1: %%
2: %% This is file `template-6s.tex',
3: %% generated with the docstrip utility.
4: %%
5: %% The original source files were:
6: %%
7: %% template.raw (with options: `6s')
8: %%
9: %% Template for the LaTeX class aipproc.
10: %%
11: %% (C) 1998,2000,2001 American Institute of Physics and Frank Mittelbach
12: %% All rights reserved
13: %%
14: %%
15: %% $Id: template.raw,v 1.12 2005/07/06 19:22:14 frank Exp $
16: %%
17:
18: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
19: %% Please remove the next line of code if you
20: %% are satisfied that your installation is
21: %% complete and working.
22: %%
23: %% It is only there to help you in detecting
24: %% potential problems.
25: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
26:
27: \input{aipcheck}
28:
29: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
30: %% SELECT THE LAYOUT
31: %%
32: %% The class supports further options.
33: %% See aipguide.pdf for details.
34: %%
35: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
36:
37: \documentclass[
38: ,final % use final for the camera ready runs
39: %% ,draft % use draft while you are working on the paper
40: %% ,numberedheadings % uncomment this option for numbered sections
41: %% , % add further options here if necessary
42: ]
43: {aipproc}
44:
45: \layoutstyle{6x9}
46:
47: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
48: %% FRONTMATTER
49: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
50:
51: \begin{document}
52:
53: \title{Neon and Chemical Fractionation Trends in Late-type Stellar Atmospheres}
54:
55: \classification{95.85.Nv,97.10.-q,97.10.Tk}
56: \keywords {stars: abundances - stars: activity - stars: coronae - X-rays: stars}
57:
58: \author{David Garc\'{\i}a-Alvarez}{
59: address={Instituto de Astrof\'{\i}sica de Canarias, E-38205 La Laguna, Tenerife,
60: Spain},altaddress={GTC CALP, E-38712 San Antonio, La Palma, Spain, david.garcia@gtc.iac.es}
61: }
62:
63: \author{Jeremy J. Drake}{
64: address={Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA}
65: }
66:
67: \author{Paola Testa$^{**}$}{address={}
68: % additional visiting address
69: }
70:
71:
72: \begin{abstract}
73: A survey of Ne, O and Fe coronal abundances culled from the recent
74: literature for about 60 late-type stars confirms that the Ne/O ratio
75: of stellar outer atmospheres is about two times the value
76: recently recommended
77: by Asplund et al. The mean Ne/O remains flat from the most active
78: stars down to at least intermediate activity levels ($-5<L_X/L_{bol}<-2$),
79: with some evidence for a decline toward the
80: lowest activity levels sampled. The abundances surveyed are all based
81: on emission measure distribution analyses and the mean Ne/O is about
82: 0.1~dex lower than that found from line ratios in the seminal study of
83: mostly active stars by Drake \& Testa (2005), but is within the systematic
84: uncertainties of that study. We also confirm a pattern of strongly
85: decreasing Fe/O with increasing stellar activity. The observed
86: abundance patterns are reminiscent of the recent finding of a
87: dependence of the solar Ne/O and Fe/O ratios on active region plasma
88: temperature and indicate a universal fractionation process is at work.
89: The firm saturation in stellar Ne/O at higher activity levels combined
90: with variability in the solar coronal Ne/O leads us to suggest that Ne
91: is generally depleted in the solar outer atmosphere and photospheric
92: values are reflected in active stellar coronae. The solution to the
93: recent solar model problem would then appear to lie in a combination
94: of the Asplund et al. (2005) O abundance downward revision being too large,
95: and the Ne abundance being underestimated for the Sun by about a
96: factor of 2.
97:
98: \end{abstract}
99:
100: \maketitle
101:
102: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
103: %% MAINMATTER
104: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
105:
106: \section{Introduction}
107:
108:
109: The interior structure of the Sun can be studied with great accuracy
110: using observations of its oscillations, similar to seismology of the
111: Earth. Precise agreement between helioseismological measurements and
112: predictions of theoretical solar models has been a triumph of modern
113: astrophysics \cite{Bahcall05}. However, a recent downward revision by
114: 25-35\%\ of the solar abundances of light elements such as C, N, O and
115: Ne \cite{Asplund05} has broken this accordance: models adopting the
116: new abundances incorrectly predict the depth of the convection zone,
117: the depth profiles of sound speed and density, and the helium
118: abundance \cite{Bahcall05}. The discrepancies are far beyond the
119: uncertainties in either the data or the model
120: predictions \cite{Bahcall05b}.
121:
122: \citet{Drake05a} reported on neon abundances relative to
123: oxygen measured in a sample of nearby solar-like stars from their
124: X-ray spectra. The results were very similar for all stars and
125: substantially larger than the recommended solar value of Ne/O=0.15 by
126: number \cite{Anders89,Asplund05}. If the Ne/O abundance
127: in these stars is adopted for the Sun the models are brought back into
128: agreement with helioseismology \cite{Antia05}. However, the stellar
129: sample used by \citet{Drake05a} for their abundance
130: analysis contains mostly active stars and binary systems, which are
131: not comparable to the Sun in terms of activity and tend to exhibit
132: different outer atmosphere chemical fractionation patterns. Hence it
133: is also necessary to determine the Ne/O ratio in relatively inactive
134: stars that are comparable to the Sun. In this work we analyse a
135: sample three times larger than that of \citet{Drake05a},
136: including about 20 low activity stars ($\log L_{\rm X}/L_{\rm
137: bol}<-5$).
138:
139:
140:
141:
142: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
143: %% Sample figure:
144: %%
145: %% The option [height=...] scales the picture to the given height,
146: %% without it it would be printed at its nominal size
147: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
148:
149: \begin{figure}
150: \includegraphics[height=.5\textheight]{plot_litneo.ps}
151: \caption{The coronal Ne/O abundance ratio for the stellar sample
152: expressed relative to the solar photospheric value of
153: \citet{Asplund05}
154: (n(Ne)/n(O)=0.15 by number). The highest value found is for the T
155: Tauri star TW Hya and was been interpretted by \citet{Drake05b}
156: in terms of gain depletion of metals in gas emitting X-rays
157: from an accretion shock. The mean [Ne/O] illustrated was computed
158: omitting this point.}
159: \end{figure}
160:
161: \begin{figure}
162: \includegraphics[height=.5\textheight]{plot_litfeo.ps}
163: \caption{The coronal Fe/O abundance ratio expressed relative to
164: the \citet{Asplund05} solar photospheric mixture in the usual
165: spectroscopic logarithmic bracket notation for the stellar
166: sample. The Herbig Ae pre-main sequence star AB Aurigae is the only
167: deviant point from the well-defined trend of decreasing Fe/O ratio
168: with increasing stellar activity.}
169: \end{figure}
170:
171:
172: \section{Observations and Data Analysis}
173:
174: Our sample is based on analyses of high resolution {\it Chandra} and
175: {\it XMM-Newton} spectra culled from the recent literature for about
176: 60 late-type stars, including dwarfs, giants, tidally-interacting
177: binaries and pre-main sequence stars. It covers a wide range of
178: activity regimes ($-2 < \log L_{\rm X}/L_{\rm bol} < -7$) and spectral
179: types (mid-F to mid-M). We examined the coronal Fe/O and Ne/O ratios
180: for these stars using the abundances derived from differential
181: emission measure distribution analyses performed in the various
182: literature studies. In the following, the coronal Fe/O and Ne/O
183: abundance ratios
184: are expressed relative to the Asplund et al.\citet{Asplund05}
185: solar photospheric mixture for the stellar sample.
186:
187:
188:
189:
190:
191: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
192: %% SAMPLE TABLE
193: %%
194: %% Shows the use of \tablehead and \tablenote
195: %% macros
196: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
197: \section{Discussion and Conclusion}
198:
199: %We present a survey of Ne, O and Fe coronal abundances based on
200: %differential emission measure distribution analyses of high resolution
201: %{\it Chandra} and {\it XMM-Newton} spectra culled from the recent
202: %literature for about 60 late-type stars, including dwarfs, giants,
203: %tidally-interacting binaries and pre-main sequence stars.
204:
205: The mean Ne/O of our stellar sample is about twice the value recently
206: recommended for
207: the solar photosphere \cite{Asplund05} and the average of
208: estimates for the solar corona, and about 0.1 dex lower than the mean
209: estimated by \citet{Drake05a} from line ratios for a sample of
210: mostly active stars, but is within the systematic uncertainties of the
211: latter study (see Fig.1).
212:
213: There is no significant dependence of coronal Ne/O on the stellar
214: activity indicators $L_X/L_{bol}$ or Rossby number, though the lowest
215: activity stars of the sample present some evidence of a decline in
216: Ne/O for $L_X/L_{bol}< 6$ and solar-like activity, as has also been
217: suggested in a recent study of the same stars \cite{Robrade08}.
218: For higher activities Ne/O, for dwarfs is statistically consistant with
219: a constant value [Ne/O]=0.3 with observational scatter of about 0.1
220: dex.
221:
222: In contrast to Ne/O, the Fe/O ratios vary by more than order of
223: magnitude with a clear trend of decreasing Fe/O with increasing
224: activity (see Fig.2). Low to intermediate activity stars with $L_X/L_{bol}<
225: -4.5$ tend to have enhanced Fe/O compared with photospheric
226: expectations (quasi-solar for most of the stars in the sample)
227: indicative of a solar-like FIP effect. At higher activity levels,
228: Fe/O exhibits a strong decline with increasing activity in all the
229: types of stars sampled, including pre-main sequence stars.
230:
231: The observed abundance patterns are reminiscent of evidence for a
232: dependence of the solar Ne/O and Fe/O ratios on active region plasma
233: temperature \cite{Drake08} and indicate a universal fractionation
234: process is at work. The apparently constant stellar Ne/O over a wide
235: range in activity level combined with variability observed in the
236: solar coronal Ne/O leads us to suggest that Ne is generally depleted
237: in the solar outer atmosphere, whereas photospheric values are
238: reflected in more active stellar coronae.
239:
240: If this is the case, the solution to the recent "solar model problem"
241: - solar models using the \citet{Asplund05} composition containing too little metal opacity to match helioseismic observations - is a
242: combination of the \citet{Asplund05} O abundance downward revision
243: being too large, and the Ne abundance being underestimated for the Sun
244: by about a factor of 2.
245:
246: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
247: %% BACKMATTER
248: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
249:
250: \begin{theacknowledgments}
251: DGA thanks the finantial support by the Spanish Ministry of Science through
252: project AYA 2007-63881. JJD was funded by NASA contract
253: NAS8-39073 to the CXC during the course of this research.
254:
255: \end{theacknowledgments}
256:
257: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
258: %% The bibliography can be prepared using the BibTeX program or
259: %% manually.
260: %%
261: %% The code below assumes that BibTeX is used. If the bibliography is
262: %% produced without BibTeX comment out the following lines and see the
263: %% aipguide.pdf for further information.
264: %%
265: %% For your convenience a manually coded example is appended
266: %% after the \end{document}
267: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
268:
269: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
270: %% You may have to change the BibTeX style below, depending on your
271: %% setup or preferences.
272: %%
273: %%
274: %% For The AIP proceedings layouts use either
275: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
276:
277: \bibliographystyle{aipproc} % if natbib is available
278: %\bibliographystyle{aipprocl} % if natbib is missing
279:
280: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
281: %% You probably want to use your own bibtex database here
282: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
283: %\bibliography{sample}
284: \begin{thebibliography}{9}
285:
286: \bibitem[{{Anders} \& {Grevesse}(1989)}]{Anders89}
287: {Anders}, E.\& {Grevesse}, N. 1989, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 53, 197
288:
289: \bibitem[{{Antia} \& {Basu}(2005)}]{Antia05}
290: {Antia}, H.~M. and {Basu}, S. 2005, ApJL, 620, L129
291:
292: \bibitem[{{Asplund} {et~al.}(2005){Asplund}, {Grevesse}, \& {Sauval}}]{Asplund05}
293: {Asplund}, M., {Grevesse}, N., \& {Sauval}, A.~J. 2005, in ASP Conf. Ser. 336:
294: Cosmic Abundances as Records of Stellar Evolution and Nucleosynthesis, 25--+
295:
296: \bibitem[{{Bahcall} {et~al.}(2005)}]{Bahcall05}
297: {Bahcall}, J.~N.,{Basu}, S.,{Pinsonneault}, M. \& {Serenelli}, A.~M. 2005, ApJ, 618, 1049
298:
299: \bibitem[{{Bahcall} {et~al.}(2005)}]{Bahcall05b}
300: {Bahcall}, J.~N., {Serenelli}, A.~M. \& ,{Basu}, S. 2005, ApJL, 621, L85
301:
302: \bibitem[{{Drake}(2008)}]{Drake08}
303: {Drake}, J.~J. 2008, ApJ, in preparation
304:
305: \bibitem[{{Drake} \& {Testa}(2005)}]{Drake05a}
306: {Drake}, J.~J. \& {Testa}, P. 2005, Nature, 436, 525
307:
308: \bibitem[{{Drake} {et~al.}(2005){Drake}, {Testa}, \& {Hartmann}}]{Drake05b}
309: {Drake}, J.~J., {Testa}, P., \& {Hartmann}, L. 2005, ApJ, 627, L149
310:
311: \bibitem[{{Grevesse} \& {Sauval}(1998)}]{Grevesse98}
312: {Grevesse}, N. \& {Sauval}, A.~J. 1998, Space Science Reviews, 85, 161
313:
314: \bibitem[{{Robrade} {et~al.}(2008){Robrade}, {Schmitt}, \& {Favata}}]{Robrade08}
315: {Robrade}, J. and {Schmitt}, J.~H.~M.~M. and {Favata}, F. 2008, A\&A, 486, 995
316:
317: \end{thebibliography}
318:
319: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
320: %% Just a reminder that you may have to run bibtex
321: %% All of it up to \end{document} can be removed
322: %% if you don't like the warning.
323: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
324: \IfFileExists{\jobname.bbl}{}
325: {\typeout{}
326: \typeout{******************************************}
327: \typeout{** Please run "bibtex \jobname" to optain}
328: \typeout{** the bibliography and then re-run LaTeX}
329: \typeout{** twice to fix the references!}
330: \typeout{******************************************}
331: \typeout{}
332: }
333:
334: \end{document}
335:
336: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
337: %% The following lines show an example how to produce a bibliography
338: %% without the help of the BibTeX program. This could be used instead
339: %% of the above.
340: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
341:
342: \begin{thebibliography}{9}
343:
344: \bibitem[{{Asplund} {et~al.}(2005){Asplund}, {Grevesse}, \&
345: {Sauval}}]{Asplund05}
346: {Asplund}, M., {Grevesse}, N., \& {Sauval}, A.~J. 2005, in ASP Conf. Ser. 336:
347: Cosmic Abundances as Records of Stellar Evolution and Nucleosynthesis, 25--+
348:
349: \bibitem[{{Drake}(2008)}]{Drake08}
350: {Drake}, J.~J. 2008, \apj, in preparation
351:
352: \bibitem[{{Drake} \& {Testa}(2005)}]{Drake05a}
353: {Drake}, J.~J. \& {Testa}, P. 2005, \nat, 436, 525
354:
355: \bibitem[{{Drake} {et~al.}(2005){Drake}, {Testa}, \& {Hartmann}}]{Drake05b}
356: {Drake}, J.~J., {Testa}, P., \& {Hartmann}, L. 2005, \apj, 627, L149
357:
358: \end{thebibliography}
359:
360: \endinput
361: %%
362: %% End of file `template-6s.tex'.
363: