1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \def\simless{\mathbin{\lower 3pt\hbox
4: {$\rlap{\raise 5pt\hbox{$\char'074$}}\mathchar"7218$}}} %< or of order
5: \def\simgreat{\mathbin{\lower 3pt\hbox
6: {$\rlap{\raise 5pt\hbox{$\char'076$}}\mathchar"7218$}}} %> or of order
7:
8: \shorttitle{The MASIV Survey II}
9: \shortauthors{Lovell et al.}
10:
11: \begin{document}
12:
13: \title{The Micro-Arcsecond Scintillation-Induced
14: Variability (MASIV) Survey II: The First Four Epochs}
15:
16: \author{J.~E.~J.~Lovell\altaffilmark{1,2,9}}
17: \email{Jim.Lovell@utas.edu.au}
18: \author{B.~J.~Rickett\altaffilmark{3}}
19: \email{bjrickett@ucsd.edu}
20: \author{J-P.~Macquart\altaffilmark{4,10}}
21: \email{jpm@astro.caltech.edu}
22: \author{D.~L.~Jauncey\altaffilmark{1}}
23: \email{David.Jauncey@csiro.au}
24: \author{H.~E.~Bignall\altaffilmark{5,10}}
25: \email{H.Bignall@curtin.edu.au}
26: \author{L.~Kedziora-Chudczer\altaffilmark{6}}
27: \email{Lucyna.Kedziora-Chudczer@csiro.au}
28: \author{R.~Ojha\altaffilmark{7}}
29: \email{rojha@usno.navy.mil}
30: \author{T.~Pursimo\altaffilmark{8}}
31: \email{tpursimo@not.iac.es}
32: \author{M.~Dutka\altaffilmark{7}}
33: \email{mdutka@umd.edu}
34: \author{C.~Senkbeil\altaffilmark{9}}
35: \email{cliffs@utas.edu.au}
36: \author{S.~Shabala\altaffilmark{9,11}}
37: \email{stshabal@utas.edu.au}
38:
39:
40: \altaffiltext{1}{CSIRO Australia Telescope National Facility, PO Box 76,
41: Epping NSW, Australia. Now at University of Tasmania}
42: \altaffiltext{2}{CSIRO Industrial Physics, PO Box 218 Lindfield NSW 2070, Australia}
43: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University
44: of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093}
45: \altaffiltext{4}{NRAO Jansky Fellow, Department of Astronomy, California Institute
46: of Technology, Pasadena CA 91125, U.S.A.}
47: \altaffiltext{5}{Joint Institute for VLBI in Europe, Postbus 2, 7990
48: AA, Dwingeloo, The Netherlands}
49: \altaffiltext{6}{School of Physics, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia}
50: \altaffiltext{7}{US Naval Observatory, 3450 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Washington DC 20392, U.S.A.}
51: \altaffiltext{8}{Nordic Optical telescope, Sta Cruz de La Palma, E-38700 Tenerife, Spain}
52: \altaffiltext{9}{School of Mathematics and Physics, University of Tasmania, Tas 7001, Australia}
53: \altaffiltext{10}{Now at Curtin University of Technology, Bentley, WA 6845, Australia}
54: \altaffiltext{11}{Cavendish Astrophysics, J.J. Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0HE, United Kingdom}
55:
56: \begin{abstract}
57: We report on the variability of 443 flat spectrum, compact radio sources
58: monitored using the VLA for 3 days in 4 epochs at $\sim 4$ month
59: intervals at 5 GHz as part of the Micro-Arcsecond Scintillation-Induced
60: Variability (MASIV) survey. Over half of these sources exhibited 2-10\%
61: rms variations on timescales over 2 days. We analyzed the variations by
62: two independent methods, and find that the rms variability amplitudes of
63: the sources correlate with the emission measure in the ionized
64: Interstellar Medium along their respective lines of sight. We thus link
65: the variations with interstellar scintillation of components of these
66: sources, with some (unknown) fraction of the total flux density
67: contained within a compact region of angular diameter in the range
68: 10-50$\mu$as. We also find that the variations decrease for high mean
69: flux density sources and, most importantly, for high redshift sources.
70: The decrease in variability is probably due either to an increase in the apparent
71: diameter of the source, or a decrease in the flux density of the compact
72: fraction beyond $z \sim 2$. Here we present a statistical analysis of
73: these results, and a future paper will the discuss the cosmological
74: implications in detail.
75: \end{abstract}
76:
77: \keywords{galaxies: active --- ISM: structure --- radio continuum --- radiation mechanisms: nonthermal}
78:
79: \section{Introduction}
80:
81: The discovery of centimeter-wavelength Intra-Day Variability (IDV)
82: or ``flickering'' in Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN)
83: by \citet{hee84} initially raised concerns
84: that some AGN possess brightness temperatures over six orders of magnitude
85: above the $10^{12}\,$K inverse Compton limit for incoherent synchrotron emission
86: \citep[e.g.][]{qui89}. However, considerable evidence has now accumulated
87: to demonstrate that interstellar scintillation (ISS) in the turbulent,
88: ionized interstellar medium (ISM) of our Galaxy is the principal mechanism
89: responsible for the IDV observed in AGN, as was proposed by \citet{HR87}.
90:
91: Two more recent observational techniques provide compelling evidence for the
92: prevalence of ISS. Time delays of 1--8\,min are observed in the arrival
93: times of the flux density variations between telescopes on different
94: continents for the three intra-hour variable sources B0405--385,
95: B1257--326 and J1819$+$3845 \citep{jau2000,big2006,dtdb2002}. The delay
96: arises due to the finite time required for the stochastic fluctuations
97: associated with the ISM to drift across the Earth. A second observational
98: signature of ISS relates to the modulation of IDV variability timescales
99: with a period of exactly one year. This arises because the Earth's
100: orbital motion about the Sun contributes to the effective velocity with
101: which the interstellar scattering material moves relative to an Earth-bound observer;
102: the variations are slow as the Earth moves parallel to the material and
103: fast as it moves anti-parallel to it. Annual cycles in IDV variability
104: timescales are reported in at least seven sources
105: \citep[e.g.][]{den2003,ric2001,jau2001,big2003,jau2003}, including several
106: whose long variability timescales preclude detection of time delays in the
107: scintillation pattern over intercontinental distances. For many lines of
108: sight through the ISM the slowest variations are expected in September if
109: the motion of the turbulent material is comparable to the local standard
110: of rest (LSR).
111:
112: The recognition of ISS as the dominant cause of IDV has not entirely
113: alleviated the brightness temperatures problems posed by these sources.
114: A source must be small to scintillate; in the weak scintillation case most
115: frequently observed at frequencies near 5 GHz \citep{wal98}, the source
116: angular size must be comparable to or smaller than the angular size of the
117: first Fresnel zone, $\theta_{\rm F}=\sqrt{c/2 \nu \pi L}$.
118: Here $L$ is the distance to the scattering region, which we will refer
119: to as the screen even though in some cases it may be better described as
120: a slab extending from the Earth out to distance $\sim L$.
121: $\theta_{\rm F}$ is typically tens of microarcseconds
122: for screen distances of tens to hundreds of parsecs, which
123: implies source components with angular sizes two to three orders of
124: magnitude finer than the scales probed by VLBI.
125: The long time-scale over which IDV has been observed in
126: some sources suggests that such scintillating components can be relatively
127: long-lived despite their small physical sizes.
128:
129:
130: This paper reports on the results of a Micro-Arcsecond
131: Scintillation-Induced Variability (MASIV) survey for IDV in AGN. This
132: year-long survey conducted observations of between 500--700 AGN over each
133: of four epochs of three or four days duration in 2002 and 2003 at 4.9\,GHz
134: with the VLA.
135: %\footnote{The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a facility of the
136: %National Science Foundation operated under cooperative agreement by
137: %Associated Universities, Inc.}.
138: The aim of the survey was to provide a
139: catalogue of at least 100 AGN which vary on timescales of hours to days to
140: provide the basis of detailed studies of the IDV AGN population drawn from
141: a well-defined sample. A description of the observations in epochs 2, 3
142: and 4 is presented in \S\ref{obs} as a supplement to descriptions of
143: the first epoch observations and MASIV source selection in \citet{lov2003}
144: (hereafter Paper 1). In \S\ref{VarClass} we describe how the time series of flux density for each source in each epoch was classified as variable or non-variable. In \S\ref{DsClass} we describe how we have quantified the amplitude and timescale for the variations from an analysis of the structure function combined from all 4 epochs and apply corrections for noise and other sources of flux density error. The basic hypothesis of the paper that the variations are predominantly due to interstellar scintillation is presented and examined in \S\ref{sec:ISS}, including the influence of parameters of the interstellar medium (\S\ref{VarB} emission measure and galactic latitude) and of the sources themselves (\S\ref{VarAlpha} mean flux density, spectral index).
145: We now have redshifts for more than half
146: of the sources and we present the dependence of the variability on
147: redshift in \S\ref{VarZ} - a result which shows that the MASIV survey
148: provides a new cosmological probe. In \S\ref{CompareVar}
149: we consider whether the variability is intermittent over the four epochs.
150: Our data are listed in Table \ref{tab:BigTable} and
151: our conclusions are presented in \S\ref{Conc}.
152:
153:
154: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}
155: \label{obs}
156:
157:
158:
159: The VLA observations took place over four periods during January, May and
160: September 2002 and January 2003 (see Table \ref{tab:obs}). All epochs were
161: 72 hours in duration except September 2002, which included an additional
162: 24 hours. The additional time in this epoch was added as an attempt to
163: detect the slower variation expected in September due to interstellar
164: scintillation caused by material moving at a velocity comparable to the LSR.
165:
166:
167: All observations took place during array reconfiguration and in each case
168: the array was being moved to a more compact configuration (except for epoch \#1). In each epoch
169: the VLA was divided into five independent subarrays. In the first epoch
170: each subarray observed a subset of the 710 source sample. Subarrays 1
171: through 4 observed the ``core'' 578 sources of our compact, flat spectrum sample \citep{lov2003}, namely the weak
172: ($105<S_{\rm 8.6\,GHz} < 130$\,mJy) and strong ($S_{\rm 8.6\,GHz}
173: >600$\,mJy) sub-samples, while the fifth subarray observed a sample of
174: intermediate flux density sources in two regions of the sky. For the next
175: three epochs all sources previously observed in subarrays 1 through 4 were
176: reobserved, thus providing full coverage for the core sample. However,
177: subarray 5 was re-dedicated to observing a smaller number of sources
178: comprising all objects found to be variable in subarray 5 during the first
179: epoch, as well as the most rapid variables found during the first epoch
180: which required faster sampling in order to determine time scales. In this
181: paper we compare results for the core sample from subarrays 1 through 4
182: only.
183:
184: Shadowing was a serious concern at low elevations in the more compact VLA
185: configurations. The impact of shadowing was minimized by
186: assigning 5 or 6 antennas to each subarray in such a way that at any given time a
187: source could be observed with at least 3 unshadowed antennas. Any data from baselines containing shadowed antennas were flagged. Antennas that had
188: either not moved during reconfiguration or were
189: moved but had pointing solutions already applied were assigned
190: to subarrays 1 to 4 where possible.
191:
192: The core sample was divided into four roughly equal parts by Declination and a subarray assigned to each. The Declination ranges for the four subarrays were $0^\circ \leq \delta < 14^\circ$, $14^\circ \leq \delta < 34.08^\circ$, $34.08^\circ \leq \delta < 49^\circ$, $\delta \geq 49^\circ$. The Declination boundary between the second and third subarray was set to the latitude of the VLA to avoid long slews in azimuth when changing between sources transiting north and south of the zenith.
193:
194: Each subarray was scheduled so that every source was observed for one
195: minute every $\sim$2 h while it was above an elevation of
196: $15^\circ$. We used the standard VLA frequency configuration for continuum 4.9~GHz observations (dual polarisation and two 50~MHz bandwidth IFs per polarisation) and a 3.3~s integration time. For flux density calibration, each subarray
197: observed B1328+307 (3C286) and J2355+4950 every $\sim$~2
198: hours. B1328+307 is the primary flux density calibrator for the VLA and
199: J2355+4950 is a GPS source, not likely to vary over short timescales,
200: and is monitored regularly at the VLA as part of a calibrator
201: monitoring program.
202:
203: Following the observations we calibrated the data in AIPS
204: using the standard technique for continuum data. The task
205: FILLM was used to load the data where corrections were
206: made for known antenna gain variations as a function of
207: elevation and for atmospheric opacity. Upon inspection
208: of the data it was clear that there were residual
209: time-dependent amplitude calibration errors.
210: We ascribe this to the fact that in each epoch, some VLA
211: antennas had recently been moved and their
212: pointing calibration observations were not complete. The residual
213: pointing errors may depend on azimuth and
214: elevation so we chose several bright, non-variable sources in each
215: subarray at a range of RA as gain calibrators for
216: surrounding sources. Precautions were taken to ensure that the
217: calibrators themselves were not variable: if a given calibrator caused
218: the majority of sources against which it was applied to vary, then
219: another calibrator was chosen. These sources, typically
220: recommended VLA calibrators, were drawn from our source sample.
221: The numbers of sources used as secondary calibrators in the four
222: epochs were 42, 33, 20 and 36.
223: On the epochs that a particular source was used
224: as a calibrator, it is by definition non-variable and was excluded
225: from the structure function analysis discussed below.
226:
227: Following calibration, the data for each source were
228: inspected and occasional outlying samples were flagged.
229: The data were then incoherently averaged on a one-minute
230: timescale over all baselines. For all sources, the formal
231: errors obtained were less than those estimated due to
232: the residual constant and fractional errors discussed
233: later in this paper. Incoherent averaging was chosen
234: because, on the assumption that all sources are
235: unresolved, the phase should be zero and any residual
236: phase errors in the data would artificially reduce the
237: average flux density. In low signal-to-noise regimes
238: an incoherent average can induce an upward bias, as
239: visibility amplitudes follow a Rice distribution,
240: which has a mean that is systematically higher
241: than the true mean \citep{tms2001}. In the case
242: of our observations though, the signal-to-noise
243: ratio of our observations is sufficiently high that
244: this effect is negligible
245:
246: As the VLA array configurations became more compact, our data became more
247: sensitive to extended structure in the source and in nearby objects. The
248: changing response of the VLA with time due to this structure can appear as
249: variability in a light curve. Fortunately, as our observations were
250: scheduled in sidereal time and were repeated at the same times every day,
251: false variability due to structure appears as a repeating pattern with a
252: period of one day. In general this was easy to recognise but in some cases
253: imaging was carried out to verify contaminating structure. For the
254: purposes of our analysis, such sources were removed from our sample. A
255: total of 102 sources were removed due to structure or confusion,
256: and one was removed due to an error in our initial sample selection process.
257: Following these removals, we are left with a
258: sample of 475 point sources common to all four epochs.
259:
260: \section{Classification of Variables}
261: \label{VarClass}
262:
263: We used two separate approaches to analyze the flux density variations.
264: This section describes how we classified the sources based on the
265: apparent modulation index of their intensity. The following section
266: describes a structure function analysis.
267: The virtues of these two techniques are complementary: the first
268: is based on a conservative but robust criterion of source variability, while
269: the second uses a simple statistical estimator which
270: allowed us to quantify the amplitude and time scale of the variations.
271:
272:
273: In order to ascertain whether an individual source is variable it is
274: necessary to understand the sources of error inherent to the measurements.
275: There are uncertainties in the individual measurements
276: due to calibration errors causing a fractional error, $p$,
277: and additive errors, $s$, due to thermal noise and confusion.
278: Calibration errors include contributions from antenna pointing errors,
279: system gain variation between the observations of flux calibrators and
280: variable atmospheric absorption. Since they are a small percentage
281: of the mean source flux density, $\bar{S}$, they can be approximated as additive
282: and added in quadrature to the noise as given by
283: \begin{eqnarray}
284: \sigma_{{\rm err},s,p} = \sqrt{(s/\bar{S})^2 + p^2} \, .
285: \label{eq:error1}
286: \end{eqnarray}
287: Here $\sigma_{{\rm err},s,p}$ is the rms error in each flux density estimate
288: normalized by the mean for each epoch. In our initial analysis (Paper I)
289: we estimated $s=1.5$\,mJy and $p=0.01$.
290:
291: An initial inspection classified sources based on a
292: their modulation index, defined as the rms of
293: the three days observations divided by the mean flux density,
294: computed for each epoch. A source
295: was identified as variable if its modulation index exceeded
296: twice the expected contribution from the measurement errors, $2\sigma_{{\rm err},s,p}$,
297: as in a $\chi^2$ test.
298: However, direct inspection of the data revealed that many of the
299: slower variables, that is sources with variability time-scales longer than
300: three days, were not detected as variable using this criterion.
301:
302: We therefore introduced an alternative variability criterion, which
303: classified a source as variable if the modulation index of its \it daily
304: average \rm flux densities exceeded $2\sigma_{\rm err}$. This process yielded
305: more detections, but visual inspection again revealed that many sources
306: that clearly exhibited variability were undetected by either test.
307: In particular, examination revealed that our two criteria do not detect
308: variability in those sources with low-level monotonic flux density changes
309: during the 3-4 d duration of our observations. This is because
310: the $\chi^2$ statistic used in our two selection criteria is
311: not an ordered statistic and is therefore sub-optimal in detecting such a
312: low level trend.
313:
314: Our selection criteria were therefore augmented with a visual inspection of the remaining light curves. Inspection was performed by
315: two of us independently and the results compared. Each source was
316: considered non-variable unless otherwise demonstrated, and any source
317: where there was disagreement on its classification was reviewed; we
318: adopted the conservative approach of classifying as non-variable any
319: source is which no final agreement was reached on the classification.
320: In the left panel of Figure \ref{fig:mraw} we show a scatter plot
321: of the raw modulation index $m_{\rm raw}$ of all sources against
322: their mean flux density from epoch 1, using differing symbols for variables
323: and non-variables. The predicted error in a single flux density measurement
324: from equation (\ref{eq:error1}) is shown by the dashed line,
325: which roughly separates the variable from non-variable classifications.
326: This emphasizes that our classification is determined largely by
327: $m_{\rm raw}$. Table \ref{tab:BigTable} lists all the raw modulation indices and variability classifications of all the sources and Figures
328: \ref{fig:D1} and \ref{fig:lightcurves} show some sample
329: light-curves from the survey.
330:
331:
332: In Table \ref{tab:SourceCounts} we list the number of sources classified
333: as variable in zero, one, two, three or all four observing epochs
334: and associated percentages. In this table and in all of what follows we define
335: a set of 443 sources from the 475 sources that excludes those
336: used as secondary calibrators in two or more epochs.
337: Note that 12\% of the sources were seen to vary during all four
338: epochs. With any analysis of a large number of observations,
339: however, false positives, i.e. sources that are incorrectly classified as
340: variable, are a significant concern. Since the visual classification was
341: very close to the two sigma criterion, our variability
342: classification is reliable with $\sim95$\% confidence. Thus we give
343: in columns 3 and 4 the predicted fraction of sources misclassified
344: based on the null hypothesis that all 443 sources are non-variable.
345: Evidently these are negligibly small relative to the observed
346: fractions of variables in two or more epochs.
347:
348: The large numbers of sources classified as variable on multiple epochs
349: firmly establishes that our classification process is
350: reliable. If all 443 sources were non-variable, then the number
351: expected to be classified variable on 2, 3 or 4 epochs is a
352: mere 6.7 or 1.4\%, compared with the observed 192 (43\%).
353: Even if our classification was 90\%
354: reliable, then the number of false positives with 2 or more detections
355: remains less than 5\%.
356:
357: The fraction of sources that can be reliably classified as variable
358: can be deduced using Table \ref{tab:SourceCounts}. Denoting $N$ as the
359: actual number of non-variable sources, $T$ the actual number
360: of one-time variables and $F$ the number of non-variables misclassified as one-time variables,
361: then the apparent number of non-variables $161 = N-F$
362: and from Table \ref{tab:SourceCounts}, $F/N = 0.172$.
363: This yields $N = 194, F = 33$ and hence $T = 90-F =56$, and the corrected total
364: number of variables is 192+56=248. Therefore the fraction of sources that exhibited variability
365: in one or more epochs in our survey is 56\%.
366: This value is significantly higher than
367: the 15-20\% found in previous IDV surveys \citep{qwk1992,ked2001a}.
368: In comparing with other surveys one must be careful to consider
369: the selection criteria applied. As described in \S\ref{obs} we
370: started with 710 sources selected from spectral index and mean
371: flux density criteria which was reduced to 443, when we excluded
372: those used as calibrators in more than one epoch and
373: those exhibiting resolution effects, raising the percentage
374: of variable sources. In addition the large number of one-, two-
375: and three-time variable sources raises the percentage. We
376: believe that this is due to intermittency in the IDV phenomenon,
377: which we describe by a simple model in \S\ref{CompareVar}.
378:
379:
380: For the purposes of subsequent analysis we conservatively define as ``non-variable'' those 161 sources that showed no variability in any of the four epochs, and we define as ``variable'' those 192 sources that showed variability on two or more of the four epochs. With these definitions we have two large
381: and reliable samples each of approximately 200 sources, where the
382: non-variables act as a control sample for the variables. Each was drawn
383: from the same selection criteria and cover the same overall area of sky.
384:
385:
386:
387: \section{Structure Function of the Variations} \label{DsClass}
388:
389: Here we discuss how we quantify the flux density
390: variation for each source using the structure function (SF) of
391: each time series,
392: \begin{eqnarray}
393: D(\tau) = \frac{1}{N_{\tau}} \Sigma_{j,k} (S_j - S_k)^2
394: \label{eq:strfn}
395: \end{eqnarray}
396: where $S_j$ is a flux density measurement normalized by
397: the mean flux density of the source over all four epochs and
398: $N_\tau$ is the number of pairs of flux densities
399: with a time lag $\tau$ binned in 2-hour increments.
400: The SF is a statistically reliable estimator
401: which can be modeled even for short data spans.
402: It is defined independent of any variability classification.
403: Examples are shown in the lower panels of Figure \ref{fig:D1}
404: and \ref{fig:lightcurves}.
405: The SF is preferable to the autocorrelation function for short data spans,
406: which can be badly biased by a poor estimation of the mean.
407:
408:
409: For an idealized observation of \it stationary \rm stochastic variations
410: spanning a time much longer than their characteristic time $\tau_{\rm char}$,
411: $D(\tau)$ rises with time lag and tends to saturation at twice the true variance.
412: However for our observations $\tau_{\rm char}$ is typically more than two days and
413: saturation is rarely seen. We thus chose $D(\tau=2\,{\rm d})$
414: as a standard characterization of the intra-day variations
415: because $\tau = 2\,$d is the maximum lag out to which our structure
416: functions contain reliable information for the 72~hour observing sequences.
417: Note that we estimate $D(\tau=2\,{\rm d})$ by combining data from all four epochs,
418: which makes it a more stable statistic under the hypothesis
419: of stationary stochastic variations. Hence we do not use this statistic to
420: determine whether a source's variability differs over the four epochs.
421:
422:
423:
424: \subsection{Measurement errors}\label{measerr}
425:
426: Additive flux density errors that are independent
427: of the ISS (or intrinsic) variations contribute an additive term
428: to the SF. If the errors are independent from one
429: sample to the next (i.e.\,``white''), the error contribution to SF
430: would have a mean value $D_{\rm noise}=2 \sigma_{\rm err}^2$ independent of time lag.
431: While random pointing errors will be white, there may be non-white errors
432: caused by systematic pointing errors due to recent antenna relocations and
433: residuals of gain and atmospheric variation, which may contribute a
434: term that is a function of time lag. Nevertheless we now proceed by assuming that all
435: the errors are white and thus the errors add a constant ($D_{\rm noise}$)
436: (plus random variations about the constant due to estimation error) and postpone
437: discussion of possible non-white measurement errors.
438:
439: Our goal is to subtract $D_{\rm noise}$ from the raw SF
440: $D(\tau)$ in order to estimate the SF of any true variations
441: in a source's flux density. But first we must consider how best to estimate
442: $D_{\rm noise}$. One estimate is $2\sigma_{\rm err}^2$ from equation
443: (\ref{eq:error1}), which depends on the constants $s$ and $p$.
444: Another estimate of $D_{\rm noise}$ comes from the SF
445: itself -- evaluated at its shortest time lag (2h). This would be an
446: unbiased estimate for $D_{\rm noise}$ if all real flux density variation
447: had time scales much longer than 2 h. Hence we examined single-epoch estimates
448: of $D(t=2{\rm h})$, which we plot as an equivalent modulation index
449: $m_{2{\rm h}} = \sqrt{0.5 D(t=2{\rm h})}$ in the right panel of
450: Figure \ref{fig:mraw}. The sources classified as variable include a
451: substantial number with large values of $m_{2{\rm h}}$, which are
452: due to rapid flux density variations stronger than expected for noise.
453: Note in particular the highest
454: point which is quasar J$1819+3845$ which shows large amplitude
455: rapid ISS. Its timescale is typically shorter than our 2~h
456: sampling and so its SF has already saturated at 2~h
457: and its variations are ``white'' in our sampling.
458: Similarly the other sources with elevated $m_{2{\rm h}}$ are
459: probably due to ISS with short time scales.
460:
461:
462: Now consider the non-variables, which are plotted as pluses and
463: provide a set of sources with low or zero variation in epoch 1,
464: which are useful in studying the noise processes.
465: In the right panel of Figure \ref{fig:mraw} the mean of the plus symbols
466: lies significantly below the dashed line
467: (equation (\ref{eq:error1}) with $s=0.0015$~Jy
468: and $p=0.01$) particularly for the higher flux density sources.
469: The solid line with $s=0.0013$~Jy and $p=0.005$ provides a better
470: model for the noise as discussed in \S\ref{sec:SF}.
471: In the absence of any real variations
472: the estimates $m_{2{\rm h}}$ should be scattered equally above and below
473: their mean value.
474: Comparing the right and left hand panels
475: we see that $m_{\rm raw}$ is typically higher than $m_{2{\rm h}}$
476: even for the non-variables, which suggests that $m_{\rm raw}$
477: is increased due to low level variations with a timescale longer than
478: 2~h.
479:
480:
481:
482: The discussion above reduces the choice for estimating
483: $D_{\rm noise}$ to either
484: $D(2{\rm~h})$ or the value corresponding to the solid line
485: $D_{{\rm err},s,p} = 2 \sigma_{\rm err}^2$ with $p=0.005$. Whereas it is
486: appealing to use the observable $D(2{\rm h})$,
487: any rapid real flux density variations
488: can contribute to $D(2{\rm~h})$ which thus overestimates
489: $D_{\rm noise}$. Thus we adopted $D_{{\rm err},s,p}$
490: as an estimator for $D_{\rm noise}$,
491: which states that the measurement errors are well described by
492: equation(\ref{eq:error1}) but with calibration errors contributing
493: at a 0.5\% rather than a 1\% level. However we discuss a slight revision
494: of this in the next section.
495:
496:
497:
498: \subsection{Structure Function Correction and Fitting}
499: \label{sec:SF}
500:
501: For each source at each epoch we computed the raw SF as defined
502: in equation (\ref{eq:strfn}). As the time lag increases the number of
503: available lagged products ($N_\tau$) drops and so increases the error in the
504: SF. A threshold for plotting an estimate for $D(\tau)$ was set
505: at $N_\tau > 20$\% of the total number of data samples in that epoch.
506: As the example in Figure \ref{fig:D1} shows, this gives estimates clustered
507: at lags 2-8 h and near 24 h and near 48 h.
508: In order to characterize the variability amplitudes
509: we initially estimate the SF at a lag of 2\,d from the
510: mean SF and its estimated error, calculated using the
511: values at lags in the range $\tau = 48 \pm 2\,$hours.
512: The overplotted model is described in \S\ref{VarTimeScale}.
513:
514:
515: First consider the equivalent 2-day modulation index
516: $m_{2\,{\rm d}} = \sqrt{0.5 D(2\,{\rm d})}$ (without noise correction)
517: plotted against the mean source flux density $\bar{S}$ for epoch 1
518: in Figure \ref{fig:m2d1}. It should be compared with the
519: left and right panels of Figure \ref{fig:mraw} for the non-variable
520: sources. The comparison makes it clear that
521: $m_{2\,{\rm d}} > m_{2\,{\rm h}}$ for almost all of the
522: non-variable sources. Indeed there is a close correspondence between
523: $m_{2\,{\rm d}}$ and $m_{\rm raw}$. Thus it is clear that there are
524: low level flux density variations on a timescale longer than 2~h
525: in the sources classified as non-variable.
526: In order to investigate what causes these we examined the difference
527: $\Delta D = D(2\,{\rm d})-D(2\,{\rm h})$ for the \it non-variable \rm
528: sources from each epoch.
529:
530: We examined how $\Delta D$ depends on mean flux density, Galactic latitude
531: and H$\alpha$ emission -- quantities which we find
532: in \S\ref{sec:ISS} influence $D(2\,{\rm d})$ for the
533: \it variable \rm classifications.
534: The results showed that the mean of $\Delta D$ in each epoch
535: was significantly higher for the sources weaker than
536: 0.4 Jy than for those stronger than 0.4 Jy. However, it
537: showed no significant dependence on Galactic latitude or H$\alpha$
538: emission. Hence the process
539: responsible for the low-level variability in the sources classified as
540: non-variable is not ISS and is unlikely to have an astrophysical origin.
541:
542: We consider the most likely cause to be confusion, which
543: can be due either to extended source structure which is partially resolved
544: on the baselines of each sub-array or to low level confusing sources in the
545: primary beam. We had already eliminated obvious cases of confusion by
546: removing sources whose light curves showed clear daily patterns of
547: variability which repeated in each day of a 3 day sequence. Since our SF estimation is from
548: the light curves normalized by $\bar{S}$ an increase in $\Delta D$
549: at low $\bar{S}$ is consistent with the effect of low level confusion
550: characterized by a certain rms in Jy. This is supported by the VLA
551: documentation that gives 2.3~mJy as the brightest source expected
552: in a single antenna beam at 5 GHz.
553:
554:
555: We examined the shape of the
556: mean $D(\tau)$ for high and low $\bar{S}$ sources in each epoch.
557: Evidence for the effects of confusion was found in the
558: consistent minima in $D(\tau)$ near time lags $\tau =$ 1d and 2d.
559: However, there was also a component rising from the noise floor at 2h
560: and typically saturating between 12 and 24h. All three components
561: were substantially larger for the weak group of sources
562: than for the strong sources. When averaged over four epochs
563: the noise floor was, respectively, at
564: $\sim 3.0\times10^{-4}$ and $\sim 0.61\times10^{-4}$
565: and the averages for $\Delta D$ were, respectively,
566: $\sim 2.8\times10^{-4}$ and $\sim 1.1\times10^{-4}$
567: for these groups (mean flux density 0.13 Jy and 1.4 Jy).
568: By equating these average SF amplitudes to $2\sigma_{err}^2$ using equation
569: (\ref{eq:error1}) we estimated $s=0.0013$ Jy and $p=0.0073$.
570: The $s$ values for each epoch ranged from
571: 0.001-0.002 Jy and for $p$ 0.003-0.01, but no consistent patterns
572: were seen versus epoch.
573:
574:
575: We also considered the effect of long-term variations as characterized by
576: the variation between epochs of the mean flux density from each epoch.
577: These slower variations are mostly intrinsic and might contribute
578: to a trend within the 3 or 4 days of each epoch. So we calculated
579: the rate of change of flux density from
580: the average of the magnitude of the differences in flux density
581: between neighbouring epochs, divided by the number of days between
582: epochs and the resulting magnitude of $D(2{\rm d})$ due to such a trend.
583: Surprisingly, for all sources this was smaller than the noise-corrected $D(2{\rm d})$
584: except for those which were negative as a result of noise subtraction.
585: Further the highest of them was 0.0001, which is one quarter of
586: the threshold value. So we conclude that long-term variations did not make a significant
587: contribution to the variations observed within the epochs. We note,
588: however, that we can usefully estimate the structure function on
589: time lags of 3 and 6 months from the MASIV survey data, which
590: may be useful in studies of intrinsic variability.
591: Thus we include the epoch averaged
592: flux density for each epoch in the data table \ref{tab:BigTable}.
593:
594: The foregoing studies reveal that the apparently non-variable light curves
595: include not only white noise but also a low level contaminating process
596: whose rms values can be approximately characterized
597: by equation (\ref{eq:error1}). While we can
598: quantify the white noise process by this equation, the non-white contamination
599: is not well enough understood to be reliably characterized by an
600: SF which could be subtracted from the estimates for all sources at each epoch.
601: So in order to reduce the effect of these non-white
602: variations, we increased the estimated $D_{\rm noise}$ to
603: to be subtracted by using the values $s=0.0013$ Jy and $p=0.007$,
604: and we also set a threshold on $ D(2\,{\rm d}) = 4\times 10^{-4}$
605: below which the noise-corrected SF values may be contaminated
606: and therefore should only be interpreted as
607: upper limits to the true SF of flux density variations.
608:
609: It is of interest that, since confusion effects will be precisely repeated
610: at 24~h intervals, the samples of the structure function at
611: 24 and 48~hr will be unaffected by confusion. The results we present in
612: subsequent sections are from fitting the SF over all time lags, since
613: the fit makes better use of the data. However, we also analyzed the
614: single sample estimates of $D(24{\rm h})$ and $D(48{\rm h})$
615: and found very similar results, though with somewhat worse
616: statistical errors. As an extra precaution we re-reviewed
617: all the light curves and SF plots for 24~h periodic patterns
618: and found 34 sources that might be contaminated at a level near
619: the threshold. For these sources we
620: used the lower of $D(2\,{\rm d})$ from the fit and
621: that estimated from $48\pm2$~h.
622:
623:
624: \subsection{Variability Timescales}
625: \label{VarTimeScale}
626:
627: Although we estimated the SF as described above for each source at each epoch,
628: the single-epoch $D(2\,{\rm d})$ is only based on about one independent
629: sample of a 2~d variation and so it has a large statistical error
630: -- such that its rms error is about equal to its mean
631: \citep{RCM2000}.
632: Thus we do not attempt to evaluate the variability amplitude
633: on a source by source basis for each of the epochs.
634: Rather we average the SF for each source
635: over all 4 epochs (after subtracting the $D_{\rm noise}$ as defined
636: in the previous section).
637: Hence the SF results are insensitive to any intermittency or
638: annual changes in ISS due to the effects of the Earth's velocity.
639:
640: We then fitted the following simple model to the SFs:
641: \begin{eqnarray}
642: D(\tau) = 2 m^2 \frac{\tau}{\tau + \tau_{\rm char}},
643: \label{eq:dmodel}
644: \end{eqnarray}
645: where $2 m^2$ is the amplitude at which the function
646: would saturate and $\tau_{\rm char}$ is the characteristic
647: timescale where the SF reaches half of its saturation.
648: The motivation for this form is described
649: in Appendix \ref{DsISS}. It approximates the form
650: expected from ISS caused by a turbulent interstellar
651: medium uniformly distributed through a thick scattering
652: region, as opposed to turbulence confined to a thin layer
653: (see equation(\ref{eq:Dmodel})). We estimated two parameters
654: only: the timescale $\tau_{\rm char}$ and the value of
655: $D(\tau=2\,\mbox{d})$ for each source. It should also
656: be noted that a light curve that is dominated
657: by a linear trend in flux density gives rise to
658: a parabolic SF, which is not well fitted by equation
659: (\ref{eq:dmodel}). The value of $D(\tau=2\,\mbox{d})$
660: in such a case will be somewhat underestimated.
661:
662: An example of fitted SF is shown
663: in Figure \ref{fig:D1}.
664: The points show $D(\tau)$ increasing
665: (noisily) with time lag $\tau$ but not reaching saturation.
666: Since the timescale is defined at half the saturation value
667: it is poorly constrained in this example:
668: $\tau_{\rm char} = 1.0 \pm 0.5$~days.
669: However, from the same fit $D(t=2\,\mbox{d}) = (44 \pm 3)\times 10^{-4}$,
670: which is quite well constrained. With observations
671: limited to 3~days (4~days for epoch 3) it is not
672: possible to estimate timescales longer than about 3~days.
673: However, in those cases it was possible to recognize that
674: the characteristic timescale is longer than 3~days from the
675: shape of the structure function.
676: Two other examples are shown in
677: Figure \ref{fig:lightcurves}, in
678: which there is evidence for faster variations.
679: For source J0949+5819 the variations are very strong in epoch 1
680: and much weaker in epoch 3. From the epoch-average
681: we find $\tau_{\rm char} = 0.02 \pm 0.05$~days and
682: $D(t=2\,\mbox{d}) = (19 \pm 2)\times 10^{-3}$.
683: For J1328+6221 the variations are more consistent
684: over the epochs with
685: $\tau = 0.2 \pm 0.2$~days and
686: $D(t=2\,\mbox{d}) = (10 \pm 1)\times 10^{-3}$.
687: Given our 2~hr sampling and the typically large fractional errors
688: in the timescale we have simply classified the timescale into fast
689: $\tau_{\rm char} < 0.5$\,d, medium $0.5 <\tau_{\rm char}
690: < 3$\,d and slow $3\,{\rm d} < \tau_{\rm char}$.
691: We also looked for any correlation between the
692: timescale and $D(t=2\,\mbox{d})$ but found no consistent pattern.
693:
694:
695:
696: During the visual examination of the light curves for
697: each source at each epoch, the timescales were estimated
698: by counting the number of inflection points
699: (i.e. change in sign of the derivative) for those epochs
700: classified as variable. Since in the visual examination
701: there was an effective smoothing, inflection points due to noise-like
702: deviations were not counted.
703: The majority of sources were found to show none or at
704: most one inflection point indicating variability timescales that are
705: predominantly longer than 3 days. The observed distribution of
706: inflection points is shown in Figure \ref{InflectionTimescale}.
707: Only a small number of sources (20\%) showed 2 or more inflection points.
708: A comparison of the distribution of inflection points for the weak and
709: strong sources revealed no significant difference between the two
710: classes. Overall, the distribution of
711: timescales was statistically the same for each epoch, remembering that
712: epoch 3 was four days rather than the three days of the other epochs.
713: An important conclusion from the timescale study is
714: our 3 or 4~d lightcurves commonly underestimate
715: both the timescale and true modulation index for many
716: of the sources.
717:
718:
719: The annual cycle reported in a number of IDV sources is due to the changing
720: relative velocities of the Earth and the ISM responsible for the
721: scattering \citep{mac2003}. If the ISM velocities follow the Local
722: Standard of Rest, many sources would be expected to
723: exhibit slower variations in the third quarter of the year
724: (i.e. during the third epoch), and hence may more easily be missed because
725: of the lengthened time-scales. Figure \ref{InflectionTimescale} shows the numbers of
726: variables found at each of the four epochs. A Chi-squared contingency test shows
727: no evidence that the numbers differ from the mean in any epoch, even
728: though epoch 3 lasted for four rather than three days. The uniformity
729: of variable numbers in each epoch suggests a lack of evidence for a
730: third-quarter slow-down, and it follows that the majority of the
731: scattering material is not moving at the LSR. This is perhaps not
732: unexpected; both PKS~1257--326 and J1819+3845, the two sources for
733: which reliable screen velocities have been measured, have measured
734: screen velocities that differ significantly from the LSR
735: \citep{big2006,den2003,lrr2007}.
736:
737: In summary we used the visual analysis to classify each source at each epoch
738: as variable or not variable. We computed SFs for
739: all sources and then examined the SFs of those classified as
740: non-variable in order to quantify the measurement errors.
741: We were able to correct the SFs by subtracting a constant versus
742: time lag due to errors that are independent over the 2~h sampling
743: and are characterized by equation \ref{eq:error1}. In addition
744: we found a low level contaminating process with a timescale of 1-2 d,
745: which we suggest is due to low-level confusion with an rms of 1-2 mJy.
746: The SF of the slower contamination could not be reliably estimated
747: and so sets a limit on the minimum detectable variation in flux density.
748: By fitting a simple curve to the epoch-averaged and noise-corrected SFs,
749: we estimated $D(t=2\,\mbox{d})$ for each source.
750: The contamination is minimized by requiring
751: this quantity to be above a threshold of $4\times10^{-4}$
752: for a useable estimate of the timescale $\tau_{\rm char}$.
753: Most sources were classified as slow variables.
754:
755:
756:
757: \subsection{Comparison of SF with the visual variability
758: classification}
759:
760: We now compare the SF analysis with the
761: variability classification from \S\ref{VarClass}.
762: Figure \ref{fig:nevar} shows the number of epochs in which a source
763: was classified as variable plotted against its value of $D(2\,\mbox{d})$
764: obtained as described from a fit to the structure function
765: of the cumulative data from all 4 epochs.
766: The large circle shows the mean values for each group of sources.
767: While it is clear that the sources with higher $D(2\,\mbox{d})$
768: were classified as variable more frequently, there is a very wide
769: distribution in the rms level of the variation over 2~d
770: among the sources. The vertical line marks the threshold
771: $D(2\,\mbox{d}) = 4\times 10^{-4}$ above which we
772: have made a timescale estimate. Values below this should be regarded as upper
773: bounds in view of the possibility of low level confusion.
774:
775: Table \ref{tab:compvar} lists the source counts
776: sorted by the number of ``variable'' epochs for the 443 sources
777: (as always excluding those used as calibrators in more than one epoch.)
778: It also shows the mean values of $D(2\,\mbox{d})$ and the numbers of sources
779: above and below the SF threshold. In total
780: 37\% of them are above the threshold versus
781: 45\% from the variability classification on 2 or more epochs.
782: In the latter classification process we do not characterize
783: the rms amplitude but attempt to quantify any intermittency
784: in the phenomenon. In contrast the SF analysis quantifies the
785: rms amplitude over 2~d averaged over all 4 epochs.
786:
787:
788:
789:
790: \section{Interpretation as Interstellar Scintillation}
791: \label{sec:ISS}
792:
793: We now examine our basic hypothesis, stated in the introduction, that
794: the variations in flux density detected in the MASIV survey are caused
795: by interstellar scintillation (ISS). The extremely small diameters of pulsars
796: revealed the ISS phenomenon almost as soon as pulsars were discovered
797: and they still provide the best information on the distribution of
798: small scale structure in the ionized interstellar medium --
799: indeed they provide a calibration of the ISS phenomenon.
800: The pulsar observations have been combined into a model for the distribution
801: of electron density in the interstellar medium by \cite{tc93} and
802: revised by \cite{cl05}.
803:
804: Because the refractive index of an ionized medium varies with radio frequency,
805: there is a transition frequency ($f_{\rm w}$) above which the scintillation of
806: a point source, like a pulsar, is weak in the sense that its scintillation
807: (modulation) index ($m_{\rm pt}$) is less than one. This frequency
808: is on the order of 5~GHz but depends on the strength of the turbulent fluctuations
809: in electron density on the given line of sight \citep{wal98,cl05}. Above $f_{\rm w}$ the ISS of a point source has a single
810: timescale approximately given by $t_{\rm F}= r_{\rm F}/V$,
811: where $V$ is the effective velocity of the Earth through
812: the ISS diffraction pattern and $r_{\rm F}=\sqrt{L\lambda/2\pi}$
813: and $L$ is the typical distance to the scattering region.
814:
815:
816: In our observations the angular diameters of the extra-galactic sources
817: are considerably larger than those of pulsars and so their ISS is heavily
818: quenched. See \citet{ric2006} for a discussion of how the ``low-wavenumber
819: approximation'' can be applied for quenched scintillation even below the
820: transition frequency. If we approximate the scattering as taking place in a thin
821: region of the Galactic plane, we obtain simple expressions for the reduction
822: in scintillation index and lengthening of timescale (e.g. \citet{R86}).
823: In Appendix \ref{DsISS} we apply the same simple ``screen'' model to the
824: structure function analysis and obtain expressions for how the
825: observable $D(2\,\mbox{d})$ might vary with angular size of each source
826: and on distance to the scattering region and the level of turbulence on
827: each line of sight. Of course the level of ISS also depends on properties
828: of the source -- in particular the fraction of its flux density
829: in its most compact component and on the effective diameter of that component.
830:
831:
832: \subsection{Galactic Dependence of ISS} \label{VarB}
833:
834: We start by comparing our $D(2\mbox{d})$ results
835: with the emission measure (column density of the square of the electron density)
836: as estimated from observations of H$\alpha$ emission.
837: We find the intensity of H$\alpha$
838: emission (in Rayleighs) from the WHAM Northern sky survey on a 1
839: degree grid \citep{wham} nearest to each source.
840: We use the intensity summed over all velocities,
841: which \citet{wham} interpret as proportional to the ISM emission measure
842: on that line of sight, assuming the temperature of the emitting gas
843: does not vary by a large percentage. We expect the level of ISS
844: to be related to the emission measure on that line of sight, as described
845: by \citet{sc98} and observed by \citet{ric2006}.
846:
847: Figure \ref{fig:Halpha} plots $D(2\mbox{d})$ against the WHAM H$\alpha$
848: emission (in Rayleighs). Though the scatter plot in the top
849: panel shows little obvious trend,
850: the bin averages in the middle panel show a clear upward
851: trend with emission measure, which establishes ISS as the
852: dominant cause of the variability in the MASIV survey.
853: We stress the complete independence of
854: the two data sets in this figure and that the bin averages are
855: independent of any threshold set on $D(2\mbox{d})$.
856: We exclude the extreme IHV source J1819+3845
857: from this and subsequent bin average plots because its $D(2\mbox{d})$
858: value is 0.25 which is so much higher than the next highest at 0.015
859: that it distorts the mean and the variance within its bin.
860:
861: The bottom panel shows that
862: the fraction of slowly scintillating sources clearly increases
863: with emission measure and vice-versa for the fast scintillators.
864: This finding that the longer timescales occur when seen through
865: greater column density of electrons is consistent with
866: enhanced ISS from strongly ionized regions of the ISM, which are typically
867: at low Galactic latitudes and at greater distances $L$.
868: An increase in $L$ increases the scale of the scintillation
869: pattern which slows the scintillation time - see Appendix \ref{DsISS}.
870:
871:
872: Since the strength and effective distance of the scattering layer
873: depends on Galactic latitude, we also expect a dependence of ISS on
874: Galactic latitude. For our visual classification of sources
875: (as variable or non-variable) we asked the
876: simple question ``are their latitude distributions the same?''.
877: A Chi-squared contingency test dividing the sources into two
878: samples, a low latitude sample, $|b| <$ 40 degrees, and high latitude
879: sample, $|b| >$ 40 degrees, shows that the two distributions differ at
880: the 98\% confidence level. There are fractionally
881: more variables at low latitudes than there are at high latitudes, supporting
882: ISS as the origin of the intra-day variability.
883:
884: For the structure function analysis we simply plot $D(2\mbox{d})$
885: against the Galactic latitude of each source, in a fashion similar to
886: that of \citet{HR87}. The upper panel of figure
887: \ref{fig:latplot} is a scatter plot, differentiated by
888: the timescale group (fast, medium or slow). The middle panel averages
889: $D(2\mbox{d})$ into 30 degree wide bins for all sources, which
890: as already noted is independent of the threshold on $D(2\mbox{d})$.
891: There is a low level of scintillation above 60 degrees, increasing
892: in the mid range (30-60 deg), in both northern and southern hemispheres.
893: However in the low latitudes (0-30 deg) the ISS increases in the south
894: of the plane but decreases north of the plane.
895: While the figure is in reasonable agreement with the latitude
896: dependence found by \cite{ric2006} in their analysis of the
897: modulation index of 146 flat-spectrum sources observed at 2~GHz with the
898: Green Bank Interferometer, there are competing effects in our MASIV
899: survey since data were sampled for no more than 4 days.
900:
901: As the latitude $b$ decreases both the distance $L$ to and the
902: path length through the scattering medium increase
903: ($\propto {\rm cosec}\;b)$. The increased path
904: length makes the scintillation stronger at lower latitudes
905: so that the modulation index should increase. However,
906: the increased distance $L$ increases the scale of the scintillation
907: pattern which slows the scintillation time
908: so that the structure function will saturate at times longer than 4 days,
909: causing a decrease in $D(2\mbox{d})$. The combination of these
910: two effects requires careful modeling.
911:
912: The model for the structure function described in Appendix A
913: is a starting point for analyzing the effects of Galactic latitude.
914: Equation (\ref{eq:d2dmodel}) shows that as the distance $L$
915: increases $D(2\mbox{d})$ should decrease. However, the
916: equation assumes that the scintillation index of a point source
917: $m_{\rm pt}=1$, omitting any increase due to the longer scattered path length
918: at lower latitudes. In a more realistic model $m_{\rm pt}$ may be
919: less than one looking out of the Galactic plane ($|b| \sim 90$~deg)
920: and should increase with decreasing latitude, reaching unity
921: at $\sim\pm 45$~deg \citep{wal98}. At lower latitudes
922: still it will increase only slowly due to effects of refractive ISS.
923: The increase in $m_{\rm pt}$ between 90 and 45~deg partially compensates for
924: the reduction in $D(2\mbox{d})$ due to increasing distance $L$. At still
925: lower latitudes $D(2\mbox{d})$ might be expected to decrease.
926: In the observations one sees a difference of low latitude behavior
927: between the Northern and Southern hemispheres.
928: This asymmetry can be understood by looking at the
929: center panel of Figure \ref{fig:latplot} which shows
930: that the emission measure is commonly higher for Southern latitudes.
931:
932: In a complete model the (unknown) compact fraction
933: $f_c$ of the source flux density in the scintillating component
934: must also be considered. Thus the expected variation of the ISS
935: level with Galactic latitude must be combined with the probability distributions
936: for the flux fraction and for the diameters of the compact
937: components, which will further dilute
938: the variation of $D(2\mbox{d})$ with latitude.
939:
940: In the Green Bank Interferometer observations cited above, the data were
941: sampled daily (or on alternate days) over many years and so
942: provided estimates of the actual modulation index, which were not reduced
943: by the lengthening ISS time scale at low latitudes. However,
944: even for these data the latitude dependence is not a strong effect.
945: Note that the asymmetry about the Galactic plane is very similar
946: to the asymmetry in the typical H$\alpha$ emission as shown by the
947: circles in the center plot.
948: The lower panel of figure \ref{fig:latplot} plots the
949: fraction of sources in the three timescale
950: groups versus latitude and shows clear evidence that the fast scintillators
951: dominate at high latitudes and that slow scintillators dominate at
952: low latitudes. This agrees with the expected increase in ISS
953: timescale at low latitudes outlined above.
954:
955:
956: \subsection{Dependence of ISS on Source Spectral Index and Flux Density}
957: \label{VarAlpha}
958:
959:
960: As stated earlier the ISS of extragalactic sources is expected to
961: be strongly suppressed, relative to that of pulsars, by the smoothing
962: effect of their larger angular diameters. Consequently, we expect
963: that the more compact sources should show higher levels of ISS.
964: Here we examine the influence of mean flux density ($\bar{S}$)
965: and spectral index $\alpha$ ($\bar{S} \propto \nu^{\alpha}$),
966: since we expect synchrotron emitting sources to be more compact for
967: larger $\alpha$ and lower $\bar{S}$, due to the effects of synchrotron
968: self-absorption and inverse Compton losses.
969:
970: In \citet{hee84}'s initial survey of short-term variability of a
971: large sample of both steep-spectrum and flat-spectrum sources he
972: found that the flat-spectrum sources varied, ``flicker'', but
973: the steep-spectrum sources did not. This can be understood as the
974: steep-spectrum sources are dominated by optically thin synchrotron
975: emission with low brightness temperatures, while the flat spectrum
976: sources are dominated by synchrotron self-absorbed components with
977: very high brightness temperatures \citep{SW68}, making them compact
978: enough to show ISS.
979:
980: The MASIV sources were selected to have flat spectral indices
981: $\alpha > -0.3$ \citep{lov2003} and so are predominantly quasars with
982: compact cores. However, it is possible that there are also
983: some very compact galaxies in the sample.
984: Figure \ref{fig:sidist} shows the spectral index distributions
985: separately for the sources with the visual classification as
986: variable or non-variable. The spectral indices shown are those
987: used to form the sample: 1.4 GHz NVSS \citep{con1998} to 8.5 GHz JVAS
988: \citep{pat1992,bro1998,wil1998} or
989: CLASS \citep{mye1995} flux densities. This shows a slight increase in the fraction of sources that are variable with increasing $\alpha$, in agreement
990: with the expectation that the flatter (and inverted) spectrum sources are
991: more compact. Though in Figure \ref{fig:sid2d} the mean $D(2\mbox{d})$
992: shows no significant trend with spectral index, the bottom panel
993: shows a slight increase in the fraction of variable sources
994: for $\alpha > 0$. This is mostly due to an
995: increase in the fraction of slow variables which constitute the
996: largest timescale group. It is worth pointing out that the surveys from which the flux densities were drawn to obtain spectral index were not coeval. It is likely then that any change in sample properties as a function of spectral index will be blurred as many of the sources vary intrinsically.
997:
998:
999: Turning to the influence of mean flux density, we first discuss the
1000: visual variability classification and then plot
1001: $D(2\mbox{d})$ against flux density.
1002: The selection of sources for the MASIV survey divided them into
1003: a high mean flux density group (strong) and a low mean flux density group
1004: (weak $S < 0.3$ Jy).
1005: As reported in Paper 1 there was a greater fraction of variable
1006: sources in epoch 1 from the low flux density group than from the high flux density group. Combining all four epochs the numbers of weak sources that varied in 0-4 epochs is (94, 46, 36, 39, 33) and for strong sources
1007: the numbers are (62, 45, 49, 22, 23). Thus there are significantly
1008: more 3 \& 4 time variables among the weak sources than among the
1009: strong ones, though this trend is not supported in the 2 or 1 time variables.
1010:
1011:
1012:
1013: Figure \ref{fig:saveplot} shows $D(2\mbox{d})$ versus
1014: mean flux density. The center panel shows a clear downward
1015: trend with increasing flux density in the lowest three bins,
1016: while in the fourth bin it increases but with
1017: fewer sources the mean has a large error.
1018: The interpretation is an increasing angular diameter of the
1019: compact source components with increasing total mean flux density.
1020: Furthermore, the bottom panel shows a decrease in the fraction
1021: of fast and medium scintillators with increasing mean flux density.
1022: These are exactly the trends expected if their effective angular diameters
1023: are constrained by a maximum brightness temperature due to self-absorption
1024: or inverse Compton losses ($\theta \propto (\bar{S}/T_{\rm B})^{0.5}$).
1025:
1026: \subsection{Source Models}
1027: \label{sec:sourcemodels}
1028:
1029: The foregoing analysis establishes that about half of the
1030: 443 compact flat spectrum radio sources in the MASIV
1031: survey show ISS at an rms level above 1\% over times of
1032: 2~d. We now consider a simple model for the
1033: compact source structure based on Appendix A.
1034: Equation (\ref{eq:d2dmodel}) gives an approximate relation between
1035: $D(2\mbox{d})$ and parameters of the source
1036: ($f_c$ and $\theta_{\rm src}$) and of the interstellar medium
1037: ($L$ and $V$). We proceed by assuming a basic model for the
1038: latter parameters $L=500$~pc and $V=50$~km~s$^{-1}$
1039: and finding constraints on the source.
1040:
1041: Figure \ref{fig:d2dmod} shows (solid) contours of $D(2\mbox{d})$ versus
1042: the source parameters: compact
1043: component diameter and compact flux fraction -- defined in the
1044: observer's frame.
1045: Also shown are (dashed) contours of $T_b/\bar{S}_{\rm Jy}$.
1046: The majority of sources are in the range $0.0004 < D(2\mbox{d}) < 0.01$
1047: which, for sources of 0.1 Jy mean flux density,
1048: maps to maximum brightness temperatures $10^{12}$K to $10^{14}$K.
1049: These figures require substantial Doppler factors in the AGN jets
1050: comparable with those estimated from VLBI.
1051: However, we note that the plot of Figure \ref{fig:d2dmod}
1052: only provides a guide since it is based
1053: on 500~pc as the distance to an interstellar scattering screen.
1054:
1055: The distribution of scattering electrons along the line of
1056: sight to each source is likely to be much more complex
1057: and can extend from tens of pc to a few kpc. Scattering at tens of
1058: pc has been shown to be important for the rare rapid scintillators
1059: (IHV) and scattering from more than 1~kpc is responsible for the
1060: slower timescale ISS associated from sight lines with large
1061: emission measures. Since the implied
1062: angular diameters scale roughly with the distance, the uncertainty in $L$
1063: corresponds to an extremely large range in implied brightness temperatures.
1064: We note, however, the fast ISS sources in our sample are mostly
1065: scintillating at levels of only 1-5\%, unlike the large amplitude
1066: variations in the well studied IHV sources B0405--385, B1257--326
1067: and J1819$+$3845. This suggests that the nearby scattering regions responsible
1068: are relatively rare covering only a small fraction of the sky.
1069: \cite{laz08} discuss the relative importance of sparsely distributed
1070: ``clumps of scattering material'' and a more uniformly distributed
1071: interstellar scattering plasma, suggesting that the former could be more important for ISS and the latter for angular broadening in the ISM.
1072: These authors find minimum diameters of $\sim1-2$~mas at 1~GHz,
1073: which they suggest is caused by interstellar scattering, which
1074: predicts $40-80 \mu$as when scaled to 5~GHz. It will be important to
1075: use the full MASIV data set to re-examine these questions, but
1076: since our emphasis here is on presenting the data,
1077: we postpone them to a later paper.
1078:
1079: \subsection{Combined effects of Intrinsic Variations and ISS}
1080:
1081: Here we examine the competing contributions that scintillation and
1082: intrinsic variability would potentially make to the measured lightcurves.
1083: A source at an angular diameter distance $D_A$ undergoing intrinsic
1084: variations on a timescale $\tau$ has an implied maximum
1085: intrinsic angular size:
1086: \begin{eqnarray}
1087: \theta = 17.3 \,{\cal D} \left( \frac{\tau}{100\,{\rm days}} \right)
1088: \left( \frac{D_A}{1\,{\rm Gpc}}\right)^{-1}\,\mu{\rm as},
1089: \end{eqnarray}
1090: where ${\cal D}$ is the Doppler factor. Further, a variation in flux
1091: density $\Delta S$ implies an observed brightness temperature of
1092: \begin{eqnarray}
1093: T_B = 6.4 \times 10^{12} \, \left( \frac{\Delta S}{100\,{\rm mJy}} \right)
1094: \left( \frac{\tau}{100\,{\rm days}} \right)^{-2}
1095: \left( \frac{D_A}{1\,{\rm Gpc}}\right)^{2} \, {\rm K}.
1096: \label{eq:Tbobs}
1097: \end{eqnarray}
1098: When mapped into the emission rest frame the brightness temperature
1099: is then reduced by a factor ${\cal D}^3 (1+z)^{-3}$,
1100: under the hypothesis of intrinsic variation.
1101:
1102: As an example consider a source that undergoes $100\,$mJy
1103: intrinsic fluctuations in $100\,$days, as observed between epochs for several
1104: of our sources.
1105: At a typical distance $D_A\sim 1{\rm Gpc}$ the implied
1106: maximum source size would be $\sim 17\,{\cal D} \mu$as.
1107: Suppose further that it does not show ISS within an epoch, which
1108: implies it must be larger than $~80\,\mu$as in the observed frame
1109: and so ${\cal D}>4.6$. Hence mapping equation (\ref{eq:Tbobs})
1110: into the emission frame gives $T_{\rm B,em} \simless 5\times 10^{10}$K.
1111: We conclude that sources showing intra-epoch (intrinsic) variation and no ISS
1112: have relatively low emission frame brightness
1113: and, conversely, higher brightness sources that show intra-epoch
1114: variation have to show ISS.
1115:
1116:
1117: \subsection{Dependence of ISS on Source Redshift} \label{VarZ}
1118:
1119: We found redshifts for about half of the 443 sources in the survey
1120: from the published literature and we have subsequently measured
1121: another 69 \citep{Purs08} for a total of 275 redshifts. This
1122: constitutes the largest sample of ISS measurements versus redshift.
1123:
1124: Figure \ref{fig:zplot} plots $D(2\mbox{d})$ versus redshift and reveals a highly
1125: significant decrease in the prevalence of ISS as redshift increases. In particular
1126: the middle panel shows that when binned in redshift
1127: the mean level of ISS drops steeply above redshift 2.
1128: As in other plots in this format the binned averages
1129: are independent of any SF threshold. However, note that the exact value
1130: of the lowest binned averages of $D(2\mbox{d})$
1131: depend on the details of the noise subtraction.
1132: We note that, since the effect of confusion is to slightly increase
1133: $D(2\mbox{d})$, our estimates become upper limits when
1134: below the threshold of about 0.0004.
1135:
1136: The bottom panel suggests that
1137: the fraction of fast variables drops more quickly with redshift
1138: than the fraction of slow and medium variables.
1139: However, the error bars show that this is only marginally significant,
1140: and in view of the importance of this question we list
1141: the source counts in Table \ref{tab:redshiftcounts}.
1142: If true it would imply that the drop in mean ISS level is due to
1143: an increase in angular diameter with redshift,
1144: which also lengthens the ISS timescale. While the drop in ISS
1145: level seen in the middle panel could be due either to an increase in
1146: diameter of the compact core of emission from these sources
1147: or a decrease in the compact fraction of flux density in that core,
1148: the latter interpretation would not explain a steeper decrease in
1149: fast ISS with redshift than in slow ISS.
1150: The most likely conclusion from this analysis
1151: is that the extremely compact emitting regions
1152: responsible for the ISS in over half the quasars studied
1153: appear broader in angular diameter with redshift above 2.
1154: The interpretation of this result involves either an evolution
1155: in the emitting regions with redshift or an angular broadening
1156: phenomenon due to propagation. We caution that a full consideration
1157: of selection effects must be made when interpreting this result. For
1158: example, redshifts are currently more complete in the strong (84\%)
1159: than the weak (43\%) sub-samples. Therefore, although this new
1160: cosmologically important result is the major finding
1161: from the MASIV survey, we postpone a full discussion of
1162: the interpretation to a paper in preparation \citep{macq08}
1163: pending a thorough investigation of selection effects \citep{Purs08}.
1164: Interested readers can consult preliminary discussions of the
1165: interpretation by \citet{ricMRU}.
1166: We also note that \cite{laz08} plotted angular diameter at 1~GHz
1167: against redshift from a much smaller sample of scintillating and non-scintillating sources but could draw no firm conclusions.
1168:
1169:
1170: \subsection{Intermittent Variability} \label{CompareVar}
1171:
1172:
1173: We now ask whether the sources that were only classified as variable in
1174: one to three of the four epochs are varying episodically or
1175: are the result of statistical uncertainty and a fixed threshold for variability
1176: on the raw modulation index. As a result of the measurement uncertainties
1177: there can be both false positives and false negatives, whose
1178: probabilities we can estimate. Concentrating on the 91
1179: sources that were classified as variable in only one epoch
1180: and correcting for false positives leaves us with 61 sources $\sim 13$\% of the
1181: total. These may be a category of short-lived, episodic
1182: scintillators revealed by our regular sampling over a full year.
1183:
1184: We note the strong case for intermittent ISS in the rapid variable
1185: PKS~0405--385 \citep{ked2001b}, and so consider a simple model for the intermittency in terms
1186: of the longevity of each IDV episode and the duration between episodes.
1187: Intermittency may arise either due to fluctuations in the level of turbulence
1188: responsible for ISS, or it may arise if the lifetimes of the
1189: bright, microarcsecond source components that undergo ISS are short.
1190: In the latter case one might expect sources to undergo IDV in conjunction
1191: with each outburst of the central engine.
1192:
1193:
1194: Consider a simple model in which the IDV episodes have a finite duration
1195: $\Delta T$ and an interval, $T_f$, between outbursts. Obviously in
1196: reality both quantities will have a distribution of possible values,
1197: but given the infrequency of our time sampling we restrict ourselves
1198: to this simple assumption here. For any given source the
1199: IDV episode commences at some random time $t_i \in [0,T_f)$, with the
1200: probability distribution of episodes distributed uniformly:
1201: \begin{eqnarray}
1202: p(t_i) = T_f^{-1}, \quad 0 \le t_i < T_f.
1203: \end{eqnarray}
1204: If we make a single observation the probability that the source will be exhibiting IDV is
1205: \begin{eqnarray}
1206: p_1=\Delta T/T_f,
1207: \end{eqnarray}
1208: so for a survey that examines $N$ intermittent sources the expected
1209: number showing IDVs at any one time is $N \Delta T/T_f$. One can
1210: similarly calculate the probability of detecting IDV in a source
1211: during one or more of multiple observing epochs of a multi-epoch
1212: survey (see Appendix \ref{IntermittApp}). In particular, the
1213: probability of detecting IDV in a source in one or more epochs
1214: of a four epoch survey, with epochs separated evenly in time by
1215: $t_{\rm obs}$, is
1216: \begin{eqnarray}
1217: p_4 = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll}
1218: \frac{\Delta T + 3 t_{\rm obs}}{T_f}, & t_{\rm obs} \leq \Delta T, \\
1219: \frac{4 \Delta T}{T_f}, & t_{\rm obs} > \Delta T. \\
1220: \end{array}
1221: \right.
1222: \end{eqnarray}
1223: The number of IDV sources detected is a maximum when the interval
1224: between observing epochs exceeds the duration of IDV episodes because
1225: for shorter epoch intervals, after one merely discovers few new IDVs
1226: after the first epoch, one only keeps reobserving all the IDVs that
1227: were present in the first epoch. (Obviously, in the limit when
1228: $t_{\rm obs}$ is small, multiple observations discover the same
1229: number of sources as a single-epoch survey.)
1230:
1231: Now, the mean detection rate of IDV sources in each epoch
1232: is 30\%, whereas the fraction of sources that exhibited IDV
1233: in one or more of our four epochs is 58\%. These two numbers
1234: imply a typical burst duration $\Delta T = 1.2$\,yr and a
1235: burst period of $T_f = 3.8\,$yr.
1236:
1237: We can also calculate the corresponding probability that IDV
1238: is observed in a source in all four epochs:
1239: \begin{eqnarray}
1240: p_{\rm all 4} = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll}
1241: \frac{\Delta T-3 t_{\rm obs}}{T_f}, & 3 t_{\rm obs} < \Delta T, \\
1242: 0, & 3 t_{\rm obs} > \Delta T.
1243: \end{array}
1244: \right.
1245: \end{eqnarray}
1246: Based on the foregoing estimates of $\Delta T$ and $T_f$ one
1247: estimates that only 4\% of all sources should be common to all
1248: four epochs. However, the actual detection fraction is 12\%.
1249:
1250:
1251: It should be remembered that this model does not take
1252: into account several effects which are likely to be important,
1253: including: (i) annual cycle effects influence the number of
1254: sources one detects at any one epoch (ii) there is likely
1255: a distribution of episode durations and repetition rates,
1256: (iii) the repetition is likely irregular and (iv) not all
1257: IDVs are likely to be episodic. We favor (ii), the importance of
1258: which is illustrated by the fact that many one-time
1259: IDVs were seen in epochs 2 \& 3 that were (obviously)
1260: not detected in epoch 4. However, our model implies
1261: that sources that commenced IDV in these epochs should
1262: have been detected subsequently because the predicted
1263: burst duration exceeds the interval between observing
1264: runs (i.e. $\Delta T > 3 t_{\rm obs}$).
1265:
1266: \section{Conclusions}
1267: \label{Conc}
1268:
1269: We have reported results from the four epochs of the MASIV survey. There were
1270: 710 sources with flat spectra ($\alpha<-0.3$) near 5~GHz selected in
1271: weak and strong flux density groups surveyed for variability in four epochs
1272: over a year. These flat spectrum sources are predominantly quasars with
1273: compact emission probably from a core and jet, many with effective diameters small
1274: enough to show interstellar scintillation (ISS). In each epoch the flux density was measured
1275: using sub-arrays of the VLA every~2 hrs for about 12~hrs each day for 3-4~days.
1276: Sources were removed from the study if they showed evidence for
1277: changing correlated flux density due to confusion or resolution of their more extended
1278: structure, leaving 443 sources which were analyzed for variability in two
1279: ways.
1280:
1281: The first was a binary classification based on the raw modulation index
1282: (visual method) in which 43\% of the
1283: sources were classified as variable in 2, 3 or 4 of the epochs.
1284: The second was a fit to the epoch-averaged structure function
1285: parameterized by $D(2\mbox{d})$ and a timescale $\tau_{\rm char}$.
1286: In view of the uncertainties in the latter
1287: we classified sources as slow ($>3$~days), medium (0.5-3~days) or
1288: fast ($<0.5$~days) if $D(2\mbox{d})$ exceeded
1289: $4\times10^{-4}$. By this criterion 37\% of the sources varied
1290: with more than 1.4\% modulation index over 2~days, which is similar
1291: to the 43\% variables by the visual classification.
1292:
1293: We found that $D(2\mbox{d})$ and timescale
1294: varied both with coordinates in the Galaxy and also with source-based quantities.
1295: This confirms that the variations are dominated
1296: by ISS, which depends on both the strength of scattering and the distance
1297: to the scattering region and also on the fraction of flux density
1298: in its most compact component and its effective angular diameter. The following
1299: is a summary of our findings:
1300:
1301: \begin{itemize}
1302:
1303:
1304: \item
1305: The amplitude of 2-d variability increases with increasing emission
1306: measure estimated from H$\alpha$ intensity for each line of sight.
1307: Emission measure is the column density for the square of
1308: the electron density which is expected to be strongly correlated with
1309: inhomogeneity in the ionized medium that causes ISS.
1310: This result provides observational evidence that ISS is the dominant cause
1311: of the variations. We find fast variations dominate for
1312: low emission measure, as expected since such regions will be seen
1313: out of the plane and closer to the Earth, and
1314: slow variations dominate for high emission measure which are typically
1315: seen at greater distances toward the Galactic plane especially for
1316: southern latitudes where the H$\alpha$ intensity is high.
1317:
1318: \item
1319: The amplitude of 2-d ISS variability varies significantly with
1320: Galactic latitude but differs substantially between positive and negative
1321: latitudes. The expected behaviour is
1322: complicated; greater path lengths at low latitudes, where the
1323: scattering should be stronger, cause the scattering to be slower
1324: which should reduce the rms over 3 d.
1325: However, the observed timescales show that there are more sources with
1326: fast variations at high latitudes and more sources with
1327: slow variations at low latitudes in both hemispheres, in
1328: clear support of ISS as the dominant cause.
1329:
1330: \item The ISS modulation index tends to decrease with increasing mean flux
1331: density, as expected if the compact emission is limited
1332: by synchrotron self absorption or inverse Compton losses to
1333: have a maximum brightness temperature. In that case the expected
1334: angular diameter $\propto \sqrt{\bar{S}}$ which will quench the ISS
1335: of the stronger sources.
1336:
1337: \item There is little change in the ISS amplitude with spectral index
1338: for our sample with $\alpha > -0.3$.
1339:
1340: \item There is evidence that the ISS can be intermittent on times of 3-6 months
1341: for some sources, but this is hard to quantify from the
1342: 3~day observing sequences, when the time scale of
1343: the variations is of the same order.
1344:
1345: \item We model $D(2\mbox{d})$ as a function of compact source component
1346: fractional flux density and angular diameter, from which we find
1347: compact diameter to lie in the range 0.005 -- 0.15 milli arcseconds
1348: and brightness temperatures in the range $10^{12} - 10^{14}$K.
1349:
1350: \item
1351: The most far-reaching result reported here is the discovery of
1352: a decrease in both the fraction of sources that scintillate and in their
1353: scintillation amplitude beyond redshifts around 2. We conclude
1354: that there is an increase in the typical angular diameter
1355: of the most compact radio-emitting regions of the quasars beyond reshift 2.
1356: The possible interpretations
1357: of this exciting result will be presented in a companion paper
1358: \citep{macq08}.
1359:
1360: \item
1361: A further surprise (at least to us) was the apparent absence of the
1362: very rapid variables (IHV). J1819+3845 fell in our sample, but it was the
1363: only source to show remarkable large amplitude variability. J0929+5013 showed rapid
1364: variability in the January 2002 epoch \citep{lov2003} but,
1365: although monitored closely, revealed only slower, many-hour
1366: variability in the three later epochs. We had expected to find more of
1367: these rapid variables especially given that two of the three known,
1368: J1819+3845 and PKS1257-326 were discovered serendipitously. This
1369: strongly suggests that the IHV sources lie behind discrete local
1370: interstellar clouds which cover a small fraction of the sky.
1371:
1372: \end{itemize}
1373:
1374:
1375: \acknowledgements
1376:
1377: The National Radio Astronomy
1378: Observatory is a facility of the National Science Foundation operated
1379: under cooperative agreement by Associated Universities, Inc.
1380: We are extremely grateful for the technical support provided by NRAO
1381: staff at Socorro, in particular we would like to thank Ken Sowinski,
1382: Miller Goss, Mark Claussen and Jim Ulvestad for helping to implement
1383: the five subarrays at the VLA.
1384: This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database
1385: (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California
1386: Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics
1387: and Space Administration. We also made use of data from the
1388: Wisconsin H-Alpha Mapper, which is funded by the National Science Foundation.
1389: BJR thanks the US-NSF for funding under grant AST 0507713.
1390: He also thanks both the Cavendish Astrophysics group at Cambridge
1391: and the ATNF, Epping for hospitality.
1392:
1393:
1394: \clearpage
1395: \appendix
1396:
1397: \section{Structure function for ISS}
1398: \label{DsISS}
1399:
1400: In all of the MASIV data the intrinsic source diameters
1401: ($\theta_{\rm src}$) are large enough to suppress the scintillations relative to
1402: those of a point source (such as a pulsar), which at 6~cm would
1403: be expected to have a true modulation index
1404: $m_{\rm pt}$ near unity. In this section we describe a model
1405: for the structure function for such extended sources;
1406: this is easier to interpret than the apparent modulation index $m_i$.
1407:
1408: The source diameter smoothes the ISS of a
1409: point source and so reduces the modulation index to $m_{\theta}$
1410: and lengthens the timescale to $\tau_{\theta}$. If the
1411: scattering is concentrated at a distance
1412: $L$ from the Earth and we are near the transition from
1413: weak to strong scintillation, a useful approximate relation is:
1414: \begin{eqnarray}
1415: m_{\theta} \sim m_{\rm pt} \frac{\theta_{\rm F}^{7/6}}{(\theta_{\rm F}^2 +
1416: \theta_{\rm src}^2)^{7/12}} \, .
1417: \label{eq:mtheta}
1418: \end{eqnarray}
1419: Here $\theta_{\rm F} = \sqrt{\lambda/(2 \pi L)}$ is the angular
1420: size subtended by the Fresnel scale
1421: ($r_{\rm F}$) and $\theta_{\rm src}$ is the angular radius of the source.
1422: The exponents $7/6$ and $7/12$ apply for a Kolmogorov
1423: spectrum of interstellar turbulence \citep{Coles87}.
1424: To the same accuracy the ISS timescale for a point source would be
1425: $\tau_{\rm F} = L\theta_{\rm F}/V$ and the source smoothing would increase it to:
1426: \begin{eqnarray}
1427: \tau_{\theta} = \tau_{\rm F} \frac{\sqrt{\theta_{\rm F}^2 + \theta_{\rm src}^2}}{\theta_{\rm F}} \, ,
1428: \label{eq:tautheta}
1429: \end{eqnarray}
1430: where $V$ is the effective transverse velocity of the observer relative to the layer of scattering plasma.
1431: Note that when the source diameter is sufficiently large to suppress the scintillations we have
1432: \begin{eqnarray}
1433: m_{\theta} \sim (\theta_{\rm F}/\theta_{\rm src})^{7/6} \; ,
1434: \tau_{\theta} \sim L \theta_{\rm src}/V \, ,
1435: \label{eq:mtau}
1436: \end{eqnarray}
1437: where we have set $m_{\rm pt}=1$ \citep{R86}.
1438:
1439: The theoretical form of the auto-correlation function for an extended source
1440: that substantially suppresses the scintillation index is given by the
1441: low wavenumber approximation of \citet{Coles87}. This in turn gives
1442: the theoretical structure function, whose detailed shape depends on
1443: both the spectrum of the plasma density and on its distribution along
1444: the line of sight through the Galaxy. Figure 14 of
1445: \citet{ric2006} shows the form for sources with Gaussian brightness
1446: with peak temperature $10^{11}-10^{13}$K, when the medium is modeled by the \cite{cl05}
1447: electron distribution at a Galactic latitude of 45$^\circ$
1448: (away from the Galactic center). The form of the structure function
1449: at small time lags depends strongly on the density distribution in
1450: the local ISM. A useful approximation to these results is given by:
1451: \begin{eqnarray}
1452: D(t) = 2 f_c^2 m_{\theta}^2 \frac{t^a}{t^a+\tau_{\theta}^a} \, ,
1453: \label{eq:Dmodel}
1454: \end{eqnarray}
1455: where $1 \le a \le 2$ is a constant that depends on the density
1456: distribution in the local ISM. Here $a \sim 2$ for a local bubble
1457: with low turbulence such that the effective scattering distance
1458: is beyond the bubble ($> 100$~pc) and alternatively $a \sim 1$
1459: if the medium is uniformly turbulent out to a scale height
1460: (as in the ``disk'' of the CL05 electron density model).
1461: We have also introduced an extra variable $f_c$ that is
1462: the fraction of the source flux density in the bright (core) component.
1463:
1464: Equations (\ref{eq:Dmodel}) and (\ref{eq:mtau}) thus provide a simple interpretation
1465: for our estimates of $D(t=2\mbox{d})$. Inserting $m_{\theta}$
1466: and $\tau_{\theta}$ from equation (\ref{eq:mtau}) we obtain:
1467: \begin{eqnarray}
1468: D(2\mbox{d}) = 2 f_c^2 [\frac{1}{1+ 2\pi L \theta_{\rm src}^2/\lambda}]^{7/6}
1469: \frac{1}{1+(L\theta_{\rm src}/V 2\mbox{d})^a } \, ,
1470: \label{eq:d2dmodel}
1471: \end{eqnarray}
1472: An important feature of this result is that $D(2\mbox{d})$ decreases steeply with increasing $\theta_{\rm src}$ and so provides a sensitive measure of source diameter. In estimating $D(2\mbox{d})$ for every source-epoch we set $a=1$, which allows us to estimate the scintillation timescale $\tau_{\theta}$ without having to also estimate the exponent $a$. $D(2\mbox{d})$ can be converted to an effective 2-day modulation index by $m_{2\rm{d}} = \sqrt{0.5D(2\mbox{d})}$. We note that $m_{2\rm{d}}$ can substantially exceed the apparent modulation index $m_i$ when the time scale is longer than about 2 days.
1473:
1474:
1475: \section{A simple model for IDV intermittency} \label{IntermittApp}
1476:
1477: Consider a model in which a source outbursts every duration $T_f$ in time and each IDV episode lasts $\Delta T$. The initial outburst time is unknown, but its probability is evenly distributed in the interval $t_i \in [0,T_f)$: $p(t_i) = T_f^{-1}$. Now consider a function $\bar f(t)= 1-[H(t) - H(t-\Delta T)]$, which assumes the value one whenever the source shows {\it no} IDV but the value zero when it is on.
1478:
1479: Thus the fraction of the time in which the source is off for initial burst durations between $t_i$ and $t_i+d\delta t_i$ is $\bar f(t_i) p(t_i) \delta t_i$. Thus the probability that IDV is absent is
1480: \begin{eqnarray}
1481: p_{\rm 1 off} &=& \int_0^{T_f} dt_i \bar f (t_i) p(t_i) \nonumber \\
1482: &=& 1- \frac{\Delta T}{T_f}.
1483: \end{eqnarray}
1484: Thus the probability that the source is observed to exhibit IDV is $1-p_{\rm 1 off} = \Delta T/T_f$.
1485:
1486: Now suppose we look for IDV at times $t=0, t_{\rm obs}, 2 t_{\rm obs}, 3 t_{\rm obs}$. The fraction of the burst times between $t_i$ and $t_i +\delta t_i$ for which IDV is absent in all four observations is $\bar f(t_i) \bar f(t_i+t_{\rm obs}) \bar f(t_i+2 t_{\rm obs})\bar f(t_i+3 t_{\rm obs}) p(t_i) \delta t_i$. If we assume that the repetition period exceeds the total duration of our observations (i.e. $T_f > 3 \,t_{\rm obs}$), the probability of observing no IDV over all four epochs is
1487: \begin{eqnarray}
1488: p_{\rm 4 off} &=& \int_0^{T_f} dt_i \bar f (t_i) \bar f(t_i+t_{\rm obs}) \bar f(t_i+2 t_{\rm obs})\bar f(t_i+3 t_{\rm obs}) p(t_i) \nonumber \\
1489: &=& \left\{
1490: \begin{array}{ll}
1491: 1- \frac{\Delta T+3 t_{\rm obs}}{T_f}, & t_{\rm obs} \leq \Delta T, \\
1492: 1- \frac{4 \Delta T}{T_f}, & t_{\rm obs} > \Delta T.
1493: \end{array}
1494: \right.
1495: \end{eqnarray}
1496: Thus the probability that IDV is observed in any one or more of these four epochs is
1497: \begin{eqnarray}
1498: p_{\hbox{\footnotesize any of 4 on}} = 1-p_{\rm 4 off} = \left\{
1499: \begin{array}{ll}
1500: \frac{\Delta T+3 t_{\rm obs}}{T_f}, & t_{\rm obs} \leq \Delta T, \\
1501: \frac{4 \Delta T}{T_f}, & t_{\rm obs} > \Delta T.
1502: \end{array}
1503: \right.
1504: \end{eqnarray}
1505:
1506: We can similarly consider the probability of observing IDV in multiple observations by defining the function $f(t) = H(t) - H(t-\Delta T)$ which takes the value one whenever the IDV is on and zero otherwise. The probability that IDV is observed in all four epochs is thus
1507: \begin{eqnarray}
1508: p_{\rm 4 on} &=& \int_0^{T_f} dt_if (t_i) f(t_i+t_{\rm obs}) f(t_i+2 t_{\rm obs}) f(t_i+3 t_{\rm obs}) p(t_i) \nonumber \\
1509: &=& \left\{
1510: \begin{array}{ll}
1511: \frac{\Delta T-3 t_{\rm obs}}{T_f}, & 3t_{\rm obs} \leq \Delta T, \\
1512: 0, & T_f > 3t_{\rm obs} > \Delta T.
1513: \end{array}
1514: \right.
1515: \end{eqnarray}
1516:
1517:
1518: \clearpage
1519:
1520: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1521: \bibitem[Bignall et al.(2003)]{big2003} Bignall, H. E., Jauncey, D. L., Lovell, J. E. J., Tzioumis, A. K., Kedziora-Chudczer, L., Macquart, J.-P., Tingay, S. J., Rayner, D. P. \& Clay, R. W. 2003, \apj., 585, 653.
1522: \bibitem[Bignall et al.(2006)]{big2006} Bignall, H.E., Macquart, J-P., Jauncey, D.L., Lovell, J.E.J., Tzioumis, A.K. \& Kedziora-Chudczer, L. 2006, \apj., 652, 1050
1523: \bibitem[Browne et al.(1998)]{bro1998} Browne, I.W.A., Wilkinson, P. N., Patnaik, A. R. \& Wrobel, J. M. 1998, MNRAS, 293, 257
1524: \bibitem[Coles et al.(1987)]{Coles87} Coles, W. A., Frehlich, R. G., Rickett, B. J., \& Codona, J. L. 1987, \apj, 315, 666
1525: \bibitem[Condon et al.(1998)]{con1998} Condon, J.J., Cotton, W. D., Greisen, E. W., Yin, Q. F., Perley, R. A., Taylor, G. B. \& Broderick, J. J. 1998, \aj, 115, 1693
1526: \bibitem[Condon \& Jauncey(1974)]{con1974} Condon, J.J. \& Jauncey, D.L. 1974, \aj., 79, 1220
1527: \bibitem[Cordes and Lazio(2005)]{cl05}Cordes, J. M. \& Lazio, T. J. W. 2005, astro-ph/0207156 (CL05, version 3)
1528: \bibitem[Dennett-Thorpe \& de Bruyn(2000)]{den2000} Dennett-Thorpe, J. \& de Bruyn, A. G. 2000, \apj., 529, 65
1529: \bibitem[Dennett-Thorpe \& de Bruyn(2001)]{dtdb2001} Dennett-Thorpe, J. \& de Bruyn, A.G. 2001, Astrophys. \&
1530: Space Sci., 278, 101
1531: \bibitem[Dennett-Thorpe \& de Bruyn(2002)]{dtdb2002}
1532: Dennett-Thorpe, J. \& de Bruyn, A.G. 2002, Nature, 415, 57
1533: \bibitem[Dennett-Thorpe \& de Bruyn(2003)]{den2003} Dennett-Thorpe, J. \& de Bruyn, A.G. 2003, A\&A, 404, 113
1534: \bibitem[Haffner et al.(2003)]{wham}Haffner, L. M.,
1535: Reynolds, R. J., Tufte, S. L., Madsen, G. J., Jaehnig, K. P.,
1536: Percival, J. W. 2003, \apjs, 149, 405.
1537: \bibitem[Heeschen(1984)]{hee84} Heeschen, D.S. 1984, \aj, 89, 1111
1538: \bibitem[Heeschen \& Rickett(1987)]{HR87} Heeschen, D.S. \& Rickett, B.J. 1987, \aj, 93, 589
1539: \bibitem[Hirabayashi et al.(1998)]{hir1998} Hirabayashi, H., et al. 1998, Science, 281, 1825
1540: \bibitem[Jauncey et al.(2000)]{jau2000} Jauncey, D.L., Kedziora-Chudczer, L., Lovell, J.E.J., Nicolson, G.D.,
1541: Perley, R.A., Reynolds, J.E., Tzioumis, A.K. \& Wieringa, M.H. 2000, ,
1542: in Astrophysical Phenomena Revealed by Space VLBI, ed H. Hirabayashi, P.G. Edwards \& D.W. Murphy, 147
1543: \bibitem[Jauncey \& Macquart(2001)]{jau2001} Jauncey, D.L., \& Macquart, J-P. 2001, A\&A, 370, L9
1544: \bibitem[Jauncey et al.(2003)]{jau2003} Jauncey, D. L., Johnston, H. M., Bignall, H. E., Lovell, J. E. J., Kedziora-Chudczer, L., Tzioumis, A. K., Macquart, J-P 2003, Ap\&SS, 288, 63
1545: \bibitem[Kedziora-Chudczer et al.(1997)]{ked1997} Kedziora-Chudczer, L., Jauncey, D. L., Wieringa, M. H., Walker, M. A., Nicolson, G. D., Reynolds, J. E., Tzioumis, A. K. 1997, \apj., 490, L9
1546: \bibitem[Kedziora-Chudczer et al.(2001a)]{ked2001a}
1547: Kedziora-Chudczer, L. L.; Jauncey, D. L.; Wieringa, M. H.; Tzioumis, A. K.; Reynolds, J. E. 2001, \mnras, 325,1411
1548: \bibitem[Kedziora-Chudczer et al.(2001b)]{ked2001b} Kedziora-Chudczer,
1549: L., Jauncey, D. L., Lovell, J. E. J., Walker, M. A., Macquart,
1550: J.-P., Wieringa, M. H., Tzioumis, A. K., Perley, R. A., Reynolds,
1551: J. E. 2001 in ``Particles and Fields in Radio Galaxies'', ASP Conference Proceedings Vol. 250, Eds. Robert A. Laing \& Katherine M. Blundell, Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 128
1552: \bibitem[Lazio et al.(2008)]{laz08}
1553: Lazio, T. J. W.; Ojha, R., Fey, A. L., Kedziora-Chudczer, L., Cordes, J. M., Jauncey, D. L., Lovell, J. E. J., 2008, \apj, 672, 115
1554: \bibitem[Linsky et al. (2007)]{lrr2007} Linsky, J., Rickett, B.J. \& Redfield, S. 2007, \apj, 675, 413
1555: \bibitem[Lovell et al.(2003)]{lov2003} Lovell, J. E. J., Jauncey, D. L., Bignall, H. E., Kedziora-Chudczer, L., Macquart, J.-P., Rickett, B. J., Tzioumis, A. K. 2003, \aj., 126, 1699
1556: \bibitem[Macquart \& Jauncey(2003)]{mac2003} Macquart, J-P, \& Jauncey, D. L. 2002, \apj, 572, 786
1557: \bibitem[Macquart et al.(2008)]{macq08} Macquart, J-P. et al., 2008, in preparation.
1558: \bibitem[Myers et al.(1995)]{mye1995} Myers, S.T., et al 1995, \apj, 447, L5
1559: \bibitem[Ojha et al.(2004)]{ojha2004} Ojha, R., Fey, A.L., Lovell, J.E.J., Jauncey, D.L. \& Johnston, K.J. 2004, \aj, 128, 1570
1560: \bibitem[Patnaik et al.(1992)]{pat1992} Patnaik, A. R., Browne, I. W. A., Wilkinson, P. N., \& Wrobel, J. M. 1992, \mnras, 254, 655
1561: \bibitem[Preston et al.(1983)]{pmj}
1562: Preston, R.A., Morabito, D.D., Jauncey, D.L., 1983, \apj, 269, 387
1563: \bibitem[Pursimo et al.(2008)]{Purs08} Pursimo, T. et al., 2008, in preparation.
1564: \bibitem[Quirrenbach et al.(1989)]{qui89} Quirrenbach, A.,
1565: Witzel, A., Krichbaum, T., Hummel, C.~A., \& Alberdi, A.\ 1989, \nat, 337, 442
1566: \bibitem[Quirrenbach et al.(1992)]{qwk1992} Quirrenbach, A., Witzel, A., Kirchbaum, T. P., Hummel, C. A., Wegner, R., Schalinski, C. J., Ott, M., Alberdi, A., Rioja, M. 1992, \aap, 258, 279
1567: \bibitem[Rickett(1986)]{R86} Rickett, B.J. 1986,\apj, 307, 564
1568: \bibitem[Rickett et al.(2000)]{RCM2000} Rickett, B. J., Coles, Wm. A. \& Markkanen, J. 2000, \apj, 503, 304
1569: \bibitem[Rickett et al.(2001)]{ric2001} Rickett, B.J., Witzel, A., Kraus, A., Krichbaum, T. P., Qian, S. J. 2001, \apj, 550, L11
1570: \bibitem[Rickett et al.(2006)]{ric2006} Rickett, B.J., Lazio, T.J.W., \& Ghigo, F.D. 2006 \apjs, 165, 439
1571: \bibitem[Rickett et al.(2007)]{ricMRU} Rickett, B.J. et al. 2007, in proceedings of ``From Planets to Dark Energy: the Modern Radio Universe'', Manchester,
1572: Eds. R. J. Beswick, P. J. Diamond \& R. Schilizzi, PoS(MRU)046
1573: \bibitem[Scheuer \& Williams(1968)]{SW68}
1574: Scheuer, P.A.G. \& Williams, P.J.S. 1968, \araa, 6, 321
1575: \bibitem[Spangler \& Cordes(1998)]{sc98} Spangler, S.R. \& Cordes, J.M. 1998, \apj, 505, 766
1576: \bibitem[Taylor \& Cordes(1993)]{tc93} Taylor, J. H., \& Cordes, J. M. 1993, \apj, 411, 674
1577: \bibitem[Thompson et al.(2001)]{tms2001} Thompson, A.~R.,
1578: Moran, J.~M.,
1579: \& Swenson, G.~W., Jr.\ 2001, Interferometry and synthesis in radio astronomy by A.~Richard Thompson, James M.~Moran, and George W.~Swenson, Jr.~2nd ed.~ New York : Wiley, c2001.xxiii, 692 p.~: ill.~; 25 cm.~''A Wiley-Interscience publication.'' Includes bibliographical references and indexes.~ISBN : 0471254924,
1580: \bibitem[Walker(1998)]{wal98} Walker, M.~A.\ 1998, \mnras, 294, 307
1581: \bibitem[Wilkinson et al.(1998)]{wil1998} Wilkinson, P. N., Browne, I. W. A., Patnaik, A. R., Wrobel, J. M., Sorathia, B. 1998, \mnras, 300, 790
1582: \end{thebibliography}
1583:
1584: \begin{figure}
1585: \includegraphics[width=15cm]{f1.eps} % this has panels for mraw and mstr1
1586: \caption{\it Left: \rm Raw modulation index
1587: for epoch 1 plotted against mean source flux density.
1588: Sources classified as variable plotted as circles
1589: and non-variable as pluses.
1590: \it Right: \rm Similar plot for $m_{2{\rm h}} $ as described and defined in \S\ref{measerr}.
1591: In both plots the dashed line is equation(\ref{eq:error1})
1592: with $s=0.0015$ Jy and $p=0.01$
1593: and the solid line has $s=0.0013$ Jy and $p=0.005$.
1594: Similar plots are obtained for the other three epochs.}
1595: \label{fig:mraw}
1596: \end{figure}
1597:
1598:
1599: \begin{figure}
1600: \begin{tabular}{c}
1601: \includegraphics[width=7cm]{f2a.eps} \\
1602: \includegraphics[width=7cm]{f2b.eps}
1603: \end{tabular}
1604: \caption{\it Upper: \rm Time series of flux density (Jy) for J2325+3957 versus
1605: day number from 2002 January 1; error bars are as in Paper 1. \it Lower: \rm
1606: Structure Function $D(\tau)$ of flux density (normalized by its mean)
1607: averaged over all 4 epochs. The dashed line is
1608: the estimated noise level $D_{\rm noise}$ and the solid line is a simple model fit
1609: (see \S \ref{VarTimeScale}). The vertical bar centered near lag
1610: of 2~d is an estimate of $D(\mbox{2\,day})$ and its standard error.
1611: }
1612: \label{fig:D1}
1613: \end{figure}
1614:
1615:
1616: \begin{figure}
1617: \begin{tabular}{cc}
1618: \includegraphics[height=10cm, angle=0]{f3a.eps} & % lines are thickened!
1619: \includegraphics[height=10cm, angle=0]{f3b.eps} \\
1620: \includegraphics[width=7cm]{f3c.eps} &
1621: \includegraphics[width=7cm]{f3d.eps} \\
1622: \end{tabular}
1623: \caption{Examples of MASIV variability. J0949+5819 (left) and
1624: J1328+6221 (right). The top panel in each case shows all the
1625: flux densities in Jy against day number from 2002 January
1626: 1. The middle four panels show light-curves for each of the first
1627: four epochs. The horizontal scale is the same (four days) in each
1628: case. Lower panels show structure function of flux density
1629: (normalized by its mean) averaged over all 4 epochs.
1630: Dashed line is the estimated noise level $D_{\rm noise}$
1631: and the solid line is a simple model fit (see text).
1632: J0949+5819 shows evidence of episodic scintillation, possibly related to intrinsic source changes as there appears to be a corresponsence between mean flux density over an epoch and amplitude of scintillation. J1328+6221 shows strong, consistent scintillation over all four observation epochs.}
1633: \label{fig:lightcurves}
1634: \end{figure}
1635:
1636:
1637:
1638: \begin{figure}[hbt]
1639: \includegraphics[width=10cm]{f4.eps}
1640: \caption{$m_{2\,{\rm d}} = \sqrt{D(2\,{\rm d})}$
1641: (without any noise subtraction) plotted against mean
1642: source flux density. Circles are sources classified as variables and
1643: pluses as non-variables.
1644: The lines are equation(\ref{eq:error1}) with $s=0.0015$ Jy and $p=0.01$ for the dashed line and $s=0.0013$ Jy and $p=0.005$ for the solid line.
1645: Similar plots are obtained for the other three epochs.
1646: }
1647: \label{fig:m2d1}
1648: \end{figure}
1649:
1650:
1651:
1652: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1653: \begin{tabular}{c}
1654: \includegraphics[width=9cm,angle=270]{f5a.ps} \\
1655: \includegraphics[width=9cm,angle=270]{f5b.ps} \\
1656: \end{tabular}
1657: \caption{\it Upper: \rm The number of sources classified as variable versus the
1658: observed number of changes in the sign of the derivative of flux
1659: density vs time (i.e. number of inflection points). Clearly a
1660: majority of the sources vary on timescales of 3 days or longer.
1661: \it Lower: \rm Numbers of sources classified as variable in each
1662: epoch. Screens moving at the LSR would be
1663: expected to result in fewer variables beeing seen in epoch 3; we see
1664: no such deficit. }
1665: \label{InflectionTimescale}
1666: \end{figure}
1667:
1668:
1669: \begin{figure}[hbt]
1670: \includegraphics[width=13cm]{f6.eps}
1671: \caption{
1672: The number of ``variable'' epochs plotted against
1673: the value of $D(2\mbox{d})$ fitted to the cumulative
1674: structure function for all four epochs.
1675: The large circles show the mean values for each group of sources
1676: (see Table \ref{tab:compvar}).
1677: }
1678: \label{fig:nevar}
1679: \end{figure}
1680:
1681:
1682: \begin{figure}[hbt]
1683: \includegraphics[width=13cm]{f7.eps}
1684: \caption{\it Upper panel: \rm Log-log Scatter plot of $D(2\mbox{d})$
1685: against WHAM H$\alpha$ emission which is proportional
1686: to the emission measure on a line of sight sampled on a 1 degree grid
1687: of the Northern sky \citep{wham}. The intra-hour variable
1688: source J1819+3845 is off scale at 0.25.
1689: The different symbols represent the
1690: three classifications of ISS timescale, as described in the text.
1691: \it Center panel: \rm Mean value of $D(2\mbox{d})$ in
1692: the indicated bins of H$\alpha$ emission including
1693: all sources except J1819+3845; vertical bar gives the standard error in the mean.
1694: \it Lower panel: \rm Fraction of sources above the threshold in each timescale
1695: class in each bin showing that fast ISS is commonest
1696: for the lower column density of electrons and slower ISS
1697: dominates for higher column densities. Error bars assume binomial
1698: distributions. The same method is used in Figures \ref{fig:latplot},
1699: \ref{fig:sid2d}, \ref{fig:saveplot} \& \ref{fig:zplot}.
1700: }
1701: \label{fig:Halpha}
1702: \end{figure}
1703:
1704: \begin{figure}[hbt]
1705: \includegraphics[width=13cm]{f8.eps}
1706: \caption{\it Upper panel: \rm Scatter plot of $D(2\mbox{d})$
1707: (on log scale) against Galactic latitude. The intra-hour variable
1708: source J1819+3845 is off scale at 0.25. The different symbols represent the
1709: three classifications of timescale, as described in \S\ref{VarTimeScale}.
1710: \it Center panel: \rm Squares show mean value of $D(2\mbox{d})$
1711: in 30 degree bins of latitude including all sources except J1819+3845;
1712: vertical bar gives the error in the mean. Note the N-S asymmetry in the
1713: circles show mean H$\alpha$ emission in each bin.
1714: \it Lower panel: \rm Fraction of sources above the threshold
1715: in each timescale class in each bin.
1716: }
1717: \label{fig:latplot}
1718: \end{figure}
1719:
1720: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1721: \includegraphics[width=8cm,angle=270]{f9.ps}
1722: \caption{Number of variable and non-variable sources as a function of spectral index.}
1723: \label{fig:sidist}
1724: \end{figure}
1725:
1726:
1727: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1728: \includegraphics[width=13cm]{f10.eps}
1729: \caption{$D(2\mbox{d})$ as a function of spectral index.
1730: \it Upper panel: \rm Logarithmic scatter plot of $D(2\mbox{d})$.
1731: Different symbols represent the three classifications of ISS timescale.
1732: \it Center panel: \rm Mean $D(2\mbox{d})$ binned by spectral index
1733: including all sources except J1819+3845. \it Lower panel: \rm Fraction of sources above the threshold in each timescale class in each bin.
1734: No significant trend is seen.
1735: }
1736: \label{fig:sid2d}
1737: \end{figure}
1738:
1739:
1740: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1741: \includegraphics[width=13cm]{f11.eps}
1742: \caption{\it Upper panel: \rm Scatter plot of $D(2\mbox{d})$
1743: against mean flux density.
1744: The higher values are more common
1745: for lower flux density sources. The different symbols represent the
1746: three classifications of ISS timescale, as described in the text.
1747: \it Center panel: \rm Mean value of $D(2\mbox{d})$
1748: in bins of mean flux density for all
1749: sources (excluding extreme IHV quasar J1819+3845).
1750: Note lower levels of ISS for the sources with higher flux density.
1751: The points centered at 2.5 Jy have only a few sources in each timescale
1752: group giving larger errors in the mean for that bin.
1753: \it Lower panel: \rm Fraction of sources in each timescale class in each bin.
1754: Note decreasing occurrence of fast variables among stronger sources.
1755: }
1756: \label{fig:saveplot}
1757: \end{figure}
1758:
1759:
1760: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1761: \includegraphics[width=15cm]{f12.eps}
1762: \caption{Solid lines show contours of $\log_{10}[D(2\mbox{d})]$
1763: versus $f_c$ and $\theta_{\rm src}$ based on a Kolmogorov model for ISS
1764: in a region at a distance of 500~pc. Dashed lines are contours of
1765: $\log_{10}[T_b/\bar{S}_{\rm Jy}]$ for total source flux density
1766: $\bar{S}_{\rm Jy}$.
1767: }
1768: \label{fig:d2dmod}
1769: \end{figure}
1770:
1771:
1772: \begin{figure}[bht]
1773: \includegraphics[width=13cm]{f13.eps}
1774: \caption{\it Upper panel: \rm Scatter plot of $D(2\mbox{d})$
1775: against source redshift. The different symbols represent the
1776: three classifications of ISS timescale, as described in the text.
1777: \it Center panel: \rm Mean value of $D(2\mbox{d})$
1778: in redshift bins for the 271 sources (out of 443) with measured
1779: redshift (excluding extreme IHV quasar J1819+3845).
1780: Note lower levels of ISS at high redshift.
1781: Values below the dash-dot line are upper bounds since they may be
1782: raised slightly by low level confusion.
1783: \it Lower panel: \rm Fraction of sources in each timescale class in each bin.
1784: The two bins above z=3 have been combined, as there are so few sources
1785: at this redshift.
1786: }
1787: \label{fig:zplot}
1788: \end{figure}
1789:
1790: \clearpage
1791:
1792:
1793: \begin{table}[ht]
1794: \caption{A Summary of the observation dates, durations and VLA array
1795: configurations for the first four MASIV epochs.}
1796: \label{tab:obs}
1797: \smallskip
1798: \begin{center}
1799: \begin{tabular}{cr@{,\,}lcc}
1800: \tableline
1801: \noalign{\smallskip}
1802: Epoch Number & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Start Time (UT)} & Duration (h) & Array Configuration \\
1803: \tableline
1804: 1 & 2002 January 19 & 19:14 & 72 & D $\rightarrow$ A \\
1805: 2 & 2002 May 9 & 08:02 & 72 & A $\rightarrow$ BnA \\
1806: 3 & 2002 September 13 & 17:50 & 96 & B $\rightarrow$ CnB \\
1807: 4 & 2003 January 10 & 16:21 & 72 & C $\rightarrow$ DnC \\
1808: \tableline
1809: \end{tabular}
1810: \end{center}
1811: \end{table}
1812:
1813:
1814: \begin{table}[ht]
1815: \caption{Observed numbers and percentages of sources classified
1816: as variable in the four epochs. Percentages are given of the
1817: 443 sources observed, which excludes those used
1818: as calibrators in more than one epoch. The predicted percentage
1819: of misclassifications assuming all sources were non-variable
1820: (where $P=0.05$ is the probability of a single misclassification).
1821: }
1822: \smallskip
1823: \begin{center}
1824: \begin{tabular}{ccccc}
1825: \tableline
1826: \noalign{\smallskip}
1827: Number of & Observed number & Observed percentage & Predicted fraction & Predicted fraction \\
1828: variable epochs & of sources & of sources & of misclassifications & if none are variable \\
1829: \tableline
1830: 0 & 161 & 36\% & $(1-P)^4$ & 81.5\% \\
1831: 1 & 90 & 21\% & $4 P (1-P)^3$ & 17.2\% \\
1832: 2 & 79 & 18\% & $6 P^2 (1-P)^2$ & 1.3\% \\
1833: 3 & 58 & 13\% & $4 P^3 (1-P)$ & 0.05\% \\
1834: 4 & 55 & 12\% & $P^4$ & 0.0006\% \\
1835: \tableline
1836: \end{tabular} \label{tab:SourceCounts}
1837: \end{center}
1838: \end{table}
1839:
1840:
1841:
1842: \begin{table}[ht]
1843: \caption{Statistics of SF and visual variability classifications
1844: for the 443 source sample.}
1845: \begin{center}
1846: \begin{tabular}{cccccc}
1847: \tableline
1848: No. epochs ``variable'' & No. of Sources & \% Sources & Mean $D(2\,\mbox{d})$ &
1849: No. $>4\times10^{-4}$ & No. $<4\times10^{-4}$ \\
1850: \tableline
1851: 0 & 161 & 36\% & 0.00024 & 27 & 134 \\
1852: 1 & 90 & 21\% & 0.00071 & 54 & 36 \\
1853: 2 & 79 & 18\% & 0.0011 & 64 & 15 \\
1854: 3 & 58 & 13\% & 0.0027 & 58 & 0 \\
1855: 4 & 55 & 12\% & 0.0071 & 55 & 0 \\
1856: \tableline
1857: \end{tabular} \label{tab:compvar}
1858: \end{center}
1859: \end{table}
1860:
1861:
1862: \begin{deluxetable}{lllccccclc}
1863: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1864: \rotate
1865: \tablewidth{0cm}
1866: \tablecaption{MASIV source variability characteristics. Column 4 gives
1867: H$\alpha$ in Rayleighs for WHAM.
1868: Columns 5-8 give mean flux density for epochs 1-4;
1869: Columns 9-12 give raw modulation index in \% for epochs 1-4;
1870: Column 13 $\sigma_{\rm err}$ as \%; Column 14 gives the visual classification per
1871: epoch for variable (y), non-variable (n) and non-variable source used as a secondary calibrator (c);
1872: Column 15 gives $D(2{\rm d})$ from fit to epoch average SF where error -1 flags a non-convergent fit;
1873: Column 16 gives timescale classifications, 1:$\tau_{\rm char}<0.5$d, 2:0.5d$<\tau_{\rm char}<3$d, 3:$\tau_{\rm char}>3$d,
1874: 0: $D(2{\rm d})$ below threshold of $4\times10^{-4}$.}
1875: \tablehead{
1876: \colhead{Name} &
1877: \colhead{RA(J2000)} &
1878: \colhead{Dec(J2000)} &
1879: \colhead{H$\alpha$ R} &
1880: \colhead{$\bar{S_\nu}$(Jy)} &
1881: \colhead{Mod index \% } &
1882: \colhead{\%err} &
1883: \colhead{Var} &
1884: \colhead{$D(2{\rm d})$} &
1885: \colhead{tim} }
1886: \startdata
1887: J0005+3820 & 00:05:57.17 & 38:20:15.1& 2.9 & 0.61 0.57 0.43 0.47 & 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.5 & 0.57 & nnny & +4.73e-04 $\pm$ 1.4e-05 & 3 \\
J0007+5706 & 00:07:48.47 & 57:06:10.4& 10.8 & 0.18 0.20 0.17 0.17 & 2.1 0.9 1.1 1.0 & 0.88 & nnnn & +2.91e-04 $\pm$ 4.3e-05 & 0 \\
J0009+1513 & 00:09:43.47 & 15:13:37.9& 0.7 & 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.16 & 1.0 1.7 2.0 1.3 & 0.94 & nnnn & +4.92e-04 $\pm$ 5.5e-05 & 2 \\
J0010+1724 & 00:10:33.99 & 17:24:18.7& 0.8 & 0.85 0.83 0.81 0.81 & 0.8 1.0 0.9 0.5 & 0.53 & nnnn & +1.07e-04 $\pm$ 1.3e-05 & 0 \\
J0010+4412 & 00:10:30.04 & 44:12:42.4& 2.3 & 0.20 0.20 0.19 0.18 & 1.5 1.2 1.5 1.7 & 0.83 & nynn & +4.28e-04 $\pm$ 3.9e-05 & 1 \\
J0011+7045 & 00:11:31.90 & 70:45:31.6& 6.7 & 0.62 0.71 0.63 0.59 & 1.9 0.6 0.6 1.4 & 0.54 & ynny & +3.46e-04 $\pm$ 3.6e-05 & 0 \\
J0017+5312 & 00:17:51.75 & 53:12:19.1& 13.3 & 0.61 0.60 0.61 0.65 & 1.5 0.9 1.2 1.2 & 0.54 & nnyy & +3.88e-04 $\pm$ -1.0e+00 & 0 \\
J0017+8135 & 00:17:08.47 & 81:35:08.1& 2.2 & 0.91 0.92 0.92 0.92 & 1.4 1.2 0.5 0.7 & 0.52 & nnnn & +2.13e-04 $\pm$ 1.6e-05 & 0 \\
J0019+2021 & 00:19:37.85 & 20:21:45.5& 0.7 & 1.16 1.05 1.03 1.22 & 2.0 0.2 1.0 0.7 & 0.52 & ynnn & +4.86e-04 $\pm$ 3.6e-05 & 3 \\
J0019+7327 & 00:19:45.78 & 73:27:30.0& 4.3 & 0.45 0.46 0.47 0.47 & 1.5 0.8 1.7 1.0 & 0.57 & nnyn & +5.27e-04 $\pm$ 1.0e+03 & 3 \\
J0038+4137 & 00:38:24.84 & 41:37:06.0& 2.6 & 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 & 1.3 0.9 1.6 1.0 & 0.56 & ynyn & +5.71e-04 $\pm$ 2.6e-05 & 3 \\
J0041+1339 & 00:41:17.21 & 13:39:27.4& 1.1 & 0.15 0.16 0.16 0.16 & 0.8 2.5 1.9 1.8 & 0.97 & nynn & +7.29e-04 $\pm$ 5.7e-05 & 2 \\
J0042+2320 & 00:42:04.54 & 23:20:01.1& 0.7 & 0.78 0.79 0.84 0.87 & 0.7 1.0 0.8 0.1 & 0.52 & nnnn & +1.87e-04 $\pm$ 1.0e+03 & 0 \\
J0042+5708 & 00:42:19.45 & 57:08:36.5& 23.5 & 0.86 0.84 0.86 0.83 & 1.4 0.9 0.4 0.5 & 0.52 & ynnn & +1.06e-04 $\pm$ 9.5e-06 & 0 \\
J0043+0502 & 00:43:46.73 & 05:02:56.0& 0.4 & 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 & 1.1 2.3 2.2 1.8 & 1.40 & nnnn & +7.44e-04 $\pm$ 8.5e-05 & 3 \\
J0052+1633 & 00:52:36.16 & 16:33:00.4& 0.8 & 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 & 0.8 1.0 1.1 0.4 & 0.91 & nnnn & +1.39e-05 $\pm$ 1.0e+03 & 0 \\
J0056+1625 & 00:56:55.29 & 16:25:13.3& 0.8 & 0.19 0.23 0.29 0.27 & 1.7 3.0 2.9 1.8 & 0.72 & nyyy & +1.39e-03 $\pm$ 1.1e-04 & 1 \\
J0056+3142 & 00:56:22.61 & 31:42:09.1& 1.2 & 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 & 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.6 & 1.82 & nnnn & +5.83e-04 $\pm$ 9.3e-05 & 1 \\
J0057+3021 & 00:57:48.88 & 30:21:08.8& 1.2 & 0.67 0.69 0.70 0.67 & 0.6 1.0 1.3 1.2 & 0.53 & nnnn & +2.36e-04 $\pm$ 2.4e-05 & 0 \\
J0101+5004 & 01:01:16.99 & 50:04:44.9& 7.0 & 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.16 & 2.6 1.1 1.7 2.9 & 0.95 & ynny & +1.16e-03 $\pm$ 1.1e-04 & 2 \\
J0102+5824 & 01:02:45.76 & 58:24:11.1& 17.7 & 1.37 1.88 2.63 2.34 & 8.0 3.5 6.3 3.1 & 0.53 & yyyy & +1.09e-02 $\pm$ 3.4e-04 & 3 \\
J0104+1134 & 01:04:10.62 & 11:34:16.3& 0.8 & 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 & 1.4 2.5 1.8 1.7 & 1.70 & nnnn & +3.64e-04 $\pm$ 8.5e-05 & 0 \\
J0104+2949 & 01:04:08.32 & 29:49:05.6& 1.2 & 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 & 2.8 3.5 2.2 1.5 & 1.54 & yynn & +9.06e-04 $\pm$ 1.4e-04 & 1 \\
J0105+4819 & 01:05:49.92 & 48:19:03.1& 5.4 & 1.09 1.17 1.15 1.19 & 0.8 0.2 1.0 0.2 & 0.51 & nnnn & +1.87e-04 $\pm$ 2.2e-05 & 0 \\
J0108+0135 & 01:08:38.77 & 01:35:00.3& 0.7 & 2.41 2.41 2.60 2.83 & 0.5 1.7 1.3 0.8 & 0.50 & nyyn & +2.56e-04 $\pm$ 3.6e-05 & 0 \\
J0111+3906 & 01:11:37.31 & 39:06:28.0& 1.8 & 1.31 1.34 1.29 1.31 & 0.2 0.6 0.7 0.7 & 0.51 & nnnn & +4.77e-05 $\pm$ 6.6e-06 & 0 \\
J0121+0422 & 01:21:56.86 & 04:22:24.7& 0.6 & 0.89 0.89 0.95 0.97 & 1.6 2.0 1.2 0.7 & 0.52 & yynn & +5.13e-04 $\pm$ 2.9e-05 & 2 \\
J0121+1149 & 01:21:41.59 & 11:49:50.4& 0.7 & 1.70 1.71 1.57 1.59 & 0.7 1.4 0.5 0.8 & 0.51 & nnnn & +1.34e-04 $\pm$ 1.8e-05 & 0 \\
J0122+0310 & 01:22:01.91 & 03:10:02.4& 0.5 & 0.12 0.11 0.10 0.10 & 0.7 1.6 1.6 1.4 & 1.30 & nnnn & +1.30e-04 $\pm$ 5.1e-05 & 0 \\
J0122+2502 & 01:22:38.81 & 25:02:31.7& 0.9 & 0.82 0.82 0.84 0.86 & 1.1 1.5 1.1 1.2 & 0.52 & nnny & +3.81e-04 $\pm$ 2.5e-05 & 0 \\
J0122+2536 & 01:22:40.77 & 25:36:14.9& 0.9 & 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.12 & 1.5 2.0 1.8 4.8 & 1.27 & nnny & +2.16e-03 $\pm$ 3.9e-04 & 1 \\
J0126+2559 & 01:26:42.79 & 25:59:01.2& 1.0 & 0.74 0.76 0.79 0.81 & 0.8 2.1 0.8 0.5 & 0.53 & nynn & +3.68e-04 $\pm$ 6.2e-05 & 0 \\
J0135+2158 & 01:35:53.49 & 21:58:16.1& 0.9 & 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.12 & 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.1 & 1.15 & nnnn & +3.04e-04 $\pm$ 2.7e-05 & 0 \\
J0136+4751 & 01:36:58.59 & 47:51:29.1& 8.0 & 2.75 3.26 2.52 2.71 & 1.8 2.0 1.2 4.2 & 0.51 & yyyy & +2.23e-03 $\pm$ 6.4e-05 & 3 \\
J0141+7506 & 01:41:00.62 & 75:06:28.2& 1.9 & 0.09 0.10 0.09 0.09 & 4.3 1.4 2.1 2.0 & 1.49 & ynnn & +1.72e-03 $\pm$ -1.0e+00 & 3 \\
J0150+2646 & 01:50:02.80 & 26:46:28.0& 1.3 & 0.12 0.14 0.13 0.12 & 7.7 4.2 4.2 7.2 & 1.14 & yyyy & +9.10e-03 $\pm$ 1.9e-03 & 1 \\
J0151+2744 & 01:51:27.14 & 27:44:41.7& 1.4 & 0.85 0.84 0.83 0.83 & 0.2 0.8 0.8 0.4 & 0.52 & nnnn & +9.88e-05 $\pm$ 2.0e-05 & 0 \\
J0152+2207 & 01:52:18.05 & 22:07:07.7& 0.9 & 1.06 1.04 1.04 1.06 & 1.2 1.0 0.7 0.6 & 0.52 & ynnn & +1.25e-04 $\pm$ 1.5e-05 & 0 \\
J0154+4743 & 01:54:56.29 & 47:43:26.5& 8.4 & 0.44 0.35 0.39 0.39 & 1.3 1.0 2.0 2.0 & 0.60 & ynyy & +8.34e-04 $\pm$ 4.9e-05 & 3 \\
J0158+4137 & 01:58:23.84 & 41:37:39.5& 2.6 & 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.09 & 1.9 1.6 1.4 2.0 & 1.63 & nnnn & +1.11e-04 $\pm$ 3.4e-05 & 0 \\
J0200+0322 & 02:00:40.81 & 03:22:49.5& 0.5 & 0.32 0.27 0.22 0.20 & 1.0 2.8 1.2 0.9 & 0.75 & nynn & +6.87e-04 $\pm$ 8.3e-05 & 1 \\
J0204+1514 & 02:04:50.41 & 15:14:11.0& 0.7 & 2.81 3.07 3.04 3.01 & 0.9 1.3 0.1 0.8 & 0.50 & nnnn & +2.38e-04 $\pm$ 2.9e-05 & 0 \\
J0212+3626 & 02:12:09.73 & 36:26:17.9& 2.2 & 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08 & 2.3 1.8 1.4 2.1 & 1.68 & nnnn & +3.78e-04 $\pm$ 9.3e-05 & 0 \\
J0213+3652 & 02:13:48.19 & 36:52:33.9& 2.1 & 0.13 0.16 0.16 0.18 & 1.6 1.2 2.0 1.0 & 0.96 & nnyn & +5.35e-04 $\pm$ 1.0e+03 & 1 \\
J0217+7349 & 02:17:30.81 & 73:49:32.6& 2.2 & 3.43 3.46 3.41 3.41 & 0.1 1.0 0.1 0.1 & 0.50 & nnnn & +3.95e-04 $\pm$ 2.7e-05 & 0 \\
J0228+6721 & 02:28:50.05 & 67:21:03.0& 4.3 & 2.07 2.02 1.79 1.63 & 0.6 0.1 0.6 0.3 & 0.51 & nnnn & +2.30e-05 $\pm$ 4.7e-06 & 0 \\
J0237+2046 & 02:37:50.62 & 20:46:18.4& 1.4 & 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 & 3.5 5.2 2.8 2.4 & 1.41 & yyyy & +4.10e-03 $\pm$ 2.3e-04 & 3 \\
J0237+2848 & 02:37:52.40 & 28:48:08.9& 1.8 & 2.78 3.05 3.47 3.69 & 0.9 0.4 1.1 0.1 & 0.50 & nnnn & +3.08e-04 $\pm$ 5.5e-05 & 0 \\
J0238+1636 & 02:38:38.93 & 16:36:59.2& 1.1 & 1.50 1.61 1.58 1.34 & 2.8 3.0 1.2 1.8 & 0.51 & yyyy & +1.19e-03 $\pm$ 9.5e-05 & 1 \\
J0239+0416 & 02:39:51.26 & 04:16:21.4& 0.8 & 0.65 0.60 0.60 0.68 & 0.7 0.9 1.6 0.5 & 0.54 & nnnn & +3.06e-04 $\pm$ 4.5e-05 & 0 \\
J0242+1101 & 02:42:29.17 & 11:01:00.7& 1.0 & 1.12 1.16 1.24 1.21 & 0.2 1.1 0.9 0.8 & 0.51 & nnnn & +1.41e-04 $\pm$ 2.2e-05 & 0 \\
J0246+3536 & 02:46:21.07 & 35:36:37.9& 3.0 & 0.17 0.17 0.16 0.16 & 1.6 4.1 2.1 1.1 & 0.93 & nyyn & +2.20e-03 $\pm$ 1.5e-04 & 2 \\
J0248+0434 & 02:48:14.82 & 04:34:40.8& 0.8 & 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.14 & 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.3 & 1.01 & nnnn & +4.21e-05 $\pm$ 1.8e-05 & 0 \\
J0249+0619 & 02:49:18.01 & 06:19:51.9& 0.8 & 0.68 0.68 0.70 0.68 & 0.9 1.1 1.1 0.9 & 0.53 & nnnn & +1.75e-04 $\pm$ 2.3e-05 & 0 \\
J0251+4315 & 02:51:34.53 & 43:15:15.8& 5.7 & 1.18 1.23 1.20 1.21 & 0.6 0.6 0.2 0.2 & 0.51 & nnnn & +6.50e-06 $\pm$ 4.1e-06 & 0 \\
J0253+3217 & 02:53:33.65 & 32:17:20.8& 2.7 & 0.09 0.11 0.12 0.14 & 2.5 12.5 6.6 4.3 & 1.21 & yyyy & +2.23e-02 $\pm$ 1.5e-03 & 3 \\
J0257+4338 & 02:57:59.07 & 43:38:37.6& 5.6 & 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.14 & 1.5 0.8 1.4 1.2 & 1.07 & nnnn & +2.11e-04 $\pm$ 2.4e-05 & 0 \\
J0259+1925 & 02:59:29.65 & 19:25:44.3& 1.3 & 0.20 0.23 0.22 0.19 & 1.6 4.8 2.4 3.1 & 0.80 & nyyy & +2.65e-03 $\pm$ 2.6e-04 & 1 \\
J0301+0221 & 03:01:00.08 & 02:21:46.4& 2.3 & 0.14 0.13 0.14 0.13 & 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.0 & 1.09 & nnnn & +8.83e-05 $\pm$ 2.1e-05 & 0 \\
J0303+4716 & 03:03:35.24 & 47:16:16.2& 5.0 & 1.28 1.29 1.41 1.22 & 0.4 1.1 0.5 0.4 & 0.51 & nnnn & +1.12e-04 $\pm$ 9.2e-06 & 0 \\
J0304+6821 & 03:04:22.00 & 68:21:37.4& 2.6 & 0.65 0.67 0.68 0.67 & 1.8 1.4 0.7 0.7 & 0.54 & yynn & +3.29e-04 $\pm$ 3.7e-05 & 0 \\
J0308+1208 & 03:08:39.38 & 12:08:49.7& 1.9 & 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.07 & 4.5 3.7 4.0 1.2 & 1.76 & yyyn & +3.26e-03 $\pm$ 2.1e-04 & 2 \\
J0309+1029 & 03:09:03.62 & 10:29:16.3& 1.5 & 0.65 0.69 0.73 0.71 & 0.7 1.2 1.2 0.5 & 0.53 & nnnn & +3.51e-04 $\pm$ 2.2e-05 & 0 \\
J0313+0228 & 03:13:13.40 & 02:28:35.2& 6.8 & 0.13 0.13 0.15 0.13 & 6.3 6.9 6.7 3.0 & 1.07 & yyyy & +1.19e-02 $\pm$ 5.9e-04 & 3 \\
J0314+4345 & 03:14:08.05 & 43:45:19.7& 3.5 & 0.20 0.21 0.20 0.20 & 1.1 1.1 1.1 0.7 & 0.81 & nnnn & +1.35e-04 $\pm$ 2.5e-05 & 0 \\
J0319+4130 & 03:19:48.16 & 41:30:42.1& 4.6 & 18.10 18.10 17.40 17.30 & 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.1 & 0.50 & nnnn & +3.82e-05 $\pm$ 7.9e-06 & 0 \\
J0321+1221 & 03:21:53.10 & 12:21:13.9& 2.1 & 1.50 1.52 1.51 1.49 & 0.7 1.6 1.0 0.8 & 0.51 & nnnn & +2.36e-04 $\pm$ 3.0e-05 & 0 \\
J0323+0446 & 03:23:14.72 & 04:46:12.5& 4.6 & 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.13 & 2.3 3.1 1.4 2.8 & 1.04 & yyny & +9.87e-04 $\pm$ 1.7e-04 & 1 \\
J0328+2552 & 03:28:44.34 & 25:52:08.4& 3.5 & 0.16 0.17 0.19 0.17 & 1.8 3.5 5.0 1.5 & 0.89 & yyyy & +6.18e-03 $\pm$ 1.0e+03 & 3 \\
J0331+2403 & 03:31:47.47 & 24:03:10.2& 2.4 & 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 & 1.1 1.2 2.4 1.4 & 1.22 & nnnn & +4.71e-04 $\pm$ 7.2e-05 & 2 \\
J0338+3818 & 03:38:27.99 & 38:18:56.5& 6.2 & 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.10 & 1.6 2.6 3.3 1.2 & 1.69 & nnyn & +1.32e-03 $\pm$ -1.0e+00 & 3 \\
J0342+3859 & 03:42:16.26 & 38:59:06.2& 8.1 & 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13 & 3.1 3.2 4.5 3.1 & 1.24 & yyyy & +3.83e-03 $\pm$ 1.5e-04 & 3 \\
J0343+3622 & 03:43:28.95 & 36:22:12.4& 7.8 & 0.75 0.51 0.56 0.73 & 8.3 4.2 2.2 4.3 & 0.57 & yyyy & +7.91e-03 $\pm$ 4.0e-04 & 3 \\
J0344+6827 & 03:44:41.44 & 68:27:47.8& 2.5 & 0.09 0.10 0.12 0.11 & 5.5 1.5 3.0 4.2 & 1.31 & ynyy & +5.01e-03 $\pm$ 2.5e-04 & 3 \\
J0345+1453 & 03:45:06.41 & 14:53:49.5& 2.2 & 0.33 0.32 0.33 0.35 & 1.3 2.0 1.8 0.7 & 0.63 & ynyn & +5.04e-04 $\pm$ 3.3e-05 & 1 \\
J0349+4609 & 03:49:18.74 & 46:09:59.6& 2.8 & 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.00 & 0.2 1.0 0.6 0.0 & 0.51 & nnnn & +1.43e-04 $\pm$ 2.4e-05 & 0 \\
J0351+1308 & 03:51:26.23 & 13:08:05.0& 3.1 & 0.10 0.10 0.08 0.10 & 2.1 2.6 7.8 6.0 & 1.48 & nyyy & +1.11e-02 $\pm$ 4.1e-04 & 3 \\
J0354+4643 & 03:54:30.01 & 46:43:18.7& 2.5 & 0.79 0.80 0.79 0.00 & 1.4 2.0 0.5 0.0 & 0.52 & yynn & +5.01e-04 $\pm$ 2.0e-05 & 2 \\
J0355+2005 & 03:55:19.85 & 20:05:08.0& 1.9 & 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 & 1.3 2.4 1.9 1.6 & 2.11 & nnnn & -1.22e-04 $\pm$ 4.1e-05 & 0 \\
J0357+0924 & 03:57:46.63 & 09:24:10.3& 18.0 & 0.07 0.05 0.05 0.05 & 2.9 5.4 1.6 4.0 & 2.35 & nynn & +2.49e-03 $\pm$ 3.8e-04 & 2 \\
J0358+3850 & 03:58:44.43 & 38:50:21.6& 12.3 & 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.11 & 1.8 4.0 2.3 1.8 & 1.24 & nyyn & +2.97e-03 $\pm$ 1.0e+03 & 3 \\
J0359+6005 & 03:59:02.64 & 60:05:22.0& 4.4 & 0.85 0.84 0.78 0.74 & 0.6 1.4 0.9 0.8 & 0.53 & nyny & +3.18e-04 $\pm$ -1.0e+00 & 0 \\
J0403+2600 & 04:03:05.58 & 26:00:01.5& 4.7 & 0.86 0.84 0.83 0.83 & 0.1 1.3 1.4 0.7 & 0.52 & nnyn & +4.20e-04 $\pm$ 2.4e-05 & 3 \\
J0406+2511 & 04:06:25.99 & 25:11:31.2& 4.5 & 0.11 0.09 0.10 0.11 & 2.3 4.5 4.5 8.8 & 1.39 & nyyy & +8.63e-03 $\pm$ 4.9e-04 & 2 \\
J0409+1217 & 04:09:22.00 & 12:17:39.8& 7.6 & 0.73 0.65 0.59 0.45 & 1.2 4.1 4.4 1.9 & 0.55 & yyyy & +3.52e-03 $\pm$ 2.0e-04 & 2 \\
J0411+0843 & 04:11:33.85 & 08:43:11.4& 10.7 & 0.13 0.10 0.10 0.09 & 4.7 5.1 5.4 4.0 & 1.32 & yyyy & +5.19e-03 $\pm$ 4.0e-04 & 1 \\
J0414+3418 & 04:14:37.25 & 34:18:51.1& 13.3 & 1.36 1.37 1.32 1.36 & 0.7 0.2 0.9 0.2 & 0.51 & nnnn & +1.49e-04 $\pm$ 1.8e-05 & 0 \\
J0419+3955 & 04:19:22.55 & 39:55:28.9& 3.9 & 0.34 0.37 0.39 0.41 & 3.2 4.2 2.2 2.4 & 0.60 & yyyy & +2.54e-03 $\pm$ 1.1e-04 & 2 \\
J0422+0219 & 04:22:52.21 & 02:19:26.9& 4.6 & 1.09 1.21 1.27 1.27 & 1.1 0.2 1.4 0.6 & 0.51 & ynyn & +3.08e-04 $\pm$ 2.7e-05 & 0 \\
J0423+4150 & 04:23:56.01 & 41:50:02.7& 2.8 & 1.70 1.68 1.71 0.00 & 0.1 1.0 1.2 0.0 & 0.51 & nyyn & +3.09e-04 $\pm$ -1.0e+00 & 0 \\
J0427+4133 & 04:27:46.04 & 41:33:01.0& 2.8 & 0.79 0.83 0.78 0.00 & 1.6 1.1 1.0 0.0 & 0.53 & yyny & +4.17e-04 $\pm$ 2.9e-05 & 2 \\
J0432+3131 & 04:32:06.44 & 31:31:13.3& 3.7 & 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.12 & 0.9 2.6 2.4 2.0 & 1.24 & nyyn & +1.22e-03 $\pm$ 1.3e-04 & 3 \\
J0443+3441 & 04:43:31.63 & 34:41:06.6& 2.9 & 0.87 0.84 0.83 0.81 & 0.6 0.8 0.9 0.7 & 0.52 & nnnn & +1.18e-04 $\pm$ 9.8e-06 & 0 \\
J0449+1121 & 04:49:07.67 & 11:21:28.6& 9.8 & 2.31 2.25 1.90 1.89 & 1.4 1.0 1.3 0.1 & 0.51 & yyyn & +5.37e-04 $\pm$ 1.0e+03 & 3 \\
J0453+0128 & 04:53:02.23 & 01:28:35.6& 8.4 & 0.17 0.18 0.17 0.18 & 5.9 6.1 13.3 2.7 & 0.90 & yyyy & +2.45e-02 $\pm$ 1.5e-03 & 2 \\
J0459+0229 & 04:59:52.05 & 02:29:31.1& 7.4 & 1.21 1.21 1.22 1.13 & 0.4 0.7 1.2 0.8 & 0.51 & nnnn & +1.41e-04 $\pm$ 1.2e-05 & 0 \\
J0502+1338 & 05:02:33.21 & 13:38:10.9& 8.6 & 0.54 0.69 0.53 0.53 & 5.0 4.8 4.2 5.7 & 0.55 & yyyy & +9.64e-03 $\pm$ 2.6e-04 & 3 \\
J0503+0203 & 05:03:21.19 & 02:03:04.6& 9.9 & 2.00 1.95 1.94 1.88 & 0.1 0.8 1.0 0.8 & 0.50 & nnnn & +1.49e-04 $\pm$ 1.8e-05 & 0 \\
J0505+0459 & 05:05:23.18 & 04:59:42.7& 12.3 & 0.79 0.76 0.86 0.79 & 1.3 1.3 1.1 1.0 & 0.52 & nnnn & +3.12e-04 $\pm$ 1.4e-05 & 0 \\
J0509+0541 & 05:09:25.96 & 05:41:35.3& 24.5 & 0.52 0.49 0.56 0.69 & 3.1 3.8 6.1 6.9 & 0.55 & yyyy & +1.38e-02 $\pm$ 4.8e-04 & 3 \\
J0510+1800 & 05:10:02.36 & 18:00:41.5& 22.1 & 0.68 0.71 0.58 0.63 & 1.8 1.8 1.6 1.0 & 0.55 & yyyn & +6.60e-04 $\pm$ 6.8e-05 & 1 \\
J0512+2037 & 05:12:39.07 & 20:37:42.7& 6.1 & 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.12 & 1.4 4.0 4.1 1.6 & 1.24 & nyyn & +3.14e-03 $\pm$ 2.0e-04 & 3 \\
J0530+1331 & 05:30:56.41 & 13:31:55.1& 70.5 & 2.73 2.42 2.86 3.44 & 1.1 6.9 0.6 1.8 & 0.51 & nyny & +4.58e-03 $\pm$ 2.2e-04 & 3 \\
J0534+1047 & 05:34:40.73 & 10:47:16.5& 147.0 & 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.16 & 1.2 0.9 0.9 0.8 & 1.01 & nnnn & +1.52e-05 $\pm$ 1.7e-05 & 0 \\
J0536+5038 & 05:36:20.23 & 50:38:26.2& 1.7 & 0.94 0.93 0.92 0.91 & 1.0 0.7 0.8 0.3 & 0.52 & nnnn & +1.07e-04 $\pm$ 8.0e-06 & 0 \\
J0539+1433 & 05:39:42.36 & 14:33:45.5& 30.3 & 1.04 1.19 1.20 1.23 & 0.1 1.6 1.8 0.2 & 0.51 & nyyn & +7.86e-04 $\pm$ 8.9e-05 & 0 \\
J0541+5312 & 05:41:16.17 & 53:12:24.8& 1.4 & 0.43 0.42 0.40 0.41 & 0.8 0.7 1.1 0.9 & 0.59 & nnnn & +1.23e-04 $\pm$ 1.1e-05 & 0 \\
J0544+4541 & 05:44:01.16 & 45:41:02.7& 2.1 & 0.15 0.16 0.15 0.15 & 2.5 1.3 1.4 0.9 & 0.98 & ynnn & +1.26e-04 $\pm$ 1.2e-04 & 0 \\
J0552+0313 & 05:52:50.10 & 03:13:27.2& 18.4 & 0.62 0.57 0.56 0.66 & 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.3 & 0.55 & nnnn & +1.10e-04 $\pm$ 1.5e-05 & 0 \\
J0553+1439 & 05:53:38.03 & 14:39:29.7& 9.7 & 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.13 & 0.6 2.1 1.5 1.1 & 1.09 & nnnn & +2.62e-04 $\pm$ 4.1e-05 & 0 \\
J0558+0044 & 05:58:08.44 & 00:44:48.1& 24.2 & 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.17 & 0.9 1.2 1.1 0.7 & 0.93 & nnnn & +8.69e-05 $\pm$ 2.5e-05 & 0 \\
J0605+4030 & 06:05:50.85 & 40:30:08.0& 1.8 & 1.03 1.06 0.95 0.92 & 1.3 1.8 1.5 1.1 & 0.52 & yyyy & +7.02e-04 $\pm$ 2.2e-05 & 3 \\
J0605+5753 & 06:05:42.22 & 57:53:16.3& 1.3 & 0.24 0.23 0.22 0.21 & 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.0 & 0.76 & nnnn & +1.49e-04 $\pm$ 2.2e-05 & 0 \\
J0606+4401 & 06:06:50.21 & 44:01:40.8& 1.6 & 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.09 & 1.6 1.9 1.8 1.2 & 1.49 & nnnn & +3.82e-04 $\pm$ 7.4e-05 & 0 \\
J0608+4508 & 06:08:03.43 & 45:08:25.0& 1.9 & 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 & 0.8 1.4 1.4 1.7 & 1.41 & nnnn & -9.46e-05 $\pm$ 3.5e-05 & 0 \\
J0610+7801 & 06:10:24.27 & 78:01:36.1& 1.9 & 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.10 & 2.1 3.5 4.8 2.8 & 1.61 & nyyn & +4.19e-03 $\pm$ 1.0e+03 & 3 \\
J0614+6046 & 06:14:23.86 & 60:46:21.7& 1.7 & 0.71 0.71 0.72 0.71 & 0.8 0.3 0.8 0.8 & 0.53 & nnnn & +9.33e-05 $\pm$ 1.0e-05 & 0 \\
J0618+4207 & 06:18:08.61 & 42:07:59.8& 1.3 & 0.16 0.15 0.12 0.12 & 1.3 1.2 2.6 1.9 & 1.07 & ynyn & +7.33e-04 $\pm$ 5.0e-05 & 2 \\
J0624+3856 & 06:24:19.02 & 38:56:48.7& 1.7 & 0.55 0.55 0.54 0.60 & 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.4 & 0.55 & nnnn & +3.74e-04 $\pm$ 1.9e-05 & 0 \\
J0639+7324 & 06:39:21.96 & 73:24:58.0& 1.8 & 0.78 0.79 0.86 0.84 & 1.5 3.4 1.3 0.8 & 0.52 & yynn & +1.39e-03 $\pm$ 4.5e-05 & 3 \\
J0643+1238 & 06:43:59.85 & 12:38:18.0& 8.6 & 0.09 0.08 0.10 0.09 & 3.2 4.4 3.6 6.1 & 1.47 & yyyy & +7.71e-03 $\pm$ 1.0e+03 & 3 \\
J0644+2911 & 06:44:44.82 & 29:11:04.0& 3.5 & 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.16 & 3.0 2.0 2.9 2.1 & 0.99 & ynyn & +2.09e-03 $\pm$ 1.2e-04 & 3 \\
J0644+3914 & 06:44:53.71 & 39:14:47.5& 1.1 & 0.59 0.58 0.63 0.67 & 0.6 1.2 1.3 1.1 & 0.54 & nnyn & +3.46e-04 $\pm$ 1.6e-05 & 0 \\
J0646+4451 & 06:46:32.02 & 44:51:16.5& 1.0 & 2.67 2.69 2.82 2.90 & 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.1 & 0.50 & nnnn & +3.76e-06 $\pm$ 1.0e-05 & 0 \\
J0650+6001 & 06:50:31.25 & 60:01:44.5& 1.3 & 1.16 1.19 1.11 1.10 & 0.2 1.3 1.0 1.3 & 0.51 & nyny & +4.33e-04 $\pm$ 2.1e-05 & 3 \\
J0653+3705 & 06:53:58.28 & 37:05:40.6& 2.0 & 0.56 0.57 0.57 0.60 & 0.8 1.3 0.7 0.8 & 0.55 & nnnn & +1.90e-04 $\pm$ 1.4e-05 & 0 \\
J0657+3858 & 06:57:54.46 & 38:58:02.5& 1.1 & 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.08 & 2.5 3.4 3.5 4.7 & 1.80 & nnny & +3.00e-03 $\pm$ 1.7e-04 & 2 \\
J0659+0813 & 06:59:17.99 & 08:13:30.9& 7.6 & 0.84 0.83 0.85 0.77 & 0.6 1.1 0.9 0.5 & 0.52 & nnnn & +1.55e-04 $\pm$ 1.5e-05 & 0 \\
J0700+1709 & 07:00:01.52 & 17:09:21.7& 3.8 & 1.15 1.09 0.98 0.90 & 1.0 1.4 2.4 0.5 & 0.53 & nyyn & +6.78e-04 $\pm$ 7.2e-05 & 2 \\
J0704+4502 & 07:04:50.96 & 45:02:41.6& 1.0 & 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 & 2.1 2.2 1.8 1.9 & 1.55 & nnnn & +3.92e-04 $\pm$ 6.0e-05 & 0 \\
J0708+3455 & 07:08:24.44 & 34:55:42.1& 2.0 & 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.17 & 1.4 2.5 2.7 1.5 & 0.97 & nyyn & +1.33e-03 $\pm$ 1.3e-04 & 3 \\
J0709+3422 & 07:09:55.43 & 34:22:56.7& 2.4 & 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 & 2.2 2.3 1.4 1.6 & 1.35 & nnnn & +2.53e-04 $\pm$ 3.0e-05 & 0 \\
J0713+4349 & 07:13:38.16 & 43:49:17.1& 1.2 & 1.56 1.55 1.54 1.54 & 0.1 0.8 0.1 0.2 & 0.51 & nnnn & +1.29e-04 $\pm$ 2.5e-05 & 0 \\
J0713+5053 & 07:13:12.89 & 50:53:43.9& 0.5 & 0.15 0.16 0.16 0.16 & 1.5 1.5 1.6 0.9 & 0.96 & nnnn & +2.26e-04 $\pm$ 9.8e-05 & 0 \\
J0714+6814 & 07:14:58.37 & 68:14:00.5& 1.2 & 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 & 1.8 1.5 3.3 3.5 & 1.42 & nnyy & +1.43e-03 $\pm$ 1.1e-04 & 1 \\
J0717+5231 & 07:17:29.94 & 52:31:04.8& 0.5 & 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.13 & 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 & 1.08 & nnnn & -3.06e-05 $\pm$ 1.2e-05 & 0 \\
J0725+1425 & 07:25:16.80 & 14:25:13.7& 4.1 & 0.95 1.09 1.12 0.98 & 2.6 2.9 4.6 1.0 & 0.51 & yyyn & +3.97e-03 $\pm$ 1.0e+03 & 3 \\
J0726+4124 & 07:26:22.42 & 41:24:43.6& 1.1 & 0.16 0.16 0.14 0.13 & 1.4 2.2 1.6 1.5 & 1.00 & nnnn & +5.12e-04 $\pm$ 4.7e-05 & 1 \\
J0726+6125 & 07:26:51.67 & 61:25:13.6& 1.0 & 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.09 & 2.5 2.1 4.1 3.9 & 1.17 & ynyy & +2.82e-03 $\pm$ 1.2e-04 & 2 \\
J0726+7911 & 07:26:11.74 & 79:11:31.0& 1.0 & 0.85 0.88 0.85 0.86 & 1.5 0.7 1.4 0.8 & 0.52 & nnyn & +3.28e-04 $\pm$ 1.5e-05 & 0 \\
J0728+5701 & 07:28:49.63 & 57:01:24.3& 0.9 & 0.44 0.46 0.49 0.50 & 2.0 0.8 1.1 2.2 & 0.57 & ynny & +6.69e-04 $\pm$ 3.6e-05 & 2 \\
J0734+6528 & 07:34:18.03 & 65:28:02.6& 1.0 & 0.10 0.09 0.10 0.10 & 1.7 1.8 1.5 3.0 & 1.44 & nnny & +7.16e-04 $\pm$ 1.2e-04 & 2 \\
J0738+1742 & 07:38:07.39 & 17:42:18.9& 4.0 & 1.62 1.60 1.70 1.71 & 0.1 1.3 1.1 0.1 & 0.50 & nnyn & +2.81e-04 $\pm$ 4.3e-05 & 0 \\
J0739+0137 & 07:39:18.03 & 01:37:04.6& 1.8 & 1.43 1.44 1.56 1.61 & 1.4 0.3 5.5 1.9 & 0.50 & ynyy & +6.84e-03 $\pm$ 9.0e-04 & 3 \\
J0739+1739 & 07:39:28.55 & 17:39:27.1& 4.0 & 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 & 1.3 2.1 2.1 4.0 & 1.77 & nnny & +1.87e-03 $\pm$ 1.0e+03 & 3 \\
J0739+7527 & 07:39:13.19 & 75:27:47.7& 1.3 & 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 & 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 & 0.79 & nnnn & +9.16e-05 $\pm$ 8.7e-06 & 0 \\
J0741+2557 & 07:41:29.74 & 25:57:32.2& 2.8 & 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 & 1.7 2.3 2.3 1.7 & 1.96 & nnnn & +4.82e-04 $\pm$ -1.0e+00 & 3 \\
J0741+3112 & 07:41:10.70 & 31:12:00.2& 2.3 & 2.70 2.49 2.25 2.07 & 0.4 0.2 1.5 0.4 & 0.52 & nnyn & +4.75e-04 $\pm$ 3.4e-05 & 0 \\
J0745+1011 & 07:45:33.05 & 10:11:12.6& 1.4 & 3.40 3.39 3.40 3.36 & 0.1 1.1 1.1 0.1 & 0.50 & nnyn & +3.37e-04 $\pm$ 6.2e-05 & 0 \\
J0748+2400 & 07:48:36.11 & 24:00:24.1& 4.0 & 0.57 0.62 0.60 0.62 & 1.2 1.1 1.8 1.4 & 0.54 & nnyn & +4.92e-04 $\pm$ 2.6e-05 & 1 \\
J0749+0837 & 07:49:58.53 & 08:37:30.7& 1.3 & 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 & 1.2 2.7 2.5 1.8 & 1.28 & nyyn & +1.29e-03 $\pm$ 7.3e-05 & 3 \\
J0750+1231 & 07:50:52.04 & 12:31:04.8& 1.8 & 1.37 1.38 1.33 1.34 & 0.7 2.9 2.1 2.3 & 0.51 & nyyy & +1.30e-03 $\pm$ 1.0e-04 & 2 \\
J0753+5352 & 07:53:01.38 & 53:52:59.6& 0.8 & 0.71 0.96 0.92 1.00 & 1.0 1.5 2.4 0.9 & 0.52 & nnyn & +7.01e-04 $\pm$ 3.9e-05 & 3 \\
J0757+0956 & 07:57:06.64 & 09:56:34.8& 1.5 & 1.48 1.34 1.36 1.57 & 5.8 2.4 3.0 2.3 & 0.51 & yyyy & +6.55e-03 $\pm$ 3.3e-04 & 3 \\
J0757+6110 & 07:57:44.69 & 61:10:32.7& 1.0 & 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 & 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.4 & 1.31 & nnnn & +2.69e-04 $\pm$ 4.7e-05 & 0 \\
J0758+0827 & 07:58:28.04 & 08:27:09.0& 1.3 & 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.11 & 4.5 3.5 8.5 3.4 & 1.33 & yyyy & +1.23e-02 $\pm$ 5.4e-04 & 2 \\
J0800+4854 & 08:00:34.37 & 48:54:24.0& 0.5 & 0.11 0.12 0.11 0.11 & 4.0 4.7 1.7 11.4 & 1.26 & yyny & +8.55e-03 $\pm$ 8.7e-04 & 1 \\
J0801+6639 & 08:01:36.38 & 66:39:09.9& 0.7 & 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.11 & 1.5 2.8 2.5 2.3 & 1.30 & nyyy & +1.35e-03 $\pm$ 1.1e-04 & 3 \\
J0802+1809 & 08:02:48.03 & 18:09:49.2& 3.9 & 0.53 0.52 0.54 0.54 & 1.6 0.9 1.1 1.7 & 0.55 & ynny & +4.26e-04 $\pm$ 3.2e-05 & 2 \\
J0804+1012 & 08:04:07.58 & 10:12:13.2& 1.5 & 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 & 4.9 5.0 2.8 3.3 & 1.69 & yyyy & +3.78e-03 $\pm$ 4.2e-04 & 1 \\
J0805+6144 & 08:05:18.17 & 61:44:23.7& 0.8 & 1.06 1.17 1.22 1.27 & 1.0 1.1 0.6 0.2 & 0.51 & nnnn & +9.93e-05 $\pm$ 1.3e-05 & 0 \\
J0807+1352 & 08:07:38.50 & 13:52:17.3& 1.7 & 0.18 0.18 0.17 0.17 & 1.6 1.7 1.7 0.9 & 0.90 & ynnn & +5.00e-04 $\pm$ 4.1e-05 & 2 \\
J0808+0514 & 08:08:38.84 & 05:14:39.9& 1.0 & 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.13 & 1.8 2.5 2.8 1.6 & 1.28 & nyyn & +1.02e-03 $\pm$ 5.7e-05 & 1 \\
J0808+4950 & 08:08:39.66 & 49:50:36.5& 0.6 & 0.75 0.67 0.64 0.60 & 2.6 1.2 0.9 1.0 & 0.54 & ynnn & +4.64e-04 $\pm$ 5.1e-05 & 1 \\
J0810+1010 & 08:10:26.42 & 10:10:41.0& 1.3 & 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.12 & 1.0 1.2 1.2 0.7 & 1.14 & nnnn & -1.90e-05 $\pm$ 1.9e-05 & 0 \\
J0811+0146 & 08:11:26.70 & 01:46:52.2& 1.7 & 0.90 0.85 0.82 0.86 & 0.9 2.0 3.7 3.3 & 0.53 & nyyy & +2.91e-03 $\pm$ 2.2e-04 & 3 \\
J0818+4222 & 08:18:16.00 & 42:22:45.4& 1.2 & 0.96 0.89 0.79 0.87 & 1.3 3.5 1.5 2.9 & 0.53 & nyyy & +1.59e-03 $\pm$ 1.8e-04 & 1 \\
J0821+3107 & 08:21:07.61 & 31:07:51.1& 2.3 & 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.11 & 1.3 1.9 1.8 1.1 & 1.26 & nnnn & +4.96e-04 $\pm$ 7.9e-05 & 3 \\
J0823+4138 & 08:23:55.81 & 41:38:10.1& 1.2 & 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.14 & 1.0 2.5 1.7 1.5 & 1.07 & nnnn & +4.14e-04 $\pm$ 3.7e-05 & 1 \\
J0824+5552 & 08:24:47.23 & 55:52:42.6& 0.8 & 1.21 1.16 1.08 1.03 & 0.8 1.0 0.2 0.6 & 0.52 & nnnn & +9.78e-05 $\pm$ 1.1e-05 & 0 \\
J0825+0309 & 08:25:50.33 & 03:09:24.5& 0.9 & 0.96 0.90 1.30 1.26 & 1.2 2.1 2.3 1.4 & 0.51 & nyyy & +1.31e-03 $\pm$ 1.0e-04 & 2 \\
J0825+0831 & 08:25:04.77 & 08:31:11.0& 2.2 & 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 & 1.4 1.5 1.5 0.9 & 1.07 & nnnn & +1.79e-04 $\pm$ 3.7e-05 & 0 \\
J0829+4018 & 08:29:35.57 & 40:18:59.2& 1.1 & 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 & 9.2 11.3 11.5 17.5 & 1.47 & yyyy & +4.75e-02 $\pm$ 5.0e-03 & 1 \\
J0830+2410 & 08:30:52.08 & 24:10:59.8& 2.9 & 0.98 1.03 1.28 1.34 & 2.1 1.2 1.4 1.0 & 0.51 & ynyn & +4.75e-04 $\pm$ 4.1e-05 & 1 \\
J0831+0429 & 08:31:48.87 & 04:29:39.0& 1.4 & 1.06 0.96 1.13 1.16 & 0.2 1.3 1.0 0.7 & 0.51 & nnyn & +1.62e-04 $\pm$ 1.4e-05 & 0 \\
J0839+0319 & 08:39:49.19 & 03:19:53.8& 1.9 & 0.63 0.61 0.60 0.58 & 1.3 0.8 1.1 0.7 & 0.55 & ynyn & +2.62e-04 $\pm$ 1.7e-05 & 0 \\
J0839+2002 & 08:39:10.89 & 20:02:07.3& 2.6 & 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.10 & 1.1 2.9 1.6 1.1 & 1.33 & nynn & +7.88e-04 $\pm$ 1.0e+03 & 3 \\
J0839+4301 & 08:39:52.37 & 43:01:48.8& 0.8 & 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 & 1.6 2.0 1.4 1.5 & 1.41 & nnnn & +1.13e-04 $\pm$ 2.6e-05 & 0 \\
J0842+1835 & 08:42:05.09 & 18:35:40.9& 2.0 & 1.08 1.07 1.04 1.02 & 0.1 1.2 1.2 0.1 & 0.52 & nnyn & +4.89e-04 $\pm$ 1.9e-05 & 0 \\
J0850+5159 & 08:50:42.24 & 51:59:11.6& 0.7 & 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.10 & 3.5 1.4 6.3 5.3 & 1.31 & ynyy & +8.62e-03 $\pm$ -1.0e+00 & 3 \\
J0851+4847 & 08:51:36.51 & 48:47:30.7& 0.8 & 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.08 & 2.7 2.5 2.9 1.8 & 1.92 & nnyn & +1.05e-03 $\pm$ 1.1e-04 & 2 \\
J0854+2006 & 08:54:48.87 & 20:06:30.6& 1.3 & 2.28 2.67 2.17 1.93 & 1.4 0.1 0.2 0.9 & 0.51 & ynnn & +3.01e-04 $\pm$ 4.0e-05 & 0 \\
J0854+8034 & 08:54:48.58 & 80:34:22.3& 1.6 & 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.18 & 2.1 1.5 1.7 2.5 & 0.92 & yyyy & +7.81e-04 $\pm$ 4.3e-05 & 1 \\
J0856+7146 & 08:56:54.86 & 71:46:23.8& 0.9 & 0.20 0.17 0.14 0.14 & 3.4 2.3 4.0 5.1 & 0.94 & yyyy & +4.56e-03 $\pm$ 2.4e-04 & 3 \\
J0902+0443 & 09:02:27.16 & 04:43:09.5& 2.7 & 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.13 & 1.1 1.7 1.4 1.4 & 1.08 & nnnn & +4.71e-04 $\pm$ 5.5e-05 & 3 \\
J0903+6757 & 09:03:53.15 & 67:57:22.6& 0.8 & 0.60 0.61 0.62 0.62 & 1.1 0.9 1.3 0.8 & 0.54 & nnyn & +2.77e-04 $\pm$ 2.6e-05 & 0 \\
J0909+0121 & 09:09:10.09 & 01:21:35.6& 1.4 & 1.99 1.80 1.85 1.97 & 1.0 1.1 0.1 0.4 & 0.51 & nnnn & +1.42e-04 $\pm$ 1.7e-05 & 0 \\
J0914+0245 & 09:14:37.91 & 02:45:59.2& 2.1 & 0.41 0.41 0.45 0.52 & 5.2 1.8 1.0 1.3 & 0.58 & yyyy & +2.03e-03 $\pm$ 1.0e+03 & 3 \\
J0916+0242 & 09:16:41.77 & 02:42:52.9& 1.9 & 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.14 & 5.7 4.4 2.8 2.2 & 1.17 & yyyy & +5.75e-03 $\pm$ 2.8e-04 & 3 \\
J0920+4441 & 09:20:58.45 & 44:41:53.9& 0.4 & 1.06 1.02 1.03 1.03 & 0.4 0.9 1.0 0.5 & 0.52 & nnnn & +1.12e-04 $\pm$ 1.5e-05 & 0 \\
J0921+6215 & 09:21:36.23 & 62:15:52.1& 0.8 & 1.40 1.27 1.17 1.12 & 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.3 & 0.51 & nnnn & +1.45e-04 $\pm$ 1.5e-05 & 0 \\
J0922+4209 & 09:22:39.58 & 42:09:53.3& 0.4 & 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.11 & 1.5 3.4 1.9 2.1 & 1.36 & nynn & +7.07e-04 $\pm$ 1.0e-04 & 1 \\
J0923+2018 & 09:23:09.07 & 20:18:49.4& 1.1 & 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.08 & 2.2 2.3 3.1 4.5 & 1.94 & nnny & +3.57e-03 $\pm$ 1.9e-04 & 3 \\
J0929+5013 & 09:29:15.44 & 50:13:35.9& 0.6 & 0.51 0.54 0.58 0.45 & 6.2 3.1 3.4 5.0 & 0.55 & yyyy & +4.19e-03 $\pm$ 1.7e-04 & 1 \\
J0931+2750 & 09:31:51.78 & 27:50:50.6& 0.8 & 0.16 0.17 0.16 0.16 & 1.4 1.8 3.0 2.1 & 0.95 & nyyy & +1.73e-03 $\pm$ 1.2e-04 & 3 \\
J0943+2028 & 09:43:48.09 & 20:28:09.9& 0.6 & 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.14 & 1.9 2.1 2.3 1.3 & 1.08 & nynn & +1.01e-03 $\pm$ 5.9e-05 & 3 \\
J0946+5020 & 09:46:16.04 & 50:20:09.3& 0.5 & 0.13 0.14 0.16 0.16 & 8.1 7.1 1.9 3.6 & 1.01 & yyyy & +8.85e-03 $\pm$ 9.0e-04 & 1 \\
J0948+4039 & 09:48:55.34 & 40:39:44.5& 0.5 & 1.84 1.81 1.84 1.89 & 1.0 1.3 0.9 0.7 & 0.50 & yynn & +1.80e-04 $\pm$ 2.1e-05 & 0 \\
J0949+5819 & 09:49:39.81 & 58:19:12.9& 0.7 & 0.08 0.05 0.03 0.02 & 15.1 5.7 6.1 13.5 & 3.37 & yyny & +1.90e-02 $\pm$ 1.9e-03 & 1 \\
J0952+4941 & 09:52:00.66 & 49:41:25.9& 0.5 & 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.14 & 1.6 1.1 0.7 1.0 & 1.02 & nnnn & +3.39e-05 $\pm$ 3.2e-05 & 0 \\
J0953+1720 & 09:53:59.23 & 17:20:56.6& 0.9 & 0.15 0.13 0.13 0.17 & 1.8 1.3 3.9 2.7 & 1.03 & ynyy & +2.04e-03 $\pm$ 1.0e-04 & 2 \\
J0956+2515 & 09:56:49.87 & 25:15:16.0& 0.6 & 0.97 0.93 0.93 0.92 & 0.1 1.8 2.1 0.2 & 0.52 & nyyn & +1.21e-03 $\pm$ 7.7e-05 & 0 \\
J0958+4725 & 09:58:19.67 & 47:25:07.8& 0.7 & 1.67 1.75 1.95 1.77 & 2.6 1.3 1.3 1.0 & 0.50 & yyyy & +7.86e-04 $\pm$ 3.4e-05 & 2 \\
J0958+6533 & 09:58:47.24 & 65:33:54.8& 1.1 & 0.70 0.62 0.53 0.51 & 1.1 1.9 1.7 1.4 & 0.55 & nyyy & +4.80e-04 $\pm$ 5.4e-05 & 1 \\
J1007+1356 & 10:07:41.49 & 13:56:29.6& 1.2 & 0.83 0.88 0.85 0.85 & 0.9 1.3 1.5 0.7 & 0.52 & nyyn & +3.20e-04 $\pm$ 2.7e-05 & 0 \\
J1008+0621 & 10:08:00.81 & 06:21:21.2& 0.8 & 0.72 0.83 0.87 0.59 & 2.6 2.2 2.5 2.4 & 0.53 & yyyy & +1.57e-03 $\pm$ 6.5e-05 & 1 \\
J1009+0622 & 10:09:49.80 & 06:22:00.9& 0.8 & 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 & 0.7 0.8 1.7 1.0 & 0.75 & nnyn & +2.92e-04 $\pm$ 2.7e-05 & 0 \\
J1009+1322 & 10:09:00.09 & 13:22:54.4& 1.2 & 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 & 2.1 1.9 2.8 2.0 & 1.91 & nnnn & +7.34e-04 $\pm$ 8.3e-05 & 3 \\
J1011+6529 & 10:11:38.18 & 65:29:21.3& 0.8 & 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.10 & 1.7 1.9 1.9 2.2 & 1.25 & nnyn & +5.99e-04 $\pm$ 6.1e-05 & 1 \\
J1013+2449 & 10:13:53.42 & 24:49:16.4& 0.3 & 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.91 & 0.4 1.6 2.0 0.8 & 0.52 & nyyn & +5.66e-04 $\pm$ 6.0e-05 & 2 \\
J1016+2037 & 10:16:44.32 & 20:37:47.3& 0.8 & 0.79 0.77 0.77 0.78 & 0.5 1.9 1.6 1.1 & 0.53 & nyyn & +5.22e-04 $\pm$ 3.4e-05 & 2 \\
J1018+3542 & 10:18:10.98 & 35:42:39.4& 0.6 & 0.83 0.86 0.90 0.96 & 0.9 0.3 1.5 0.8 & 0.52 & nnyn & +2.90e-04 $\pm$ 2.5e-05 & 0 \\
J1021+5114 & 10:21:32.23 & 51:14:33.7& 0.3 & 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.11 & 1.9 2.1 1.9 1.4 & 1.36 & nnnn & +3.99e-04 $\pm$ 6.3e-05 & 0 \\
J1022+4126 & 10:22:02.02 & 41:26:05.3& 0.6 & 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14 & 2.2 4.2 2.7 2.0 & 1.16 & nyyn & +2.32e-03 $\pm$ 1.2e-04 & 2 \\
J1024+1912 & 10:24:44.81 & 19:12:20.4& 0.8 & 0.52 0.51 0.51 0.56 & 0.7 2.0 1.2 1.1 & 0.56 & nynn & +3.36e-04 $\pm$ 3.7e-05 & 0 \\
J1024+2332 & 10:24:53.63 & 23:32:33.9& 0.8 & 0.15 0.20 0.17 0.16 & 5.6 5.7 3.0 2.2 & 0.91 & yyyy & +5.51e-03 $\pm$ 3.4e-04 & 2 \\
J1025+1253 & 10:25:56.28 & 12:53:49.0& 1.3 & 0.78 0.78 0.76 0.69 & 1.0 1.5 1.4 0.6 & 0.53 & nyyn & +4.09e-04 $\pm$ 2.5e-05 & 3 \\
J1026+7032 & 10:26:36.68 & 70:32:43.0& 1.2 & 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.12 & 1.6 2.4 2.8 1.9 & 1.14 & nyyy & +2.14e-03 $\pm$ 2.2e-04 & 3 \\
J1029+2911 & 10:29:11.47 & 29:11:01.9& 0.7 & 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.07 & 2.3 1.4 2.6 2.7 & 1.73 & nnnn & +6.74e-04 $\pm$ 9.5e-05 & 1 \\
J1034+6832 & 10:34:01.11 & 68:32:27.1& 0.7 & 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.10 & 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.3 & 1.33 & nnnn & +1.89e-05 $\pm$ 3.3e-05 & 0 \\
J1041+0610 & 10:41:17.16 & 06:10:16.9& 1.5 & 1.47 1.40 1.36 1.31 & 0.5 0.2 1.4 0.2 & 0.51 & nnnn & +2.27e-04 $\pm$ 2.2e-05 & 0 \\
J1041+4138 & 10:41:16.62 & 41:38:59.0& 0.6 & 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.11 & 1.4 2.4 2.5 2.4 & 1.39 & nnyn & +1.01e-03 $\pm$ 8.1e-05 & 2 \\
J1042+3615 & 10:42:32.24 & 36:15:20.8& 0.5 & 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.09 & 2.3 3.7 2.1 1.4 & 1.46 & nnnn & +1.19e-03 $\pm$ 1.9e-04 & 2 \\
J1043+2408 & 10:43:09.03 & 24:08:35.4& 0.6 & 0.98 1.02 0.96 0.91 & 0.1 0.2 3.5 1.2 & 0.52 & nnyy & +2.52e-03 $\pm$ 1.0e+03 & 0 \\
J1044+8054 & 10:44:23.06 & 80:54:39.4& 1.0 & 1.09 1.13 1.20 1.18 & 0.8 0.1 0.2 0.2 & 0.51 & nnnn & +6.81e-05 $\pm$ 7.7e-06 & 0 \\
J1048+7143 & 10:48:27.62 & 71:43:35.9& 0.5 & 1.47 1.47 1.30 1.33 & 1.1 0.9 1.8 0.2 & 0.51 & nnyn & +6.40e-04 $\pm$ 3.9e-05 & 3 \\
J1049+1429 & 10:49:46.32 & 14:29:38.5& 0.9 & 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.20 & 4.3 3.7 3.5 5.9 & 0.94 & yyyy & +8.39e-03 $\pm$ 4.7e-04 & 3 \\
J1054+3928 & 10:54:32.42 & 39:28:12.3& 0.3 & 0.12 0.14 0.14 0.14 & 2.4 4.2 4.3 2.2 & 1.08 & nyyn & +3.60e-03 $\pm$ 3.6e-04 & 1 \\
J1056+7011 & 10:56:53.61 & 70:11:45.9& -0.2 & 0.53 0.43 0.38 0.41 & 1.4 1.0 1.1 2.1 & 0.59 & nnny & +3.97e-04 $\pm$ 3.4e-05 & 0 \\
J1058+0133 & 10:58:29.60 & 01:33:58.8& 0.9 & 3.41 3.40 3.14 3.10 & 0.1 0.6 0.9 0.7 & 0.50 & nnnn & +9.99e-05 $\pm$ -1.0e+00 & 0 \\
J1101+0215 & 11:01:37.43 & 02:15:12.2& 1.0 & 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.12 & 2.3 2.8 2.6 2.0 & 1.30 & nyyy & +9.98e-04 $\pm$ 9.7e-05 & 1 \\
J1104+3812 & 11:04:27.31 & 38:12:31.7& 0.6 & 0.58 0.60 0.65 0.69 & 0.3 2.4 1.5 0.4 & 0.54 & nyyn & +7.26e-04 $\pm$ 5.6e-05 & 0 \\
J1105+1754 & 11:05:38.81 & 17:54:15.6& 0.4 & 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 & 1.0 1.9 1.2 1.3 & 1.05 & nnnn & +2.51e-04 $\pm$ 3.1e-05 & 0 \\
J1107+5219 & 11:07:25.83 & 52:19:31.6& 0.1 & 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.14 & 2.9 1.8 2.3 1.4 & 1.04 & ynyn & +1.07e-03 $\pm$ 7.7e-05 & 2 \\
J1112+3527 & 11:12:08.08 & 35:27:07.6& 0.6 & 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 & 2.1 2.5 1.9 1.6 & 1.54 & nnnn & +4.40e-04 $\pm$ 6.1e-05 & 1 \\
J1118+2922 & 11:18:57.92 & 29:22:13.7& 0.5 & 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 & 1.3 2.6 2.2 1.7 & 1.57 & nnnn & +3.53e-04 $\pm$ 4.8e-05 & 0 \\
J1120+2108 & 11:20:11.65 & 21:08:48.1& 0.6 & 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 & 1.1 3.1 2.1 1.7 & 1.48 & nnnn & +2.71e-04 $\pm$ 1.7e-04 & 0 \\
J1125+2610 & 11:25:53.71 & 26:10:19.9& 0.5 & 0.82 0.83 0.83 0.85 & 0.1 1.8 0.4 0.2 & 0.52 & nynn & +7.08e-04 $\pm$ 9.7e-05 & 0 \\
J1130+3815 & 11:30:53.28 & 38:15:18.5& 0.5 & 0.95 0.98 1.03 1.04 & 1.3 2.0 0.2 2.8 & 0.52 & nyny & +2.18e-03 $\pm$ 1.2e-04 & 3 \\
J1132+4455 & 11:32:23.76 & 44:55:10.3& 0.5 & 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 & 2.5 2.8 1.9 3.0 & 1.13 & nynn & +1.38e-03 $\pm$ 1.0e-04 & 1 \\
J1134+2901 & 11:34:14.32 & 29:01:21.1& 0.4 & 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 & 0.6 1.6 1.3 0.9 & 0.95 & nnnn & +1.26e-04 $\pm$ 2.7e-05 & 0 \\
J1137+3441 & 11:37:09.16 & 34:41:55.9& 0.5 & 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 & 3.2 3.9 2.1 1.8 & 1.72 & nynn & +1.32e-03 $\pm$ 1.3e-04 & 1 \\
J1141+5953 & 11:41:16.06 & 59:53:08.7& 0.4 & 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.12 & 1.3 2.5 1.7 1.5 & 1.25 & nnnn & +4.44e-04 $\pm$ 2.9e-05 & 1 \\
J1149+3559 & 11:49:33.97 & 35:59:08.0& 0.5 & 0.14 0.15 0.18 0.15 & 1.5 2.9 2.3 1.3 & 0.96 & nyyn & +1.21e-03 $\pm$ 6.8e-05 & 1 \\
J1150+2417 & 11:50:19.21 & 24:17:53.8& 0.4 & 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.78 & 0.5 1.0 1.0 0.6 & 0.53 & nnnn & +9.68e-05 $\pm$ 1.1e-05 & 0 \\
J1153+8058 & 11:53:12.49 & 80:58:29.1& 1.2 & 1.47 1.56 1.57 1.57 & 0.2 0.9 1.2 0.6 & 0.51 & nnyn & +2.47e-04 $\pm$ 6.5e-06 & 0 \\
J1157+0641 & 11:57:00.65 & 06:41:12.6& 0.8 & 0.18 0.18 0.16 0.14 & 1.7 1.4 1.9 1.5 & 0.94 & nnyn & +5.25e-04 $\pm$ 3.5e-05 & 1 \\
J1158+2450 & 11:58:25.78 & 24:50:17.9& 0.3 & 0.80 0.79 0.78 0.77 & 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.4 & 0.53 & nnnn & -1.44e-05 $\pm$ -1.0e+00 & 0 \\
J1159+2914 & 11:59:31.83 & 29:14:43.8& 0.5 & 2.89 2.89 2.28 1.90 & 5.8 3.4 4.6 4.5 & 0.52 & yyyy & +6.27e-03 $\pm$ 5.4e-04 & 1 \\
J1203+1118 & 12:03:12.98 & 11:18:17.3& 0.8 & 0.17 0.21 0.22 0.23 & 1.1 1.7 1.9 1.1 & 0.80 & nnnn & +5.65e-04 $\pm$ 4.8e-05 & 2 \\
J1219+4829 & 12:19:06.41 & 48:29:56.1& 0.5 & 0.70 0.66 0.61 0.59 & 0.6 1.2 0.9 0.5 & 0.54 & nnnn & +1.58e-04 $\pm$ 1.5e-05 & 0 \\
J1221+2813 & 12:21:31.69 & 28:13:58.4& 0.4 & 0.74 0.70 0.66 0.64 & 1.4 1.0 0.6 0.3 & 0.54 & ynnn & +2.13e-04 $\pm$ 2.9e-05 & 0 \\
J1222+0413 & 12:22:22.55 & 04:13:15.7& 0.2 & 0.62 0.57 0.59 0.62 & 0.7 1.2 1.2 0.5 & 0.55 & nnnn & +1.66e-04 $\pm$ 1.5e-05 & 0 \\
J1224+0330 & 12:24:52.42 & 03:30:50.2& 0.2 & 0.82 0.80 0.78 0.76 & 1.0 0.7 1.3 0.4 & 0.53 & nnnn & +1.38e-04 $\pm$ 1.2e-05 & 0 \\
J1229+5522 & 12:29:09.28 & 55:22:30.5& 0.3 & 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.12 & 2.8 1.6 3.5 2.2 & 1.43 & nnyn & +2.18e-03 $\pm$ 1.8e-04 & 3 \\
J1242+3751 & 12:42:51.37 & 37:51:00.0& 0.5 & 0.65 0.66 0.67 0.70 & 1.4 0.3 1.2 0.9 & 0.54 & ynnn & +3.93e-04 $\pm$ 3.4e-05 & 0 \\
J1247+7046 & 12:47:07.55 & 70:46:45.1& 0.4 & 0.13 0.14 0.17 0.17 & 2.6 2.7 3.3 2.0 & 0.98 & yyyy & +2.85e-03 $\pm$ 1.0e+03 & 3 \\
J1247+7124 & 12:47:09.32 & 71:24:20.0& 0.4 & 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 & 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.5 & 1.10 & nnnn & +1.52e-04 $\pm$ 2.5e-05 & 0 \\
J1248+2022 & 12:48:37.26 & 20:22:26.3& 0.7 & 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 & 1.9 1.3 3.0 3.3 & 1.74 & nnyn & +8.79e-04 $\pm$ 1.3e-04 & 1 \\
J1252+1607 & 12:52:36.51 & 16:07:06.9& 0.3 & 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.12 & 1.1 2.2 1.4 1.8 & 1.26 & nnnn & +5.70e-04 $\pm$ 6.1e-05 & 3 \\
J1254+0233 & 12:54:45.46 & 02:33:28.9& 0.4 & 0.22 0.22 0.21 0.20 & 0.8 1.2 1.3 0.8 & 0.79 & nnnn & +2.56e-04 $\pm$ 1.0e+03 & 0 \\
J1254+1141 & 12:54:38.25 & 11:41:05.8& 0.3 & 0.64 0.65 0.67 0.67 & 0.6 0.8 1.6 1.0 & 0.54 & nnyn & +3.40e-04 $\pm$ 1.0e+03 & 0 \\
J1254+1856 & 12:54:33.27 & 18:56:01.9& 0.6 & 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.12 & 1.1 0.8 2.0 1.7 & 1.14 & nnnn & +2.57e-04 $\pm$ 4.0e-05 & 0 \\
J1256+1247 & 12:56:34.85 & 12:47:34.2& 0.5 & 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.08 & 1.1 2.0 3.2 1.9 & 1.57 & nyyy & +1.01e-03 $\pm$ 1.4e-04 & 3 \\
J1300+0828 & 13:00:36.44 & 08:28:02.8& 0.3 & 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 & 3.8 2.1 2.3 1.2 & 1.20 & yyyn & +2.30e-03 $\pm$ 1.0e+03 & 3 \\
J1302+4819 & 13:02:17.19 & 48:19:17.5& 0.5 & 0.29 0.27 0.24 0.23 & 1.0 1.8 1.6 0.9 & 0.72 & nnnn & +3.54e-04 $\pm$ 3.7e-05 & 0 \\
J1302+5748 & 13:02:52.46 & 57:48:37.6& 0.3 & 0.95 0.89 0.84 0.91 & 1.3 0.3 0.9 0.8 & 0.52 & nnnn & +1.72e-04 $\pm$ 2.6e-05 & 0 \\
J1309+0716 & 13:09:29.18 & 07:16:56.3& 0.6 & 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.11 & 1.7 1.6 1.8 2.3 & 1.37 & nnnn & +3.58e-04 $\pm$ 4.3e-05 & 0 \\
J1309+1154 & 13:09:33.93 & 11:54:24.5& 0.4 & 1.13 1.15 1.10 1.07 & 0.3 0.2 1.5 0.2 & 0.51 & nnnn & +4.12e-04 $\pm$ 5.5e-05 & 0 \\
J1310+3220 & 13:10:28.66 & 32:20:43.7& 0.2 & 1.63 1.74 1.81 1.74 & 0.8 0.1 1.2 0.9 & 0.51 & nnnn & +2.20e-04 $\pm$ 3.8e-05 & 0 \\
J1310+3233 & 13:10:59.40 & 32:33:34.4& 0.2 & 0.69 0.72 0.74 0.79 & 0.7 1.3 1.3 1.2 & 0.53 & nynn & +2.42e-04 $\pm$ 2.9e-05 & 0 \\
J1312+3113 & 13:12:48.80 & 31:13:00.5& 0.3 & 0.10 0.10 0.12 0.13 & 1.6 0.9 1.8 1.7 & 1.28 & nnnn & +3.26e-04 $\pm$ 6.1e-05 & 0 \\
J1316+0504 & 13:16:22.95 & 05:04:52.6& 0.5 & 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.10 & 2.0 1.5 2.6 2.7 & 1.48 & nnny & +1.17e-03 $\pm$ 1.1e-04 & 3 \\
J1316+6927 & 13:16:22.98 & 69:27:16.6& 0.4 & 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.12 & 1.5 1.3 1.8 1.6 & 1.24 & nnnn & +4.19e-04 $\pm$ 5.2e-05 & 3 \\
J1327+2210 & 13:27:00.86 & 22:10:50.1& 0.5 & 1.18 0.98 0.85 0.82 & 0.1 0.9 1.4 0.4 & 0.53 & nnnn & +2.94e-04 $\pm$ 2.5e-05 & 0 \\
J1328+6221 & 13:28:40.56 & 62:21:37.0& 0.5 & 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 & 5.0 6.0 8.0 5.2 & 1.17 & yyyy & +8.36e-03 $\pm$ 5.0e-04 & 1 \\
J1329+3154 & 13:29:52.86 & 31:54:11.0& 0.2 & 1.47 1.32 1.15 1.12 & 0.6 0.9 0.2 0.5 & 0.51 & nnnn & +9.31e-05 $\pm$ 1.3e-05 & 0 \\
J1330+4954 & 13:30:29.38 & 49:54:27.4& 0.5 & 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.11 & 2.1 1.6 1.5 1.2 & 1.23 & nnnn & +2.36e-04 $\pm$ 4.5e-05 & 0 \\
J1350+3034 & 13:50:52.73 & 30:34:53.5& 0.4 & 0.33 0.32 0.26 0.30 & 1.0 2.0 1.7 1.1 & 0.67 & nyyn & +6.99e-04 $\pm$ 4.6e-05 & 2 \\
J1352+3603 & 13:52:00.94 & 36:03:51.2& 0.4 & 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.10 & 1.4 1.2 1.7 1.0 & 1.33 & nnnn & +1.73e-04 $\pm$ 3.6e-05 & 0 \\
J1354+6645 & 13:54:23.08 & 66:45:25.5& 0.6 & 0.12 0.13 0.12 0.11 & 3.9 3.9 3.2 1.7 & 1.19 & yyyn & +3.26e-03 $\pm$ 1.8e-04 & 2 \\
J1355+3024 & 13:55:41.11 & 30:24:11.8& 0.5 & 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 & 1.1 1.5 2.0 1.0 & 1.30 & nnyn & +1.94e-04 $\pm$ 4.6e-05 & 0 \\
J1407+2827 & 14:07:00.39 & 28:27:14.6& 0.4 & 2.46 2.47 2.47 2.48 & 0.1 0.1 0.7 0.0 & 0.50 & nnnn & +5.44e-05 $\pm$ 1.8e-05 & 0 \\
J1410+6141 & 14:10:30.98 & 61:41:36.9& 0.4 & 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.14 & 1.3 0.8 1.5 1.0 & 1.09 & nnnn & +2.46e-04 $\pm$ 3.8e-05 & 0 \\
J1414+1922 & 14:14:29.50 & 19:22:18.4& 0.7 & 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.15 & 0.6 0.8 1.5 0.8 & 0.98 & nnnn & +1.79e-04 $\pm$ 1.0e+03 & 0 \\
J1415+1320 & 14:15:58.81 & 13:20:23.7& 0.4 & 0.85 0.89 0.94 0.92 & 0.7 1.0 1.2 0.8 & 0.52 & nnyn & +2.58e-04 $\pm$ 1.1e-05 & 0 \\
J1416+1242 & 14:16:28.65 & 12:42:13.5& 0.4 & 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 & 1.3 1.7 0.7 1.3 & 1.39 & nnnn & -1.82e-05 $\pm$ 4.3e-05 & 0 \\
J1417+3818 & 14:17:40.44 & 38:18:21.1& 0.3 & 0.10 0.09 0.12 0.12 & 2.7 2.5 2.6 2.7 & 1.32 & yyyy & +1.45e-03 $\pm$ 1.4e-04 & 1 \\
J1419+3821 & 14:19:46.61 & 38:21:48.4& 0.3 & 0.60 0.67 0.66 0.73 & 1.0 0.5 1.1 0.9 & 0.54 & nnnn & +2.10e-04 $\pm$ 2.2e-05 & 0 \\
J1419+5423 & 14:19:46.59 & 54:23:14.7& 0.5 & 0.95 0.89 0.95 0.91 & 1.3 1.2 1.1 0.7 & 0.52 & nyyn & +2.16e-04 $\pm$ 1.8e-05 & 0 \\
J1426+3625 & 14:26:37.08 & 36:25:09.5& 0.2 & 0.41 0.42 0.42 0.46 & 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.3 & 0.59 & nnnn & +2.87e-04 $\pm$ 3.7e-05 & 0 \\
J1434+1952 & 14:34:39.79 & 19:52:00.7& 0.7 & 0.22 0.24 0.25 0.24 & 0.6 0.9 2.1 0.9 & 0.73 & nnyn & +6.54e-04 $\pm$ 6.7e-05 & 2 \\
J1436+2321 & 14:36:40.98 & 23:21:03.2& 0.5 & 0.71 0.64 0.59 0.56 & 0.4 0.8 1.6 0.3 & 0.55 & nnyn & +3.67e-04 $\pm$ 3.1e-05 & 0 \\
J1436+6336 & 14:36:45.80 & 63:36:37.8& 0.4 & 1.14 1.14 1.14 1.14 & 1.1 0.8 0.2 0.2 & 0.51 & nnnn & +1.31e-04 $\pm$ 1.2e-05 & 0 \\
J1437+5112 & 14:37:19.79 & 51:12:49.3& 0.7 & 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.14 & 2.8 1.6 1.7 1.6 & 1.04 & ynny & +6.56e-04 $\pm$ 4.6e-05 & 1 \\
J1438+1235 & 14:38:37.79 & 12:35:34.2& 0.6 & 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.13 & 1.5 3.4 1.3 0.9 & 1.27 & nynn & +9.48e-04 $\pm$ 1.0e+03 & 3 \\
J1442+0625 & 14:42:12.23 & 06:25:26.1& 0.6 & 0.10 0.10 0.08 0.07 & 3.1 2.9 3.3 4.4 & 1.59 & yyyy & +3.29e-03 $\pm$ 5.2e-04 & 2 \\
J1444+0257 & 14:44:31.76 & 02:57:53.4& 0.6 & 0.12 0.10 0.11 0.10 & 2.9 2.6 2.9 3.2 & 1.32 & yyyy & +2.38e-03 $\pm$ 1.6e-04 & 2 \\
J1444+1632 & 14:44:39.23 & 16:32:12.7& 0.4 & 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 & 1.1 1.1 2.1 2.5 & 1.41 & nnnn & +4.63e-04 $\pm$ 7.2e-05 & 1 \\
J1446+1721 & 14:46:35.34 & 17:21:07.5& 0.3 & 1.01 0.99 0.93 0.81 & 0.6 0.2 1.0 0.8 & 0.53 & nnnn & +1.35e-04 $\pm$ 2.9e-05 & 0 \\
J1447+1920 & 14:47:16.08 & 19:20:46.9& 0.3 & 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.12 & 1.2 2.6 3.1 2.3 & 1.29 & nynn & +1.27e-03 $\pm$ 1.5e-04 & 1 \\
J1448+5326 & 14:48:59.17 & 53:26:09.2& 0.7 & 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 & 1.1 0.9 1.2 0.8 & 0.85 & nnnn & +6.51e-05 $\pm$ 2.3e-05 & 0 \\
J1451+0106 & 14:51:45.94 & 01:06:18.7& 0.6 & 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 & 2.3 2.9 2.8 1.4 & 1.73 & nyyn & +1.73e-03 $\pm$ 1.0e+03 & 3 \\
J1453+2648 & 14:53:53.60 & 26:48:33.4& 0.5 & 0.35 0.37 0.34 0.31 & 0.7 1.8 1.8 0.8 & 0.63 & nyyn & +6.61e-04 $\pm$ 4.8e-05 & 3 \\
J1457+0938 & 14:57:52.53 & 09:38:16.5& 1.1 & 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 & 0.4 0.8 0.8 0.3 & 0.75 & nnnn & -5.92e-06 $\pm$ 1.5e-05 & 0 \\
J1459+2708 & 14:59:39.91 & 27:08:18.8& 0.5 & 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 & 1.4 2.6 3.1 1.8 & 1.30 & nyyn & +9.57e-04 $\pm$ 1.3e-04 & 1 \\
J1500+4751 & 15:00:48.65 & 47:51:15.5& 0.6 & 0.32 0.31 0.33 0.38 & 2.1 1.3 1.4 1.0 & 0.64 & ynyn & +6.85e-04 $\pm$ 4.1e-05 & 2 \\
J1502+3350 & 15:02:33.94 & 33:50:55.7& 0.4 & 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.10 & 2.1 1.9 2.9 1.1 & 1.55 & nnyn & +7.01e-04 $\pm$ 1.2e-04 & 1 \\
J1505+0326 & 15:05:06.47 & 03:26:30.8& 1.0 & 0.64 0.81 0.87 0.85 & 0.5 0.7 3.5 0.5 & 0.52 & nnyn & +1.92e-03 $\pm$ 1.6e-04 & 3 \\
J1505+3318 & 15:05:09.01 & 33:18:32.5& 0.4 & 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.09 & 1.8 2.9 1.7 1.6 & 1.61 & nnnn & +5.11e-04 $\pm$ 7.5e-05 & 1 \\
J1506+3730 & 15:06:09.53 & 37:30:51.1& 0.7 & 0.76 0.70 0.68 0.65 & 1.3 2.9 1.0 0.8 & 0.54 & nnnn & +6.57e-04 $\pm$ 1.4e-04 & 2 \\
J1514+2931 & 15:14:20.88 & 29:31:03.6& 0.5 & 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 & 1.3 1.7 2.3 1.3 & 1.20 & nnyn & +6.41e-04 $\pm$ 5.3e-05 & 2 \\
J1516+1932 & 15:16:56.79 & 19:32:13.0& 0.9 & 0.50 0.53 0.52 0.49 & 0.9 2.2 2.2 1.0 & 0.56 & nyyn & +1.23e-03 $\pm$ 1.0e+03 & 1 \\
J1521+1756 & 15:21:17.58 & 17:56:01.0& 0.8 & 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 & 0.6 1.1 1.9 0.6 & 0.91 & nnyn & +3.16e-04 $\pm$ 4.1e-05 & 0 \\
J1521+7858 & 15:21:02.80 & 78:58:30.2& 0.8 & 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.10 & 2.1 2.0 1.7 1.8 & 1.53 & nnnn & +3.03e-04 $\pm$ 3.0e-05 & 0 \\
J1526+1632 & 15:26:41.90 & 16:32:45.9& 0.8 & 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.10 & 1.0 1.6 1.7 1.1 & 1.35 & nnnn & +1.21e-04 $\pm$ 5.1e-05 & 0 \\
J1530+3758 & 15:30:16.25 & 37:58:31.1& 0.6 & 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.15 & 1.3 2.1 1.0 1.0 & 1.02 & nynn & +2.60e-04 $\pm$ 6.0e-05 & 0 \\
J1534+0131 & 15:34:52.45 & 01:31:04.2& 0.8 & 0.82 0.85 0.88 0.86 & 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.8 & 0.52 & nnnn & +1.38e-04 $\pm$ 1.1e-05 & 0 \\
J1535+4836 & 15:35:14.65 & 48:36:59.6& 0.2 & 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 & 1.5 1.6 0.9 1.1 & 1.19 & nnnn & +1.20e-04 $\pm$ 5.6e-05 & 0 \\
J1535+6953 & 15:35:19.22 & 69:53:18.3& 1.2 & 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.06 & 2.4 2.1 2.4 2.2 & 2.00 & nnnn & +4.41e-04 $\pm$ 6.4e-05 & 2 \\
J1536+3833 & 15:36:13.84 & 38:33:28.6& 0.5 & 0.15 0.15 0.17 0.18 & 0.5 1.3 1.5 1.2 & 0.92 & nnyn & +3.73e-04 $\pm$ 3.2e-05 & 0 \\
J1549+0237 & 15:49:29.43 & 02:37:01.1& 1.4 & 1.23 1.28 1.37 1.23 & 0.7 0.7 1.1 0.7 & 0.51 & nnyn & +2.39e-04 $\pm$ 3.9e-05 & 0 \\
J1549+5038 & 15:49:17.46 & 50:38:05.7& 0.4 & 1.00 1.03 1.05 1.05 & 0.2 1.1 2.7 0.2 & 0.52 & nyyn & +1.73e-03 $\pm$ 1.0e+03 & 0 \\
J1550+0527 & 15:50:35.26 & 05:27:10.4& 1.0 & 2.89 3.01 3.39 3.56 & 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 & 0.50 & nnnn & +4.80e-05 $\pm$ 1.0e-05 & 0 \\
J1556+1230 & 15:56:50.78 & 12:30:35.6& 1.2 & 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.13 & 0.8 1.4 2.1 0.9 & 1.13 & nnyn & +4.63e-04 $\pm$ 1.0e-04 & 3 \\
J1559+0805 & 15:59:49.72 & 08:05:17.5& 0.9 & 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 & 1.2 1.7 1.1 1.1 & 1.22 & nnnn & +5.88e-05 $\pm$ 2.1e-05 & 0 \\
J1602+3326 & 16:02:07.26 & 33:26:53.0& 0.5 & 1.68 1.68 1.63 1.58 & 0.1 1.0 1.2 0.1 & 0.51 & nnyn & +2.87e-04 $\pm$ 2.7e-05 & 0 \\
J1604+1744 & 16:04:26.50 & 17:44:31.1& 1.0 & 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.11 & 1.0 1.2 2.2 1.6 & 1.23 & nnnn & +5.24e-04 $\pm$ 4.5e-05 & 3 \\
J1608+1029 & 16:08:46.20 & 10:29:07.7& 1.4 & 2.81 3.29 2.85 2.16 & 0.1 1.3 0.9 0.5 & 0.51 & nnnn & +2.25e-04 $\pm$ 2.3e-05 & 0 \\
J1610+7809 & 16:10:50.62 & 78:09:00.5& 0.8 & 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 & 5.2 2.3 3.5 2.3 & 1.21 & yyyy & +2.82e-03 $\pm$ 1.5e-04 & 1 \\
J1613+3412 & 16:13:41.06 & 34:12:47.9& 0.5 & 4.56 4.73 4.64 4.61 & 0.5 1.3 0.1 0.7 & 0.50 & nynn & +1.60e-04 $\pm$ 1.6e-05 & 0 \\
J1615+0623 & 16:15:55.67 & 06:23:19.0& 0.8 & 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.10 & 1.3 2.1 1.4 1.0 & 1.34 & nnnn & +1.53e-04 $\pm$ 3.6e-05 & 0 \\
J1616+0459 & 16:16:37.55 & 04:59:32.7& 1.2 & 0.81 0.81 0.79 0.80 & 0.4 1.1 0.7 0.6 & 0.53 & nnnn & +1.32e-04 $\pm$ 2.2e-05 & 0 \\
J1616+4632 & 16:16:03.76 & 46:32:25.2& 0.5 & 0.11 0.09 0.08 0.08 & 2.0 1.3 2.5 2.1 & 1.53 & ynyn & +7.84e-04 $\pm$ 1.1e-04 & 3 \\
J1617+0246 & 16:17:49.90 & 02:46:43.0& 1.1 & 0.71 0.68 0.66 0.68 & 0.8 1.2 1.5 0.9 & 0.54 & nnyn & +4.49e-04 $\pm$ -1.0e+00 & 3 \\
J1619+2247 & 16:19:14.82 & 22:47:47.9& 0.6 & 0.68 0.68 0.66 0.67 & 0.5 2.4 1.6 1.1 & 0.54 & nyyy & +9.09e-04 $\pm$ 6.0e-05 & 3 \\
J1623+6308 & 16:23:46.77 & 63:08:47.1& 0.9 & 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 & 1.7 3.3 3.0 2.1 & 1.91 & nyyn & +1.55e-03 $\pm$ 1.0e+03 & 3 \\
J1624+0543 & 16:24:07.73 & 05:43:24.2& 1.2 & 0.25 0.24 0.25 0.22 & 2.2 1.2 1.0 1.7 & 0.74 & ynny & +6.78e-04 $\pm$ 3.1e-05 & 3 \\
J1625+4134 & 16:25:57.66 & 41:34:40.6& 0.4 & 1.02 1.07 1.08 1.11 & 0.8 1.4 0.6 1.0 & 0.52 & nnnn & +1.58e-04 $\pm$ 2.0e-05 & 0 \\
J1635+3808 & 16:35:15.49 & 38:08:04.4& 0.4 & 2.63 2.62 2.62 2.57 & 0.1 1.5 0.9 0.6 & 0.50 & nyyn & +1.71e-04 $\pm$ 2.6e-05 & 0 \\
J1638+5720 & 16:38:13.45 & 57:20:23.9& 0.8 & 1.17 1.30 1.37 1.50 & 0.9 1.5 0.9 0.6 & 0.51 & nnnn & +1.73e-04 $\pm$ 1.7e-05 & 0 \\
J1639+4128 & 16:39:15.81 & 41:28:33.7& 0.5 & 0.07 0.13 0.18 0.13 & 2.7 3.4 2.4 1.9 & 1.16 & nyyy & +1.92e-03 $\pm$ 1.6e-04 & 3 \\
J1640+3946 & 16:40:29.63 & 39:46:46.0& 1.0 & 0.82 0.91 1.07 1.13 & 0.7 1.2 0.7 0.8 & 0.51 & nnnn & +1.07e-04 $\pm$ 8.3e-06 & 0 \\
J1642+3948 & 16:42:58.81 & 39:48:36.9& 1.0 & 10.60 9.49 8.75 8.85 & 0.6 1.1 0.9 0.7 & 0.51 & nnnn & +1.18e-04 $\pm$ 1.7e-05 & 0 \\
J1646+0042 & 16:46:06.96 & 00:42:27.2& 2.5 & 0.07 0.06 0.09 0.07 & 2.5 2.6 1.9 1.8 & 1.81 & ynnn & +6.59e-04 $\pm$ -1.0e+00 & 3 \\
J1648+2141 & 16:48:17.06 & 21:41:05.8& 1.1 & 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 & 6.9 5.3 5.3 4.8 & 1.56 & yyyy & +6.80e-03 $\pm$ 4.2e-04 & 1 \\
J1649+7442 & 16:49:40.95 & 74:42:44.6& 1.1 & 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 & 2.3 2.2 3.3 3.5 & 1.40 & nnyy & +1.65e-03 $\pm$ 1.2e-04 & 1 \\
J1651+0129 & 16:51:03.66 & 01:29:23.4& 1.9 & 0.72 0.70 0.72 0.73 & 1.0 1.4 0.7 0.3 & 0.53 & nynn & +2.18e-04 $\pm$ 3.1e-05 & 0 \\
J1658+0515 & 16:58:33.44 & 05:15:16.4& 2.1 & 0.91 0.90 0.98 0.98 & 0.7 1.4 1.5 1.1 & 0.52 & nnyn & +3.52e-04 $\pm$ 4.0e-05 & 0 \\
J1659+1714 & 16:59:13.85 & 17:14:15.0& 1.1 & 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 & 0.9 2.2 2.0 1.4 & 1.17 & nnnn & +8.70e-04 $\pm$ 3.8e-05 & 3 \\
J1701+0338 & 17:01:21.37 & 03:38:51.1& 2.0 & 0.23 0.20 0.22 0.23 & 2.2 2.3 1.1 1.4 & 0.78 & yyny & +8.78e-04 $\pm$ 6.2e-05 & 3 \\
J1708+3346 & 17:08:01.24 & 33:46:46.4& 1.0 & 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.16 & 1.0 1.6 2.9 1.0 & 0.99 & nyyn & +1.20e-03 $\pm$ 9.5e-05 & 3 \\
J1711+6853 & 17:11:20.17 & 68:53:01.6& 1.2 & 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.10 & 2.1 2.5 2.3 4.5 & 1.33 & ynny & +1.94e-03 $\pm$ 1.2e-04 & 1 \\
J1716+6836 & 17:16:13.93 & 68:36:38.7& 1.3 & 0.50 0.52 0.55 0.58 & 1.6 1.7 1.1 1.4 & 0.55 & yyny & +4.10e-04 $\pm$ 3.0e-05 & 1 \\
J1717+1917 & 17:17:01.16 & 19:17:40.6& 1.0 & 0.27 0.26 0.25 0.24 & 0.7 1.3 1.2 0.9 & 0.71 & nnnn & +1.81e-04 $\pm$ 2.3e-05 & 0 \\
J1717+3905 & 17:17:28.51 & 39:05:22.7& 1.2 & 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.09 & 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.5 & 1.48 & nnnn & -8.36e-05 $\pm$ 5.2e-05 & 0 \\
J1718+4448 & 17:18:07.39 & 44:48:12.4& 0.8 & 0.12 0.11 0.10 0.12 & 1.5 1.4 1.8 2.2 & 1.24 & nnny & +3.97e-04 $\pm$ 6.7e-05 & 0 \\
J1719+0817 & 17:19:52.20 & 08:17:03.5& 2.0 & 0.63 0.64 0.62 0.64 & 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.1 & 0.54 & yyyn & +5.53e-04 $\pm$ 4.9e-05 & 1 \\
J1719+1745 & 17:19:13.04 & 17:45:06.4& 1.1 & 0.66 0.68 0.82 0.75 & 2.0 0.2 1.5 3.0 & 0.52 & ynyy & +1.49e-03 $\pm$ 1.3e-04 & 2 \\
J1727+4530 & 17:27:27.65 & 45:30:39.7& 1.0 & 0.96 1.79 1.21 0.96 & 1.0 0.1 0.9 0.9 & 0.52 & nnnn & +1.96e-04 $\pm$ 1.6e-05 & 0 \\
J1728+0427 & 17:28:24.95 & 04:27:04.8& 2.5 & 0.89 0.85 0.92 0.82 & 1.6 1.1 1.4 1.2 & 0.52 & ynyy & +5.89e-04 $\pm$ 5.1e-05 & 3 \\
J1728+1931 & 17:28:54.86 & 19:31:11.1& 1.3 & 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 & 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.6 & 1.19 & nnnn & +1.44e-04 $\pm$ 5.3e-05 & 0 \\
J1730+0024 & 17:30:34.99 & 00:24:38.6& 1.9 & 0.16 0.17 0.18 0.18 & 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.4 & 0.90 & nnnn & +3.90e-04 $\pm$ 3.8e-05 & 0 \\
J1733+1635 & 17:33:01.54 & 16:35:52.6& 1.3 & 0.14 0.13 0.14 0.13 & 1.3 0.9 2.0 1.1 & 1.09 & nnnn & +3.70e-04 $\pm$ 6.3e-05 & 0 \\
J1734+3857 & 17:34:20.57 & 38:57:51.4& 1.4 & 0.68 0.87 0.74 0.76 & 2.6 1.4 1.2 2.1 & 0.53 & yyny & +9.84e-04 $\pm$ 4.0e-05 & 3 \\
J1734+4625 & 17:34:30.29 & 46:25:53.1& 1.0 & 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06 & 2.1 3.4 3.5 2.4 & 2.08 & nnnn & +1.51e-03 $\pm$ 1.7e-04 & 3 \\
J1735+3616 & 17:35:48.08 & 36:16:45.6& 1.3 & 0.40 0.42 0.40 0.38 & 0.8 1.0 1.4 1.0 & 0.60 & nnyn & +4.06e-04 $\pm$ 3.2e-05 & 3 \\
J1739+2240 & 17:39:38.12 & 22:40:31.0& 1.7 & 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.09 & 2.2 2.5 3.4 1.9 & 1.49 & nyyn & +2.04e-03 $\pm$ 1.6e-04 & 3 \\
J1739+4737 & 17:39:57.12 & 47:37:58.3& 1.3 & 0.69 0.90 0.94 1.03 & 1.5 1.2 1.9 1.4 & 0.53 & yyyy & +5.17e-04 $\pm$ 5.9e-05 & 1 \\
J1740+5211 & 17:40:36.97 & 52:11:43.4& 0.9 & 0.55 0.73 1.15 1.34 & 1.5 1.9 1.8 1.4 & 0.53 & yyyy & +1.01e-03 $\pm$ 1.0e-04 & 3 \\
J1742+5945 & 17:42:32.00 & 59:45:06.7& 1.3 & 0.11 0.12 0.11 0.11 & 2.1 2.8 4.2 4.2 & 1.23 & nyyy & +3.39e-03 $\pm$ 1.7e-04 & 2 \\
J1745+1720 & 17:45:35.20 & 17:20:01.4& 1.6 & 0.79 0.73 0.70 0.69 & 0.1 0.2 1.2 0.6 & 0.53 & nnnn & +3.00e-04 $\pm$ 4.8e-05 & 0 \\
J1745+4059 & 17:45:28.45 & 40:59:51.8& 2.1 & 0.09 0.08 0.10 0.10 & 4.8 1.9 4.4 3.1 & 1.48 & ynyy & +5.18e-03 $\pm$ -1.0e+00 & 3 \\
J1747+4658 & 17:47:26.64 & 46:58:50.9& 1.1 & 0.28 0.28 0.27 0.25 & 3.5 3.8 3.2 2.2 & 0.69 & yyyy & +4.37e-03 $\pm$ 1.3e-04 & 3 \\
J1751+0939 & 17:51:32.81 & 09:39:00.7& 3.1 & 3.09 2.72 2.10 2.28 & 0.1 1.7 1.3 2.7 & 0.51 & nyyy & +1.33e-03 $\pm$ 8.5e-05 & 3 \\
J1753+4409 & 17:53:22.64 & 44:09:45.6& 1.7 & 0.69 0.68 0.72 0.83 & 1.1 1.1 2.9 1.5 & 0.54 & nnyy & +1.03e-03 $\pm$ 1.1e-04 & 3 \\
J1757+0531 & 17:57:58.82 & 05:31:47.9& 3.4 & 0.15 0.13 0.13 0.14 & 1.9 1.8 1.2 2.1 & 1.07 & yyny & +7.62e-04 $\pm$ 6.5e-05 & 3 \\
J1757+4757 & 17:57:28.34 & 47:57:24.4& 0.9 & 0.17 0.18 0.17 0.17 & 1.1 1.0 0.8 1.2 & 0.90 & nnnn & +6.79e-05 $\pm$ 2.6e-05 & 0 \\
J1800+3848 & 18:00:24.76 & 38:48:30.6& 2.2 & 0.73 0.76 0.75 0.77 & 0.8 1.1 1.3 0.9 & 0.53 & nyyn & +3.18e-04 $\pm$ 2.0e-05 & 0 \\
J1800+7828 & 18:00:45.68 & 78:28:04.0& 2.6 & 2.47 2.46 2.73 2.23 & 0.8 0.1 1.0 0.6 & 0.50 & nnnn & +1.28e-04 $\pm$ 7.2e-06 & 0 \\
J1804+0101 & 18:04:15.98 & 01:01:32.3& 11.5 & 0.72 0.74 0.71 0.79 & 1.5 1.2 0.5 1.0 & 0.53 & ynnn & +2.68e-04 $\pm$ 2.9e-05 & 0 \\
J1812+5603 & 18:12:57.66 & 56:03:49.1& 1.8 & 0.35 0.33 0.30 0.27 & 1.8 1.8 2.2 1.6 & 0.65 & yyyy & +1.12e-03 $\pm$ 4.9e-05 & 3 \\
J1816+4021 & 18:16:53.67 & 40:21:04.0& 1.3 & 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 & 2.7 1.7 2.4 1.5 & 1.55 & ynnn & +4.34e-04 $\pm$ 6.7e-05 & 1 \\
J1817+5528 & 18:17:19.65 & 55:28:37.7& 2.1 & 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.15 & 1.7 1.1 1.8 1.5 & 1.04 & nnnn & +3.26e-04 $\pm$ 2.8e-05 & 0 \\
J1818+0903 & 18:18:40.06 & 09:03:46.2& 3.6 & 0.11 0.09 0.08 0.07 & 1.6 2.8 4.5 2.0 & 1.55 & nnyn & +2.03e-03 $\pm$ 1.7e-04 & 3 \\
J1819+0640 & 18:19:20.59 & 06:40:22.3& 4.1 & 0.12 0.10 0.11 0.10 & 1.1 1.9 1.0 1.4 & 1.32 & nnnn & +1.51e-04 $\pm$ 5.6e-05 & 0 \\
J1819+3845 & 18:19:26.54 & 38:45:01.7& 2.2 & 0.20 0.40 0.30 0.34 & 36.7 30.9 29.3 37.1 & 0.67 & yyyy & +2.63e-01 $\pm$ 1.5e-02 & 1 \\
J1824+1044 & 18:24:02.85 & 10:44:23.7& 2.7 & 0.78 0.76 0.80 0.76 & 1.0 1.2 0.2 0.7 & 0.53 & nnnn & +1.58e-04 $\pm$ 2.1e-05 & 0 \\
J1829+2819 & 18:29:06.79 & 28:19:51.4& 3.2 & 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.10 & 2.1 2.6 2.2 2.3 & 1.48 & nnnn & +5.58e-04 $\pm$ 6.9e-05 & 1 \\
J1832+1357 & 18:32:43.47 & 13:57:44.4& 2.3 & 0.48 0.50 0.43 0.45 & 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 & 0.57 & nnnn & +2.82e-04 $\pm$ 2.6e-05 & 0 \\
J1834+3205 & 18:34:49.09 & 32:05:25.3& 3.3 & 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.12 & 1.3 1.6 1.1 1.2 & 1.17 & nnnn & +1.79e-04 $\pm$ -1.0e+00 & 0 \\
J1839+4100 & 18:39:05.80 & 41:00:59.0& 2.4 & 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.14 & 1.8 2.3 2.1 1.0 & 0.97 & yyyn & +8.67e-04 $\pm$ 5.2e-05 & 2 \\
J1841+6740 & 18:41:42.30 & 67:40:05.5& 3.2 & 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.12 & 2.3 1.7 2.5 2.6 & 1.23 & ynyy & +1.48e-03 $\pm$ 1.2e-04 & 2 \\
J1842+6809 & 18:42:33.64 & 68:09:25.2& 4.2 & 0.68 0.85 0.69 0.74 & 1.1 1.7 1.8 0.9 & 0.54 & nyyn & +6.74e-04 $\pm$ 3.7e-05 & 2 \\
J1848+3219 & 18:48:22.09 & 32:19:02.5& 5.3 & 0.97 0.93 0.77 0.73 & 1.3 1.1 1.4 3.1 & 0.52 & ynny & +8.90e-04 $\pm$ 1.0e+03 & 1 \\
J1850+2825 & 18:50:27.59 & 28:25:13.1& 5.8 & 1.18 1.18 1.14 1.12 & 0.1 1.0 0.3 0.2 & 0.51 & nnnn & +7.76e-05 $\pm$ 8.3e-05 & 0 \\
J1854+7351 & 18:54:57.29 & 73:51:19.9& 2.0 & 0.48 0.49 0.50 0.50 & 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.5 & 0.56 & nyny & +3.17e-04 $\pm$ 1.6e-05 & 0 \\
J1905+1943 & 19:05:36.47 & 19:43:08.0& 3.2 & 0.20 0.21 0.18 0.20 & 1.0 0.9 2.2 2.1 & 0.83 & nnny & +1.03e-03 $\pm$ 6.1e-05 & 3 \\
J1919+3159 & 19:19:13.22 & 31:59:45.0& 6.5 & 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.14 & 0.7 1.6 2.0 0.9 & 1.10 & nnnn & +3.97e-04 $\pm$ 6.9e-05 & 0 \\
J1925+2106 & 19:25:59.60 & 21:06:26.1& 5.1 & 1.53 1.94 1.97 1.87 & 0.7 1.2 2.1 0.4 & 0.50 & nnyn & +6.43e-04 $\pm$ 1.2e-04 & 3 \\
J1931+4743 & 19:31:16.55 & 47:43:41.2& 5.2 & 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.12 & 4.5 2.5 2.2 2.3 & 1.26 & yyyy & +2.13e-03 $\pm$ 2.3e-04 & 1 \\
J1947+0422 & 19:47:51.53 & 04:22:14.9& 4.0 & 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 & 1.9 1.4 1.5 3.4 & 1.53 & nnny & +1.32e-03 $\pm$ 1.0e+03 & 3 \\
J1950+0807 & 19:50:05.54 & 08:07:13.9& 3.5 & 1.09 1.12 1.08 1.11 & 0.9 0.9 0.7 1.4 & 0.51 & nnny & +2.49e-04 $\pm$ 4.2e-05 & 0 \\
J1953+3537 & 19:53:30.87 & 35:37:59.3& 38.5 & 0.36 0.36 0.37 0.38 & 0.8 1.1 0.5 0.5 & 0.61 & nnnn & +3.10e-05 $\pm$ 9.1e-06 & 0 \\
J1955+5131 & 19:55:42.73 & 51:31:48.5& 7.6 & 1.16 1.18 1.05 1.02 & 0.9 1.9 2.4 1.3 & 0.52 & nyyn & +1.17e-03 $\pm$ 7.6e-05 & 3 \\
J2002+4725 & 20:02:10.41 & 47:25:28.7& 14.7 & 0.77 0.78 0.74 0.73 & 2.1 1.1 0.6 1.0 & 0.53 & ynnn & +5.63e-04 $\pm$ 3.2e-05 & 3 \\
J2005+1033 & 20:05:30.34 & 10:33:39.8& 2.8 & 0.13 0.14 0.13 0.13 & 2.5 1.1 1.4 2.9 & 1.10 & ynnn & +7.70e-04 $\pm$ 7.2e-05 & 1 \\
J2005+7752 & 20:05:30.99 & 77:52:43.2& 1.9 & 1.07 1.14 1.05 1.07 & 1.2 1.0 1.1 0.9 & 0.52 & nnnn & +2.57e-04 $\pm$ 1.1e-05 & 0 \\
J2006+6424 & 20:06:17.69 & 64:24:45.4& 4.3 & 0.46 0.42 0.37 0.36 & 2.9 1.5 1.4 1.2 & 0.60 & yyyy & +1.21e-03 $\pm$ 4.6e-05 & 3 \\
J2007+4029 & 20:07:44.94 & 40:29:48.6& 174.0 & 2.64 2.70 2.79 2.63 & 0.1 1.2 0.2 0.1 & 0.50 & nnnn & +3.43e-04 $\pm$ 5.0e-05 & 0 \\
J2009+7229 & 20:09:52.30 & 72:29:19.3& 4.8 & 1.30 1.24 1.23 1.19 & 2.5 1.3 1.5 0.3 & 0.51 & yyyn & +1.34e-03 $\pm$ 1.1e-04 & 3 \\
J2011+7205 & 20:11:03.82 & 72:05:12.1& 4.8 & 0.13 0.12 0.13 0.11 & 2.4 3.4 3.1 2.1 & 1.13 & yyyn & +2.46e-03 $\pm$ 8.1e-05 & 2 \\
J2012+5308 & 20:12:32.60 & 53:08:44.0& 5.4 & 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 & 1.4 1.9 2.0 1.9 & 1.73 & nnnn & +4.41e-04 $\pm$ 5.3e-05 & 3 \\
J2012+6319 & 20:12:22.02 & 63:19:11.9& 3.9 & 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.00 & 3.6 1.4 3.2 0.0 & 1.56 & ynyy & +1.56e-03 $\pm$ 9.6e-05 & 2 \\
J2015+3410 & 20:15:28.83 & 34:10:39.4& 65.6 & 0.78 0.74 0.92 0.83 & 0.7 1.2 0.3 0.7 & 0.52 & nnnn & +9.44e-05 $\pm$ 2.4e-05 & 0 \\
J2016+1632 & 20:16:13.86 & 16:32:34.1& 3.6 & 0.42 0.40 0.41 0.43 & 2.2 1.8 4.1 2.8 & 0.59 & yyyy & +3.86e-03 $\pm$ 1.7e-04 & 3 \\
J2022+6136 & 20:22:06.68 & 61:36:58.8& 3.4 & 3.04 3.10 3.06 0.00 & 0.2 0.8 0.1 0.0 & 0.49 & nnnn & +2.28e-04 $\pm$ 1.6e-05 & 0 \\
J2023+5427 & 20:23:55.84 & 54:27:35.8& 5.6 & 1.03 1.01 1.00 1.02 & 0.8 0.2 0.8 0.5 & 0.52 & nnnn & +1.20e-04 $\pm$ 9.7e-06 & 0 \\
J2027+1213 & 20:27:39.10 & 12:13:55.2& 3.3 & 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.10 & 3.6 1.1 4.2 2.5 & 1.26 & ynyy & +2.39e-03 $\pm$ 2.0e-04 & 2 \\
J2030+5957 & 20:30:11.30 & 59:57:26.8& 3.5 & 0.13 0.12 0.10 0.09 & 2.9 1.9 2.3 5.0 & 1.26 & ynny & +1.90e-03 $\pm$ 1.4e-04 & 2 \\
J2031+1219 & 20:31:54.99 & 12:19:41.3& 2.3 & 0.86 0.81 0.72 0.56 & 2.4 0.7 2.9 1.9 & 0.53 & ynyy & +1.36e-03 $\pm$ 9.4e-05 & 2 \\
J2031+5455 & 20:31:47.95 & 54:55:03.1& 4.6 & 0.81 0.79 0.80 0.78 & 0.8 0.7 0.8 1.4 & 0.53 & nnnn & +1.36e-04 $\pm$ 2.1e-05 & 0 \\
J2049+1003 & 20:49:45.86 & 10:03:14.3& 1.4 & 0.48 0.59 0.61 0.67 & 1.5 0.3 1.8 1.3 & 0.55 & ynyn & +8.41e-04 $\pm$ 7.2e-05 & 2 \\
J2101+0341 & 21:01:38.83 & 03:41:31.3& 1.5 & 0.85 0.75 0.62 0.58 & 0.8 0.7 1.2 1.3 & 0.54 & nnyy & +3.35e-04 $\pm$ 1.3e-05 & 0 \\
J2109+3532 & 21:09:31.87 & 35:32:57.6& 21.8 & 1.30 1.40 1.51 1.38 & 1.8 0.2 0.7 1.8 & 0.51 & ynny & +5.98e-04 $\pm$ 5.2e-05 & 3 \\
J2113+1121 & 21:13:54.72 & 11:21:25.4& 1.9 & 0.12 0.14 0.10 0.10 & 3.0 7.3 3.7 4.7 & 1.25 & yyyy & +1.17e-02 $\pm$ 5.7e-04 & 3 \\
J2114+3742 & 21:14:44.12 & 37:42:25.7& 20.0 & 0.17 0.16 0.14 0.13 & 1.4 1.2 1.0 1.3 & 1.00 & nnnn & +1.45e-04 $\pm$ 2.9e-05 & 0 \\
J2116+0337 & 21:16:40.90 & 03:37:47.0& 1.4 & 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.09 & 2.2 1.9 1.1 1.2 & 1.55 & ynnn & +2.33e-04 $\pm$ 9.6e-05 & 0 \\
J2116+0536 & 21:16:36.63 & 05:36:17.0& 1.4 & 0.15 0.16 0.16 0.17 & 1.5 2.1 2.8 2.4 & 0.94 & nyyy & +1.31e-03 $\pm$ 1.1e-04 & 1 \\
J2123+0535 & 21:23:44.51 & 05:35:22.0& 1.4 & 1.96 2.10 2.30 2.14 & 2.7 1.5 0.9 0.1 & 0.50 & yynn & +8.51e-04 $\pm$ 5.0e-05 & 3 \\
J2130+0339 & 21:30:10.49 & 03:39:54.8& 1.2 & 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.10 & 1.2 1.2 1.9 1.1 & 1.29 & nnnn & +2.63e-04 $\pm$ 5.6e-05 & 0 \\
J2136+0041 & 21:36:38.58 & 00:41:54.2& 1.2 & 9.97 10.10 9.99 10.00 & 0.3 0.8 0.1 1.0 & 0.50 & nnnn & +2.00e-04 $\pm$ 1.0e+03 & 0 \\
J2137+0451 & 21:37:30.02 & 04:51:22.1& 1.3 & 0.11 0.12 0.11 0.12 & 1.5 2.5 3.3 1.5 & 1.23 & nyyn & +1.86e-03 $\pm$ 9.2e-05 & 3 \\
J2148+0657 & 21:48:05.45 & 06:57:38.6& 0.9 & 6.86 6.72 6.70 6.67 & 0.2 0.8 0.3 0.9 & 0.50 & nnnn & +1.21e-04 $\pm$ 1.1e-05 & 0 \\
J2151+0552 & 21:51:37.87 & 05:52:12.9& 1.2 & 0.86 0.89 0.90 0.90 & 0.5 0.8 0.5 1.2 & 0.52 & nnny & +2.13e-04 $\pm$ 1.0e+03 & 0 \\
J2151+0709 & 21:51:31.42 & 07:09:26.7& 1.1 & 1.12 1.09 1.05 1.01 & 0.3 0.8 0.3 0.7 & 0.52 & nnnn & +5.63e-05 $\pm$ 9.3e-06 & 0 \\
J2155+0916 & 21:55:33.65 & 09:16:39.8& 1.4 & 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 & 2.7 4.4 2.8 1.9 & 1.21 & yyyn & +2.28e-03 $\pm$ 8.5e-05 & 1 \\
J2203+1725 & 22:03:26.89 & 17:25:48.2& 1.7 & 0.91 1.05 1.33 1.27 & 3.4 2.4 2.8 2.5 & 0.51 & yyyy & +3.05e-03 $\pm$ 8.0e-05 & 3 \\
J2208+1808 & 22:08:24.19 & 18:08:26.8& 1.4 & 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.12 & 1.1 1.8 1.5 1.1 & 1.16 & nnnn & +1.85e-04 $\pm$ 3.3e-05 & 0 \\
J2212+2355 & 22:12:05.96 & 23:55:40.5& 2.3 & 1.38 0.89 1.09 1.00 & 0.1 1.2 2.4 2.2 & 0.51 & nyyy & +1.22e-03 $\pm$ 9.4e-05 & 1 \\
J2212+2759 & 22:12:39.10 & 27:59:38.4& 4.0 & 0.18 0.19 0.16 0.17 & 3.9 2.7 2.4 2.4 & 0.90 & yyyy & +2.34e-03 $\pm$ 2.8e-04 & 3 \\
J2220+3354 & 22:20:51.24 & 33:54:57.3& 6.0 & 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 & 3.7 4.0 2.6 2.7 & 1.78 & yynn & +2.94e-03 $\pm$ 3.0e-04 & 3 \\
J2221+1117 & 22:21:19.15 & 11:17:41.9& 1.0 & 0.11 0.10 0.09 0.08 & 1.4 1.8 1.6 1.1 & 1.43 & nnnn & +2.19e-04 $\pm$ 5.1e-05 & 0 \\
J2230+6946 & 22:30:36.46 & 69:46:28.0& 6.7 & 0.47 0.55 0.54 0.00 & 2.6 0.9 1.3 0.0 & 0.56 & ynyn & +6.80e-04 $\pm$ 3.9e-05 & 2 \\
J2236+0830 & 22:36:42.49 & 08:30:24.4& 1.3 & 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.13 & 2.3 1.8 1.9 3.2 & 1.21 & ynny & +1.28e-03 $\pm$ 8.8e-05 & 2 \\
J2236+2828 & 22:36:22.47 & 28:28:57.4& 1.6 & 1.86 1.89 2.10 1.89 & 1.4 1.7 0.7 0.4 & 0.50 & ynnn & +2.86e-04 $\pm$ 3.6e-05 & 0 \\
J2237+4216 & 22:37:04.20 & 42:16:48.2& 5.1 & 0.18 0.13 0.14 0.14 & 12.0 7.0 9.6 10.4 & 1.01 & yyyy & +5.08e-02 $\pm$ 1.0e+03 & 3 \\
J2241+0953 & 22:41:49.71 & 09:53:52.4& 1.4 & 0.66 0.64 0.64 0.64 & 1.4 2.3 1.6 1.0 & 0.54 & yyyn & +1.02e-03 $\pm$ 1.0e+03 & 3 \\
J2241+4120 & 22:41:07.20 & 41:20:11.6& 37.6 & 0.24 0.24 0.23 0.24 & 2.9 5.7 3.8 1.8 & 0.74 & yyyy & +5.54e-03 $\pm$ 3.5e-04 & 3 \\
J2242+2955 & 22:42:15.16 & 29:55:43.1& 2.3 & 0.15 0.15 0.17 0.14 & 4.7 1.9 4.6 4.4 & 0.98 & ynyy & +4.51e-03 $\pm$ 4.7e-04 & 1 \\
J2243+2021 & 22:43:54.74 & 20:21:03.8& 1.5 & 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.11 & 2.3 2.0 2.9 1.6 & 1.24 & nnyn & +1.74e-03 $\pm$ 7.5e-05 & 3 \\
J2245+0324 & 22:45:28.28 & 03:24:08.8& 0.6 & 0.43 0.44 0.43 0.44 & 0.4 1.8 1.1 0.7 & 0.58 & nynn & +4.26e-04 $\pm$ 2.2e-05 & 3 \\
J2247+0310 & 22:47:58.68 & 03:10:42.3& 0.7 & 0.65 0.64 0.62 0.59 & 1.2 0.3 1.1 0.8 & 0.54 & ynnn & +2.03e-04 $\pm$ 2.2e-05 & 0 \\
J2248+7054 & 22:48:00.77 & 70:54:49.3& 4.6 & 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 & 1.5 1.6 1.4 1.0 & 1.20 & nnnn & +2.60e-04 $\pm$ 2.6e-05 & 0 \\
J2249+2107 & 22:49:00.56 & 21:07:02.8& 1.5 & 0.58 0.71 0.73 0.72 & 0.2 1.9 0.8 0.9 & 0.53 & nynn & +2.71e-04 $\pm$ 5.6e-05 & 0 \\
J2253+1608 & 22:53:57.74 & 16:08:53.5& 1.2 & 11.30 11.30 11.40 12.10 & 0.6 1.7 0.6 0.8 & 0.50 & nnnn & +1.96e-04 $\pm$ 4.1e-05 & 0 \\
J2253+3236 & 22:53:12.50 & 32:36:04.3& 2.9 & 0.16 0.23 0.21 0.17 & 1.9 3.4 2.3 1.9 & 0.82 & yyyn & +1.59e-03 $\pm$ 2.2e-04 & 1 \\
J2258+0516 & 22:58:24.60 & 05:16:39.1& 0.9 & 0.18 0.19 0.20 0.20 & 0.7 1.5 1.2 0.6 & 0.83 & nnnn & +2.60e-04 $\pm$ 3.7e-05 & 0 \\
J2301+3513 & 23:01:14.44 & 35:13:00.8& 2.6 & 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 & 1.6 1.4 2.4 1.9 & 1.20 & nnnn & +4.90e-04 $\pm$ 5.3e-05 & 1 \\
J2303+1431 & 23:03:09.95 & 14:31:41.3& 1.1 & 0.12 0.12 0.14 0.16 & 3.4 2.9 4.8 2.9 & 1.09 & yyyy & +3.74e-03 $\pm$ 4.1e-04 & 1 \\
J2304+2710 & 23:04:29.40 & 27:10:31.1& 1.3 & 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.07 & 5.4 5.9 2.7 4.5 & 2.05 & yyny & +4.39e-03 $\pm$ 4.4e-04 & 1 \\
J2307+3230 & 23:07:15.91 & 32:30:31.9& 2.1 & 0.52 0.51 0.49 0.48 & 1.0 1.5 0.9 1.3 & 0.57 & nynn & +3.20e-04 $\pm$ 2.5e-05 & 0 \\
J2308+0946 & 23:08:44.17 & 09:46:26.0& 1.3 & 0.30 0.33 0.34 0.29 & 1.1 2.8 1.3 1.3 & 0.64 & nynn & +8.69e-04 $\pm$ 6.9e-05 & 1 \\
J2311+3156 & 23:11:27.20 & 31:56:34.7& 2.2 & 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 & 1.5 2.8 1.8 1.2 & 1.30 & nnnn & +6.60e-04 $\pm$ 1.5e-04 & 1 \\
J2311+4543 & 23:11:47.41 & 45:43:56.0& 3.2 & 0.66 0.65 0.58 0.60 & 2.2 1.3 1.7 2.1 & 0.54 & yyyy & +7.32e-04 $\pm$ 4.7e-05 & 1 \\
J2313+0628 & 23:13:07.70 & 06:28:38.8& 0.7 & 0.10 0.11 0.10 0.11 & 2.4 4.8 3.1 1.8 & 1.32 & yyyn & +2.35e-03 $\pm$ 3.9e-04 & 1 \\
J2314+1923 & 23:14:19.63 & 19:23:26.0& 1.2 & 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.11 & 2.2 1.6 2.6 1.9 & 1.34 & nnyn & +6.76e-04 $\pm$ 8.4e-05 & 1 \\
J2315+8631 & 23:15:49.82 & 86:31:43.6& 2.3 & 0.22 0.23 0.23 0.25 & 2.2 1.5 2.2 0.9 & 0.75 & yyyn & +1.15e-03 $\pm$ 4.1e-05 & 3 \\
J2317+1539 & 23:17:46.64 & 15:39:41.6& 1.3 & 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.10 & 2.1 3.0 4.1 1.7 & 1.41 & nyyn & +2.79e-03 $\pm$ 1.4e-04 & 3 \\
J2318+2404 & 23:18:33.96 & 24:04:39.7& 1.3 & 0.18 0.18 0.20 0.19 & 2.6 2.1 1.7 1.1 & 0.85 & yynn & +6.70e-04 $\pm$ 8.1e-05 & 1 \\
J2325+3957 & 23:25:17.87 & 39:57:36.5& 2.3 & 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 & 3.6 4.4 3.5 4.6 & 1.68 & yyyy & +4.41e-03 $\pm$ 3.0e-04 & 2 \\
J2327+0940 & 23:27:33.57 & 09:40:09.4& 0.6 & 0.78 0.83 0.81 0.81 & 0.8 1.3 1.8 0.5 & 0.52 & nyyn & +5.80e-04 $\pm$ -1.0e+00 & 3 \\
J2330+1100 & 23:30:40.85 & 11:00:18.7& 0.9 & 1.04 1.04 1.03 1.01 & 0.2 1.7 0.9 1.3 & 0.52 & nyny & +6.61e-04 $\pm$ 2.7e-05 & 3 \\
J2334+0736 & 23:34:12.82 & 07:36:27.5& 0.6 & 0.94 0.91 0.99 1.08 & 1.9 1.4 1.1 0.5 & 0.52 & yynn & +4.20e-04 $\pm$ 2.1e-05 & 2 \\
J2339+0244 & 23:39:29.71 & 02:44:05.3& 0.6 & 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.12 & 1.9 2.6 2.5 1.9 & 1.24 & nyyn & +1.32e-03 $\pm$ 7.0e-05 & 2 \\
\enddata
1888:
1889:
1890: \label{tab:BigTable}
1891: \end{deluxetable}
1892:
1893:
1894:
1895: \begin{table}[ht]
1896: \caption{Counts versus redshift for sources with $D(2{\rm d})$ above the
1897: threshold $4\times 10^{-4}$ .}
1898: \begin{center}
1899: \begin{tabular}{lccccccc}
1900: \tableline
1901: Redshift & 0-0.5 & 0.5-1 & 1-1.5 & 1.5-2.1 & 2.1-2.6 & 2.6-3.1 & 3.1-4.1 \\
1902: \tableline
1903: No. of sources & 51 & 58 & 69 & 43 & 21 & 18 & 11\\
1904: Fast & 12 & 9 & 11 & 7 & 5 & 0 & 0 \\
1905: Medium & 5 & 14 & 4 & 3 & 2 & 3 & 1 \\
1906: Slow & 13 & 12 & 20 & 12 & 5 & 3 & 0 \\
1907: \% above threshold& 59 & 60 & 51 & 57 & 57 & 33 & 9 \\
1908: \tableline
1909: \end{tabular} \label{tab:redshiftcounts}
1910: \end{center}
1911: \end{table}
1912:
1913:
1914: \end{document}
1915:
1916: