1: \documentclass{emulateapj}
2: \usepackage{natbib}
3: \usepackage{apjfonts}
4: \bibliographystyle{apj}
5:
6: \def\ltsim {\lower .1ex\hbox{\rlap{\raise .6ex\hbox{\hskip .3ex
7: {\ifmmode{\scriptscriptstyle <}\else
8: {$\scriptscriptstyle <$}\fi}}}
9: \kern -.4ex{\ifmmode{\scriptscriptstyle \sim}\else
10: {$\scriptscriptstyle\sim$}\fi}}}
11:
12: \def\gtsim {\lower .1ex\hbox{\rlap{\raise .6ex\hbox{\hskip .3ex
13: {\ifmmode{\scriptscriptstyle >}\else
14: {$\scriptscriptstyle >$}\fi}}}
15: \kern -.4ex{\ifmmode{\scriptscriptstyle \sim}\else
16: {$\scriptscriptstyle\sim$}\fi}}}
17:
18: \begin{document}
19:
20: \title{\emph{Hubble Space Telescope} Spectroscopic Observations of the
21: Narrow-Line Region in Nearby Low-Luminosity Active Galactic
22: Nuclei\footnotemark[1]}
23:
24: \author{Jonelle L. Walsh \footnotemark[2], Aaron J. Barth
25: \footnotemark[2], Luis C. Ho \footnotemark[3], Alexei V. Filippenko
26: \footnotemark[4], Hans-Walter Rix \footnotemark[5], \\Joseph
27: C. Shields \footnotemark[6], Marc Sarzi \footnotemark[7], and Wallace
28: L. W. Sargent \footnotemark[8]}
29:
30: \footnotetext[1]{Based on observations made with the NASA/ESA
31: \emph{Hubble Space Telescope}, obtained from the Data Archive at the
32: Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the
33: Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under
34: NASA contract NAS 5-26555. These observations are associated with
35: programs GO-7403 and GO-7354.}
36:
37: \footnotetext[2]{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of
38: California at Irvine, 4129 Frederick Reines Hall, Irvine, CA
39: 92697-4574; jlwalsh@uci.edu, barth@uci.edu .}
40:
41: \footnotetext[3]{The Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of
42: Washington, 813 Santa Barbara Street, Pasadena, CA 91101; lho@ociw.edu .}
43:
44: \footnotetext[4]{Department of Astronomy, University of California,
45: Berkeley, CA 94720-3411; alex@astron.berkeley.edu .}
46:
47: \footnotetext[5]{Max-Planck Institut f\"{u}r Astronomie,
48: K\"{o}nigstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany; rix@mpia-hd.mpg.de .}
49:
50: \footnotetext[6]{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Ohio University,
51: Athens, OH 45701; shields@phy.ohiou.edu .}
52:
53: \footnotetext[7]{Centre for Astrophysics Research, University of
54: Hertfordshire, AL10 9AB Hatfield, UK; sarzi@star.herts.ac.uk .}
55:
56: \footnotetext[8]{Palomar Observatory, California Institute of
57: Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125; wws@astro.caltech.edu .}
58:
59: \begin{abstract}
60:
61: We present Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph observations of 14
62: nearby low-luminosity active galactic nuclei, including 13 LINERs and
63: 1 Seyfert, taken at multiple parallel slit positions centered on the
64: galaxy nuclei and covering the H$\alpha$ spectral region. For each
65: galaxy, we measure the emission-line velocities, line widths, and
66: strengths, to map out the inner narrow-line region structure,
67: typically within $\sim$100 pc from the galaxy nucleus. There is a wide
68: diversity among the velocity fields: in a few galaxies the gas is
69: clearly in disk-like rotation, while in other galaxies the gas
70: kinematics appear chaotic or are dominated by radial flows with
71: multiple velocity components. In most objects, the emission-line
72: surface brightness distribution is very centrally peaked. The
73: [\ion{S}{2}] line ratio indicates a radial stratification in gas
74: density, with a sharp increase within the inner 10--20 pc, in the
75: majority of the Type 1 (broad-lined) objects. The electron-density
76: gradients of the Type 1 objects exhibit a similar shape that is well
77: fit by a power law of the form $\emph{n}_{\mathrm{e}} =
78: \emph{n}_0(r/1~ \mathrm{pc})^{\alpha}$, where $\alpha = -0.60
79: \pm{0.13}$. We examine how the [\ion{N}{2}] $\lambda 6583$ line width
80: varies as a function of aperture size over a range of spatial scales,
81: extending from scales comparable to the black hole's sphere of
82: influence to scales dominated by the host galaxy's bulge. For most
83: galaxies in the sample, we find that the emission-line velocity
84: dispersion is largest within the black hole's gravitational sphere of
85: influence, and decreases with increasing aperture size toward values
86: similar to the bulge stellar velocity dispersion measured within
87: ground-based apertures. We construct models of gas disks in circular
88: rotation and show that this behavior can be consistent with virial
89: motion, although for some combinations of disk parameters we show that
90: the line width can increase as a function of aperture size, as
91: observed in NGC 3245. Future dynamical modeling in order to determine
92: black hole masses for a few objects in this sample may be worthwhile,
93: although disorganized motion will limit the accuracy of the mass
94: measurements.
95:
96: \end{abstract}
97:
98: \keywords{galaxies: active -- galaxies: bulges --
99: galaxies: kinematics and dynamics -- galaxies: nuclei}
100:
101: \section{Introduction}
102: \label{sec:intro}
103:
104: With its $\sim$ 0\farcs1 resolution, the Space Telescope Imaging
105: Spectrograph (STIS) aboard the \emph{Hubble Space Telescope (HST)} has
106: provided the exceptional ability to spatially resolve gas kinematics
107: within the gravitational sphere of influence of the putative central
108: black hole in nearby galaxies. Resolving the gas kinematics very close
109: to the black hole allows for the determination of black hole mass in a
110: relatively straightforward manner, provided that the gas is in
111: Keplerian rotation in a thin, disk-like structure. STIS has thus had a
112: major impact on the field of supermassive black hole detection in
113: galactic nuclei, and data from STIS have contributed greatly toward
114: establishing the correlations between black hole mass and host-galaxy
115: properties, such as those with the stellar velocity dispersion
116: \citep{Ferrarese_2000,Gebhardt_2000,Tremaine_2002} and bulge
117: luminosity \citep{Kormendy_Gebhardt_2001}.
118:
119: More recently, ground-based integral field unit (IFU) observations
120: have provided two-dimensional (2D) kinematic information on the
121: ionized gas in galaxy centers \citep{Sarzi_2006,
122: Dumas_2007}. Additionally, ground-based IFU observations with the
123: assistance of adaptive optics have produced gas dynamical black hole
124: mass measurements \citep{Hicks_Malkan_2007, Neumayer_2007}. Without
125: the use of adaptive optics, however, ground-based observations are
126: usually unable to resolve scales comparable to the black hole radius
127: of influence in nearby galaxies. Although STIS is a long-slit
128: instrument, 2D information similar to IFU data can be obtained with
129: STIS by using multiple slit positions.
130:
131: Even with the past decade of high-resolution observations, only about
132: 30 dynamical black hole mass measurements have been made
133: \citep{Ferrarese_Ford_2005}. Consequently, searching for regular gas
134: velocity fields dominated by gravitational motion is essential for
135: extending the number of black hole mass measurements and further
136: establishing the connections between black holes and host
137: galaxies. While searching for regular gas velocity fields is clearly
138: important, it appears, however, that they are fairly rare. Instead,
139: complicated and chaotic emission-line velocity fields are more
140: commonly found near the centers of galaxies \citep{Ho_2002,
141: Atkinson_2005}. Although only upper limits on the black hole mass can
142: be estimated using gas dynamical modeling in these situations
143: \citep{Sarzi_2002}, subarcsecond-resolution observations can still be
144: useful for studying the dynamical state of the gas and searching for
145: radial motions that might be related to active galactic nucleus (AGN)
146: fueling or outflows. Modeling AGN outflows on subarcsecond scales
147: \citep{Capetti_1996, Crenshaw_Kraemer_2000} is important for
148: furthering our understanding of the connection between AGN feedback
149: and host-galaxy properties. Of particular interest are the connection
150: to star formation, the growth of the supermassive black hole, and how
151: gas may be driven out from the host galaxy as predicted in some
152: feedback scenarios \citep{Springel_2005, Hopkins_2006, Sijacki_2007}.
153:
154: Moreover, the narrow-line region (NLR) velocity dispersion
155: ($\sigma_{g}$), often measured from the width of the [\ion{O}{3}]
156: $\lambda 5007$ line, may provide a reasonable estimate of the
157: host-galaxy stellar velocity dispersion ($\sigma_\star$), albeit with
158: substantial scatter \citep{Nelson_Whittle_1996, Greene_Ho_2005}.
159: Detailed NLR studies are essential in understanding the origin of the
160: scatter in the $\sigma_{g}$--$\sigma_\star$ relationship. This
161: relationship can be useful for distant and luminous AGNs where
162: measurement of the stellar velocity dispersion is not feasible
163: \citep{Salviander_2007, Shields_2003}. Using the narrow emission-line
164: widths as a proxy for stellar velocity dispersion is only meaningful
165: if the NLR gas is dominated by virial motion in the host-galaxy bulge
166: and not by the gravitational influence of the black hole or
167: nongravitational motions. Therefore, outflows and similar
168: nongravitational motions, which can disrupt viral motion, are one
169: potential cause of the scatter in the $\sigma_{g}$--$\sigma_\star$
170: relationship.
171:
172: While nongravitational motions are clearly important in setting the
173: narrow-line widths in AGNs with strong outflows, there can be an
174: important contribution to the line widths from nongravitational motion
175: even in objects that are not outflow-dominated. From \emph{HST} STIS
176: observations, \cite{VerdoesKleijn_2006} found that circumnuclear gas
177: in Fanaroff-Riley 1 radio galaxies typically has an intrinsic velocity
178: dispersion in excess of that expected from purely gravitational motion
179: in the host-galaxy potential. They concluded that this excess line
180: width is driven by the injection of energy by the AGN, although there
181: was no obvious relationship between the AGN radiative luminosity and
182: the magnitude of the nongravitational line dispersion.
183:
184: Other origins for the scatter were studied by \cite{Greene_Ho_2005}
185: using a large sample of Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) type 2
186: AGNs. They looked for correlations of nuclear properties (radio power,
187: AGN luminosity, Eddington ratio), as well as global properties
188: (host-galaxy morphology, local environment, star-formation rate), with
189: the excess line width, defined to be the difference between the
190: dispersion of the [\ion{O}{3}] $\lambda 5007$ line and the stellar
191: velocity dispersion. They found a strong correlation between the
192: excess line width and Eddington ratio, where larger excess line
193: widths, indicative of outflowing gas, were seen in the higher
194: Eddington ratio objects.
195:
196: Another potential explanation for the scatter in the
197: $\sigma_{g}$--$\sigma_\star$ relationship is the effect of
198: observational aperture size. \cite{Rice_2006} investigated the
199: relationship between line width and aperture size in a sample of
200: nearby Seyferts using single-slit STIS observations. They found a wide
201: range of behavior in how the widths of the [\ion{O}{3}] $\lambda 5007$
202: and [\ion{S}{2}] $\lambda\lambda$6716, 6731 lines varied as a function
203: of radius, but the most common trends were either a roughly constant
204: width or an increase in width with increasing aperture size. Their
205: analysis showed that the line widths measured within the largest STIS
206: aperture were systematically smaller by 10\%--20\% than both the
207: stellar velocity dispersion and the line widths measured within a
208: ground-based sized aperture. They concluded that the smaller line
209: width measured within the randomly oriented STIS slit is the result of
210: sampling a smaller portion of the velocity field than the larger
211: ground-based aperture.
212:
213: Beyond the $\sigma_{g}$--$\sigma_\star$ relationship, we can address
214: other open questions concerning low-luminosity AGNs. \cite{Laor_2003}
215: pointed out that while the NLR in luminous AGNs occurs on scales of
216: tens of parsecs, where its dynamics are dominated by the bulge, the
217: NLR in low-luminosity AGNs is more compact, and its dynamics could be
218: dominated by the black hole. It is therefore interesting to ask
219: whether the narrow-line widths in low-luminosity AGNs are set by the
220: black hole or by the bulge potential.
221:
222: The NLR emission lines also provide information on ionization
223: mechanisms. Spectra of low-ionization nuclear emission-line regions
224: \citep[LINERs;][]{Heckman_1980} can be reproduced with photoionization
225: models involving a nonstellar continuum and low ionization parameters
226: \citep{Ferland_Netzer_1983, Halpern_Steiner_1983}, but high electron
227: densities, as well as a large range of densities, are needed in order
228: to reproduce the strength of the [\ion{O}{3}] $\lambda 4363$ line
229: \citep{Filippenko_Halpern_1984, Filippenko_1985,
230: Ho_1993}. \cite{Filippenko_Halpern_1984} demonstrated that such
231: conditions exist in the LINER NGC 7213, and that there is a
232: correlation between line width and the critical density for
233: collisional deexcitation. A similar relationship between line width
234: and ionization potential was also previously seen in Seyferts
235: \citep{Pelat_1981}. This implied that the NLR is not a homogeneous
236: environment, but must have radial gradients in velocity and
237: density. In ground-based spectra these spatial gradients were
238: generally unresolved, but using STIS it is possible to directly
239: resolve the density gradients in the inner NLR \citep{Barth_2001a,
240: Shields_2007}. It is therefore of interest to determine what fraction
241: of LINERs show spatially resolved density gradients, and whether the
242: type 2 LINERs, where a central photoionizing source is not always
243: seen, exhibit density gradients.
244:
245: In this paper, we present multislit \emph{HST} STIS observations of 14
246: low-luminosity AGNs, including 13 LINERs and 1 Seyfert. We use the
247: high spatial resolution of STIS to map out the 2D kinematic structure
248: of the NLR within the inner $\sim 100$ pc, and search for velocity
249: fields that show signs of regular rotation for which gas dynamical
250: modeling may be performed. The subarcsecond resolution STIS data also
251: allow us to detect electron-density gradients through the [\ion{S}{2}]
252: $\lambda 6716/\lambda 6731$ line ratio diagnostic. Finally, we examine
253: how the [\ion{N}{2}] line width varies as a function of aperture size
254: over spatial scales ranging from those comparable to the black hole
255: sphere of influence to scales dominated by the bulge.
256:
257: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}
258: \label{sec:obs}
259:
260: Our goal is to examine the NLR of low-luminosity AGNs through STIS
261: spectra of the H$\alpha$ spectral region at multiple slit
262: positions. Eight galaxies observed under program GO-7354 (PI Dressel)
263: fit this description, and we retrieved those from the \emph{HST}
264: archive. We combined these eight galaxies with six galaxies that were
265: observed as part of our own program, GO-7403, to arrive at a sample of
266: 14 galaxies. Program GO-7354 was originally designed to study LINER
267: nuclei with compact, flat-spectrum radio cores, while the observations
268: under program GO-7403 focused on obtaining black hole masses in a
269: sample of low-luminosity broad-lined AGNs. All of the galaxies are
270: optically classified as LINERs except NGC 3227, which contains a
271: Seyfert 1 nucleus, and NGC 3245, which is a transition
272: object. Properties of all 14 galaxies in the sample are given in Table
273: \ref{tab:galprop} and details of the observations are presented in
274: Table \ref{tab:obsparams}.
275:
276: With the exception of NGC 3998, NGC 4594, and NGC 6500, all of the
277: galaxies from program GO-7354 were observed with the STIS
278: \texttt{52x0.1} aperture with no gap between the three adjacent slit
279: positions. NGC 3998, NGC 4594, and NGC 6500 were observed with the
280: same \texttt{52x0.1} aperture, but consist of five slit positions,
281: again with no gap between neighboring slit positions. The CCD was read
282: out with binning by two along the dispersion axis, creating a scale of
283: $0$\farcs$0507$ pixel$^{-1}$ along the spatial axis and $1.108$ \AA\
284: pixel$^{-1}$ along the dispersion axis. The slit position angle was
285: constrained to be within 15$^\circ$ of the major axis of the gaseous
286: disk. The G750M grating provided coverage of 6490--7050 \AA, which
287: included the [\ion{N}{2}] $\lambda\lambda$6548, 6583, H$\alpha$, and
288: [\ion{S}{2}] $\lambda\lambda$6716, 6731 lines. For this program, a
289: typical exposure time per position was $\sim 400$ s.
290:
291: Observations of the six galaxies under program GO-7403 were obtained
292: with the STIS \texttt{52x0.2} and a spacing of $0$\farcs$25$ between
293: adjacent slits (i.e., a gap of $0$\farcs$05$ between slits). Two of
294: these galaxies, NGC 1052 and NGC 3227, were observed with seven
295: parallel slit positions, while NGC 3245, NGC 4036, NGC 4278, and NGC
296: 4579 were observed with five slit positions. For these galaxies, the
297: CCD was read out in unbinned mode, and the slit position angle was
298: left unconstrained. With this setting the 2D spectral image has a
299: scale of $0$\farcs$0507$ pixel$^{-1}$ along the slit and $0.554$ \AA\
300: pixel$^{-1}$ along the dispersion direction. The G750M grating was
301: used to cover 6300--6860~\AA, which included the H$\alpha +
302: $[\ion{N}{2}], [\ion{S}{2}] $\lambda\lambda$6716, 6731, and
303: [\ion{O}{1}] $\lambda\lambda$6300, 6364 emission lines. A typical
304: exposure time per position was $\sim 3000$ s. The combination of
305: longer exposure times and the use of a wider slit made it possible to
306: map out the NLR to larger radii and at higher signal-to-noise ratio
307: (S/N) than for program GO-7354.
308:
309: The data for all 14 galaxies were reduced using the standard STScI
310: pipeline. Dark and bias subtraction, as well as flat-field
311: corrections, were performed, along with the rejection of cosmic-ray
312: events through the combination of multiple subexposures. The data were
313: wavelength and flux calibrated and rectified for geometric
314: distortions. Occasionally a number of hot pixels remained even after
315: the data were run through the pipeline. In those cases, we performed
316: an additional cleaning step by replacing the bad pixel with a local
317: mean value in the flattened data, and then applied the geometric
318: distortion correction to the cleaned images.
319:
320: In addition to the STIS observations, we obtained Wide Field Planetary
321: Camera 2 (WFPC2) images from the archives in order to examine the
322: nuclear morphology. When available, we retrieved the images from the
323: WFPC2 Associations web site
324: \footnote{http://archive.stsci.edu/hst/wfpc2/search.html
325: .}. Otherwise, they were retrieved from the \emph{HST} archive. In
326: order to remove cosmic rays, ``CR-split'' observations were combined
327: using the IRAF {\tt combine} task. If only single exposures were
328: available, they were cleaned using the LA-COSMIC task
329: \citep{vanDokkum}.
330:
331: Black hole mass measurements have been previously made for three of
332: the galaxies in the sample: NGC 3245 \citep{Barth_2001}, NGC 3998
333: \citep{DeFrancesco_2006}, and NGC 5077 \citep{DeFrancesco_2008}. In
334: addition, \cite{DeFrancesco_2008} presented velocity curves for NGC
335: 6500 and IC 989; however, both velocity fields were too complex to
336: model the gas as a thin circularly rotating disk, so no black hole
337: masses were determined for these two galaxies.
338:
339: \section{Measurement of Emission Lines}
340: \label{sec:measurement}
341:
342: Spectra were extracted from individual rows of the geometrically
343: rectified 2D images, and the rows were extracted as far out as
344: emission lines were detectable. For the eight galaxies from program
345: GO-7354, the emission lines were typically detectable out to about
346: $0$\farcs$5$ from the slit center, and for the six galaxies from
347: program GO-7403, emission lines were measured out to about
348: $1$\farcs$5$. Before any fitting was performed, the continuum was
349: removed from the spectrum on a row-by-row basis by fitting a straight
350: line to the continuum regions covering $6280$--$6380$ \AA,
351: $6500$--$6650$ \AA, and $6700$--$6750$ \AA. This continuum fit was
352: then subtracted from the spectrum. In general, a straight line is not
353: a very good continuum model near H$\alpha$, but given the low S/N in
354: the continuum at most positions, the small wavelength range, and the
355: AGN dominance in the nuclei of some objects, a proper starlight
356: subtraction could not be performed. During the emission-line fitting
357: process, multiple rows that contained weak emission lines far from the
358: slit center were binned together to improve the S/N.
359:
360: In order to obtain the emission-line velocity, velocity dispersion,
361: and flux, we fit each spectrum with a set of Gaussians, where the fit
362: was carried out row-by-row with a Levenberg-Marquardt least-squares
363: minimization technique using C. Markwardt's ``MPFIT'' library in
364: IDL\footnote{http://cow.physics.wisc.edu/$\sim$craigm/idl/idl.html .}.
365: Single Gaussians were simultaneously fit to all the emission lines
366: present in the spectra that were strong enough to be fit
367: accurately. The fluxes of the [\ion{N}{2}] $\lambda\lambda$6548, 6583
368: lines were held at a 3:1 ratio, and all lines were required to have a
369: common velocity. The [\ion{N}{2}] lines were constrained to have equal
370: velocity widths. The widths of the [\ion{S}{2}] lines were also
371: required to be the same, which was necessary due to the lower S/N in
372: the off-nuclear rows. Although the widths of the two [\ion{S}{2}]
373: lines can differ, the effect is small \citep{Filippenko_Halpern_1984,
374: Filippenko_Sargent_1988}. If present, the [\ion{O}{1}] line widths
375: were constrained to be equal.
376:
377: Whenever this basic model did not return adequate fits due to either
378: low S/N or to severe blending between the [\ion{N}{2}] and H$\alpha$
379: lines, we applied further constraints, such as tying together the
380: H$\alpha$ and [\ion{N}{2}] widths, or linking the H$\alpha$,
381: [\ion{N}{2}], and [\ion{S}{2}] widths. Additionally, some spectra
382: appeared to contain two kinematically separate components at some
383: locations. In these instances, we fit two Gaussians to each of the
384: H$\alpha$, [\ion{N}{2}] $\lambda\lambda$6548, 6583, [\ion{S}{2}]
385: $\lambda\lambda$6716, 6731, and the [\ion{O}{1}] $\lambda 6300$
386: lines. We fit a single Gaussian to the [\ion{O}{1}] $\lambda 6364$
387: line, and sometimes to the [\ion{O}{1}] $\lambda 6300$ line, in place
388: of two Gaussians since often these lines were too weak to constrain a
389: multiple-component model. Each set of Gaussians in the
390: multiple-velocity component model was constrained in the manner
391: previously described above for the basic model.
392:
393: Near the nuclear regions, several galaxies in the sample exhibited a
394: broad H$\alpha$ component in addition to the narrow lines of H$\alpha$
395: and [\ion{N}{2}] $\lambda\lambda$6548, 6583. For these regions, an
396: additional component in the form of either a single or a double
397: Gaussian was added to the fit. If the broad component could not be
398: adequately fit by two Gaussians, we selected points along the broad
399: base of the H$\alpha$ line and fit a cubic spline to trace the shape
400: of the broad component. This was then subtracted from the spectrum,
401: leaving just the narrow emission lines. A cubic-spline model was
402: needed for several rows while fitting the broad component in NGC 3227,
403: NGC 4278, and NGC 4579. We judged the effectiveness of an additional
404: H$\alpha$ broad component both by eye and by comparing the reduced
405: $\chi^2$, where if the reduced $\chi^2$ was improved by $15\%$ or
406: more, we accepted the broad-component fit. Figure \ref{fig:fitex}
407: shows examples of fits with single or double narrow-line components
408: and with a broad H$\alpha$ component.
409:
410: From the model fits, we obtained the velocity, velocity dispersion,
411: and flux for the [\ion{N}{2}] $\lambda 6583$ emission line. In
412: calculating the velocity dispersion, we accounted for the instrumental
413: line width by using observations of the STIS wavelength calibration
414: lamp. Gaussian models were fit to the emission-line profiles of
415: extracted calibration-lamp spectra. The variation in line width as a
416: function of wavelength was insignificant across the spectrum and as a
417: result, we used the average value from measurements of several
418: lines. The instrumental velocity dispersion was $\sigma_i \approx 31$
419: km s$^{-1}$ for program GO-7403 and $\sigma_i \approx 17$ km s$^{-1}$
420: for program GO-7354. These instrumental line widths were then
421: subtracted in quadrature from the observed line widths.
422:
423: \section{Results}
424: \label{sec:resuls}
425:
426: The velocity, velocity dispersion, and flux measured from the
427: [\ion{N}{2}] $\lambda 6583$ emission line for 12 of the 14 galaxies is
428: plotted as a function of the position along a single slit in Figures
429: \ref{fig:ngc1052}--\ref{fig:ic989}. We show the galaxy's systemic
430: velocity, taken from optical line measurements in the Third Reference
431: Catalogue of Bright Galaxies (RC3) \citep{RC3_catalog}, as the dashed
432: line in the radial-velocity plots. For each galaxy, we also calculated
433: the flux-weighted average velocity measured from the largest square
434: aperture possible given the number of STIS slits for the galaxy and
435: the number of rows from which spectra could be extracted. For five
436: galaxies in the sample, the flux-weighted mean velocity differs from
437: the RC3 velocity by $> 60$ km s$^{-1}$.
438:
439: We define the galaxy center ($y$-offset = 0) to be the row with the
440: largest continuum flux. The peak of the continuum flux coincided with
441: the peak of the H$\alpha$ broad-component flux in five of the seven
442: broad-line galaxies, and in the cases of NGC 4579 and NGC 3998, the
443: peak broad-component flux was offset from the peak of the continuum by
444: one CCD row, corresponding to 4 and 8 pc, respectively. One possible
445: explanation for the small offset is differential extinction between
446: the continuum and the emission-line flux. Similarly, the peak of the
447: narrow-line emission coincided with the peak of the continuum in five
448: of the seven narrow-line galaxies, but for NGC 4036 and IC 989, the
449: peak of the [\ion{N}{2}] $\lambda 6583$ flux was offset from the
450: continuum peak by one CCD row, corresponding to 5 and 50 pc,
451: respectively. The H$\alpha$ broad-component flux peak coincided with
452: the narrow-line flux maximum in only two (NGC 1052 and NGC 4278) of
453: the seven type 1 AGNs. In the other type 1 objects, the offset between
454: broad and narrow-flux peaks was just one CCD row.
455:
456: For completeness we include the velocity fields from NGC 3245, NGC
457: 3998, and NGC 5077, although the data have been previously presented
458: by \cite{Barth_2001}, \cite{DeFrancesco_2006}, and
459: \cite{DeFrancesco_2008}, respectively. We also include the velocity
460: fields for NGC 6500 and IC 989 since \cite{DeFrancesco_2008} present
461: the velocity curves from the central slit positions, while we display
462: the velocity fields from every slit position. Our measurements of the
463: velocity fields from all five of these galaxies are consistent with
464: those results previously published.
465:
466: For all but two galaxies, a continuum-subtracted H$\alpha +
467: $[\ion{N}{2}] image was created by subtracting a scaled WFPC2 702W
468: image, or a scaled combination of F547M and F791W images, from a F658N
469: image. This is shown along with the positions of the STIS slits in the
470: second panel of the set of WFPC2 images at the top of the figures. We
471: verified that the central slit position was placed on the nucleus by
472: examining the peak-up image, which is an undispersed image taken
473: through the slit, and the acquisition image, which is an initial image
474: of the object taken with a larger aperture. We compared the spatial
475: profile of the peak-up image to the spatial profile produced by
476: vertical cuts through the nucleus of the acquisition image, and found
477: similar profiles, indicating that the slit was centered on the
478: nucleus.
479:
480: The 14 galaxies in the sample show a large diversity in their observed
481: velocity fields. Some velocity fields are consistent with rotation but
482: perhaps at a low S/N, some galaxies seem to be in overall rotation
483: with significant random components, some appear to be dominated by
484: irregular motions, and others demonstrate clear evidence for
485: outflows. As mentioned earlier, three galaxies (NGC 3245, NGC 3998,
486: NGC 5077) have velocity fields previously shown to be consistent with
487: circularly rotating disks. While there is no foolproof way to predict
488: which galaxies will contain regularly rotating gas, \cite{Ho_2002}
489: determine that the morphology of dust lanes can be a reliable
490: indicator of organized velocities fields. They find that galaxies with
491: smooth, circularly symmetric dust rings often have velocity fields
492: suitable for gas dynamical modeling, while those objects with clearly
493: disorderly dust lanes almost never contain regular velocity fields.
494:
495: Figure \ref{fig:nii2sb_radial} shows the [\ion{N}{2}] $\lambda 6583$
496: surface brightness as a function of projected angular distance from
497: the nucleus, where each point corresponds to a single row
498: measurement. In order to emphasize the trends, we averaged together
499: points within 0\farcs1-wide annuli for the galaxies observed under
500: program GO-7403. For NGC 3998, NGC 4594, and NGC 6500, we averaged
501: together points that fell within 0\farcs05-wide bins. These averages
502: are plotted as black triangles. The shape of the surface brightness
503: profile varies between galaxies, where some galaxies show a dramatic
504: increase in surface brightness within the innermost regions and other
505: galaxies exhibit a gradual rise in surface brightness over a larger
506: range of radii. However, almost all of the galaxies in the sample do
507: exhibit a centrally peaked surface brightness profile. NGC 3998 shows
508: the sharpest peak in surface brightness, where the [\ion{N}{2}]
509: surface brightness falls by about a factor of 58 between $r=0$ and
510: $r=$ 0\farcs28. Conversely, NGC 4278, NGC 3245, and IC 989 show the
511: flattest profiles, where the [\ion{N}{2}] surface brightness decreases
512: by a factor of about 3--4 within the inner 0\farcs25. NGC 2911 does
513: not exhibit a central peak in the emission-line surface brightness,
514: although the error bars are large and may mask a weak rise in surface
515: brightness at smaller radii. In general, both type 1 and 2 LINERs have
516: central peaks in emission-line surface brightness.
517:
518: Radial-velocity maps of each galaxy are shown in Figure
519: \ref{fig:radvelmap}. For galaxies having multiple velocity components,
520: we show the radial-velocity map for the velocity component plotted in
521: black in Figures \ref{fig:ngc1052}, \ref{fig:ngc3227},
522: \ref{fig:ngc4278}, and \ref{fig:ngc4579}. In these multiple-slit
523: velocity curves for NGC 1052, NGC 3227, NGC 4278, and NGC 4579, we
524: attempt to label what appears to be coherent kinematic systems by
525: using black and grey colors. However, we cannot definitively say that
526: all black points represent a single component and all grey points
527: represent a separate component. This ambiguity in the identification
528: of coherent velocity components affects the radial-velocity maps in
529: Figure \ref{fig:radvelmap} and may cause the velocity field we show to
530: be more chaotic than it is in reality. While the multiple-slit
531: velocity curves presented in Figures
532: \ref{fig:ngc1052}--\ref{fig:ic989} contain the same information, the
533: velocity maps show more clearly whether the gas is dominated by
534: rotational motion or chaotic motions.
535:
536: Below we discuss the velocity fields for each galaxy in the sample,
537: with the exception of NGC 3245 and NGC 3998.
538:
539: \subsection{NGC 1052}
540: \label{subsec:indivdes_ngc1052}
541:
542: Overall the gas does not exhibit a regular rotation curve, and the
543: presence of strong outflows can clearly be seen in the STIS data. The
544: multiple velocity components identified in our spectra are spatially
545: coincident with the structure seen in the narrow-band H$\alpha +
546: $[\ion{N}{2}] emission-line image from \cite{Pogge_2000}, who detected
547: an ionization cone at a position angle of $96^{\circ}$. Two
548: kinematically distinct components are seen in four of the off-nucleus
549: slit positions and correspond to the location of jet-like features
550: seen in the WFPC2 F658N image. The velocity splittings are as large as
551: $\sim 400-600$ km s$^{-1}$. The jet-like feature emerging from the
552: nucleus toward the east is blueshifted by $\sim 560$ km s$^{-1}$
553: relative to the galaxy's systemic velocity of 1474 km s$^{-1}$, and
554: the western jet is redshifted by $\sim 240$ km s$^{-1}$. In the
555: eastern jet, in slit position 7, the line widths are extremely large,
556: with a velocity dispersion of 600 km s$^{-1}$.
557:
558: Previous ground-based spectroscopic work by \cite{Sugai_2005} has also
559: found two components to the emission-line profiles, where one
560: component is due to disk rotation at radii greater than
561: $\sim1$\arcsec\ with an axis of rotation at a position angle of
562: 153$^{\circ}$. The second component is attributed to a bipolar
563: outflow, seen at a radius of $\sim$1\arcsec\ from the nucleus, whose
564: axis is at a position angle of $\sim 103^{\circ}$. The blueshifted
565: side of the outflow has a higher velocity of at least $-1200$ km
566: s$^{-1}$ relative to the systemic velocity, while the redshifted side
567: has a velocity of $800$ km s$^{-1}$ relative to the systemic velocity
568: \citep{Sugai_2005}. Additionally, \cite{Davies_Illingworth_1986} and
569: \cite{Schulz_2003} found evidence for outflows on large scales from
570: ground-based spectra.
571:
572: The fit to the spectrum from the nuclear region of the central slit
573: was improved by the addition of a broad H$\alpha$ component, as
574: expected since this is a well-known type 1.9 LINER; the broad
575: H$\alpha$ emission has been shown to be polarized, indicating that the
576: broad-line region is seen in reflected light \citep{Barth_1999}.
577:
578: Although the velocity map of NGC 1052 and the central slit velocity
579: curve superficially resemble a rotational velocity field, the velocity
580: structure shown in Figure \ref{fig:radvelmap} indicates that the NLR
581: is actually dominated by an outflow. The color-coded velocity map
582: shows only one of the two velocity components, where the component we
583: plot shows redshifted and blueshifted sides that correspond to the
584: jet-like features seen in the WFPC2 image.
585:
586: \subsection{NGC 1497}
587: \label{subsec:indivdes_ngc1497}
588:
589: Due to the poor S/N of the spectra, especially from the first slit
590: position, only a few rows in each exposure could be fit. Consequently,
591: it is difficult to determine whether the gas is rotating. However, a
592: velocity gradient of 150 km s$^{-1}$ is seen across 0\farcs15 in the
593: central slit position, and this could be consistent with rotation,
594: although the velocity gradient is not symmetric about the location of
595: the peak of the narrow-line region flux.
596:
597: \subsection{NGC 2911}
598: \label{subsec:indivdes_ngc2911}
599:
600: Only a small number of velocity measurements could be made at each
601: slit position due to the low S/N of the spectra. However, the velocity
602: map suggests that the gas is dominated by rotational motion. The
603: central slit position exhibits a gradient of 270 km s$^{-1}$ across
604: the innermost 0\farcs3. With higher quality spectra, this galaxy could
605: be a good candidate for dynamical modeling. The flux-weighted average
606: velocity measured in a 0\farcs3 square aperture is 3285 km s$^{-1}$,
607: while the systemic velocity taken from RC3 is 3167 km s$^{-1}$. Other
608: optical measurements of the systemic velocity given by the NASA
609: Extragalactic Database (NED) span a large range of velocities, $\sim
610: 3030 - 3250$ km s$^{-1}$. The inconsistencies between the various
611: systemic velocity measurements may be the result of dust obscuration
612: of the galaxy nucleus and one side of the emission-line disk, as a
613: dust lane is visible in the WFPC2 image.
614:
615: \subsection{NGC 3227}
616: \label{subsec:indivdes_ngc3227}
617:
618: The velocity field is very complex and chaotic. Two separate kinematic
619: components are seen in all seven slit positions. At some locations,
620: the velocity differences between the multiple velocity components are
621: as large as $\sim 600$ km s$^{-1}$. Our kinematic mapping of NGC 3227
622: shows that the NLR contains components with low velocities and low
623: velocity dispersions, as well as components with high velocities and
624: high velocity dispersions. In particular, in the eastern direction in
625: slit positions 1 and 2, one of the components has a velocity of $\sim
626: 300$ km s$^{-1}$ relative to the systemic velocity and a velocity
627: dispersion of $\sim 400$ km s$^{-1}$. In slit position 7, in the
628: northern direction, one component has a velocity of $\sim 300-350$ km
629: s$^{-1}$ relative to the systemic velocity, and a velocity dispersion
630: of $\sim 400$ km s$^{-1}$. Similar multicomponent structures have been
631: seen in other Seyferts as well, including NGC 4151 \citep{Kaiser_2000,
632: Nelson_2000}.
633:
634: An additional H$\alpha$ broad component was fit to spectra in all but
635: the outermost two slit positions. The brightness of the H$\alpha$
636: broad component in the central slit position, as well as in the
637: adjacent slit positions 2 and 3, appears to be consistent with a
638: bright point source that has been smeared by the STIS point-spread
639: function (PSF). However, the flux of the broad component found at a Y
640: Offset of $-$0\farcs3 to 0\farcs05 in slit position 5, and the broad
641: component flux at a Y Offset of $-$0\farcs25 to 0\farcs15 in slit
642: position 6, appear to be in excess of that expected from the wings of
643: a point source. It is possible that NGC 3227 exhibits scattered
644: broad-line region light located in this region to the northwest of the
645: nucleus.
646:
647: Previous studies of the ionized gas in NGC 3227 have also found
648: chaotic velocity fields, as well as asymmetries and double-peaked
649: profiles of the narrow H$\alpha$, [\ion{S}{2}], [\ion{N}{2}], and
650: [\ion{O}{3}] emission lines. These asymmetries were attributed to the
651: superposition of several physically and kinematically distinct
652: components, where the broader component was attributed to outflowing
653: gas \citep{Arribas_1994, Gonzales-Delgado_1997,
654: Garcia-Lorenzo_2001}. Although strong outflows are seen in the ionized
655: gas, the molecular gas in NGC 3227 appears to be in regular rotation
656: with a major axis at a position angle of 140$^{\circ}$
657: \citep{Schinnerer_2000, Reunanen_2002, Davies_2006,
658: Hicks_Malkan_2007}. Our data show that one of the two velocity
659: components, given by the black points in Figure \ref{fig:ngc3227} and
660: shown in Figure \ref{fig:radvelmap}, exhibits similar overall features
661: as the molecular gas velocity field presented in
662: \cite{Hicks_Malkan_2007}. The redshifted and blueshifted ionized gas
663: in this kinematic component roughly corresponds spatially to the
664: redshifted and blueshifted portions of the molecular gas. While one of
665: the [\ion{N}{2}] velocity components appears to trace the general
666: features of the molecular gas, the ionized gas is still highly
667: disturbed and is not participating in simple disk-like rotation.
668:
669: \subsection{NGC 4036}
670: \label{subsec:indivdes_ngc4036}
671:
672: The radial-velocity map shows the gas is rotating, although this
673: motion is difficult to recognize from the multiple slit velocity
674: curves alone. Velocities measured from the two slit positions to the
675: southwest of the nucleus are blueshifted by as much as 200 km
676: s$^{-1}$, while velocities from slit position 2 are redshifted by 150
677: km s$^{-1}$ relative to the systemic velocity of 1397 km s$^{-1}$. The
678: central slit position exhibits a velocity gradient of $\sim 300$ km
679: s$^{-1}$ across the inner 0\farcs2. \cite{Cinzano_1999} examined the
680: [\ion{O}{2}] gas kinematics and found that NGC 4036 contained gas that
681: was clearly not undergoing circular motion on scales less than
682: 10\arcsec. Additionally, based upon their WFPC2 narrow-band H$\alpha +
683: $[\ion{N}{2}] image, \cite{Pogge_2000} noted the existence of a
684: complicated filamentary and clumpy structure.
685:
686: We did not require a H$\alpha$ broad component in the fit to the
687: spectra in any of the slit positions. However, through ground-based
688: measurements, \cite{Ho_1997b} determined that NGC 4036 contained a
689: weak, very low-amplitude, broad H$\alpha$ component. This disagreement
690: may be the result of variability, but another possibility is that the
691: apparent broad H$\alpha$ component in the ground-based data arises
692: from the unresolved high-velocity material in the inner NLR.
693:
694: \subsection{NGC 4278}
695: \label{subsec:indivdes_ngc4278}
696:
697: From the multislit velocity curves and the velocity map, the gas
698: appears to be in organized motion and displays some characteristics of
699: rotation. However, within the inner 0\farcs5, the velocity field
700: appears to be twisted, and may be the result of a counter-rotating
701: core. Another attractive possibility is that this central decoupled
702: structure is related to the parsec-scale radio jet seen by
703: \cite{Giroletti_2005}. According to \cite{Giroletti_2005}, the
704: double-sided jet is seen at position angles of 155$^{\circ}$ and
705: $-40^{\circ}$, which suggests that the central kinematic structure
706: seen in the velocity field may be the result of material being pushed
707: by the jet. The central slit position exhibits a velocity curve that
708: is symmetric about the central row and has a gradient of $\sim$ 400 km
709: s$^{-1}$ across the inner 0\farcs2. Two velocity components were
710: needed to fit some of the spectra in the two outermost slit positions,
711: where the additional component's velocity differed by $\sim 450$ km
712: s$^{-1}$ from the primary component. An additional broad H$\alpha$
713: component was fit in the inner regions of the central slit position.
714:
715: \subsection{NGC 4579}
716: \label{subsec:indivdes_ngc4579}
717:
718: Both the multislit velocity curves and the velocity map show that the
719: gas is not in regular rotation. A few spectra in the off-nucleus slit
720: position immediately adjacent to the center slit displayed two
721: kinematically distinct components, where the velocity separation is
722: $\sim 450$ km s$^{-1}$. The nuclear disk may be nearly face-on since
723: the primary velocity component is almost flat at $\sim 1500$ km
724: s$^{-1}$. In the central slit position, the [\ion{N}{2}] velocity
725: dispersion peaks at 440 km s$^{-1}$ at a separation of 0\farcs25 from
726: the central row. A broad component of H$\alpha$ was detected in the
727: nuclear regions of the central slit as well as in slit position 4. In
728: the STIS data, the nuclear spectrum reveals an asymmetric, very broad
729: H$\alpha$ component with a full width at zero intensity of $\sim
730: 18000$ km s$^{-1}$ and ``shoulders'' on the red and blue sides
731: \citep{Barth_2001a}. In their H$\alpha + $[\ion{N}{2}] narrow-band
732: image, \cite{Pogge_2000} find complex, clumpy, and filamentary
733: emission, which they liken to a shell or a ring. Ground-based
734: measurements on larger scales also find irregular kinematics
735: \citep{Gonzales-Delgado_1996}. The flux-weighted average velocity
736: measured from a 1\farcs2 square aperture is 1465 km s$^{-1}$, while
737: the systemic velocity taken from RC3 is 1627 km s$^{-1}$. The other
738: optical measurements of the systemic velocity given by NED span a wide
739: range of velocities, $\sim$1480--1750 km s$^{-1}$.
740:
741: \subsection{NGC 4594}
742: \label{subsec:indivdes_ngc4594}
743:
744: The data for NGC 4594 show organized motion consistent with an overall
745: rotation pattern, but with significant irregularities. The central
746: slit position contains a velocity gradient of $\sim 550$ km s$^{-1}$
747: across 0\farcs25. Narrow-band H$\alpha + $[\ion{N}{2}] WFPC2 images
748: from \cite{Pogge_2000} revealed a bright H$\alpha$ core surrounded by
749: spiral-like wisps that extended to 4\arcsec\ east and west and
750: 1\arcsec\ south of the nucleus. \cite{Emsellem_2000} found that a cut
751: through the [\ion{N}{2}] $\lambda 6583$ velocity map along the
752: galaxy's major axis showed the existence of a strong velocity gradient
753: near the center, and that the gas kinematics within 1\arcsec\ was
754: decoupled from the gas located in the spiral wisps.
755:
756: There has been some previous debate as to whether a broad H$\alpha$
757: component is present in NGC 4594. \cite{Kormendy_1996} concluded that
758: such a component existed; on the other hand, both \cite{Ho_1997} and
759: \cite{Nicholson_1998} were able to reproduce the H$\alpha +
760: $[\ion{N}{2}] blend with only narrow components. In our analysis, an
761: additional broad H$\alpha$ component improved the fit to several of
762: the nuclear rows of the central slit position. We also tried to fit
763: multiple narrow components to each of the H$\alpha$, [\ion{N}{2}], and
764: [\ion{S}{2}] lines without a broad component, but failed to find a
765: satisfactory result. However, the H$\alpha + $[\ion{N}{2}] lines are
766: severely blended together and the S/N is low in the central rows, so
767: we are unable to conclude that a broad component is definitely
768: required.
769:
770: \subsection{NGC 5077}
771: \label{subsec:indivdes_ngc5077}
772:
773: The velocity curves and the radial-velocity map show that the gas is
774: likely to be in regular rotation. This is in agreement with
775: \cite{DeFrancesco_2008}, who used the same archival STIS dataset to
776: perform gas dynamical modeling and determined the black hole mass to
777: be $M_{\mathrm{BH}} = 6.8^{+4.3}_{-2.8}\times 10^8$ $M_\odot$. The
778: flux-weighted average velocity measured from a square aperture of
779: 0\farcs3 is 2732 km s$^{-1}$, while the systemic velocity taken from
780: RC3 is 2832 km s$^{-1}$. Other optical measurements given by NED cover
781: the range $\sim 2650 - 2850$ km s$^{-1}$.
782:
783: \subsection{NGC 5635}
784: \label{subsec:indivdes_ngc5635}
785:
786: The velocity map and the velocity curve from the central slit position
787: are consistent with disk rotation. The central slit position shows a
788: velocity gradient of $\sim 200$ km s$^{-1}$ across the nucleus. The
789: spectra from the off-nucleus slit positions had such low S/N that only
790: a single velocity measurement could be made. Unfortunately, the poor
791: quality of the spectra precludes detailed kinematic modeling of the
792: gas.
793:
794: \subsection{NGC 6500}
795: \label{subsec:indivdes_ngc6500}
796:
797: The velocity field from the multiple slit positions is irregular and
798: not consistent with pure circular motion. Based upon the velocity map,
799: the gas does appear to be dominated by rotation, though with some
800: additional random components. This is in agreement with
801: \cite{DeFrancesco_2008}, who also find complex velocity curves and
802: departures from regularly rotating gas, but they do note a general
803: rotation trend from the central slit position. They suggest that the
804: complicated velocity curves are the result of a nuclear expanding
805: bubble. \cite{Gonzales-Delgado_1996} detected multiple velocity
806: components out to 1 kpc away from the nucleus, indicating that the
807: extended NLR is experiencing an outflow.
808:
809: \subsection{IC 989}
810: \label{subsec:indivdes_ic989}
811:
812: The S/N is very low and velocities could only be measured at a few
813: positions, so the kinematic state of the gas is not well
814: constrained. With the same archival STIS dataset,
815: \cite{DeFrancesco_2008} note that the central slit position shows
816: overall rotation with blueshifted gas southwest of the nucleus and
817: redshifted gas northeast of the nucleus. They suggest the presence of
818: a counter-rotating nuclear gas disk since the velocity gradient is
819: reversed at the center. Alternatively, this may indicate the presence
820: of a radial flow component.
821:
822: \section{Discussion}
823: \label{sec:discussion}
824:
825: \subsection{Density Gradients}
826: \label{subsec:densitygrads}
827:
828: In addition to determining the velocity, velocity dispersion, and flux
829: from the measurement of emission lines, we measured the [\ion{S}{2}]
830: $\lambda 6716/$[\ion{S}{2}] $\lambda 6731$ and the [\ion{O}{1}]
831: $\lambda 6300/($[\ion{S}{2}] $\lambda 6716 + $[\ion{S}{2}] $\lambda
832: 6731)$ line intensity ratios. The [\ion{S}{2}] ratio can be used to
833: determine the electron density because of the difference between the
834: critical densities of the two lines, where \emph{n}$_{\mathrm{crit}} =
835: 1.5 \times 10^{3}$ cm$^{-3}$ for [\ion{S}{2}] $\lambda 6716$ and
836: \emph{n}$_{\mathrm{crit}} = 3.9 \times 10^{3}$ cm$^{-3}$ for
837: [\ion{S}{2}] $\lambda 6731$ (e.g., \citealt{Peterson_book}). However,
838: this ratio is only sensitive to density over the range $10^{2}$
839: cm$^{-3} \ltsim$ \emph{n}$_{\mathrm{e}}\ \ltsim\ 10^{4}$
840: cm$^{-3}$. The [\ion{O}{1}]/[\ion{S}{2}] ratio is also
841: density-dependent, but not in a unique fashion since the ratio is
842: influenced by the abundances, ionization level, and shape of the
843: ionizing spectrum. However, the [\ion{O}{1}]/[\ion{S}{2}] ratio is
844: sensitive to electron density over a range wider than the [\ion{S}{2}]
845: ratio because of the larger critical density of the [\ion{O}{1}]
846: $\lambda 6300$ line, where \emph{n}$_{\mathrm{crit}} = 1.8 \times
847: 10^{6}$ cm$^{-3}$ (e.g., \citealt{Peterson_book}). Below, we show
848: results from photoionization calculations to illustrate the use of the
849: [\ion{O}{1}]/[\ion{S}{2}] ratio to probe high-density regions.
850:
851: Figure \ref{fig:density} contains plots of the [\ion{S}{2}] $\lambda
852: 6716$/[\ion{S}{2}] $\lambda 6731$ ratio, the [\ion{O}{1}]/[\ion{S}{2}]
853: ratio, and the electron density determined from the [\ion{S}{2}] ratio
854: as a function of projected radial distance from the nucleus. The
855: [\ion{O}{1}] lines were not present in the NGC 3998 spectra since the
856: grating tilt was set to provide coverage of 6490--7050~\AA, so only
857: the [\ion{S}{2}] ratio and the electron density are plotted as a
858: function of distance from the nucleus. To examine the overall trends
859: in electron density with radius, we computed average [\ion{S}{2}]
860: $\lambda 6716$/$\lambda 6731$ ratios in 0\farcs1-wide radial bins (or
861: 0\farcs05-wide bins for NGC 3998). With the radial averages of the
862: [\ion{S}{2}] $\lambda 6716/$[\ion{S}{2}] $\lambda 6731$ ratio, the
863: electron density as a function of radius was calculated using the IRAF
864: task {\tt temden} assuming a temperature of 10,000 K. In the instances
865: where velocity splitting was present, the secondary component was too
866: weak to produce an independent measurement of the electron density,
867: and the two components were summed before the [\ion{S}{2}] ratio was
868: calculated. The remaining eight LINERs not included in Figure
869: \ref{fig:density} have such large uncertainties in the density
870: measurements that no information on the density structure could be
871: extracted from the data.
872:
873: Significant density gradients are seen in NGC 1052, NGC 4278, NGC
874: 3998, and NGC 4579. Measurements of the density structure in NGC 4579
875: have been previously presented by \cite{Barth_2001a}. In these
876: galaxies, the electron density increases from $\sim 200-900$ cm$^{-3}$
877: in the outer regions to $\sim 1700-16,000$ cm$^{-3}$ at the center. In
878: contrast to these four galaxies, NGC 4036 does not exhibit any
879: systematic change in \emph{n}$_{\mathrm{e}}$ with respect to radial
880: distance from the center or a central spike in density. It is
881: interesting to note, however, that this galaxy did not need a broad
882: H$\alpha$ component to fit the central spectrum. Among the objects
883: with a sufficient S/N to map \emph{n}$_{\mathrm{e}}$ from the
884: [\ion{S}{2}] lines, all of the broad-lined AGNs show central density
885: peaks.
886:
887: The [\ion{O}{1}]$/$[\ion{S}{2}] ratio also rises dramatically toward
888: the nucleus in some objects, increasing to as much as $1.2\pm0.1$ in
889: NGC 1052, $1.0\pm0.1$ in NGC 4579, and $0.8\pm0.1$ in NGC 4278. These
890: central [\ion{O}{1}]$/$[\ion{S}{2}] values are very large in
891: comparison to the average ratio typically found on scales of hundreds
892: of parsecs from ground-based spectra of LINERs. For comparison, we
893: used the emission-line measurements from \cite{Ho_1997} to calculate
894: an average [\ion{O}{1}]/[\ion{S}{2}] ratio for both type 1 and type 2
895: LINERs. We first removed the galaxies for which a ``low confidence''
896: or a ``high uncertainty'' flag was given for either the LINER
897: classification or the [\ion{O}{1}]$/$H$\alpha$ and
898: [\ion{S}{2}]$/$H$\alpha$ ratios. This left a sample of 57 galaxies
899: from which we calculated the average [\ion{O}{1}]$/$[\ion{S}{2}] ratio
900: to be $0.26$ in the ground-based 2\arcsec$\times$4\arcsec\
901: aperture. From the same sample of 57 galaxies, those galaxies
902: classified as type 1 LINERs had [\ion{O}{1}]$/$[\ion{S}{2}] ratios in
903: the range $0.15$--$0.54$ with an average ratio of $0.32$, while the
904: type 2 LINERs had [\ion{O}{1}]$/$[\ion{S}{2}] ratios of $0.13$--$0.58$
905: with an average ratio of $0.21$.
906:
907: Although the [\ion{O}{1}]/[\ion{S}{2}] ratios at the centers of NGC
908: 1052, NGC 4278, and NGC 4579 are well above the typical values found
909: in LINERs, the [\ion{O}{1}]$/$[\ion{S}{2}] ratio is not a unique
910: indicator of density. The ratio is additionally affected by the
911: abundance ratio, the ionization parameter (\emph{U}, which
912: characterizes the number of ionizing photons per nucleon), and the
913: shape of the ionizing continuum. In order to further interpret the
914: high values of [\ion{O}{1}]/[\ion{S}{2}], we used version 07.02.00 of
915: CLOUDY \citep{Ferland_1998} to generate a few grids of simple
916: photoionization models. In particular, we used the AGN continuum model
917: that takes as free parameters the temperature of the thermal big blue
918: bump component, the UV (2500 \AA) to X-ray (2 keV) spectral slope
919: $\alpha_{\mathrm{ox}}$, and the power-law slopes of the low-energy
920: part of the big blue bump ($\alpha_{\mathrm{uv}}$) and of the X-ray
921: continuum ($\alpha_{\mathrm{x}}$). We left the thermal component
922: temperature, $\alpha_{\mathrm{uv}}$, and $\alpha_{\mathrm{x}}$ at
923: their default values ($T=150,000 $ K, $\alpha_{\mathrm{uv}} = -0.5$,
924: $\alpha_{\mathrm{x}} = -1$). The $\alpha_{\mathrm{ox}}$ parameter was
925: varied over $-0.6$ to $-1.6$ in increments of $0.2$, bracketing the
926: typical range for low-luminosity AGNs \citep{Ho_1999}. Models were
927: computed for a single plane-parallel slab of constant-density gas
928: either at solar and twice solar metallicity, with gas density ranging
929: from \emph{n}$_{\rm H} = 10^2$ cm$^{-3}$ to 10$^6$ cm$^{-3}$, and
930: ionization parameter ranging from log \emph{U} = $-4$ to $-2$. We
931: calculated models that did and did not include dust grains.
932:
933: From these grids of photoionization models, we found small
934: [\ion{O}{1}]/[\ion{S}{2}] ratios, consistent with ground-based
935: results, at low values of \emph{n}$_{\rm H}$ ($10^{2}$ cm$^{-3}$ --
936: $10^{4}$ cm$^{-3}$). The ratio increases strongly for \emph{n}$_{\rm
937: H}\gtsim 10^{4}$ cm$^{-3}$. To illustrate our model results, in Figure
938: \ref{fig:cloudy} we plot the [\ion{O}{1}]$/$[\ion{S}{2}] ratio as a
939: function of gas density for the models with twice-solar metallicity
940: and dust-free gas, and for $\alpha_{\mathrm{ox}} = -0.8$ and
941: $-1.4$. For $\alpha_{\mathrm{ox}} = -0.8$, a
942: [\ion{O}{1}]$/$[\ion{S}{2}] ratio of $1.0$ corresponds to a density of
943: $\sim 2\times10^{4}$ $\mathrm{cm}^{-3}$ for \emph{U} = $10^{-2}$ and
944: $10^{-4}$, and a density of $\sim 1\times10^{4}$ $\mathrm{cm}^{-3}$
945: for \emph{U} = $10^{-3}$. For $\alpha_{\mathrm{ox}} = -1.4$, a
946: [\ion{O}{1}]$/$[\ion{S}{2}] ratio of $1.0$ corresponds to a density of
947: $\sim 1\times10^{5}$ $\mathrm{cm}^{-3}$ for \emph{U} = $10^{-2}$ and
948: $10^{-3}$, and a density of $\sim 5\times10^{4}$ $\mathrm{cm}^{-3}$
949: for \emph{U} = $10^{-4}$. The smaller [\ion{O}{1}]/[\ion{S}{2}] ratio
950: for $\alpha_{\mathrm{ox}} = -1.6$ is expected since the increased UV
951: flux relative to X-ray flux results in a less extended partially
952: ionized zone. The models where solar metallicity was used and where
953: dust was included showed qualitatively similar results to the models
954: presented in Figure \ref{fig:cloudy} for the low ionization
955: parameters, where densities greater than $\sim 10^{4}$
956: $\mathrm{cm}^{-3}$ were needed in order to produce an
957: [\ion{O}{1}]/[\ion{S}{2}] ratio of $1.0$. Thus, while the electron
958: density cannot be directly determined from the
959: [\ion{O}{1}]$/$[\ion{S}{2}] ratio, the rise in the line ratio seen in
960: NGC 1052, NGC 4278, and NGC 4579 gives strong evidence for a steep
961: inner rise in density.
962:
963: The single Seyfert galaxy in the sample, NGC 3227, exhibits a density
964: gradient over a portion of the NLR, with \emph{n}$_{\mathrm{e}}
965: \approx 600$ $\mathrm{cm}^{-3}$ in the outer regions and
966: \emph{n}$_{\mathrm{e}} \approx 13,000$ $\mathrm{cm}^{-3}$ at a radius
967: of $10$ pc. The electron density then decreases at the nucleus to
968: $\sim 2800$ $\mathrm{cm}^{-3}$. Additionally, the
969: [\ion{O}{1}]$/$[\ion{S}{2}] ratio rises toward the nucleus to
970: $0.8\pm0.1$ at a radius of $10$ pc, then decreases to $0.4\pm0.1$ at
971: the center.
972:
973: Overall, the data from NGC 1052, NGC 3998, NGC 4278, and NGC 4579
974: provide clear evidence that Type 1 LINERs contain a radially
975: density-stratified NLR. The detection of density gradients in Type 1
976: LINERs is consistent with photoionization models of LINERs. It also
977: appears that density gradients can persist even in the presence of
978: strong outflows such as those seen in NGC 1052 and those seen over a
979: portion of the NLR in NGC 3227. Moreover, these five broad-lined AGNs
980: exhibit similar density structure as can be seen in Figure
981: \ref{fig:logden_logr}, where we show the electron density as a
982: function of projected radial distance from the nucleus for the five
983: AGNs. We fit a power law of the form $\emph{n}_{\mathrm{e}} =
984: \emph{n}_0(r/1~ \mathrm{pc})^{\alpha}$ to the density measurements
985: from each galaxy separately. We calculated the average slope and
986: normalization, as well as the standard deviation for each of the two
987: parameters, and found $\emph{n}_0 = 5370 \pm{2495}$ cm$^{-3}$ and
988: $\alpha = -0.60 \pm{0.13}$. Although there is a large range in the
989: normalization values between the five broad-lined AGNs, the density
990: measurements are characterized by a similar slope.
991:
992: In order to determine whether unresolved density gradients exist even
993: on the smallest angular scales probed by STIS, we examine the nuclear
994: spectrum for evidence of a correlation between line width and critical
995: density for collisional deexcitation
996: \citep[e.g.,][]{Filippenko_Halpern_1984, Filippenko_1985}. The
997: line-width--\emph{n}$_{\mathrm{crit}}$ relationship implies that the
998: NLR has radial gradients in velocity and density, where the broader
999: emission lines arise from gas closer to the black hole. In Figure
1000: \ref{fig:fwhmvsncrit}, we plot the full width at half-maximum
1001: intensity (FWHM) of the [\ion{S}{2}] $\lambda 6731$, [\ion{N}{2}]
1002: $\lambda 6583$, and [\ion{O}{1}] $\lambda 6300$ lines as a function of
1003: critical density. The widths of these lines were measured from the
1004: central row of the central slit position for all the galaxies in the
1005: sample with the exception of NGC 3227. Due to the sharp peak in the
1006: surface brightness at the nucleus of NGC 3227, the geometric
1007: rectification performed during the data reduction produced anomalous
1008: bumps in the continuum as well as an irregular [\ion{O}{1}] $\lambda
1009: 6300$ line profile. We therefore binned together the innermost three
1010: rows from the central slit position before fitting
1011: H$\alpha+$[\ion{N}{2}], the [\ion{S}{2}] doublet, and the [\ion{O}{1}]
1012: $\lambda 6300$ lines to a double-Gaussian narrow-component model. In
1013: the plot for NGC 3227 in Figure \ref{fig:fwhmvsncrit}, we show the
1014: FWHM for each of the two Gaussian components for a single emission
1015: line.
1016:
1017: Of the eight objects in the sample with only [\ion{S}{2}] and
1018: [\ion{N}{2}] measurements, seven of the galaxies show that the FWHM of
1019: the [\ion{N}{2}] line is greater than the FWHM of the [\ion{S}{2}]
1020: line. Although many of these width measurements have large error bars,
1021: it does appear that the FWHM rises with increasing critical
1022: density. Of the five galaxies with measurements of all three lines,
1023: NGC 1052 and NGC 4579 clearly show the presence of a
1024: line-width--\emph{n}$_{\mathrm{crit}}$ relationship, while NGC 4278
1025: exhibits an increase in the FWHM between the [\ion{S}{2}] $\lambda
1026: 6731$ and the [\ion{O}{1}] $\lambda 6300$ line. NGC 4036 shows an
1027: increase in the FWHM between the [\ion{S}{2}] $\lambda 6731$ and the
1028: [\ion{N}{2}] $\lambda 6583$ lines, but a slightly smaller FWHM for the
1029: [\ion{O}{1}] $\lambda 6300$ line. In contrast, NGC 3227 shows a
1030: decreasing FWHM with increasing critical density for both the high
1031: velocity dispersion and low velocity dispersion Gaussian
1032: components. The decreasing line width with increasing critical density
1033: indicates that the lowest density gas is actually moving the fastest,
1034: which may be the result of the strong outflow in NGC 3227. It is also
1035: possible, however, that this unusual trend seen in the Seyfert NGC
1036: 3227, as well as the decrease in the electron density seen in the
1037: inner region in Figure \ref{fig:density}, may not be real and may be
1038: due to an inadequate fit to a rather complicated nuclear
1039: spectrum. Without additional Seyferts in the sample, or higher
1040: luminosity AGNs similar to NGC 3227, it is impossible to determine
1041: whether this is an anomalous result or a more common finding related
1042: to the properties of the AGN. With the exception of the Seyfert galaxy
1043: NGC 3227, a line-width--\emph{n}$_{\mathrm{crit}}$ relationship can be
1044: observed even on the smallest STIS scales corresponding to $\sim 8$
1045: pc, making the line-width--\emph{n}$_{\mathrm{crit}}$ relationship a
1046: generic property for LINERs. We are therefore seeing unresolved
1047: density structure, providing further evidence that the density
1048: continues to rise even within the innermost $\sim 8$ pc in most
1049: LINERs.
1050:
1051: \subsection{Aperture Size and Line Width}
1052: \label{subsec:aperatureandlinewidth}
1053:
1054: Another question that can be addressed with our measurements concerns
1055: the variations in emission-line width with aperture size. Such an
1056: analysis is useful in determining the scales over which the bulge
1057: dominates the NLR kinematics in low-luminosity AGNs. In the past, it
1058: has been assumed that ground-based observations sample NLR gas that is
1059: kinematically dominated by the virial motion in the bulge potential
1060: \citep{Nelson_Whittle_1996}. However, as discussed by
1061: \cite{Laor_2003}, low-luminosity AGNs have a more compact NLR whose
1062: kinematics may instead be dominated by the black hole.
1063:
1064: \cite{Rice_2006} examined narrow-line widths as a function of aperture
1065: size using single STIS slit observations of a sample of Seyfert
1066: galaxies. They found most of the galaxies exhibited a constant or
1067: increasing FWHM with increasing aperture size. Our sample allows us to
1068: perform a similar analysis on low-luminosity AGNs. We are able to
1069: considerably improve upon the \cite{Rice_2006} analysis by using the
1070: STIS multislit observations to study the line-width variation within
1071: square apertures of increasing size, eliminating the biases introduced
1072: by studying only a relatively narrow and randomly oriented portion of
1073: the velocity field.
1074:
1075: For the six galaxies from program GO-7403, we choose square apertures
1076: of $0$\farcs$2$, $0$\farcs$7$, $1$\farcs$2$, and $1$\farcs$7$ on a
1077: side, and for the eight galaxies from program GO-7354 we used square
1078: apertures $0$\farcs$1$, $0$\farcs$3$, and $0$\farcs$5$ on a side. The
1079: sizes of the apertures were chosen such that the width of an entire
1080: STIS slit fell within the aperture. We then used the results of the
1081: spectral fitting to the narrow [\ion{N}{2}] $\lambda 6583$ emission
1082: line and summed together the Gaussian components that fell within the
1083: various aperture bins. We characterized the profile of the summed
1084: Gaussians in each aperture by measuring the line width at $50$\% of
1085: the peak height, thus defining a FWHM for the summed line profile. The
1086: FWHM was measured directly from the summed model, not from a Gaussian
1087: fit to the summed model.
1088:
1089: The quantity FWHM/2.35 is plotted against half the length of the
1090: square aperture size (i.e., the ``radius'' of the aperture) in Figure
1091: \ref{fig:fwhm2.35_radius_stis}. We plot FWHM/2.35 in order to compare
1092: with the bulge stellar velocity dispersion. Also included in the plots
1093: is an additional line-width measurement for [\ion{N}{2}] $\lambda
1094: 6583$ from a ground-based $2$\arcsec$\times$$4$\arcsec aperture given
1095: by \cite{Ho_1997} for all but three galaxies in our sample. The
1096: $2$\arcsec$\times$$4$\arcsec aperture is taken to be an effectively
1097: $3$\arcsec\ square aperture and is plotted at a radius of
1098: $1$\farcs$5$. Additionally, we found ground-based measurements of the
1099: bulge stellar velocity dispersion from the literature for $13$ of the
1100: $14$ galaxies in the sample. These values are listed in Table
1101: \ref{tab:galprop} and are plotted in Figure
1102: \ref{fig:fwhm2.35_radius_stis} as the dashed horizontal lines. We
1103: estimated the radius of the sphere of influence of the supermassive
1104: black hole, given by ${r_g} = {GM_{\rm BH}/}\sigma_*^2$, in each of
1105: the 13 galaxies for which a stellar velocity dispersion measurement
1106: could be found. We used the \cite{Tremaine_2002} $M_{\rm
1107: BH}$--$\sigma_*$ relation to estimate the black hole mass in all of
1108: the galaxies except NGC 3227, NGC 3245, NGC 3998, NGC 4594, and NGC
1109: 5077. For these galaxies we used black hole mass measurements from the
1110: literature (Table \ref{tab:galprop}). The sphere of influence was then
1111: converted into an angular scale using the distances listed in Table
1112: \ref{tab:galprop} and plotted as the dotted vertical lines in Figure
1113: \ref{fig:fwhm2.35_radius_stis}.
1114:
1115: For most of the galaxies in the sample, the [\ion{N}{2}] velocity
1116: dispersion peaks within the black hole sphere of influence and then
1117: decreases in larger apertures, approaching the bulge stellar velocity
1118: dispersion. This implies that on scales accessible to ground-based
1119: measurements, the width of the low-ionization lines, such as
1120: [\ion{N}{2}], is set by the bulge and not by the black hole. The work
1121: by \cite{Laor_2003} suggested that in low-luminosity AGNs, the NLR may
1122: be dominated by the black hole and not the bulge. However, the
1123: arguments put forth by \cite{Laor_2003} involved the [\ion{O}{3}]
1124: line, which due to the higher ionization and higher critical density,
1125: originates from a region closer to the black hole than the
1126: [\ion{N}{2}] line. Also, our finding that, for most galaxies in the
1127: sample, the velocity dispersion is largest within the black hole
1128: sphere of influence supports the idea that STIS central line-width
1129: measurements trace the black hole mass, and can therefore be used to
1130: place upper limits on black hole masses in nearby galaxies
1131: \citep{Sarzi_2002,Beifiori_2007}.
1132:
1133: NGC 1052, NGC 3227, and NGC 3245, however, show a different trend,
1134: where the FWHM increases with aperture size. Both NGC 1052 and NGC
1135: 3227 contain successively wider or roughly constant [\ion{N}{2}]
1136: narrow lines for the increasing STIS aperture sizes, but a smaller
1137: FWHM for the ground-based aperture. In the cases of NGC 1052 and NGC
1138: 3227, the strong radial motions create large velocity splitting
1139: between components, causing an increase in the FWHM. The smaller line
1140: width seen in the ground-based aperture may be the result of the
1141: outflows decelerating at larger radii, as described in the outflow
1142: cone models by \cite{Crenshaw_Kraemer_2000}.
1143:
1144: An initial expectation for the behavior of line width with aperture
1145: size for gravitationally dominated gas may be a decreasing FWHM with
1146: increasing aperture size. This is reasonable since most of the ionized
1147: gas flux comes from a region close to the black hole, where the gas is
1148: moving the fastest and thus has the largest line width due to
1149: unresolved rotation. However, the line-width variation with aperture
1150: size in NGC 3245 clearly disagrees with the above expectation, since
1151: the gas in NGC 3245 is known to be in near-perfect disk-like rotation
1152: \citep{Barth_2001}. In order to gain a more complete understanding of
1153: line-width variation with aperture size, we constructed a toy
1154: thin-disk model for gas in circular rotation. First, we generated a
1155: model velocity field on a grid where each model pixel was
1156: 0\farcs{00507} on a side (i.e., 10$\times$ oversampled relative to the
1157: STIS pixel size). The velocity field is set by the black hole mass,
1158: the disk inclination angle, and the stellar mass profile. We used a
1159: \citet{Hernquist_1990} model to describe the stellar mass
1160: contribution. The intrinsic line-of-sight velocity profiles were
1161: assumed to be Gaussian before passing through the telescope optics,
1162: and were calculated on a velocity grid with a bin size of 25.24 km
1163: s$^{-1}$, in order to match the STIS pixel scale.
1164:
1165: The model velocity field was then projected onto the plane of the sky,
1166: and was synthetically ``observed'' in a manner that closely matches
1167: the STIS observation. This synthetic observation involved summing the
1168: intrinsic line-of-sight velocity profiles at every point in the disk
1169: and including the blurring introduced by the nonzero STIS pixel size
1170: and the telescope PSF. In particular, the line-of-sight velocity
1171: profiles were weighted by the emission-line surface brightness
1172: profile, modeled by the function $S(r) = S_0 + S_1 e^{-r/r_o}$. We
1173: included an intrinsic velocity dispersion, similar to those observed
1174: in other early-type galaxies \citep{vanderMarel_vandenBosch_1998}, by
1175: setting the widths of the line-of-sight velocity profiles according to
1176: $\sigma(r) = \sigma_0 + \sigma_1 e^{-r/r_o}$. Finally, we accounted
1177: for the telescope PSF by using Tiny Tim \citep{Krist_Hook_2004} to
1178: generate a 0\farcs2$\times$0\farcs2 subsection of the full STIS
1179: PSF. The PSF was subsampled to match the model pixel grid and computed
1180: for a monochromatic filter passband at $6600$ \AA. Each velocity slice
1181: of the pixel grid was convolved with the PSF. These modeling steps are
1182: a simplified version of the modeling described in detail by
1183: \cite{Barth_2001}. For our purposes, this synthetic observation
1184: involved placing a single STIS slit with increasing aperture lengths
1185: at different angles measured from the gaseous disk major axis in order
1186: to mimic the \cite{Rice_2006} analysis. We additionally placed square
1187: apertures of increasing size over the model velocity field to
1188: replicate our measurements previously discussed. In both instances, we
1189: summed the line profiles that fell within the various apertures and
1190: calculated the FWHM of the summed profile.
1191:
1192: As an example, in Figure \ref{fig:fwhm2.35_radius_stis_model} we show
1193: the results of the toy model using the properties of NGC 3245 and NGC
1194: 3998 as the input parameters. We selected these galaxies because in
1195: both cases the gas is known to be in circular rotation but the
1196: behavior of line width versus aperture size is quite different for the
1197: two objects. We used the black hole mass and inclination angle
1198: determined from the models of \cite{Barth_2001} and
1199: \cite{DeFrancesco_2006}, and we choose the \citet{Hernquist_1990}
1200: bulge normalization and the scale radius such that the toy model
1201: velocity field would match the observed velocity field as closely as
1202: possible for the outermost velocity measurements. Similarly, we
1203: determined the parameters of the emission-line surface brightness
1204: profile by requiring the profile to match the observed [\ion{N}{2}]
1205: flux distribution. Also, for NGC 3245, the parameters of the function
1206: describing the widths of the line-of-sight velocity profiles were
1207: given by \cite{Barth_2001}.
1208:
1209: Note that \cite{DeFrancesco_2006} did not include any intrinsic
1210: velocity dispersion in their model of NGC 3998. We therefore first
1211: generated disk models using only a small constant intrinsic line width
1212: of $\sigma_0 = 20$ km s$^{-1}$. We found an overall trend that
1213: qualitatively matched the data, but the line widths overall were too
1214: small, as can be seen in Figure \ref{fig:fwhm2.35_radius_stis_model},
1215: and the line profile was double peaked in each of the apertures. Since
1216: a double-peaked line profile is not seen in the data, we instead
1217: included an intrinsic velocity dispersion with the parameters
1218: $\sigma_0 = 220$ km s$^{-1}$, $\sigma_1 = 100$ km s$^{-1}$, and $r_o =
1219: 10$ pc. We chose this intrinsic velocity dispersion since it produced
1220: a central line width more consistent with the data and a single-peaked
1221: line profile in each of the apertures. Such values for the intrinsic
1222: velocity dispersion are not unreasonable given previous results of
1223: disk modeling by \cite{vanderMarel_vandenBosch_1998} and
1224: \cite{Barth_2001}. Moreover, we stress that we are employing a
1225: simplified version of the disk modeling; a complete treatment,
1226: including a more appropriate emission-line surface brightness profile
1227: and a more realistic model of how the light passes through the
1228: telescope optics, would change the values of the intrinsic velocity
1229: dispersion parameters needed to reproduce the observed line widths.
1230:
1231: The top panels for both NGC 3245 and NGC 3998 in Figure
1232: \ref{fig:fwhm2.35_radius_stis_model} are the results from using
1233: progressively larger square apertures. Since we adopted a simplified
1234: disk model, the models in Figure \ref{fig:fwhm2.35_radius_stis_model}
1235: do not exactly numerically match the observational data. However,
1236: with our model, we are able to reproduce the qualitative behavior of
1237: line-width variation with aperture size. The model shows that the line
1238: width increases with increasing aperture size for NGC 3245, and the
1239: FWHM decreases with increasing aperture size for NGC 3998. The
1240: additional plots in each column are the results of using a single STIS
1241: slit, at an orientation that is aligned along the major or minor axis
1242: of the gaseous disk. Clearly, the orientation of the single slit not
1243: only affects the numerical values of the line widths, but also the
1244: general behavior of the line-width variation with aperture size, as
1245: can be seen in NGC 3245. In both cases, the disk models always
1246: produced a monotonic trend with line width, either an increasing or
1247: decreasing line width with increasing aperture size.
1248:
1249: These models demonstrate how either an increasing or decreasing line
1250: width with increasing aperture size can be seen for gravitationally
1251: dominated gas. NGC 3245 contains a massive bulge that produces large
1252: circular velocities at distances far from the nucleus. While this is
1253: also true for NGC 3998, NGC 3245 has a flatter emission-line surface
1254: brightness profile with relatively more flux at larger radii than in
1255: NGC 3998, as can be seen in Figure
1256: \ref{fig:nii2sb_radial}. Additionally, the gaseous disk in NGC 3245 is
1257: highly inclined at \emph{i} = $63^{\circ}$, and the disk in NGC 3998
1258: is less inclined with \emph{i} = $30^{\circ}$. The combination of the
1259: flatter surface brightness profile, the highly inclined disk, and the
1260: massive bulge of NGC 3245 results in the contribution of a significant
1261: amount of gas with large circular velocities further away from the
1262: nucleus. Consequently, the line width increases with increasing
1263: aperture size.
1264:
1265: Therefore, based upon the results of the toy model and the analysis of
1266: the observational data, the overall behavior of line width with
1267: aperture size is not a unique indicator of the kinematic state of the
1268: gas. Outflowing gas can give an increasing line width with aperture
1269: size, as seen in NGC 1052 and NGC 3227, but decelerating outflows
1270: could produce a decreasing trend in line width with aperture size as
1271: discussed by \cite{Rice_2006}. Similarly, rotation can generate either
1272: a decreasing or increasing line width with increasing aperture
1273: size. Thus, while the \cite{Rice_2006} results are useful for
1274: identifying which aperture sizes yield similar stellar and gas line
1275: widths, our results show that measurements such as these are not
1276: necessarily useful as an indicator of whether the line widths are
1277: primarily virial in origin.
1278:
1279: Finally, many previous studies have examined the possible role of
1280: outflows and nongravitational motions to explain the scatter in the
1281: $\sigma_g$--$\sigma_{\star}$ relationship. However, our modeling and
1282: data have shown that, even for galaxies whose NLR gas is in overall
1283: rotation and dominated by virial motion, the gas line widths can
1284: differ significantly from the stellar velocity dispersion, as seen in
1285: NGC 3245 and NGC 3998. We find that the gaseous disk inclination, the
1286: surface brightness distribution, and the aperture size and shape are
1287: important factors that also most likely contribute to the scatter seen
1288: in the $\sigma_g$--$\sigma_{\star}$ relationship.
1289:
1290: \section{Conclusions}
1291: \label{sec:conclusions}
1292:
1293: We have used STIS data to measure detailed velocity, velocity
1294: dispersion, flux, and line-intensity ratio information within $\sim
1295: 100$ pc from the nucleus of 14 nearby galaxies. All of the galaxies
1296: harbor low-luminosity AGNs, 13 of which are classified as LINERs and
1297: one of which is a Seyfert. We see a large diversity in the velocity
1298: fields of the 14 galaxies, where simple disk rotation is not a common
1299: state. Only a few galaxies have definite disk rotation, while some
1300: others have possible disk rotation but the emission-line S/N is too
1301: low to clearly determine the kinematic state of the gas. Some velocity
1302: fields are dominated by irregular motions, some show an overall
1303: rotation but with large random components, and others clearly exhibit
1304: outflows. Dynamical modeling of NGC 2911 and NGC 4594 to determine
1305: black hole masses may be possible and worthwhile, although chaotic and
1306: disorganized motion will limit the accuracy of mass measurements.
1307:
1308: Through the [\ion{S}{2}] $\lambda 6716$/[\ion{S}{2}] $\lambda 6731$
1309: diagnostic, we were able to detect significant electron-density
1310: gradients in four (NGC 1052, NGC 3998, NGC 4278, and NGC 4579) of the
1311: five LINERs having a sufficient S/N. Moreover, the electron-density
1312: gradients in these objects share a similar shape that can be described
1313: by a power law with a slope of $-0.60 \pm {0.13}$. A similar increase
1314: near the nucleus was seen in the [\ion{O}{1}]/[\ion{S}{2}] line ratio
1315: for the first three of these galaxies. These results demonstrate that
1316: density gradients within the inner $\sim 20$ pc are common in type 1
1317: LINERs. This is consistent with expectations from photoionization
1318: models of LINERs and from ground-based detections of correlations
1319: between line width and \emph{n}$_{\mathrm{crit}}$ in LINERs. We find
1320: that the density gradients persist in NGC 1052 and over a portion of
1321: the NLR in NGC 3227, even in the presence of strong outflows that
1322: clearly have a large impact on the NLR gas as seen through the
1323: disorganized velocity fields with multiple velocity components. We
1324: also see evidence for correlations between line width and
1325: \emph{n}$_{\mathrm{crit}}$ in most LINERs even on the 0\farcs1 scales
1326: probed by STIS.
1327:
1328: Measurements of the STIS spectra additionally provided a means to
1329: study the [\ion{N}{2}] $\lambda 6583$ narrow-line width variation with
1330: spectrograph aperture size. For most galaxies in our sample, the
1331: emission-line velocity dispersion peaks within the black hole sphere
1332: of influence, then decreases in larger apertures, approaching the
1333: bulge stellar velocity dispersion. This trend is consistent with, but
1334: does not uniquely imply, virial motion. The increasing line width with
1335: aperture size seen in NGC 1052 and NGC 3227 is due to the outflows
1336: that dominate the NLR kinematics. In NGC 3245, the increase is the
1337: result of the combination of the galaxy's fairly flat emission-line
1338: surface brightness profile, the galaxy's massive bulge, and the highly
1339: inclined gaseous disk. NGC 3245 demonstrates that even gas in pure
1340: disk rotation can exhibit an increasing line width as a function of
1341: aperture size.
1342:
1343: While work by \cite{Boroson_2005} and \cite{Greene_Ho_2005} provide
1344: evidence for a connection between the Eddington ratio and kinematic
1345: disturbance in the NLR, which may reflect an underlying trend of
1346: outflow-dominated NLRs being more predominant at high AGN
1347: luminosities, our sample of galaxies is too small and does not span a
1348: sufficiently wide luminosity range to arrive at such a
1349: conclusion. Since such a relationship would be helpful in
1350: understanding AGN feedback and the effects on host-galaxy properties,
1351: further investigation, ideally with IFU data on a much larger sample
1352: of AGNs spanning a wide range of luminosities, is needed.
1353:
1354: \section{Acknowledgments}
1355: \label{sec:acknowledgments}
1356:
1357: This material is based upon work supported by the National Science
1358: Foundation under Grants AST--0548198 and AST--0607485. Additional
1359: funding was provided by NASA grant GO-7403 from the Space Telescope
1360: Science Institute (STScI), which is operated by the Association of
1361: Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract
1362: NAS5-26555. This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic
1363: Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
1364: California Institute of Technology, under contract with NASA. The data
1365: presented in this paper were obtained from the Multimission Archive at
1366: STScI (MAST); support for MAST for non-\emph{HST} data is provided by
1367: the NASA Office of Space Science via grant NAG5-7584 and by other
1368: grants and contracts.
1369:
1370: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1371:
1372: \bibitem[Arribas \& Mediavilla(1994)]{Arribas_1994} Arribas, S., \&
1373: Mediavilla, E. 1994, ApJ, 437, 149
1374:
1375: \bibitem[Atkinson et al.(2005)]{Atkinson_2005} Atkinson, J.~W., et al. 2005,
1376: MNRAS, 359, 504
1377:
1378: \bibitem[Barth et al.(1999)]{Barth_1999} Barth, A.~J., Filippenko, A.~V.,
1379: \& Moran, E.~C. 1999, ApJ, 525, 673
1380:
1381: \bibitem[Barth et al.(2001a)]{Barth_2001a} Barth, A.~J., Ho, L.~C.,
1382: Filippenko, A.~V., Rix, H.-W., \& Sargent, W.~L.~W. 2001a, ApJ, 54, 205
1383:
1384: \bibitem[Barth et al.(2001b)]{Barth_2001} Barth, A.~J., Sarzi, M.,
1385: Rix, H.-W., Ho, L.~C., Filippenko, A.~V., \& Sargent, W.~L.~W. 2001b, ApJ,
1386: 555, 685
1387:
1388: \bibitem[Beifiori et al.(2007)]{Beifiori_2007} Beifiori, A., Corsini, E.~M.,
1389: Dalla Bonta, E., Pizzella, A., Coccato, L., Sarzi, M., \& Bertola, F. 2007,
1390: preprint (astro-ph/0709.0866v2)
1391:
1392: \bibitem[Bender et al.(1994)]{Bender_1994} Bender, R., Saglia, R.~P.,
1393: \& Gerhard, O.~E. 1994, MNRAS, 269, 785
1394:
1395: \bibitem[Boroson(2005)]{Boroson_2005} Boroson, T. 2005, AJ, 130, 381
1396:
1397: \bibitem[Capetti et al.(1996)]{Capetti_1996} Capetti, A., Axon, D.~J.,
1398: Macchetto, F., Sparks, W.~B., \& Boksenberg, A. 1996, ApJ, 469, 554
1399:
1400: \bibitem[Cinzano et al.(1999)]{Cinzano_1999} Cinzano, P., Rix, H.-W.,
1401: Sarzi, M., Corsini, E.~M., Zeilinger, W.~W., \& Bertola, F. 1999, MNRAS,
1402: 307, 433
1403:
1404: \bibitem[Crenshaw \& Kraemer(2000)]{Crenshaw_Kraemer_2000} Crenshaw, D.~M.,
1405: \& Kraemer, S.~B. 2000, ApJL, 532, L101
1406:
1407: \bibitem[Davies \& Illingworth(1986)]{Davies_Illingworth_1986} Davies, R.~L.,
1408: \& Illingworth, G.~D. 1986, ApJ, 302, 234
1409:
1410: \bibitem[Davies et al.(2006)]{Davies_2006} Davies, R.~I., et al. 2006, ApJ,
1411: 646, 754
1412:
1413: \bibitem[de Francesco et al.(2006)]{DeFrancesco_2006} de Francesco, G.,
1414: Capetti, A., \& Marconi, A. 2006, A\&A, 460, 439
1415:
1416: \bibitem[de Francesco et al.(2008)]{DeFrancesco_2008} de Francesco, G.,
1417: Capetti, A., \& Marconi, A. 2008, A\&A, in press (astro-ph/0801.0064)
1418:
1419: \bibitem[de Vaucouleurs et al.(1991)]{RC3_catalog} de Vaucouleurs, G.,
1420: de Vaucouleurs, A., Corwin, H.~G., Buta, R.~J., Paturel, G., \& Fouque, P.
1421: 1991, Third Reference Catalogue of Bright Galaxies (New York: Springer-Verlag)
1422:
1423: \bibitem[di Nella et al.(1995)]{DiNella_1995} di Nella, H., Garcia, A.~M.,
1424: Garnier, R., \& Paturel, G. 1995, A\&AS, 113, 151
1425:
1426: \bibitem[Dopita \& Sutherland(1995)]{Dopita_Sutherland_1995} Dopita, M.~A.,
1427: \& Sutherland, R.~S. 1995, ApJ, 455, 468
1428:
1429: \bibitem[Dumas et al.(2007)]{Dumas_2007} Dumas, G., Mundell, C.~G.,
1430: Emsellem, E., \& Nagar, N.~M. 2007, MNRAS, 379, 1249
1431:
1432: \bibitem[Emsellem \& Ferruit(2000)]{Emsellem_2000} Emsellem, E., \&
1433: Ferruit, P. 2000, A\&A, 357, 111
1434:
1435: \bibitem[Faber et al.(1989)]{Faber_1989} Faber, S.~M., Wegner, G.,
1436: Burstein, D., Davies, R.~L., Dressler, A., Lynden-Bell, D., \&
1437: Terlevich, R.~J. 1989, ApJS, 69, 763
1438:
1439: \bibitem[Ferland \& Netzer(1983)]{Ferland_Netzer_1983} Ferland, G.~J., \&
1440: Netzer, H. 1983, ApJ, 264, 105
1441:
1442: \bibitem[Ferland et al.(1998)]{Ferland_1998} Ferland, G.~J., Korista, K.~T.,
1443: Verner, D.~A., Ferguson, J.~W., Kingdon, J.~B., \& Verner, E.~M. 1998, PASP,
1444: 110, 761
1445:
1446: \bibitem[Ferrarese \& Merritt(2000)]{Ferrarese_2000} Ferrarese, L., \&
1447: Merritt, D. 2000, ApJL, 539, L9
1448:
1449: \bibitem[Ferrarese \& Ford(2005)]{Ferrarese_Ford_2005} Ferrarese, L., \&
1450: Ford, H. 2005, Space Sci. Rev., 116, 523
1451:
1452: \bibitem[Filippenko(1985)]{Filippenko_1985} Filippenko, A.~V., 1985, ApJ,
1453: 289, 475
1454:
1455: \bibitem[Filippenko \& Halpern(1984)]{Filippenko_Halpern_1984} Filippenko,
1456: A.~V., \& Halpern, J.~P. 1984, ApJ, 285, 458
1457:
1458: \bibitem[Filippenko \& Sargent(1988)]{Filippenko_Sargent_1988} Filippenko,
1459: A.~V., \& Sargent, W.~L.~W. 1988, ApJ, 324, 134
1460:
1461: \bibitem[Fisher(1997)]{Fisher_1997} Fisher, D. 1997, AJ, 113, 950
1462:
1463: \bibitem[Fosbury et al.(1978)]{Fosbury_1978} Fosbury, R.~A.~E., Mebold, U.,
1464: Goss, W.~M., \& Dopita, M.~A. 1978, MNRAS, 183, 549
1465:
1466: \bibitem[Garc\'{i}a-Lorenzo et al.(2001)]{Garcia-Lorenzo_2001}
1467: Garc\'{i}a-Lorenzo, B., Mediavilla, E., \& Arribas, S. 2001, Ap\&SS,
1468: 276, 1121
1469:
1470: \bibitem[Gebhardt et al.(2000)]{Gebhardt_2000} Gebhardt, K., et al. 2000,
1471: ApJL, 539, L13
1472:
1473: \bibitem[Giroletti et al.(2005)]{Giroletti_2005} Giroletti, M., Taylor,
1474: G.~B., \& Giovannini, G. 2005, ApJ, 622, 178
1475:
1476: \bibitem[Gonz\'{a}lez Delgado \& P\'{e}rez(1996)]{Gonzales-Delgado_1996}
1477: Gonz\'{a}lez Delgado, R. M., \& P\'{e}rez, E. 1996, MNRAS, 281, 1105
1478:
1479: \bibitem[Gonz\'{a}lez Delgado \& P\'{e}rez(1997)]{Gonzales-Delgado_1997}
1480: Gonz\'{a}lez Delgado, R. M., \& P\'{e}rez, E. 1997, MNRAS, 284, 931
1481:
1482: \bibitem[Greene \& Ho(2005)]{Greene_Ho_2005} Greene, J.~E., \& Ho, L.~C.
1483: 2005, ApJ, 627, 721
1484:
1485: \bibitem[Halpern \& Steiner(1983)]{Halpern_Steiner_1983} Halpern, J.~P., \&
1486: Steiner, J.~E. 1983, ApJL, 269, L37
1487:
1488: \bibitem[Heckman(1980)]{Heckman_1980} Heckman, T.~M. 1980, A\&A, 87, 152
1489:
1490: \bibitem[Hernquist(1990)]{Hernquist_1990} Hernquist, L. 1990, ApJ, 356, 359
1491:
1492: \bibitem[Hicks \& Malkan(2007)]{Hicks_Malkan_2007} Hicks, E.~K.~S. \&
1493: Malkan, M.~A. 2007, ApJ, in press (astro-ph/0707.0611)
1494:
1495: \bibitem[Ho et al.(1993)]{Ho_1993} Ho, L.~C., Filippenko, A.~V., \&
1496: Sargent, W.~L.~W. 1993, ApJ, 417, 63
1497:
1498: \bibitem[Ho et al.(1997a)]{Ho_1997} Ho, L.~C., Filippenko, A.~V., \&
1499: Sargent, W.~L.~W. 1997a, ApJS, 112, 315
1500:
1501: \bibitem[Ho et al.(1997b)]{Ho_1997b} Ho, L.~C., Filippenko, A.~V.,
1502: Sargent, W.~L.~W., \& Peng, C.~Y. 1997b, ApJS, 112, 391
1503:
1504: \bibitem[Ho(1999)]{Ho_1999} Ho, L.~C. 1999, ApJ, 516, 672
1505:
1506: \bibitem[Ho et al.(2002)]{Ho_2002} Ho, L.~C., Sarzi, M., Rix, H.-W.,
1507: Shields, J.~C., Rudnick, G., Filippenko, A.~V., \& Barth, A.~J. 2002, PASP,
1508: 114, 137
1509:
1510: \bibitem[Ho et al.(2003)]{Ho_2003} Ho, L.~C., Filippenko, A.~V., \&
1511: Sargent, W.~L.~W. 2003, ApJ, 583, 159
1512:
1513: \bibitem[Hopkins et al.(2006)]{Hopkins_2006} Hopkins, P.~F., Hernquist, L.,
1514: Cox, T., Di Matteo, T., Robertson, B., \& Springel, V. 2006, ApJS, 163, 1
1515:
1516: \bibitem[Kaiser et al.(2000)]{Kaiser_2000} Kaiser, M.~E., et al. 2000, ApJ,
1517: 528, 260
1518:
1519: \bibitem[Kormendy et al.(1996)]{Kormendy_1996} Kormendy, J., et al. 1996,
1520: ApJL, 473, L91
1521:
1522: \bibitem[Kormendy \& Gebhardt(2001)]{Kormendy_Gebhardt_2001} Kormendy, J.
1523: \& Gebhardt, K. 2001, in The 20th Texas Symposium on Relativistic
1524: Astrophysics, ed. H. Martel and J.~C. Wheeler (Melville: AIP), 363
1525:
1526: \bibitem[Koski \& Osterbrock(1976)]{Koski_Osterbrock_1976} Koski, A.~T.,
1527: \& Osterbrock, D.~E. 1976, ApJL, 203, L49
1528:
1529: \bibitem[Krist \& Hook(2004)]{Krist_Hook_2004} Krist, J., \& Hook, R. 2004,
1530: The Tiny Tim User's Guide (Baltimore:STScI)
1531:
1532: \bibitem[Laor(2003)]{Laor_2003} Laor, A. 2003, ApJ, 590, 86
1533:
1534: \bibitem[Mould et al.(2000)]{Mould_2000} Mould, J.~R. 2000, ApJ, 529, 786
1535:
1536: \bibitem[Nelson \& Whittle(1995)]{Nelson_Whittle_1995} Nelson, C.~H. \&
1537: Whittle, M. 1995, ApJS, 99, 67
1538:
1539: \bibitem[Nelson \& Whittle(1996)]{Nelson_Whittle_1996} Nelson, C.~H. \&
1540: Whittle, M. 1996, ApJ, 465, 96
1541:
1542: \bibitem[Nelson et al.(2000)]{Nelson_2000} Nelson, C.~H., Weistrop, D.,
1543: Hutchings, J.~B., Crenshaw, D.~M., Gull, T.~R., Kaiser, M.~E.,
1544: Kraemer, S.~B., \& Lindler, D. 2000, ApJ, 531, 257
1545:
1546: \bibitem[Neumayer et al.(2007)]{Neumayer_2007} Neumayer, N., Cappellari, M.,
1547: Reunanen, J., Rix, H.-W., van der Werf, P.~P., de Zeeuw, P.~T., \&
1548: Davies, R.~I. 2007, ApJ, 671, 1329
1549:
1550: \bibitem[Nicholson et al.(1998)]{Nicholson_1998} Nicholson, K.~L.,
1551: Reichert, G.~A., Mason, K.~O., Puchnarewicz, E.~M., Ho, L.~C.,
1552: Shields, J.~C., \& Filippenko, A.~V. 1998, MNRAS, 300, 893
1553:
1554: \bibitem[Pelat et al.(1981)]{Pelat_1981} Pelat, D., Alloin, D., \&
1555: Fosbury, R.~A.~E. 1981, MNRAS, 195, 787
1556:
1557: \bibitem[Peterson(1997)]{Peterson_book} Peterson, B.~M. 1997, An
1558: Introduction to Active Galactic Nuclei (Cambridge:Cambridge University
1559: Press)
1560:
1561: \bibitem[Pogge et al.(2000)]{Pogge_2000} Pogge, R.~W., Maoz, D., Ho, L.~C.,
1562: \& Eracleous, M. 2000, ApJ, 532, 323
1563:
1564: \bibitem[Raimond et al.(1981)]{Raimond_1981} Raimond, E., Faber, S. M~.,
1565: Galagher, J.~S., \& Knapp, G.~R. 1981, ApJ, 246, 708
1566:
1567: \bibitem[Reunanen et al.(2002)]{Reunanen_2002} Reunanen, J.,
1568: Kotilainen, J.~K., \& Prieto, M.~A. 2002, MNRAS, 331, 154
1569:
1570: \bibitem[Rice et al.(2006)]{Rice_2006} Rice, M.~S., Martini, P.,
1571: Greene, J.~E., Pogge, R.~W., Shields, J.~C., Mulchaey, J.~S., \& Regan, M.~W.
1572: 2006, ApJ, 636, 654
1573:
1574: \bibitem[Salviander et al.(2007)]{Salviander_2007} Salviander, S.,
1575: Shields, G.~A., Gebhardt, K., \& Bonning, E.~W. 2007, ApJ, 662, 131
1576:
1577: \bibitem[Sarzi et al.(2002)]{Sarzi_2002} Sarzi, M., et al. 2002, ApJ,
1578: 567, 237
1579:
1580: \bibitem[Sarzi et al.(2006)]{Sarzi_2006} Sarzi, M., et al. 2006, MNRAS,
1581: 366, 1151
1582:
1583: \bibitem[Schinnerer et al.(2000)]{Schinnerer_2000} Schinnerer, E.,
1584: Eckart, A., \& Tacconi, L.~J. 2000, ApJ, 533, 826
1585:
1586: \bibitem[Schulz \& Henkel(2003)]{Schulz_2003} Schulz, H., \& Henkel, C. 2003,
1587: A\&A, 400, 41
1588:
1589: \bibitem[Shields et al.(2003)]{Shields_2003} Shields, G.~A., Gebhardt, K.,
1590: Salviander, S., Wills, B.~J., Xie, B., Brotherton, M.~S., Yuan, J.,
1591: \& Dietrich, M. 2003, ApJ, 583, 124
1592:
1593: \bibitem[Shields et al.(2007)]{Shields_2007} Shields, J.~C., et al. 2007,
1594: ApJ, 654, 125
1595:
1596: \bibitem[Sijacki et al.(2007)]{Sijacki_2007} Sijacki, D., Springel, V.,
1597: Di Matteo, T., \& Hernquist, L. 2007, MNRAS, 380, 877
1598:
1599: \bibitem[Springel et al.(2005)]{Springel_2005} Springel, V., Di Matteo, T.,
1600: \& Hernquist, L. 2005, MNRAS, 361, 776
1601:
1602: \bibitem[Sugai et al.(2005)]{Sugai_2005} Sugai, H., et al. 2005, ApJ, 629,
1603: 131
1604:
1605: \bibitem[Terlevich et al.(1990)]{Terlevich_1990} Terlevich, E., Diaz, A.~I.,
1606: \& Terlevich, R. 1990, MNRAS, 242, 271
1607:
1608: \bibitem[Tonry \& Davis(1981)]{Tonry_1981} Tonry, J.~L., \& Davis, M. 1981,
1609: ApJ, 246, 666
1610:
1611: \bibitem[Tremaine et al.(2002)]{Tremaine_2002} Tremaine, S., et al. 2002,
1612: ApJ, 574, 740
1613:
1614: \bibitem[van der Marel \& van den Bosch
1615: (1998)]{vanderMarel_vandenBosch_1998} van der Marel, R.~.P., \& van
1616: den Bosch, F.~C. 1998, AJ, 116, 2220
1617:
1618: \bibitem[van der Marel et al.(1994)]{VanderMarel_1994} van der Marel, R.~P.,
1619: Rix, H.-W., Carter, D., Franx, M., White, S.~D.~M., \& de Zeeuw, T. 1994,
1620: MNRAS, 268, 521
1621:
1622: \bibitem[van Dokkum(2001)]{vanDokkum} van Dokkum, P.~G. 2001, PASP, 113, 1420
1623:
1624: \bibitem[Verdoes Kleijn et al.(2000)]{VerdoesKleijn_2000} Verdoes
1625: Kleijn, G.~A., van der Marel, R.~P., Carollo, C.~M., \& de Zeeuw,
1626: P.~T. 2000, AJ, 120, 1221
1627:
1628: \bibitem[Verdoes Kleijn et al.(2006)]{VerdoesKleijn_2006}
1629: Verdoes Kleijn, G.~A., van der Marel, R.~P., \& Noel-Storr, J. 2006, AJ,
1630: 131, 1961
1631:
1632: \bibitem[Wegner et al.(2003)]{Wegner_2003} Wegner, G., et al. 2003,
1633: AJ, 126, 2268
1634:
1635: \bibitem[White et al.(1983)]{White_1983} White, S.~D.~M., Huchra, J.,
1636: Latham, D., \& Davis, M. 1983, MNRAS, 203, 701
1637:
1638: \bibitem[Whittle(1992)]{Whittle_1992} Whittle, M. 1992, ApJS, 79, 49
1639:
1640: \end{thebibliography}
1641:
1642: \clearpage
1643:
1644: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccccc}
1645: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1646: \tablewidth{0pt}
1647: \tablecaption{Properties of Galaxies in the Sample \label{tab:galprop}}
1648: \tablehead{
1649: \colhead{Galaxy} &
1650: \colhead{Morphological} &
1651: \colhead{$cz$} &
1652: \colhead{$D$} &
1653: \colhead{Spectroscopic} &
1654: \colhead{$\sigma_{\star}$} &
1655: \colhead{$M_{\mathrm{BH}}$} &
1656: \colhead{log $L$(H$\alpha$)} &
1657: \colhead{References} \\
1658: \colhead{} &
1659: \colhead{Type} &
1660: \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} &
1661: \colhead{(Mpc)} &
1662: \colhead{Classification} &
1663: \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} &
1664: \colhead{($M_{\sun}$)} &
1665: \colhead{(ergs s$^{-1}$)} &
1666: \colhead{for $\sigma_{\star}$}
1667: }
1668:
1669: \startdata
1670:
1671: NGC $1052$ & E & $1474$ & $14.7$ & L$1.9$ & $215$ & $1.8\times10^8$ &
1672: $39.28$ & $1$ \\
1673:
1674: NGC $1497$ & S0 & $6170$ & $80.8$ & L$2^{*}$ & $249$ & $3.3\times10^8$ &
1675: $39.05^{\dagger}$ & $2$ \\
1676:
1677: NGC $2911$ & S0 pec & $3167$ & $45.1$ & L$2$ & $237$ & $2.7\times10^8$ &
1678: $39.44$ & $3$ \\
1679:
1680: NGC $3227$ & SAB pec & $1145$ & $18.3$ & S$1.5$ & $128$ &
1681: $1.5\times10^7$\tablenotemark{a} & $40.26^{\dagger}$ & $1$ \\
1682:
1683: NGC $3245$ & S0 & $1348$ & $20.3$ & T$2$: & $232$ &
1684: $2.0\times10^8$\tablenotemark{b} & $39.51$ & $4$ \\
1685:
1686: NGC $3998$ & S0 & $1066$ & $16.4$ & L$1.9$ & $333$ &
1687: $2.7\times10^8$\tablenotemark{c} & $39.76$ & $1$ \\
1688:
1689: NGC $4036$ & S0 & $1397$ & $21.5$ & L$1.9$ & $166$ & $6.7\times10^7$ &
1690: $39.23$ & $5$ \\
1691:
1692: NGC $4278$ & E & $628$ & $13.1$ & L$1.9$ & $270$ & $4.5\times10^8$ &
1693: $39.43$ & $6$ \\
1694:
1695: NGC $4579$ & SABb & $1627$ & $16.9$ & S$1.9/$L$1.9$ & $160$ &
1696: $5.5\times10^7$ & $39.44$ & $1$ \\
1697:
1698: NGC $4594$ & Sa & $1082$ & $19.4$ & L$2$ & $257$ &
1699: $1.0\times10^9$\tablenotemark{d} & $39.67$ & $7$ \\
1700:
1701: NGC $5077$ & E & $2832$ & $44.4$ & L$1.9$ & $275$ &
1702: $6.8\times10^8$\tablenotemark{e} & $39.75$ & $8$ \\
1703:
1704: NGC $5635$ & S pec & $4352$ & $64.3$ & L$2^{*}$ & \nodata & \nodata &
1705: $38.91^{\dagger}$ & \nodata \\
1706:
1707: NGC $6500$ & Sab & $2975$ & $44.6$ & L$2$ & $168$ & $6.7\times10^7$ &
1708: $40.42$ & $9$ \\
1709:
1710: IC $989$ & E & $7556$ & $110.2$ & L$2^{*}$ & $176$ & $8.1\times10^7$ &
1711: $39.47^{\dagger}$ & $10$ \\
1712:
1713: \enddata
1714:
1715: \tablecomments{Morphological types and distances are taken from the
1716: NASA Extragalactic Database (NED), where the distances are derived
1717: using the \cite{Mould_2000} Virgo + Great Attractor + Shapley
1718: Supercluster Infall velocity field model. Recession velocities come
1719: from the optical line measurement of the Third Reference Catalogue of
1720: Bright Galaxies (RC3) \citep{RC3_catalog}. Spectroscopic
1721: classifications come from \cite{Ho_1997}, where S = Seyfert nucleus, L
1722: = LINER, T = Transition object, and the number next the class
1723: specifies the type. Type 2 objects have no detectable broad lines,
1724: type 1.9 objects show a broad H$\alpha$ component, and type 1.5
1725: objects exhibit broad H$\alpha$ and H$\beta$ lines. An uncertain
1726: spectroscopic classification is given by ``:''. The spectral
1727: classifications marked with an asterisk were based upon whether a
1728: broad H$\alpha$ component was seen in the data from program GO-7354
1729: and were not taken from \cite{Ho_1997}. Black hole masses, unless
1730: marked, were estimated using the \cite{Tremaine_2002} $M_{\rm
1731: BH}-\sigma_*$ relation. The black hole masses for NGC 3227, NGC 3245,
1732: NGC 3998, NGC 4594, and NGC 5077 were determined through dynamical
1733: measurements. H$\alpha$ luminosities were calculated using the
1734: distances listed in column (4) and the H$\alpha$ flux taken from
1735: \cite{Ho_1997} and \cite{Ho_2003}, except for those objects marked
1736: with a cross: NGC 1497, NGC 3227, NGC 5635, and IC 989. The H$\alpha$
1737: luminosities for these four objects were calculated from the flux
1738: measured within the largest aperture that could be constructed given
1739: the number of STIS slit positions for the galaxy and the number of
1740: rows from which spectra could be extracted.}
1741:
1742: \tablenotetext{a}{\citealt{Davies_2006}.}
1743: \tablenotetext{b}{\citealt{Barth_2001}.}
1744: \tablenotetext{c}{\citealt{DeFrancesco_2006}.}
1745: \tablenotetext{d}{\citealt{Kormendy_1996}.}
1746: \tablenotetext{e}{\citealt{DeFrancesco_2008}.}
1747:
1748: \tablerefs{(1) \citealt{Nelson_Whittle_1995}; (2)
1749: \citealt{Wegner_2003}; (3) \citealt{DiNella_1995}; (4)
1750: \citealt{Tonry_1981}; (5) \citealt{Fisher_1997}; (6)
1751: \citealt{Bender_1994}; (7) \citealt{VanderMarel_1994}; (8)
1752: \citealt{Faber_1989}; (9) \citealt{Terlevich_1990}; (10)
1753: \citealt{White_1983}.}
1754:
1755: \end{deluxetable}
1756:
1757:
1758: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccccc}
1759: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1760: \tablewidth{0pt}
1761: \tablecaption{Summary of Observations \label{tab:obsparams}}
1762: \tablehead{
1763: \colhead{Galaxy} &
1764: \colhead{Program} &
1765: \colhead{UT Date} &
1766: \colhead{Aperture} &
1767: \colhead{Binning} &
1768: \colhead{Slit} &
1769: \colhead{Number} &
1770: \colhead{Separation} &
1771: \colhead{Exposure} \\
1772: \colhead{} &
1773: \colhead{GO ID} &
1774: \colhead{} &
1775: \colhead{$'' \times ''$} &
1776: \colhead{} &
1777: \colhead{Orientation} &
1778: \colhead{of} &
1779: \colhead{(Arcsec)} &
1780: \colhead{Time} \\
1781: \colhead{} &
1782: \colhead{} &
1783: \colhead{} &
1784: \colhead{} &
1785: \colhead{} &
1786: \colhead{( $^\circ$ E of N)} &
1787: \colhead{Positions} &
1788: \colhead{} &
1789: \colhead{(s)}
1790: }
1791:
1792: \startdata
1793:
1794: NGC $1052$ & $7403$ & $1999$--$01$--$02$ & $52\times0.2$ & $1\times1$ &
1795: $13.8$ & $7$ & $0.25$ & $2160$ \\
1796:
1797: NGC $1497$ & $7354$ & $1997$--$11$--$13$ & $52\times0.1$ & $2\times1$ &
1798: $159.3$ & $3$ & $0.10$ & $440$ \\
1799:
1800: NGC $2911$ & $7354$ & $1998$--$12$--$03$ & $52\times0.1$ & $2\times1$ &
1801: $237.1$ & $3$ & $0.10$ & $480$ \\
1802:
1803: NGC $3227$ & $7403$ &$1999$--$01$--$31$ & $52\times0.2$ & $1\times1$ &
1804: $222.5$ & $7$ & $0.25$ & $1840$ \\
1805:
1806: NGC $3245$ & $7403$ & $1999$--$02$--$02$ & $52\times0.2$ & $1\times1$ &
1807: $202.4$ & $5$ & $0.25$ & $3150$ \\
1808:
1809: NGC $3998$ & $7354$ & $1997$--$11$--$01$ & $52\times0.1$ & $2\times1$ &
1810: $278.3$ & $5$ & $0.10$ & $330$ \\
1811:
1812: NGC $4036$ & $7403$ & $1999$--$03$--$25$ & $52\times0.2$ & $1\times1$ &
1813: $133.7$ & $5$ & $0.25$ & $3360$ \\
1814:
1815: NGC $4278$ & $7403$ & $2000$--$05$--$11$ & $52\times0.2$ & $1\times1$ &
1816: $88.0$ & $5$ & $0.25$ & $3040$ \\
1817:
1818: NGC $4579$ & $7403$ & $1999$--$04$--$21$ & $52\times0.2$ & $1\times1$ &
1819: $95.4$ & $5$ & $0.25$ & $3100$ \\
1820:
1821: NGC $4594$ & $7354$ & $1999$--$02$--$05$ & $52\times0.1$ & $2\times1$ &
1822: $249.6$ & $5$ & $0.10$ & $280$ \\
1823:
1824: NGC $5077$ & $7354$ & $1998$--$03$--$12$ & $52\times0.1$ & $2\times1$ &
1825: $279.1$ & $3$ & $0.10$ & $400$ \\
1826:
1827: NGC $5635$ & $7354$ & $1999$--$02$--$02$ & $52\times0.1$ & $2\times1$ &
1828: $243.6$ & $3$ & $0.10$ & $480$ \\
1829:
1830: NGC $6500$ & $7354$ & $1998$--$11$--$03$ & $52\times0.1$ & $2\times1$ &
1831: $14.8$ & $5$ & $0.10$ & $250$ \\
1832:
1833: IC $989$ & $7354$ & $1998$--$03$--$13$ & $52\times0.1$ & $2\times1$ &
1834: $203.1$ & $3$ & $0.10$ & $490$ \\
1835:
1836: \enddata
1837:
1838: \tablecomments{The exposure time column gives the average of each slit
1839: position's exposure time for each galaxy.}
1840:
1841: \end{deluxetable}
1842:
1843: \clearpage
1844:
1845: \begin{figure}
1846: \begin{center}
1847: \epsscale{0.5}
1848: \plotone{fig1.ps}
1849: \caption{Examples of various models used to fit the spectra: (a) a
1850: spectrum from NGC 4036 with a single-Gaussian fit to the narrow lines,
1851: (b) a spectrum from NGC 3227 having multiple velocity components with
1852: double-peaked profiles and a broad H$\alpha$ component, and (c) a
1853: central spectrum from NGC 3998 fit with single Gaussians to the narrow
1854: lines and a broad H$\alpha$ component. Thin solid lines represent the
1855: individual Gaussian components, and the sum of the model components is
1856: given by the thick solid line. \label{fig:fitex}}
1857: \end{center}
1858: \end{figure}
1859:
1860: \begin{figure}
1861: \begin{center}
1862: \figurenum{2a}
1863: \epsscale{0.9}
1864: \plottwo{fig2a1.ps}{fig2a2.ps}
1865: \epsscale{0.9}
1866: \plotone{fig2a3.ps}
1867: \caption{The velocity, velocity dispersion, and flux as a function of
1868: position along the slit for each of the slit positions in NGC
1869: 1052. Spectral rows that were binned together in order to improve the
1870: S/N are shown with error bars in the $x$-direction, where the error
1871: bars denote the radial range over which the spectra were
1872: extracted. The grey points represent separate velocity components. The
1873: horizontal dashed line shows the galaxy's systemic velocity that was
1874: taken from optical line measurements in RC3. The positive and negative
1875: $y$-offsets correspond to the spectra extracted from the rows above
1876: and below the central row, respectively, when the slits are oriented
1877: such that the STIS instrumental $y$-axis points directly upward. Thus,
1878: the bottom half of the slit drawn over the F658N WFPC2 image
1879: corresponds to the left side of the velocity, velocity dispersion, and
1880: flux plots. The length of the slits in the same diagram corresponds to
1881: the length over which we could measure the emission lines. The
1882: upper-right panel shows the spectrum extracted from the nuclear region
1883: of the central slit, where the flux density is in units of $10^{-18}$
1884: ergs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ \AA$^{-1}$. No WFPC2 continuum images were
1885: available. \label{fig:ngc1052}}
1886: \end{center}
1887: \end{figure}
1888:
1889: \begin{figure}
1890: \begin{center}
1891: \figurenum{2b}
1892: \epsscale{1.0}
1893: \plottwo{fig2b1.ps}{fig2b2.ps}
1894: \epsscale{1.0}
1895: \plotone{fig2b3.ps}
1896: \caption{NGC 1497; see Figure \ref{fig:ngc1052} for
1897: description. \label{fig:ngc1497}}
1898: \end{center}
1899: \end{figure}
1900:
1901: \begin{figure}
1902: \begin{center}
1903: \figurenum{2c}
1904: \epsscale{1.0}
1905: \plottwo{fig2c1.ps}{fig2c2.ps}
1906: \epsscale{1.0}
1907: \plotone{fig2c3.ps}
1908: \caption{NGC 2911; see Figure \ref{fig:ngc1052} for
1909: description. \label{fig:ngc2911}}
1910: \end{center}
1911: \end{figure}
1912:
1913: \begin{figure}
1914: \begin{center}
1915: \figurenum{2d}
1916: \epsscale{0.9}
1917: \plottwo{fig2d1.ps}{fig2d2.ps}
1918: \epsscale{0.9}
1919: \plotone{fig2d3.ps}
1920: \caption{NGC 3227; see Figure \ref{fig:ngc1052} for
1921: description. \label{fig:ngc3227}}
1922: \end{center}
1923: \end{figure}
1924:
1925: \begin{figure}
1926: \begin{center}
1927: \figurenum{2e}
1928: \epsscale{1.0}
1929: \plottwo{fig2e1.ps}{fig2e2.ps}
1930: \epsscale{1.0}
1931: \plotone{fig2e3.ps}
1932: \caption{NGC 3245; see Figure \ref{fig:ngc1052} for description. The
1933: S/N was too low to accurately fit the [S II] lines. See also
1934: \cite{Barth_2001}. \label{fig:ngc3245}}
1935: \end{center}
1936: \end{figure}
1937:
1938: \begin{figure}
1939: \begin{center}
1940: \figurenum{2f}
1941: \epsscale{1.0}
1942: \plottwo{fig2f1.ps}{fig2f2.ps}
1943: \epsscale{1.0}
1944: \plotone{fig2f3.ps}
1945: \caption{NGC 3998; see Figure \ref{fig:ngc1052} for description. See
1946: also \cite{DeFrancesco_2006}. \label{fig:ngc3998}}
1947: \end{center}
1948: \end{figure}
1949:
1950: \begin{figure}
1951: \begin{center}
1952: \figurenum{2g}
1953: \epsscale{1.0}
1954: \plottwo{fig2g1.ps}{fig2g2.ps}
1955: \epsscale{1.0}
1956: \plotone{fig2g3.ps}
1957: \caption{NGC 4036; see Figure \ref{fig:ngc1052} for
1958: description. \label{fig:ngc4036}}
1959: \end{center}
1960: \end{figure}
1961:
1962: \begin{figure}
1963: \begin{center}
1964: \figurenum{2h}
1965: \epsscale{1.0}
1966: \plottwo{fig2h1.ps}{fig2h2.ps}
1967: \epsscale{1.0}
1968: \plotone{fig2h3.ps}
1969: \caption{NGC 4278; see Figure \ref{fig:ngc1052} for
1970: description. \label{fig:ngc4278}}
1971: \end{center}
1972: \end{figure}
1973:
1974: \begin{figure}
1975: \begin{center}
1976: \figurenum{2i}
1977: \epsscale{1.0}
1978: \plottwo{fig2i1.ps}{fig2i2.ps}
1979: \epsscale{1.0}
1980: \plotone{fig2i3.ps}
1981: \caption{NGC 4579; see Figure \ref{fig:ngc1052} for description. The
1982: spectra near the central regions in the second slit position contained
1983: severely blended H$\alpha$ and [\ion{N}{2}] lines, where the widths of
1984: the three Gaussians were held fixed at a specific value in order to
1985: achieve the most reasonable fit. The open circles correspond to rows
1986: where this width restriction was necessary. \label{fig:ngc4579}}
1987: \end{center}
1988: \end{figure}
1989:
1990: \begin{figure}
1991: \begin{center}
1992: \figurenum{2j}
1993: \epsscale{1.0}
1994: \plottwo{fig2j1.ps}{fig2j2.ps}
1995: \epsscale{1.0}
1996: \plotone{fig2j3.ps}
1997: \caption{NGC 4594; see Figure \ref{fig:ngc1052} for
1998: description. \label{fig:ngc4594}}
1999: \end{center}
2000: \end{figure}
2001:
2002: \begin{figure}
2003: \begin{center}
2004: \figurenum{2k}
2005: \epsscale{1.0}
2006: \plottwo{fig2k1.ps}{fig2k2.ps}
2007: \epsscale{1.0}
2008: \plotone{fig2k3.ps}
2009: \caption{NGC 5077; see Figure \ref{fig:ngc1052} for description. See
2010: also \cite{DeFrancesco_2008}. \label{fig:ngc5077}}
2011: \end{center}
2012: \end{figure}
2013:
2014: \begin{figure}
2015: \begin{center}
2016: \figurenum{2l}
2017: \epsscale{1.0}
2018: \plottwo{fig2l1.ps}{fig2l2.ps}
2019: \epsscale{1.0}
2020: \plotone{fig2l3.ps}
2021: \caption{NGC 5635; see Figure \ref{fig:ngc1052} for
2022: description. \label{fig:ngc5635}}
2023: \end{center}
2024: \end{figure}
2025:
2026: \begin{figure}
2027: \begin{center}
2028: \figurenum{2m}
2029: \epsscale{1.0}
2030: \plottwo{fig2m1.ps}{fig2m2.ps}
2031: \epsscale{1.0}
2032: \plotone{fig2m3.ps}
2033: \caption{NGC 6500; see Figure \ref{fig:ngc1052} for description. See
2034: also \cite{DeFrancesco_2008}. \label{fig:ngc6500}}
2035: \end{center}
2036: \end{figure}
2037:
2038: \begin{figure}
2039: \begin{center}
2040: \figurenum{2n}
2041: \epsscale{1.0}
2042: \plottwo{fig2n1.ps}{fig2n2.ps}
2043: \epsscale{1.0}
2044: \plotone{fig2n3.ps}
2045: \caption{IC 989; see Figure \ref{fig:ngc1052} for description. See
2046: also \cite{DeFrancesco_2008}. \label{fig:ic989}}
2047: \end{center}
2048: \end{figure}
2049:
2050: \clearpage
2051:
2052: \begin{figure}
2053: \begin{center}
2054: \figurenum{3}
2055: \epsscale{1.0}
2056: \plotone{fig3.ps}
2057: \caption{[N II] $\lambda 6583$ surface brightness as a function of
2058: projected angular distance from the nucleus. In the plots of the
2059: galaxies from program GO-7403, the black triangles are averages of the
2060: measurements in 0\farcs1 bins, and the grey squares represent the
2061: entire, unbinned set of measurements. In the plots of NGC 3998, NGC
2062: 4594, and NGC 6500, the black triangles are averages of the surface
2063: brightness within a 0\farcs05 bin. \label{fig:nii2sb_radial}}
2064: \end{center}
2065: \end{figure}
2066:
2067: \begin{figure}
2068: \begin{center}
2069: \figurenum{4}
2070: \epsscale{1.0}
2071: \plotone{fig4.ps}
2072: \caption{Smoothed radial-velocity fields in the slit frame generated
2073: by combining the multislit velocity measurements for each galaxy. For
2074: the galaxies having multiple velocity components, we show the velocity
2075: component plotted in black in Figures \ref{fig:ngc1052},
2076: \ref{fig:ngc3227}, \ref{fig:ngc4278}, and \ref{fig:ngc4579}. The
2077: minimum and maximum velocities for each galaxy relative to the
2078: systemic velocity are given next to the key. For all of the galaxies,
2079: green corresponds to the systemic velocity. Since the galaxies from
2080: program GO-7403 were observed with slits separated by 0\farcs{25}, we
2081: interpolated over the spacing to determine the velocities at those
2082: locations. \label{fig:radvelmap}}
2083: \end{center}
2084: \end{figure}
2085:
2086: \begin{figure}
2087: \begin{center}
2088: \figurenum{5}
2089: \epsscale{1.0}
2090: \plotone{fig5.ps}
2091: \caption{[S II] $\lambda 6716/$[S II] $\lambda 6731$ line ratio, [O I]
2092: $\lambda 6300/($[S II] $\lambda 6716 + $[S II] $\lambda 6731)$ line
2093: ratio, and electron density as determined from the [S II] line ratio,
2094: as a function of projected radial distance from the nucleus. The black
2095: triangles are averages of the measurements in 0\farcs1 bins, and grey
2096: squares represent the entire, unbinned set of measurements. In NGC
2097: 3998, the black triangles are averages of the ratios within a
2098: 0\farcs{05} bin. \label{fig:density}}
2099: \end{center}
2100: \end{figure}
2101:
2102: \begin{figure}
2103: \begin{center}
2104: \figurenum{6}
2105: \epsscale{1.0}
2106: \plotone{fig6.ps}
2107: \caption{[O I] $\lambda 6300/$([S II] $\lambda 6716$+[S II] $\lambda
2108: 6731$) as a function of density for a range of values of the
2109: ionization parameter. These photoionization models were generated
2110: using CLOUDY with a metallicity of two times solar in the absence of
2111: dust and with the AGN continuum model where $\alpha_{\mathrm{ox}} =
2112: -0.8$ and $\alpha_{\mathrm{ox}} = -1.4$. The models where solar
2113: metallicity was used and where dust was included show qualitatively
2114: similar results for the low ionization parameters. \label{fig:cloudy}}
2115: \end{center}
2116: \end{figure}
2117:
2118: \begin{figure}
2119: \begin{center}
2120: \figurenum{7}
2121: \epsscale{0.8}
2122: \plotone{fig7.ps}
2123: \caption{Electron density determined from the [S II] line ratio as a
2124: function of projected radial distance from the nucleus for the five
2125: galaxies exhibiting a significant density gradient. Error bars have
2126: been omitted for clarity, but are given in Figure
2127: \ref{fig:density}. NGC 1052 (blue filled squares), NGC 3227 (purple
2128: filled triangles), NGC 3998 (orange crosses), NGC 4278 (red filled
2129: circles), and NGC 4579 (green open squares) show similar
2130: electron-density gradients, where the best-fit power law, with a slope
2131: of $-0.60\pm{0.13}$, is plotted as the dashed black
2132: line. \label{fig:logden_logr}}
2133: \end{center}
2134: \end{figure}
2135:
2136: \begin{figure}
2137: \begin{center}
2138: \figurenum{8}
2139: \epsscale{1.0}
2140: \plotone{fig8.ps}
2141: \caption{FWHM of the [S II] $\lambda 6731$, [N II] $\lambda 6583$, and
2142: [O I] $\lambda 6300$ lines measured from the central row of the
2143: central slit position for each of the galaxies as a function of the
2144: critical density, with the exception of NGC 3227 where the innermost
2145: three rows were binned together. The correlation between line width
2146: and \emph{n}$_{\mathrm{crit}}$ is seen in most of the LINERs in the
2147: sample, even on the 0\farcs1 scales probed by STIS. For NGC 1052, NGC
2148: 3227, NGC 4278, and NGC 4579, the error bars are smaller than the plot
2149: symbols. Both the low velocity dispersion (plotted in black) and high
2150: velocity dispersion (plotted in grey) components for NGC 3227 are
2151: shown. \label{fig:fwhmvsncrit}}
2152: \end{center}
2153: \end{figure}
2154:
2155: \begin{figure}
2156: \begin{center}
2157: \figurenum{9}
2158: \epsscale{1.0}
2159: \plotone{fig9.ps}
2160: \caption{[N II] $\lambda 6583$ line width as a function of aperture
2161: size. Depending on how many slit positions were used to observe the
2162: galaxy, either two, three, or four aperture bins were constructed. The
2163: outermost point comes from a ground-based measurement \citep{Ho_1997}
2164: using effectively a 3\arcsec\ square aperture. NGC 1497, NGC 5635, and
2165: IC 989 were not included in the \cite{Ho_1997} sample and thus no
2166: measurement for $1$\farcs$5$ is given. The abscissa represents half of
2167: the square aperture size in arcseconds. The dotted vertical line is
2168: the black hole sphere of influence and the dashed horizontal line is
2169: the bulge stellar velocity dispersion measured from a ground-based
2170: aperture. \label{fig:fwhm2.35_radius_stis}}
2171: \end{center}
2172: \end{figure}
2173:
2174: \begin{figure}
2175: \begin{center}
2176: \figurenum{10}
2177: \epsscale{1.0}
2178: \plotone{fig10.ps}
2179: \caption{FWHM/2.35 as a function of aperture size as determined
2180: through the use of a circularly rotating thin-disk toy model for NGC
2181: 3245 and NGC 3998. The black hole sphere of influence for each galaxy
2182: is plotted in the dotted vertical line and the bulge stellar velocity
2183: dispersion for each galaxy is shown by the dashed horizontal line. The
2184: variation in line width with aperture size in the top set of plots was
2185: found using successively larger square apertures. For NGC 3998, the
2186: black filled squares are the result of using a disk model with a
2187: radially dependent intrinsic velocity dispersion, while the grey open
2188: squares are the result of using a model with a small constant
2189: intrinsic velocity dispersion. The bottom two sets of plots were
2190: generated by sampling the modeled velocity field with a single slit of
2191: width 0\farcs2 for NGC 3245 and 0\farcs1 for NGC 3998, with
2192: progressively longer lengths. The single STIS slit was aligned along
2193: the major axis of the gaseous disk for the middle set of plots, and
2194: along the minor axis for the lower panels. The abscissa represents
2195: half of the aperture size in
2196: arcseconds. \label{fig:fwhm2.35_radius_stis_model}}
2197: \end{center}
2198: \end{figure}
2199:
2200: \end{document}
2201: