1: %%

2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'

3: %%

4: %% Modified 2005 December 5

5: %%

6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the

7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.

8: 

9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document

10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore

11: %% any data that comes before this command.

12: 

13: %% The command below calls the preprint style

14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.

15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use

16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.

17: %% 03 46 48.397 *  +68 05 47.06

18: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

19: 

20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:

21: 

22: %%\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}

23: 

24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:

25: 

26: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}

27: 

28: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}

29: 

30: 

31: \documentclass{aastex}

32: \usepackage{emulateapj5}

33: 

34: \newcommand{\lta}{\lesssim}

35: \newcommand{\gta}{\gtrsim}

36: \newcommand{\coone}{$\rm ^{12}CO(1-0)$}

37: \newcommand{\cotwo}{$\rm ^{12}CO(2-1)$}

38: \newcommand{\one}{$\rm (1-0)$}

39: \newcommand{\two}{$\rm (2-1)$}

40: \newcommand{\ione}{$I_{10}$}

41: \newcommand{\itwo}{$I_{21}$}

42: %\newcommand{\nhico}{$\frac{N_{H_2}}{I_{CO}}$}

43: \newcommand{\nhico}{$X_{CO}$}

44: \newcommand{\CO}{$^{12}$CO\,}

45: %\newcommand{\COe}{$^{12}CO(1-0)$ }

46: %\newcommand{\COz}{$^{12}CO(2-1)$ }

47: \newcommand{\COe}{$CO(1-0)$}

48: \newcommand{\COz}{$CO(2-1)$\,}

49: \newcommand{\solm}{M_{\odot}}

50: \newcommand{\solms}{\>{\rm M_{\odot}/pc^2}}

51: \newcommand{\rsol}{R$_{\odot}$}

52: \newcommand{\rf}{\par\noindent\hangindent 15pt {}}

53: \newcommand{\ea}{et al.}

54: \newcommand{\kkms}{\>{\rm K}\,{\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}}

55: \newcommand{\kms}{\>{\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}}

56: \newcommand{\yr}{\>{\rm yr}}

57: \newcommand{\gyr}{\>{\rm Gyr}}

58: \newcommand{\myr}{\>{\rm Myr}}

59: \newcommand{\mg}{\>{\rm mag}}

60: \newcommand{\pc}{\>{\rm pc}}

61: \newcommand{\kpc}{\>{\rm kpc}}

62: \newcommand{\mpc}{\>{\rm Mpc}}

63: \newcommand{\m}{\>{\rm m}}

64: \newcommand{\km}{\>{\rm km}}

65: \newcommand{\ergs}{\>{\rm ergs}\,{\rm s}^{-1}}

66: \newcommand{\cm}{\>{\rm cm}^{-2}}

67: \newcommand{\mm}{\>{\rm mm}}

68: \newcommand{\mum}{\>{\mu {\rm m}}}

69: \newcommand{\kev}{\>{\rm keV}}

70: \newcommand{\jy}{\>{\rm Jy}}

71: \newcommand{\mjy}{\>{\rm mJy}}

72: \newcommand{\msun}{\>{\rm M_{\odot}}}

73: \newcommand{\lsun}{\>{\rm L_{\odot}}}

74: %\newcommand{\ul}{\underline}

75: \newcommand{\dg}{^{\circ}}

76: \newcommand{\sqas}{\Box ^{\prime\prime}}

77: \newcommand{\as}{^{\prime\prime}}

78: \newcommand{\am}{^{\prime}}

79: \newcommand{\bdm}{\begin{displaymath}}

80: \newcommand{\edm}{\end{displaymath}}

81: \newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}

82: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}

83: \newcommand{\bit}{\begin{itemize}}

84: \newcommand{\eit}{\end{itemize}}

85: \newcommand{\ben}{\begin{enumerate}}

86: \newcommand{\een}{\end{enumerate}}

87: \newcommand{\bfi}{\begin{figure}[htb]}

88: \newcommand{\bpfi}{\begin{figure}[p]}

89: \newcommand{\lbol}{$\rm L_{Bol}$}

90: \newcommand{\llyc}{$\rm L_{Lyc}$}

91: %\newcommand{\ln}{$\rm L_N$}

92: \newcommand{\lk}{$\rm L_K$}

93: \newcommand{\av}{\rm A_V}

94: \newcommand{\mv}{\rm M_V}

95: \newcommand{\htwo}{$\rm H_2$}

96: \newcommand{\lir}{$\rm L_{IR}$}

97: \newcommand{\brg}{$\rm Br\gamma$}

98: \newcommand{\ha}{$\rm H\alpha$}

99: \newcommand{\paa}{$\rm Pa\alpha$}

100: \newcommand{\mhtwo}{$M_{\rm H_2}$}

101: 

102: 

103: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}

104: \newcommand{\myemail}{schinner@mpia.de}

105: %\usepackage{graphicx}

106: 

107: 

108: %\slugcomment{To be submitted to ApJL}

109: 

110: 

111: \shorttitle{Fueling and Feedback in IC342's Nucleus}

112: \shortauthors{Schinnerer et al.}

113: 

114: \begin{document}

115: 

116: 

117: \title{Self-Regulated Fueling of Galaxy Centers:\\

118:        Evidence for Star-Formation Feedback in IC342's Nucleus\altaffilmark{1}}

119: 

120: \author{Eva Schinnerer\altaffilmark{2},

121: Torsten B\"oker\altaffilmark{3},

122: David S. Meier\altaffilmark{4,5},

123: Daniela Calzetti\altaffilmark{6}}

124: \altaffiltext{1}{Based on observations carried out with the IRAM

125:   Plateau de Bure Interferometer. IRAM is supported by INSU/CNRS

126:   (France), MPG (Germany) and IGN (Spain).}

127: 

128: \altaffiltext{2}{Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Astronomie, K\"onigstuhl 17,

129:     D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany}

130: \altaffiltext{3}{European Space Agency, Dept. RSSD, Keplerlaan 1, 

131:     2200 AG Noordwijk, Netherlands}

132: \altaffiltext{4}{David S. Meier is a Jansky Fellow of the National 

133:     Radio Astonomy Observatory}

134: \altaffiltext{5}{National Radio Astronomy Observatory, P.O. Box O, 

135:     Socorro, NM 87801, U.S.A.}

136: \altaffiltext{6}{Department of Astronomy, University of Massachusetts, 

137:     Amherst, MA 01003, U.S.A.}

138: 

139: %\email{schinner@mpia.de}

140: %\email{tboeker@rssd.esa.int}

141: %\email{dmeierd@nrao.edu}

142: %\email{calzetti@astro.umass.edu}

143: 

144: \begin{abstract}

145:   Using new, high-resolution interferometric observations of the CO

146:   and HCN molecules, we directly compare the molecular and ionized

147:   components of the interstellar medium in the center of the nearby

148:   spiral galaxy IC\,342, on spatial scales of $\approx$ 10\,pc. The

149:   morphology of the tracers suggests that the molecular gas flow

150:   caused by a large-scale stellar bar has been strongly affected by

151:   the mechanical feedback from recent star formation activity within

152:   the central 100\,pc in the nucleus of the galaxy. Possibly, stellar

153:   winds and/or supernova shocks originating in the nuclear star

154:   cluster have compressed, and likely pushed outward, the infalling

155:   molecular gas, thus significantly reducing the gas supply to the

156:   central 10\,pc. Although our analysis currently lacks kinematic

157:   confirmation due to the face-on orientation of IC\,342, the

158:   described scenario is supported by the generally observed repetitive

159:   nature of star formation in the nuclear star clusters of late-type

160:   spiral galaxies.

161: \end{abstract}

162: 

163: 

164: \keywords{galaxies: nuclei --- 

165:           galaxies: ISM --- 

166:           galaxies: kinematics and dynamics --- 

167:           galaxies: individual(IC 342)}

168: 

169: 

170: 

171: \section{Introduction}

172: 

173: Any ``activity'' found in a galactic nucleus -- be it due to massive

174: star formation, an accreting super-massive black hole, or a

175: combination of both -- requires the inflow of gas into the central few

176: pc. On scales of kpc, the gas flow is regulated by the response to

177: asymmetries in the gravitational potential, e.g. stellar bar or tidal

178: interactions \citep{sak99,she05}. Numerical models

179: \citep[e.g.][]{ath92,sel93} have demonstrated that large-scale stellar

180: bars are especially efficient in moving gas into the central

181: kpc. However, no clear picture is yet available for the gas flow

182: inside a few 100 pc from the nucleus \citep{gar03,wad04}.

183: 

184: Arguably the simplest galaxies to observationally test these models

185: are the latest-type spirals, because they have bulge-less

186: disks. However, even these objects have rather complex central star

187: formation histories. About 75\% of late-type disks host distinct

188: nuclear star clusters \citep{boe02}, most of which have experienced

189: multiple discrete star formation events in their history

190: \citep{ros06,wal06}. So far, it is unclear whether the repetitive star 

191: formation in these nuclear clusters is due to variability of the

192: gravitational potential (e.g. dissolution/formation of a stellar bar),

193: the clumpy nature of the molecular gas (e.g. inflow of discrete giant

194: molecular complexes -- GMCs), or whether nuclear massive star

195: formation itself is disrupting the gas supply.

196: 

197: The Scd spiral \objectname{IC342} is one of the nearest examples of a

198: late-type spiral harboring a well-studied nuclear star cluster. The

199: nuclear cluster has a stellar mass of $\sim 10^7\,\msun$ and its

200: luminosity is dominated by a recent, 4--30~Myr~old, short-lived star

201: formation event \citep[after correction for a revised distance of 3.0

202: Mpc;][]{boe97,boe99,fin07}. Previous studies of the molecular gas in

203: IC342, with single dish and interferometric millimeter instruments

204: \citep{tur92,tur93,ish90,dow92,mei01}, lack sufficient spatial

205: resolution (58--72~pc) to resolve the structure of the GMCs, thus

206: hampering accurate comparisons with the nuclear star formation. The

207: spiral geometry of the molecular gas in the central 500pc is due to

208: the response of the gas to the large-scale stellar bar

209: \citep{ish90}. A comprehensive study \citep{mei05} of the molecular

210: chemistry in IC342 has demonstrated that the molecular gas in the

211: central few hundred pc is subject to a number of different excitation

212: mechanisms. Recent OVRO observations of the $^{12}$CO(2-1) line

213: showed evidence for molecular gas being associated with the nuclear

214: star cluster itself \citep{sch03}.

215: 

216: \section{Observations and absolute astrometry}

217: 

218: The $^{12}$CO(2-1) and HCN(1-0) lines tracing the total and dense

219: molecular gas content were observed with the IRAM Plateau de Bure

220: interferometer (PdBI) in 2005 January/February and 2004 January,

221: respectively. For calibration and mapping, we used the standard IRAM

222: GILDAS software packages CLIC and MAPPING \citep{gui00}. The

223: observations resulted in data cubes of $0.67''\times0.51''$ and

224: $1.64''\times1.29''$ resolution with an rms of 10 and 3.6 mJy/beam for

225: the CO(2-1) and HCN(1-0) line. Intensity maps were derived using a

226: 3$\sigma$ cut for line emission present over at least two channel of

227: 3.0 (6.0) km/s width. 

228: 

229: For a direct comparison of the (dense) molecular gas to the stellar

230: light and the ionized gas (as observed with HST), the HST data need to

231: have an absolute astrometry of better than at least 0.5''. To achieve

232: this, we first aligned a newly obtained HST Pa$\alpha$ image (PI

233: Calzetti, PID 11080) to a deep 6cm continuum VLA image (PI Schinnerer)

234: as both exhibit a very similar geometry at comparable angular

235: resolution (0.4'' vs. 0.75''). Archival HST F656N and F606W images

236: (PID 8581, 5446) were then aligned to the Pa$\alpha$ map using a

237: number of stellar clusters. To obtain the continuum-subtracted

238: H$\alpha$ map, we subtracted a scaled version of the F606W image from

239: F656N. No astrometric corrections are required for radio

240: interferometric data as the observations provide an absolute

241: astrometric reference frame. This resulted in very well aligned

242: optical/NIR and radio images, solving the ambiguities that plagued our

243: previous study which relied on the geometry of the dust lanes

244: \citep{sch03}.

245: 

246: \section{Gas distribution shaped by star formation}

247: 

248: \subsection{Distribution of the Molecular Gas}

249: 

250: In the new CO(2-1) and HCN(1-0) maps (Fig. \ref{fig:sum}), the Eastern

251: spiral arm exhibits a prominent break at $3^{h}46^{m}49.0^{s}$ and

252: $+68^{o}5'45.5''$ (J2000), about 4'' east and 1'' South of the galaxy

253: center. At this break the Eastern spiral arm stops continuing inward

254: and stays at a roughly constant distance from the nucleus whereas the

255: Western spiral arm reaches close (within 1'') to the nucleus itself.

256: The nuclear CO(2-1) gas clump identified earlier \citep{sch03} is now

257: resolved into a faint, narrow gas lane running East-West just North of

258: the nucleus. In addition, the Southern portion of the Eastern spiral

259: arm exhibits a sharp edge on the side facing the nucleus. The geometry

260: of the HCN emission closely resembles that of the CO(2-1), except for

261: the Western spiral arm which extends further towards the nucleus in

262: HCN while the emission North of it is too diffuse to be detected in

263: HCN. The central 'cavity' in the molecular gas distribution is

264: displaced from the nucleus to the Southeast and offers a relatively

265: unobscured view onto the stellar disk, as demonstrated by the

266: comparison to the optical continuum (Fig. \ref{fig:sum}): the stellar

267: disk is substantially fainter wherever molecular gas is present. Both

268: CO(2-1) and HCN emission trace very well the prominent dust lanes in

269: the central 250pc. This dramatic change in extinction causes an

270: elongation of the isophotes even at NIR wavelengths, which might be

271: misinterpreted as a small-scale bar. A comparison of the CO(2-1) and

272: H$\alpha$ distribution (Fig. \ref{fig:ha}) shows that the ionized gas

273: fills the central 'cavity' of the molecular gas. In particular,

274: the H$\alpha$ shells (or arcs) delineating the Southeast edge of the

275: cavity suggest an ionized outflow that coincides with the inner edge

276: of the Southeastern CO(2-1) spiral arm. Due to IC342's almost face-on

277: orientation, the gas motions are difficult to interpret, as we start

278: to observe a blend of several smaller molecular clouds plus streaming

279: motions due to the stellar bar and a mix of the diffuse and dense gas

280: component in the CO(2-1) emission.

281: 

282: \subsection{Impact of Nuclear Star Formation on a Bar-Induced Gas Flow}

283: 

284: While the overall molecular gas distribution in the center of

285: IC342 is governed by the gravitational influence of a large-scale

286: stellar bar \citep{ish90} \citep[also as evidenced by the presence of

287: shocks seen in CH$_{3}$OH and SiO,][]{mei05,use06}, the asymmetries in

288: the molecular gas properties within the inner 50 pc can be explained

289: by the impact of nuclear star formation onto this gas flow. The

290: comparison of the molecular gas distribution to the H$\alpha$ image

291: suggests that the expanding ionized gas is 'running' into the

292: molecular gas, particularly in the Southeastern portion of the spiral

293: arm (hereafter: segment). As we will show in \S \ref{sec:feed},

294: the displacement of this arm segment is in agreement with mechanical

295: energy input into the total and dense molecular gas, leading to it

296: being compressed and pushed out, or at least 'halted' by the pressure

297: of the ionized gas.

298: 

299: \cite{mei05} have shown that this part of the spiral (GMC--A) is the

300: one most excited by UV photons and more diffuse than the rest of the

301: dense GMCs. Radiative excitation by the nucleus can be excluded as it

302: is not an AGN or a UV source \citep{boe99}. The discontinuity in the

303: Eastern spiral arm as well as the different chemical properties of

304: this arm segment argue against a simple offset of the gas spiral from

305: the dynamical center. Taken together, this suggests an impact from

306: stellar winds and supernova explosions on the morphology of

307: circumnuclear molecular gas as well as altering its chemical

308: composition.

309: 

310: Some evidence for a corresponding discontinuity along the Northern

311: portion of the western arm (thin dotted line in Fig. \ref{fig:sketch})

312: is observed in CO(2--1). However the weak H$\alpha$ emission, the lack

313: of an altered chemistry and the HCN morphology makes the case for

314: direct impact of stellar winds and SNe less clear here. The exact

315: reasons for the asymmetry manifested by the outflow from the nuclear

316: starburst (as seen in the H$\alpha$ line) are unclear, but a such

317: behavior is not unusual for large-scale outflows from central star

318: formation \citep[e.g. M82;][]{ohy02}.  Potentially the Northern

319: portion of the Western spiral arm might lack these signs because it is

320: composed of more dispersed molecular material. In addition, the higher

321: extinction on the near-side (Western side) of the galaxy can cause

322: some differences as well.

323: 

324: Although the dynamical timescale in the nuclear region is very small

325: ($\sim$ 10\,Myr), the spiral pattern itself is rotating slower. As

326: nuclear spirals can easily be excited by large-scale bars

327: \citep[e.g.,][]{mac04,eng00}, we can use the pattern speed

328: of the stellar bar of $\Omega_{bar}$ = 0.4 km/s/'' \citep{cro00}. At a

329: radius of 3.3'' (50pc) this corresponds to a velocity of 8\,km/s, thus

330: one revolution of the spiral pattern itself takes about 40\,Myr. For

331: a 10 Myr old starburst the spiral has moved by a quarter. This is

332: consistent with the arm segment which covers about a quarter of a circle

333: and also the age for the most recent star formation event in the

334: nuclear cluster.

335: 

336: To summarize, the ionizing outflow produced by stellar winds and

337: supernovae from the recent nuclear star forming event appears to have

338: changed the location of the Southern part of the Eastern spiral arm,

339: while the Western spiral arm appears less effected. If the gas

340: flow along the western arm is less disturbed by the nuclear bubble,

341: this may explain why the youngest star formation episode is also

342: asymmetrically stronger towards the western arm

343: \citep[e.g.][]{tsa06}.

344: 

345: \section{Evidence for Feedback}\label{sec:feed}

346: 

347: We now investigate whether the timescale and required energy are

348: indeed compatible with the scenario outlined above. The dislocation is

349: either due to an actual movement of individual molecular clouds against

350: the gravitational potential or the ionized gas is acting as a barrier

351: altering the orbits of the molecular gas. In both scenarios, some kind

352: of force is required to counterbalance the gravitational potential,

353: thus the following estimates should be valid in either case.

354: 

355: The deprojected distance from the nuclear cluster to the

356: H$\alpha$ rim is about 3.3" or 50pc. A shell with a typical expansion

357: velocity of 20-40 km/s \citep{mar98} can travel this distance in about

358: (2.4 - 1.2) Myr, which is less than the age of the last nuclear star

359: formation episode (4-30 Myr). To first order, it is therefore possible

360: that the H$\alpha$ shells were produced in this event. Assuming that

361: the Southeastern arm segment has been `pushed' to a larger radius, we

362: can derive a rough estimate for the required cumulative energy using

363: the mass of the molecular gas and reasonable assumptions about the

364: gravitational potential.

365: 

366: We assume a virial gas mass of $1.6\times10^6\,\msun$ for the

367: Southeastern segment \citep{mei01}. To estimate the

368: kinetic and potential energy required, we use the rotation curve of

369: \cite{tur92} after correcting for the new distance to estimate

370: velocities of v(r$_2$=50pc)$\approx$25 km/s and

371: v(r$_1$=22pc)$\approx$12 km/s. A total energy of $\rm

372: E_{tot}=E_{kin}+E_{pot}=3\cdot

373: E_{kin}=3\cdot\,m_{GMC-A}\,[v(r_2)^2\,-\,v(r_1)^2]/2\cong

374: 2.2\times10^{52} erg$ is required to move the molecular gas mass from a

375: radius of 18pc (the location of the unaffected Western spiral arm) to

376: 50pc, the current distance of the Southeastern segment

377: \citep[inclination effects are neglected given the low inclination of

378: $\sim31^o$,][]{cro00}.

379: 

380: A cluster with a stellar mass of $1\times10^7\,\msun$ releases a

381: mechanical luminosity of $\rm 3\times10^{41}\,erg\,s^{-1}$ at an age

382: of 4-30 Myr \citep[assuming an instantaneous burst with solar

383: metallicity; see STARBURST99 models,][]{lei99}. Since the

384: flux-calibrated continuum-subtracted HST Pa$\alpha$ image suffers less

385: dust extinction than the H$\alpha$ image (Fig. \ref{fig:ha}), we use

386: the former for a consistency check. The Pa$\alpha$ line flux of the

387: ionized gas bubble ($\rm \sim 7\times10^{-13}\,erg\,s^{-1}cm^{-2}$)

388: can be converted into a H$\alpha$ luminosity of $\rm

389: 5.4\times10^{39}erg\,s^{-1}$ using a H$\alpha$/Pa$\alpha$ ratio of

390: 7.82 appropriate for a metal-rich region (without extinction

391: correction). Assuming that about 3\% of the mechanical energy is

392: converted into H$\alpha$ luminosity

393: \citep{bin85} and a filling factor of about 0.5 for the bubble (from

394: the flux present inside the bubble), this translates into a mechanical

395: luminosity of about $\rm 3.6\times10^{41}erg\,s^{-1}$. This is

396: consistent with the above value derived from the cluster mass and age.

397: 

398: Thus over the course of the derived travel time of 2 Myrs a total

399: mechanical energy of $\rm 2\times10^{55}erg$ will be produced.

400: However, this mechanical energy is distributed over the entire sphere

401: and subject to radiative losses. Assuming a filling factor of only 3\%

402: for GMC-A and radiative losses of 90\%, plus taking into account that

403: likely only a fraction of 20\% of the nuclear stellar mass was

404: produced in the last event, an energy of $\rm 1.2\times10^{52}erg$ is

405: expected to be available for mechanical interaction. Even this rather

406: conservative estimate for the available mechanical energy is

407: sufficient to explain the gas morphology. We conclude that, based on

408: time and energetic arguments, mechanical feedback from nuclear star

409: formation is a plausible explanation for the observed molecular gas

410: distribution.

411: 

412: \section{Self-Regulated Fueling}

413: 

414: The following picture for the gas flow in IC342 emerges (Fig.

415: \ref{fig:sketch}): The large-scale stellar bar moves gas toward the

416: center via two gas spiral arms. The stellar winds and supernova shocks

417: released by the most recent nuclear star formation event have

418: significantly altered the path of the molecular gas towards the center

419: on the last few 10pc, thus currently preventing efficient fueling of

420: the nucleus. This is the first time strong evidence has been found

421: for mechanical feedback of nuclear star formation onto the (disk) gas

422: {\it flow} in an extragalactic nucleus. As the large-scale stellar

423: bar continues to move gas towards the center, it is likely that the

424: gas resumes its old path once the mechanical energy has been

425: dispersed.  Presumably, the nucleus will then again collect molecular

426: gas until the next star formation episode. This feedback between

427: nuclear activity and fueling efficiency appears to self-regulate the

428: rate of nuclear star formation and offers a natural explanation for

429: the repetitive star formation found in nuclear star clusters

430: \citep{ros06,wal06}.

431: 

432: If correct, this scenario implies that models for the gas fueling

433: mechanism (over the innermost 1-100\,pc) cannot rely on the shape of

434: the gravitational potential alone but need to take the effect of

435: mechanical energy released by nuclear activity onto the gas flow into

436: account. The impact of this feedback process will be strongly

437: variable in time and will critically depend on the amount of energy

438: released as well as its geometry. Although mechanical feedback has

439: long been suspected to be important for galactic nuclei, so far no

440: observations have existed to directly support this. In a broader

441: sense, these results also have implications for the evolution of any

442: central massive object (be it a stellar cluster or a black hole) that

443: requires occasional fueling. Nuclear activity appears to have the

444: potential to significantly reduce or even (temporarily) shut off

445: fueling, thus self-regulating the growth of the central mass.

446: 

447: 

448: \acknowledgments

449: 

450: We thank J. Knapen and K. Wada for their constructive criticism. ES

451: would like to thank the IRAM staff for their help with the data

452: reduction.

453: 

454: 

455: {\it Facilities:} \facility{IRAM PdBI}, \facility{HST (WFPC2,NICMOS)}.

456: 

457: 

458: 

459: \begin{thebibliography}{}

460: 

461: \bibitem[Athanassoula(1992)]{ath92}Athanassoula, E., 1992, \mnras, 259, 345

462: \bibitem[Binette et al.(1985)]{bin85} Binette, L., Dopita, M.~A., \& 

463:          Tuohy, I.~R.\ 1985, \apj, 297, 476 

464: \bibitem[B\"oker et al.(1997)]{boe97} B{\"o}ker, T., 

465:         F\"orster-Schreiber, N.~M., \& Genzel, R.\ 1997, \aj, 114, 1883 

466: \bibitem[B{\"o}ker et al.(2002)]{boe02} B{\"o}ker, T., Laine, S., 

467:          van der Marel, R.~P., Sarzi, M., Rix, H.-W., Ho, L.~C., \& 

468:          Shields, J.~C.\ 2002, \aj, 123, 1389 

469: \bibitem[B{\"o}ker et al.(1999)]{boe99} B{\"o}ker, T., van der Marel, R.~P., 

470:          \& Vacca, W.~D.\ 1999, \aj, 118, 831 

471: \bibitem[Crosthwaite et al.(2000)]{cro00} Crosthwaite, L.~P., Turner, J.~L., 

472:          \& Ho, P.~T.~P.\ 2000, \aj, 119, 1720 

473: \bibitem[Downes et al.(1992)]{dow92} Downes, D., Radford, S.~J.~E., 

474:          Guilloteau, S., Guelin, M., Greve, A., \& Morris, D.\ 1992, 

475:          \aap, 262, 424 

476: \bibitem[Englmaier \& Shlosman(2000)]{eng00} 

477:          Englmaier, P.~\& Shlosman, I.\ 2000, \apj, 528, 677 

478: \bibitem[Fingerhut et al.(2007)]{fin07} Fingerhut, R.~L., Lee, H., 

479:          McCall, M.~L., \& Richer, M.~G.\ 2007, \apj, 655, 814 

480: \bibitem[Garc{\'{\i}}a-Burillo et al.(2003)]{gar03} Garc{\'{\i}}a-Burillo, S., 

481:          et al.\ 2003, \aap, 407, 485 

482: \bibitem[Guilloteau \& Lucas(2000)]{gui00} 

483:         Guilloteau, S., \& Lucas, R. 2000, ASP Conf.~Ser., 217, 299 

484: \bibitem[Ishizuki et al.(1990)]{ish90} Ishizuki, S., Kawabe, R., Ishiguro, M., 

485:          Okumura, S.~K., \& Morita, K.-I.\ 1990, \nat, 344, 224 

486: \bibitem[Leitherer et al.(1999)]{lei99} Leitherer, C., et al.\ 1999, 

487:          \apjs, 123, 3 

488: \bibitem[Maciejewski(2004)]{mac04} 

489:          Maciejewski, W.\ 2004, \mnras, 354, 892 

490: \bibitem[Martin(1998)]{mar98} Martin, C.~L.\ 1998, \apj, 506, 222 

491: \bibitem[Meier \& Turner(2001)]{mei01} Meier, D.~S., \& Turner, J.~L.\ 2001, 

492:          \apj, 551, 687 

493: \bibitem[Meier \& Turner(2005)]{mei05} Meier, D.~S., \& Turner, J.~L.\ 2005, 

494:          \apj, 618, 259 

495: \bibitem[Ohyama et al.(2002)]{ohy02} Ohyama, Y., et al.\ 2002, \pasj, 54, 891 

496: \bibitem[Rossa et al.(2006)]{ros06} Rossa, J., van der Marel, R.~P., 

497:          B{\"o}ker, T., Gerssen, J., Ho, L.~C., Rix, H.-W., Shields, J.~C., 

498:          \& Walcher, C.-J.\ 2006, \aj, 132, 1074 

499: %\bibitem[Saha et al.(2002)]{sah02} Saha, A., Claver, J., \& Hoessel, J.~G.\ 

500: %         2002, \aj, 124, 839 

501: \bibitem[Sakamoto et al.(1999)]{sak99} Sakamoto, K., Okumura, S.~K., 

502:          Ishizuki, S., \& Scoville, N.~Z.\ 1999, \apj, 525, 691 

503: \bibitem[Schinnerer et al.(2003)]{sch03} Schinnerer, E., B{\"o}ker, T., \& 

504:          Meier, D.~S.\ 2003, \apjl, 591, L115 

505: \bibitem[Sellwood \& Wilkinson(1993)]{sel93} Sellwood, J.~A., \& Wilkinson, A.

506:          \ 1993, Reports of Progress in Physics, 56, 173 

507: \bibitem[Sheth et al.(2005)]{she05} Sheth, K., Vogel, S.~N., Regan, M.~W., 

508:          Thornley, M.~D., \& Teuben, P.~J.\ 2005, \apj, 632, 217 

509: \bibitem[Tsai et al.(2006)]{tsa06} Tsai, C.-W., Turner, J.~L., Beck, S.~C., 

510:          Crosthwaite, L.~P., Ho, P.~T.~P., \& Meier, D.~S.\ 2006, \aj, 

511:          132, 2383 

512: \bibitem[Turner et al.(1993)]{tur93} Turner, J.~L., Hurt, R.~L., \& 

513:          Hudson, D.~Y.\ 1993, \apjl, 413, L19 

514: \bibitem[Turner \& Hurt(1992)]{tur92} Turner, J.~L., \& Hurt, R.~L.\ 1992, 

515:          \apj, 384, 72 

516: \bibitem[Wada(2004)]{wad04} Wada, K.\ 2004, Coevolution of Black Holes 

517:          and Galaxies, 186 

518: \bibitem[Walcher et al.(2006)]{wal06} Walcher, C.~J., B{\"o}ker, T., 

519:          Charlot, S., Ho, L.~C., Rix, H.-W., Rossa, J., Shields, 

520:          J.~C., \& van der Marel, R.~P.\ 2006, \apj, 649, 692 

521: \bibitem[Usero et al.(2006)]{use06} Usero, A., Garc{\'{\i}}a-Burillo, S., 

522:          Mart{\'{\i}}n-Pintado, J., Fuente, A., \& Neri, R.\ 2006, \aap, 

523:          448, 457 

524: 

525: \end{thebibliography}

526: 

527: \clearpage

528: 

529: \begin{figure}

530: \includegraphics[angle=-90.,scale=0.7]{f1.eps}

531: \caption{Distribution of the cold molecular gas as traced by the

532:   $^{12}$CO(2-1) line emission ({\it middle}; color and contours

533:   starting at 0.9 Jy/beam\,km/s in uneven steps) in the central

534:   225\,pc of the late-type spiral galaxy IC342 at a resolution of

535:   0.6'' (9.6\,pc). A narrow faint gas bridge connecting the two spiral

536:   arms can be seen just north of the nuclear cluster (marked by a

537:   circle in all panels).  The dense molecular gas as traced by the

538:   HCN(1-0) line emission ({\it left}; color and contours starting at

539:   0.45 Jy/beam\,km/s in steps of 0.15 Jy/beam\,km/s) shows a very

540:   similar distribution, although the western spiral arm extends

541:   further towards the nucleus.  The break (marked by the arrow) about

542:   4'' east and 1'' south of the center in the eastern spiral arm is

543:   also more prominent in the HCN map. The molecular gas also coincides

544:   well with the regions of high extinction in the optical continuum

545:   image ({\it right}, HST F606W filter in color), while the underlying

546:   stellar disk is less obscured inside the molecular gas

547:   'cavity'.\label{fig:sum}}

548: \end{figure}

549: 

550: \begin{figure}

551: \epsscale{.80}

552: \plotone{f2.eps}

553: \caption{ The CO(2-1) ({\it top}) and HCN(1-0) ({\it bottom})

554:   intensity maps (contours from Fig. \ref{fig:sum}) are overlaid onto

555:   the continuum-subtracted H$\alpha$ image from HST (color). The

556:   ionized gas bubble shows a shell-like structure in the Southeast

557:   that fits well into the 'cavity' of the molecular gas distribution.

558:   Most of the arcs outlining the bubble appear to have originated from

559:   the nuclear stellar cluster.

560: \label{fig:ha}}

561: \end{figure}

562: 

563: \begin{figure}

564: \epsscale{0.6}

565: \plotone{f3.eps}

566: \caption{

567: Schematic figure outlining the proposed scenario for the

568: self-regulation of the fueling of the nuclear stellar cluster in

569: IC342. {\it Left:} In the absence of massive star formation the

570: molecular gas moves towards the nucleus (star) along the gas lanes

571: (black arcs) due to the gravitational influence of a large-scale

572: stellar bar. {\it Right:} The mechanical energy (indicated by black

573: arrows) released by stellar winds and supernovae of the recent massive

574: star formation in the nucleus is sufficient to alter the flow of the

575: molecular gas (from the dashed to the solid position), so that

576: molecular gas from the Eastern spiral arm can no longer reach close to

577: the nucleus, thus significantly reducing the fuel available for future

578: star formation events. The effect on the Western arm is less dramatic

579: (thin dotted line and arrows). After the stellar winds and SN

580: explosions have ceased, it is expected that the force of the

581: gravitational bar potential takes over again and the gas flow will be

582: similar to the situation shown in the left panel.

583: \label{fig:sketch}}

584: \end{figure}

585: 

586: \end{document}

587: