1: %\documentstyle[referee,epsf]{mn2e}
2: %\documentstyle[epsf]{mn2e}
3: %\documentstyle[epsf]{mn}
4: \documentclass{mn2e}
5: \hyphenation{english}
6: %%\input psfig.tex
7: \usepackage{epsf}
8:
9:
10: \newif\ifAMStwofonts
11: %\AMStwofontstrue
12:
13:
14: %%%%% AUTHORS - PLACE YOUR OWN MACROS HERE %%%%%
15:
16:
17: \def\gtorder{\mathrel{\raise.3ex\hbox{$>$}\mkern-14mu
18: \lower0.6ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}
19: \def\ltorder{\mathrel{\raise.3ex\hbox{$<$}\mkern-14mu
20: \lower0.6ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}
21:
22: %\newcommand\ion[2]{#1$\;${\small\rmfamily\@Roman{#2}}\relax}
23:
24:
25: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
26:
27:
28:
29:
30: %\slugcomment{Draft of \today}
31:
32:
33: \title[SDSS J120923.7$+$264047]{SDSS J120923.7$+$264047: A new massive galaxy cluster with a bright giant arc}
34:
35: \author[E.~O.~Ofek et al.]
36: {Eran~O.~Ofek\thanks{e-mail: eran@astro.caltech.edu}$^{1}$, Stella~Seitz$^{2}$, Felix Klein$^{2}$ \\
37: $^{1}$ Division of Physics, Mathematics and Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125 \\
38: $^{2}$ Universit\"{a}ts-Sternwarte M\"{u}nchen, M\"{u}nchen, Germany}
39:
40:
41: \date{Accepted ?
42: Received ?
43: in original form ?}
44:
45:
46: \begin{document}
47:
48: \maketitle
49:
50: \begin{abstract}
51:
52: Highly magnified lensed galaxies
53: allow us to probe
54: the morphological and spectroscopic properties
55: of high-redshift stellar systems in great detail.
56: %
57: However, such objects are rare, and there are
58: only a handful of lensed galaxies which are bright
59: enough for a high-resolution spectroscopic study
60: with current instrumentation.
61: %
62: We report the discovery of a new massive lensing cluster,
63: SDSS\,J120923.7$+$264047, at $z=0.558$.
64: Present around the cluster core, at angular distances of up to $\sim40''$,
65: are many arcs and arc candidates,
66: presumably due to lensing of background galaxies by the
67: cluster gravitational potential.
68: One of the arcs, $21''$ long, has an $r$-band magnitude of 20, making
69: it one of the brightest known lensed galaxies.
70: We obtained a low-resolution spectrum of this galaxy, using the Keck-I telescope,
71: and found it is at redshift of $z=1.018$.
72: %making it an excellent target for high-resolution spectroscopic study.
73:
74:
75: \end{abstract}
76:
77: \begin{keywords}
78: gravitational lensing\ --- galaxies: clusters: individual (SDSS\,J120923.7$+$264047\ --- galaxies: high-redshift
79: \end{keywords}
80:
81:
82: \section{Introduction}
83: \label{Introduction}
84:
85: High redshift galaxies ($z\gtorder1$) are
86: out of reach for current high-resolution
87: spectrographs.
88: Fortunately, such galaxies may be highly magnified,
89: when lensed
90: by galaxies or cluster of galaxies, making them
91: bright enough for high-resolution spectroscopic studies.
92: %
93: % and searching for very faint high redshift population
94: %of galaxies (e.g., Stark et al. 2007; Swinbank et al. 2007).
95: %
96: However, high magnification lensed galaxies are rare,
97: and only small number of targets suitable
98: for high-resolution spectroscopic studies are known.
99: %
100: Among these are:
101: MS1512$-$cB58 (Yee et al. 1996), with $r=20.4$\,mag at $z=2.72$;
102: an $r=20.3$\,mag Lyman break galaxy at $z=3.07$ (Smail et al. 2007);
103: %A $z=3.24$ arc in the cluster 1E0657$-$56 (Mehlert et al. 2001);
104: and finally a highly magnified galaxy, at $z=2.73$,
105: with $r=19.2$\,mag (Allam et al. 2007).
106: %
107: %http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006astro.ph.10061H
108: %
109: Studies of these objects
110: (e.g., Teplitz et al. 2000; Pettini et al. 2000; 2002; Baker et al. 2004; Schaerer \& Verhamme 2008)
111: provided valuable information
112: %, although for a small number of targets,
113: on their metallicity and inter-stellar medium.
114:
115:
116: In this paper we report on the discovery of a previously unknown
117: rich cluster of galaxies at $z=0.558$.
118: The cluster containing
119: a bright ``giant arc'', which is an appropriate target
120: for high-resolution spectroscopic studies.
121: In addition, the cluster, which has a considerable Einstein radius
122: of probably $\sim20-40''$, contains a large number of additional
123: arcs and lensed galaxies. This cluster is probably
124: as rich as the Abell 1689 lensing cluster (Broadhurst et al. 2005),
125: and therefore it is an excellent target for detailed
126: strong lensing and weak lensing modeling (e.g., Brada\u{c} et al. 2006; Halkola et al. 2006).
127:
128: The outline of this paper is as follows.
129: We describe the observations in \S\ref{Obs} and
130: in \S\ref{Arcs} we discuss the cluster and arcs
131: along with their measured properties.
132: Finally, we briefly discuss the results in \S\ref{Sum}.
133:
134:
135: \section{Observations}
136: \label{Obs}
137:
138: The discovery of the cluster and arcs described in this paper,
139: was made as part of a survey for large separation
140: lensed quasars (e.g., Maoz et al. 1997; Ofek et al. 2001; Phillips et al. 2001;
141: Inada et al. 2003; Oguri et al. 2004; Inada et al. 2006; Oguri et al. 2008),
142: among Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS; York et al. 2000) photometrically selected quasars.
143: This search will be described elsewhere.
144: %
145: Our search uncovered a previously unknown cluster of galaxies
146: in an SDSS image.
147: In addition to the cluster,
148: a giant arc was clearly visible near the cluster,
149: in the relatively shallow SDSS images.
150:
151:
152:
153: %
154: \begin{figure*}
155: \centerline{\epsfxsize=15cm\epsfbox{f1.eps}}
156: \caption{$R$-band image of SDSS\,J120923.7$+$264047,
157: obtained with LRIS mounted on the Keck-I 10\,m telescope.
158: Objects labeled by A1..K are candidate arcs.
159: The properties of the labeled arc candidates are listed
160: in Table~\ref{Tab-Pos}.
161: Also labeled are: the cluster bright galaxy
162: (cg1; SDSS\,J120923.68$+$264046.7) which is at $z=0.558$;
163: (cg2; SDSS\,J120924.41$+$264057.8) at $z=0.542$;
164: (cg3; SDSS\,J120923.60$+$264059.9) at $z=0.542$;
165: and a bright SDSS quasar (cq1; SDSS\,J120920.61$+$264041.2),
166: at $z=1.555$.
167: The quasar, cq1, which has an $r$-band magnitude of 19.2 is found
168: $41''$ from the bright cluster galaxy, so most probably
169: it is not strongly lensed by the cluster.
170: Also marked is the position (and actual width) of the slit
171: we used to obtain the spectrum of the arc.}
172: \label{SDSS1209R}
173: \end{figure*}
174: %
175:
176: On UTC 2008 Jan 04, we obtained $5\times220$\,s $g$-band
177: and $5\times180$\,s $R$-band images of the cluster environment using
178: the Low Resolution Imaging Spectrograph (LRIS; Oke et al. 1995)
179: on the Keck-I telescope, under seeing of $0.6''$.
180: The combined Keck $R$-band image is presented in Figure~\ref{SDSS1209R},
181: and the combined $g$-band image is presented in Fig.~\ref{SDSS1209g}.
182: %
183: The images were calibrated astrometrically using six objects
184: appearing in both the Keck and SDSS images.
185: The solution root-mean-square (RMS) is
186: better than $0.1''$ in both axes and both images.
187: %
188: In Table~\ref{Tab-Pos} we give the positions and photometry
189: of the main arcs detected in the images.
190: %
191: We have measured the magnitude of each arc, by
192: combining all the light within a polygon
193: defined by the SExtractor segmentation (Bertin \& Arnouts 1996).
194: In case SExtractor broke an arc to several segments,
195: we combined the light within these segments.
196: The SExtractor detection threshold was set to
197: about 2-$\sigma$ above background.
198:
199:
200: On the same night, using LRIS--Atmospheric Dispersion Compensator we also obtained a 1300\,s spectrum of
201: the bright
202: giant arc, labeled A1...A4 in Fig.~\ref{SDSS1209R}.
203: We used a $0.7''$ slit with the 5600\,\AA~dichroic;
204: the 400/3400 grism on the blue side; and
205: the 400/8500 grating, centered on $7693$\,\AA, on the red arm.
206: The slit position angle was set to $180.2$\,deg, in
207: order to include also the blue (SDSS $g-r\approx0.6$)
208: galaxy labeled cg2 in Fig.~\ref{SDSS1209R}.
209: The spectrum was flux calibrated using observations,
210: obtained on the same night,
211: of the spectrophotometric standard Hz2 (Turnshek et al. 1990).
212: The spectrum of arc A is shown in Fig.~\ref{GiantArcSpec}.
213: We also obtained using the same setup, on UTC 2007 Dec 15,
214: a 1500\,s-exposure spectra of the galaxies cg2 and cg3.
215: The spectral reduction was done using tools in
216: the MATLAB environment (Ofek et al. 2006).
217: The spectra of the galaxies cg2 and cg3 are shown in Fig.~\ref{Spec_2blue_obj}.
218: %
219: \begin{figure}
220: \centerline{\epsfxsize=8cm\epsfbox{f2.eps}}
221: \caption{$g$-band image of SDSS\,J120923.7$+$264047,
222: obtained with LRIS mounted on the Keck-I 10\,m telescope.
223: See Fig.~\ref{SDSS1209R} for details.}
224: \label{SDSS1209g}
225: \end{figure}
226: %
227: %
228: \begin{figure}
229: \centerline{\epsfxsize=8cm\epsfbox{f3.eps}}
230: \caption{The Keck/LRIS spectrum of the giant arc A
231: (Fig.~\ref{SDSS1209R}; Tab.~\ref{Tab-Pos}).
232: The detection of several lines indicates a redshift of 1.018.}
233: \label{GiantArcSpec}
234: \end{figure}
235: %
236: %
237: \begin{figure}
238: \centerline{\epsfxsize=8cm\epsfbox{f4.eps}}
239: \caption{The Keck/LRIS spectrum of the galaxies cg2 and cg3.
240: The galaxies are at redshift of $0.542$.
241: For clarity, the spectrum of cg3 is shifted upward by $4\times10^{-16}$\,erg\,cm$^{-2}$\,s$^{-1}$\,\AA$^{-1}$.}
242: \label{Spec_2blue_obj}
243: \end{figure}
244: %
245:
246: \section{The cluster and arcs}
247: \label{Arcs}
248:
249: The Keck $R$-band image of the cluster is presented in Fig.~\ref{SDSS1209R}.
250: In this figure, it is possible to identify
251: many arc candidates, most of which
252: are labeled (A to K).
253: We list the properties of these arcs and arc candidates
254: in Table~\ref{Tab-Pos}.
255: The most prominent arc in this system, labeled
256: as A1--A4 in Fig.~\ref{SDSS1209R}, is very large
257: and bright. This arc is located about $11''$ East
258: of the brightest cluster galaxy, and its length
259: is $21''$.
260: The spectrum of the arc, presented in Fig.~\ref{GiantArcSpec},
261: shows a single strong emission line and
262: several absorption features, at a probable redshift of $z=1.018$.
263: %
264: We note that there is also an indication for a Balmer decrement
265: around 7700\,\AA~(observed wavelength).
266: The redshift is based on the detection
267: of a single emission line.
268: Therefore, we attempted to look for other possible explanations
269: for this emission line, and
270: we did~not find any other reasonable redshift solution.
271: Moreover, the Einstein radius increases with source redshift.
272: Therefore, the relatively small Einstein radius of arc-A
273: implies that it is at relatively low redshift.
274: %
275: Its redshift,
276: which places it in the background of the cluster,
277: along with its unique appearance,
278: confirms the nature of this arc as a lensed galaxy.
279:
280:
281: The~Einstein~radius of a system scales like
282: $[D_{ls}/(D_{l}D_{s})]^{1/2}$, where
283: $D_{ls}$, $D_{l}$ and $D_{s}$ are
284: the angular diameter distances between
285: the lens and source, observer and lens,
286: and observer and source, respectively
287: (e.g., Narayan \& Bartelmann 1996).
288: Therefore, for the system discussed here,
289: we expect that the Einstein radius for
290: a $z\approx4$ system to be about $30\%$ larger
291: than for a $z=1$ system\footnote{Assuming 3rd year WMAP
292: cosmological parameters: $\Omega_{\Lambda}=0.716$, $\Omega_{m}=0.268$, H$_{0}=70.4$\,km\,s$^{-1}$\,Mpc$^{-1}$; Spergel et al. (2007).}.
293: This suggest that at least some of the arclets further away from the center of the cluster
294: are most probably strongly lensed background galaxies at higher redshifts.
295:
296:
297: The brightest cluster galaxy,
298: cg1 (SDSS\,J120923.69$+$264046.7)
299: in Fig.~\ref{SDSS1209R},
300: was observed spectroscopically by the SDSS, and we find it to be at a redshift of
301: 0.558.
302: As mentioned before, we also obtained a spectrum
303: of the blue galaxies marked cg2
304: (SDSS\,J120924.41$+$264057.8)
305: and cg3 (SDSS\,J120923.60$+$264059.9)
306: in Fig.~\ref{SDSS1209R}.
307: We measured a redshift of 0.542 to these galaxies using
308: the H$\beta$ (4862.7\,\AA) and [OIII] (5008.2\,\AA)
309: emission lines present in their spectra.
310: %
311: Given the redshift of the brightest cluster galaxy,
312: we suggest that the cluster redshift is 0.558.
313: However, confirmation of this redshift
314: requires a redshift measurement for additional
315: galaxies in this region.
316:
317:
318:
319:
320:
321: %
322: \begin{table}
323: \begin{center}
324: \begin{tabular}{lcccc}
325: \hline
326: Name & R.A. J2000 & Dec. J2000 & g & r \\
327: & & & mag & mag \\
328: \hline
329: A1 & 12:09:24.19 & +26:40:54.7 & & \\
330: A2 & 12:09:24.38 & +26:40:51.9 & & \\
331: A3 & 12:09:24.46 & +26:40:49.1 & & \\
332: A4 & 12:09:24.48 & +26:40:47.0 & & \\
333: A & & &20.3 &20.0 \\
334: % SDSS J120924.43+264048.8
335: B & 12:09:24.00 & +26:40:49.9 & &24.0 \\
336: C1 & 12:09:21.91 & +26:40:56.9 & &24.8 \\
337: C2 & 12:09:22.31 & +26:41:05.9 & &24.9 \\
338: %C & & & & \\
339: D & 12:09:22.04 & +26:40:46.5 & &24.5 \\
340: E & 12:09:21.22 & +26:40:45.8 & &24.2 \\
341: F1 & 12:09:24.94 & +26:40:53.5 & &23.4 \\
342: F2 & 12:09:24.96 & +26:40:51.6 & &23.7 \\
343: %F & & & & \\
344: G & 12:09:25.06 & +26:40:54.5 & &25.2 \\
345: H1 & 12:09:23.65 & +26:40:20.2 & &25.6 \\
346: H2 & 12:09:22.82 & +26:40:23.5 & &26.0 \\
347: I & 12:09:23.38 & +26:40:13.2 & &25.3 \\
348: J & 12:09:24.17 & +26:40:12.6 & &24.5 \\
349: K & 12:09:24.10 & +26:40:03.6 & &24.7 \\
350: \hline
351: \end{tabular}
352: \caption{Positions and approximate magnitudes of most of
353: the arc candidates detected in the Keck $R$-band image (Fig.~\ref{SDSS1209R}).
354: The magnitudes are approximate, and have typical uncertainties of 0.3\,mag.
355: The astrometry was performed relative to the SDSS.}
356: \label{Tab-Pos}
357: \end{center}
358: \end{table}
359:
360:
361: \section{Discussion}
362: \label{Sum}
363:
364:
365: Strong and weak lensing are being used
366: to trace the mass distribution of galaxy clusters.
367: However, detailed modeling of the mass distribution
368: of the cores of galaxy clusters requires the identification
369: of multiple images of lensed sources.
370: Such an identification needs good multi-band color information,
371: or/and good spatial resolution (e.g., Broadhusrt et al. 2005;
372: Sharon et al. 2006). Indeed we are planing additional
373: multi-band observations of this cluster,
374: which will enable a detailed modeling of
375: the cluster gravitational potential.
376:
377:
378: To confirm the presence of the cluster,
379: in Fig.~\ref{fig:SDSS1209_RedSequence} we show
380: the color magnitude diagram for SDSS galaxies
381: found with $2'$ from the cluster bright galaxy (black circles).
382: For comparison, we also show all the SDSS galaxies found
383: between $5'$ and $1^{\circ}$ from the cluster bright galaxy (gray dots).
384: The solid (dashed) red-lines display the locus of Elliptical (Sb)
385: galaxies as a function of redshift.
386: These lines take into account the Galactic extinction
387: ($E_{B-V}=0.019$\,mag) in the direction of the
388: cluster (Schlegel et al. 1998; Cardelli et al. 1989).
389: It is evident, that in the cluster direction
390: there is an excess of high-redshift galaxies, relative to the field.
391: %
392: \begin{figure}
393: \centerline{\epsfxsize=8cm\epsfbox{f5.eps}}
394: \caption{The color-magnitude diagram of SDSS galaxies
395: in the direction of the cluster.
396: The black circles represent
397: galaxies found with $2'$ from the cluster bright galaxy.
398: For comparison, we also show all the SDSS galaxies found
399: between $5'$ and $1^{\circ}$ from the cluster bright galaxy (gray dots).
400: The solid (dashed) red-lines display the locus of Elliptical (Sb)
401: galaxies as a function of redshift.
402: These lines take into account the Galactic extinction
403: ($E_{B-V}=0.019$\,mag) in the direction of the
404: cluster (Schlegel et al. 1998; Cardelli et al. 1989).
405: The galaxies colors as a function of redshift
406: are based on synthetic photometry of galaxy
407: templates from Kinney et al. (1996).
408: The synthetic photometry was performed using
409: the code of Poznanski et al. (2002).}
410: \label{fig:SDSS1209_RedSequence}
411: \end{figure}
412: %
413:
414:
415: At the approximate position of the bright cluster galaxy,
416: we find a known ROSAT source (Voges et al. 2000).
417: Using the PIMMS
418: webtool\footnote{http://cxc.harvard.edu/toolkit/pimms.jsp},
419: we converted the ROSAT/PSPC count rate to an unabsorbed flux
420: of $6.9\times10^{-13}$\,erg\,cm$^{-2}$\,s$^{-1}$,
421: assuming a Galactic neutral Hydrogen column density of
422: $1.8\times10^{20}$\,cm$^{-2}$ (Dickey \& Lockman 1990; Kalberla et al. 2005)
423: and a power-law spectrum
424: with a photon index of $\Gamma=1$
425: (assuming thermal optically thin Bremsstrahlung).
426: Given the luminosity distance to the cluster, this flux implies
427: a luminosity of $\sim8\times10^{44}$\,erg\,s$^{-1}$ in the 0.1--2.4\,keV band.
428: Using the X-ray luminosity-mass relation given by
429: Reiprich \& B\"{o}hringer (2002), we estimate that the
430: $M_{200}$ mass\footnote{$M_{200}$ is the mass enclosed within $r_{200}$, which is the radius in which the mean density equals 200 times the mean density of the Universe (e.g., Navarro, Frenk, \& White 1997).} of the cluster is approximately $10^{15}$\,M$_{\odot}$.
431: %
432: %cts = 4.39e-2 +/-1.2e-2
433: %NH = 1.8e20
434: %z=0.543
435: %unabsorbed flux (0.2-10 keV)
436: %for Gamma=1 = 2.9e-12 ->
437: % 2 = 8.0e-13 ->
438: % 3 = 4.0e-13 ->
439: % 0 = 1.5e-11 ->
440: %
441: % (0.1-2.4 keV)
442: % 0 8.6e-13 ->
443: % 1 6.9e-13
444: % 2 6.5e-13 Lx = 7.7e44
445: % 3 7.7e-13
446: %
447:
448: We can also estimate the mass of the cluster from its Einstein radius:
449: \begin{equation}
450: \theta_{E}=\Big[ \frac{4GM(\theta_{E})}{c^{2}}\frac{D_{ls}}{D_{l}D_{s}} \Big]^{1/2}.
451: \label{ER}
452: \end{equation}
453: %
454: The Einstein radius is a robust measure of the lens mass
455: within this radius.
456: Although we did~not identify the counter-image(s)
457: of arc-A we can estimate the Einstein radius based on
458: the distance of the arc from the cluster bright galaxy ($\sim11''$).
459: %
460: Using Eq.~\ref{ER} we estimate that the total mass
461: enclosed within 90~kpc (i.e., the Einstein radius, $11''$,
462: at $z\approx1$) is $\sim6\times10^{13}$\,M$_{\odot}$.
463:
464:
465:
466:
467:
468:
469:
470:
471:
472:
473:
474:
475:
476:
477: To summarize, we report on the discovery of
478: SDSS\,120923.7$+$264047 -- a massive cluster of galaxies at $z=0.558$.
479: The cluster hosts many prominent arcs, including a giant arc with
480: $R$-band magnitude of 20.0, at $z=1.018$.
481: Moreover, presumably the cluster has a large Einstein radius,
482: suggesting that it is one of the richest strong
483: lensing clusters known.
484:
485:
486:
487:
488:
489:
490:
491:
492:
493:
494: \section*{ACKNOWLEDGMENTS}
495: Partial support for this work was provided by NASA through
496: grant HST-GO-10793.01-A from the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is
497: operated by the Association of Universities for Research in
498: Astronomy, Incorporated, under NASA contract NAS5-26555.
499: %
500: We thank Chuck Steidel for help with the spectrum analysis,
501: and Orly Gnat and Robert Quimby for comments on the manuscript.
502: %
503: Funding for the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) and SDSS-II has been provided
504: by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the Participating Institutions,
505: the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Energy,
506: the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the
507: Japanese Monbukagakusho, and the Max Planck Society,
508: and the Higher Education Funding Council for England.
509: The SDSS Web site is http://www.sdss.org/.
510:
511:
512:
513:
514:
515: \begin{thebibliography}{}
516:
517: %\bibitem[Alard \& Lupton(1998)]{1998ApJ...503..325A} Alard, C., \& Lupton,
518: %R.~H.\ 1998, ApJ, 503, 325
519:
520: \bibitem[Allam et al.(2007)]{2007ApJ...662L..51A} Allam, S.~S., Tucker,
521: D.~L., Lin, H., Diehl, H.~T., Annis, J., Buckley-Geer, E.~J., \& Frieman,
522: J.~A.\ 2007, ApJL, 662, L51
523:
524: \bibitem[Baker et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...604..125B} Baker, A.~J., Tacconi,
525: L.~J., Genzel, R., Lehnert, M.~D., \& Lutz, D.\ 2004, ApJ, 604, 125
526:
527: \bibitem[Bertin \& Arnouts(1996)]{1996A&AS..117..393B} Bertin, E., \& Arnouts, S.\ 1996, A\&AS, 117, 393
528:
529: \bibitem[Brada\u{c} et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...652..937B} Brada{\v c}, M., et al.\ 2006, ApJ, 652, 937
530:
531: \bibitem[Broadhurst et al.(2005)]{2005ApJ...621...53B} Broadhurst, T., et
532: al.\ 2005, ApJ, 621, 53
533:
534: \bibitem[Cardelli et al.(1989)]{1989ApJ...345..245C} Cardelli, J.~A.,
535: Clayton, G.~C., \& Mathis, J.~S.\ 1989, ApJ, 345, 245
536:
537: \bibitem[Dickey \& Lockman(1990)]{1990ARA&A..28..215D} Dickey, J.~M., \& Lockman, F.~J.\ 1990, ARA\&A, 28, 215
538:
539: \bibitem[Halkola et al.(2006)]{2006MNRAS.372.1425H} Halkola, A., Seitz, S.,
540: \& Pannella, M.\ 2006, MNRAS, 372, 1425
541:
542: \bibitem[Inada et al.(2003)]{2003Natur.426..810I} Inada, N., et al.\ 2003,
543: Nature, 426, 810
544:
545: \bibitem[Inada et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...653L..97I} Inada, N., et al.\ 2006,
546: ApJL, 653, L97
547:
548: \bibitem[Kalberla et al.(2005)]{2005A&A...440..775K} Kalberla, P.~M.~W., Burton, W.~B., Hartmann, D., Arnal, E.~M., Bajaja, E., Morras, R., P\"{o}ppel, W.~G.~L.\ 2005, A\&A, 440, 775
549:
550: \bibitem[Kinney et al.(1996)]{1996ApJ...467...38K} Kinney, A.~L., Calzetti,
551: D., Bohlin, R.~C., McQuade, K., Storchi-Bergmann, T., \& Schmitt, H.~R.\
552: 1996, ApJ, 467, 38
553:
554: \bibitem[Maoz et al.(1997)]{1997ApJ...486...75M} Maoz, D., Rix, H.-W.,
555: Gal-Yam, A., \& Gould, A.\ 1997, ApJ, 486, 75
556:
557: \bibitem[Navarro et al.(1997)]{1997ApJ...490..493N} Navarro, J.~F., Frenk,
558: C.~S., \& White, S.~D.~M.\ 1997, ApJ, 490, 493
559:
560: \bibitem[Ofek et al.(2001)]{2001MNRAS.324..463O} Ofek, E.~O., Maoz, D.,
561: Prada, F., Kolatt, T., \& Rix, H.-W.\ 2001, MNRAS, 324, 463
562:
563: \bibitem[Ofek et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...641...70O} Ofek, E.~O., Maoz, D.,
564: Rix, H.-W., Kochanek, C.~S., \& Falco, E.~E.\ 2006, ApJ, 641, 70
565:
566: \bibitem[Ofek et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...641...70O} Ofek, E.~O., Maoz, D.,
567: Rix, H.-W., Kochanek, C.~S., \& Falco, E.~E.\ 2006, ApJ, 641, 70
568:
569: \bibitem[Oguri et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...605...78O} Oguri, M., et al.\ 2004,
570: ApJ, 605, 78
571:
572: \bibitem[Oguri et al.(2008)]{2008ApJ...676L...1O} Oguri, M., et al.\ 2008,
573: ApJL, 676, L1
574:
575: \bibitem[Oke et al.(1995)]{1995PASP..107..375O} Oke, J.~B., et al.\ 1995,
576: PASP, 107, 375
577:
578: \bibitem[Pettini et al.(2000)]{2000ApJ...528...96P} Pettini, M., Steidel,
579: C.~C., Adelberger, K.~L., Dickinson, M., \& Giavalisco, M.\ 2000, ApJ,
580: 528, 96
581:
582: \bibitem[Pettini et al.(2002)]{2002Ap&SS.281..461P} Pettini, M., Rix,
583: S.~A., Steidel, C.~C., Hunt, M.~P., Shapley, A.~E., \& Adelberger, K.~L.\
584: 2002, Ap\&SS, 281, 461
585:
586: \bibitem[Phillips et al.(2001)]{2001MNRAS.328.1001P} Phillips, P.~M., et
587: al.\ 2001, MNRAS, 328, 1001
588:
589: \bibitem[Poznanski et al.(2002)]{2002PASP..114..833P} Poznanski, D.,
590: Gal-Yam, A., Maoz, D., Filippenko, A.~V., Leonard, D.~C.,
591: \& Matheson, T.\ 2002, PASP, 114, 833
592:
593: \bibitem[Reiprich \& B\"{o}hringer(2002)]{2002ApJ...567..716R} Reiprich,
594: T.~H., B\"{o}hringer, H.\ 2002, ApJ, 567, 716
595:
596: \bibitem[Schaerer\& Verhamme(2008)]{2008A&A...480..369S} Schaerer, D., \& Verhamme, A. 2008, A\&A, 480, 369
597:
598: \bibitem[Schlegel et al.(1998)]{1998ApJ...500..525S} Schlegel, D.~J.,
599: Finkbeiner, D.~P., \& Davis, M.\ 1998, ApJ, 500, 525
600:
601: \bibitem[Sharon et al.(2005)]{2005ApJ...629L..73S} Sharon, K., et al.\
602: 2005, ApJL, 629, L73
603:
604: \bibitem[Smail et al.(2007)]{2007ApJ...654L..33S} Smail, I., et al.\ 2007, ApJL, 654, L33
605:
606: \bibitem[Spergel et al.(2007)]{2007ApJS..170..377S} Spergel, D.~N., et al.\
607: 2007, ApJS, 170, 377
608:
609: \bibitem[Teplitz et al.(2000)]{2000ApJ...542...18T} Teplitz, H.~I., et al.\
610: 2000, ApJ, 542, 18
611:
612: \bibitem[Turnshek et al.(1990)]{1990AJ.....99.1243T} Turnshek, D.~A.,
613: Bohlin, R.~C., Williamson, R.~L., II, Lupie, O.~L., Koornneef, J.,
614: \& Morgan, D.~H.\ 1990, AJ, 99, 1243
615:
616: \bibitem[Voges et al.(2000)]{2000IAUC.7432R...1V} Voges, W., et al.\ 2000,
617: IAUC, 7432, 1
618:
619: \bibitem[Yee et al.(1996)]{1996AJ....111.1783Y} Yee, H.~K.~C., Ellingson,
620: E., Bechtold, J., Carlberg, R.~G., \& Cuillandre, J.-C.\ 1996, AJ, 111,
621: 1783
622:
623: \bibitem[York et al.(2000)]{2000AJ....120.1579Y} York, D.~G., et al.\ 2000,
624: AJ, 120, 1579
625:
626: \end{thebibliography}
627:
628:
629: \end{document}
630:
631:
632: