78} (2007) 015106.
287:
288: \bibitem{Hir1} K. Hirayama {\it et al.}: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 77} (2008) 075001.
289:
290:
291:
292:
293:
294:
295:
296: %\bibitem{Kam1} Y. Kamihara, T. Watanabe, M. Hirano, and H. Hosono: J. Am. Chem. Soc. {\bf 130} (2008) 3296.
297:
298: %\bibitem{Kit1} H. Kito, H. Eisaki, and A. Iyo: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 77} (2008) 063707.
299:
300: %\bibitem{Take1} N. Takeshita, A. Iyo, H. Eisaki, H. Kito, and T. Ito: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 77} (2008) 075003.
301:
302: %\bibitem{Ren2} Z. A. Ren, J. Yang, W. Lu, W. Yi, X. L. Shen, Z. C. Li, G. C. Che, X. L. Dong, L. L. Sun, F. Zhou, and Z. X. Zhao:
303: %Euro. Phys. Lett. {\bf 82} (2008) 57002.
304:
305: %\bibitem{Rot1} M. Rotter, M. Tegel, D. Johrendt, I. Schellenberg, W. Hermes, R. P$\ddot{\rm o}$ttgen: arXiv:0805.4021v1.
306:
307: %\bibitem{Hua1} Q. Huang, Y. Qiu, W. Bao, J. W. Lynn, M. A. Green, Y. C. Gasparovic, T. Wu, G. Wu, and X. H. Chen: arXiv:0806.2776v1.
308:
309: %\bibitem{Rot2} M. Rotter, M. Tegel, and D. Johrendt: arXiv:0805.4630v1.
310:
311: %\bibitem{Ali1} P. L. Alireza, J. Gillett, Y. T. Chris Ko, S. E. Sebastian, and G. G. Lonzarich: arXiv: 0807.1896v1.
312:
313: %\bibitem{Fuk2} H. Fukazawa, K. Hirayama, K. Kondo, T. Yamazaki, Y. Kohori, N. Takeshita, K. Miyazawa,
314: %H. Kito, H. Eisaki, A. Iyo: to be published in J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. No.9 (2008).
315: %See also H. Fukazawa {\it et al.}: arXiv:0806.4514v3.
316:
317: %\bibitem{Fuk3} H. Fukazawa, T. Yamazaki, K. Kondo, K. Hirayama, Y. Kohori, N. Takeshita, K. Miyazawa,
318: %H. Kito, H. Eisaki, A. Iyo: submitted to the Proceedings of the International Symposium on Fe-Oxipnictide Superconductors.
319:
320: %\bibitem{Mor1} N. M$\hat{\rm{o}}$ri, H. Takahashi and N. Takeshita:
321: %High Pressure Research {\bf 24} (2004) 225.
322:
323: %\bibitem{Tom1} Y. Tomioka: private communications.
324:
325: %\bibitem{Fuk4} H. Fukazawa, K. Hirayama, T. Yamazaki, Y. Kohori, and T. Matsumoto:
326: %J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 76} (2007) 125001.
327:
328: %\bibitem{Rey1} A.P. Reyes, E.T. Ahrens, R.H. Heffner, P.C. Hammel and J.D. Thompson,
329: %Rev. Sci. Instrum. {\bf 63}, 3120 (1992).
330:
331: %\bibitem{Kum1} M. Kumar, M. Nicklas, A. Jesche, N. Caroca-Canales, M. Schmitt,
332: %M. Hanfland, D. Kasinathan, U. Schwarz, H. Rosner, and C. Geibel: arXiv: 0807.4283v1.
333:
334: %\bibitem{HCh1} H. Chen, Y. Ren, Y. Qiu, W. Bao, R. H. Liu, G. Wu, T. Wu,
335: %Y. L. Xie, X. F. Wang, Q. Huang, and X. H. Chen: arXiv: 0807.3950v1.
336:
337: %\bibitem{Fuk1} H. Fukazawa, N. Yamatoji, Y. Kohori, C. Terakura, N. Takeshita, Y. Tokura, and H. Takagi:
338: %Rev. Sci. Instrum. {\bf 78} (2007) 015106.
339:
340: %\bibitem{Hir1} K. Hirayama, T. Yamazaki, H. Fukazawa, Y. Kohori, N. Takeshita: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 77} (2008) 075001.
341:
342:
343:
344:
345:
346:
347:
348:
349:
350: \end{thebibliography}
351: \end{document}
352: